Next Article in Journal
Characterization of the PIN Auxin Efflux Carrier Gene Family and Its Expression during Zygotic Embryogenesis in Persea americana
Previous Article in Journal
Atrazine Toxicity: The Possible Role of Natural Products for Effective Treatment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Water Metabolism of Lonicera japonica and Parthenocissus quinquefolia in Response to Heterogeneous Simulated Rock Outcrop Habitats

1
School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550081, China
3
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Guizhou Vocational College of Agriculture, Qingzhen 551400, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(12), 2279; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12122279
Submission received: 6 April 2023 / Revised: 8 June 2023 / Accepted: 8 June 2023 / Published: 12 June 2023

Abstract

:
The karst carbon sink caused by rock outcrops results in enrichment of the bicarbonate in soil, affecting the physiological process of plants in an all-round way. Water is the basis of plant growth and metabolic activities. In heterogeneous rock outcrop habitats, the impact of bicarbonate enrichment on the intracellular water metabolism of plant leaf is still unclear, which needs to be revealed. In this paper, the Lonicera japonica and Parthenocissus quinquefolia plants were selected as experimental materials, and electrophysiological indices were used to study their water holding, transfer and use efficiency under three simulated rock outcrop habitats, i.e., rock/soil ratio as 1, 1/4 and 0. By synchronously determining and analyzing the leaf water content, photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, the response characteristics of water metabolism within leaf cells to the heterogeneous rock outcrop habitats were revealed. The results showed that the soil bicarbonate content in rock outcrop habitats increased with increasing rock/soil ratio. Under the treatment of a higher concentration of bicarbonate, the leaf intra- and intercellular water acquisition and transfer efficiency as well as the photosynthetic utilization capacity of P. quinquefolia decreased, the leaf water content was lower, and those plants had low bicarbonate utilization efficiency, which greatly weakened their drought resistance. However, the Lonicera japonica had a high bicarbonate use capacity when facing the enrichment of bicarbonate within cells, the above-mentioned capacity could significantly improve the water status of the leaves, and the water content and intracellular water-holding capacity of plant leaves in large rock outcrop habitats were significantly better than in non-rock outcrop habitats. In addition, the higher intracellular water-holding capacity was likely to maintain the stability of the intra- and intercellular water environment, thus ensuring the full development of its photosynthetic metabolic capacity, and the stable intracellular water-use efficiency also made itself more vigorous under karstic drought. Taken together, the results suggested that the water metabolic traits of Lonicera japonica made it more adaptable to karst environments.

1. Introduction

As the most significant phenological feature in karst areas, rock outcrops (ROs) have important hydrological significance in karst ecosystems [1]. In habitats with outcrops, exposed rocks not only interrupt the mid-loam flow but also intercept a large proportion of rainwater transport to soil patches, thus making the moisture and resource content of soils around outcrops significantly higher than in habitats far from outcrops or without outcrops [2,3,4]. Carbonate rocks are the most dominant rock type in karst areas [5], and the products of their dissolution and decomposition under hydraulic action produce enrichment in adjacent soils with the flow of water, so that the soil bicarbonate (HCO3) content is significantly higher than that in non-karst areas, which is the so-called carbon sink effect [6], and the concentration of HCO3 in such a soil solution shows a positive correlation with soil moisture [7]. Moreover, the heterogeneous redistribution of precipitation, which is attributed to the various morphologies, sizes and orientations of ROs in habitats, makes the soil moisture content in the karst landscape area vary significantly, resulting in heterogeneous karst habitats with differential enrichment of bicarbonate [8], which further affects biodiversity distribution. The karst ecological environment is extremely fragile, and karstic desertification is of great concern today. In order to accelerate the process of ecological restoration in karst areas, the vulnerable ecological environment in these areas can only be better managed by selecting plants that are higher matched to heterogeneous karst habitats.
HCO3 is an alkaline salt with strong stability in the environment. In HCO3 habitats, the physiological activities in plants are highly susceptible to disturbance [9,10,11,12]. On the one hand, under the effects of a high concentration of HCO3, the growth and function of plant roots are inhibited, and the excessive accumulation of HCO3 in plants can also have toxic effects on plant cells, blocking cell metabolism [13]; on the other hand, the high pH induced by a high concentration of HCO3 will change the ionic environment of the soil around plant roots, and the precipitation of ions such as Fe2+ and Mg2+ in soil habitats will lead to the obstruction of plant photosynthetic pigment synthesis, further limiting plant growth and metabolic processes [14,15]. However, it is worth mentioning that HCO3 also has a positive effect on plant photosynthesis that cannot be ignored. HCO3 not only acts as a mobile proton acceptor during the photosynthesis reaction to improve photosynthetic efficiency [16,17] but it also promotes photosynthesis in plants by enabling the reversible conversion of HCO3 to water and carbon dioxide, under the efficient catalysis of carbonic anhydrase (CA) [18,19,20]. When plants are under stress conditions that trigger stomatal closure, this process can directly increase the assimilation of CO2, which is beneficial to plant growth and development.
Water is the basis of all plant growth and metabolic activities [21]. In recent years, a series of achievements has been made in the study of the physiological characteristics of plants under HCO3 stress, but the related research has rarely included the changes in the water metabolism characteristics of plants, and the influence mechanism of HCO3 on plant water metabolism remains unclear. In addition, the typical aboveground–underground dual spatial structure of karst has a very strong water seepage effect, so the temporary soil drought may occur even during periods of abundant rainfall, affecting the water metabolic processes of plants [22,23]. Therefore, the process of HCO3 effects on plant water metabolism is often accompanied by drought in karst areas, which also poses further challenges to plant suitability studies.
Plant photosynthesis is very sensitive to changes in water availability, and studies have shown that when plants do not have access to sufficient water, stomatal conductance of plant leaves decreases, transpiration rate decreases, water-use efficiency increases and net photosynthetic rate decreases [24,25]. However, these photosynthetic parameters reflect the variation of intercellular water in leaves and do not characterize the internal water metabolism well, while the intracellular water metabolism of leaves is more reflective of plant response to karst drought. Plant electrophysiological techniques have an unmistakable advantage in reflecting the intracellular water metabolism of plant leaves [26,27]. In 1967, Sinyukhin’s work confirmed that plant electrical signals are present at the beginning and throughout a plant’s life, and almost all life activities in a plant’s body involve charge separation, electron movement and proton and dielectric transport [28]. Plant electrophysiological technology regards plant membranous cells and organelles as containers that can conduct electricity based on electrical principles (Figure 1), the liquid environment inside and outside the membrane is equivalent to the bipolar plates of a capacitor, membrane lipids having resistive properties and intracellular ions, ionic groups and electric dipoles are electrolytes. When the plant’s internal growth conditions and the external environment change, the permeability of the plant cell membrane alters initially, resulting in a change in the electrolyte concentration inside and outside the cells, which leads to changes in the cell’s capacitance (C), resistance (R) and impedance (Z), and the water inside the cells also changes. Jamaludin et al. [29] found that the impedance showed a significant negative relationship with leaf water status, and Yu et al. [30] also found that the electrophysiological parameters C, R and Z of plant leaves could characterize the response of plant growth and development to soil moisture. Furthermore, parameters based on leaves’ intrinsic electrophysiological parameters derived from leaves’ intracellular water-holding capacity, water translocation rate and water-use efficiency have also shown unique value in reflecting the characteristics of plant leaf water metabolism [31]. Due to the close relationship between plant leaf cell volume and physiological C, R and Z, electrophysiological parameters can also be used to monitor plant water conditions online, quickly, accurately and in a timely and undamaged manner; thus, electrophysiological characteristics are increasingly applied to reflect plant water metabolism and diagnostic plant water status [32,33,34,35], which is a key consideration for the introduction of electrophysiological techniques in this study.
Considering the soil in karst areas is prone to HCO3 enrichment and frequent drought, adapted plants often need to show efficient water metabolism under HCO3 stress and drought stress simultaneously. Vines are pioneer plants in the succession of forest communities in rocky desertification areas [36], of which the Lonicera japonica (L. japonica) is highly adaptable, not strictly selective in terms of soil and climate and can be tolerant to drought, cold and salt in order to grow on limestone soils and generally saline lands, making it an excellent medicinal, silvicultural and greening plant [37,38]. The Parthenocissus tricuspidate (P. tricuspidate), an ideal plant for the greening of vine plants, is also highly adaptable to soil and climate [39]. It is resistant to cold, drought and barren, it has adaptability to soil acidity and alkalinity, and it is often used to restore vegetation on arid and barren hills. Both species show strong potential for karst habitability [40]. However, current studies on the water metabolism capacity of plants in karst areas have mostly considered the effects of a single drought stress, with little attention paid to the toxic effects of HCO3, which is widespread in karst areas in addition to drought. The specific mechanisms of plant water metabolism in response to HCO3 stress in karst habitats are also unclear.
Therefore, in this study, we analyzed the electrophysiological, photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Lonicera japonica and P. quinquefolia in heterogeneous simulated RO habitats under different drought levels in the field, aiming to (1) analyze the effects of heterogeneous ROs; (2) further explore the water metabolic characteristics of plants in heterogeneous RO habitats under drought conditions; (3) compare the matching of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia with karst heterogeneous RO habitats based on plant water metabolic characteristics. The results of the study provide a theoretical basis for the selection of plant species that match well with karst heterogeneous habitats in the process of vegetation restoration of fragile karst habitats.

2. Results

2.1. Differences in the Concentrations of HCO3 in Three Simulated Habitats under Different Drought Periods

The results of HCO3 content per 100 cm³ of soil in the simulated habitats with large rock outcrops in the field (L-ROs), small rock outcrops (S-ROs) and no rock outcrops (N-ROs) are shown in Figure 2. It was found that under the same drought period, the soil HCO3 content in the simulated habitats showed a trend of L-RO habitat > S-RO habitat > N-RO habitat, which was consistent with the field reality.

2.2. Differential Analysis of Water Content and Electrophysiological Parameters of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia Leaves in Three Simulated Habitats under Different Drought Periods

As shown in Figure 3, under the same drought period, L. japonica showed difference between habitats only in the moderate drought period, with the LWC value of L. japonica in the L-RO habitat being 1.06 times higher than that in the N-RO habitat. P. quinquefolia showed significant difference between habitats in both the mild and moderate drought periods; for example, the LWC value of P. quinquefolia in the L-RO habitat was only 0.94 times higher than that in the N-RO habitat during the mild and moderate drought periods.
In the same simulated habitat, the LWC of L. japonica planted in S-RO and N-RO habitats decreased significantly with the development of the drought period compared to the previous drought period, while the LWC of L. japonica planted in the L-RO habitats was significantly lower in the moderate drought period than in the mild drought period, its value being 0.93 of that in the mild drought period. The LWC of P. quinquefolia in all three habitats decreased significantly with the development of the drought period.
As shown in Table 1, during the same drought period, the intracellular water holding capacity (IWHC) of L. japonica was enhanced with increasing rock-to-soil ratio in the simulated habitats, especially in the non- and moderate drought periods, this value was 1.88 in the L-RO habitat and 2.22 in the N-RO habitat; meanwhile, the IWHC of P. quinquefolia in the L-RO habitat was significantly lower than that in the N-RO habitat, at 0.49 times the IWHC of the N-RO habitat during non-drought, 0.47 times during mild drought and 0.51 times during moderate drought.
In the same simulated habitat, the IWHCs of L. japonica in the L-RO, S-RO and N-RO habitats in the moderate drought period were 52%, 59% and 45% of the non-drought period, and the IWHCs of P. quinquefolia were 38%, 31% and 37% of the non-drought period.
The change in leaf intracellular water transfer rate (IWTR) of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia among different conditions is presented in Table 2, and it appeared as a similar trend to that of IWHC shown in Table 1.
For the IWTR of L. japonica in the L-RO habitat, it was 1.96, 1.43 and 2.27 times that of the N-RO habitat during the non-, mild and moderate drought periods, respectively, while for the P. quinquefolia in the same habitat it was 0.47, 0.46 and 0.51 times, respectively.
During the same moderate drought, the IWTR of L. japonica in the L-RO, S-RO and N-RO habitats was 51%, 61% and 43% of that in the non-drought period, and for P. quinquefolia in the three habitats during moderate drought, the IWTR was 39%, 30% and 36% of that in the non-drought period.
In Table 3, under the same drought period, there was no difference in the IWUE of L. japonica between simulated habitats; the IWUE of P. quinquefolia increased with increasing habitat rock-to-soil ratio, but it was not significant.
With the development of drought, the increased IWUE value of L. japonica in three habitats was not significant, whereas the IWUE of P. quinquefolia in the L-RO habitat increased significantly by 58% during the stage of the mild to moderate drought periods.

2.3. Differential Analysis of Photosynthetic Parameters of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia Leaves in Three Simulated Habitats under Different Drought Periods

During the same drought period, the PN showed a decreasing trend with increasing rock/soil ratio in simulated habitats (Figure 4). The PN of both plants in the L-RO habitat was significantly lower than that in the respective N-RO habitat during the non-drought period. In mild and moderate drought periods, the PN of L. japonica did not differ between habitats, and the PN of P. quinquefolia in the L-RO habitat showed a significantly lower value than that in the N-RO habitat.
In the same simulated habitat, the PN of both L. japonica and P. quinquefolia showed significant decreases with the development of drought degree, but the PN of L. japonica was always higher than that of P. quinquefolia.
As Figure 5 shows, the stomatal conductance (gs) of L. japonica did not significantly differ between habitats during all drought periods; the gs of P. quinquefolia was also not significantly different between habitats in the non- and moderate drought periods, but during the mild drought period it was 0.024 in the L-RO habitat, which was significantly lower than that in the N-RO habitat with a value of 0.11.
With the development of drought, the gs of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia in all stimulated habitats decreased significantly, and during the period of moderate drought, the gs values of both plants were close to zero.
The change in instantaneous water-use efficiency (WUEi) is illustrated in Figure 6. There was no apparent difference in the WUEi of L. japonica between habitats in each period; the WUEi of P. quinquefolia in mild and moderate drought periods was significantly higher in the L-RO and S-RO habitats than in the N-RO habitat.
With the development of drought degree, the WUEi of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia in the three habitats increased significantly. The WUEi of L. japonica in the L-RO, S-RO and N-RO habitats increased by 119%, 141% and 112% from the non- to moderate drought periods, respectively; the WUEi of P. quinquefolia increased by 270%, 275% and 146%, respectively.

2.4. Differential Analysis of Fluorescence Parameters of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia Leaves in Three Simulated Habitats under Different Drought Periods

Chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics reflects the intrinsic processes of plant photosynthesis, and by tracking changes in fluorescence parameters such as Fv/Fm, qP and ETR, they can further explore the photosynthetic structure and functional integrity of plants and refine their stress response characteristics.
The Fv/Fm reflects the maximum light energy conversion efficiency within the PS II reaction center and is a good indicator of whether the photosynthetic machinery of the crop is impaired and the efficiency of light energy conversion [41].
As shown in Figure 7, during the same drought period, there was no difference in the Fv/Fm of L. japonica between habitats, whereas the Fv/Fm of P. quinquefolia in RO habitats was lower than that in the N-RO habitat and became more pronounced in the L-RO habitat.
With the development of drought, the value of Fv/Fm of L. japonica in all habitats was consistently maintained at a high level.; however, P. quinquefolia’s Fv/Fm in the same habitat decreased significantly.
The photochemical fluorescence quenching coefficient (qP) is a measure of the oxidation state of PSII primary electron acceptor QA, reflecting the efficiency of converting light energy captured by PSII antenna pigments into chemical energy [42]. The results in qP of the experimental plants are presented in Figure 8.
Among different habitats, the qP of L. japonica in the L-RO habitat was significantly lower than that in the S-RO habitat during the moderate drought, and no significant difference was observed between habitats during the other periods; the qP of P. quinquefolia in the L-RO habitat was significantly lower than that in the other habitats during the mild drought period and showed no apparent difference between habitats during the non- and moderate drought periods.
When the drought developed from non- to mild drought, the qP of L. japonica in the same habitat did not change significantly, while that of P. quinquefolia in the same habitat decreased significantly; when the drought further developed to moderate, the qP of both plants decreased significantly. Nevertheless, the qP of L. japonica was higher than that of P. quinquefolia in the same habitat during the same drought period.
ETR is an expression of the apparent photosynthetic electron transfer rate of plant leaves, which is one of the variables characterizing the photosynthetic capacity of plants and can provide a reference for the evaluation of photosynthetic capacity [43].
As shown in Figure 9, L. japonica’s ETR in the L-RO habitat was significantly lower than that in the N-RO habitat during the non- and moderate drought periods; the ETR of P. quinquefolia in the L-RO habitat was significantly lower than that in the other two habitats during the mild drought period.
With the development of drought degree, the ETR of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia significantly declined in all habitats. Overall, the ETRs of L. japonica were always greater than those of P. quinquefolia in the same habitat during the same drought period.

3. Discussion

In this study, the leaf intra- and extracellular water metabolisms of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia under different simulated RO habitats and synoptic drought conditions were evaluated by determining the electrophysiological and photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, and the specific water metabolism response mechanisms of these two plants under different stress conditions were summarized as follows:

3.1. Analysis of the Intra- and Intercellular Water Metabolic Response Mechanisms of L. japonica Leaves in Heterogeneous RO Habitats

For the three simulated habitats, as the rock-to-soil ratio increased in the habitat, the soil became enriched in bicarbonate (HCO3), which was the highest in the L-RO (rock-to-soil ratio: 1) habitat, followed by the S-RO (rock-to-soil ratio: 1/4) habitat and the lowest in the N-RO (rock-to-soil ratio: 0) habitat. Due to the difference in bicarbonate content between the three habitats, the water metabolic response of plant leaves in these habitats also differed. In general, plant leaves close their stomata under bicarbonate stress to avoid excessive water loss, but this behavior also makes it more difficult for the cells to absorb water from the environment, causing the water content of leaves to decrease and the intracellular water status of the leaves to deteriorate, further restricting photosynthetic metabolism; in severe cases, leaf cell structure is damaged and photosynthetic capacity lost, which in turn accelerates the death of the organism.
However, in this paper, we found that the soil in the RO habitats was rich with bicarbonate, the water status of L. japonica leaves did not deteriorate but was better than that in the N-RO habitat, and this anomalous phenomenon became more pronounced as the bicarbonate content of the habitat increased (Figure 10). This was attributed to the high CA activity of L. japonica [44], which effectively catalyzed the conversion of intracellularly enriched HCO3 to water and carbon dioxide, a process that optimized the intracellular water and ionic environment of leaf cells, relieving the excessive demand for extracellular water and ensuring the stomata remained open. However, despite this, the PN of L. japonica did not show an increasing trend to match the changes in intracellular water. This implied that the photosynthetic rate of L. japonica was mainly limited by non-stomatal factors [45], and high pH stress triggered by the enrichment of bicarbonate in RO habitats could inhibit the synthesis of chlorophyll and Fd, which in turn affected the efficiency of photosynthetic electron transfer and reduced photosynthetic efficiency.
On this basis, this paper further considered the effect of karst drought in karst habitats and investigated the changes in water status of plants under different drought periods in the above heterogeneous simulated RO habitats. Under drought stress, the plants had more difficulty obtaining water and materials from the environment by themselves, which would further amplify the superiority and inferiority of the water metabolism ability of plants under karst adversity. However, combining the results of various parameters, it could be confirmed that although drought stress continued to decrease the water content of the leaves (LWC), the intracellular water-holding capacity (IWHC) and transfer rate (IWTR) were decreasing, water-use efficiency (WUE) was increasing, and the intra- and intercellular water metabolism of the leaves was deteriorating, but in terms of the intracellular water, the plants in RO habitats still exhibited better status than those in the N-RO habitat with the supplement of bicarbonate reverse conversion water. Furthermore, as the drought stress increased, this advantage effectively weakened the degree of water deficit and ionic stress to which the photosynthetic structure of the leaves was subjected, so that the photosynthetic efficacy and its variation of L. japonica in RO habitats under drought conditions exhibited no significant difference from that of the control habitat. In other words, L. japonica was well adapted to the RO habitats, and this suitability was not altered by the effects of drought.

3.2. Analysis of the Intra- and Intercellular Water Metabolic Response Mechanisms of P. quinquefolia Leaves in Heterogeneous RO Habitats

Different from L. japonica, P. quinquefolia has lower CA activity [42], and its low bicarbonate utilization leads to the excessive intracellular accumulation of bicarbonate in leaves, amplifying the extent to which water metabolism in P. quinquefolia is affected by bicarbonate (Figure 10). In the three simulated habitats with different bicarbonate concentrations, the water metabolism of P. quinquefolia leaf cells showed a typical trend of deteriorating with increased bicarbonate concentration. Compared to the N-RO habitat, the P. quinquefolia in RO habitats had lower gs, and the LWC and intracellular water status IWHC and IWTR decreased with increased bicarbonate concentration in the simulated habitats, weakened photosynthetic capacity and reduced the photosynthetic efficiency.
The water metabolism of P. quinquefolia in heterogeneous RO habitats under drought stress was further investigated, and the results showed that the water metabolism process of leaf cells of P. quinquefolia in RO habitats were constrained further with the onset and development of drought in the simulated habitats. Comparing leaves of P. quinquefolia during different drought periods in the L-RO and N-RO habitats, the LWC, IWHC, IWTR, gs and PN of P. quinquefolia in the L-RO habitat decreased significantly during the mild drought period, and gs and PN were even close to zero when the drought further developed to the moderate period; by comparison, although the intra- and intercellular water metabolism capacity of P. quinquefolia growing in the N-RO habitat was inhibited, the degree of inhibition was still lower than that in the RO habitats.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Simulation of Heterogeneous RO Habitats in Natural Environment

By adjusting the ratio of rock to soil in indoor pots, the large rock outcrop (L-RO) habitats with outcrops over 1.5 m in height in natural environment are simulated by the rock-to-soil ratio of 1:1 as shown in Figure 11a, the small rock outcrop (S-RO) habitats are simulated by the rock-to-soil ratio of 1:4 (Figure 11b), and the no rock outcrop (N-RO) habitats are taken as control. Each simulated habitat was regularly sprayed with equal amounts of tap water (1 L per 3 days/time) and lasted for two months.

4.2. Plant Material and Water Control

The experimental plants were selected from annual “Beihua No. 1” L. japonica and P. quinquefolia seedlings, which were moved into three simulated habitats in April 2022 and observed in July 2022. Culture environment: photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) in the lab was 500 µmol·m−2·s−1, daily light time 12 h, indoor temperature maximum 25 °C, minimum 16 °C, indoor air humidity 65–75%.
Three seedlings (3 pots) of honeysuckle and P. quinquefolia growing robustly in three simulated habitats were selected for the measurement. Different levels of drought stress were simulated using artificially controlled moisture. Each simulated habitat was supplemented with water 2 days prior to the experimental observation so that its habitat water reached saturation and a 10-day drought treatment was started after 2 days of stabilization. Soil moisture data were obtained with the aid of HydraGO probes (seeing Table 4) for each simulated habitat from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. According to the change in soil water content, the photosynthetic, fluorescence and electrophysiological parameters of the experimental plants were measured when the soil water content was about 25% (non-drought), 15% (mild drought) and 8% (moderate drought) [46].

4.3. Theory and Methods for Obtaining Index Parameters

4.3.1. Selection of Plant Leaf Materials and Data Collection Time

The fully expanded leaves at the 4th or 5th leaf position of the newborn branches of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia were selected for data collection. The data collection time was from 8:00 to 10:00 on the same day.

4.3.2. The Obtaining of Photosynthetic Parameters

The photosynthetic and fluorescence indices of the plants were measured using a portable photosynthetic measurement system Li-6800 (Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA), and the measurement was conducted in triplicate for each plant species.
Photosynthesis was measured using red and blue light source leaf chamber and a CO2 cylinder with a PPFD of 500 µmol·m−2·s−1, temperature of 25 °C and CO2 concentration of 400 µmol·mol−1.
Photosynthetic indicators: net photosynthetic rate (PN, µmol·m−2·s−1), stomatal conductance (gs, mol·m−2·s−1) and transpiration rate (E, mmol·m−2·s−1) of plant leaves. The instantaneous water-use efficiency (WUEi, µmol·mmol−1) was:
WUE i   = P N / E

4.3.3. The Obtaining of Fluorescence Parameters

The chlorophyll fluorescence was measured with a portable photosynthetic measurement system Li-6800. Plants were fully dark-adapted for 30 min to ensure that the PSII reaction center of the plant leaves was completely opened before measurement. The fluorescence parameters of original fluorescence (Fo), maximum fluorescence (Fm), photochemical quenching coefficient (qP) and electron transfer rate (ETR) of leaves were measured and record, and the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSⅡ (Fv/Fm) was calculated as follows:
F v / F m   = ( F m F o ) / F m

4.3.4. Calculation of the Water Content of Plant Leaves

The water content of the leaves (LWC, %) was measured using the international drying constant weight method. The fresh leaves were numbered and weighed on an analytical balance and recorded as Wf, and then the leaves were put into wide-mouth bottles and the bottles were put into an oven at 80 °C for 10–12 h to dry to constant weight, which was weighed and recorded as Wd. The LWC was calculated as follows:
LWC = W f W d W f × 100

4.3.5. The Theory and Modeling of Electrophysiological Parameters

As electrophysiological parameters are easily influenced by environmental stimuli, the isolated leaves were firstly immersed in water for 30 min to ensure that the leaf cells were in a standard and uniform state. Afterwards, the surface of each leaf was wiped off with a paper towel and sandwiched between parallel electrode plates as shown in Figure 12 [31] and then connected to an LCR tester (model 6300, GWinstek Electronics Industrial Co., Ltd., Taiwan, China). Because the electrical characteristics of plant leaves are low capacitance and high impedance, the measurement frequency and voltage were set to 3 KHz and 1.5 V and employed parallel mode. The physiological impedance (Z), physiological capacitance (C) and physiological resistance (R) were measured by sequentially adding weights of equal mass (M = 100 g) to the leaves with different gradients of 1.17 N, 2.17 N, 3.17 N, 5.17 N and 7.17 N of clamping force (F, N). Three different parts of each leaf were measured, the average value was taken, and the measurements were repeated three times at each level for each treatment. Previous studies by our group showed that the plant leaves can withstand forces ranging from 15.89 to 30.01 N. Therefore, the effect of the maximum clamping force of 7.17 N on the measurement results in this experiment is negligible [47].
The calculated equation for intracellular water-holding capacity (IWHC), water transport rate (IWTR) and water-use efficiency (IWUE) are as follows [45]:
IWHC = IC 3 IWTR = IWHC IC × IZ IWUE = d IWHC

4.4. Data Statistics and Analysis

Valid data were screened and obtained by Microsoft Excel 2019. The electrophysiological parameter curves were fitted using SigmaPlot 14.0 software. Analysis of variance was performed using DPS software, multiple comparisons were performed using the Tukey method, and the level of significant differences was assessed using the lowest significant difference post hoc test at the 5% level of significance (p ≤ 0.05). Data are shown as mean ± standard error determined by one-sample t-test. Graphs were plotted using Origin 2019.

5. Conclusions

This study revealed the differential water metabolic responses of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia to heterogeneous RO habitats based on analysis of the water content of plant leaves and leaf electrical and photosynthetic properties. It was found that the water metabolism of P. quinquefolia was significantly inhibited under karst bicarbonate enrichment, and this inhibition would be further amplified by the occurrence of karstic drought, making it difficult for it to adapt to such habitats. Compared with the P. quinquefolia, the water metabolism mechanism of L. japonica was the basis for its ability to be adapted to karst habitats. L. japonica could efficiently use its internal enriched bicarbonate, and this resulted in a better water status of L. japonica growing in the RO habitats with a high concentration of bicarbonate, its stronger intracellular water-holding capacity effectively regulating the leaf intra- and intercellular water metabolic environment, which was probably the reason for the high photosynthetic capacity of the plant in the dry habitat of the rock outcrops, and the stable intracellular water-use efficiency also made it more adapted to the karst drought environment. The results in this research deepen the understanding of the response mechanisms of plant water metabolism to heterogeneous karst habitats to a certain extent and can provide a useful reference for the screening of pioneer species in karst adversity restoration.

Author Contributions

Project construction, Y.W.; research design, Y.W. and X.Z.; plant material cultivation and acquisition of original data, X.Z., F.Z. and H.L.; data analysis, X.Z., Y.W. and D.X.; writing, X.Z., Y.W. and D.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Support Plan Projects of Science and Technology of Guizhou Province (number (2021) YB453).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, K.L.; Zhang, C.H.; Chen, H.S.; Yue, Y.M.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, M.Y.; Qi, X.K.; Fu, Z.Y. Karst landscapes of China: Patterns, ecosystem processes and services. Landsc. Ecol. 2019, 34, 2743–2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Zhao, Z.M.; Shen, Y.X.; Jiang, R.H.; Wang, Q.H. Rock outcrops change infiltrability and water flow behavior in a karst soil. Vadose Zone J. 2020, 19, e20002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Shen, Y.X.; Yu, Y.; Lucas-Borja, M.E.; Chen, F.J.; Chen, Q.Q.; Tang, Y.Y. Change of soil K, N and P following forest restoration in rock outcrop rich karst area. Catena 2020, 186, 104395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, F.; Chen, H.S.; Lian, J.J.; Fu, Z.Y.; Nie, Y.P. Hydrological response of karst stream to precipitation variation recognized through the quantitative separation of runoff components. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 748, 142483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nico, G.; Zhao, C.; Augusto, S.A.; Michel, B.; Stefan, B.; David, D.; Jens, H.; Jiang, G.H.; Nils, M.; Stevanovic, Z.; et al. Global distribution of carbonate rocks and karst water resources. Hydrogeol. J. 2020, 28, 1661–1677. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang, C. Carbonate rock dissolution rates in different landuses and their carbon sink effect. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2011, 56, 3759–3765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. McCray, J.M.; Matocha, J.E. Effects of soil water levels on solution bicarbonate, chlorosis and growth of sorghum. J. Plant Nutr. 1992, 15, 1877–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shen, Y.X.; Wang, D.J.; Chen, Q.Q.; Tang, Y.Y.; Chen, F.J. Large heterogeneity of water and nutrient supply derived from runoff of nearby rock outcrops in karst ecosystems in SW China. Catena 2019, 172, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, J.K.; He, L.; Li, T. Response of seedling growth and physiology of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench to saline-alkali stress. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hitti, Y.; MacPherson, S.; Lefsrud, M. Separate Effects of sodium on germination in saline–sodic and alkaline forms at different concentrations. Plants 2023, 12, 1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hu, H.; Liu, H.; Du, G.H.; Yang, F.; Deng, G.; Yang, Y.; Liu, F.H. Fiber and seed type of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) responded differently to salt-alkali stress in seedling growth and physiological indices. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 129, 624–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, X.; Cheng, F.; Wang, K. Physiological responses of Leymus chinensis to long-term salt, alkali and mixed salt-alkali stresses. J. Plant Nutr. 2015, 38, 526–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sagervanshi, A.; Geilfus, G.M.; Kaiser, H.; Mühling, K.H. Alkali salt stress causes fast leaf apoplastic alkalinization together with shifts in ion and metabolite composition and transcription of key genes during the early adaptive response of Vicia faba L. Plant Sci. 2022, 319, 111253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Guo, J.X.; Lu, X.Y.; Tao, Y.F.; Guo, H.J.; Min, W. Comparative ionomics and metabolic responses and adaptive strategies of cotton to salt and alkali stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 871387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jiao, X.Y.; Li, Y.X.; Zhang, X.Z.; Liu, C.L.; Liang, W.; Li, C.; Ma, F.W.; Li, C.Y. Exogenous dopamine application promotes alkali tolerance of apple seedlings. Plants 2019, 8, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Shevela, D.; Do, H.N.; Fantuzzi, A.; Rutherford, A.W.; Messinger, J. Bicarbonate-mediated CO2 formation on both sides of Photosystem II. Biochemistry 2020, 59, 2442–2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Koroidov, S.; Shevela, D.; Shutova, T.; Samuelsson, G.; Messinger, J. Mobile hydrogen carbonate acts as proton acceptor in photosynthetic water oxidation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 6299–6304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lü, X.F.; He, Q.F.; Wang, Z.J.; Cao, M.; Zhao, J.Y.; Jiang, J.J.; Zhao, R.Y.; Zhang, H. Calcium carbonate precipitation mediated by bacterial carbonic anhydrase in a karst cave: Crystal morphology and stable isotopic fractionation. Chem. Geol. 2019, 530, 119331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, Y.Y. Combined effect of bicarbonate and water in photosynthetic oxygen evolution and carbon neutrality. Acta Geochim. 2023, 42, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, R.; Wu, Y.Y.; Xing, D.K.; Hang, H.T.; Xie, X.L.; Yang, X.Q.; Zhang, K.Y.; Rao, S. Biomass production of three biofuel energy plants’ use of a new carbon resource by carbonic anhydrase in simulated karst soils: Mechanism and capacity. Energies 2017, 10, 1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hsiao, T.C. Plant responses to water stress. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1973, 24, 519–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tang, Y.Q.; Sun, K.; Zhang, X.H.; Zhou, J.; Yang, Q.; Liu, Q. Microstructure changes of red clay during its loss and leakage in the karst rocky desertification area. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, C.C.; Liu, Y.G.; Guo, K.; Zheng, Y.R.; Li, G.Q.; Yu, L.F.; Yang, R. Influence of drought intensity on the response of six woody karst species subjected to successive cycles of drought and rewatering. Physiol. Plant. 2010, 139, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, Y.J.; Bi, M.H.; Nie, Z.F.; Jiang, H.; Liu, X.D.; Fang, X.W.; Brodribb, T.J. Evolution of stomatal closure to optimize water-use efficiency in response to dehydration in ferns and seed plants. New Phytol. 2021, 230, 2001–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Villalobos-González, L.; Alarcón, N.; Bastías, R.; Pérez, C.; Sanz, R.; Peña-Neira, Á.; Pastenes, C. Photoprotection is achieved by photorespiration and modification of the leaf incident light, and their extent is modulated by the stomatal sensitivity to water deficit in grapevines. Plants 2022, 11, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Volkov, A.G. Plant Electrophysiology: Signaling and Responses; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, M.M.; Wu, Y.Y.; Xing, D.K.; Zhao, K.; Yu, R. Rapid measurement of drought resistance in plants based on electrophysiological properties. Trans. ASABE 2015, 58, 1441–1446. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sinyukhin, A.M.; Britikov, E.A. Action potentials in the reproductive system of plants. Nature 1967, 215, 1278–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jamaludin, D.; Abd Aziz, S.; Ahmad, D.; Jaafar, H.Z. Impedance analysis of Labisia pumila plant water status. Inf. Process. Agric. 2015, 2, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yu, R.; Wu, Y.Y.; Xing, D.K. Can electrophysiological parameters substitute for growth, and photosynthetic parameters to characterize the response of mulberry and paper mulberry to drought? Plants 2021, 10, 1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, C.; Wu, Y.Y.; Su, Y.; Li, H.T.; Fang, L.; Xing, D.K. Plant’s electrophysiological information manifests the composition and nutrient transport characteristics of membrane proteins. Plant Signal. Behav. 2021, 16, 1918867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, C.; Wu, Y.Y.; Su, Y.; Xing, D.K.; Dai, Y.; Wu, Y.S.; Fang, L. A plant’s electrical parameters indicate its physiological state: A study of intracellular water metabolism. Plants 2020, 9, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yudina, L.; Gromova, E.; Grinberg, M.; Popova, A.; Sukhova, E.; Sukhov, V. Influence of burning-induced electrical signals on photosynthesis in pea can be modified by soil water shortage. Plants 2022, 11, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tran, D.; Dutoit, F.; Najdenovska, E.; Wallbridge, N.; Plummer, C.; Mazza, M.; Raileanu, L.E.; Camps, C. Electrophysiological assessment of plant status outside a Faraday cage using supervised machine learning. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Qin, X.J.; Xing, D.K.; Wu, Y.Y.; Wang, W.X.; Li, M.Q.; Solangi, K. Diurnal variation in transport and use of intracellular leaf water and related photosynthesis in three karst plants. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, D.D.; Cheng, G.; Li, H.Y.; Zhou, S.H.; Yao, N.; Zhang, J.; Xie, L.J. The cultivation techniques and quality characteristics of a new germplasm of Vitis adenoclada Hand.-Mazz grape. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. He, W.J.; Yan, K.; Zhang, Y.; Bian, L.X.; Mei, H.M.; Han, G.X. Contrasting photosynthesis, photoinhibition and oxidative damage in honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica Thunb.) under iso-osmotic salt and drought stresses. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 182, 104313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alatzas, A.; Theocharis, S.; Miliordos, D.E.; Leontaridou, K.; Kanellis, A.K.; Kotseridis, Y.; Hatzopoulos, P.; Koundouras, S. The effect of water deficit on two Greek Vitis vinifera L. cultivars: Physiology, grape composition and gene expression during berry development. Plants 2021, 10, 1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Liu, Q.; Su, L.J.; Xiao, H.; Xu, W.N.; Xia, Z.Y. Selection and configuration of plants in high-and steep-cutting rock slope greening in a subtropical region: Case study of the first-phase urban expressway of Xiazhou Avenue in Yichang. J. Highw. Transp. Res. Dev. 2019, 13, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Javed, Q.; Azeem, A.; Sun, J.; Ullah, I.; Jabran, K.; Anandkumar, A.; Prabakaran, K.; Buttar, N.A.; Du, D. Impacts of salt stress on the physiology of plants and opportunity to rewater the stressed plants with diluted water: A Review. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2019, 17, 12583–12604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Varghese, N.; Alyammahi, O.; Nasreddine, S.; Alhassani, A.; Gururani, M.A. Melatonin positively influences the photosynthetic machinery and antioxidant system of Avena sativa during salinity stress. Plants 2019, 8, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Guidi, L.; Lo Piccolo, E.; Landi, M. Chlorophyll fluorescence, photoinhibition and abiotic stress: Does it make any difference the fact to be a C3 or C4 species? Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yaghoubi Khanghahi, M.; Leoni, B.; Crecchio, C. Photosynthetic responses of durum wheat to chemical/microbiological fertilization management under salt and drought stresses. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2021, 43, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xing, D.K.; Wu, Y.Y. Photosynthetic response of three climber plant species to osmotic stress induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000. Acta Physiol. Plant 2012, 34, 1659–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Flexas, J.; Medrano, H. Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited. Ann. Bot. 2002, 89, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Fang, S.; Zhao, P.; Tan, Z.; Peng, Y.; Xu, L.; Jin, Y.; Wei, F.; Guo, L.; Yao, X. Combining Physio-Biochemical Characterization and Transcriptome Analysis Reveal the Responses to Varying Degrees of Drought Stress in Brassica napus L. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xing, D.K.; Chen, L.; Wu, Y.Y.; Zwiazek, J.J. Leaf physiological impedance and elasticity modulus in Orychophragmus violaceus seedlings subjected to repeated osmotic stress. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 276, 109763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Leaf cell equivalent circuit diagram. Note: Z is impedance, Cm is film capacitance, Rm is film resistance, Xcm is film capacitance, XLm is film inductance, Ro is external film resistance, Ri is internal film resistance.
Figure 1. Leaf cell equivalent circuit diagram. Note: Z is impedance, Cm is film capacitance, Rm is film resistance, Xcm is film capacitance, XLm is film inductance, Ro is external film resistance, Ri is internal film resistance.
Plants 12 02279 g001
Figure 2. Concentrations of HCO3 in soils of simulated habitats under non-drought, mild and moderate drought conditions. Note: data in the figure are mean ± standard deviation, n = 3. The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 5 level p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Concentrations of HCO3 in soils of simulated habitats under non-drought, mild and moderate drought conditions. Note: data in the figure are mean ± standard deviation, n = 3. The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 5 level p < 0.05.
Plants 12 02279 g002
Figure 3. Leaf moisture content (LWC) of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia during non-drought, mild drought and moderate drought periods in different simulated habitats. The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 5 level p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Leaf moisture content (LWC) of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia during non-drought, mild drought and moderate drought periods in different simulated habitats. The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 5 level p < 0.05.
Plants 12 02279 g003
Figure 4. Net photosynthetic rate (PN) of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia during non-drought, mild drought and moderate drought periods in different simulated habitats. Note: Data in the figure are mean ± standard deviation, n = 3, and different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05), which is the same below.
Figure 4. Net photosynthetic rate (PN) of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia during non-drought, mild drought and moderate drought periods in different simulated habitats. Note: Data in the figure are mean ± standard deviation, n = 3, and different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05), which is the same below.
Plants 12 02279 g004
Figure 5. Stomatal conductance (gs) of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia during non-drought, mild drought and moderate drought periods in different simulated habitats. The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 5 level p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Stomatal conductance (gs) of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia during non-drought, mild drought and moderate drought periods in different simulated habitats. The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 5 level p < 0.05.
Plants 12 02279 g005
Figure 6. Instantaneous water-use efficiency (WUEi) of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia during non-drought, mild drought and moderate drought periods in different simulated habitats. The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 5 level p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Instantaneous water-use efficiency (WUEi) of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia during non-drought, mild drought and moderate drought periods in different simulated habitats. The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 5 level p < 0.05.
Plants 12 02279 g006
Figure 7. Fv/Fm of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia during non-drought, mild drought and moderate drought periods in different simulated habitats. The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 5 level p < 0.05.
Figure 7. Fv/Fm of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia during non-drought, mild drought and moderate drought periods in different simulated habitats. The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 5 level p < 0.05.
Plants 12 02279 g007
Figure 8. Photochemical fluorescence (qP) of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia in different simulated habitats during non-drought, mild drought and moderate drought periods. The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 5 level p < 0.05.
Figure 8. Photochemical fluorescence (qP) of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia in different simulated habitats during non-drought, mild drought and moderate drought periods. The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 5 level p < 0.05.
Plants 12 02279 g008
Figure 9. Photosynthetic electron transfer rate (ETR) of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia during non-drought, mild drought and moderate drought periods in different simulated habitats. The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 5 level p < 0.05.
Figure 9. Photosynthetic electron transfer rate (ETR) of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia during non-drought, mild drought and moderate drought periods in different simulated habitats. The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 5 level p < 0.05.
Plants 12 02279 g009
Figure 10. Dynamic traits of leaf water metabolism of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia in three simulated habitats during different drought periods.
Figure 10. Dynamic traits of leaf water metabolism of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia in three simulated habitats during different drought periods.
Plants 12 02279 g010
Figure 11. Schematic diagram of simulated RO habitats: (a) L-RO habitats; (b) S-RO habitats.
Figure 11. Schematic diagram of simulated RO habitats: (a) L-RO habitats; (b) S-RO habitats.
Plants 12 02279 g011
Figure 12. Schematic diagram of parallel plate electrode and experimental test setup [31]: (1) bracket; (2) foam plate; (3) electrode plate; (4) electric wire; (5) iron block; (6) plastic rod; (7) fixing clip.
Figure 12. Schematic diagram of parallel plate electrode and experimental test setup [31]: (1) bracket; (2) foam plate; (3) electrode plate; (4) electric wire; (5) iron block; (6) plastic rod; (7) fixing clip.
Plants 12 02279 g012
Table 1. Intracellular water-holding capacity (IWHC) of leaves of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia under different drought periods in three simulated habitats.
Table 1. Intracellular water-holding capacity (IWHC) of leaves of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia under different drought periods in three simulated habitats.
Plant SpeciesDrought PeriodSimulated Habitat
L-ROS-RON-RO
L. japonicaNon-drought388.73 ± 21.33 b207.51 ± 18.82 cdef206.70 ± 13.32 cdef
Mild256.81 ± 31.15 cd178.06 ± 25.20 defg181.18 ± 1.62 defg
Moderate204.25 ± 18.82 cdef122.48 ± 16.91 efg92.20 ± 6.32 g
P. quinquefoliaNon-drought296.87 ± 9.05 de502.43 ± 18.42 a599.11 ± 43.01 a
Mild176.80 ± 4.08 defg243.16 ± 23.80 cd376.03 ± 22.84 b
Moderate113.90 ± 5.48 fg153.80 ± 19.74 defg221.39 ± 15.49 cde
Note: values indicate the mean ± SD, n = 3, and different lowercase letters differ significantly (p < 0.05) in the content between habitats during different drought periods.
Table 2. Intracellular water transfer rate (IWTR) of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia leaves under different drought periods in three simulated habitats.
Table 2. Intracellular water transfer rate (IWTR) of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia leaves under different drought periods in three simulated habitats.
Plant SpeciesDrought PeriodSimulated Habitat
L-ROS-RON-RO
L. japonicaNon-drought7.92 ± 0.85 bc4.07 ± 0.37 efgh4.04 ± 0.26 efgh
Mild4.99 ± 0.55 ef3.50 ± 0.48 efghi3.48 ± 0.04 efghi
Moderate4.02 ± 0.21 efgh2.50 ± 0.40 ghi1.77 ± 0.12 i
P. quinquefoliaNon-drought5.60 ± 0.25 de9.64 ± 0.80 ab11.70 ± 0.78 a
Mild3.33 ± 0.06 fghi4.64 ± 0.44 efg7.21 ± 0.43 cd
Moderate2.16 ± 0.10 hi2.92 ± 0.37 fghi4.23 ± 0.29 efgh
Note: values indicate the mean ± SD, and different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 5 level p < 0.05.
Table 3. Intracellular water-use efficiency (IWUE) of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia under different drought periods in three simulated habitats.
Table 3. Intracellular water-use efficiency (IWUE) of L. japonica and P. quinquefolia under different drought periods in three simulated habitats.
Plant SpeciesDrought PeriodSimulated Habitat
L-ROS-RON-RO
L. japonicaNon-drought0.12 ± 0.00 bcd0.12 ± 0.01 bcde0.11 ± 0.01 cde
Mild0.13 ± 0.01 bcd0.12 ± 0.00 bcde0.16 ± 0.00 abc
Moderate0.15 ± 0.01 abc0.14 ± 0.01 abc0.17 ± 0.01 ab
P. quinquefoliaNon-drought0.12 ± 0.01 bcde0.08 ± 0.01 de0.06 ± 0.00 e
Mild0.12 ± 0.01 bcde0.12 ± 0.01 bcde0.11 ± 0.01 cde
Moderate0.19 ± 0.03 a0.15 ± 0.02 abc0.15 ± 0.02 abc
Note: values indicate the mean ± SD, and different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at 5 level p < 0.05.
Table 4. Soil moisture in the experimental simulated habitats under different drought days.
Table 4. Soil moisture in the experimental simulated habitats under different drought days.
Plant SpeciesSimulated HabitatSoil Moisture (%)
Day 1Day 2Day 3Day 4Day 5Day 6Day 7Day 8Day 9Day 10
L japonicaL-RO33.53 ± 0.2727.57 ± 0.3223.93 ± 0.0320.03 ± 0.1215.87 ± 0.5412.73 ± 0.3010.67 ± 0.419.73 ± 0.187.50 ± 0.216.10 ± 0.21
S-RO35.73 ± 0.1931.33 ± 0.2426.20 ± 0.1221.53 ± 0.1917.03 ± 0.1514.50 ± 0.3211.30 ± 0.369.33 ± 0.217.87 ± 0.246.90 ± 0.06
N-RO35.53 ± 0.1231.70 ± 0.1526.77 ± 0.1824.83 ± 0.6318.53 ± 0.3214.23 ± 0.3710.63 ± 0.329.03 ± 0.187.97 ± 0.097.00 ± 0.12
P. quinquefoliaL-RO32.80 ± 0.4027.07 ± 0.1220.87 ± 0.1314.57 ± 0.4313.53 ± 0.3312.00 ± 0.369.80 ± 0.438.43 ± 0.277.87 ± 0.216.03 ± 0.15
S-RO34.70 ± 0.2131.63 ± 0.2626.93 ± 0.0718.77 ± 0.1214.97 ± 0.1813.73 ± 0.6411.87 ± 0.278.37 ± 0.277.60 ± 0.236.57 ± 0.22
N-RO34.03 ± 0.1230.77 ± 0.1926.1 ± 0.1219.70 ± 0.2116.03 ± 0.3813.30 ± 0.4011.37 ± 0.229.50 ± 0.358.10 ± 0.426.70 ± 0.35
Note: data in the table are mean ± standard deviation, water content during non-drought, mild drought and moderate drought periods are marked in blue, orange and red, respectively.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, X.; Wu, Y.; Xing, D.; Li, H.; Zhang, F. Water Metabolism of Lonicera japonica and Parthenocissus quinquefolia in Response to Heterogeneous Simulated Rock Outcrop Habitats. Plants 2023, 12, 2279. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12122279

AMA Style

Zhao X, Wu Y, Xing D, Li H, Zhang F. Water Metabolism of Lonicera japonica and Parthenocissus quinquefolia in Response to Heterogeneous Simulated Rock Outcrop Habitats. Plants. 2023; 12(12):2279. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12122279

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Xiaopan, Yanyou Wu, Deke Xing, Haitao Li, and Furong Zhang. 2023. "Water Metabolism of Lonicera japonica and Parthenocissus quinquefolia in Response to Heterogeneous Simulated Rock Outcrop Habitats" Plants 12, no. 12: 2279. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12122279

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop