Next Article in Journal
Computational Study on Selective PDE9 Inhibitors on PDE9-Mg/Mg, PDE9-Zn/Mg, and PDE9-Zn/Zn Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Fibrinogen and a Triad of Thrombosis, Inflammation, and the Renin-Angiotensin System in Premature Coronary Artery Disease in Women: A New Insight into Sex-Related Differences in the Pathogenesis of the Disease
Previous Article in Journal
α-Difluoromethylornithine-Induced Cytostasis is Reversed by Exogenous Polyamines, Not by Thymidine Supplementation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Cardiovascular Risk Marker May Be Less Efficient in Women Than in Men
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Susceptibility of Women to Cardiovascular Disease and the Prevention Potential of Mind–Body Intervention by Changes in Neural Circuits and Cardiovascular Physiology

1
Korea Institute of Brain Science, Seoul 06022, Korea
2
Department of Integrative Health Care, University of Brain Education, Cheonan 31228, Korea
3
Temasek Life Sciences Laboratories, Singapore 117604, Singapore
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2021, 11(5), 708; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11050708
Submission received: 28 February 2021 / Revised: 25 April 2021 / Accepted: 5 May 2021 / Published: 10 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomolecules and Cardiovascular Disease in Women)

Abstract

:
Women have been reported to be more vulnerable to the development, prognosis and mortality of cardiovascular diseases, yet the understanding of the underlying mechanisms and strategies to overcome them are still relatively undeveloped. Studies show that women’s brains are more sensitive to factors affecting mental health such as depression and stress than men’s brains. In women, poor mental health increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, and conversely, cardiovascular disease increases the incidence of mental illness such as depression. In connection with mental health and cardiovascular health, the presence of gender differences in brain activation, cortisol secretion, autonomic nervous system, vascular health and inflammatory response has been observed. This connection suggests that strategies to manage women’s mental health can contribute to preventing cardiovascular disease. Mind–body interventions, such as meditation, yoga and qigong are forms of exercise that strive to actively manage both mind and body. They can provide beneficial effects on stress reduction and mental health. They are also seen as structurally and functionally changing the brain, as well as affecting cortisol secretion, blood pressure, heart rate variability, immune reactions and reducing menopausal symptoms, thus positively affecting women’s cardiovascular health. In this review, we investigate the link between mental health, brain activation, HPA axis, autonomic nervous system, blood pressure and immune system associated with cardiovascular health in women and discuss the effects of mind–body intervention in modulating these factors.

1. Susceptibility of Women to Cardiovascular Disease

1.1. Gender Differences in Mortality from Cardiovascular Disease

Accumulated research has shown more negative clinical outcomes from cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women compared to men. Epidemiological studies show that the CVD mortality rate in women exceeds that found in men [1,2,3]. In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention, the mortality rate is higher in women compared with men of similar age [4,5]. Moreover, after myocardial infarction, younger women have a higher mortality rate than men of the same age or older women during hospitalization [6]. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMVD) which is associated with hyperactivation of the sympathetic nervous system is more frequently observed in women than in men, which increases the event-free mortality rate in women, but not in men [7,8,9].

1.2. Stress and Cardiovascular Disease

A large-scale prospective follow-up data analysis in adults has shown that stress is associated with CVD [10,11,12,13]. Adulthood stress plays an important role as a disease stimulator for individuals who already have a high burden of arteriosclerosis plaque. It correlates with increased risk of negative clinical outcomes for those suffering from preexisting conventional cardiovascular/cerebrovascular diseases [12]. According to a meta-analysis of stress as a predictor of CVD and mortality [12], while the link between adulthood stress, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events is moderate in the general public, strong links are found in high-risk groups experiencing partner bereavement, anger and emotional instability [14,15,16,17], and stressors are strongly associated with recurrent cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with CVD [18,19,20,21,22]. Thus, adulthood stress plays an important role in the progression and outcome of CVD [12].

1.3. Relationship between Mental Health and Cardiovascular Health and Its Gender Differences

Persistent stress reactions are related to the onset and maintenance of mental health problems such as anxiety and depression [23,24,25]. Chronic stress and exposure to adverse conditions during early development have been found to be highly correlated with the onset of depression [26]. Depression is twice as common in women as in men [27,28], the frequency of which starts to diverge from mid-puberty and is maintained into later life [29]. Depression is associated with the development of CVD [30], and women are more prone to develop depression-related CVD [31]. There is growing evidence that patients with depressive disorder (DD) are more likely to develop acute myocardial infarction, heart failure or stroke [32,33]. In a 16-year follow-up study, women with depression were more likely to develop myocardial infarction or stroke [34]. Anxiety, one of the risk factors of CVD, is more likely to occur in women than in men throughout their lives, with a male to female ratio of 1:1.7 [35], and is related with major cardiac events in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) [36].
In takotsubo cardiomyopathy which results in temporary left ventricular dysfunction as a result of severe psychological stress, the hypoconnectivity of brain structures related to autonomic nervous system control is observed in patients [37]. The decrease in estrogen levels in postmenopausal women increases the susceptibility of takotsubo cardiomyopathy [38], and women over 55 years of age are almost five times more likely to develop takotsubo cardiomyopathy than women under 55 years of age [39]. After mental stress, women exhibited more negative and fewer positive feelings than men and higher platelet aggregation and developed more cases of myocardial ischemia caused by mental stress [40]. In the Women’s Health Initiative which involved 93,676 postmenopausal women for four years, depression was found to be an independent risk factor for CVD death and all-cause mortality after adjusting for other existing risk factors such as age, race, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, high cholesterol, etc. among women with no history of CVD [41].
Conversely, CVD affects mental health, especially in women. Compared to men, women experience twice the prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) after stroke [42]. After myocardial infarction, young women are twice as likely to develop mental stress-induced myocardial ischemia as men of the same age [43].

1.4. Effects of Menopause on Women’s Cardiovascular Health

Unlike men, women experience dramatic changes in the secretion of sex hormones during menopause, thus experiencing physiological and psychological changes. Middle-aged women experience a decrease in estradiol levels as they pass menopause, and the pattern of decline varies slightly from woman to woman and also changes dynamically [44]. Estradiol has been shown to exert protective effects against cardiovascular disease [45], but ongoing studies have reported contradictory results in the effect of estradiol patterns on arteriosclerosis in women during menopausal transition [46]. The level of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) starts to increase six years before the final menstrual period [47,48], but the pattern of hormone dynamics depends on various factors such as race/ethnicity and premenopausal body mass index (BMI) [44]. While not all studies show connections between the FSH and subclinical CVDs, significant associations have been consistently found. In middle-aged women, higher level of FSH correlated with thicker carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) [49], lower brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) [50] and a greater number of aortic plaques [51].
In addition, a number of risk factors for CVD increase with respect to the onset of menopause in women. In the middle age around menopause, the levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein B and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol increase significantly [52,53,54], which correlates with the presence of the carotid plaque after menopause [55]. Menopause transition is also associated with adverse vascular remodeling which accompanies changes in carotid intima media thickness and carotid adventitial diameter [56,57,58]. Blood pressure of women is generally lower than that of men before menopause, but prevalence of hypertension, a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, is higher than that of men after menopause [59].
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is an established risk factor for CVD [60]. In a population-based cross-sectional study which investigated the association between menopause and type 2 diabetes among 8191 middle-aged women (median age, 56), the postmenopausal status was found to be the most important risk factor for type 2 diabetes in women [61].
Meta-analysis of menopausal initiation and CVD risk has consistently shown that early menopause initiation increases the CVD risk [62,63,64,65]. In a 2015 meta-analysis study which involved 297,496 women with early menopause onset in 31 studies, early menopause onset was associated with a higher risk of overall coronary heart disease (CHD), fatal CHD, CVD mortality and all-cause mortality [63]. In another 2019 meta-analysis which included 301,438 women in 15 studies, premature menopause (<40 years) or early menopause (40–44 years) were related with a higher CVD risk compared to women with normal menopause (50–51 years). On the other hand, women who reached menopause at age >51 years had a significantly reduced CVD risk [65].

2. Link between the Brain and Cardiovascular Health

When the brain is stressed, changes occur in the stress response neural circuit [66]. The sympathetic nervous system and hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal cortex (HPA) axis are activated, which increases the levels of epinephrine, norepinephrine and cortisol, inducing elevation of heart rate and blood pressure [67]. Chronic exposure to stress reduces activity of the medial prefrontal cortex, resulting in overactivation of the amygdala. This induces continuous activation of the noradrenaline-producing locus coeruleus as well as chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system [68]. Subsequently, this aggravates the inflammatory process which is called sterile inflammation (inflammation induced in the absence of pathogens) [69] and promotes endothelial dysfunction and arteriosclerosis [70] (Figure 1). This neural circuit–inflammatory–vascular link differs between women and men and disproportionately contributes to cardiovascular risk [71].

2.1. Sexual Dimorphism in the Connection between the Brain and Cardiovascular Health

Several studies suggest that the amygdala is an important central nervous system structure in gender-specific CVD events. In healthy adults, resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) of the amygdala differ in women and in men. Compared to men, women exhibit higher left amygdala rsFC with other structures such as the hippocampus, inferior frontal gyrus, left middle temporal gyrus and postcentral gyrus [76]. In a four-year follow-up study of 300 participants (median age, 55 years), the higher the resting metabolic activity in the amygdala, the higher the risk of developing cardiovascular disease was [77]. Amygdala hyperactivity is connected to preclinical atherosclerosis [78] and major depression [79]. In addition, overactivation of the amygdala is directly related to myocardial injury in women but not in men [8,74,75]. Cardiac autonomic dysregulation in women with major depressive disorders and negative emotional stimulation is associated with hypoconnectivity between the hippocampus, amygdala, right orbitofrontal cortex and hypothalamus [72]. In the same subgroup, hyperactivity of the right amygdala and hypothalamus was observed.

2.2. Gender Differences in Stress-Induced HPA Axis Activation

Within minutes of exposure to stressors, the HPA axis is activated, which releases the corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) from the hypothalamus into the anterior pituitary gland [80], and the CRH stimulates the pituitary gland to release the adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) into the bloodstream. The ACTH causes the adrenal cortex to secrete the glucocorticoid cortisol [81]. Under stress, when glucocorticoid levels increase, inflammatory cytokines increase [82], and these are regulated by the negative feedback of the glucocorticoid [83]. However, chronic activation of the stress response can inhibit the negative feedback mechanism [83] and contribute to the initiation of disease, mental illness and poor wellbeing [23,84,85].
Since gender differences are found in stress-related diseases [86], it is estimated that there will be gender differences in the regulation of the HPA axis by stress. Indeed, differences in the response of the HPA axis to stress are observed in humans [87]. The prevalence of stress-related diseases (e.g., major depressive disorders, affective disorders) developed after puberty is higher in women [86,88,89], while physiological stress responses before puberty are comparable between the genders [90]. However, from adolescence into adulthood, studies on sex differences in HPA axis responses are less consistent [86]. For example, there are studies in which adult women have higher HPA responses to acute stressors compared to men, while others exhibit no significance in the responses [86,87,91,92,93]. The inconsistency is presumably because of factors including age, overall health and menstrual cycle stage [86,91,93]. When investigating cortisol responses in women at various stages of the menstrual cycle and men, gender differences were found in saliva cortisol responses to psychosocial stress when women were in the low-estrogen state of the follicular phase but not in the luteal phase [94]. Thus, estrogen and progesterone are suggested to play a role in controlling stress reactivity across the menstrual cycle in women. There is also a gender difference in the secretion of cortisol, a product of the HPA axis. According to a survey of 204 healthy adults (60 men), women have higher morning cortisol secretion (when adjusted to sex hormones) than men [95]. In addition, in women, cortisol is negatively associated with the rsFC of the amygdala with brain regions related with emotion, reward, memory processing and action execution, compared to the positive association in men [76].

2.3. Gender Differences in Stress-Induced Changes in the Autonomous Nervous System

The amygdala has a strong projection effect to the brain stem (e.g., locus coeruleus, pons) and produces sympathetic neural responses to threat and stress in the brain stem [96]. The sympathetic nervous system has a direct cardiostimulatory effect and a pressor effect. The chronic imbalance of the autonomous nervous system in the form of increased sympathetic tone and decreased parasympathetic tone is a strong risk factor for morbidity of the cardiovascular system and mortality [97]. In the general population, the long-term effects of dysfunction on both the autonomic nervous system and the HPA axis contribute to changes that accelerate arteriosclerosis [66]. Patients with depression exhibit excessive stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system and decreased parasympathetic tone [98].
Short sleep and fragmented rest are often seen in depressed women, which prevents control of the autonomic nervous system and increases heart rate and blood pressure in association with cortisol hypersecretion [99]. Several studies have suggested that DD is associated with greater sympathetic nervous system activation and decreased regulation of the parasympathetic nervous system of the heart rate and blood pressure [32,33]. This phenomenon may be most relevant to women, in whom the imbalance in autonomous functions is shown to be worse than that of men [99]. In women with CMVD, takotsubo cardiomyopathy [100,101] and ACS [102], an increase in sympathetic tone and negative cardiovascular outcomes were observed [103]. Heart failure and myocardial infarction have worse prognosis in women, which is associated with upregulated cardiac sympathetic nervous activity [104,105].

2.4. Relation of Stress Activation of the HPA Axis and Cardiovascular Health in Women

The stress-induced autonomic nervous system and HPA axis activity affect hemostatic factors, increasing platelet activity, fibrinogen levels, viscosity and coagulation factors [12]. In the long run, it promotes arteriosclerosis [66] and triggers the occurrence of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events, which negatively affect the cardiovascular system [106]. Serotonin plays a pivotal role in platelet aggregation, and women have a higher platelet aggregation response to the serotonin and epinephrine circulation level than men [40]. After mental stress, women experienced more cases of myocardial ischemia and exhibited more negative feelings and fewer positive feelings and higher collagen-stimulated platelet aggregation [40]. Depression is reported to be associated with higher endothelial damage in adolescent females [107].
The basic structure and mechanism for the cardiovascular system is different between genders. The epicardial coronary arteries are smaller in women than in men regardless of adjustment of the body mass index, left ventricular size and age [108]. As the myocardial blood flow in women is higher than that in men, the overall coronary flow reserve in women and men is comparable [109,110]. However, this is thought to give a higher endothelial shear stress in the coronary arteries of women [111]. Moreover, cholesterol production and metabolism, which are important determinants of vascular health, seem to be affected by gender differences as well [112,113]. Middle-aged women who reported vascular motor symptoms (i.e., hot flushes or night sweats) were at an increased risk of coronary heart disease within the subsequent 10–15 years [114,115]. A cross-sectional study which investigated 1906 postmenopausal women indicated that vasomotor symptoms were associated with metabolic syndrome, which is related with cardiovascular risk [116].

2.5. Gender Differences in Inflammation and Their Relation with the Cardiovascular System

Inflammation plays an important role in the development and progression of arteriosclerosis [117]. Increased stress-induced activity in the amygdala was related to increased secretion of the inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-6 [118]. The sympathetic nervous system affects metabolism (promoting insulin resistance and lipolysis) and the immune system (increasing inflammation) [119,120,121,122,123]. Specifically, the sympathetic nervous system induces systemic stress-induced sterile inflammation (elevation of inflammatory proteins in the absence of pathogens), which is passed from the circulatory system to tissues, and increases inflammatory danger/damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and reduces anti–inflammatory miRNA [69].
Chronic exposure to stressors increases cortisol secretion and inflammatory reactions simultaneously. As a result, it contributes to stress response exhaustion, chronic low-grade inflammation and antigen-specific immunosuppression [69]. Cortisol was originally thought to be anti-inflammatory, but it was reported that its in vitro administration induced increased cytokine production and activation of NF-kB in isolated macrophages [124]. When cortisol is pre-dosed to healthy individuals, production of inflammatory cytokine IL–6 was increased in the continual endotoxin challenge response [125]. In mental illnesses such as clinical anxiety and depression, increase in inflammatory cytokines due to stress was observed [82,83,126,127].
Sexual dimorphism is observed in both innate and acquired immunity [128]. Inflammation is the immune system’s response to stimulation, and gender differences in inflammation are found across the course of life [129]. In the case of chronic inflammation, probably due to collateral tissue damage, women have worse prognosis and higher mortality than men. In detail, higher mortality is observed in women suffering from cystic fibrosis [130], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [131], as well as worse prognosis in girls suffering from chronic asthma, cystic fibrosis and sickle cell anemia [132].
Inflammation can at least partially affect the development of coronary artery disease (CAD) in depressed women. In depressed patients, increased levels of acute-phase proteins (e.g., C-reactive protein (CRP), α-1-acid glycoprotein, α 1-antichymotrypsin, haptoglobin), cell adhesion molecules and circulating cytokines are commonly observed [133]. Unlike in men, increases in the body mass index (BMI) and other CVD risk factors in women are closely related to higher inflammation states (=higher CRP level) [134,135,136,137]. In female patients with impaired heart function, the upregulation of amygdala metabolism is positively associated with increased inflammation. However, this connection is not found in male patients [75]. Furthermore, the IL-6 reaction to mental stress is higher in young women with CAD compared to men of the same age [138]. This suggests that the interaction between psychological stress, myocardial damage and inflammation has characteristics of sexual dimorphism.

3. Changes in the Brain and Physiological Responses by Mind–Body Intervention

Multiple lifestyle factors such as diet, physical activity, tobacco, treatment plan adherence, stress and coping have complex effects on chronic disease such as cardiovascular disease [139,140,141,142]. Mind–body interventions help reduce stress [143,144] and also produce beneficial effects on unhealthy behaviors such as overeating and smoking that can be induced by stress [145,146]. In addition, mind–body interventions themselves have also been shown to exert positive effects on physical health [147,148]. This suggests that mind–body interventions can have a positive effect on the increase in healthy lifestyle factors, resulting in at least a partial contribution to the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Indeed, an increase in the number of healthy lifestyle factors are related with a decrease in the risk of cardiovascular disease [142]. Since previous reviews and recent meta-analysis of the effects of lifestyle factors on cardiovascular disease are well-reported [139,140,141,142], in this section, we limit the discussion to the scope of the effect of mind–body interventions on cardiovascular disease. In addition, although the effects of mind–body intervention for women have been reported only in a limited number of studies, its potential for CVD prevention is critical. Therefore, here, we investigate the effects of mind–body interventions in women and focus on the aspects of the brain, autonomic nervous system, HPA axis and cardiovascular and immune systems as discussed above (Figure 1, Table 1).

3.1. Effects of Mind–Body Intervention on Cardiovascular Disease

A 2017 American Heart Association scientific statement on meditation and cardiovascular risk suggested that meditation could help reduce cardiovascular risk and therefore be considered as an addition to guidance-oriented cardiovascular risk reduction interventions. Meditation can increase physical and mental relaxation, resulting in improved outcomes after major cardiovascular events [149]. Meditation effects are assumed to be mainly mediated by the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis, hypothalamus–pituitary–thyroid axis, renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system and energy homeostasis, and changes in the endocrine function following meditation are estimated to correspond to improvements in mental health [150]. In studies using the 2012 and 2017 National Health Interview Survey data with a total of 61,267 participants, the relationship between meditation and cardiovascular risk in patients who reported health issues such as hypercholesterolemia, systemic hypertension, diabetes, stroke and CAD was investigated. In this study, it was found that meditation was independently associated with lower prevalence rates of hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, stroke or CAD compared to those who did not meditate after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, race, marital status, smoking, sleep time and depression [151].
Table 1. Changes in psychological state, heart rate, blood pressure, vasomotor state, cortisol and cytokine secretion by mind–body interventions focusing on women.
Table 1. Changes in psychological state, heart rate, blood pressure, vasomotor state, cortisol and cytokine secretion by mind–body interventions focusing on women.
ScopeSub-ScopeReferenceStudy TypePopulation (n, % Female, Age)InterventionControlConsidered ConfoundersOutcome
Brain (psychological)DepressionGong et al. [152]Meta-analysis (six RCTs)Pregnant women (n = 375, 100% female, age range, 20–40)YogaUsual care or any other physical or mental careN/A
  • Compared to the comparison groups, the level of depression was significantly reduced in yoga groups.
Brain (psychological)PTSDVan der Kolk et al. [153]RCTWomen with chronic, treatment-resistant PTSD (n = 64, 100% female, mean age, 43)Yoga for ten weeksHealth education for ten weeksAge, race, education, marital status, income, etc.
  • Both groups exhibited significant decreases on the PTSD scale, with a larger reduction in the yoga group compared to the control group.
Brain (psychological)Depression, stress, anxietyHaller et al. [154]Meta-analysis (ten RCTs)Women with breast cancer (n = 1709, 100% female)MBSR, MBCTUsual care, active comparator (supportive expressive therapy, nutritional education program)N/A
  • Compared to usual care, there were significant postintervention effects of MBSR/MBCT for health-related QOL, fatigue, sleep, stress, anxiety, and depression.
  • Compared to other active interventions, significant effects were found for anxiety and depression.
Brain (psychological)Affect (female vs. male)Kang et al. [155]RCTSixth-grade students (n = 114, 46% female, mean age, 12)School-based mindfulness training for six weeksActive control for six weeksAge, % female, psychological state
  • Female meditators exhibited greater increases in positive affect compared to females in the control group, whereas male meditators and control males showed equivalent gains.
  • Increases in self-reported self-compassion were associated with improvements in affect among females but not males.
Brain (psychological)Affect (female vs. male)Rojiani et al. [156]A longitudinal studyUniversity students (n = 77, 47% female, mean age, 21)Meditation for 12 weeksN/AAge, affect, mindfulness, self-compassion, placebo effect-like confounders driven by self-selection
  • Women exhibited greater decreases in negative affect and greater increases in mindfulness and self-compassion compared to men.
Brain (psychological)Anxiety, withdrawal symptoms (female vs. male)Chen et al. [157]A controlled longitudinal studyVolunteers in the rehabilitation unit of a residential addiction treatment facility (n = 207, 27% female, mean age, 34)Qigong meditation (relaxation, breathing, guided imagery, inward attention, mindfulness) for two weeksStress management and relaxation training for two weeksRace, % female, employment, education, social perception (religion, general feeling about life, etc.), withdrawal symptoms, etc.
  • Female meditation participants reported a significantly higher reduction in anxiety and withdrawal symptoms than did any other group.
Brain (structure)Brain structure (female vs. male)Luders et al. [158]A cross-sectional studyLong-term meditators (mean practice time, 20.2 years) vs. meditation-naïve individuals; mean age, 47 years; 50% female; n = 60N/AN/ASex, handedness, age
  • Meditation effects differed between men and women in magnitude, laterality and location on the hippocampus surface.
Brain (psychological)Depression, anxietyWong et al. [159]RCTPostmenopausal women with mild to moderate symptoms (n = 197, 100% female, mean age, 52)MBSR for eight weeksMenopause education for eight weeksAge, education, occupation, marital status, religion, family size, income, menopause state
  • MBSR showed a greater reduction of psychological symptoms of depression and anxiety than active controls but did not reduce other somatic, urogenital and vasomotor symptoms.
CardiovascularVasomotor symptomsChattha et al. [160]RCTWomen with menopausal symptoms (n = 120, 100% female, mean age, 48)Yoga (postures, breathing, meditation) for eight weeksExercise (walking, stretching, rest) for eight weeksAge, occupation, BMI, diet, menopause state
  • Hot flushes, night sweats and sleep disturbance were significantly reduced in the yoga group compared to the control group.
CardiovascularVasomotor symptomsCarmody et al. [161]RCTLate perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women experiencing moderate or severe hot flushes (including night sweats) (n = 110, 100% female, mean age, 53)MBSR for three monthsWaitlistAge, race, education, employment, smoking, physical activity, alcohol intake, BMI, QOL, etc.
  • Bother from hot flushes was significantly decreased by the treatment.
CardiovascularBlood pressureCampbell et al. [162]A waitlist-controlled longitudinal studyFemale post-treatment cancer patients (n = 70, 100% female, mean age, 53)MBSR for eight weeksWaitlistAge, SBP, DBP
  • In the MBSR group, women with ‘higher BP’ at week 1 had decreased their SBP by week 8.
  • In the MBSR group, decreases in rumination correlated with decreases in SBP and increases in mindful attention.
ANS, cardiovascularBlood pressure, HRVMuthukrishnan et al. [163]RCTPregnant Indian women at 12 weeks gestation (n = 74, 100% female, mean age, 22)Mindfulness meditation for five weeksUsual obstetric care for five weeksSBP, DBP, RR, perceived stress, HRV, cold pressor SBP, cold pressor DBP, etc.
  • In the meditation group, a significant decrease in perceived stress scores, a significant decrease in blood pressure response to the cold pressor test and a significant increase in HRV.
CardiovascularBlood pressureRakshani et al. [164]RCTPregnant women at 12 weeks gestation with previous medical history in pregnancy (n = 68, 100% female, mean age, 27)Yoga (breathing, meditation, yogi postures) for 15 weeksStandard care plus conventional antenatal exercises (walking) for 15 weeksAge, education, income, weight, height, BMI, SBP, DBP
  • A significant difference between groups in the ratio of pregnancy-induced hypertension.
CardiovascularBlood pressureThornton et al. [165]RCTHealthy community-dwelling women (n = 34, 100% female, mean age, 48)Tai chi for 12 weeksControlAge, body weight, body height, blood pressure
  • Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly decreased by tai chi training.
ANSHRVTrivedi et al. [166]RCTHealthy women (n = 36, 100% female, mean age, 33)Active meditation (breathing, positive emotions, guided imagery) for 20 minControl (silence meditation—breathing only) for 20 minAge, HRV, affect
  • In the experimental group, HRV (specifically, PNS) parameters showed a significant improvement compared to the control group.
ANSHRVPraveena et al. [167]A prospective longitudinal studyWomen within five years of menopause (n = 67, 100% female, age range, 45~60)Yoga for three monthsControlAge, duration of menopause, body fat, resting heart rate, systolic blood pressure, etc.
  • Yoga practice improved HRV in early postmenopausal women significantly.
ANSHRVAudette et al. [168]RCTSedentary women (n = 27, 100% female, mean age, 71)Tai chi for 12 weeks (RCT) Brisk walking for 12 weeks (RCT), sedentary life style for 12 weeks (a separate group)Age, weight, exercise test, HRV, flexibility, single leg balance
  • In the tai chi group, significant improvement in estimated VO2 max, increase in high-frequency power (representing increased parasympathetic activity) and decrease in low-frequency power (representing decreased sympathetic activity) were found.
HPACortisolField et al. [169]RCTPrenatally depressed women at 22 weeks gestation (n = 92, 100% female, mean age, 24)Yoga for 12 weeksSocial support for 12 weeksAge, education, SES, ethnicity, marital status
  • Cortisol levels decreased for both groups following each session.
HPACortisol slope, stress, QOL Carlson et al. [170]RCTDistressed survivor women of stage I to III breast cancer (n = 271, 100% female, mean age, 55)MBCR for eight weeksSET for 12 weeks, control (one-day stress management)Age, cancer severity, time since diagnosis, alcohol, nicotine intake, quality of sleep, diet
  • Cortisol slopes were maintained over time in both the SET and MBCR groups relative to the control group, where the cortisol slopes became flatter.
  • The MBCR group exhibited a significant improvement in stress symptoms and QOL compared to the SET group and the control group.
HPACortisolDaubenmier et al. [171]RCTOverweight/obese women (n = 47, 100% female, mean age, 41)A four-month mindfulness program for stress eatingWaitlistAge, weight, BMI, waist circumference, psychological state, CAR response, eating behavior
  • The mindfulness group exhibited significant reductions in the CAR and maintained body weight, while the control group had a stable CAR and gained weight.
  • Improvements in mindfulness, chronic stress and CAR were associated with reductions in abdominal fat.
HPA, immuneCortisol, cytokineWitek–Janusek et al. [172]A longitudinal study Women newly diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer (n = 66, 100% female, mean age, 55), women without cancer (mean age = 55, n = 30)MBSR for eight weeksNon-MBSR, cancer-free groupAge, assessment time of the day
  • Women in the MBSR group had reduced cortisol levels, improved QOL and increased coping effectiveness compared to the non-MBSR group.
  • The non-MBSR group exhibited continued reductions in NKCA and IFN-γ production with increased IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10 production, while the MBSR group re-established their NKCA and cytokine production levels.
ImmuneCytokineRobins et al. [173]RCTWomen with high CVD risk (n = 63, 100% female, 35–50 years)Tai chi for eight weeksWaitlistAge, waist circumference
  • The tai chi group significantly lowered the level of interferon gamma, TNF, IL-8 and IL-4 compared to the control group.
ImmuneCytokineHarkess et al. [174]RCTA subsample (n = 28, mean age, 41) from a population of women reporting psychological distress (n = 116, 100% female)Yoga for eight weeksWaitlistAge, weight-to-height ratio
  • Reduced methylation of the TNF region in the yoga group relative to the waitlist control.
ImmuneCytokineGallegos et al. [175]A longitudinal studyTrauma-exposed women (n = 50, 100% female, mean age, 44)MBSR for eight weeksN/AAge, race, employment status, income
  • Session attendance was associated with significant decreases in IL-6 levels.
Abbreviation: RCT, randomized controlled trial; N/A, not available; PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder; MBSR, mindfulness-based stress reduction; MBCT, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy; BMI, body mass index; QOL, quality of life; BP, blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; RR, respiratory rate; HRV, heart rate variability; ANS, autonomic nervous system; PNS, parasympathetic nervous system; MBCR, mindfulness-based cancer recovery; SET, supportive–expressive group therapy; HPA, hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal; CAR, cortisol awakening response; IL, interleukin; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

3.2. Changes in Mental Health Caused by Mind–Body Intervention and Findings in Women

The application of various mind–body interventions has shown improvement in mental health. In 23 randomized controlled trials (RCT) with 1373 participants, mind–body intervention (meditation, yoga, mindfulness) reduced depression, anxiety and stress with a moderate effect size [176]. When analyzed with RCTs using only active controls, the effect size was reduced [176]. To investigate whether physical yoga exercise alleviates depressive symptoms in people diagnosed with mental disorders, 13 RCTs investigating the effects of yoga intervention on the symptoms of 632 adults (female, 67.7%; mean age, 37.4 years) with a recognized diagnosed mental disorder according to DSM-3, -4, -5 were meta-analyzed. The yoga group had significantly reduced depressive symptoms compared to the control groups. Higher frequency of yoga sessions was associated with a greater reduction in depression [177]. In a meta-analysis study of 47 RCTs (3515 participants) using meditation and active controls, meditation reduced anxiety and depression with moderate effect size compared to active controls [143]. In a meta-analysis of seven studies to investigate the effects of qigong on depressive symptoms, qigong was effective in improving depression [178].
This application of mind–body intervention improves mental health in various populations. In a meta-analysis of 19 studies with 1076 participants (mean age, 71.8 years; female, 67.2%) to investigate the influence of mindfulness meditation (MM) intervention on depression in older adults, MM (structured MM, mean 7 weeks, 1.3 sessions/week, 102 min/session; unstructured MM, 4.7 sessions/week, 24.6 min/session) significantly improved depression compared to the control [179]. MM with guided meditation further reduces depression more than MM alone [179]. To investigate the effectiveness of meditative movements (tai chi, qigong, yoga) on major depressive disorder treatment, a meta-analysis of 15 RCTs (participants: MDD, 94.5%, female, 74.1%, mean age, 44.1 years) was performed and the results showed a significant improvement in depression (15 RCTs, n = 830) and anxiety severity (5 RCTs, n = 356) [180]. To investigate the effects of mind–body intervention on students who may be stressed due to academic demands, a meta-analysis of 34 studies (3296 students) using meditation and cognitive behavioral programs was performed to survey stress, depression and anxiety [181]. In a meta-analysis, mind–body intervention significantly reduced the stress, depression and anxiety levels of the students [181].
In particular, research on women suggests that mind–body intervention helps improve mental health of the female population of various ages and backgrounds. In a meta-analysis of six RCTs involving 375 pregnant women aged 20 to 40 to determine validity of yoga interventions in the management of antenatal depression, yoga interventions significantly reduced depression levels compared to the control groups (standard prenatal care, standard antenatal exercises, social support, etc.) [152]. Furthermore, they investigated two different variations of yoga training: physical exercise-based yoga and integrated yoga (addition of meditation or deep relaxation elements to physical exercises). Interestingly, significant reductions in depression levels were observed only in the integrated yoga group [152]. In a meta-analysis to investigate the effects of yoga on menopausal symptoms of women, 13 RCTs with 1306 menopausal women were included [182]. Regarding psychological factors (anxiety, depression), yoga intervention showed reductions in those symptoms compared to the control group, but the effects were comparable when compared with the exercise group. In another meta-analysis of 16 RCTs with 930 breast cancer patients for the investigation of effects of yoga, yoga intervention significantly reduced depression and anxiety compared to the control [183]. In the subgroup analysis, the reduction of anxiety was only significant when the practitioners continued practicing for more than three months. Mindfulness-based meditation has also been researched for its effects on breast cancer patients. In a meta-analysis which investigated the effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) on 1709 breast cancer patients in ten studies, the intervention significantly reduced the levels of stress, anxiety and depression [154]. After completion of the intervention, the improved state of mind was maintained for a further six months for anxiety and 12 months for depression.
Other studies examining gender differences on the effects of mind–body intervention on mental health suggest that in various groups, such as adolescents, adults and drug addicts, women gain more benefits than men from the intervention. In an RCT which investigated whether school-based mindfulness training affects affective outcome differently depending on gender among early adolescents (sixth-grade students), participants who practiced mindfulness meditation 4–5 times weekly for six weeks (n = 52, mean age, 11.73 years, 44% female) and people in the active control group (n = 48, mean age, 11.85 years, 48% female) were compared and the analysis was performed according to gender. Female meditators exhibited a greater increase in positive feelings compared to the controls while male meditators exhibited equivalent gains with the control males. Furthermore, this improvement in feelings in females was associated with self-reported self-compassion, but not in males [155]. In order to see if meditation training has different effects on negative feelings depending on gender, 77 college students (46% female, mean age, 20.7) conducted a 12-week meditation training, which showed a greater decrease in negative feelings and a greater increase on the mindfulness and self-compassion scales in women compared to those in men [156]. This suggests that mind–body intervention may have a greater effect on women. In a study to find out the possibility and efficacy of using integrative qigong meditation as a treatment for substance abuse, 284 participants in the adult rehabilitation unit of a residential addiction treatment facility underwent a four-week qigong program. The results indicated that female meditation participants exhibited more significant reductions in anxiety and withdrawal symptoms than other groups [157].

3.3. Changes in Brain Structures and Functions by Mind–Body Intervention

The fact that mental and physical intervention structurally and functionally changes the brain is clearly demonstrated by accumulated brain imaging studies. In a meta-analysis study on the effects of meditation on brain structure [184], 300 meditation participants and 123 brain morphology differences were analyzed through 21 neuroimaging studies. In meditators’ brains, changes were consistently observed in the following brain function–related regions including eight brain regions: meta-awareness (frontopolar cortex/BA10), exteroceptive and interoceptive body awareness (sensory cortices; insula), memory consolidation and reconsolidation (hippocampus), self- and emotion regulation (anterior and middle cingulate; orbitofrontal cortex) and intra– and interhemispheric communication (superior longitudinal fasciculus; corpus callosum).

3.3.1. Structural Changes in the Prefrontal Cortex by Mind–Body Intervention

The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) includes BA10, 14, 25, 32, 11, 12, and 13. In alert, non-stress conditions, the vmPFC controls subcortical structures (such as the amygdala, the nucleus accumbens, the hypothalamus), regulating emotional responses and habits [185,186,187]. However, in stress conditions, the control of the prefrontal cortex over the subcortical structure weakens, causing the amygdala to activate stress pathways in the hypothalamus and brain stem, resulting in excess secretion of noradrenaline and dopamine, which in turn weakens PFC control and strengthens amygdala activity, entering a vicious cycle [188]. Accumulated evidence has shown that the performance of mind–body interventions, including meditation, changes the structure and function of the frontal cortex. This supports improvements in stress management by mind–body intervention at the structural/functional level of the brain.
A meta-analysis by Fox et al. [184] showed changes in brain structures, especially increases of the gray and white matter in the prefrontal cortex, by meditation. Specifically, in the anterior prefrontal cortex (BA10), cortical thickness significantly increased compared to controls [189,190,191]. In the orbitofrontal cortex (BA11), cortical thickness [190,191] and white matter fiber density [190] were significantly increased in meditators compared to those in control groups. In the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (BA46), white matter fiber density was significantly increased in meditators compared to controls [190]. Increase of cortical thickness was also observed in other regions of the frontal brain [192,193].

3.3.2. Functional Changes in the Prefrontal Cortex by Mind–Body Intervention

A meta-analysis using 78 functional neuroimaging (fMRI, PET) studies from 31 meditation experiments involving 527 participants [194] investigated the effects of meditation on brain function. In this analysis, the following meditation types were included: focused attention (FA) (seven experiments [195,196,197,198,199,200,201]), mantra recitation (eight experiments [201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208]), open monitoring (OM) (ten experiments [196,197,209,210,211,212,213,214,215]), compassion/loving–kindness (six experiments [197,199,209,216,217,218]). Meta-analysis results showed that the frontal brain regions were activated in most of the meditation types. In the meta-analysis of FA meditation studies, the meditation group significantly activated the prefrontal cortex area including the premotor cortex (BA6), dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (BA24), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (BA8/9) and left mid insula (BA13) [194]. In the meta-analysis of mantra recitation meditation studies, the meditation group exhibited significant activity in frontal regions including the posterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex/left premotor cortex (BA6/8), presupplementary motor cortex and supplementary motor cortex (BA6) compared to the control group. In the meta-analysis of OM meditation studies, the meditation group significantly activated frontal regions including the left inferior frontal gyrus (BA44/45), presupplementary motor area (BA32/6), supplementary motor area (BA6) and motor cortex (BA6) compared to those of the control group [194]. In the meta-analysis of loving–kindness and compassion meditation studies, meditation induced significant activation in the right anterior insula/frontal operculum (BA13) which are part of the vmPFC. This region is related to awareness of bodily sensations and feelings [194].

3.3.3. Changes in Functional Connectivity between the Prefrontal Cortex and the Amygdala by Mind–Body Intervention

During emotional regulation, the medial prefrontal regions directly influence the amygdala [219], while the lateral prefrontal cortices indirectly regulate the amygdala via the medial prefrontal and orbitofrontal system [220,221]. At rest, high anxiety negatively correlates with functional connectivity between the amygdala and the ventral medial PFC (mPFC), while low anxiety positively correlates with it [222]. Mind–body intervention affects emotional control by changing the functional connectivity between these medial prefrontal regions and the amygdala. According to a meta-analysis of 21 fMRI studies on eight-week MBSR and MBCT programs, these mind–body interventions reduced the functional activity of the amygdala, increased the functional connectivity between the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex and facilitated deactivation after the exposure to emotional stimuli [223], supporting the improvement of emotional regulation by mind–body intervention. In another RCT, meditation-naïve healthy adults (n = 67) were randomized into eight–week MBSR or a health enhancement program group. Affective pictures were shown to participants. The results showed a significant improvement in the functional connectivity between the amygdala and the vmPFC (emotion regulation-related regions) from exposure to affective pictures in the MBSR group compared to the other group. Moreover, meditation training was related with lower amygdala reactivity to positive pictures [224]. In another study, fMRI analysis was used to compare the response of participants conditioned with two weeks of mindfulness-based attention-to-breath meditation versus passive viewing in untrained participants. Meditation training was found to reduce amygdala activity compared to passive viewing while increasing emotion-related functional connectivity of the amygdala for the dorsal left prefrontal cortex [225]. In another study, Sant Mat meditators (n = 21, 67% female) exhibited a stronger positive functional connectivity between the amygdala and the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex to explicit happiness compared to the control group (n = 20, 60% female) [226]. These examples suggest that amygdala–prefrontal cortex integration is a potential neural pathway of emotional regulation by mind–body intervention.

3.3.4. Gender Differences in Brain Structural Changes by Mind–Body Intervention

To determine whether the meditation-induced hippocampus-specific effects are gender-dependent, analysis of high-resolution magnetic response data of 30 long-term meditation performers (50% female) and 30 well-matched control subjects (50% female) was conducted. The effect of meditation between men and women was found to be different in magnitude, laterality and location on the hippocampal surface [158]. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether this is a genetic difference or one induced by mediation in the male and female brains.

3.4. Changes in Cortisol Secretion by Mind–Body Intervention

With regard to the effects of mind–body interventions on human endocrine systems, the HPA axis has been the most widely explored [150]. In various populations such as colon cancer patients [227], breast cancer patients [172], prostate cancer patients [228], depressive patients [229] and healthy people [230,231], mind–body intervention affects regulation of the HPA axis which reflects stress levels. According to a meta-analysis of RCT studies investigating the effectiveness of meditation on physiological stress markers compared to active controls (seven studies, n = 212), the meditation group had significantly reduced cortisol levels compared to the control group [232]. According to a meta-analysis study investigating whether the effects of meditation on cortisol secretion levels vary depending on the level of stress [233], meditation intervention showed a significant blood cortisol reduction compared to control groups in ten independent studies (n = 336). Interestingly, this effect was only present in at-risk samples (patients with somatic illness). Twenty-one studies using saliva samples (n = 1063) showed significant cortisol reduction only in groups living in stressful life situations [233]. These patterns suggest benefits of meditation intervention, especially in at-risk populations.
In a meta-analysis of the effects of mindfulness mediation on the circadian rhythm of cortisol secretion (nine studies, n = 699) [234], there were no changes in cortisol awakening response (two studies [235,236]), 0 min post-awakening cortisol (one study [236]), 30 min post-awakening cortisol (two studies [236,237]), mean diurnal cortisol (one study [238]), pre-bedtime cortisol (two studies [236,237]) and pre-lunch cortisol (one study [237]), while there were significant reductions in diurnal cortisol—high slope (two studies [235,236]) and diurnal cortisol—low slope (three studies [235,236,237]) by meditation. According to a meta-analysis on the effects of yoga and MBSR on cortisol secretion (eight studies, n = 614) [239], yoga intervention significantly reduced waking cortisol (five studies [170,240,241,242,243]), afternoon salivary cortisol (three studies [170,240,244]), evening cortisol (five studies [170,240,241,242,243]), while it had no effect on salivary cortisol at 30 min post-awakening (three studies [240,241,242]) and 60 min post-awakening (two studies [241,242]), mid-morning cortisol (three studies [169,243,245]) and cortisol slope (three studies [170,240,241]). Cortisol secretion, the end product of the HPA axis activated by stress, affects vascular health and the immune system, and its chronic secretion by prolonged activation of the HPA axis also affects brain structure and function, affecting mental health.
Mind–body intervention also seems to significantly change the secretion of cortisol by contributing to the regulation of the HPA axis in studies conducted only on women. In an RCT for overweight/obese women (n = 47), a four-month mindfulness program for stress eating significantly reduced the cortisol awakening response compared to the waitlist [171]. In a 12-week RCT that examined the effects of yoga and social support on 92 prenatally depressed women, both groups had significantly reduced cortisol levels per session [169]. In an RCT where 271 distressed breast cancer survivors were randomized into a mindfulness-based cancer recovery (MBCR) group, a supportive–expressive group therapy (SET) group or a control group (stress management seminar), the MBCR and SET groups exhibited a more normative diurnal cortisol profile, whereas the control group exhibited a flat cortisol slope [170].

3.5. Changes in Blood Pressure, Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability by Mind–Body Intervention

The stress response can initially activate both the sympathetic nervous system and the parasympathetic nervous system simultaneously, but then, as the parasympathetic nervous system is withdrawn, uninhibited sympathetic nerve activation maintains the heart rate increase [246]. Furthermore, mind–body intervention seems to increase overall heart rate variability (HRV) and decrease the blood pressure and heart rate by activating the parasympathetic nervous system [149,247] (Figure 1).

3.5.1. Resting Systolic Blood Pressure

In a meta-analysis by Pascoe et al., meditation significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP) (11 studies, n = 582) [232]. In a sub-analysis, automatic self-transcending (AST) meditation (three studies, n = 151 [248,249,250]) and FA meditation (three studies, n = 72 [251,252,253]) reduced resting SBP compared to the active control, while OM meditation did not reduce SBP (five studies, n = 359 [254,255,256,257,258]). In a meta-analysis of yoga interventions [239], yoga interventions significantly reduced resting SBP (17 studies, n = 1058 [242,245,252,257,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269], while MBSR interventions did not change the resting SBP (two studies, n = 76) [257,262]. In a meta-analysis study of the effects of yoga on patients with coronary heart disease [270], yoga interventions of 3–6 months significantly reduced SBP compared to usual care (three studies, n = 330 [271,272,273]). In a meta–analysis study of the effectiveness of tai chi on risk factors in CVD for adults with essential hypertension [274], the tai chi intervention significantly decreased SBP (significant for all <three months, ≥three months, ≥six months) compared to the controls (15 studies, n = 772). In the meta–analysis of studies investigating the effectiveness of mindfulness training for adults with CVD [275], the mindfulness-based intervention groups had a significantly reduced SBP compared to the control groups (seven studies, n = 509 [258,276,277,278,279]), but no significant changes were observed in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (six studies, n = 492 [258,276,277,278,279]).

3.5.2. Resting Diastolic Blood Pressure

In a meta-analysis for resting DBP [232], it was significantly reduced when all meditation types were analyzed (11 studies, n = 582) [248,249,250,251,252,254,255,256,257,258], but it was not significant when analyzed according to the meditation subtype (AST (three studies, n = 151) [248,249,250], FA (three studies, n = 72) [251,252,253], OM (five studies, n = 359) [254,255,256,257,258] meditations). In a meta-analysis of yoga and MBSR (16 studies, n = 887), yoga intervention significantly reduced resting DBP compared to the active control, and there was no difference in effectiveness depending on the type of yoga. When comparing MBSR and non-MBSR (yoga) groups, both had a significantly reduced resting DBP [239]. In a meta-analysis study of the effects of yoga on patients with coronary heart disease [270], yoga interventions for three to six months significantly reduced DBP compared to usual care (three studies, n = 330 [271,272,273]). In a meta-analysis study investigating the effectiveness of tai chi on risk factors of CVDs [274], tai chi intervention did not change DBP in the interventions of less than three months (three studies, n = 194), but changed DBP in the interventions of more than three months (six studies, n = 620) or six months (six studies, n = 729). In a meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of qigong [178], diastolic blood pressure was found to be significantly decreased.

3.5.3. Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure

In a meta-analysis for ambulatory SBP [232], it was significantly decreased in the total meditation analysis (five studies, n = 377) [254,280,281,282]. In an analysis depending on the meditation type, OM meditation significantly decreased the ambulatory SBP (three studies, n = 226) [254,281,282], while AST did not result in significant changes (two studies, n = 126) [283,284,285]. In a meta–analysis of the effects of yoga interventions on ambulatory SBP, yoga interventions did not significantly change the ambulatory SBP (three studies, n = 272) [283,284,285].

3.5.4. Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure

In a meta-analysis for ambulatory DBP [232], it was significantly reduced in the total meditation analysis (five studies, n = 352) [254,280,281,282,286], but there was no significant change in the analysis according to the type of meditation (AST (two studies, n = 126) [280,286], OM (three studies, n = 226) [254,281,282]). In a meta-analysis of the effects of yoga on ambulatory DBP (24 hours) [239], there was no change by yoga interventions (three studies, n = 242 [283,284,285]).

3.5.5. Heart Rate

In a meta-analysis for HR (nine studies, n = 345) [232], OM meditation reduced the resting HR (five studies, n = 24), while FA meditation did not affect it. When all meditation groups were analyzed together, the resting HR decreased significantly. However, ambulatory HR was not changed by the intervention. In a yoga meta-analysis study (15 studies, n = 879) [239], yoga intervention significantly reduced the resting heart rate compared to the active control.

3.5.6. Heart Rate Variability, Respiration Rate, Arterial Pressure

In a meta-analysis for the effects of yoga (four studies, n = 367) [239], both low and high frequencies of resting HRV were significantly changed by the yoga intervention compared to the controls. In the study to investigate whether long-term meditators exhibit difference in resting respiration rate compared to meditation-naïve people (n = 69), long-term mindfulness training exhibited a slower baseline respiration rate (RR) compared to the matched group of non-meditators. Regardless of age and gender, longer practice experience was associated with slower RR. This association was specific in intensive retreat practice but not in routine daily practice [287]. In a meta-analysis of yoga studies [239], yoga interventions (Iyengar yoga, hatha yoga/meditation, integrated yoga, yoga/lifestyle modification) significantly reduced the resting mean arterial pressure (five studies, n = 315). Mind–body intervention studies conducted only on women also showed significantly changed HRV. In a study comparing HRV and mood of women in an active meditation group with those in a breath-focused silence group, active meditation significantly increased HRV parameters (n = 36) and positive feelings (n = 48) compared to the control group [166].

3.6. The Effects of Mind–Body Intervention on Lipid Profile and Blood Glucose

The following studies suggested that mind–body interventions such as tai chi, yoga and meditation have positive effects on the lipid profile, blood glucose and insulin resistance, which is estimated to have a positive effect on cardiovascular health. In a meta-analysis to examine the effect of tai chi on cardiovascular disease risk factors for adults with essential hypertension, tai chi practice significantly reduced total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C (five studies, n = 846), as well as blood glucose (four studies, n = 612) [274]. In a meta-analysis that examined the effect of yoga on the lipid profile (four studies, n = 332), yoga practice significantly reduced TG and increased HDL-C and did not change the levels of LDL-C and TC as compared to the usual care [270]. In another meta-analysis which examined the effects of meditation on physiological markers of stress (four studies, n = 328), meditation significantly reduced TG but did not change the levels of HDL, LDL and cholesterol as compared to active controls [232].
Several studies also focused specifically on investigating the effects of mind–body interventions on blood lipids and glucose in women. In an RCT which examined the effects of yoga therapy on glucose metabolism and blood lipids of 90 adolescent girls with polycystic ovary syndrome (age = 15–18 years), both yoga therapy and conventional physical exercise significantly reduced fasting blood glucose, LDL, TC, TG and increased HDL, with more significant improvements in yoga compared to conventional physical exercise [288]. In another RCT on 37 prediabetic females (diabetes risk score ≥ 60, mean age, 52), the yoga group exhibited a significant decrease in plasma glucose levels after three months of yoga compared to the non-practicing group [289].

3.7. Changes in Inflammatory Response Levels by Mind–Body Intervention

Recent findings include inflammation to a set of existing well-known cardiovascular disease risk factors such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol and diabetes [290,291]. The following studies suggested that mind–body interventions may partially contribute to the prevention of cardiovascular disease also by pathways affecting the immune system in addition to the other risk factors of cardiovascular disease discussed above. According to a systematic review of 20 randomized controlled trials researching mindfulness meditation (comprising more than 1600 participants), it is provisional for mindfulness meditation to be related with inflammation (reductions in NF-kB transcription activity and CRP level); however, the association has been shown to be replicated [292]. While acute psychological stress activates NF-kB in peripheral blood mononuclear cells [121,293,294,295,296,297], the use of mindfulness meditation reduced the expression of NF-kB in RCTs for breast cancer patients (n = 71) [295], lonely older adults (n = 40) [296] and older adults (n = 49) [297]. In RCTs in patients with ulcerative colitis (n = 55) [298] as well as in healthy people with inflammatory risk markers (n = 40 [296], n = 185 [238]), mindfulness meditation also induced a reduction [298] or a tendency of reduction [238,296] in the level of CRP, a representative inflammatory protein. In another meta-analysis, meditation reduced TNF-α compared to active controls (three studies, n = 100) [232], and IL-6 was significantly decreased by yoga or MBSR intervention when compared to active control groups (four studies, n = 128) [239]. However, a meta-analysis of MBSR only showed no significant IL-6 changes compared to the controls (five studies, n = 125) [232].
In studies of women only, mind–body intervention has significant effects of reducing inflammation. DNA methylation was investigated using peripheral blood samples of 116 women reporting psychological distress in an RCT setting. Eight weeks of yoga intervention showed a significant difference in methylation in the TNF region as a whole as compared to the waitlist control group, and no significant differences were found in other genes. This suggests the effects of yoga interventions on the immune system at the epigenetic level [174]. In addition, in a pilot study of the effect of the MBSR program on inflammatory biomarkers in women with interpersonal trauma, eight-week MBSR significantly reduced IL-6 levels (n = 50) [175].

3.8. The Effects of Mind–Body Intervention on Menopausal Symptoms Related with Cardiovascular Health

In women, the menopause transition period is associated with an increase in CVD risk factors as described in Section 1.4. It has been known that mind–body interventions provide relief towards women’s overall menopausal symptoms. In a meta-analysis of 13 RCTs involving 1306 women [182], yoga reduced total menopausal, psychological, somatic, vasomotor and urogenital symptoms compared to the non-treatment group. Compared to exercise controls, significant changes were observed only for vasomotor symptoms. In an RCT which compared the effects of MBSR (n = 98) or active controls (menopause education control, MEC, n = 99) on menopause-related symptoms for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women at the baseline and at various time periods post-intervention [159], both groups exhibited a reduced total Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) score at eight months. Compared with active controls, MBSR significantly reduced overall menopausal symptoms as well as two sub-scales of menopausal symptoms, i.e., anxiety and depression, but not other symptoms, i.e., somatic, urogenital and vasomotor symptoms. In another RCT in late perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women (n =110), bother and distress from hot flushes and night sweats were significantly reduced after three-month MBSR compared to the waitlist control group [161]. Symptoms of menopause are reduced by mind–body interventions, suggesting their contribution to lowering the menopause-associated cardiovascular disease risk in women.

4. Conclusions

There is a gender difference in the development, prognosis and mortality of CVD, and the underlying mechanism may include a female-specific vulnerability in stress–amygdala–physiological response, as studies have reported the association between amygdala activity and CVD-specific physiological response only in women [72,73,74,75]. Mind–body intervention improves stress management skills, which lowers the level of stress that the brain perceives. This characteristic of mind–body intervention is shown to reduce the risk of CVD by reducing the downstream mechanisms induced by stress, including activation in the amygdala, the HPA axis and the sympathetic nervous system. Since mind–body interventions also affect other aspects of cardiovascular disease such as hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia, synergistic effects of mind–body intervention on cardiovascular health are expected along with improved mental health [299]. Although there is not yet enough evidence of the specific effect of mind–body interventions on women, they are expected to be used as a preventive strategy to reduce the risk of women’s specific vulnerability in CVD, as the evidence has shown that it helps to reduce stress and improve stress-related cardiovascular physiology. In the future, a robust study design is required to demonstrate the effects of mind–body intervention customized for women in the prevention or treatment of CVDs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-J.Y.; investigation, H.-J.Y.; data curation, H.-J.Y., Y.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.-J.Y.; writing—review and editing, E.K.; visualization, H.-J.Y.; supervision, H.-J.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the members of Korea Institute of Brain Science for fruitful discussions and support for the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Shaw, L.J.; Bugiardini, R.; Merz, C.N. Women and ischemic heart disease: Evolving knowledge. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 54, 1561–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Wilmot, K.A.; O’Flaherty, M.; Capewell, S.; Ford, E.S.; Vaccarino, V. Coronary Heart Disease Mortality Declines in the United States from 1979 Through 2011: Evidence for Stagnation in Young Adults, Especially Women. Circulation 2015, 132, 997–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Townsend, N.; Wilson, L.; Bhatnagar, P.; Wickramasinghe, K.; Rayner, M.; Nichols, M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: Epidemiological update 2016. Eur. Heart J. 2016, 37, 3232–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Smilowitz, N.R.; Mahajan, A.M.; Roe, M.T.; Hellkamp, A.S.; Chiswell, K.; Gulati, M.; Reynolds, H.R. Mortality of Myocardial Infarction by Sex, Age, and Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Status in the ACTION Registry-GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get with the Guidelines). Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2017, 10, e003443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Otten, A.M.; Maas, A.H.; Ottervanger, J.P.; Kloosterman, A.; van ‘t Hof, A.W.; Dambrink, J.H.; Gosselink, A.T.; Hoorntje, J.C.; Suryapranata, H.; de Boer, M.J.; et al. Is the difference in outcome between men and women treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention age dependent? Gender difference in STEMI stratified on age. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care 2013, 2, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Vaccarino, V.; Parsons, L.; Every, N.R.; Barron, H.V.; Krumholz, H.M. Sex-based differences in early mortality after myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Participants. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 341, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dean, J.; Cruz, S.D.; Mehta, P.K.; Merz, C.N. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: Sex-specific risk, diagnosis, and therapy. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2015, 12, 406–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gebhard, C.; Bengs, S.; Haider, A.; Fiechter, M. The Neuro-Inflammatory-Vascular Circuit: Evidence for a Sex-Dependent Interrelation? Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 614345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Maredziak, M.; Bengs, S.; Portmann, A.; Haider, A.; Wijnen, W.J.; Warnock, G.I.; Etter, D.; Froehlich, S.; Fiechter, M.; Meisel, A.; et al. Microvascular dysfunction and sympathetic hyperactivity in women with supra-normal left ventricular ejection fraction (snLVEF). Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2020, 47, 3094–3106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kivimaki, M.; Kawachi, I. Work Stress as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2015, 17, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Dragano, N.; Siegrist, J.; Nyberg, S.T.; Lunau, T.; Fransson, E.I.; Alfredsson, L.; Bjorner, J.B.; Borritz, M.; Burr, H.; Erbel, R.; et al. Effort-Reward Imbalance at Work and Incident Coronary Heart Disease: A Multicohort Study of 90,164 Individuals. Epidemiology 2017, 28, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kivimaki, M.; Steptoe, A. Effects of stress on the development and progression of cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2018, 15, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Huang, Y.; Xu, S.; Hua, J.; Zhu, D.; Liu, C.; Hu, Y.; Liu, T.; Xu, D. Association between job strain and risk of incident stroke: A meta-analysis. Neurology 2015, 85, 1648–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Carey, I.M.; Shah, S.M.; DeWilde, S.; Harris, T.; Victor, C.R.; Cook, D.G. Increased risk of acute cardiovascular events after partner bereavement: A matched cohort study. JAMA Intern. Med. 2014, 174, 598–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Smyth, A.; O’Donnell, M.; Lamelas, P.; Teo, K.; Rangarajan, S.; Yusuf, S.; Investigators, I. Physical Activity and Anger or Emotional Upset as Triggers of Acute Myocardial Infarction: The INTERHEART Study. Circulation 2016, 134, 1059–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mostofsky, E.; Penner, E.A.; Mittleman, M.A. Outbursts of anger as a trigger of acute cardiovascular events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Heart J. 2014, 35, 1404–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. O’Donnell, M.J.; Chin, S.L.; Rangarajan, S.; Xavier, D.; Liu, L.; Zhang, H.; Rao-Melacini, P.; Zhang, X.; Pais, P.; Agapay, S.; et al. Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): A case-control study. Lancet 2016, 388, 761–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, J.; Zhang, M.; Loerbroks, A.; Angerer, P.; Siegrist, J. Work stress and the risk of recurrent coronary heart disease events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2015, 28, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arnold, S.V.; Smolderen, K.G.; Buchanan, D.M.; Li, Y.; Spertus, J.A. Perceived stress in myocardial infarction: Long-term mortality and health status outcomes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012, 60, 1756–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wilbert-Lampen, U.; Leistner, D.; Greven, S.; Pohl, T.; Sper, S.; Volker, C.; Guthlin, D.; Plasse, A.; Knez, A.; Kuchenhoff, H.; et al. Cardiovascular events during World Cup soccer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stewart, R.A.H.; Colquhoun, D.M.; Marschner, S.L.; Kirby, A.C.; Simes, J.; Nestel, P.J.; Glozier, N.; O’Neil, A.; Oldenburg, B.; White, H.D.; et al. Persistent psychological distress and mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Heart 2017, 103, 1860–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wei, J.; Rooks, C.; Ramadan, R.; Shah, A.J.; Bremner, J.D.; Quyyumi, A.A.; Kutner, M.; Vaccarino, V. Meta-analysis of mental stress-induced myocardial ischemia and subsequent cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 2014, 114, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Oken, B.S.; Chamine, I.; Wakeland, W. A systems approach to stress, stressors and resilience in humans. Behav. Brain Res. 2015, 282, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Iwata, M.; Ota, K.T.; Duman, R.S. The inflammasome: Pathways linking psychological stress, depression, and systemic illnesses. Brain. Behav. Immun. 2013, 31, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ventriglio, A.; Gentile, A.; Baldessarini, R.J.; Bellomo, A. Early-life stress and psychiatric disorders: Epidemiology, neurobiology and innovative pharmacological targets. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2015, 21, 1379–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hammen, C.L. Stress and depression: Old questions, new approaches. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2015, 4, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. World Health Organization. Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders: Global Health Estimates. WHO/MSD/MER/2017.2. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/254610 (accessed on 10 February 2021).
  28. Albert, P.R. Why is depression more prevalent in women? J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2015, 40, 219–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kuehner, C. Why is depression more common among women than among men? Lancet Psychiatry 2017, 4, 146–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dhar, A.K.; Barton, D.A. Depression and the Link with Cardiovascular Disease. Front. Psychiatry 2016, 7, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bucciarelli, V.; Caterino, A.L.; Bianco, F.; Caputi, C.G.; Salerni, S.; Sciomer, S.; Maffei, S.; Gallina, S. Depression and cardiovascular disease: The deep blue sea of women’s Heart. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 30, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Goldstein, B.I.; Carnethon, M.R.; Matthews, K.A.; McIntyre, R.S.; Miller, G.E.; Raghuveer, G.; Stoney, C.M.; Wasiak, H.; McCrindle, B.W.; American Heart Association, A.; et al. Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder Predispose Youth to Accelerated Atherosclerosis and Early Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015, 132, 965–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lichtman, J.H.; Froelicher, E.S.; Blumenthal, J.A.; Carney, R.M.; Doering, L.V.; Frasure-Smith, N.; Freedland, K.E.; Jaffe, A.S.; Leifheit-Limson, E.C.; Sheps, D.S.; et al. Depression as a risk factor for poor prognosis among patients with acute coronary syndrome: Systematic review and recommendations: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014, 129, 1350–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Gafarov, V.V.; Panov, D.O.; Gromova, E.A.; Gagulin, I.V.; Gafarova, A.V. The influence of depression on risk development of acute cardiovascular diseases in the female population aged 25-64 in Russia. Int. J. Circumpolar. Health 2013, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. McLean, C.P.; Asnaani, A.; Litz, B.T.; Hofmann, S.G. Gender differences in anxiety disorders: Prevalence, course of illness, comorbidity and burden of illness. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2011, 45, 1027–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Allgulander, C. Anxiety as a risk factor in cardiovascular disease. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2016, 29, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Templin, C.; Hanggi, J.; Klein, C.; Topka, M.S.; Hiestand, T.; Levinson, R.A.; Jurisic, S.; Luscher, T.F.; Ghadri, J.R.; Jancke, L. Altered limbic and autonomic processing supports brain-heart axis in Takotsubo syndrome. Eur. Heart J. 2019, 40, 1183–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ueyama, T.; Kasamatsu, K.; Hano, T.; Tsuruo, Y.; Ishikura, F. Catecholamines and estrogen are involved in the pathogenesis of emotional stress-induced acute heart attack. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1148, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Deshmukh, A.; Kumar, G.; Pant, S.; Rihal, C.; Murugiah, K.; Mehta, J.L. Prevalence of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy in the United States. Am. Heart J. 2012, 164, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Samad, Z.; Boyle, S.; Ersboll, M.; Vora, A.N.; Zhang, Y.; Becker, R.C.; Williams, R.; Kuhn, C.; Ortel, T.L.; Rogers, J.G.; et al. Sex differences in platelet reactivity and cardiovascular and psychological response to mental stress in patients with stable ischemic heart disease: Insights from the REMIT study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014, 64, 1669–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wassertheil-Smoller, S.; Shumaker, S.; Ockene, J.; Talavera, G.A.; Greenland, P.; Cochrane, B.; Robbins, J.; Aragaki, A.; Dunbar-Jacob, J. Depression and cardiovascular sequelae in postmenopausal women. The Women’s Health Initiative (WHI). Arch. Intern. Med. 2004, 164, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zerriaa, O.; Moula, O.; Ben Saadi, S.; Ghachem, J.R. Benefits of antidepressant treatment after a stroke. Eur. Psychiatry 2017, 41, S315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vaccarino, V.; Sullivan, S.; Hammadah, M.; Wilmot, K.; Al Mheid, I.; Ramadan, R.; Elon, L.; Pimple, P.M.; Garcia, E.V.; Nye, J.; et al. Mental Stress-Induced-Myocardial Ischemia in Young Patients with Recent Myocardial Infarction: Sex Differences and Mechanisms. Circulation 2018, 137, 794–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tepper, P.G.; Randolph, J.F., Jr.; McConnell, D.S.; Crawford, S.L.; El Khoudary, S.R.; Joffe, H.; Gold, E.B.; Zheng, H.; Bromberger, J.T.; Sutton-Tyrrell, K. Trajectory clustering of estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone during the menopausal transition among women in the Study of Women’s Health across the Nation (SWAN). J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, 2872–2880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yang, X.P.; Reckelhoff, J.F. Estrogen, hormonal replacement therapy and cardiovascular disease. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2011, 20, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. El Khoudary, S.R.; Thurston, R.C. Cardiovascular Implications of the Menopause Transition: Endogenous Sex Hormones and Vasomotor Symptoms. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am. 2018, 45, 641–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Randolph, J.F., Jr.; Zheng, H.; Sowers, M.R.; Crandall, C.; Crawford, S.; Gold, E.B.; Vuga, M. Change in follicle-stimulating hormone and estradiol across the menopausal transition: Effect of age at the final menstrual period. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 746–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Burger, H.G.; Dudley, E.C.; Hopper, J.L.; Groome, N.; Guthrie, J.R.; Green, A.; Dennerstein, L. Prospectively measured levels of serum follicle-stimulating hormone, estradiol, and the dimeric inhibins during the menopausal transition in a population-based cohort of women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1999, 84, 4025–4030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Celestino Catao Da Silva, D.; Nogueira De Almeida Vasconcelos, A.; Cleto Maria Cerqueira, J.; De Oliveira Cipriano Torres, D.; Oliveira Dos Santos, A.C.; De Lima Ferreira Fernandes Costa, H.; Bregieiro Fernandes Costa, L.O. Endogenous sex hormones are not associated with subclinical atherosclerosis in menopausal women. Minerva Ginecol. 2013, 65, 297–302. [Google Scholar]
  50. Moreau, K.L.; Hildreth, K.L.; Meditz, A.L.; Deane, K.D.; Kohrt, W.M. Endothelial function is impaired across the stages of the menopause transition in healthy women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, 4692–4700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Munir, J.A.; Wu, H.; Bauer, K.; Bindeman, J.; Byrd, C.; Feuerstein, I.M.; Villines, T.C.; Taylor, A.J. The perimenopausal atherosclerosis transition: Relationships between calcified and noncalcified coronary, aortic, and carotid atherosclerosis and risk factors and hormone levels. Menopause 2012, 19, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Derby, C.A.; Crawford, S.L.; Pasternak, R.C.; Sowers, M.; Sternfeld, B.; Matthews, K.A. Lipid changes during the menopause transition in relation to age and weight: The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2009, 169, 1352–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. De Kat, A.C.; Dam, V.; Onland-Moret, N.C.; Eijkemans, M.J.; Broekmans, F.J.; van der Schouw, Y.T. Unraveling the associations of age and menopause with cardiovascular risk factors in a large population-based study. BMC Med. 2017, 15, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Matthews, K.A.; Crawford, S.L.; Chae, C.U.; Everson-Rose, S.A.; Sowers, M.F.; Sternfeld, B.; Sutton-Tyrrell, K. Are changes in cardiovascular disease risk factors in midlife women due to chronological aging or to the menopausal transition? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 54, 2366–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Matthews, K.A.; El Khoudary, S.R.; Brooks, M.M.; Derby, C.A.; Harlow, S.D.; Barinas-Mitchell, E.J.; Thurston, R.C. Lipid Changes Around the Final Menstrual Period Predict Carotid Subclinical Disease in Postmenopausal Women. Stroke 2017, 48, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Wildman, R.P.; Colvin, A.B.; Powell, L.H.; Matthews, K.A.; Everson-Rose, S.A.; Hollenberg, S.; Johnston, J.M.; Sutton-Tyrrell, K. Associations of endogenous sex hormones with the vasculature in menopausal women: The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Menopause 2008, 15, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Johnson, B.D.; Dwyer, K.M.; Stanczyk, F.Z.; Bittner, V.; Berga, S.L.; Braunstein, G.D.; Azziz, R.; Yang, Y.; Hale, G.E.; Bairey Merz, C.N. The relationship of menopausal status and rapid menopausal transition with carotid intima-media thickness progression in women: A report from the Los Angeles Atherosclerosis Study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, 4432–4440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. El Khoudary, S.R.; Wildman, R.P.; Matthews, K.; Thurston, R.C.; Bromberger, J.T.; Sutton-Tyrrell, K. Progression rates of carotid intima-media thickness and adventitial diameter during the menopausal transition. Menopause 2013, 20, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Lima, R.; Wofford, M.; Reckelhoff, J.F. Hypertension in postmenopausal women. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2012, 14, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Strain, W.D.; Paldanius, P.M. Diabetes, cardiovascular disease and the microcirculation. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2018, 17, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Ren, Y.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Y.; Sun, X.; Wang, B.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, D.; Liu, X.; Zhang, D.; Liu, F.; et al. Association of menopause and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Menopause 2019, 26, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Atsma, F.; Bartelink, M.L.; Grobbee, D.E.; van der Schouw, Y.T. Postmenopausal status and early menopause as independent risk factors for cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis. Menopause 2006, 13, 265–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Muka, T.; Oliver-Williams, C.; Kunutsor, S.; Laven, J.S.; Fauser, B.C.; Chowdhury, R.; Kavousi, M.; Franco, O.H. Association of Age at Onset of Menopause and Time Since Onset of Menopause with Cardiovascular Outcomes, Intermediate Vascular Traits, and All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2016, 1, 767–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Tao, X.Y.; Zuo, A.Z.; Wang, J.Q.; Tao, F.B. Effect of primary ovarian insufficiency and early natural menopause on mortality: A meta-analysis. Climacteric 2016, 19, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhu, D.; Chung, H.F.; Dobson, A.J.; Pandeya, N.; Giles, G.G.; Bruinsma, F.; Brunner, E.J.; Kuh, D.; Hardy, R.; Avis, N.E.; et al. Age at natural menopause and risk of incident cardiovascular disease: A pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Public Health 2019, 4, e553–e564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Brotman, D.J.; Golden, S.H.; Wittstein, I.S. The cardiovascular toll of stress. Lancet 2007, 370, 1089–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Vaccarino, V.; Bremner, J.D. Behavioral, emotional and neurobiological determinants of coronary heart disease risk in women. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017, 74, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Arnsten, A.F. Stress weakens prefrontal networks: Molecular insults to higher cognition. Nat. Neurosci. 2015, 18, 1376–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fleshner, M.; Crane, C.R. Exosomes, DAMPs and miRNA: Features of Stress Physiology and Immune Homeostasis. Trends Immunol. 2017, 38, 768–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lima, B.B.; Hammadah, M.; Kim, J.H.; Uphoff, I.; Shah, A.; Levantsevych, O.; Almuwaqqat, Z.; Moazzami, K.; Sullivan, S.; Ward, L.; et al. Association of Transient Endothelial Dysfunction Induced by Mental Stress with Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Men and Women with Coronary Artery Disease. JAMA Cardiol. 2019, 4, 988–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mehta, P.K.; Lima, B.B.; Nelson, M.D.; Bairey Merz, C.N. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes in women: Blame the amygdala? Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2019, 20, 633–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Garcia, R.G.; Mareckova, K.; Holsen, L.M.; Cohen, J.E.; Whitfield-Gabrieli, S.; Napadow, V.; Barbieri, R.; Goldstein, J.M. Impact of sex and depressed mood on the central regulation of cardiac autonomic function. Neuropsychopharmacology 2020, 45, 1280–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Mareckova, K.; Holsen, L.; Admon, R.; Whitfield-Gabrieli, S.; Seidman, L.J.; Buka, S.L.; Klibanski, A.; Goldstein, J.M. Neural—Hormonal responses to negative affective stimuli: Impact of dysphoric mood and sex. J. Affect. Disord. 2017, 222, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Fiechter, M.; Haider, A.; Bengs, S.; Maredziak, M.; Burger, I.A.; Roggo, A.; Portmann, A.; Warnock, G.I.; Schade, K.; Treyer, V.; et al. Sex Differences in the Association between Inflammation and Ischemic Heart Disease. Thromb. Haemost. 2019, 119, 1471–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Fiechter, M.; Haider, A.; Bengs, S.; Maredziak, M.; Burger, I.A.; Roggo, A.; Portmann, A.; Schade, K.; Warnock, G.I.; Treyer, V.; et al. Sex-dependent association between inflammation, neural stress responses, and impaired myocardial function. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2020, 47, 2010–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kogler, L.; Muller, V.I.; Seidel, E.M.; Boubela, R.; Kalcher, K.; Moser, E.; Habel, U.; Gur, R.C.; Eickhoff, S.B.; Derntl, B. Sex differences in the functional connectivity of the amygdalae in association with cortisol. Neuroimage 2016, 134, 410–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Tawakol, A.; Ishai, A.; Takx, R.A.; Figueroa, A.L.; Ali, A.; Kaiser, Y.; Truong, Q.A.; Solomon, C.J.; Calcagno, C.; Mani, V.; et al. Relation between resting amygdalar activity and cardiovascular events: A longitudinal and cohort study. Lancet 2017, 389, 834–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Gianaros, P.J.; Hariri, A.R.; Sheu, L.K.; Muldoon, M.F.; Sutton-Tyrrell, K.; Manuck, S.B. Preclinical atherosclerosis covaries with individual differences in reactivity and functional connectivity of the amygdala. Biol. Psychiatry 2009, 65, 943–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Drevets, W.C. Functional anatomical abnormalities in limbic and prefrontal cortical structures in major depression. Prog. Brain. Res. 2000, 126, 413–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Herman, J.P.; McKlveen, J.M.; Ghosal, S.; Kopp, B.; Wulsin, A.; Makinson, R.; Scheimann, J.; Myers, B. Regulation of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenocortical Stress Response. Compr. Physiol. 2016, 6, 603–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Tsigos, C.; Chrousos, G.P. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, neuroendocrine factors and stress. J. Psychosom. Res. 2002, 53, 865–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Salim, S.; Chugh, G.; Asghar, M. Inflammation in anxiety. Adv. Protein. Chem. Struct. Biol. 2012, 88, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Silverman, M.N.; Sternberg, E.M. Glucocorticoid regulation of inflammation and its functional correlates: From HPA axis to glucocorticoid receptor dysfunction. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2012, 1261, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Miller, D.B.; O’Callaghan, J.P. Neuroendocrine aspects of the response to stress. Metabolism 2002, 51, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Pascoe, M.C.; Crewther, S.G.; Carey, L.M.; Crewther, D.P. Inflammation and depression: Why poststroke depression may be the norm and not the exception. Int. J. Stroke 2011, 6, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Bangasser, D.A.; Valentino, R.J. Sex differences in stress-related psychiatric disorders: Neurobiological perspectives. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2014, 35, 303–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Kudielka, B.M.; Kirschbaum, C. Sex differences in HPA axis responses to stress: A review. Biol. Psychol. 2005, 69, 113–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bale, T.L.; Epperson, C.N. Sex differences and stress across the lifespan. Nat. Neurosci. 2015, 18, 1413–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Heim, C.; Nemeroff, C.B. The impact of early adverse experiences on brain systems involved in the pathophysiology of anxiety and affective disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 1999, 46, 1509–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Romeo, R.D. Pubertal maturation and programming of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal reactivity. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2010, 31, 232–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Seeman, T.E.; Singer, B.; Wilkinson, C.W.; McEwen, B. Gender differences in age-related changes in HPA axis reactivity. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2001, 26, 225–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Uhart, M.; Chong, R.Y.; Oswald, L.; Lin, P.I.; Wand, G.S. Gender differences in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis reactivity. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2006, 31, 642–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kirschbaum, C.; Kudielka, B.M.; Gaab, J.; Schommer, N.C.; Hellhammer, D.H. Impact of gender, menstrual cycle phase, and oral contraceptives on the activity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. Psychosom. Med. 1999, 61, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rohleder, N.; Schommer, N.C.; Hellhammer, D.H.; Engel, R.; Kirschbaum, C. Sex differences in glucocorticoid sensitivity of proinflammatory cytokine production after psychosocial stress. Psychosom. Med. 2001, 63, 966–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Juster, R.P.; Raymond, C.; Desrochers, A.B.; Bourdon, O.; Durand, N.; Wan, N.; Pruessner, J.C.; Lupien, S.J. Sex hormones adjust “sex-specific” reactive and diurnal cortisol profiles. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2016, 63, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. LeDoux, J.E.; Iwata, J.; Cicchetti, P.; Reis, D.J. Different projections of the central amygdaloid nucleus mediate autonomic and behavioral correlates of conditioned fear. J. Neurosci. 1988, 8, 2517–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Curtis, B.M.; O’Keefe, J.H., Jr. Autonomic tone as a cardiovascular risk factor: The dangers of chronic fight or flight. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2002, 77, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Hage, M.P.; Azar, S.T. The Link between Thyroid Function and Depression. J. Thyroid Res. 2012, 2012, 590648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Voss, A.; Boettger, M.K.; Schulz, S.; Gross, K.; Bar, K.J. Gender-dependent impact of major depression on autonomic cardiovascular modulation. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2011, 35, 1131–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Di Monaco, A.; Bruno, I.; Calcagni, M.L.; Nerla, R.; Lamendola, P.; Barone, L.; Scalone, G.; Mollo, R.; Coviello, I.; Bagnato, A.; et al. Cardiac adrenergic nerve function in patients with cardiac syndrome X. J. Cardiovasc. Med. 2010, 11, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Templin, C.; Ghadri, J.R.; Diekmann, J.; Napp, L.C.; Bataiosu, D.R.; Jaguszewski, M.; Cammann, V.L.; Sarcon, A.; Geyer, V.; Neumann, C.A.; et al. Clinical Features and Outcomes of Takotsubo (Stress) Cardiomyopathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 929–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Ubrich, R.; Barthel, P.; Haller, B.; Hnatkova, K.; Huster, K.M.; Steger, A.; Muller, A.; Malik, M.; Schmidt, G. Sex differences in long-term mortality among acute myocardial infarction patients: Results from the ISAR-RISK and ART studies. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Hogarth, A.J.; Graham, L.N.; Mary, D.A.; Greenwood, J.P. Gender differences in sympathetic neural activation following uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J. 2009, 30, 1764–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. La Rovere, M.T.; Bigger, J.T., Jr.; Marcus, F.I.; Mortara, A.; Schwartz, P.J. Baroreflex sensitivity and heart-rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction. ATRAMI (Autonomic Tone and Reflexes After Myocardial Infarction) Investigators. Lancet 1998, 351, 478–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Mitoff, P.R.; Gam, D.; Ivanov, J.; Al-hesayen, A.; Azevedo, E.R.; Newton, G.E.; Parker, J.D.; Mak, S. Cardiac-specific sympathetic activation in men and women with and without heart failure. Heart 2011, 97, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. McEwen, B.S. Stress, adaptation, and disease. Allostasis and allostatic load. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1998, 840, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Tomfohr, L.M.; Martin, T.M.; Miller, G.E. Symptoms of depression and impaired endothelial function in healthy adolescent women. J. Behav. Med. 2008, 31, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hiteshi, A.K.; Li, D.; Gao, Y.; Chen, A.; Flores, F.; Mao, S.S.; Budoff, M.J. Gender differences in coronary artery diameter are not related to body habitus or left ventricular mass. Clin. Cardiol. 2014, 37, 605–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Murthy, V.L.; Lee, B.C.; Sitek, A.; Naya, M.; Moody, J.; Polavarapu, V.; Ficaro, E.P.; Di Carli, M.F. Comparison and prognostic validation of multiple methods of quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb PET. J. Nucl. Med. 2014, 55, 1952–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Haider, A.; Bengs, S.; Maredziak, M.; Messerli, M.; Fiechter, M.; Giannopoulos, A.A.; Treyer, V.; Schwyzer, M.; Kamani, C.H.; Patriki, D.; et al. Heart rate reserve during pharmacological stress is a significant negative predictor of impaired coronary flow reserve in women. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 46, 1257–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Patel, M.B.; Bui, L.P.; Kirkeeide, R.L.; Gould, K.L. Imaging Microvascular Dysfunction and Mechanisms for Female-Male Differences in CAD. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2016, 9, 465–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Magkos, F.; Patterson, B.W.; Mohammed, B.S.; Klein, S.; Mittendorfer, B. Women produce fewer but triglyceride-richer very low-density lipoproteins than men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 92, 1311–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Hewitt, K.N.; Boon, W.C.; Murata, Y.; Jones, M.E.; Simpson, E.R. The aromatase knockout mouse presents with a sexually dimorphic disruption to cholesterol homeostasis. Endocrinology 2003, 144, 3895–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Muka, T.; Oliver-Williams, C.; Colpani, V.; Kunutsor, S.; Chowdhury, S.; Chowdhury, R.; Kavousi, M.; Franco, O.H. Association of Vasomotor and Other Menopausal Symptoms with Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Herber-Gast, G.; Brown, W.J.; Mishra, G.D. Hot flushes and night sweats are associated with coronary heart disease risk in midlife: A longitudinal study. BJOG 2015, 122, 1560–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Ryu, K.J.; Park, H.T.; Kwon, D.H.; Yang, K.S.; Kim, Y.J.; Yi, K.W.; Shin, J.H.; Hur, J.Y.; Kim, T. Vasomotor symptoms and metabolic syndrome in Korean postmenopausal women. Menopause 2015, 22, 1239–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Libby, P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature 2002, 420, 868–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Muscatell, K.A.; Dedovic, K.; Slavich, G.M.; Jarcho, M.R.; Breen, E.C.; Bower, J.E.; Irwin, M.R.; Eisenberger, N.I. Greater amygdala activity and dorsomedial prefrontal-amygdala coupling are associated with enhanced inflammatory responses to stress. Brain. Behav. Immun. 2015, 43, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Huang, Q.H.; Takaki, A.; Arimura, A. Central noradrenergic system modulates plasma interleukin-6 production by peripheral interleukin-1. Am. J. Physiol. 1997, 273, R731–R738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Goebel, M.U.; Mills, P.J.; Irwin, M.R.; Ziegler, M.G. Interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha production after acute psychological stress, exercise, and infused isoproterenol: Differential effects and pathways. Psychosom. Med. 2000, 62, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Bierhaus, A.; Wolf, J.; Andrassy, M.; Rohleder, N.; Humpert, P.M.; Petrov, D.; Ferstl, R.; von Eynatten, M.; Wendt, T.; Rudofsky, G.; et al. A mechanism converting psychosocial stress into mononuclear cell activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 1920–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. DeRijk, R.H.; Boelen, A.; Tilders, F.J.; Berkenbosch, F. Induction of plasma interleukin-6 by circulating adrenaline in the rat. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1994, 19, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Kop, W.J.; Weissman, N.J.; Zhu, J.; Bonsall, R.W.; Doyle, M.; Stretch, M.R.; Glaes, S.B.; Krantz, D.S.; Gottdiener, J.S.; Tracy, R.P. Effects of acute mental stress and exercise on inflammatory markers in patients with coronary artery disease and healthy controls. Am. J. Cardiol. 2008, 101, 767–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Smyth, G.P.; Stapleton, P.P.; Freeman, T.A.; Concannon, E.M.; Mestre, J.R.; Duff, M.; Maddali, S.; Daly, J.M. Glucocorticoid pretreatment induces cytokine overexpression and nuclear factor-kappaB activation in macrophages. J. Surg. Res. 2004, 116, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Yeager, M.P.; Pioli, P.A.; Guyre, P.M. Cortisol exerts bi-phasic regulation of inflammation in humans. Dose Response 2011, 9, 332–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Sapolsky, R.M.; Romero, L.M.; Munck, A.U. How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr. Rev. 2000, 21, 55–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Kinlein, S.A.; Wilson, C.D.; Karatsoreos, I.N. Dysregulated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function contributes to altered endocrine and neurobehavioral responses to acute stress. Front. Psychiatry 2015, 6, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Markle, J.G.; Fish, E.N. SeXX matters in immunity. Trends Immunol. 2014, 35, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Casimir, G.J.; Lefevre, N.; Corazza, F.; Duchateau, J.; Chamekh, M. The Acid-Base Balance and Gender in Inflammation: A Mini-Review. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Straub, R.H. The complex role of estrogens in inflammation. Endocr. Rev. 2007, 28, 521–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Casimir, G.J.; Lefevre, N.; Corazza, F.; Duchateau, J. Sex and inflammation in respiratory diseases: A clinical viewpoint. Biol. Sex Differ. 2013, 4, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Rosenfeld, M.; Davis, R.; FitzSimmons, S.; Pepe, M.; Ramsey, B. Gender gap in cystic fibrosis mortality. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1997, 145, 794–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Howren, M.B.; Lamkin, D.M.; Suls, J. Associations of depression with C-reactive protein, IL-1, and IL-6: A meta-analysis. Psychosom. Med. 2009, 71, 171–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Wong, N.D.; Pio, J.; Valencia, R.; Thakal, G. Distribution of C-reactive protein and its relation to risk factors and coronary heart disease risk estimation in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III. Prev. Cardiol. 2001, 4, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Qasim, A.N.; Budharaju, V.; Mehta, N.N.; St Clair, C.; Farouk, S.; Braunstein, S.; Schutta, M.; Iqbal, N.; Rader, D.J.; Reilly, M.P. Gender differences in the association of C-reactive protein with coronary artery calcium in type-2 diabetes. Clin. Endocrinol. 2011, 74, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Pruijm, M.; Vollenweider, P.; Mooser, V.; Paccaud, F.; Preisig, M.; Waeber, G.; Marques-Vidal, P.; Burnier, M.; Bochud, M. Inflammatory markers and blood pressure: Sex differences and the effect of fat mass in the CoLaus Study. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2013, 27, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Shanahan, L.; Freeman, J.; Bauldry, S. Is very high C-reactive protein in young adults associated with indicators of chronic disease risk? Psychoneuroendocrinology 2014, 40, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Sullivan, S.; Hammadah, M.; Wilmot, K.; Ramadan, R.; Pearce, B.D.; Shah, A.; Kaseer, B.; Gafeer, M.M.; Lima, B.B.; Kim, J.H.; et al. Young Women with Coronary Artery Disease Exhibit Higher Concentrations of Interleukin-6 at Baseline and in Response to Mental Stress. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2018, 7, e010329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Kushner, R.F.; Sorensen, K.W. Lifestyle medicine: The future of chronic disease management. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 2013, 20, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Lavie, C.J.; Ozemek, C.; Carbone, S.; Katzmarzyk, P.T.; Blair, S.N. Sedentary Behavior, Exercise, and Cardiovascular Health. Circ. Res. 2019, 124, 799–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Doughty, K.N.; Del Pilar, N.X.; Audette, A.; Katz, D.L. Lifestyle Medicine and the Management of Cardiovascular Disease. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2017, 19, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Barbaresko, J.; Rienks, J.; Nothlings, U. Lifestyle Indices and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Meta-analysis. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2018, 55, 555–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Goyal, M.; Singh, S.; Sibinga, E.M.; Gould, N.F.; Rowland-Seymour, A.; Sharma, R.; Berger, Z.; Sleicher, D.; Maron, D.D.; Shihab, H.M.; et al. Meditation programs for psychological stress and well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern. Med. 2014, 174, 357–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Gallegos, A.M.; Crean, H.F.; Pigeon, W.R.; Heffner, K.L. Meditation and yoga for posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2017, 58, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Katterman, S.N.; Kleinman, B.M.; Hood, M.M.; Nackers, L.M.; Corsica, J.A. Mindfulness meditation as an intervention for binge eating, emotional eating, and weight loss: A systematic review. Eat. Behav. 2014, 15, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Davis, J.M.; Goldberg, S.B.; Anderson, M.C.; Manley, A.R.; Smith, S.S.; Baker, T.B. Randomized trial on mindfulness training for smokers targeted to a disadvantaged population. Subst. Use Misuse 2014, 49, 571–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Chang, P.S.; Knobf, T.; Oh, B.; Funk, M. Physical and Psychological Health Outcomes of Qigong Exercise in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2019, 47, 301–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Strowger, M.; Kiken, L.G.; Ramcharran, K. Mindfulness meditation and physical activity: Evidence from 2012 National Health Interview Survey. Health Psychol. 2018, 37, 924–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Levine, G.N.; Lange, R.A.; Bairey-Merz, C.N.; Davidson, R.J.; Jamerson, K.; Mehta, P.K.; Michos, E.D.; Norris, K.; Ray, I.B.; Saban, K.L.; et al. Meditation and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  150. Pascoe, M.C.; Thompson, D.R.; Ski, C.F. Meditation and Endocrine Health and Wellbeing. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 31, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Krittanawong, C.; Kumar, A.; Wang, Z.; Narasimhan, B.; Jneid, H.; Virani, S.S.; Levine, G.N. Meditation and Cardiovascular Health in the US. Am. J. Cardiol. 2020, 131, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Gong, H.; Ni, C.; Shen, X.; Wu, T.; Jiang, C. Yoga for prenatal depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2015, 15, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Van der Kolk, B.A.; Stone, L.; West, J.; Rhodes, A.; Emerson, D.; Suvak, M.; Spinazzola, J. Yoga as an adjunctive treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2014, 75, e559–e565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Haller, H.; Winkler, M.M.; Klose, P.; Dobos, G.; Kummel, S.; Cramer, H. Mindfulness-based interventions for women with breast cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta. Oncol. 2017, 56, 1665–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Kang, Y.; Rahrig, H.; Eichel, K.; Niles, H.F.; Rocha, T.; Lepp, N.E.; Gold, J.; Britton, W.B. Gender differences in response to a school-based mindfulness training intervention for early adolescents. J. Sch. Psychol. 2018, 68, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Rojiani, R.; Santoyo, J.F.; Rahrig, H.; Roth, H.D.; Britton, W.B. Women Benefit More Than Men in Response to College-based Meditation Training. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Chen, K.W.; Comerford, A.; Shinnick, P.; Ziedonis, D.M. Introducing qigong meditation into residential addiction treatment: A pilot study where gender makes a difference. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2010, 16, 875–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Luders, E.; Thompson, P.M.; Kurth, F. Larger hippocampal dimensions in meditation practitioners: Differential effects in women and men. Front. Psychol. 2015, 6, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Wong, C.; Yip, B.H.; Gao, T.; Lam, K.Y.Y.; Woo, D.M.S.; Yip, A.L.K.; Chin, C.Y.; Tang, W.P.Y.; Choy, M.M.T.; Tsang, K.W.K.; et al. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) or Psychoeducation for the Reduction of Menopausal Symptoms: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Chattha, R.; Raghuram, N.; Venkatram, P.; Hongasandra, N.R. Treating the climacteric symptoms in Indian women with an integrated approach to yoga therapy: A randomized control study. Menopause 2008, 15, 862–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Carmody, J.F.; Crawford, S.; Salmoirago-Blotcher, E.; Leung, K.; Churchill, L.; Olendzki, N. Mindfulness training for coping with hot flashes: Results of a randomized trial. Menopause 2011, 18, 611–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Campbell, T.S.; Labelle, L.E.; Bacon, S.L.; Faris, P.; Carlson, L.E. Impact of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) on attention, rumination and resting blood pressure in women with cancer: A waitlist-controlled study. J. Behav. Med. 2012, 35, 262–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Muthukrishnan, S.; Jain, R.; Kohli, S.; Batra, S. Effect of Mindfulness Meditation on Perceived Stress Scores and Autonomic Function Tests of Pregnant Indian Women. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016, 10, CC05–CC08. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Rakhshani, A.; Nagarathna, R.; Mhaskar, R.; Mhaskar, A.; Thomas, A.; Gunasheela, S. The effects of yoga in prevention of pregnancy complications in high-risk pregnancies: A randomized controlled trial. Prev. Med. 2012, 55, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Thornton, E.W.; Sykes, K.S.; Tang, W.K. Health benefits of Tai Chi exercise: Improved balance and blood pressure in middle-aged women. Health Promot. Int. 2004, 19, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. Trivedi, G.Y.; Patel, V.; Shah, M.H.; Dhok, M.J.; Bhoyania, K. Comparative Study of the Impact of Active Meditation Protocol and Silence Meditation on Heart Rate Variability and Mood in Women. Int. J. Yoga 2020, 13, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Praveena, S.M.; Asha, G.; Sunita, M.; Anju, J.; Ratna, B. Yoga Offers Cardiovascular Protection in Early Postmenopausal Women. Int. J. Yoga 2018, 11, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Audette, J.F.; Jin, Y.S.; Newcomer, R.; Stein, L.; Duncan, G.; Frontera, W.R. Tai Chi versus brisk walking in elderly women. Age Ageing 2006, 35, 388–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Field, T.; Diego, M.; Delgado, J.; Medina, L. Yoga and social support reduce prenatal depression, anxiety and cortisol. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2013, 17, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Carlson, L.E.; Doll, R.; Stephen, J.; Faris, P.; Tamagawa, R.; Drysdale, E.; Speca, M. Randomized controlled trial of Mindfulness-based cancer recovery versus supportive expressive group therapy for distressed survivors of breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 3119–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Daubenmier, J.; Kristeller, J.; Hecht, F.M.; Maninger, N.; Kuwata, M.; Jhaveri, K.; Lustig, R.H.; Kemeny, M.; Karan, L.; Epel, E. Mindfulness Intervention for Stress Eating to Reduce Cortisol and Abdominal Fat among Overweight and Obese Women: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Study. J. Obes. 2011, 2011, 651936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Witek-Janusek, L.; Albuquerque, K.; Chroniak, K.R.; Chroniak, C.; Durazo-Arvizu, R.; Mathews, H.L. Effect of mindfulness based stress reduction on immune function, quality of life and coping in women newly diagnosed with early stage breast cancer. Brain. Behav. Immun. 2008, 22, 969–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Robins, J.L.; Elswick, R.K., Jr.; Sturgill, J.; McCain, N.L. The Effects of Tai Chi on Cardiovascular Risk in Women. Am. J. Health Promot. 2016, 30, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Harkess, K.N.; Ryan, J.; Delfabbro, P.H.; Cohen-Woods, S. Preliminary indications of the effect of a brief yoga intervention on markers of inflammation and DNA methylation in chronically stressed women. Transl. Psychiatry 2016, 6, e965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  175. Gallegos, A.M.; Lytle, M.C.; Moynihan, J.A.; Talbot, N.L. Mindfulness-based stress reduction to enhance psychological functioning and improve inflammatory biomarkers in trauma-exposed women: A pilot study. Psychol. Trauma 2015, 7, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Breedvelt, J.J.F.; Amanvermez, Y.; Harrer, M.; Karyotaki, E.; Gilbody, S.; Bockting, C.L.H.; Cuijpers, P.; Ebert, D.D. The Effects of Meditation, Yoga, and Mindfulness on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in Tertiary Education Students: A Meta-Analysis. Front. Psychiatry 2019, 10, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Brinsley, J.; Schuch, F.; Lederman, O.; Girard, D.; Smout, M.; Immink, M.A.; Stubbs, B.; Firth, J.; Davison, K.; Rosenbaum, S. Effects of yoga on depressive symptoms in people with mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. So, W.W.Y.; Cai, S.; Yau, S.Y.; Tsang, H.W.H. The Neurophysiological and Psychological Mechanisms of Qigong as a Treatment for Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Psychiatry 2019, 10, 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Reangsing, C.; Rittiwong, T.; Schneider, J.K. Effects of mindfulness meditation interventions on depression in older adults: A meta-analysis. Aging Ment. Health 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Zou, L.; Yeung, A.; Li, C.; Wei, G.X.; Chen, K.W.; Kinser, P.A.; Chan, J.S.M.; Ren, Z. Effects of Meditative Movements on Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Gonzalez-Valero, G.; Zurita-Ortega, F.; Ubago-Jimenez, J.L.; Puertas-Molero, P. Use of Meditation and Cognitive Behavioral Therapies for the Treatment of Stress, Depression and Anxiety in Students. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Cramer, H.; Peng, W.; Lauche, R. Yoga for menopausal symptoms-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas 2018, 109, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Pan, Y.; Yang, K.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Liang, H. Could yoga practice improve treatment-related side effects and quality of life for women with breast cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 13, e79–e95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Fox, K.C.; Nijeboer, S.; Dixon, M.L.; Floman, J.L.; Ellamil, M.; Rumak, S.P.; Sedlmeier, P.; Christoff, K. Is meditation associated with altered brain structure? A systematic review and meta-analysis of morphometric neuroimaging in meditation practitioners. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2014, 43, 48–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Price, J.L.; Amaral, D.G. An autoradiographic study of the projections of the central nucleus of the monkey amygdala. J. Neurosci. 1981, 1, 1242–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. Price, J.L.; Carmichael, S.T.; Drevets, W.C. Networks related to the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex; a substrate for emotional behavior? Prog. Brain Res. 1996, 107, 523–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Ghashghaei, H.T.; Barbas, H. Pathways for emotion: Interactions of prefrontal and anterior temporal pathways in the amygdala of the rhesus monkey. Neuroscience 2002, 115, 1261–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Debiec, J.; LeDoux, J.E. Noradrenergic signaling in the amygdala contributes to the reconsolidation of fear memory: Treatment implications for PTSD. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1071, 521–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Lazar, S.W.; Kerr, C.E.; Wasserman, R.H.; Gray, J.R.; Greve, D.N.; Treadway, M.T.; McGarvey, M.; Quinn, B.T.; Dusek, J.A.; Benson, H.; et al. Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness. Neuroreport 2005, 16, 1893–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Kang, D.H.; Jo, H.J.; Jung, W.H.; Kim, S.H.; Jung, Y.H.; Choi, C.H.; Lee, U.S.; An, S.C.; Jang, J.H.; Kwon, J.S. The effect of meditation on brain structure: Cortical thickness mapping and diffusion tensor Imaging. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2013, 8, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Vestergaard-Poulsen, P.; van Beek, M.; Skewes, J.; Bjarkam, C.R.; Stubberup, M.; Bertelsen, J.; Roepstorff, A. Long-term meditation is associated with increased gray matter density in the brain stem. Neuroreport 2009, 20, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Grant, J.A.; Duerden, E.G.; Courtemanche, J.; Cherkasova, M.; Duncan, G.H.; Rainville, P. Cortical thickness, mental absorption and meditative practice: Possible implications for disorders of attention. Biol. Psychol. 2013, 92, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Kumar, U.; Guleria, A.; Kishan, S.S.; Khetrapal, C.L. Effect of SOHAM meditation on human brain: A voxel-based morphometry study. J. NeuroImaging 2014, 24, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Fox, K.C.; Dixon, M.L.; Nijeboer, S.; Girn, M.; Floman, J.L.; Lifshitz, M.; Ellamil, M.; Sedlmeier, P.; Christoff, K. Functional neuroanatomy of meditation: A review and meta-analysis of 78 functional neuroimaging investigations. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2016, 65, 208–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  195. Brefczynski-Lewis, J.A.; Lutz, A.; Schaefer, H.S.; Levinson, D.B.; Davidson, R.J. Neural correlates of attentional expertise in long-term meditation practitioners. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 11483–11488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  196. Manna, A.; Raffone, A.; Perrucci, M.G.; Nardo, D.; Ferretti, A.; Tartaro, A.; Londei, A.; Del Gratta, C.; Belardinelli, M.O.; Romani, G.L. Neural correlates of focused attention and cognitive monitoring in meditation. Brain Res. Bull. 2010, 82, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Brewer, J.A.; Worhunsky, P.D.; Gray, J.R.; Tang, Y.Y.; Weber, J.; Kober, H. Meditation experience is associated with differences in default mode network activity and connectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 20254–20259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  198. Hasenkamp, W.; Wilson-Mendenhall, C.D.; Duncan, E.; Barsalou, L.W. Mind wandering and attention during focused meditation: A fine-grained temporal analysis of fluctuating cognitive states. Neuroimage 2012, 59, 750–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Lee, T.M.; Leung, M.K.; Hou, W.K.; Tang, J.C.; Yin, J.; So, K.F.; Lee, C.F.; Chan, C.C. Distinct neural activity associated with focused-attention meditation and loving-kindness meditation. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e40054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Dickenson, J.; Berkman, E.T.; Arch, J.; Lieberman, M.D. Neural correlates of focused attention during a brief mindfulness induction. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2013, 8, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Xu, J.; Vik, A.; Groote, I.R.; Lagopoulos, J.; Holen, A.; Ellingsen, O.; Haberg, A.K.; Davanger, S. Nondirective meditation activates default mode network and areas associated with memory retrieval and emotional processing. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Lazar, S.W.; Bush, G.; Gollub, R.L.; Fricchione, G.L.; Khalsa, G.; Benson, H. Functional brain mapping of the relaxation response and meditation. Neuroreport 2000, 11, 1581–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Shimomura, T.; Fujiki, M.; Akiyoshi, J.; Yoshida, T.; Tabata, M.; Kabasawa, H.; Kobayashi, H. Functional brain mapping during recitation of Buddhist scriptures and repetition of the Namu Amida Butsu: A study in experienced Japanese monks. Turk. Neurosurg. 2008, 18, 134–141. [Google Scholar]
  204. Davanger, S.; Ellingsen, O.; Holen, A.; Hugdahl, K. Meditation-specific prefrontal cortical activation during acem meditation: An fMRI study. Percept. Mot. Skills 2010, 111, 291–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Engstrom, M.; Pihlsgard, J.; Lundberg, P.; Soderfeldt, B. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of hippocampal activation during silent mantra meditation. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2010, 16, 1253–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  206. Kalyani, B.G.; Venkatasubramanian, G.; Arasappa, R.; Rao, N.P.; Kalmady, S.V.; Behere, R.V.; Rao, H.; Vasudev, M.K.; Gangadhar, B.N. Neurohemodynamic correlates of “OM” chanting: A pilot functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Int. J. Yoga 2011, 4, 3–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Wang, D.J.; Rao, H.; Korczykowski, M.; Wintering, N.; Pluta, J.; Khalsa, D.S.; Newberg, A.B. Cerebral blood flow changes associated with different meditation practices and perceived depth of meditation. Psychiatry Res. 2011, 191, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Guleria, A.; Kumar, U.; Kishan, S.S.; Khetrapal, C.L. Effect of “SOHAM” meditation on the human brain: An fMRI study. Psychiatry Res. 2013, 214, 462–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Lou, H.C.; Kjaer, T.W.; Friberg, L.; Wildschiodtz, G.; Holm, S.; Nowak, M. A 15O-H2O PET study of meditation and the resting state of normal consciousness. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1999, 7, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Farb, N.A.; Segal, Z.V.; Mayberg, H.; Bean, J.; McKeon, D.; Fatima, Z.; Anderson, A.K. Attending to the present: Mindfulness meditation reveals distinct neural modes of self-reference. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2007, 2, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Ives-Deliperi, V.L.; Solms, M.; Meintjes, E.M. The neural substrates of mindfulness: An fMRI investigation. Soc. Neurosci. 2011, 6, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Taylor, V.A.; Grant, J.; Daneault, V.; Scavone, G.; Breton, E.; Roffe-Vidal, S.; Courtemanche, J.; Lavarenne, A.S.; Beauregard, M. Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators. Neuroimage 2011, 57, 1524–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Gard, T.; Holzel, B.K.; Sack, A.T.; Hempel, H.; Lazar, S.W.; Vaitl, D.; Ott, U. Pain attenuation through mindfulness is associated with decreased cognitive control and increased sensory processing in the brain. Cereb. Cortex. 2012, 22, 2692–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  214. Farb, N.A.; Segal, Z.V.; Anderson, A.K. Attentional modulation of primary interoceptive and exteroceptive cortices. Cereb. Cortex. 2013, 23, 114–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  215. Lutz, J.; Herwig, U.; Opialla, S.; Hittmeyer, A.; Jancke, L.; Rufer, M.; Grosse Holtforth, M.; Bruhl, A.B. Mindfulness and emotion regulation--an fMRI study. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2014, 9, 776–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  216. Lutz, A.; Brefczynski-Lewis, J.; Johnstone, T.; Davidson, R.J. Regulation of the neural circuitry of emotion by compassion meditation: Effects of meditative expertise. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Lutz, A.; Greischar, L.L.; Perlman, D.M.; Davidson, R.J. BOLD signal in insula is differentially related to cardiac function during compassion meditation in experts vs. novices. Neuroimage 2009, 47, 1038–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  218. Weng, H.Y.; Fox, A.S.; Shackman, A.J.; Stodola, D.E.; Caldwell, J.Z.; Olson, M.C.; Rogers, G.M.; Davidson, R.J. Compassion training alters altruism and neural responses to suffering. Psychol. Sci. 2013, 24, 1171–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  219. Wager, T.D.; Davidson, M.L.; Hughes, B.L.; Lindquist, M.A.; Ochsner, K.N. Prefrontal-subcortical pathways mediating successful emotion regulation. Neuron 2008, 59, 1037–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  220. Lieberman, M.D.; Eisenberger, N.I.; Crockett, M.J.; Tom, S.M.; Pfeifer, J.H.; Way, B.M. Putting feelings into words: Affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 18, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Ray, R.D.; Zald, D.H. Anatomical insights into the interaction of emotion and cognition in the prefrontal cortex. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2012, 36, 479–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  222. Kim, M.J.; Gee, D.G.; Loucks, R.A.; Davis, F.C.; Whalen, P.J. Anxiety dissociates dorsal and ventral medial prefrontal cortex functional connectivity with the amygdala at rest. Cereb. Cortex. 2011, 21, 1667–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Gotink, R.A.; Meijboom, R.; Vernooij, M.W.; Smits, M.; Hunink, M.G. 8-week Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction induces brain changes similar to traditional long-term meditation practice—A systematic review. Brain. Cogn. 2016, 108, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Kral, T.R.A.; Schuyler, B.S.; Mumford, J.A.; Rosenkranz, M.A.; Lutz, A.; Davidson, R.J. Impact of short- and long-term mindfulness meditation training on amygdala reactivity to emotional stimuli. Neuroimage 2018, 181, 301–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Doll, A.; Holzel, B.K.; Mulej Bratec, S.; Boucard, C.C.; Xie, X.; Wohlschlager, A.M.; Sorg, C. Mindful attention to breath regulates emotions via increased amygdala-prefrontal cortex connectivity. Neuroimage 2016, 134, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Chen, C.; Chen, Y.C.; Chen, K.L.; Cheng, Y. Atypical Anxiety-Related Amygdala Reactivity and Functional Connectivity in Sant Mat Meditation. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Black, D.S.; Peng, C.; Sleight, A.G.; Nguyen, N.; Lenz, H.J.; Figueiredo, J.C. Mindfulness practice reduces cortisol blunting during chemotherapy: A randomized controlled study of colorectal cancer patients. Cancer 2017, 123, 3088–3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Carlson, L.E.; Speca, M.; Faris, P.; Patel, K.D. One year pre-post intervention follow-up of psychological, immune, endocrine and blood pressure outcomes of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in breast and prostate cancer outpatients. Brain Behav. Immun. 2007, 21, 1038–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Manzaneque, J.M.; Vera, F.M.; Ramos, N.S.; Godoy, Y.A.; Rodriguez, F.M.; Blanca, M.J.; Fernandez, A.; Enguix, A. Psychobiological modulation in anxious and depressed patients after a mindfulness meditation programme: A pilot study. Stress Health 2011, 27, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Vandana, B.; Vaidyanathan, K.; Saraswathy, L.A.; Sundaram, K.R.; Kumar, H. Impact of integrated amrita meditation technique on adrenaline and cortisol levels in healthy volunteers. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 2011, 379645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  231. Jevning, R.; Wilson, A.F.; Davidson, J.M. Adrenocortical activity during meditation. Horm. Behav. 1978, 10, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Pascoe, M.C.; Thompson, D.R.; Jenkins, Z.M.; Ski, C.F. Mindfulness mediates the physiological markers of stress: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2017, 95, 156–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Koncz, A.; Demetrovics, Z.; Takacs, Z.K. Meditation interventions efficiently reduce cortisol levels of at-risk samples: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol. Rev. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Heckenberg, R.A.; Eddy, P.; Kent, S.; Wright, B.J. Do workplace-based mindfulness meditation programs improve physiological indices of stress? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Psychosom. Res. 2018, 114, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Meland, A.; Ishimatsu, K.; Pensgaard, A.M.; Wagstaff, A.; Fonne, V.; Garde, A.H.; Harris, A. Impact of Mindfulness Training on Physiological Measures of Stress and Objective Measures of Attention Control in a Military Helicopter Unit. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 2015, 25, 191–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  236. Roeser, R.W.; Schonert-Reichi, K.A.; Jha, A.; Cullen, M.; Wallace, L.; Wilensky, R.; Oberle, E.; Thomson, K.; Taylor, C.; Harrison, J. Mindfulness training and reductions in teacher stress and burnout: Results from two randomized, waitlist-control field trials. J. Educ. Psychol. 2013, 105, 787–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  237. Flook, L.; Goldberg, S.B.; Pinger, L.; Bonus, K.; Davidson, R.J. Mindfulness for teachers: A pilot study to assess effects on stress, burnout and teaching efficacy. Mind Brain Educ. 2013, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  238. Malarkey, W.B.; Jarjoura, D.; Klatt, M. Workplace based mindfulness practice and inflammation: A randomized trial. Brain. Behav. Immun. 2013, 27, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  239. Pascoe, M.C.; Thompson, D.R.; Ski, C.F. Yoga, mindfulness-based stress reduction and stress-related physiological measures: A meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2017, 86, 152–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Bower, J.E.; Greendale, G.; Crosswell, A.D.; Garet, D.; Sternlieb, B.; Ganz, P.A.; Irwin, M.R.; Olmstead, R.; Arevalo, J.; Cole, S.W. Yoga reduces inflammatory signaling in fatigued breast cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2014, 43, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  241. Corey, S.M.; Epel, E.; Schembri, M.; Pawlowsky, S.B.; Cole, R.J.; Araneta, M.R.; Barrett-Connor, E.; Kanaya, A.M. Effect of restorative yoga vs. stretching on diurnal cortisol dynamics and psychosocial outcomes in individuals with the metabolic syndrome: The PRYSMS randomized controlled trial. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2014, 49, 260–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  242. Sieverdes, J.C.; Mueller, M.; Gregoski, M.J.; Brunner-Jackson, B.; McQuade, L.; Matthews, C.; Treiber, F.A. Effects of Hatha yoga on blood pressure, salivary alpha-amylase, and cortisol function among normotensive and prehypertensive youth. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2014, 20, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  243. Vadiraja, H.S.; Raghavendra, R.M.; Nagarathna, R.; Nagendra, H.R.; Rekha, M.; Vanitha, N.; Gopinath, K.S.; Srinath, B.S.; Vishweshwara, M.S.; Madhavi, Y.S.; et al. Effects of a yoga program on cortisol rhythm and mood states in early breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy: A randomized controlled trial. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2009, 8, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  244. Gothe, N.P.; Keswani, R.K.; McAuley, E. Yoga practice improves executive function by attenuating stress levels. Biol. Psychol. 2016, 121, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Granath, J.; Ingvarsson, S.; von Thiele, U.; Lundberg, U. Stress management: A randomized study of cognitive behavioural therapy and yoga. Cogn. Behav. Ther. 2006, 35, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Carrive, P. Dual activation of cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic components during conditioned fear to context in the rat. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2006, 33, 1251–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Nesvold, A.; Fagerland, M.W.; Davanger, S.; Ellingsen, O.; Solberg, E.E.; Holen, A.; Sevre, K.; Atar, D. Increased heart rate variability during nondirective meditation. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2012, 19, 773–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Barnes, V.A.; Treiber, F.A.; Davis, H. Impact of Transcendental Meditation on cardiovascular function at rest and during acute stress in adolescents with high normal blood pressure. J. Psychosom. Res. 2001, 51, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Patel, C.; North, W.R. Randomised controlled trial of yoga and bio-feedback in management of hypertension. Lancet 1975, 2, 93–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Paul-Labrador, M.; Polk, D.; Dwyer, J.H.; Velasquez, I.; Nidich, S.; Rainforth, M.; Schneider, R.; Merz, C.N. Effects of a randomized controlled trial of transcendental meditation on components of the metabolic syndrome in subjects with coronary heart disease. Arch. Intern. Med. 2006, 166, 1218–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  251. Curiati, J.A.; Bocchi, E.; Freire, J.O.; Arantes, A.C.; Braga, M.; Garcia, Y.; Guimaraes, G.; Fo, W.J. Meditation reduces sympathetic activation and improves the quality of life in elderly patients with optimally treated heart failure: A prospective randomized study. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2005, 11, 465–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Harinath, K.; Malhotra, A.S.; Pal, K.; Prasad, R.; Kumar, R.; Kain, T.C.; Rai, L.; Sawhney, R.C. Effects of Hatha yoga and Omkar meditation on cardiorespiratory performance, psychologic profile, and melatonin secretion. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2004, 10, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Prakhinkit, S.; Suppapitiporn, S.; Tanaka, H.; Suksom, D. Effects of Buddhism walking meditation on depression, functional fitness, and endothelium-dependent vasodilation in depressed elderly. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2014, 20, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Barnes, V.A.; Davis, H.C.; Murzynowski, J.B.; Treiber, F.A. Impact of meditation on resting and ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate in youth. Psychosom. Med. 2004, 66, 909–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Daubenmier, J.; Moran, P.J.; Kristeller, J.; Acree, M.; Bacchetti, P.; Kemeny, M.E.; Dallman, M.; Lustig, R.H.; Grunfeld, C.; Nixon, D.F.; et al. Effects of a mindfulness-based weight loss intervention in adults with obesity: A randomized clinical trial. Obesity 2016, 24, 794–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  256. Kingston, J.; Chadwick, P.; Meron, D.; Skinner, T.C. A pilot randomized control trial investigating the effect of mindfulness practice on pain tolerance, psychological well-being, and physiological activity. J. Psychosom. Res. 2007, 62, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Palta, P.; Page, G.; Piferi, R.L.; Gill, J.M.; Hayat, M.J.; Connolly, A.B.; Szanton, S.L. Evaluation of a mindfulness-based intervention program to decrease blood pressure in low-income African-American older adults. J. Urban Health 2012, 89, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  258. Parswani, M.J.; Sharma, M.P.; Iyengar, S. Mindfulness-based stress reduction program in coronary heart disease: A randomized control trial. Int. J. Yoga 2013, 6, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Babbar, S.; Hill, J.B.; Williams, K.B.; Pinon, M.; Chauhan, S.P.; Maulik, D. Acute feTal behavioral Response to prenatal Yoga: A single, blinded, randomized controlled trial (TRY yoga). Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 214, 399 e391–e398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  260. Cohen, D.L.; Bloedon, L.T.; Rothman, R.L.; Farrar, J.T.; Galantino, M.L.; Volger, S.; Mayor, C.; Szapary, P.O.; Townsend, R.R. Iyengar Yoga versus Enhanced Usual Care on Blood Pressure in Patients with Prehypertension to Stage I Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 2011, 546428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  261. Ebnezar, J.; Nagarathna, R.; Yogitha, B.; Nagendra, H.R. Effect of integrated yoga therapy on pain, morning stiffness and anxiety in osteoarthritis of the knee joint: A randomized control study. Int. J. Yoga 2012, 5, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Hughes, J.W.; Fresco, D.M.; Myerscough, R.; van Dulmen, M.H.; Carlson, L.E.; Josephson, R. Randomized controlled trial of mindfulness-based stress reduction for prehypertension. Psychosom. Med. 2013, 75, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  263. Innes, K.E.; Selfe, T.K. The Effects of a Gentle Yoga Program on Sleep, Mood, and Blood Pressure in Older Women with Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS): A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Trial. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 2012, 294058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Kanaya, A.M.; Araneta, M.R.; Pawlowsky, S.B.; Barrett-Connor, E.; Grady, D.; Vittinghoff, E.; Schembri, M.; Chang, A.; Carrion-Petersen, M.L.; Coggins, T.; et al. Restorative yoga and metabolic risk factors: The Practicing Restorative Yoga vs. Stretching for the Metabolic Syndrome (PRYSMS) randomized trial. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2014, 28, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  265. Patil, S.G.; Aithala, M.R.; Das, K.K. Effect of yoga on arterial stiffness in elderly subjects with increased pulse pressure: A randomized controlled study. Complement. Ther. Med. 2015, 23, 562–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Ruby, M.; Repka, C.P.; Arciero, P.J. Comparison of Protein-Pacing Alone or with Yoga/Stretching and Resistance Training on Glycemia, Total and Regional Body Composition, and Aerobic Fitness in Overweight Women. J. Phys. Act. Health 2016, 13, 754–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  267. Saptharishi, L.; Soudarssanane, M.; Thiruselvakumar, D.; Navasakthi, D.; Mathanraj, S.; Karthigeyan, M.; Sahai, A. Community-based Randomized Controlled Trial of Non-pharmacological Interventions in Prevention and Control of Hypertension among Young Adults. Indian J. Community Med. 2009, 34, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Thiyagarajan, R.; Pal, P.; Pal, G.K.; Subramanian, S.K.; Trakroo, M.; Bobby, Z.; Das, A.K. Additional benefit of yoga to standard lifestyle modification on blood pressure in prehypertensive subjects: A randomized controlled study. Hypertens. Res. 2015, 38, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  269. Yang, K.; Bernardo, L.M.; Sereika, S.M.; Conroy, M.B.; Balk, J.; Burke, L.E. Utilization of 3-month yoga program for adults at high risk for type 2 diabetes: A pilot study. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 2011, 257891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Li, J.; Gao, X.; Hao, X.; Kantas, D.; Mohamed, E.A.; Zheng, X.; Xu, H.; Zhang, L. Yoga for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement. Ther. Med. 2020, 57, 102643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Pal, A.; Srivastava, N.; Tiwari, S.; Verma, N.S.; Narain, V.S.; Agrawal, G.G.; Natu, S.M.; Kumar, K. Effect of yogic practices on lipid profile and body fat composition in patients of coronary artery disease. Complement. Ther. Med. 2011, 19, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Tillin, T.; Tuson, C.; Sowa, B.; Chattopadhyay, K.; Sattar, N.; Welsh, P.; Roberts, I.; Ebrahim, S.; Kinra, S.; Hughes, A.; et al. Yoga and Cardiovascular Health Trial (YACHT): A UK-based randomised mechanistic study of a yoga intervention plus usual care versus usual care alone following an acute coronary event. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e030119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  273. Yadav, A.; Singh, S.; Singh, K.; Pai, P. Effect of yoga regimen on lung functions including diffusion capacity in coronary artery disease patients: A randomized controlled study. Int. J. Yoga 2015, 8, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Liang, H.; Luo, S.; Chen, X.; Lu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wei, L. Effects of Tai Chi exercise on cardiovascular disease risk factors and quality of life in adults with essential hypertension: A meta-analysis. Heart Lung 2020, 49, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Scott-Sheldon, L.A.J.; Gathright, E.C.; Donahue, M.L.; Balletto, B.; Feulner, M.M.; DeCosta, J.; Cruess, D.G.; Wing, R.R.; Carey, M.P.; Salmoirago-Blotcher, E. Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Adults with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann. Behav. Med. 2020, 54, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Blom, K.; Baker, B.; How, M.; Dai, M.; Irvine, J.; Abbey, S.; Abramson, B.L.; Myers, M.G.; Kiss, A.; Perkins, N.J.; et al. Hypertension analysis of stress reduction using mindfulness meditation and yoga: Results from the HARMONY randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Hypertens. 2014, 27, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  277. Delui, M.H.; Yari, M.; Khouyinezhad, G.; Amini, M.; Bayazi, M.H. Comparison of cardiac rehabilitation programs combined with relaxation and meditation techniques on reduction of depression and anxiety of cardiovascular patients. Open. Cardiovasc. Med. J. 2013, 7, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  278. Momeni, J.; Omidi, A.; Raygan, F.; Akbari, H. The effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on cardiac patients’ blood pressure, perceived stress, and anger: A single-blind randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Soc. Hypertens. 2016, 10, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Younge, J.O.; Wery, M.F.; Gotink, R.A.; Utens, E.M.; Michels, M.; Rizopoulos, D.; van Rossum, E.F.; Hunink, M.G.; Roos-Hesselink, J.W. Web-Based Mindfulness Intervention in Heart Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  280. Barnes, V.A.; Treiber, F.A.; Johnson, M.H. Impact of transcendental meditation on ambulatory blood pressure in African-American adolescents. Am. J. Hypertens. 2004, 17, 366–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Barnes, V.A.; Pendergrast, R.A.; Harshfield, G.A.; Treiber, F.A. Impact of breathing awareness meditation on ambulatory blood pressure and sodium handling in prehypertensive African American adolescents. Ethn. Dis. 2008, 18, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  282. Gregoski, M.J.; Barnes, V.A.; Tingen, M.S.; Harshfield, G.A.; Treiber, F.A. Breathing awareness meditation and LifeSkills Training programs influence upon ambulatory blood pressure and sodium excretion among African American adolescents. J. Adolesc. Health 2011, 48, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  283. Cohen, D.L.; Boudhar, S.; Bowler, A.; Townsend, R.R. Blood Pressure Effects of Yoga, Alone or in Combination with Lifestyle Measures: Results of the Lifestyle Modification and Blood Pressure Study (LIMBS). J. Clin. Hypertens. 2016, 18, 809–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  284. Hagins, M.; Rundle, A.; Consedine, N.S.; Khalsa, S.B. A randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of yoga with an active control on ambulatory blood pressure in individuals with prehypertension and stage 1 hypertension. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2014, 16, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  285. Ziv, A.; Vogel, O.; Keret, D.; Pintov, S.; Bodenstein, E.; Wolkomir, K.; Doenyas, K.; Mirovski, Y.; Efrati, S. Comprehensive Approach to Lower Blood Pressure (CALM-BP): A randomized controlled trial of a multifactorial lifestyle intervention. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2013, 27, 594–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  286. Wenneberg, S.R.; Schneider, R.H.; Walton, K.G.; Maclean, C.R.; Levitsky, D.K.; Salerno, J.W.; Wallace, R.K.; Mandarino, J.V.; Rainforth, M.V.; Waziri, R. A controlled study of the effects of the Transcendental Meditation program on cardiovascular reactivity and ambulatory blood pressure. Int. J. Neurosci. 1997, 89, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Wielgosz, J.; Schuyler, B.S.; Lutz, A.; Davidson, R.J. Long-term mindfulness training is associated with reliable differences in resting respiration rate. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  288. Nidhi, R.; Padmalatha, V.; Nagarathna, R.; Ram, A. Effect of a yoga program on glucose metabolism and blood lipid levels in adolescent girls with polycystic ovary syndrome. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2012, 118, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Singh, A.K.; Kaur, N.; Kaushal, S.; Tyagi, R.; Mathur, D.; Sivapuram, M.S.; Metri, K.; Bammidi, S.; Podder, V.; Modgil, S.; et al. Partitioning of radiological, stress and biochemical changes in pre-diabetic women subjected to Diabetic Yoga Protocol. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2019, 13, 2705–2713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Ferrucci, L.; Fabbri, E. Inflammageing: Chronic inflammation in ageing, cardiovascular disease, and frailty. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2018, 15, 505–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  291. Mattina, G.F.; Van Lieshout, R.J.; Steiner, M. Inflammation, depression and cardiovascular disease in women: The role of the immune system across critical reproductive events. Ther. Adv. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2019, 13, 1753944719851950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Black, D.S.; Slavich, G.M. Mindfulness meditation and the immune system: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2016, 1373, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Pace, T.W.; Mletzko, T.C.; Alagbe, O.; Musselman, D.L.; Nemeroff, C.B.; Miller, A.H.; Heim, C.M. Increased stress-induced inflammatory responses in male patients with major depression and increased early life stress. Am. J. Psychiatry 2006, 163, 1630–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  294. Murphy, M.L.; Miller, G.E.; Wrosch, C. Conscientiousness and stress exposure and reactivity: A prospective study of adolescent females. J. Behav. Med. 2013, 36, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Bower, J.E.; Crosswell, A.D.; Stanton, A.L.; Crespi, C.M.; Winston, D.; Arevalo, J.; Ma, J.; Cole, S.W.; Ganz, P.A. Mindfulness meditation for younger breast cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer 2015, 121, 1231–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Creswell, J.D.; Irwin, M.R.; Burklund, L.J.; Lieberman, M.D.; Arevalo, J.M.; Ma, J.; Breen, E.C.; Cole, S.W. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction training reduces loneliness and pro-inflammatory gene expression in older adults: A small randomized controlled trial. Brain. Behav. Immun. 2012, 26, 1095–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  297. Black, D.S.; O’Reilly, G.A.; Olmstead, R.; Breen, E.C.; Irwin, M.R. Mindfulness meditation and improvement in sleep quality and daytime impairment among older adults with sleep disturbances: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern. Med. 2015, 175, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  298. Jedel, S.; Hoffman, A.; Merriman, P.; Swanson, B.; Voigt, R.; Rajan, K.B.; Shaikh, M.; Li, H.; Keshavarzian, A. A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness-based stress reduction to prevent flare-up in patients with inactive ulcerative colitis. Digestion 2014, 89, 142–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  299. Ray, I.B.; Menezes, A.R.; Malur, P.; Hiltbold, A.E.; Reilly, J.P.; Lavie, C.J. Meditation and coronary heart disease: A review of the current clinical evidence. Ochsner J. 2014, 14, 696–703. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Potential mechanism of reduction in cardiovascular disease risks by mind–body intervention in women. Unlike in men, significant associations between amygdala activity and physiological responses have been reported specifically in women [72,73,74,75]. Poor mental health (red), such as chronic persistence of depression and stress, reduces functional connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala, decreases activity of the medial prefrontal cortex and increases activity of the amygdala, which is controlled by the prefrontal cortex. Subsequently, the sympathetic nervous system is activated to increase the heart rate and blood pressure, while the HPA axis is activated to increase cortisol secretion, and the chronic activation of these states induces inflammation. The above states represent increased risks for cardiovascular disease. On the other hand, the application of mind–body intervention (green) helps improve mental health by reducing perceived stress and depression. The functional connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala increases, and the activity of the medial frontal cortex also increases, thereby reducing the activity of the amygdala. Mind–body intervention activates the parasympathetic nervous system, thereby reducing sympathetic nerve activity, as well as reducing HPA axial activity as stress decreases. As a result, heart rate, blood pressure and cortisol secretion are reduced and inflammatory conditions are reduced. These states mean a reduction in cardiovascular disease risk. AMYG, amygdala; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; SNS, sympathetic nervous system; HPA, hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal cortex.
Figure 1. Potential mechanism of reduction in cardiovascular disease risks by mind–body intervention in women. Unlike in men, significant associations between amygdala activity and physiological responses have been reported specifically in women [72,73,74,75]. Poor mental health (red), such as chronic persistence of depression and stress, reduces functional connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala, decreases activity of the medial prefrontal cortex and increases activity of the amygdala, which is controlled by the prefrontal cortex. Subsequently, the sympathetic nervous system is activated to increase the heart rate and blood pressure, while the HPA axis is activated to increase cortisol secretion, and the chronic activation of these states induces inflammation. The above states represent increased risks for cardiovascular disease. On the other hand, the application of mind–body intervention (green) helps improve mental health by reducing perceived stress and depression. The functional connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala increases, and the activity of the medial frontal cortex also increases, thereby reducing the activity of the amygdala. Mind–body intervention activates the parasympathetic nervous system, thereby reducing sympathetic nerve activity, as well as reducing HPA axial activity as stress decreases. As a result, heart rate, blood pressure and cortisol secretion are reduced and inflammatory conditions are reduced. These states mean a reduction in cardiovascular disease risk. AMYG, amygdala; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; SNS, sympathetic nervous system; HPA, hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal cortex.
Biomolecules 11 00708 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, H.-J.; Koh, E.; Kang, Y. Susceptibility of Women to Cardiovascular Disease and the Prevention Potential of Mind–Body Intervention by Changes in Neural Circuits and Cardiovascular Physiology. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11050708

AMA Style

Yang H-J, Koh E, Kang Y. Susceptibility of Women to Cardiovascular Disease and the Prevention Potential of Mind–Body Intervention by Changes in Neural Circuits and Cardiovascular Physiology. Biomolecules. 2021; 11(5):708. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11050708

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Hyun-Jeong, Eugene Koh, and Yunjeong Kang. 2021. "Susceptibility of Women to Cardiovascular Disease and the Prevention Potential of Mind–Body Intervention by Changes in Neural Circuits and Cardiovascular Physiology" Biomolecules 11, no. 5: 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11050708

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop