Next Article in Journal
Floristic and Vegetation Changes on a Small Mediterranean Island over the Last Century
Previous Article in Journal
Algerian Olive Germplasm and Its Relationships with the Central-Western Mediterranean Varieties Contributes to Clarify Cultivated Olive Diversification
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 4
10.3390/plants10040679
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

MYC2 Transcription Factors TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b Negatively Regulate Triptolide Biosynthesis in Tripterygium wilfordii Hairy Roots

by
Yanbo Huo
1,2,
Jing Zhang
1,2,
Bin Zhang
1,2,
Ling Chen
1,2,
Xing Zhang
1,2,* and
Chuanshu Zhu
1,2,*
1
College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
2
Shaanxi Research Center of Biopesticide Engineering & Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(4), 679; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040679
Submission received: 16 March 2021 / Revised: 29 March 2021 / Accepted: 30 March 2021 / Published: 1 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Molecular Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Triptolide, an important bioactive diterpenoid extracted from the plant Tripterygium wilfordii, exhibits many pharmacological activities. MYC2 transcription factor (TF) plays an important role in the regulation of various secondary metabolites in plants. However, whether MYC2 TF could regulate the biosynthesis of triptolide in T. wilfordii is still unknown. In this study, two homologous MYC2 TF genes, TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b, were isolated from T. wilfordii hairy roots and functionally characterized. The analyses of the phylogenetic tree and subcellular localization showed that they were grouped into the IIIe clade of the bHLH superfamily with other functional MYC2 proteins and localized in the nucleus. Furthermore, yeast one-hybrid and GUS transactivation assays suggested that TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b inhibited the promoter activity of the miltiradiene synthase genes, TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b, by binding to the E-box (CACATG) and T/G-box (CACGTT) motifs in their promoters. Transgenic results revealed that RNA interference of TwMYC2a/b significantly enhanced the triptolide accumulation in hairy roots and liquid medium by upregulating the expression of several key biosynthetic genes, including TwMS (TwTPS27a/b), TwCPS (TwTPS7/9), TwDXR, and TwHMGR1. In summary, our findings show that TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b act as two negative regulators of triptolide biosynthesis in T. wilfordii hairy roots and also provide new insights on metabolic engineering of triptolide in the future.

1. Introduction

Tripterygium wilfordii, common name Lei Gong Teng or thunder duke vine, has a long history in traditional Chinese medicine, mainly to treat rheumatoid arthritis [1,2]. The identification of hundreds of effective compounds isolated from the roots of T wilfordii, such as diterpenoids, triterpenoids, and sesquiterpenoids [3,4], has stimulated the study of their pharmacological properties. In T. wilfordii, much of the observed pharmacological activity can be attributed to the presence of triptolide, which has a variety of pharmacological activities, such as antitumor, anticancer, immunosuppressive, and anti-inflammatory activities [5,6,7,8]. Recently, numerous studies have focused on investigating the biosynthetic pathway of triptolide, leading to the isolation and functional characterization of many triptolide biosynthetic pathway genes, including not only the upstream pathway genes, such as TwHMGR1 [9], TwHMGS [10,11], TwDXR [12,13], TwDXS1/2 [12,14], TwHDR [15], TwIDI [16,17], and TwGGPPS1/4/8 [18,19], but also the downstream pathway genes, such as TwTPS7/7v2/9/9v2 [20,21], TwTPS27/27v2 [20,21], and TwCYP728B70 [22] (all of these functional pathway genes’ full names are shown in Table S1). However, less is known about the transcriptional regulation of triptolide pathway in T. wilfordii, as compared with the progress of triptolide biosynthetic genes.
MYC2 transcription factor (TF), which belongs to the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) superfamily, has been shown to involve in the regulation of plant secondary metabolism. In Arabidopsis thaliana, AtMYC2 enhances the production of sesquiterpene, especially (E)-β-caryophyllene, by upregulating the sesquiterpene synthase genes TPS21 and TPS11 [23]. In Chimonanthus praecox, overexpression of CpMYC2 in model plant A. thaliana shows an increase in the production of monoterpene linalool [24]. In Salvia miltiorrhiza, SmMYC2a positively regulates the biosynthesis of diterpenoid tanshinone by affecting multiple pathway genes in tanshinone biosynthesis [25]. In Withania somnifera, WsMYC2 upregulates the biosynthesis of triterpenoid withanolides via key pathway genes WsCYP85A and WsCYP90B [26]. These findings also suggest that MYC2 promotes a wider range of terpenoids biosynthesis. In addition to the positive effects of MYC2, the negative role of MYC2 in regulating plant secondary metabolism has also been reported but limited. For example, AtMYC2 negatively controls Trp and Trp-derived indole glucosinolate biosynthesis during JA signaling in A. thaliana [27]. TcJAMYC1/2/4, three homologous of AtMYC2, display a negative role in taxol biosynthetic gene expression, at least when transiently overexpressed in Taxus cuspidata cultured cells [28]. However, whether MYC2 could up- or down-regulate the diterpenoid triptolide biosynthesis in T. wilfordii is still unknown. Therefore, it is necessary to isolate the MYC2 TF gene from T. wilfordii and identify its potential function in triptolide biosynthesis.
It has been reported that the E-box elements ‘CANNTG’ and its variants ‘CACGTG’ (called G-box) and ‘CACGTT’ (called T/G-box) in the promoters of pathway genes can be bound by bHLH and MYC2 TFs which are involved in plant secondary metabolism [29,30,31,32]. For example, SmbHLH10 enhances the tanshinone biosynthesis in S. miltiorrhiza by directly binding to the T/G-box (CACGTT) and G-box like (CACGTC) motifs in the promoters of key enzyme genes SmCPS1, SmCPS5, and SmDXS2 [33]. AsMYC2 upregulates agarwood sesquiterpene biosynthesis by directly binding to the G-box motif in the promoter of ASS1, a key sesquiterpene synthase gene in Aquilaria sinensis [34]. These findings suggest that the E-box motifs in the key pathway gene promoters play important roles in the regulation of secondary metabolism in plants. Recently, in our previous studies, five different types of E-box elements, including CAGATG, CACATG, CAAATG, CACGTT (T/G-box), and CAATTG, were found in the promoters of miltiradiene synthase genes, TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b, key genes of triptolide biosynthesis in T. wilfordii [35]. This indicated that these E-box elements in the promoters of TwTPS27a/b as the potential MYC binding sites might be recognized by MYC2 TF in T. wilfordii. Therefore, the interaction between the TwTPS27a/b promoters and MYC2 TF that may regulate triptolide biosynthesis needs further investigation.
RNA interference (RNAi) technology is often used for the functional identification of candidate genes in vivo in plants [36]. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated RNA interference (RNAi) technology has been successfully used to identify transcription factors (TFs) function and regulate the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites in many plants, such as Salvia miltiorrhiza [25], Catharanthus roseus [37], Nicotiana benthamiana [38], Coptis japonica [39], and Ophiorrhiza pumila [40]. For example, RNA interference-mediated knockdown experiments with hairy roots of Salvia miltiorrhiza suggested that SmMYC2a is a positive regulator in the biosynthesis of tanshinones [25]. Artificial micro RNA mediated suppression of WsMYC2 was performed in W. somnifera leaves to confirm its positive role in regulating withanolide biosynthesis by inhibiting key pathway genes [26]. Recently, our lab established a rapid and efficient Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated RNAi system, generating stable transgenic hairy roots of T. wilfordii [9]. Therefore, the establishment of a transgenic RNAi hairy roots system will contribute to identifying the function of candidate TFs that may be involved in the regulating of triptolide biosynthesis.
To date, no MYC2 TF gene has been isolated and characterized by its function in T. wilfordii. The purpose of this study is to identify and find out the potential role of the MYC2 in regulating triptolide biosynthesis of T. wilfordii. We isolated two homologous MYC2 TFs named TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b. They are homologous with other plant MYC2 proteins and phylogenetic analysis showed that they were grouped into the IIIe clade of the bHLH superfamily with other functional MYC2 proteins. The subcellular localization analysis implied that TwMYC2a/b are two nuclear-localized proteins. The yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) and GUS transactivation assays confirmed the interaction between the TwMYC2a/b proteins and the promoters of miltiradiene synthase genes, TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b, which are the key genes in triptolide biosynthesis. Furthermore, TwMYC2a/b were silenced using RNA interference (RNAi) in T. wilfordii hairy roots. The expression of several key pathway genes of triptolide biosynthesis and production of triptolide were analyzed in the TwMYC2a/b-RNAi and control hairy roots lines. Taken together, our results indicate that TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b are two negative regulators of triptolide biosynthesis in the hairy roots of T. wilfordii and provide new insights on metabolic engineering of triptolide in the future.

2. Results

2.1. Isolation and Molecular Characterization of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b

Through homolog searching, one candidate gene, comp41180_c0_seq5, was selected from the T. wilfordii transcriptome library (SRX472292) with the highest score (Figure S1). This candidate gene was homologous to the known transcription factor (TF) AtMYC2 (as the query protein) from Arabidopsis thaliana. To obtain the full-length cDNA of this candidate gene, the 5′/3′-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (5′/3′-RACE) and full-length coding sequence (CDS) cloning assays were performed. The identification of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products of the candidate gene was shown in Figure S2. After sequence alignment (Figures S3 and S4), two homologous nucleotide sequences were obtained and named TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b, respectively. Then, the sequences of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b including 5′/3′-untranslated region (5′/3′-UTR) and full-length CDS were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database and were given the Genbank accession numbers MN836714 and MN836715, respectively.
Based on the NCBI ORF finder, the CDSs of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b are both 2049 bp, encoding 682 aa. The alignment of the full-length CDSs and protein sequences between TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b revealed that these two genes were homologous, sharing 93.67%/90.19% nucleotide/protein sequence identity (Figure S5). The theoretical isoelectric point (pI) and the molecular weight (Mw) of the TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b proteins were 5.19/74.43 kDa (pI/Mw) and 5.50/74.44 kDa (pI/Mw), respectively. Moreover, multiple sequence alignment showed that both the TwMYC2a/b proteins possess a bHLH-MYC superfamily domain at the N-terminal region and a basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper domain at the C-terminal region (Figure 1A). Additionally, the 4aa-length peptides in the TwMYC2a/b proteins (‘SDHS’ for TwMYC2a and ‘SEHS’ for TwMYC2b, Figure 1A), assumed to be the phosphorylation sites, were only highly similar among MYC2 proteins [41]. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that they were grouped into the IIIe clade of the bHLH superfamily with other functional MYC2 proteins (Figure 1B), which were previously shown to regulate the biosynthesis of plant secondary metabolites [27,37,42,43,44,45,46], suggesting that TwMYC2a/b are likely to be involved in the regulation of secondary metabolism in T. wilfordii. Besides, both the TwMYC2a/b proteins also have a predicted typical nuclear localization signal (NLS) (Figure 1A). The subcellular localization analyses of the TwMYC2a/b proteins were performed in tobacco leaf cells (Figure 1C). As shown in Figure 1C, the fluorescence of GFP was detected in the cytoplasm and nucleus in the tobacco leaves transformed with the empty vector (35S-eGFP). In contrast to this, the fluorescent signals of 35S-TwMYC2a-eGFP and 35S-TwMYC2b-eGFP fusion proteins were only detected in the nucleus. These data implied that TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b are nuclear-localized proteins.

2.2. TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b Specifically Bind the E-Box and T/G-Box Motifs within the TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b Promoters

It is well known that MYC2 TFs recognize the E-box (CANNTG) and its variants G-box (CACGTG) or T/G-box (CACGTT) within the promoters of their target genes [47,48,49,50,51,52]. Our previous studies [35] showed that several different types of E-box motifs (CANNTG) were found in the promoters of miltiradiene synthase genes, TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b, which are the key genes in triptolide biosynthesis. As shown in Figure 2A, there are five different E-box motifs present in the TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b promoters, including E1 (CAGATG), E2 (CACATG), E3 (CAAATG), E4 (CACGTT, called T/G-box), and E5 (CAATTG), indicating that these motifs may be the binding sites of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b.
To verify the binding of TwMYC2a/b to the E-box (E2, CACATG) and T/G-box (E4, CACGTT) motifs of TwTPS27a/b promoters, yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) assays were performed in Y1HGold yeast cells. After introducing the vacant pGADT7-Rec2 (AD) vector into the yeast cells harboring the bait vectors, 3×E2-AbAi or 3×E4-AbAi (Figure 2B), it was found that the growth of the transformed yeast cells was inhibited on an SD/−Leu plate under 200 and 300 ng/mL concentration of aureobasidin A (AbA), which is a potent and unique yeast antibiotic (Figure 2C). However, when transformed with the prey vectors TwMYC2a-AD/TwMYC2b-AD (Figure 2B), the yeast cells harboring 3×E2-AbAi or 3×E4-AbAi vectors were still able to grow normally on an SD/−Leu/AbA300 ng/mL plate (Figure 2C). These findings suggested that TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b were indeed able to bind the E-box (CACATG) and T/G-box (CACGTT) present in the TwTPS27a/b promoters, which was consistent with the expectation of MYC2 TFs.

2.3. TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b Could Repress the TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b Promoters

To examine whether TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b directly regulate the promoters of TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b in tobacco (N. benthamiana) leaves, the effectors 35S::TwMYC2a/b or empty vector (EV) (Figure 3A) co-transformed with the reporters 27aP::GUS or 27bP::GUS (Figure 3A) into tobacco leaves, respectively, for β-glucuronidase (GUS) transactivation assays. As shown in Figure 3B,C, the GUS staining analysis showed that the staining intensity was lower on the right side of the midrib in the same infiltrated tobacco leaves, which were co-transformed with 27aP::GUS and 35S::TwMYC2a/35S::TwMYC2b, or 27bP::GUS and 35S::TwMYC2a/35S::TwMYC2b, than their corresponding controls, which were co-transformed with EV and 27aP::GUS, or EV and 27bP::GUS, on the left side of the midrib in the same infiltrated tobacco leaves. Similarly, their GUS fluorimetric activities also decreased significantly, compared with their corresponding controls (Figure 3B,C), indicating that the transient overexpression of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b could strongly decrease the activity of the TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b promoters. Therefore, these results revealed that TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b both negatively regulated the activity of the TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b promoters, and also implied that TwMYC2a/b may play roles in down-regulating the biosynthesis of triptolide.

2.4. Relative Expression of TwMYC2a/b and Key Pathway Genes in the RNA Interference (RNAi) Hairy Roots of T. wilfordii

To investigate the regulatory role of TwMYC2a/b in triptolide biosynthesis, RNAi-mediated expression knockdown assays were carried out in T. wilfordii. Three RNA interference (RNAi) fragments (314, 304, and 311 bp) designed according to the full-length coding sequence of TwMYC2a (Figure S6) were cloned into a pK7GWIWG2_II-RedRoot vector, containing a red fluorescent protein (RFP) gene, thereby generating three silencing constructs. After the introduction, the transgenic hairy roots lines (R1, R2, R3, and the control line, which introduced with the empty vector pK7GWIWG2_II-RedRoot) were confirmed by fluorescence identification and PCR analysis (Figure S7). We then conducted a qRT-PCR analysis of these transgenic lines. As shown in Figure 4A, the transcript levels of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b in R1, R2, and R3 RNAi lines were significantly decreased by 55%~81% and 46%~73%, respectively, compared with the control line (EV). Among them, the expressions of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b in the R1 hairy roots line were the lowest, 19% and 27% of the control line, respectively. Next, we chose the R1 line for further study. To evaluate how the expression of genes related to triptolide biosynthesis is influenced by TwMYC2a/b, expression levels of several key triptolide biosynthetic genes were analyzed in R1 and control (EV) hairy roots lines. As shown in Figure 4B, the expressions of downstream pathway genes TwCPS (TwTPS7/9) and TwMS (TwTPS27a/b) and upstream pathway genes TwDXR and TwHMGR1 were significantly increased, by 2.66-, 2.12-, 2.21-, and 1.64-fold in R1 line, respectively, compared with the control line (EV). These results further confirmed the negative regulatory effect of TwMYC2a/b on TwTPS27a/b and other key pathway genes and also demonstrated that the miltiradiene synthase genes TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b were two target genes of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b.

2.5. RNAi of TwMYC2a/b Increases Triptolide Production in the Hairy Roots of T. wilfordii

First, we measured the dry weight of the R1 and control (EV) hairy roots after being cultured for 28 d. As shown in Figure 5A, the biomass of the R1 line (0.70 g DW) was significantly higher than that of the control line (EV, 0.40 g DW) after being cultured for 28 d (1.76-fold). This finding was consistent with the phenotypes of the R1 and control (EV) hairy roots (Figure 5B).
Then, the accumulation of triptolide in R1 and control hairy roots was detected by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) (Figure 5C and Figure S8). The results showed that the content of triptolide in R1 hairy roots (65.38 DW μg/g) was significantly increased by 1.67-fold, compared with the control (EV, 39.20 DW μg/g). Besides, the release content of triptolide in the liquid medium of R1 (229.63 μg/flask) was also significantly higher than that of the control (EV, 111.49 μg/flask) (2.06-fold) (Figure 5C). These results indicated that TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b were negative regulators that affected the biosynthesis of triptolide in T. wilfordii hairy roots.

3. Discussion

MYC2, which belongs to the IIIe clade of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) superfamily that is one of the largest group of transcription factors (TFs) in plants, is a core regulator involved in plant secondary metabolism [41]. In this study, two homologous MYC2 TF genes TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b were identified from Tripterygium wilfordii hairy roots by the 5′/3′-RACE method. Bioinformatics analysis showed that two domains were highly conserved in the TwMYC2a/b proteins and other MYC2 TFs: a bHLH-MYC superfamily domain at the N-terminal region and a basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper domain at the C-terminal region. Besides, the 4aa-length peptide present in the TwMYC2a/b proteins (‘SDHS’ for TwMYC2a and ‘SEHS’ for TwMYC2b, Figure 1A), assumed to be the phosphorylation site, were only highly similar among MYC2 [41]. Phylogenetic analysis showed that TwMYC2a/b were grouped into the IIIe clade of the bHLH superfamily with other functional MYC2 proteins, such as CrMYC2 [37], AtMYC2 [27], TcMYC2a [42], NtMYC2a/b [43], HbMYC2 [44], HbMYC2b [45], and SmMYC2 [46] (Figure 1B). Thus, these findings indicate that TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b are two typical MYC2 TF and may play an important role in the regulation of secondary metabolism in T. wilfordii.
The bHLH TFs function by binding to the E-box (CANNTG) motif in their target gene promoters [31]. Our previous studies have isolated the promoters of key pathway genes TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b and silico analysis showed that five different types of E-box (CANNTG) motifs were found in their promoters [35]. It has been reported that in addition to the G-box (CACGTG) showing the strongest MYC2 binding capacity, the E-box (CACATG) and T/G-box (CACGTT) have stronger binding capacity than other E-box variants [27]. This implies that the E-box (CACATG) and T/G-box (CACGTT) present in the TwTPS27a/b promoters, as the potential MYC-binding sites, are most likely to be bound by TwMYC2a/b in T. tripterygium. In this study, to verify this hypothesis, yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) assays were conducted and demonstrated that these two potential MYC-binding sites, E-box (CACATG) and T/G-box (CACGTT), in the TwTPS27a/b promoters were indeed bound by TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b (Figure 2C). Besides, β-glucuronidase (GUS) transactivation assays were performed and further demonstrated that TwMYC2a/b negatively regulated the activity of the TwTPS27a/b promoters (Figure 3B,C). These results confirmed the interaction between the TwTPS27a/b promoters and TwMYC2a/b TFs. Then, the qRT-PCR analysis in the ectopic RNA interference-mediated knockdown experiments with hairy roots cultures of T. wilfordii proved that the miltiradiene synthase genes TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b were two target genes of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b. Besides, these results will lay a foundation for studying the interaction between the key pathway genes of triptolide biosynthesis and the candidate transcription factors involved in the regulation of triptolide biosynthesis in T. wilfordii.
Recently, the release of the T. wilfordii genomic data [22] made it easier to analyze the potential MYC-binding sites in the triptolide biosynthetic gene promoters. In the genomic data of T. wilfordii, the downstream key pathway genes TwTPS7/7v2 and TwTPS9/9v2, and the upstream key pathway genes TwDXR and TwHMGR1, were found in the chromosome of 21, 21, 18, and 7, respectively. The potential promoter sequences (2000 bp nucleotides upstream of their start codon ATG) of these biosynthetic genes were analyzed and showed that many E-box motifs present in their potential promoter sequences (Table S2). Notably, the E-box motifs ‘CACATG’ (demonstrated to be bound by TwMYC2a/b in Y1H assays, Figure 2C) or its reverse sequence ‘CATGTG’ were found in all these genes’ potential promoter sequences, and the T/G-box motif ‘CACGTT’ (demonstrated to be bound by TwMYC2a/b in Y1H assays, Figure 2C) was found in the potential promoter sequence of TwHMGR1. Therefore, the presence of many potential MYC-binding sites (various types of E-box motifs) in their potential promoters indicated that these pathway genes might be recognized and regulated by TwMYC2a/b. In this study, the relative expressions of these key pathway genes TwCPS (TwTPS7/9), TwMS (TwTPS27a/b), TwDXR, and TwHMGR1 were significantly increased, by 2.66-, 2.12-, 2.21-, and 1.64-fold in RNAi-TwMYC2a/b hairy roots (R1 line), respectively, compared with the control line (EV) (Figure 4B). Compared with the control, the triptolide productions in the hairy roots and liquid medium of RNAi-TwMYC2a/b hairy roots (R1 line) were both significantly enhanced by 1.67- and 2.06-fold, respectively (Figure 5C). Therefore, these results further verified that these key pathway genes could be regulated by TwMYC2a/b, and TwMYC2a/b act negative roles in the regulation of triptolide biosynthesis.
In this study, we measured the dry weight of the R1 and control (EV) hairy roots after being cultured for 28 d and the results showed that the biomass of the R1 hairy roots line was significantly higher than that of the control line (1.76-fold) (Figure 5A). It is reported that AtMYC2 inhibits primary root growth in A. thaliana [53,54]. Similarly, AaMYC2 from Artemisia annua and MdMYC2 from Malus domestica exhibit the same function as AtMYC2 in Arabidopsis seedlings [55,56]. Therefore, we speculate that TwMYC2a/b also has the potential effect on inhibiting root growth in T. wilfordii. This hypothesis may explain the increased dry weight of the RNAi-TwMYC2a/b hairy roots line (R1 line). However, SmMYC2b from S. miltiorrhiza exerts opposite functions in inhibiting root growth [57]. Notably, the phylogenetic analysis showed that SmMYC2b was grouped into the IIId clade of the bHLH superfamily with other functional JAM proteins, such as AtJAM1, AtJAM2, and AtJAM3 from A. thaliana [25,58]. Besides, JAM is antagonistic to MYC2 and negatively regulates the inhibition of root growth [59,60]. Therefore, it is easy to understand why SmMYC2b, as a member of JAM TF, plays the opposite role in inhibiting root growth, rather than showing the same inhibitory effect as the real MYC2 TF. In addition, the triptolide accumulation in the hairy roots and liquid medium of RNAi-TwMYC2a/b hairy roots (R1 line) were both significantly higher than that of controls (Figure 5C). Given this, RNAi-TwMYC2a/b hairy roots line (R1 line) with rapid growth and high content of triptolide will provide an important candidate resource for the metabolic engineering of triptolide.
In the regulation of plant secondary metabolism, many key enzyme gene promoters can be recognized by positive or negative regulators, thereby increasing or decreasing the content of secondary metabolites. For example, the promoter of SmKSL, a key tanshinone biosynthetic gene encoding miltiradiene synthase in S miltiorrhiza, containing GCC-box and E-box motifs, can be recognized by positive regulators SmERF6 [61] and SmERF128 [62], and negative regulator SmbHLH3 [63], thereby up-regulating and down-regulating the biosynthesis of tanshinone. Similarly, in T. wilfordii, the promoters of miltiradiene synthase genes TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b containing TGACG-motif, E-box, and T/G-box elements also can be regulated by positive regulator TwTGA1 upregulating triptolide biosynthesis [35,64] and negative regulators TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b reported here. These findings indicate that the regulation of triptolide biosynthesis is complex and more potential transcription factors can be involved in the biosynthesis of triptolide, which needs further study.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials, Growth Conditions, RNA Isolation, and cDNA Synthesis

The plant of Tripterygium wilfordii was grown beside the grape trellis of Shaanxi Research Center of Biopesticide Engineering & Technology, Northwest A&F University, YangLing, China. The hairy roots and sterile seedlings of T. wilfordii were maintained and subcultured in our laboratory [9]. Tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) plants for agroinfiltration were grown under 16 h day/8 h night (24 ± 1 °C) conditions in a plant growth chamber for five or six weeks. The Y1H Gold yeast cells were used for yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) assays. The extraction of total RNA was conducted according to the instruction manuals of the Plant Total RNA Extraction Kit (DNA-free) (Biospin, Shanghai, China). The first-strand cDNA synthesis for gene cloning and expression was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol of PrimeScript™ II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). The first-strand cDNA synthesis for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed according to the manufacturer’s instruction of PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Dalian, China).

4.2. Isolation and Bioinformatics Analyses of the TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b

The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) search was conducted for homolog searching, using the tBLASTn (protein sequence searched against translated nucleotide sequences) mode, from T. wilfordii transcriptome library (SRX472292), and the functional protein sequence of AtMYC2 (also called RD22BP1, GenBank accession NO. BAA25078) from Arabidopsis thaliana as the query sequence. One candidate gene, comp41180_c0_seq5, was screened with the highest score (bits) (Figure S1). To clone the 5′/3′-untranslated region (5′/3′-UTR) of this candidate gene, 5′/3′-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (5′/3′-RACE) assays were conducted according to the protocol of SMARTer RACE 5′/3′ Kit (Clontech, CA, USA). Specific primers for the first round 5′/3′-RACE polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (MYC2-5’-R1-1066 and MYC2-3’-F1-1192, Table S3) and second round 5′/3′-RACE PCR (MYC2-5’-R2-795 and MYC2-3’-F2-1578, Table S3) were designed according to the candidate gene sequence. After the second round 5′/3′-RACE PCR cloning, the PCR products were purified and then introduced into the pMD19-T clone vector by TA cloning procedure. After sequencing and alignment, the 5′/3′-UTR of the candidate gene was confirmed. According to the 5′/3′-UTR and the candidate gene sequence, the primers for cloning the full-length CDS of the candidate gene were designed (Table S3). Finally, through sequence alignment, two homologous full-length cDNA of the candidate gene were obtained and named TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b, respectively.
The nucleotide sequence and open reading frame (ORF) of TwMYC2a/b were analyzed by ORF Finder (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder/ (accessed on 1 July 2016)). The theoretical isoelectric point (pI) and molecular weight (Mw) of the TwMYC2a/b protein sequences were analyzed by the Compute pI/Mw tool (https://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/ (accessed on 1 July 2016)). The conserved domains of these two protein sequences were predicted using NCBI’s conserved domain database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi (accessed on 1 July 2016)). Using DNAMAN version 9, the protein sequences of TwMYC2a/b were compared with other homologous plant MYC2 proteins. The phylogenetic tree of TwMYC2a/b with other functional MYC2 protein sequences was constructed by the neighbor-joining method using the MEGA7 software with 1000 bootstraps run.

4.3. Subcellular Localization of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b

The coding sequences of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b removing the stop codon with EcoR I and Kpn I restriction sites were separately cloned into a modified vector pCAMBIA1302 (35S-eGFP) to generate the recombinant vectors 35S-TwMYC2a-eGFP and 35S-TwMYC2b-eGFP. The 35S-eGFP was used as the control vector. All of these vectors were separately transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 (pSoup-p19) and infiltrated into tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) leaves using Agrobacterium-mediated transient transformation. After 48 h of cultivation, the fluorescence in the transformed tobacco leaves was observed using Leica TCS SP8 MP confocal microscope (Leica, Bensheim, Germany). All the primers used for the construction of subcellular localization vectors are listed in Table S3.

4.4. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) Analysis

The qRT-PCR assays for gene expression analysis were performed according to our previous method [9]. The relative gene expression was quantified by using the 2−ΔΔCt method [65]. Elongation factor 1 α (EF1α) was used as the internal standard for gene expression normalization. The qRT-PCR primers of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b were designed in the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of TwMYC2a/b (Figure S9). All the primers used for qRT-PCR analysis are listed in Table S3.

4.5. Yeast One-Hybrid (Y1H) Assay

To detect whether TwMYC2a/b bound to the E-box (CACATG) and T/G-box (CACGTT) of TwTPS27a/b promoters in yeast, the Y1H assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Clontech, CA, USA). The triple repeated sequence ‘ATTCACATGTAA’ and ‘CATCACGTTAGA’ (three bases of flanking sequence together with the core elements CACATG/CACGTT) were artificially synthesized and separately cloned into pAbAi (Clontech, CA, USA) to generate the bait vectors. The coding sequences of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b were amplified by PCR and separately fused to the yeast GAL4 activation domain (GAL4 AD) of pGADT7-Rec (Clontech, CA, USA) to generate the prey vectors. Then the bait vectors were linearized and integrated into the genome of Y1H Gold yeast strain, selected on SD/-Ura agar medium plate, which was cultured at 30 °C for 3 d. Next, the prey vectors and the blank pGADT7-Rec (AD, used as a control), were introduced into the yeast cells previously transformed with the bait vectors, respectively. The concentration of positively transformed yeast cells that harbor different combinations of bait and prey vectors were adjusted to OD600 ≈ 1.0 and serially diluted 1/10, 1/100, 1/1000 in sterile ddH2O. The serial dilution of transformed yeast cells was cultured on SD/−Leu medium plates with an optimal concentration of aureobasidin A (AbA) to examine any protein-DNA interactions. Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 3 d. All the primers used for the construction of the bait and prey vectors are listed in Table S3.

4.6. GUS Transactivation Assay

To verify whether TwMYC2a/b could regulate the TwTPS27a/b promoters, GUS transactivation assays were performed in tobacco leaves. The full-length CDSs of TwMYC2a/b were separately cloned into a pJCV53 vector (Invitrogen, CA, USA) containing a red fluorescent protein (RFP) gene, using the Gateway cloning system (Invitrogen, CA, USA), thereby generating the effector vectors, 35S::TwMYC2a and 35S::TwMYC2b. The empty vector (EV) was used as a negative control. The promoters of TwTPS27a (1494 bp upstream of the start codon) and TwTPS27b (1862 bp upstream of the start codon) were cloned into the pBI121 vector, generating the reporter vectors, 27aP::GUS and 27bP::GUS, which had been previously constructed [35]. All of these constructs were separately transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 (pSoup-p19). The bacterial cultures harboring the effectors (35S::TwMYC2a/b or EV) and reporters (27aP::GUS or 27bP::GUS) were resuspended in 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES) buffer to OD600 of 1.2 and 0.8, respectively, and mixed in the ratio of 1:1 (v:v) before infiltration. Each mixed bacterial suspension was infiltrated into the left and right sides of the midrib in the same leaf, respectively. The GUS fluorimetric activity and GUS staining of these infiltrated tobacco leaves were analyzed until 72 h after infiltration. These assays were performed as described in our previous study [35] and repeated at least three times with similar results. All the primers used for the construction of effector and reporter vectors are listed in Table S3.

4.7. Construction of RNAi Vector and Generation of TwMYC2a/b Transgenic RNAi Hairy Roots

According to the full-length coding sequence of TwMYC2a, three RNA interference (RNAi) fragments, 314, 304, and 311 bp, were designed (Figure S6). These three RNAi fragments were then separately cloned into a pK7GWIWG2_II-RedRoot vector (Invitrogen, CA, USA) containing a red fluorescent protein (RFP) gene, using the Gateway cloning system, thereby generating three RNAi vectors, named pKR-RNAi-1, pKR-RNAi-2, and pKR-RNAi-3, respectively. All these constructs were then introduced into Agrobacterium rhizogenes ATCC15834 via a freeze-thaw method. All the primers used for the construction of the RNAi vectors are listed in Table S3.
The induction of transgenic hairy roots was performed as described in our previous study [9]. The hairy roots line harboring the empty vector (pK7GWIWG2_II-RedRoot) was used as control.

4.8. Transformant Selection and Transcript Analysis

The positive transgenic hairy roots lines were confirmed by fluorescence identification and PCR analyses as described previously [9]. Genomic DNA was extracted from the transgenic hairy roots lines according to the instruction manuals of the Plant Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Biospin, Shanghai, China). All the primers used for the identification of transgenic hairy roots lines are listed in Table S3.
Transcript abundances of TwMYC2a/b and several key pathway genes were analyzed by qRT-PCR. All the primers used for qRT-PCR analysis are listed in Table S3.

4.9. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Analysis

For the quantification of triptolide, the 28-day-old transgenic hairy roots were dried at 45 °C to a constant weight in an oven and then ground to powder. The sample powder (100 mg) was extracted with absolute ethanol (1 mL) under ultrasonic treatment for 30 min (repeated three times). The resulting mixture was centrifuged at 12, 857 g for 5 min. The extractive supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm organic membrane filter. After the sample was evaporated to dryness, it was dissolved in 1 mL of acetonitrile and filtered through a 0.22 μm organic membrane filter again. All the samples were analyzed by HPLC. The procedures of HPLC analysis of triptolide were the same as described previously [66].

4.10. Statistical Analysis

All data were presented as means ± SD of three biological replicates. Statistical analyses were carried out using the SPSS23.0 (SPSS, IBM, USA) software. The statistically significant difference was determined by Student’s t-test (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01).

5. Conclusions

In the present study, two MYC2 transcription factors, TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b, were identified as negative rather than positive regulators involved in the regulation of triptolide biosynthesis in the hairy roots of T. wilfordii. These findings here extend our understanding of the transcriptional regulation of triptolide biosynthesis and also provide new light on metabolic engineering of triptolide in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants10040679/s1, Table S1: Full names of several functional pathway genes in triptolide biosynthesis, Table S2: The numbers of various E-box motifs in the protential promoter sequences of TwTPS7, TwTPS9, TwDXR, and TwHMGR1 (2000 bp nucleotides upstream of their start condon ATG), Table S3: Primers used in this study, Figure S1: Results of tBLASTn search in T. wilfordii transcriptome library (SRX472292), Figure S2: Identification of the PCR products for the second round of the 5′/3′-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (5′/3′-RACE) (A) and the full-length coding sequence (CDS) (B) of candidate genes (TwMYC2a/b), Figure S3: Sequence alignment between the 5′/3′-RACE sequences and the candidate gene sequence, Figure S4: Sequence alignment between the 5′/3′-RACE sequences and the partial CDSs of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b, Figure S5: Alignment the full-length CDSs and protein sequences between TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b, Figure S6: Positions of the three RNAi fragments exist in the cDNA of TwMYC2a, Figure S7: Identification of RNAi transgenic hairy roots lines, Figure S8: Chromatograms of the standard Triptolide and samples (three biological replicates of EV and R1 hairy roots line), Figure S9: Primers were designed in the 3’-untranslated region (3’-UTR) of TwMYC2a/b for qRT-PCR assays of TwMYC2a/b.

Author Contributions

Y.H. and X.Z. conceived and designed the experiment. Y.H., J.Z., B.Z. and L.C. performed the experiments. Y.H. and J.Z. analyzed the data. Y.H. wrote the manuscript. X.Z. and C.Z. provided technical guidance and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFA0907900) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2019JZ-39).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [X.Z.], upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sylvester, J.; Liacini, A.; Li, W.Q.; Dehnade, F.; Zafarullah, M. Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F Extract Suppresses Proinflammatory Cytokine-Induced Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinase Genes in Articular Chondrocytes by Inhibiting Activating Protein-1 and Nuclear Factor-KappaB Activities. Mol. Pharmacol. 2001, 59, 1196–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ma, J.; Dey, M.; Yang, H.; Poulev, A.; Pouleva, R.; Dorn, R.; Lipsky, P.E.; Kennelly, E.J.; Raskin, I. Anti-Inflammatory and Immunosuppressive Compounds from Tripterygium wilfordii. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 1172–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, F.; Li, C.; Ma, J.; Ni, L.; Huang, J.; Li, L.; Lin, M.; Hou, Q.; Zhang, D. Diterpenoids and Lignans from the Leaves of Tripterygium wilfordii. Fitoterapia 2018, 129, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, P.; Shen, S.-X.; Liu, L.-X.; Xu, J.-H.; Ma, X.-H.; Shi, D.-M.; Zhang, Z.-Q. A New Demethyl Abietane Diterpenoid from the Roots of Tripterygium wilfordii. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020, 34, 3094–3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Titov, D.V.; Gilman, B.; He, Q.-L.; Bhat, S.; Low, W.-K.; Dang, Y.; Smeaton, M.; Demain, A.L.; Miller, P.S.; Kugel, J.F.; et al. XPB, a Subunit of TFIIH, Is a Target of the Natural Product Triptolide. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zhou, Z.-L.; Yang, Y.-X.; Ding, J.; Li, Y.-C.; Miao, Z.-H. Triptolide: Structural Modifications, Structure-Activity Relationships, Bioactivities, Clinical Development and Mechanisms. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012, 29, 457–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhou, H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Long, C.; Sun, X. Triptolide Inhibits Epstein-Barr Nuclear Antigen 1 Expression by Increasing Sensitivity of Mitochondria Apoptosis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shi, Y.-F.; Liu, L.; He, L.-L.; Ye, J.; Lin, Z.-J.; Yuan, D.-L.; Deng, M.-M.; Fang, Z.-H.; Carter, B.Z.; Xu, B. Combining Triptolide with ABT-199 Is Effective against Acute Myeloid Leukemia through Reciprocal Regulation of Bcl-2 Family Proteins and Activation of the Intrinsic Apoptotic Pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, B.; Huo, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, C. Agrobacterium Rhizogenes-Mediated RNAi of Tripterygium wilfordii and Application for Functional Study of Terpenoid Biosynthesis Pathway Genes. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 139, 111509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Y.-J.; Zhao, Y.-J.; Zhang, M.; Su, P.; Wang, X.-J.; Zhang, X.-N.; Gao, W.; Huang, L.-Q. Cloning and Characterisation of the Gene Encoding 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-CoA Synthase in Tripterygium wilfordii. Molecules 2014, 19, 19696–19707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Tong, Y.-R.; Zhang, Y.-F.; Zhao, Y.-J.; Hu, T.-Y.; Wang, J.-D.; Huang, L.-Q.; Gao, W. Differential Expression of the TwHMGS Gene and Its Effect on Triptolide Biosynthesis in Tripterygium wilfordii. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2019, 17, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tong, Y.; Su, P.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Gao, W.; Huang, L. Molecular Cloning and Characterization of DXS and DXR Genes in the Terpenoid Biosynthetic Pathway of Tripterygium wilfordii. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 25516–25535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, J.; Hu, T.; Tong, Y.; Zhou, J.; Song, Y.; Gao, W.; Huang, L. Overexpression and RNA Interference of TwDXR Regulate the Accumulation of Terpenoid Active Ingredients in Tripterygium wilfordii. Biotechnol. Lett. 2018, 40, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, J.; Hu, T.; Tong, Y.; Zhou, J.; Gao, J.; Huang, L.; Gao, W. The Expression of TwDXS in the MEP Pathway Specifically Affects the Accumulation of Triptolide. Physiol. Plant. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cheng, Q.; Tong, Y.; Wang, Z.; Su, P.; Gao, W.; Huang, L. Molecular Cloning and Functional Identification of a CDNA Encoding 4-Hydroxy-3-Methylbut-2-Enyl Diphosphate Reductase from Tripterygium wilfordii. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2017, 7, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tong, Y.; Zhang, M.; Su, P.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Gao, W.; Huang, L. Cloning and Functional Characterization of an Isopentenyl Diphosphate Isomerase Gene from Tripterygium wilfordii. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2016, 63, 863–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Su, P.; Hu, T.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Zhou, J.; Ma, B.; Gao, W.; et al. Overexpression and RNAi-Mediated Downregulation of TwIDI Regulates Triptolide and Celastrol Accumulation in Tripterygium wilfordii. Gene 2018, 679, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, M.; Su, P.; Zhou, Y.-J.J.; Wang, X.-J.J.; Zhao, Y.-J.J.; Liu, Y.-J.J.; Tong, Y.-R.R.; Hu, T.-Y.Y.; Huang, L.-Q.Q.; Gao, W. Identification of Geranylgeranyl Diphosphate Synthase Genes from Tripterygium wilfordii. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 2179–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Su, P.; Gao, L.; Tong, Y.; Guan, H.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, J.; Hu, T.; Tu, L.; et al. Analysis of the Role of Geranylgeranyl Diphosphate Synthase 8 from Tripterygium wilfordii in Diterpenoids Biosynthesis. Plant Sci. 2019, 285, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hansen, N.L.; Heskes, A.M.; Hamberger, B.; Olsen, C.E.; Hallström, B.M.; Andersen-Ranberg, J.; Hamberger, B. The Terpene Synthase Gene Family in Tripterygium wilfordii Harbors a Labdane-Type Diterpene Synthase among the Monoterpene Synthase TPS-b Subfamily. Plant J. 2017, 89, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Su, P.; Guan, H.; Zhao, Y.; Tong, Y.; Xu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, T.; Yang, J.; Cheng, Q.; Gao, L.; et al. Identification and Functional Characterization of Diterpene Synthases for Triptolide Biosynthesis from Tripterygium wilfordii. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2018, 93, 50–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Tu, L.; Su, P.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, L.; Wang, J.; Hu, T.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.; et al. Genome of Tripterygium wilfordii and Identification of Cytochrome P450 Involved in Triptolide Biosynthesis. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hong, G.-J.; Xue, X.-Y.; Mao, Y.-B.; Wang, L.-J.; Chen, X.-Y. Arabidopsis MYC2 Interacts with DELLA Proteins in Regulating Sesquiterpene Synthase Gene Expression. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 2635–2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Aslam, M.Z.; Lin, X.; Li, X.; Yang, N.; Chen, L. Molecular Cloning and Functional Characterization of CpMYC2 and CpbHLH13 Transcription Factors from Wintersweet (Chimonanthus praecox L.). Plants 2020, 9, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhou, Y.; Sun, W.; Chen, J.; Tan, H.; Xiao, Y.; Li, Q.; Ji, Q.; Gao, S.; Chen, L.; Chen, S.; et al. SmMYC2a and SmMYC2b Played Similar but Irreplaceable Roles in Regulating the Biosynthesis of Tanshinones and Phenolic Acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Sharma, A.; Rather, G.A.; Misra, P.; Dhar, M.K.; Lattoo, S.K. Jasmonate Responsive Transcription Factor WsMYC2 Regulates the Biosynthesis of Triterpenoid Withanolides and Phytosterol via Key Pathway Genes in Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 100, 543–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dombrecht, B.; Xue, G.P.; Sprague, S.J.; Kirkegaard, J.A.; Ross, J.J.; Reid, J.B.; Fitt, G.P.; Sewelam, N.; Schenk, P.M.; Manners, J.M.; et al. MYC2 Differentially Modulates Diverse Jasmonate-Dependent Functions in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 2225–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lenka, S.K.; Nims, N.E.; Vongpaseuth, K.; Boshar, R.A.; Roberts, S.C.; Walker, E.L. Jasmonate-Responsive Expression of Paclitaxel Biosynthesis Genes in Taxus cuspidata Cultured Cells Is Negatively Regulated by the bHLH Transcription Factors TcJAMYC1, TcJAMYC2, and TcJAMYC4. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Atchley, W.R.; Fitch, W.M. A Natural Classification of the Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Class of Transcription Factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 5172–5176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Abe, H.; Urao, T.; Ito, T.; Seki, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) Function as Transcriptional Activators in Abscisic Acid Signaling. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Carretero-Paulet, L.; Galstyan, A.; Roig-Villanova, I.; Martínez-García, J.F.; Bilbao-Castro, J.R.; Robertson, D.L. Genome-Wide Classification and Evolutionary Analysis of the bHLH Family of Transcription Factors in Arabidopsis, Poplar, Rice, Moss, and Algae. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 1398–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Hu, D.-G.; Yu, J.-Q.; Han, P.-L.; Xie, X.-B.; Sun, C.-H.; Zhang, Q.-Y.; Wang, J.-H.; Hao, Y.-J. The Regulatory Module MdPUB29-MdbHLH3 Connects Ethylene Biosynthesis with Fruit Quality in Apple. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 1966–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xing, B.; Yang, D.; Yu, H.; Zhang, B.; Yan, K.; Zhang, X.; Han, R.; Liang, Z. Overexpression of SmbHLH10 Enhances Tanshinones Biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza Hairy Roots. Plant Sci. 2018, 276, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, Y.-H.; Liao, Y.-C.; Lv, F.-F.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, P.-W.; Gao, Z.-H.; Hu, K.-P.; Sui, C.; Jin, Y.; Wei, J.-H. Transcription Factor AsMYC2 Controls the Jasmonate-Responsive Expression of ASS1 Regulating Sesquiterpene Biosynthesis in Aquilaria sinensis (Lour.) Gilg. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 1924–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Huo, Y.; Zhang, B.; Chen, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, C. Isolation and Functional Characterization of the Promoters of Miltiradiene Synthase Genes, TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b, and Interaction Analysis with the Transcription Factor TwTGA1 from Tripterygium wilfordii. Plants 2021, 10, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hilson, P.; Allemeersch, J.; Altmann, T.; Aubourg, S.; Avon, A.; Beynon, J.; Bhalerao, R.P.; Bitton, F.; Caboche, M.; Cannoot, B.; et al. Versatile Gene-Specific Sequence Tags for Arabidopsis Functional Genomics: Transcript Profiling and Reverse Genetics Applications. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 2176–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zhang, H.; Hedhili, S.; Montiel, G.; Zhang, Y.; Chatel, G.; Pré, M.; Gantet, P.; Memelink, J. The Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factor CrMYC2 Controls the Jasmonate-Responsive Expression of the ORCA Genes That Regulate Alkaloid Biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2011, 67, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Todd, A.T.; Liu, E.; Polvi, S.L.; Pammett, R.T.; Page, J.E. A Functional Genomics Screen Identifies Diverse Transcription Factors That Regulate Alkaloid Biosynthesis in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2010, 62, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yamada, Y.; Kokabu, Y.; Chaki, K.; Yoshimoto, T.; Ohgaki, M.; Yoshida, S.; Kato, N.; Koyama, T.; Sato, F. Isoquinoline Alkaloid Biosynthesis Is Regulated by a Unique bHLH-Type Transcription Factor in Coptis japonica. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 1131–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hao, X.; Xie, C.; Ruan, Q.; Zhang, X.; Wu, C.; Han, B.; Qian, J.; Zhou, W.; Nützmann, H.-W.; Kai, G. The Transcription Factor OpWRKY2 Positively Regulates the Biosynthesis of the Anticancer Drug Camptothecin in Ophiorrhiza pumila. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kazan, K.; Manners, J.M. MYC2: The Master in Action. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 686–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Zhang, M.; Jin, X.; Chen, Y.; Wei, M.; Liao, W.; Zhao, S.; Fu, C.; Yu, L. TcMYC2a, a Basic Helix–Loop–Helix Transcription Factor, Transduces JA-Signals and Regulates Taxol Biosynthesis in Taxus chinensis. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, H.-B.; Bokowiec, M.T.; Rushton, P.J.; Han, S.-C.; Timko, M.P. Tobacco Transcription Factors NtMYC2a and NtMYC2b Form Nuclear Complexes with the NtJAZ1 Repressor and Regulate Multiple Jasmonate-Inducible Steps in Nicotine Biosynthesis. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Deng, X.; Guo, D.; Yang, S.; Shi, M.; Chao, J.; Li, H.; Peng, S.; Tian, W. Jasmonate Signalling in the Regulation of Rubber Biosynthesis in Laticifer Cells of Rubber Tree, Hevea brasiliensis. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3559–3571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Guo, D.; Li, H.-L.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, J.-H.; Peng, S.-Q. A Myelocytomatosis Transcription Factor from Hevea brasiliensis Positively Regulates the Expression of the Small Rubber Particle Protein Gene. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 133, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, N.; Zhou, W.; Su, J.; Wang, X.; Li, L.; Wang, L.; Cao, X.; Wang, Z. Overexpression of SmMYC2 Increases the Production of Phenolic Acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Wang, Y.; Salasini, B.C.; Khan, M.; Devi, B.; Bush, M.; Subramaniam, R.; Hepworth, S.R. Clade I TGACG-Motif Binding Basic Leucine Zipper Transcription Factors Mediate BLADE-ON-PETIOLE-Dependent Regulation of Development. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 937–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Budimir, J.; Treffon, K.; Nair, A.; Thurow, C.; Gatz, C. Redox-Active Cysteines in TGACG-BINDING FACTOR 1 (TGA1) Do Not Play a Role in Salicylic Acid or Pathogen-Induced Expression of TGA1-Regulated Target Genes in Arabidopsis Thaliana. New Phytol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sun, T.; Busta, L.; Zhang, Q.; Ding, P.; Jetter, R.; Zhang, Y. TGACG-BINDING FACTOR 1 (TGA1) and TGA4 Regulate Salicylic Acid and Pipecolic Acid Biosynthesis by Modulating the Expression of SYSTEMIC ACQUIRED RESISTANCE DEFICIENT 1 (SARD1) and CALMODULIN-BINDING PROTEIN 60g (CBP60g). New Phytol. 2018, 217, 344–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Hou, J.; Sun, Q.; Li, J.; Ahammed, G.J.; Yu, J.; Fang, H.; Xia, X. Glutaredoxin S25 and Its Interacting TGACG Motif-Binding Factor TGA2 Mediate Brassinosteroid-Induced Chlorothalonil Metabolism in Tomato Plants. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 255, 113256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gatz, C. From Pioneers to Team Players: TGA Transcription Factors Provide a Molecular Link between Different Stress Pathways. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2013, 26, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Song, Y.H.; Yoo, C.M.; Hong, A.P.; Kim, S.H.; Jeong, H.J.; Shin, S.Y.; Kim, H.J.; Yun, D.-J.; Lim, C.O.; Bahk, J.D.; et al. DNA-Binding Study Identifies C-Box and Hybrid C/G-Box or C/A-Box Motifs as High-Affinity Binding Sites for STF1 and LONG HYPOCOTYL5 Proteins. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146, 1862–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Boter, M.; Ruíz-Rivero, O.; Abdeen, A.; Prat, S. Conserved MYC Transcription Factors Play a Key Role in Jasmonate Signaling Both in Tomato and Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2004, 18, 1577–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Lorenzo, O.; Chico, J.M.; Sánchez-Serrano, J.J.; Solano, R. JASMONATE-INSENSITIVE1 Encodes a MYC Transcription Factor Essential to Discriminate between Different Jasmonate-Regulated Defense Responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1938–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Shen, Q.; Lu, X.; Yan, T.; Fu, X.; Lv, Z.; Zhang, F.; Pan, Q.; Wang, G.; Sun, X.; Tang, K. The Jasmonate-Responsive AaMYC2 Transcription Factor Positively Regulates Artemisinin Biosynthesis in Artemisia annua. New Phytol. 2016, 210, 1269–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. An, J.-P.; Li, H.-H.; Song, L.-Q.; Su, L.; Liu, X.; You, C.-X.; Wang, X.-F.; Hao, Y.-J. The Molecular Cloning and Functional Characterization of MdMYC2, a bHLH Transcription Factor in Apple. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 108, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhou, Y.; Feng, J.; Li, Q.; Huang, D.; Chen, X.; Du, Z.; Lv, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Han, Y.; Chen, J.; et al. SmMYC2b Enhances Tanshinone Accumulation in Salvia miltiorrhiza by Activating Pathway Genes and Promoting Lateral Root Development. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Goossens, J.; Mertens, J.; Goossens, A. Role and Functioning of bHLH Transcription Factors in Jasmonate Signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 1333–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Nakata, M.; Mitsuda, N.; Herde, M.; Koo, A.J.K.; Moreno, J.E.; Suzuki, K.; Howe, G.A.; Ohme-Takagi, M. A bHLH-Type Transcription Factor, ABA-INDUCIBLE bHLH-TYPE TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR/JA-ASSOCIATED MYC2-LIKE1, Acts as a Repressor to Negatively Regulate Jasmonate Signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 1641–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Sasaki-Sekimoto, Y.; Jikumaru, Y.; Obayashi, T.; Saito, H.; Masuda, S.; Kamiya, Y.; Ohta, H.; Shirasu, K. Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors JASMONATE-ASSOCIATED MYC2-LIKE1 (JAM1), JAM2, and JAM3 Are Negative Regulators of Jasmonate Responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Bai, Z.; Li, W.; Jia, Y.; Yue, Z.; Jiao, J.; Huang, W.; Xia, P.; Liang, Z. The Ethylene Response Factor SmERF6 Co-Regulates the Transcription of SmCPS1 and SmKSL1 and Is Involved in Tanshinone Biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza Hairy Roots. Planta 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zhang, Y.; Ji, A.; Xu, Z.; Luo, H.; Song, J. The AP2/ERF Transcription Factor SmERF128 Positively Regulates Diterpenoid Biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 100, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhang, C.; Xing, B.; Yang, D.; Ren, M.; Guo, H.; Yang, S.; Liang, Z. SmbHLH3 Acts as a Transcription Repressor for Both Phenolic Acids and Tanshinone Biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza Hairy Roots. Phytochemistry 2020, 169, 112183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Han, J.; Liu, H.; Wang, S.; Wang, C.; Miao, G. A Class I TGA Transcription Factor from Tripterygium wilfordii Hook.f. Modulates the Biosynthesis of Secondary Metabolites in Both Native and Heterologous Hosts. Plant Sci. 2020, 290, 110293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Miao, G.; Zhu, C.; Feng, J.; Han, J.; Song, X.-W.; Zhang, X. Aggregate Cell Suspension Cultures of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. f. for Triptolide, Wilforgine, and Wilforine Production. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. PCTOC 2013, 112, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 10 00679 g001 550
Figure 1. Multiple sequence alignment, phylogenetic analysis, and subcellular localization analyses of TwMYC2a/b. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of the TwMYC2a/b protein sequences with their homologous MYC2 proteins from different plant species: Ricinus communis RcMYC2 (XP_002519814.1), Euphorbia lathyris ElMYC2 (AVA18027.1), Ziziphus jujuba ZjMYC2 (XP_015896923.1), Morus notabilis MnMYC2 (XP_010104300.1), Populus tomentosa PtMYC2 (AZQ19203.1), and Prunus persica PpMYC2 (XP_020419289.1). The bHLH-MYC-N domain, bHLH-leucine zipper domain, and phosphorylation site were marked with an overline. JAZ interaction domain was marked with an underline. The nuclear localization signal (NLS) was represented by a solid box. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of TwMYC2a/b and other clades IIId/IIIe/IIIf bHLHs. Numbers at nodes represent bootstrap values (based on 1000 resamplings). The scale bar indicates the evolutionary distance. TwMYC2a/b are represented by large green dots. Accession NO. in GenBank: AtMYC2 (also called RD22BP1, BAA25078), AtbHLH3 (AAL55710), AtbHLH13 (Q9LNJ5), AtbHLH17 (Q9ZPY8), GL3 (NP_193864), TT8 (OAO98324), TcMYC2a (ATY38591), OsMYC2 (0336P5), SmMYC2 (AO09733), NtMYC2a (ADU60100), NtNYC2b (ADU60101), CrMYC2 (AQ14332), HbMYC2 (AJC01627), and HbMYC2b (XP_021664832). (C) Subcellular localization analyses of the TwMYC2a/b proteins in tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana). TwMYC2a/b fused in-frame with an enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) was transiently expressed in tobacco leaf cells. The empty vector 35S::eGFP was used as a control. The red arrows indicate the location of the nucleus. Scale bars are 20 μm.
Figure 1. Multiple sequence alignment, phylogenetic analysis, and subcellular localization analyses of TwMYC2a/b. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of the TwMYC2a/b protein sequences with their homologous MYC2 proteins from different plant species: Ricinus communis RcMYC2 (XP_002519814.1), Euphorbia lathyris ElMYC2 (AVA18027.1), Ziziphus jujuba ZjMYC2 (XP_015896923.1), Morus notabilis MnMYC2 (XP_010104300.1), Populus tomentosa PtMYC2 (AZQ19203.1), and Prunus persica PpMYC2 (XP_020419289.1). The bHLH-MYC-N domain, bHLH-leucine zipper domain, and phosphorylation site were marked with an overline. JAZ interaction domain was marked with an underline. The nuclear localization signal (NLS) was represented by a solid box. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of TwMYC2a/b and other clades IIId/IIIe/IIIf bHLHs. Numbers at nodes represent bootstrap values (based on 1000 resamplings). The scale bar indicates the evolutionary distance. TwMYC2a/b are represented by large green dots. Accession NO. in GenBank: AtMYC2 (also called RD22BP1, BAA25078), AtbHLH3 (AAL55710), AtbHLH13 (Q9LNJ5), AtbHLH17 (Q9ZPY8), GL3 (NP_193864), TT8 (OAO98324), TcMYC2a (ATY38591), OsMYC2 (0336P5), SmMYC2 (AO09733), NtMYC2a (ADU60100), NtNYC2b (ADU60101), CrMYC2 (AQ14332), HbMYC2 (AJC01627), and HbMYC2b (XP_021664832). (C) Subcellular localization analyses of the TwMYC2a/b proteins in tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana). TwMYC2a/b fused in-frame with an enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) was transiently expressed in tobacco leaf cells. The empty vector 35S::eGFP was used as a control. The red arrows indicate the location of the nucleus. Scale bars are 20 μm.
Plants 10 00679 g001
Plants 10 00679 g002a 550Plants 10 00679 g002b 550
Figure 2. TwMYC2a/b could bind to the E-box (CACATG) and T/G-box (CACGTT) in yeast cells. (A) Schematic diagram of the different E-box motifs present in the TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b promoters. These motifs are E1 (CAGATG), E2 (CACATG), E3 (CAAATG), E4 (CACGTT, called T/G-box), and E5 (CAATTG), respectively. ATG, the start codon. (B) Schematic diagrams of the bait and prey vectors used for yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) assays. The triple repeated sequences of E-box (E2, CACATG) and T/G-box (E4, CACGTT) were synthesized and ligated into pAbAi, while the full-length coding sequences of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b were separately fused with GAL4 AD in pGADT7-Rec2. (C) Y1H assays showing that TwMYC2a/b could bind to the E-box (E2, CACATG) and T/G-box (E4, CACGTT) present in the TwTPS27a/b promoters, based on the ability of the transformed Y1HGold yeast cells to grow on SD/−Leu/AbA200 and SD/−Leu/AbA300 medium in the gradient dilution (1/10, 1/100, 1/1000). The transformants grown on SD/−Leu/−AbA plate were used as positive controls for transformants growth. Positive transformants were confirmed by spotting yeast cells onto agar medium of SD/−Leu with 200 and 300 ng/mL AbA. These assays were repeated three times with similar results.
Figure 2. TwMYC2a/b could bind to the E-box (CACATG) and T/G-box (CACGTT) in yeast cells. (A) Schematic diagram of the different E-box motifs present in the TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b promoters. These motifs are E1 (CAGATG), E2 (CACATG), E3 (CAAATG), E4 (CACGTT, called T/G-box), and E5 (CAATTG), respectively. ATG, the start codon. (B) Schematic diagrams of the bait and prey vectors used for yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) assays. The triple repeated sequences of E-box (E2, CACATG) and T/G-box (E4, CACGTT) were synthesized and ligated into pAbAi, while the full-length coding sequences of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b were separately fused with GAL4 AD in pGADT7-Rec2. (C) Y1H assays showing that TwMYC2a/b could bind to the E-box (E2, CACATG) and T/G-box (E4, CACGTT) present in the TwTPS27a/b promoters, based on the ability of the transformed Y1HGold yeast cells to grow on SD/−Leu/AbA200 and SD/−Leu/AbA300 medium in the gradient dilution (1/10, 1/100, 1/1000). The transformants grown on SD/−Leu/−AbA plate were used as positive controls for transformants growth. Positive transformants were confirmed by spotting yeast cells onto agar medium of SD/−Leu with 200 and 300 ng/mL AbA. These assays were repeated three times with similar results.
Plants 10 00679 g002aPlants 10 00679 g002b
Plants 10 00679 g003 550
Figure 3. Repression of the TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b promoters by transient overexpression of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b in tobacco leaves. (A) Sketch map of the reporter and effector vectors for GUS staining and GUS fluorimetric assays. 27aP::GUS and 27bP::GUS represent the promoter expression vectors constructed by introducing the promoter sequences of TwTPS27a (1496 bp) and TwTPS27b (1862 bp) into the pBI121 vector, respectively. Based on the GUS staining and GUS fluorimetric analysis of the infiltrated tobacco leaves, TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b significantly decreased the promoter activity of TwTPS27a (B) and TwTPS27b (C). Different combinations of the mixed bacterial suspension were infiltrated into the left and right sides of the same tobacco leaves, respectively. 27aP and 27bP represent the 27aP::GUS and 27bP::GUS. M2a and M2b represent the 35S::TwMYC2a and 35S::TwMYC2b. GUS activity of the infiltrated leaves was measured after infiltration for 72 h. The value of GUS activity was measured as pmol of 4-MU generated per hour per μg protein. All data presented here are means ± SD of three biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test (** p < 0.01). These assays were repeated three times with similar results.
Figure 3. Repression of the TwTPS27a and TwTPS27b promoters by transient overexpression of TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b in tobacco leaves. (A) Sketch map of the reporter and effector vectors for GUS staining and GUS fluorimetric assays. 27aP::GUS and 27bP::GUS represent the promoter expression vectors constructed by introducing the promoter sequences of TwTPS27a (1496 bp) and TwTPS27b (1862 bp) into the pBI121 vector, respectively. Based on the GUS staining and GUS fluorimetric analysis of the infiltrated tobacco leaves, TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b significantly decreased the promoter activity of TwTPS27a (B) and TwTPS27b (C). Different combinations of the mixed bacterial suspension were infiltrated into the left and right sides of the same tobacco leaves, respectively. 27aP and 27bP represent the 27aP::GUS and 27bP::GUS. M2a and M2b represent the 35S::TwMYC2a and 35S::TwMYC2b. GUS activity of the infiltrated leaves was measured after infiltration for 72 h. The value of GUS activity was measured as pmol of 4-MU generated per hour per μg protein. All data presented here are means ± SD of three biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test (** p < 0.01). These assays were repeated three times with similar results.
Plants 10 00679 g003
Plants 10 00679 g004 550
Figure 4. Relative expressions of TwMYC2a/b (A) and several key triptolide biosynthesis genes (B) in the RNAi transgenic and control hairy roots lines. Elongation factor 1 α (EF1α) was used as the internal standard for gene expression normalization. All data presented here are means ± SD of three biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01). These assays were repeated two times with similar results.
Figure 4. Relative expressions of TwMYC2a/b (A) and several key triptolide biosynthesis genes (B) in the RNAi transgenic and control hairy roots lines. Elongation factor 1 α (EF1α) was used as the internal standard for gene expression normalization. All data presented here are means ± SD of three biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01). These assays were repeated two times with similar results.
Plants 10 00679 g004
Plants 10 00679 g005 550
Figure 5. The biomass, phenotypes, and the production of triptolide in the control (EV) and TwMYC2a/b RNAi (R1) hairy roots lines. (A) The dry weight of the control (EV) and R1 hairy roots. (B) Phenotypes of the control (EV) and R1 hairy roots. Scale bars are 2 cm. (C) Triptolide content in hairy roots and the release content of triptolide in the medium in the control (EV) and R1. DW, dry weight. All the hairy roots were obtained after being cultured for 28 d. All data presented here are means ± SD of three biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test (** p < 0.01). These assays were repeated three times with similar results.
Figure 5. The biomass, phenotypes, and the production of triptolide in the control (EV) and TwMYC2a/b RNAi (R1) hairy roots lines. (A) The dry weight of the control (EV) and R1 hairy roots. (B) Phenotypes of the control (EV) and R1 hairy roots. Scale bars are 2 cm. (C) Triptolide content in hairy roots and the release content of triptolide in the medium in the control (EV) and R1. DW, dry weight. All the hairy roots were obtained after being cultured for 28 d. All data presented here are means ± SD of three biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test (** p < 0.01). These assays were repeated three times with similar results.
Plants 10 00679 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huo, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, B.; Chen, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, C. MYC2 Transcription Factors TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b Negatively Regulate Triptolide Biosynthesis in Tripterygium wilfordii Hairy Roots. Plants 2021, 10, 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040679

AMA Style

Huo Y, Zhang J, Zhang B, Chen L, Zhang X, Zhu C. MYC2 Transcription Factors TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b Negatively Regulate Triptolide Biosynthesis in Tripterygium wilfordii Hairy Roots. Plants. 2021; 10(4):679. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040679

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huo, Yanbo, Jing Zhang, Bin Zhang, Ling Chen, Xing Zhang, and Chuanshu Zhu. 2021. "MYC2 Transcription Factors TwMYC2a and TwMYC2b Negatively Regulate Triptolide Biosynthesis in Tripterygium wilfordii Hairy Roots" Plants 10, no. 4: 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040679

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop