Next Article in Journal
A New Essential Oil from the Native Andean Species Nectandra laurel Klotzsch ex Nees of Southern Ecuador: Chemical and Enantioselective Analyses
Next Article in Special Issue
The Exploration of Flowering Mechanisms in Cherry Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Salinity Tolerance Mechanisms in Diverse Wheat Genotypes Using Physiological, Anatomical, Agronomic and Gene Expression Analyses
Previous Article in Special Issue
Floral Development on Vitis vinifera Is Associated with MADS-Box Transcription Factors through the Transcriptional Regulation of VviZIP3
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Quantification and Qualification of Floral Patterns of Coffea arabica L. in Colombia

Plants 2023, 12(18), 3332; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183332
by Carlos Andres Unigarro 1,*, Luis Carlos Imbachi 2, Aquiles Enrique Darghan 3 and Claudia Patricia Flórez-Ramos 4
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Plants 2023, 12(18), 3332; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12183332
Submission received: 10 July 2023 / Revised: 9 August 2023 / Accepted: 11 August 2023 / Published: 21 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Floral Biology 2.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors

I read the article Quantification and qualification of floral patterns of Coffea arabica L. in Colombia.

please revise the introduction part ( do not need figures)

please add novelty of your research in introduction part.

please add version R for software in Materials and method.

good luck

 

Author Response

Please revise the introduction part (do not need figures)

R/.

The figures were removed from the document and their corresponding description of the Introduction. The length of the Introduction was reduced from 2360 words to 1801 words (23% less).

 

Please add the novelty of your research in the introduction part.

R/.

A brief paragraph describing the novelty of the research was added in lines 171-173.

 

Please add version R for software in Materials and Method.

R/.

The software version was added on line 276.

 

Reviewer 2 Report

Very long introduction and parts of the text written as if they were results and discussion. It seems inappropriate.

Very long conclusion. The author could go straight to the point.

Most of the bibliographical references have more than 10 years of publication and are in exaggerated number. Maybe it can be reduced.

Author Response

Very long introduction and parts of the text written as if they were results and discussion. It seems inappropriate.

R/.

The length of the introduction was reduced from 2360 words to 1801 words (23% less), and the section written as results and discussion was withdrawn from the document. The figures were removed from the paper and their corresponding description.

 

Very long conclusion. The author could go straight to the point.

R/.

The length of the Conclusion was reduced from 232 words to 199 words (14% less), with some modifications in the text.

 

Most of the bibliographical references have more than 10 years of publication and are in exaggerated numbers. Maybe it can be reduced.

R/.

The bibliographic references were modified throughout the document. The changes are summarized in the following table:

 

 

References in the previous version

 

References in the actual version

Year

Number

%

 

Number

%

2023-2014

24

34

 

30

51

2013-2004

19

27

 

14

24

>2003

27

39

 

15

25

 

Reviewer 3 Report

I have no further comments, but, looking at the results obtained, it would be very interesting to evaluate whether, depending on the frequency of flowering throughout the year in the different populations, it could have an effect on the yield or quality of the fruits obtained, thinking perhaps that that the more reproductive events the populations have, there could be some negative effect on the quality of the fruits. This for future studies.

Author Response

R/.

None.

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

We consider that the changes made are satisfactory.

Back to TopTop