Next Article in Journal
Root Distribution of Tomato Cultivated in Greenhouse under Different Ventilation and Water Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
Bio-Fabrication of Silver Nanoparticles Using Citrus aurantifolia Fruit Peel Extract (CAFPE) and the Role of Plant Extract in the Synthesis
Previous Article in Journal
Exogenous Auxin and Gibberellin on Fluoride Phytoremediation by Eichhornia crassipes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Moringa oleifera Lam Leaf Extract Stimulates NRF2 and Attenuates ARV-Induced Toxicity in Human Liver Cells (HepG2)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/plants12081626
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro Cytotoxic Potential of Selected Jordanian Flora and Their Associated Phytochemical Analysis

by
Manal I. Alruwad
1,
Manal M. Sabry
1,*,
Abdallah M. Gendy
2,
Riham Salah El-Dine
1 and
Hala M. El Hefnawy
1
1
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy Cairo University, Cairo 11562, Egypt
2
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, October 6 University, Giza 12585, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(8), 1626; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081626
Submission received: 13 March 2023 / Revised: 6 April 2023 / Accepted: 7 April 2023 / Published: 12 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural and Functional Analysis of Extracts in Plants III)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Traditional medicines are a significant source of phytochemicals with potential anticancer effects. Ten Jordanian plants were chosen to be tested for cytotoxicity on human colorectal (HT-29) and breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) cell lines. The ethanol extracts were screened for their potential cytotoxic effects using a Sulforhodamine B (SRB) colorimetric assay, using doxorubicin as positive control. Plants extracts exhibiting marked cytotoxic activity were further investigated by qualitative and quantitative phytochemical methods. Total phenolics were quantified using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, while flavonoids were quantified using aluminum chloride. The total saponins of the n-butanol fraction were estimated using diosgenin as a standard. The total alkaloids and total terpenoids were also evaluated using the gravimetric method. As results, Senecio leucanthemifolius (IC50: 13.84 μg/mL) and Clematis cirrhosa (IC50: 13.28 μg/mL) exhibited marked cytotoxic effects on human colorectal adenocarcinoma (HT-29) cell lines. Total phenolics, flavonoids, saponins, alkaloids, and terpenoids found in Senecio leucanthemifolius were (91.82, 14.90, 14.27, 101, and 135.4 mg/g of dry extract), respectively. They were revealed to be (68.18, 7.16, 31.25, 73.6, and 180 mg/g of dry extract) in Clematis cirrhosa, respectively. Senecio leucanthemifolius and Clematis cirrhosa have been found to possess cytotoxicity against colorectal (HT-29). In conclusion, the findings of this study offer a new perspective on Jordanian plant extracts anticancer activity research.

1. Introduction

Cancer is considered as one of the main causes of death worldwide [1]. In Jordan, breast cancer is the main cause of mortality, contributed 20.8% of all deaths, followed by colorectal cancer (10.9%) and lung cancer (9.1%) [2]. Table 1 illustrates the most prevalent cancer types among Jordanian populations of both sexes and all ages in 2020. Notably, over the past 20 years, both the prevalence and mortality by malignant tumors, in particular breast and colorectal malignancies, have increased among Arabians [3]. There are numerous cancer treatment options, including surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, cancer vaccines, photodynamic, stem cell transformation, and combinations thereof, all of which have serious side effects. However, these conventional and well-established cancer treatments are constrained by a number of risk concerns, such as the potential for tumor cells to acquire resistance and harmful side effects from chemotherapy such as limited bioavailability, toxicity, no specificity, rapid clearance, and metastasis [4,5,6]. The need for safe and effective anticancer drugs has turned our attention to researching folk medicinal plants in the hope of developing an efficient cytotoxic drug. Many medicinal plants have been shown to have anticancer properties [2]. Various research organizations are targeting medicinal crops for their cytotoxic activity, which can result in the discovery of new anticancer medications. More than half of the FDA-approved medicines used in cancer treatment come from natural products [7]. Some of these include irinotecan, topotecan, and camptothecin from the wood and bark of Camptotheca acuminata, etoposide, paclitaxel from Taxus brevifolia bark, and the vinca alkaloids vinblastine and vincristinefrom Catharanthus roseus in addition to bacterian actinomycin D and mitomycin C as well as bleomycin of marine origin [7,8].
Jordan’s varied geographical and climate conditions result in a wide variety of wild plants [9]. Around 2543 plant species divided into 142 families and 868 genera. There are 485 species from 99 different families that are classified as medicinal plants, and they are dispersed widely around the nation [10]. Despite the availability of modern treatment, traditional medicine is ingrained in Jordanian culture, and herbal therapy has remained popular. According to literature reviews based on the published studies, 27 plant species are regarded as traditional remedies in Jordan and nearby countries for the treatment of various cancers [11].
In this study, ten traditionally used Jordanian plants, collected from the Ajloun highlands (North of Jordan), belonging to four plant families, were selected for this research. Traditional uses for these plants are listed in Table 2. Several previous studies have investigated the medicinal value of these plants, particularly the hepatoprotective effects and free radical scavenging of the ethanol extract of Onopordum alexandrinum [12], and the in vitro neuroprotective, antihyperglycemic, and antioxidative effects of Anchusa undulata [13,14,15]. The aqueous extract of Anchusa strigosa showed antibacterial and antidiabetic activities in diabetic rats [16]. The essential oil of Glebionis segetum exhibited antibacterial, antioxidant, in vitro antiproliferative, and acetyl cholinesterase inhibition activities [17]. Antifungal activity, antioxidant activity, and enzyme inhibitory effects of the methanol and hydro methanol extracts of Clematis cirrhosa were previously assessed [18,19], as well as the antioxidant capacity, and antimicrobial activity of Lagoecia cuminoides [20]. The essential oil of Eryngium glomeratum aerial parts and roots showed antibacterial activity [21]. Additionally, Senecio leucanthemifolius’s in vitro antibacterial and hypoglycemic activities were previously assessed [22].
The current study aims to assess the in vitro cytotoxic activity of ten selected plants in Jordan on colorectal (HT-29) and breast cancer (MCF-7) cell lines using the sulforhodamine B assay. Additionally, total phenolics, total flavonoids, and total saponin will be colorimetrically quantified; total alkaloids and total terpenoids will also be evaluated using gravimetric methods.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Percentage Yield of the 70% Ethanol Extracts

A high variation in the percentage yield of extracts was observed among the different plants. The results are displayed in Table 3. Clematis cirrhosa extract was the highest, with a percentage yield of 23.6%, followed by Ranunculus asiaticus 16.8%, while Lagoecia cuminoides had the lowest yield, with only 2%.

2.2. In Vitro Cytotoxicity

The cytotoxic effects of the 70% ethanol extracts of the plant species under study were evaluated on two cell lines (MCF-7 and HT-29). A dose-dependent response was observed. Applying a gradual decrease to the concentrations of 70% ethanol extracts (100–0.01 μg/mL) to both cell lines showed an increase in the average percentage of survival. Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50 values) are summarized in Table 4. According to the American National Cancer Institute (NCI), optimally crude herbal extracts are considered effective antineoplastic if their IC50 < 20 µg/mL or 10 µM after two or three days of incubation [30]. Importantly, significant cytotoxic activity was observed with the 70% ethanol extracts of S. leucanthemifolius (IC50 of 13.84 μg/mL) and C. cirrhosa (IC50 of 13.28 μg/mL) extracts against HT-29 cells, while they showed low activity against MCF-7 (IC50 value of 56.27 and >100 μg/mL, respectively), compared to doxorubicin (IC50 of 0.49 μg/mL and 0.28 μg/mL for HT-29 and MCF-7, respectively). The rest of the tested plant extracts showed no or very low cytotoxic activity against the previously mentioned cell lines. These findings are consistent with earlier reports of cytotoxicity of other Clematis spp. Previous research showed that Clematis apiifolia methanol extract exhibited good cytotoxicity against mouse lymphocytic leukaemia (L1210), human leukaemia (HL-60), and human ovarian (SK-OV-30) tumor cell lines [31]. Additionally, the extract of Clematis manshrica showed anticancer activity on murine sarcoma (S-180), hepatocellular carcinoma (Hepa), and lymphoma (P388) implanted in mice. Several Senecio spp. were found to have cytotoxic activity in the literature. The methanol extract of Senecio gibbosus subsp. gibbosus demonstrated good cytotoxic activity against human prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP) and human breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7). The cytotoxic activity of dichloromethane and ethyl acetate fractions was the highest, notably on the human prostate cancer cell lines [32]. The ethyl acetate fraction of Senecio glaucus L. aerial parts showed potent cytotoxicity against the human pancreatic cancer cell line (PANC-1) [33]. The bioactive plants’ cytotoxic potential is most likely attributed to the presence of various phytochemicals such as phenolics, flavonoids, saponins, terpenoids, and alkaloids detected by qualitative phytochemical analysis.

2.3. Qualitative Phytochemical Screening

The phytochemical screening was performed on the two selected biologically active plants (S. leucanthemifolius and C. cirrhosa) showing cytotoxic activity against HT-29 cells. Phytochemical screening of their 70% ethanol extracts revealed the presence of phenolics, flavonoids, terpenoids, alkaloids, and saponins. Furthermore, the extracts were subjected to evaluation of these major phytochemicals.

2.4. Quantitative Estimation of Some Major Phytochemicals

Based on the preliminary phytochemical screening results, quantitative estimation of S. leucanthemifolius and C. cirrhosa was carried out using standard methods for key phytochemicals such as phenolics, flavonoids, terpenoids, alkaloids, and saponins. The total phenolic content, expressed as gallic acid, as deduced by the Folin-Ciocalteu test with the pre-established standard calibration curve (Figure 1), was calculated as follows: y = 0.004x + 0.089, R2 = 0.994. Where y denotes absorbance, x denotes the corresponding concentration (µg/mL) and R2 is the correlation coefficient. The total phenolic content of the 70% ethanol extracts of S. leucanthemifolius and C. cirrhosa were found to be 91.82 ± 5.68 and 68.18 ± 1.8 mg gallic acid/g of dry extract, respectively. The total flavonoid content, expressed as quercetin, as deduced by the aluminum chloride method with the pre-established standard calibration curve (Figure 1), was calculated as follows: y = 0.003x + 0.139, R2 = 0.998. Where y denotes absorbance, x denotes the corresponding concentration (µg/mL) and R2 is the correlation coefficient. The total flavonoids content of the 70% ethanol extracts of S. leucanthemifolius and C. cirrhosa were found to be 14.9 ± 2.82 and 7.16 ± 2.10 mg quercetin/g of dry extract, respectively. The total terpenoid content was 135.4 ± 5.54 and 180 ± 4.18 mg/g of dry extract in S. leucanthemifolius extract and C. cirrhosa, respectively, while the total alkaloid was found to be 101 ± 4.50 and 73.6 ± 3.85 mg/g of dry extract, respectively. The total saponins content, expressed as diosgenin, as deduced from the pre-established standard calibration curve (Figure 1), was calculated as follows: y = 0.004x + 0.066, R2 = 0.99 where y denotes absorbance, x denotes the corresponding concentration (µg/mL), and R2 is the correlation coefficient. The total saponins content of the n-butanol fraction of the 70% ethanol of the defatted S. leucanthemifolius and C. cirrhosa were found to be 14.27 ± 2.82 and 31.25 ± 2.1 mg diosgenin/g of dry extract, respectively. It is well recognized that plants are rich sources for different types of bioactive metabolites that play an important role in the therapy. The bioactive plants’ cytotoxic potential of both plants is most likely attributed to the presence of various phytochemicals such as phenolics, flavonoids, saponins, terpenoids, and alkaloids detected by qualitative phytochemical analysis. Among these metabolites are the phenolic compounds which contribute to the chemotherapy by several compounds either in the actual form or after chemical modification [34]. They are powerful antioxidants that have been associated with lower rates of occurrence and mortality in a variety of human diseases [35]. According to epidemiological research, a diet high in flavonoid-rich fruits and vegetables may be linked to a lower risk of cancer [36]. Flavonoids have also been shown to induce cellular cytotoxicity in cancer cells through the induction of apoptosis [37]. Some phytochemicals in Senecio and Clematis species were reported to possess cytotoxic activity against different malignant cell lines. Correlations between cytotoxic activity and saponin content, which possesses cytotoxic and chemopreventive functions, were also explored in several review publications [38,39,40]. For instance, in Clematis argentilucida, two identified saponins (3β-O-[β-D-ribopyranosyl-(1 → 3)-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-α-L-arabinopyranosyl] hederagenin-11, 13-dien-28-oic acid and 3β-O-{β-D-ribopyranosyl- (1 → 3)-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl-(1 → 2)-[β-D-glucopyranosyl-(1 → 4)]-β-D-xylopyranosyl} oleanolic acid) showed significant cytotoxic activity against human leukemia (HL-60), hepatocellular carcinoma (Hep-G2), and glioblastoma (U251MG) cells [41,42]. Plant alkaloids are one of the major types of drugs used in cancer chemotherapy [43]. On the other hand, pyrrolizidine alkaloids are characteristic metabolites present in most of Senecio species [44,45]. They exhibited a genotoxic activity [46], a significant cytotoxic potency against many carcinoma cells. Jacaranone, a pyrrolizidine alkaloid isolated from Senecio ambigus, was found to be cytotoxic to both prostate carcinoma (LNCaP) and renal adenocarcinoma (ACHN) cell lines [45]. Previous research has demonstrated that S. stabianus n-hexane extract is efficacious against melanotic melanoma (C32), hormone-dependent prostate cancer (LNCaP), human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7), and renal adenocarcinoma (ACHN0) cancer cell lines regarding the presence of the terpenes linalool and caryophyllene [44]. Likewise, the alkaloids reported in Clematis spp. demonstrated extensive cytotoxicity against many cancer cell lines. The alkaloids extracted from an ethanol extract of Clematis terniflora aerial parts showed significant cytotoxicity against the human esophageal carcinoma cell line (ECA-109) [47]. Moreover, Clematis argentilucida triterpenes were found to be effective against hepatic carcinoma (Hep-G2), glioma (U251MG), and leukemic cells (HL-60) [48].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material

The plants were harvested from the Ajloun highlands, which consists of the Mediterranean-like hills ranging from 600–1100 m above sea level in Jordan during their flowering season (April 2021). Taxonomic identification of the plant material was confirmed by Mr. Sameh Khatatbeh, ecological researcher and specialist in flora research at the Royal Society for the Conservation of Nature (RSCN) (Amman, Jordan). A specimen of each plant was kept at the Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University. A list of the voucher numbers of the plants is provided in Table 2.

3.2. Preparation of the Extracts

Each plant’s aerial parts were gathered, air-dried in the shade, ground into a fine powder (mesh size: 0.2–0.636 mm), and kept in firmL y closed glass bottles until use. The powders were macerated in 70% ethanol in three separate extractions with constant shaking. The obtained extracts were evaporated under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator (Stuart, Staffordshire, UK) till complete dryness and the extract yields were calculated. Table 3 displays the extraction yields calculated as dry weight percentage.

3.3. Chemicals and Reagents

Ethanol, sulfuric acid, acetic acid, ammonium hydroxide, methanol, sodium carbonate, sodium nitrite, aluminum nitrate, aluminum chloride, ammonia, sodium hydroxide, sodium chloride, n-butanol, diethyl ether, petroleum ether, p-anisaldehyde, hydrochloric acid, potassium bismuth iodide, ethyl acetate, etc. were purchased from Biochem, Egypt. Advanced Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), bovine serum, trypsin-EDTA, L-glutamine, fetal bovine serum, penicillin, streptomycin, tris-(hydroxymethyl) aminomethane (TRIS), trichloroacetic acid (TCA), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), sulforhodamine B (SRB), gallic acid, Folin and Ciocalteu′s phenol reagent, quercetin, diosgenin, were supplied from Sigma Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany), doxorubicin hydrochloride (Ebewe Pharma, Unterach, Austria).

3.4. Cytotoxicity Screening

3.4.1. Cell Culture

Two human cancer cell lines, HT-29 and MCF-7, were used for cytotoxicity screening of the ten selected Jordanian medicinal plant extracts. Both cell lines were provided from Nawah Scientific Inc. (Mokatam, Cairo, Egypt). Cells were retained in DMEM media, supplemented with 100 mg/mL of streptomycin, 100 units/mL of penicillin, and 10% of heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum in a humidified 5% (v/v) CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. Doxorubicin was used as a positive control.

3.4.2. In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay

Cell viability was estimated by the SRB assay, adopting the method of El Haddad et al. 2022 [49]. Aliquots of 100 μL cell suspension (5 × 103 cells) were put in 96-well plates and incubated in complete media for 24 h. A second aliquot of 100 μL of medium with different doses of the extracts was applied to the cells. Cells were fixed by replacing the medium with 150 μL of 10% TCA and incubating at 4 °C for 1 h after 72 h of plant extract exposure. The TCA solution was withdrawn and distilled water was used to wash the cells five times. Aliquots of 70 μL SRB solution (0.4% w/v) were added and incubated for 10 min in a dark place at room temperature. Plates were washed 3 times with 1% acetic acid before being let to air dry overnight. Finally, 150 μL of tris(hydroxymethyl) aminomethane (TRIS) (10 mM) were added to dissolve protein-bound SRB stain; the optical density (OD) of both treated and untreated cells was read at 540 nm. The percentage growth inhibition of cells exposed to treatments was calculated as follows.
% I n h i b i t i o n   =   ( [ O D   o f   c o n t r o l   −   O D   o f   s a m p l e ] / O D   o f   c o n t r o l )   ×   100

3.4.3. Determination of IC50 Values

The toxicity percent of each treated well was calculated, and since the experiments were performed in triplicate, the average toxicity percent was also calculated for every treatment concentration. Then, a curve of cytotoxicity percentage against the logarithm of concentration was drawn, and the IC50 (concentration at which there was 50% cell death compared to negative control) value was calculated from the equation of the logarithmic line.

3.5. Data Analysis

All the tests were conducted in triplicates, and the data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A Student’s t-test was then performed to determine the statistical significance of the difference between control and plant extract treated groups, with a level of significance (p < 0.05).

3.6. Qualitative Phytochemical Analysis of Active Extracts

A qualitative phytochemical screening of S. leucanthemifolius and C. cirrhosa extracts was performed using standard methods described by Evans 2009 [50]. The powder of each plant sample was extracted with water and 70% ethanol at room temperature with constant shaking. Saponins were tested in the aqueous extract, while phenolics, flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenoids, and saponins were tested in the 70% ethanol alcoholic extract.

3.7. Quantitative Phytochemical Analysis

3.7.1. Determination of the Total Phenolics

The total phenolic contents of S. leucanthemifolius and C. cirrhosa extracts were spectrophotometrically determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu method as described by Attard 2013 [51]. Samples preparation was performed at a concentration of 5 mg/mL in methanol. In brief, an addition of 10 μL of sample/standard to 100 μL of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (Diluted 1:10) (v/v) was applied in a 96-well microplate. Subsequently, the mixture was incubated for 20 min in the dark at room temperature (25 °C) with 80 μL of 1M Na2CO3. After the incubation time ends, microplate reader FluoStar Omega (Ortenberg, Germany) was used to measure the developing complex blue color at 630 nm. Data are displayed as means ± SD. Eight serial dilutions of the 1 mg/mL gallic acid stock solution in methanol were prepared in the concentrations of 0.025, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.60, 0.80, and 1 mg/mL.

3.7.2. Determination of the Total Flavonoids

The total flavonoid contents of S. leucanthemifolius and C. cirrhosa extracts were spectrophotometrically determined using the aluminum chloride method as described by Kiranmai et al. 2011 [52]. Ten serial dilutions of the 1 mg/mL quercetin stock solution in DMSO were prepared in the concentrations of 0.001, 0.002, 0.004, 0.008, 0.025, 0.050, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, and 0.80 mg/mL. Samples were prepared at a concentration of 5 mg/mL in methanol. In brief, a total of 15 μL of sample/standard was placed in a 96-well microplate. After that, 175 μL of methanol and 30 μL of 1.25% AlCl3 were added, followed by addition of 30 μL of 0.125 M C2H3NaO2 and incubation for 5 min. A microplate reader was used to measure the ensuing yellow color at 420 nm at the end of the incubation period. Data are presented as means ± SD.

3.7.3. Determination of the Total Terpenoids

The total terpenoids were determined gravimetrically. About ten g of S. leucanthemifolius and C. cirrhosa powder were macerated in 70% alcohol for 24 h. The extract was subjected to filtration then extraction with petroleum ether. The petroleum ether extracts were separately evaporated to dryness into pre-weighed glass. The total terpenoids yield (%) was calculated according to Indumathi et al. 2014 [53].

3.7.4. Determination of Total Alkaloids

The total alkaloids were determined gravimetrically. In a 250 mL beaker, 5 g of S. leucanthemifolius and C. cirrhosa powder were weighed, followed by the addition of 200 mL of 10% ethanolic acetic acid, capped, and left to stand for four hours. After filtration of the samples, the extracts were concentrated in a water bath to about the quarter of their volume. In order to fully precipitate the extract, concentrated ammonium hydroxide was added dropwise. After allowing the resulting suspension to settle, the precipitated material was washed with diluteNH4OH, then dried and weighed according to Harborne 1998 [54].

3.7.5. Determination of Total Saponins

The concentrated 70% ethanol extract was suspended in distilled water, defatted twice with diethyl ether (10 mL each) in a separating funnel, then the ethereal layer was rejected. The remaining aqueous layer was extracted with n-butanol saturated with water (2 × 10 mL). The combined n-butanol fraction was washed with 1 mL of 5% aqueous NaCl solution, then concentrated to drying. A stock solution of standard Diosgenin in ethyl acetate (1 mg /mL) was prepared. A weighed amount of the dried n-butanol fraction of the 70% ethanol extracts of the defatted S. leucanthemifolius and C. cirrhosa were dissolved in methanol to yield a 0.20 mg/mL solution.
The total saponin contents of S. leucanthemifolius and C. cirrhosa in the n-butanol fraction were determined spectrophotometrically, using diosgenin as a standard, as described by Saxena et al., 2013 [55]. The diosgenin level was determined in the tested sample by measuring the absorbance (at λ = 430 nm) of the color produced as a result of the reaction of steroidal saponins with p-anisaldehyde/sulfuric acid in an ethyl acetate medium.
For the establishment of the calibration curve, serial dilutions of diosgenin (0.01–0.08 mg/mL) were prepared in ethyl acetate. An aliquot (one mL) of each dilution was added to two mL of ethyl acetate in a test tube, treated with one mL of each of reagent A (p-anisaldehyde (99%)/ethyl acetate 0.5:99.5 v/v ethyl acetate) and B (concentrated sulfuric acid/ethyl acetate 50:50 v/v) and stirred. The reaction mixture was heated at 60 °C for 10 min, then allowed to cool for another 10 min at ambient temperature. The absorbance of the greenish-violet color produced was measured at 430 nm against a blank prepared with pure ethyl acetate using a double-beam spectrophotometer UV-1650 PC (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Each determination was carried out in triplicate, and the calibration curve was constructed by plotting the average of the observed absorbance versus concentrations.

4. Conclusions

The findings of this study offer a new perspective on Jordanian plant extracts anticancer activity research. Some Jordanian plant extracts demonstrated a significant anti-proliferative effect with lower IC50 values against human colorectal (HT-29) carcinoma cell lines, for example, 70% ethanol extracts from Senecio leucanthemifolius with an IC50 value of 13.84 μg/mL, and the ethanol extract from Clematis cirrhosa with an IC50 value of 13.28 μg/mL. These values are below the range of 30 µg/mL that the national cancer institute considers interesting for raw plant extracts. These cytotoxic results revealed that both extracts can trigger apoptosis in culture. Quantitative estimation of total phenolics, flavonoids, saponins, alkaloids, and terpenoids found in Senecio leucanthemifolius were (91.82, 14.90, 14.27, 101, and 135.4 mg/g of dry extract), respectively. They were revealed to be (68.18, 7.16, 31.25, 73.6, and 180 mg/g of dry extract) in Clematis cirrhosa, respectively. In recent years, several phytochemicals extracted from therapeutic plants with potential anticancer properties have been discovered. In order to increase the number of cytotoxic compounds for potential medication development, rigorous screening must be conducted. Moreover, the use of plant extracts and/or their bioactive compounds alone or in combination with traditional chemotherapy may be anticipated in the future as promising adjuvant drugs in cancer therapy. However, more research is required to isolate bioactive compounds from plant extracts and assess their unknown effects as well as their synergistic effects, in in vitro and in vivo animal models. Further in vivo studies are required to fully understand the impact of the reported results.

Author Contributions

M.I.A.: investigation, resources, visualization and writing—original draft; A.M.G.: conceptualization; M.M.S.: conceptualization-supervision, visualization—writing—review and editing; R.S.E.-D. and H.M.E.H.: conceptualization-supervision-visualization and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding and APC is funded by the authors.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bray, F.; Laversanne, M.; Weiderpass, E.; Soerjomataram, I. The ever-increasing importance of cancer as a leading cause of premature death worldwide. Cancer 2021, 127, 3029–3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Arafa, M.A.; Farhat, K. Colorectal cancer in the Arab world—Screening practices and future prospects. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2015, 16, 7425–7430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Arokiyaraj, S.; Dinesh Kumar, V.; Elakya, V.; Kamala, T.; Park, S.K.; Ragam, M.; Saravanan, M.; Bououdina, M.; Arasu, M.V.; Kovendan, K.; et al. Biosynthesized silver nanoparticles using floral extract of Chrysanthemum indicum L.—Potential for malaria vector control. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 9759–9765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mukherjee, S.; Patra, C.R. Therapeutic application of anti-angiogenic nanomaterials in cancers. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 12444–12470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mittra, I.; Pal, K.; Pancholi, N.; Shaikh, A.; Rane, B.; Tidke, P.; Kirolikar, S.; Khare, N.K.; Agrawal, K.; Nagare, H.; et al. Prevention of chemotherapy toxicity by agents that neutralize or degrade cell-free chromatin. Ann. Oncol. 2017, 28, 2119–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, M.; Lu, J.J.; Ding, J. Natural products in cancer therapy: Past, present and future. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2021, 11, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. McChesney, J.D.; Venkataraman, S.K.; Henri, J.T. Plant natural products: Back to the future or into extinction? Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 2015–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Al-Eisawi, D. Vegetation of Jordan; Regional Office for Science and Technology for the Arab States: Cairo, Egypt, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  10. Oran, S.A.; Al-Eisawi, D.M. Check-list of medicinal plants in Jordan. Dirasat 1998, 25, 84–112. [Google Scholar]
  11. Afifi, F.U.; Kasabri, V.; Abu-Dahab, R. Medicinal plants from Jordan in the treatment of cancer: Traditional uses vs in vitro and in vivo evaluations part 1. Planta Med. 2011, 77, 1203–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Salama, M.M.; Ezzat, S.M.; Sleem, A.A. A new hepatoprotective flavone glycoside from the flowers of Onopordum alexandrinum growing in Egypt. Z. Naturforsch. C 2011, 66, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Taban, K.; Eruygur, N.; Üstün, O. Biological activity studies on the aqueous methanol extract of Anchusa undulata L. subsp. hybrida (Ten.) Coutinho. Marmara Pharm. J. 2018, 21, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kaya, G.I.; Somer, N.U.; Konyalioğlu, S.; Yalcin, H.T.; Yavaşoğlu, N.Ü.K.; Sarikaya, B.; Onur, M.A.L.İ. Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Ranunculus marginatus var. trachycarpus and R. sprunerianus. Turk. J. Biol. 2010, 34, 139–146. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sarikurkcu, C.; Zengin, G.; Aktumsek, A.; Ceylan, O. Screening of possible in vitro neuroprotective, skin care, antihyperglycemic, and antioxidative effects of Anchusa undulata L. subsp. hybrida (Ten.) Coutinho from Turkey and its fatty acid profile. Int. J. Food Prop. 2015, 18, 1491–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Muhammed, A.; Arı, N. Antidiabetic activity of the aqueous extract of Anchusa strigosa Lab in streptozotocin diabetic rats. Int. J. Pharm. 2012, 2, 445–449. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bardaweel, S.K.; Hudaib, M.M.; Tawaha, K.A.; Bashatwah, R.M. Studies on the in vitro antiproliferative, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and acetylcholinesterase inhibition activities associated with Chrysanthemum coronarium essential oil. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 790838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Chohra, D.; Ferchichi, L.; Cakmak, Y.S.; Zengin, G.; Alsheikh, S.M. Phenolic profiles, antioxidant activities and enzyme inhibitory effects of an Algerian medicinal plant (Clematis cirrhosa L.). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 132, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ali-Shtayeh, M.S.; Abu Ghdeib, S.I. Antifungal activity of plant extracts against dermatophytes. Mycoses 1999, 42, 665–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Proestos, C.; Chorianopoulos, N.; Nychas, G.J.E.; Komaitis, M. RP-HPLC analysis of the phenolic compounds of plant extracts. Investigation of their antioxidant capacity and antimicrobial activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1190–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Landoulsi, A.; Roumy, V.; Duhal, N.; Skhiri, F.H.; Rivière, C.; Sahpaz, S.; Neut, C.; Benhamida, J.; Hennebelle, T. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil from aerial parts and roots of Eryngium barrelieri Boiss. and Eryngium glomeratum Lam. from Tunisia. Chem. Biodivers. 2016, 13, 1720–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tundis, R.; Loizzo, M.R.; Statti, G.A.; Houghton, P.J.; Miljkovic-Brake, A.; Menichini, F. In vitro hypoglycemic and antimicrobial activities of Senecio leucanthemifolius Poiret. Nat. Prod. Res. 2007, 21, 396–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qasem, J.R. Prospects of wild medicinal and industrial plants of saline habitats in the Jordan valley. Pak. J. Bot. 2015, 47, 551–570. [Google Scholar]
  24. Al-Quran, S. Taxonomical and pharmacological survey of therapeutic plants in Jordan. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 1, 10–26. [Google Scholar]
  25. Al-Khalil, S. A survey of plants used in Jordanian traditional medicine. Int. J. Pharmacogn. 1995, 33, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Agulló-Ortuño, M.T.; Díaz, C.E.; González-Coloma, A.; Reina, M. Structure-dependent cytotoxic effects of eremophilanolide sesquiterpenes. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2017, 12, 663–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Goo, Y.K. Therapeutic Potential of Ranunculus Species (Ranunculaceae): A literature review on traditional medicinal herbs. Plants 2022, 11, 1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, P.; Su, Z.; Yuan, W.; Deng, G.; Li, S. Phytochemical constituents and pharmacological activities of Eryngium L. (Apiaceae). Pharm. Crop. 2012, 3, 99–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Yazdanshenas, H.; Shafeian, E.; Nasiri, M.; Mousavi, S.A. Indigenous knowledge on use values of Karvan district plants, Iran. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2016, 18, 1217–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Boik, J. Natural Compounds in Cancer Therapy; Oregon Medical Press: Princeton, MN, USA, 2001; Volume 851. [Google Scholar]
  31. Youn, U.-J.; Jin, W.-Y.; Song, K.-S.; Seong, Y.-H.; Bae, K.-H. Cytotoxic constituents from the aerial part of Clematis apiifolia L. Korean J. Med. Crop Sci. 2006, 14, 299–302. [Google Scholar]
  32. Conforti, F.; Marrelli, M.; Statti, G.; Menichini, F. Antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of methanolic extract and fractions from Senecio gibbosus subsp. gibbosus (GUSS) DC. Nat. Prod. Res. 2006, 20, 805–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zaher, A.M.; Sultan, R.; Ramadan, T.; Amro, A. New antimicrobial and cytotoxic benzofuran glucoside from Senecio glaucus L. Nat. Prod. Res. 2022, 36, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Carocho, M.; Ferreira, I. The role of phenolic compounds in the fight against cancer—A Review. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 1236–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Anderson, K.J.; Teuber, S.S.; Gobeille, A.; Cremin, P.; Waterhouse, A.L.; Steinberg, F.M. Walnut polyphenolics inhibit in vitro human plasma and LDL oxidation. J. Nutr. 2001, 131, 2837–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Surh, Y.-J. Cancer chemoprevention with dietary phytochemicals. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 768–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ramos, S. Effects of dietary flavonoids on apoptotic pathways related to cancer chemoprevention. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2007, 18, 427–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Shibata, S. Chemistry and cancer preventing activities of ginseng saponins and some related triterpenoid compounds. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2001, 16, S28–S37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kerwin, S.M. Soy saponins and the anticancer effects of soybeans and soy-based foods. Curr. Med. Chem. Agents 2004, 4, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bachran, C.; Bachran, S.; Sutherland, M.; Bachran, D.; Fuchs, H. Saponins in tumor therapy. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2008, 8, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chudzik, M.; Korzonek-Szlacheta, I.; Król, W. Triterpenes as potentially cytotoxic compounds. Molecules 2015, 20, 1610–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zhao, M.; Ma, N.; Qiu, F.; Hai, W.L.; Tang, H.F.; Zhang, Y.; Wen, A.D. Triterpenoid saponins from the roots of Clematis argentilucida and their cytotoxic activity. Planta Med. 2014, 80, 942–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liang, X.; Gao, Y.; Luan, S. Two decades of advances in diterpenoid alkaloids with cytotoxicity activities. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 23937–23946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Tundis, R.; Loizzo, M.R.; Bonesi, M.; Menichini, F.; Dodaro, D.; Passalacqua, N.G.; Statti, G.; Menichini, F. In vitro cytotoxic effects of Senecio stabianus Lacaita (Asteraceae) on human cancer cell lines. Nat. Prod. Res. 2009, 23, 1707–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Loizzo, M.R.; Tundis, R.; Statti, G.A.; Menichini, F. Jacaranone: A cytotoxic constituent from Senecio ambiguus subsp. ambiguus (Biv.) DC. against renal adenocarcinoma ACHN and prostate carcinoma LNCaP cells. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2007, 30, 701–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Allemang, A.; Mahony, C.; Lester, C.; Pfuhler, S. Relative potency of fifteen pyrrolizidine alkaloids to induce DNA damage as measured by micronucleus induction in HepaRG human liver cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 121, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, W.-T.; Yang, B.-X.; Zhu, W.; Gong, M.-H.; Xu, X.-D.; Lu, X.-H.; Sun, L.-L.; Tian, J.-K.; Zhang, L. A new indole alkaloidal glucoside from the aerial parts of Clematis terniflora DC. Nat. Prod. Res. 2013, 27, 2333–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hai, W.; Cheng, H.; Zhao, M.; Wang, Y.; Hong, L.; Tang, H.; Tian, X. Two new cytotoxic triterpenoid saponins from the roots of Clematis argentilucida. Fitoterapia 2012, 83, 759–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. El-Haddad, A.E.; Gendy, A.M.; Amin, M.M.; Alshareef, W.A.; Gizawy, H.A. El Comparative characterization of carob pulp and seeds extracts: HPLC, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and cytotoxic studies. Egypt. J. Chem. 2022, 65, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Evans, W.C. Trease and Evans’ Pharmacognosy E-Book; Elsevier Health Sciences: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; ISBN 0702041890. [Google Scholar]
  51. Attard, E. A rapid microtitre plate Folin-Ciocalteu method for the assessment of polyphenols. Open Life Sci. 2013, 8, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kiranmai, M.; Kumar, C.B.M.; Mohammed, I. Comparison of total flavanoid content of Azadirachta indica root bark extracts prepared by different methods of extraction. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 254–261. [Google Scholar]
  53. Indumathi, C.; Durgadevi, G.; Nithyavani, S.; Gayathri, P.K. Estimation of terpenoid content and its antimicrobial property in Enicostemma litorrale. Int. J. Chem. Tech. Res. 2014, 6, 4264–4267. [Google Scholar]
  54. Harborne, J.B. Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis; Champman and Hall: London, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  55. Saxena, R.; Rathore, S.S.; Barnwal, P.; Soni, A.; Sharma, L.; Saxena, S.N. Effect of cryogenic grinding on recovery of diosgenin content in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) genotypes. Int. J. Seed Spices 2013, 3, 26–30. [Google Scholar]
Plants 12 01626 g001 550
Figure 1. Standard calibration curve (A) Gallic acid, (B) Quercetin, (C) Diosgenin.
Figure 1. Standard calibration curve (A) Gallic acid, (B) Quercetin, (C) Diosgenin.
Plants 12 01626 g001
Table
Table 1. The most common cancers in Jordan, both sexes, all ages, in 2020.
Table 1. The most common cancers in Jordan, both sexes, all ages, in 2020.
RankSiteNumber of CasesPercent
1Breast240320.8%
2Colorectal126010.9%
3Lung10479.1%
4Urinary Bladder5724.9%
5Leukemia5694.9%
Table
Table 2. A list of the plant species evaluated in this study, names and traditional uses.
Table 2. A list of the plant species evaluated in this study, names and traditional uses.
Plant Scientific NameFamilyCommon Names (English)Local Name (Arabic)Traditional UsesSpecimen No.
Glebionis segetum L. Fourr.AsteraceaeCorn Marigold(Albusbas)Treatment for fever, nocturnal sweats, spasms, burns, and ulcers. Diuretic and stomachic [23]17-06-2021 Ι
Onopordum alexandrinum Boiss.AsteraceaeCotton Thistle(Atour)Hepatoprotective [24]19-06-2021 Ι
Phagnalon rupestre L. DC.AsteraceaeAfrican Fleabane(Qadaha)Abdominal pain
Joints pain [23,25]		16-06-2021 Ι
Senecio leucanthemifolius Poir.AsteraceaeEastern Groundsel(Shykha)Cancer treatment [26]21-06-2021 Ι
Clematis cirrhosa L.RanunculaceaeEvergreen
Virgin´s-Bower		(Hublmiskiun)Skin diseases [19]20-06-2021 Ι
Ranunculus asiaticus L.RanunculaceaeTurban Buttercup(Hawdhan)Pertussis [27]18-06-2021 Ι
Anchusa strigosa Banks & Sol.BoraginaceaePrickly Alkanet(Humhum)Astringent for burns and wounds, anti-ulcer, cough, and rheumatic inflammation [23]14-06-2021 A
Anchusa undulata L.BoraginaceaeCommon Alkanet(Humhum)Antidiabetic [15]14-06-2021 B
Eryngium glomeratum Lam.ApiaceaeClustered eryngo(Euidalqizm)Scorpion and snakes bite. Diuretic, renal stones [23,28]22-06-2021 Ι
Lagoecia cuminoides L.ApiaceaeFalse Cumin(Amjiris)Improving the digestion
Bilestone repellent [29]		15-06-2021 Ι
Table
Table 3. Percentage Yield of the screened ethanol extracts.
Table 3. Percentage Yield of the screened ethanol extracts.
Name of the PlantYield (%)
Glebionis segetum L. Fourr.7.7%
Onopordum alexandrinum Boiss.9.2%
Phagnalon rupestre L. DC.6.2%
Senecio leucanthemifolius Poir.10.4%
Clematis cirrhosa L.23.6%
Ranunculus asiaticus L.16.8%
Anchusa strigosa Banks & Sol.13.6%
Anchusa undulata L.8.4%
Eryngium glomeratum Lam.6.4%
Lagoecia cuminoides L.2%
Table
Table 4. Cytotoxic activity (IC50) of plant extracts under investigation towards HT-29 and MCF-7 cell lines.
Table 4. Cytotoxic activity (IC50) of plant extracts under investigation towards HT-29 and MCF-7 cell lines.
Name of the PlantIC50 Values of Cell Lines (μg/mL)
HT-29MCF-7
Glebionis segetum L. Fourr.203.90 μg/mL mL ± 17.11>100 μg/mL
Onopordum alexandrinum Boiss.120.24 μg/mL ± 3.55234.79 μg/mL ± 10.98
Phagnalon rupestre L. DC.>100 μg/mL >100 μg/mL
Senecio leucanthemifolius Poir.13.84 μg/mL ± 0.1456.27 μg/mL ± 1.02
Clematis cirrhosa L.13.28 μg/mL ± 0.69>100 μg/mL
Ranunculus asiaticus L.175.94 μg/mL ± 2.25656.47 μg/mL ± 20.77
Anchusa strigosa Banks & Sol.188.84 μg/mL ± 12.91191.48 μg/mL ± 5.67
Anchusa undulata L.534.59 μg/mL ± 15.21>100 μg/mL
Eryngium glomeratum Lam.68.51 μg/mL ± 3.46173.45 μg/mL ± 5.31
Lagoecia cuminoides L.617.53 μg/mL ± 7.50>100 μg/mL
Doxorubicin0.49 μg/mL ± 0.050.28 μg/mL ± 0.02
Results are the average and standard deviation of three replicates. Doxorubicin: positive control.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alruwad, M.I.; Sabry, M.M.; Gendy, A.M.; El-Dine, R.S.; El Hefnawy, H.M. In Vitro Cytotoxic Potential of Selected Jordanian Flora and Their Associated Phytochemical Analysis. Plants 2023, 12, 1626. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081626

AMA Style

Alruwad MI, Sabry MM, Gendy AM, El-Dine RS, El Hefnawy HM. In Vitro Cytotoxic Potential of Selected Jordanian Flora and Their Associated Phytochemical Analysis. Plants. 2023; 12(8):1626. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081626

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alruwad, Manal I., Manal M. Sabry, Abdallah M. Gendy, Riham Salah El-Dine, and Hala M. El Hefnawy. 2023. "In Vitro Cytotoxic Potential of Selected Jordanian Flora and Their Associated Phytochemical Analysis" Plants 12, no. 8: 1626. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12081626

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop