Next Article in Journal
Dietary Supplementation with Yerba Mate (Ilex paraguariensis) Infusion Increases IRS-1 and PI3K mRNA Levels and Enhances Insulin Sensitivity and Secretion in Rat Pancreatic Islets
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of the Green Chemistry-like Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Grape (Vitis labrusca L.) and Blackberry (Rubus fruticosus L.) Seeds with Concomitant Biological and Antioxidant Activity Assessments
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 14
10.3390/plants12142619
Review Report
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Phylogeny and Flow Cytometry of the Genus Kalidium Moq. (Amaranthaceae s.l.) in Kazakhstan

Plants 2023, 12(14), 2619; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142619
by B. B. Osmonali 1,2, P. V. Vesselova 1, G. M. Kudabayeva 1, M. V. Skaptsov 3, A. I. Shmakov 3 and N. Friesen 4,*
Reviewer 1:
Yoon-Jung Hwang
Reviewer 2:
Eduardo Cires
Reviewer 3:
Marcin Nobis
Plants 2023, 12(14), 2619; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142619
Submission received: 15 May 2023 / Revised: 29 June 2023 / Accepted: 1 July 2023 / Published: 11 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Systematics, Taxonomy, Nomenclature and Classification)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

For the methodology, the cited paper corresponding to solving the 2C estimation and index is outdated. Similarly, the ploidy level determination using the index formula provided needs to be confirmed. For the results, the tables do not adhere to the journal's format. Likewise, the format for the citation is also bothersome and does not follow the journal's format. 

The introduction, results, and conclusions must be improved as the paragraphs have no coherence. In the conclusion part, the way it was stated is a bit confusing as well as the structure of the paragraphs is unusual. 

Author Response

 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

After careful consideration and review of the manuscript (Phylogeny and flow cytometry of species of the genus Kalidium Moq. (Amaranthaceae s. lato) in Kazakhstan), I found that the results presented in the paper are not appropriate for publication.

I feel that the research presented in the manuscript does not contribute significantly to the existing body of knowledge in the field and I must reject your publication. See comments in the attached document but basically, the authors should increase the sampling to all species of the genus, clarify the methodology and substantially improve the discussion.

In my opinion, the manuscript can be greatly improved and has serious deficiencies. Moreover, I would like to request that you make some improvements to the figures presented.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf


Author Response

Please see in attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

All of my comments are presented in the attached pdf version of the manuscript

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

-

Author Response

Please see in attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors have improved the previous version of the manuscript following the recommendations of the reviewers.

Authors have improved the previous version of the manuscript following the recommendations of the reviewers.

Back to TopTop