This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessReview
From Cooperative Dual-Arm Manipulators to Cooperative Multi-Arm Manipulators—Where Are We Standing Today?
1
Automation Computervison and Robotics (ACRO), Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Wetenschapspark 27, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
2
Flanders Make@KU Leuven, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 300, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Robotics 2026, 15(5), 97; https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics15050097 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 18 March 2026
/
Revised: 24 April 2026
/
Accepted: 6 May 2026
/
Published: 11 May 2026
Abstract
This paper highlights the state of the art in Cooperative Dual-Manipulation (CDM) and Cooperative Multi-Manipulation (CMM), comparing advances in modeling, control, planning, sensing, vision, and end-effector technologies. Methods originally established in CDM have been extended or adapted to support higher complexity of CMM. A historical timeline visualizes the steady growth of cooperative manipulation (CM) and the recent acceleration of CMM driven by rising process complexity and the need for more flexible automation strategies. CM is becoming increasingly relevant as industrial processes demand higher payload capacity, larger workspaces, and greater flexibility. In addition, this paper categorizes existing applications by cooperation type and application domain. Here, a clear dominance of simultaneous object manipulation tasks is visible (fixation-fixation). However, fixation-tooling tasks, where one manipulator grasps the product while another performs a tool operation, and tooling-tooling tasks, where multiple manipulators perform tool operations simultaneously, remain significantly underrepresented. A similar imbalance is found for rigid/non-deformable object manipulation and flexible/deformable object manipulation, respectively. Based on this review, several research gaps are identified: (i) reliable flexible object manipulation methods; (ii) CM strategies for disassembly (e.g., battery pack deconstruction); (iii) complexity in control and planning for multi-manipulator systems; (iv) pathways to industrial deployment beyond laboratory demonstrators; and (v) task-specific tooling and end-effector innovation.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Ketelbuters, L.; Engelen, B.; Dekker, I.; Kellens, K.
From Cooperative Dual-Arm Manipulators to Cooperative Multi-Arm Manipulators—Where Are We Standing Today? Robotics 2026, 15, 97.
https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics15050097
AMA Style
Ketelbuters L, Engelen B, Dekker I, Kellens K.
From Cooperative Dual-Arm Manipulators to Cooperative Multi-Arm Manipulators—Where Are We Standing Today? Robotics. 2026; 15(5):97.
https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics15050097
Chicago/Turabian Style
Ketelbuters, Lander, Bart Engelen, Ivo Dekker, and Karel Kellens.
2026. "From Cooperative Dual-Arm Manipulators to Cooperative Multi-Arm Manipulators—Where Are We Standing Today?" Robotics 15, no. 5: 97.
https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics15050097
APA Style
Ketelbuters, L., Engelen, B., Dekker, I., & Kellens, K.
(2026). From Cooperative Dual-Arm Manipulators to Cooperative Multi-Arm Manipulators—Where Are We Standing Today? Robotics, 15(5), 97.
https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics15050097
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.