Next Article in Journal
Aberrant Uteroplacental and Vascular Signaling and Remodeling by Matrix Metalloproteinases in Pregnancy-Related Hypertension and Preeclampsia
Previous Article in Journal
Chrysotoxine Attenuates Key Atherogenic Processes via Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and COX-Dependent Antiplatelet Mechanisms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Halogen-Containing Drugs in 2025: A Record Year for the Therapeutic Use and Synthesis of FDA-Approved Small Molecules

1
Laboratory of Molecular Logic Gates, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta
2
Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical, and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Ferdinando Stagno d’Alcontres 31, 98166 Messina, Italy
3
Group of Catalysis and Organic Green Chemistry, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Perugia, Via del Liceo 1, 06123 Perugia, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2026, 16(3), 381; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16030381
Submission received: 30 January 2026 / Revised: 17 February 2026 / Accepted: 25 February 2026 / Published: 3 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Biological Factors)

Abstract

Halogens, particularly fluorine, chlorine, and bromine, play a pivotal role in modern drug discovery and development. Their incorporation into drug molecules significantly influences physicochemical properties, including lipophilicity, metabolic stability, and target binding affinity. Fluorine, the most commonly used halogen, enhances bioavailability and receptor interactions, as seen in several blockbuster drugs. Chlorine and bromine contribute to hydrophobic interactions and modulate pharmacokinetics, while iodine is less frequently utilized due to its larger atomic size and reactivity. The strategic placement of halogens in drug scaffolds has led to the success of numerous FDA-approved pharmaceuticals across therapeutic areas, including oncology, infectious diseases, and central nervous system disorders. This review explores the structure–activity relationships (SAR) of halogen-containing drugs, highlighting recent approvals (2025), their synthesis (with yields, when available), therapeutic use, and, when experimentally available, the interaction with their biological target macromolecules.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In our previous works [1,2,3,4] and especially in [1], we have highlighted the emergent role of halogens and, in particular, of fluorine and chlorine in the preparation of drugs for the treatment of several diseases, such as viral infections, several types of cancer, cardiovascular disease, multiple sclerosis, migraine, and inflammatory diseases such as vasculitis. Talking about numbers, we showed that 14 of the 50 molecules approved by the FDA in 2021 contained halogens. In 2022, only six drugs approved contained halogens [5]. In 2023, the number rose to 14 [5]. More recently, namely in 2024, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved 50 new drugs, of which 16 contain halogen atoms such as fluorine and chlorine. Therefore, it is evident that halogens play a significant role in drug discovery and development due to their impact on the pharmacological properties of compounds [5].
The review by Ali et al. [5] highlights the importance of fluorine and chlorine in medicinal chemistry, discussing their properties and how they influence drug profiles. The authors provided detailed information on each halogen-containing drug approved in 2024, including: trade name, active ingredients, route of administration, approval date, indication, and mode of action. The 16 halogen-containing approved drugs in 2024 are shown in Figure 1: tovorafenib 1 (fluorine-based), vorasidenib 2 (fluorine- and chlorine-based), inavolisib 3 (fluorine-based), revumenib 4 (fluorine-based), ensartinib 5 (fluorine and chlorine-based), arimoclomol 6 (chlorine-based), crinecerfont 7 (fluorine and chlorine-based), tezacaftor 8 (fluorine-based), flurpiridaz F18 9 (fluorine- and chlorine-based), iomeprol 10 (iodine-based), resmetirom 11 (chlorine-based), seladelpar 12 (fluorine-based), vadadustat 13 (chlorine-based), danicopan 14 (fluorine- and bromine-based), aprocitentan 15 (bromine-based), acoramidis 16 (fluorine-based) [6]. Importantly, the majority of approved drugs contain at least covalently bound fluorine, which is often combined with another halogen (most often chlorine or bromine). Only one drug, iomeprol, contains iodine. Among fluorine-containing drugs, trifluoromethyl groups are encountered in three drugs (1, 2, and 12). Aromatic single-atom fluorine is present in five drugs (4, 5, 7, 8, and 16). Aliphatic-type fluorine is contained in 3, 8, 9, and 14. Moreover, 9 is a novel positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging tracer [7].
This trend, that is, the majority of approved drugs contain fluorine or chlorine, is confirmed by our analysis presented in Figure 2. The bar charts were created using data retrieved from PubMed using the general terms “fluorine approved drugs” [8], “bromine approved drugs” [9], “chlorine approved drugs” [10], and “iodine approved drugs” [11] in the period of 2000–2025. The arithmetic sum of each halogen contribution is reported. It appears that fluorine and chlorine are dominating in terms of number. Iodine also yielded a high number of hits. This could be explained by the fact that many advanced radioactive iodine therapeutics are in the pipeline.
Ali’s [5], our [1] work, and many other comprehensive reviews [12,13] have previously shown that the careful addition of fluorine or fluorine-containing groups (e.g., CHF2, CF3, OCF3) to electron-rich heteroaromatic and aromatic rings or olefins that are vulnerable to oxidation may result in greater metabolic stability. Fluorine can increase metabolic stability by acting as an isostere of carbonyl groups, eliminating reductive reactions [14]. Moving to physicochemical parameters, adding fluorine to aryl or vinyl moieties increases their lipophilicity. In contrast, adding fluorine to an aliphatic system diminishes lipophilicity [15].
Chlorine can serve as a bioisostere for several functions, including halides (F, Br, I), monovalent substituents (OH, SH), and pseudohalides (CF3 and CN) [16]. Chlorine’s similar physicochemical qualities allow it to operate as a bioisostere of methyl groups, improving metabolic stability in vivo [5]. Chlorine is a more effective halogen bond donor than fluorine due to its bigger size [17]. According to certain literature, the addition of bromine can increase the affinity and binding strength to its target via halogen bonds [18]. While bromine has potential properties, other studies suggest it can have negative consequences on the human body [19].
Iodine isotopes have potential for drug discovery and development, but their instability in the body due to weak bonds with organic molecules limits their usage [5]. Interestingly, one iodine-containing drug (iomeprol 10) was approved in 2024 as a contrast agent.
In the last year (2025), several halogen-containing small molecules (MW < 600 Da) were approved by the FDA. In the next sections, the novel drugs (“novel” drugs are new drugs never before approved or marketed in the U.S. [20]) will be presented according to their date of approval. For each molecule, a notable synthetic pathway (those from the inventors will be privileged) will be given together with the therapeutic indication.

2. Halogen-Containing Drugs Approved by the FDA in 2025

2025 appeared to be a promising year for drug development. The focus on novel therapies for unmet medical needs, including cancer treatments, vaccines, and treatments for rare diseases, yielded several new drugs, including 17 halogen-containing drugs.
The following sections will describe the synthetic pathways of approved halogenated small molecules and, when experimental structures are available, will report an analysis of their target–ligand interactions, performed with the aid of software such as PLIP (Protein-Ligand Interaction Profiler, version 2.3.0) [21], Maestro (version 14.4.138) [22], and PyMOL (version 3.2.0) [23].

2.1. Suzetrigine (17)

Approved on 30 January 2025 [20] and developed by Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA, suzetrigine (17, Journavx®) is a potent and selective inhibitor of the NaV1.8 pain signal for the treatment of moderate-to-severe pain [24]. Voltage-gated sodium channel 1.8 (NaV1.8) is a genetically and pharmacologically verified pain target that is exclusively expressed in peripheral pain-sensing neurons and not in the central nervous system (CNS) [24]. This approval was reported as “an important public health milestone in acute pain management” by the FDA [25]. Unlike opioids, this medicine does not cause euphoria or excitation in the brain, which eliminates the risk of addiction [26]. Suzetrigine’s approval emphasizes that Nav1.8 targeting may be a crucial tactic for managing moderate to severe acute pain [26]. At the moment, the number of Nav1.8 inhibitors in clinical trials is still low. With an IC50 of 0.7 nM and more than 31,000-fold selectivity against other NaV isoforms, VX-548 is a superbly selective inhibitor of NaV1.8. Important off-target effects on NaV1.4 (muscle contraction) and NaV1.5 (cardiac rhythm) are prevented by this selectivity [27]. Its structure and synthesis [28,29] (taken from its patent assignee and developers, Vertex Pharmaceuticals) is shown in Scheme 1. It originates from fluorine-based carboxylic acid 18 that is condensed with alcohol 19 via 1,1′-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI) in acetonitrile (ACN) to give unsaturated lactone 20 (85% yield). The double bond in 20 was reduced by catalytic hydrogenation in isopropanol (iPrOH) to give lactone 21 (95%). Carbonyl of ester was reduced by diisobutylaluminum hydride (DIBAL-H) to give alcohol 22 (99.7%), which was protected by using p-nitrobenzoyl chloride 23 in basic conditions (triethylamine, TEA) to give 24 (yields not disclosed in the primary patent literature). This underwent cyanosilylation via trimethylsilyl cyanide ((CH3)3Si-C≡N, 25) to give nitrile 26 (yields not disclosed in the primary patent literature). Hydrolysis (potassium hydroxide, KOH) of nitrile, accompanied by diastereomeric resolution by quinine (27), afforded carboxylic acid 28 (70%). Conversion to acyl chloride 29 (yield not reported) mediated by oxalyl chloride (COCl)2 was followed by reaction with nucleophilic aniline 30 using TEA in dichloromethane (DCM) that gave amide 31 (85–90%). Eventually, treatment with ammonia in methanol (NH3/MeOH) solution resulted in suzetrigine in excellent yield (92–94%, yield range as reported by the inventors). From a recent pharmacology study [24,30] it appeared that suzetrigine is highly selective for NaV1.8 (≥31,000-fold vs. other NaV subtypes). Therefore, the halogen substitutions could contribute to that selectivity by optimizing interactions specific to NaV1.8.
Non-opioid analgesics, particularly NSAIDs, have been linked to gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects, including dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, and peptic ulcer, among others [30]. Some selected physicochemical parameters for suzetrigine were LogP (logarithm of the partition coefficient; it measures the lipophilicity of a compound based on its distribution between octanol and water when the molecule is in its neutral form): 2.42; tPSA (topological polar surface area): 103.01; and LogS (logarithm of aqueous solubility): −5.021. Its non-halogenated counterpart displayed lower LogP, the same tPSA, and higher solubility in water (LogP: 1.46, tPSA: 103.01, LogS: −3.55). In essence, this comparison is an example of a strategic trade-off: sacrificing solubility to potentially gain improvements in potency, metabolic stability, or cell permeability. The physicochemical parameters (LogP, tPSA, and LogS) were calculated by us using ChemDraw Professional 16.0.1 [31].

2.2. Mirdametinib (32)

Approved on 11 February 2025, mirdametinib (32, Gomekli®, Springworks Therapeutics Inc., Stamford, CT, USA) is a kinase inhibitor for adult and pediatric patients 2 years of age and older with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) who have symptomatic plexiform neurofibromas (PN) not amenable to complete resection [32]. It is selectively targeting mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK), an integral kinase within the mitogen-activated protein kinase 1/2 (MAPK) family [33]. Inhibitors such as mirdametinib show promise by crossing the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [34]. It is orally administered, making it convenient for patients [35]. Common side effects include rash, diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea [32]. Chemically, it is a hydroxamic acid ester produced from benzohydroxamic acid, with the hydroxamic acid group converted into a 2,3-dihydroxypropyl ester. The chemical structure contains a 2-fluoro-4-iodophenylamino group at position 2 of the benzene ring, with fluorine substitutions at positions 3 and 4, a secondary amine linker, a difluorobenzene, and an organoiodine benzene ring with strong MAPK kinase inhibitory capabilities [36].
Its synthesis [37] (Scheme 2) originates from hydroxylamine 37 that is prepared from alcohol 33, which is protected with trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride 34 to give triflate 35. This was reacted with N-hydroxyphthalimide to give 36. Hydroxylamine 37 was obtained from 36 via hydrazinolysis. The second part of the synthesis involves the highly halogenated biphenyl carboxylic acid 38, which was activated to acyl chloride 39 by using thionyl chloride (SOCl2), followed by treatment with previously obtained 37 in the presence of potassium carbonate (K2CO3) in toluene to give acetonide 40. This was converted to product mirdametinib (32) in the presence of hydrochloric acid (HCl) to deprotect the acetonide to vicinal diol. Overall yield was 58%. The pharmacokinetics support that 32 has improved metabolic stability compared to earlier MEK inhibitors [38]. The majority of the medication is excreted unaltered, with around 68% in urine and 27% in feces [39].
Treatment-related side effects observed with mirdametinib include dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, dry skin, alopecia, decreased ejection fraction, increased blood creatinine phosphokinase, dizziness, pruritus, constipation, rash, abdominal pain, acne, dry mouth, peripheral edema, skin pain, urticaria, blurred vision, eczema, stomatitis, increased weight, hair color change, hair texture abnormality, extremity pain, paronychia and headache, among others [36].
Analysis of the experimentally solved KSR2:MEK1/mirdametinib complex (PDB: 7JUU [40]; crystal structure of human KSR2 (kinase suppressor of RAS 2) and MEK1 (MAPK/ERK Kinase 1), KSR2:MEK1 in complex with AMP-PNP, and allosteric MEK inhibitor mirdametinib) suggest that the diarylamine moiety is accommodated into a pocket lined by residues Lys97C, Leu118C, Val127C, Phe129C, Ile141C, Met143C, Asp208C, Phe209C, Val211C, and Leu215C, establishing hydrophobic interactions with Leu118C, Ile141C and Leu215C. In addition, a H-bond interaction is found between the ligand carbonyl oxygen and the side chain of residue Lys97C, and a π-π stacking interaction is formed between the 2-fluoro-4-iodobenzene ring and the phenyl ring of Phe209C. Of note, a relevant halogen bond interaction is identified between the backbone carbonyl oxygen of Val127C and the iodine atom of the 2-fluoro-4-iodobenzene moiety. This interaction is critical for the stability of the drug–enzyme complex and for the inhibitory activity of the mirdametinib [41] (see Figure 3, PDB: 7JUU [40], crystal structure of KSR2:MEK1 in complex with AMP-PNP and allosteric MEK inhibitor mirdametinib).
Physicochemical parameters of mirdametinib (LogP: 3.61, tPSA: 90.82, LogS: –5.173) compared to the non-halogenated derivative (LogP: 1.78, tPSA: 90.82, LogS: –3.332) showed that iodine especially contributed to the “lipophilicity” of the drug.

2.3. Avutometinib (41) and Defactinib (42)

Both approved on 8 May 2025, the combination of avutometinib (41) and defactinib (42), also known as Avmapki® Fakzynja® Co-Pack, consists of two fluorine-containing drugs (Figure 4) for the indication KRAS-mutated recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) after prior systemic therapy [42].
Avutometinib (also known as VS-6766), developed by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Chūō-ku, Tokyo, Japan, in collaboration with Roche, Basel, Switzerland [43], is a small-molecule inhibitor that uniquely targets both mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) and rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (RAF) kinases, disrupting a critical signaling pathway often dysregulated in cancer [43]. Unlike traditional MEK inhibitors, avutometinib prevents the phosphorylation of MEK by RAF, effectively shutting down the RAF–MEK–ERK cascade at two key nodes [44]. This dual inhibition enhances antitumor activity and reduces compensatory feedback mechanisms that frequently lead to drug resistance [45].
The ATP-competitive focal adhesion kinase (FAK) inhibitor defactinib, often referred to as VS-6063, was developed by Pfizer and is currently owned by Verastem [46]. FAK is frequently overexpressed or activated in various cancers, contributing to tumor progression, metastasis, and resistance to therapy [47]. By targeting FAK, defactinib disrupts tumor–stroma interactions and impairs the cancer cells’ ability to survive under stress or evade immune detection [48].
The most common adverse effects of the drug combination are diarrhea (8%), anemia (5%), and dermatitis acneiform (4%) [42]. Pyridine is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract in mammals and undergoes extensive metabolism by C- and N-oxidation and by N-methylation, a likely pathway in avutometinib [49].
The synthesis of avutometinib (41) [50] (Scheme 3) proceeds via mixing a fluorinated pyridine derivative 43 with resorcinol 44 under acidic (methanesulfonic acid, MsOH) conditions in trifluoroethanol (CF3CH2OH) to give coumarin derivative 45. The following SNAR on the phenolic oxygen (using 2-bromopyrimidine 46 as electrophile in cesium carbonate, Cs2CO3) and the acylation using N-methylsulfamoyl chloride 47, pyridine as a base, and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) as solvent led to avutometinib (41) in excellent yield (73%, two steps).
Analysis of the experimentally solved MEK1/avutometinib complex (see Figure 5, PDB: 3WIG [51]; human MEK1 kinase in complex with avutometinib and MgAMP-PNP) indicates that the ligand establishes different hydrophobic interactions with residues Leu119A, Val128A, Ile142A, Phe210A, Leu216A, and Ile217A. The bound conformation is stabilized by four H-bonds that involve the sulphonamide NH groups and the backbone carbonyl oxygen of Arg190A, as well as the sidechain oxygen atom of Asn222A, and the lactone carbonyl oxygen and the backbone amide nitrogens of Val212A and Ser213A. In addition, a π-π stacking interaction with the phenyl ring of Phe210A is observed. The fluorine atom may also contribute to stabilization of the bioactive conformation of the ligand by interacting with the sulphonamide NH group and the sulfur and oxygen atoms of Met220A and Asn222A, respectively. Physicochemical parameters of avutometinib (LogP: 1.91, tPSA: 130.81, LogS: −5.347) compared to the non-halogenated derivative (LogP: 1.77, tPSA: 130.81, LogS: −5.119) showed that the fluorine did not affect the LogP value much, but very likely, besides its potential influence on pharmacodynamics, it may act as a metabolic shield, preventing a primary route of degradation.
Defactinib (42, Scheme 4) is obtained via reacting N-(3-aminomethyl-pyrazin-2-yl)-N-methyl-methanesulfonamide 48 with 2,4-dichloro-5-trifluoromethyl-pyrimidine 49 in N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIEA)/DCM to afford intermediate 50 in 32% yield. The subsequent SNAr using 4-amino-N-methyl-benzamide 51 as a nucleophile in butanol/acetic acid (nBuOH/AcOH) afforded the product defactinib (42) in 14% yield [52]. In the paper, the aminopyrimidine inhibitor binding was investigated, confirming existing FAK structure–activity relationships and providing a structure–kinetic relationship study for FAK [52]. The –CF3 group likely enhances binding affinity with the target protein by improving nonpolar interactions with residues Val25A, Ala38A, Leu86A, and Ile 149A (Figure 6). The three fluorine atoms might even be involved in the stabilization of the bioactive conformation by interacting with one of the ligand sulphone oxygens and with the sidechain sulfur of Cys70A. Furthermore, the pyrimidine ring forms hydrophobic interactions with Ala38A and Leu139A, while the benzene ring forms hydrophobic interactions with Tyr88A. Two H-bonds are observed between the ligand and the backbone of residue Cys89A (Figure 6, PDB: 5MAH [53]; crystal structure of MELK in complex with defactinib). Physicochemical parameters of defactinib (LogP: n/a, tPSA: 139.98, LogS: −7.014) compared to non-halogenated derivative (LogP: n/a, tPSA: 139.98, LogS: −6.201) showed that the trifluoromethyl group affected solubility but to a small extent.

2.4. Taletrectinib (52)

Approved on 11 June 2025, taletrectinib (52, Ibtrozi®, Scheme 5) is a next-generation oral ROS1 and NTRK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) [54,55]. It was designated to target ROS1 fusion-positive and NTRK fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including brain metastases and resistance mutations [56].
Chemically, it is composed of an imidazo [1,2-b]pyridazine central core decorated by two additional pendants, each containing an aromatic ring. Moreover, an aromatic fluorine atom is present. Its synthesis [57] [taken from its patent assignee and developers: AnHeart Therapeutics (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China] develops from 3-bromo-6-chloroimidazo [1,2-b]pyridazine 53 that is reacted with (R)-1-(3-fluorophenyl)ethan-1-amine 54 in the presence of potassium fluoride (KF) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a solvent to give secondary amine 55 in excellent yield (87%). Then, a Suzuki coupling (promoted by [1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene]palladium(II) dichloride) between 55 and boronic ester 56 gave BOC-protected amine 57 (66% yield) which was eventually converted to taletrectinib (52) via acidic deprotection (trifluoroacetic acid, TFA) followed by neutralization (hydrogen carbonate, HCO3) in good yield (72%). The most common treatment-related adverse events were alanine transaminase elevations (72.7%), aspartate transaminase elevations (72.7%), and nausea (50.0%) [55].
In biochemical kinase assays, taletrectinib shows ~20-fold selectivity for ROS1 (IC50 = 0.07) over TRKA (IC50 = 1.26) and TRKB (IC50 =1.47) [58]. Physicochemical parameters of taletrectinib (LogP: 3.95, tPSA: 75.24, LogS: −5.467) compared to the non-halogenated derivative (LogP: 3.8, tPSA: 75.24, LogS: −5.221) showed that the fluorine has a little impact on lipophilicity and solubility but may exert an essential role for the drug’s potency, selectivity, and pharmacokinetic properties.

2.5. Sunvozertinib (58)

Sunvozertinib (58, Zegfrovy®) is an oral, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that selectively targets EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations and certain human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) exon 20 insertion mutations, while minimizing activity against wild-type EGFR. It binds covalently to the kinase, disrupting tumor cell proliferation and angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) models [59].
Received FDA accelerated approval on 2 July 2025, under the brand name Zegfrovy®, for adult patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions, post platinum chemotherapy, as detected by an FDA-approved test [60]. Chemically, it contains one fluorine and one chlorine on the same aromatic ring. Its synthesis [taken from its patent assignee and developers: Dizal (Jiangsu) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China] [61] (Scheme 6) starts from halogenated aniline derivative 59 that is reacted with dichloro-pyrimidine 60 to give trihalogenated intermediate 61 (50% yield), which in turn was treated with 4-fluoro-2-methoxy-5-nitroaniline 62 to give compound 63 in great yield (83%). This was then reacted with (R)-N,N-dimethylpyrrolidin-3-amine 64 to yield 65 in excellent yield (87%). The reduction in nitro group operated by metallic zinc (Zn) in an acidic environment (ammonium chloride, NH4Cl) gave aniline 66 (63%), which was eventually transformed into Sunvozertinib (58) via the addition of acryloyl chloride 67 in the presence of DIEA in a low yield (10%). Common side effects of sunvozertinib include diarrhea, nausea, itchy skin, rash, infected skin around the nail, dry skin, and decreased appetite [62]. Its IC50 is 2.1 nM against EGFR exon 20 insertion NPG mutant (in pEGFR phosphorylation assays) [63]. Physicochemical parameters of sunvozertinib (LogP: 4.53, tPSA: 113.82, LogS: −7.366) compared to the non-halogenated derivative (LogP: 3.81, tPSA: 113.82, LogS: −6.419) showed that the fluorine optimizes the drug’s pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, while the chlorine is a masterstroke of pharmacodynamic (PD) design. The introduction of both 4-fluoro and 5-chloro substitutions successfully reduced human hepatocyte clearance from 34 to 7.1 (μL/min)/(106 cells) [63].

2.6. Sebetralstat (68)

Approved on 7 July 2025 by the FDA [64], sebetralstat (68, Ekterly®Scheme 7) is an oral drug developed by KalVista Pharmaceuticals (Framingham, MA, USA) for the on-demand treatment of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks [64,65]. Hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks are characterized by sudden, painful swelling episodes in various parts of the body. These attacks can affect the face, limbs, abdomen, and, most seriously, the airways, potentially leading to life-threatening situations [66]. Sebetralstat is a selective plasma kallikrein inhibitor designed to prevent the excessive production of bradykinin [67], a peptide that increases vascular permeability and causes the painful, potentially life-threatening swelling characteristic of HAE. The most common sebetralstat side effect is headache [68].
The synthesis (taken from its patent assignee and developers: KalVista Pharmaceuticals) for sebetralstat [69,70] develops from pyridin-2-ol 69, which is treated with benzylchloride 70 to give 2-pyridone-based benzyl alcohol derivative 71 in high yield (77%). Conversion of alcohol to chloride derivative 72 via methanesulfonyl chloride (MeSO2Cl) (80%) was followed by reaction with pyrazole 73 to afford the desired regioisomer (after column chromatography) 74 (54%). Alkaline hydrolysis of ester using 2M NaOH gave free carboxylic acid 75 (34%), which was eventually coupled with aminomethyl pyridine 76 under CDI conditions to generate sebetralstat (68) in good yield (78%). Overall, sebetralstat was associated with encouraging side-effect and safety profiles [71]. Oral sebetralstat provided faster symptom relief, more rapid reduction in severity, and a higher likelihood of complete resolution within 24 h compared to placebo in HAE attacks [71].
Analysis of the experimentally solved kallekrein/sebetralstat complex (Figure 7, PDB: 8A3Q [70]; crystal structure of human plasma kallekrein in complex with sebetralstat) reveals a characteristic U-shaped conformation about the central pyrazole core. This conformation is facilitated by the movement of Trp215A, which enables the formation of a π–π stacking interaction network involving His57A, Tyr174A, Trp215A, and three out of the four ligand aromatic rings. In addition, H-bonds with residues Gly99A, Lys 192A, and Ser214A further stabilize the bound conformation. Fluorine substitution may likely increase metabolic stability and membrane permeability and could also contribute to the stabilization of the bound conformation through interactions with the sidechain oxygen of Ser195A and the backbone carbonyl oxygen of Ser214A. Additionally, Davie et al. [70], based on WaterMap calculations, suggested that the 3-fluoro-4-methoxypyridine might contribute to the favorable binding energy of sebetralstat by displacement of a water molecule they predicted to lie above the face of Tyr228A. The physicochemical parameters of sebetralstat (LogP: 2.19, tPSA: 95.83, LogS: −4.422) compared to the non-halogenated derivative (LogP: 2.03, tPSA: 95.83, LogS: −4.21) showed that the fluorine has a little impact on these three properties, but may directly contribute to the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile by making the molecule more stable.

2.7. Rilzabrutinib (77)

Approved on 29 August 2025, rilzabrutinib (77, Wayrilz®, Scheme 8) was discovered by Principia Biopharma Inc. (South San Francisco, CA, USA, Sanofi group) for adults with persistent or chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who have had an insufficient response to a previous treatment [72]. It is an oral active inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase BTK (IC50 = 1.3 nM), a reversible, covalent, and selective compound [73,74]. It contains an aromatic fluorine atom. Its synthesis (Scheme 8, disclosed by their inventors at Principia Biopharma Inc.) [75] develops from the amine 78, which is iodinated using N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) to obtain intermediate 79 (52% yield). Mitsunobu reaction mediated by triphenylphosphine (PPh3)/diisopropyl azodicarboxylate (DIAD) between 79 and tert-butyl (R)-3-hydroxypiperidine-1-carboxylate (80) gave BOC-protected amine 81 (30%). Suzuki coupling reaction of 81 with the boronic acid 82 afforded 83 in good yield (77%), followed by the removal of the BOC protecting group to give. The free piperidine group was condensed with cyanoacetic acid using hexafluorophosphate azabenzotriazole tetramethyl uronium (HATU) and TEA in DMF to give amide 84 (two steps yield: 32%, starting from 83). Eventually, the crucial step to form α-cyanoacrylamide was a Knoevenagel condensation reaction with the aldehyde 85, catalyzed by trimethylsilyl chloride (TMSCl), to give the final product rilzabrutinib 77 in good yield (70%). Moving to the SAR of this molecule [76], the pyrazolo [3,4-d]pyrimidine core with the anilino/phenoxy aryl substituent provides the H-bonding to the hinge and main potency. A piperidine linker/amide links the hinge core to the electrophile-bearing side chain and controls vector to Cys481. The warhead represented by the α-cyanoacrylamide moiety, that is, the feature that enables reversible covalent Michael addition to Cys481. Additionally, a tertiary amine/piperazine bearing an oxetane (or similar polar substituent) was identified as the best substituent to tune PK, solubility, and cell penetration. The fluorine atom generates improved human whole blood potency while occupying a small pocket adjacent to Ala428; in general, the complexity of the side chain attached to the pyrimidine ring allows for more selective and reversible binding to the cysteine residue compared to ibrutinib, which has a simpler side chain. The reversible binding of rilzabrutinib leads to enhanced specificity over time since off-target binding is not sustained [77]. The analysis of the rilzabrutinib/BTK complex (Figure 8, PDB: 7L5O; crystal structure of the noncovalently bonded complex of rilzabrutinib with BTK) reveals that the fluorobenzene ring is located adjacent to residues Val416A, Ala428A, Lys430, and Thr474A, forming hydrophobic interactions with Val416A and a π–cation interaction with Lys430A. The terminal benzene ring is found to make hydrophobic interactions with Phe540A and Leu542A, as well as a π–π stacking interaction with Phe540A. The bioactive conformation is stabilized by H-bond interactions with Glu475A, Met477A, and Cys481A. The physicochemical parameters of rilzabrutinib (LogP: 3.78, tPSA: 135.38, LogS: −7.724) compared to the non-halogenated derivative (LogP: 3.62, tPSA: 135.38, LogS: −7.46) showed that fluorine has little impact on these three properties.

2.8. Imlunestrant (86)

Imlunestrant (86, Inluriyo®, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA), an estrogen receptor antagonist, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration on 25 September 2025 for adults with ER-positive, HER2-negative, ESR1-mutated advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had progressed after at least one line of endocrine therapy [78]. Chemically, it contains an aliphatic fluorine and a trifluoromethyl group bound to an aromatic ring. Its synthesis (Scheme 9, taken from the inventors at Eli Lilly and Company) [79,80] develops from initial metal-halogen exchange of 4-bromo-3-chloro-7-methoxyquinoline (87) with isopropylmagnesium chloride (i-PrMgCl) in tetrahydrofuran (THF) and subsequent Grignard reaction with 4-fluorobenzoyl chloride (88) in THF, which gives (3-chloro-7-methoxy-4-quinolyl)-(4-fluorophenyl)methanone (89, 38%). O-demethylation of 7-methoxyquinoline derivative (89) by means of Boron tribromide (BBr3) in DCM affords 7-hydroxyquinoline derivative (90) in quantitative yield, which, upon coupling with 2-[3-(fluoromethyl)azetidin- 1-yl]ethanol hydrochloride (91) using sodium hydride (NaH) in DMF, produces the corresponding ether (92, 84%). Suzuki coupling of fluoro derivative (92) with ortho-fluorurated benzeneboronic acid (93) by means of catalyst XPhos-Pd-G2 and K2CO3 in 2-methyl-2-butanol/ H2O generates diaryl derivative (94, 78%), whose keto moiety is reduced with lithium triethylborohydride (LiBHEt3) in THF/1,4-dioxane to produce secondary alcohol (95, 86.2%). Intramolecular cyclization of compound (95) using NaH in refluxing THF provides racemic chromeno [4,3-c] quinolin-2-ol derivative (96, 72%), which is finally subjected to chiral resolution by means of chiral supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) to give 86 in 99% enantiomeric excess (ee). Imlunestrant induces long-lasting target inhibition and significant arrest of tumor growth [81]. It is important to note that the fluromethylazetidine side chain of imlunestrant may account for its degradation activity on the estrogen receptor [81]. Moreover, their favorable toxicity profiles and oral bioavailability may be particularly relevant for their possible future combination with other targeted treatments, including CDK4/6 inhibitors [81]. The IC50 concentrations were 0.34 nM and 5.2 nM in tumor 47, sample D (T47D), and Michigan Cancer Foundation-7 (MCF7) cells, respectively [82]. The physicochemical parameters of imlunestrant (LogP: 5.56, tPSA: 54.29, LogS: −7.553) compared to the non-halogenated derivative (LogP: 5.4, tPSA: 54.29, LogS: −6.746) showed that the fluorine atoms have a negative impact on solubility, but this is weighted out by an improvement in the binding process and metabolic stability.

2.9. Paltusotine (97)

The FDA has authorized on 25 September 2025 paltusotine (Palsonify®, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), a new nonpeptide somatostatin receptor type 2 (SST2) agonist, for the treatment of acromegaly in people who had an insufficient response to surgery and/or for whom surgery is not an option [83]. Paltusotine was chosen from a newly synthesized series of compounds due to its potent and highly specific activation of the SST2 receptor, as peptides are not effectively ingested from the gastrointestinal tract [84]. Chemically, it is a diarylquinoline containing two aromatic fluorine atoms.
Its synthesis [84] (Scheme 10, described by Crinetics Pharmaceuticals) involves four steps to generate the final 4-(4-aminopiperidinyl)-3,6-diarylquinoline. The first step was the nucleophilic replacement on 3-bromo-4,6-dichloroquinoline (98) via N-BOC-piperazine 99, which generated tert-butyl (1-(3-bromo-6-chloroquinolin-4-yl)piperidin-4-yl)carbamate 100 (58%). The second step was the selective Suzuki coupling on the bromine via using (3,5-difluorophenyl)boronic acid (101) to give synthon 102 (68%). This was subjected to another Suzuki coupling involving (3-cyano-2-hydroxyphenyl)boronic acid 103 to afford N-Boc-protected compound 104, which was eventually converted into paltusotine (97, 52%) via acidic treatment (HCl). Although yields were not disclosed, the chemistry suggests they are likely to be high. The analysis of the experimentally solved SSTR2/paltusotine complex (Figure 9, PDB: 7YAC) [85]; CryoEM structure of paltusotine-bound SSTR2-Gi complex) reveals that the primary amino group of aminopiperidin strongly interacts with residue Asp122E, making both a H-bond and a salt bridge, as well as a H-bond with Tyr302E. The 3,5-difluorophenyl moiety of paltusotine is accommodated within a pocket lined by residues Leu99E, Gln102E, and Val103E, establishing hydrophobic contacts with Leu99E and Gln102E. In addition, this moiety engages in Van der Waals interactions with Tyr50E and Asp295E, with the fluorine atom likely interacting with the sidechain oxygen atoms of Tyr50E and Asp295E [86]. As reported by Zhao et al. [85], the latter residue appears to be crucial for ligand activity, as substitution with bulkier groups has been reported to reduce activation potency. Finally, the ligand forms other hydrophobic interactions with Ile195E, Ile209E, and Phe272E.
The SAR studies clearly suggested that a 3,5 difluoro substitution of the benzene ring is preferred for SST2 receptor activity [84]. It is noticeable that deleting both fluoro groups resulted in a seven-fold potency loss [84]. The physicochemical parameters of paltusotine (LogP: 4.76, tPSA: 85.64, LogS: −7.627) compared to the non-halogenated derivative (LogP: 4.45, tPSA: 85.64, LogS: −7.11) showed that the fluorine atoms have little impact on these properties but are fundamental for the binding.

2.10. Remibrutinib (105)

Remibrutinib (Rhapsido®, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland), an oral, highly selective Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor, showed efficacy in the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria [87]. It was approved by the FDA on 30 September 2025 to treat chronic spontaneous urticaria in adults who remain symptomatic despite H1 antihistamine treatment [88].
Chemical key features include an amino-pyrimidine core linked to a fluorinated phenyl group, a cyclopropyl-fluorobenzamide moiety, and a reactive methylacryloyl group that covalently binds to Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK).
Remibrutinib forms a covalent bond with C481 and inhibits BTK with an IC50 of 1.3 ± 0.9 nM. Based on affinity measurements (Kd = 0.63 nM for BTK), remibrutinib exhibits high selectivity against other similar kinases [89]. Its synthesis [90] (Scheme 11, disclosed by their inventors at Novartis) is a kind of parallel synthesis in which two synthons (compounds 110 and 114) are prepared in parallel and then joined in the last steps of the synthesis. The first synthon is obtained from 1-bromo-5-fluoro-2-methyl-3-nitrobenzene (106), which underwent a Suzuki coupling using bis(pinacolato)diboron (B2pin2), potassium acetate (KOAc), and PdCl2(dppf) in 1,4-dioxane in excellent yield (107, 92%). The following reduction (catalytic hydrogenation) of the nitro group afforded aniline 108 (93% yield), which was used to prepare amide 110 by reacting with methyl ester 109 using sodium hexamethyldisilazide (NaHMDS) as the base in THF (76%). The second synthon is obtained via reacting pyrimidine 111 with ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) and BBr3 to give monochloro aniline 112 (59%). This was transformed into tertiary amine 114 via a polymer-bound triphenylphosphine (Smopex 310) in the corresponding Mitsunobu reaction involving tert-butyl (2-hydroxyethyl)(methyl)carbamate 113 (53%). This reacted with 110 under Suzuki conditions [(PdCl2(PPh3)2 Na2CO3 in 1,2-dimethoxyethane/water, DME–H2O, 110 °C, 25 min)] to give the precursor 115 for remibrutinib (105). The last step involved the deprotection of the BOC group (using TFA) and the formation of acrylamide via propanephosphonic acid anhydride (T3P) in a moderate yield (45%). The physicochemical parameters of remibrutinib (LogP: 4.28, tPSA: 109.38, LogS: −6.127) compared to the non-halogenated derivative (LogP: 3.97, tPSA: 109.38, LogS: −5.607) showed that the fluorine atoms have a slightly negative impact on solubility and increase lipophilicity, and may be fundamental as an aromatic metabolic blocker.

2.11. Nerandomilast (116)

On 7 October 2025, the FDA approved nerandomilast (Jascayd®, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany) for the treatment of adults with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [91].
Nerandomilast (also known as BI 1015550) is an orally administered, preferential inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4B with antifibrotic and immunomodulatory properties. It has been proven that 116 decreases the course of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, but further investigation into its effects in other kinds of progressive pulmonary fibrosis is required [92].
The synthesis of nerandomilast (disclosed by their inventors at Boehringer Ingelheim) is a complex process designed to be robust and scalable for multikilogram production. The strategy involves assembling three key components: a dihydrothieno [3, 2-d]pyrimidine core, an aminocyclobutanol moiety, and a 5-chloro-2-(piperidin-4-yl)pyrimidine group [93].
The preparation of dihydrothieno [3, 2-d]pyrimidine core 122 (Scheme 12) starts with thioether 117 that was treated with Lewis acid chlorotriisopropoxytitanium [(CH3)2CHO]3TiCl] and triethylamine to give 118 in an improved intramolecular Dieckmann with excellent yield (96%). This was reacted with the relatively expensive ethylisothiourea hydrobromide 119 to afford pyrimidine 120 in good yield (60–70%). This was followed by acidic hydrolysis to give diol 121 in excellent yield (95%) [94]. The authors pointed out that there was significant decomposition of 120 under the basic reaction conditions that resulted in the formation of foul-smelling byproducts. Diol 121 was eventually converted to dichloro-pyrimidine 122 by reacting with phosphorus oxychloride (POCl3) (88%).
The installation of the aminocyclobutanol moiety on dihydrothieno [3, 2-d]pyrimidine core (Scheme 12) was accomplished via reacting 122 with commercially available 1-aminocyclobanemethanol hydrochloride (123) to give aminocyclobutanol 124 (76%). The subsequent asymmetric oxidation to chiral sulfoxide was carried out using chiral [1,1′-Binaphthalene]-2,2′-diol, (S)-BINOL, (i-PrO)4Ti, and with t-BuOOH as the stoichiometric oxidant, providing sulfoxide 125 in good yield (87.4%) and enantioselectivity (>99.0% ee). The author added that it is likely the presence of the secondary amine near the sulfide in 124 likely contributed to the strong enantioselectivity obtained.
For the preparation of the 5-chloro-2-(piperidin-4-yl)pyrimidine group (Scheme 12), the synthesis was developed from commercially available piperidine-4-carbonitrile 126. This was treated with HCl and methanol/cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME) to give imidate hydrochloride 127, which, without isolation, was treated with sodium methoxide and ammonia in methanol to give amidine 128. This was not isolated but condensed with vinamidinium salt 129 in the presence of additional sodium methoxide to give crude 130 as the hexafluorophosphate salt 130.
Robust and scalable processes were developed for the synthesis of intermediates 125 and 130, which were transformed into nerandomilast (116) in the presence of Hünig’s base and a solvent system consisting of a mixture of THF and water (Scheme 12). An additional recrystallization from 2-propanol/water was required to obtain nerandomilast with the desired single-crystalline polymorph.
The physicochemical parameters of nerandomilast (LogP: 1.85, tPSA: 102.01, LogS: −3.99) compared to the non-halogenated derivative (LogP: 1.3, tPSA: 102.01, LogS: −3.336) showed that the chlorine atom negatively impacts the lipophilicity and the solubility, but may be fundamental as a steric anchor to achieve the potency and for improving metabolic stability.

2.12. Elinzanetant (131)

On 24 October 2025, the FDA approved elinzanetant (Figure 10, Lynkuet®, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) for the treatment of women with moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms due to menopause (IPF) [95].
Elinzanetant was discovered through Bayer’s internal neurokinin receptor antagonist program, originally targeting central nervous system pathways involved in thermoregulation and hormone feedback. Optimization efforts focused on developing a compound that could simultaneously block neurokinin-1 (NK1) and neurokinin-3 (NK3) receptors [96,97]—both implicated in menopausal vasomotor symptoms (VMS) such as hot flashes—while maintaining favorable pharmacokinetics and safety [98]. The compound was selected for development after promising preclinical results showing potent inhibition of substance P [99] and neurokinin B signaling pathways, with good oral bioavailability and central nervous system penetration [100].
Chemically, it displays seven fluorine atoms (two trifluoromethyl groups and an aromatic fluorine).
The patent EP4431512A1 [101] mentions “methods of preparing said compounds, intermediate compounds useful for preparing said compounds”, but is somewhat general and is directed to a family of compounds (not exclusively elinzanetant). Therefore, the specific step-by-step synthesis for the marketed molecule may be partly confidential.
However, the last steps of its synthesis [102] (Scheme 13, current patent assignee: Kandy Therapeutics) stem from the complex octahydropyrazino [2,1-c][1,4]oxazine heterocycle 132 that is mixed with the chloro-derivate 133 to give protected alcohol 134 in good yield (88.2%), which is eventually converted to elinzanetant hydrochloride salt (135) in excellent yield (88.6%) via hydrogenation and formation of salt using HCl. The physicochemical parameters of elinzanetant (LogP: 6.92, tPSA: 68.61, LogS: −8.461) compared to the non-halogenated derivative (LogP: 5.89, tPSA: 68.61, LogS: −6.867) showed that the fluorine atoms strikingly affect lipophilicity and solubility, but may directly contribute to the pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles.

2.13. Ziftomenib (136)

On 11 November 2025, the FDA approved ziftomenib (Figure 11, Komzifti®, Kura Oncology, San Diego, CA, USA and Kyowa Kirin, Tokyo, Japan) for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia with a susceptible nucleophosmin 1 mutation who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options [103]. Ziftomenib selectively disrupts the menin–lysine methyltransferase 2A (KMT2A) interaction [104], which is required for the maintenance of oncogenic transcriptional programs driving leukemic cell proliferation. Ziftomenib shows high selectivity and potency for menin–KMT2A binding, exhibits excellent oral bioavailability, and once-daily pharmacokinetics demonstrates robust differentiation activity without excessive cytotoxicity [105].
Ziftomenib is manufactured via a multi-step chemical process, although the specifics are private. Kura Oncology, the creator of this experimental medication, is responsible for its manufacture. Chemically, it contains a trifluoromethyl pendant which is linked to thieno [3-d]pyrimidine core via a methylene group. Research publications discuss the synthesis of similar compounds, such as thieno [3-d]pyrimidines [106], as part of the development process for menin inhibitors like ziftomenib.
The common synthon 137 (Scheme 14), used in the synthesis of various thieno [3-d]pyrimidines [106] was prepared in five steps starting from a Gewald thiophene reaction involving 2-cyanoacetamide 138 and 4,4,4-trifluorobutanal 139 using sulfur, triethylamine, and DMF as a solvent. Condensation of thiophene with triethyl orthoformate gave pyrimidinone 140 (76%, two steps). The conversion of 140 to chloropyrimidine 141 was mediated by POCl3 with an excellent yield (92%). The following transformation of 141 to synthon (hydrochloride salt) 137 was accomplished via firstly reacting with tert-butyl 4-aminopiperidine-1-carboxylate 142 and secondly via deprotecting the BOC-group under acidic conditions (HCl). Yield for synthon 137 was 62% (two steps). The analysis of the experimental solved ziftomenib/menin complex (Figure 12, PDB: 8VA6 [104]; crystal structure of menin in complex with ziftomenib) reveals that the ligand establishes hydrophobic interactions with Tyr319A, Met322A, Tyr323A, and Glu366A. In addition, three H-bonds are identified with Tyr276A, Arg330A, and Trp341A, along with a π–cation interaction between the protonated nitrogen atom of piperidine and the phenyl ring of Tyr319A. The –CF3 group appears to be accommodated within a pocket lined by residues Ser155A, Asp180A, His181A, and Ala182A. The three fluorine atoms may also contribute to the stabilization of the ligand–menin complex through interactions with the sidechain oxygen of Ser155A, the backbone carbonyl oxygen of Asp180A, the backbone carbonyl oxygen and amide nitrogen of His181A, and the backbone amide nitrogen of Ala182A. The physicochemical parameters of ziftomenib (LogP: n/a, tPSA: 119.67, LogS: −8.434) compared to the non-halogenated derivative (LogP: 3.86, tPSA: 119.67, LogS: −7.51) showed that the trifluoromethyl group decreases the water solubility but is fundamental for enhancing the binding with KMT2A.

2.14. Sevabertinib (143)

On 19 November 2025, the FDA approved sevabertinib (Scheme 15, Hyrnuo®, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.), a kinase inhibitor for patients with metastatic or locally advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors include activating mutations in the HER2 (ERBB2) tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) [107]. Clinical research demonstrating sevabertinib’s ability to reduce tumor size and manage illness supports the FDA’s ruling. Over half of the patients in these studies saw tumor shrinkage, and in one research group, the response rate exceeded 70%. Approximately 80% of the patients experienced disease stabilization or reduction [108]. Diarrhea was the most common adverse event [109]. Chemically, it is a 4H-pyrrolo[3,2-c]pyridin-4-one, which displays a substituted chlorobenzene. Its synthesis [110] (Scheme 15, current patent assignee: Bayer Pharmaceuticals Inc.) develops from 1-chloro-3-isothiocyanato-2-methoxybenzene 144, which was reacted with tert-butyl 2,4-dioxopiperidine-1-carboxylate 145 in acetonitrile and 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) as a base to afford oxo-dihydropyridine 146 in 71% yield. Deprotection of BOC via TFA in DCM gave intermediate 147 in 78% yield. This was reacted with 1-{3-[(1,4-dioxan-2- yl)methoxy]pyridin-4-yl}methanamine (148) at elevated temperature (120 °C) to yield precursor 149 in 39% yield. The final compound in a racemic mixture (150) was obtained via cyclization of 149 in TFA/H2O2 in methanol (51% yield). Sevabertinib was eventually obtained by a preparative chiral HPLC method.
The physicochemical parameters of sevabertinib (LogP: 1.11, tPSA: 102.44, LogS: −5.21) compared to its non-halogenated derivative (LogP: 0.56, tPSA: 102.44, LogS: −4.524) showed that the chlorine impacts the lipophilicity (making the molecule more lipophilic) and the solubility (decreases the solubility). However, it is outstanding to see how the LogP for this derivative is quite low compared to other described drugs. This is due to a combination of polar groups present in the molecule: dioxane pendant, pyridine nitrogen, and 6-oxo-3,6-dihydropyridine core.

2.15. Zoliflodacin (151)

On 12 December 2025, the FDA approved zoliflodacin (Scheme 16, Nuzolvence®, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK) to treat uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea due to Neisseria gonorrhoeae [111,112]. It is a first-in-class oral antibiotic developed for the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea, including infections caused by strains resistant to existing antibiotics [113]. It belongs to a novel chemical class known as spiropyrimidinetriones and works by inhibiting the bacterial DNA gyrase (specifically the GyrB subunit), a mechanism that is distinct from fluoroquinolones and helps avoid cross-resistance [114,115]. The drug is intended to be used as a single-dose oral therapy, which improves patient adherence and removes the need for injectable treatment [111]. Zoliflodacin was originally discovered at AstraZeneca and later advanced through clinical development by Entasis Therapeutics. Its final development and path toward regulatory approval were supported through a public–private partnership between the Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership (GARDP) and Innoviva Specialty Therapeutics [116]. Its synthesis [117] (Scheme 16, current patent assignee: AstraZeneca) develops from 2,3,4-trifluorobenzaldehyde 152, which is treated with ethylene glycol in the presence of catalytic p-toluenesulfonic acid (TsOH), giving the 1,3-dioxolane 153 (78%). This was metalated by n-butyllithium in cold THF, followed by the addition of DMF to generate aldehyde 154 (93%). This was treated with hydroxylamine hydrochloride to give oxime 155 in high yield (80%), followed by chlorination with N-chlorosuccinimide (NCS) to give 156 as a white solid (76%). The treatment of 156 with (S)-2-aminopropan-1-ol 157 in DMF afforded 158 via addition to the electrophilic oxime carbon and simultaneously an intramolecular SNAr (oxygen from aminopropan-1-ol displaced one aromatic fluorine). Next, the treatment with CDI and Cs2CO3 in DMF afforded the characteristic oxazolidinone 159 in moderate yield (53%). Next, the deprotection of dioxolane via HCl in THF/water regenerated aldehyde 160 (quantitative yield), which was treated with (2R,6R)-2,6-dimethylmorpholine 161 in alkaline conditions (Cs2CO3) to give the substituted fluoroarene 162 in good yield (73%). Eventually, the addition of barbituric acid to 162 involved a 1,5-hydrogen shift to generate an intermediate that epimerized before cyclization to the spiropyrimidinedione in zoliflodacin 151. It is worth noting that the last step involved supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) as a purification technique.
Analysis of the crystal structure of zoliflodacin in complex with S. aureus DNA gyrase and substrate DNA (Figure 13, PDB: 8BP2 [118]; crystal structure of zoliflodacin with S. aureus DNA gyrase and DNA) reveals that the benzoxazol ring of the ligand engages in π-π stacking interactions with substrate DNA bases DC2012E and DG2013E. Three H-bonds are observed with residues Asp437D, Asn476D, and the phosphodiester backbone of DG2009F.
The physicochemical parameters of zoliflodacin (LogP: 1.14, tPSA: 138.87, LogS: −4.792) compared to its non-halogenated derivative (LogP: 0.98, tPSA: 138.87, LogS: −4.571) showed that the fluorine impacts the lipophilicity (making the molecule more lipophilic) and the solubility (decreases the solubility).

2.16. Tradipitant (163)

Tradipitant (Scheme 17, NEREUS®, developed by Eli Lilly and Company) is a neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor antagonist primarily used for the acute prevention of vomiting induced by motion [119]. Approved on 30 December 2025, it works by selectively blocking neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptors in the central nervous system, which are critical in the sensory pathways that trigger nausea and vomiting [120]. Vanda Pharmaceuticals is the company that licensed it and is developing and commercializing it today [121]. Chemically, it contains two trifluoromethyl groups and a chloroarene. Its synthesis [122] develops from thiophenol 164, which is condensed with 165 in the presence of K2CO3 in DMF at 110 °C to yield a sulfide intermediate, which is then oxidized by means of NaOCl in AcOH to give 2-(benzenesulfonyl)pyridine 166. This is treated with (iPr)2NH and n-BuLi in THF at −60 to −70 °C and subsequently couples with 2-chlorobenzaldehyde 167 in THF at −60 to −70 °C to furnish (2-(phenylsulfonyl)pyridin-3-yl)-(2-chlorophenyl)methanone 168. Ketone couples with the enolate of 4-acetylpyridine 169 (formed by treating 4-acetylpyridine with t-BuOK in DMSO) in the presence of LiOH in DMSO and subsequently is treated with PhCOOH in iPrOAc to give rise to pyridine benzoate derivative 170. This finally couples with 1-azidomethyl-3,5-bistrifluoromethylbenzene 171 in the presence of K2CO3 in t-BuOH to afford the title compound tradipitant 163. The yields for this pathway were not retrieved. The physicochemical parameters of tradipitant (LogP: 6.9, tPSA: 69.75, LogS: −9.479) compared to its non-halogenated derivative (LogP: 5.47, tPSA: 69.75, LogS: −7.536) indicate that tradipitant exhibits higher lipophilicity and lower aqueous solubility, while both compounds possess identical polar surface area.

3. Other Halogen-Containing Approved Drugs in 2025 (Macromolecules)

Datopotamab deruxtecan (dato–DXd; datopotamab deruxtecan–dlnk) is an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) designed for the targeted treatment of various cancers, particularly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) [123,124].
Deruxtecan (172) is a chemical compound, a camptothecin-derived drug, specifically a derivative of exatecan 173 (Figure 14), that acts as a topoisomerase I inhibitor [123]. It contains an aromatic fluorine, and its molecular weight is 1034.068 g·mol−1. The introduction of fluorine into such compounds is likely to improve their pharmacokinetic and pharmacological properties, enhancing antitumor activity.

4. Other Halogen-Containing Pipeline Drugs (Not Approved)

In this section, a short list of halogen-containing drugs that were not approved but are evaluated for possible approval is presented (Figure 15). Troriluzole 174 is a glutamate modulator in development for the treatment of adult patients with spinocerebellar ataxia [125]. Relacorilant 175 is a selective cortisol modulator under development for use in combination therapy for patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer with endogenous hypercortisolism (Cushing’s syndrome) [126]. Ensitrelvir 176 is a 3CL protease inhibitor antiviral in development for post-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 [127]. Reproxalap 177 is a novel small-molecule regulator of reactive aldehyde species (RASP) that is being developed to treat dry eye complaints [128]. Troriluzole and relacorilant are fluorine-based small molecules (both contain a trifluoromethyl group), whereas reproxalap is chlorine-based. Ensitrelvir contains both chlorine and fluorine atoms. All four are drug candidates in clinical development or regulatory review and are not currently approved (in the U.S. or broadly globally) for their intended uses.
Small molecules continue to be at the center of the research, according to the FDA’s Novel Drug Approvals for 2025 report. Among 46 total novel drug approvals (data assessed on 30 December 2025), 31 are small molecules (<1000 Da) (67%). It is an impressive reminder that while new modalities grab headlines, organic chemistry continues to drive the majority of therapeutic breakthroughs.
An analysis of drugs (new chemical entities) approved by the FDA [129] in the last 6 years are shown in Figure 16. It is evident from the graph that in 2022, this represented a major drop, followed by a recovery in the period 2023–2024 [130]. This trend is also followed by the number of halogen-containing small molecules, which are 16, 14, 6, 14, and 16 for the years 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively [5]. Halogen-containing molecules, within the context of all FDA-approved chemical entities, represent a significant proportion (~40%) in 2020 and 2021, reducing to 27% in 2022 and increasing to a value of ~40% in 2023 and of 50% in 2024. In 2025, among 27 new chemical entities (excluding peptides, oligonucleotides, and antibody–drug conjugates), 17 were halogen-containing small molecules. This represents almost 63%, indicating that halogens have been extensively employed in drugs in the last year. All the small molecules presented in this review (Table 1) are administered orally. Oral medications can be self-administered, reducing the need for clinical supervision and lowering healthcare costs.
About half of the discussed drugs (mirdametinib, avutometinib, defactinib, taletrectinib, sunvozertinib, and imlunestrant) are primarily anticancer drugs, while the rest target autoimmune, endocrine, or other non-cancer conditions.
In this review, we showed that over the decades, halogen atoms have established themselves as silent architects of molecular design, being subtle yet profoundly influential in shaping the behavior of countless therapeutic agents. As of 2025, the continued prevalence of halogen-containing drugs among FDA-approved small molecules highlights how indispensable these elements remain to medicinal chemistry, even in the field of orphan drugs, as already shown by our previous review [131]. Their ability to modulate electronic properties, fine-tune lipophilicity, and guide molecular recognition within biological targets makes them far more than mere substituents; they are deliberate design elements that bridge chemistry and biology.
Recent approvals illustrate an evolving sophistication in halogen employment. Fluorine, in particular, continues to dominate as a tool for enhancing metabolic stability and optimizing pharmacokinetics, while chlorine and iodine often play crucial roles in achieving target selectivity or favorable binding orientations. Bromine was not encountered in any of the approved drugs in 2025. The strategic placement of halogens has thus become a defining feature in modern drug design, supporting the creation of highly optimized therapeutic profiles across oncology, infectious disease, metabolic disorders, and neurological conditions. Moreover, besides the high recurrence of halogens in drug design, a very recent machine-learning study [132] (using a model called Hybrid Dynamic Graph-based Ensemble Model, HD-GEM) actually challenged the old assumption that all halogenation increases toxicity. The findings, particularly regarding complex aromatic scaffolds, suggest that polyhalogenation (adding multiple halogens) can show reduced toxicity, likely due to the stabilizing effect mentioned above, which mitigates the formation of reactive metabolites. Iodine substituents, in particular, were found to be associated with the lowest toxicity in the scaffolds they studied. Additionally, several studies suggest that halogenation, especially fluorination, continues to be a strategy to improve oral bioavailability [133]. Altogether, the unprecedented advances of 2025 reaffirm halogen-containing small-molecule drugs as a cornerstone of modern therapeutics, underscoring their enduring value in innovation, precision design, and transformative clinical impact.

5. Conclusions

Halogenation remains one of the most powerful and strategically refined tools in modern medicinal chemistry. As highlighted throughout this review, the deliberate incorporation of fluorine, chlorine, bromine, and, more selectively, iodine continues to shape the physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic profiles of contemporary drug candidates. Fluorine, in particular, has proven indispensable for fine-tuning lipophilicity, metabolic resistance, and target binding through electronic modulation and participation in unique noncovalent interactions. Chlorine further expands structural diversity by enhancing hydrophobic contacts, influencing molecular conformation, and optimizing pharmacokinetic behavior.
Recent FDA approvals in 2025 reinforce the enduring relevance of halogen chemistry in addressing complex therapeutic challenges across oncology, infectious diseases, and central nervous system disorders. Structure–activity relationship (SAR) analyses consistently demonstrate that strategic halogen placement can dramatically alter potency, selectivity, and safety profiles. Advances in synthetic methodologies have also improved the efficiency, regioselectivity, and scalability of halogen incorporation, supporting practical drug development with favorable yields and sustainable approaches.
Beyond traditional electronic and lipophilic effects, growing structural and biophysical evidence underscores the importance of halogen bonding and other directional interactions in stabilizing ligand–target complexes. These insights deepen our understanding of molecular recognition and provide a rational framework for future design strategies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.B.T. and L.S.; methodology, D.B.T.; software, N.I. and M.D.; validation, D.B.T. and L.S.; formal analysis, D.B.T.; investigation, D.B.T. and L.S.; resources, D.B.T. and L.S.; data curation, M.D.; writing—original draft preparation, D.B.T., L.S. and N.I.; writing—review and editing, D.B.T., L.S., C.S., and N.I.; visualization, D.B.T., L.S., and C.S.; supervision, L.S. and C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available at https://www.fda.gov/drugs/novel-drug-approvals-fda/novel-drug-approvals-2025 (accessed on 15 January 2025).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ACNacetonitrile
AcOHacetic acid
ADCantibody–drug conjugate
BBBblood–brain barrier
BBr3boron tribromide
BOCtert-butoxycarbonyl
BTKBruton’s tyrosine kinase
BuLin-butyllithium
BuOHn-butanol
CDIcarbonyldiimidazole
CNScentral nervous system
COVID-19coronavirus disease 2019
Cryo-EMcryogenic electron microscopy
CPMEcyclopentyl methyl ether
Cs2CO3cesium carbonate
DBU1,8-diazabicyclo [5.4.0]undec-7-ene
DCMdichloromethane
DIADdiisopropyl azodicarboxylate
DIBALHdiisobutylaluminum hydride
DIEAdiisopropylethylamine
DMEdimethoxyethane
DMFdimethylformamide
DMSOdimethyl sulfoxide
EGFRepidermal growth factor receptor
FAKfocal adhesion kinase
FDAFood and Drug Administration
GIgastrointestinal
HATUO-(7-azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate
HClhydrochloric acid
HER2human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
iPrOHisopropanol
ITPimmune thrombocytopenia
MAPKmitogen-activated protein kinase
MCF7Michigan Cancer Foundation-7 (breast cancer cell line)
MEKmitogen-activated protein kinase kinase
MeOHmethanol
MeSO2Clmethanesulfonyl chloride
NCSN-chlorosuccinimide
NF1neurofibromatosis type 1
NISN-iodosuccinimide
NSCLCnon-small cell lung cancer
PDpharmacodynamics
PKpharmacokinetics
PPh3triphenylphosphine
SFCsupercritical fluid chromatography
SNArnucleophilic aromatic substitution
SOCl2thionyl chloride
TFAtrifluoroacetic acid
THFtetrahydrofuran
TKDtyrosine kinase domain
TKItyrosine kinase inhibitor
TMSCltrimethylsilyl chloride
TNBCtriple-negative breast cancer
tPSAtotal polar surface area
TsOHp-toluenesulfonic acid

References

  1. Benedetto Tiz, D.; Bagnoli, L.; Rosati, O.; Marini, F.; Sancineto, L.; Santi, C. New Halogen-Containing Drugs Approved by FDA in 2021: An Overview on Their Syntheses and Pharmaceutical Use. Molecules 2022, 27, 1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Benedetto Tiz, D.; Bagnoli, L.; Rosati, O.; Marini, F.; Santi, C.; Sancineto, L. FDA-Approved Small Molecules in 2022: Clinical Uses and Their Synthesis. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Benedetto Tiz, D.; Rosati, O.; Sancineto, L. Sulfur- and Phosphorus-Containing FDA Approved Drugs in the Last Five Years (2020–2024): A Journey among Small Molecules. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2025, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Benedetto Tiz, D.; Mangiavacchi, F.; Sancineto, L. The Importance of Nitrile Functionality: FDA-Approved Small Molecules from 2021 to 2024. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2026, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ali, S.; Tian, X.; Meccia, S.A.; Zhou, J. Highlights on U.S. FDA-Approved Halogen-Containing Drugs in 2024. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2025, 287, 117380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. 2024 Novel Small Molecule FDA Drug Approvals. Available online: https://www.datocms-assets.com/92605/1738357181-sq_dh-2024-fda-small-molecule-approvals.pdf (accessed on 15 January 2025).
  7. Maddahi, J.; Agostini, D.; Bateman, T.M.; Bax, J.J.; Beanlands, R.S.B.; Berman, D.S.; Dorbala, S.; Garcia, E.V.; Feldman, J.; Heller, G.V.; et al. Flurpiridaz F-18 PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2023, 82, 1598–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fluorine Approved Drugs. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=fluorine+approved+drugs&filter=years.2000-2025 (accessed on 1 June 2025).
  9. Bromine Approved Drugs. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=bromine+approved+drugs&filter=years.2000-2025 (accessed on 1 June 2025).
  10. Chlorine Approved Drugs. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=chlorine+approved+drugs (accessed on 1 June 2025).
  11. Iodine Approved Drugs. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=iodine+approved+drugs&filter=years.2000-2025 (accessed on 1 June 2025).
  12. Du, Y.; Bian, Y.; Baecker, D.; Dhawan, G.; Semghouli, A.; Kiss, L.; Zhang, W.; Sorochinsky, A.E.; Soloshonok, V.A.; Han, J. Fluorine in the Pharmaceutical Industry: FDA-Approved Fluorine-Containing Drugs in 2024. Chem.–Eur. J. 2025, 31, e202500662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gannarapu, M.R.; Nagiri, R.K.; Desagoni, M.; Velma, G.R. FDA-Approved Fluorine-Containing Molecules in 2024: Significance, Synthesis, and Therapeutic Applications. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2025, 25, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gillis, E.P.; Eastman, K.J.; Hill, M.D.; Donnelly, D.J.; Meanwell, N.A. Applications of Fluorine in Medicinal Chemistry. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 8315–8359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shah, P.; Westwell, A.D. The Role of Fluorine in Medicinal Chemistry: Review Article. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2007, 22, 527–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Patani, G.A.; LaVoie, E.J. Bioisosterism: A Rational Approach in Drug Design. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 3147–3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mu, K.; Zhu, Z.; Abula, A.; Peng, C.; Zhu, W.; Xu, Z. Halogen Bonds Exist between Noncovalent Ligands and Natural Nucleic Acids. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 4424–4435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hardegger, L.A.; Kuhn, B.; Spinnler, B.; Anselm, L.; Ecabert, R.; Stihle, M.; Gsell, B.; Thoma, R.; Diez, J.; Benz, J.; et al. Systematic Investigation of Halogen Bonding in Protein–Ligand Interactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 314–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Inouye, B.; Katayama, Y.; Ishida, T.; Ogata, M.; Utsumi, K. Effects of Aromatic Bromine Compounds on the Function of Biological Membranes. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1979, 48, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Novel Drug Approvals for 2025. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/novel-drug-approvals-fda/novel-drug-approvals-2025 (accessed on 1 June 2025).
  21. Salentin, S.; Schreiber, S.; Haupt, V.J.; Adasme, M.F.; Schroeder, M. PLIP: Fully Automated Protein–Ligand Interaction Profiler. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, W443–W447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schrödinger, Inc. Schrödinger Release 2025−1: Maestro; Schrödinger, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  23. Schrödinger, Inc. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, version 3.0; Schrödinger, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2024.
  24. Osteen, J.D.; Immani, S.; Tapley, T.L.; Indersmitten, T.; Hurst, N.W.; Healey, T.; Aertgeerts, K.; Negulescu, P.A.; Lechner, S.M. Pharmacology and Mechanism of Action of Suzetrigine, a Potent and Selective NaV1.8 Pain Signal Inhibitor for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Pain. Pain Ther. 2025, 14, 655–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. FDA Approves Novel Non-Opioid Treatment for Moderate to Severe Acute Pain. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-novel-non-opioid-treatment-moderate-severe-acute-pain (accessed on 15 January 2026).
  26. Hu, S.; Lyu, D.; Gao, J. Suzetrigine: The First Nav1.8 Inhibitor Approved for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acute Pain. Drug Discov. Ther. 2025, 19, 80–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. A First-in-Class, FDA-Approved Non-Addictive NaV1.8 Inhibitor for Acute and Moderate Pain. Available online: https://drughunter.com/molecule/suzetrigine-vx-548/ (accessed on 15 January 2026).
  28. Suzetrigine Synthesis. Available online: https://www.a2bchem.com/synthesisRoute/2649467-58-1 (accessed on 15 January 2026).
  29. Harrison, C. Process for the Synthesis of Substituted Tetrahydrofuran Modulators of Sodium Channels 2022. U.S. Patent Application No. 18/566,170, 20 November 2025. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sibomana, O.; Okereke, M.; Hakayuwa, C.M. Suzetrigine Approval Breaks a 25-Year Silence: A New Era in Non-Opioid Acute Pain Management. J. Pain Res. 2025, 18, 2805–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. ChemDraw—PerkinElmer Informatics. Available online: https://perkinelmerinformatics.com/products/research/chemdraw (accessed on 29 November 2022).
  32. FDA. Approves Mirdametinib for Adult and Pediatric Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Who Have Symptomatic Plexiform Neurofibromas Not Amenable to Complete Resection. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-mirdametinib-adult-and-pediatric-patients-neurofibromatosis-type-1-who-have-symptomatic (accessed on 15 January 2026).
  33. Gallagher, P.; Rolfo, C.; Elez, E.; Taieb, J.; Houlden, J.; Collins, L.; Roberts, C.; André, T.; Lawler, M.; Di Nicolantonio, F.; et al. A Phase Ia Study of the MEK1/2 Inhibitor PD-0325901 with the c-MET Inhibitor Crizotinib in Patients with Advanced Solid Cancers. BJC Rep. 2025, 3, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Asir R V, A.; Buzaeva, P.; Michaelevski, I. Unlocking the Therapeutic Potential of Protein Kinase Inhibitors in Neurodegenerative and Psychiatric Disorders. Explor. Drug Sci. 2025, 2, 100892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Weiss, B.D.; Wolters, P.L.; Plotkin, S.R.; Widemann, B.C.; Tonsgard, J.H.; Blakeley, J.; Allen, J.C.; Schorry, E.; Korf, B.; Robison, N.J.; et al. NF106: A Neurofibromatosis Clinical Trials Consortium Phase II Trial of the MEK Inhibitor Mirdametinib (PD-0325901) in Adolescents and Adults with NF1-Related Plexiform Neurofibromas. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 797–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Oztosun, G.; Armstrong, A.; Hirbe, A.C. Mirdametinib, an FDA-Approved MEK1/2 Inhibitor for Adult and Pediatric NF1-Associated Plexiform Neurofibromas. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2025, 34, 665–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Irdam, E.; Nanninga, T.; Davis, E.; Tjiong, H.; Weaver, J.; Winkle, D. Methods of Preparing Mek Inhibitor 2006. International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2006/001584, 12 December 2006. [Google Scholar]
  38. LoRusso, P.M.; Krishnamurthi, S.S.; Rinehart, J.J.; Nabell, L.M.; Malburg, L.; Chapman, P.B.; DePrimo, S.E.; Bentivegna, S.; Wilner, K.D.; Tan, W.; et al. Phase I Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Oral MAPK/ERK Kinase Inhibitor PD-0325901 in Patients with Advanced Cancers. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 1924–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Saara; Kamboj, S.; Rani, D. Mirdametinib: FDA Approved MEK Inhibitor for Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2025, 95, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Khan, Z.M.; Real, A.M.; Marsiglia, W.M.; Chow, A.; Duffy, M.E.; Yerabolu, J.R.; Scopton, A.P.; Dar, A.C. Structural Basis for the Action of the Drug Trametinib at KSR-Bound MEK. Nature 2020, 588, 509–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Milesi, P.; Baldelli Bombelli, F.; Lanfrancone, L.; Gomila, R.M.; Frontera, A.; Metrangolo, P.; Terraneo, G. Structural Insights on the Role of Halogen Bonding in Protein MEK Kinase-Inhibitor Complexes. Chem.–Asian J. 2024, 19, e202301033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Banerjee, S.N.; Van Nieuwenhuysen, E.; Aghajanian, C.; D’Hondt, V.; Monk, B.J.; Clamp, A.; Prendergast, E.; Oaknin, A.; Ring, K.; Colombo, N.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Avutometinib ± Defactinib in Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: Primary Analysis of ENGOT-OV60/GOG-3052/RAMP 201. J. Clin. Oncol. 2025, 43, 2782–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Guo, C.; Chénard-Poirier, M.; Roda, D.; de Miguel, M.; Harris, S.J.; Candilejo, I.M.; Sriskandarajah, P.; Xu, W.; Scaranti, M.; Constantinidou, A.; et al. Intermittent Schedules of the Oral RAF-MEK Inhibitor CH5126766/VS-6766 in Patients with RAS/RAF-Mutant Solid Tumours and Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Centre, Open-Label, Phase 1 Dose-Escalation and Basket Dose-Expansion Study. Lancet Oncol. 2020, 21, 1478–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Coma, S.; Arcas, M.M.; Downward, J.; Pachter, J.A. Abstract 4155: The RAF/MEK Clamp Avutometinib (VS-6766) Induces an Immunogenic Tumor Microenvironment and Potentiates the Efficacy of Anti-PD-1. Cancer Res. 2023, 83, 4155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Almazan, J.; Turapov, T.; Kircher, D.A.; Stanley, K.A.; Culver, K.; Medellin, A.P.; Field, M.N.; Parkman, G.L.; Colman, H.; Coma, S.; et al. Combined Inhibition of Focal Adhesion Kinase and RAF/MEK Elicits Synergistic Inhibition of Melanoma Growth and Reduces Metastases. Cell Rep. Med. 2025, 6, 101943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lee, B.Y.; Timpson, P.; Horvath, L.G.; Daly, R.J. FAK Signaling in Human Cancer as a Target for Therapeutics. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015, 146, 132–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhan, Z.; Mao, W. Development of Novel Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) Inhibitors for Targeting Cancer: Structural Insights and Therapeutic Potential. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2024, 279, 116913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dawson, J.C.; Serrels, A.; Stupack, D.G.; Schlaepfer, D.D.; Frame, M.C. Targeting FAK in Anticancer Combination Therapies. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2021, 21, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pyridine—Some Industrial Chemicals—NCBI Bookshelf. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK390836/ (accessed on 15 February 2026).
  50. Aoki, T.; Hyohdoh, I.; Furuichi, N.; Ozawa, S.; Watanabe, F.; Matsushita, M.; Sakaitani, M.; Morikami, K.; Takanashi, K.; Harada, N.; et al. Optimizing the Physicochemical Properties of Raf/MEK Inhibitors by Nitrogen Scanning. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  51. Lito, P.; Saborowski, A.; Yue, J.; Solomon, M.; Joseph, E.; Gadal, S.; Saborowski, M.; Kastenhuber, E.; Fellmann, C.; Ohara, K.; et al. Disruption of CRAF-Mediated MEK Activation Is Required for Effective MEK Inhibition in KRAS Mutant Tumors. Cancer Cell 2014, 25, 697–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Berger, B.-T.; Amaral, M.; Kokh, D.B.; Nunes-Alves, A.; Musil, D.; Heinrich, T.; Schröder, M.; Neil, R.; Wang, J.; Navratilova, I.; et al. Structure-Kinetic Relationship Reveals the Mechanism of Selectivity of FAK Inhibitors over PYK2. Cell Chem. Biol. 2021, 28, 686–698.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Klaeger, S.; Heinzlmeir, S.; Wilhelm, M.; Polzer, H.; Vick, B.; Koenig, P.-A.; Reinecke, M.; Ruprecht, B.; Petzoldt, S.; Meng, C.; et al. The Target Landscape of Clinical Kinase Drugs. Science 2017, 358, eaan4368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Papadopoulos, K.P.; Borazanci, E.; Shaw, A.T.; Katayama, R.; Shimizu, Y.; Zhu, V.W.; Sun, T.Y.; Wakelee, H.A.; Madison, R.; Schrock, A.B.; et al. U.S. Phase I First-in-Human Study of Taletrectinib (DS-6051b/AB-106), a ROS1/TRK Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 4785–4794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ou, S.-H.I.; Fujiwara, Y.; Shaw, A.T.; Yamamoto, N.; Nakagawa, K.; Fan, F.; Hao, Y.; Gao, Y.; Jänne, P.A.; Seto, T. Efficacy of Taletrectinib (AB-106/DS-6051b) in ROS1+ NSCLC: An Updated Pooled Analysis of U.S. and Japan Phase 1 Studies. JTO Clin. Res. Rep. 2021, 2, 100108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nagasaka, M.; Brazel, D.; Ou, S.-H.I. Taletrectinib for the Treatment of ROS-1 Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Drug Evaluation of Phase I and II Data. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2024, 33, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhou, F.; Chen, D.D.; Guo, F.; Ren, Z.; Shang, L.; Wang, H. Method for Producing 3,6-Disubstituted-Imidazo[1,2-B]Pyridazine Compounds 2023. International Patent Application No. PCT/CN2022/093570, 23 November 2023. [Google Scholar]
  58. Waliany, S.; Lin, J.J. Taletrectinib: TRUST in the Continued Evolution of Treatments for ROS1 Fusion-Positive Lung Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2024, 42, 2622–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dhillon, S. Sunvozertinib: First Approval. Drugs 2023, 83, 1629–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. FDA. Approves Sunvozertinib in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer. Available online: https://www.ajmc.com/view/fda-approves-sunvozertinib-in-non-small-cell-lung-cancer (accessed on 25 July 2025).
  61. Li, Z.; Zou, H.; Zhu, W.; Shen, C.; Wang, R.; Liu, W.; Chen, X.; Tsui, H.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, X. Erbb/Btk Inhibitors 2019. International Patent Application No. PCT/CN2019/073355, 8 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
  62. Sunvozertinib: Side Effects, Uses, Dosage, Interactions, Warnings. Available online: https://www.rxlist.com/sunvozertinib/generic-drug.htm (accessed on 2 October 2025).
  63. Wang, M.; Yang, J.C.-H.; Mitchell, P.L.; Fang, J.; Camidge, D.R.; Nian, W.; Chiu, C.-H.; Zhou, J.; Zhao, Y.; Su, W.-C.; et al. Sunvozertinib, a Selective EGFR Inhibitor for Previously Treated Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations. Cancer Discov. 2022, 12, 1676–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. FDA. Approves Sebetralstat for Hereditary Angioedema. Available online: https://www.ajmc.com/view/fda-approves-sebetralstat-for-hereditary-angioedema (accessed on 26 July 2025).
  65. Aygören-Pürsün, E.; Zanichelli, A.; Cohn, D.M.; Cancian, M.; Hakl, R.; Kinaciyan, T.; Magerl, M.; Martinez-Saguer, I.; Stobiecki, M.; Farkas, H.; et al. An Investigational Oral Plasma Kallikrein Inhibitor for On-Demand Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema: A Two-Part, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Phase 2 Trial. Lancet 2023, 401, 458–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bygum, A.; Busse, P.; Caballero, T.; Maurer, M. Disease Severity, Activity, Impact, and Control and How to Assess Them in Patients with Hereditary Angioedema. Front. Med. 2017, 4, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Feener, E.P.; Davie, R.L.; Murugesan, N.; Pethen, S.J.; Hampton, S.L.; Smith, M.D.; Audhya, P.K.; Yea, C.M. Sebetralstat: A Rapidly Acting Oral Plasma Kallikrein Inhibitor for the On-Demand Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema. Drugs Drug Candidates 2024, 3, 328–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Farkas, H.; Balla, Z. An Evaluation of Sebetralstat as the First Oral On-Demand Therapy for Hereditary Angioedema. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2025, 26, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Beaton, H.; Crowe, D.M.; Edwards, H.J.; Griffiths-Haynes, N.J. Polymorphs of N-[(3-Fluoro-4-Methoxypyridin-2-Yl)Methyl]-3-(Methoxymethyl)-1-({4-[2-Oxopyridin-1-Yl)Methyl]Phenyl} Methyl) Pyrazole -4-Carboxamide as Kallikrein Inhibitors 2017. International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2017/051546, 7 December 2017. [Google Scholar]
  70. Davie, R.L.; Edwards, H.J.; Evans, D.M.; Hodgson, S.T.; Stocks, M.J.; Smith, A.J.; Rushbrooke, L.J.; Pethen, S.J.; Roe, M.B.; Clark, D.E.; et al. Sebetralstat (KVD900): A Potent and Selective Small Molecule Plasma Kallikrein Inhibitor Featuring a Novel P1 Group as a Potential Oral On-Demand Treatment for Hereditary Angioedema. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 13629–13644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Riedl, M.A.; Farkas, H.; Aygören-Pürsün, E.; Psarros, F.; Soteres, D.F.; Staevska, M.; Cancian, M.; Hagin, D.; Honda, D.; Melamed, I.; et al. Oral Sebetralstat for On-Demand Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks. N. Engl. J. Med. 2024, 391, 23–34. Available online: https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2314192 (accessed on 6 October 2025). [CrossRef]
  72. McCormick, B. Rilzabrutinib Becomes First FDA-Approved BTK Inhibitor for ITP|AJMC. Available online: https://www.ajmc.com/view/rilzabrutinib-becomes-first-fda-approved-btk-inhibitor-for-itp (accessed on 21 September 2025).
  73. Zhang, Q.; Wen, C.; Zhao, L.; Wang, Y. A Comprehensive Review of Small-Molecule Inhibitors Targeting Bruton Tyrosine Kinase: Synthetic Approaches and Clinical Applications. Molecules 2023, 28, 8037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. A Phase I Trial of PRN1008, a Novel Reversible Covalent Inhibitor of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase, in Healthy Volunteers—Smith —2017—British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology—Wiley Online Library. Available online: https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bcp.13351 (accessed on 21 September 2025).
  75. Owens, T.; Verner, E. Pyrazolopyrimidine Compounds as Kinase Inhibitors 2015. International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/058614, 10 March 2015. [Google Scholar]
  76. Owens, T.D.; Brameld, K.A.; Verner, E.J.; Ton, T.; Li, X.; Zhu, J.; Masjedizadeh, M.R.; Bradshaw, J.M.; Hill, R.J.; Tam, D.; et al. Discovery of Reversible Covalent Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors PRN473 and PRN1008 (Rilzabrutinib). J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 5300–5316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kuter, D.J.; Ghanima, W. Evaluating Rilzabrutinib in the Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia. Immunotherapy 2025, 17, 767–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. FDA. Research, C. for D.E. and FDA Approves Imlunestrant for ER-Positive, HER2-Negative, ESR1-Mutated Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer; FDA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2025.
  79. Hanna, K.S.; Moniz, R.; Chan, C.; Helmke, A.; Hudson, A.; Palmatier, S.; Chapman, M. Imlunestrant. Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD), Treatment of Breast Cancer. Drugs Future 2023, 48, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bastian, J.A.; Cohen, J.D.; Rubio, A.; Sall, D.J. Selective Estrogen Receptor Degraders 2020. International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/041334, 16 January 2020. [Google Scholar]
  81. Guglielmi, G.; Del Re, M.; Gol, L.S.; Bengala, C.; Danesi, R.; Fogli, S. Pharmacological Insights on Novel Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degraders in Breast Cancer. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2024, 969, 176424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Sherman, S.; Sandusky, Z.M.; Russo, D.; Zak, D.; Nardone, A.; Friel, D.; Hermida-Prado, F.; Heraud, C.; Kuziel, G.; Verma, A.; et al. Imlunestrant a Next-Generation Oral SERD Overcomes ESR1 Mutant Resistance in Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer. JCI Insight 2025, 10, e188051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. McNulty, R. Paltusotine FDA Approved for Acromegaly in Adults|AJMC. Available online: https://www.ajmc.com/view/paltusotine-fda-approved-for-acromegaly-in-adults (accessed on 2 October 2025).
  84. Zhao, J.; Wang, S.; Markison, S.; Kim, S.H.; Han, S.; Chen, M.; Kusnetzow, A.K.; Rico-Bautista, E.; Johns, M.; Luo, R.; et al. Discovery of Paltusotine (CRN00808), a Potent, Selective, and Orally Bioavailable Non-Peptide SST2 Agonist. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2023, 14, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhao, J.; Fu, H.; Yu, J.; Hong, W.; Tian, X.; Qi, J.; Sun, S.; Zhao, C.; Wu, C.; Xu, Z.; et al. Prospect of Acromegaly Therapy: Molecular Mechanism of Clinical Drugs Octreotide and Paltusotine. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Zhao, J.; Shao, Z. Paltusotine-Bound SSTR2-Gi Complex: 7yac 2023; RCSB PDB: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  87. Metz, M.; Giménez-Arnau, A.; Hide, M.; Lebwohl, M.; Mosnaim, G.; Saini, S.; Sussman, G.; Szalewski, R.; Haemmerle, S.; Lheritier, K.; et al. Remibrutinib in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria. N. Engl. J. Med. 2025, 392, 984–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Novartis Receives FDA Approval for Rhapsido® (Remibrutinib), the Only Oral, Targeted BTKi Treatment for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU). Available online: https://www.novartis.com/news/media-releases/novartis-receives-fda-approval-rhapsido-remibrutinib-only-oral-targeted-btki-treatment-chronic-spontaneous-urticaria-csu (accessed on 8 October 2025).
  89. Li, K.; Wang, M.; Akoglu, M.; Pollard, A.C.; Klecker, J.B.; Alfonso, P.; Corrionero, A.; Prendiville, N.; Qu, W.; Parker, M.F.L.; et al. Synthesis and Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel Fluorine-18-Labeled Tracer for Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 2023, 6, 410–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kocienski, P. Synthesis of Remibrutinib. Synfacts 2020, 16, 0888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. FDA. Approves Nerandomilast for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis|AJMC. Available online: https://www.ajmc.com/view/fda-approves-nerandomilast-for-idiopathic-pulmonary-fibrosis (accessed on 8 October 2025).
  92. Maher, T.M.; Assassi, S.; Azuma, A.; Cottin, V.; Hoffmann-Vold, A.-M.; Kreuter, M.; Oldham, J.M.; Richeldi, L.; Valenzuela, C.; Wijsenbeek, M.S.; et al. Nerandomilast in Patients with Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2025, 392, 2203–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Frutos, R.P.; Tampone, T.G.; Gerstmann, F.; Weber, D.; Brodmann, T.; Hagenkötter, R.; Abella, J.; Yang, B.-S.; Mulder, J.; Rodriguez, S.; et al. Development of a Scalable Asymmetric Process for the Synthesis of Selective PDE4B Inhibitor Nerandomilast (BI 1015550). Org. Process Res. Dev. 2024, 28, 3745–3751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Frutos, R.P.; Tampone, T.G.; Mulder, J.A.; Rodriguez, S.; Yee, N.K.; Yang, B.-S.; Senanayake, C.H. Development of a Practical Process for the Synthesis of PDE4 Inhibitors. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2016, 20, 982–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. FDA. Approves Elinzanetant, a Hormone-Free Option for Hot Flashes in Menopause|AJMC. Available online: https://www.ajmc.com/view/fda-approves-elinzanetant-a-hormone-free-option-for-hot-flashes-in-menopause (accessed on 25 October 2025).
  96. Hager, M.; Goldstein, T.; Fitz, V.; Ott, J. Elinzanetant, a New Combined Neurokinin-1/-3 Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Vasomotor Symptoms. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2024, 25, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Pawsey, S.; Mills, E.G.; Ballantyne, E.; Donaldson, K.; Kerr, M.; Trower, M.; Dhillo, W.S. Elinzanetant (NT-814), a Neurokinin 1,3 Receptor Antagonist, Reduces Estradiol and Progesterone in Healthy Women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 106, e3221–e3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Simon, J.A.; Anderson, R.A.; Ballantyne, E.; Bolognese, J.; Caetano, C.; Joffe, H.; Kerr, M.; Panay, N.; Seitz, C.; Seymore, S.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Elinzanetant, a Selective Neurokinin-1,3 Receptor Antagonist for Vasomotor Symptoms: A Dose-Finding Clinical Trial (SWITCH-1). Menopause 2023, 30, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Definition of Elinzanetant—NCI Drug Dictionary—NCI. Available online: https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-drug/def/elinzanetant (accessed on 25 October 2025).
  100. Panay, N.; Joffe, H.; Maki, P.M.; Nappi, R.E.; Pinkerton, J.V.; Simon, J.A.; Soares, C.N.; Thurston, R.C.; Francuski, M.; Caetano, C.; et al. Elinzanetant for the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms Associated with Menopause: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern. Med. 2025, 185, 1319–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Rottmann, A.; Peters, M.; Engelen, A.; Bordini, E.; Davalli, S.; Cufari, D.; Trower, M. Novel Dual Nk-1/Nk-3 Receptor Antagonists 2024. International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2024/056351, 19 September 2024. [Google Scholar]
  102. Craig, A.S.; Ismail, S.Z.; Lawrence, R.M. Anhydrate Forms of a Pyridine Derivative 2011. International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2010/062420, 3 March 2011. [Google Scholar]
  103. MA, L.J. FDA Approves Ziftomenib for R/R NPM1-Mutated AML|AJMC. Available online: https://www.ajmc.com/view/fda-approves-ziftomenib-for-r-r-npm1-mutated-aml (accessed on 13 November 2025).
  104. Wang, E.S.; Issa, G.C.; Erba, H.P.; Altman, J.K.; Montesinos, P.; DeBotton, S.; Walter, R.B.; Pettit, K.; Savona, M.R.; Shah, M.V.; et al. Ziftomenib in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (KOMET-001): A Multicentre, Open-Label, Multi-Cohort, Phase 1 Trial. Lancet Oncol. 2024, 25, 1310–1324. Available online: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(24)00386-3/abstract (accessed on 13 November 2025). [CrossRef]
  105. Thomas, X. Small Molecule Menin Inhibitors: Novel Therapeutic Agents Targeting Acute Myeloid Leukemia with KMT2A Rearrangement or NPM1 Mutation. Oncol. Ther. 2024, 12, 57–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Borkin, D.; Pollock, J.; Kempinska, K.; Purohit, T.; Li, X.; Wen, B.; Zhao, T.; Miao, H.; Shukla, S.; He, M.; et al. Property Focused Structure-Based Optimization of Small Molecule Inhibitors of the Protein–Protein Interaction between Menin and Mixed Lineage Leukemia (MLL). J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 892–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. FDA. Research, C. for D.E. and FDA Grants Accelerated Approval to Sevabertinib for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; FDA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2025.
  108. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Dana-Farber Research Supports FDA Approval of Sevabertinib for HER2-Mutant Lung Cancer. Available online: https://www.dana-farber.org/newsroom/news-releases/2025/dana-farber-research-supports-fda-approval-of-sevabertinib-for-her2-mutant-lung-cancer-0 (accessed on 21 November 2025).
  109. Le, X.; Kim, T.M.; Loong, H.H.; Prelaj, A.; Goh, B.C.; Li, L.; Fang, Y.; Lu, S.; Dong, X.; Wu, L.; et al. Sevabertinib in Advanced HER2-Mutant Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2025, 393, 1819–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Siegel, S.; SIEGEL, F.; Schulze, V.; Berger, M.; Graham, K.; Sülzle, D.; Bömer, U.; Korr, D.; SCHRÖDER, J.; MÖNNING, U.; et al. 4h-Pyrrolo[3,2-c]Pyridin-4-One Compounds 2020. International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2020/061176, 29 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
  111. Workowski, K.A. Zoliflodacin Shows Benefit as an Oral Treatment for Uncomplicated Gonorrhoea. Lancet 2026, 407, 106–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. FDA. Approves Two Oral Therapies to Treat Gonorrhea. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-two-oral-therapies-treat-gonorrhea (accessed on 17 December 2025).
  113. Bhavnani, S.M.; Cammarata, A.P.; Hammel, J.P.; Luckey, A.; Daram, P.; Larson, K.B.; O’Donnell, J.P.; Rubino, C.M. P-1251. Pharmacometric Analyses to Support Dose Selection of Zoliflodacin, a First-in-Class Oral Antibiotic Being Developed for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Gonorrhea. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2025, 12, ofae631.1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Oyardi, O.; Yilmaz, F.N.; Dosler, S. Efficacy of Zoliflodacin, a Spiropyrimidinetrione Antibiotic, Against Gram-Negative Pathogens. Curr. Microbiol. 2024, 81, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. ACS Infectious Diseases. Zoliflodacin: An Oral Spiropyrimidinetrione Antibiotic for the Treatment of Neisseria Gonorrheae, Including Multi-Drug-Resistant Isolates. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00021 (accessed on 17 December 2025).
  116. ‘Groundbreaking’: First Treatment Targeting ‘Super-Gonorrhoea’ Passes Trial. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03448-x (accessed on 17 December 2025).
  117. Kocienski, P. Synthesis of Zoliflodacin. Synfacts 2020, 16, 0890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Morgan, H.; Lipka-Lloyd, M.; Warren, A.J.; Hughes, N.; Holmes, J.; Burton, N.P.; Mahenthiralingam, E.; Bax, B.D. A 2.8 Å Structure of Zoliflodacin in a DNA Cleavage Complex with Staphylococcus Aureus DNA Gyrase. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Polymeropoulos, V.M.; Kiely, L.; Bushman, M.L.; Sutherland, E.B.; Goldberg, A.R.; Pham, A.X.; Miller, C.R.; Mourad, R.; Davis, T.R.; Pham, N.V.; et al. Motion Syros: Tradipitant Effective in the Treatment of Motion Sickness; a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Front. Neurol. 2025, 16, 1550670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Polymeropoulos, V.M.; Czeisler, M.É.; Gibson, M.M.; Anderson, A.A.; Miglo, J.; Wang, J.; Xiao, C.; Polymeropoulos, C.M.; Birznieks, G.; Polymeropoulos, M.H. Tradipitant in the Treatment of Motion Sickness: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 563373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Dunleavy, K. Vanda, Agios Score Holiday Season FDA Approvals. Available online: https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/vandas-motion-sickness-drug-and-agios-thalassemia-treatment-make-grade-fda (accessed on 6 January 2026).
  122. Amegadzie, A.; Gardinier, K.; Hembre, E.; Hong, J.; Jungheim, L.; Muehl, B.; Remick, D.; Robertson, M.; Savin, K. Triazole Derivatives as Tachykinin Receptor Antagonists 2003. International Patent Application No. PCT/US2003/010681, 6 November 2003. [Google Scholar]
  123. Datopotamab Deruxtecan-Dlnk—NCI. Available online: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/drugs/datopotamab-deruxtecan-dlnk (accessed on 6 October 2025).
  124. Royce, M.; Shah, M.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, J.; Bonner, M.K.; Pegues, M.; Miller, C.P.; Leu, L.; Price, L.S.L.; Qiu, J.; et al. FDA Approval Summary: Datopotamab Deruxtecan-Dlnk for Treatment of Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic, HR-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2025, 31, 4405–4411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Vyglxia (Troriluzole): What Is It and Is It FDA Approved? Available online: https://www.drugs.com/history/vyglxia.html (accessed on 16 November 2025).
  126. Drugs.com. Relacorilant: What Is It and Is It FDA Approved? Available online: https://www.drugs.com/history/relacorilant.html (accessed on 16 November 2025).
  127. Drugs.com. Ensitrelvir: What Is It and Is It FDA Approved? Available online: https://www.drugs.com/history/ensitrelvir.html (accessed on 16 November 2025).
  128. Drugs.com. Reproxalap: What Is It and Is It FDA Approved? Available online: https://www.drugs.com/history/reproxalap.html (accessed on 16 November 2025).
  129. De La Torre, B.G.; Albericio, F. The Pharmaceutical Industry in 2023: An Analysis of FDA Drug Approvals from the Perspective of Molecules. Molecules 2024, 29, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Wang, Y.; Yang, F.; Wang, B.; Xie, L.; Chen, W. New FDA Drug Approvals for 2024: Synthesis and Clinical Application. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2025, 285, 117241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Benedetto Tiz, D.; Bagnoli, L.; Rosati, O.; Marini, F.; Sancineto, L.; Santi, C. Top Selling (2026) Small Molecule Orphan Drugs: A Journey into Their Chemistry. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Boya, B.R.; Lee, J.-H.; Choi, J.-M.; Lee, J. Impact of Halogenation on Scaffold Toxicity Assessed Using HD-GEM Machine Learning Model. Brief. Bioinform. 2025, 26, bbaf347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Henary, E.; Casa, S.; Dost, T.L.; Sloop, J.C.; Henary, M. The Role of Small Molecules Containing Fluorine Atoms in Medicine and Imaging Applications. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. FDA-approved drugs in 2024 containing halogens.
Figure 1. FDA-approved drugs in 2024 containing halogens.
Biomolecules 16 00381 g001
Figure 2. Bar charts obtained from PubMed data using the general terms “halogen approved drugs”, “fluorine approved drugs”, “bromine approved drugs”, “chlorine approved drugs”, and “iodine approved drugs” in the period of 2000–2025. Data assessed on 30 May 2025.
Figure 2. Bar charts obtained from PubMed data using the general terms “halogen approved drugs”, “fluorine approved drugs”, “bromine approved drugs”, “chlorine approved drugs”, and “iodine approved drugs” in the period of 2000–2025. Data assessed on 30 May 2025.
Biomolecules 16 00381 g002
Scheme 1. Preparation of suzetrigine (17).
Scheme 1. Preparation of suzetrigine (17).
Biomolecules 16 00381 sch001
Scheme 2. Preparation of mirdametinib (32).
Scheme 2. Preparation of mirdametinib (32).
Biomolecules 16 00381 sch002
Figure 3. Experimental bound conformation of mirdametinib (PDB: 7JUU [40], crystal structure of KSR2:MEK1 in complex with AMP-PNP and allosteric MEK inhibitor mirdametinib). Mirdametinib is depicted as thick green sticks, MEK1 is represented by cyan cartoons and thin sticks. H-bond is represented by a yellow dashed line, halogen bond by a magenta dashed line, and π-π stacking interaction by a dark green dashed line.
Figure 3. Experimental bound conformation of mirdametinib (PDB: 7JUU [40], crystal structure of KSR2:MEK1 in complex with AMP-PNP and allosteric MEK inhibitor mirdametinib). Mirdametinib is depicted as thick green sticks, MEK1 is represented by cyan cartoons and thin sticks. H-bond is represented by a yellow dashed line, halogen bond by a magenta dashed line, and π-π stacking interaction by a dark green dashed line.
Biomolecules 16 00381 g003
Figure 4. Structures of avutometinib (41) and defactinib (42).
Figure 4. Structures of avutometinib (41) and defactinib (42).
Biomolecules 16 00381 g004
Scheme 3. Preparation of avutometinib (41).
Scheme 3. Preparation of avutometinib (41).
Biomolecules 16 00381 sch003
Figure 5. Experimental bound conformation of avutometinib (PDB: 3WIG [51]; human MEK1 kinase in complex with avutometinib and MgAMP-PNP). Avutometinib is depicted as thick green sticks, MEK1 is represented by cyan cartoons and thin sticks. H-bonds are represented by yellow dashed lines, while the dashed dark green line represents a π-π stacking interaction.
Figure 5. Experimental bound conformation of avutometinib (PDB: 3WIG [51]; human MEK1 kinase in complex with avutometinib and MgAMP-PNP). Avutometinib is depicted as thick green sticks, MEK1 is represented by cyan cartoons and thin sticks. H-bonds are represented by yellow dashed lines, while the dashed dark green line represents a π-π stacking interaction.
Biomolecules 16 00381 g005
Scheme 4. Preparation of defactinib (42).
Scheme 4. Preparation of defactinib (42).
Biomolecules 16 00381 sch004
Figure 6. Experimental bound conformation of defactinib (PDB: 5MAH [53]; crystal structure of MELK in complex with defactinib). Defactinib is depicted as thick green sticks, MELK is represented by cyan cartoons and thin sticks. H-bonds are represented by yellow dashed lines.
Figure 6. Experimental bound conformation of defactinib (PDB: 5MAH [53]; crystal structure of MELK in complex with defactinib). Defactinib is depicted as thick green sticks, MELK is represented by cyan cartoons and thin sticks. H-bonds are represented by yellow dashed lines.
Biomolecules 16 00381 g006
Scheme 5. Preparation of taletrectinib (52).
Scheme 5. Preparation of taletrectinib (52).
Biomolecules 16 00381 sch005
Scheme 6. Preparation of sunvozertinib (58).
Scheme 6. Preparation of sunvozertinib (58).
Biomolecules 16 00381 sch006
Scheme 7. Preparation of sebetralstat (68); on = overnight.
Scheme 7. Preparation of sebetralstat (68); on = overnight.
Biomolecules 16 00381 sch007
Figure 7. Experimental bound conformation of sebetralstat (PDB: 8A3Q [70]; crystal structure of human plasma kallekrein in complex with sebetralstat). Sebetralstat is depicted as thick green sticks, kallekrein is represented by cyan cartoons and thin sticks. H-bonds are represented by yellow dashed lines, while the dashed dark green lines represent π-π stacking interactions.
Figure 7. Experimental bound conformation of sebetralstat (PDB: 8A3Q [70]; crystal structure of human plasma kallekrein in complex with sebetralstat). Sebetralstat is depicted as thick green sticks, kallekrein is represented by cyan cartoons and thin sticks. H-bonds are represented by yellow dashed lines, while the dashed dark green lines represent π-π stacking interactions.
Biomolecules 16 00381 g007
Scheme 8. Preparation of rilzabrutinib (77).
Scheme 8. Preparation of rilzabrutinib (77).
Biomolecules 16 00381 sch008
Figure 8. Experimental bound conformation of rilzabrutinib (PDB: 7L5O; crystal structure of the noncovalently bonded complex of rilzabrutinib with BTK). Rilzabrutinib is depicted as thick green sticks, and BTK is represented by cyan cartoons and thin sticks. H-bonds are represented by yellow dashed lines, while π-π stacking and π–cation interactions are represented by dark green and red dashed lines, respectively.
Figure 8. Experimental bound conformation of rilzabrutinib (PDB: 7L5O; crystal structure of the noncovalently bonded complex of rilzabrutinib with BTK). Rilzabrutinib is depicted as thick green sticks, and BTK is represented by cyan cartoons and thin sticks. H-bonds are represented by yellow dashed lines, while π-π stacking and π–cation interactions are represented by dark green and red dashed lines, respectively.
Biomolecules 16 00381 g008
Scheme 9. Preparation of imlunestrant (86).
Scheme 9. Preparation of imlunestrant (86).
Biomolecules 16 00381 sch009
Scheme 10. Preparation of paltusotine (97).
Scheme 10. Preparation of paltusotine (97).
Biomolecules 16 00381 sch010
Figure 9. Experimental bound conformation of paltusotine (PDB: 7YAC [85]; CryoEM structure of paltusotine-bound SSTR2-Gi complex). Paltusotine is depicted as thick green sticks, and somatostatin receptor is represented by cyan cartoons and thin sticks. H-bonds are represented by yellow dashed lines, while ionic interaction is represented by purple dashed lines.
Figure 9. Experimental bound conformation of paltusotine (PDB: 7YAC [85]; CryoEM structure of paltusotine-bound SSTR2-Gi complex). Paltusotine is depicted as thick green sticks, and somatostatin receptor is represented by cyan cartoons and thin sticks. H-bonds are represented by yellow dashed lines, while ionic interaction is represented by purple dashed lines.
Biomolecules 16 00381 g009
Scheme 11. Preparation of remibrutinib (105).
Scheme 11. Preparation of remibrutinib (105).
Biomolecules 16 00381 sch011
Scheme 12. Synthesis of nerandomilast (116).
Scheme 12. Synthesis of nerandomilast (116).
Biomolecules 16 00381 sch012
Figure 10. The chemical structure of elinzanetant (131).
Figure 10. The chemical structure of elinzanetant (131).
Biomolecules 16 00381 g010
Scheme 13. The last steps of synthesis for elinzanetant (131). The hydrochloride salt of elinzanetant (135).
Scheme 13. The last steps of synthesis for elinzanetant (131). The hydrochloride salt of elinzanetant (135).
Biomolecules 16 00381 sch013
Figure 11. The chemical structure of ziftomenib (136).
Figure 11. The chemical structure of ziftomenib (136).
Biomolecules 16 00381 g011
Scheme 14. The steps for the synthesis of synthon 137.
Scheme 14. The steps for the synthesis of synthon 137.
Biomolecules 16 00381 sch014
Figure 12. Experimental bound conformation of ziftomenib (PDB: 8VA6 [104]; crystal structure of menin in complex with ziftomenib (KO-539)). Ziftomenib is depicted as thick green sticks, menin is represented by cyan cartoons and thin sticks. H-bonds are represented by yellow dashed lines, while red dashed lines represent π–cation interaction.
Figure 12. Experimental bound conformation of ziftomenib (PDB: 8VA6 [104]; crystal structure of menin in complex with ziftomenib (KO-539)). Ziftomenib is depicted as thick green sticks, menin is represented by cyan cartoons and thin sticks. H-bonds are represented by yellow dashed lines, while red dashed lines represent π–cation interaction.
Biomolecules 16 00381 g012
Scheme 15. The steps for the synthesis of sevabertinib (143).
Scheme 15. The steps for the synthesis of sevabertinib (143).
Biomolecules 16 00381 sch015
Scheme 16. The steps for the synthesis of zoliflodacin (151).
Scheme 16. The steps for the synthesis of zoliflodacin (151).
Biomolecules 16 00381 sch016
Figure 13. Experimental bound conformation of zoliflodacin (PDB: 8BP2 [118]; crystal structure of zoliflodacin with S. aureus DNA gyrase and DNA). Zoliflodacin is depicted as thick green sticks, GyrA subunit is represented by gray cartoons, GyrB by cyan cartoons and thin sticks, substrate DNA by orange cartoons and purple sticks. H-bonds are represented by yellow dashed lines, while the dashed dark green lines represent π-π stacking interactions.
Figure 13. Experimental bound conformation of zoliflodacin (PDB: 8BP2 [118]; crystal structure of zoliflodacin with S. aureus DNA gyrase and DNA). Zoliflodacin is depicted as thick green sticks, GyrA subunit is represented by gray cartoons, GyrB by cyan cartoons and thin sticks, substrate DNA by orange cartoons and purple sticks. H-bonds are represented by yellow dashed lines, while the dashed dark green lines represent π-π stacking interactions.
Biomolecules 16 00381 g013
Scheme 17. The steps for the synthesis of tradipitant (163).
Scheme 17. The steps for the synthesis of tradipitant (163).
Biomolecules 16 00381 sch017
Figure 14. Chemical structure of deruxtecan and exatecan.
Figure 14. Chemical structure of deruxtecan and exatecan.
Biomolecules 16 00381 g014
Figure 15. Chemical structure of other halogen-containing molecules in the pipeline.
Figure 15. Chemical structure of other halogen-containing molecules in the pipeline.
Biomolecules 16 00381 g015
Figure 16. New FDA chemical entities (green line) and halogen-containing small molecules (red dashed line) approved in the years 2020–2025.
Figure 16. New FDA chemical entities (green line) and halogen-containing small molecules (red dashed line) approved in the years 2020–2025.
Biomolecules 16 00381 g016
Table 1. Names of the discussed halogenated drugs (FDA-approved in 2025) with additional data, including their therapeutic indication.
Table 1. Names of the discussed halogenated drugs (FDA-approved in 2025) with additional data, including their therapeutic indication.
Drug NameCompany NamePhysicochemical Properties Brand NameTherapeutic Indication
SuzetrigineVX-548LogP: 2.42
tPSA: 103.0
LogS: −5.021
Journavx®Treatment of moderate-to-severe pain
MirdametinibPD-0325901LogP: 3.61
tPSA: 90.82
LogS: −5.173
Gomekli®For adult and pediatric patients 2 years of age and older with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)
Avutometinib and defactinibCH5126766 or RO5126766 (avutometinib); VS-6063 (defactinib)LogP: 1.91
tPSA: 130.81
LogS: −5.347
LogP: n/a
tPSA: 139.98
LogS: −7.014
Avmapki® Fakzynja® Co-PackKRAS-mutated recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) after prior systemic therapy
TaletrectinibDS-6051LogP: 3.95
tPSA: 75.24
LogS: −5.467
Ibtrozi®Target ROS1 fusion-positive and NTRK fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including brain metastases and resistance mutations
SunvozertinibDZD-9008LogP: 4.53
tPSA: 113.82
LogS: −7.366
Zegfrovy®For patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions, post-platinum chemotherapy
Sebetralstat KVD-900LogP: 2.19
tPSA: 95.83
LogS: −4.422
Ekterly®For the on-demand treatment of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks
RilzabrutinibPRN-1008LogP: 3.78
tPSA: 135.38
LogS: −7.724
Wayrilz®For adults with persistent or chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who have had an insufficient response to a previous treatment
ImlunestrantLY-3484356LogP: 5.56
tPSA: 54.29
LogS: −7.553
Inluriyo®For adults with ER-positive, HER2-negative, ESR1-mutated advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had progressed after at least one line of endocrine therapy
PaltusotineCRN00808LogP: 4.76
tPSA: 85.64
LogS: −7.627
Palsonify®For the treatment of acromegaly in people who had an insufficient response to surgery and/or for whom surgery is not an option
RemibrutinibLOU064LogP: 4.28
tPSA: 109.38
LogS: −6.127
Rhapsido®To treat chronic spontaneous urticaria in adults who remain symptomatic despite H1 antihistamine treatment
Nerandomilast BI 1015550LogP: 1.85
tPSA: 102.01
LogS: −3.99
Jascayd®Treatment of adults with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)
ElinzanetantBAY 3427080LogP: 6.92
tPSA: 68.61
LogS: −8.461
Lynkuet®Treatment of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms due to menopause
Ziftomenib KO-539LogP: n/a
tPSA: 119.67
LogS: −8.434
Komzifti®Treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia with a susceptible nucleophosmin 1 mutation who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options
SevabertinibBAY 2927088LogP: 1,11
tPSA: 102.44
LogS: −5.21
Hyrnuo®For patients with metastatic or locally advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors include activating mutations in the HER2 (ERBB2) tyrosine kinase domain (TKD)
ZoliflodacinAZD0914LogP: 1.14
tPSA: 138.87
LogS: −4.792
Nuzolvence®To treat uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea due to Neisseria gonorrhoeae
TradipitantLY686017 or VLY-686LogP: 6.9
tPSA: 69.75
LogS: −9.479
NEREUS®For the acute prevention of vomiting induced by motion
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Benedetto Tiz, D.; D’Alì, M.; Iraci, N.; Santi, C.; Sancineto, L. Halogen-Containing Drugs in 2025: A Record Year for the Therapeutic Use and Synthesis of FDA-Approved Small Molecules. Biomolecules 2026, 16, 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16030381

AMA Style

Benedetto Tiz D, D’Alì M, Iraci N, Santi C, Sancineto L. Halogen-Containing Drugs in 2025: A Record Year for the Therapeutic Use and Synthesis of FDA-Approved Small Molecules. Biomolecules. 2026; 16(3):381. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16030381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Benedetto Tiz, Davide, Marco D’Alì, Nunzio Iraci, Claudio Santi, and Luca Sancineto. 2026. "Halogen-Containing Drugs in 2025: A Record Year for the Therapeutic Use and Synthesis of FDA-Approved Small Molecules" Biomolecules 16, no. 3: 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16030381

APA Style

Benedetto Tiz, D., D’Alì, M., Iraci, N., Santi, C., & Sancineto, L. (2026). Halogen-Containing Drugs in 2025: A Record Year for the Therapeutic Use and Synthesis of FDA-Approved Small Molecules. Biomolecules, 16(3), 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16030381

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop