Next Article in Journal
An Evaluation Model for Analyzing Robustness and Spatial Closeness of 3D Indoor Evacuation Networks
Next Article in Special Issue
Cloud and Snow Segmentation in Satellite Images Using an Encoder–Decoder Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Previous Article in Journal
Cascaded Attention DenseUNet (CADUNet) for Road Extraction from Very-High-Resolution Images
Article

Implicit, Formal, and Powerful Semantics in Geoinformation

Institute for Electromagnetic Sensing of the Environment, National Research Council of Italy, via Bassini 15, I20133 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Wolfgang Kainz
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10(5), 330; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10050330
Received: 12 March 2021 / Revised: 21 April 2021 / Accepted: 1 May 2021 / Published: 13 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence for Multisource Geospatial Information)
Distinct, alternative forms of geosemantics, whose classification is often ill-defined, emerge in the management of geospatial information. This paper proposes a workflow to identify patterns in the different practices and methods dealing with geoinformation. From a meta-review of the state of the art in geosemantics, this paper first pinpoints “keywords” representing key concepts, challenges, methods, and technologies. Then, we illustrate several case studies, following the categorization into implicit, formal, and powerful (i.e., soft) semantics depending on the kind of their input. Finally, we associate the case studies with the previously identified keywords and compute their similarities in order to ascertain if distinguishing methodologies, techniques, and challenges can be related to the three distinct forms of semantics. The outcomes of the analysis sheds some light on the diverse methods and technologies that are more suited to model and deal with specific forms of geosemantics. View Full-Text
Keywords: geosemantics; implicit semantics; formal semantics; powerful semantics geosemantics; implicit semantics; formal semantics; powerful semantics
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Bordogna, G.; Fugazza, C.; Tagliolato Acquaviva d’Aragona, P.; Carrara, P. Implicit, Formal, and Powerful Semantics in Geoinformation. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10050330

AMA Style

Bordogna G, Fugazza C, Tagliolato Acquaviva d’Aragona P, Carrara P. Implicit, Formal, and Powerful Semantics in Geoinformation. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2021; 10(5):330. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10050330

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bordogna, Gloria, Cristiano Fugazza, Paolo Tagliolato Acquaviva d’Aragona, and Paola Carrara. 2021. "Implicit, Formal, and Powerful Semantics in Geoinformation" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 10, no. 5: 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10050330

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop