Next Article in Journal
Impact of Heat Stress on Expression of Wheat Genes Responsive to Hessian Fly Infestation
Next Article in Special Issue
Lead and Zinc Uptake and Toxicity in Maize and Their Management
Previous Article in Journal
Systemic Signaling: A Role in Propelling Crop Yield
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cadmium Stabilization and Redox Transformation Mechanism in Maize Using Nanoscale Zerovalent-Iron-Enriched Biochar in Cadmium-Contaminated Soil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nickel Toxicity Interferes with NO3/NH4+ Uptake and Nitrogen Metabolic Enzyme Activity in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

1
Office of Academic Research, Office of VP for Research & Graduate Studies, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
2
College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
3
Agricultural Research Station (ARS), Office of VP for Research and Graduate Studies, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
4
Central Laboratories Unit (CLU), Office of VP for Research and Graduate Studies, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
5
Center for Sustainable Development, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
6
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
7
Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(11), 1401; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111401
Submission received: 31 March 2022 / Revised: 24 April 2022 / Accepted: 27 April 2022 / Published: 25 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Responses and Tolerance to Metal/Metalloid Toxicity Ⅱ)

Abstract

:
The excessive use of nickel (Ni) in manufacturing and various industries has made Ni a serious pollutant in the past few decades. As a micronutrient, Ni is crucial for plant growth at low concentrations, but at higher concentrations, it can hamper growth. We evaluated the effects of Ni concentrations on nitrate (NO3) and ammonium (NH4+) concentrations, and nitrogen metabolism enzyme activity in rice seedlings grown in hydroponic systems, using different Ni concentrations. A Ni concentration of 200 μM significantly decreased the NO3 concentration in rice leaves, as well as the activities of nitrate reductase (NR), nitrite reductase (NiR), glutamine synthetase (GS), and glutamate synthetase (GOGAT), respectively, when compared to the control. By contrast, the NH4+ concentration and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) activity both increased markedly by 48% and 46%, respectively, compared with the control. Furthermore, the activity of most active aminotransferases, including glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT) and glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT), was inhibited by 48% and 36%, respectively, in comparison with the control. The results indicate that Ni toxicity causes the enzymes involved in N assimilation to desynchronize, ultimately negatively impacting the overall plant growth.

1. Introduction

Heavy metals mainly accumulate in agricultural soils via natural and anthropogenic sources, such as weathering, mining, waste disposal, and the excessive use of pesticides and fertilizer [1,2]. Soil polluted with heavy metals reduces agricultural land quality, and crop yield and quality [3,4], as well as induces deleterious effects on the soil biota [5]. Plants exposed to high Ni concentrations are affected by a variety of toxic effects, including seed germination inhibition, stunted growth [3], leaf chlorosis induction, wilting, necrosis, enhanced lipid peroxidation [6], as well as reduced yields. Previous studies reported that Ni toxicity is linked to plants’ oxidative damage [7,8]. In support of this fact, studies found that Ni could interfere indirectly with the antioxidant system responses [9]. Similarly, Ni toxicity resulted in decreased plant height, rice yield, and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium concentrations in rice crops [10], and reduced chlorophyll contents and biomass production in Eruca sativa plants [2].
Ni, a component of the plant, soil, and aquatic environment, is an essential micronutrient in low concentrations, which is required for plants, such as cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), tomato (Solanum Lycopersicon L.), and other plant species, to complete their growth cycles [11]. Ni is a vital component of urease and is also a constituent of several metalloenzymes, such as Ni-Fe hydrogenase, methyl-coenzyme M reductase, acetyl coenzyme-A synthase, RNase-A, and superoxide dismutase [12]. Ni toxicity decreases the nitrogen concentration, inhibits nitrate uptake, and negatively influences nitrogen assimilation-related enzymes. Although attempts have been made to explore Ni toxicity mechanisms in plants, the impact of Ni on primary plant metabolism remains poorly understood.
Nitrogen (N) is considered to be an essential macronutrient for plant growth [13,14], and also an important component of many organic molecules, such as proteins and amino acids, which regulate processes including N assimilation, antioxidant defense systems, photosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, and the entire cellular cycle [15]. Plants usually take up N through nitrate (NO3) and ammonium (NH4+) ions from the soil. Firstly, the reduction of NO3 into nitrite (NO2) is catalyzed by cytosolic nitrate reductase (NR), then nitrite reductase (NiR) located in the chloroplasts converts NO2 into NH4+. Secondly, glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) collaborate to incorporate NH4+ into organic compounds [16]. The glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) assimilates NH4+ ions into organic compounds, in addition to the GS/GOGAT cycle. GDH plays a limited or no role in the primary assimilation of NH4+ in plants, because of its affinity with NH4+, in relation to GS [17]. However, GDH plays a pivotal role in stressful environments when the GS/GOGAT system is inhibited. GDH activity induction can mitigate the accumulation of toxic quantities of NH4+ and provide the glutamate needed for several protective biomolecules [18]. Finally, glutamate can be transaminated into other amino acids by enzymes known as glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT) and glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT) [19,20].
A few studies examined Ni tolerance and the causes of rice toxicity prior to this study. Nevertheless, little is known about how Ni affects rice growth and N metabolism during seedling development. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out in-depth analyses to understand the N assimilation capacity of the rice crop under Ni stress, to counter the problems associated with Ni toxicity. In this study, we investigated the effects of Ni on growth, the content of photosynthesis pigments, and the enzyme activities of N metabolism in rice seedlings grown under a gradient of Ni concentrations in a controlled hydroponics system. The study will assist us in understanding how plants manage their nitrogen metabolism in stressed conditions.

2. Results

2.1. Ni-Induced Visible Toxicity Symptoms and Ni Contents in Rice Plants

We measured the root and shoot Ni concentration in response to Ni stress, in order to determine whether the Ni concentration correlates with rice plant toxicity. Higher Ni concentrations caused more symptoms of Ni toxicity and a higher accumulation of Ni in the roots and shoots, as compared with the control plants (Figure 1). Ni toxicity was observed on the rice seedling leaves, which showed symptoms of chlorosis, as well as necrosis, and this was most apparent on the new leaves. In relation to higher concentrations of Ni in the roots and shoots of Ni-stressed rice plants, we found that excessive Ni severely hampered rice growth performance by reducing plant height, as well as showing shorter and less hairy roots than the control plants (Figure 1a). The Ni concentration was increased by 109-, 195-, and 264-fold in the roots, and 687-, 1610-, and 4894-fold in the shoots at 50, 100, and 200 μM Ni, respectively, in relation to the control (Figure 1b,c).

2.2. Impact of Ni Stress on Plant Growth, Biomass, and Photosynthetic Pigments

To calculate the toxic effects of Ni on rice growth, we calculated the plant height, FWs, and DWs of the seedlings on day 14 of Ni application. The plant height was reduced by 13%, 26%, and 39% at 50, 100, and 200 μM Ni, respectively, in comparison with the control (Figure 2a). The incremental rise in Ni concentration in the solution seriously impaired the rice seedling biomass. Compared with the control, the reduction in FW was 12%, 43%, and 55%, and the reduction in DW was 21%, 40%, and 57% at 50, 100, and 200 μM Ni, respectively (Figure 2b,c). In the Ni-treated seedlings, the total Chl content decreased by 6%, 14%, and 19% at 50, 100, and 200 μM Ni, respectively, relative to the control (Figure 2d).

2.3. Effects of Ni Stress on NO3 and NH4+ Concentrations

Ni-stressed seedlings showed a varied pattern in the concentrations of NO3 and NH4+ in the rice leaves. The NO3 concentration was decreased by 9%, 29%, and 38% at 50, 100, and 200 μM Ni, respectively, with respect to the control (Figure 3a). By contrast, the Ni levels raised the NH4+ concentration by 2%, 22%, and 48%, respectively, compared with the control (Figure 3b).

2.4. Effects of Ni Stress on Enzymes Involved in N Metabolism

Ni-stressed rice seedlings showed declining levels of NR and NiR activities as the Ni concentration increased. The NR activity decreased by 10%, 34%, and 56%, and the NiR activity by 8%, 20%, and 39% at 50, 100, and 200 μM Ni, respectively, compared with the control (Figure 4a,b).
Similarly to the NR and NiR activities, the GS activities and GOGAT activities were also inhibited upon a gradual increase in Ni levels by 2%, 17% and 44%, and 3%, 7% and 11% at 50, 100, and 200 μM Ni, respectively, in comparison with the control (Figure 5a,b). Ni stress resulted in a sharp rise in the activity of GDH, indicating a relatively linear association between the activity of GDH and the concentration of Ni in the culture medium [12%, 31% and 46% at 50 μM, 100 μM and 200 μM Ni, respectively] (Figure 5c).
GOT and GPT activities, related to amino acid recycling, were significantly impaired by Ni stress. Compared with the control, Ni stress induced a significant reduction in GOT activity by 15%, 27%, and 48%, as well as in GPT activity by 5%, 16%, and 36%, respectively (Figure 6a,b).

3. Discussion

Plant growth and development was studied by varying Ni concentrations in a nutrient solution, with a gradient of Ni concentration. We observed that Ni stress causes phenotypic aberrations in rice, depending on the dose (Figure 1a). To support our findings, Ni-induced symptoms were also noted in various plant species, such as O. sativa L., Glycine max L., and T. aestivum L. [21,22]. The Ni concentration was increased in the shoot and root, according to Ni uptake (Figure 1b,c), and these results are consistent with those of G. max L. [22], T. aestivum L. [23], and rice [24]. Paddy rice is generally characterized by the formation of Fe plaque on the root surfaces. As a result of the continuous exchange of O2 from the rice shoots to the roots, Fe oxyhydroxides accumulate in the rhizosphere, which causes Fe plaques to develop around the roots [25]. Because the Fe plaque binds heavy metals, it minimizes their translocation into the shoots [26]. Thus, rice roots retain more Ni concentrations as compared to the shoot. Studies have demonstrated that Ni may contribute to plant growth and biomass in species such as S. tuberosum L., T. aestivum L., and G. hirsutum L., at low concentrations [11]. However, most plant species can exert toxicity if their accumulation is beyond the tolerable range [3]. The results of this study showed that the rice seedlings suffered growth retardation and reduced biomass with increasing concentrations of Ni in the solution (Figure 2a–c), as was shown by previous studies on G. hirsutum L. [27] and L. esculentum L. [28]. Consequently, the reduction in biomass from Ni-mediated stress could be due to the reduction in nutrient acquisition, essential for physiological functions in plants, or the oxidative stress triggered by Ni stress in plants [7,29].
The rate of photosynthesis affects plant growth and biomass by affecting the levels of carbohydrates and proteins. The content of total Chl in this study, as indicated in Figure 2d, decreased significantly following Ni administration. These findings confirm recent research showing that high Ni concentrations affect the total Chl content, limiting photosynthetic activity [8,22]. According to our previous studies, Ni stress decreased Chl a, Chl b and the total Chl content, and may also cause deformed stomata in the leaves, in addition to the chloroplast distortion observed, and may contribute to the decline in total chlorophyll levels [3,6,8,28]. Moreover, our study showed that under Ni stress (200 uM), gas exchange parameters, such as net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (Tr), and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), were decreased [8].
N metabolism is a fundamental physiological process in plants and is a crucial component of geochemical cycling [19]. In the majority of plants, the consumption or production of biochemically produced ammonium nitrate is linked to the concerted action of the NR/NiR cycle, composed of cytosolic NR and plastidial NiR, and to the subsequent action of GS and GOGAT, which comprise the GS/GOGAT cycle [19]. In this study, the NO3 concentration in rice leaves was found to decrease significantly as the application of Ni in the solution increased (Figure 3a). In support of our findings, previous reports also demonstrated a decrease in NO3 concentration in different plant species, such as O. sativa L. [30] and T. aestivum L. [23]. It is recommended that higher Ni concentrations limit the uptake and transport of NO3 from roots. Similar to the NO3 concentration, we observed a significant reduction in NR activity in the rice leaves (Figure 4a).
As a critical enzyme in N metabolism, NR catalyzes the reduction of NO3 into NO2 and is vulnerable to environmental stress conditions [31]. Our findings are consistent with earlier studies that found a reduction in NR activity in the presence of Ni stress (Figure 4a) [23,30]. It is suggested that a decline in NR activity could be caused by disrupting coordination among carbon, sulfur, and N metabolic pathways, along with the decline in NO3 content [32]. Furthermore, this reduced NR activity may be attributed to one or more of the following: (1) a low affinity for NO3 ions, (2) an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS), and (3) reduced availability of NO3 to plants during stressful conditions [33]. Additionally, Sharma and Dubey (2005) [33] demonstrated that the NR enzyme is susceptible to H2O2. Our previous studies observed a significant enhancement in endogenous accumulation of H2O2 in O. sativa L. under Ni stress conditions [3,8]. Therefore, the inhibition of NR activity may be associated with an increased reactive oxygen species content in rice leaves. In parallel to the decreased NR activity, we also observed a drastic decline in NiR activity with the increase in Ni concentration in the solution (Figure 4b), as supported by the previous study on T. aestivum L. [23]. NiR is an enzyme that catalyzes the reduction of NO2 into NH4+. NR-catalyzed NO3 reduction might cause a decline in NiR activity, primarily because of a reduced availability of NO2 ions.
In the present study, Ni stress significantly increased the NH4+ content at all doses of Ni (Figure 3b), as was observed in other studies involving rice [30] and wheat [23]. Higher NH4+ accumulation within a cell is toxic, creating various damage, such as disturbance in osmotic balance, intracellular pH alteration, nutrient deficiency, ATP synthesis inhibition, and necrosis, ultimately restricting secondary growth [30]. This may be due to increased protease activity, hydrolysis of N-containing metabolites, and free amino acids [31]. The GS converts NH4+ to glutamine, which is then converted by GOGAT to glutamate. The GDH function is only activated when the GS/GOGAT cycle is blocked, and it is only activated under stressful circumstances [34]. We also detected inhibition in GS activity with augmented Ni doses in the present study (Figure 5a). Our findings follow those of Kevrešan et al. (1998) [35], who showed that Ni stress significantly reduced the GS activity of sugar beet leaves. Similar to GS activity, we observed that GOGAT activity also decreased significantly under Ni stress conditions (Figure 5b). Decreased GOGAT activity was also reported in different plant species when exposed to toxic levels of heavy metals [36,37]. It has been suggested that the decline in GOGAT activity is due to the decline in a process that initiates NO3 uptake, and continues until the participation of NH4+ in the organic structure substances [36]. In contrast to GS and GOGAT activity, we detected a sharp increase in GDH activity with Ni application in the growth medium (Figure 5c). In accordance with our findings, many previous reports showed enhancement of GDH activity under various stress conditions in plants [38]. The ROS produced by abiotic stresses are believed to trigger glutamate synthesis by increasing GDH expression [39]. Furthermore, aminotransferases (GOT and GPT) play a critical role in glutamate metabolism, as they allow glutamate groups to be converted into other amino acids [40]. It has been found that GOT and GPT catalyze the conversion of glutamate to alanine and aspartate. Ni stress inhibited the activity of GOT and GPT in rice leaves in this study (Figure 6a,b). It has been suggested that Ni stress reduces GOT and GPT activities by impairing GS and GOGAT activities. After N is taken up by plants, glutamate is the first amino acid synthesized from it [38], and it is produced principally by NH4+ assimilation, catalyzed by these enzymes [41].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Experimental Setup

Rice seeds (Oryza sativa L.), cultivar yangliangyou 6, were cleaned with H2O2 (10% (v/v)) for 10 min, followed by repeated washing and soaking in deionized water for 24 h. Afterward, seeds were placed on plastic nets placed on top of plastic pots containing deionized water and placed in darkness at 28 ± 2 °C. Twelve uniformly sized seedlings were moved after four days into a 4 L plastic box containing a 50% nutrient solution, and the pH was adjusted to 6.0 using either NaOH or HCl, as previously described [8]. Following 10 days of acclimatization, the nutrient solution was upgraded to 100%. The nutrient solution contained the following elements (in mg L−1): 40 N, 10 P, 40 K, 40 Ca, 40 Mg, 0.5 Mn, 0.05 Mo, 0.2 B, 0.01 Zn, 0.01 Cu, and 2 Fe, which were added in the form of NH4NO3, NaHPO4∙2H2O, K2SO4, CaCl2, MgSO4∙7H2O, MnCl2∙4H2O, (NH4)6Mo7O4∙4H2O, H3BO3, ZnSO4∙7H2O, CuSO4∙5H2O, FeCl3∙6H2O, and citric acid (monohydrate), respectively [20].
Plants were treated with Ni (NiSO4∙6H2O) at concentrations of 50, 100, and 200 μM, while rice seedlings without Ni concentration served as a control. The nutrient solutions were renewed every 3 days, and the seedlings were removed after the 14th day of Ni application. The trial was conducted according to a completely randomized design (CRD), with three replications. The experiment was carried out at Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China, and the seedlings were grown in a greenhouse at 28 ± 1 °C with a relative humidity of 80%, under a light intensity of 820 μmol m−2 s−1 (16/8 h day/night).

4.2. Determination of Plant Growth

After 14 days of treatment, the plant height and root length of the rice seedlings were measured using a ruler. After that, each seedling was dissected, washed with deionized water, then dried with tissue paper to remove excess surface water. To eliminate external Ni adsorbed at the root surface, roots were first washed with tap water, then with distilled water, and finally with 0.01 M HCl for approximately 5 s [42]. Following the determination of fresh weight, the roots and shoots of the rice seedlings were placed at 65 °C for 72 h so that their dry weight could be determined.

4.3. Determination of Total Chl Content

To determine the total content of Chl in the rice leaves, we measured the absorbance of 80% (v/v) acetone-extracted supernatant at 663, 645, and 470 nm, using the formulas suggested by Lichtenthaler and Wellburn (1983) [43].

4.4. Quantification of Ni Content

In order to determine the Ni content of the roots and shoots, they were oven-dried and then digested at 140 °C using a concentrated acid solution mixture (HNO3:HClO4 at 4:1). The resulting transparent liquids were used to determine the Ni concentration in the roots and shoots of the rice seedlings, using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS: Agilent Technologies, 200 series AA, Santa Clara, United States).

4.5. NO3 and NH4+ Content Determination

The kits for NO3 (ZXTD-2-G) and NH4+ (ZATD-2-G), offered by Comin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China (http://www.cominbio.com) were used to evaluate the NO3 and NH4+ quality of the fresh rice leaves. The instructions given by the manufacturer were strictly followed, and for NO3 N and NH4+ N, respectively, the absorbance was read at 580 and 410 nm, and the units for both parameters were expressed in μg g−1 FW.

4.6. Measurement of N Metabolism-Related Enzyme Activities

Each frozen sample was ground in liquid nitrogen, and weighed within a range of 0.5 to 1 g. The enzymes were extracted in ice baths and then determined using the corresponding detection kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The rice plants’ fresh leaves were used to measure the N metabolizing enzymes, such as NR, NiR, GS, GOGAT, GDH, GOT, and GPT; testing kits were purchased from Comin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China (http://www.cominbio.com). To determine the activities of NR and NiR, the kits NR-2-Y and NIR-2-G were used, and the principle of measurement used was based on the concentration of enzymes needed to generate 1 μmol of NO2 per h per milligram of protein for both enzymes, which was quantified as one unit (U) of enzyme activity. Similarly, GS activity was tested using the GS-2-Y detection kit, and one U of enzyme activity was described in the per mL reaction system as per milligram protein required to adjust the absorption by 0.01 per min at 540 nm. The GOGAT enzyme level was investigated using the detection kit (GOGAT-2-Y), and the activity of one U enzyme was measured as 1 nmol NADH per minute per milligram of protein. The activity of GDH was monitored using the GDH-2-Y kit, and the principle of measurement was based on the enzyme level per milligram of tissue protein required to alter absorption by 0.01 per minute. The kits for GOT (GOT-2-Y) and GPT (GPT-2-Y) were used to investigate GOT and GPT enzyme levels. To make the absorption shift of 0.01 per minute, one U of enzyme activity was calculated per gram of protein in the reaction system.

4.7. Statistical Analysis

Treatment differences were analyzed for significance (p < 0.05) using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) along with Fisher’s least significant test (LSD) performed with GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

5. Conclusions

Collectively, higher levels of Ni have caused serious effects by altering several plant physiological and biochemical processes. Excess Ni exposure inhibited growth and reduced biomass, a phenomenon that was directly related to an increase in Ni concentration in the root and shoot tissue, as well as the depletion of photosynthetic pigments. Additionally, higher Ni concentrations influenced all the steps involved in N assimilation in rice leaves. As a result, NO3 was reduced, and various enzyme activities, such as NR, NiR, GS, GOGAT, GOT, and GPT, were decreased, while the NH4+ concentration and GDH activity were increased. In summary, the findings suggest that Ni toxicity may cause desynchronization of the enzymes necessary for N assimilation in plants, subsequently having a negative impact on plant growth.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R. and S.T.; methodology, M.R.; software, K.U. and T.S.; validation, M.R. and S.T.; formal analysis, M.R. and K.U.; investigation, M.R.; resources, S.T.; data curation, M.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R., K.U. and M.H.S.; writing—review and editing, M.R., K.U., M.A., H.A.J., M.H.S. and T.S.; supervision, S.T.; project administration, M.R.; funding acquisition, S.T., H.A.J. and M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported in part by National Key Research and Development Program (2018YFC1800305), Guangxi Major Special Project of Science and Technique (AA17202026-3), Hubei Special Project for Technique Innovation (2017ABA154), and Qatar University’s Vegetable Factory Project (QUEX–CAS–MJF–VF–18/19).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adrees, M.; Ali, S.; Rizwan, M.; Ibrahim, M.; Abbas, F.; Farid, M.; Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Irshad, M.K.; Bharwana, S.A. The Effect of Excess Copper on Growth and Physiology of Important Food Crops: A Review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 8148–8162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kamran, M.A.; Eqani, S.A.M.A.S.; Bibi, S.; Xu, R.K.; Amna; Monis, M.F.H.; Katsoyiannis, A.; Bokhari, H.; Chaudhary, H.J. Bioaccumulation of Nickel by E. Sativa and Role of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPRs) under Nickel Stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 126, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rizwan, M.; Imtiaz, M.; Dai, Z.; Mehmood, S.; Adeel, M.; Liu, J.; Tu, S. Nickel Stressed Responses of Rice in Ni Subcellular Distribution, Antioxidant Production, and Osmolyte Accumulation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 20587–20598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tang, J.; He, M.; Luo, Q.; Adeel, M.; Jiao, F. Heavy Metals in Agricultural Soils from a Typical Mining City in China: Spatial Distribution, Source Apportionment, and Health Risk Assessment. Polish J. Environ. Stud. 2020, 29, 1379–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Adeel, M.; Ma, C.; Ullah, S.; Rizwan, M.; Hao, Y.; Chen, C.; Jilani, G.; Shakoor, N.; Li, M.; Wang, L.; et al. Exposure to Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles Insinuates Physiological, Ultrastructural and Oxidative Damage: A Life Cycle Study on Eisenia Fetida. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 254, 113032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rizwan, M.; Mostofa, M.G.; Ahmad, M.Z.; Imtiaz, M.; Mehmood, S.; Adeel, M.; Dai, Z.; Li, Z.; Aziz, O.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Nitric Oxide Induces Rice Tolerance to Excessive Nickel by Regulating Nickel Uptake, Reactive Oxygen Species Detoxification and Defense-Related Gene Expression. Chemosphere 2018, 191, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rehman, M.Z.U.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Fatima, N.; Yousaf, B.; Naeem, A.; Sabir, M.; Ahmad, H.R.; Ok, Y.S. Contrasting Effects of Biochar, Compost and Farm Manure on Alleviation of Nickel Toxicity in Maize (Zea mays L.) in Relation to Plant Growth, Photosynthesis and Metal Uptake. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 133, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rizwan, M.; Mostofa, M.G.; Ahmad, M.A.Z.; Zhou, Y.; Adeel, M.; Mehmood, S.; Ahmad, M.A.Z.; Javed, R.; Imtiaz, M.; Aziz, O.; et al. Hydrogen Sulfide Enhances Rice Tolerance to Nickel through the Prevention of Chloroplast Damage and the Improvement of Nitrogen Metabolism under Excessive Nickel. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 138, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Soares, C.; de Sousa, A.; Pinto, A.; Azenha, M.; Teixeira, J.; Azevedo, R.A.; Fidalgo, F. Effect of 24-Epibrassinolide on ROS Content, Antioxidant System, Lipid Peroxidation and Ni Uptake in Solanum nigrum L. under Ni Stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 122, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nazir, H.; Asghar, H.N.; Zahir, Z.A.; Akhtar, M.J.; Saleem, M. Judicious Use of Kinetin to Improve Growth and Yield of Rice in Nickel Contaminated Soil. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2016, 18, 651–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yusuf, M.; Fariduddin, Q.; Hayat, S.; Ahmad, A. Nickel: An Overview of Uptake, Essentiality and Toxicity in Plants. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2011, 86, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Magnitskiy, S. Nickel The Last of the Essential Micronutrients. Agron. Colomb. 2011, 29, 49–56. [Google Scholar]
  13. Singh, M.; Singh, V.P.; Prasad, S.M. Nitrogen Modifies NaCl Toxicity in Eggplant Seedlings: Assessment of Chlorophyll a Fluorescence, Antioxidative Response and Proline Metabolism. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2016, 7, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Giagnoni, L.; Pastorelli, R.; Mocali, S.; Arenella, M.; Nannipieri, P.; Renella, G. Availability of Different Nitrogen Forms Changes the Microbial Communities and Enzyme Activities in the Rhizosphere of Maize Lines with Different Nitrogen Use Efficiency. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2016, 98, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Siddiqui, M.H.; Mohammad, F.; Khan, M.M.A.; Al-Whaibi, M.H. Cumulative Effect of Nitrogen and Sulphur on Brassica juncea L. Genotypes under NaCl Stress. Protoplasma 2012, 249, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Miflin, B.J.; Habash, D.Z. The Role of Glutamine Synthetase and Glutamate Dehydrogenase in Nitrogen Assimilation and Possibilities for Improvement in the Nitrogen Utilization of Crops. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 979–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Dubois, F.; Tercé-Laforgue, T.; Gonzalez-Moro, M.B.; Estavillo, J.M.; Sangwan, R.; Gallais, A.; Hirel, B. Glutamate Dehydrogenase in Plants: Is There a New Story for an Old Enzyme? Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2003, 41, 565–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bhushan Jha, A.; Shanker Dubey, R. Arsenic Exposure Alters Activity Behaviour of Key Nitrogen Assimilatory Enzymes in Growing Rice Plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2004, 43, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lancien, M.; Gadal, P.; Hodges, M. Enzyme Redundancy and the Importance of 2-Oxoglutarate in Higher Plant Ammonium Assimilation. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Yoshida, S.; Forno, D.A.; Cock, J.H.; Gomez, K.A. Routine Procedure for Growing Rice Plants in Culture Solution, 3rd ed.; Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice; The International Rice Research Institute: Los Baños, Philippines, 1976; pp. 61–66. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gajewska, E.; Wielanek, M.; Bergier, K.; Skłodowska, M. Nickel-Induced Depression of Nitrogen Assimilation in Wheat Roots. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2009, 31, 1291–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sirhindi, G.; Mir, M.A.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Ahmad, P.; Gucel, S. Jasmonic Acid Modulates the Physio-Biochemical Attributes, Antioxidant Enzyme Activity, and Gene Expression in Glycine Max under Nickel Toxicity. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Gajewska, E.; Skłodowska, M. Nickel-Induced Changes in Nitrogen Metabolism in Wheat Shoots. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 1034–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Maheshwari, R.; Dubey, R.S. Nickel Toxicity Inhibits Ribonuclease and Protease Activities in Rice Seedlings: Protective Effects of Proline. Plant Growth Regul. 2007, 51, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Khan, N.; Seshadri, B.; Bolan, N.; Saint, C.P.; Kirkham, M.B.; Chowdhury, S.; Yamaguchi, N.; Lee, D.Y.; Li, G.; Kunhikrishnan, A.; et al. Root Iron Plaque on Wetland Plants as a Dynamic Pool of Nutrients and Contaminants. Adv. Agron. 2016, 138, 1–96. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hseu, Z.Y.; Lai, Y.J. Nickel Accumulation in Paddy Rice on Serpentine Soils Containing High Geogenic Nickel Contents in Taiwan. Environ. Geochem. Health 2017, 39, 1325–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Khaliq, A.; Ali, S.; Hameed, A.; Farooq, M.A.; Farid, M.; Shakoor, M.B.; Mahmood, K.; Ishaque, W.; Rizwan, M. Silicon Alleviates Nickel Toxicity in Cotton Seedlings through Enhancing Growth, Photosynthesis, and Suppressing Ni Uptake and Oxidative Stress. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2016, 62, 633–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mosa, A.; El-Banna, M.F.; Gao, B. Biochar Filters Reduced the Toxic Effects of Nickel on Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) Grown in Nutrient Film Technique Hydroponic System. Chemosphere 2016, 149, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, C.; Huang, D.; Liu, J. Functions and Toxicity of Nickel in Plants: Recent Advances and Future Prospects. Clean—Soil Air Water 2009, 37, 304–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mishra, P.; Dubey, R.S. Nickel and Al-Excess Inhibit Nitrate Reductase but Upregulate Activities of Aminating Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Aminotransferases in Growing Rice Seedlings. Plant Growth Regul. 2011, 64, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Boussama, N.; Ouariti, O.; Ghorbal, M.H. Changes in Growth and Nitrogen Assimilation in Barley Seedlings under Cadmium Stress. J. Plant Nutr. 1999, 22, 731–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gill, S.S.; Khan, N.A.; Tuteja, N. Cadmium at High Dose Perturbs Growth, Photosynthesis and Nitrogen Metabolism While at Low Dose It up Regulates Sulfur Assimilation and Antioxidant Machinery in Garden Cress (Lepidium sativum L.). Plant Sci. 2012, 182, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sharma, P.; Shanker Dubey, R. Modulation of Nitrate Reductase Activity in Rice Seedlings under Aluminium Toxicity and Water Stress: Role of Osmolytes as Enzyme Protectant. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 854–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, Y.; Lu, X.; Yan, B.; Li, B.; Sun, J.; Guo, S.; Tezuka, T. Bottle Gourd Rootstock-Grafting Affects Nitrogen Metabolism in NaCl-Stressed Watermelon Leaves and Enhances Short-Term Salt Tolerance. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 653–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kevrešan, S.; Petrović, N.; Popović, M.; Kandrač, J. Effect of Heavy Metals on Nitrate and Protein Metabolism in Sugar Beet. Biol. Plant. 1998, 41, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Erdal, S.; Turk, H. Cysteine-Induced Upregulation of Nitrogen Metabolism-Related Genes and Enzyme Activities Enhance Tolerance of Maize Seedlings to Cadmium Stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 132, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sebastian, A.; Prasad, M.N.V. Operative Photo Assimilation Associated Proteome Modulations Are Critical for Iron-Dependent Cadmium Tolerance in Oryza sativa L. Protoplasma 2015, 252, 1375–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Du, J.; Shu, S.; An, Y.; Zhou, H.; Guo, S.; Sun, J. Influence of Exogenous Spermidine on Carbon–Nitrogen Metabolism under Ca(NO3)2 Stress in Cucumber Root. Plant Growth Regul. 2017, 81, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Skopelitis, D.S.; Paranychianakis, N.V.; Paschalidis, K.A.; Pliakonis, E.D.; Delis, I.D.; Yakoumakis, D.I.; Kouvarakis, A.; Papadakis, A.K.; Stephanou, E.G.; Roubelakis-Angelakis, K.A. Abiotic Stress Generates ROS That Signal Expression of Anionic Glutamate Dehydrogenases to Form Glutamate for Proline Synthesis in Tobacco and Grapevine. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 2767–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Liang, C.G.; Chen, L.P.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Xu, G.L.; Li, T. High Temperature at Grain-Filling Stage Affects Nitrogen Metabolism Enzyme Activities in Grains and Grain Nutritional Quality in Rice. Rice Sci. 2011, 18, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gangwar, S.; Singh, V.P. Indole Acetic Acid Differently Changes Growth and Nitrogen Metabolism in Pisum sativum L. Seedlings under Chromium (VI) Phytotoxicity: Implication of Oxidative Stress. Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam) 2011, 129, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Montes, M.; De La Rosa, G.; Corral-Diaz, B. Bioaccumulation of Cadmium, Chromium and Copper by Convolvulus arvensis L.: Impact on Plant Growth and Uptake of Nutritional Elements. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 92, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lichtenthaler, H.K.; Wellburn, A.R. Determinations of Total Carotenoids and Chlorophylls a and b of Leaf Extracts in Different Solvents. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1983, 11, 591–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Symptoms of nickel (Ni) toxicity (a), Ni concentrations in the root (b), and shoot (c) of rice seedlings subjected to 0, 50, 100 and 200 μM Ni for a period of 14 days. Bars represent means ± standard deviations (SDs) of three independent replications (n = 3). Means followed by the same letter did not significantly differ among the treatments at p < 0.05, according to Fisher’s least significant difference test.
Figure 1. Symptoms of nickel (Ni) toxicity (a), Ni concentrations in the root (b), and shoot (c) of rice seedlings subjected to 0, 50, 100 and 200 μM Ni for a period of 14 days. Bars represent means ± standard deviations (SDs) of three independent replications (n = 3). Means followed by the same letter did not significantly differ among the treatments at p < 0.05, according to Fisher’s least significant difference test.
Plants 11 01401 g001
Figure 2. Effects of nickel (Ni) on plant height (a), fresh weight (FW) (b), dry weight (DW) (c), and the levels of total chlorophyll (d) in leaves of rice seedlings exposed to 0, 50, 100 and 200 μM Ni for a period of 14 days. Bars represent means ± standard deviations (SDs) of three independent replications (n = 3). Means followed by the same letter did not significantly differ among the treatments at p < 0.05, according to Fisher’s least significant difference test.
Figure 2. Effects of nickel (Ni) on plant height (a), fresh weight (FW) (b), dry weight (DW) (c), and the levels of total chlorophyll (d) in leaves of rice seedlings exposed to 0, 50, 100 and 200 μM Ni for a period of 14 days. Bars represent means ± standard deviations (SDs) of three independent replications (n = 3). Means followed by the same letter did not significantly differ among the treatments at p < 0.05, according to Fisher’s least significant difference test.
Plants 11 01401 g002
Figure 3. Effects of nickel (Ni) on the concentrations of nitrate (NO3) (a) and ammonium (NH4+) (b) in the leaves of rice seedlings exposed to 0, 50, 100 and 200 μM Ni for a period of 14 days. Bars represent means ± standard deviations (SDs) of three independent replications (n = 3). Means followed by the same letter did not significantly differ among the treatments at p < 0.05, according to Fisher’s least significant difference test.
Figure 3. Effects of nickel (Ni) on the concentrations of nitrate (NO3) (a) and ammonium (NH4+) (b) in the leaves of rice seedlings exposed to 0, 50, 100 and 200 μM Ni for a period of 14 days. Bars represent means ± standard deviations (SDs) of three independent replications (n = 3). Means followed by the same letter did not significantly differ among the treatments at p < 0.05, according to Fisher’s least significant difference test.
Plants 11 01401 g003
Figure 4. Effects of nickel (Ni) on the activity of nitrate reductase (NR) (a), and nitrite reductase (NiR) (b) in the leaves of rice seedlings exposed to 0, 50, 100 and 200 μM Ni for a period of 14 days. Bars represent means ± standard deviations (SDs) of three independent replications (n = 3). Means followed by the same letter did not significantly differ among the treatments at p < 0.05, according to Fisher’s least significant difference test.
Figure 4. Effects of nickel (Ni) on the activity of nitrate reductase (NR) (a), and nitrite reductase (NiR) (b) in the leaves of rice seedlings exposed to 0, 50, 100 and 200 μM Ni for a period of 14 days. Bars represent means ± standard deviations (SDs) of three independent replications (n = 3). Means followed by the same letter did not significantly differ among the treatments at p < 0.05, according to Fisher’s least significant difference test.
Plants 11 01401 g004
Figure 5. Effects of nickel (Ni) on the activity of glutamine synthetase (GS) (a), glutamate synthase (GOGAT) (b), and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) (c) in the leaves of rice seedlings exposed to 0, 50, 100 and 200 μM Ni for a period of 14 days. Bars represent means ± standard deviations (SDs) of three independent replications (n = 3). Means followed by the same letter did not significantly differ among the treatments at p < 0.05, according to Fisher’s least significant difference test.
Figure 5. Effects of nickel (Ni) on the activity of glutamine synthetase (GS) (a), glutamate synthase (GOGAT) (b), and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) (c) in the leaves of rice seedlings exposed to 0, 50, 100 and 200 μM Ni for a period of 14 days. Bars represent means ± standard deviations (SDs) of three independent replications (n = 3). Means followed by the same letter did not significantly differ among the treatments at p < 0.05, according to Fisher’s least significant difference test.
Plants 11 01401 g005
Figure 6. Effects of nickel (Ni) on the activity of glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT) (a) and glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT) (b) in the leaves of rice seedlings exposed to 0, 50, 100 and 200 μM Ni for a period of 14 days. Bars represent means ± standard deviations (SDs) of three independent replications (n = 3). Means followed by the same letter did not significantly differ among the treatments at p < 0.05, according to Fisher’s least significant difference test.
Figure 6. Effects of nickel (Ni) on the activity of glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT) (a) and glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT) (b) in the leaves of rice seedlings exposed to 0, 50, 100 and 200 μM Ni for a period of 14 days. Bars represent means ± standard deviations (SDs) of three independent replications (n = 3). Means followed by the same letter did not significantly differ among the treatments at p < 0.05, according to Fisher’s least significant difference test.
Plants 11 01401 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rizwan, M.; Usman, K.; Alsafran, M.; Jabri, H.A.; Samreen, T.; Saleem, M.H.; Tu, S. Nickel Toxicity Interferes with NO3/NH4+ Uptake and Nitrogen Metabolic Enzyme Activity in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plants 2022, 11, 1401. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111401

AMA Style

Rizwan M, Usman K, Alsafran M, Jabri HA, Samreen T, Saleem MH, Tu S. Nickel Toxicity Interferes with NO3/NH4+ Uptake and Nitrogen Metabolic Enzyme Activity in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plants. 2022; 11(11):1401. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111401

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rizwan, Muhammad, Kamal Usman, Mohammed Alsafran, Hareb Al Jabri, Tayyaba Samreen, Muhammad Hamzah Saleem, and Shuxin Tu. 2022. "Nickel Toxicity Interferes with NO3/NH4+ Uptake and Nitrogen Metabolic Enzyme Activity in Rice (Oryza sativa L.)" Plants 11, no. 11: 1401. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111401

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop