Structural and Functional Insights into the Biofilm-Associated BceF Tyrosine Kinase Domain from Burkholderia cepacia
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. BceF Cloning
2.2. BceF Protein Expression and Purification for Crystallization
2.3. BceF Protein Purification for Biochemical Measurements
2.4. BceF Protein Purification for the Steady-State Kinetics
2.5. TEV Protease Expression and Purification
2.6. BceF Crystallization Experiments
2.7. X-ray Data Collection and Structure Determination
2.8. Evolutionary Conservation Analysis
2.9. Crystal Structure Calculations and Visualization
2.10. Steady-State Enzymatic Kinetics Analysis of BceF
2.11. MST Measurement of the Affinity of BceF for the ATP Analog
2.12. Size Exclusion Chromatography-Multi-Angle Light Scattering (SEC-MALS)
2.13. Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS) Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. The Crystal Structure of the BceF Kinase Domain
3.2. Evolutionary Conservation Analysis and Structural Comparison of BY-Kinases
3.3. Steady-State Kinetics Reveals Low Enzymatic Efficiency of the BceF Kinase Domain
3.4. BceF Kinase Domain Displays a Low Binding Affinity for the Non-Hydrolyzable ATP Analog AMP-PNP
3.5. BceF Kinase Domain Exists as a Dimer in Solution and in the Crystals
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Shommu, N.S.; Vogel, H.J.; Storey, D.G. Potential of metabolomics to reveal Burkholderia cepacia complex pathogenesis and antibiotic resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ferreira, A.S.; Leitão, J.H.; Sousa, S.A.; Cosme, A.M.; Sá-Correia, I.; Moreira, L.M. Functional Analysis of Burkholderia cepacia Genes bceD and bceF, Encoding a Phosphotyrosine Phosphatase and a Tyrosine Autokinase, Respectively: Role in Exopolysaccharide Biosynthesis and Biofilm Formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 524–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cozzone, A.J. Bacterial tyrosine kinases: Novel targets for antibacterial therapy? Trends Microbiol. 2009, 17, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cegelski, L.; Marshall, G.R.; Eldridge, G.R.; Hultgren, S.J. The biology and future prospects of antivirulence therapies. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Grangeasse, C.; Nessler, S.; Mijakovic, I. Bacterial tyrosine kinases: Evolution, biological function and structural insights. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2012, 367, 2640–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Grangeasse, C.; Cozzone, A.J.; Deutscher, J.; Mijakovic, I. Tyrosine phosphorylation: An emerging regulatory device of bacterial physiology. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2007, 32, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shi, L.; Cavagnino, A.; Rabefiraisana, J.-L.; Lazar, N.; De La Sierra-Gallay, I.L.; Ochsenbein, F.; Valerio-Lepiniec, M.; Urvoas, A.; Minard, P.; Mijakovic, I.; et al. Structural Analysis of the Hanks-Type Protein Kinase YabT From Bacillus subtilis Provides New Insights in its DNA-Dependent Activation. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chao, J.D.; Wong, D.; Av-Gay, Y. Microbial Protein-tyrosine Kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 9463–9472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Grangeasse, C.; Terreux, R.; Nessler, S. Bacterial tyrosine-kinases: Structure–function analysis and therapeutic potential. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Proteins Proteom. 2010, 1804, 628–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Obadia, B.; Lacour, S.; Doublet, P.; Baubichon-Cortay, H.; Cozzone, A.J.; Grangeasse, C. Influence of Tyrosine-Kinase Wzc Activity on Colanic Acid Production in Escherichia coli K12 Cells. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 367, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bechet, E.; Gruszczyk, J.; Terreux, R.; Gueguen-Chaignon, V.; Vigouroux, A.; Obadia, B.; Cozzone, A.J.; Nessler, S.; Grangeasse, C. Identification of structural and molecular determinants of the tyrosine-kinase Wzc and implications in capsular polysaccharide export. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 77, 1315–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lee, D.C.; Zheng, J.; She, Y.-M.; Jia, Z. Structure of Escherichia coli tyrosine kinase Etk reveals a novel activation mechanism. EMBO J. 2008, 27, 1758–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gruszczyk, J.; Olivares-Illana, V.; Nourikyan, J.; Fleurie, A.; Béchet, E.; Gueguen-Chaignon, V.; Freton, C.; Aumont-Nicaise, M.; Moréra, S.; Grangeasse, C.; et al. Comparative Analysis of the Tyr-Kinases CapB1 and CapB2 Fused to Their Cognate Modulators CapA1 and CapA2 from Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Olivares-Illana, V.; Meyer, P.R.; Bechet, E.; Gueguen-Chaignon, V.; Soulat, D.; Lazereg-Riquier, S.; Mijakovic, I.; Deutscher, J.; Cozzone, A.J.; Laprévote, O.; et al. Structural Basis for the Regulation Mechanism of the Tyrosine Kinase CapB from Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6, e143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Gasteiger, E.; Hoogland, C.; Gattiker, A.; Duvaud, S.; Wilkins, M.R.; Appel, R.D.; Bairoch, A. Protein Identification and Analysis Tools on the ExPASy Server. In The Proteomics Protocols Handbook; Walker, J.M., Ed.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 571–607. [Google Scholar]
- Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- McCoy, A.J.; Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W.; Adams, P.D.; Winn, M.D.; Storoni, L.C.; Read, R.J. Phasercrystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2007, 40, 658–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Murshudov, G.N.; Vagin, A.A.; Dodson, E.J. Refinement of Macromolecular Structures by the Maximum-Likelihood Method. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 1997, 53, 240–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Emsley, P.; Cowtan, K. Coot: Model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004, 60, 2126–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pettersen, E.F.; Goddard, T.D.; Huang, C.C.; Couch, G.S.; Greenblatt, D.M.; Meng, E.C.; Ferrin, T.E. UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1605–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ashkenazy, H.; Abadi, S.; Martz, E.; Chay, O.; Mayrose, I.; Pupko, T.; Ben-Tal, N. ConSurf 2016: An improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W344–W350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ashkenazy, H.; Erez, E.; Martz, E.; Pupko, T.; Ben-Tal, N. ConSurf 2010: Calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, W529–W533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Landau, M.; Mayrose, I.; Rosenberg, Y.; Glaser, F.; Martz, E.; Pupko, T.; Ben-Tal, N. ConSurf 2005: The projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, W299–W302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Weiss, M.S. Global indicators of X-ray data quality. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2001, 34, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Karplus, P.A.; Diederichs, K. Linking Crystallographic Model and Data Quality. Science 2012, 336, 1030–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, V.B.; Arendall, W.B., III; Headd, J.J.; Keedy, D.A.; Immormino, R.M.; Kapral, G.J.; Murray, L.W.; Richardson, J.S.; Richardson, D.C. MolProbity: All-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010, 66, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Brunati, A.M.; Donella-Deana, A.; Ruzzene, M.; Marin, O.; Pinna, L.A. Site specificity of p72syk protein tyrosine kinase: Efficient phosphorylation of motifs recognized by Src homology 2 domains of the Src family. FEBS Lett. 1995, 367, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Guskov, A.; Slotboom, D.J. Size exclusion chromatography with multi-angle laser light scattering (SEC-MALLS) to determine protein oligomeric states. In From Molecules to Living Organisms: An Interplay between Biology and Physics; Oxford University Press (OUP): Oxford, UK, 2016; pp. 169–183. [Google Scholar]
- Some, D.; Amartely, H.; Tsadok, A.; Lebendiker, M. Characterization of Proteins by Size-Exclusion Chromatography Coupled to Multi-Angle Light Scattering (SEC-MALS). J. Vis. Exp. 2019, e59615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Spellberg, B. Antibiotic Resistance: Promoting Critically Needed Antibiotic Research and Development and Appropriate Use (“Stewardship”) of these Precious Drugs; Testimony of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA): Arlington, VA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Ferreira, A.S.; Silva, I.N.; Oliveira, V.H.; Becker, J.D.; Givskov, M.; Ryan, R.P.; Fernandes, F.; Moreira, L.M. Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of the Burkholderia cepacia Tyrosine Kinase bceF Mutant Reveals a Role in Tolerance to Stress, Biofilm Formation, and Virulence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 3009–3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]






| BceF | |
|---|---|
| PDB accession code | 6Z0P |
| Beamline | ESRF ID23-2 |
| Date | 25 June 2016 |
| Data collection | |
| Space group | P 1 21 1 |
| Cell dimensions | |
| a, b, c (Å) | 44.27 90.48 61.34 |
| α, β, γ (°) | 90.0 111.1 90.0 |
| Wavelength (Å) | 0.8729 |
| Resolution (Å) | 90.5-1.85 (2.2-1.85) |
| R-factor observed (%) | 9.5 (47.3) |
| aRmeas (%) | 11.2 (55.1) |
| I / sigma | 9.6 (2.7) |
| Total reflections | 142,307 (58,228) |
| Unique reflections | 38,309 (15,478) |
| Completeness (%) | 99.4 (99.5) |
| Multiplicity | 3.7 (3.8) |
| b CC1/2 (%) | 99.7 (80.6) |
| Refinement | |
| Resolution (Å) | 48.4-1.85 (1.90-1.85) |
| Completeness (%) | 99.3 (96.6) |
| c No. reflections | 36413 |
| dRwork (%) | 18.3 (25.6) |
| Rfree (%) | 20.2 (23.5) |
| Rfree value test set size (%) | 5 |
| No. atoms | 3780 |
| Protein | 1836 (Chain A; 271 residues) 1839 (Chain B; 271 residues) |
| Ligand/ion | 54 (ADP) |
| Water | 51 |
| B-factors | |
| Protein | 26.3 (Chain A) 24.8 (Chain B) |
| Ligand/ion | 20.6 (ADP) |
| Water | 24.8 |
| R.m.s. deviations | |
| Bond lengths (Å) | 0.005 |
| Bond angles (°) | 1.272 |
| Clash score * | 4.6 (97th percentile) |
| Molprobity score * | 1.24 (99th percentile) |
| Number of xtals used for scaling | 1 |
| ADP-Glo | Transcreener | |
|---|---|---|
| Vmax, μM min−1 | 0.1835 ± 0.0107 | 0.1634 ± 0.0198 |
| Km, μM | 123.06 ± 13.78 | 92.51 ± 22.58 |
| Kcat, min−1 | 0.0541 ± 0.0031 | 0.0481 ± 0.0058 |
| Kcat/Km, μM−1 min−1 | 0.0004 | 0.0005 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mayer, M.; Matiuhin, Y.; Nawatha, M.; Tabachnikov, O.; Fish, I.; Schutz, N.; Dvir, H.; Landau, M. Structural and Functional Insights into the Biofilm-Associated BceF Tyrosine Kinase Domain from Burkholderia cepacia. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11081196
Mayer M, Matiuhin Y, Nawatha M, Tabachnikov O, Fish I, Schutz N, Dvir H, Landau M. Structural and Functional Insights into the Biofilm-Associated BceF Tyrosine Kinase Domain from Burkholderia cepacia. Biomolecules. 2021; 11(8):1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11081196
Chicago/Turabian StyleMayer, Michal, Yulia Matiuhin, Mickal Nawatha, Orly Tabachnikov, Inbar Fish, Nili Schutz, Hay Dvir, and Meytal Landau. 2021. "Structural and Functional Insights into the Biofilm-Associated BceF Tyrosine Kinase Domain from Burkholderia cepacia" Biomolecules 11, no. 8: 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11081196
APA StyleMayer, M., Matiuhin, Y., Nawatha, M., Tabachnikov, O., Fish, I., Schutz, N., Dvir, H., & Landau, M. (2021). Structural and Functional Insights into the Biofilm-Associated BceF Tyrosine Kinase Domain from Burkholderia cepacia. Biomolecules, 11(8), 1196. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11081196

