Next Article in Journal
Indoor Positioning for Smartphones Using Asynchronous Ultrasound Trilateration
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Source Data Processing Middleware for Land Monitoring within a Web-Based Spatial Data Infrastructure for Siberia
Open AccessArticle

Evaluation of Model Validation Techniques in Land Cover Dynamics

1
School of Geography & Environmental Science, Building 11, Clayton Campus, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia
2
Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2013, 2(3), 577-597; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi2030577
Received: 30 April 2013 / Revised: 17 June 2013 / Accepted: 19 June 2013 / Published: 26 June 2013
This paper applies different methods of map comparison to quantify the characteristics of three different land change models. The land change models used for simulation are termed as “Stochastic Markov (St_Markov)”, “Cellular Automata Markov (CA_Markov)” and “Multi Layer Perceptron Markov (MLP_Markov)” models. Various model validation techniques such as per category method, kappa statistics, components of agreement and disagreement, three map comparison and fuzzy methods have then been applied. A comparative analysis of the validation techniques has also been discussed. In all cases, it is found that “MLP_Markov” gives the best results among the three modeling techniques. Fuzzy set theory is the method that seems best able to distinguish areas of minor spatial errors from major spatial errors. Based on the outcome of this paper, it is recommended that scientists should try to use the Kappa, three map comparison and fuzzy methods for model validation. This paper facilitates communication among land change modelers, because it illustrates the range of results for a variety of model validation techniques and articulates priorities for future research. View Full-Text
Keywords: model validation; map comparison; land cover change; Kappa; fuzzy; Markov chain; cellular automata; artificial neural network; three map comparison model validation; map comparison; land cover change; Kappa; fuzzy; Markov chain; cellular automata; artificial neural network; three map comparison
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahmed, B.; Ahmed, R.; Zhu, X. Evaluation of Model Validation Techniques in Land Cover Dynamics. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2013, 2, 577-597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi2030577

AMA Style

Ahmed B, Ahmed R, Zhu X. Evaluation of Model Validation Techniques in Land Cover Dynamics. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2013; 2(3):577-597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi2030577

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahmed, Bayes; Ahmed, Raquib; Zhu, Xuan. 2013. "Evaluation of Model Validation Techniques in Land Cover Dynamics" ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2, no. 3: 577-597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi2030577

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop