Next Article in Journal
Lime Rate in Clayey Soils Influences Chemical Fertility and Sugarcane Yield
Next Article in Special Issue
Advances in the Mining of Disease Resistance Genes from Aegilops tauschii and the Utilization in Wheat
Previous Article in Journal
Bonactin and Feigrisolide C Inhibit Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum Fungus and Control Wheat Blast Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 16
10.3390/plants11162109
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Precise Identification of Chromosome Constitution and Rearrangements in Wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium Derivatives by ND-FISH and Oligo-FISH Painting

by
Zhihui Yu
1,
Hongjin Wang
1,
Ennian Yang
2,
Guangrong Li
1,* and
Zujun Yang
1,*
1
School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China
2
Crop Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(16), 2109; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162109
Submission received: 27 July 2022 / Revised: 10 August 2022 / Accepted: 11 August 2022 / Published: 13 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic and Genomic Resources for Wheat Improvement)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Thinopyrum intermedium possesses many desirable agronomic traits that make it a valuable genetic source for wheat improvement. The precise identification of individual chromosomes of allohexaploid Th. intermedium is a challenge due to its three sub-genomic constitutions with complex evolutionary ancestries. The non-denaturing fluorescent in situ hybridization (ND-FISH) using tandem-repeat oligos, including Oligo-B11 and Oligo-pDb12H, effectively distinguished the St, J and JS genomes, while Oligo-FISH painting, based on seven oligonucleotide pools derived from collinear regions between barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), was able to identify each linkage group of the Th. intermedium chromosomes. We subsequently established the first karyotype of Th. intermedium with individual chromosome recognition using sequential ND-FISH and Oligo-FISH painting. The chromosome constitutions of 14 wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploids and addition lines were characterized. Distinct intergenomic chromosome rearrangements were revealed among Th. intermedium chromosomes in these amphiploids and addition lines. The precisely defined karyotypes of these wheat–Th. intermedium derived lines may be helpful for further study on chromosome evolution, chromatin introgression and wheat breeding programs.

1. Introduction

As a perennial grass with a native distribution throughout the Mediterranean and Eastern Europe [1], Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Barkworth & D.R. Dewey has undergone the most direct selection for hay and pasture grass improvement [2]. As an allohexaploid (2n = 6x = 42), Th. intermedium chromosomes have been previously identified and allocated into three tentatively designated sub-genomes sets as J, JS and St, where St is closely related to the genome of Pseudoroegneria strigosa and J is closely related to that of Th. bessarabicum. The JS genome is a modified version of the J and St genomes [3,4]. Th. intermedium consists of two subspecies, namely, intermediate wheatgrass, ssp. intermedium and a pubescent variant ssp. trichophorum that carries novel and high levels of resistance to several wheat fungal diseases, such as rusts and powdery mildew, and many useful agronomic traits, including novel glutenins, and contributes to the tertiary gene pool for wheat improvement [4,5]. The production and identification of amphiploids or partial amphiploids between wheat and Th. intermedium is an important intermediate step for gene transfer [5]. To date, a number of wheat–Th. intermedium amphiploids, Otrastsyuskaya (OT), TAF46, Zhong1 to Zhong5, 78829, TAI7044, TE-3, TE253-1, TE257, TE267, TE346, SX12-787, SX12-1150 and SX12-1269, have been obtained [4,6,7,8,9,10]. The precise identification of individual Th. intermedium chromosomes is essential for comparative molecular and cytogenetic analysis of Th. intermedium species and the introgression of diverse Th. intermedium chromatin for breeding purposes of wheat.
Due to the complexity of the genomic composition of Th. intermedium, the precise recognition of individual Th. intermedium chromosomes in wild grass itself and wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploids is rather difficult by current molecular cytogenetic methods including C-banding, genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with the reported probes [4,5,10,11,12]. Recently, we developed seven bulked pools for an oligo painting system, which enabled the assignment of the chromosomes to the Triticeae linkage groups and the characterization of wheat-alien chromosome derivatives [13]. The powerful Oligo-FISH painting methods [14], in combination with non-denaturing fluorescent in situ hybridization (ND-FISH) using multiple oligo probes [15,16,17,18,19,20], have clearly improved the efficiency and accuracy of distinguishing Th. intermedium chromosome segments and their introgression in a common wheat background.
In the present study, we established a standard karyotype of individual Th. intermedium chromosomes, which show the genomic heterogeneity of wheatgrass. Comprehensive FISH and Oligo-FISH painting enabled the precise identification of individual chromosomes and chromosome rearrangements in a wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploid and derived lines.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of Individual Thinopyrum intermedium Chromosomes

All 21 pairs of Th. intermedium chromosomes have been previously identified by ND-FISH using the repetitive sequences Oligo-pSc119.2 and Oligo-pTa535 as probes. Subsequently, ND-FISH using the probes Oligo-B11 and Oligo-pDb12H was performed to further characterize the mitotic metaphase chromosomes of the Th. intermedium accession PI440043. The Oligo-pDb12H was able to clearly classify the 14 JS chromosomes of Th. intermedium, while the abundant signals associated with Oligo-B11 revealed the St chromosomes, and the mostly telomeric and sub-telomeric signals with Oligo-B11 on the J chromosomes [17,18]. As shown in Figure 1a, all the 42 Th. intermedium chromosomes were clearly distinguished into three subgenomes designated as J, St and JS, each with 14 chromosomes by using ND-FISH. The sequential ND-FISH patterns using probes Oligo-pSc119.2 and Oligo-pTa535, combined with the FISH patterns by Oligo-B11 and Oligo-pDb12H, were able to distinguish the individual Th. intermedium chromosomes in three J, St and JS sub-genomes (Figure 1b).
The wheat–barley bulked oligo pools Synt1 to Synt7 were then used by sequential FISH for validation of the signal distribution and specificity for the chromosomes of Th. intermedium PI440043 (Figure 1). Each chromosome plate was first analyzed by ND-FISH with probe combinations of Oligo-B11 + Oligo-pDb12H (Figure 1a) and then Oligo-pSc119.2 + Oligo-pTa535 (Figure 1b,e,g,i). For example, the probe Synt5 produced strong hybrid green signals on each of three homoeologous chromosome pairs along the entire lengths of these groups of six chromosomes (Figure 1c). According to ND-FISH results, the three pairs of homoeologous chromosomes belong to each St, J and JS subgenome. They are thus designated as 5St, 5J and 5JS (Figure 1c). In the same metaphase cell, the probe Synt7 generated distinct red signals on three chromosomes pairs of 7St, 7J and 7JS (Figure 1c), and Synt3 identified another three chromosomes pairs 3St, 3J and 3JS (Figure 1d), respectively. Similarly, the bulked probes Synt1, Synt2, Synt4 and Synt6 also hybridized to mitotic chromosomes of Th. intermedium, and they all produced distinct signals on their individual three homoeologous chromosomes pairs (Figure 1). Therefore, all seven painting probes resulted in distinct hybridization signals covering chromosome arms along their entire lengths for each linkage group, suggesting that the bulked Oligo-based FISH painting can be used to identify each of the Th. intermedium chromosomes or chromosome segments of particular homoeologous groups. The 21 chromosome pairs were finally assigned to seven homoeologous groups among St, J and JS- subgenomes (Figure 1k).
Based on the hybridization patterns of Oligo-pSc119.2 and Oligo-pTa535 on the chromosomes of PI440043, some homologous chromosomes pairs showed different hybridization signal patterns for Oligo-pSc119.2, including 2St, 6St and 3JS with the presence or absence of signals at their terminal regions. Furthermore, the chromosome pairs 7JS and 5J displayed different Oligo-pTa535 signals on the pericentromeric regions (Figure 1). Importantly, the different ND-FISH patterns were visible only on one of the homologous pairs, indicating structural chromosome heterozygosity in Th. intermedium plants.

2.2. Chromosome Identification of Wheat–Th. intermedium Amphiploids

The wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploid TAF46 was selected to characterize the Thinopyrum chromosome compositions. Sequential ND-FISH using Oligo-pSc119.2 and Oligo-pTa535 could easily distinguish the 42 wheat chromosomes and a total of 14 Th. intermedium chromosomes. The hybridization signals of probes Oligo-B11 and Oligo-pDb12H appeared to clearly distinguish the St, J and JS chromosomes in TAF46 (Figure 2a). The 42 wheat chromosomes consisted each of 12 A, 14 B, and 16 D chromosomes, including two pairs of 5BS.7BS and 5BL.7BL reciprocal translocation chromosomes, as well as the absence of chromosome 6A substituted by four chromosome 6D in TAF46 (Figure 2a,b). FISH using the probes Oligo-B11 and Oligo-pDb12H for TAF46 showed the absence of Oligo-pDb12H hybridization signals, indicating that TAF46 did not possess JS chromosomes. A total six St and eight J chromosomes were observed based on the hybridization patterns of Oligo-B11 (Figure 2a,b). This is consistent with the previous reports of St-genome based GISH [3]. The Oligo-FISH painting by seven probes gave rise to distinct hybridization signals covering wheat and Th. intermedium chromosome arms along their entire lengths for each homoeologous group. The probe Synt1 produced strong green signals on the chromosome pairs of 1A, 1B and 1D (Figure 2c), in addition to another a pair of Th. intermedium group 1 chromosomes, which was defined as chromosomes 1J compared to the standard karyotype (Figure 2b,d). Similarly, the probe Synt3 generated distinct red signals on eight chromosomes including the previously identified 3A, 3B and 3D by Oligo-pSc119.2 + Oligo-pTa535 (Figure 2c), and a pair of Th. intermedium 3J-chromosomes (Figure 2c). Similarly, the bulked probes Synt2 + Synt5 (Figure 3e) and Synt4 + Synt6 (Figure 2g) also hybridized specifically to chromosomes of TAF46, compared to the sequential ND-FISH of Oligo-pSc119.2 + Oligo-pTA535 (Figure 2f,h). These results show that Th. intermedium chromosomes of TAF46 consisted of J genome chromosomes of the homoeologous groups 1, 3, 5, 7 and St genome chromosomes of groups 2, 4 and 6 (Figure 2). The karyotype for individual chromosomes of the subgenomes and linkage groups of Th. intermedium of TAF46 is shown in Figure 2j. Our results are consistent with the chromosome assignment of Th. intermedium addition lines by GISH and molecular analysis of the TAF46-derived wheat–Thinopyrum addition lines L1 to L7 [21].
We used a similar approach to precisely identify the Th. intermedium chromosomes in 78,829 (2n = 56). The ND-FISH using Oligo-pSc119.2 and Oligo-pTa535 revealed that 78,829 has complete wheat chromosomes, each of 14 A, B, and D chromosomes. The sequential ND-FISH by probes Oligo-B11 and Oligo-pDb12H revealed the Thinopyrum chromosomes included six St, four St-JS, two J-JS and two JS chromosomes (Figure 1 and Figure 3b). It is also interesting to observe that an Oligo-B11 signal appeared in the terminal region of 4D, indicating a small translocation between 4D and a Th. intermedium chromosome (Figure 3a). In comparison with ND-FISH patterns using Oligo-pSc119.2 + Oligo-pTa535 and in combination with bulked pool probes Synt1 + Synt7 (Figure 3c), Synt3+ Synt6 (Figure 3e), Synt2 + Synt5 (Figure 3g) and Synt4 (Figure S1a), we constructed the karyotype of the 14 Th. intermedium chromosomes of 78829, as linkage groups 3St, 4St, 5St, 6JS-J, 7JS, 1St-JS and 2St-JS, respectively. The Th. intermedium chromosome karyotype is shown in Figure 3j. Therefore, the bulked Oligo-based FISH painting was effective in identifying each of the wheat chromosomes or chromosome segments for particular linkage groups in the wheat–Th. intermedium amphiploid.

2.3. Constitution of Th. intermedium Chromosomes in 12 Wheat–Thinopyrum Amphiploids

By the above-mentioned strategies with ND-FISH and Oligo-FISH painting, we also determined the karyotypes of 12 wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploids TE-1502 and TE-1508, TH101-2, y70-1-4, TAI7045 and TAI7047, Zhong2, Zhong3, Zhong4, Zhong5, 78784 and 8024 (Figure S2). About 12 to 16 Th. intermedium chromosomes were observed in these amphiploids. The Th. intermedium chromosomes with their subgenome and linkage groups are shown in Figure 4 and Table 1. Among the identified partial amphiploids (Figure S3), only 20 chromosomes involving J, JS and St subgenomes were observed with the absence of the 2J chromosome. The St (42.8%) and JS chromosomes (35.9%) were transmitted higher than the J chromosomes (21.3%), with the highest frequency being for 7JS in partial amphiploids. The linkage group 4 with 4St, 4J and 4JS appeared equally transmitted in these partial amphiploids. About 32.8% of chromosomes displayed the homologous translocation between St-JS, J-JS and St-J, while only 2 of 99 chromosomes had the non-homologous translocation of 2JS-5JS and 3St-6St. The amphiploids TE-1502 and TAI7047 had 16 different chromosomes from Th. intermedium. Zhong 3, Zhong 4 and Zhong 5 displayed a close karyotype of Th. intermedium, except the varied number of linkage groups 2 and 4 chromosomes. Moreover, there was different number of wheat chromosomes in amphiploids. The lines TE-1502 and TE-1508 had 4J and 4JS substituted for wheat chromosome 4B and Zhong 2 had four 6A chromosomes; 8024 had an absence of 7D during the transmission of the lines (Table 1).

2.4. Revisiting the Karyotype of Wheat–Th. intermedium Additions Z3

The wheat–Th. intermedium chromosome addition line Z3 contained a pair of short-satellited chromosomes with clear nucleolus regions. The ND-FISH using probes Oligo-B11 + Oligo-pDb12H, showed that the added Th. intermedium chromosomes were a J-St-JS translocation, and the sequential ND-FISH using probes Oligo-pSc119.2 + Oligo-pTa535 showed that these chromosomes had weak signals (Figure 5a). The Oligo-FISH painting using probes Synt1 and Synt5 was used to screen the metaphase spreads of Z3. The probe Synt1 produced strong green signals on the chromosomes 1A, 1B and 1D, and the probe Synt5 generated the red signals on chromosomes 5A, 5B and 5D, respectively, while the added Th. intermedium chromosomes showed the green and red signals in each arm (Figure 5b). Therefore, the Oligo-FISH painting results indicated that the added Thinopyrum chromosomes in Z3 were a pair of translocated chromosomes involving the short arms of group 5 and long arms of group 1.
The sequential ND-FISH with probes Oligo-5SrDNA, Oligo-pTa71, Oligo-3A1 and Oligo-pSt122 was performed to confirm the karyotype of the added Th. intermedium chromosomes of Z3. The signals from Oligo-5SrDNA, Oligo-pTa71 were observed in the interstitial regions of the satellite regions of Th. intermedium chromosomes in Z3 (Figure S3). The alien chromosome in Z3 has strong Oligo-3A1 hybridization signals on the short arm closed to centromere, and Oligo-pSt122 signals at the telomeric ends of long arms. In addition, the PCR analysis by molecular markers of group 5S (CINAU1462, CINAU1463, CINAU1472, CINAU 1489) and group 1L (TNAC1021, TNAC1042, TNAC1076, TNAC1088) produced the Th. intermedium specific amplification of Z3 (Figure 6). The evidence provided by molecular markers and the standard Th. intermedium karyotype (Figure 1) indicates that the Th. intermedium chromosome in Z3 was 5JS.1St-JSL. Therefore, the Oligo-FISH painting combined with molecular markers provide an opportunity for the precise identification of a complex chromosome rearrangement.

3. Discussion

Assigning a chromosome to a specific linkage group in polyploid Triticeae species with extremely large genomes traditionally relies on aneuploid analysis combined with individual chromosome recognition [22]. However, such aneuploid stocks are difficult to maintain and complete sets of aneuploids are not available for all Triticeae species [23]. Chromosome-banding techniques have long been considered as a fast, reliable, and economical means for the identification of chromosomes for wheat and related species; however, chromosome banding represents uninformative heterochromatin blocks [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Previous studies revealed that Th. intermedium possessed a large amount of cytogenetic polymorphism and structural modifications of chromosomes as revealed by C-banding [24]. Moreover, conventional FISH for chromosome identification was principally based on the dispersed or tandem repetitive DNA sequences, which are mostly not linkage group-specific [16,20,23,26]. Synthesizing short single-copy oligonucleotide pools has provided a new and affordable method to develop chromosome specific painting probes for FISH [27,28]. We first applied seven bulked oligos Synt1 to Synt7 as permanent resources, which enabled us to identify the homoeologous groups of chromosomes from Triticeae species fast, at a low cost and with high efficiency [13,14]. In the present study, we conducted the sequential ND-FISH probed by Oligo-B11 and Oligo-pDb12H to distinguish each of the three genomes of St, J and JS in Th. intermedium. After that, Oligo-FISH painting by probes Synt1 to Synt7 was used to identify the seven individual linkage groups. In the present study, we first set up all the 21 pairs of Th. intermedium chromosomes with their precise assignment of subgenomes and linkage groups based on the Oligo-FISH painting probes and ND-FISH with subgenome-related probes (Figure 1). Our protocols can be used to karyotype the different accessions of Th. intermedium. The heterozygosity of each linkage group of the Th. intermedium was revealed (Figure 2). The results indicate that the heterozygous FISH patterns were observed in seven chromosome pairs, indicating the complexity of the karyotype of Th. intermedium, which is difficult to be identified by previous cytogenetic methods. Recombination among inter-genomic and non-homologous chromosome pairs was not found in the present Th. intermedium accession. The appropriate multiplex probes could be applied for studying chromosome constitution and chromosome variation for a large number of wild wheatgrass genetic resources.
Cauderon [31] and Cauderon et al. [32] reported the production of a wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploid TAF46 with 56 chromosomes, and it was firstly identified to have seven pairs of alien chromosomes and wheat 5B-7B reciprocal translocation by C-banding [24]. GISH using a genomic DNA from Ps. strigosa, Chen et al. [33] clearly determined that TAF46 has six S and eight J genome chromosomes in a wheat background, and also found that chromosome 6A was missing in an aneuploid of TAF46. In the present study, we precisely identified the individual St and J chromosomes in TAF46 and confirmed that four 6D chromosomes substituted for 6A of wheat (Figure 3). Zhong 5 has the Thinopyrum chromosome composition, including four S, two JS and eight S-JS or S-J translocation chromosomes [33]. The present study defined the linkage group of the individual Thinopyrum chromosome in Zhong 5, which is consistent with the previous ND-FISH results from the Zhong 5-derived addition lines [24]. The Robertsonian translocation between 1St and 1JS, 2JS and 2St, as well as two small translocations, occurred between 4D and Th. intermedium chromosomes in 78,829 (Figure 3). In the present study, the Oligo-FISH painting probes facilitated the study of inter-species chromosome homologous relationships and visualized non-homologous chromosomal rearrangements in some wheat-Thinopyrum derivatives. Our results provide a precise recognition of individual Th. intermedium chromosome and their rearrangement of the 13 wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploids, which will be helpful for the subsequent transfer of Thinopyrum chromatin from amphiploid to wheat. The high transmission rate of chromosome 7JS in the identified amphiploids may be partially due to the presence of novel disease- and insect-resistance genes [4,34,35].
The wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploid contained stable karyotypes, since the homoeologous group of three subgenome chromosomes have high complementary [4]. However, their chromosome structures were easily rearranged following their hybridization with wheat [5]. The wheat–Th. intermedium introgression lines have been developed to transfer novel gene(s) from the diversified gene-pool of Thinopyrum to wheat [5,8]. Tang et al. [34] revealed that the addition line Z3 derived from Zhong 5 contained a pair of Th. Intermedium-derived small-satellite chromosomes by GISH. Hu et al. [36] revealed that the C-banding patterns and the FISH signals by pTa71 hybridization of 1St#2 chromosomes in AS1677 differed from those in Z3. In the present study, the ND-FISH with multiple probes and the Oligo-FISH painting methods indicated that the added Th. intermedium chromosome in Z3 is a 5JS.1St-JSL translocation (Figure 5). The Th. intermedium chromosomes in Z3 are derived from the chromosome set in the parent Zhong 5 (Figure 4). Our previous study identified that the line Hy37, which originated from Zhong 5, contained a 5JS.3StS chromosome [24], indicating frequent chromosome modifications after the wheat–Th. intermedium amphiploid was crossed to wheat. Therefore, the oligo-painting probe-based FISH proved to be a useful tool for visualizing the occurrence of chromosome rearrangements during early and later generations of wheat-alien transfer subsequent to wide hybridization and chromosome engineering.
High molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GSs) are encoded by the Glu-1 loci located on the long arm of group-1 chromosomes of Triticeae species [37,38]. Several genes for HMW-GS have been identified in the subgenomes of Th. intermedium [39]. Niu et al. [40] systematically characterized the HMW-GS composition of several wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploids and derivatives, and found that TAF46 and Zhong 2 expressed the Thinopyrum-specific HMW-GS. Hu et al. [36] confirmed that the Th. intermedium ssp. Trichophorum-derived partial amphiploid and substitution line AS1677 expressed the 1St-specific HMW-GS. The present study found that both TAF46 and Zhong 2 have the 1J chromosome, while other amphiploids contained the 1StS.1JSL-rearranged chromosome (Figure 4). The line Z3 with 5JS.1JSL did not express Thinopyrum-specific HMW-glutenin subunits [40]. It is worthwhile to investigate HMW-GS expression in newly developed Th. intermedium 1JS substitution lines [41,42], and also to reveal the structure of the 1JSL in Z3 and determine the absence of the expression of HMW-GS. The HMW-GS gene expansion and expression will be studied in detail to reveal the mechanism of the changes during allo-polyploidization and introgression [43]. The ongoing precise genome sequencing of Th. intermedium species at a chromosomal level and the re-sequencing of wheat–Th. intermedium derivatives will be essential to dissect the complex evolutionary history of Triticeae species [43,44,45,46].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

Th. intermedium PI440043 (StJSJ, 2n = 6x = 42) was obtained from the National Small Grains Collection at Aberdeen, Idaho, USA. Wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploid TAF46 [21] was kindly provided by Dr. Bernd Friebe, Wheat Genetics Resource Center, Kansas State University, USA. Wheat lines Chinese Spring (CS); wheat–Th. intermedium ssp. trichophorum partial amphiploid TE-1508, TE-1502, TH101-2 and y70-1-4; wheat–Th. intermedium addition lines Z3 [22] and Hy37 [18] are maintained by the Center for Informational Biology, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China. The wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploids TAI7045 and TAI7047, Zhong2, Zhong3, Zhong4, Zhong5, 78784, 78829 and 8024 were obtained from Dr. Zhijian Chang, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China.

4.2. Probe Preparation

Seven oligo-FISH pools of probes Synt1 to Synt7 corresponded to each of the seven Triticeae homoeologous groups, respectively [13]. These oligo probes were selected from the single-copy sequences derived from 1H to 7H barley chromosomes with a 96% sequence homology with wheat linkage groups 1 to 7 chromosomes, which enabled us to distinguish the chromosomes for specific linkage groups. The bulked oligo libraries Synt1 to Synt7 were synthesized by MYcroarray (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Probe preparation from the synthesized oligo library was performed as described by Han et al. [29]. The tandem repeat-based oligo-nucleotide probes for ND-FISH are listed in Table S1. Labeled Oligonucleotide probes were synthesized by Shanghai Invitrogen Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The labeling and preparation of bulk painting oligos was conducted following the description of Li and Yang [14].

4.3. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization

Root tips from germinated seeds were collected and treated with nitrous oxide followed by enzyme digestion, using the procedure of Han et al. [47]. The synthetic oligonucleotides were either 5′ end-labelled with 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-FAM) for green or 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine (Tamra) for red signals. The protocol of non-denaturing FISH (ND-FISH) by the synthesized probes was described by Fu et al. [19]. After the oligo-based FISH, the sequential FISH with bulk painting with oligos was conducted following the description by Li and Yang [14]. Photomicrographs of FISH chromosomes were taken with an Olympus BX-53 microscope equipped with a DP-70 CCD camera.

4.4. Molecular Marker Analysis

The PLUG markers [48] and CINAU primers [49] for location on specific chromosomes were obtained by searching the database of Wheat Genome Assembly ref. v1.0. The PCR protocol used the 8% PAGE gel separation was as described by Hu et al. [36].

5. Conclusions

The present oligo-bulked pool FISH visualized homoeologous regions directly on Triticeae chromosomes in a simple and fast experimental procedure. Our present comparative genomic-based oligo-painting FISH studies provide new insights into the evolution of the Th. intermedium genomes. The protocol of FISH with multiple types of oligos has great potential for the high-throughput karyotyping of wheat–Th. intermedium introgression lines for effective wheat breeding by chromosome manipulation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11162109/s1, Figure S1. Sequential Oligo-FISH painting using specific bulked oligo probes Synt4 (a) and FISH by probes Oligo-pSc119.2 + Oligo-pTa535 (b) for 78829. Figure S2. Karyotyping of 12 wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium partial amphiploids by sequential ND-FISH and Oligo-FISH painting. Figure S2-1. Karyotyping of the partial amphiploid 78784 by sequential ND-FISH (a,b,d,f,h) and Oligo-FISH painting (c,e,g). Karyotypes of wheat chromosomes (i) and Th. intermedium (j) were showed, respectively. Figure S2-2. Karyotyping of the partial amphiploid 8024 by sequential ND-FISH (a,b,d,f,h) and Oligo-FISH painting (c,e,g). Karyotypes of wheat chromosomes (i) and Th. intermedium (j) were showed, respectively. Figure S2-3. Karyotyping of the partial amphiploid TAI7045 by sequential ND-FISH (a,b,d,f,h) and Oligo-FISH painting (c,e,g). Karyotypes of wheat chromosomes (i) and Th. intermedium (j) were showed, respectively. Figure S2-4. Karyotyping of the partial amphiploid TAI7047 by sequential ND-FISH (a,b,d,f,h) and Oligo-FISH painting (c,e,g). Karyotypes of wheat chromosomes (i) and Th. intermedium (j) were showed, respectively. Figure S2-5. Karyotyping of the partial amphiploid TE-1502 by sequential ND-FISH (a,b,d,f,h) and Oligo-FISH painting (c,e,g). Karyotypes of wheat chromosomes (i) and Th. intermedium (j) were showed, respectively. Figure S2-6. Karyotyping of the partial amphiploid TE-1508 by sequential ND-FISH (a,b,d,f,h) and Oligo-FISH painting (c,e,g). Karyotypes of wheat chromosomes (i) and Th. intermedium (j) were showed, respectively. Figure S2-7. Karyotyping of the partial amphiploid TH101-2 by sequential ND-FISH (a,b,d,f,h) and Oligo-FISH painting (c,e,g). Karyotypes of wheat chromosomes (i) and Th. intermedium (j) were showed, respectively. Figure S2-8. Karyotyping of the partial amphiploid y70-1-4 by sequential ND-FISH (a,b,d,f,h) and Oligo-FISH painting (c,e,g). Karyotypes of wheat chromosomes (i) and Th. intermedium (j) were showed, respectively. Figure S2-9. Karyotyping of the partial amphiploid Zhong2 by sequential ND-FISH (a,b,d,f,h) and Oligo-FISH painting (c,e,g). Karyotypes of wheat chromosomes (i) and Th. intermedium (j) were showed, respectively. Figure S2-10. Karyotyping of the partial amphiploid Zhong 3 by sequential ND-FISH (a,b,d,f,h) and Oligo-FISH painting (c,e,g). Karyotypes of wheat chromosomes (i) and Th. intermedium (j) were showed, respectively. Figure S2-11. Karyotyping of the partial amphiploid Zhong 4 by sequential ND-FISH (a,b,d,f,h) and Oligo-FISH painting (c,e,g). Karyotypes of wheat chromosomes (i) and Th. intermedium (j) were showed, respectively. Figure S2-12. Karyotyping of the partial amphiploid Zhong 5 by sequential ND-FISH (a,b,d,f,h) and Oligo-FISH painting (c,e,g). Karyotypes of wheat chromosomes (i) and Th. intermedium (j) were showed, respectively. Figure S3. The frequency of St, J and JS chromosomes in the identified wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploid. Figure S4. Sequential ND-FISH of Z3 by multiple probes. The probes Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) + Oligo-pTa535 (red) (a,d), Oligo-pTa71 (red) + Oligo-3A1 (green) (b), Oligo-pDb12H (red) + Oligo-B11(green) (c,f) and Oligo-pSt122(green) + Oligo-5SrDNA (red) (e) are indicated. The additional Th. intermedium chromosomes in Z3 are shown (g). Bars, 10 μm. Table S1. Genome-specific oligo probes for distinguishing the Triticeae species by ND-FISH.

Author Contributions

Z.Y. (Zujun Yang) and G.L. designed the research; Z.Y. (Zhihui Yu) and H.W. performed the experiments; Z.Y. (Zujun Yang) and E.Y. analyzed the data; Z.Y. (Zujun Yang) and G.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971886), and International Cooperation Program (2022YFH0012) of the Science and Technology Department of Sichuan, China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request. Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Ian Dundas at University of Adelaide, Australia, for reviewing the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tsvelev, N.N. Grasses of the Soviet Union; Oxonian Press Pvt. Ltd.: New Delhi, India, 1983; pp. 196–298. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jensen, K.B.; Yan, X.B.; Larson, S.R.; Wang, R.R.C.; Robins, J.G. Agronomic and genetic diversity in intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium). Plant Breed. 2016, 135, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, Q.; Conner, R.L.; Laroche, A.; Thomas, J.B. Genome analysis of Thinopyrum intermedium and Thinopyrum ponticum using genomic in situ hybridization. Genome 1998, 41, 580–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, Q. Detection of alien chromatin introgression from Thinopyrum into wheat using S genomic DNA as a probe—A landmark approach for Thinopyrum genome research. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2005, 109, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, H.; Wang, X. Thinopyrum ponticum and Th. intermedium: The promising source of resistance to fungal and viral diseases of wheat. J. Genet. Genom. 2009, 36, 557–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chang, Z.J.; Zhang, X.J.; Yang, Z.J.; Zhan, H.X.; Li, X.; Liu, C.; Zhang, C.Z. Characterization of a partial wheat—Thinopyrum intermedium amphiploid and its reaction to fungal diseases of wheat. Hereditas 2010, 147, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fedak, G.; Han, F. Characterization of derivatives from wheat—Thinopyrum wide crosses. Cytogenet. Genom. Res. 2005, 109, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bao, Y.G.; Wu, X.; Zhang, C.; Li, X.F.; Han, F.P.; Qi, X.L.; Wang, H.G. Chromosomal constitutions and reactions to powdery mildew and stripe rust of four novel wheat—Thinopyrum intermedium partial amphiploids. J. Genet. Genom. 2014, 41, 663–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cui, Y.; Xing, P.; Qi, X.; Bao, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, R.R.C.; Li, X. Characterization of chromosome constitution in three wheat—Thinopyrum intermedium amphiploids revealed frequent rearrangement of alien and wheat chromosomes. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mahelka, V.; Kopecky, D.; Baum, B.R. Contrasting patterns of evolution of 45S and 5S rDNA families uncover new aspects in the genome constitution of the agronomically important grass Thinopyrum intermedium (Triticeae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2065–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Li, J.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, P.; Lang, T.; Hoxha, S.; Li, G.; Yang, Z. Comparative FISH and molecular identification of new stripe rust resistant wheat—Thinopyrum intermedium ssp. trichophorum introgression lines. Crop J. 2019, 7, 819–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cui, L.; Ren, Y.K.; Zhang, Y.M.; Tang, Z.H.; Guo, Q.; Niu, Y.Q.; Yan, W.Z.; Sun, Y.; Li, H.J. Characterization of resistance to cereal cyst nematode, agronomic performance, and end-use quality parameters in four perennial wheat—Thinopyrum intermedium lines. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 594197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, G.; Zhang, T.; Yu, Z.; Wang, H.; Yang, E.; Yang, Z. An efficient Oligo-FISH painting system for revealing chromosome rearrangements and polyploidization in Triticeae. Plant J. 2021, 105, 978–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, G.; Yang, Z. Oligo-FISH paints in Triticeae. Curr. Protoc. 2022, 2, e364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tang, S.; Tang, Z.; Qiu, L.; Yang, Z.; Li, G.; Lang, T.; Zhu, W.; Zhang, J.; Fu, S. Developing new oligo probes to distinguish specific chromosomal segments and the A, B, D genomes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using ND-FISH. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tang, Z.; Yang, Z.; Fu, S. Oligonucleotides replacing the roles of repetitive sequences pAs1, pSc119.2, pTa-535, pTa71, CCS1, and pAWRC.1 for FISH analysis. J. Appl. Genet. 2014, 5, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xi, W.; Tang, Z.; Tang, S.; Yang, Z.; Luo, J.; Fu, S. New ND-FISH-positive Oligo probes for identifying Thinopyrum chromosomes in wheat backgrounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, Z.; Wang, H.; Xu, Y.; Li, Y.; Lang, T.; Yang, Z.; Li, G. Characterization of chromosomal rearrangement in new wheat—Thinopyrum intermedium addition lines carrying Thinopyrum-specific grain hardness genes. Agronomy 2019, 9, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fu, S.L.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, M.; Yang, Z.; Qiu, L.; Yan, B.; Ren, Z.; Tang, Z. Oligonucleotide probes for ND-FISH analysis to identify rye and wheat chromosomes. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lang, T.; Li, G.R.; Wang, H.J.; Yu, Z.H.; Chen, Q.H.; Yang, E.N.; Fu, S.L.; Tang, Z.X.; Yang, Z.J. Physical location of tandem repeats in the wheat genome and application for chromosome identification. Planta 2019, 249, 663–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, Q.; Conner, R.L.; Li, H.J.; Sun, S.C.; Ahmad, F.; Laroche, A.; Graf, R.J. Molecular cytogenetic discrimination and reaction to wheat streak mosaic virus and the wheat curl mite in Zhong series of wheat—Thinopyrum intermedium partial amphiploids. Genome 2003, 46, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jiang, J.M.; Gill, B.S. Nonisotopic in situ hybridization and plant genome mapping: The first 10 years. Genome 1994, 37, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jiang, J.; Friebe, B.; Gill, B.S. Recent advances in alien gene transfer in wheat. Euphytica 1994, 73, 199–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Friebe, B.; Mukai, Y.; Gill, B.S.; Cauderon, Y. C-banding and in-situ hybridization analyses of Agropyron intermedium, a partial wheat x Ag. intermedium amphiploid, and six derived chromosome addition lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1992, 84, 899–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Larkin, P.J.; Banks, P.M.; Lagudah, E.S.; Appels, R.; Chen, X.; Xin, Z.Y.; Ohm, H.W.; McIntosh, R.A. Disomic Thinopyrum intermedium addition lines in wheat with barley yellow dwarf virus resistance and with rust resistances. Genome 1996, 38, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lukaszewski, A.J.; Gustafson, J.P. Translocations and modifications of chromosomes in triticale × wheat hybrids. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1983, 64, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gill, B.S.; Friebe, B.; Endo, T.R. Standard karyotype and nomenclature system for description of chromosome bands and structural aberrations in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genome 1991, 34, 830–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mukai, Y.; Gill, B.S. Detection of barley chromatin added to wheat by genomic in situ hybridization. Genome 1991, 34, 448–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Han, Y.H.; Zhang, T.; Thammapichai, P.; Weng, Y.Q.; Jiang, J.M. Chromosome-specific painting in Cucumis species using bulked oligonucleotides. Genetics 2015, 200, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jiang, J. Fluorescence in situ hybridization in plants: Recent developments and future applications. Chromosome Res. 2019, 27, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cauderon, Y. Genome analysis in the genus. Agropyron. Hered. 1966, 2, 218–234. [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen, Q.; Conner, R.L.; Laroche, A.; Ji, W.Q.; Armstrong, K.C.; Fedak, G. Genomic in situ hybridization analysis of Thinopyrum chromatin in a wheat—Th. intermedium partial amphiploid and six derived chromosome addition lines. Genome 1999, 42, 1217–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Saigne, B.; Dauge, M. The resistance to wheat rusts of Agropyron intermedium and its use in wheat improvement. Proc. Int. Wheat Genet. Symp. 1973, 4, 401–407. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tang, S.; Li, Z.; Jia, X.; Larkin, P.J. Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) analyses of Thinopyrum intermedium, its partial amphiploid Zhong 5, and disease-resistant derivatives in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000, 100, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lang, T.; La, S.; Li, B.; Yu, Z.; Chen, Q.; Li, J.; Yang, E.; Li, G.; Yang, Z. Precise identification of wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium translocation chromosomes carrying resistance to wheat stripe rust in line Z4 and its derived progenies. Genome 2018, 61, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hu, L.J.; Li, G.R.; Zeng, Z.X.; Chang, Z.J.; Liu, C.; Zhou, J.P.; Yang, Z.J. Molecular cytogenetic identification of a new wheat-Thinopyrum substitution line with stripe rust resistance. Euphytica 2011, 177, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, G.R.; Liu, C.; Li, C.H.; Zhao, J.M.; Zhou, L.; Dai, G.; Yang, E.N.; Yang, Z.J. Introgression of a novel Thinopyrum intermedium St-chromosome-specific HMW-GS gene into wheat. Mol. Breed. 2013, 31, 843–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shewry, P.R.; Halford, N.G.; Lafiandra, D. Genetics of wheat gluten proteins. Adv. Genet. 2003, 49, 111–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhang, X.; DeHaan, L.R.; Higgins, L.; Markowski, T.W.; Wyse, D.L.; Anderson, J.A. New insights into high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits and sub-genomes of the perennial crop Thinopyrum intermedium (Triticeae). J. Cereal Sci. 2014, 59, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Niu, Z.X.; Klindworth, D.L.; Wang, R.R.C.; Jauhar, P.P.; Larkin, P.J.; Xu, S.S. Characterization of HMW glutenin subunits in Thinopyrum intermedium, Th. bessarabicum, Lophopyrum elongatum, Aegilops markgrafii, and their addition lines in wheat. Crop Sci. 2011, 51, 667–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, Y.; Cao, Q.; Zhang, J.; Wang, S.; Chen, C.; Wang, C.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Ji, W. Cytogenetic analysis and molecular marker development for a new wheat–Thinopyrum ponticum 1Js (1D) disomic substitution line with resistance to stripe rust and powdery mildew. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, M.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, X.; Wang, H.; Bao, Y. Molecular cytogenetic identification of a novel wheat–Thinopyrum ponticum 1JS (1B) substitution line resistant to powdery mildew and leaf rust. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 12, 727734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Li, Y.; Fu, J.; Shen, Q.; Yang, D. High-molecular-weight glutenin subunits: Genetics, structures, and relation to end use qualities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nikitina, E.; Kuznetsova, V.; Kroupin, P.; Karlov, G.I.; Divashuk, M.G. Development of specific Thinopyrum cytogenetic markers for wheat-wheatgrass hybrids using sequencing and qPCR data. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Qiao, L.; Liu, S.; Li, J.; Li, S.; Yu, Z.; Liu, C.; Li, X.; Liu, J.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, P.; et al. Development of sequence-tagged site marker set for identification of J, JS and St sub-genomes of Thinopyrum intermedium in wheat background. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 685216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cseh, A.; Yang, C.Y.; Hubbart-Edwards, S.; Scholefield, D.; Ashling, S.S.; Burridgem, A.J.; Wilkinson, P.A.; King, I.P.; King, J.; Grewal, S. Development and validation of an exome-based SNP marker set for identification of the St, Jr and Jvs genomes of Thinopyrym intermedium in a wheat background. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 1555–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Han, F.P.; Lamb, J.C.; Birchler, J.A. High frequency of centromere inactivation resulting in stable dicentric chromosomes of maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 3238–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ishikawa, G.; Nakamura, T.; Ashida, T.; Saito, M.; Nasuda, S.; Endo, T.R.; Wu, J.; Matsumoto, T. Localization of anchor loci representing five hundred annotated rice genes to wheat chromosomes using PLUG markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 118, 499–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, X.; Wei, X.; Xiao, J.; Yuan, C.; Wu, Y.; Cao, A.; Xing, L.; Chen, P.; Zhang, S.; Wang, X.; et al. Whole genome development of intron targeting (IT) markers specific for Dasypyrum villosum chromosomes based on next-generation sequencing technology. Mol. Breed. 2017, 37, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 11 02109 g001 550
Figure 1. Sequential FISH for Th. intermedium PI440043 with probes Oligo-B11 + Oligo-pDb12H (a), Oligo-pSc119.2 + Oligo-pTa535 (b,e,g,i), Synt5 + Synt7SL (c), Synt3 (d), Synt4 + Synt6 (f), Synt1 and Synt7 (h) and Synt2 (j), respectively. The chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). (k) Karyotypes of Thinopyrum intermedium PI440043 with homoeologous and subgenome assignment were subjected to sequential ND-FISH with Oligo-pSc119.2 + Oligo-pTa535. Bars, 10 μm.
Figure 1. Sequential FISH for Th. intermedium PI440043 with probes Oligo-B11 + Oligo-pDb12H (a), Oligo-pSc119.2 + Oligo-pTa535 (b,e,g,i), Synt5 + Synt7SL (c), Synt3 (d), Synt4 + Synt6 (f), Synt1 and Synt7 (h) and Synt2 (j), respectively. The chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). (k) Karyotypes of Thinopyrum intermedium PI440043 with homoeologous and subgenome assignment were subjected to sequential ND-FISH with Oligo-pSc119.2 + Oligo-pTa535. Bars, 10 μm.
Plants 11 02109 g001
Plants 11 02109 g002 550
Figure 2. Sequential FISH probes Oligo-B11 + Oligo-pDb12H (a), Oligo-pSc119.2 +Oligo-pTa535 (b,d,f,h) and Oligo-FISH painting using specific bulked oligo probes Synt1+ Synt3 (c), Synt2 + Synt5 (e) and Synt4 + Synt6 (g) for wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploid TAF46, respectively. Karyotype of wheat chromosomes (i) and Th. intermedium (j) are shown. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Bars, 10 μm.
Figure 2. Sequential FISH probes Oligo-B11 + Oligo-pDb12H (a), Oligo-pSc119.2 +Oligo-pTa535 (b,d,f,h) and Oligo-FISH painting using specific bulked oligo probes Synt1+ Synt3 (c), Synt2 + Synt5 (e) and Synt4 + Synt6 (g) for wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploid TAF46, respectively. Karyotype of wheat chromosomes (i) and Th. intermedium (j) are shown. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Bars, 10 μm.
Plants 11 02109 g002
Plants 11 02109 g003 550
Figure 3. Sequential FISH probes Oligo-B11 + Oligo-pDb12H (a), Oligo-pSc119.2 + Oligo-pTa535 (b,d,f,h) and Oligo painting using specific bulked oligo probes Synt1+ Synt7 (c), Synt3 + Synt6 (e) and Synt2 + Synt5 (g) for wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploid 78829, respectively. Karyotypes of wheat chromosomes (i) and Th. intermedium (j) are shown. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Arrows showed the wheat–Thinopyrum small translocation chromosomes.
Figure 3. Sequential FISH probes Oligo-B11 + Oligo-pDb12H (a), Oligo-pSc119.2 + Oligo-pTa535 (b,d,f,h) and Oligo painting using specific bulked oligo probes Synt1+ Synt7 (c), Synt3 + Synt6 (e) and Synt2 + Synt5 (g) for wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploid 78829, respectively. Karyotypes of wheat chromosomes (i) and Th. intermedium (j) are shown. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Arrows showed the wheat–Thinopyrum small translocation chromosomes.
Plants 11 02109 g003
Plants 11 02109 g004 550
Figure 4. Karyogram of Th. intermedium chromosomes in wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploids based on FISH signals of Oligo-pSc119.2 + Oligo-pTa535 (up), and Oligo-B11 + Oligo-pDb12H (bottom). The homoeologous groups 1 to 7 of the Th. intermedium were determined by Oligo-painting probes Synt1 to Synt7. The FISH plates of various partial amphiploids are shown in Table 1 and Figure S2.
Figure 4. Karyogram of Th. intermedium chromosomes in wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploids based on FISH signals of Oligo-pSc119.2 + Oligo-pTa535 (up), and Oligo-B11 + Oligo-pDb12H (bottom). The homoeologous groups 1 to 7 of the Th. intermedium were determined by Oligo-painting probes Synt1 to Synt7. The FISH plates of various partial amphiploids are shown in Table 1 and Figure S2.
Plants 11 02109 g004
Plants 11 02109 g005 550
Figure 5. Sequential ND-FISH and Oligo-FISH painting of the wheat–Th. intermedium addition line Z3. (a) Probes Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) + Oligo-pTa535 (red) and (b) Synt1 (green) + Synt5 (red) are shown. The added Thinopyrum chromosomes are shown by arrows and the cut-and-paste chromosomes at the bottom left. Bars, 10 μm.
Figure 5. Sequential ND-FISH and Oligo-FISH painting of the wheat–Th. intermedium addition line Z3. (a) Probes Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) + Oligo-pTa535 (red) and (b) Synt1 (green) + Synt5 (red) are shown. The added Thinopyrum chromosomes are shown by arrows and the cut-and-paste chromosomes at the bottom left. Bars, 10 μm.
Plants 11 02109 g005
Plants 11 02109 g006 550
Figure 6. PCR analysis using TNAC and CINAU primers of the short arms of group 1 (a) and group 5 (b). Materials, CS (Chinese Spring); Hy37 (5JS.3StS translocation line); AS1677 (1St-1D substitution); Z3, Zhong5. The * indicate Th. Intermedium-specific bands.
Figure 6. PCR analysis using TNAC and CINAU primers of the short arms of group 1 (a) and group 5 (b). Materials, CS (Chinese Spring); Hy37 (5JS.3StS translocation line); AS1677 (1St-1D substitution); Z3, Zhong5. The * indicate Th. Intermedium-specific bands.
Plants 11 02109 g006
Table
Table 1. The Thinopyrum chromosome constitution of the wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploids.
Table 1. The Thinopyrum chromosome constitution of the wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploids.
MaterialsChromosome NumberChromosome ConstitutionFigure
Zhong22n = 56, four 6A1J, 2St-JS, 3St, 4JS, 5JS, 7JSFigure S2-9
Zhong32n = 561St-JS, 2JS-St, 3St, 4St, 5J-St, 6JS-J, 7JSFigure S2-10
Zhong42n = 561St-JS, 2St-JS, 3St-6St, 4St-, 5J-St, 6JS-J, 7JSFigure S2-11
Zhong52n = 561St-JS, 2St-JS, 3St, 4St, 5J-St, 6JS-J, 7JSFigure S2-12
TAI70452n = 561St-JS, 2St, 3JS, 4J, 5J-St, 6JS-J, 7JSFigure S2-3
y70-1-42n = 561St-JS, 2St, 3JS, 4J, 5J-St (1), 5St (1), 6JS-J, 7JSFigure S2-8
787842n = 561St-JS, 2St-JS, 3St, 4St, 5St, 6JS-J, 7JSFigure S2-1
TAI70472n = 56 + t1St-JS, 2St, 3JS, 4J, 5J-St, 6JS-J, 7JS, 7J teloFigure S2-4
788292n = 561St-JS, 2St-JS, 3St, 4St, 5J-St, 6JS-J, 7JSFigure 3
TE-15022n = 56, absence of 4B1St, 2St, 3J, 4J, 4JS, 2JS-5JS, 6St, 7StFigure S2-5
TE-15082n = 561St, 2JS, 3J, 4J, 4JS, 6St, 7StFigure S2-6
TH101-22n = 561St, 2JS, 3St, 4JS, 5JS, 6St, 7StFigure S2-7
80242n = 54, absence of 7D1St-JS, 2St-JS, 3St, 4JS, 5J-St, 6JS-J, 7JSFigure S2-2
TAF462n = 561J, 2St-, 3J, 4St, 5J, 6St, 7JFigure 2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, Z.; Wang, H.; Yang, E.; Li, G.; Yang, Z. Precise Identification of Chromosome Constitution and Rearrangements in Wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium Derivatives by ND-FISH and Oligo-FISH Painting. Plants 2022, 11, 2109. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162109

AMA Style

Yu Z, Wang H, Yang E, Li G, Yang Z. Precise Identification of Chromosome Constitution and Rearrangements in Wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium Derivatives by ND-FISH and Oligo-FISH Painting. Plants. 2022; 11(16):2109. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162109

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Zhihui, Hongjin Wang, Ennian Yang, Guangrong Li, and Zujun Yang. 2022. "Precise Identification of Chromosome Constitution and Rearrangements in Wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium Derivatives by ND-FISH and Oligo-FISH Painting" Plants 11, no. 16: 2109. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162109

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop