Next Article in Journal
Intersecting Roles of Estrogens and Neutrophils in Modulating Innate Immunity in Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Disulfidptosis vs. Ferroptosis: A Comprehensive Review of SLC7A11-Mediated Metal Dyshomeostasis and Cell Death
Previous Article in Journal
Brain Lymphatic Dysfunction in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications
Previous Article in Special Issue
AGE-RAGE Axis Involvement in Allergies and Autoimmunity: Cellular Signaling, Barrier Dysfunction and Immune Polarization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Applying the Lessons of Physiological Cell Culture to Human Embryo Culture for In Vitro Fertilization

Department of Biological Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2026, 16(5), 618; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16050618
Submission received: 9 March 2026 / Revised: 17 April 2026 / Accepted: 20 April 2026 / Published: 22 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Section “Cellular Biochemistry”, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

Growth media for human cell culture were developed in the twentieth century, when the first immortal human cell lines were established. The nutrient compositions of these media arose not from a desire to reproduce the microenvironment of the cells in vivo, but rather to encourage continuous replicative growth. Armed with comprehensive datasets detailing the metabolomes of the various fluid compartments within which cells reside, cell culturists are now exploring the effects of media designed to reproduce the in vivo environment on cell biology. The early results of this research indicate the media composition has profound impacts on cell form and function. In parallel, taking care to maintain oxygen at the relatively low levels found in vivo also affects many cellular activities. The lessons learned from ‘physiological cell culture’ should be applied to the culture of human embryos in the in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinic, where a critical stage of growth and development might be best supported by recreating, to the greatest extent possible, the environment of the oviduct and uterus. In this review, we translate recent advancements in physiological cell culture to emerging approaches in human embryo culture.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Over the past 20 years, there has been a significant increase in the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), particularly in vitro fertilization (IVF), amongst couples experiencing infertility. In 2018, Canada saw over 16,000 IVF cycles performed, resulting in nearly 2500 pregnancies (Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society, 2019) [1]. Optimizing the success rates of this technique is an important objective of current reproductive medicine research.
Normally, an oocyte is released from an ovary and fertilized in the oviduct, where it develops into a cleavage-stage embryo, enters the uterus, and continues development into a blastocyst. The blastocyst implants in the uterus where it develops into a fetus. In IVF, oocytes are retrieved directly from the ovaries and then fertilized in a petri dish where they are maintained in a temperature-, humidity-, and gas-controlled incubator for typically 5–6 days prior to uterine implantation. Prior to uterine transfer and hopeful implantation, the fertilized egg grows, divides, and develops into a blastocyst with 70–100 cells. The quality of the blastocyst is of utmost importance to the success of the pregnancy—higher-quality blastocysts have a greater chance of becoming viable pregnancies [2]. For example, in a recent large study of 10,000 women undergoing a single blastocyst transfer, low-quality blastocysts resulted in a live birth 30% of the time, compared to 44% for higher-quality blastocysts [3]. Thus, blastocyst quality has immediate effects on the likelihood of a successful pregnancy; on the other hand, the longer-term consequences of lower-quality blastocysts that develop into a fetus are not well understood.
The early stages of embryo development are thus an important and sensitive time, during which it is essential to provide optimal conditions for development. It is during this stage of development that the maternal-to-zygotic transition (MZT) occurs, as maternal mRNA transcripts are gradually degraded and replaced by zygotic ones [4]. IVF culture conditions can influence the MZT by, for example, affecting the orchestration of DNA methylation events and thus gene expression [5]. Culture conditions also impinge upon nutrient sensing and signaling pathways that influence embryonic development. There is evidence that human embryos, as has been documented in many other mammalian species, undergo a growth-arrested diapause mediated by mTOR inhibition when their microenvironment is not conducive to development [6]. mTOR, the mechanistic target of rapamycin, is a key growth signaling node that is regulated by energy and amino acid availability and promotes a range of anabolic activities including protein synthesis [7]. Uterine implantation is compromised under such conditions, an obviously undesirable outcome for IVF. Thus, the details of embryo culture are critical to its future development.

2. The Advent of Physiological Cell Culture

Many mammalian cell biologists who routinely use cell culture as an experimental approach have begun to transition toward using more physiologically representative media and oxygen levels, particularly following the recent publication of several studies describing effects of non-physiological media (e.g., DMEM) on most aspects of cell function [8,9,10]; reviewed in [11]. Although most of this work has been done in cancer cell lines, where applied in relevant reproductive contexts, the impact is similar [12]. In general, the implications of physiological cell culture likely apply to any cell type, including those of the developing embryo. The purpose of this literature review is to examine the practice of embryo culture in IVF in the light of our increasing knowledge of how the nutrient composition of growth media modulates gene expression and instigates the ‘metabolic re-wiring’ of cells.
The goal of physiological cell culture is to mimic the characteristics of the in vivo microenvironment, an elusive goal since this is incredibly complex and dynamic. Two aspects that are generally more readily addressed, however, are growth medium composition and oxygen levels. We will first consider medium composition.
Most of the growth media used in routine culture of cells, including cancer cells, myoblasts, and fibroblasts, were developed in the mid-20th century. These media, including Dulbecco’s Modified Eagles Medium (DMEM) and Roswell Park Institute (RPMI) 1640, continue to be used today. However, in 2017, Human Plasma-Like Medium (HPLM) was developed as a physiological medium modeled on the human blood plasma metabolome. Cancer cell lines growing in HPLM were shown to have broadly altered transcriptomes and re-wired metabolism that affected their susceptibility to the chemotherapy drug 5-fluorouracil [13]. In 2019, Plasmax was developed as a more complete (i.e., more individual metabolites) plasma-like medium. Growth of several cancer cell lines in Plasmax versus standard cell culture media had broad effects, including reducing the pseudohypoxia artifact associated with non-physiological pyruvate concentrations in DMEM-F12. We have shown effects of Plasmax (versus DMEM) on cellular bioenergetics and mitochondrial network dynamics [9]. We recently developed a Tumour MicroEnvironment Medium (TMEM) with a composition based on the interstitial fluid metabolome of murine pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Growth of PDAC cells in TMEM and typical tumour hypoxia (1.5% O2) versus a plasma-like medium and physiologically normal oxygen levels (5% O2) again showed broad effects, encompassing the transcriptome, growth, and energy metabolism [14]. Growth of PC-3 prostate cancer cells in TMEM versus DMEM significantly altered their susceptibility to the chemotoxin docetaxel (unpublished observations). In summary, media composition consistently affects a wide range of cellular activities. Culturing cells in physiologically relevant nutrient conditions will improve the reproducibility and translatability of research, and its benefits may extend to embryo culture.

3. The In Vivo Environment of the Embryo

Any effort to reproduce an in vivo microenvironment in vitro requires that consideration be given to the nutrient metabolome. In this case, the relevant in vivo microenvironments to model in vitro are oviduct fluid and uterine fluid. There is surprisingly little data on the detailed metabolite composition of oviductal fluid. The most complete dataset for human oviduct fluid comes from the recent study by Utsunomiya et al. [15], who measured inorganic salts, glucose, organic acids, and amino acids in 28 females between 26 and 40 years of age (Table 1).

4. Issues with Current Commercially Provided Embryo Culture Media

The paucity of detailed metabolomic data for oviduct fluid has been a limitation in IVF. Perhaps equally important, however, is the reluctance of commercial providers of embryo culture media to disclose detailed formulations of their products [16,17]. IVF clinics generally use commercial media, and the companies that make and provide these have not shared their detailed formulations. This has happened despite evidence from some clinical trials that some of these commercial media may perform better than others (reviewed in [18]). As a result, it has previously been virtually impossible to assess the physiological relevance of existing media in terms of their similarity to oviduct fluid. This alarming information gap has been the topic of recent editorials [16].
Ultimately, the situation has been addressed not by voluntary disclosures of formulations but rather by extensive independent metabolomic analyses of human embryo culture media by Tarahomi et al. [19] and Zagers [17]. In the latter, 40 components of commercial embryo culture media, with and without recommended supplements, were identified and quantified. A total of 47 commercially available media marketed as being appropriate for fertilization, cleavage-stage, or blastocyst-stage human embryo culture were included in this study. Several of these were ‘continuous media’, marketed for use throughout the duration of embryo culture. In order to appropriately interpret the formulation of the various human embryo culture media, the human embryo developmental stages were aligned with menstrual cycle phases and anatomical locations previously established in the literature. Fertilization occurs in the ampulla of the oviduct, around midcycle, just following ovulation [20]. Therefore, we compared the compositions of select commercial fertilization media to the composition of human oviduct fluid during midcycle, around day 14 [15]. Similarly, since early cleavage occurs in the isthmus of the oviducts during the early luteal phase [20], the compositions of cleavage media were compared to human oviduct fluid at the luteal phase, around days 15–17 [15]. The blastocyst then reaches the uterus and implants on the uterine wall during the mid-to-late luteal phase [20]. Therefore, we compared human embryo blastocyst media to the composition of human uterine fluid [21]. These comparisons are shown in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 below, which are examples taken from many such analyses in [17].
Two trends are evident in the data. Firstly, the various commercial media marketed for use in any specific developmental stage vary widely in their compositions. While blastocyst-stage media tend to be more uniform amongst the examples shown here, the fertilization-stage media have little in common with each other (Table 2). Similar variability is seen amongst cleavage-stage media (Table 3). Secondly, the compositions of fertilization or cleavage-stage media do not closely resemble that of oviductal fluid, while blastocyst-stage media are generally reasonable approximations of uterine fluid.

5. Culture Media Metabolites Affect Intracellular Signaling and Gene Expression

There are numerous issues with the use of non-physiological growth media in human embryo culture. Some researchers and clinicians have advocated for the ‘let the embryo decide’ approach, i.e., providing nutrients in excess and allowing the developing embryo to take up those it needs [22]. However, recent research on physiological cell culture has shown that the result of this approach is a complex cellular-level adaptive response manifesting as changes to the transcriptome, rates of cell division, epigenetic regulation, and energy metabolism (reviewed in [11,23,24]). Indeed, virtually all cell properties that have been measured are affected by the composition of growth media. Below we discuss several examples of specific nutrient concentrations affecting cell biology that may impinge on the growth and development of the embryo.
Surprisingly, high levels of the D-lactate enantiomer were found in some commercial embryo culture media (Table 3 and Table 4). For example, it comprised ~50% of the total lactate found in Early Cleavage media and MultiBlast Blastocyst media from Irvine Scientific. D-lactate, the stereoisomer of L-lactate, cannot be metabolized to produce ATP to support embryonic development. In fact, a study by [19] found a correlation between elevated D-lactate levels and reduced cleavage rate, impaired blastocyst formation, and compromised implantation potential. Importantly, while histone lysine L-lactylation is thought to play a role in embryonic development [25,26], it is currently unclear whether D-lactate contributes to histone lactylation in this context. Irvine Scientific recently discontinued their Early Cleavage and MultiBlast media.
In the first several days post-fertilization, L-lactate appears to be an important energy source for the developing embryo (reviewed in [27]), whereas by the blastocyst stage it is a key metabolic end-product with intercellular signaling roles [28]. The lactate concentration in human oviduct is 5–10 mM (Table 1; [29]), which is appreciably higher than in blood plasma (1–2 mM; [30]). While the fertilization-stage media shown in Table 2 have similar L-lactate concentrations, cleavage-stage media range from 2.2 to 47.5 mM. Higher concentrations of L-lactate during the cleavage stage may have metabolic effects, including on the metabolism of pyruvate [31]. Moreover, L-lactate has roles in signaling and epigenetic regulation that may be of particular importance in the early embryo. Extracellular L-lactate concentration can affect epigenetic reprogramming during embryo development via histone lactylation [32,33,34]. Lactylation of histone lysine residues is an important epigenetic mechanism that links cellular metabolism to development. Aberrant lactylation has the potential to dysregulate key developmental processes, such as zygotic genome activation [35].
The suite of amino acids, and their individual concentrations, found in embryo culture media is particularly displaced from those found in oviduct and, to a lesser extent, uterine fluids. Essential amino acids play critical roles in protein synthesis, hormone production, neurotransmitter synthesis, immune function, energy regulation, and nutrient sensing. For example, leucine plays a key role in nutrient sensing via mTOR, impinging on the protein synthesis needed for cell division and differentiation [7]. Iyer et al. [6] recently demonstrated the role of mTOR in human blastocyst-stage development. Leucine is essentially absent in many fertilization- and cleavage-stage media, though it is much closer to physiologically relevant levels in blastocyst media. In general, the amino acid profile of early-stage culture media has particularly non-physiological amino acid compositions, in many cases.

6. Towards More Physiologically Representative Embryo Culture Media

The issue of physiological human embryo culture media has recently been addressed by Utsunomiya et al. [15], who developed OVIT medium based on the oviduct fluid metabolomic data listed above. Although the entire formulation was not provided by the authors, the amino acid concentrations are similar to the measured mean values of oviduct fluid (pooled) from Table 1 above. In a clinical trial including several thousand people, growth of embryos in this medium resulted in higher quality blastocysts for transfer than several commercial media. This outcome was particularly pronounced in patients with a maternal age of 38 and greater. Thus, this new physiological medium may be the best available option for human embryo culture yet.
One important consideration in embryo culture, as in any cell culture using physiological media, is the rate of nutrient depletion/waste accumulation. This is particularly relevant in continuous culture media, where the composition on day 5 may differ markedly from that on day 0 due to the continuous uptake of nutrients and excretion of metabolic wastes. We have recently reported rates of nutrient depletion from Plasmax by human cancer cells, showing that significant nutrient depletion can occur within 24 h in culture, necessitating daily media exchanges [36]. Rates of amino acid utilization from media have been evaluated in human embryo culture at blastocyst stage [37]. Leucine is consumed at a rate of about 5 pmol/embryo/h, or about 240 pmol/embryo over two days. For culture in 25 µL of medium with 185 µM leucine (total 4625 pmol leucine), this is only about 5% depletion and therefore unlikely to perturb signaling systems. However, for cleavage-stage culture with extremely low (or zero) concentrations of individual amino acids, depletion is possible and should be similarly assessed.
Another important consideration for the implementation of physiological embryo culture is the choice of sequential or continuous culture regimes, which differ with respect to how closely they attempt to recapitulate the changing nutrient environment of the developing embryo. The sequential approach involves the use of two chemically distinct media: one cleavage-stage medium, used for the first three days of culture, and one blastocyst-stage medium, used from day 3 onward. These media contain distinct metabolite profiles and seek to emulate the nutrient environment of the embryo across both stages. Cleavage-stage media, for example, are generally lower in their supply of amino acids and glucose, while including high levels of pyruvate and lactate, preferred metabolic fuels in early stages of development [38] (see Table 3). Blastocyst-stage media, on the other hand, are higher in their supply of amino acids and glucose (see Table 4). The adoption of separate culture media for each developmental stage ensures that culture conditions are tailored to suit the relatively quiescent metabolic state of the cleavage-stage embryo and the more highly glycolytic, biosynthetic state of the embryo in the blastocyst stage.
The continuous approach, on the other hand, involves the culture of embryos in single culture media that contain the entire range of nutrients needed for the duration of in vitro development. An example of this would be the OVIT culture medium described by Utsunomiya et al. [15], which uses pooled metabolomic data from human oviductal fluid in the midcycle and luteal phases to approximate the nutrient environment of the developing embryo. While this approach has some limitations, including the potential for nutrient depletion and waste accumulation, as well as the need to include nutrients at concentrations that may be inappropriate for individual developmental stages, its advantages include the ability to reduce handling and environmental disturbance, thereby maintaining more stable culture conditions and minimizing stress associated with temperature shifts, pH fluctuations, and repeated removal from the incubator.
Multiple laboratories have sought to investigate the outcomes associated with sequential versus continuous culture regimes, with respect to both blastocyst formation, embryo quality, and pregnancy/miscarriage rates; however, results have been conflicting and seem to depend on the outcome being measured. For example, while studies from Reed et al. [39] and López-Pelayo [40] observed that continuous culture media produce more high-quality embryos and increase blastocyst formation in vitro, a meta-analysis from Dieamant et al. [41] found that the choice of sequential or continuous media makes no difference to pregnancy and miscarriage rates. More recently, a study from Stimpfel et al. [42] found that continuous media produce fewer poor-quality embryos on day 3 of culture, but found no statistically significant effects with respect to pregnancy or live birth rates. Therefore, while there is certainly evidence to suggest that the choice of culture regime has significant effects on embryo quality during in vitro development, it is less clear whether these differences translate into meaningful improvements to clinical outcomes such as pregnancy or live birth rates. Future research in this field will certainly benefit from the adoption of standardized measures of embryo quality that evaluate the embryo’s epigenetic and metabolic states rather than relying solely on morphological or downstream clinical endpoints.

7. Oxygen Is a Key Variable in Embryo Culture

Most mammalian tissue cells exist in oxygen levels of 2–9% in vivo [43]–much lower than atmospheric levels of ~20.5%. Most standard CO2 incubators for mammalian cell culture do not regulate O2 levels, which equilibrate to ~18.5% due to the addition of 5% CO2 and water vapour. Thus, most mammalian cell culture for research purposes is performed under hyperoxic conditions. This has wide-ranging deleterious effects on cells, including increased reactive oxygen species production, increased oxidative DNA damage, reduced cell replication rates, and early onset replicative senescence [23]. It is therefore important to consider the exposure of human embryos to oxygen during in vitro culture.
Oxygen levels experienced by the embryo in vivo range from 5–7% in oviduct fluid to ~2% in the uterine cavity [44,45]. The effects of oxygen tension during mammalian embryo culture have been well studied over several decades. Numerous studies have reported that culture under low oxygen tension (typically 5–6% O2) improves embryo development and quality, including embryo morphology, blastocyst formation, and embryo utilization, and some studies have also reported improved implantation, pregnancy, cumulative pregnancy, or live birth outcomes relative to atmospheric oxygen [46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. However, these clinical benefits have not been observed consistently across studies. Some randomized studies reported improved embryo-quality-related endpoints without corresponding gains in ongoing pregnancy or live birth, and meta-analyses suggest that the evidence for improved clinical outcomes remains insufficient or of low certainty [50,51,54,55,56]. It is important to note that any effect of oxygen tension on clinical outcomes may be obscured by factors downstream of culture itself, since implantation and pregnancy depend not only on embryo competence but also on endometrial receptivity, embryo-transfer technique, and patient-specific factors [57]. In addition, oxygen is only one component of the culture system, and its effects may interact with other laboratory variables, including medium formulation and protein supplementation. Importantly, the absence of a clear difference in pregnancy or perinatal endpoints should not be interpreted as evidence that atmospheric and low-oxygen culture exert equivalent effects on the embryo, because atmospheric oxygen constitutes a hyperoxic condition relative to the in vivo environment, and its longer-term developmental consequences remain insufficiently defined. Consistent with this rationale, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) guidelines recommend culture in low oxygen tension in their current guidelines [58].
A further limitation of low-oxygen culture is that oxygen tension is usually defined by the incubator headspace rather than measured in the medium immediately surrounding the embryo. Thus, the oxygen concentration actually experienced by the embryo may differ from the nominal incubator setting and is likely shaped by factors such as medium volume, diffusion distance, oil overlay, embryo density, and developmental stage. As embryonic oxygen consumption increases during development, the local microenvironment may diverge further from the nominal gas-phase oxygen tension over time. Evidence from mouse and bovine embryos cultured in ambient air shows that oxygen gradients can form in the medium immediately surrounding the embryo and become more pronounced with developmental stage [59,60]. Thus, direct assessment of oxygen at the embryo level will be crucial for optimizing physiologically relevant culture conditions.
The type of incubator may have implications for physiological embryo culture. Where the developing embryo must be removed from the incubator repeatedly for morphological assessment under a microscope, fluctuations in temperature, CO2, pH, and O2 levels are expected to occur. Incubators that can image the embryos in situ would be expected to have greater stability. Kermack et al. [37] studied this with 585 sibling zygotes. 289 were cultured in incubators with self-contained imaging (time-lapse system; TLS), such that embryos were not removed for assessment. A total of 296 zygotes were incubated in standard incubators requiring them to be periodically removed for assessment. Interestingly, more zygotes cultured in TLS developed to the blastocyst stage (55%) versus 45% in standard incubators. Similarly, there were more high-quality embryos from culture in TLS incubators (31% versus 23%). Other studies of this nature have produced a variety of confirmatory or contradictory results [61,62,63,64,65,66]. Differences between studies may relate to time spent out of the incubator or other aspects of a clinic’s workflow. Further research must be done to confirm whether a certain type of incubator yields better blastocyst quality, but it is likely useful to avoid any environmental stress where possible.

8. Additional Considerations and Future Directions

8.1. Proteinaceous Sources in Embryo Culture Media

An additional and often underappreciated source of complexity in embryo culture media is protein supplementation. In routine IVF practice, media are commonly used with proteinaceous supplements such as human serum albumin (HSA) or more complex serum-derived supplements [67,68]. These additives can support embryo culture by binding or carrying lipids, metabolites, growth factors, and other bioactive molecules [67], but they are also among the least defined components of the culture system. Analyses of protein supplements used for human embryo culture have shown substantial compositional variability, including previously undescribed components and differences in metal content. Morbeck et al. noted high concentrations of pro-oxidant transition metals in many of these supplements, which may interact with oxygen and affect blastocyst development [68]. Broader analyses of commercial embryo media confirm that supplementation contributes further to the heterogeneity of the final formulations used in practice [17,68].
From the standpoint of physiological embryo culture, this is important because improving the ionic and metabolite composition of the base medium alone may not fully define the embryo microenvironment if the accompanying protein supplement remains variable or incompletely characterized. This concern may be especially relevant for albumin-based supplements, which can introduce batch-dependent molecular cargo into the culture system. Indeed, commercially available albumin preparations differ in their lipid composition, and these differences were associated with changes in embryo development, implantation, and fetal growth in a mouse model [69,70]. More standardized alternatives such as recombinant human albumin have supported embryo development comparably to plasma-derived HSA in prospective studies [68,71], although their bound molecular cargo may still differ depending on product formulation and should not be assumed to be physiologically representative.

8.2. Toward Dynamic Embryo Culture Systems

Static embryo culture in a microdrop is an imperfect representation of the in vivo environment. In vivo, the preimplantation embryo develops within a changing physical and chemical milieu as it moves through the oviduct and into the uterus. Accordingly, an important future direction is the development of dynamic culture systems, particularly microfluidic platforms, that permit tighter control of the embryo microenvironment over time and may allow a more physiologically relevant fluid movement, with nutrient renewal and waste removal, than conventional static culture [72,73]. Although such approaches remain under evaluation, they underscore that physiological embryo culture may ultimately require attention not only to medium composition and oxygen tension, but also to the physical culture platform itself.

8.3. Clinical, Translational, and Regulatory Barriers to Implementation

The implementation of more physiological embryo culture media in routine IVF practice will require more than evidence of altered embryo metabolism or improved preimplantation development. As we have discussed above, a major translational barrier is that embryo culture media are often commercial proprietary products with incompletely disclosed formulations, which limits independent mechanistic evaluation, cross-study comparison, and rational optimization [16]. In parallel, any new medium must be introduced within the strict quality-management framework of the IVF laboratory, where media should be embryo-culture grade, appropriately regulated for clinical use, accompanied by batch-specific quality-control documentation, and locally validated when adequate testing is not provided by the manufacturer [58]. Together, these issues suggest that physiological media will require not only a strong biological rationale, but also transparency, manufacturing consistency, laboratory validation, and convincing clinical evidence before widespread adoption can be justified.

9. Conclusions

The recent development and commercialization of plasma-based media such as Plasmax and HPLM has encouraged more widespread efforts to improve the physiological relevance and translatability of cell culture models. Here, we have argued that human embryo culture for IVF is a field in need of similar considerations. Remarkably, IVF clinics generally use commercially developed media whose composition is not disclosed. The compositions of various commercial media for IVF vary greatly in their nutrient levels, and the vast majority do not resemble oviductal fluid at specific stages of embryonic development. The embryo is highly sensitive to environmental conditions, and the inclusion of non-physiological metabolites, such as D-lactate, or metabolites at non-physiological concentrations, will challenge and potentially disrupt metabolic and epigenetic processes occurring during development. The findings of Utsunomiya et al. clearly demonstrate the importance of this, as they showed that incorporating oviduct-like nutrient levels to culture media improved outcomes for IVF patients. Further, while it has already been established that culture in low oxygen tensions increases the production of high-quality embryos, efforts should be made to ascertain how oxygen levels in the incubator headspace are reflected in the medium at the embryo level. IVF is perhaps the most important instance of physiological cell culture that should receive immediate attention in the light of recent findings from the broader cell biology community.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P. and J.A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.P. and J.A.S.; writing—review and editing, A.P., J.A.S., R.A. and J.E.W.; supervision, J.A.S. and R.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery grant (RGPIN 2020-05274) to J.A.S.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Canadian IVF Clinics Continue to Improve Patient Safety by Bringing the Multiple Pregnancy Rate Arising from IVF to an All-Time Low of 7.4%. Available online: https://cfas.ca/_Library/CARTR/2019_CARTR_Press_Release_PDF.pdf (accessed on 1 April 2026).
  2. Günther, V.; Dasari-Mettler, A.; Mettler, L.; von Otte, S.; Ackermann, J.; Maass, N.; Alkatout, I. Is Blastocyst Culture Responsible for Higher Pregnancy Rates? A Critical Analysis of the Day of Optimal Embryo Transfer and Embryo Quality. J. Bras. Reprod. Assist. 2022, 26, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Zou, H.; Kemper, J.M.; Hammond, E.R.; Xu, F.; Liu, G.; Xue, L.; Bai, X.; Liao, H.; Xue, S.; Zhao, S.; et al. Blastocyst Quality and Reproductive and Perinatal Outcomes: A Multinational Multicentre Observational Study. Hum. Reprod. 2023, 38, 2391–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Kojima, M.L.; Hoppe, C.; Giraldez, A.J. The Maternal-to-Zygotic Transition: Reprogramming of the Cytoplasm and Nucleus. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2025, 26, 245–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. Menezo, Y.; Clément, P.; Dale, B. DNA Methylation Patterns in the Early Human Embryo and the Epigenetic/Imprinting Problems: A Plea for a More Careful Approach to Human Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Iyer, D.P.; Khoei, H.H.; van der Weijden, V.A.; Kagawa, H.; Pradhan, S.J.; Novatchkova, M.; McCarthy, A.; Rayon, T.; Simon, C.S.; Dunkel, I.; et al. MTOR Activity Paces Human Blastocyst Stage Developmental Progression. Cell 2024, 187, 6566–6583.e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Szwed, A.; Kim, E.; Jacinto, E. Regulation and Metabolic Functions of MTORC1 and MTORC2. Physiol. Rev. 2021, 101, 1371–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Vande Voorde, J.; Ackermann, T.; Pfetzer, N.; Sumpton, D.; Mackay, G.; Kalna, G.; Nixon, C.; Blyth, K.; Gottlieb, E.; Tardito, S. Improving the Metabolic Fidelity of Cancer Models with a Physiological Cell Culture Medium. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaau7314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  9. Moradi, F.; Moffatt, C.; Stuart, J.A. The Effect of Oxygen and Micronutrient Composition of Cell Growth Media on Cancer Cell Bioenergetics and Mitochondrial Networks. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  10. Wang, J.; Peng, W.; Yu, A.; Fokar, M.; Mechref, Y. Comparative Transcriptomics and Proteomics of Cancer Cell Lines Cultivated by Physiological and Commercial Media. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Golikov, M.V.; Valuev-Elliston, V.T.; Smirnova, O.A.; Ivanov, A.V. Physiological Media in Studies of Cell Metabolism. Mol. Biol. 2022, 56, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Avellino, G.; Deshmukh, R.; Rogers, S.N.; Charnock-Jones, D.S.; Smith, G.C.S.; Tardito, S.; Aye, I.L.M.H. Physiologically Relevant Culture Medium Plasmax Improves Human Placental Trophoblast Stem Cell Function. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2023, 324, C878–C885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Cantor, J.R.; Abu-Remaileh, M.; Kanarek, N.; Freinkman, E.; Gao, X.; Louissaint, A.; Lewis, C.A.; Sabatini, D.M. Physiologic Medium Rewires Cellular Metabolism and Reveals Uric Acid as an Endogenous Inhibitor of UMP Synthase. Cell 2017, 169, 258–272.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Gardner, G.L.; Stuart, J.A. Tumour Microenvironment-Like Conditions Alter Pancreatic Cancer Cell Metabolism and Behaviour. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2024, 327, C959–C978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Utsunomiya, T.; Yao, T.; Itoh, H.; Kai, Y.; Kumasako, Y.; Setoguchi, M.; Nakagata, N.; Abe, H.; Ishikawa, M.; Kyono, K.; et al. Creation, Effects on Embryo Quality, and Clinical Outcomes of a New Embryo Culture Medium with 31 Optimized Components Derived from Human Oviduct Fluid: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial. Reprod. Med. Biol. 2022, 21, e12459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Paulson, R.J. What Do You Mean, You Don’t Know What Is in the Culture Media? F S Rep. 2023, 4, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Zagers, M.S.; Laverde, M.; Goddijn, M.; de Groot, J.J.; Schrauwen, F.A.P.; Vaz, F.M.; Mastenbroek, S. The Composition of Commercially Available Human Embryo Culture Media. Hum. Reprod. 2025, 40, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  18. Mantikou, E.; Youssef, M.A.F.M.; van Wely, M.; van der Veen, F.; Al-Inany, H.G.; Repping, S.; Mastenbroek, S. Embryo Culture Media and IVF/ICSI Success Rates: A Systematic Review. Hum. Reprod. Update 2013, 19, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  19. Tarahomi, M.; Vaz, F.M.; van Straalen, J.P.; Schrauwen, F.A.P.; van Wely, M.; Hamer, G.; Repping, S.; Mastenbroek, S. The Composition of Human Preimplantation Embryo Culture Media and Their Stability during Storage and Culture. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 34, 1450–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Moore, K.L.; Persaud, T.V.N.; Torchia, M.G. The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 11th ed.; Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tarahomi, M.; Zagers, M.S.; Zafardoust, S.; Mohammadzadeh, A.; Fathi, Z.; Sareban, H.; Fatemi, F.; Fakhr, S.; Hamer, G.; Repping, S.; et al. In vivo Human Uterine Temperature, pH, and Uterine Fluid Composition Analysis. bioRxiv 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Gruber, I.; Klein, M. Embryo Culture Media for Human IVF: Which Possibilities Exist? J. Turk. Ger. Gynecol. Assoc. 2011, 12, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  23. Alva, R.; Gardner, G.L.; Liang, P.; Stuart, J.A. Supraphysiological Oxygen Levels in Mammalian Cell Culture: Current State and Future Perspectives. Cells 2022, 11, 3123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Kes, M.M.G.; Berkers, C.R.; Drost, J. Bridging the Gap: Advancing Cancer Cell Culture to Reveal Key Metabolic Targets. Front. Oncol. 2024, 14, 1480613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Hu, X.; Tang, Y.; Zhao, W.; Liu, J.; Liu, Z.; Yang, Q.; Chu, M.; Tian, J.; An, L.; Wang, S. Lactate Promotes the Second Cell Fate Decision in Blastocysts by Prompting Primitive Endoderm Formation Through an Intercellular Positive Feedback Loop That Couples Paracrine FGF Signalling. Cell Prolif. 2025, 58, e70088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Yang, W.; Wang, P.; Cao, P.; Wang, S.; Yang, Y.; Su, H.; Nashun, B. Hypoxic in Vitro Culture Reduces Histone Lactylation and Impairs Pre-Implantation Embryonic Development in Mice. Epigenetics Chromatin 2021, 14, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  27. Lee, S.H.; Rinaudo, P.F. Metabolic Regulation of Preimplantation Embryo Development in Vivo and in Vitro: Molecular Mechanisms and Insights. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2024, 726, 150256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Gurner, K.H.; Gardner, D.K. Blastocyst-Derived Lactate as a Key Facilitator of Implantation. Biomolecules 2025, 15, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Gardner, D.K.; Lane, M.; Calderon, I.; Leeton, J. Environment of the Preimplantation Human Embryo in Vivo: Metabolite Analysis of Oviduct and Uterine Fluids and Metabolism of Cumulus Cells. Fertil. Steril. 1996, 65, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Ackermann, T.; Tardito, S. Cell Culture Medium Formulation and Its Implications in Cancer Metabolism. Trends Cancer 2019, 5, 329–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Lane, M.; Gardner, D.K. Lactate Regulates Pyruvate Uptake and Metabolism in the Preimplantation Mouse Embryo. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 62, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Li, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Lin, X.; Fu, X.; An, Y.; Zou, Y.; Wang, J.-X.; Wang, Z.; Yu, T. Lactate Metabolism in Human Health and Disease. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Lu, Z.; Zheng, X.; Shi, M.; Yin, Y.; Liang, Y.; Zou, Z.; Ding, C.; He, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Li, X. Lactylation: The Emerging Frontier in Post-Translational Modification. Front. Genet. 2024, 15, 1423213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, M.; Huang, X.; Liu, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, N.; Lei, L. Lactate Modulates Zygotic Genome Activation through H3K18 Lactylation Rather than H3K27 Acetylation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2024, 81, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Yang, D.; Zheng, H.; Lu, W.; Tian, X.; Sun, Y.; Peng, H. Histone Lactylation Is Involved in Mouse Oocyte Maturation and Embryo Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 4821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Gardner, G.L.; Moradi, F.; Moffatt, C.; Cliche, M.; Garlisi, B.; Gratton, J.; Mehmood, F.; Stuart, J.A. Rapid Nutrient Depletion to below the Physiological Range by Cancer Cells Cultured in Plasmax. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2022, 323, C823–C834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Kermack, A.J.; Fesenko, I.; Christensen, D.R.; Parry, K.L.; Lowen, P.; Wellstead, S.J.; Harris, S.F.; Calder, P.C.; Macklon, N.S.; Houghton, F.D. Incubator Type Affects Human Blastocyst Formation and Embryo Metabolism: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Hum. Reprod. 2022, 37, 2757–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Leese, H.J. Metabolism of the Preimplantation Embryo: 40 Years On. Reproduction 2012, 143, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  39. Reed, M.L.; Hamic, A.; Thompson, D.J.; Caperton, C.L. Continuous Uninterrupted Single Medium Culture without Medium Renewal versus Sequential Media Culture: A Sibling Embryo Study. Fertil. Steril. 2009, 92, 1783–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  40. López-Pelayo, I.; Gutiérrez-Romero, J.M.; Armada, A.I.M.; Calero-Ruiz, M.M.; De Acevedo-Yagüe, P.J.M. Comparison of Two Commercial Embryo Culture Media (SAGE-1 Step Single Medium vs. G1-PLUSTM/G2-PLUSTM Sequential Media): Influence on in Vitro Fertilization Outcomes and Human Embryo Quality. J. Bras. Reprod. Assist. 2018, 22, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Dieamant, F.; Petersen, C.G.; Mauri, A.L.; Comar, V.; Mattila, M.; Vagnini, L.D.; Renzi, A.; Petersen, B.; Ricci, J.; Oliveira, J.B.A.; et al. Single versus Sequential Culture Medium: Which Is Better at Improving Ongoing Pregnancy Rates? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Bras. Reprod. Assist. 2017, 21, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Stimpfel, M.; Bacer-Kermavner, L.; Jancar, N.; Vrtacnik-Bokal, E. The Influence of the Type of Embryo Culture Media on the Outcome of IVF/ICSI Cycles. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 59, 848–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Keeley, T.P.; Mann, G.E. Defining Physiological Normoxia for Improved Translation of Cell Physiology to Animal Models and Humans. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 161–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Ng, K.Y.B.; Mingels, R.; Morgan, H.; Macklon, N.; Cheong, Y. In Vivo Oxygen, Temperature and pH Dynamics in the Female Reproductive Tract and Their Importance in Human Conception: A Systematic Review. Hum. Reprod. Update 2018, 24, 15–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Marsico, T.V.; Silva, M.V.; Valente, R.S.; Annes, K.; Rissi, V.B.; Glanzner, W.G.; Sudano, M.J. Unraveling the Consequences of Oxygen Imbalance on Early Embryo Development: Exploring Mitigation Strategies. Animals 2023, 13, 2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  46. Ciray, H.N.; Aksoy, T.; Yaramanci, K.; Karayaka, I.; Bahceci, M. In Vitro Culture under Physiologic Oxygen Concentration Improves Blastocyst Yield and Quality: A Prospective Randomized Survey on Sibling Oocytes. Fertil. Steril. 2009, 91, 1459–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Kasterstein, E.; Strassburger, D.; Komarovsky, D.; Bern, O.; Komsky, A.; Raziel, A.; Friedler, S.; Ron-El, R. The Effect of Two Distinct Levels of Oxygen Concentration on Embryo Development in a Sibling Oocyte Study. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2013, 30, 1073–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Waldenström, U.; Engström, A.-B.; Hellberg, D.; Nilsson, S. Low-Oxygen Compared with High-Oxygen Atmosphere in Blastocyst Culture, a Prospective Randomized Study. Fertil. Steril. 2009, 91, 2461–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Van Montfoort, A.P.A.; Arts, E.G.J.M.; Wijnandts, L.; Sluijmer, A.; Pelinck, M.-J.; Land, J.A.; Van Echten-Arends, J. Reduced Oxygen Concentration during Human IVF Culture Improves Embryo Utilization and Cumulative Pregnancy Rates per Cycle. Hum. Reprod. Open 2020, 2020, hoz036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Herbemont, C.; Labrosse, J.; Bennani-Smires, B.; Cedrin-Durnerin, I.; Peigne, M.; Sermondade, N.; Sarandi, S.; Vivot, A.; Vicaut, E.; Talib, Z.; et al. Impact of Oxygen Tension According to Embryo Stage of Development: A Prospective Randomized Study. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  51. de los Santos, M.J.; Gámiz, P.; Albert, C.; Galán, A.; Viloria, T.; Pérez, S.; Romero, J.L.l.; Remohï, J. Reduced Oxygen Tension Improves Embryo Quality but Not Clinical Pregnancy Rates: A Randomized Clinical Study into Ovum Donation Cycles. Fertil. Steril. 2013, 100, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Dumoulin, J.C.M.; Meijers, C.J.J.; Bras, M.; Coonen, E.; Geraedts, J.P.M.; Evers, J.L.H. Effect of Oxygen Concentration on Human In-Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Culture*. Hum. Reprod. 1999, 14, 465–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Kovačič, B.; Vlaisavljević, V. Influence of Atmospheric versus Reduced Oxygen Concentration on Development of Human Blastocysts in Vitro: A Prospective Study on Sibling Oocytes. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2008, 17, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Nastri, C.O.; Nóbrega, B.N.; Teixeira, D.M.; Amorim, J.; Diniz, L.M.M.; Barbosa, M.W.P.; Giorgi, V.S.I.; Pileggi, V.N.; Martins, W.P. Low versus Atmospheric Oxygen Tension for Embryo Culture in Assisted Reproduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 106, 95–104.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Gomes Sobrinho, D.B.; Oliveira, J.B.A.; Petersen, C.G.; Mauri, A.L.; Silva, L.F.I.; Massaro, F.C.; Baruffi, R.L.R.; Cavagna, M.; Franco, J.G. IVF/ICSI Outcomes after Culture of Human Embryos at Low Oxygen Tension: A Meta-Analysis. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2011, 9, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  56. Gelo, N.; Kirinec, G.; Baldani, D.P.; Vrčić, H.; Ježek, D.; Milošević, M.; Stanić, P. Influence of Human Embryo Cultivation in a Classic CO2 Incubator with 20% Oxygen versus Benchtop Incubator with 5% Oxygen on Live Births: The Randomized Prospective Trial. Zygote 2019, 27, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Reshef, E.A.; Robles, A.; Hynes, J.S.; Turocy, J.M.; Forman, E.J. A Review of Factors Influencing the Implantation of Euploid Blastocysts after in Vitro Fertilization. F S Rev. 2022, 3, 105–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. ESHRE Guideline Group on Good Practice in IVF Labs; De los Santos, M.J.; Apter, S.; Coticchio, G.; Debrock, S.; Lundin, K.; Plancha, C.E.; Prados, F.; Rienzi, L.; Verheyen, G.; et al. Revised Guidelines for Good Practice in IVF Laboratories (2015). Hum. Reprod. 2016, 31, 685–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Trimarchi, J.R.; Liu, L.; Porterfield, D.M.; Smith, P.J.S.; Keefe, D.L. Oxidative Phosphorylation-Dependent and -Independent Oxygen Consumption by Individual Preimplantation Mouse Embryos. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 62, 1866–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Shiku, H.; Shiraishi, T.; Ohya, H.; Matsue, T.; Abe, H.; Hoshi, H.; Kobayashi, M. Oxygen Consumption of Single Bovine Embryos Probed by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 3751–3758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  61. Cruz, M.; Gadea, B.; Garrido, N.; Pedersen, K.S.; Martínez, M.; Pérez-Cano, I.; Muñoz, M.; Meseguer, M. Embryo Quality, Blastocyst and Ongoing Pregnancy Rates in Oocyte Donation Patients Whose Embryos Were Monitored by Time-Lapse Imaging. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2011, 28, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Rubio, I.; Galán, A.; Larreategui, Z.; Ayerdi, F.; Bellver, J.; Herrero, J.; Meseguer, M. Clinical Validation of Embryo Culture and Selection by Morphokinetic Analysis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the EmbryoScope. Fertil. Steril. 2014, 102, 1287–1294.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Barberet, J.; Chammas, J.; Bruno, C.; Valot, E.; Vuillemin, C.; Jonval, L.; Choux, C.; Sagot, P.; Soudry, A.; Fauque, P. Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Embryo Culture in Two Incubator Systems: G185 K-System versus EmbryoScope. Fertil. Steril. 2018, 109, 302–309.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Barrie, A.; Homburg, R.; McDowell, G.; Brown, J.; Kingsland, C.; Troup, S. Embryos Cultured in a Time-Lapse System Result in Superior Treatment Outcomes: A Strict Matched Pair Analysis. Hum. Fertil. 2017, 20, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Armstrong, S.; Bhide, P.; Jordan, V.; Pacey, A.; Marjoribanks, J.; Farquhar, C. Time-Lapse Systems for Embryo Incubation and Assessment in Assisted Reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Kalleas, D.; McEvoy, K.; Horne, G.; Roberts, S.A.; Brison, D.R. Live Birth Rate Following Undisturbed Embryo Culture at Low Oxygen in a Time-Lapse Incubator Compared to a High-Quality Benchtop Incubator. Hum. Fertil. 2022, 25, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  67. Blake, D.; Svalander, P.; Jin, M.; Silversand, C.; Hamberger, L. Protein Supplementation of Human IVF Culture Media. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2002, 19, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Morbeck, D.E.; Paczkowski, M.; Fredrickson, J.R.; Krisher, R.L.; Hoff, H.S.; Baumann, N.A.; Moyer, T.; Matern, D. Composition of Protein Supplements Used for Human Embryo Culture. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2014, 31, 1703–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. Zander-Fox, D.; Villarosa, L.; McPherson, N.O. Albumin Used in Human IVF Contain Different Levels of Lipids and Modify Embryo and Fetal Growth in a Mouse Model. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2021, 38, 2371–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  70. Logsdon, D.M.; Ermisch, A.F.; Herrick, J.R.; Becker, J.; Yao, L.; Broeckling, C.; Schoolcraft, W.B.; Krisher, R.L. Fatty Acids Present in Commercial Albumin Preparations Differentially Affect Development of Murine Embryos before and during Implantation. F S Sci. 2021, 2, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  71. Bungum, M.; Humaidan, P.; Bungum, L. Recombinant Human Albumin as Protein Source in Culture Media Used for in Vitro Fertilization, a Prospective Randomized Study. Fertil. Steril. 2002, 78, S56–S57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  72. Krisher, R.L.; Wheeler, M.B. Towards the Use of Microfluidics for Individual Embryo Culture. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2009, 22, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Swain, J.E.; Smith, G.D. Advances in Embryo Culture Platforms: Novel Approaches to Improve Preimplantation Embryo Development through Modifications of the Microenvironment. Hum. Reprod. Update 2011, 17, 541–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Table 1. Amino acid composition of human oviduct fluid. Mean concentrations of constituents of human oviduct fluid collected between day 0 and day 12 from 28 females between the ages of 26 and 40. Modified from [15].
Table 1. Amino acid composition of human oviduct fluid. Mean concentrations of constituents of human oviduct fluid collected between day 0 and day 12 from 28 females between the ages of 26 and 40. Modified from [15].
MetaboliteMid-Cycle Mean ± SEM (µM) (n = 21)Luteal Phase Mean ± SEM (µM) (n = 7)Pooled Mean ± SEM (µM)
(n = 28)
Inorganic SaltsSodium156,137 ± 5587153,223 ± 4411155,352 ± 4291
 Potassium15,832 ± 160913,723 ± 105615,264 ± 1223
 Calcium1331 ± 1201133 ± 861278 ± 92
 Magnesium510 ± 59599 ± 54534 ± 46
 Chlorine135,966 ± 5329137,405 ± 5660136,339 ± 4172
 Phosphate2788 ± 4671677 ± 1982500 ± 361
Carbohydrates andGlucose3429 ± 3516159 ± 6354164 ± 381
Organic AcidsPyruvate209 ± 35106 ± 23182 ± 28
Lactate5193 ± 6663136 ± 2084660 ± 525
Citrate134 ± 10178 ± 19146 ± 9
Essential Amino AcidsValine115 ± 14149 ± 19124 ± 12
Leucine92 ± 1495 ± 1193 ± 10
Isoleucine40 ± 642 ± 641 ± 5
Lysine215 ± 31160 ± 22201 ± 24
Threonine126 ± 15123 ± 19125 ± 12
Methionine27 ± 421 ± 225 ± 3
Histidine58 ± 867 ± 1261 ± 6
Phenylalanine50 ± 755 ± 651 ± 5
Tryptophan18 ± 229 ± 321 ± 2
Arginine133 ± 2193 ± 14123 ± 16
Cystine58 ± 1345 ± 1355 ± 10
Tyrosine54 ± 858 ± 855 ± 6
Glutamine426 ± 38542 ± 44455 ± 32
Non-essential AminoGlycine1114 ± 1401137 ± 2161120 ± 116
AcidsAlanine335 ± 45351 ± 47339 ± 36
Glutamate670 ± 99508 ± 69630 ± 77
Aspartate142 ± 20124 ± 19137 ± 16
Asparagine16 ± 123 ± 618 ± 2
Proline123 ± 17111 ± 16120 ± 13
Serine196 ± 27216 ± 55201 ± 24
OtherTaurine1732 ± 2101265 ± 1981615 ± 168
Table 2. Metabolite composition (µM) of human midcycle oviduct fluid vs. commercial fertilization and continuous culture media.
Table 2. Metabolite composition (µM) of human midcycle oviduct fluid vs. commercial fertilization and continuous culture media.
SupplierComposition of Human Oviduct Fluid during Midcycle [15]CookMedical
Sydney IVF
Fertilization
Medium [17]
Vitrolife G-IVF Fertilization
Medium + HSA [17]
CooperSurgical Quinn’s
Advantage
Fertilization
Medium + HSA [17]
Vitrolife G-TL Continuous
Culture Medium [17]
Glucose 3429 ± 3513000251027201020
L-lactate5193 ± 666420010,10043009700
Pyruvate209 ± 35190320300470
Histidine58 ± 800171
Isoleucine40 ± 6000202
Leucine92 ± 14010183
Lysine215 ± 314180213
Methionine27 ± 400054
Phenylalanine50 ± 7011097
Threonine126 ± 1500041
Tryptophan18 ± 234126
Valine115 ± 14230186
Arginine133 ± 210014315
Glutamine426 ± 381140022
Glycine1114 ± 140374038125208
Proline123 ± 1711017100110
Tyrosine54 ± 8330100
Alanine335 ± 4518611571
Aspartate142 ± 20113105112146
Asparagine16 ± 165711222
Glutamate670 ± 991051174130
Serine196 ± 27971398123
HSA = human serum albumin supplement.
Table 3. Metabolite composition (µM) of human luteal phase oviduct fluid vs. several commercial cleavage and continuous culture media.
Table 3. Metabolite composition (µM) of human luteal phase oviduct fluid vs. several commercial cleavage and continuous culture media.
SupplierHuman Oviduct Fluid During
Luteal Phase
[15]
CookMedical
Sydney IVF
Cleavage Medium [17]
Irvine Scientific Early Cleavage Medium + DSS [17]InVitroCare IVC-TWO Cleavage Medium + HSA [17]Vitrolife G-TL Continuous
Culture Medium [17]
Glucose 6159 ± 6353104503801020
L-lactate 3136 ± 2082200887847,5009700
D-lactateN/A010,42200
Pyruvate106 ± 2319028060470
Histidine67 ± 1270071
Isoleucine42 ± 6181910202
Leucine95 ± 112100183
Lysine160 ± 222500213
Methionine21 ± 240054
Phenylalanine55 ± 6100097
Threonine123 ± 1900041
Tryptophan29 ± 351126
Valine149 ± 192000186
Arginine93 ± 142600315
Glutamine542 ± 44 930022
Glycine1137 ± 2163833696208
Proline111 ± 161060125110
Tyrosine58 ± 81822100
Alanine351 ± 4715707871
Aspartic Acid124 ± 19108482146
Asparagine23 ± 655011122
Glutamate508 ± 69104097130
DSS = Dextran Serum Supplement; HSA = human serum albumin supplement.
Table 4. Metabolite composition (µM) of human uterine fluid vs. several commercial blastocyst and continuous culture media.
Table 4. Metabolite composition (µM) of human uterine fluid vs. several commercial blastocyst and continuous culture media.
SupplierComposition of Human Uterine Fluid Mean ± SEM (µM) (n = 22) [21]Vitrolife G-2 PLUS Blastocyst
Medium [17]
CooperSurgical Quinn’s
Advantage
Blastocyst
Medium + SPS [17]
Irvine Scientific Multi-Blast
Medium + SSS [17]
Vitrolife G-TL Continuous
Medium [17]
Glucose 5100 ± 17803260250027101020
L-lactate6600 ± 11205800400085569700
D-lactateN/A0010,0400
Pyruvate 80 ± 208090140470
Histidine97 ± 1778676571
Isoleucine114 ± 14198178164202
Leucine193 ± 31185169181183
Lysine298 ± 53204181202213
Methionine38 ± 957474554
Phenylalanine1008 ± 1510010211197
Threonine117 ± 204313614041
Tryptophan37 ± 426283026
Valine190 ± 26194187185186
Arginine136 ± 40314298310315
Glutamine227 ± 401090922
Glycine955 ± 156110126112208
Proline221 ± 3311510363110
Tyrosine86 ± 15999294100
Alanine513 ± 8218046771
Aspartic Acid230 ± 2912411260146
Asparagine33 ± 747813522
Glutamate1162 ± 183114663130
Serine220 ± 461029264123
SPS = Serum Protein Substitute; SSS = Serum Substitute Supplement.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pokorski, A.; Alva, R.; Wiebe, J.E.; Stuart, J.A. Applying the Lessons of Physiological Cell Culture to Human Embryo Culture for In Vitro Fertilization. Biomolecules 2026, 16, 618. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16050618

AMA Style

Pokorski A, Alva R, Wiebe JE, Stuart JA. Applying the Lessons of Physiological Cell Culture to Human Embryo Culture for In Vitro Fertilization. Biomolecules. 2026; 16(5):618. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16050618

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pokorski, Abigail, Ricardo Alva, Jacob E. Wiebe, and Jeffrey A. Stuart. 2026. "Applying the Lessons of Physiological Cell Culture to Human Embryo Culture for In Vitro Fertilization" Biomolecules 16, no. 5: 618. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16050618

APA Style

Pokorski, A., Alva, R., Wiebe, J. E., & Stuart, J. A. (2026). Applying the Lessons of Physiological Cell Culture to Human Embryo Culture for In Vitro Fertilization. Biomolecules, 16(5), 618. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16050618

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop