Next Article in Journal
Transcriptomic Reprogramming, Alternative Splicing and RNA Methylation in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Plants in Response to Potato Virus Y Infection
Next Article in Special Issue
Helichrysum Genus and Compound Activities in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus
Previous Article in Journal
In Vivo Imaging and Quantification of Carbon Tracer Dynamics in Nodulated Root Systems of Pea Plants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phytochemical Screening of Rosmarinus officinalis L. as a Potential Anticholinesterase and Antioxidant–Medicinal Plant for Cognitive Decline Disorders
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ethnobotanical Survey of Local Flora Used for Medicinal Purposes among Indigenous People in Five Areas in Lagos State, Nigeria

by
Ibraheem Oduola Lawal
1,*,
Basirat Olabisi Rafiu
1,
Joy Enitan Ale
1,
Onuyi Emmanuel Majebi
2 and
Adeyemi Oladapo Aremu
3,*
1
Biomedicinal Research Centre, Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria, P.M.B. 5054, Jericho Hill, Ibadan 200272, Oyo, Nigeria
2
Department of General Studies, Federal Cooperative College, P.M.B. 5033, Eleyele, Ibadan 200284, Oyo, Nigeria
3
Indigenous Knowledge Systems Centre, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Private Bag X2046, Mmabatho 2790, North West, South Africa
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(5), 633; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11050633
Submission received: 12 January 2022 / Revised: 19 February 2022 / Accepted: 21 February 2022 / Published: 25 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Updates on African Traditional Medicinal Plants Research)

Abstract

:
Traditional medicine is typically the most accessible primary healthcare for a large proportion of the people in Nigeria. However, its potential remains under-explored, especially with regards to their documentation. This research investigated and documented the use of medicinal plants in the management of various health conditions/diseases among local populations in Lagos State. This study was conducted in five (5) locations of Lagos State i.e., Alimosho, Badagry, Eti-Osa, and Epe (including Ijebu and Imota). Ethnobotanical information from 100 participants was obtained using semi-structured questionnaires. Frequency of citation (FC), relative frequency of citation (RFC), fidelity level (FL), and informant consensus factor (ICF) were used to assess the importance of plants utilised for various health conditions/diseases. We identified 183 plants from 61 plant families with the highest number (24) of plants belonging to Fabaceae. Based on the high FC, the top-five popular plants used for managing health conditions/diseases in the study areas were Mangifera indica (95%), Waltheria indica (93%), Zingiber officinale (87%), Alchornea cordifolia (83%) and Ipomoea involucrata (81%). Furthermore, Rauvolfia vomitoria, Urena lobata and Waltheria indica were recognised as the most adaptable plants, as they were used to treat five different health conditions/diseases. The most commonly used life-forms were herbs (34%) and woody species (shrubs; 30%, and trees; 22%). The most regularly used plant parts were leaves. The calculated RFC values for all medicinal plant species ranged from 0.01 to 0.95, while FL values ranged from 7.14 to 100%. We found 14 health conditions/diseases, with ICF values ranging from 0.88 to 0.95. Insomnia, insanity, convulsion, nervousness, and muscle relaxants had the lowest (ICF = 0.88) agreement, while malaria/fevers, stomach, and respiratory-related diseases had the most (ICF = 0.95) agreement. The documented therapeutic uses of the plants provide basic data for further research aimed at pharmacological and conservation studies of the most important flora existing in the study areas.

1. Introduction

Globally, intense efforts are being geared towards the documentation of plant resources, with the goal of ensuring their sustainable utilisation and conservation to meet the needs of humans [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Particularly, the need to explore, document and preserve the indigenous knowledge associated with medicinal plants has been identified as one of the seven priorities for strategic action (Shenzhen’s proclamation of 2017) among plant scientists [7]. Furthermore, indigenous knowledge embedded in traditional medicine, including the use of medicinal plants, often offers culturally familiar techniques that address both the physical and spiritual state of an individual [8,9]. The inherent benefits such as relative affordability and accessibility of traditional medicine to a significant portion of the global population, especially in developing countries, further highlight the renewed interest from different stakeholders [4,5,10]. An increasing number of ethnobotanical studies are being done among diverse tribes and ethnic groups around the world, based on the understanding and acknowledgement of the relevance of plants for therapeutic effects and associated cultural value [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21].
In Nigeria, the diverse floristic compositions of plant forms, including trees, shrubs, herbs, and other non-timber forest resources, has contributed greatly to the widespread use of Nigerian plants as medicine [1,13,16,22,23,24]. Furthermore, the use of medicinal plants is well-known among the indigenous peoples of Southwestern Nigeria. Particularly in Lagos State, ethnobotanical studies have been approached from different perspectives including the focus on plant species used for medicinal purposes by indigenous residents known as the Eegun people [25] as well as generating plant inventory used against various health conditions such as diabetics, hypertension, erectile dysfunction and fever [26,27].
Despite the increasing interest and commitment toward the documentation of plant resources with therapeutic value, some research gaps still exist in Nigeria including Lagos State [1,22]. Substantial documentation remains important to mitigate the potential loss of valuable indigenous knowledge associated with plant resources among local communities. In addition, the socio-cultural uniqueness and inherent dynamics associated with understanding local and customary medicinal use among local communities cannot be underestimated [9,23,28]. The potential of medicinal plants is still far from being extensively explored locally and nationally as well as internationally. Thus, the aim of this study was to generate an inventory of plants with medicinal value among selected local communities in Lagos State.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Inventory of Plant Species Used to Treat a Variety of Health Conditions/Diseases

The current study identified 183 medicinal plants from 61 plant families used in treating a variety of human health problems and diseases (Supplementary Table S1; Figure 1). The distribution of the plants across the selected study sites revealed an increasing number of medicinal plants in the order of Eti-Osa (78), Imota (89), Ijebu (91), Badagry (93) and Alimosho (100) (Supplementary Table S2). In addition, these five aforementioned locations had 24 medicinal plants in common. In comparison to similar ethnobotanical studies conducted in Southwestern Nigeria [13,16,23,25,29], the current study areas had a higher number of plants used for medicinal purposes. The generated inventory contributes to a global effort to document local flora and their accompanying indigenous knowledge for the benefit of the current and future generations [1,7,22]. Furthermore, the current study adds to the existing database of valuable medicinal plants in Southwestern Nigeria [1].
Multiple vernacular/local names were reported for a significant number of the identified plants in the current study, indicating their relevance among the participants. Plants with more than three local names included Malvastrum coromandelianum, Microdesmis puberula, Mariscus alternifolius, Senna tora and Urena lobata. Mukaila et al. [16] highlighted the use of more than one local name for medicinal plants in a recent ethnobotanical survey in Southwestern Nigeria, and evidence of newly recorded vernacular names was reported. Plant naming is frequent among ethnic groups, and the same plant may be given multiple names in different languages and localities [1,17,30,31,32]. Local names for plants are not chosen at random, they typically reflect their socio-cultural and medicinal significance [33], and can serve as a point of reference for community members.

2.2. Plant Families Used for Medicinal Purpose

Fabaceae was the most dominant (approximately 13%) plant family utilised as medicine for various health conditions/diseases in the study area (Figure 1). Other well-represented plant families were Asteraceae (8%), Malvaceae (7.7%), Euphorbiaceae (7%) and Lamiaceae (5%). On the other hand, about 70% of the 61 plant families documented had 1–2 representative members used for medicinal purposes (Supplementary Table S1). The dominance of Fabaceae as the most abundant family has been widely observed in several ethnobotanical studies in Nigeria [13,24,29,34] and other African countries such as Ethiopia [19], Ghana [31] and South Africa [12]. Existing data support the popularity of Fabaceae for their therapeutic efficacy, according to an exhaustive assessment of plant groups utilised in African traditional medicine [35]. In addition, families such as Apocynaceae, Burseraceae and Rubiaceae are considered as some of the most commonly traded species of African medicinal plants, an indication of their commercial value [35]. The popularity and high preference of plants from Fabaceae in African traditional medicine can be attributed to their availability and abundance, as well as their adaptability to diverse environments.

2.3. Life-Forms and Utilised Parts of the Documented Medicinal Plants

The inventory of 183 medicinal plants was represented by diverse life-forms which were mainly dominated (about 51%) by woody species consisting of trees and shrubs (Figure 2). Woody plants are essential to the African landscape in terms of biodiversity [36,37]. In particular, a significant portion of woody plants is well represented in traditional African medicine. There is increasing evidence that they are used for medicinal purposes in local communities [38,39,40,41,42,43]. When compared with herbaceous species, the predominance of woody species in traditional medicine is related to their relatively longer availability and persistence of the different botanical components used [37,44].
In the study area, a significant portion (34.4%) of the medicinal plants were herbs (Figure 2). A similar high dependence on herbaceous plants was evident in some previous studies [16,19]. Globally, herbaceous life forms are often abundant and widely distributed thereby contributing to their frequent utilisation as herbal medicine among different communities. In some instances, the ease of harvesting and collecting herbs explains their dominance in traditional medicine.
Overall, leaves were the most frequently used plant part identified in this study (Figure 3). The dominance of leaves relative to the stem and roots were clearly evident in the majority of the five selected sites. However, preference of the stem over the leaves was slightly higher if not similar in Ijebu and Eti-Osa. From previous studies, the popularity of the leaves over other plant parts remains a common trend among local communities with a rich history of traditional medicine [16,17,31]. The high number of metabolic activities (including photosynthesis) that occurs in the leaves may have resulted in the build-up of valuable compounds with medicinal properties [31]. When compared to other plant parts, leaves are frequently readily available, making them easier to access and harvest. From the standpoint of conservation and sustainability, leaves are chosen over plant elements such as bark and roots [45]. In general, harvesting leaves exerts less strain on the regeneration of a plant than the use of roots and bark. The prominence of leaves in traditional medicine may be attributed to these aforementioned characteristics.

2.4. Ethnobotanical Indices of Plant Species Used to Treat a Variety of Health Conditions/Diseases

Ethnobotanical indices are frequently used to infer the value of plants found in a specific study area [46,47]. These indices are widely used to rank medicinal plants based on their value, cultural significance, and perceived efficacy, and they are also useful tools for setting conservation priorities and prospecting for potentially beneficial therapeutic chemicals [28,46]. However, the interpretation and utility of these indices are frequently disputed, particularly when sample sizes vary [16,21,28,46]. As a result, the findings must be weighed against the purpose and scope of the research. The relative value of the described medicinal plants was analysed in the current study using various ethnobotanical indices (Table 1). Some of these ethnobotanical indices (for example, FC and RFC) are generated from one another, resulting in a similar pattern [46].
Cough, malaria, impotence, and haemorrhage were the most commonly treated conditions in the study area. We used ICF to determine the importance of selected plants for medicinal purposes (Table 2). Several plants have been used to treat a variety of health problems/diseases. Based on their indications for the treatment of five health conditions/diseases, Rauvolfia vomitoria, Urena lobata and Waltheria indica have been identified as the most versatile plants.

2.4.1. Frequency of Citation (FC, %) and Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC) for the Documented Plants

We recorded FC and RFC values that ranged from 1–95 and 0.01–0.95, respectively. An estimated 19.13% of the plants had a value of at least 50% (0.5). Examples of these plants included Mangifera indica, Waltheria indica, Zingiber officinale, Alchornea cordifolia, Ipomoea involucrata, Ageratum conyzoides, Vernonia amygdalina, Ocimum gratissimum and Albizia zygia. Given the significant number of mentions by the participants, these plants are well-known and play an important role in the maintenance of the health and well-being among community members. Plant species with higher FC and RFC values are regarded as more popular and well known among local inhabitants [20]. On the other hand, Cucumeropsis mannii, Desmodium velutinum, and Euphorbia heterophylla were the three least-mentioned plants by the participants.

2.4.2. Fidelity Level (%) for the Documented Plants

As a reasonable proxy, FL may be relevant for identifying the preferred plant(s) for treating a certain ailment [48]. We examined each illness category with the highest degree of agreementto highlight the most essential plants utilised in each category. As shown in Table 1, the highest (100%) FL was recorded for Artocarpus communis (malaria), Anthocleista djalonensis (hypertension), Anthocleista vogelii (divinity), Anacardium occidentale (malaria), Amaranthus viridis (longevity), Hippocratea pallens (malaria), Hoslundia opposita (ulcer), Sesamum indicum (potency), Sesamum radiatum (potency), Sida cordifolia (cough), Smilax kraussiana (erection), Sorghum bicolor (malaria), Sterculia tragacantha (diabetes), Syzygium guineense (diabetes), Trichilia monadelpha (insomnia) and Urena lobata var. glauca (potency). On the other hand, the lowest level of FL was indicated for plants such as Alchornea cordifolia (malaria, 7.23%), Lantana camara (nervousness, 7.14%), Borreria verticillata (contraceptive, 11.63%) and Emilia coccinea (contraceptive, 8.11%).

2.4.3. Informant Consensus Factor (ICF) in the Study Area

As a measure of the agreement among participants that a plant or group of plants species can cure a particular disease category, the importance of ICF cannot be overemphasised [49]. This may be particularly useful in selecting plants for pharmacological and phytochemical studies [18,50]. Even though it is often difficult to classify diseases from ethnographic surveys [9], it is nevertheless essential to understand local attitudes about disease and the use of medicinal plants. In traditional medicine, the use of plants has been well-described for health conditions such as metabolic-related diseases [51,52], malaria [53], respiratory conditions [54], pains and inflammations [55,56]. In this study, the health conditions were grouped into 14 categories and ICF values ranged from 0.88–0.95 (Table 2). In the study area, respiratory-related ailments, stomach-related ailments, malaria and other fevers, had the highest agreement among the participants with an ICF of 0.95. This was followed by infectious diseases, cardiovascular-related diseases, foot pain, neck pain, rheumatism, arthritis (ICF = 0.94). The least agreement among the participants was observed in insomnia, insanity, convulsion, nervousness, muscle relaxant category with an ICF value of 0.88.
The higher ICF scores for respiratory-related diseases, stomach-related disorders, malaria, and other fever categories show that there is a high level of agreement in the research area regarding the management of these health problems. The majority of the aforementioned health issues include a variety of symptoms that traditional healers may easily identify. This is most likely responsible for the enormous number of plants and, as a result, the higher ICF. Pharmacologically effective antidotes have been recognised to have higher ICF values [49]. Therefore, the results of ICF may be useful in prioritising plants for further pharmacological studies, as the efficacy of traditional herbal medicines is highly correlated with the value of ICF [18,20,50].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Study Area

This study was conducted in five (5) purposively selected locations of Lagos State, Nigeria (Alimosho, Badagry, Eti-Osa and Epe, which included Ijebu and Imota) (Figure 4). These sites are located at longitudes 20°42′ E and 32°2′ E, and latitudes 60°22′ N and 60°2′ N, respectively. Lagos State is surrounded by Ogun State to the north and east and by the Republic of Benin to the west. It stretches for more than 180 km along the Guinean coast in the Bight of Benin of the Atlantic Ocean. Its political territory and jurisdiction include the city of Lagos and the four administrative divisions of Badagry, Epe, Ikeja and Ikorodu. It covers an area of 358,862 hectares (3577 km2), representing 0.4% of Nigeria’s total land area of 923,773 m2 [57]. The inhabitants were Yoruba, but the first settlers were Awori hunters and fishermen who migrated from Ile-Ife to the coast as well as the Egbas, who are known for their carvings, sculptures, and traditional arts [58]. The main vegetation in Lagos State is freshwater swamp forest and mangrove swamp forest, both of which are affected by the double rainfall pattern, which makes up the wetland ecosystem. In Lagos State, there are two distinct seasons: dry (November–March) and wet (April–October) [59].

3.2. Field Interview

Following project approval by the study ethics committee, participants were briefed on the purpose of the survey in order to obtain their consent and willingness to participate. We recruited ten (10) native field assistants to help with administration and explaining the questions to participants (in Yoruba, the local language). The ethnobotanical survey was carried out between July 2018 and December 2019.
Using a semi-structured questionnaire, we collected ethnobotany information from 100 randomly selected participants (herbal vendors, traditionalists, farmers, hunters) (Supplementary Table S3). The majority of participants (89%) were male and basic education (79%) was predominantly their highest level of education (Table 3). Participants were asked about their understanding of the use of plant species in the treatment of various health conditions/diseases in the region. In addition, we documented information such as plant parts, administration, preparation, and dosages used for the stated health problem/diseases.

3.3. Plant Collection and Identification

Plant specimens from the research area were collected based on their vernacular names. An expert recognised and authenticated voucher specimens for all of the plants, which were prepared according to taxonomic norms. These plants were then donated to the Forest Herbarium Ibadan (FHI), Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria. Given the importance of precise scientific names [30,32], the current taxonomic classification was validated using the website ‘The Plant List’ (http://www.theplantlist.org/, accessed on 19 February 2022).

3.4. Quantitative Ethnobotanical Indices

To establish the importance of the identified plants against various diseases among the participants, we analysed the data using the following ethnobotanical indices.

3.4.1. Frequency of Citation (FC) and Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC)

We calculated the frequency of citation (FC) and relative frequency of citation (RFC) for the plant species mentioned in the search areas using the method published by Tardío and Pardo-de-Santayana [60]. Accordingly, FC and RFC were calculated as follows:
FC = (number of times a particular species is mentioned)/(total number of times all species are mentioned) × 100.
RFC = FC/N.
where FC is the number of informants referring to species use and N denotes the number of informants who participated in the survey.
This index, in theory, ranges from 0 to 1. If the RFC index is zero, no one cites valuable plants; if the RFC index is one, all informants in the study mention useful plants.

3.4.2. Fidelity Level (FL, %)

The fidelity level (FL) is used to indicate the percentage of participants who stated the use of certain plant species for the same medicinal purpose [48]. FL was calculated as follows:
FL (%) = (Np/N) × 100
where Np: the number of participants who confirm the use of a plant species to treat certain diseases. N: the number of participants who use plants as medicine to cure several diseases.

3.4.3. Informant Consensus Factor (ICF)

For the general analysis of plant use data, the informant consensus factor (ICF) was used to verify the homogeneity of the information obtained [61]. All citations are placed in the category of disease for which the plant is claimed to be used.
ICF = (Nur − Nt)/(Nur − 1)
where Nur: number of usage citations in each category and Nt: number of species used. The ICF value will be low (close to 0) if the plant is selected at random or if the whistle-blower does not exchange information about its use and the value will be high (close to 1) if there are well-defined selection criteria in the community and/or if the information is shared among informants.

3.5. Ethical Consideration

The study was approved (CFGO711FRIN06) by the Ethics Committee of Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria, Ibadan, Nigeria. Access to the study areas was provided by the traditional authority. All the participants provided consent prior to the study.

4. Conclusions

The current research revealed 183 medicinal plants with diverse therapeutic uses in the study areas. This generated inventory contributes to local, national and international efforts aimed at documenting indigenous flora with medicinal benefits among local communities. Given their high mentions (FC, RFC), Mangifera indica, Waltheria indica and Zingiber officinale were identified as the most popular plants used for medicinal purposes among the participants. The most versatile plants, given their utilisation for managing at least five health conditions/diseases, included Rauvolfia vomitoria, Urena lobata and Waltheria indica. In relation to the ICF, we generated 14 health conditions/diseases managed with the use of medicinal plants in the study areas. As an indication of the vital role of traditional medicine for healthcare needs, the highest degree of consensus on plants was evident for malaria, stomach, and respiratory-related conditions. These aforementioned health conditions/diseases are known to be prevalent in rural areas and the use of medicinal plants for managing them highlights the importance of traditional medicine for primary healthcare needs. Taken together, the documented therapeutic uses of these plants provide baseline data for further research aimed at pharmacological and conservation studies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11050633/s1. Table S1: Inventory, taxonomical profiles and life-form for plants used for managing diverse health conditions/diseases in five (5) selected locations in Lagos State of Nigeria; Table S2: Folkloric uses of the identified plants and the number of participants from each location. LGA = local government area; Table S3: Data collection sheet for ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used for managing various health conditions/diseases in five (5) selected location in Lagos State of Nigeria

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.O.L.; methodology, J.E.A., O.E.M. and B.O.R.; formal analysis, J.E.A., O.E.M. and B.O.R.; investigation, J.E.A., O.E.M. and B.O.R.; resources, I.O.L. and A.O.A.; writing—original draft preparation, I.O.L. and B.O.R. writing—review and editing, I.O.L. and A.O.A.; supervision, I.O.L. and A.O.A.; project administration, I.O.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The project was funded by Traditional medicine Board, State Secretariat, Alausa Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria. Financial support from National Research Foundation (NRF, Pretoria, South Africa) in form of African Interaction fund (NRF Grant UID: 138253) to AOA is gratefully appreciated.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria, Ibadan, Nigeria (CFGO711FRIN06, 2 November 2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

We have included all data related the study in the manuscript and as supplementary materials.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all the participants for their willingness to be part of this study. We appreciated Omoseyindemi, Jolasun and Coker for their support towards the success of this project.

Conflicts of Interest

We declare no conflict of interest with regards to this study. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. ‘In compliance with the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity, the participants from the selected study areas retain the ownership of indigenous knowledge (including recipes) documented in this article. Consequently, any use of the documented information, other than for scientific publications, requires prior consent of the participants and their agreement on access to benefits resulting from any commercial use’.

References

  1. Ajao, A.A.; Mukaila, Y.O.; Sabiu, S. Wandering through southwestern Nigeria: An inventory of Yoruba useful angiosperm plants. Heliyon 2022, 8, e08668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Van Wyk, B.E. A review of ethnobotanical research in southern Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2002, 68, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Seethapathy, G.S.; Ravikumar, K.; Paulsen, B.S.; de Boer, H.J.; Wangensteen, H. Ethnobotany of dioecious species: Traditional knowledge on dioecious plants in India. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 221, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Moyo, M.; Aremu, A.O.; van Staden, J. Ethnopharmacology in Sub-Sahara Africa: Current Trends and Future Perspectives. In Ethnopharmacology; Heinrich, M., Jäger, A.K., Eds.; Wiley Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2015; pp. 263–278. [Google Scholar]
  5. Vandebroek, I.; Pieroni, A.; Stepp, J.R.; Hanazaki, N.; Ladio, A.; Alves, R.R.N.; Picking, D.; Delgoda, R.; Maroyi, A.; van Andel, T.; et al. Reshaping the future of ethnobiology research after the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat. Plants 2020, 6, 723–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cordell, G.A. Ecopharmacognosy and the responsibilities of natural product research to sustainability. Phytochem. Lett. 2015, 11, 332–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Crane, P.R.; Ge, S.; Hong, D.-Y.; Huang, H.-W.; Jiao, G.-L.; Knapp, S.; Kress, W.J.; Mooney, H.; Raven, P.H.; Wen, J.; et al. The Shenzhen declaration on plant sciences—Uniting plant sciences and society to build a green, sustainable Earth. Plants People Planet 2019, 1, 59–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pachter, L.M. Culture and clinical care: Folk illness beliefs and behaviors and their implications for health care delivery. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1994, 271, 690–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Staub, P.O.; Geck, M.S.; Weckerle, C.S.; Casu, L.; Leonti, M. Classifying diseases and remedies in ethnomedicine and ethnopharmacology. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 174, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Cordell, G.A. Cognate and cognitive ecopharmacognosy—In an anthropogenic era. Phytochem. Lett. 2017, 20, 540–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Heinrich, M.; Edwards, S.; Moerman, D.E.; Leonti, M. Ethnopharmacological field studies: A critical assessment of their conceptual basis and methods. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 124, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Magwede, K.; van Wyk, B.E.; van Wyk, A.E. An inventory of Vhavenḓa useful plants. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 122, 57–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lawal, I.O.; Olufade, I.I.; Rafiu, B.O.; Aremu, A.O. Ethnobotanical survey of plants used for treating cough associated with respiratory conditions in Ede South Local Government Area of Osun State, Nigeria. Plants 2020, 9, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fakchich, J.; Elachouri, M. An overview on ethnobotanico-pharmacological studies carried out in Morocco, from 1991 to 2015: Systematic review (part 1). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 267, 113200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Vitalini, S.; Iriti, M.; Puricelli, C.; Ciuchi, D.; Segale, A.; Fico, G. Traditional knowledge on medicinal and food plants used in Val San Giacomo (Sondrio, Italy)—An alpine ethnobotanical study. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 145, 517–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mukaila, Y.O.; Oladipo, O.T.; Ogunlowo, I.; Ajao, A.A.-N.; Sabiu, S. Which plants for what ailments: A quantitative analysis of medicinal ethnobotany of Ile-Ife, Osun State, southwestern Nigeria. Evid.-Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2021, 2021, 5711547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Al-Fatimi, M. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants in central Abyan governorate, Yemen. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 241, 111973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ngoua-Meye-Misso, R.-L.; Sima-Obiang, C.; Ndong, J.D.L.C.; Ndong-Atome, G.-R.; Ondo, J.P.; Ovono Abessolo, F.; Obame-Engonga, L.-C. Medicinal plants used in management of cancer and other related diseases in Woleu-Ntem province, Gabon. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2019, 29, 100924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bekalo, T.H.; Woodmatas, S.D.; Woldemariam, Z.A. An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by local people in the lowlands of Konta Special Woreda, southern nations, nationalities and peoples regional state, Ethiopia. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2009, 5, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Faruque, M.O.; Uddin, S.B.; Barlow, J.W.; Hu, S.; Dong, S.; Cai, Q.; Li, X.; Hu, X. Quantitative ethnobotany of medicinal plants used by indigenous communities in the Bandarban district of Bangladesh. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Nortje, J.M.; van Wyk, B.E. Medicinal plants of the Kamiesberg, Namaqualand, South Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 171, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Erinoso, S.; Aworinde, D. Current outlook and future promise of ethnobotany in Nigeria: A review and personal observation. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 2018, 12, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Sonibare, M.A.; Gbile, Z.O. Ethnobotanical survey of anti-asthmatic plants in South Western Nigeria. Afr. J. Tradit. Complementary Altern. Med. 2008, 5, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. El-Ghani, M.M.A. Traditional medicinal plants of Nigeria: An overview. Agric. Biol. J. N. Am. 2016, 7, 220–247. [Google Scholar]
  25. Adedeji, D.E.; Kayode, J.; Ayeni, M.J. An ethnobotanical study of plant species used for medicine by the Eegun indigenous tribal group of Lagos State, Nigeria. Not. Sci. Biol. 2018, 10, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Gbolade, A.A. Inventory of antidiabetic plants in selected districts of Lagos State, Nigeria. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 121, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Olowokudejo, J.; Kadiri, A.; Travih, V. An ethnobotanical survey of herbal markets and medicinal plants in Lagos State of Nigeria. Ethnobot. Leafl. 2008, 12, 851–865. [Google Scholar]
  28. Dudney, K.; Warren, S.; Sills, E.; Jacka, J. How study design influences the ranking of medicinal plant importance: A case study from Ghana, West Africa. Econ. Bot. 2015, 69, 306–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chukwuma, D.M.; Chukwuma, E.C.; Adekola, O.O. An ethnobotanical survey of Malaria-treating plants in Ado-Ekiti Local Government Area, Ekiti State, Nigeria. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2019, 18, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rivera, D.; Allkin, R.; Obón, C.; Alcaraz, F.; Verpoorte, R.; Heinrich, M. What is in a name? The need for accurate scientific nomenclature for plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 152, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Boadu, A.A.; Asase, A. Documentation of herbal medicines used for the treatment and management of human diseases by some communities in southern Ghana. Evid.-Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2017, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Dauncey, E.A.; Irving, J.; Allkin, R.; Robinson, N. Common mistakes when using plant names and how to avoid them. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 2016, 8, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Singh, H. Importance of local names of some useful plants in ethnobotanical study. Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 2008, 7, 365–370. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kankara, S.S.; Ibrahim, M.H.; Mustafa, M.; Go, R. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used for traditional maternal healthcare in Katsina state, Nigeria. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2015, 97, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Van Wyk, B.E. A family-level floristic inventory and analysis of medicinal plants used in Traditional African Medicine. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 249, 112351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Daru, B.H.; Berger, D.K.; Wyk, A.E. Opportunities for unlocking the potential of genomics for African trees. New Phytol. 2016, 210, 772–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Muleba, I.; Yessoufou, K.; Rampedi, I.T. Testing the non-random hypothesis of medicinal plant selection using the woody flora of the Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 4162–4173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yaoitcha, A.S.; Houehanou, T.D.; Fandohan, A.B.; Houinato, M.R.B. Prioritization of useful medicinal tree species for conservation in Wari-Maro Forest Reserve in Benin: A multivariate analysis approach. For. Policy Econ. 2015, 61, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yirgu, A.; Mohammed, K.; Geldenhuys, C.J. Useful medicinal tree species of Ethiopia: Comprehensive review. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 122, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Van Wyk, A.S.; Prinsloo, G. A review of the ethnobotanical uses, pharmacology, toxicology, management and cultivation of selected South African protected multi-purpose tree species. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 124, 258–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ahoyo, C.C.; Houéhanou, T.D.; Yaoïtcha, A.S.; Prinz, K.; Glèlè Kakaï, R.; Sinsin, B.A.; Houinato, M.R.B. Traditional medicinal knowledge of woody species across climatic zones in Benin (West Africa). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 265, 113417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Van Andel, T.; Myren, B.; van Onselen, S. Ghana’s herbal market. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 140, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Selogatwe, K.M.; Asong, J.A.; Struwig, M.; Ndou, R.V.; Aremu, A.O. A review of ethnoveterinary knowledge, biological activities and secondary metabolites of medicinal woody plants used for managing animal health in South Africa. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. De Albuquerque, U.P.; Farias Paiva de Lucena, R. Can apparency affect the use of plants by local people in tropical forests? Interciencia 2005, 30, 506–510. [Google Scholar]
  45. Moyo, M.; Aremu, A.O.; Van Staden, J. Medicinal plants: An invaluable, dwindling resource in sub-Saharan Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 174, 595–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Leonti, M. The relevance of quantitative ethnobotanical indices for ethnopharmacology and ethnobotany. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 288, 115008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Weckerle, C.S.; de Boer, H.J.; Puri, R.K.; van Andel, T.; Bussmann, R.W.; Leonti, M. Recommended standards for conducting and reporting ethnopharmacological field studies. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 210, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Friedman, J.; Yaniv, Z.; Dafni, A.; Palewitch, D. A preliminary classification of the healing potential of medicinal plants, based on a rational analysis of an ethnopharmacological field survey among Bedouins in the Negev Desert, Israel. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1986, 16, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Trotter, R.T.; Logan, M.H. Informant consensus: A new approach for identifying potentially effective medicinal plants. In Plants in Indigenous Medicine & Diet Biobehavioral Approaches; Etkin, N.L., Ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 1986; pp. 91–112. [Google Scholar]
  50. Asiimwe, S.; Namutebi, A.; Borg-Karlson, A.-K.; Mugisha, M.K.; Kakudidi, E.K.; Hannington, O.-O. Documentation and consensus of indigenous knowledge on medicinal plants used by the local communities of western Uganda. J. Nat. Prod. Plant Resour. 2014, 4, 34–42. [Google Scholar]
  51. Balogun, F.O.; Ashafa, A.O.T. A review of plants used in South African traditional medicine for the management and treatment of hypertension. Planta Med. 2019, 85, 312–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Nyakudya, T.T.; Tshabalala, T.; Dangarembizi, R.; Erlwanger, K.H.; Ndhlala, A.R. The potential therapeutic value of medicinal plants in the management of metabolic disorders. Molecules 2020, 25, 2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Alebie, G.; Urga, B.; Worku, A. Systematic review on traditional medicinal plants used for the treatment of malaria in Ethiopia: Trends and perspectives. Malar. J. 2017, 16, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Alamgeer Younis, W.; Asif, H.; Sharif, A.; Riaz, H.; Bukhari, I.A.; Assiri, A.M. Traditional medicinal plants used for respiratory disorders in Pakistan: A review of the ethno-medicinal and pharmacological evidence. Chin. Med. 2018, 13, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Aremu, A.O.; Pendota, S.C. Medicinal plants for mitigating pain and inflammatory-related conditions: An appraisal of ethnobotanical uses and patterns in South Africa. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Frimpong, E.K.; Asong, J.A.; Aremu, A.O. A review on medicinal plants used in the management of headache in Africa. Plants 2021, 10, 2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. National Population Commission. Lagos State Nigeria, Census Figures; Nigeria Master Web; National Population Commission (NPC): Abuja, Nigeria, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  58. Idu, M.; Erhabor, J.O.; Efijuemue, H.M. Documentation on medicinal plants sold in markets in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2010, 9, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Sojobi, A.O.; Balogun, I.I.; Salami, A.W. Climate change in Lagos State, Nigeria: What really changed? Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Tardío, J.; Pardo-de-Santayana, M. Cultural Importance Indices: A comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain). Econ. Bot. 2008, 62, 24–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Heinrich, M.; Ankli, A.; Frei, B.; Weimann, C.; Sticher, O. Medicinal plants in Mexico: Healers’ consensus and cultural importance. Soc. Sci. Med. 1998, 47, 1859–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Frequency of plant families used for the management of diverse health conditions/diseases in five (5) selected locations in Lagos State of Nigeria.
Figure 1. Frequency of plant families used for the management of diverse health conditions/diseases in five (5) selected locations in Lagos State of Nigeria.
Plants 11 00633 g001
Figure 2. Life-form distribution (%) for the plant species used for managing health conditions/diseases in five (5) selected locations in Lagos State of Nigeria.
Figure 2. Life-form distribution (%) for the plant species used for managing health conditions/diseases in five (5) selected locations in Lagos State of Nigeria.
Plants 11 00633 g002
Figure 3. Frequency of plant parts used for the management of diverse health conditions/diseases in five (5) selected locations in Lagos State of Nigeria.
Figure 3. Frequency of plant parts used for the management of diverse health conditions/diseases in five (5) selected locations in Lagos State of Nigeria.
Plants 11 00633 g003
Figure 4. Locations selected for the ethnobotanical survey conducted in Lagos State of Nigeria.
Figure 4. Locations selected for the ethnobotanical survey conducted in Lagos State of Nigeria.
Plants 11 00633 g004
Table 1. Fidelity level (FL, %), relative frequency of citation (RFC) and frequency of citation (FC) for plants used to treat a variety of health conditions/diseases in five (5) selected locations in Lagos State of Nigeria.
Table 1. Fidelity level (FL, %), relative frequency of citation (RFC) and frequency of citation (FC) for plants used to treat a variety of health conditions/diseases in five (5) selected locations in Lagos State of Nigeria.
Plant SpeciesHeath Condition, FL (%)RFCFC (%)
Abrus precatorius L.Cough, 71.70
Stomachache, 28.30
0.5353
Acalypha fimbriata Schumach. & Thonn.Cough, 38.7
Divinity, 61.29
0.3131
Acanthospermum hispidum DC.Hypertension, 62.96
Divinity, 37.04
0.2727
Achyranthes aspera L.Erection, 28.17
Sight, 47.89
Potency, 23.94
0.7171
Adenia lobata (Jacq.) Engl.Piles, 33.33
Arthritis, 66.67
0.4848
Ageratum conyzoides (L.) L.Infectious disease, 21.25
Malaria, 42.5
Hypertension, 20.00
Sight, 16.25
0.8080
Albizia ferruginea (Guill. & Perr.) Benth.Cough, 46.15
Pregnancy, 53.85
0.2626
Albizia lebbeck (L.) Benth.Fever, 21.05
Arthritis, 45.61
Cough, 33.33
0.5757
Albizia zygia (DC.) J.F.Macbr.Aphrodisiac, 25.97
Arthritis, 53.25
Cough, 33.77
Toothache, 3.90
0.7777
Alchornea cordifolia (Schumach. & Thonn.) Müll.Arg.Arthritis, 18.07
Sight, 39.76
Ulcers, 15.66
Malaria, 7.23
0.8383
Alchornea laxiflora (Benth.) Pax & K.Hoffm.De-worming, 24.56
Infectious diseases, 10.53
Malaria, 35.09
Oral hygiene, 29.82
0.5757
Alternanthera sessilis (L.) R.Br. ex DC.Sight, 64.71
Jaundice, 35.29
0.1717
Amaranthus spinosus L.Sight, 42.86
Cirrhosis, 57.14
0.2121
Amaranthus viridis L.Longevity, 100.000.1313
Anacardium occidentale L.Malaria, 100.000.3838
Anchomanes difformis (Blume) Engl.Chicken pox, 40.00
Measles, 60.00
0.2020
Annona senegalensis Pers.Malaria, 53.33
Potency, 46.67
0.3030
Anthocleista djalonensis A.Chev.Hypertension, 100.000.2626
Anthocleista vogelii Planch.Divinity, 100.000.077
Artocarpus communis J.R.Forst. & G.Forst. (Synonym: Artocarpus altilis (Parkinson ex F.A.Zorn) Fosberg)Malaria, 100.000.2020
Aspilia africana (Pers.) C.D.AdamsFibroid, 26.00
Cough, 56.00
Purgative, 18.00
0.5050
Asystasia gangetica (L.) T.AndersonNeck pain, 12.50
Sight, 43.75
Potency, 15.63
Cough, 28.13
0.6464
Azadirachta indica A.Juss.Anti-snake bite, 100.000.1616
Baphia nitida Lodd.Divinity, 100.000.1212
Barleria opaca (Vahl) NeesDiabetes, 100.000.1717
Bidens pilosa L.Cough, 100.000.1919
Boerhavia diffusa L.Malaria, 100.000.1818
Borreria scabra (Schumach. & Thonn.) K.Schum. (Synonym: Spermacoce ruelliae DC.) Ringworm, 19.18
Diabetes, 35.62
Eczema, 21.92
Birth control, 23.28
0.7373
Borreria verticillata (synonym: Spermacoce verticillata L.)Ringworm, 88.37
Birth control, 11.63
0.4343
Bridelia ferruginea Benth.Diabetes, 66.04
Birth control, 33.96
0.5353
Bryophyllum pinnatum (Lam.) OkenCough,72.22
Sight, 27.78
0.5454
Caladium bicolor (Aiton) Vent.Pimples, 61.70
Cough, 38.30
0.4747
Calophyllum inophyllum L.Scurvy, 1000.088
Calopogonium mucunoides Desv.Cough, 60.94
Scurvy, 17.19
Ulcer, 21.88
0.6464
Calotropis procera (Aiton) Dryand.Malaria, 60.00
Conjunctivitis, 40.00
0.2525
Canna indica L.Cirrhosis, 50.00
Pimples, 50.00
0.2828
Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC.Pregnancy, 100.000.1010
Carpolobia lutea G.DonEasy labour, 100.000.1212
Celosia argentea L.Malaria, 100.000.022
Centrosema pubescens Benth.Pimples, 46.15
Purgative, 53.85
0.1313
Chassalia kolly (Schumach.) HepperAphrodisiac, 100.000.1818
Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M.King & H.Rob.Malaria, 93.55
Potency, 6.45
0.6262
Cissampelos owariensis P.Beauv. ex DC.Miscarriage, 100.000.3636
Citrus aurantiifolia (Christm.) SwingleMalaria, 100.000.2626
Cleistopholis patens (Benth.) Engl. & DielsPimples, 100.000.2323
Cleome fruticosa L. (Synonym: Cadaba fruticosa (L.) Druce)Cirrhosis, 61.90
Birth control, 38.10
0.2121
Clerodendrum capitatum (Willd.) Schumach. & ThonnMalaria, 53.85
Diabetes, 46.15
0.2626
Clerodendrum paniculatum L.Cirrhosis, 100.000.066
Clerodendrum umbellatum Poir.Stomachache, 100.000.1616
Clerodendrum volubile P.Beauv.Immune booster, 100.000.022
Cnestis ferruginea Vahl ex DC.Immune booster, 100.000.055
Cola millenii K.Schum.Miscarriage, 100.000.099
Colocasia esculenta (L.) SchottCough, 100.000.1414
Commelina africana L.Diabetes, 78.57
Curse, 21.43
0.1414
Commelina erecta L.Potency, 100.000.1515
Costus afer Ker Gawl.Cough, 58.44
Ulcer, 41.56
0.7777
Croton lobatus L. (Synonym: Astraea lobata (L.) Klotzsch).Cough, 100.000.1818
Croton zambesicus Müll.Arg. (Synonym: Croton gratissimus Burch.)Malaria, 56.52
Hypertension, 43.48
0.2323
Cucumeropsis mannii NaudinCough, 100.000.011
Cyathula prostrata (L.) BlumePimples, 100.000.033
Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) StapfLongevity, 100.000.099
Cyperus haspans L.Arthritis, 100.000.1111
Dalbergia saxatilis Hook.f.Longevity, 100.000.1414
Datura metel L.Hypertension, 48.27
Immune booster, 37.93
Muscle relaxant, 13.80
0.2929
Desmodium velutinum (Willd.) DC.Erection, 100.000.011
Dichrostachys cinerea (L.) Wight & Arn.Headache, 27.03
Toothache, 32.43
Cough, 40.54
0.3737
Dissotis rotundifolia (Sm.) Triana (Synonym Heterotis rotundifolia (Sm.) Jacq.-Fél.)Easy labour, 20.69
Pregnancy care, 79.31
0.2929
Eclipta prostrata (L.) L.Cough, 100.000.1616
Elaeis guineensis Jacq.Blood tonic, 100.000.033
Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.Pile, 19.57
Cough, 43.47
Malaria, 36.96
0.4646
Eleutheranthera ruderalis (Swartz) Sch.-Bip.Piles, 61.54
Longevity, 38.46
0.2626
Emilia coccinea (Sims) G.DonFoot pain, 59.46
Birth control, 8.11
Purgative, 32.43
0.3737
Entandrophragma angolense (Welw.) C.DC.Piles, 100.000.1515
Eragrostis namaquennsis Nees ex Schrad. (Synonym: Eragrostis japonica (Thunb.) Trin.)Stomachache, 100.000.1010
Erigeron floribundus (Kunth) Sch.Bip.Scurvy, 100.000.099
Erythrina senegalensis DC.Diabetes, 100.000.1313
Euphorbia glaucophylla Poir. (Synonym: Euphorbia trinervia Schumach. & Thonn.)Longevity, 46.94
Malaria, 22.45
Cough, 30.61
0.4949
Euphorbia heterophylla L.Longevity, 100.000.011
Ficus benjamina L.Scurvy, 30.30
Cough, 69.70
0.3333
Ficus capensis Thunb. (Synonym: Ficus sur Forssk.)Hypertension, 26.67
Cough, 73.33
0.4545
Ficus exasperata VahlScurvy, 50.00
Cough, 27.27
Hypertension, 22.73
0.4444
Ficus polita VahlPimples, 100.000.066
Fleurya aestuans (L.) ChewCough, 100.000.1818
Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp.Arthritis, 46.15
Hypertension, 53.85
0.2626
Glyphaea brevis (Spreng.) Monach.Ulcer, 100.000.1313
Gomphrena celosioides Mart.Pimples, 62.16
Potency, 37.84
0.3737
Grewia pubescens P.Beauv.Hypertension, 100.000.1616
Harungana madagascariensis Lam. ex Poir.Anti-snake bite, 100.000.1818
Heliotropium indicum L.Erection, 33.33
Piles, 66.67
0.2727
Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L.Cough, 100.000.1010
Hibiscus surattensis L.Diabetes, 65.71
Potency, 34.29
0.3535
Hippocratea pallens Planch. ex Oliv. (Synonym: Apodostigma pallens (Planch. ex Oliv.) R.Wilczek)Malaria, 100.000.1717
Hoslundia opposita VahlUlcer, 100.000.1919
Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit.Anti-snake bite, 100.000.2222
Icacina trichantha Oliv.Curse, 20.90
Potency, 79.10
0.6767
Indigofera arrecta A.Rich.Piles, 61.11
Pregnancy, 38.89
0.1818
Indigofera hirsuta L.Sight, 22.95
Stomachache, 45.90
Purgative, 31.15
0.6161
Ipomoea involucrata P.Beauv. (Synonym: Ipomoea pileata Roxb.)Anti-snake bite, 19.75
Malaria, 19.76
Cough, 60.49
0.8181
Jatropha curcas L.Piles, 83.64
Sight, 16.36
0.5555
Jatropha gossypiifolia L.Piles, 100.000.4040
Kigelia africana (Lam.) Benth.Cough, 46.43
Piles, 53.57
0.2828
Lantana camara L.Purgative, 50.00
Nervousness, 7.14
Potency, 42.86
0.1414
Lawsonia inermis L.Malaria, 77.27
Gonorrhoea, 22.73
0.4444
Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de WitPurgative, 100.000.066
Luffa cylindrica (L.) M.Roem.Cramps, 14.00
Fever, 30.00
Purgative, 38.00
Convulsion, 18.00
0.5050
Macaranga barteri Müll.Arg.Easy labour, 42.42
Anti-snake bite, 57.58
0.3333
Microdesmis puberula Hook.f. ex Planch.Easy labour, 100.000.1111
Mallotus oppositifolius (Geiseler) Müll.Arg.Stomach problems, 51.61
Malaria, 32.26
Sight, 16.13
0.3131
Malvastrum coromandelianum (L.) GarckeAnti-snake bite, 100.000.022
Mangifera indica L.Malaria, 76.84
Fever, 23.16
0.9595
Margaritaria discoidea (Baill.) G.L.WebsterMalaria, 100.000.2323
Mariscus alternifolius Vahl (Synonym: Cyperus cyperoides (L.) Kuntze)Jaundice, 33.33
Arthritis, 66.67
0.099
Melanthera scandens (Schumach. & Thonn.) RobertyCurse, 37.50
Malaria, 62.50
0.2424
Merremia pterygocaulos (Choisy) Hallier f.Foot pain, 80.00
Sight, 20.00
0.2020
Mezoneuron benthamianum (Synonym: Caesalpinia benthamiana (Baill.) Herend. & Zarucchi)Piles, 100.000.2525
Mimosa pudica L.Erection, 84.00
Anti-snake bite, 16.00
0.2525
Morinda lucida Benth.Malaria, 62.86
Fever, 24.29
Jaundice, 12.85
0.7070
Moringa oleifera Lam.Cough, 100.000.2727
Myrianthus arboreus P.Beauv.Neck pain, 70.59
Cough, 29.41
0.1717
Nauclea latifolia Sm. (Synonym: Sarcocephalus latifolius (Sm.) E.A.Bruce)Malaria, 50.00
Pimples, 27.27
Diabetes, 22.73
0.6666
Newbouldia laevis (P.Beauv.) Seem.Diabetes, 40.30
Measles, 25.37
Worm-expellant, 10.45
Jaundice, 23.88
0.6767
Ocimum gratissimum L.Piles, 38.46
Purgative, 46.15
Cough, 15.39
0.7878
Panicum scandens (Schrad. ex Schult.) Trin. (Synonym: Setaria scandens Schrad.)Malaria, 100.000.2121
Passiflora foetida L.Foot pain, 80.65
Sight, 19.35
0.3131
Paullinia pinnata L.Aphrodisiac, 52.17
Piles, 47.83
0.2323
Perotis indica (L.) KuntzeBlood tonic,100.000.033
Persea americana Mill.Longevity, 100.000.1414
Phaulopsis falcisepala C.B.Clarke (Synonym: Phaulopsis ciliata (Willd.) Hepper)Malaria, 100.000.1515
Phyllanthus amarus Schumach. & Thonn.Fever, 23.40
Pregnancy, 36.18
Immune booster, 17.02
Cough, 23.40
0.4747
Phyllanthus niruri L.Foot pain, 57.89
Sight, 42.11
0.1919
Physalis angulata L.Skin rashes, 76.00
Piles, 24.00
0.5050
Piliostigma thonningii (Schum.) Milne-Redh. (Synonym: Bauhinia thonningii Schum.)Potency, 100.000.066
Pinus caribaea MoreletCough, 100.000.055
Pleioceras barteri Baill.Neck pain, 38.89
Stomachache, 61.11
0.1818
Polyalthia suaveolens Engl. & Diels (Synonym: Greenwayodendron suaveolens (Engl. & Diels) Verdc.)Cough, 100.000.022
Portulaca oleracea L.Cough, 55.56
Anti-snake bite, 44.44
0.1818
Psidium guajava L.Fever, 22.50
Stomachache, 77.50
0.4040
Rauvolfia vomitoria Afzel.Malaria, 16.13
Insanity, 29.03
Hypertension, 22.58
Muscle relaxant, 16.13
Cough, 16.13
0.6262
Ricinus communis L.Divinity, 44.83
Sight, 55.17
0.2929
Scoparia dulcis L.Black coated tongue, 30.77
Birth control, 69.23
0.1313
Secamone afzelii (Roem. & Schult.) K.Schum.Immune booster, 100.000.2626
Securinega virosa (Roxb. ex Willd.) Baill. (Synonym: Flueggea virosa (Roxb. ex Willd.) Royle)Typhoid, 47.83
Pregnancy, 28.26
Immune booster, 23.91
0.4646
Senna hirsuta (L.) H.S.Irwin & BarnebyCough, 37.04
Purgative, 62.96
0.2727
Senna obtusifolia (L.) H.S.Irwin & BarnebyScurvy, 39.02
Cough, 60.98
0.4141
Senna podocarpa (Guill. & Perrottet) LockStomach problem, 100.000.1616
Senna siamea (Lamarck) H.S.Irwin & BarnebyImmune booster, 100.000.1111
Senna tora (L.) Roxb.Potency, 33.33
Sight, 19.44
Malaria, 36.12
Divinity, 11.11
0.3636
Sesamum indicum L.Potency, 100.000.033
Sesamum radiatum Schumach. & Thonn.Potency, 100.000.066
Sida acuta Burm.f.Fibroids, 38.89
Sight, 61.11
0.1818
Sida cordifolia L.Cough, 100.000.1212
Sida linifolia Juss. ex Cav.Scurvy, 58.82
Pimples, 41.18
0.1717
Smilax kraussiana Meisn. (Synonym: Smilax anceps Willd.)Erection, 100.000.1212
Solanum nigrum L. (Synonym: Solanum americanum Mill.)Diabetes, 46.87
Cough, 53.13
0.3232
Solanum torvum Sw.Pimples, 22.22
Potency, 41.67
Hypertension, 36.11
0.3636
Solenostemon monostachyus (P.Beauv.) Briq. (Synonym: Plectranthus monostachyus (P.Beauv.) B.J.Pollard)Piles, 26.92
Malaria, 34.62
Purgative, 17.31
Potency, 21.15
0.5252
Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchMalaria, 100.000.077
Sphenocentrum jollyanum PierreDeworming, 45.16
Malaria, 19.36
Fever, 35.48
0.3131
Spigellia anthelmia L.Diabetes, 38.46
Piles, 61.54
0.2626
Spondias mombin L.Penile erection, 40.00
Diabetes, 28.57
Anti-snake bite, 14.29
Insomnia, 17.14
0.3535
Sporobolus indicus (L.) R.Br.Diabetes, 60.87
Purgative, 39.13
0.2323
Stachytarpheta indica (L.) VahlErection, 20.00
Hypertension, 80.00
0.2020
Sterculia tragacantha Lindl.Diabetes, 100.000.1313
Synedrella nodiflora (L.) Gaertn.Potency, 55.55
Sight, 5.56
Longevity, 27.78
Malaria, 11.11
0.1818
Syzygium guineense (Willd.) DC.Diabetes, 100.000.1212
Talinum triangulare (Jacq.) Willd. (Synonym: Talinum fruticosum (L.) Juss.)Blood tonic, 86.36
Malaria, 13.64
0.4444
Tapinanthus globiferous (A.Rich.) Tiegh.Fibroid, 100.000.1111
Telfairia occidentalis Hook.f.Blood tonic, 79.55
Hypertension, 20.45
0.4444
Terminalia ivorensis A.Chev.Divinity, 100.000.099
Tetracera alnifolia Willd.Fibroid, 100.000.055
Thaumatococcus daniellii (Benn.) Benth.Ulcer, 75.38
Food sweetener, 24.62
0.6565
Thevetia peruviana (Pers.) K.Schum.Purgative, 61.54
Pimples, 17.95
Cough, 20.51
0.3939
Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A.GrayMalaria, 86.15
Piles, 13.85
0.6565
Trichilia monadelpha (Thonn.) J.J.de WildeInsomnia, 100.000.022
Tridax procumbens (L.) L.Ulcer, 22.22
Foot pain, 33.33
Malaria, 19.44
Hypertension, 25.01
0.3636
Triumfetta cordifolia A.Rich.Easy labour, 64.29
Birth control, 35.71
0.1414
Urena lobata L. var. var. glauca (Blume) Borss. Waalk.Potency, 100.000.1515
Urena lobata L.Birth control, 18.64
Rheumatism, 16.95
Wound, 28.81
Diarrhoea, 22.03
Stomachache, 13.57
0.5959
Vernonia amygdalina DelileDiabetes, 18.99
Malaria, 39.24
Oral hygiene, 21.52
Diarrhoea, 20.25
0.7979
Vernonia cinerea (L.) Less. (Synonym: Cyanthillium cinereum (L.) H.Rob.Asthma, 28.57
Bronchitis, 22.45
Cold, 26.53
Stomachache, 22.45
0.4949
Vitex doniana SweetDysentery, 36.20
Diarrhoea, 24.14
Hypertension, 24.14
Indigestion, 15.52
0.5858
Waltheria indica L.Wound, 13.98
Blood tonic, 33.33
Ulcer, 17.21
Cold, 10.75
Cough, 24.73
0.9393
Zingiber officinale RoscoeUlcer, 24.14
Indigestion, 27.59
Cough, 36.78
Flu, 11.49
0.8787
Table 2. Informant Consensus Factor (ICF) for medicinal plants from five (5) selected locations in Lagos State of Nigeria.
Table 2. Informant Consensus Factor (ICF) for medicinal plants from five (5) selected locations in Lagos State of Nigeria.
S/nDisease CategoryNumber of SpeciesUse CitationICF
1Respiratory-related ailments468420.95
2Stomach-related ailments509170.95
3Infectious diseases213200.94
4Malaria and other fevers499440.95
5Cardiovascular-related diseases314960.94
6Male reproductive-related issues273040.91
7Female reproductive-related issues252930.92
8Vision-related issues182240.92
9Foot pain, neck pain, rheumatism, arthritis162660.94
10Oral hygiene, black coated tongue, toothache5530.92
11Divinity, curse (spiritual-related)101000.91
12Anti-snake bite, de-wormer, worm-expellant101180.92
13Cirrhosis, scurvy, blood tonic, longevity, immune booster314040.93
14Insomnia, insanity, convulsion, nervousness, muscle relaxant7500.88
Table 3. Demographic characteristics of the participants (n = 100) in five (5) selected areas in Lagos State of Nigeria.
Table 3. Demographic characteristics of the participants (n = 100) in five (5) selected areas in Lagos State of Nigeria.
FeatureFrequency (n)
Age group
  30–392
  40–4928
  50–5934
  60–6918
  70–7912
  80 and above6
Gender
  Male89
  Female11
Marital status
  Widower/widow7
  Single2
  Married91
Religion status
  African traditionalist60
  Christianity12
  Islam28
Formal education level
  None7
  Primary79
  Secondary12
  Tertiary2
Occupation-type
  Farmer29
  Herbalist52
  Trader19
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lawal, I.O.; Rafiu, B.O.; Ale, J.E.; Majebi, O.E.; Aremu, A.O. Ethnobotanical Survey of Local Flora Used for Medicinal Purposes among Indigenous People in Five Areas in Lagos State, Nigeria. Plants 2022, 11, 633. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11050633

AMA Style

Lawal IO, Rafiu BO, Ale JE, Majebi OE, Aremu AO. Ethnobotanical Survey of Local Flora Used for Medicinal Purposes among Indigenous People in Five Areas in Lagos State, Nigeria. Plants. 2022; 11(5):633. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11050633

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lawal, Ibraheem Oduola, Basirat Olabisi Rafiu, Joy Enitan Ale, Onuyi Emmanuel Majebi, and Adeyemi Oladapo Aremu. 2022. "Ethnobotanical Survey of Local Flora Used for Medicinal Purposes among Indigenous People in Five Areas in Lagos State, Nigeria" Plants 11, no. 5: 633. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11050633

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop