Next Article in Journal
Characterization and QTL Mapping of a Major Field Resistance Locus for Bacterial Blight in Rice
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Heat Stress on Expression of Wheat Genes Responsive to Hessian Fly Infestation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Diversity Assessment of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center and Chinese Wheat Core Germplasms by Non-Denaturing Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization

1
Crop Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China
2
Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement on Southwestern China (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of P.R.C.), Chengdu 610066, China
3
Environment-friendly Crop Germplasm Innovation and Genetic Improvement Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610066, China
4
School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(11), 1403; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111403
Submission received: 27 April 2022 / Revised: 17 May 2022 / Accepted: 23 May 2022 / Published: 25 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetic Resources)

Abstract

:
Germplasm is the material basis for crop genetic improvement and related basic research. Knowledge of genetic diversity present in wheat is the prerequisite for wheat breeding and improvement. Non-denaturing fluorescence in situ hybridization (ND-FISH) is a powerful tool to distinguish chromosomal polymorphisms and evaluate genetic diversity in wheat. In this study, ND-FISH using Oligo-pSc119.2-1, Oligo-pTa535-1, and Oligo-(GAA)7 as probes were used to analyze the genetic diversity among 60 International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) derived wheat lines, and 93 cultivated wheat and landraces from the Chinese wheat core germplasm. A total of 137 polymorphic FISH patterns were obtained, in which 41, 65, and 31 were from A-, B-, and D-genome chromosomes, respectively, indicating polymorphism of B-genome > A-genome > D-genome. In addition, 22 and 51 specific FISH types were observed in the two germplasm resource lines. Twelve types of rearrangements, including seven new translocations, were detected in all 153 wheat lines. Genetic relationships among 153 wheat lines were clustered into six groups. Our research provides cytological information for rational utilization of wheat germplasm resources.

1. Introduction

Germplasm is the material basis of human survival and innovation of agricultural science and technology, as well as the material basis for crop genetic improvement and related basic research. Each breakthrough in crop breeding is closely related to the discovery and utilization of novel germplasm. Dwarfing genes were introduced into wheat and rice breeding, triggering the first “Green Revolution” from the 1940s to the 1960s, making an outstanding contribution to the improvement of high-yielding varieties worldwide [1,2,3]. “Taigu male-sterile wheat”, a natural mutant of dominant male sterility, is a breakthrough in providing a new method for the creation of wheat germplasm resources with great utilization value [4]. “Chuanmai42”, derived from synthetic wheat, has raised the yield of wheat to a new level in Sichuan [5]. “Sumai 3”, the most useful resistance resource against Fusarium head blight, has also played an important role in breeding disease-resistant wheat worldwide [6,7]. Therefore, the utilization of germplasm is of great significance to breeding breakthrough varieties, promoting the sustainable development of the modern seed industry, and guaranteeing national food security.
Common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), one of the most important food crops for humanity, feeds 36% of the world population [8]. Unfortunately, the genetic base of wheat breeding is shrinking due to most breeding programs relying on a few parents in developing germplasm pools [9,10]. Autrique et al. [11] found that the same 15 ancestors were present in the pedigree of at least 80% of all 54 wheat cultivars, with five being found in all of them. In a study of wheat genetic diversity trends during domestication and breeding, a loss of genetic diversity was also observed from landrace cultivars to the elite breeding germplasm [12]. Such narrow genetic diversity is a challenge for sustainable wheat production with the changing climate and rapidly growing world population [13]. Landraces, wild species, and wild relatives possess high levels of genetic diversity for valuable traits, which may have been lost in elite genetic pools by selective processes [14]. Studies have shown that the genetic diversity could be increased by the introgression of novel lines from landrace cultivars, which contained numerous unique alleles that were absent in modern bread wheat cultivars [12]. Besides, foreign germplasm resources, such as the CIMMYT germplasm, have played an important role in wheat breeding and improvement, and the introduction of these resources has enriched the genetic diversity of wheat germplasm [15]. Thus, the utilization of landraces and the continuous introduction of foreign germplasm are of great significance to wheat breeding.
Collection and utilization of wheat germplasm are essential for the improvement of wheat cultivars, but genetic diversity present in wheat germplasm is the prerequisite for the utilization of germplasm. Currently, several methods are widely used to evaluate the genetic diversity of wheat, including morphological markers [13], biochemical markers [16], and molecular markers [17,18,19]. In addition, cytogenetic approaches such as C-banding and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) have also succeeded in revealing considerable polymorphism within the wheat genome [20], except for the identification of alien introgressions in wheat background [21,22] and studying chromosome behavior [23]. In recent years, ND-FISH based on oligonucleotide probes has been developed to detect wheat chromosomes rapidly, accurately, and at scale. Tang et al. [24] and Fu et al. [25] first developed the oligonucleotide probes Oligo-pTa535 and Oligo-pSc119.2 for ND-FISH, which can replace the repetitive DNA sequences pSc119.2 and pAs1 to identify the 21 wheat chromosomes. Since then, the technology has been widely used as a powerful karyotyping tool to identify wheat chromosome variations. Jiang et al. [26] constructed the chromosome karyotype for 85 common wheat varieties, displayed by ND-FISH using Oligo-pSc119.2-1, Oligo-pTa535-1, and Oligo-(GAA)6 as probes. Guo et al. [27] reported the genetic diversity of 76 representative Chinese wheat lines by ND-FISH. Ren et al. [28] performed ND-FISH using five oligonucleotide probes to examine 21 wheat cultivars and lines. Hu et al. [29] assessed chromosome polymorphisms of 166 common wheat cultivars using 11 oligonucleotide probes. However, studies for evaluating the Chinese and CIMMYT wheat core germplasm by ND-FISH have not been reported.
The CIMMYT Mexican core germplasm (CIMCOG) has facilitated wheat breeding for grain yield and quality worldwide, especially in warm areas [30]. Several studies have been performed to either evaluate or use this germplasm for slow rusting resistance [31], lodging-related traits [32], seed storability [33], seed dormancy and longevity [34], grain quality [35], and agronomic traits [36]. Studies have also been conducted on resistance to stripe rust and powdery mildew of Chinese core germplasm [37,38]. In the present study, 60 CIMCOG wheat lines and 93 Chinese applied core germplasm (CACG) wheat lines were used to assess genetic diversity by ND-FISH using Oligo-pSc119.2-1, Oligo-pTa535-1, and Oligo-(GAA)7 as probes, in order to provide cytological information for improvements in wheat breeding.

2. Results

2.1. Construction of Wheat Karyotype by ND-FISH

Five seeds were randomly selected from each line, and the metaphase chromosomes of each seed were analyzed by ND-FISH with Oligo-PSC119.2-1, Oligo-pTa535-1, and Oligo-(GAA)7. The standard karyotype of Chinese Spring (CS) was established based on the hybridization patterns of the three probes. As shown in Figure 1, the Oligo-pSc119.2 probe mainly hybridized with B-genome chromosomes, whereas the hybridization signals of Oligo-pTa535-1 were mainly distributed on A- and D-genome chromosomes. The Oligo-(GAA)7 probe produced strong signals at most peri-centromeric regions for all the B-genome chromosomes analyzed. Using the karyotype of CS as reference, two of 60 CIMCOG wheat lines were tetraploid (2n = 28) (Figure 2, Table 1), whereas 58 of 60 CIMCOG wheat lines and all 93 CACG wheat lines were hexaploid (2n = 42) (Table 1 and Table 2). Therefore, combined with the three probes, we were able to distinguish all 21 wheat chromosomes and determine the hybrid signal polymorphism and chromosomal rearrangement among the wheat lines by comparing the distribution of FISH patterns.

2.2. ND-FISH Polymorphisms of A-, B-, and D-Genome Chromosomes

Based on the comparison of ND-FISH hybridization signals displayed by the three probes, polymorphisms of wheat chromosomes could be displayed by the variation of tandem repeats in the amount and distribution. In the 153 lines, 137 polymorphic FISH types among 21 chromosomes were obtained (Table 3); 41 from A-genome (Figure 3), 65 from B-genome (Figure 4), and 31 from D-genome chromosomes (Figure 5). The number of FISH types ranged from 2 to 13, 5 to 13, and 3 to 8 in A-, B-, and D-genomes, respectively. All 21 chromosomes had two types of ND-FISH hybridization signal patterns at least. Among these, chromosomes 1A and 6A only had two types, whereas chromosomes 2A, 4A, 2B, 3B, 6B, and 7B had more than 10 types. Chromosomes 2A and 6B had the highest number of types. Separately, the 60 CIMCOG wheat lines contained 91 polymorphic types, including 28, 41, and 22, respectively, from A-, B-, and D-genome chromosomes. The 93 CACG wheat lines had 137 types, including 39, 55, and 27 from A-, B-, and D-genome chromosomes, respectively. In other words, the polymorphism of ND-FISH hybridization signals in genomes was B-genome > A-genome > D-genome. Therefore, ND-FISH based on different oligonucleotide probes could generate sufficient hybridization signal patterns to evaluate the genetic diversity of wheat.
Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 show that all 21 chromosomes of the CIMCOG and CACG wheat lines contained common FISH types (yellow boxes). Furthermore, the two germplasm resources also had their own specific FISH types. For example, the CIMCOG wheat lines had 22 specific FISH types (green boxes), among which chromosomes 3A, 6A, 7A, 4B, 1D, 5D, and 6D had no specific type; chromosomes 1A, 2A, 1B, 2B, 3B, 5B, 2D, 3D, 4D, and 7D had one specific type; and chromosome 5A possessed two specific types, chromosomes 6B and 7B contained three specific types, and chromosome 4A contained four specific types. Similarly, 51 specific types were observed in the CACG wheat lines: no specific types from chromosomes 1A, 6A, 3D, and 5D; one specific type from chromosomes 5B, 2D, 4D, and 7D; two specific types from chromosomes 4A, 4B, 7B, and 6D; three specific types from chromosomes 3A, 5A, and 7A; four specific types from chromosomes 1B and 1D; five specific types from chromosomes 2B, 3B, and 6B; and eight specific types from chromosome 1A. These results showed that the genetic diversity of the CACG wheat lines was richer than that of the CIMCOG wheat lines.

2.3. Detection of Chromosomal Translocations

Twelve types of chromosomal translocations were found among all the 153 lines using ND-FISH, in which the CIMCOG wheat lines contained three types (Table 1) and the CACG wheat lines had nine types (Table 2). 1RS.1BL translocation was observed in 12 lines, including CIMCOG14, CIMCOG38, CIMCOG43, CIMCOG45, CIMCOG46, CACG17, CACG33, CACG37, CACG41, CACG78, CACG79, and CACG80. Three lines, CIMCOG8, CIMCOG42, and CIMCOG53, contained 5BS.7BS/5BL.7BL translocation, while two lines, CIMCOG17 and CIMCOG59, possessed 1RS.1BL and 5BS.7BS/5BL.7BL translocations. Four polymorphic FISH types were detected in the 5BL.7BL translocation chromosome, but only one type in the 1RS.1BL and 5BS.7BS translocation chromosomes (Figure 6). Furthermore, eight Robertsonian translocations, including 1RS.7DS/1BL.7DL, 1AS.4BS/1AL.4BL, 3BS.4AL/3BL.4AS, 2BL.4DS/2BS.4DL, 1DL.4AL/1DS.4AS, 4BS.2AS/4BL.2AL, 4AS.4BL/4AL.4BS, and 5BS.2DS/5BL.2DL were found in lines CACG39, CACG6, CACG12, CACG23, CACG28, CACG68, CACG69, and CACG84, respectively (Figure 7 and Figure 8). Non-Robertsonian translocations, 2AS.5AS-5AL/5AS.2AS-2AL, between 2A and 5A chromosomes were also observed in CACG4 (Figure 7A–C). Based on the signal patterns, the breakpoints were located in the short arm of chromosome 2A distal to the telomeric signals of Oligo-pTa535-1 and the short arm of chromosome 5A distal to the telomeric signals of Oligo-pSc119.2. These translocations involved chromosomes 1A, 2A, 4A, 5A, 1B, 2B, 3B, 4B, 5B, 7B, 1D, 2D, and 4D, among which 4A and 4B had the largest number of translocations, each with three translocations. However, these translocation chromosomes occurred only in one line with no polymorphism. These results indicated that it could effectively identify chromosome rearrangement of A-, B-, and D-genome in wheat when using Oligo-pTa535, pSc119.2-1-1, and Oligo-(the GAA)7.

2.4. Distributions of Different Chromosomal Types between the Two Wheat Germplasm Resources

The distributions of different types in A-, B-, and D-genome chromosomes are listed in Table 3. Types 1AI, 2AIII, 3AI, 4AII, 5AIV, 6AI, 7AI, 1BIII, 2BII, 3BIII, 4BI, 5BII, 6BIV, 7BIV, 1DI, 2DIII, 3DII, 4DII, 5DI, 6DI, 7DII occurred most frequently in the CIMCOG wheat lines when types 1AII, 2AIII, 3AI, 4AIX, 5AIV, 6AII, 7AIV, 1BII, 2BIII, 3BV, 4BI, 5BII, 6BVIII, 7BV, 1DI, 2DIII, 3DIII, 4DII, 5DIII, 6DI, 7DII appeared at high frequencies in the CACG wheat lines. Among them, types 2AIII, 3AI, 5AIV, 4BI, 5BII, 1DI, 2DIII, 4DII, 6DI, and 7DII were the main types in both the CIMCOG wheat lines and the CACG wheat lines, accounting for a relatively high proportion.

2.5. Genetic Relationships Revealed by FISH Patterns

Based on the polymorphism of the FISH types, a dendrogram was constructed by cluster analysis among the 153 wheat lines. These wheat lines were divided into six groups (G1–G6) (Figure 9). The two tetraploid wheat lines derived from CIMCOG were in G1; the other CIMCOG wheat lines were mainly distributed in G2 and G5, with only CIMCOG25 in G4. Ninety of the CACG wheat lines were dispersed in G3, G4, and G6, except for three lines in G2 and G5. Among the CACG wheat lines, Chinese landraces and introduced varieties were mainly in G3, while breeding varieties were in G4.

3. Discussion

The ND-FISH technique not only accurately identified the chromosomes of A-, B-, and D-genomes in wheat but also analyzed wheat chromosomal diversity based on oligonucleotide probes showing different signal patterns on the same chromosome of different lines. In this study, all 21 wheat chromosomes were distinguished by ND-FISH using Oligo-pSc119.2-1, Oligo-pTa535-1, and Oligo-(GAA)7, and the standard karyotype of CS was established, which could accurately detect the variation of chromosomes. The polymorphisms of chromosomes of 85 wheat cultivars/lines were investigated by ND-FISH analysis using Oligo-pSc119.2-1, Oligo-pTa535-1, and Oligo-(AAG)6 as probes. The results showed that each line had a unique ND-FISH karyotype, and more variations of wheat chromosomes were displayed [26]. Seventy-six representative Chinese wheat lines were selected for investigation by ND-FISH using Oligo-pTa535, Oligo-pSc119.2, and Oligo-(GAA)8 as probes, and the number of FISH types ranged from 2 to 7, 2 to 6, and 1 to 5 in A-, B-, and D-genome chromosomes, respectively [27]. Novel karyotype characteristics of 166 common wheat cultivars bred from the hometown CS were revealed using 11 oligonucleotide probes [29]. Chromosomes 5A, 3B, and 1D showed the highest number of karyotype variations, which were 24, 18, and 6, respectively [29]. Moreover, the genetic diversity of Asian and European common wheat lines was assessed by pTa535 and pSc119.2 probes, and the ranges of the number of FISH types in the A-, B-, and D-genomes were 2 to 8, 3 to 7, and 2 to 4, respectively, in which the FISH types of the 5A chromosome occurred at the highest frequency [39]. In the present study, ND-FISH using Oligo-pSc119.2-1, Oligo-pTa535-1, and Oligo-(GAA)7 as probes were used to analyze the genetic diversity between the CIMCOG and CACG wheat lines. ND-FISH reflected that 97.39% of all 153 wheat lines could be clearly recognized except CIMCOG11, CIMCOG12, CIMCOG34, and CIMCOG35. A total of 137 polymorphic FISH types were obtained, of which 41, 65, and 31 were from A-, B-, and D-genome chromosomes, respectively. All 21 chromosomes had at least two types of ND-FISH hybridization signal patterns. Chromosomes 2A and 6B had the highest number (13) of types. Besides, we found polymorphism of B-genome > A-genome > D-genome in all 153 lines, as well as in the CACG and CIMCOG wheat lines alone. The same phenomenon was found by Guo et al. [27] and Yang et al. [39]. Recently, Hu et al. [29] also found that the FISH types of the D-genome were less than those of A- and B-genomes. These results analyzed by ND-FISH were consistent with the distribution of AFLP markers [40], microsatellite markers [41], DArT markers [42], and GBS-SNPs markers [43,44] in the three genomes, respectively. Therefore, ND-FISH is an effective tool for distinguishing chromosomal types and estimating genetic diversity in wheat.
Chromosomal translocations are large-scale mutational events that play an evolutionary role in intra-specific divergence and speciation [45]. Identification of chromosomal translocations is necessary for a full understanding of germplasm resources. In this study, 12 types of complex translocations were detected among 153 wheat lines according to the ND-FISH analysis. For instance, the 1RS.1BL translocation was observed in 14 wheat lines of both CIMCOG and CACG wheat lines, accounting for 9.15%. Because of the superior genes for grain yield and stress tolerance in the 1RS chromosome, the 1RS.1BL translocation is widely used in wheat breeding [46]. Previous studies revealed the polymorphism of 1BL.1RS using probe (AAG)n [27,29]. However, no polymorphism of 1BL.1RS was detected in this study. Based on the pedigree analysis, the origin of the 1BL.1RS translocation might be single. For example, CACG79 yunmai34, derived from the cross Kavkaz/IRN68-77 and CACG17 Lovrin10 are both derivatives of Neuzucht. CACG37 shannong7859 was derived from Predgornia 2. 1RS.7DS/1BL.7DL translocations were only detected in CACG39 Lumai1, which was derived from Aifeng 3//Mengxian 201/Neuzucht. Qi et al. [47,48] explained that this pair of translocations were produced by spontaneous chromosome translocation between 1BL.1RS and 7DS.7DL during hybridization. 5BS.7BS/5BL.7BL translocations were observed in five lines, in which the 5BL.7BL translocation chromosome had four FISH signal patterns. The four patterns might have occurred independently in these lines based on pedigree. 5BS.7BS/5BL.7BL translocations were widely found in wheat from western countries [49,50,51]. However, in China, the related reports only mention Sichuan varieties with French ancestry [29,52,53]. In addition, the translocations were only in the CIMCOG wheat lines in this study. 5BS.7BS/5BL.7BL translocations might be related to the adaptation to specific environmental conditions. A total of seven Robertsonian translocations were found, including 1AS.4BS/1AL.4BL, 3BS.4AL/3BL.4AS, 2BL.4DS/2BS.4DL, 1DL.4AL/1DS.4AS, 4BS.2AS/4BL.2AL, 4AS.4BL/4AL.4BS, and 5BS.2DS/5BL.2DL. 4BS.2AS/4BL.2AL translocations widely existed in Ethiopian tetraploid wheat, and the fixation of the translocations indicated the presence of a severe bottleneck during its dispersal [54]. However, 4BS.2AS/4BL.2AL translocations in this study were found in hexaploid wheat; thus, they might be different from previous findings. The remaining six chromosomal translocations were new translocations that have not been reported before. 2AS.5AS-5AL/5AS.2AS-2AL non-Robertsonian translocations observed in Kefeng3 were also new translocations. All the translocations involved chromosomes 1A, 2A, 4A, 5A, 1B, 2B, 3B, 4B, 5B, 7B, 1D, 2D, and 4D, among which 4A and 4B were involved in more rearrangements than the others. In addition, 6, 8, and 4 translocations involving the A-, B-, and D-genomes, respectively, were detected in this study. It appeared that the B-genome was more prone to chromosomal translocations than the A- and D-genomes, which was consistent with previous studies [39,41,50].
Several studies have found that the genetic diversity of wheat lines is lower compared with their progenitors [13,19,55,56]. Utilization of wheat core germplasm resources and continuous introduction of foreign germplasm will play an important role in the enrichment of genetic diversity. In this study, the diversity of the CACG wheat lines (137 types) was more than the CIMCOG wheat lines (91 types). Except for common FISH types, most of the 21 chromosomes between the CIMCOG and CACG wheat lines contained their own specific FISH types. About 22 specific FISH types were detected in the CIMCOG wheat lines, while 51 specific FISH types were found in the CACG wheat lines. The specific FISH types were also significantly higher in the CACG wheat lines than in the CIMCOG wheat lines. The CIMCOG wheat lines mainly consisted of modern breeding varieties (lines), but the CACG wheat lines included not only breeding varieties but also introduced varieties and landraces. Wheat landraces contain wider genetic diversity than most breeding programs [10]. Therefore, the diversity of species composition might be responsible for more specific FISH types in the CACG wheat lines. Furthermore, based on the distributions of different types, 10 common types, such as 2AIII, 3AI, 5AIV, 4BI, 5BII, 1DI, 2DIII, 4DII, 6DI, and 7DII, occurred most frequently in both CIMCOG and CACG wheat lines. Only three specific types were predominant in their respective populations, 1AI and 4AII in the CIMCOG wheat lines, while 4AIX in the CACG wheat lines. Previous studies indicated that chromosome karyotype was closely associated with adaptation [27,29], explaining why these chromosome types appear more frequently in their respective populations.
The contribution of the CIMMYT germplasm to Chinese wheat varieties is significant. The proportion of varieties with the CIMMYT germplasm increased from less than 10% in the early 1980s to nearly 25% by 2011 [57]. The application of the CIMMYT germplasm significantly enhanced the performance of Chinese varieties in important traits, including yield potential, processing quality, disease resistance, and early maturity [57]. Thus, it is essential to fully understand the CIMMYT germplasm for breeding. For instance, promising slow rusting resistance was observed in CIMCOG14, 17, 38, 43, 46, 53, and 59 [31]. The cytological results of this study showed that CIMCOG14, 38, 43, and 46 contained 1BL.1RS translocation, CIMCOG53 carried 5BS.7BS/5BL.7BL translocations, and CIMCOG17 and 59 possessed 1BL.1RS and 5BS.7BS/5BL.7BL translocations. The same was true for the CACG wheat lines. CACG80, Xingyi 4, immune to stem rust, stripe rust, and powdery mildew [38], was a 1BL.1RS translocation line. CACG69, Shanmai, showing resistance to both stem rust and stripe rust [38], carried 4AS.4BL/4AL.4BS translocations. All of these results can provide useful information for the rational utilization of wheat germplasm.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

A total of 154 lines, including 60 CIMCOG wheat lines (Table 1), 93 CACG wheat lines, and CS (Table 2), were investigated in this study. The CACG wheat lines consisted of 36 breeding varieties, 10 introduced varieties, and 47 Chinese landraces. The seeds were provided by Crop Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sichuan, China.

4.2. ND-FISH Analysis

Five seeds were randomly selected from each line for ND-FISH analysis. Root-tip metaphase chromosomes were prepared as described by Han et al. [58]. The oligonucleotide probes, including Oligo-pSc119.2-1, Oligo-pTa535-1, and Oligo-(GAA)7, were used for ND-FISH analysis. Sequences of these oligonucleotide probes were referenced from Tang et al. in Table 4 [24]. Oligo-pSc119.2-1 was 5′-end-labeled with 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-FAM, green); Oligo-pTa535-1 was 5′-end-labeled with 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA, red); and Oligo-(GAA)7 was 5′-end-labeled with Cy5 (red). The detailed process of FISH was performed following Fu et al. [25]. Probe amounts per slide were as described by Tang et al. [24]. Each slide with the cell spread was added with 10 μL probe mixture (each probe in 2 × SSC and 1 × TE buffer, pH 7.0) and covered with a glass coverslip. Slides were stored in a moist box at 42 °C for 1 h and eluted in 2 × SSC solution at room temperature. The slides were mounted with Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories) with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole), and chromosomes were counterstained blue. Photomicrographs of FISH chromosomes were taken using an epifluorescence microscope (DM4B, Leica) and processed with Photoshop CC.

4.3. Data Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2010. The dendrogram was constructed using http://www.bioinformatics.com.cn (accessed on 12 March 2022), an online platform for data analysis and visualization.

5. Conclusions

High-resolution ND-FISH facilitates the identification of chromosomal polymorphisms and structural rearrangements in wheat. A total of 137 polymorphic FISH types were obtained from the CIMCOG and CACG wheat lines, in which 41, 65, and 31 were from A-, B-, and D-genome chromosomes, respectively, indicating polymorphism of B-genome > A-genome > D-genome. In addition, 22 and 51 specific FISH types were observed in the two germplasm resources, respectively. Twelve types of rearrangements, including seven new translocations, were detected in all 153 wheat lines. Genetic relationships among 153 wheat lines were clustered into six groups. Overall, our research can provide valuable cytological information for rational utilization of wheat germplasm.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Y., W.Y. and E.Y.; data curation, M.Y. and Z.Y.; methodology, M.Y.; project administration, W.Y. and E.Y.; resources, E.Y.; software, M.Y.; writing—original draft, M.Y.; writing—review and editing, Z.Y. and E.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Sichuan Financial Special Project (No. 2021ZYGG-003, No. 2022ZZCX003), Sichuan Science and Technology Program of China (No. 2022ZDZX0014), Sichuan Wheat Breeding Community (No. 2021YFYZ0002), Sichuan International Cooperation Program (No. 2021YFH0051), and Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hedden, P. The genes of the Green Revolution. Trends Genet. 2003, 19, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yu, Y.H.; Wu, Y.T.; Zeng, X.; Yuan, L.P. Present situation of utilization on rice dwarf gene resources and its research advances in molecular biology. Hunan Agric. Sci. 2007, 5, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhu, H.; Niu, Y.L.; Wang, P.; Quan, J.L.; Chen, Y.F. Molecular detection and genetic effect research of dwarf dene in wheat. Mol. Plant Breed. 2018, 16, 1855–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wen, H.Q.; Pei, Z.Y.; Hou, M.L.; Zhang, L.S.; Cheng, T.L.; Li, X.; Zhu, M. Research progress and application of Taigu male-sterile wheat in Shanxi province. J. Shanxi Agric. Sci. 2015, 43, 1715–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, Y.; Yang, W.Y.; Zou, Y.C. Characterisation of the new wheat cultivar Chuanmai42 derived from CIMMYT hexaploidy wheat. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 2007, 20, 199–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ban, T.; Suenaga, K. Genetic analysis of resistance to Fusarium head blight caused by Fusarium graminearum in Chinese wheat cultivar Sumai 3 and the Japanese cultivar Saikai 165. Euphytica 2000, 113, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bai, G.; Shaner, G. Management and resistance in wheat and barley to fusarium head blight. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2004, 42, 135–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Talha, M.; Swati, H.; Jaiswal, J.P. Marker assisted detection of underutilized potential Yr genes in elite wheat breeding lines. SABRAO J. Breed. Genet. 2016, 48, 309–317. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tanksley, S.D.; McCouch, S.R. Seed banks and molecular maps: Unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 1997, 277, 1063–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lopes, M.S.; El-Basyoni, I.; Baenziger, P.S.; Singh, S.; Royo, C.; Ozbek, K.; Aktas, H.; Ozer, E.; Ozdemir, F.; Manickavelu, A.; et al. Exploiting genetic diversity from landraces in wheat breeding for adaptation to climate change. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 3477–3486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Autrique, E.; Nachit, M.M.; Monneveux, P.; Tanksley, S.D.; Sorrells, M.E. Genetic diversity in durum wheat based on RFLPs, morphophysiological traits, and coefficient of parentage. Crop Sci. 1996, 36, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Reif, J.C.; Zhang, P.; Dreisigacker, S.; Warburton, M.L.; Van Ginkel, M.; Hoisington, D.; Bohn, M.; Melchinger, A.E. Wheat genetic diversity trends during domestication and breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 110, 859–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bhatta, M.; Morgounov, A.; Belamkar, V.; Poland, J.; Baenziger, P.S. Unlocking the novel genetic diversity and population structure of synthetic hexaploid wheat. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Wang, C.L.; Hu, S.L.; Gardner, C.; Lübberstedt, T. Emerging avenues for utilization of exotic germplasm. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 624–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Zou, Y.C.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, W.Y.; Yang, E.N.; Huang, G. Reviews and prospects of Sichuan-CIMMYT wheat shuttle breeding program. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 2003, 16, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Branlard, G.; Dardevet, M.; Saccomano, R.; Lagoutte, F.; Gourdon, J. Genetic diversity of wheat storage proteins and bread wheat quality. Euphytica 2001, 119, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hao, C.Y.; Dong, Y.C.; Wang, L.F.; You, G.X.; Zhang, H.N.; Ge, H.M.; Jia, J.Z.; Zhang, X.Y. Genetic diversity and construction of core collection in Chinese wheat genetic resources. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2008, 53, 1518–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Fu, Y.-B.; Somers, D.J. Genome-wide reduction of genetic diversity in wheat breeding. Crop Sci. 2009, 49, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bhatta, M.; Shamanin, V.; Shepelev, S.; Baenziger, P.S.; Pozherukova, V.; Pototskaya, I.; Morgounov, A. Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of synthetic and bread wheat accessions in Western Siberia. J. Appl. Genet. 2019, 60, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Adonina, I.G.; Leonova, I.N.; Badaeva, E.D.; Salina, E.A. Genotyping of hexaploid wheat varieties from different Russian regions. Russ. J. Genet. Appl. Res. 2017, 7, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ceoloni, C.; Del Signore, G.; Ercoli, L.; Donini, P. Locating the alien chromatin segment in common wheat—Aegilops longissima mildew resistant transfers. Hereditas 1992, 116, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kuzmanović, L.; Rossini, F.; Ruggeri, R.; Pagnotta, M.A.; Ceoloni, C. Engineered durum wheat germplasm with multiple alien introgressions: Agronomic and quality performance. Agronomy 2020, 10, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Cuadrado, A.; Vitellozzi, F.; Jouve, N.; Ceoloni, C. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with multiple repeated DNA probes applied to the analysis of wheat-rye chromosome pairing. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1997, 94, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tang, Z.X.; Yang, Z.J.; Fu, S.L. Oligonucleotides replacing the roles of repetitive sequences pAs1, pSc119.2, pTa-535, pTa71, CCS1, and pAWRC.1 for FISH analysis. J. Appl. Genet. 2014, 55, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fu, S.L.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y.Y.; Li, M.; Yang, Z.J.; Qiu, L.; Yan, B.J.; Ren, Z.L.; Tang, Z.X. Oligonucleotide probes for ND-FISH analysis to identify rye and wheat chromosomes. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Jiang, M.; Xaio, Z.Q.; Fu, S.L.; Tang, Z.X. FISH karyotype of 85 common wheat cultivars/lines displayed by ND-FISH using oligonucleotide probes. Cereal Res. Commun. 2017, 45, 549–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Guo, J.; Gao, D.; Gong, W.P.; Li, H.S.; Li, J.B.; Li, G.R.; Song, J.M.; Liu, J.J.; Yang, Z.J.; Liu, C. Genetic diversity in common wheat lines revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Plant Syst. Evol. 2019, 305, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ren, T.H.; He, M.J.; Sun, Z.X.; Tian, F.Q.; Luo, P.G.; Tang, Z.X.; Fu, S.L.; Yan, B.J.; Ren, Z.L.; Li, Z. The polymorphisms of oligonucleotide probes in wheat cultivars determined by ND-FISH. Molecules 2019, 24, 1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hu, Z.L.; Luo, J.T.; Wan, L.R.; Luo, J.; Li, Y.Z.; Fu, S.L.; Liu, D.C.; Hao, M.; Tang, Z.X. Chromosomes polymorphisms of Sichuan wheat cultivars displayed by ND-FISH landmarks. Cereal Res. Commun. 2021, 50, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fleitas, M.C.; Mondal, S.; Gerard, G.S.; Hernández-Espinosa, N.; Singh, R.P.; Crossa, J.; Guzmán, C. Identification of CIMMYT spring bread wheat germplasm maintaining superior grain yield and quality under heat-stress. J. Cereal Sci. 2020, 93, 102981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Singh, V.K.; Singh, P.K.; Harikrishna; Mathuria, R.C.; Gogoi, R.; Aggarwal, R. Assessment of slow rusting resistance components to stripe rust pathogen in some exotic wheat germplasm. Indian Phytopathol. 2017, 70, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Piñera-Chavez, F.J.; Berry, P.M.; Foulkes, M.J.; Molero, G.; Reynolds, M.P. Avoiding lodging in irrigated spring wheat. II. Genetic variation of stem and root structural properties. Field Crop. Res. 2016, 196, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, Y.M.; Qu, J.P.; Zhang, J.; Xiang, S.J.; Li, J.; Wan, H.S. Seed storability of CIMMYT core wheat germplasm panel and their haplotypes in lipoxygenase locus. Agric. Sci. 2021, 12, 977–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, J.; Xiang, S.J.; Wan, H.S. Negative association between seed dormancy and seed longevity in bread wheat. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 347–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mahdavi, S.; Arzani, A.; Maibody, S.A.M.M.; Kadivar, M. Grain quality of wheat genotypes under heat stress. Preprints 2021, 2021090447. [Google Scholar]
  36. Turuspekov, Y.; Baibulatova, A.; Yermekbayev, K.; Tokhetova, L.; Chudinov, V.; Sereda, G.; Ganal, M.; Griffiths, S.; Abugalieva, S. GWAS for plant growth stages and yield components in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) harvested in three regions of Kazakhstan. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 190–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Huang, L.; Liu, T.G.; Liu, B.; Gao, L.; Luo, P.G.; Chen, W.Q. Resistance evaluation of 197 Chinese wheat core germplasms to a new stripe rust race, CYR34. Plant Prot. 2019, 45, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Qiu, Y.C.; Li, J.J.; Rong, Z.X.; Zhu, H.R. Identification and analysis of China wheat micro-core germplasms resistance to stem rust, stripe rust and powdery mildew. J. Triticeae Crop. 2015, 35, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, X.; Tan, B.W.; Yang, Y.L.; Zhang, X.H.; Zhu, W.; Xu, L.L.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, J.; Fan, X.; Sha, L.N.; et al. Genetic diversity of Asian and European common wheat lines assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genome 2021, 64, 959–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huang, X.Q.; Zeller, F.J.; Hsam, S.L.K.; Wenzel, G.; Mohler, V. Chromosomal location of AFLP markers in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) utilizing nulli-tetrasomic stocks. Genome 2000, 43, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, X.Q.; Börner, A.; Röder, M.S.; Ganal, M.W. Assessing genetic diversity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm using microsatellite markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 105, 699–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Nielsen, N.H.; Backes, G.; Stougaard, J.; Andersen, S.U.; Jahoor, A. Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of European hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e94000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Eltaher, S.; Sallam, A.; Belamkar, V.; Emara, H.A.; Nower, A.A.; Salem, K.F.M.; Poland, J.; Baenziger, P.S. Genetic diversity and population structure of F3:6 Nebraska winter wheat genotypes using genotyping-by-sequencing. Front. Genet. 2018, 9, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mourad, A.M.I.; Belamkar, V.; Baenziger, P.S. Molecular genetic analysis of spring wheat core collection using genetic diversity, population structure, and linkage disequilibrium. BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 434–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wingen, L.U.; West, C.; Leverington-Waite, M.; Collier, S.; Orford, S.; Goram, R.; Yang, C.-Y.; King, J.; Allen, A.M.; Burridge, A.; et al. Wheat landrace genome diversity. Genetics 2017, 205, 1657–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Zhao, C.H.; Cui, F.; Wang, X.Q.; Shan, S.C.; Li, X.F.; Bao, Y.G.; Wang, H.G. Effects of 1BL/1RS translocation in wheat on agronomic performance and quality characteristics. Field Crop. Res. 2012, 127, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Qi, Z.J.; Liu, D.J.; Chen, P.D.; Li, Q.Q. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of winter wheat germplasm Aimengniu. Acta Bot. Sin. 2001, 5, 469–474. [Google Scholar]
  48. Qi, Z.J.; Liu, D.J.; Chen, P.D.; Wang, S.L.; Li, S.S.; Li, Q.Q. Genetic transmission characteristics of the new wheat-rye complex translocation discovered in winter wheat germplasm Aimengniu. Acta Agron. Sin. 2001, 5, 582–589. [Google Scholar]
  49. Riley, R.; Coucoli, H.; Chapman, V. Chromosomal interchanges and the phylogeny of wheat. Heredity 1967, 22, 233–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Badaeva, E.D.; Dedkova, O.S.; Gay, G.; Pukhalskyi, V.A.; Zelenin, A.V.; Bernard, S.; Bernard, M. Chromosomal rearrangements in wheat: Their types and distribution. Genome 2007, 50, 907–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Walkowiak, S.; Gao, L.L.; Monat, C.; Haberer, G.; Kassa, M.T.; Brinton, J.; Ramirez-Gonzalez, R.H.; Kolodziej, M.C.; Delorean, E.; Thambugala, D.; et al. Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding. Nature 2020, 588, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yang, M.Y.; Li, G.R.; Wan, H.S.; Li, L.P.; Li, J.; Yang, W.Y.; Pu, Z.J.; Yang, Z.J.; Yang, E.N. Identification of QTLs for stripe rust resistance in a recombinant inbred line population. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Yang, M.Y.; Yang, Z.J.; Yang, W.Y.; Yang, E.N. Development and identification of new wheat varieties (lines) with multiple translocation chromosomes via cytogenetic method. J. Triticeae Crop. 2018, 38, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kawahara, T.; Taketa, S. Fixation of translocation 2A·4B infers the monophyletic origin of Ethiopian tetraploid wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000, 101, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lage, J.; Warburton, M.L.; Crossa, J.; Skovmand, B.; Andersen, S.B. Assessment of genetic diversity in synthetic hexaploid wheats and their Triticum dicoccum and Aegilops tauschii parents using AFLPs and agronomic traits. Euphytica 2003, 134, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, P.; Dreisigacker, S.; Melchinger, A.E.; Reif, J.C.; Kazi, A.M.; Van Ginkel, M.; Hoisington, D.; Warburton, M.L. Quantifying novel sequence variation and selective advantage in synthetic hexaploid wheats and their backcross-derived lines using SSR markers. Mol. Breed. 2005, 15, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Huang, J.K.; Xiang, C.; Wang, Y.Q. The Impact of CIMMYT Wheat Germplasm on Wheat Productivity in China; Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy (CCAP), Chinese Academy of Science (CAS): Beijing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  58. Han, F.P.; Lamb, J.C.; Birchler, J.A. High frequency of centromere inactivation resulting in stable dicentric chromosomes of maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 3238–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Standard ND-FISH pattern of Chinese Spring. (A) Oligo-pTa535 (red) and Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) were used as FISH probes. (B) Oligo-(GAA)7 (red) were used as FISH probes. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar indicates 10 μm.
Figure 1. Standard ND-FISH pattern of Chinese Spring. (A) Oligo-pTa535 (red) and Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) were used as FISH probes. (B) Oligo-(GAA)7 (red) were used as FISH probes. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar indicates 10 μm.
Plants 11 01403 g001
Figure 2. ND-FISH of the lines CIMCOG5 (A,B) and CIMCOG26 (C,D) in the CIMMYT Mexican wheat core germplasm. (A,C) Oligo-pTa535 (red) and Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) were used as FISH probes. (B,D) Oligo-(GAA)7 (red) were used as FISH probes. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar indicates 10 μm.
Figure 2. ND-FISH of the lines CIMCOG5 (A,B) and CIMCOG26 (C,D) in the CIMMYT Mexican wheat core germplasm. (A,C) Oligo-pTa535 (red) and Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) were used as FISH probes. (B,D) Oligo-(GAA)7 (red) were used as FISH probes. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar indicates 10 μm.
Plants 11 01403 g002
Figure 3. Polymorphic FISH types of A-genome. CS represents Chinese Spring. Oligo-pTa535 (red) and Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) were used as probes on the left chromosomes, while Oligo-(GAA)7 (red) was used as the probe on the right chromosomes. Yellow boxes represent shared types, green boxes represent specific types in the CIMCOG wheat lines, and purple boxes represent specific types in the CACG wheat lines.
Figure 3. Polymorphic FISH types of A-genome. CS represents Chinese Spring. Oligo-pTa535 (red) and Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) were used as probes on the left chromosomes, while Oligo-(GAA)7 (red) was used as the probe on the right chromosomes. Yellow boxes represent shared types, green boxes represent specific types in the CIMCOG wheat lines, and purple boxes represent specific types in the CACG wheat lines.
Plants 11 01403 g003
Figure 4. Polymorphic FISH types of B-genome. CS represents Chinese Spring. Oligo-pTa535 (red) and Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) were used as probes on the left chromosomes, while Oligo-(GAA)7 (red) was used as the probe on the right chromosomes. Yellow boxes represent shared types, green boxes represent specific types in the CIMCOG wheat lines, and purple boxes represent specific types in the CACG wheat lines.
Figure 4. Polymorphic FISH types of B-genome. CS represents Chinese Spring. Oligo-pTa535 (red) and Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) were used as probes on the left chromosomes, while Oligo-(GAA)7 (red) was used as the probe on the right chromosomes. Yellow boxes represent shared types, green boxes represent specific types in the CIMCOG wheat lines, and purple boxes represent specific types in the CACG wheat lines.
Plants 11 01403 g004
Figure 5. Polymorphic FISH types of D-genome. CS represents Chinese Spring. Oligo-pTa535 (red) and Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) were used as probes on the left chromosomes, while Oligo-(GAA)7 (red) was used as the probe on the right chromosomes. Yellow boxes represent shared types, green boxes represent specific types in the CIMCOG wheat lines, and purple boxes represent specific types in the CACG wheat lines.
Figure 5. Polymorphic FISH types of D-genome. CS represents Chinese Spring. Oligo-pTa535 (red) and Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) were used as probes on the left chromosomes, while Oligo-(GAA)7 (red) was used as the probe on the right chromosomes. Yellow boxes represent shared types, green boxes represent specific types in the CIMCOG wheat lines, and purple boxes represent specific types in the CACG wheat lines.
Plants 11 01403 g005
Figure 6. Polymorphic FISH types of translocation chromosomes. Oligo-pTa535 (red) and Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) were used as probes on the left chromosomes, while Oligo-(GAA)7 (red) was used as the probe on the right chromosomes.
Figure 6. Polymorphic FISH types of translocation chromosomes. Oligo-pTa535 (red) and Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) were used as probes on the left chromosomes, while Oligo-(GAA)7 (red) was used as the probe on the right chromosomes.
Plants 11 01403 g006
Figure 7. ND-FISH pattern of translocation chromosomes of the lines CACG4 (AC), CACG6 (DF), CACG12 (GI), CACG23 (JL) in the Chinese applied core germplasm. (A,D,G,J) Oligo-pTa535 (red) and Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) were used as FISH probes. (B,E,H,K) Oligo-(GAA)7 (red) was used as a FISH probe. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Arrows show translocation chromosomes. Scale bar indicates 10 μm.
Figure 7. ND-FISH pattern of translocation chromosomes of the lines CACG4 (AC), CACG6 (DF), CACG12 (GI), CACG23 (JL) in the Chinese applied core germplasm. (A,D,G,J) Oligo-pTa535 (red) and Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) were used as FISH probes. (B,E,H,K) Oligo-(GAA)7 (red) was used as a FISH probe. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Arrows show translocation chromosomes. Scale bar indicates 10 μm.
Plants 11 01403 g007
Figure 8. ND-FISH pattern of translocation chromosomes of the lines CACG28 (AC), CACG68 (DF), CACG69 (GI), CACG84 (JL) in the Chinese applied core germplasm. (A,D,G,J) Oligo-pTa535 (red) and Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) were used as FISH probes. (B,E,H,K) Oligo-(GAA)7 (red) was used as FISH probe. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Arrows show translocation chromosomes. Scale bar indicates 10 μm.
Figure 8. ND-FISH pattern of translocation chromosomes of the lines CACG28 (AC), CACG68 (DF), CACG69 (GI), CACG84 (JL) in the Chinese applied core germplasm. (A,D,G,J) Oligo-pTa535 (red) and Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) were used as FISH probes. (B,E,H,K) Oligo-(GAA)7 (red) was used as FISH probe. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Arrows show translocation chromosomes. Scale bar indicates 10 μm.
Plants 11 01403 g008
Figure 9. Genetic relationships among 153 wheat lines revealed by FISH patterns. Green letters show the CIMMYT Mexican core germplasm. Red, purple, and blue letters show breeding varieties, introduced varieties, and landraces in the Chinese applied core germplasm.
Figure 9. Genetic relationships among 153 wheat lines revealed by FISH patterns. Green letters show the CIMMYT Mexican core germplasm. Red, purple, and blue letters show breeding varieties, introduced varieties, and landraces in the Chinese applied core germplasm.
Plants 11 01403 g009
Table 1. List of CIMMYT Mexican core germplasm.
Table 1. List of CIMMYT Mexican core germplasm.
NumberNameNo. of ChrTranslocation
CIMCOG1ATTILA2n = 42
CIMCOG2ATTILA∗2/PBW652n = 42
CIMCOG3ATTILA∗2/PBW65∗2/5/REH/HARE//2∗BCN/3/CROC_1/AE.SQUARROSA (213)//PGO/4/HUITES2n = 42
CIMCOG4ATTILA//PGO/SERI/3/PASTOR2n = 42
CIMCOG5BABAX/LR42//BABAX/3/ER20002n = 42
CIMCOG6BABAX/LR42//BABAX/3/VORB2n = 28
CIMCOG7BACANORA T 882n = 42
CIMCOG8BAVIACORA M 922n = 425BS.7BS, 5BL.7BL
CIMCOG9BCN/RIALTO2n = 42
CIMCOG10BCN/WBLL12n = 42
CIMCOG11BECARD2n = 42
CIMCOG12BECARD/KACHU2n = 42
CIMCOG13BRBT1∗2/KIRITATI2n = 42
CIMCOG14C80.1/3∗BATAVIA//2∗WBLL1/5/REH/HARE//2∗BCN/3/CROC_1/AE.SQUARROSA (213)//PGO/4/HUITES2n = 421RS.1BL
CIMCOG15SAUAL/4/CROC_1/AE.SQUARROSA (205)//KAUZ/3/ATTILA/5/SAUAL2n = 42
CIMCOG16SAUAL/WHEAR//SAUAL2n = 42
CIMCOG17CHIR3/4/SIREN//ALTAR 84/AE.SQUARROSA (205)/3/3∗BUC/5/PFAU/WEAVER2n = 421RS.1BL, 5BS.7BS, 5BL.7BL
CIMCOG18CHWL86/6/FILIN/IRENA/5/CNDO/R143//ENTE/MEXI_2/3/AEGILOPS SQUARROSA (TAUS)/4/WEAVER2n = 42
CIMCOG19CMH79A.955/4/AGA/3/4∗SN64/CNO67//INIA66/5/NAC/6/RIALTO2n = 42
CIMCOG20CIRNO C 20082n = 42
CIMCOG21CNDO/R143//ENTE/MEXI_2/3/AEGILOPS SQUARROSA (TAUS)/4/OCI/5/PASTOR/6/TEMPORALERA M 87/ROMO962n = 42
CIMCOG22CNDO/R143//ENTE/MEXI_2/3/AEGILOPS SQUARROSA (TAUS)/4/WEAVER/5/2∗KAUZ2n = 42
CIMCOG23CNO79//PF70354/MUS/3/PASTOR/4/BAV92∗2/5/FH6-1-72n = 42
CIMCOG24CROC_1/AE.SQUARROSA (205)//BORL95/3/PRL/SARA//TSI/VEE#5/4/FRET22n = 42
CIMCOG25GK ARON/AG SECO 7846//2180/4/2∗MILAN/KAUZ//PRINIA/3/BAV922n = 42
CIMCOG26KINGBIRD #1//INQALAB 91∗2/TUKURU2n = 28
CIMCOG27KFA/3/PFAU/WEAVER//BRAMBLING/4/PFAU/WEAVER∗2//BRAMBLING2n = 42
CIMCOG28MEX94.27.1.20/3/SOKOLL//ATTILA/3∗BCN2n = 42
CIMCOG29MILAN/KAUZ//PRINIA/3/BAV922n = 42
CIMCOG30MUNAL #12n = 42
CIMCOG31ATTILA/PASTOR2n = 42
CIMCOG32OASIS/5∗BORL95/5/CNDO/R143//ENTE/MEXI75/3/AE.SQ/4/2∗OCI2n = 42
CIMCOG33MISR 12n = 42
CIMCOG34OASIS/SKAUZ//4∗BCN/3/2∗PASTOR/5/FRET2∗2/4/SNI/TRAP#1/3/KAUZ∗2/TRAP//KAUZ/6/SAUAL #12n = 42
CIMCOG35PANDORA//WBLL1∗2/BRAMBLING2n = 42
CIMCOG36PASTOR/3/URES/JUN//KAUZ/4/WBLL12n = 42
CIMCOG37PAVON F 762n = 42
CIMCOG38PBW343∗2/KUKUNA∗2//FRTL/PIFED2n = 421RS.1BL
CIMCOG39PFAU/SERI.1B//AMAD/3/WAXWING2n = 42
CIMCOG40ARMENT//2∗SOOTY_9/RASCON_37/4/CNDO/PRIMADUR//HAI-OU_17/3/SNITAN2n = 42
CIMCOG41QUAIU #3//MILAN/AMSEL2n = 42
CIMCOG42RL6043/4∗NAC//2∗PASTOR2n = 425BS.7BS, 5BL.7BL
CIMCOG43ROLF07∗2/5/REH/HARE//2∗BCN/3/CROC_1/AE.SQUARROSA (213)//PGO/4/HUITES2n = 421RS.1BL
CIMCOG44SERI M 822n = 42
CIMCOG45SIETE CERROS T662n = 421RS.1BL
CIMCOG46SOKOLL∗2/3/BABAX/LR42//BABAX2n = 421RS.1BL
CIMCOG47SOKOLL//PBW343∗2/KUKUNA/3/ATTILA/PASTOR2n = 42
CIMCOG48TACUPETO F2001/SAUAL/4/BABAX/LR42//BABAX∗2/3/KURUKU2n = 42
CIMCOG49TACUPETO F2001/BRAMBLING∗2//KACHU2n = 42
CIMCOG50TC870344/GUI//TEMPORALERA M 87/AGR/3/2∗WBLL12n = 42
CIMCOG51TRAP#1/BOW/3/VEE/PJN//2∗TUI/4/BAV92/RAYON/5/KACHU #12n = 42
CIMCOG52TRCH/SRTU//KACHU2n = 42
CIMCOG53UP2338∗2/4/SNI/TRAP#1/3/KAUZ∗2/TRAP//KAUZ/5/MILAN/KAUZ//CHIL/CHUM18/6/UP2338∗2/4/SNI/TRAP#1/3/KAUZ∗2/TRAP//KAUZ2n = 425BS.7BS, 5BL.7BL
CIMCOG54W15.92/4/PASTOR//HXL7573/2∗BAU/3/WBLL12n = 42
CIMCOG55BECARD2n = 42
CIMCOG56WBLL1∗2/4/BABAX/LR42//BABAX/3/BABAX/LR42//BABAX2n = 42
CIMCOG57WBLL1∗2/KURUKU∗2/5/REH/HARE//2∗BCN/3/CROC_1/AE.SQUARROSA (213)//PGO/4/HUITES2n = 42
CIMCOG58WBLL1∗2/TUKURU∗2/4/CROC_1/AE.SQUARROSA (205)//BORL95/3/2∗MILAN2n = 42
CIMCOG59WHEAR/SOKOLL2n = 421RS.1BL, 5BS.7BS, 5BL.7BL
CIMCOG60YAV_3/SCO//JO69/CRA/3/YAV79/4/AE.SQUARROSA (498)/5/LINE 1073/6/KAUZ∗2/4/CAR//KAL/BB/3/NAC/5/KAUZ/7/KRONSTAD F2004/8/KAUZ/PASTOR//PBW3432n = 42
Table 2. List of Chinese applied core germplasm.
Table 2. List of Chinese applied core germplasm.
NumberNameVariety TypeNo. of ChrTranslocationNumberNameVariety TypeNo. of ChrTranslocation
CACG1Daqingmailandrace2n = 42 CACG48Baihuomialandrace2n = 42
CACG2Guangmailandrace2n = 42 CACG49Sanyuehuanglandrace2n = 42
CACG3Xinkehan9breeding variety2n = 42 CACG50Hongqiangchanglandrace2n = 42
CACG4Kefeng3breeding variety2n = 422AS.5AS-5AL/5AS.2AS-2ALCACG51Quzimailandrace2n = 42
CACG5Kelao4breeding variety2n = 42 CACG52Pingyuan50breeding variety2n = 42
CACG6Xinshuguang1breeding variety2n = 421AS.4BS, 1AL.4BLCACG53Baibiansuilandrace2n = 42
CACG7Dongnong101breeding variety2n = 42 CACG54Gejiaxianglandrace2n = 42
CACG8Xinshuguang6breeding variety2n = 42 CACG55Dachunbaisilengmailandrace2n = 42
CACG9Jichun1016breeding variety2n = 42 CACG56Zhahonglandrace2n = 42
CACG10Chixiaomailandrace2n = 42 CACG57Motuoxiaomailandrace2n = 42
CACG11st2422/464introduced variety2n = 42 CACG58Bianbachunmai-6landrace2n = 42
CACG12Orofenintroduced variety2n = 423BS.4AL, 3BL.4ASCACG59Baimangxiaomailandrace2n = 42
CACG13Nonglin10introduced variety2n = 42 CACG60Wujiangzhuolandrace2n = 42
CACG14 introduced variety2n = 42 CACG61Kangdingxiaomaibreeding variety2n = 42
CACG15Early premiunintroduced variety2n = 42 CACG62Zangdong4breeding variety2n = 42
CACG16Triumphintroduced variety2n = 42 CACG63Rikaze54breeding variety2n = 42
CACG17Lovrinintroduced variety2n = 421RS.1BLCACG64Rikaze8breeding variety2n = 42
CACG18 introduced variety2n = 42 CACG65Yizhimailandrace2n = 42
CACG19Tanoriintroduced variety2n = 42 CACG66Dabaimailandrace2n = 42
CACG20Atlas66introduced variety2n = 42 CACG67Laohanlandrace2n = 42
CACG21Gansu96breeding variety2n = 42 CACG68Huoliyanlandrace2n = 424BS.2AS, 4BL.2AL
CACG22Chaoanxiaomailandrace2n = 42 CACG69Shanmailandrace2n = 424AS.4BL, 4AL.4BS
CACG23Chikelandrace2n = 422BL.4DS, 2BS.4DLCACG70Hongtuzilandrace2n = 42
CACG24Songruimai4breeding variety2n = 42 CACG71Baidatoulandrace2n = 42
CACG25Shengenlandrace2n = 42 CACG72Jinhuangmailandrace2n = 42
CACG26Shanglinxiaomailandrace2n = 42 CACG73Huzhuhonglandrace2n = 42
CACG27Pingyang27breeding variety2n = 42 CACG74Jinmai4breeding variety2n = 42
CACG28Jinan2breeding variety2n = 421DL.4AL, 1DS.4ASCACG75Dingxi24breeding variety2n = 42
CACG29Qubaolandrace2n = 42 CACG76Ning10breeding variety2n = 42
CACG30Bainong3217breeding variety2n = 42 CACG77Fan6breeding variety2n = 42
CACG31Yannong15breeding variety2n = 42 CACG78Guinong10breeding variety2n = 421RS.1BL
CACG32Xinong6028breeding variety2n = 42 CACG79Yunmai34breeding variety2n = 421RS.1BL
CACG33Jibei2breeding variety2n = 421RS.1BLCACG80Xingyi4breeding variety2n = 421RS.1BL
CACG34Neichan5breeding variety2n = 42 CACG81Fengmai11breeding variety2n = 42
CACG35Zhengzhou6breeding variety2n = 42 CACG82Tongjiabaxiaomailandrace2n = 42
CACG36Jinan17breeding variety2n = 42 CACG83Honghuamailandrace2n = 42
CACG37Shannong7859breeding variety2n = 421RS.1BLCACG84Baimaizilandrace2n = 425BS.2DS, 5BL.2DL
CACG38Aifeng3breeding variety2n = 42 CACG85Chengduguangtoulandrace2n = 42
CACG39Lumai1breeding variety2n = 421RS.7DS, 1BL.7DLCACG86Jiangmailandrace2n = 42
CACG40Wenmai6breeding variety2n = 42 CACG87Baihuamailandrace2n = 42
CACG41Laizhou953breeding variety2n = 421RS.1BLCACG88Huanxiangmailandrace2n = 42
CACG42Baimangmailandrace2n = 42 CACG89Hanzhongbailandrace2n = 42
CACG43Huangguaxianlandrace2n = 42 CACG90Xiaosanyuehuanglandrace2n = 42
CACG44Banjiemanglandrace2n = 42 CACG91Suotiaohongmailandrace2n = 42
CACG45Quangudinglandrace2n = 42 CACG92Hongxumailandrace2n = 42
CACG46Xishanbiansuilandrace2n = 42 CACG93Zimailandrace2n = 42
CACG47Honggoudoulandrace2n = 42 CACG94Chinese Springlandrace2n = 42Reference genome
Table 3. Frequencies of different ND-FISH types in the CIMMYT Mexican core germplasm and Chinese applied core germplasm.
Table 3. Frequencies of different ND-FISH types in the CIMMYT Mexican core germplasm and Chinese applied core germplasm.
ChrNo. of TypesTypeCIMCOG Wheat LinesCACG Wheat LinesChrNo. of TypesTypeCIMCOG Wheat LinesCACG Wheat LinesChrNo. of TypesTypeCIMCOG Wheat LinesCACG Wheat Lines
No. of LinesPercent (%)No. of LinesPercent (%)No. of LinesPercent (%)No. of LinesPercent (%)No. of LinesPercent (%)No. of LinesPercent (%)
1A2I4880.00 1B8I23.33 1D8I2745.006064.52
II1220.009298.92 II58.334144.09 II2135.0066.45
2A13I1321.67 III3558.3388.60 III58.3333.23
II1016.671415.05 IV1118.332425.81 IV58.3344.30
III3456.674952.69 V 22.15 V 1617.20
IV23.3344.30 VI 44.30 VI 11.08
V11.6733.23 VII 44.30 VII 11.08
VI 22.15 VIII 22.15 VIII 11.08
VII 22.152B10I610.00 2D5I11.67
VIII 44.30 II1931.6755.38 II1423.332425.81
IX 44.30 III1220.002425.81 III4066.675154.84
X 44.30 IV1118.3377.53 IV35.0033.23
XI 11.08 V1220.0022.15 V 1415.05
XII 22.15 VI 1920.433D4I46.67
XIII 22.15 VII 77.53 II4270.003739.78
3A4I60100.008086.02 VIII 88.60 III1118.335559.14
II 77.53 IX 1718.28 IV11.6711.08
III 55.38 X 33.234D4I610.00
IV 11.083B12I23.33 II4778.334851.61
4A10I2033.33 II1626.6788.60 III58.334346.24
II2440.00 III2541.6766.45 IV 11.08
III11.67 IV610.0044.305D3I5083.331718.28
IV11.67 V35.002122.58 II58.333335.48
V11.6766.45 VI58.331010.75 III35.004346.24
VI711.672223.66 VII35.0033.236D3I5896.677782.80
VII46.6766.45 VIII 66.45 II 1010.75
VIII23.332425.81 IX 33.23 III 66.45
IX 3133.33 X 1010.757D4I46.67
X 11.08 XI 1313.98 II4676.678187.10
5A9I610.00 XII 88.60 III813.331010.75
II46.67 4B5I4880.004447.31 IV 11.08
III1220.0088.60 II1016.673739.785BS/7BS1I58.33
IV3151.673941.94 III23.3311.085BL/7BL4I23.33
V46.6777.53 IV 77.53 II11.67
VI35.002223.66 V 11.08 III11.67
VII 66.455B6I23.33 IV11.67
VIII 99.68 II3660.003032.261RS/1BL1I711.6777.53
IX 11.08 III1525.002324.731RS.7DS, 1BL.7DL 11.08
6A2I4676.673133.33 IV11.6722.152AS.5AS-5AL/5AS.2AS-2AL 11.08
II1423.336266.67 V11.6744.301AS.4BS, 1AL.4BL 11.08
7A7I3863.332223.66 VI 3335.483BS.4AL, 3BL.4AS 11.08
II1016.671415.056B13I711.67 4BS.2AS, 4BL.2AL 11.08
III813.3344.30 II11.67 4AS.4BL,4AL.4BS 11.08
IV46.673032.26 III11.67 2BL.4DS, 2BS.4DL 11.08
V 1516.13 IV3151.672021.515BS.2DS, 5BL.2DL 11.08
VI 33.23 V1423.331010.751DL.4AL, 1DS.4AS 11.08
VII 55.38 VI23.3333.23
VII23.331212.90
VIII23.332425.81
IX 77.53
X 99.68
XI 66.45
XII 11.08
XIII 11.08
7B11I711.67
II35.00
III35.00
IV2033.3355.38
V1525.004447.31
VI11.671010.75
VII11.672021.51
VIII11.6744.30
IX46.6755.38
X 33.23
XI 22.15
Table 4. Sequences of oligonucleotide probes.
Table 4. Sequences of oligonucleotide probes.
Name of ProbeSequence and Fluorochrome Label
Oligo-pSc119.2-16-FAM-5′CCGTT TTGTG GACTA TTACT CACCG CTTTG GGGTC CCATA GCTAT3′
Oligo-pTa535-1Tamra-5′AAAAA CTTGA CGCAC GTCAC GTACA AATTG GACAA ACTCT TTCGG AGTAT CAGGG TTTC3′
Oligo-(GAA)7Cy5-5′GAAGAAGAAGAAGAAGAAGAA3′
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, M.; Yang, Z.; Yang, W.; Yang, E. Genetic Diversity Assessment of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center and Chinese Wheat Core Germplasms by Non-Denaturing Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization. Plants 2022, 11, 1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111403

AMA Style

Yang M, Yang Z, Yang W, Yang E. Genetic Diversity Assessment of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center and Chinese Wheat Core Germplasms by Non-Denaturing Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization. Plants. 2022; 11(11):1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111403

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Manyu, Zujun Yang, Wuyun Yang, and Ennian Yang. 2022. "Genetic Diversity Assessment of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center and Chinese Wheat Core Germplasms by Non-Denaturing Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization" Plants 11, no. 11: 1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111403

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop