Next Article in Journal
Minimum Energy Utilization Strategy for Fleet of Autonomous Robots in Urban Waste Management
Next Article in Special Issue
Online Odometry Calibration for Differential Drive Mobile Robots in Low Traction Conditions with Slippage
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Real-Time 3D Map Building in a Mobile Robot System with Low-Bandwidth Communication
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Implicit Shape Model Trees: Recognition of 3-D Indoor Scenes and Prediction of Object Poses for Mobile Robots

Robotics 2023, 12(6), 158; https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics12060158
by Pascal Meißner 1,*,† and Rüdiger Dillmann 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Robotics 2023, 12(6), 158; https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics12060158
Submission received: 20 October 2023 / Revised: 18 November 2023 / Accepted: 20 November 2023 / Published: 23 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Active Methods in Autonomous Navigation)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This paper discusses three main contributions to the area of active scene recognition - algorithms for ISM generation, and scene recognition and object pose prediction using ISMs. It also discusses the benefits of leveraging part-based models, while swapping out their traditional feature extraction techniques for CNN-based feature extraction.

Overall this paper does a great job setting up the background, describing the problem and previous work, outlining the novel approaches, and providing experimental results and analysis. I think this paper is ready for publication as-is.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

Thank you very much for your kind and encouraging feedback. It is most appreciated.

Kind regards

Pascal Meissner

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In general, the article is well written. The paper should interest enough for people who are interested in the subject of “mobile robotics and object scene recognition”. For this reason and based on the obtained results, I accept the paper for publication.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing of English language required

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

Thank you very much for the accurate summary and your feedback. We hope our revision addresses your concerns and requests.

Please find detailed responses to your comments in the attached PDF file.

Kind regards

Pascal Meissner

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The paper presents several improvements to previous work already published by the authors. These new contributions, although quite related to the previous work, are very relevant for improving the practical use of the method. The authors clearly identify throughout the paper which part is their previous work and which one corresponds to a new contribution.

I think that it will that the paper would be easier to follow if some figures and tables are grouped on the same page. As an example, I will cite Tables 1 and 2 and Figure 13 or Figures 6 and 7.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

Thanks a lot for this recommendation, as well as for the time and effort invested in reviewing our work.

As you suggested, Figures 6 and 7 have been placed on the same page.

Tables 1 and 2 and Figure 13 have also been brought together on one page. The caption of Table 2 has been adjusted so that everything fits on the same page.

We hope that these changes address your concern.

Kind regards

Pascal Meissner

Back to TopTop