Next Article in Journal
Accuracy of Ground Surface Interpolation from Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) Data in Dense Forest Cover
Next Article in Special Issue
A CitSci Approach for Rapid Earthquake Intensity Mapping: A Case Study from Istanbul (Turkey)
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing Safety and Suitability of Old Trails for Hiking Using Ground and Drone Surveys
Previous Article in Special Issue
Eliciting Knowledge on Technical and Legal Aspects of Participatory Toponym Handling
Open AccessArticle

Citizens’ Spatial Footprint on Twitter—Anomaly, Trend and Bias Investigation in Istanbul

Geomatics Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, Turkey
School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9(4), 222;
Received: 11 March 2020 / Revised: 30 March 2020 / Accepted: 4 April 2020 / Published: 7 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Citizen Science and Geospatial Capacity Building)
Social media (SM) can be an invaluable resource in terms of understanding and managing the effects of catastrophic disasters. In order to use SM platforms for public participatory (PP) mapping of emergency management activities, a bias investigation should be undertaken with regard to the data related to the study area (urban, regional or national, etc.) to determine the spatial data dynamics. Thus, such determinations can be made on how SM can be used and interpreted in terms of PP. In this study, the city of Istanbul was chosen for social media data research area, as it is one of the most crowded cities in the world and expecting a major earthquake. The methodology for the data investigation is: 1. Obtain data and engage sampling, 2. Identify the representation and temporal biases in the data and normalize it in response to representation bias, 3. Identify general anomalies and spatial anomalies, 4. Manipulate the trend of the dataset with the discretization of anomalies and 5. Examine the spatiotemporal bias. Using this bias investigation methodology, citizen footprint dynamics in the city were determined and reference maps (most likely regional anomaly maps, representation maps, time-space bias maps, etc.) were produced. The outcomes of the study can be summarized in four steps. First, highly active users generate the majority of the data and removing this data as a general approach within a pseudo-cleaning process means concealing a large amount of data. Second, data normalization in terms of activity levels, changes the anomaly outcome resulting from diverse representation levels of users. Third, spatiotemporally normalized data present strong spatial anomaly tendency in some parts of the central area. Fourth, trend data is dense in the central area and the spatiotemporal bias assessments show the data density varies in terms of the time of day, day of week and season of the year. The methodology proposed in this study can be used to extract the unbiased daily routines of the social media data of the regions for the normal days and this can be referred for the emergency or unexpected event cases to detect the change or impacts. View Full-Text
Keywords: volunteered geographic information; social media; public participation; spatiotemporal bias volunteered geographic information; social media; public participation; spatiotemporal bias
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Gulnerman, A.G.; Karaman, H.; Pekaslan, D.; Bilgi, S. Citizens’ Spatial Footprint on Twitter—Anomaly, Trend and Bias Investigation in Istanbul. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 222.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop