Next Article in Journal
Acceleration in Germination Sensu stricto Plays a Central Role on Seedling Vigor in Post-Germination
Next Article in Special Issue
Dihydrophenanthrenes from a Sicilian Accession of Himantoglossum robertianum (Loisel.) P. Delforge Showed Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Antiproliferative Activities
Previous Article in Journal
Seasonal and Simultaneous Cleistogamy in Rostrate Violets (Viola, subsect. Rostratae, Violaceae)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phenolic Composition and Biological Properties of Rhus microphylla and Myrtillocactus geometrizans Fruit Extracts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Vegetal Compounds as Sources of Prophylactic and Therapeutic Agents in Dentistry

1
Departament of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 9 Revolutiei 1989 Ave., 300070 Timisoara, Romania
2
Orthodontic Research Center (ORTHO-CENTER), Faculty of Dental Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Revolutiei Ave. 1989 No. 9, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
3
Department of Dento-Alveolar Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 9 Revolutiei 1989 Ave., 300070 Timisoara, Romania
4
Department of Facial Tooth Aesthetics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 9 Revolutiei 1989 Ave., 300070 Timisoara, Romania
5
Departament of Toxicology and Drug Industry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 2nd Eftimie Murgu Sq., 300041 Timișoara, Romania
6
Research Center for Pharmaco-Toxicological Evaluations, Faculty of Pharmacy, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
7
Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 2nd Eftimie Murgu Sq., 300041 Timișoara, Romania
8
Department of Surgery I, Faculty of Medicine, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 2nd Eftimie Murgu Sq., 300041 Timișoara, Romania
9
Department of Management, Legislation and Communication in Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square No. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
10
Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 9 Revolutiei 1989 Ave., 300070 Timisoara, Romania
11
Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 9 Revolutiei 1989 Ave., 300070 Timisoara, Romania
12
Departament of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 2nd Eftimie Murgu Sq., 300041 Timișoara, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Authors with equal contribution.
Plants 2021, 10(10), 2148; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102148
Submission received: 12 September 2021 / Revised: 5 October 2021 / Accepted: 6 October 2021 / Published: 10 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Bioactive Compounds in Plants)

Abstract

:
Dental pathology remains a global health problem affecting both children and adults. The most important dental diseases are dental caries and periodontal pathologies. The main cause of oral health problems is overpopulation with pathogenic bacteria and for this reason, conventional therapy can often be ineffective due to bacterial resistance or may have unpleasant side effects. For that reason, studies in the field have focused on finding new therapeutic alternatives. Special attention is paid to the plant kingdom, which offers a wide range of plants and active compounds in various pathologies. This review focused on the most used plants in the dental field, especially on active phytocompounds, both in terms of chemical structure and in terms of mechanism of action. It also approached the in vitro study of active compounds and the main types of cell lines used to elucidate the effect and mechanism of action. Thus, medicinal plants and their compounds represent a promising and interesting alternative to conventional therapy.

1. General Aspects

Plant extracts and vegetal compounds used in monotherapy are important sources of therapeutic and prophylactic agents. They are used successfully alone or combined with chemotherapeutic agents. They have specific structures and possess multiple biological and chemical properties [1]. These structures are often used as basic compounds in industrial agent development. Phytochemicals isolated from plants and in rational usage are considered safe and effective. Nowadays, oral products with vegetal compounds included are an important part of modern therapy.
Dental pathology is a global health problem, affecting both underdeveloped and developing or developed countries. The most common oral pathologies are dental caries and periodontal disease, and the most serious oral pathologies are oral and pharyngeal cancer. For these reasons, the World Health Organization considers that oral health is a right of all people [2]. Another issue facing oral health is the large number of children who are affected by tooth decay [3]. There are currently many treatments for oral pathologies, but these have unpleasant side effects, such as altered oral microbiota or systemic gastrointestinal symptoms. For this reason, there is an acute need for new alternatives to conventional treatments, plants being an area of interest. An important example in which plants find their utility is the treatment of bacterial infections at the oral level because most conventional antibiotics are ineffective due to bacterial resistance, and those that are effective have unpleasant side effects [4].
Due to this, natural compounds are a safer alternative to antibiotics in the treatment of oral infections and are also an approach in the prevention and treatment of other oral diseases, including dental caries, but also more serious diseases such as cancer.

2. Herbal Compounds in Dentistry

Medicinal plants are a topic of interest for current research in the field of medicine, being increasingly used for the treatment of a large number of pathologies. Additionally, many drugs currently used in allopathic medicine have their origin in medicinal plants. So, plants are both sources of traditional medicines and an alternative to them [5].
One of the most basic oral health care processes is brushing your teeth. For this reason, one of the first uses of herbs in dentistry was the obtaining of natural toothbrushes using herbs. Studies show that these “natural brushes” present a large number of therapeutic effects due to the phytochemical composition. Thus, the vitamin C content protects the gums, the tannins provide a deep cleansing of the gingival tissue, and the volatile oils act by stimulating blood circulation.
Another basic practice in dentistry is rinsing the oral cavity. By using herbal mouthwashes, studies have suggested that there is an improvement in oral health, with many phytochemicals having an anti-inflammatory effect, reducing gingival bleeding, but also an antibacterial effect essential for maintaining proper oral health [6].
Dental and oral areas are contaminated generally with germs such as Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, or Candida albicans. The most common treatments for these aspects are synthetic drugs such as chlorhexidine, triclosan, and fluoride. There are some restrictive problems in toothpaste usage of the fluoridated type for children under six years to avoid changing the pigment of teeth and weakening of enamel. Chlorhexidine as a chlorophenyl bisbiguanide causes also pigmentation of the oral environment. They induce an altered sense of taste and oral dryness and irritation as well as negative systemic aspects and scaling of gingival. For triclosan, it seems it does not bind well on the oral site because of its strong positive charge. Another challenge in modern formulations included their potential to destroy carcinogenic microorganisms. Series of vegetal compounds and extracts developed such an important activity. The classical antibiotics could determine microbial resistance for this category [7].
Besides the microbial contamination of the oral cavity, another important aspect in dental pathology is represented by viral infections. Viral infections have many implications for oral health, primarily due to the pathologies they can cause, but also due to contamination that can be bidirectional. Thus, the microorganism can be transferred from the patient to the medical team, but also in reverse. The main types of viruses involved that are found in the oral cavity and that can cause alterations in health are herpes viruses and liver viruses B, C, and D [8]. Regarding the classic antiviral treatment, it is often inefficient, with many viruses not responding to conventional treatment, and vaccination is currently limited to a small number of microorganisms. Due to these drawbacks, and in addition, due to the fact that conventional drugs are quite expensive and viruses have frequent mutations making them resistant to treatment, compounds of natural origin may be a suitable alternative for the treatment of viral infections [9].
For these reasons, medicinal plants are increasingly used in dentistry due to the ingredients they contain. The plants used in dental pathology have different therapeutic actions such as anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antifungal, antiviral, and analgesic. Based on these multiple therapeutic actions, natural compounds find their utility in a multitude of dental pathologies (Figure 1).

3. Vegetal Sources of Compounds on Dentistry Products

Although progress is being made in the field of dentistry in the treatment of oral diseases, dental pathology is still a public health problem. The most common pathologies encountered in the dental field are dental caries and periodontal diseases [10]. However, oral health is also linked to a number of systemic pathologies, such as diabetes [11].
Medicinal plants have been used for thousands of years in traditional medicine, and today, in underdeveloped countries, phytotherapy remains the main method of treatment [12]. Although recent studies have focused on the discovery of new natural compounds for the treatment of various pathologies, only 1% of plants with therapeutic potential are known, which leaves room for future research. One of the areas in which natural compounds find their utility is the treatment of bacterial infections, given that modern medicine is currently facing a crisis of increasing resistance to conventional antibiotics [13]. In terms of composition, plants have over 2000 compounds that can be classified according to their chemical structure into four major groups: terpenoids, nitrogen compounds, sulfur compounds, and phenolic compounds [14,15].
Regarding the role of terpenoids in dentistry, they are used mainly due to the antibacterial activity on the bacteria responsible for the formation of tooth decay [7]. Thus, diterpenes, a subgroup of terpenoids, are known for their strong antibacterial activity on Staphylococcus aureus [16]. In addition to this antibacterial activity, studies have suggested that diterpenes may act as a potentiator of the antibacterial activity of conventional antibiotics [17]. In addition, studies that have focused on bacteria associated with tooth decay have suggested that diterpenes such as ent-kauran [18] and ent-pimarane [19] have strong antibacterial activity on Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus mitis, and Lactobacillus casei species. The mechanism underlying the antibacterial action is not fully elucidated, but studies have suggested that it is based on the ability of diterpenes to cause bacterial lysis and cause cell membrane damage [20]. Thus, terpenoids are a group of substances of interest for the discovery of new sources of anticaries agents. Certain representatives of the terpenoids class, such as monoterpenoids or borneol, are of medical interest due to their antiviral effects. Isoborneol is a terpenoid compound found in a variety of volatile oils, having a strong antiviral effect on herpes simplex virus-1. It has been observed that in vitro, isoborneol causes virus inactivation after approximately 30 min of exposure, without affecting viral adsorption [21]. Additionally, other natural compounds found in essential oils, such as thymol, citral, and γ-terpinene have been tested for their antiviral effect, noting that it is similar to the effect of acyclovir, a classic antiviral used in infection with herpes simplex virus-1. The advantage of natural compounds is that they are also active on viral strains that have become resistant to acyclovir, which suggests that phytocompounds have a different mechanism of action than conventional medicine. The possible mechanism of antiviral action associated with monoterpenoids may be the direct inactivation of the virus and damage to the structures necessary for the adsorption of the virus to the host cell [22].
Phenolic compounds are a complex class of phytocompounds, which have many beneficial therapeutic activities in dentistry such as dentin remineralization, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant [23]. An example of phenolic compounds useful in dentin remineralization and used clinically for this purpose are proanthocyanidins. They act by interacting with collagen fibers, thus causing the formation of a stable interaction between resin and dentin [24]. Additionally, another phenolic compound, quercetin, increases the resistance of the interaction between resin and dentin, and, in addition, it has useful antioxidant effects in the therapy of dental pathologies [25]. Regarding the antibacterial activity of polyphenolic compounds, it has been tested and confirmed in various studies. Phenolic compounds act on the main bacterial species responsible for the appearance of dental pathologies such as: Streptococcus mutans [26] and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans [27]. The mechanism of antibacterial action is based on the ability of phenolic compounds to inhibit the activity of the enzyme glucosyltransferase [26]. Additionally, antibacterial activity is correlated with the ability of phenolic compounds to alter the redox balance in the bacterial cell [28]. Phenolic compounds find their utility in a variety of dental pathologies due to the numerous therapeutic actions they possess. In the class of polyphenolic compounds, the category of flavonoids is of real interest. Regarding their antiviral activity, scientific documentation dates back to the early 1990s, when studies showed that the combination of acyclovir and apigenin causes increased antiviral activity on the herpes simplex viruse types 1 and 2 [29]. Concerning the mechanism of action of flavonoids, this is a complex one, with the involvement of multiple biological targets involved in the production of viral infection. If we turn our attention to hepatitis B and C viruses, studies show that flavonoids have the ability to inhibit viral replication by affecting enzymes involved in this process, such as protease NS3 and polymerase NS5B [30].
High-proline proteins represent over half of the total protein contained in salivary excretion. In addition to the beneficial effects of the polyphenolic compounds discussed above, it is worth paying special attention to analyzing the interaction between them, especially tannins, with food proteins, because these interactions can have harmful effects on the health of the oral cavity. Thus, polyphenols can cause the formation of covalent complexes with globular proteins thus leading to the formation of complexes, the stabilization of proteins and their precipitation [31]. These reactions between polyphenols and high-proline protein are harmful to oral health because this category of protein found in the salivary composition has the role of calcium binding, inhibiting the formation of hydroxyapatite and mediating the binding of hydroxyapatite, thus being part of the dental-acquired films. On the other hand, the interaction between polyphelonols and high-proline protein can be beneficial because these proteins are also involved in the binding of hydroxyapatite bacteria, thus contributing to the formation of dental floss [32].
Alkaloids are another class of phytocompounds used in dentistry due to their therapeutic actions. Thus, alkaloids such as berberine show antibacterial activity on A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis species, and it is observed that the mechanism of action consist in inhibition of collagenase enzyme activity [33]. Additionally, alkaloids find their practical utility in dentistry as local anesthetics, being used in various dental interventions [34]. These compounds also have a beneficial effect in viral infections due to their ability to stimulate the host’s immune system by increasing interferon synthesis and stimulating macrophage activity. Research in the field has shown that various plant extracts with high alkaloid content have shown intense antiviral activity on a multitude of viral species such as hepatitis A, B, C, and D and herpes simplex virus [35].
In conclusion, plants are an important source for compounds useful in dentistry and have the potential to be used as therapeutic agents or prevention of dental disease (Table 1).

4. Herbs as Therapeutic Agents in Dentistry

Achillea millefolium L. belongs to the Asteraceae family and has been used in traditional medicine for centuries [50], having many beneficial therapeutic properties, including anti-inflammatory, anti-ulcer and anti-cancer effects [51]. Considering the phytochemical composition, Achillea millefolium is rich in flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenes, tannins, phenolic acids, etc., the most important constituents being represented by flavonoids and phenolic acids. The main constituent found in essential oil from A. millefolium oil is chamazulene (Figure 2) [52]. Regarding the beneficial effects of A. millefolium in dental pathology, it has been observed that the extract has beneficial effects in healing of oral mucositis, a major complication of classical antitumor chemotherapy [53]. Responsible for this therapeutic effect are considered to be the flavonoids and tannins contained in A. millefolium [54].
Allium sativum L., or garlic, belongs to the genus Allium, the Alliaceae family, and possesses many well-known therapeutic properties, which are due to the main constituents represented mainly by alliin, methiin, and S-allylcysteine (Figure 3) [55]. Garlic is known for its beneficial effects in common pathologies such as colds or hypertension [56], but also for its beneficial immunostimulatory properties in the treatment of cancer and heart and lung diseases [55]. In dentistry, garlic finds its utility due to its antibacterial effects in the treatment of periodontitis, dental caries, endodotitis, and recent studies have also shown the beneficial effect of garlic in the treatment of oral cancer [57]. The antibacterial effects of A. sativum have been studied both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, in a study of the multi-drug-resistant species of S. mutans, it was observed that the garlic has an inhibition effect on bacterial growth [58]. Another therapeutic effect of garlic beneficial in dental pathology is represented by its antifungal effect. Thus, the antifungal effect of a garlic extract was compared with that of nystatin and fluconazole, noting that garlic extract has a more pronounced antifungal effect than that of conventional antifungal drugs [59,60]. Regarding the antitumor effects, they were studied in vitro, and it was observed that S-allylcysteine has an antiproliferative effect on human oral squamous cancer cells [61]. Underlying the bacteriostatic mechanism of action is the conversion of allicin to diallyldisulfide in the presence of the allinelyase enzyme, which causes inhibition of bacterial DNA and RNA synthesis [62].
Aloe Vera L. is a plant that belongs to the Liliaceae family and contains a variety of phytoconstituents such as vitamins A, C, E, and group B, amino acids, enzymes, and sugars. As for Aloe vera gel, it consists of over 70 constituents, the most important being lignin. In addition, Aloe vera contains various chemical compounds responsible for the anti-inflammatory effects of the plant, such as bradykinase and salicylic acid [63]. The main dental pathologies in which Aloe vera finds its utility include: oral lichen planus [64], stomatitis [65], oral submucosal fibrosis [66], oral mucositis [67], gingivitis [68], periodontitis [69], and alveolar osteitis [70]. The beneficial effects in oral pathology are based on the following biological activities of Aloe vera: (i) the bactericidal effect on the main cariogenic and periodontopathic bacteria [71]; (ii) antimicrobial effect on resistant species found in the pulp space, such as Candida albicans or Eterococcus faecalis, having the advantage that Aloe vera-based extracts can be used intracanal due to sedative and lubricating effects [72]; (iii) antioxidant properties beneficial in the treatment of oral submucous fibrosis [66] and (iv) immunostimulatory effects by stimulating macrophages [67].
Calendula officinalis L. is known by the popular name of “pot marigold” and is part of the Asteraceae family. It is an intensely used plant in traditional medicine due to its numerous therapeutic properties such as: anti-inflammatory, re-epithelializing, antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory [73]. The main phytocompounds found in Calendula officinalis are flavonoids, tannins, polysaccharides, phenolic acids, tannins and saponosides [74]. The main dental pathologies on which the effect of Calendula officinalis was studied and on which an improvement was observed were plaque and gingivitis. In the randomized study by Khairan et al. [74], they showed that tincture of Calendula officinalis causes a decrease in plaque and gingivitis [74]. In addition, Iauk et al. [75] have shown that Calendula officinalis flower extract has antibacterial effects on the most important species involved in dental pathogenesis, and Zilda et al. [76], showed that calendula has nystatin-like antifungal effects, and its use in oral candidiasis is useful. Due to the content of polysaccharides and mucilages of the calendula, it has a good bio-adhesion in porcine mouth membranes, which suggests even if it could be used in the treatment of canker sores, foot ulcers or gingivitis [77]. Another beneficial effect of calendula worth mentioning is the reduction of oropharyngeal mucositis in patients undergoing radiotherapy [78]. This therapeutic property is due to the increase in hyaluronic acid deposits due to the flavonoids contained in calendula [79]. The main biological actions that give utility to calendula in dental treatment can be summarized as follows: (i) anti-inflammatory action by reducing proinflammatory cytokines [80]; (ii) antioxidant effects due to the content of flavonoids and carotenoids [81] and (iii) immunomodulatory effects due to the content of polysaccharides [76].
Camellia sinensis L. is also known as “green tea” and is part of the Theaceae family. Green tea is intensely consumed globally, reaching the order of billions of cups consumed daily. From a phytochemical point of view, Camellia sinensis is distinguished by its rich content in proteins, vitamins, and minerals, but especially by the content of catechin. The most important catechins contained by green tea are: epigallocatechin-3-gallate and epigallocatechin. The content rich in phytocompounds offers green tea many therapeutic properties useful both in dental pathologies and in other pathologies such as cardiovascular illnesses or cancer [82]. From a dental point of view, green tea has multiple therapeutic effects beneficial in diseases such as gingivitis, periodontitis, dental caries, halitosis, and even oral cancer [83]. Gingivitis and periodontitis are two pathologies characterized by the appearance of bacterial overpopulations in the gingiva and tooth margins. In the case of these pathologies, it was highlighted that the regular consumption of green tea through its catechins content causes a decrease in the development of bacterial species such as Porphyromonas gingivalis or Prevotella nigrescens thus promoting healing [82,84]. Regarding the effect of green tea in the prevention of dental caries, it has two major mechanisms of action. First of all, due to its fluoride content, Camellia sinensis contributes to the remineralization of dental tissue and inhibits the growth of pathogenic bacteria [85]. The second mechanism of action is based on the content of epigallocatechin 3-gallate, epicatechin and epicatechin gallate (Figure 4). In a study by Otake et al. [86], they demonstrated that the polyphenols contained in green tea prevent the adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to the tooth surface [86]. Epigallocatechin 3-gallate also has a beneficial role in the treatment of halitosis. The deodorizing action is based on the reduction of hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan, the main compounds responsible for the appearance of halitosis [87].
Citrus aurantifolia, also known as lime, belongs to the Rutaceae family. In terms of its use, lime has both beneficial medical and cosmetic effects. Regarding the chemical composition, it can be stated that Citrus aurantifolia is rich in carbohydrates, alkaloids, flavonoids, steroids, and anthraquinones [88]. In general medicine and dentistry, volatile lime oil is used. Volatile oils are known for their therapeutic actions such as antimicrobial, antifungal, antitumor, and anti-inflammatory [13]. Volatile lime oil contains mainly D-Limonene and B-pinene (Figure 5) [89]. The effects of volatile lime oil have been tested in dentistry especially for antimicrobial effects. Thus, in the study by Aripin et al. [89], they compared the antimicrobial effects on Streproccocus mutans species of several types of Citrus spp. It was observed that volatile lime oil has the highest antibacterial activity compared to volatile oils from C. limon, C. hystrix, C. sinensis and C. nobilis. This antibacterial activity is beneficial for the treatment of dental caries [89]. In a similar study, the antibacterial effect of aqueous and alcoholic lime extracts on the main bacterial species causing caries was studied, noting that Citrus aurantifolia has antibacterial effects on C. pneumonia, S. aureus and P. mirabilis species [88]. These results are supported by similar studies [90] in which similar antibacterial effects of lime extract were observed, and, in addition, Pathan et al. [91], demonstrated that C. aurantifolia has antimicrobial effects on E. coli species.
Cocos nucifera L. is known as the coconut and is part of the Arecaceae family. The most important product obtained from coconut is coconut oil, known for its therapeutic effects which are antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral. Coconut water is also a product obtained from coconut and intensively used in dentistry due to its rich content in natural sugars and minerals [92]. From a compositional point of view, coconut water contains over 90% water. Besides water, coconut water contains micronutrients, vitamins, amino acids, and enzymes, but the most important components are phytohormones (cytokinins and auxin). The most important compound from the auxin class found in coconut water is indole-3-acetic acid [93]. Due to this composition, coconut water is used in dentistry, generally as a tissue growth agent and as a suitable cellular medium for maintaining the viability of cells and the periodontal ligament. In addition, due to the fact that it is sterile, coconut water can be used as a means of transport in case of emergency for a sprained tooth [94]. Additionally, coconut oil is rich in fatty acids such as lauric, myristic, caprylic, and palmitic acid. In dentistry, coconut oil is used for rinsing the mouth, which is favored due to its viscosity which aids the elimination of food, bacteria, and microorganisms from the oral cavity [95].
Curcuma longa L. is popularly known as turmeric and belongs to the Zingiberaceae family. Regarding the chemical composition, turmeric contains a multitude of phytocompounds, the most important for its therapeutic actions being diferuloylmethane, demethoxycurcumin, and bisdemethoxycurcumin (Figure 6). Turmeric has uses both in the food industry for its effects of improving storage conditions and time, and in medicine, especially due to its anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antitumor, carminative, antiseptic, and antibacterial properties [96]. In dentistry, it is used in both systemic and local pathologies such as gingivitis, periodontitis [97], dental caries [98], head and neck cancer [99], as a subgingival irrigant [100], oral submucous fibrosis [101], and oral lichen planus [102]. The use of turmeric in dentistry is based on its many therapeutic actions. For the treatment of gingivitis and periodontitis, turmeric treatment is based on its anti-inflammatory effect. Chatterjee et al. [103], conducted a double-blind study in which it was observed that the anti-inflammatory effects of turmeric can be used to improve the action of chlorhexidine [103]. Additionally, in dentistry, turmeric is used due to its antibacterial properties against Streptococcus mutans. In a study by Lee et al. [98], it was observed that turmeric has a dose-dependent antibacterial action and at high doses also has the ability to inhibit the formation of Streptococcus mutans biofilm and thus prevent the formation of dental caries [98]. Additionally, due to the antibacterial activity of turmeric, it can be used as an intracanal drug, preventing the formation of pathogens such as Enterococcus faecalis [104]. Regarding the efficacy of turmeric in the treatment of head and neck cancer, and of oral submucous fibrosis, pilot studies were performed, in vivo, in which it was observed that turmeric has positive effects and can be used as a therapeutic agent in these pathologies [99,101].
Glycyrrhiza glabra L. is part of the Leguminosae family and has been intensely used in traditional medicine and Ayurvedic medicine for over 4000 years [105]. The most used part of the plant in medicine is the root. It contains a multitude of phytocompounds such as liquirtin, isoliquertin liquiritigenin and rhamnoliquirilin, flavonoids (prenyllicoflavone A), and saponins (glycyrrhizic acid, glycyrrhizin) (Figure 7) [106]. In traditional medicine, G. glabra has many therapeutic effects, from antiviral, anti-tumor, anti-diabetic to antidepressant and antiepileptic [107], and in dentistry, it is used in the treatment of dental caries, gingival and periodontal diseases, oral candidiasis, oral cancer, and as an endodontic treatment [108]. Due to its glabridine content, G. glabra has strong antibacterial effects on both Gram-positive and-negative bacterial species. In addition, other constituents such as glycrrhizin and glycyrrhizol-A have been shown to be beneficial in preventing caries [109]. In addition, the phytocompounds Licochalcone A and 18 alpha-glycyrrhetinic acid have antibacterial effects on the species Porphyromonas gingivalis preventing the formation of biofilm and stimulating the host immune system, thus having beneficial effects in the treatment of gingivitis and periodontitis [110]. In addition to the antibacterial effect, G. glabra extract has also proven effective in the treatment of oral candidiasis by inhibiting the formation and growth of biofilm due to the content of licochalcone A, glabridin, and liquiritigenin which have antifungal effects on C. albicans [106].
Grape seed extract. Grapes are one of the most widely grown plants in the world. Recently, grape seeds have been increasingly used in medicine due to their rich content of phenolic compounds and strong antioxidant properties, effective in treating many diseases such as ulcers, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, bacterial infections, and tumors [111]. In dentistry, grape seeds are mainly used for restorative dental work and prevention of dental caries. The main compound of grape seeds responsible for the beneficial actions in dental pathologies is represented by the proanthocyanidin group [112]. In vivo studies have shown that grape seed extract has the ability to reduce colonization of S. mutans, the main bacterium involved in tooth decay [113]. Additionally, there are numerous studies in the literature that have highlighted the beneficial role of grape seeds in dental reminalization. The mechanisms of action underlying this therapeutic property consist of: (i) grape seed extract mediates remineralization; (ii) grape seed extract prevents dental degradation and (iii) grape seed extract influences the dental tensile strength. These mechanisms are due to the ability of phytocompounds in grape extract to bind to enzymes responsible for tooth enamel degradation and to promote crosslinking of collagen-rich dentin surfaces [112].
Hypericum perforatum L. belongs to the Hypericaceae family and contains a multitude of phytocompounds such as flavonoids, tannins, volatile oils, and naphthodianthrones responsible for its therapeutic actions such as anti-inflammatory, antidepressant, antidiabetic, and wound healing [114]. In dentistry, the main action of Hypericum perforatum extract is antibacterial. In a study conducted to evaluate the antibacterial effect on the main bacterial species responsible for the production of dental pathologies, it was observed that the aqueous extract has a strong antibacterial effect on all bacterial species [115]. In another study comparing the antibacterial effect of Hypericum perforatum volatile oil with that of two solutions of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine, it was observed that on the bacterial species Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, the essential oil has an antibacterial action similar to that of chlorhexidine solution, and on the species Porphyromonas gingivalis, the antibacterial activity was lower than that of the two solutions. However, by combining the essential oil with povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine solutions, a preparation with increased antibacterial activity is obtained, which suggests that Hypericum perforatum essential oil causes an increase in the antibacterial activity of the solutions [116].
Matricaria chamomilla L. from the Asteraceae family, has been used in traditional medicine for thousands of years, being one of the most important medicinal plants in Europe [117] with various therapeutic effects including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antibacterial and relaxant properties [118]. Numerous phytocompounds have been identified in Matricaria chamomilla L., the main classes are represented by volatile terpenoids, sesquiterpenes, coumarins, flavonoids, and phenolic acids [119]. The most important constituents for therapeutic use in dentistry are apigenin, α-bisabolol (Figure 8), chamazulene, and umbelliferone. Regarding the therapeutic effects in the field of dental pathologies, it has been reported that chamomile extract has beneficial properties in oral mucositis and gingivitis, effects due to phenolic compounds, especially apigenin [120,121,122].
Mentha piperita L. is a medicinal plant that belongs to the Lamiaceae family, and is known for its uses in traditional medicine and for its distinctive aroma [123] and having different biological properties, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiviral, and antitumor effects [124]. Regarding the phytochemical composition, peppermint contains flavonoids, phenolic acids, volatile compounds, lignans, and stilbenes, the most abundant compounds being luteolin, hesperidin, eriocitrin, and rosmarinic acid (Figure 9) [125]. In folk medicine, M. piperita oil has been used to reduce gingival inflammation and to stop toothache [120]. Raghavan et al. [126] conducted a study in which it was demonstrated the antimicrobial action of M. piperita on oral microorganisms such as Streptococcus mutans, Candida albicans, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans that can cause serious oral disease. Following this study, we can consider Mentha piperita as an alternative to the conventional treatment of infections, with its antibiotic resistance being more and more common [126].
Orange oil is a natural product extracted from the peel of Citrus sinensis from the Rutaceae family. The composition of the oil is vast, comprising hydrocarbons, esters, aldehydes, and alcohols, the most important phytocompound being D-limonene (Figure 10) [127]. Following various studies, it has been observed that orange oil has multiple benefits, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-aflatoxigenic properties [128,129]. In the field of dentistry, in a study conducted by Yadav et al. [130], it was observed that both orange and eucalyptus oil can be an alternative to xylene in dissolving different endodontic sealers [130].
Papain is a proteolytic enzyme obtained from the latex of the papaya fruit (Carica papaya) which belongs to the Caricaceae family [131]. The enzyme has been used for a long time for its analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties in the treatment of injuries, traumas, and allergies. In addition, its activity in dentistry regarding the removal of dental caries has been reported, by its action of breaking down partially degraded collagen from infected tissues [132,133].
Propolis is a resinous material extracted from various plants by bees [134]. In terms of chemical composition, propolis is a substance rich in resins, essential oils, wax, vitamins, minerals but also in organic compounds such as flavonoids: pinocembrin, pinobanksin (Figure 11), phenolic compounds, terpenes [135,136]. According to numerous research, propolis has various benefits including antioxidant, wound-healing, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects [137]. In dental practice, propolis has many uses: the treatment of stomatitis, periodontitis, and halitosis. It is also used in dental caries, traumatic ulcers, dentinal hypersensitivity, candidal infections and tooth coating preparations [138,139,140].
Rosmarinus officinalis L. is a widespread plant from the Lamiaceae family, with uses in the treatment of diseases and in the culinary arts [141]. Hundreds of phytocompounds have been identified in the leaves and oil extracted from rosemary, among which the most important are: caffeic acid, rosmarinic acid, camphor, 1,8-cineole, and luteolin (Figure 12) [142]. Regarding the therapeutic properties of the species Rosmarinus officinalis L., it has been proven to be used particularly for its carminative, antispasmodic, analgesic at the muscular level, and expectorant action [143,144]. In dental pathology, Rosmarinus officinalis L. is used to treat gingival diseases and to refresh the mouth [120].
Septilin is a complex polyherbal preparation from Himalaya Drug Company that contains six medicinal plants and minerals, with indications for treating acute and chronic infections, even those of a dental nature [145,146], due to the antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory activity of the phytocomplex [147].
Syzygium aromaticum L. is a medicinal plant that belongs to the Myrtaceae family with uses in the food industry as a spice but also with important uses in curative medicine [148]. Various phytoconstituents have been identified in the extracts of Syzygium aromaticum L., the main representatives being phenolic molecules, monoterpenes, and sesquiterpenes; while clove oil is rich in eugenol and β-caryophyllene (Figure 13) [149,150]. Many studies have been reported on the therapeutic benefits of Syzygium aromaticum, the antioxidant activity being significant due to the high content of phenolic compounds. In addition, the species has strong antimicrobial and antiviral activity as well as insecticidal and antitumor action, especially observed in the oil extracted from leaf buds [150,151,152,153]. In dentistry, the volatile oil is used to refresh the mouth, to reduce dental pain but also to treat gingival bleeding, while gel preparations are used for anesthetic action [154].
Tea tree oil is a volatile oil, obtained from the leaves of Melaleuca alternifolia, a plant from Australia that belongs to the Myrtaceae family, known for uses in alternative and complementary medicine [155]. Considering the phytochemical composition, tea tree essential oil comprises over 100 active compounds, including terpinen-4-ol and 1,8-cineole (Figure 14), with many therapeutic effects, such as antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, antiprotozoal activities, wound healing and anticancer effects [156]. Regarding the benefits in dentistry, it has been shown that the volatile oil used in mouthwash preparations has anti-inflammatory action on the gingival tissues but also oral antiseptic effect [154,157]. In addition, it has a possible effect in treating the root canal due to its solvent properties, useful in dissolving the necrotic pulp [120].
Thymus vulgaris L., from the Lamiaceae family, has been known since ancient times for its culinary and pharmacological properties [158]. The main therapeutic benefits consist of antiseptic, antispasmodic, carminative, diuretic, and expectorant actions, and the effects are due to the vast composition of the species in polyphenolic compounds, especially thymol and carvacrol (Figure 15) [159,160,161]. Regarding the effectiveness of Thymus vulgaris L. extracts in dental diseases, the antimicrobial action of volatile oil has been demonstrated, even on the species Streptococcus mutans, one of the microorganisms responsible for dental caries. The extract of thyme can also be used for the treatment of oral herpes, along with other herbs [162]. These beneficial therapeutic properties occur due to the content of thymol and carvacrol [163].
Trifolium pratense L., from the Fabaceae family, is a well-known plant, cultivated for fodder purposes as a nitrogen fixer, which improves the soil. Besides its usage in agriculture, the plant has been used in traditional medicine in various diseases: it relieves osteoporosis, reduces cholesterol, and treats the symptoms of menopause. Responsible for these effects are the phytoestrogens and isoflavones genistein, and daidzein (Figure 16), contained in Trifolium pratense L. [164]. In the dental field, it has been observed that Trifolium pratense extracts act as an antibiotic and anti-inflammatory in inflamed gums, and inflammation due to either an abscess or a dental procedure [6].

5. In Vitro Experimental Studies

In vitro experimental studies are an important part of the development of new therapies used in medicine and dentistry, having the advantage that they provide a number of essential information for further in vivo and clinical studies [165]. In vitro studies are used both in the dental field and in other fields, such as cancer [166]. In vitro studies show the ability to simulate the oral environment and provide standard and controllable conditions for conducting experiments. The design of in vitro studies varies from simple to complex, depending on the purpose of the research (Figure 17) [167]. The main pathologies that can be reproduced in vitro to study the effect of the compounds on them include dental caries [168], gingivitis [169], and periodontal diseases [170].
Given that the oral environment is characterized by the presence of many saprophytic bacteria and most dental pathologies are based on overpopulation with bacterial cultures, in vitro methods offer the advantage of allowing direct study of the interaction between bacteria and cells, providing an accurate picture of the cellular response [171]. For example, cell cultures can be used to study the inflammatory process and response of different eukaryotic cells in the presence of pathogenic bacterial species [172]. Such a study by Yee et. al. [173] allows the evaluation of the response of eukaryotic cells to the presence of P. gingivalis species, one of the bacteria involved in the appearance and development of periodontitis. In a similar study, Yilmaz et. al., evaluated the response of primary gingival epithelial cells in the presence of P. gingivalis, noting that in the presence of pathogenic bacteria cell adhesion is stimulated by targeting specific cellular pathways [174]. Another bacterial species with implications in the development of periodontitis is A. actinomycetemcomitans. In an in vitro study, A. actinomycetemcomitans was applied to a cancer cell line using different environmental conditions, so it was observed that cell adhesion is influenced by both the host environment and the culture conditions [175]. Such studies are needed to more closely observe how pathogens interact with cellular targets, thus providing useful information for the development of new therapies.
Another approach to in vitro studies is the use of a co-cultures system, useful for comparing the effects of different pathogens on cells at the same time [171]. Thus, an in vitro study on human gingival epithelial cells explored the effect exerted by six Gram-negative bacterial strains responsible for the development of periodontal diseases. The study allowed the comparison of the aggressiveness of bacterial strains and the observation of their interaction with specific cellular targets [176].
In addition, cell co-cultures can be used in dentistry, in which several types of eukaryotic cells are grown together. One such study is the one conducted by Bodet et al. [177], in which epithelial cells were cultured together with macrophages to observe in more detail how they respond in the presence of the bacterial species P. gingivalis. Another more recent study used three cell types, dentritic cells, gingival epithelial keratinocytes, and T-cells, which were analyzed for their response to the bacterial species P. gingivalis [178]. In such studies, an important factor to consider is the ratio of cell types that are co-culture.
Cell cultures are also useful for evaluating the biocompatibility of a dental material, such as implants. Thus, human fibroblasts can be cultured directly on the dental materials together with the bacterial species of interest [179]. Additionally, the technique has been developed to allow the study of biocompatibility directly in a 96-well plate, using in parallel bacterial species to evaluate its mode of action [180].
One factor worth considering when conducting such studies is the origin of eukaryotic cells. In the dental field, several eukaryotic cells can be used, such as primary human gingival epithelial cells, fibroblasts, immortalized human gingival, skin keratinocyte cell lines, but also oral carcinoma cell lines (Figure 18) [171]. Considering the numerous studies performed on cell cultures, it can be concluded that this technique is useful and easy to perform, allowing the evaluation of specific interactions that occur in various dental pathologies, as well as the evaluation of potential new therapies.

6. Conclusions

The plant kingdom remains an unexplored field in terms of the use of plants in the treatment of human pathologies. Due to the need to find new therapeutic alternatives in the dental field, plants and compounds of natural origin represent a real interest due to their high efficacy and low toxicity. One of the most important biological activities presented by phytocompounds is the antibacterial action, useful in the treatment of most oral health problems. An advantage of medicinal plants is that they have a complex antibacterial mechanism of action, which is why the resistance of bacteria is diminished. An important field of research in the phytotherapeutic field is represented by in vitro studies that allow the creation of an environment similar to the biological one, thus allowing the study of the effects and mechanisms of action of phytocompounds. Thus, medicinal plants are still a field worth studying due to the many beneficial properties on human health and due to the low side effects compared to conventional therapy.
It is essential that medicinal plants be private from a scientific and objective point of view. The use of medicinal plants is still a common practice in human medicine. The advantage of using natural extracts stems from the synergistic effect of compounds existing in plants that potentiate their activity causing an improved therapeutic effect. At the same time, phytocompounds can cause serious adverse reactions that deserve special attention from both physicians and patients. It is of real importance that in the therapy, to be used, the origin of medicinal plants must be known exactly, and in the case of compounds isolated from plants, they must be carried out in an appropriate quantitative and qualitative control.
In the future, research directions should be directed to developed countries, where the rate of bacterial and viral resistance is increased, and dental damage is a major health problem. Natural compounds should also be analyzed in combination with other phytocompounds, as well as with conventional drugs currently used in therapy to observe in more detail the synergistic effect between them.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.D. and C.S.; writing—original draft preparation, R.-A.M., D.C., R.B., I.M., S.R., R.C., I.V.C., A.T., C.H., R.A.P., S.D., C.D., A.S., I.P. and C.S.; writing—review and editing, R.-A.M., R.B., I.M., I.P., C.D. and C.S.; supervision, C.D. and C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dehelean, C.A.; Marcovici, I.; Soica, C.; Mioc, M.; Coricovac, D.; Iurciuc, S.; Cretu, O.M.; Pinzaru, I. Plant-Derived Anticancer Compounds as New Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Alternative Therapy. Molecules 2021, 26, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Petersen, P.; Kwan, S. The 7(Th) WHO Global Conference on Health Promotion—towards Integration of Oral Health (Nairobi, Kenya 2009). Community Dent. Health 2021, 26, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Petersen, P.E.; Bourgeois, D.; Ogawa, H.; Estupinan-Day, S.; Ndiaye, C. The Global Burden of Oral Diseases and Risks to Oral Health. Bull. World Health Organ. 2005, 83, 661–669. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Rodrigues, F.; Lehmann, M.; do Amaral, V.S.; Reguly, M.L.; de Andrade, H.H.R. Genotoxicity of Three Mouthwash Products, Cepacol, Periogard, and Plax, in the Drosophila Wing-Spot Test. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2007, 48, 644–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Taheri, J.B.; Azimi, S.; Rafieian, N.; Akhavan Zanjani, H. Herbs in Dentistry. Int. Dent. J. 2011, 61, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kumar, G.; Jalaluddin, M.; Rout, P.; Mohanty, R.; Dileep, C.L. Emerging Trends of Herbal Care in Dentistry. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2013, 7, 1827–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pancu, D.F.; Scurtu, A.; Macasoi, I.G.; Marti, D.; Mioc, M.; Soica, C.; Coricovac, D.; Horhat, D.; Poenaru, M.; Dehelean, C. Antibiotics: Conventional Therapy and Natural Compounds with Antibacterial Activity—A Pharmaco-Toxicological Screening. Antibiotics 2013, 7, 1827–1829. [Google Scholar]
  8. Laheij, A.M.G.A.; Kistler, J.O.; Belibasakis, G.N.; Välimaa, H.; de Soet, J.J.; EOMW. Healthcare-Associated Viral and Bacterial Infections in Dentistry. J. Oral Microbiol. 2012, 4, 17659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Ben-Shabat, S.; Yarmolinsky, L.; Porat, D.; Dahan, A. Antiviral Effect of Phytochemicals from Medicinal Plants: Applications and Drug Delivery Strategies. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2020, 10, 354–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Petersen, P.E. The World Oral Health Report 2003: Continuous Improvement of Oral Health in the 21st Century--the Approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 2003, 31 (Suppl. 1), 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Petersen, P.E. The Burden of Oral Disease: Challenges to Improving Oral Health in the 21st Century. Bull. World Health Organ. 2005, 83, 3. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kim, H.-S. Do Not Put Too Much Value on Conventional Medicines. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 100, 37–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Raut, J.S.; Karuppayil, S.M. A Status Review on the Medicinal Properties of Essential Oils. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 62, 250–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Martillanes, S.; Rocha-Pimienta, J.; Adámez, J.D. Agrifood By-Products as a Source of Phytochemical Compounds. Descr. Food Sci. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chioibas, R.; Susan, R.; Susan, M.; Mederle, O.; Vaduva, D.; Radulescu, M.; Berceanu, M.; Danciu, C.; Khaled, Z.; Draghici, G.; et al. Antimicrobial Activity Exerted by Total Extracts of Germander. Rev. Chim. 2019, 70, 3242–3244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gibbons, S. Anti-Staphylococcal Plant Natural Products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2004, 21, 263–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hemaiswarya, S.; Kruthiventi, A.K.; Doble, M. Synergism between Natural Products and Antibiotics against Infectious Diseases. Phytomedicine 2008, 15, 639–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ambrosio, S.R.; Furtado, N.A.J.C.; de Oliveira, D.C.R.; da Costa, F.B.; Martins, C.H.G.; de Carvalho, T.C.; Porto, T.S.; Veneziani, R.C.S. Antimicrobial Activity of Kaurane Diterpenes against Oral Pathogens. Z. Naturforsch. C 2008, 63, 326–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Porto, T.S.; Rangel, R.; Furtado, N.A.J.C.; de Carvalho, T.C.; Martins, C.H.G.; Veneziani, R.C.S.; Da Costa, F.B.; Vinholis, A.H.C.; Cunha, W.R.; Heleno, V.C.G.; et al. Pimarane-Type Diterpenes: Antimicrobial Activity against Oral Pathogens. Molecules 2009, 14, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Urzúa, A.; Rezende, M.C.; Mascayano, C.; Vásquez, L. A Structure-Activity Study of Antibacterial Diterpenoids. Molecules 2008, 13, 882–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Armaka, M.; Papanikolaou, E.; Sivropoulou, A.; Arsenakis, M. Antiviral Properties of Isoborneol, a Potent Inhibitor of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1. Antivir. Res. 1999, 43, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Astani, A.; Reichling, J.; Schnitzler, P. Comparative Study on the Antiviral Activity of Selected Monoterpenes Derived from Essential Oils. Phytother. Res. 2010, 24, 673–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kharouf, N.; Haikel, Y.; Ball, V. Polyphenols in Dental Applications. Bioengineering 2020, 7, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Leme-Kraus, A.A.; Aydin, B.; Vidal, C.M.P.; Phansalkar, R.M.; Nam, J.W.; McAlpine, J.; Pauli, G.F.; Chen, S.; Bedran-Russo, A.K. Biostability of the Proanthocyanidins-Dentin Complex and Adhesion Studies. J. Dent. Res. 2017, 96, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Yang, H.; Li, K.; Yan, H.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; Huang, C. High-Performance Therapeutic Quercetin-Doped Adhesive for Adhesive-Dentin Interfaces. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Xu, X.; Zhou, X.D.; Wu, C.D. The Tea Catechin Epigallocatechin Gallate Suppresses Cariogenic Virulence Factors of Streptococcus Mutans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 1229–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Hara, K.; Ohara, M.; Hayashi, I.; Hino, T.; Nishimura, R.; Iwasaki, Y.; Ogawa, T.; Ohyama, Y.; Sugiyama, M.; Amano, H. The Green Tea Polyphenol (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate Precipitates Salivary Proteins Including Alpha-Amylase: Biochemical Implications for Oral Health. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2012, 120, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Quideau, S.; Deffieux, D.; Douat-Casassus, C.; Pouységu, L. Plant Polyphenols: Chemical Properties, Biological Activities, and Synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2011, 50, 586–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mucsi, I.; Gyulai, Z.; Beladi, I. Combined Effects of Flavonoids and Acyclovir against Herpesviruses in Cell Cultures. Acta Microbiol. Hung. 1992, 39, 137–147. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ninfali, P.; Antonelli, A.; Magnani, M.; Scarpa, E.S. Antiviral Properties of Flavonoids and Delivery Strategies. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cirkovic Velickovic, T.D.; Stanic-Vucinic, D.J. The Role of Dietary Phenolic Compounds in Protein Digestion and Processing Technologies to Improve Their Antinutritive Properties. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 82–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Bennick, A. Interaction of Plant Polyphenols with Salivary Proteins. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 2002, 13, 184–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hu, J.P.; Takahashi, N.; Yamada, T. Coptidis Rhizoma Inhibits Growth and Proteases of Oral Bacteria. Oral Dis. 2000, 6, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sayhan, H.; Beyaz, S.G.; Çeliktaş, A. The Local Anesthetic and Pain Relief Activity of Alkaloids. In Alkaloids—Alternatives in Synthesis, Modification and Application; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Ghildiyal, R.; Prakash, V.; Chaudhary, V.K.; Gupta, V.; Gabrani, R. Phytochemicals as Antiviral Agents: Recent Updates BT—Plant-Derived Bioactives: Production, Properties and Therapeutic Applications; Swamy, M.K., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 279–295. ISBN 978-981-15-1761-7. [Google Scholar]
  36. Narayanan, N.; Lakshmi, D. Salvia Officinalis in Dentistry. Dent. Hypotheses 2015, 6, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bachrach, G.; Jamil, A.; Naor, R.; Tal, G.; Ludmer, Z.; Steinberg, D. Garlic Allicin as a Potential Agent for Controlling Oral Pathogens. J. Med. Food 2011, 14, 1338–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sakanaka, S.; Kim, M.; Taniguchi, M.; Yamamoto, T. Antibacterial Substances in Japanese Green Tea Extract against Streptococcus Mutans, a Cariogenic Bacterium. Agric. Biol. Chem. 2014, 53, 2307–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cicciù, M.; Fiorillo, L.; Cervino, G. Chitosan Use in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of Recent Clinical Studies. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Karatas, O.; Balci Yuce, H.; Taskan, M.M.; Gevrek, F.; Alkan, C.; Isiker Kara, G.; Temiz, C. Cinnamic Acid Decreases Periodontal Inflammation and Alveolar Bone Loss in Experimental Periodontitis. J. Periodontal Res. 2020, 55, 676–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yanakiev, S. Effects of Cinnamon (Cinnamomum spp.) in Dentistry: A Review. Molecules 2020, 25, 4184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chaturvedi, T. Uses of Turmeric in Dentistry: An Update. Indian J. Dent. Res. 2009, 20, 107–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Cao, P.; Wei, S.; Lu, Y. Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activities of Eugenol from Essential Oil of Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merr. & L. M. Perry (Clove) Leaf against Periodontal Pathogen Porphyromonas Gingivalis. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 113, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tiwari, R. Pharmacotherapeutic Properties of Ginger and Its Use in Diseases of the Oral Cavity: A Narrative Review. J. Adv. Oral Res. 2016, 7, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ali, N.; Abbas, M.; Al-Bayaty, F. Evaluation of Potential Effect of Menthol Solution on Oral Hygiene Status of Dental Students in a University in Iraq. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2015, 14, 687–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Da Silveira Moretti, A.B.; Abdo, R.C.C.; Carvalho, J.C.T.; Moreira Machado, M.A.d.A.; da Silva, S.M.B. Effect of Sanguinaria Canadensis Tincture Associated to a Chewing Gum on the Bacterial Biofilm. Open Complementary Med. J. 2009, 1, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Koo, H.; Pearson, S.K.; Scott-Anne, K.; Abranches, J.; Cury, J.A.; Rosalen, P.L.; Park, Y.K.; Marquis, R.E.; Bowen, W.H. Effects of Apigenin and Tt-Farnesol on Glucosyltransferase Activity, Biofilm Viability and Caries Development in Rats. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2002, 17, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Galvão, L.C.d.C.; Furletti, V.F.; Bersan, S.M.F.; da Cunha, M.G.; Ruiz, A.L.T.G.; de Carvalho, J.E.; Sartoratto, A.; Rehder, V.L.G.; Figueira, G.M.; Teixeira Duarte, M.C.; et al. Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oils against Streptococcus Mutans and Their Antiproliferative Effects. Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 2012, 751435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Corega, C.; Vaida, L.; Festila, D.G.; Rigoni, G.; Albanese, M.; D’Agostino, A.; De Santis, D.; Pardo, A.; Nocini, P.F.; Bertossi, D. The Benefits of Quercitin for Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review. Minerva Stomatol. 2014, 62. in press. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lakshmi, T.; Roy, A. Yarrow (achillea millefolium linn.) a herbal medicinal plant with broad therapeutic use—A review. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2011, 9, 136–141. [Google Scholar]
  51. Chou, S.-T.; Peng, H.-Y.; Hsu, J.-C.; Lin, C.-C.; Shih, Y. Achillea Millefolium L. Essential Oil Inhibits LPS-Induced Oxidative Stress and Nitric Oxide Production in RAW 264.7 Macrophages. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 12978–12993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Jaimand, K.; Rezaee, M.B.; Mozaffarian, V. Chemical Constituents of the Leaf and Flower Oils from Achillea Millefolium Ssp. Elbursensis Hub.-Mor. from Iran Rich in Chamazulene. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2006, 18, 293–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Miranzadeh, S.; Adib-Hajbaghery, M.; Soleymanpoor, L.; Ehsani, M. Effect of Adding the Herb Achillea Millefolium on Mouthwash on Chemotherapy Induced Oral Mucositis in Cancer Patients: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. Off. J. Eur. Oncol. Nurs. Soc. 2015, 19, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Vitalini, S.; Beretta, G.; Iriti, M.; Orsenigo, S.; Basilico, N.; Dall’Acqua, S.; Iorizzi, M.; Fico, G. Phenolic Compounds from Achillea Millefolium L. and Their Bioactivity. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2011, 58, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. El-Saber Batiha, G.; Magdy Beshbishy, A.; Wasef, L.G.; Elewa, Y.H.A.; Al-Sagan, A.A.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Taha, A.E.; Abd-Elhakim, Y.M.; Prasad Devkota, H. Chemical Constituents and Pharmacological Activities of Garlic (Allium sativum L.): A Review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Barnes, J.; Anderson, L.A.; Phillipson, J.D. Herbal Medicines: A Guide for Healthcare Professionals; Pharmaceutical Press: London, UK, 2003; ISBN 0853694745. [Google Scholar]
  57. Karic, V.; Jaiswal, A.; Abrahamse, H.; Thakur, A.; Ganeshpurkar, A. Effectiveness of Allium sativum on Bacterial Oral Infection. In Natural Oral Care in Dental Therapy; Chauhan, D.N., Singh, P.R., Shah, K., Chauhan, N.S., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 345–369. ISBN 9781119614227. [Google Scholar]
  58. Groppo, F.C.; Ramacciato, J.C.; Motta, R.H.L.; Ferraresi, P.M.; Sartoratto, A. Antimicrobial Activity of Garlic against Oral Streptococci. Int. J. Dent. Hyg. 2007, 5, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Bakhshi, M.; Taheri, J.-B.; Shabestari, S.B.; Tanik, A.; Pahlevan, R. Comparison of Therapeutic Effect of Aqueous Extract of Garlic and Nystatin Mouthwash in Denture Stomatitis. Gerodontology 2012, 29, e680–e684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mendoza-Juache, A.; Aranda-Romo, S.; Bermeo-Escalona, J.R.; Gómez-Hernández, A.; Pozos-Guillén, A.; Sánchez-Vargas, L.O. The Essential Oil of Allium sativum as an Alternative Agent against Candida Isolated from Dental Prostheses. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2017, 34, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tang, F.-Y.; Chiang, E.-P.I.; Chung, J.-G.; Lee, H.-Z.; Hsu, C.-Y. S-Allylcysteine Modulates the Expression of E-Cadherin and Inhibits the Malignant Progression of Human Oral Cancer. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2009, 20, 1013–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mikaili, P.; Maadirad, S.; Moloudizargari, M.; Aghajanshakeri, S.; Sarahroodi, S. Therapeutic Uses and Pharmacological Properties of Garlic, Shallot, and Their Biologically Active Compounds. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2013, 16, 1031–1048. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mangaiyarkarasi, S.P.; Manigandan, T.; Elumalai, M.; Cholan, P.K.; Kaur, R.P. Benefits of Aloe Vera in Dentistry. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2015, 7, S255–S259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Choonhakarn, C.; Busaracome, P.; Sripanidkulchai, B.; Sarakarn, P. The Efficacy of Aloe Vera Gel in the Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Br. J. Dermatol. 2008, 158, 573–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Babaee, N.; Zabihi, E.; Mohseni, S.; Moghadamnia, A.A. Evaluation of the Therapeutic Effects of Aloe Vera Gel on Minor Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis. Dent. Res. J. (Isfahan) 2012, 9, 381–385. [Google Scholar]
  66. Sudarshan, R.; Annigeri, R.G.; Sree Vijayabala, G. Aloe Vera in the Treatment for Oral Submucous Fibrosis—A Preliminary Study. J. Oral Pathol. Med. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Oral Pathol. Am. Acad. Oral Pathol. 2012, 41, 755–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ahmadi, A. Potential Prevention: Aloe Vera Mouthwash May Reduce Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2012, 18, 635–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ajmera, N.; Chatterjee, A.; Goyal, V. Aloe Vera: It’s Effect on Gingivitis. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2013, 17, 435–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bhat, G.; Kudva, P.; Dodwad, V. Aloe Vera: Nature’s Soothing Healer to Periodontal Disease. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2011, 15, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Poor, M.R.; Hall, J.E.; Poor, A.S. Reduction in the Incidence of Alveolar Osteitis in Patients Treated with the SaliCept Patch, Containing Acemannan Hydrogel. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2002, 60, 374–379; discussion 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Fani, M.; Kohanteb, J. Inhibitory Activity of Aloe Vera Gel on Some Clinically Isolated Cariogenic and Periodontopathic Bacteria. J. Oral Sci. 2012, 54, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Athiban, P.P.; Borthakur, B.J.; Ganesan, S.; Swathika, B. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Aloe Vera and Its Effectiveness in Decontaminating Gutta Percha Cones. J. Conserv. Dent. 2012, 15, 246–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ashwlayan, V.D.; Kumar, A.; Verma, M.; Garg, V.K.; Gupta, S. Therapeutic Potential of Calendula officinalis. Pharm. Pharmacol. Int. J. 2018, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Khairnar, M.S.; Pawar, B.; Marawar, P.P.; Mani, A. Evaluation of Calendula officinalis as an Anti-Plaque and Anti-Gingivitis Agent. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2013, 17, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Turesky, S.; Gilmore, N.D.; Glickman, I. Reduced Plaque Formation by the Chloromethyl Analogue of Victamine C. J. Periodontol. 1970, 41, 41–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Gazim, Z.C.; Rezende, C.M.; Fraga, S.R.; Svidzinski, T.I.E.; Cortez, D.A.G. Antifungal Activity of the Essential Oil from Calendula officinalis L. (Asteraceae) Growing in Brazil. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2008, 39, 61–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Schmidgall, J.; Schnetz, E.; Hensel, A. Evidence for Bioadhesive Effects of Polysaccharides and Polysaccharide-Containing Herbs in an Ex Vivo Bioadhesion Assay on Buccal Membranes. Planta Med. 2000, 66, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Babaee, N.; Moslemi, D.; Khalilpour, M.; Vejdani, F.; Moghadamnia, Y.; Bijani, A.; Baradaran, M.; Kazemi, M.T.; Khalilpour, A.; Pouramir, M.; et al. Antioxidant Capacity of Calendula officinalis Flowers Extract and Prevention of Radiation Induced Oropharyngeal Mucositis in Patients with Head and Neck Cancers: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study. Daru 2013, 21, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Patrick, K.F.; Kumar, S.; Edwardson, P.A.; Hutchinson, J.J. Induction of Vascularisation by an Aqueous Extract of the Flowers of Calendula officinalis L. the European Marigold. Phytomedicine 1996, 3, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Preethi, K.C.; Kuttan, G.; Kuttan, R. Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Flower Extract of Calendula officinalis Linn. and Its Possible Mechanism of Action. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2009, 47, 113–120. [Google Scholar]
  81. Preethi, K.C.; Kuttan, G.; Kuttan, R. Antioxidant Potential of an Extract of Calendula officinalis. Flowers in Vitro. and in Vivo. Pharm. Biol. 2006, 44, 691–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Sultan, Z.; Zafar, M.; Shahab, S.; Najeeb, S.; Naseem, M. Green Tea (Camellia Sinensis): Chemistry and Oral Health. Open Dent. J. 2016, 10, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Arab, H.; Maroofian, A.; Golestani, S.; Shafaee, H.; Sohrabi, K.; Forouzanfar, A. Review of the Therapeutic Effects of Camellia Sinensis (Green Tea) on Oral and Periodontal Health. J. Med. Plant Res. 2011, 5, 5465–5469. [Google Scholar]
  84. Makimura, M.; Hirasawa, M.; Kobayashi, K.; Indo, J.; Sakanaka, S.; Taguchi, T.; Otake, S. Inhibitory Effect of Tea Catechins on Collagenase Activity. J. Periodontol. 1993, 64, 630–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Goenka, P.; Sarawgi, A.; Karun, V.; Nigam, A.G.; Dutta, S.; Marwah, N. Camellia Sinensis (Tea): Implications and Role in Preventing Dental Decay. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2013, 7, 152–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Otake, S.; Makimura, M.; Kuroki, T.; Nishihara, Y.; Hirasawa, M. Anticaries Effects of Polyphenolic Compounds from Japanese Green Tea. Caries Res. 1991, 25, 438–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Tahani, B.; Sabzian, R. Effect of Camellia Sinensis Plant on Decreasing the Level of Halitosis: A Systematic Review. Dent. Res. J. (Isfahan) 2018, 15, 379–384. [Google Scholar]
  88. Nata’ala, M.; Dalhat, M.; Omoye, B.; Isah, A.; Kabiru, S.; Bashiru, I.; Umar, F. Phytochemical Screening and Antibacterial Activity of Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck [Orange] and Citrus Aurantifolia (Cristm.) Swingle [Lime] Stem from Bacteria Associated with Dental Caries. J. Adv. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Aripin, D.; Julaeha, E.; Dardjan, M.; Cahyanto, A. Chemical Composition of Citrus Spp. and Oral Antimicrobial Effect of Citrus Spp. Peels Essential Oils against Streptococcus Mutans. Padjadjaran J. Dent. 2015, 27, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Abdallah, E. Preliminary Phytochemical and Antibacterial Screening of Methanolic Leaf Extract of Citrus Aurantifolia. Pharm. Biotechnol. Curr. Res. 2016, 1, 2. [Google Scholar]
  91. Pathan, R.K.; Gali, P.R.; Pathan, P.; Gowtham, T.; Pasupuleti, S. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Citrus Aurantifolia and Its Phytochemical Screening. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis. 2012, 2, S328–S331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kishore, N.; Verma, A.K. Coconut Palm (Cocos nucifera L.). Nat. Oral Care Dent. Ther. 2020, 271–284. [Google Scholar]
  93. Yong, J.W.H.; Ge, L.; Ng, Y.F.; Tan, S.N. The Chemical Composition and Biological Properties of Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) Water. Molecules 2009, 14, 5144–5164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Loomba, S.; Jothi, V. Cocos nucifera: Its Properties and Contributions to Dentistry. Int. J. Sci. 2013, 1, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  95. Peedikayil, F.C.; Sreenivasan, P.; Narayanan, A. Effect of Coconut Oil in Plaque Related Gingivitis—A Preliminary Report. Niger. Med. J. 2015, 56, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Naidu, S.; Suresh, A. EFFECTS OF TURMERIC (CURCUMA LONGA) IN DENTISTRY. Int. J. Dev. Res. 2018, 8, 21828–21831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Mali, A.M.; Behal, R.; Gilda, S.S. Comparative Evaluation of 0.1% Turmeric Mouthwash with 0.2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate in Prevention of Plaque and Gingivitis: A Clinical and Microbiological Study. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2012, 16, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Lee, K.-H.; Kim, B.S.; Keum, K.-S.; Yu, H.-H.; Kim, Y.-H.; Chang, B.-S.; Ra, J.-Y.; Moon, H.-D.; Seo, B.-R.; Choi, N.-Y.; et al. Essential Oil of Curcuma Longa Inhibits Streptococcus Mutans Biofilm Formation. J. Food Sci. 2011, 76, H226–H230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Rao, S.; Dinkar, C.; Vaishnav, L.K.; Rao, P.; Rai, M.P.; Fayad, R.; Baliga, M.S. The Indian Spice Turmeric Delays and Mitigates Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer: An Investigational Study. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2014, 13, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Suhag, A.; Dixit, J.; Prof, D. Role of Curcumin as a Subgingival Irrigant: A Pilot Study. Periodontal Pract. Today 2007, 4, 115–121. [Google Scholar]
  101. Das, A.D.; Balan, A.; KT, S. Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Curcumin and Turmeric Oil as Chemopreventive Agents in Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Clinical and Histopathological Evaluation. J. Indian Acad. Oral Med. Radiol. 2010, 22, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Singh, V.; Pal, M.; Gupta, S.; Tiwari, S.K.; Malkunje, L.; Das, S. Turmeric—A New Treatment Option for Lichen Planus: A Pilot Study. Natl. J. Maxillofac. Surg. 2013, 4, 198–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Chatterjee, A.; Debnath, K.; Rao, N.K.H. A Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Curcumin and Chlorhexidine Mouthrinses on Clinical Inflammatory Parameters of Gingivitis: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Clinical Study. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2017, 21, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Yadav, R.K.; Tikku, A.P.; Chandra, A.; Verma, P.; Bains, R.; Bhoot, H. A Comparative Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Calcium Hydroxide, Chlorhexidine Gel, and a Curcumin-Based Formulation against Enterococcus Faecalis. Natl. J. Maxillofac. Surg. 2018, 9, 52–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Madan, S.; Kashyap, S.; Mathur, G. Glycyrrhiza Glabra: An Efficient Medicinal Plant for Control of Periodontitis—A Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Int. Clin. Dent. Res. Organ. 2019, 11, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kaur, H. Glycyrrhiza Glabra: A Phytopharmacological Review. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2013, 4, 2470–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Jatav, V.; Singh, S.; Khatri, P.; Sharma, A. Recent Pharmacological Trends of Glycyrrhiza Glabra Linn. Unani Res. 2011, 1, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hambire, C.; Hambire, U. Glycyrrhiza Glabra: Its Role in Dentistry. SRM J. Res. Dent. Sci. 2020, 11, 106–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sidhu, P.; Shankargouda, S.; Rath, A.; Hesarghatta Ramamurthy, P.; Fernandes, B.; Kumar Singh, A. Therapeutic Benefits of Liquorice in Dentistry. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 2020, 11, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Kim, J.-K.; Oh, S.; Kwon, H.-S.; Oh, Y.-S.; Lim, S.S.; Shin, H.-K. Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Roasted Licorice Extracts on Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammatory Responses in Murine Macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 345, 1215–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Ma, Z.F.; Zhang, H. Phytochemical Constituents, Health Benefits, and Industrial Applications of Grape Seeds: A Mini-Review. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Delimont, N.M.; Carlson, B.N. Prevention of Dental Caries by Grape Seed Extract Supplementation: A Systematic Review. Nutr. Health 2020, 26, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Singla, S.; Malhotra, R.; Nd, S.; Saxena, S. Antibacterial Efficacy of Mouthwash Prepared from Pomegranate, Grape Seed and Guava Extracts against Oral Streptococci: An in Vivo Study. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2018, 42, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Süntar, I.P.; Akkol, E.K.; Yilmazer, D.; Baykal, T.; Kirmizibekmez, H.; Alper, M.; Yeşilada, E. Investigations on the in Vivo Wound Healing Potential of Hypericum perforatum L. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 127, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Süntar, I.; Oyardi, O.; Akkol, E.K.; Ozçelik, B. Antimicrobial Effect of the Extracts from Hypericum perforatum against Oral Bacteria and Biofilm Formation. Pharm. Biol. 2016, 54, 1065–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Arpag, O.F.; Duran, N.; Açikgül, F.C.; Türkmen, M. Comparison of Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations of Hypericum perforatum L. Essential Oils, 0.2% Chlorhexidine and 10 % Povidone-Iodine Over Aggregatibacter Actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas Gingivalis. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2020, 23, 1192–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Singh, O.; Khanam, Z.; Misra, N.; Srivastava, M.K. Chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.): An Overview. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2011, 5, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Miraj, S.; Alesaeidi, S. A Systematic Review Study of Therapeutic Effects of Matricaria Recuitta Chamomile (Chamomile). Electron. Phys. 2016, 8, 3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Sharifi-Rad, M.; Nazaruk, J.; Polito, L.; Flaviana, M.; Morais-Braga, B.; Rocha, J.E.; Douglas, H.; Coutinho, M.; Salehi, B.; Tabanelli, G.; et al. Matricaria Genus as a Source of Antimicrobial Agents: From Farm to Pharmacy and Food Applications. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 215, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Şener, B. Herbal Extracts Used in Dental Disorders. Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2019, 19, 14107–14111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Gomes, V.T.S.; Nonato Silva Gomes, R.; Gomes, M.S.; Joaquim, W.M.; Lago, E.C.; Nicolau, R.A. Effects of Matricaria recutita (L.) in the Treatment of Oral Mucositis. Sci. World J. 2018, 2018, 4392184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Ghitu, A.; Schwiebs, A.; Radeke, H.H.; Avram, S.; Zupko, I.; Bor, A.; Pavel, I.Z.; Dehelean, C.A.; Oprean, C.; Bojin, F.; et al. A Comprehensive Assessment of Apigenin as an Antiproliferative, Proapoptotic, Antiangiogenic and Immunomodulatory Phytocompound. Nutrients 2019, 11, 858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Mahendran, G.; Rahman, L. Ethnomedicinal, Phytochemical and Pharmacological Updates on Peppermint (Mentha × piperita L.)-A Review. Phytother. Res. 2020, 34, 2088–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Anwar, F.; Abbas, A.; Mehmood, T.; Gilani, A.-H.; Rehman, N. Mentha: A Genus Rich in Vital Nutra-Pharmaceuticals—A Review. Phyther. Res. 2019, 33, 2548–2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. McKay, D.L.; Blumberg, J.B. A Review of the Bioactivity and Potential Health Benefits of Peppermint Tea (Mentha piperita L.). Phyther. Res. 2006, 20, 619–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Raghavan, R.; Shyamala Devi, M.; Varghese, M.; Joseph, A.; Madhavan, S.S.; Sreedevi, P.V.; Author, C. Effectiveness of Mentha piperita Leaf Extracts against Oral Pathogens: An in Vitro Study. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2018, 19, 1042–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Geraci, A.; Di Stefano, V.; Di Martino, E.; Schillaci, D.; Schicchi, R. Essential Oil Components of Orange Peels and Antimicrobial Activity. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 653–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Njoroge, S.M.; Phi, N.T.L.; Sawamura, M. Chemical Composition of Peel Essential Oils of Sweet Oranges (Citrus sinensis) from Uganda and Rwanda. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2013, 12, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Njoroge, S.M.; Phi, N.T.L.; Sawamura, M. Chemical Profile, Antifungal, Antiaflatoxigenic and Antioxidant Activity of Citrus Maxima Burm. and Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck Essential Oils and Their Cyclic Monoterpene, DL-Limonene. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 1734–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Yadav, H.K.; Yadav, R.K.; Chandra, A.; Thakkar, R.R. The Effectiveness of Eucalyptus Oil, Orange Oil, and Xylene in Dissolving Different Endodontic Sealers. J. Conserv. Dent. 2016, 19, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Arvanitoyannis, I.S.; Varzakas, T.H. Fruit/Fruit Juice Waste Management: Treatment Methods and Potential Uses of Treated Waste. Waste Manag. Food Ind. 2008, 569–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Amri, E.; Mamboya, F. Papain, a Plant Enzyme of Biological Importance: A Review. Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 8, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Lopes, M.C.; Mascarini, R.C.; da Silva, B.M.C.G.; Flório, F.M.; Basting, R.T. Effect of a Papain-Based Gel for Chemomechanical Caries Removal on Dentin Shear Bond Strength. J. Dent. Child. 2007, 74, 93–97. [Google Scholar]
  134. Sforcin, J.M. Biological Properties and Therapeutic Applications of Propolis. Phytother. Res. 2016, 30, 894–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Duca, A.; Alexa, E.; Dehelean, C.A.; Soica, C.; Danciu, C.; Popescu, I.; Cocan, I.; Lalescu, D.; Muntean, D.M. Assessment of lipid profile of eight propolis samples from western romania. Farmacia 2019, 67, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Pasupuleti, V.R.; Sammugam, L.; Ramesh, N.; Gan, S.H. Honey, Propolis, and Royal Jelly: A Comprehensive Review of Their Biological Actions and Health Benefits. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 1259510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Król, W.; Bankova, V.; Sforcin, J.M.; Szliszka, E.; Czuba, Z.; Kuropatnicki, A.K. Propolis: Properties, Application, and Its Potential. Evid. Based. Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 2013, 807578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Sinha, D.; Sinha, A. Natural Medicaments in Dentistry. AYU (Int. Q. J. Res. Ayurveda) 2014, 35, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Nakajima, M.; Arimatsu, K.; Minagawa, T.; Matsuda, Y.; Sato, K.; Takahashi, N.; Nakajima, T.; Yamazaki, K. Brazilian Propolis Mitigates Impaired Glucose and Lipid Metabolism in Experimental Periodontitis in Mice. BMC Complementary Altern. Med. 2016, 16, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. D’Auria, F.; Tecca, M.; Scazzocchio, F.; Renzini, V.; Strippoli, V. Effect of Propolis on Virulence Factors of Candida Albicans. J. Chemother. 2003, 15, 454–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Andrade, J.M.; Faustino, C.; Garcia, C.; Ladeiras, D.; Reis, C.P.; Rijo, P. Rosmarinus officinalis L.: An Update Review of Its Phytochemistry and Biological Activity. Future Sci. OA 2018, 4, FSO283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. De Oliveira, J.R.; Camargo, S.E.A.; de Oliveira, L.D. Rosmarinus officinalis L. (Rosemary) as Therapeutic and Prophylactic Agent. J. Biomed. Sci. 2019, 26, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Begum, A.; Sandhya, S.; Ali, S.S.; Vinod, K.R.; Reddy, S.; Banji, D. An In-Depth Review on the Medicinal Flora Rosmarinus officinalis (Lamiaceae). Acta Sci. Polonorum Technol. Aliment. 2013, 12, 61–74. [Google Scholar]
  144. Al-Sereiti, M.R.; Abu-Amer, K.M.; Sen, P. Pharmacology of Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis Linn.) and Its Therapeutic Potentials; NISCAIR-CSIR: New Delhi, India, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  145. Shruthi, S.; Vijayalaxmi, K. Antigenotoxic Effects of a Polyherbal Drug Septilin against the Genotoxicity of Cyclophosphamide in Mice. Toxicol. Rep. 2016, 3, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Daswani, B.R.; Yegnanarayan, R. Immunomodulatory Activity of Septilin, a Polyherbal Preparation. Phytother. Res. 2002, 16, 162–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Khanna, N.; Sharma, S.B. Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Effect of Herbal Preparation. Indian J. Med. Sci. 2001, 55, 195–202. [Google Scholar]
  148. Batiha, G.E.-S.; Alkazmi, L.M.; Wasef, L.G.; Beshbishy, A.M.; Nadwa, E.H.; Rashwan, E.K. Syzygium aromaticum L. (Myrtaceae): Traditional Uses, Bioactive Chemical Constituents, Pharmacological and Toxicological Activities. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Chaieb, K.; Hajlaoui, H.; Zmantar, T.; Ben Kahla-Nakbi, A.; Rouabhia, M.; Mahdouani, K.; Bakhrouf, A. The Chemical Composition and Biological Activity of Clove Essential Oil, Eugenia Caryophyllata (Syzigium aromaticum L. Myrtaceae): A Short Review. Phytother. Res. 2007, 21, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Rojas, D.F.C.; Souza, C.R.F.; Oliveira, W.P. Clove (Syzygium aromaticum): A Precious Spice. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2014, 4, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Popa, Z.; Rusu, L.; Susan, R.; Pinzaru, I.; Ardelean, E.; Borcan, F.; Voicu, M.; Sas, I.; Popovici, R.A.; Lazureanu, V. Obtaining and Characterization of a Polyurethane Carrier Used for Eugenol as a Possible Remedy in Oral Therapies. Mater. Plast. 2018, 55, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Gülçin, İ.; Elmastaş, M.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. Antioxidant Activity of Clove Oil—A Powerful Antioxidant Source. Arab. J. Chem. 2012, 4, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Sofia, P.K.; Prasad, R.; Vijay, V.K.; Srivastava, A.K. Evaluation of Antibacterial Activity of Indian Spices against Common Foodborne Pathogens. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 42, 910–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Buggapati, L. Herbs in Dentistry. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Invent. 2016, 5, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
  155. Carson, C.F.; Hammer, K.A.; Riley, T.V. Melaleuca Alternifolia (Tea Tree) Oil: A Review of Antimicrobial and Other Medicinal Properties. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 19, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Pazyar, N.; Yaghoobi, R.; Bagherani, N.; Kazerouni, A.; Nader Pazyar, C. A Review of Applications of Tea Tree Oil in Dermatology. Int. J. Dermatol. 2012, 52, 784–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Santamaria, M.; Petermann, K.D.; Vedovello, S.A.S.; Degan, V.; Lucato, A.; Franzini, C.M. Antimicrobial Effect of Melaleuca Alternifolia Dental Gel in Orthodontic Patients. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2014, 145, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Salehi, B.; Prakash Mishra, A.; Shukla, I.; Sharifi-Rad, M.; del Mar Contreras, M.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Fathi, H.; Nasri Nasrabadi, N.; Kobarfard, F.; Sharifi-Rad, J. Thymol, Thyme, and Other Plant Sources: Health and Potential Uses. Phyther. Res. 2018, 32, 1688–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Soto-Mendívil, E.A.; Moreno-Rodríguez, J.F.; Estarrón-Espinosa, M.; García-Fajardo, J.A.; Obledo-Vázquez, E.N. Chemical composition and fungicidal activity of the essential oil Thymus vulgaris against Alternaria citr. e-Gnosis [Online] 2006, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  160. Borugă, O.; Jianu, C.; Mişcă, C.; Goleţ, I.; Gruia, A.; Horhat, F. Thymus Vulgaris Essential Oil: Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity. J. Med. Life 2014, 7, 56. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  161. Sas, I. Thymus Vulgaris Extract Formulated as Cyclodextrin Complexes: Synthesis, Characterization, Antioxidant Activity and in Vitro Cytotoxicity Assessment. Farmacia 2019, 67, 442–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Botelho, M.; Nogueira, N.A.P.; Bastos, G.; Fonseca, S.; Lemos, T.; Matos, F.; Montenegro, D.; Heukelbach, J.; Rao, V.S.; Brito, G. Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential Oil from Lippia Sidoides, Carvacrol and Thymol against Oral Pathogens. Braz. J. Med Biol. Res. Rev. Bras. Pesqui. Med. Biol. 2007, 40, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  163. De Vincenzi, M.; Stammati, A.; Silano, M. Constituents of Aromatic Plants: Carvacrol. Fitoterapia 2004, 75, 801–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Nieves, J.W. Alternative Therapy through Nutrients and Nutraceuticals. Osteoporos. Fourth Ed. 2013, 1739–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Faggion, C.M. Guidelines for Reporting Pre-Clinical In Vitro Studies on Dental Materials. J. Evid. Based Dent. Pract. 2012, 12, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Guran, K.; Buzatu, R.; Pinzaru, I.; Boruga, M.; Marcovici, I.; Coricovac, D.; Avram, S.; Poenaru, M.; Susan, M.; Susan, R.; et al. In Vitro Pharmaco-Toxicological Characterization of Melissa Officinalis Total Extract Using Oral, Pharynx and Colorectal Carcinoma Cell Lines. Process 2021, 9, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Yu, O.Y.; Zhao, I.S.; Mei, M.L.; Lo, E.C.-M.; Chu, C.-H. A Review of the Common Models Used in Mechanistic Studies on Demineralization-Remineralization for Cariology Research. Dent. J. 2017, 5, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Amaechi, B.T.; Tenuta, L.M.A.; Ricomini Filho, A.P.; Cury, J.A. Protocols to Study Dental Caries In Vitro: Microbial Caries Models. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1922, 357–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Santos, V.R.; Gomes, R.T.; Resende, M.; de Almeida, O.P.; Colleta, R. Della Isolation and Characterization of Gingival Fibroblasts Positive for Alkaline Phosphatase in Patients with Chronic Periodontitis and Drug-Induced Gingival Hyperplasia. Rev. Odonto Ciência 2010, 25, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Ara, T.; Kurata, K.; Hirai, K.; Uchihashi, T.; Uematsu, T.; Imamura, Y.; Furusawa, K.; Kurihara, S.; Wang, P.-L. Human Gingival Fibroblasts Are Critical in Sustaining Inflammation in Periodontal Disease. J. Periodontal Res. 2009, 44, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Mountcastle, S.E.; Cox, S.C.; Sammons, R.L.; Jabbari, S.; Shelton, R.M.; Kuehne, S.A. A Review of Co-Culture Models to Study the Oral Microenvironment and Disease. J. Oral Microbiol. 2020, 12, 1773122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Stathopoulou, P.G.; Benakanakere, M.R.; Galicia, J.C.; Kinane, D.F. Epithelial Cell Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Response Differs across Dental Plaque Bacterial Species. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2010, 37, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  173. Yee, M.; Kim, S.; Sethi, P.; DŘzgŘneş, N.; Konopka, K. Porphyromonas Gingivalis Stimulates IL-6 and IL-8 Secretion in GMSM-K, HSC-3 and H413 Oral Epithelial Cells. Anaerobe 2014, 28, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Yilmaz, Ö.; Young, P.A.; Lamont, R.J.; Kenny, G.E. Gingival Epithelial Cell Signalling and Cytoskeletal Responses to Porphyromonas Gingivalis Invasion. Microbiology 2003, 149, 2417–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  175. Fives-Taylor, P.; Meyer, D.; Mintz, K. Characteristics of Actinobacillus Actinomycetemcomitans Invasion of and Adhesion to Cultured Epithelial Cells. Adv. Dent. Res. 1995, 9, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Han, Y.W.; Shi, W.; Huang, G.T.-J.; Kinder Haake, S.; Park, N.-H.; Kuramitsu, H.; Genco, R.J. Interactions between Periodontal Bacteria and Human Oral Epithelial Cells: Fusobacterium Nucleatum Adheres to and Invades Epithelial Cells. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 3140–3146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Bodet, C.; Chandad, F.; Grenier, D. Inflammatory Responses of a Macrophage/Epithelial Cell Co-Culture Model to Mono and Mixed Infections with Porphyromonas Gingivalis, Treponema Denticola, and Tannerella Forsythia. Microbes Infect. 2006, 8, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Bates, A.M.; Fischer, C.L.; Abhyankar, V.P.; Johnson, G.K.; Guthmiller, J.M.; Progulske-Fox, A.; Brogden, K.A. Matrix Metalloproteinase Response of Dendritic Cell, Gingival Epithelial Keratinocyte, and T-Cell Transwell Co-Cultures Treated with Porphyromonas Gingivalis Hemagglutinin-B. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  179. Sancilio, S.; di Giacomo, V.; Di Giulio, M.; Gallorini, M.; Marsich, E.; Travan, A.; Tarusha, L.; Cellini, L.; Cataldi, A. Biological Responses of Human Gingival Fibroblasts (HGFs) in an Innovative Co-Culture Model with Streptococcus mitis to Thermosets Coated with a Silver Polysaccharide Antimicrobial System. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Di Giulio, M.; D’ERCOLE, S.; Zara, S.; Cataldi, A.; Cellini, L. Streptococcus mitis/Human Gingival Fibroblasts Co-culture: The Best Natural Association in Answer to the 2-hydroxyethyl Methacrylate Release. Apmis 2012, 120, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The main biological actions and therapeutic uses of natural compounds in dentistry.
Figure 1. The main biological actions and therapeutic uses of natural compounds in dentistry.
Plants 10 02148 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structure of chamazulene.
Figure 2. Chemical structure of chamazulene.
Plants 10 02148 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structure of: (a) allin, (b) methiin, and (c) S-allylcysteine.
Figure 3. Chemical structure of: (a) allin, (b) methiin, and (c) S-allylcysteine.
Plants 10 02148 g003
Figure 4. Chemical structure of (a) epigallocatechin-3-gallate and (b) epigallocatechin.
Figure 4. Chemical structure of (a) epigallocatechin-3-gallate and (b) epigallocatechin.
Plants 10 02148 g004
Figure 5. Chemical structure of (a) D-Limonene and (b) B-pinene.
Figure 5. Chemical structure of (a) D-Limonene and (b) B-pinene.
Plants 10 02148 g005
Figure 6. Chemical structure of (a) diferuloylmethane, (b) demethoxycurcumin, and (c) bisdemethoxycurcumin.
Figure 6. Chemical structure of (a) diferuloylmethane, (b) demethoxycurcumin, and (c) bisdemethoxycurcumin.
Plants 10 02148 g006
Figure 7. Chemical structure of (a) glycyrrhizic acid and (b) glycyrrhizin.
Figure 7. Chemical structure of (a) glycyrrhizic acid and (b) glycyrrhizin.
Plants 10 02148 g007
Figure 8. Chemical structure of (a) apigenin and (b) α-bisabolol.
Figure 8. Chemical structure of (a) apigenin and (b) α-bisabolol.
Plants 10 02148 g008
Figure 9. Chemical structure of (a) luteolin, (b) hesperidin, (c) eriocitrin, and (d) rosmarinic acid.
Figure 9. Chemical structure of (a) luteolin, (b) hesperidin, (c) eriocitrin, and (d) rosmarinic acid.
Plants 10 02148 g009
Figure 10. Chemical structure of D-limonen.
Figure 10. Chemical structure of D-limonen.
Plants 10 02148 g010
Figure 11. Chemical structure of (a) pinocembrin and (b) pinobanksin.
Figure 11. Chemical structure of (a) pinocembrin and (b) pinobanksin.
Plants 10 02148 g011
Figure 12. Chemical structure of (a) caffeic acid, (b) rosmarinic acid, (c) camphor, and (d) luteolin.
Figure 12. Chemical structure of (a) caffeic acid, (b) rosmarinic acid, (c) camphor, and (d) luteolin.
Plants 10 02148 g012
Figure 13. Chemical structure of (a) eugenol and (b) β-caryophyllene.
Figure 13. Chemical structure of (a) eugenol and (b) β-caryophyllene.
Plants 10 02148 g013
Figure 14. Chemical structure of (a) terpinen-4-ol and (b) 1,8-cineole.
Figure 14. Chemical structure of (a) terpinen-4-ol and (b) 1,8-cineole.
Plants 10 02148 g014
Figure 15. Chemical structure of (a) thymol and (b) carvacrol.
Figure 15. Chemical structure of (a) thymol and (b) carvacrol.
Plants 10 02148 g015
Figure 16. Chemical structure of (a) genistein and (b) daidzein.
Figure 16. Chemical structure of (a) genistein and (b) daidzein.
Plants 10 02148 g016
Figure 17. The main types of cell cultures used in dentistry.
Figure 17. The main types of cell cultures used in dentistry.
Plants 10 02148 g017
Figure 18. Morphological aspect of some of the most frequently used cell lines in the dental field: (a) primary gingival keratinocytes (PGK); (b) human primary gingival fibroblasts (HGF); (c) human keratinocyte (HaCaT) and (d) human tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC4). 20× magnification.
Figure 18. Morphological aspect of some of the most frequently used cell lines in the dental field: (a) primary gingival keratinocytes (PGK); (b) human primary gingival fibroblasts (HGF); (c) human keratinocyte (HaCaT) and (d) human tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC4). 20× magnification.
Plants 10 02148 g018
Table 1. Examples of natural compounds and their use in dentistry.
Table 1. Examples of natural compounds and their use in dentistry.
Natural CompoundsDentistry ApplicationsReferences
α-thujone, and β-thujoneAntimicrobial activity against S. mutans, L. rhamnosus and A. viscosus
Anticandidal activities
Antiplaque activity
[36]
AllicinAntimicrobial activity against S. mutans, S.sobrinus, and A. oris[37]
CarvoneTreatment of gingivitis and periodontal disease[5]
CatechinsAntibacterial activity against S. mutans and S. sobrinus[38]
ChitosanAntihemorrhagic
Analgesic
Anti-inflamatory activity
Antibacterial and antifungal activity
[39]
Cinnamonic acidPeriodontitis treatment
Decreases periodontal inflammation
Antibacterial activity against S. mutans and L. casei
[40,41]
CurcuminAntioxidant and anti-inflamatory activity
Analgesic in dental pain
[42]
EugenolAntibacterial activity against P. gingivalis
Antibiofilm activity against C. albicans and S. mutans
Anti-inflammatory activity
[41,43]
GingerolAnti-inflamatory activity
Antioxidant activity
Antimicrobial activity against P. gingivalis and P. endodontalis
Treatment of recurrent apthous stomatitis, xerostomia, dental caries and gingivitis
[44]
LinaloolAntibacterial activity against P. gingivalis and S. mutans[41]
MentholAntiplaque and anti-gingivitis agent[45]
SanguinarineGingivitis and periodontal disease[46]
tt-FarnesolAntimicrobial activity against S. mutans[47]
Rosmarinic acidAntimicrobial activity on Gram-negative and positive bacteria (S. aureus, S. albus, V. cholerae and E. coli)[5]
ThymolAntibacterial activity against S. mutans[48]
QuercetinTreatment of cancers, periodontal disease, oral lesions, tooth decay, and oral infections[49]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Milutinovici, R.-A.; Chioran, D.; Buzatu, R.; Macasoi, I.; Razvan, S.; Chioibas, R.; Corlan, I.V.; Tanase, A.; Horia, C.; Popovici, R.A.; et al. Vegetal Compounds as Sources of Prophylactic and Therapeutic Agents in Dentistry. Plants 2021, 10, 2148. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102148

AMA Style

Milutinovici R-A, Chioran D, Buzatu R, Macasoi I, Razvan S, Chioibas R, Corlan IV, Tanase A, Horia C, Popovici RA, et al. Vegetal Compounds as Sources of Prophylactic and Therapeutic Agents in Dentistry. Plants. 2021; 10(10):2148. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102148

Chicago/Turabian Style

Milutinovici, Raluca-Adriana, Doina Chioran, Roxana Buzatu, Ioana Macasoi, Susan Razvan, Raul Chioibas, Ion Virgil Corlan, Alina Tanase, Calniceanu Horia, Ramona Amina Popovici, and et al. 2021. "Vegetal Compounds as Sources of Prophylactic and Therapeutic Agents in Dentistry" Plants 10, no. 10: 2148. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102148

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop