Next Article in Journal
Correction: Greve, D.; Kreischer, C. Methodology for Integrated Design Optimization of Actuation Systems for Exoskeletons. Robotics 2024, 13, 158
Previous Article in Journal
Embodied AI with Foundation Models for Mobile Service Robots: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design an Adaptive PID Control Based on RLS with a Variable Forgetting Factor for a Reconfigurable Cable-Driven Parallel Mechanism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Adaptive and Nonlinear Control of Robotics

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and the NanoScience Technology Center, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
Robotics 2026, 15(3), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics15030056
Submission received: 24 February 2026 / Revised: 3 March 2026 / Accepted: 4 March 2026 / Published: 6 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Adaptive and Nonlinear Control of Robotics)
It is my pleasure to present the Special Issue “Adaptive and Nonlinear Control of Robotics”, which brings together nine original research contributions exploring state-of-the-art control strategies for robotic systems operating under nonlinear dynamics, uncertain parameters, reconfiguration, or complex physical constraints. The platforms considered in this issue—including cable-driven parallel robots, underactuated manipulators, soft continuum arms, industrial manipulators, teleoperation systems, and bio-inspired swimmers—reflect the diversity of modern robotics and the need for robust, adaptive, and energy-efficient control beyond classical linear paradigms.
One contribution investigates adaptive PID control for a reconfigurable cable-driven parallel mechanism, where dynamic changes in topology challenge conventional fixed-gain controllers. By embedding a real-time parameter estimation scheme, the adaptive controller maintains precise pose control despite structural reconfigurations, demonstrating the potential of adaptive control in complex reconfigurable robots [1]. Another study addresses underactuated serial planar manipulators by combining optimal control and nonlinear dynamics to derive minimum-energy trajectories that suppress residual vibrations, showing that underactuated robots can achieve efficient and stable motion with proper control design [2].
Soft robotics is represented through a study on a continuum manipulator for minimally invasive surgery, which compares sliding-mode and adaptive controllers under model uncertainty and elasticity-induced nonlinearity. The experiments demonstrate that adaptive control improves tracking accuracy, albeit with slower transient response, highlighting the practical trade-offs in soft robotic control [3]. In the industrial robotics domain, a “quantum-inspired” sliding-mode controller is applied to a six-joint articulated arm, reducing chattering, improving trajectory-tracking precision, and decreasing energy consumption relative to classical sliding-mode control, pointing toward energy-efficient, high-precision industrial applications [4].
Human–robot interaction and assistive robotics are addressed by a study on an upper-limb exoskeleton, where online tuning of sliding-mode controller gains via a particle swarm optimization algorithm significantly reduces tracking error under unpredictable human-driven disturbances [5]. Another contribution focuses on teleoperation systems with time-varying delays and uncertainties, employing robust adaptive sliding-mode control to enhance stability and tracking performance, which is critical for remote manipulation tasks [6]. The work in [7] proposes and simulates a 3-DOF aircraft-manipulator system for longitudinal virtual flight testing in a wind tunnel, using a coupled dynamic model and PID-controlled inverse kinematics to replicate free-flight trajectories and demonstrate its feasibility.
Execution of dynamic tasks is explored in a study on prescribed-time interception for moving objects using robotic manipulators, combining nonlinear control with trajectory planning to ensure interception at predefined times despite uncertainties [8]. Additionally, event-driven closed-loop control is demonstrated on a three-link bio-inspired swimmer, illustrating that adaptive nonlinear control can extend to unconventional locomotion robots [9].
Collectively, these contributions highlight the maturation of nonlinear and adaptive control from theoretical research into practical, application-ready methodologies. They illustrate how modern control design—through parameter estimation, optimization, sliding-mode control, Lyapunov methods, and metaheuristic tuning—can address real-world challenges in reconfigurable robots, underactuated systems, soft manipulators, energy-efficient motion, human–robot interaction, teleoperation under delays, and dynamic task execution. At the same time, they underscore ongoing challenges: achieving rapid adaptation without compromising stability, balancing precision with transient response, ensuring safe human–robot interaction, reducing computational load for real-time control, and integrating control with higher-level planning and perception.
I sincerely thank all the authors for their significant contributions, the reviewers for their constructive feedback, and the editorial team for their support in bringing this Special Issue to fruition. I hope this compilation serves as a valuable reference for researchers and practitioners striving to design the next generation of robust and adaptive robotic systems.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Khoshbin, E.; Otis, M.J.D.; Meziane, R. Design an Adaptive PID Control Based on RLS with a Variable Forgetting Factor for a Reconfigurable Cable-Driven Parallel Mechanism. Robotics 2025, 14, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dona’, D.; Bettega, J.; Tamellin, I.; Boscariol, P.; Caracciolo, R. Minimum-Energy Trajectory Planning for an Underactuated Serial Planar Manipulator. Robotics 2025, 14, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, L.; Chen, K.; Franco, E. Robust and Adaptive Control of a Soft Continuum Manipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery. Robotics 2024, 13, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fazilat, M.; Zioui, N. Quantum-Inspired Sliding-Mode Control to Enhance the Precision and Energy Efficiency of an Articulated Industrial Robotic Arm. Robotics 2025, 14, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Méndez, D.S.; Bedolla-Martínez, D.; Saad, M.; Kali, Y.; Cena, C.E.G.; Álvarez, Á.L. Upper-Limb Robotic Rehabilitation: Online Sliding Mode Controller Gain Tuning Using Particle Swarm Optimization. Robotics 2025, 14, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chang, Y.H.; Yang, C.Y.; Lin, H.W. Robust Adaptive-Sliding-Mode Control for Teleoperation Systems with Time-Varying Delays and Uncertainties. Robotics 2024, 13, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ishola, A.; Whidborne, J.F.; Tang, G. An Aircraft-Manipulator System for Virtual Flight Testing of Longitudinal Dynamics. Robotics 2024, 13, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Flores-Campos, J.A.; Torres-San-Miguel, C.R.; Paredes-Rojas, J.C.; Perrusquía, A. Prescribed Time Interception of Moving Objects’ Trajectories Using Robot Manipulators. Robotics 2024, 13, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nuevo-Gallardo, C.; Mérida-Calvo, L.; Tejado, I.; Vinagre, B.M.; Feliu-Batlle, V. Event-Based Closed-Loop Control for Path Following of a Purcell’s Three-Link Swimmer. Robotics 2025, 14, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Behal, A. Adaptive and Nonlinear Control of Robotics. Robotics 2026, 15, 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics15030056

AMA Style

Behal A. Adaptive and Nonlinear Control of Robotics. Robotics. 2026; 15(3):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics15030056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Behal, Aman. 2026. "Adaptive and Nonlinear Control of Robotics" Robotics 15, no. 3: 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics15030056

APA Style

Behal, A. (2026). Adaptive and Nonlinear Control of Robotics. Robotics, 15(3), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics15030056

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop