Next Article in Journal
Oral Immunization with Attenuated Salmonella Choleraesuis Expressing the FedF Antigens Protects Mice against the Shiga-Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Challenge
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of a Prognostic Signature for Ovarian Cancer Based on Ubiquitin-Related Genes Suggesting a Potential Role for FBXO9
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 13
Issue 12
10.3390/biom13121725
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Functions of Representative Terpenoids and Their Biosynthesis Mechanisms in Medicinal Plants

by
Qingjie Wang
,
Xiya Zhao
,
Yang Jiang
,
Biao Jin
and
Li Wang
*
College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2023, 13(12), 1725; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13121725
Submission received: 23 October 2023 / Revised: 25 November 2023 / Accepted: 27 November 2023 / Published: 30 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Natural and Bio-derived Molecules)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Terpenoids are the broadest and richest group of chemicals obtained from plants. These plant-derived terpenoids have been extensively utilized in various industries, including food and pharmaceuticals. Several specific terpenoids have been identified and isolated from medicinal plants, emphasizing the diversity of biosynthesis and specific functionality of terpenoids. With advances in the technology of sequencing, the genomes of certain important medicinal plants have been assembled. This has improved our knowledge of the biosynthesis and regulatory molecular functions of terpenoids with medicinal functions. In this review, we introduce several notable medicinal plants that produce distinct terpenoids (e.g., Cannabis sativa, Artemisia annua, Salvia miltiorrhiza, Ginkgo biloba, and Taxus media). We summarize the specialized roles of these terpenoids in plant-environment interactions as well as their significance in the pharmaceutical and food industries. Additionally, we highlight recent findings in the fields of molecular regulation mechanisms involved in these distinct terpenoids biosynthesis, and propose future opportunities in terpenoid research, including biology seeding, and genetic engineering in medicinal plants.

1. Introduction

Medicinal plants are defined by the World Health Organization as plants that contain a substance in one or more organs that can be used for therapeutic purposes or as a precursor for the synthesis of a useful drug [1]. The biologically active constituents in medicinal plants are mainly terpenoids, alkaloids, and phenylpropane compounds [2]. Terpenoids, in particular, constitute a significant and varied group of natural products that includes both non-volatile and volatile compounds. Currently, over 80,000 terpenoid compounds have been identified and are widely used in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries [3,4].
All terpenoids comprise five-carbon isoprene units (C5H8). Based on the number of these units, they can be classified as monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, diterpenes, sesterterpenes, triterpenes, tetraterpenes, and polyterpenes [5,6]. Some specific terpenoids with unique medicinal properties have been identified in certain medicinal plants (Figure 1). These include cannabinoids (a constituent of Cannabis sativa), tanshinone (a constituent of Salvia miltiorrhiza), paclitaxel (a diterpenoid compound isolated from Taxus media), artemisinin (a bioactive compound of Artemisia annua), ginsenoside (a triterpene compound from Panax ginseng), and ginkgolide (a component of Ginkgo biloba) [7,8,9,10,11]. These terpenoids not only play a significant role in the management of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases and malaria but can also improve the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stress [12]. In turn, certain stressors and their associated hormones can promote the accumulation of terpenoids, demonstrating a feedback mechanism in terpene biosynthesis. In addition, advances in high-throughput sequencing technology have led to the successful assembly of more than 195 medicinal plant genomes and the discovery of the synthetic metabolic pathways of essential terpenoids [13,14]. The terpenoids found in medicinal plants are numerous and serve a wide variety of medicinal functions. In this regard, we have identified several major terpenoids that are well-known for their benefits in medicine. These include pain-relieving cannabinoids, anti-malarial artemisinins, anti-cardiovascular tanshinones and ginkgolides, and anti-tumor paclitaxel. Extensive research has been devoted to studying these terpenoids due to their significant contributions to human health and their potential in drug discovery. These terpenoids are among the most potent and promising compounds in the field of medical applications. Our paper provides a summary of the types and functions of terpenoids in the main medicinal plants. We specifically focus on the mechanisms of structural genes, transcription factors, and transporters participating in the regulation of terpenoid biosynthesis. Additionally, we discuss and compare the terpenoid biosynthesis pathway in these medicinal plants. Given that medicinal plant terpenoids are numerous and specific, we concentrate on the terpenoids of several representative medicinal plants, as defined in Figure 1.

2. Function of Terpenoids in Human Health

Recent studies have demonstrated that terpenoids in medicinal plants possess pharmacological properties that promote human health [15,16]. For example, artemisinin is a widely used anti-malarial medicine that is used to protect millions of people from malaria every year [17,18]. Ginkgolides are natural antagonists of platelet activation, possess neuroprotective and reparative effects, and are crucial in the treatment of ischemic strokes [19]. Cannabinoids have been used for thousands of years for their anxiolytic and anesthetic effects [20]. Paclitaxel plays a significant role in anti-tumor therapy by inducing oxidative stress, and is considered one of the most successful natural anti-cancer drugs available [21]. Furthermore, terpenoids have been found to have additional biological functions, such as anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory effects [22,23].
Terpenoids exert their therapeutic functions through various signaling pathways and receptors. For example, cannabinoids rely on their ability to interact with the body’s endocannabinoid system—the G protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2)—to exert their biological properties, including infection, inflammation, and hard tumors [24]. Due to the complex and diverse involvement mechanisms of terpenoids, we mainly focused on their signaling pathways in inflammatory and oxidative stress. NF-κB (Nuclear factor-kappa B) is involved in inflammatory processes, cell proliferation, and defense against apoptosis [25,26]. Artemisinin has been shown to significantly inhibit the expression of NF-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling genes, making it a potential drug for inflammation treatment [27]. Tanshinone IIA has been reported to play a role in the inflammatory response through the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/transforming growth factor activated kinase-1 (TAK1)/NF-κB signaling cascade [28,29,30]. Cannabinoids regulate anti-inflammatory responses by inhibiting NF-κB and other pathways [31]. Ginkgolides can significantly inhibit the expression of NF-κB, reduce the phosphorylation levels of p38, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) proteins in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, and reduce the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokine genes, thereby exerting anti-inflammatory effects [32]. Similarly, paclitaxel can inhibit the expression of NF-κB, inhibiting tumor growth and having anti-tumor effects [33].
Oxidative stress plays a crucial role in antitumor activity, cardiovascular activity, and atherogenesis [33,34,35,36]. Ginkgolide can cross the blood–brain barrier, activating the nuclear factor E2-associated factor 2 (Nrf2) signaling pathway and upregulating the expression of oxidative stress-related proteins heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and Nuclear factor-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) to reduce the cellular damage caused by oxidative stress [31]. Oxidative stress is central to the mechanism of paclitaxel’s antitumor activity as it increases mitochondrial ROS production and inhibits endoplasmic reticulum utilization and antioxidant enzymes and peptides [33,34,35,37,38]. Recent studies have found that tanshinone IIA prevents oxidative stress by increasing the activities of total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), SOD, glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and catalase (CAT) to reduce atherosclerosis [35,39]. Cannabinoids regulate antioxidants by activating antioxidant enzymes, regulating glutathione levels, and inhibiting pro-oxidases to regulate anti-inflammatory properties [40]. Although it has been discovered that terpenoids can be involved in treating diseases through multiple strategies, the specific regulatory pathways for disease treatment are not yet fully understood. Further validation is still required via utilizing more animal models or clinical trials to elucidate their regulatory mechanisms.

3. Functions of Terpenoids in Biotic Stress

On an evolutionary level, it seems that there are complex and diverse combinations of terpenoids with remarkable structural diversity that can fulfill a variety of ecological roles [41]. The terpenoids in medicinal plants also serve an ecological role in defending the plants themselves against herbivorous insects and pathogens. Terpenoids can attract natural enemies of aphids, such as predators and parasitoids. Increasing the cannabinoid content in C. sativa leaves can improve resistance to mites, especially T. urticae [42]. In A. annua, a high level of artemisinin increases the resistance of Pseudomonas syringae, while a low level reduces resistance to Botrytis cinerea [43]. When attacked by aphids, A. annua also produces artemisia ketone and (E)-β-farnesene to resist them [44]. These results suggest that biotic stress can induce A. annua to produce more and diverse types of artemisinin to enhance the plant’s resistance. Terpenoids not only protect plants themselves, but also act as alarm signals at interspecific, intraspecific, and intraplant levels. These signals trigger defense responses in nearby plants or tissues that have not yet been attacked [45]. Therefore, due to their low environmental risk and resistance to pests and pathogens, terpenoids can be effectively used as biopesticides, playing a vital role in environmental protection.

4. Effects of Environmental Factors on Terpenoid Accumulation

Synthesized and accumulated terpenoids are tightly regulated by changing abiotic environments (Figure 2) [46,47]. Light plays a critical role in terpenoid accumulation, which cannabinoid synthesis is a wonderful example. To achieve a consistent production of cannabis products, it is increasingly being grown indoors using Light Emitting Diode (LED) light, which is more energy efficient than traditional high-pressure sodium (HPS) light sources. Higher cannabinoid concentrations are measured under LED lighting compared to HPS [48]. Similarly, cannabigerolic acid (CBGA) was accumulated up to 400% more during LED treatments compared to HPS [49]. Moreover, combining LED light and metal halide lamps increased bud yield and cannabinoid concentrations [50]. Blue light LED can also lead to increased cannabinoid concentration in C. sativa [51,52,53]. The dynamic spectrum LED treatment leads to increase in yield and significant improvement in cannabinoid content compared to fixed full-spectrum white light [54].When plants are exposed to a strong light intensity or ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation, they can initiate the terpenoid metabolite biosynthesis for antioxidant defense [55]. For instance, there is a positive association between UV-B radiation and cannabinoid content in C. sativa [56]. After exposure to UV light for 24 h and 48 h, the terpenoid content increased by 10.0% to 21.9% in G. biloba [57]. Artemisinin accumulation also correlates positively with light intensity, with the highest concentration observed at 3000 Lux when exposed to a standard fluorescent lamp [58].
Cold stress, such as chilling (0–15 °C) and freezing (<0 °C), adversely affects plant development, but facilitates terpenoid accumulation [59]. The artemisinin content increased by 27.16% upon exposure to cold stress and overnight frost in A. annua [60,61]. In addition, cold stress (4 °C) also significantly increased the terpenoid content in G. biloba, reaching a maximum at 8 d and increasing by 14.5% compared to the control [62].
Salt stress can increase the content of artemisinin by 14.68%, but prolonged salt stress decreases artemisinin accumulation [63]. In C. sativa, an increase in NaCl concentration was also found to result in a subsequent decrease in cannabinoid content [64,65]. Drought can enhance terpenoid accumulation in medicinal plants (e.g., sesquiterpene content of Salvia dolomitica) [66]. The emission rates of terpenoid compounds are higher in cork oak and gum rock with increasing summer drought [67]. Similarly, there was a significant increase in the amount of (E)-β-caryophyllene in O. vulgare subsp. virens due to the drought [68]. Controlled drought stress can boost cannabinoid content in C. sativa [69]. Further research has shown that under drought stress, tanshinone enhances the photosynthetic capacity and prevents oxidative damage, thus improving drought stress resistance in S. miltiorrhiza [70].
Although the existing studies have discovered various external factors that can regulate terpenoid synthesis in medicinal plants, research on the regulatory pathways affected by these environmental factors is still very limited. Due to the importance of the environment in promoting the accumulation of terpenoids, further research should be conducted in the future to investigate various environmental factors and their combinations that regulate terpenoids accumulation in medicinal plants. By considering the characteristics of different medicinal plants, the most advantageous combination of environmental factors for terpenoid accumulation should be optimized and selected. This will provide valuable insights for the future development of high-quality medicinal plants through factory cultivation.

5. Accumulation Characteristics of Terpenoids and Their Transport

The specific sites of terpenoid synthesis, storage, and utilization vary among medicinal plants. Multicellular glandular trichomes, which are outgrowths on the epidermal, possess the ability to secrete or store significant amounts of terpenoids. Glandular secretory trichomes, located on the surface of the leaves, are where artemisinin is synthesized and stored. Thus, the density of glandular trichomes affects artemisinin accumulation [71]. Cannabinoids are present in all C. sativa aerial plants and the resin is the most highly concentrated. Cannabinoids were originally synthesized in the trichoid in the form of cannabic acid. Since acidic substances are highly toxic to plant cells, the final stage of their synthesis takes place outside the cells of the trichosomes [72]. The roots of C. sativa also contain triterpenoids’ active compounds [73].The high concentrations of monoterpenoids occur in capitate glandular trichomes in bracts; cannabinoids are also stored in the glandular trichome secretory cavity, but they are found predominantly in female flowers [24]. In T. media, taxol exhibits special mechanisms for synthesis and storage to prevent toxic effects on its source plant. Taxol can be isolated from nearly all its plant tissues, but its content is higher in the stems, primarily accumulating in the outer bark, compared to the roots and needles [74]. The present studies also reveal that taxol is stored in hydrophobic bodies within the wood parenchyma rays and phloem. This storage can help protect living cells from the cytotoxic effects of taxol [75]. By contrast, in G. biloba, the terpenoids are primarily extracted from the leaves. However, experiments using 14CO2 and (U-14C) glucose-labeled revealed that their biosynthesis site is not in the leaves but in the roots [76]. The content of terpenoids found within the cortex (bark) was 1.75 to 2.07 times higher than that found in the leaves. GbLPS, GbIDS2, GbDXR2, GbDXS2, and GbGGPPS, the core genes in the ginkgolide biosynthetic pathway, exhibited a high level of expression in roots, confirming that the roots are the main site of terpenoid biosynthesis [77,78]. Metabolic profiling and gene expression analysis indicate that ginkgolides are biosynthesized in the root fibrous and main root periderm tissues, and subsequently transported to the leaves [78]. Similarly, several major bioactive compounds have been extracted from the roots of S. miltiorrhiza, including cryptotanshinone and tanshinone IIA. The genes relevant to transhinone synthesis, particularly SmKSL1, SmCPS1, and 19 candidate SmCYPs, are all highly expressed in root periderm tissue [79,80], confirming that tanshinone accumulation mainly occurs in the S. miltiorrhiza root phloem.
Since some terpenoids are produced and stored at different sites in plants, it is necessary to study their transport [81]. However, the transport mechanisms of terpenoids have not been extensively researched in medicinal plants. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are present in most eukaryotic organisms, and can be categorized into eight subfamilies (ABCA to ABCH). They can drive the influx or efflux of secondary metabolites into cells [82,83]. A few transporters from the ABCG subfamily are implicated in terpenoid transport. The pleiotropic drug resistance (PDR) transporters, belonging to the ABCG subfamily, were found to be responsible for the membrane transport of terpenoids in medicinal plants [84,85]. In P. ginseng, PgPDR3 has been implicated in corresponding ginsenoside accumulation [85]. Similarly, in A. annua, AaPDR3 is involved in both the formation and transport of β-caryophyllene [86]. Additionally, the genome of S. miltiorrhiza contains a total of 114 genes that encode ABC transporters [83]. Combined with analyzing their expression in different tissues and their co-expression with key enzymes involved in terpenoid synthesis, several ABCG transporter genes, such as SmABCG46, SmABCG40, and SmABCG4, have been identified as potentially participating in tanshinone transport [83]. Although numerous terpenoid transporters have been identified in medicinal plants, validating their functions and determining their specificity for substrates remains challenging.

6. Terpenoid Biosynthesis Pathway and Regulation

Despite their substantial differences in structure and functionality, the terpenoids all originate from isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP). These IPP and DMAPP units can be biosynthesized via the mevalonate (MVA) or the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway [87,88,89]. However, the downstream genes integrated into the terpenoid biosynthetic pathways, and the regulatory mechanisms, are specific to different medicinal plants (Figure 3).
Gene tandem duplication is a prominent feature in the biosynthesis pathways of key secondary metabolites. Two strains of A. annua with varying levels of artemisinin were used to assemble chromosome-level haploid maps. Genomic analyses revealed that multiple copies of the AaADS (amorpha-4, 11-diene synthase) gene exist in the A. annua genome. A strong positive association was found between artemisinin levels and the number of copies of AaADS [71]. ADS catalyzes the initial and critical step in the artemisinin biosynthetic pathway, the conversion of farnesyl diphosphate (FDP) to amorpha-4, 11-diene [90]. Overexpression of AaADS can enhance artemisinin production in transgenic A. annua plants, suggesting the important role of AaADS in artemisinin biosynthesis [91,92]. Then, the cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP71AV1, along with the cytochrome P450 reductase CPR1 and cytochrome b5 (CYB5), effectively converts amorpha-4, 11-diene into artemisinic alcohol71 [93]. The overexpression of AaCYP71AV1 and AaCPR (redox partner for CYP71AV1) in A. annua can increase the artemisinin content by 2.4-fold in comparison to the wild-type [94,95]. Several other genes which are important for artemisinin synthesis have also been identified, including AaHMGR, AaDBR2, AaDXR, and AaFPS [96,97]. The co-transformation of the two important synthetic genes (e.g., AaADS and AaHMGR genes, AaFPS and AaHMGR genes) can significantly promote artemisinin content [96]. In particular, the co-overexpression of AaFPS, AaCYP71AV1, and AaCPR can dramatically increase the artemisinin concentration in A. annua [98]. In addition, most of these genes can be activated with UV light, cold, or heat shock, which correlates with higher artemisinin content [43,99,100,101,102,103].
In S. miltiorrhiza, tanshinone biosynthesis is initiated by the bicyclization of geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP), a common diterpene precursor, and catalyzed by CPP synthases (CPSs), resulting in copalyl diphosphate (CPP). The subsequent cyclization or rearrangement reaction of the alkene is catalyzed by kaurene synthase-like enzymes (KSLs) to produce an olefin. The final production of diterpenoids requires the insertion of oxygen from cytochrome P450 mono-oxygenases (CYPs) [104,105]. In the genome of S. miltiorrhiza, 82 terpene synthase genes, which are responsible for producing hemi-, mono-, sesqui-, or di-terpenes, were identified [106]. Physical clustering of terpene synthase genes and CYPs is often linked to consecutive enzymatic actions in the biosynthesis of terpenoids. Four terpenoid synthase genes/CYP pairs have been found in the S. miltiorrhiza genome. Among these, SmCPS1 and SmCPS2 are, respectively, responsible for the tanshinone biosynthesis in roots and leaves, and both are accompanied by genes from the CYP76AH subfamily. It is worth highlighting that one of these members, CYP76AH1 and CYP76AH3, was previously identified as playing an important role in tanshinone biosynthesis, confirming the functional role of these biosynthetic gene clusters in the biosynthesis of tanshinone [107]. In addition, biochemical and genetic experiments have also demonstrated the crucial role of several CYP450 genes implicated in tanshinone biosynthesis, including SmCYP76AH1, SmCYP76AH3, and SmCYP76AK1 [108,109,110].
In Taxus species, the biosynthesis pathway of toxoids is very complex and involves approximately 19 enzymatic steps. The process begins with the precursor GGPP and includes several key enzymes such as a taxadiene synthase (TS), five P450s (T2aOH, T5aOH, T13aOH, T7bOH and T10bOH), five acyltransferases (BAPT, DBAT, DBTNBT, TAT and TBT), and two extra enzymes (PAM and T2′αOH) [111,112]. The TS catalyst facilitates the cyclization of GGPP to form taxadiene. The expression of the TS gene through heterologous transformation in tobacco can significantly increase taxadiene production [113]. The enzymes taxoid 2α-hydroxylase and taxoid 7β-hydroxylase utilize taxusin as a substrate to, respectively, produce 2α-hydroxytaxusin and 7β-hydroxytaxusin [114]. Overexpression of the gene encoding DBTNBT increased paclitaxel yield by 37% in the transgenic Taxus species cells [115]. To establish a foundational pathway for toxoids, the genome of T. wallichiana was assembled and has been found to have a genome size of 10.6 Gb. In this genome, a number of genes involved in the biosynthesis of paclitaxel (terpene synthase family TPS002, cytochrome P450 family CYP725, and transferase family TRF004) were found to have undergone significant expansion [114]. These findings suggest that tandem duplication could be the primary mechanism driving the complex paclitaxel biosynthetic pathway. Through tandem duplication, an increasing number of enzymes were created to modify toxoids, ultimately leading to the production of paclitaxel.
There are several key synthetic genes that have been reported in the ginkgolides pathway, including 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase (DXS), 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate reductase (HDR), geranyl geranyl diphosphate synthase (GGPPS), and the levopimaradiene synthase (LPS) gene [62,77]. The GbLPS was cloned, and it was demonstrated that it could catalyze the synthesis of ginkgolides [116]. Overexpression of GbHDR2 in N. tabacum also elevated the diterpenoid duvatrienediol content at least sixfold [117]. In addition, CYPs genes are considered to be linked to ginkgolide biosynthesis, as the suppression of the GbCYPs genes can inhibit ginkgolide biosynthesis [118]. In recent research, the first steps of ginkgolide biosynthesis have been revealed through the exploration of gene clusters and co-expression analysis. Five CYPS genes (GbCYP7005C1, GbCYP7005C3, GbCYP867E38, GbCYP867K1, and GbCYP720B31) were identified in close proximity to the GbLPS gene. These genes encode multifunctional enzymes with atypical catalytic activities, resulting in the formation of the tert-butyl group and one of the lactone rings, which are characteristic of all trilactone terpenoids [117].
The biosynthetic pathway of cannabinoids differs slightly from that of other terpenoids. Cannabinoid biosynthesis begins with the polyketide pathway’s synthesis of olivetolic acid (OLA) and geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP). Subsequently, an enzyme known as olivetolate geranyltransferase (GOT) facilitates the alkylation of OLA and GPP, resulting in the synthesis of cannabigerolic acid (CBGA) [118,119]. This CBGA can be converted to neutral cannabinoids (THCA, CBDA, and CBCA) through heating, drying, and other non-enzymatic decarboxylation reactions [120]. There is also a variant pathway for cannabinoid production, where divarinolic acid (DA) and GPP generate the cannabinoid precursor, cannabigerovarinic acid (CBGVA), which is then catalyzed by a series of enzymes to eventually form the annabigerovarin (CBGV), Δ9-tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV), and cannabivarin (CBV). The genes encoding CsTHCAS, CsCBDAS, and CsCBCAS are regarded as key genes in the synthesis process. Among them, CsTHCAS and CsCBDAS have been shown to promote cannabinoid synthesis in glandular trichosomes [121].

7. Regulation of Terpenoid Biosynthesis by Transcription Factors

Transcription factors (TFs) are DNA-binding proteins that control the transcription of particular genes, thereby controlling their expression within the cell. Several previous studies have identified various TFs that are important in regulating terpenoid biosynthesis (e.g., MYB, WRKY, bHLH, AP2/ERF, and bZIP TFs) (Figure 4).
MYB serves as a key TF that affects the metabolism of terpenoid compounds. Several MYB TFs were shown to play an important role in terpenoid biosynthesis in medicinal plants. In S. miltiorrhiza, the transcripts of SmDXS, SmGGPPS, and SmKSL1 can be significantly upregulated by SmMYB9b, and an overexpression of SmMYB97 and SmMYB98 significantly increases the tanshinone content, indicating that these MYB may play a positive regulatory role in tanshinone biosynthesis [122,123,124]. In Taxus species, TmMYB3, a phloem-specific R2R3-MYB, was identified to activate the transcripts of TmTBT and TmTS to enhance paclitaxel biosynthesis [125]. In A. annua, AaTAR2 (MYB TF) and AaMYB17 serve as positive regulators for the glandular trichome, and, in turn, increase the level of artemisinin [5,126], while AaMYB15 directly binds to and represses the transcriptional activity of AaORA, thus suppressing artemisinin biosynthesis [127]. In C. Sativa, CsMYB1 can bind CsCBCAS and CsCBDAS promoters, negatively regulating cannabinoid accumulation [128]. Overexpression of CsMIXTA (R2R3-MYB TF) in N. tabacum promotes trichoid development, suggesting that it may promote cannabinoid production by increasing the formation of cannabis glandular trichoid [129].
WRKY TFs are specific to plants and have significant functions in defending against pathogens, responding to abiotic factors, and regulating secondary metabolism [130]. Recently, researchers have successfully isolated WRKY genes from various medicinal plants. For example, an overexpression of AaWRKY1 in A. annua can significantly activate the expression of artemisinin biosynthetic genes [131]. The overexpression of the AaWRKY4 gene in A. annua has the potential to regulate the metabolism of artemisinin, leading to an enhancement in artemisinin biosynthesis [87]. To categorize their impacts on taxol biosynthesis in Taxus species, six representative TcWRKYs have been selected [74]. Overexpression experiments demonstrated that the six TcWRKYs had diverse effects on taxol biosynthesis. Specifically, TcWRKY8 and TcWRKY47 significantly and substantially enhanced the expression levels of taxol biosynthesis-related genes [132]. In addition, experimental evidence has shown that TcWRKY33 has the ability to bind to the w-boxes in the TcDBAT promoter, resulting in the promotion of its expression [133]. In S. miltiorrhiza, SmWRKY1 was found to bind directly to the promoter of SmDXR [134], while SmWRKY2 binds to the SmCPS promoter to promote tanshinone biosynthesis [135]. In C. sativa, CsWRKY1 can also influence cannabinoid synthesis by modulating the expression of CsCBCAS and CsCBDAS [128].
AP2/ERF (APETALA2/ethylene-responsive element binding factors) TFs are a large family in the plant kingdom, and specific AP2/ERF members are essential for terpenoids formation [136,137]. Through experiments like EMSA and transient expression assay, it has been demonstrated that AaERF1, AaERF2, and TAR1 are responsible for regulating sesquiterpenoid biosynthesis in A. annua through binding to both AaADS and AaCYP71AV1 promoters [138]. In S. miltiorrhiza, SmERF6, SmERF8, SmERF128, and SmERF1L1 have also been shown to activate tanshinone biosynthesis [110,137,138,139]. The overexpression of SmERF1L1 can greatly enhance tanshinone accumulation in transgenic S. miltiorrhiza hairy roots by extensively upregulating SmDXR, which is important for the tanshinone biosynthetic pathway [139]. It was further confirmed that SmERF1L1 can bind directly to the promoter of SmDXR, regulating the biosynthesis of tanshinone. In addition, TcERF15 was found to bind and activate TcTASY, encoding a key enzyme in Taxus species, thereby enhancing paclitaxel biosynthesis [140], as well as CsAP2L1, which can promote the transcript levels of CsCBCAS and CsTHCAS, suggesting that it promotes cannabinoid biosynthesis [128].
The bHLH TFs have been identified in the regulation of plant growth and development as well as secondary metabolism. Among them, the MYC type in bHLH is the most thoroughly studied transcription factor. In A. annua, AabHLH1 and AaMYC2 are positive regulatory factors for artemisinin biosynthesis. Overexpression of AabHLH1 and AaMYC2 can significantly increase the levels of genes associated with artemisinin biosynthesis, such as AaADS, AaCYP71AV1, and AaDBR2 [140,141]. Overexpression of SmbHLH10 and SmbHLH148 in S. miltiorrhiza can enhance the tanshinone content. Yeast one-hybrid results indicate that SmbHLH10 and SmbHLH148 can directly bind to G-box elements on the promoter of enzyme genes to activate their expression, thereby controlling the tanshinone biosynthesis. Further qRT-PCR analysis of the overexpression lines revealed that SmDXS, SmDXR, SmCPS, and SmJRB were greatly induced [142,143]. In contrast, some bHLH TFs suppress terpenoid biosynthesis; SmbHLH3 negatively control tanshinones biosynthesis and downregulates related genes, such as SmDXR, SmDXS3, SmHMGR1, SmCPS1, SmKSL1, and SmCYP76AH1 [57]. Similarly, TcJAMYC1, TcJAMYC2, and TcJAMYC4 negatively regulate Taxus species paclitaxel biosynthesis [144].
There are several other TFs implicated in terpenoid biosynthesis in medicinal plants. Overexpression of AaNAC1 has been demonstrated to increase the artemisinin levels in A. annua [43]. AaHY5 and AabZIP1, which belong to the bZIP family, are reported to exert positive control on artemisinin biosynthesis in A. annua [145,146]. SmJAZ3 and SmJAZ9, which belong to the JAZ family, can inhibit the expression of tanshinone biosynthesis genes [147]. In S. miltiorrhiza, SmGRAS1 and SmGRAS2, which encode GRAS TFs, can upregulate the transcription of SmKSL1 to increase the tanshinone levels [112,148]. An increasing number of TFs were identified that are involved in the regulation of terpenoids biosynthesis in medicinal plants. These TFs can act independently or cooperatively to simultaneously regulate terpenoids biosynthesis. However, validating their function and determining their substrate specificity are also significant challenges.

8. Conclusions and Perspectives

Over the past decade, advancements in next-generation sequencing techniques, molecular biology techniques, and multi-omics techniques have greatly enhanced our comprehension of the synthesis and regulation of terpenoids in medicinal plants. Environmental factors, structural genes, transcription factors, and transporters have been identified as the pivotal factors influencing the accumulation of terpenoids in these plants. Currently, the development and utilization of key genes or technologies to enhance terpenoid biosynthesis in medicinal plants has become a hot research topic.
However, our knowledge of terpenoids remains incomplete due to the complex and specific nature of their biosynthesis. To further advance our knowledge of terpenoids, future research should focus on several areas: (1) Although several genes upstream of terpenoid biosynthetic pathways have been isolated and cloned, their precise function in the regulation of terpenoid biosynthesis still needs further experimental validation. In addition, little information is available on the downstream terpenoid biosynthetic pathways in medicinal plants, especially regarding CYP450 family genes. Some specific terpene synthesis pathways still need to be improved. (2) Callus, hairy root, and/or transient overexpression/silencing have been used to assess the functions of terpenoid genes in medicinal plants. However, stable genetic transformation systems are not available for various medicinal plants, such as S. miltiorrhiza, G. biloba, and T. media. Therefore, stable genetic transformation and gene editing systems such as the CRISPR-Cas9 system need to be established to achieve biotechnology breeding. (3) Transporters play an essential role in the transport of terpenoids since the biosynthesis and application sites of terpenoids are different in some medicinal plants. Therefore, it is crucial that we identify and characterize transporters of terpenoids in medicinal plants, which are essential for enhancing the accumulation of terpenoids. (4) Genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics analyses have provided insights into terpenoid synthesis in medicinal plants. In the future, more attention should be given to the mechanisms of transcriptional regulation in terpenoid synthesis, as well as the construction of networks of transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation. Additionally, the influence of epigenetics on terpenoid synthesis should also be considered. (5) The development of biosynthetic techniques, such as the use of yeast and other microorganisms, can facilitate the accumulation of specific terpenoids compared to those produced by plants themselves. However, when multiple terpenoids work together to exert medicinal effects, it becomes challenging to achieve similar outcomes through synthesis. In this regard, plants, capable of producing multiple terpenoids, offer additional advantages. Therefore, future research should focus on enhancing biosynthetic techniques to synthesize multiple terpenoids. These studies will be of great significance for the breeding of medicinal plants with high terpenoid content through biotechnology, as well as the production of terpenoid compounds through bioengineering.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.W. and L.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.W., X.Z. and Y.J.; writing—review and editing, Q.W. and L.W.; Visualization, B.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31971686, 32171838 and 32101558 and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, grant number, BK20210801.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahad, B.; Shahri, W.; Rasool, H.; Reshi, Z.; Rasool, S.; Hussain, T. Medicinal plants and herbal drugs: An overview. In Medicinal and Aromatic Plants: Healthcare and Industrial Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, J.; Li, B.; Luo, L.; Cao, F.; Yang, B.; Gao, J.; Yan, Y.; Zhang, G.; Peng, L.; Hu, B. Increased phenolic acid and tanshinone production and transcriptional responses of biosynthetic genes in hairy root cultures of Salvia przewalskii Maxim. treated with methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 47, 8565–8578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bailly, C.; Vergoten, G. Glycyrrhizin: An alternative drug for the treatment of COVID-19 infection and the associated respiratory syndrome? Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 214, 107618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Frank, L.; Wenig, M.; Ghirardo, A.; van der Krol, A.; Vlot, A.C.; Schnitzler, J.P.; Rosenkranz, M. Environment. Isoprene and β-caryophyllene confer plant resistance via different plant internal signalling pathways. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 1151–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhou, Z.; Tan, H.; Li, Q.; Li, Q.; Wang, Y.; Bu, Q.; Li, Y.; Wu, Y.; Chen, W.; Zhang, L. Trichome and Artemisinin Regulator 2 positively regulates trichome development and artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua. New Phytol. 2020, 228, 932–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nagegowda, D.A.; Gupta, P. Advances in biosynthesis, regulation, and metabolic engineering of plant specialized terpenoids. Plant Sci. 2020, 294, 110457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kim, N.H.; Jayakodi, M.; Lee, S.C.; Choi, B.S.; Jang, W.; Lee, J.; Kim, H.H.; Waminal, N.E.; Lakshmanan, M.; van Nguyen, B. Genome and evolution of the shade-requiring medicinal herb Panax ginseng. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 1904–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lu, S. Biosynthesis and regulatory mechanisms of bioactive compounds in Salvia miltiorrhiza, a model system for medicinal plant biology. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2021, 40, 243–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shen, Q.; Zhang, L.; Liao, Z.; Wang, S.; Yan, T.; Shi, P.; Liu, M.; Fu, X.; Pan, Q.; Wang, Y. The genome of Artemisia annua provides insight into the evolution of Asteraceae family and artemisinin biosynthesis. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 776–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Xiong, X.; Gou, J.; Liao, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Bi, G.; Li, C.; Du, R.; Wang, X.; Sun, T. The Taxus genome provides insights into paclitaxel biosynthesis. Nat. Plants 2021, 7, 1026–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, Y.-P.; Fan, G.; Yin, P.-P.; Sun, S.; Li, N.; Hong, X.; Hu, G.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, F.-M.; Han, J.-D. Resequencing 545 ginkgo genomes across the world reveals the evolutionary history of the living fossil. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Halder, M.; Jha, S. Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Phytochemical Diversity: A Fountainhead of Potential Drugs Against Human Diseases. In Medicinal Plants: Biodiversity, Biotechnology and Conservation; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 39–93. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wendel, J.F.; Jackson, S.A.; Meyers, B.C.; Wing, R.A. Evolution of plant genome architecture. Genome Biol. 2016, 17, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Meng, F.; Tang, Q.; Chu, T.; Li, X.; Lin, Y.; Song, X.; Chen, W. TCMPG: An integrative database for traditional Chinese medicine plant genomes. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhac060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Masyita, A.; Sari, R.M.; Astuti, A.D.; Yasir, B.; Rumata, N.R.; Emran, T.B.; Nainu, F.; Simal-Gandara, J. Terpenes and terpenoids as main bioactive compounds of essential oils, their roles in human health and potential application as natural food preservatives. Food Chem. X 2022, 13, 100217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Patel, B.K.; Patel, K.H.; Moochhala, S.M. Gut microbiota intervention strategies using active components from medicinal herbs to evaluate clinical efficacy of type 2 diabetes–A review. Clin. Transl. Discov. 2023, 3, e170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Briskin, D.P. Medicinal plants and phytomedicines. Linking plant biochemistry and physiology to human health. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Marchev, A.S.; Vasileva, L.V.; Amirova, K.M.; Savova, M.S.; Balcheva-Sivenova, Z.P.; Georgiev, M.I. Metabolomics and health: From nutritional crops and plant-based pharmaceuticals to profiling of human biofluids. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2021, 78, 6487–6503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhu, T.; Wang, L.; Wang, L.-P.; Wan, Q. Therapeutic targets of neuroprotection and neurorestoration in ischemic stroke: Applications for natural compounds from medicinal herbs. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 148, 112719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alexander, J.C.; Joshi, G.P. A review of the anesthetic implications of marijuana use. Bayl. Univ. Med. Cent. Proc. 2019, 3, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, T.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, B.; Lu, X. Paclitaxel resistance modulated by the interaction between TRPS1 and AF178030. 2 in triple-negative breast cancer. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2022, 2022, 6019975. [Google Scholar]
  22. Guo, Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhong, J.; Ba, T.; Xu, T.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, M. Identification of the volatile compounds and observation of the glandular trichomes in Opisthopappus taihangensis and four species of Chrysanthemum. Plants 2020, 9, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Boateng, I.D. Ginkgols and bilobols in Ginkgo biloba L. A review of their extraction and bioactivities. Phytother. Res. 2023, 37, 3211–3223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Andre, C.M.; Hausman, J.-F.; Guerriero, G. Cannabis sativa: The plant of the thousand and one molecules. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Alharbi, K.S.; Fuloria, N.K.; Fuloria, S.; Rahman, S.B.; Al-Malki, W.H.; Shaikh, M.A.J.; Thangavelu, L.; Singh, S.K.; Allam, V.S.R.R.; Jha, N.K. Nuclear factor-kappa B and its role in inflammatory lung disease. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2021, 345, 109568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, Y.; Mostafa, S.; Zeng, W.; Jin, B. Function and mechanism of jasmonic acid in plant responses to abiotic and biotic stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, K.S.; Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Mi, C.; Ma, J.; Piao, L.X.; Xu, G.H.; Li, X.; Jin, X. Artemisinin inhibits inflammatory response via regulating NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2017, 39, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Fang, C.; Xie, L.; Liu, C.; Fu, C.; Ye, W.; Liu, H.; Zhang, B. Tanshinone IIA improves hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy through TLR-4-mediated NF-κB signal pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 18, 1899–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hu, K.-B.; Lu, X.-M.; Wang, H.-Y.; Liu, H.-L.; Wu, Q.-Y.; Liao, P.; Li, S.; Long, Z.-Y.; Wang, Y.-T. Effects and mechanisms of Tanshinone IIA on PTSD-like symptoms. Phytomedicine 2023, 120, 155032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fang, J.; Chen, Q.; He, B.; Cai, J.; Yao, Y.; Cai, Y.; Xu, S.; Rengasamy, K.R.; Gowrishankar, S.; Pandian, S.K. Tanshinone IIA attenuates TNF-α induced PTX3 expression and monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells through the p38/NF-κB pathway. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 121, 622–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kozela, E.; Pietr, M.; Juknat, A.; Rimmerman, N.; Levy, R.; Vogel, Z. Cannabinoids Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol differentially inhibit the lipopolysaccharide-activated NF-κB and interferon-β/STAT proinflammatory pathways in BV-2 microglial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 1616–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhu, P.-C.; Tong, Q.; Zhuang, Z.; Wang, Z.-H.; Deng, L.-H.; Zheng, G.-q.; Wang, Y. Ginkgolide B for myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury: A preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, S.; Tang, Y.; Wang, R.; Najafi, M. Mechanisms of cancer cell death induction by paclitaxel: An updated review. Apoptosis 2022, 27, 647–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Silva, H.; Martins, F.G. Cardiovascular Activity of Ginkgo Biloba—An Insight from Healthy Subjects. Biology 2022, 12, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Guo, R.; Li, L.; Su, J.; Li, S.; Duncan, S.E.; Liu, Z.; Fan, G. Pharmacological activity and mechanism of tanshinone IIA in related diseases. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2020, 14, 4735–4748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Martins, J.N.; Silva, S.R. Use of Infrared Thermography to Assess Body Temperature as a Physiological Stress Indicator in Horses during Ridden and Lunging Sessions. Animals 2022, 12, 3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Vladu, A.F.; Ficai, D.; Ene, A.G.; Ficai, A. Combination Therapy Using Polyphenols: An Efficient Way to Improve Antitumoral Activity and Reduce Resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bergman, M.E.; Davis, B.; Phillips, M.A. Medically Useful Plant Terpenoids: Biosynthesis, Occurrence, and Mechanism of Action. Molecules 2019, 24, 3961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, Y.-I.; Elmer, G.; LeBoeuf, R.C. Tanshinone IIA reduces macrophage death induced by hydrogen peroxide by upregulating glutathione peroxidase. Life Sci. 2008, 83, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kopustinskiene, D.M.; Masteikova, R.; Lazauskas, R.; Bernatoniene, J. Cannabis sativa L. Bioactive compounds and their protective role in oxidative stress and inflammation. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Russo, E.B. Taming THC: Potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid—Terpenoid entourage effects. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 163, 1344–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kostanda, E.; Khatib, S. Biotic stress caused by Tetranychus urticae mites elevates the quantity of secondary metabolites, cannabinoids and terpenes, in Cannabis sativa L. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 176, 114331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lv, Z.; Wang, S.; Zhang, F.; Chen, L.; Hao, X.; Pan, Q.; Fu, X.; Li, L.; Sun, X.; Tang, K. Overexpression of a novel NAC domain-containing transcription factor gene (AaNAC1) enhances the content of artemisinin and increases tolerance to drought and Botrytis cinerea in Artemisia annua. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 1961–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sun, H.; Zhang, F.; Chen, S.; Guan, Z.; Jiang, J.; Fang, W.; Chen, F. Effects of aphid herbivory on volatile organic compounds of Artemisia annua and Chrysanthemum morifolium. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2015, 60, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xu, M.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, S.; Chen, F.; Chen, F. Herbivory-induced emission of volatile terpenes in Chrysanthemum morifolium functions as an indirect defense against Spodoptera litura larvae by attracting natural enemies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 9743–9753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gao, M.; Wang, X.; Meng, F.; Liu, Q.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Piao, S. Three-dimensional change in temperature sensitivity of northern vegetation phenology. Glob. Change Biol. 2020, 26, 5189–5201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Jin, J.; Zhao, M.; Jing, T.; Zhang, M.; Lu, M.; Yu, G.; Wang, J.; Guo, D.; Pan, Y.; Hoffmann, T.D. Volatile compound-mediated plant–plant interactions under stress with the tea plant as a model. Hortic. Res. 2023, 10, uhad143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Magagnini, G.; Grassi, G.; Kotiranta, S. The effect of light spectrum on the morphology and cannabinoid content of Cannabis sativa L. Med. Cannabis Cannabinoids 2018, 1, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Danziger, N.; Bernstein, N. Light matters: Effect of light spectra on cannabinoid profile and plant development of medical cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.). Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 164, 113351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hawley, D. The Influence of Spectral Quality of Light on Plant Secondary Metabolism and Photosynthetic Acclimation to Light Quality; University of Guelph: Guelph, ON, Canada, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  51. Namdar, D.; Charuvi, D.; Ajjampura, V.; Mazuz, M.; Ion, A.; Kamara, I.; Koltai, H. LED lighting affects the composition and biological activity of Cannabis sativa secondary metabolites. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 132, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hawley, D.; Graham, T.; Stasiak, M.; Dixon, M. Improving Cannabis Bud Quality and Yield with Subcanopy Lighting. HortScience 2018, 53, 1593–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Morello, V.; Brousseau, V.D.; Wu, N.; Wu, B.S.; MacPherson, S.; Lefsrud, M. Light quality impacts vertical growth rate, phytochemical yield and cannabinoid production efficiency in Cannabis sativa. Plants 2022, 11, 2982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Arora, A.S.; Yun, C.M. Dynamic spectrum lighting impact on plant morphology and cannabinoid profile of medical and recreational cannabis—A novel leapfrog strategy towards shaping the future of horticulture lighting. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 199, 116799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Demkura, P.V.; Ballare, C.L. UVR8 mediates UV-B-induced Arabidopsis defense responses against Botrytis cinerea by controlling sinapate accumulation. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 642–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Trancoso, I.; de Souza, G.A.; dos Santos, P.R.; dos Santos, K.D.; de Miranda, R.M.d.S.N.; da Silva, A.L.P.M.; Santos, D.Z.; García-Tejero, I.F.; Campostrini, E. Cannabis sativa L.: Crop management and abiotic factors that affect phytocannabinoid production. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, C.; Xing, B.; Yang, D.; Ren, M.; Guo, H.; Yang, S.; Liang, Z. SmbHLH3 acts as a transcription repressor for both phenolic acids and tanshinone biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Phytochemistry 2020, 169, 112183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Wang, D.; Shi, C.; Alamgir, K.; Kwon, S.; Pan, L.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, X. Global assessment of the distribution and conservation status of a key medicinal plant (Artemisia annua L.): The roles of climate and anthropogenic activities. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 821, 153378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Shao, C.; Zhang, C.; Lv, Z.; Shen, C. Pre-and post-harvest exposure to stress influence quality-related metabolites in fresh tea leaves (Camellia sinensis). Sci. Hortic. 2021, 281, 109984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wallaart, T.E.; Pras, N.; Beekman, A.C.; Quax, W.J. Seasonal variation of artemisinin and its biosynthetic precursors in plants of Artemisia annua of different geographical origin: Proof for the existence of chemotypes. Planta Medica 2000, 66, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Naeem, M.; Sadiq, Y.; Jahan, A.; Nabi, A.; Aftab, T.; Khan, M.M.A. Salicylic acid restrains arsenic induced oxidative burst in two varieties of Artemisia annua L. by modulating antioxidant defence system and artemisinin production. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 202, 110851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zheng, J.; Zhang, X.; Fu, M.; Zeng, H.; Ye, J.; Zhang, W.; Liao, Y.; Xu, F. Effects of different stress treatments on the total terpene trilactone content and expression levels of key genes in Ginkgo biloba leaves. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 38, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Vashisth, D.; Kumar, R.; Rastogi, S.; Patel, V.K.; Kalra, A.; Gupta, M.M.; Gupta, A.K.; Shasany, A.K. Transcriptome changes induced by abiotic stresses in Artemisia annua. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rebey, I.B.; Bourgou, S.; Rahali, F.Z.; Msaada, K.; Ksouri, R.; Marzouk, B. Relation between salt tolerance and biochemical changes in cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) seeds. J. Food Drug Anal. 2017, 25, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yep, B.; Gale, N.V.; Zheng, Y. Comparing hydroponic and aquaponic rootzones on the growth of two drug-type Cannabis sativa L. cultivars during the flowering stage. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 157, 112881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Caser, M.; Chitarra, W.; D’Angiolillo, F.; Perrone, I.; Demasi, S.; Lovisolo, C.; Pistelli, L.; Pistelli, L.; Scariot, V. Drought stress adaptation modulates plant secondary metabolite production in Salvia dolomitica Codd. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 129, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Haberstroh, S.; Kreuzwieser, J.; Lobo-do-Vale, R.; Caldeira, M.C.; Dubbert, M.; Werner, C. Terpenoid emissions of two Mediterranean woody species in response to drought stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Morshedloo, M.R.; Craker, L.E.; Salami, A.; Nazeri, V.; Sang, H.; Maggi, F. Effect of prolonged water stress on essential oil content, compositions and gene expression patterns of mono-and sesquiterpene synthesis in two oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) subspecies. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 111, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Caplan, D.; Dixon, M.; Zheng, Y. Increasing inflorescence dry weight and cannabinoid content in medical cannabis using controlled drought stress. HortScience 2019, 54, 964–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wei, T.; Deng, K.; Liu, D.; Gao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yang, M.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, X.; Wang, C.; Song, W. Ectopic expression of DREB transcription factor, AtDREB1A, confers tolerance to drought in transgenic Salvia miltiorrhiza. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 1593–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liao, B.; Shen, X.; Xiang, L.; Guo, S.; Chen, S.; Meng, Y.; Liang, Y.; Ding, D.; Bai, J.; Zhang, D. Allele-aware chromosome-level genome assembly of Artemisia annua reveals the correlation between ADS expansion and artemisinin yield. Mol. Plant 2022, 15, 1310–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kennedy, D.O. Plants and the Human Brain; Oxford University Press: Oxford, MS, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  73. Ryz, N.R.; Remillard, D.J.; Russo, E.B. Cannabis roots: A traditional therapy with future potential for treating inflammation and pain. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2017, 2, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhan, X.; Qiu, T.; Zhang, H.; Hou, K.; Liang, X.; Chen, C.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Q.; Wang, X.; Li, X.-l. Mass spectrometry imaging and single-cell transcriptional profiling reveal the tissue-specific regulation of bioactive ingredient biosynthesis in Taxus leaves. Plant Commun. 2023, 4, 100630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Soliman, S.S.; Raizada, M.N. Sites of biosynthesis and storage of Taxol in Taxus media (Rehder) plants: Mechanism of accumulation. Phytochemistry 2020, 175, 112369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cartayrade, A.; Neau, E.; Sohier, C.; Balz, J.-P.; Carde, J.-P.; Walter, J. Ginkgolide and bilobalide biosynthesis in Ginkgo biloba. I: Sites of synthesis, translocation and accumulation of ginkgolides and bilobalide. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1997, 35, 859–868. [Google Scholar]
  77. Liu, X.-G.; Lu, X.; Gao, W.; Li, P.; Yang, H. Structure, synthesis, biosynthesis, and activity of the characteristic compounds from Ginkgo biloba L. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2022, 39, 474–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Lu, X.; Yang, H.; Liu, X.; Shen, Q.; Wang, N.; Qi, L.-w.; Li, P. Combining metabolic profiling and gene expression analysis to reveal the biosynthesis site and transport of ginkgolides in Ginkgo biloba L. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Song, Z.; Lin, C.; Xing, P.; Fen, Y.; Jin, H.; Zhou, C.; Gu, Y.Q.; Wang, J.; Li, X. A high-quality reference genome sequence of Salvia miltiorrhiza provides insights into tanshinone synthesis in its red rhizomes. Plant Genome 2020, 13, e20041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Xu, Z.; Peters, R.J.; Weirather, J.; Luo, H.; Liao, B.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Ji, A.; Zhang, B.; Hu, S. Full-length transcriptome sequences and splice variants obtained by a combination of sequencing platforms applied to different root tissues of Salvia miltiorrhiza and tanshinone biosynthesis. Plant J. 2015, 82, 951–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Huang, W.; Wang, Y.; Tian, W.; Cui, X.; Tu, P.; Li, J.; Shi, S.; Liu, X. Biosynthesis Investigations of Terpenoid, Alkaloid, and Flavonoid Antimicrobial Agents Derived from Medicinal Plants. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Verrier, P.J.; Bird, D.; Burla, B.; Dassa, E.; Forestier, C.; Geisler, M.; Klein, M.; Kolukisaoglu, Ü.; Lee, Y.; Martinoia, E. Plant ABC proteins–a unified nomenclature and updated inventory. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yan, L.; Zhang, J.; Chen, H.; Luo, H. Genome-wide analysis of ATP-binding cassette transporter provides insight to genes related to bioactive metabolite transportation in Salvia miltiorrhiza. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Crouzet, J.; Roland, J.; Peeters, E.; Trombik, T.; Ducos, E.; Nader, J.; Boutry, M. NtPDR1, a plasma membrane ABC transporter from Nicotiana tabacum, is involved in diterpene transport. Plant Mol. Biol. 2013, 82, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang, R.; Huang, J.; Zhu, J.; Xie, X.; Tang, Q.; Chen, X.; Luo, J.; Luo, Z. Isolation and characterization of a novel PDR-type ABC transporter gene PgPDR3 from Panax ginseng CA Meyer induced by methyl jasmonate. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013, 40, 6195–6204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Fu, X.; Shi, P.; He, Q.; Shen, Q.; Tang, Y.; Pan, Q.; Ma, Y.; Yan, T.; Chen, M.; Hao, X. AaPDR3, a PDR transporter 3, is involved in sesquiterpene β-caryophyllene transport in Artemisia annua. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Huang, H.; Xing, S.; Tang, K.; Jiang, W. AaWRKY4 upregulates artemisinin content through boosting the expressions of key enzymes in artemisinin biosynthetic pathway. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2021, 146, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mostafa, S.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, W.; Jin, B. Floral scents and fruit aromas: Functions, compositions, biosynthesis, and regulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 860157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Huang, Y.; Xie, F.; Cao, X.; Li, M. Research progress in biosynthesis and regulation of plant terpenoids. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2021, 35, 1799–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Huang, J.Q.; Fang, X. Amorpha-4, 11-diene synthase: A key enzyme in artemisinin biosynthesis and engineering. Abiotech 2021, 2, 276–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lu, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, F.; Jiang, W.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, L.; Lv, Z.; Wang, G.; Tang, K. AaORA, a trichome-specific AP2/ERF transcription factor of Artemisia annua, is a positive regulator in the artemisinin biosynthetic pathway and in disease resistance to Botrytis cinerea. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 1191–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Maeda, H.A.; Fernie, A.R. Evolutionary history of plant metabolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2021, 72, 185–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Paddon, C.J.; Westfall, P.J.; Pitera, D.J.; Benjamin, K.; Fisher, K.; McPhee, D.; Leavell, M.; Tai, A.; Main, A.; Eng, D. High-level semi-synthetic production of the potent antimalarial artemisinin. Nature 2013, 496, 528–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Shen, Q.; Chen, Y.; Wang, T.; Wu, S.; Lu, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, F.; Jiang, W.; Wang, G.; Tang, K. Overexpression of the cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (cyp71av1) and cytochrome P450 reductase (cpr) genes increased artemisinin content in Artemisia annua (Asteraceae). Genet. Mol. Res. 2012, 11, 3298–3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Huang, J.-Q.; Li, D.-M.; Tian, X.; Lin, J.-L.; Yang, L.; Xu, J.-J.; Fang, X. Side products of recombinant amorpha-4, 11-diene synthase and their effect on microbial artemisinin production. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 2168–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Wani, K.I.; Choudhary, S.; Zehra, A.; Naeem, M.; Weathers, P.; Aftab, T. Enhancing artemisinin content in and delivery from Artemisia annua: A review of alternative, classical, and transgenic approaches. Planta 2021, 254, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yuan, Y.; Liu, W.; Zhang, Q.; Xiang, L.; Liu, X.; Chen, M.; Lin, Z.; Wang, Q.; Liao, Z. Overexpression of artemisinic aldehyde Δ11 (13) reductase gene–enhanced artemisinin and its relative metabolite biosynthesis in transgenic Artemisia annua L. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2015, 62, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Chen, Y.; Shen, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wang, T.; Wu, S.; Zhang, L.; Lu, X.; Zhang, F.; Jiang, W.; Qiu, B. The stacked over-expression of FPS, CYP71AV1 and CPR genes leads to the increase of artemisinin level in Artemisia annua L. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2013, 7, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Liu, W.; Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, S.; Chen, M.; Lan, X.; Chen, G.; Liao, Z. Cold stress improves the production of artemisinin depending on the increase in endogenous jasmonate. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2017, 64, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yin, L.; Zhao, C.; Huang, Y.; Yang, R.; Zeng, Q. Abiotic stress-induced expression of artemisinin biosynthesis genes in Artemisia annua L. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biology. 2008, 14, 1. [Google Scholar]
  101. Jing, F.; Zhang, L.; Li, M.; Tang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Pan, Q.; Wang, G.; Tang, K. Abscisic acid (ABA) treatment increases artemisinin content in Artemisia annua by enhancing the expression of genes in artemisinin biosynthetic pathway. Biologia 2009, 64, 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Pan, W.S.; Zheng, L.P.; Tian, H.; Li, W.Y.; Wang, J.W. Transcriptome responses involved in artemisinin production in Artemisia annua L. under UV-B radiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2014, 140, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Yadav, R.K.; Sangwan, R.S.; Srivastava, A.K.; Sangwan, N.S. Prolonged exposure to salt stress affects specialized metabolites-artemisinin and essential oil accumulation in Artemisia annua L.: Metabolic acclimation in preferential favour of enhanced terpenoid accumulation accompanying vegetative to reproductive phase transition. Protoplasma 2017, 254, 505–522. [Google Scholar]
  104. Cui, G.; Duan, L.; Jin, B.; Qian, J.; Xue, Z.; Shen, G.; Snyder, J.H.; Song, J.; Chen, S.; Huang, L. Functional divergence of diterpene syntheses in the medicinal plant Salvia miltiorrhiza. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 1607–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wei, X.; Cao, P.; Wang, G.; Han, J. Microbial inoculant and garbage enzyme reduced cadmium (Cd) uptake in Salvia miltiorrhiza (Bge.) under Cd stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 192, 110311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Xu, H.; Song, J.; Luo, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, J.; Li, Y.; Song, C.; Wang, B. Analysis of the genome sequence of the medicinal plant Salvia miltiorrhiza. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 949–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ma, Y.; Cui, G.; Chen, T.; Ma, X.; Wang, R.; Jin, B.; Yang, J.; Kang, L.; Tang, J.; Lai, C. Expansion within the CYP71D subfamily drives the heterocyclization of tanshinones synthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Contreras, A.; Leroy, B.; Mariage, P.-A.; Wattiez, R. Proteomic analysis reveals novel insights into tanshinones biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Wang, Z.; Peters, R.J. Tanshinones: Leading the way into Lamiaceae labdane-related diterpenoid biosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2022, 66, 102189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Zhang, Y.; Ji, A.; Xu, Z.; Luo, H.; Song, J. The AP2/ERF transcription factor SmERF128 positively regulates diterpenoid biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 100, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Abdallah, I.I.; Pramastya, H.; Van Merkerk, R.; Sukrasno; Quax, W.J. Metabolic engineering of Bacillus subtilis toward taxadiene biosynthesis as the first committed step for taxol production. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Li, J.; Mutanda, I.; Wang, K.; Yang, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y. Chloroplastic metabolic engineering coupled with isoprenoid pool enhancement for committed taxanes biosynthesis in Nicotiana benthamiana. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Fu, J.; Xu, W.; Huang, W.; Wang, B.; Li, S.; Zhang, J.; Chang, L. Importation of taxadiene synthase into chloroplast improves taxadiene production in tobacco. Planta 2021, 253, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Cheng, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, X.; Zhu, X.; Li, Z.; Chu, H.; Wang, Q.; Lou, Q.; Cai, B.; Yang, Y. Chromosome-level genome of Himalayan yew provides insights into the origin and evolution of the paclitaxel biosynthetic pathway. Mol. Plant 2021, 14, 1199–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Jiang, L.; Zhang, K.; Lü, X.; Yang, L.; Wang, S.; Chen, D.; Yang, Y.; Qiu, D. Characterization and expression analysis of genes encoding Taxol biosynthetic enzymes in Taxus spp. J. For. Res. 2021, 32, 2507–2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Schepmann, H.G.; Pang, J.; Matsuda, S.P. Cloning and characterization of Ginkgo biloba levopimaradiene synthase, which catalyzes the first committed step in ginkgolide biosynthesis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2001, 392, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Forman, V.; Luo, D.; Geu-Flores, F.; Lemcke, R.; Nelson, D.R.; Kampranis, S.C.; Staerk, D.; Møller, B.L.; Pateraki, I. A gene cluster in Ginkgo biloba encodes unique multifunctional cytochrome P450s that initiate ginkgolide biosynthesis. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Neau, E.; Cartayrade, A.; Balz, J.-P.; Carde, J.-P.; Walter, J. Ginkgolide and bilobalide biosynthesis in Ginkgo biloba. II: Identification of a possible intermediate compound by using inhibitors of cytochrome p-450-dependent oxygenases. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1997, 35, 869–879. [Google Scholar]
  119. Lange, B.M.; Zager, J.J. Comprehensive inventory of cannabinoids in Cannabis sativa L.: Can we connect genotype and chemotype? Phytochem. Rev. 2022, 21, 1273–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Jalali, S.; Salami, S.A.; Sharifi, M.; Sohrabi, S. Signaling compounds elicit expression of key genes in cannabinoid pathway and related metabolites in cannabis. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 133, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Grassa, C.J.; Weiblen, G.D.; Wenger, J.P.; Dabney, C.; Poplawski, S.G.; Timothy Motley, S.; Michael, T.P.; Schwartz, C. A new Cannabis genome assembly associates elevated cannabidiol (CBD) with hemp introgressed into marijuana. New Phytol. 2021, 230, 1665–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Hao, X.; Pu, Z.; Cao, G.; You, D.; Zhou, Y.; Deng, C.; Shi, M.; Nile, S.H.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, W. Tanshinone and salvianolic acid biosynthesis are regulated by SmMYB98 in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. J. Adv. Res. 2020, 23, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Zhang, J.; Zhou, L.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; Tan, R.; Zhao, S. Overexpression of SmMYB9b enhances tanshinone concentration in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 1297–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Li, L.; Wang, D.; Zhou, L.; Yu, X.; Yan, X.; Zhang, Q.; Li, B.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, W.; Cao, X. JA-responsive transcription factor SmMYB97 promotes phenolic acid and tanshinone accumulation in Salvia miltiorrhiza. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 14850–14862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Yu, C.; Luo, X.; Zhang, C.; Xu, X.; Huang, J.; Chen, Y.; Feng, S.; Zhan, X.; Zhang, L.; Yuan, H. Tissue-specific study across the stem of Taxus media identifies a phloem-specific TmMYB3 involved in the transcriptional regulation of paclitaxel biosynthesis. Plant J. 2020, 103, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Qin, W.; Xie, L.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Fu, X.; Chen, T.; Hassani, D.; Li, L.; Sun, X.; Tang, K. An R2R3-MYB transcription factor positively regulates the glandular secretory trichome initiation in Artemisia annua L. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 657156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Wu, Z.; Li, L.; Liu, H.; Yan, X.; Ma, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, T.; Wang, C.; Xie, L.; Hao, X. AaMYB15, an R2R3-MYB TF in Artemisia annua, acts as a negative regulator of artemisinin biosynthesis. Plant Sci. 2021, 308, 110920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Liu, Y.; Zhu, P.; Cai, S.; Haughn, G.; Page, J.E. Three novel transcription factors involved in cannabinoid biosynthesis in Cannabis sativa L. Plant Mol. Biol. 2021, 106, 49–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Haiden, S.R.; Apicella, P.V.; Ma, Y.; Berkowitz, G.A. Overexpression of CsMIXTA, a Transcription Factor from Cannabis sativa, Increases Glandular Trichome Density in Tobacco Leaves. Plants 2022, 11, 1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Rushton, P.J.; Somssich, I.E.; Ringler, P.; Shen, Q.J. WRKY transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Ma, D.; Pu, G.; Lei, C.; Ma, L.; Wang, H.; Guo, Y.; Chen, J.; Du, Z.; Wang, H.; Li, G. Isolation and characterization of AaWRKY1, an Artemisia annua transcription factor that regulates the amorpha-4, 11-diene synthase gene, a key gene of artemisinin biosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 2146–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Zhang, M.; Chen, Y.; Nie, L.; Jin, X.; Liao, W.; Zhao, S.; Fu, C.; Yu, L. Transcriptome-wide identification and screening of WRKY factors involved in the regulation of taxol biosynthesis in Taxus chinensis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Chen, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, W.; Ou, Z.; Peng, Z.; Fu, C.; Zhao, C.; Yu, L. Salicylic acid-responsive factor TcWRKY33 positively regulates taxol biosynthesis in Taxus chinensis in direct and indirect ways. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 697476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Cao, W.; Wang, Y.; Shi, M.; Hao, X.; Zhao, W.; Wang, Y.; Ren, J.; Kai, G. Transcription factor SmWRKY1 positively promotes the biosynthesis of tanshinones in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Deng, C.; Hao, X.; Shi, M.; Fu, R.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Feng, Y.; Makunga, N.P.; Kai, G. Tanshinone production could be increased by the expression of SmWRKY2 in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Plant Sci. 2019, 284, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Sakuma, Y.; Liu, Q.; Dubouzet, J.G.; Abe, H.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. DNA-binding specificity of the ERF/AP2 domain of Arabidopsis DREBs, transcription factors involved in dehydration-and cold-inducible gene expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 290, 998–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Bai, Z.; Li, W.; Jia, Y.; Yue, Z.; Jiao, J.; Huang, W.; Xia, P.; Liang, Z. The ethylene response factor SmERF6 co-regulates the transcription of SmCPS1 and SmKSL1 and is involved in tanshinone biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Planta 2018, 248, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Yu, Z.; Li, J.; Yang, C.; Hu, W.; Wang, L.; Chen, X. The jasmonate-responsive AP2/ERF transcription factors AaERF1 and AaERF2 positively regulate artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua L. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 353–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Huang, Q.; Sun, M.; Yuan, T.; Wang, Y.; Shi, M.; Lu, S.; Tang, B.; Pan, J.; Wang, Y.; Kai, G. The AP2/ERF transcription factor SmERF1L1 regulates the biosynthesis of tanshinones and phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Food Chem. 2019, 274, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Zhang, M.; Li, S.; Nie, L.; Chen, Q.; Xu, X.; Yu, L.; Fu, C. Two jasmonate-responsive factors, TcERF12 and TcERF15, respectively act as repressor and activator of tasy gene of taxol biosynthesis in Taxus chinensis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2015, 89, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Ji, Y.; Xiao, J.; Shen, Y.; Ma, D.; Li, Z.; Pu, G.; Li, X.; Huang, L.; Liu, B.; Ye, H. Cloning and characterization of AabHLH1, a bHLH transcription factor that positively regulates artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 1592–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Xing, B.; Yang, D.; Yu, H.; Zhang, B.; Yan, K.; Zhang, X.; Han, R.; Liang, Z. Overexpression of SmbHLH10 enhances tanshinones biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Plant Sci. 2018, 276, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Xing, B.; Liang, L.; Liu, L.; Hou, Z.; Yang, D.; Yan, K.; Zhang, X.; Liang, Z. Overexpression of SmbHLH148 induced biosynthesis of tanshinones as well as phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots. Plant Cell Rep. 2018, 37, 1681–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Lenka, S.K.; Nims, N.E.; Vongpaseuth, K.; Boshar, R.A.; Roberts, S.C.; Walker, E.L. Jasmonate-responsive expression of paclitaxel biosynthesis genes in Taxus cuspidata cultured cells is negatively regulated by the bHLH transcription factors TcJAMYC1, TcJAMYC2, and TcJAMYC4. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Zhang, F.; Fu, X.; Lv, Z.; Lu, X.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, M.; Wang, G.; Sun, X.; Liao, Z. A basic leucine zipper transcription factor, AabZIP1, connects abscisic acid signaling with artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Zhou, F.; Sun, T.-H.; Zhao, L.; Pan, X.-W.; Lu, S. The bZIP transcription factor HY5 interacts with the promoter of the monoterpene synthase gene QH6 in modulating its rhythmic expression. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Shi, M.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, J.; Huang, S.; Wang, H.; Kai, G. Methyl jasmonate induction of tanshinone biosynthesis in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy roots is mediated by Jasmonate Zim-Domain repressor proteins. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Li, W.; Bai, Z.; Pei, T.; Yang, D.; Mao, R.; Zhang, B.; Liu, C.; Liang, Z. SmGRAS1 and SmGRAS2 regulate the biosynthesis of tanshinones and phenolic acids in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomolecules 13 01725 g001
Figure 1. Several important medicinal plants and their specific terpenoids.
Figure 1. Several important medicinal plants and their specific terpenoids.
Biomolecules 13 01725 g001
Biomolecules 13 01725 g002
Figure 2. Terpenoid-mediated plant-environment interactions. Medicinal plants produce terpenoids to inhibit insect feeding and pathogen attack, whereas UV-B radiation, drought, salt, and temperature stress can induce terpenoids accumulation in medicinal plants.
Figure 2. Terpenoid-mediated plant-environment interactions. Medicinal plants produce terpenoids to inhibit insect feeding and pathogen attack, whereas UV-B radiation, drought, salt, and temperature stress can induce terpenoids accumulation in medicinal plants.
Biomolecules 13 01725 g002
Biomolecules 13 01725 g003
Figure 3. Biosynthetic pathways of terpenoids in several important medicinal plants. Artemisinin (purple), cannabinoids (orange), ginkgolide (pink), paclitaxel (yellow), tanshinones (green). One solid arrow indicates one step, two solid arrows represent more than one step, and the dashed arrows show hypothetical steps. Abbreviations: AACT, acetoacetyl-CoA synthase; HMGR, HMG-CoA reductase; HMGS, hydroxymethylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA synthase; MVK, mevalonate kinase; PMK, phosphomevalonate kinase; MVD, mevalonate diphosphate decarboxylase; FPPS, farnesyl diphosphate synthase; DXR, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductase; DXS, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase; HDR, 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate reductase; HDS, 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate synthase; CMK, 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythrito kinase; MCT, 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythrito synthase; MDS, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-2, 4-cyclodiphosphate synthase; GGPPS, geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase; ADS, amorpha-4, 11-diene synthase; ALDH1, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1; DBR2, artemisinic aldehyde Δ11(13) reductase; LPS, levopimaradiene synthase gene; CYP450, cytochrome P450; TS, taxadiene synthetase; T5αH, taxadiene 5-α-hydroxylase; T2αH, taxoid 2-α-hydroxylase; T7βH, taxoid 7-β-hydroxylase; TBT, 2-α-hydroxytaxane 2-O-benzoyltransferase; BAPT, baccatin III amino phenylpropanoyl-13-O-transferase; DBTNBT, 3′-N-debenzoyltaxol-N-benzoyltransferase; T13αH, taxane 13-α-hydroxylase; KSL, kaurene synthase-like; CPS, copalyldiphosphate synthase; AAE, acyl-activating enzyme; OLS, olivetol synthase; GOT, olivetolate geranyltransferase; THCAS, tetrahydrocannabinolic acid synthase; CBDAS, cannabidiolic acid synthase; CBCA, cannabichromenic acid synthase. Dashed square frames represent terpenoid biosynthesis sites.
Figure 3. Biosynthetic pathways of terpenoids in several important medicinal plants. Artemisinin (purple), cannabinoids (orange), ginkgolide (pink), paclitaxel (yellow), tanshinones (green). One solid arrow indicates one step, two solid arrows represent more than one step, and the dashed arrows show hypothetical steps. Abbreviations: AACT, acetoacetyl-CoA synthase; HMGR, HMG-CoA reductase; HMGS, hydroxymethylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA synthase; MVK, mevalonate kinase; PMK, phosphomevalonate kinase; MVD, mevalonate diphosphate decarboxylase; FPPS, farnesyl diphosphate synthase; DXR, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductase; DXS, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase; HDR, 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate reductase; HDS, 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate synthase; CMK, 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythrito kinase; MCT, 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythrito synthase; MDS, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-2, 4-cyclodiphosphate synthase; GGPPS, geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase; ADS, amorpha-4, 11-diene synthase; ALDH1, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1; DBR2, artemisinic aldehyde Δ11(13) reductase; LPS, levopimaradiene synthase gene; CYP450, cytochrome P450; TS, taxadiene synthetase; T5αH, taxadiene 5-α-hydroxylase; T2αH, taxoid 2-α-hydroxylase; T7βH, taxoid 7-β-hydroxylase; TBT, 2-α-hydroxytaxane 2-O-benzoyltransferase; BAPT, baccatin III amino phenylpropanoyl-13-O-transferase; DBTNBT, 3′-N-debenzoyltaxol-N-benzoyltransferase; T13αH, taxane 13-α-hydroxylase; KSL, kaurene synthase-like; CPS, copalyldiphosphate synthase; AAE, acyl-activating enzyme; OLS, olivetol synthase; GOT, olivetolate geranyltransferase; THCAS, tetrahydrocannabinolic acid synthase; CBDAS, cannabidiolic acid synthase; CBCA, cannabichromenic acid synthase. Dashed square frames represent terpenoid biosynthesis sites.
Biomolecules 13 01725 g003
Biomolecules 13 01725 g004
Figure 4. The important TFs and structural genes associated with terpenoid biosynthesis in several important medicinal plants.
Figure 4. The important TFs and structural genes associated with terpenoid biosynthesis in several important medicinal plants.
Biomolecules 13 01725 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Q.; Zhao, X.; Jiang, Y.; Jin, B.; Wang, L. Functions of Representative Terpenoids and Their Biosynthesis Mechanisms in Medicinal Plants. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1725. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13121725

AMA Style

Wang Q, Zhao X, Jiang Y, Jin B, Wang L. Functions of Representative Terpenoids and Their Biosynthesis Mechanisms in Medicinal Plants. Biomolecules. 2023; 13(12):1725. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13121725

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Qingjie, Xiya Zhao, Yang Jiang, Biao Jin, and Li Wang. 2023. "Functions of Representative Terpenoids and Their Biosynthesis Mechanisms in Medicinal Plants" Biomolecules 13, no. 12: 1725. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13121725

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop