Next Article in Journal
Integrated UAV-Based Real-Time Mapping for Security Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Constructing Geographic Dictionary from Streaming Geotagged Tweets
Previous Article in Special Issue
GeoAnnotator: A Collaborative Semi-Automatic Platform for Constructing Geo-Annotated Text Corpora
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Why Shape Matters—On the Inherent Qualities of Geometric Shapes for Cartographic Representations

Research Division Cartography, Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Vienna University of Technology, 1040 Vienna, Austria
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8(5), 217; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8050217
Received: 15 November 2018 / Revised: 23 April 2019 / Accepted: 2 May 2019 / Published: 8 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human-Centered Geovisual Analytics and Visuospatial Display Design)
  |  
PDF [1328 KB, uploaded 8 May 2019]
  |  

Abstract

All human communication involves the use of signs. By following a mutually shared set of signs and rules, meaning can be conveyed from one entity to another. Cartographic semiology provides such a theoretical framework, suggesting how to apply visual variables with respect to thematic content. However, semiotics does not address how the choice and composition of such visual variables may lead to different connotations, interpretations, or judgments. The research herein aimed to identify perceived similarities between geometric shape symbols as well as strategies and processes underlying these similarity judgments. Based on a user study with 38 participants, the (dis)similarities of a set of 12 basic geometric shapes (e.g., circle, triangle, square) were examined. Findings from cluster analysis revealed a three-cluster configuration, while multidimensional scaling further quantified the proximities between the geometric shapes in a two-dimensional space. Qualitative and quantitative content analyses identified four strategies underlying the participants’ similarity judgments, namely visual, affective, associative, and behavioral strategies. With the findings combined, this research provides a differentiated perspective on shape proximities, cognitive relations, and the processes involved. View Full-Text
Keywords: visual communication; cartography; semiotics; geometric shape; thematic maps visual communication; cartography; semiotics; geometric shape; thematic maps
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Klettner, S. Why Shape Matters—On the Inherent Qualities of Geometric Shapes for Cartographic Representations. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 217.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. EISSN 2220-9964 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top