This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
On the Use of LLMs for GIS-Based Spatial Analysis
by
Roberto Pierdicca
Roberto Pierdicca 1,*
,
Nikhil Muralikrishna
Nikhil Muralikrishna 1
,
Flavio Tonetto
Flavio Tonetto 2
and
Alessandro Ghianda
Alessandro Ghianda 3
1
Department of Civil Engineering, Construction and Architecture (DICEA), Marche Polytechnic University, 60128 Ancona, Italy
2
Sinergia EPC S.r.l Pesaro, 61121 Pesaro, Italy
3
EBWorld S.r.l, Information Technology and Services, 61122 Pesaro, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2025, 14(10), 401; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14100401 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 16 July 2025
/
Revised: 30 September 2025
/
Accepted: 7 October 2025
/
Published: 14 October 2025
Abstract
This paper presents an approach integrating Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4 and the open-source DeepSeek-R1, into Geographic Information System (GIS) workflows to enhance the accessibility, flexibility, and efficiency of spatial analysis tasks. We designed and implemented a system capable of interpreting natural language instructions provided by users and translating them into automated GIS workflows through dynamically generated Python scripts. An interactive graphical user interface (GUI), built using CustomTkinter, was developed to enable intuitive user interaction with GIS data and processes, reducing the need for advanced programming or technical expertise. We conducted an empirical evaluation of this approach through a comparative case study involving typical GIS tasks such as spatial data validation, data merging, buffer analysis, and thematic mapping using urban datasets from Pesaro, Italy. The performance of our automated system was directly compared against traditional manual workflows executed by 10 experienced GIS analysts. The results from this evaluation indicate a substantial reduction in task completion time, decreasing from approximately 1 h and 45 min in the manual approach to roughly 27 min using our LLM-driven automation, without compromising analytical quality or accuracy. Furthermore, we systematically evaluated the system’s factual reliability using a diverse set of geospatial queries, confirming robust performance for practical GIS tasks. Additionally, qualitative feedback emphasized improved usability and accessibility, particularly for users without specialized GIS training. These findings highlight the significant potential of integrating LLMs into GISs, demonstrating clear advantages in workflow automation, user-friendliness, and broader adoption of advanced spatial analysis methodologies.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Pierdicca, R.; Muralikrishna, N.; Tonetto, F.; Ghianda, A.
On the Use of LLMs for GIS-Based Spatial Analysis. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2025, 14, 401.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14100401
AMA Style
Pierdicca R, Muralikrishna N, Tonetto F, Ghianda A.
On the Use of LLMs for GIS-Based Spatial Analysis. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2025; 14(10):401.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14100401
Chicago/Turabian Style
Pierdicca, Roberto, Nikhil Muralikrishna, Flavio Tonetto, and Alessandro Ghianda.
2025. "On the Use of LLMs for GIS-Based Spatial Analysis" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 14, no. 10: 401.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14100401
APA Style
Pierdicca, R., Muralikrishna, N., Tonetto, F., & Ghianda, A.
(2025). On the Use of LLMs for GIS-Based Spatial Analysis. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 14(10), 401.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14100401
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.