Influence of Sample Size on Automatic Positional Accuracy Assessment Methods for Urban Areas
AbstractIn recent years, new approaches aimed to increase the automation level of positional accuracy assessment processes for spatial data have been developed. However, in such cases, an aspect as significant as sample size has not yet been addressed. In this paper, we study the influence of sample size when estimating the planimetric positional accuracy of urban databases by means of an automatic assessment using polygon-based methodology. Our study is based on a simulation process, which extracts pairs of homologous polygons from the assessed and reference data sources and applies two buffer-based methods. The parameter used for determining the different sizes (which range from 5 km up to 100 km) has been the length of the polygons’ perimeter, and for each sample size 1000 simulations were run. After completing the simulation process, the comparisons between the estimated distribution functions for each sample and population distribution function were carried out by means of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Results show a significant reduction in the variability of estimations when sample size increased from 5 km to 100 km. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Ariza-López, F.J.; Ruiz-Lendínez, J.J.; Ureña-Cámara, M.A. Influence of Sample Size on Automatic Positional Accuracy Assessment Methods for Urban Areas. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2018, 7, 200.
Ariza-López FJ, Ruiz-Lendínez JJ, Ureña-Cámara MA. Influence of Sample Size on Automatic Positional Accuracy Assessment Methods for Urban Areas. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2018; 7(6):200.Chicago/Turabian Style
Ariza-López, Francisco J.; Ruiz-Lendínez, Juan J.; Ureña-Cámara, Manuel A. 2018. "Influence of Sample Size on Automatic Positional Accuracy Assessment Methods for Urban Areas." ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 7, no. 6: 200.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.