Next Article in Journal
Heading Estimation with Real-time Compensation Based on Kalman Filter Algorithm for an Indoor Positioning System
Previous Article in Journal
Parallel Landscape Driven Data Reduction & Spatial Interpolation Algorithm for Big LiDAR Data
Concept Paper

Evaluation of Deterministic and Complex Analytical Hierarchy Process Methods for Agricultural Land Suitability Analysis in a Changing Climate

1
Faculty of Science Engineering and Built Environment, Centre for Regional and Rural Futures, Deakin University, Melbourne 3125, Australia
2
Department of Spatial Economics, SPINlab, Vrije University Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Wolfgang Kainz
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2016, 5(6), 99; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5060099
Received: 11 March 2016 / Revised: 23 May 2016 / Accepted: 13 June 2016 / Published: 20 June 2016
Land suitability analysis is employed to evaluate the appropriateness of land for a particular purpose whilst integrating both qualitative and quantitative inputs, which can be continuous in nature. However, in agricultural modelling there is often a disregard of this contiguous aspect. Therefore, some parametric procedures for suitability analysis compartmentalise units into defined membership classes. This imposition of crisp boundaries neglects the continuous formations found throughout nature and overlooks differences and inherent uncertainties found in the modelling. This research will compare two approaches to suitability analysis over three differing methods. The primary approach will use an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), while the other approach will use a Fuzzy AHP over two methods; Fitted Fuzzy AHP and Nested Fuzzy AHP. Secondary to this, each method will be assessed into how it behaves in a climate change scenario to understand and highlight the role of uncertainties in model conceptualisation and structure. Outputs and comparisons between each method, in relation to area, proportion of membership classes and spatial representation, showed that fuzzy modelling techniques detailed a more robust and continuous output. In particular the Nested Fuzzy AHP was concluded to be more pertinent, as it incorporated complex modelling techniques, as well as the initial AHP framework. Through this comparison and assessment of model behaviour, an evaluation of each methods predictive capacity and relevance for decision-making purposes in agricultural applications is gained. View Full-Text
Keywords: land suitability; Analytical Hierarchy Process; Fuzzy Analysis; Fuzzy AHP; agriculture; climate land suitability; Analytical Hierarchy Process; Fuzzy Analysis; Fuzzy AHP; agriculture; climate
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Romeijn, H.; Faggian, R.; Diogo, V.; Sposito, V. Evaluation of Deterministic and Complex Analytical Hierarchy Process Methods for Agricultural Land Suitability Analysis in a Changing Climate. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2016, 5, 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5060099

AMA Style

Romeijn H, Faggian R, Diogo V, Sposito V. Evaluation of Deterministic and Complex Analytical Hierarchy Process Methods for Agricultural Land Suitability Analysis in a Changing Climate. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2016; 5(6):99. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5060099

Chicago/Turabian Style

Romeijn, Harmen, Robert Faggian, Vasco Diogo, and Victor Sposito. 2016. "Evaluation of Deterministic and Complex Analytical Hierarchy Process Methods for Agricultural Land Suitability Analysis in a Changing Climate" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 5, no. 6: 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5060099

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop