Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Reliability of Quantitative Fatty Acid Signature Analysis and Compound-Specific Isotope Analysis-Based Mixing Models for Trophic Studies
Next Article in Special Issue
Mitochondria-Endoplasmic Reticulum Crosstalk in Parkinson’s Disease: The Role of Brain Renin Angiotensin System Components
Previous Article in Journal
Heat Shock Proteins HSPA1 and HSP90AA1 Are Upregulated in Colorectal Polyps and Can Be Targeted in Cancer Cells by Anti-Inflammatory Oxicams with Arylpiperazine Pharmacophore and Benzoyl Moiety Substitutions at Thiazine Ring
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Endogenous Metal Nanoparticles in Biological Systems
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/biom11111589
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Metabolic Dysfunction Biomarkers as Predictors of Early Diabetes

by
Carla Luís
1,2,3,
Pilar Baylina
3,4,
Raquel Soares
1,2,5,* and
Rúben Fernandes
2,3,4
1
FMUP–Departamento de Biomedicina, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
2
i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
3
LABMI-PORTIC, Laboratory of Medical & Industrial Biotechnology, Porto Research, Technology and Innovation Center, Porto Polytechnic, 4200-375 Porto, Portugal
4
IPP–Escola Superior de Saúde, Instituto Politécnico do Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
5
Biochemistry Unit, Department of Biochemistry, FMUP, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Al Prof Hernani Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2021, 11(11), 1589; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11111589
Submission received: 13 October 2021 / Revised: 26 October 2021 / Accepted: 26 October 2021 / Published: 27 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Biochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
During the pathophysiological course of type 2 diabetes (T2D), several metabolic imbalances occur. There is increasing evidence that metabolic dysfunction far precedes clinical manifestations. Thus, knowing and understanding metabolic imbalances is crucial to unraveling new strategies and molecules (biomarkers) for the early-stage prediction of the disease’s non-clinical phase. Lifestyle interventions must be made with considerable involvement of clinicians, and it should be considered that not all patients will respond in the same manner. Individuals with a high risk of diabetic progression will present compensatory metabolic mechanisms, translated into metabolic biomarkers that will therefore show potential predictive value to differentiate between progressors/non-progressors in T2D. Specific novel biomarkers are being proposed to entrap prediabetes and target progressors to achieve better outcomes. This study provides a review of the latest relevant biomarkers in prediabetes. A search for articles published between 2011 and 2021 was conducted; duplicates were removed, and inclusion criteria were applied. From the 29 studies considered, a survey of the most cited (relevant) biomarkers was conducted and further discussed in the two main identified fields: metabolomics, and miRNA studies.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

According to the International Diabetes Federation, diabetes affects more than 463 million people, with type 2 diabetes (T2D) being the most common, accounting for around 90% of all diabetes worldwide in 2019 [1]. T2D was responsible for more than 4.2 million deaths in 2019, and is also a trigger for other non-communicable diseases, putting considerable pressure on national health systems [1]. T2D is associated with severe comorbidities, such as cardiovascular diseases (ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease, heart failure, and stable angina being the most prevalent) [2], kidney diseases (such as glomerulosclerosis and glomerular hypertrophy inflammation/fibrosis, which ultimately lead to diabetic kidney disease) [3], and liver diseases (nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), liver failure, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma) [4], while it also increases the possibility of developing several types of cancer (such as breast cancer, bladder cancer, pancreatic cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, etc.) [5]. Outcomes of such comorbidities can be reduced with early intervention in the development of type 2 diabetes. In recent decades, there has been a massive effort and investment to find biomarkers that can detect T2D early and support the implementation of prophylactic measures.
One of the most important clinical symptoms of diabetes mellitus is hyperglycemia. Thus, monitoring blood glucose levels via a glycated hemoglobin assessment remains the most common screening method. However, when glucose levels are elevated, the disease is already active. Significant investments in research have allowed the identification of biomarkers that can be used to describe the progression from a subclinical to a clinical stage, and some biomarkers have been described as having potential predictive value to differentiate between progressors and non-progressors.
The critical threshold is prediabetes. Prediabetes is an asymptomatic disorder of the normoglycemia–hyperglycemia transitional state, when plasma glucose is above normal range but below clinical diabetes. Prediabetic subjects present either impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), or both, as well as an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Such metabolic alterations are already mentioned as being responsible for microvascular problems (such as retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy—persistent complications among the hyperglycemic community) [6]. Whether prediabetes justifies clinical identification and intervention is still continuously debated among international professional organizations, and overall criteria remain without consensus. However, the importance of targeting prediabetes is relevant considering that the risk of developing diabetes can decrease by 40 to 70% with lifestyle alterations in prediabetic patients [7]. The main problem associated with prediabetes is that it may lead to overdiagnosis and, therefore, overtreatment. The pharmacotherapy associated with prediabetes can include antidiabetic drugs such as biguanides (e.g., metformin) or thiazolidinediones (e.g., rosiglitazone), and others, such as GLP-1 analogs or α-glucosidase inhibitors. In addition to pharmacotherapy, bariatric surgery (such as gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy) has already been studied in prediabetic patients, with positive results, such as the reversion of IGT to normal values in 98% of individuals [7].
At a prediabetic stage, several metabolic imbalances are already established, occurring before the clinical manifestations. Identifying these imbalances with adequate and precise biomarkers can facilitate early intervention. In America, one in every three individuals have prediabetes, and 11% will develop diabetes [8]. Worldwide, prediabetes is increasing, and the expectation is that, by 2030, the number of people with prediabetes will increase to more than 470 million. Each year, 5–10% will progress to diabetes and develop diabetic comorbidities, such as hypertension [9].
Novel biomarkers can enable the risk stratification of diabetic progression. In this study, a review was performed on new and emerging biomarkers that can act as targets to improve clinical outcomes of the disease’s evolution through early intervention. A study of review articles on the subject was performed to identify the most relevant biomarkers. Among the obtained results, the most cited biomarkers across the studies were further considered and discussed. Our review’s primary objective was to evaluate the research stage and the mechanistic pathway of each biomarker in order to highlight their importance in clinical implementation.

2. Materials and Methods

Search Strategy and Selection Criteria

The present work was developed in 2 steps: the first step aimed to identify the most relevant biomarkers (with review articles); after having identified them, the second step consisted of establishing their respective descriptions.
Initially, a search for English review articles published between 2011 and 2021 (last ten years) was conducted in PubMed. Queries were ‘Biomarkers’ and ‘Prediabetes’/’Impaired fasting glucose’/’Impaired glucose tolerance’. From the collected articles, duplicates and manuscripts with an association between prediabetic condition, impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, and other comorbidities (cardiovascular diseases, cancer, polycystic ovarian syndrome, etc.) or diet-related factors (polyphenols, vegetables, etc.) were removed.
After a thorough assessment of each of the included manuscripts, the biomarkers were identified; those mentioned in a higher number of articles were considered to be the most relevant. Finally, for the most relevant biomarkers, a comprehensive review was carried out regarding description, outcomes, advantages, and disadvantages.

3. Results

A total of 145 total cumulative records were retrieved from PubMed, 13 of which were duplicates and, hence, immediately excluded. The title and abstract were examined for the remaining 132 records, following concordance assessment of the inclusion criteria and objectives, resulting in an additional exclusion of 103 records. Thus, 29 studies were identified as being eligible and relevant. All manuscripts were carefully studied, and biomarkers were identified and counted. The analysis of the results identified two approaches to novel prediabetic biomarkers: metabolomics [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30], and microRNA studies [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. The results are shown in Figure 1. Further ahead, Table 1 and Table 2 summarize the most relevant biomarkers’ descriptions, outcomes, advantages, and disadvantages.

3.1. Metabolomics Studies

Metabolomics is a high-throughput technique that enables the identification and quantification of small molecules present in biological samples such as blood, urine, and tissue. Metabolomics is increasingly used to address metabolic dysregulation associated with prediabetes (Figure 2). The method used in metabolomics combines analytical chemistry and data analysis with spectroscopic/spectrometric techniques (such as mass spectrometry or nuclear magnetic resonance) and separation techniques (such as gas chromatography, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), ultra-HPLC, etc.) in a profitable, high-yield manner.

3.2. MicroRNA Studies

miRNAs are small, non-coding RNAs involved in post-transcriptional gene expression (Figure 3); they can modulate important biological mechanisms such as growth and proliferation, differentiation, and cell death. Research on miRNAs is more recent than metabolomics research, leading to the belief that there is still much to be uncovered. miRNAs are becoming increasingly prominent in many pathologies, including prediabetic studies. Interestingly enough, different miRNA profiles were found in healthy, prediabetic, and diabetic individuals [38].
miRNAs associated with diabetic progression have different types of correlation according to their miRNA-specific function. Moreover, miRNAs can predict diabetic complications such as cardiovascular diseases, chronic renal disease, or retinopathy. They display consistent and reproducible circulating levels, and are stable and resistant to RNase activity—essential characteristics in biomarker assessment. Previous studies concluded that diabetes-related miRNA does not change dramatically in the prediabetic stage [38]. Moreover, due to a wide range of prediabetic-associated miRNAs, choosing a set of representative prediabetic biomarkers is challenging [92,93,94].

4. Discussion

Diabetes has already reached global pandemic status, as its incidence ranges all over the world. No longer considered a disease of developed countries, today it is even found that diabetes is becoming more prevalent in developing countries [1]. Investment to find new biomarkers for early detection is of the utmost importance; new and promising molecules have been emerging and achieving improved outcomes.
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is still the most common screening method to monitor glycaemia status; it is a stable and standardized assay that reflects blood glucose levels over the past 2–3 months. Although commonly used in clinical practice, this method presents notable disadvantages: moderated sensitivity; cutoff inconsistencies; does not consider some variables—such as the production rate and lifespan of red blood cells, body mass index, age, sex, and ethnicity—and it cannot be used in neonatal diabetes; moreover, short-term glycemic changes are not accurate. Regarding prediabetes, there is still no clinical consensus for the HbA1c threshold [95,96].
Another popular screening method is the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), which measures glucose clearance of blood taken before and after ingestion of glucose. This is a low-cost, widely accepted (for all types of diabetes), direct method to stratify glucose status. However, it also has some weaknesses in terms of its variability, invasiveness, and time-consuming analysis. Moreover, it is affected by individual variability and other pathologies [66]. Nevertheless, results demonstrate that it is more sensitive for detecting prediabetes than HbA1c [21].
The use of these classic biomarkers to entrap prediabetes was not considered successful enough; hence, new molecules are being considered for use to differentiate diabetic progression to a clinical stage. This study aimed to evaluate the most relevant potential biomarkers, making it possible to determine two types of approaches with different characteristics: metabolomics, and microRNA.
Metabolomic studies aim to better understand the relationships between metabolites and the disease’s pathophysiological mechanisms. Outstanding results have been achieved, although none of the identified biomarkers have yet been implemented for routine diagnostic use in clinical practice. Metabolomics studies are sensitive and rapid, with a high-throughput strategy capable of hundreds of readily achievable analyses, although initial equipment investment may present a challenge [97]. Our results show that the most relevant prediabetic biomarkers in research are 2-hydroxybutyrate, aromatic amino acids, adiponectin, acylcarnitine, branched-chain amino acids, C-reactive protein, ferritin, glycated albumin, glycine, linoleoyl-glycerophosphocholine (LGPC), and triglycerides. Although they do not share a common background, they all exhibit great potential for use as a future clinical diagnostic tool. Some biomarkers are associated with inflammation, adiposity, lipid oxidation, glycation, oxidative stress, and iron metabolism. This is relevant because the metabolic dysregulation observed in diabetic progression can have numerous etiologies. In accordance, we anticipate that the answer may be found in a multiplex set of different biomarkers.
We have also observed new tendencies with microRNA studies. MicroRNAs are present in different types of bodily fluids, such as blood, saliva, and urine. Moreover, they are extraordinarily stable, which renders circulating miRNAs as outstanding candidates for minimally invasive prediabetic biomarkers. Authors seem to agree that optimization should be prioritized, with standardization of the pre-analytical variables (sample collection, isolation, and quantification), alternative biological sources of the sample, and consideration of nonblood biofluids. At the moment, there is no consensus regarding the most promising miRNA multiplex for any pathology [98], including prediabetes. Our study showed that the most relevant miRNAs are miRNA-15a, miRNA-23a, miRNA-29a, miRNA-126, miRNA-150, miRNA-192, miRNA-320, and miRNA-375.
Interestingly, alongside microRNA, one work mentions other potential molecules that can also bring new insights in the implementation of biomarkers: long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). These molecules are transcripts with more than 200 nucleotides that are not translated into proteins, although they exhibit pre- and pro-transcription functions. Previous studies suggest that lncRNAs present functionality, but only some lncRNAs’ functional interactions have been previously uncovered [99].
Another potential pathway not contemplated in our study is the gut microbiome—a growing area of interest. The gut microbiome is the totality of microorganisms, bacteria, viruses, protozoa, fungi, and their collective genetic material present in the gastrointestinal tract [100]. Alterations in the microbiome have been associated with different pathologies, including T2D. Previous studies by the University of Gothenburg found alterations in implemented T2D [101] and prediabetes [102]. Alterations in the microbiome are associated with impaired glucose tolerance; however, these results must be interpreted with caution. For example, antidiabetic drugs such as metformin are able to alter the human microbiota; hence, results can be misleading [102].
The authors would like to recognize the limitations of the present study. We found that different manuscripts describe the same class of metabolite in different ways. For instance, some articles consider BCAAs to be one single biomarker, while others describe and consider individual BCAAs. We observed the same in the case of AAAs and FFA. It was impossible to overcome this limitation, but we are aware that this could influence the number of mentioned biomarkers. Moreover, new biomarkers may find themselves at a disadvantage. Additionally, we did not assess publication bias or strength of evidence. As the number of included systematic reviews/meta-analyses was small (4 in 29), we do not consider this an umbrella review.
Global investment is suggested in intervening clinical trials to identify and implement selected molecules as biomarkers for early diagnosis that enable the academic and clinical community to identify patients who will progress to T2D, and immediately address preventive/therapeutic strategies.

5. Conclusions

Diabetes is still one of the most challenging health problems worldwide. Programs for prevention and awareness of diabetes have proven to be insufficient to stop this pandemic; hence, clinical intervention could be the answer to avoid diabetic progression by targeting prediabetes. The growing attention to novel glycemic biomarkers is attributable to the limitations demonstrated by both HbA1c and OGTT.
From the present study, our interpretation is that these biomarkers are the ones that, so far, are at a more advanced research stage and, thus, are more promising for clinical implementation. However, many other biomarkers have been the target of research in diabetes (such as ophthalmate or galectin-3) with positive results, demonstrating the continuous effort of the academic community to find, comprehend, and interpret new and reliable molecules for the assessment of the (pre)diabetic pathology.
We believe that a biomarker multiplex is the most effective solution to achieve better sensitivity and specificity in predicting progressors in T2D. Such an achievement would improve patients’ health and decrease the national system’s burden regarding diabetes. Moreover, low-cost, effective interventions in the form of lifestyle changes would be sufficient to diminish drug/surgery-based clinical interventions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.F. and P.B.; writing—original draft preparation, C.L.; writing—review and editing, R.F., P.B., C.L. and R.S.; supervision, R.F. and R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (REF UID/BIM/04293/2019), and by the following scholarships: (Ref. SAICT2016/FEDER/BIO4DIA/BTI) and (SFRH/BD/146489/2019).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, since it is a review paper.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of Pedro Alves, Managing Director of IQNet Association, and Nuno Meireles from the Secretariat office of LABMI-PORTIC, Laboratory of Medical and Industrial Biotechnology, Porto Research, Technology and Innovation Center, Porto Polytechnic, in the revision of the English language.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. IDF. Diabetes Atlas. Int. Diabetes Fed. 2019, 1, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shah, A.D.; Langenberg, C.; Rapsomaniki, E.; Denaxas, S.; Rodriguez, M.P.; Gale, C.P.; Deanfield, J.; Smeeth, L.; Timmis, A.; Hemingway, H. Type 2 diabetes and incidence of cardiovascular diseases: A cohort study in 1.9 million people. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015, 3, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Alicic, R.Z.; Rooney, M.T.; Tuttle, K.R. Diabetic Kidney Disease. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017, 12, 2032–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tolman, K.G.; Fonseca, V.; Dalpiaz, A.; Tan, M.H. Spectrum of Liver Disease in Type 2 Diabetes and Management of Patients with Diabetes and Liver Disease. Diabetes Care 2007, 30, 734–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Collins, K.K. The Diabetes-Cancer Link. Diabetes Spectr. 2014, 27, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Buysschaert, M.; Bergman, M. Definition of Prediabetes. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2011, 95, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bansal, N. Prediabetes diagnosis and treatment: A review. World J. Diabetes 2015, 6, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Keck, J.W.; Thomas, A.R.; Hieronymus, L.; Roper, K.L. Prediabetes Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices at an Academic Family Medicine Practice. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 2019, 32, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alderman, M.H. Prediabetes: An unexplored cardiovascular disease risk factor. J. Hypertens. 2021, 39, 42–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Long, J.; Yang, Z.; Wang, L.; Han, Y.; Peng, C.; Yan, C.; Yan, D. Metabolite biomarkers of type 2 diabetes mellitus and pre-diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2020, 20, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bergman, M.; Abdul-Ghani, M.; DeFronzo, R.A.; Manco, M.; Sesti, G.; Fiorentino, T.V.; Ceriello, A.; Rhee, M.; Phillips, L.S.; Chung, S.; et al. Review of methods for detecting glycemic disorders. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2020, 165, 108233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Luc, K.; Schramm-Luc, A.; Guzik, T.J.; Mikolajczyk, T.P. Oxidative stress and inflammatory markers in prediabetes and diabetes. J. Physiol. Pharm. 2019, 70, 809–824. [Google Scholar]
  13. Thorens, B.; Rodriguez, A.; Cruciani-Guglielmacci, C.; Wigger, L.; Ibberson, M.; Magnan, C. Use of preclinical models to identify markers of type 2 diabetes susceptibility and novel regulators of insulin secretion—A step towards precision medicine. Mol. Metab. 2019, 27, S147–S154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Arneth, B.; Arneth, R.; Shams, M. Metabolomics of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Bigagli, E.; Lodovici, M. Circulating Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Clinical Studies on Type 2 Diabetes and Its Complications. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Diwaker, A.; Kishore, D.; Singh, V.; Mahapatra, S.P. The Novel Biomarkers in Diabetes. J. Assoc. Physicians India 2019, 67, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Jagannathan, R.; Buysschaert, M.; Medina, J.L.; Katz, K.; Musleh, S.; Dorcely, B.; Bergman, M. The 1-h post-load plasma glucose as a novel biomarker for diagnosing dysglycemia. Acta Diabetol. 2018, 55, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gar, C.; Rottenkolber, M.; Prehn, C.; Adamski, J.; Seissler, J.; Lechner, A. Serum and plasma amino acids as markers of prediabetes, insulin resistance, and incident diabetes. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2017, 55, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Maghsoudi, A.S.; Vakhshiteh, F.; Torabi, R.; Hassani, S.; Ganjali, M.R.; Norouzi, P.; Hosseini, M.; Abdollahi, M. Recent advances in biosensor technology in assessment of early diabetes biomarkers. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 99, 122–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liggi, S.; Griffin, J.L. Metabolomics applied to diabetes—Lessons from human population studies. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2017, 93, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dorcely, B.; Katz, K.; Jagannathan, R.; Chiang, S.S.; Oluwadare, B.; Goldberg, I.J.; Bergman, M. Novel biomarkers for prediabetes, diabetes, and associated complications. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. Targets Ther. 2017, 10, 345–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Bhat, S.; Jagadeeshaprasad, M.G.; Venkatasubramani, V.; Kulkarni, M.J. Abundance matters: Role of albumin in diabetes, a proteomics perspective. Expert Rev. Proteom. 2017, 14, 677–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yan-Do, R.; MacDonald, P. Impaired “Glycine”-mia in Type 2 Diabetes and Potential Mechanisms Contributing to Glucose Homeostasis. Endocrinology 2017, 158, 1064–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Larsen, M.P.; Torekov, S.S. Glucagon-Like Peptide 1: A Predictor of Type 2 Diabetes? J. Diabetes Res. 2017, 2017, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Guasch-Ferré, M.; Hruby, A.; Toledo, E.; Clish, C.B.; Martínez-González, M.A.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Hu, F.B. Metabolomics in Prediabetes and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2016, 39, 833–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ribeiro, R.T.; Macedo, M.P.; Raposo, J.F. HbA1c, Fructosamine, and Glycated Albumin in the Detection of Dysglycaemic Conditions. Curr. Diabetes Rev. 2015, 12, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Urpi-Sarda, M.; Almanza-Aguilera, E.; Tulipani, S.; Tinahones, F.J.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Andres-Lacueva, C. Metabolomics for Biomarkers of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Advances and Nutritional Intervention Trends. Curr. Cardiovasc. Risk Rep. 2015, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dunmore, S.J.; Brown, J.E.P. The role of adipokines in β-cell failure of type 2 diabetes. J. Endocrinol. 2012, 216, T37–T45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Lyons, T.J.; Basu, A. Biomarkers in diabetes: Hemoglobin A1c, vascular and tissue markers. Transl. Res. 2012, 159, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Gjesing, A.P.; Pedersen, O. ‘Omics’-driven discoveries in prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 42, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. González-Sánchez, L.E.; Ortega-Camarillo, C.; Contreras-Ramos, A.; Barajas-Nava, L.A. miRNAs as biomarkers for diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. J. Diabetes 2021, 13, 792–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Athira, S.; Misra, P.; Bhatia, K.; Sibin, M. Identification of circulatory miRNAs as candidate biomarkers in prediabetes—A systematic review and bioinformatics analysis. Gene Rep. 2020, 21, 100954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pielok, A.; Marycz, K. Non-Coding RNAs as Potential Novel Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of Hepatic Insulin Resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vasu, S.; Kumano, K.; Darden, C.M.; Rahman, I.; Lawrence, M.C.; Naziruddin, B. MicroRNA Signatures as Future Biomarkers for Diagnosis of Diabetes States. Cells 2019, 8, 1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Zhang, W.; Zheng, J.; Hu, X.; Chen, L. Dysregulated expression of long noncoding RNAs serves as diagnostic biomarkers of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocrine 2019, 65, 494–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Vaishya, S.; Sarwade, R.D.; Seshadri, V. MicroRNA, Proteins, and Metabolites as Novel Biomarkers for Prediabetes, Diabetes, and Related Complications. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Ashoori, M.R.; Rahmati-Yamchi, M.; Ostadrahimi, A.; Aval, S.F.; Zarghami, N. MicroRNAs and adipocytokines: Promising biomarkers for pharmacological targets in diabetes mellitus and its complications. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 93, 1326–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Raffort, J.; Hinault, C.; Dumortier, O.; Van Obberghen, E. Circulating microRNAs and diabetes: Potential applications in medical practice. Diabetologia 2015, 58, 1978–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Gall, W.E.; Beebe, K.; Lawton, K.A.; Adam, K.-P.; Mitchell, M.; Nakhle, P.J.; Ryals, J.A.; Milburn, M.V.; Nannipieri, M.; Camastra, S.; et al. α-Hydroxybutyrate Is an Early Biomarker of Insulin Resistance and Glucose Intolerance in a Nondiabetic Population. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Landaas, S. The formation of 2-hydroxybutyric acid in experimental animals. Clin. Chim. Acta 1975, 58, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cobb, J.; Eckhart, A.; Perichon, R.; Wulff, J.; Mitchell, M.; Adam, K.-P.; Wolfert, R.; Button, E.; Lawton, K.; Elverson, R.; et al. A Novel Test for IGT Utilizing Metabolite Markers of Glucose Tolerance. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2015, 9, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Tricò, D.; Prinsen, H.; Giannini, C.; De Graaf, R.; Juchem, C.; Li, F.; Caprio, S.; Santoro, N.; Herzog, R.I. Elevated α-Hydroxybutyrate and Branched-Chain Amino Acid Levels Predict Deterioration of Glycemic Control in Adolescents. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 102, 2473–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Owei, I.; Umekwe, N.; Stentz, F.; Wan, J.; Dagogo-Jack, S. Amino acid signature predictive of incident prediabetes: A case-control study nested within the longitudinal pathobiology of prediabetes in a biracial cohort. Metabolism 2019, 98, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Walford, G.A.; Davis, J.; Warner, A.S.; Ackerman, R.J.; Billings, L.K.; Chamarthi, B.; Fanelli, R.R.; Hernandez, A.M.; Huang, C.; Khan, S.Q.; et al. Branched chain and aromatic amino acids change acutely following two medical therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 2013, 62, 1772–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Saltevo, J.; Kautiainen, H.; Vanhala, M. Gender differences in adiponectin and low-grade inflammation among individuals with normal glucose tolerance, prediabetes, and type 2 diabetes. Gend. Med. 2009, 6, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jiang, Y.; Owei, I.; Wan, J.; Ebenibo, S.; Dagogo-Jack, S. Adiponectin levels predict prediabetes risk: The Pathobiology of Prediabetes in A Biracial Cohort (POP-ABC) study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 2016, 4, e000194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Stefan, N.; Sun, Q.; Fritsche, A.; Machann, J.; Schick, F.; Gerst, F.; Jeppesen, C.; Joost, H.-G.; Hu, F.B.; Boeing, H.; et al. Impact of the Adipokine Adiponectin and the Hepatokine Fetuin-A on the Development of Type 2 Diabetes: Prospective Cohort- and Cross-Sectional Phenotyping Studies. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e92238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Lai, H.; Lin, N.; Xing, Z.; Weng, H.; Zhang, H. Association between the level of circulating adiponectin and prediabetes: A meta-analysis. J. Diabetes Investig. 2015, 6, 416–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, X.; Zhang, C.; Chen, L.; Han, X.; Ji, L. Human serum acylcarnitine profiles in different glucose tolerance states. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2014, 104, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mai, M.; Tönjes, A.; Kovacs, P.; Stumvoll, M.; Fiedler, G.M.; Leichtle, A.B. Serum Levels of Acylcarnitines Are Altered in Prediabetic Conditions. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Adams, S.; Hoppel, C.L.; Lok, K.H.; Zhao, L.; Wong, S.W.; Minkler, P.E.; Hwang, D.H.; Newman, J.; Garvey, W.T. Plasma Acylcarnitine Profiles Suggest Incomplete Long-Chain Fatty Acid β-Oxidation and Altered Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle Activity in Type 2 Diabetic African-American Women. J. Nutr. 2009, 139, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sun, L.; Liang, L.; Gao, X.; Zhang, H.; Yao, P.; Hu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Wang, F.; Jin, Q.; Li, H.; et al. Early Prediction of Developing Type 2 Diabetes by Plasma Acylcarnitines: A Population-Based Study. Diabetes Care 2016, 39, 1563–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Ruiz-Canela, M.; Guasch-Ferré, M.; Toledo, E.; Clish, C.B.; Razquin, C.; Liang, L.; Wang, D.D.; Corella, D.; Estruch, R.; Hernáez, Á.; et al. Plasma branched chain/aromatic amino acids, enriched Mediterranean diet and risk of type 2 diabetes: Case-cohort study within the PREDIMED Trial. Diabetologia 2018, 61, 1560–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Chen, X.; Yang, W. Branched-chain amino acids and the association with type 2 diabetes. J. Diabetes Investig. 2015, 6, 369–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yemelyanov, A. Branched Chain Amino Acids and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Literature Review. Master’s Thesis, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  56. Festa, A.; Hanley, A.J.; Tracy, R.P.; D’Agostino, R.; Haffner, S.M. Inflammation in the Prediabetic State Is Related to Increased Insulin Resistance Rather Than Decreased Insulin Secretion. Circulation 2003, 108, 1822–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Van Woudenbergh, G.J.; Kuijsten, A.; Sijbrands, E.J.G.; Hofman, A.; Witteman, J.C.M.; Feskens, E.J.M. Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load and Their Association with C-Reactive Protein and Incident Type 2 Diabetes. J. Nutr. Metab. 2011, 2011, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Sabanayagam, C.; Shankar, A.; Lim, S.C.; Lee, J.; Tai, E.S.; Wong, T.Y. Serum C-reactive protein level and prediabetes in two Asian populations. Diabetologia 2011, 54, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Grossmann, V.; Schmitt, V.H.; Zeller, T.; Panova-Noeva, M.; Schulz, A.; Laubert-Reh, D.; Juenger, C.; Schnabel, R.B.; Abt, T.G.; Laskowski, R.; et al. Profile of the Immune and Inflammatory Response in Individuals with Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015, 38, 1356–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Sharifi, F.; Nasab, N.M.; Zadeh, H.J. Elevated serum ferritin concentrations in prediabetic subjects. Diabetes Vasc. Dis. Res. 2008, 5, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Huang, J.; Jones, D.; Luo, B.; Sanderson, M.; Soto, J.; Abel, E.D.; Cooksey, R.C.; McClain, N.A. Iron Overload and Diabetes Risk: A Shift from Glucose to Fatty Acid Oxidation and Increased Hepatic Glucose Production in a Mouse Model of Hereditary Hemochromatosis. Diabetes 2010, 60, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Kunutsor, S.K.; Apekey, T.A.; Walley, J.; Kain, K. Ferritin levels and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective evidence. Diabetes/Metab. Res. Rev. 2013, 29, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Forouhi, N.G.; Harding, A.H.; Allison, M.; Sandhu, M.S.; Welch, A.; Luben, R.; Bingham, S.; Khaw, K.T.; Wareham, N.J. Elevated serum ferritin levels predict new-onset type 2 diabetes: Results from the EPIC-Norfolk prospective study. Diabetology 2007, 50, 949–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Lee, J.-E. Alternative biomarkers for assessing glycemic control in diabetes: Fructosamine, glycated albumin, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol. Ann. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 20, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Danese, E.; Montagnana, M.; Nouvenne, A.; Lippi, G. Advantages and Pitfalls of Fructosamine and Glycated Albumin in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2015, 9, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Parrinello, C.M.; Selvin, E. Beyond HbA1c and Glucose: The Role of Nontraditional Glycemic Markers in Diabetes Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Management. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2014, 14, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Selvin, E.; Rawlings, A.; Grams, M.; Klein, R.; Sharrett, A.R.; Steffes, M.; Coresh, J. Fructosamine and glycated albumin for risk stratification and prediction of incident diabetes and microvascular complications: A prospective cohort analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014, 2, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Wang-Sattler, R.; Yu, Z.; Herder, C.; Messias, A.; Floegel, A.; He, Y.; Heim, K.; Campillos, M.; Holzapfel, C.; Thorand, B.; et al. Novel biomarkers for pre-diabetes identified by metabolomics. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2012, 8, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pérez-Matos, M.C.; Morales, M.; Toloza, F.J.K.; Ricardo-Silgado, M.L.; Mantilla-Rivas, J.O.; Pinzón-Cortes, J.A.; Perez-Mayorga, M.; Jiménez, E.; Guevara, E.; Mendivil, C.O. The Phospholipid Linoleoylglycerophosphocholine as a Biomarker of Directly Measured Insulin Resistance. Diabetes Metab. J. 2017, 41, 466–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ahn, N.; Baumeister, S.E.; Amann, U.; Rathmann, W.; Peters, A.; Huth, C.; Thorand, B.; Meisinger, C. Visceral adiposity index (VAI), lipid accumulation product (LAP), and product of triglycerides and glucose (TyG) to discriminate prediabetes and diabetes. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Hamasaki, H.; Noda, M.; Moriyama, S.; Yoshikawa, R.; Katsuyama, H.; Sako, A.; Mishima, S.; Kakei, M.; Ezaki, O.; Yanai, H. Daily Physical Activity Assessed by a Triaxial Accelerometer Is Beneficially Associated with Waist Circumference, Serum Triglycerides, and Insulin Resistance in Japanese Patients with Prediabetes or Untreated Early Type 2 Diabetes. J. Diabetes Res. 2015, 2015, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Shimodaira, M.; Niwa, T.; Nakajima, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Hanyu, N.; Nakayama, T. Serum Triglyceride Levels Correlated with the Rate of Change in Insulin Secretion Over Two Years in Prediabetic Subjects. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2014, 64, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Al-Kafaji, G.; Al-Mahroos, G.; Alsayed, N.A.; Hasan, Z.A.; Nawaz, S.; Bakhiet, M. Peripheral blood microRNA-15a is a potential biomarker for type 2 diabetes mellitus and pre-diabetes. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 7485–7490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Rawal, S.; Munasinghe, P.E.; Nagesh, P.T.; Lew, J.K.S.; Jones, G.T.; Williams, M.; Davis, P.; Bunton, D.; Galvin, I.F.; Manning, P.; et al. Down-regulation of miR-15a/b accelerates fibrotic remodelling in the Type 2 diabetic human and mouse heart. Clin. Sci. 2017, 131, 847–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Chang, H.; Chang, H.; Cheng, T.; Lee, G.D.; Chen, X.; Qi, K. Micro-ribonucleic acid-23a-3p prevents the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus by suppressing the activation of nucleotide-binding oligomerization-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 inflammatory bodies-caused pyroptosis through negatively regulating NIMA-related kinase 7. J. Diabetes Investig. 2021, 12, 334–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Yang, Z.; Chen, H.; Si, H.; Li, X.; Ding, X.; Sheng, Q.; Chen, P.; Zhang, H. Serum miR-23a, a potential biomarker for diagnosis of pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2014, 51, 823–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bagge, A.; Clausen, T.R.; Larsen, S.; Ladefoged, M.; Rosenstierne, M.W.; Larsen, L.; Vang, O.; Nielsen, J.H.; Dalgaard, L. MicroRNA-29a is up-regulated in beta-cells by glucose and decreases glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 426, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Liang, Y.-Z.; Dong, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, S.; He, Y.; Yan, Y.-X. Identification of Neuroendocrine Stress Response-Related Circulating MicroRNAs as Biomarkers for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Insulin Resistance. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Liu, Y.; Gao, G.; Yang, C.; Zhou, K.; Shen, B.; Liang, H.; Jiang, X. The Role of Circulating MicroRNA-126 (miR-126): A Novel Biomarker for Screening Prediabetes and Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 10567–10577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Zhang, T.; Lv, C.; Li, L.; Chen, S.; Liu, S.; Wang, C.; Su, B. Plasma miR-126 Is a Potential Biomarker for Early Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Susceptible Individuals. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 761617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Jiménez-Lucena, R.; Camargo, A.; Alcala-Diaz, J.F.; Romero-Baldonado, C.; Luque, R.M.; Van Ommen, B.; Delgado-Lista, J.; Ordovás, J.M.; Pérez-Martínez, P.; Rangel-Zuñiga, O.A.; et al. A plasma circulating miRNAs profile predicts type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes: From the CORDIOPREV study. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018, 50, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Ying, W.; Tseng, A.; Chang, R.C.-A.; Wang, H.; Lin, Y.-L.; Kanameni, S.; Brehm, T.; Morin, A.; Jones, B.; Splawn, T.; et al. miR-150 regulates obesity-associated insulin resistance by controlling B cell functions. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Parrizas, M.; Brugnara, L.; Esteban, Y.; Gonzalez-Franquesa, A.; Canivell, S.; Murillo, S.; Gordillo-Bastidas, E.; Cussó, R.; Cadefau, J.A.; Garcia-Roves, P.M.; et al. Circulating miR-192 and miR-193b Are Markers of Prediabetes and Are Modulated by an Exercise Intervention. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, E407–E415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Lopez, Y.N.; Pittas, A.G.; Pratley, R.E.; Seyhan, A.A. Circulating levels of miR-7, miR-152 and miR-192 respond to vitamin D supplementation in adults with prediabetes and correlate with improvements in glycemic control. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2017, 49, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Pan, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, C.; Xu, F.; Yan, J.; Weng, J. miR-192 is upregulated in T1DM, regulates pancreatic β-cell development and inhibits insulin secretion through suppressing GLP-1 expression. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018, 16, 2717–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Wei, G.; Yi, S.; Yong, D.; Shaozhuang, L.; Guangyong, Z.; Sanyuan, H. miR-320 mediates diabetes amelioration after duodenal-jejunal bypass via targeting adipoR1. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. 2018, 14, 960–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gao, J.; Ailifeire, M.; Wang, C.; Luo, L.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, L.; Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Wang, M. miR-320/VEGFA axis affects high glucose-induced metabolic memory during human umbilical vein endothelial cell dysfunction in diabetes pathology. Microvasc. Res. 2019, 127, 103913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Du, H.; Zhao, Y.; Yin, Z.; Wang, D.W.; Chen, C. The role of miR-320 in glucose and lipid metabolism disorder-associated diseases. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 17, 402–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Poy, M.N.; Hausser, J.; Trajkovski, M.; Braun, M.; Collins, S.; Rorsman, P.; Zavolan, M.; Stoffel, M. miR-375 maintains normal pancreatic-and-cell mass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 5813–5818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Li, Y.; Xu, X.; Liang, Y.; Liu, S.; Xiao, H.; Li, F.; Cheng, H.; Fu, Z. miR-375 enhances palmitate-induced lipoapoptosis in insulin-secreting NIT-1 cells by repressing myotrophin (V1) protein expression. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2010, 3, 254–264. [Google Scholar]
  91. Al-Muhtaresh, H.A.; Al-Kafaji, G. Evaluation of Two-Diabetes Related microRNAs Suitability as Earlier Blood Biomarkers for Detecting Prediabetes and type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Kong, L.; Zhu, J.; Han, W.; Jiang, X.; Xu, M.; Zhao, Y.; Dong, Q.; Pang, Z.; Guan, Q.; Gao, L.; et al. Significance of serum microRNAs in pre-diabetes and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: A clinical study. Acta Diabetol. 2010, 48, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chen, X.; Ba, Y.; Ma, L.; Cai, X.; Yin, Y.; Wang, K.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Guo, X.; et al. Characterization of microRNAs in serum: A novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Cell Res. 2008, 18, 997–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Gilad, S.; Meiri, E.; Yogev, Y.; Benjamin, S.; Lebanony, D.; Yerushalmi, N.; Benjamin, H.; Kushnir, M.; Cholakh, H.; Melamed, N.; et al. Serum MicroRNAs Are Promising Novel Biomarkers. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Bonora, E.; Tuomilehto, J. The Pros and Cons of Diagnosing Diabetes with A1C. Diabetes Care 2011, 34, S184–S190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Radin, M.S. Pitfalls in Hemoglobin A1c Measurement: When Results may be Misleading. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2013, 29, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Mamas, M.; Dunn, W.; Neyses, L.; Goodacre, R. The role of metabolites and metabolomics in clinically applicable biomarkers of disease. Arch. Toxicol. 2011, 85, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Witwer, K.W. Circulating MicroRNA Biomarker Studies: Pitfalls and Potential Solutions. Clin. Chem. 2015, 61, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Fatica, A.; Bozzoni, I. Long non-coding RNAs: New players in cell differentiation and development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15, 7–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Lederberg, J.; McCray, A. ’Ome Sweet’ Omics—A Genealogical Treasury of Words. Scientist 2001, 15, 8–10. [Google Scholar]
  101. Gurung, M.; Li, Z.; You, H.; Rodrigues, R.; Jump, D.B.; Morgun, A.; Shulzhenko, N. Role of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes pathophysiology. EBioMedicine 2020, 51, 102590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Wu, H.; Tremaroli, V.; Schmidt, C.; Lundqvist, A.; Olsson, L.M.; Krämer, M.; Gummesson, A.; Perkins, R.; Bergström, G.; Bäckhed, F. The Gut Microbiota in Prediabetes and Diabetes: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Cell Metab. 2020, 32, 379–390.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biomolecules 11 01589 g001 550
Figure 1. Number of citations regarding biomarkers associated with (a) metabolomics studies; (b) microRNA studies. The grey areas highlight the most relevant biomarkers. Biomarkers with just one reference were not included in these results.
Figure 1. Number of citations regarding biomarkers associated with (a) metabolomics studies; (b) microRNA studies. The grey areas highlight the most relevant biomarkers. Biomarkers with just one reference were not included in these results.
Biomolecules 11 01589 g001
Biomolecules 11 01589 g002 550
Figure 2. Metabolomics biomarkers’ discovery cycle: from the biological sample, to the identification of the disturbed metabolic signaling pathways, to its clinical significance. Metabolomics results facilitate the integration of the metabolic profile in the pathophysiology of prediabetes.
Figure 2. Metabolomics biomarkers’ discovery cycle: from the biological sample, to the identification of the disturbed metabolic signaling pathways, to its clinical significance. Metabolomics results facilitate the integration of the metabolic profile in the pathophysiology of prediabetes.
Biomolecules 11 01589 g002
Biomolecules 11 01589 g003 550
Figure 3. The current model for the biogenesis and post-transcriptional suppression of microRNAs: ① In the nucleus, the miRNA gene is a transcript from RNA polymerase II, which produces a primary miRNA: pri-microRNA (pri-miRNA). ② The pri-microRNA transcripts are first processed into ~70-nucleotide pre-miRNAs by Drosha inside the nucleus. ③ Pre-miRNA is quickly exported by Exportin-5 to the cytosol. ④ In the cytoplasm, the pre-miRNA is processed by Dicer, thus producing a double-ribbon miRNA. ⑤ This product is unwound and then joined with Argonaute to form the complex RISC. ⑥ The RISC complex obtains the pairing between the miRNA and the homolog target mRNA via reverse base complement. ⑦ It subsequently acts on its target through translational repression or mRNA cleavage ⑧, depending, at least in part, on the level of complementarity between the small RNA and its target.
Figure 3. The current model for the biogenesis and post-transcriptional suppression of microRNAs: ① In the nucleus, the miRNA gene is a transcript from RNA polymerase II, which produces a primary miRNA: pri-microRNA (pri-miRNA). ② The pri-microRNA transcripts are first processed into ~70-nucleotide pre-miRNAs by Drosha inside the nucleus. ③ Pre-miRNA is quickly exported by Exportin-5 to the cytosol. ④ In the cytoplasm, the pre-miRNA is processed by Dicer, thus producing a double-ribbon miRNA. ⑤ This product is unwound and then joined with Argonaute to form the complex RISC. ⑥ The RISC complex obtains the pairing between the miRNA and the homolog target mRNA via reverse base complement. ⑦ It subsequently acts on its target through translational repression or mRNA cleavage ⑧, depending, at least in part, on the level of complementarity between the small RNA and its target.
Biomolecules 11 01589 g003
Table
Table 1. Prediabetic biomarkers identified in metabolomics studies: description, outcomes, and identification of their advantages and disadvantages.
Table 1. Prediabetic biomarkers identified in metabolomics studies: description, outcomes, and identification of their advantages and disadvantages.
BiomarkerDescription/OutcomesAdvantages/DisadvantagesReferences
2-Hydroxybutyrate (2HB)2HB is a metabolite of alpha-ketobutyrate synthesis produced in the threonine and methionine catabolism and glutathione anabolism; it is a predictive marker of hyperglycemia and beta-cell dysfunction; Elevated levels of 2HB are associated with insulin resistance, oxidative stress, lipid oxidation, and diabetic state aggravation. Decreased levels of 2HB were observed 6 months after bariatric surgery as a representative improvement of the pathology. 2HB has proven to be a biomarker independent of sex, age, BMI, and collection site; however, it is still in a premature investigation stage.[39,40,41,42]
Aromatic Amino Acids (AAAs)AAAs, tyrosine, and phenylalanine are amino acids with an integrated aromatic ring. Phenylalanine is a precursor of tyrosine, and tyrosine is a precursor of catecholamines. Both tyrosine and phenylalanine are glucogenic and ketogenic amino acids.
Increased levels of tyrosine and phenylalanine were observed in obesity-related insulin resistance, and predicted the development of T2D. After diabetic treatment with glipizide and metformin, AAA levels changed in accordance with the patient’s insulin resistance status.		Different expression patterns of amino acids can be predictive of prediabetes in various cohorts. Additionally, significance can be altered after variable adjustment of body mass index (BMI), age, sex, race/ethnicity, and FPG levels.[18,43,44]
AdiponectinAdiponectin is a hormone secreted from the adipose tissue with insulin sensitivity, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-atherogenic properties. Adiponectin stimulates a broad spectrum of metabolic actions via ceramidase activation; it is directly correlated with insulin sensitivity, and inversely correlated with T2D development risk. Lower adiponectin levels were observed 10 years prior to T2D diagnosis.A biomarker independent of ethnic differences, it can be affected by sex-specific mechanisms nevertheless.
Certain studies do not corroborate the lower adiponectin levels in prediabetics compared with healthy individuals. 		[45,46,47,48]
AcylcarnitineAcylcarnitines result from the conjugations of acyl-coenzyme A with carnitine conjugation for the transport of fatty acids through the inner mitochondrial membrane for beta-oxidation. They are associated with the NF-κB pathway, and can promote insulin resistance and inflammation. Acylcarnitine has shown to be higher in prediabetes due to the dysregulation of mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation. A panel of acylcarnitines was observed to be associated with T2D development in a 6-year follow-up.Some acylcarnitines did not show any association with body fat or waist–hip ratio, fat mass, or fat distribution. Overall, they are independent biomarkers of traditional risk factors.[49,50,51,52]
Branched-Chain Amino Acids (BCAAs)BCAAs such as leucine, isoleucine, and valine are the most abundant and essential amino acids present in a regular diet. Accumulation of BCAAs activates via mTOR and, consequently, S6 kinase, which leads to serine phosphorylation of the substrate-1 (IRS–1) insulin receptor, causing insulin resistance. High levels of BCAAs are associated with obesity, insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, and T2D. BCAA levels normalize after bariatric surgery.Phenotypic and genetic factors can influence BCAA levels, which can reveal associations with both sex and BMI. There is still some debate on whether BCAAs are the cause or the effect and, as such, whether they should be considered a biomarker.[53,54,55]
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)CRP is an inflammatory biomarker of hepatic origin associated with the acute phase response; it responds to transcription factors released by macrophages and adipocytes.
Higher CRP levels were found in patients with prediabetes and insulin resistance, rendering it a sensitive biomarker for early T2D diagnosis. These results may be a consequence of the low state of chronic inflammation grade found before the onset of type 2 diabetes.		Association between CRP and prediabetes is independent of age, sex, ethnicity, alcohol consumption, smoking, hypertension, BMI, and total cholesterol. It is still in an early investigation stage for prediabetes signaling.[56,57,58,59]
FerritinFerritin is a protein (acute phase reactant) involved in iron storage, which is able to release iron in a controlled manner. Iron contributes to insulin resistance via many pathways, such as β-cell oxidative stress and β-cell apoptosis through ROS formation. Iron metabolism seems to be correlated with T2D status: uncontrolled T2D is associated with iron deficiency. High ferritin levels translate to an increased risk of developing T2D. Dietary restriction and chelation may prevent T2D progression.The threshold level is still uncertain, and may vary according to age and sex. Ferritin levels are predictive of diabetes progression independently of a comprehensive range of risk factors, such as physical activity, smoking, and family history.[60,61,62,63]
Glycated Albumin (GA)Albumin is the most commonly studied soluble protein, and is highly susceptible to post-translational modifications (PTMs). One frequent modification is glycation, resulting in GA. GA plays a vital role in diabetic pathophysiology; it is inversely correlated with obesity and positively correlated with diabetes. The increase observed in diabetes is associated with secondary comorbidities. GA can act as an antigen, elicit the immune response, and form complexes that can accumulate in the arteries and kidneys, leading to nephropathy and atherosclerosis.Accurate assessment for short-term glycemic control. The enzymatic method is sensitive, fast, and less susceptible to pre-analytical variables. Values of GA are not reliable in individuals with abnormal albumin metabolism. [22,64,65,66,67]
GlycineGlycine is a nonessential stable amino acid, able to be synthesized by the body from serine. Glycine is a precursor of protein metabolism, and can act as a neurotransmitter and as a co-ligand for N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptors to control insulin secretion and liver glucose output, functioning on both the pancreas and the brain. Lower glycine levels are associated with an increased risk of prediabetes, type 2 diabetes, and obesity, and are also correlated with insulin resistance and glucose intolerance.Glycine levels are not dependent exclusively on glycemic status, and may vary in individuals with abnormal amino acid metabolisms or metabolic syndrome. [10,18,23,68]
Linoleoyl-glycerophosphocholine (LGPC)Linoleoyl-glycerophosphocholine (LGPC) is a metabolite of the phospholipase A2 hepatic enzyme and lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase. Known for its anti-inflammatory properties, it acts as a non-competitive enzyme inhibitor of phospholipase A2, usually increasing during the inflammatory state. This metabolite’s plasma concentration is associated with an increased risk of developing insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, and diabetes.Independent of age, sex, body mass index, familial diabetes, fasting glucose, waist circumference, blood pressure, glycosylated hemoglobin, triglycerides, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.[21,69]
TriglyceridesTriglycerides are the most common lipids present in the body, and are composed of three fatty acids and a glycerol molecule. They are often an indication of conditions such as obesity and metabolic dysfunction. High levels of triglycerides are associated with diabetic progression, beta-cell dysfunction, and impaired insulin secretion. Studies have demonstrated that the product of triglycerides and glucose is able to discriminate prediabetes and diabetes, and triglyceride levels can be improved with physical activity and, therefore, improve glycemic status.Triglycerides have already been implemented in clinical practice. In prediabetic individuals, high levels of triglycerides are a predictive factor for T2D progression. Studies found variations between different ethnicities.[70,71,72]
Table
Table 2. A brief description and outcomes of miRNAs expression associated with prediabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, and impaired fasting glucose.
Table 2. A brief description and outcomes of miRNAs expression associated with prediabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, and impaired fasting glucose.
miRNAsDescription/OutcomesReferences
miRNA-15amiRNA-15a is associated with several biological processes, such as angiogenesis and insulin production; it is also involved in the activation of TGFβR1, CTGF, and p53 proteins.
Lower miRNA-15a levels were found in individuals who developed T2D in a 10-year follow-up. The association between miRNA-15a and diabetic progression was still significant after variable adjustment for age, sex, BMI, and hypertension status.		[73,74]
miRNA-23amiRNA-23a indirectly targets SMAD4—a critical pathway in the regulation of insulin-dependent glucose transport activity. NEK7 is also a target of miRNA-23a and, in animal models, a low level of NLRP3 induced pyroptosis, mitigating the hepatic and renal complications of T2D.
The levels of miRNA-23a are lower in prediabetic and T2D patients compared with healthy individuals. Levels of miRNA-23a can also distinguish prediabetic and T2D patients.		[75,76]
miRNA-29amiRNA-29a was observed to improve pancreatic beta-cell function in in vitro studies. Likewise, upregulation of miRNA-29a is implicated in diabetic progression by IGT and decreased insulin secretion.
Higher expression of miRNA-29a is an independent predictor of T2D, IFG, and IR. Additionally, it is significantly correlated with stress hormone levels.		[77,78]
miRNA-126One of the most studied miRNAs in prediabetic conditions, it is highly correlated with VEGF, and with the promotion of angiogenesis.
Anti-miRNA-126 targets SPRED-1 via Ras/ERK/VEGF and PI3K/Akt/eNOS, inhibiting the proliferation and migration of endothelial progenitor cells and promoting apoptosis. Low levels of miRNA-126 are strongly correlated with the progression of the disease.		[79,80]
miRNA-150Previous miRNA-150 studies demonstrated its regulatory function in beta-cell formation, hematopoietic stem cell differentiation, and obesity-induced inflammation and insulin resistance by controlling adipose tissue and beta-cell function.
In the CORDIOPREV study, prediabetic progressors were evaluated in a 5-year follow-up; miRNA-150 levels were higher in plasma several years before the diagnosis of T2D.		[81,82]
miRNA-192miRNA-192 is involved in IFG and IGT, triglyceride levels, and the fatty liver index. Moreover, miRNA-192 inhibited the proliferation of pancreatic beta-cell lines and insulin secretion.
Levels of miRNA-192 are found to be higher in diabetic subjects. Interestingly, vitamin D supplementation modulates miRNA-192 levels, improving the hyperglycemic status in prediabetic patients.		[83,84,85]
miRNA-320Expression of miRNA-320 is associated with VEGF, IGF1, and FGF. The VEGFa/miRNA-320 axis modulates proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis of endothelial cells, and has been reported to be an active player in diabetic progression.
miRNA-320 is positively correlated with prediabetic incidence, and improves diabetic progression via adipoR1 after duodenal–jejunal bypass.		[86,87,88]
miRNA-375miRNA-375 is a pancreatic-islet-specific miRNA involved in regulating insulin secretion and maintaining average pancreatic alpha and beta-cell mass.
miRNA-375 levels are higher and independently associated in prediabetic and diabetic individuals. Deregulation of miRNA-375 was observed years before the onset of T2D in the CORDIOPREV trial.		[89,90,91]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luís, C.; Baylina, P.; Soares, R.; Fernandes, R. Metabolic Dysfunction Biomarkers as Predictors of Early Diabetes. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11111589

AMA Style

Luís C, Baylina P, Soares R, Fernandes R. Metabolic Dysfunction Biomarkers as Predictors of Early Diabetes. Biomolecules. 2021; 11(11):1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11111589

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luís, Carla, Pilar Baylina, Raquel Soares, and Rúben Fernandes. 2021. "Metabolic Dysfunction Biomarkers as Predictors of Early Diabetes" Biomolecules 11, no. 11: 1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11111589

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop