Next Article in Journal
Lighting Conditions Influence the Dynamics of Protease Synthesis and Proteasomal Activity in the White Rot Fungus Cerrena unicolor
Next Article in Special Issue
Natural Compounds Modulate Drug Transporter Mediated Oral Cancer Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Promising Opportunities for Treating Neurodegenerative Diseases with Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Potential of Phytochemicals in Oral Cancer Prevention and Therapy: A Review of the Evidence
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/biom10091321
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Traditional Herbal Medicine Mediated Regulations during Head and Neck Carcinogenesis

by
Xiang-Yun Lan
1,†,
Tzu-Ting Chung
2,†,
Chien-Ling Huang
3,
Yi-Jang Lee
4,5 and
Wan-Chun Li
1,2,5,*
1
Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
2
Department of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
3
Department of Health Technology and Informatics (HTI), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU), Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, SAR, China
4
Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
5
Cancer Progression Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomolecules 2020, 10(9), 1321; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10091321
Submission received: 30 July 2020 / Revised: 13 September 2020 / Accepted: 14 September 2020 / Published: 15 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application and Mechanism of Natural Compounds in Dentistry)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is one of the most prevalent neoplasms worldwide. It is well recognized that environmental challenges such as smoking, viral infection and alcohol consumption are key factors underlying HNSCC pathogenesis. Other than major clinical interventions (e.g., surgical resection, chemical and radiotherapy) that have been routinely practiced over years, adjuvant anticancer agents from Traditional Herbal Medicine (THM) are proposed, either alone or together with conventional therapies, to be experimentally effective for improving treatment efficacy in different cancers including HNSCCs. At a cellular and molecular basis, THM extracts could modulate different malignant indices via distinct signaling pathways and provide better control in HNSCC malignancy and its clinical complications such as radiotherapy-induced xerostomia/oral mucositis. In this article, we aim to systemically review the impacts of THM in regulating HNSCC tumorous identities and its potential perspective for clinical use.

1. Introduction

Head and Neck Squamous Cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) influence a variety of anatomic sites, including the oral cavity, oropharynx, nasopharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, and salivary glands [1]. Different stimuli including smoking, alcohol consumption, viral infection and imbalanced metabolism serve as potential triggers for HNSCC development [2,3,4]. Despite advances in surgical technology and development of adjuvant treatments, the 5-year survival rate of HNSCC remains low (32% to 53%), mainly resulting from frequent local invasion, regional lymph node metastasis and overgrowth of drug-resistant HNSCC cells in response to conventional treatments [2,5]. More recently, the concept of “Integrative medicine” has gained attention. This concept focuses on a collaborative application to HNSCC patient care that involves a strategy to bring conventional and complementary approaches together in a coordinated way [6]. Among different integrative therapies, Traditional Herbal Medicine (THM) might be the most common biologically-based therapy used by patients with HNSCCs [7]. While scientific evidence is fairly limited regarding the efficacy of THM compounds for cancer prevention and treatment, abundant data supporting integrative therapies for symptom management in clinic were defined by randomized controlled trials. A systematic review suggested that around 6–79% of HNSCC patients routinely receive integrative therapy, depending on the methodology of data collection [7,8]. Collectively, not only in Asian countries, global recognition for THM compounds for treating deleterious physiological abnormalities such as HNSCCs is drawing more attention, making it essential to provide better understanding, from a scientific point of view, of the working mechanisms of THM in regulating oncogenicity. This review article therefore seeks to elucidate the cellular and molecular basis of THM-mediated anticancer impacts for different cancerous identity including cell growth/survival, cell migration/metastasis, angiogenesis, therapeutic sensitivity and radiotherapy-induced complications in HNSCCs. Despite different disease etiology, in order to increase the sizes of reference literature, in addition to oral, tongue, buccal, laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers, we also recruited esophageal and nasopharyngeal carcinoma, which are anatomically similar to HNSCCs.

2. Multifaceted Regulations by THM in HNSCCs

2.1. THM Extracts Lessen Cell Growth/Survival in HNSCCs

Suppression of tumor cell growth/survival is the most convincing strategy to command cancer oncogenesis. Numerous studies were previously reported showing that different THM compounds could both directly regulate the survival and proliferation of cancers and enhance the sensitivity of tumor cells to clinical interventions [9,10,11]. Different THM compounds including curcumin, triptolide, cucurbitacins, oridonin, artesunate, β-elemene and cepharanthine could all influence cell cycle-related molecules such as cyclins and caspases, thus leading to cell cycle arrest and promoting cell apoptosis in HNSCC cells [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. At the molecular level, THM compounds seem to regulate tumorous properties through modulation of different external and intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathways. For instance, berberine, demethoxycurcumin, ursolic acid, tanshinones, oridonin, moscatilin and wogonin were all capable of suppressing oncogenic PI3K/Akt/mTOR and MAPK/JNK/p38 pathways thereby resulting in cell proliferation inhibition in HNSCC as well as in nasopharyngeal carcinoma [13,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Moreover, mitochondrial-associated apoptotic regulators BCL-2 and Bax were also important mediators for THM-related antigrowth/survival activity. While mitochondria also play an important role in cellular metabolism, it suggested that THM compounds might also be essential to elicit anti-HNSCC activity via metabolic regulation. Previous studies indicated that curcumin, oridonin, artesunate and β-elemene modulated HNSCC cell viability by affecting the BCL-2/Bax protein level [12,13,19,29,30]. Interestingly, a very recent study reporting that chrysophanol could up-regulate Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) levels thereby regulating cell death further supports that THM compounds are likely metabolic regulating agents [31]. Another common underlying THM-mediated regulatory cue for HNSCC growth/survival is autophagy, as Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), dihydroartemisinin, tanshinones and wogonin were all autophagy inducers in HNSCC cells [25,32,33,34]. The experimental evidence of utilizing THM compounds as effectors for HNSCC growth/survival is summarized in Table 1.

2.2. THM Extracts Control Cell Motility and Angiogenesis in HNSCCs

Over the past decade, numerous studies revealed the potential that THM compounds could inhibit HNSCC metastasis and angiogenesis (Table 2). With regard to the regulation of cell motility, it is well accepted that tumor cells need to make room for movement. Metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of proteinases that could catalyze various components of the Extracellular Matrix (ECM). MMPs could be categorized into several subfamilies according to their substrate including collagenases, gelatinases, stromelysins, matrilysins, membrane-type MMPs (MT-MMPs) etc. Among them, gelatinases, MMP-2 and MMP-9, are frequently enriched in HNSCCs and often relate to an increased risk of metastasis [43], making MMPs a potential underlying regulator of THM-mediated migration/metastasis in HNSCCs. Indeed, it is reported that most investigations found that THM compounds could suppress different types of MMPs, mainly MMP-2 and MMP-9, suggesting that MMPs could be key molecular cues for HNSCC cell motility. At the cellular level, MMP-2 and MMP-9 were thought to affect cancer migration and invasion through their catalytic ability to degrade type IV collagen and denatured collagen (gelatin), thus weakening the structure of ECM. Interestingly, recent studies showed that MMP-2 and MMP-9 could also regulate cytokines, growth factors, chemokines, and other bioactive molecules in the process of ECM degradation, indicating that MMP-2 and MMP-9 could possibly act indirectly to control cell migration and angiogenesis [43]. In addition to different MMPs, ECM degradation for cell movement could also be controlled by inhibitory signals such as tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), endogenous inhibitors of MMPs. TIMPs exhibit fairly high affinity to MMPs by noncovalent binding, thereby blocking the active site of MMPs resulting in inactive MMPs [44]. Unexpectedly, TIMPs also contribute to the activation of MMPs. For example, the formation of MT1-MMP/TIMP-2/pro-MMP2 tri-molecule complex is required to activate conversion of pro-MMP-2 to active MMP-2 [43]; on the other hand, a higher level of TIMP-2 may saturate MT1-MMPs, thus preventing the cleavage of pro-MMP-2 [43]. In short, an optimal level of TIMPs is needed to reach the maximum activity of MMPs.
In addition to TIMPs, interleukins, interferons, epidermal growth factor (EGF), keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), nerve growth factor (NGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and transforming growth factor (TGF-β) could all transactivate MMP gene expression [78]. Other than extracellular signaling molecules, intracellular factors such as activator protein-1 (AP-1) also play an important role in regulating MMP genes. AP-1 is a transcription factor that consists of four subfamilies, Jun, Fos, Maf, and activating transcription factor (ATF) [79]. The dimeric AP-1 complex is composed of Jun and Fos proteins, all of which could bind to proximal promoter regions of different MMPs including MMP-1, -3, -7, -9, -10, -12, and -13 and thereby promote MMP mRNA levels [78]. The upstream triggers for AP-1 activity have also been studied while mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) turned out to be one of the key contributors for AP-1 activation. MAPKs consist of mitogen-activated intracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), stress-activated Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), p38 kinase, and ERK5 [80]. For example, ERKs could phosphorylate ternary complex factors (TCFs), Fra1/2, and monocyte-specific enhancer binding factor 2c (MEF2C), which promote fos transcription, c-Jun activity and c-Jun expression, respectively [79]. On the other hand, JNK can directly phosphorylate c-Jun or phosphorylate ATF2 resulting in c-jun transcriptional activation. Moreover, p38 could also directly phosphorylate ATF2, MEF2C, and TCFs facilitating AP-1 transcription [79]. Lastly, Urokinase-plasminogen activator (u-PA) is also found in several studies involving ECM degradation by converting plasminogen to active plasmin which leads to MMP activation [43,81].
In addition to MMPs, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) also offers a perspective on the subject. To date, EMT is still a hypothetical phenomenon that is recognized mostly in metastatic tumor cells. EMT activation is defined as a transformation of highly differentiated, polarized, and organized epithelial cells into undifferentiated, isolated, and mesenchymal-like cells. These mesenchymal-like cells could develop anoikis resistance, have poorer cell-to-cell/cell-to-matrix adhesion, and might be more invasive and migratory [82]. Cells that undergo EMT could survive and avoid apoptosis despite the absence of ECM; in other words, mesenchymal cells could acquire anoikis resistance. At the molecular level, these cells possess higher expression of antiapoptotic genes (Bcl-2 family) and/or more active prosurvival cues (i.e., PI3K/Akt signaling pathway). Additionally, proapoptotic proteins such as p53-effector related to pmp22 (PERP), p21, Bim, Bax, and Noxa are down-regulated. The expression of mesenchymal markers such as vimentin, fibronectin, α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) as well as MMPs is also increased. Apart from anoikis resistance, EMT lets epithelial cells remodel the cytoskeleton to form invasive protrusions known as invadopodia, thus increasing the motility of the cells [82]. Also, the cell-to-cell linkage is reduced due to the loss of E-cadherin and catenin through epigenetic modifications. In contrast, N-cadherin, a mesenchymal cadherin expressed in stromal cells, is increased, thereby enhancing the ability of tumor cells to invade into the stroma [82]. Several important transcription factors such as Snail, ZEB1/2, Twist, NF-kB, and HIF1/2 are involved in EMT in a coordinative manner with other signaling pathways [82,83].
To support tumor growth, angiogenesis is also important for metastatic cancer cells while blood vessels are essential for nutrient transportation. Angiogenesis represents an outcome of balance between proangiogenic factors (VEGF, PDGR, FGF, Angiopoietin) and antiangiogenic factors (endostatin, angiostatin, and thrombospondin) [81]. In all studies we reviewed, vascular endothelial-derived growth factor (VEGF) is most frequently discussed. VEGF is an important proangiogenic and provasculogenic factor. As VEGF binds to VEGF receptors on tumor cells, downstream signaling pathways could be further activated, thus leading to greater cell proliferation, migration, survival, and better vascular permeability. Interestingly, it was found that Notch signaling is involved and promotes the formation of tip cells and filopodia, which are important for angiogenic sprouting [84]. Besides VEGF, MMPs also regulate angiogenesis in a more complicated manner. Many members of the MMP family can activate proangiogenic factors and antiangiogenic factors. For instance, MMP-9 is capable of activating VEGF while other MMPs exhibited the ability to induce basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF), or transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) to promote angiogenesis [85]. On the contrary, some MMPs might activate antiangiogenic factors via activation of angiostatin and endostatin, endogenous inhibitors of angiogenesis [85]. In summary, THM compounds are effective in inhibiting metastasis and angiogenesis. The possible mechanism might include the down-regulation of MMPs and EMT. THM compounds have also shown the ability to decrease VEGF levels, thus suppressing angiogenesis.

2.3. THM Extracts Modulate Therapeutic Sensitivity in HNSCCs

To date, the 5-year survival rates for HNSCC patients remained low once tumors metastasize to distant organs, resulting in treatment resistance to conventional therapies [86]. General clinical therapeutic schemes for HNSCC patients have been widely practiced, both with single or combinational regimes. Surgical resection, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are common choices depending on tumor sizes, locations, tumor grades and clinic stages [87,88]. Other alternative treatments such as cryotherapy [89] and photodynamic therapy (PDT) [90,91] were also tested for their efficacy for treating oral neoplasms. Targeting HNSCC-specific molecules further developed a number of targeted therapy agents including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab, panitumumab, zalutumumab and nimotuzumab), EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib, afatinib and dacomitinib) as well as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors (bevacizumab) or vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors (sorafenib, sunitinib and vandetanib) [92]. With significant improvement to local control early-stage disease, multidisciplinary therapy is often applied in order to enhance prognosis for advanced HNSCCs. While the use of combinations of different therapeutic agents such as cisplatin (CDDP) +5-fluorouracil (5-FU), CDDP + radiotherapy, cetuximab + radiation (for local advanced HNSCCs) and cetuximab + chemotherapeutic drugs (for recurrent/metastatic HNSCCs) were also frequently practiced in clinic [93,94]. CDDP-based treatment, however, showed certain limitations as patients often acquired drug resistance with prolonged treatment [95,96]. At the cellular and molecular level, multiple drug resistance (MDR) could be achieved by several mechanisms: (i) modulation of drug influx/efflux capacity; (ii) increase of drug metabolism; (iii) promotion of DNA repair activity and (iv) an enhancement of cell survival and dissemination machinery [97,98]. Even though previous investigations have found numerous molecules such as ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter proteins, nucleotide excision repair (NER) gene ERCC1, TP53, Aurora kinases and epithelium-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers contributed to the resistance of treatment, mainly for chemotherapy, in HNSCC cells [98], successful reports to facilitate treatment sensitivity by targeting these resistance-associated factors are scarce. In addition, as most studies only describe the association between resistance and gene expression, it still remains unknown what the upstream inducers are for MDR gene alterations thereby leading to an acquired treatment resistance in HNSCCs.
Many lines of evidence indicate that THM compounds are promising to reduce multidrug resistance in different cancers. For example, ginsenoside Rh2 could inhibit P-glycoprotein (P-gp) activity, thereby suppressing multidrug resistance in breast cancer cells [99], whereas ginsenoside Rg3 could also ameliorate CDDP resistance via a downregulation of B7-H1 levels and resume T-cell cytotoxicity in human nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells [100]. Emodin, an anthraquinone derivative isolated from many plants including Rheum palmatum, Polygonum cuspidatum, Polygonum multiflorum, and Cassia obtusifolia was also reported to effectively facilitate cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity through multidrug resistance associated protein 1 (MRP1) down-regulation in human bladder cancer T24 and J82 cells [101]. Moreover, both in vitro and in vivo evidence implied that the combination of gambogic acid (GA), major compounds derived from gambogethe resin exuded from garcinia hanburyi and garcinia Morella, with doxorubicin, synergistically reduces cell viability in platinum-resistant human ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells and SKOV3-bearing xenografic tumors [102].
As for HNSCCs cells, a number of studies have showed that THM compounds could reverse multidrug resistance. An early study showed that Berberine, the major constituent of Coptis Chinese, modulated multidrug resistance gene, pgp-179 and sensitized paclitaxel-induced cytotoxicity [103]. Furthermore, artesunate could selectively inhibit cell growth through iron-dependent and Nrf2-mediated ferroptosis in CDDP resistant HN9 cells [104]. Targeting Nrf2 could also be applicable to reduce CDDP resistance by wogonin, a natural flavonoid found in root extract of Scutellaria baicalensis in HNSCC cells [105]. Other studies found that (-)-gossypol, a natural product isolated from cotton seeds and roots, could sensitize CDDP resistance in HNSCC cells, through regulations of tumor suppressor p53 status and apoptosis-related protein BCL-2 and BCL-xL [106,107]. At the cellular level, emerging evidence supports a concept that the tumor is derived from a distinct subset of cells with characteristics of self-renewal and differentiation capacity named cancer-initiating cells (CICs) or cancer stem cells (CSCs) [108]. As CICs/CSCs exhibit a quiescent slow-turnover phenotype, they are likely resistant to the conventional therapies which are often targeting highly proliferative cancer cells [109,110]. Following this concept, it was found that EGCG could attenuate stemness thereby enhancing CDDP chemosensitivity via the Notch signaling pathway, both in vitro and in vivo [111]. Other studies showing THM compounds displaying antiresistance impacts were also reported. For example, Galium verum aqueous extract profoundly suppressed cell invasion in Taxol-resistant human laryngeal carcinoma [55]. Danshen extract significantly inhibited proliferation of etoposide- and Taxol-resistant human oral cancer cells [112]. Finally, Celastrol triggered cell apoptosis in vincristine-resistant human tongue cancer cells via modulation of JNK1/2 signaling pathway [113]. Collectively, THM compounds could reduce drug resistance experimentally, both in vitro and in vivo, in HNSCC cells (Table 3).

2.4. Effects of THM Extracts for Radiotherapy-Induced Xerostomia/Oral Mucositis

HNSCC patients are often managed with preventive or therapeutic radiotherapy, which could result in frequent salivary gland damage and oral mucositis [114,115]. Salivary gland dysfunction could lead to reduced saliva secretion, which in turn gives rise to symptoms of xerostomia (dry mouth). Xerostomia affects patients’ quality of life by various pathophysiological conditions including oral discomfort, altered taste, difficulty of talking, swallowing and chewing as well as increased risk of dental diseases [116]. Oral lubricants, artificial saliva or saliva substitutes as well as pharmacologic treatment (e.g., pilocarpine) for xerostomia have been found to be temporally effective to improve xerostomia symptoms. However, only transient relief and reported adverse effects (of pilocarpine) limit their use [117,118]. Following the concept of integrative medicine, the guideline of using THM compounds as part of the management recommendations for xerostomia patients has been developed [119,120]. One open-label parallel study aiming to determine the effectiveness of a 4-week usage of an herbal compound containing Malva sylvestris and Alcea digitata powder compared to artificial saliva, showed a significant difference between two groups in relieving xerostomia symptoms [121]. Nevertheless, a study that systematically reviewed the outcomes of treatments with THM and without THM for over 900 HNSCC patients with radiotherapy-induced xerostomia in 14 different random controlled trails concluded that THM is not capable of significantly lessening xerostomia and related complications [122]. In brief, THM compounds seem not convincingly applicable to treat radiation-induced xerostomia.
Oral mucositis is also a radiotherapy-related pathological condition often found in HNSCC patients. Oral mucositis is characterized by inflammation or ulceration of the oral mucosa [115,123]. The most common features of oral mucositis include edema, erythema, ulcerations, bleeding, pain and xerostomia-related symptoms such as difficulty in swallowing, eating, drinking, talking and altered taste [124]. The concept of applying THM compounds for optimal treatment efficacy has been proposed and practiced in HNSCC patients with oral mucositis after radiotherapy or chemotherapy [125]. Mechanistically, THM compounds could help improve oral mucositis via several cues including anti-inflammation, immunomodulatory, antitoxic and antiseptic effects [124]. As most THM compounds exhibit anti-inflammatory activity, the underlying mechanism is thought to be down-regulation of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) and up-regulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-4, IL-13, IL-10, and TGF-β) [125]. Recently, several systematic review articles, which compiled evidence-based studies for further determining the usefulness of THM agents in the management of oral mucositis induced by chemotherapy or radiotherapy in HNSCC patients, were reported. Taken together, it seems that most trials showed promising results stating that use of THM compounds could ease oral mucositis in HNSCC subjects, both in a preventive and therapeutic manner [126,127]. Further investigations are still required to determine the underlying molecular basis of antioral mucositis effects of each THM compound and cross-talk between various herbs since the knowledge of multiherbal combination therapy is not yet revealed.

3. Conclusions

THM compounds could exert anti-HNSCC properties by targeting different cellular cues. Further investigations are still required to comprehensively determine the underlying molecular basis of individual anti-HNSCC THM compounds. The cross-talk between various herbs in multiherbal combination therapy schemes is also of great interest to explore. In addition, the advantage of using THM in modulating treatment efficacy by FDA-approved immunotherapy monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoint molecules Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its receptor Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (e.g., nivolumab and pembrolizumab) in HNSCC patients with relapse or metastatic CDDP-resistant tumors should also be closely followed. Lastly, better understanding of availability, administration route, effective doses and patient compliance upon THM application would be also of importance to feasibly translate THM compounds in aiding quality of life of HNSCC patients.

Funding

This work is supported by grants from Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 106-2314-B-010-005-MY3 and 109-2628-B-010-008).

Acknowledgments

We thank Jude Clapper (Taipei American School) for critical review and English corrections for the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cohen, N.; Fedewa, S.; Chen, A.Y. Epidemiology and Demographics of the Head and Neck Cancer Population. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2018, 30, 381–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Leemans, C.R.; Braakhuis, B.J.; Brakenhoff, R.H. The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, T.Y.; Hsieh, Y.T.; Huang, J.M.; Liu, C.J.; Chuang, L.T.; Huang, P.C.; Kuo, T.Y.; Chia, H.Y.; Chou, C.Y.; Chang, C.W.; et al. Determination of Pyruvate Metabolic Fates Modulates Head and Neck Tumorigenesis. Neoplasia 2019, 21, 641–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Meurman, J.H. Infectious and dietary risk factors of oral cancer. Oral. Oncol. 2010, 46, 411–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Al-Sarraf, M. Treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer: Historical and critical review. Cancer Control 2002, 9, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Matovina, C.; Birkeland, A.C.; Zick, S.; Shuman, A.G. Integrative Medicine in Head and Neck Cancer. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2017, 156, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Miller, M.C.; Pribitkin, E.A.; Difabio, T.; Keane, W.M. Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among a population of head and neck cancer patients: A survey-based study. Ear Nose Throat J. 2010, 89, E23–E27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Warrick, P.D.; Irish, J.C.; Morningstar, M.; Gilbert, R.; Brown, D.; Gullane, P. Use of alternative medicine among patients with head and neck cancer. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1999, 125, 573–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Luo, H.; Vong, C.T.; Chen, H.; Gao, Y.; Lyu, P.; Qiu, L.; Zhao, M.; Liu, Q.; Cheng, Z.; Zou, J.; et al. Naturally occurring anti-cancer compounds: Shining from Chinese herbal medicine. Chin. Med. 2019, 14, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wang, S.; Wu, X.; Tan, M.; Gong, J.; Tan, W.; Bian, B.; Chen, M.; Wang, Y. Fighting fire with fire: Poisonous Chinese herbal medicine for cancer therapy. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 140, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhong, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Tao, H.; Sang, W.; Cui, L.; Qiang, W.; Cheang, W.S.; Hu, Y.; Yu, H.; Wang, Y. Anti-inflammatory activities of Sigesbeckia glabrescens Makino: Combined in vitro and in silico investigations. Chin. Med. 2019, 14, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Sivanantham, B.; Sethuraman, S.; Krishnan, U.M. Combinatorial Effects of Curcumin with an Anti-Neoplastic Agent on Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Through the Regulation of EGFR-ERK1/2 and Apoptotic Signaling Pathways. ACS Comb. Sci. 2016, 18, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jiang, J.H.; Pi, J.; Jin, H.; Cai, J.Y. Oridonin-induced mitochondria-dependent apoptosis in esophageal cancer cells by inhibiting PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Ras/Raf pathways. J. Cell Biochem. 2019, 120, 3736–3746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhou, P.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Y.; Xu, D.; Zhang, L.; Qin, J.; Su, G.; Feng, Y.; Chen, H.; You, S.; et al. Cepharanthine hydrochloride reverses the mdr1 (P-glycoprotein)-mediated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell cisplatin resistance through JNK and p53 signals. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 111144–111160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Johnson, D.G.; Walker, C.L. Cyclins and cell cycle checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1999, 39, 295–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Hashimoto, T.; Kikkawa, U.; Kamada, S. Contribution of caspase(s) to the cell cycle regulation at mitotic phase. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e18449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Yanchun, M.; Yi, W.; Lu, W.; Yu, Q.; Jian, Y.; Pengzhou, K.; Ting, Y.; Hongyi, L.; Fang, W.; Xiaolong, C.; et al. Triptolide prevents proliferation and migration of Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer via MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 851, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hung, C.-M.; Chang, C.-C.; Lin, C.-W.; Ko, S.-Y.; Hsu, Y.-C. Cucurbitacin E as inducer of cell death and apoptosis in human oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line SAS. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 17147–17156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Liu, L.; Zuo, L.F.; Zuo, J.; Wang, J. Artesunate induces apoptosis and inhibits growth of Eca109 and Ec9706 human esophageal cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 1465–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Z.; Lin, R.; Liu, Z.; Yan, T.; Xia, Y.; Zhao, L.; Lin, F.; Zhang, X.; Li, C.; Wang, Y. Curcumin analog, WZ37, promotes G2/M arrest and apoptosis of HNSCC cells through Akt/mTOR inhibition. Toxicol. In Vitr. 2020, 65, 104754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Harada, T.; Harada, K.; Ueyama, Y. The enhancement of tumor radioresponse by combined treatment with cepharanthine is accompanied by the inhibition of DNA damage repair and the induction of apoptosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Oncol. 2012, 41, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jiang, S.X.; Qi, B.; Yao, W.J.; Gu, C.W.; Wei, X.F.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, Y.Z.; Zhao, B.S. Berberine displays antitumor activity in esophageal cancer cells in vitro. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 2511–2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lin, C.W.; Chin, H.K.; Lee, S.L.; Chiu, C.F.; Chung, J.G.; Lin, Z.Y.; Wu, C.Y.; Liu, Y.C.; Hsiao, Y.T.; Feng, C.H.; et al. Ursolic acid induces apoptosis and autophagy in oral cancer cells. Environ. Toxicol. 2019, 34, 983–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Qiu, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, Q.; Zeng, X.; Ji, P. Tanshinone IIA induces cell death via Beclin-1-dependent autophagy in oral squamous cell carcinoma SCC-9 cell line. Cancer Med. 2018, 7, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chow, S.E.; Chen, Y.W.; Liang, C.A.; Huang, Y.K.; Wang, J.S. Wogonin induces cross-regulation between autophagy and apoptosis via a variety of Akt pathway in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2012, 113, 3476–3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chien, M.H.; Yang, W.E.; Yang, Y.C.; Ku, C.C.; Lee, W.J.; Tsai, M.Y.; Lin, C.W.; Yang, S.F. Dual Targeting of the p38 MAPK-HO-1 Axis and cIAP1/XIAP by Demethoxycurcumin Triggers Caspase-Mediated Apoptotic Cell Death in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells. Cancers 2020, 12, 703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lee, E.; Han, A.R.; Nam, B.; Kim, Y.R.; Jin, C.H.; Kim, J.B.; Eun, Y.G.; Jung, C.H. Moscatilin Induces Apoptosis in Human Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells via JNK Signaling Pathway. Molecules 2020, 25, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Porta, C.; Paglino, C.; Mosca, A. Targeting PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling in Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2014, 4, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Yang, J.; Ren, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y.; Cheng, B.; Xia, J. Oridonin inhibits oral cancer growth and PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 100, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, C.; Yu, Y. Synergistic Cytotoxicity of beta-Elemene and Cisplatin in Gingival Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Inhibition of STAT3 Signaling Pathway. Med. Sci. Monit. 2017, 23, 1507–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Hsu, P.C.; Cheng, C.F.; Hsieh, P.C.; Chen, Y.H.; Kuo, C.Y.; Sytwu, H.K. Chrysophanol Regulates Cell Death, Metastasis, and Reactive Oxygen Species Production in Oral Cancer Cell Lines. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2020, 2020, 5867064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Irimie, A.I.; Braicu, C.; Zanoaga, O.; Pileczki, V.; Gherman, C.; Berindan-Neagoe, I.; Campian, R.S. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate suppresses cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis and autophagy in oral cancer SSC-4 cells. Onco Targets Ther. 2015, 8, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Shi, X.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Bai, J.; Li, J.; Li, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, M. Dihydroartemisinin induces autophagy-dependent death in human tongue squamous cell carcinoma cells through DNA double-strand break-mediated oxidative stress. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 45981–45993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ding, L.; Wang, S.; Qu, X.; Wang, J. Tanshinone IIA sensitizes oral sqaumous cell carcinoma to radiation due to an enhanced autophagy. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2016, 46, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lee, H.M.; Patel, V.; Shyur, L.F.; Lee, W.L. Copper supplementation amplifies the anti-tumor effect of curcumin in oral cancer cells. Phytomedicine 2016, 23, 1535–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Milano, F.; Mari, L.; van de Luijtgaarden, W.; Parikh, K.; Calpe, S.; Krishnadath, K.K. Nano-curcumin inhibits proliferation of esophageal adenocarcinoma cells and enhances the T cell mediated immune response. Front. Oncol. 2013, 3, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Shin, Y.S.; Kang, S.U.; Park, J.K.; Kim, Y.E.; Kim, Y.S.; Baek, S.J.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, C.H. Anti-cancer effect of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) in head and neck cancer through repression of transactivation and enhanced degradation of beta-catenin. Phytomedicine 2016, 23, 1344–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lin, R.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zou, P.; Feng, C.; Wang, L.; Liang, G. Dihydroartemisinin (DHA) induces ferroptosis and causes cell cycle arrest in head and neck carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2016, 381, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, Y.; Sui, H.; Jiang, C.; Li, S.; Han, Y.; Huang, P.; Du, X.; Du, J.; Bai, Y. Dihydroartemisinin Increases the Sensitivity of Photodynamic Therapy Via NF-kappaB/HIF-1alpha/VEGF Pathway in Esophageal Cancer Cell in vitro and in vivo. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 48, 2035–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, W.; Kang, M.; Zhang, T.; Li, B.; Liao, X.; Wang, R. Triptolide Combined with Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma via NF-kappaB-Related Mechanism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Liu, T.; Sun, X.; Cao, Z. Shikonin-induced necroptosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells via ROS overproduction and upregulation of RIPK1/RIPK3/MLKL expression. Onco Targets Ther. 2019, 12, 2605–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Liu, G.; Wu, D.; Liang, X.; Yue, H.; Cui, Y. Mechanisms and in vitro effects of cepharanthine hydrochloride: Classification analysis of the drug-induced differentially-expressed genes of human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 34, 2002–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Chien, M.H.; Lin, C.W.; Cheng, C.W.; Wen, Y.C.; Yang, S.F. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 as a target for head and neck cancer therapy. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2013, 17, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bachmeier, B.E.; Iancu, C.M.; Jochum, M.; Nerlich, A.G. Matrix metalloproteinases in cancer: Comparison of known and novel aspects of their inhibition as a therapeutic approach. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2005, 5, 149–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, L.; Yue, G.G.; Lee, J.K.; Wong, E.C.; Fung, K.P.; Yu, J.; Lau, C.B.; Chiu, P.W. Gene expression profiling reveals the plausible mechanisms underlying the antitumor and antimetastasis effects of Andrographis paniculata in esophageal cancer. Phytother. Res. 2018, 32, 1388–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, L.; Yue, G.G.; Lee, J.K.; Wong, E.C.; Fung, K.P.; Yu, J.; Lau, C.B.; Chiu, P.W. The adjuvant value of Andrographis paniculata in metastatic esophageal cancer treatment—From preclinical perspectives. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yue, G.G.; Lee, J.K.; Li, L.; Chan, K.M.; Wong, E.C.; Chan, J.Y.; Fung, K.P.; Lui, V.W.; Chiu, P.W.; Lau, C.B. Andrographis paniculata elicits anti-invasion activities by suppressing TM4SF3 gene expression and by anoikis-sensitization in esophageal cancer cells. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2015, 5, 3570–3587. [Google Scholar]
  48. Liao, M.Y.; Chuang, C.Y.; Hsieh, M.J.; Chou, Y.E.; Lin, C.W.; Chen, W.R.; Lai, C.T.; Chen, M.K.; Yang, S.F. Antimetastatic effects of Eclipta prostrata extract on oral cancer cells. Environ. Toxicol. 2018, 33, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hsin, C.H.; Huang, C.C.; Chen, P.N.; Hsieh, Y.S.; Yang, S.F.; Ho, Y.T.; Lin, C.W. Rubus idaeus Inhibits Migration and Invasion of Human Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells by Suppression of MMP-2 through Modulation of the ERK1/2 Pathway. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2017, 45, 1557–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Huang, Y.W.; Chuang, C.Y.; Hsieh, Y.S.; Chen, P.N.; Yang, S.F.; Shih Hsuan, L.; Chen, Y.Y.; Lin, C.W.; Chang, Y.C. Rubus idaeus extract suppresses migration and invasion of human oral cancer by inhibiting MMP-2 through modulation of the Erk1/2 signaling pathway. Environ. Toxicol. 2017, 32, 1037–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, J.S.; Lin, C.W.; Hsieh, Y.S.; Cheng, H.L.; Lue, K.H.; Yang, S.F.; Lu, K.H. Selaginella tamariscina (Beauv.) possesses antimetastatic effects on human osteosarcoma cells by decreasing MMP-2 and MMP-9 secretions via p38 and Akt signaling pathways. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 59, 801–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yang, W.E.; Ho, Y.C.; Tang, C.M.; Hsieh, Y.S.; Chen, P.N.; Lai, C.T.; Yang, S.F.; Lin, C.W. Duchesnea indica extract attenuates oral cancer cells metastatic potential through the inhibition of the matrix metalloproteinase-2 activity by down-regulating the MEK/ERK pathway. Phytomedicine 2019, 63, 152960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chung, H.H.; Chen, M.K.; Chang, Y.C.; Yang, S.F.; Lin, C.C.; Lin, C.W. Inhibitory effects of Leucaena leucocephala on the metastasis and invasion of human oral cancer cells. Environ. Toxicol. 2017, 32, 1765–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hseu, Y.C.; Wu, C.R.; Chang, H.W.; Kumar, K.J.; Lin, M.K.; Chen, C.S.; Cho, H.J.; Huang, C.Y.; Huang, C.Y.; Lee, H.Z.; et al. Inhibitory effects of Physalis angulata on tumor metastasis and angiogenesis. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 135, 762–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Schmidt, M.; Scholz, C.J.; Gavril, G.L.; Otto, C.; Polednik, C.; Roller, J.; Hagen, R. Effect of Galium verum aqueous extract on growth, motility and gene expression in drug-sensitive and -resistant laryngeal carcinoma cell lines. Int. J. Oncol. 2014, 44, 745–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Chen, Y.Y.; Hsieh, M.J.; Hsieh, Y.S.; Chang, Y.C.; Chen, P.N.; Yang, S.F.; Ho, H.Y.; Chou, Y.E.; Lin, C.W. Antimetastatic effects of Rheum palmatum L. extract on oral cancer cells. Environ. Toxicol. 2017, 32, 2287–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Chen, Y.Y.; Chiang, S.Y.; Lin, J.G.; Ma, Y.S.; Liao, C.L.; Weng, S.W.; Lai, T.Y.; Chung, J.G. Emodin, aloe-emodin and rhein inhibit migration and invasion in human tongue cancer SCC-4 cells through the inhibition of gene expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9. Int. J. Oncol. 2010, 36, 1113–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ho, Y.T.; Yang, J.S.; Li, T.C.; Lin, J.J.; Lin, J.G.; Lai, K.C.; Ma, C.Y.; Wood, W.G.; Chung, J.G. Berberine suppresses in vitro migration and invasion of human SCC-4 tongue squamous cancer cells through the inhibitions of FAK, IKK, NF-kappaB, u-PA and MMP-2 and -9. Cancer Lett. 2009, 279, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lu, K.W.; Chen, J.C.; Lai, T.Y.; Yang, J.S.; Weng, S.W.; Ma, Y.S.; Lu, P.J.; Weng, J.R.; Chueh, F.S.; Wood, W.G.; et al. Gypenosides inhibits migration and invasion of human oral cancer SAS cells through the inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-2 -9 and urokinase-plasminogen by ERK1/2 and NF-kappa B signaling pathways. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2011, 30, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chung, T.T.; Chuang, C.Y.; Teng, Y.H.; Hsieh, M.J.; Lai, J.C.; Chuang, Y.T.; Chen, M.K.; Yang, S.F. Tricetin suppresses human oral cancer cell migration by reducing matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression through the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Environ. Toxicol. 2017, 32, 2392–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, M.K.; Liu, Y.T.; Lin, J.T.; Lin, C.C.; Chuang, Y.C.; Lo, Y.S.; Hsi, Y.T.; Hsieh, M.J. Pinosylvin reduced migration and invasion of oral cancer carcinoma by regulating matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression and extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 117, 109160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Fang, C.Y.; Wu, C.Z.; Chen, P.N.; Chang, Y.C.; Chuang, C.Y.; Lai, C.T.; Yang, S.F.; Tsai, L.L. Antimetastatic potentials of salvianolic acid A on oral squamous cell carcinoma by targeting MMP-2 and the c-Raf/MEK/ERK pathway. Environ. Toxicol. 2018, 33, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lai, W.W.; Hsu, S.C.; Chueh, F.S.; Chen, Y.Y.; Yang, J.S.; Lin, J.P.; Lien, J.C.; Tsai, C.H.; Chung, J.G. Quercetin inhibits migration and invasion of SAS human oral cancer cells through inhibition of NF-kappaB and matrix metalloproteinase-2/-9 signaling pathways. Anticancer Res. 2013, 33, 1941–1950. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Chen, H.J.; Lin, C.M.; Lee, C.Y.; Shih, N.C.; Amagaya, S.; Lin, Y.C.; Yang, J.S. Phenethyl isothiocyanate suppresses EGF-stimulated SAS human oral squamous carcinoma cell invasion by targeting EGF receptor signaling. Int. J. Oncol. 2013, 43, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Pang, J.S.; Yen, J.H.; Wu, H.T.; Huang, S.T. Gallic Acid Inhibited Matrix Invasion and AP-1/ETS-1-Mediated MMP-1 Transcription in Human Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Peng, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zeng, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Ai, P. Evodiamine inhibits the migration and invasion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells in vitro via repressing MMP-2 expression. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2015, 76, 1173–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chien, S.Y.; Hsieh, M.J.; Chen, C.J.; Yang, S.F.; Chen, M.K. Nobiletin inhibits invasion and migration of human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines by involving ERK1/2 and transcriptional inhibition of MMP-2. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2015, 19, 307–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lin, F.Y.; Hsieh, Y.H.; Yang, S.F.; Chen, C.T.; Tang, C.H.; Chou, M.Y.; Chuang, Y.T.; Lin, C.W.; Chen, M.K. Resveratrol suppresses TPA-induced matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression through the inhibition of MAPK pathways in oral cancer cells. J. Oral. Pathol. Med. 2015, 44, 699–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, S.; Jiang, S.; Jiang, W.; Zhou, Y.; Shen, X.Y.; Luo, T.; Kong, L.P.; Wang, H.Q. Anticancer effects of crocetin in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma KYSE-150 cells. Oncol. Lett. 2015, 9, 1254–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Hsieh, M.J.; Chin, M.C.; Lin, C.C.; His, Y.T.; Lo, Y.S.; Chuang, Y.C.; Chen, M.K. Pinostilbene Hydrate Suppresses Human Oral Cancer Cell Metastasis by Downregulation of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Through the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathway. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 50, 911–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lin, C.H.; Shen, Y.A.; Hung, P.H.; Yu, Y.B.; Chen, Y.J. Epigallocathechin gallate, polyphenol present in green tea, inhibits stem-like characteristics and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in nasopharyngeal cancer cell lines. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 12, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Fang, C.Y.; Wu, C.C.; Hsu, H.Y.; Chuang, H.Y.; Huang, S.Y.; Tsai, C.H.; Chang, Y.; Tsao, G.S.; Chen, C.L.; Chen, J.Y. EGCG inhibits proliferation, invasiveness and tumor growth by up-regulation of adhesion molecules, suppression of gelatinases activity, and induction of apoptosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 2530–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Li, Y.J.; Wu, S.L.; Lu, S.M.; Chen, F.; Guo, Y.; Gan, S.M.; Shi, Y.L.; Liu, S.; Li, S.L. (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits nasopharyngeal cancer stem cell self-renewal and migration and reverses the epithelial-mesenchymal transition via NF-kappaB p65 inactivation. Tumour. Biol. 2015, 36, 2747–2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Chang, C.M.; Chang, P.Y.; Tu, M.G.; Lu, C.C.; Kuo, S.C.; Amagaya, S.; Lee, C.Y.; Jao, H.Y.; Chen, M.Y.; Yang, J.S. Epigallocatechin gallate sensitizes CAL-27 human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells to the anti-metastatic effects of gefitinib (Iressa) via synergistic suppression of epidermal growth factor receptor and matrix metalloproteinase-2. Oncol. Rep. 2012, 28, 1799–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Shi, H.; Shi, D.; Wu, Y.; Shen, Q.; Li, J. Qigesan inhibits migration and invasion of esophageal cancer cells via inducing connexin expression and enhancing gap junction function. Cancer Lett. 2016, 380, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhao, J.X.; Li, X.F.; Wang, X.X. Effects of body-resistance strengthening and tumor-suppressing granules on immune adhesion function of red blood cells and expression of metastasis protein CD44 in tumor cells of patients with esophageal carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2007, 13, 4360–4364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Shi, Q.; Diao, Y.; Jin, F.; Ding, Z. Antimetastatic effects of Aidi on human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by inhibiting epithelialmesenchymal transition and angiogenesis. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 18, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Chaudhary, A.K.; Singh, M.; Bharti, A.C.; Asotra, K.; Sundaram, S.; Mehrotra, R. Genetic polymorphisms of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in potentially malignant and malignant lesions of the head and neck. J. Biomed. Sci. 2010, 17, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Shaulian, E.; Karin, M. AP-1 as a regulator of cell life and death. Nat. Cell. Biol. 2002, 4, E131–E136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chang, L.; Karin, M. Mammalian MAP kinase signalling cascades. Nature 2001, 410, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Alizadeh, A.M.; Shiri, S.; Farsinejad, S. Metastasis review: From bench to bedside. Tumour. Biol. 2014, 35, 8483–8523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Guan, X. Cancer metastases: Challenges and opportunities. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2015, 5, 402–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Paoli, P.; Giannoni, E.; Chiarugi, P. Anoikis molecular pathways and its role in cancer progression. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1833, 3481–3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Apte, R.S.; Chen, D.S.; Ferrara, N. VEGF in Signaling and Disease: Beyond Discovery and Development. Cell 2019, 176, 1248–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Folgueras, A.R.; Pendas, A.M.; Sanchez, L.M.; Lopez-Otin, C. Matrix metalloproteinases in cancer: From new functions to improved inhibition strategies. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2004, 48, 411–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Santuray, R.T.; Johnson, D.E.; Grandis, J.R. New Therapies in Head and Neck Cancer. Trends Cancer 2018, 4, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Cognetti, D.M.; Weber, R.S.; Lai, S.Y. Head and neck cancer: An evolving treatment paradigm. Cancer 2008, 113, 1911–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Du, E.; Mazul, A.L.; Farquhar, D.; Brennan, P.; Anantharaman, D.; Abedi-Ardekani, B.; Weissler, M.C.; Hayes, D.N.; Olshan, A.F.; Zevallos, J.P. Long-term Survival in Head and Neck Cancer: Impact of Site, Stage, Smoking, and Human Papillomavirus Status. Laryngoscope 2019, 129, 2506–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yu, C.H.; Lin, H.P.; Cheng, S.J.; Sun, A.; Chen, H.M. Cryotherapy for oral precancers and cancers. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2014, 113, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Biel, M.A. Photodynamic therapy of head and neck cancers. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 635, 281–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mimikos, C.; Shafirstein, G.; Arshad, H. Current state and future of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. World J. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2016, 2, 126–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Kozakiewicz, P.; Grzybowska-Szatkowska, L. Application of molecular targeted therapies in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 7497–7505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Ansell, A.; Jedlinski, A.; Johansson, A.C.; Roberg, K. Epidermal growth factor is a potential biomarker for poor cetuximab response in tongue cancer cells. J. Oral. Pathol. Med. 2016, 45, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cognetti, F.; Pinnaro, P.; Carlini, P.; Ruggeri, E.M.; Ambesi Impiombato, F.; Del Vecchio, M.R.; Giannarelli, D.; Perrino, A. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer. Cancer 1988, 62, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Higuchi, E.; Oridate, N.; Furuta, Y.; Suzuki, S.; Hatakeyama, H.; Sawa, H.; Sunayashiki-Kusuzaki, K.; Yamazaki, K.; Inuyama, Y.; Fukuda, S. Differentially expressed genes associated with CIS-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) resistance in head and neck cancer using differential display and CDNA microarray. Head Neck 2003, 25, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Suzuki, M.; Ishikawa, H.; Tanaka, A.; Mataga, I. Heterogeneity of anticancer drug sensitivity in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Hum. Cell 2011, 24, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Gottesman, M.M.; Fojo, T.; Bates, S.E. Multidrug resistance in cancer: Role of ATP-dependent transporters. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Lopez-Verdin, S.; Lavalle-Carrasco, J.; Carreon-Burciaga, R.G.; Serafin-Higuera, N.; Molina-Frechero, N.; Gonzalez-Gonzalez, R.; Bologna-Molina, R. Molecular Markers of Anticancer Drug Resistance in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Literature Review. Cancers 2018, 10, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Zhang, J.; Zhou, F.; Wu, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.; Zha, B.S.; Niu, F.; Lu, M.; Hao, G.; Sun, Y.; et al. Cellular pharmacokinetic mechanisms of adriamycin resistance and its modulation by 20(S)-ginsenoside Rh2 in MCF-7/Adr cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 165, 120–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Jiang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yue, Z.; Pan, Z.; Ren, X. Ginsenoside Rg3 attenuates cisplatin resistance in lung cancer by downregulating PD-L1 and resuming immune. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 96, 378–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Li, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Yin, X.; Shi, G.; Li, H.; Hu, Z.; Liang, X. Emodin enhances cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in human bladder cancer cells through ROS elevation and MRP1 downregulation. BMC Cancer 2016, 16, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Wang, J.; Yuan, Z. Gambogic acid sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to doxorubicin through ROS-mediated apoptosis. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2013, 67, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Lin, H.L.; Liu, T.Y.; Wu, C.W.; Chi, C.W. Berberine modulates expression of mdr1 gene product and the responses of digestive track cancer cells to Paclitaxel. Br. J. Cancer 1999, 81, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Roh, J.L.; Kim, E.H.; Jang, H.; Shin, D. Nrf2 inhibition reverses the resistance of cisplatin-resistant head and neck cancer cells to artesunate-induced ferroptosis. Redox. Biol. 2017, 11, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kim, E.H.; Jang, H.; Shin, D.; Baek, S.H.; Roh, J.L. Targeting Nrf2 with wogonin overcomes cisplatin resistance in head and neck cancer. Apoptosis 2016, 21, 1265–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Bauer, J.A.; Trask, D.K.; Kumar, B.; Los, G.; Castro, J.; Lee, J.S.; Chen, J.; Wang, S.; Bradford, C.R.; Carey, T.E. Reversal of cisplatin resistance with a BH3 mimetic, (-)-gossypol, in head and neck cancer cells: Role of wild-type p53 and Bcl-xL. Mol. Cancer. Ther. 2005, 4, 1096–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Oliver, C.L.; Bauer, J.A.; Wolter, K.G.; Ubell, M.L.; Narayan, A.; O’Connell, K.M.; Fisher, S.G.; Wang, S.; Wu, X.; Ji, M.; et al. In vitro effects of the BH3 mimetic, (-)-gossypol, on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004, 10, 7757–7763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Rasheed, Z.A.; Kowalski, J.; Smith, B.D.; Matsui, W. Concise review: Emerging concepts in clinical targeting of cancer stem cells. Stem. Cells 2011, 29, 883–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Frank, N.Y.; Schatton, T.; Frank, M.H. The therapeutic promise of the cancer stem cell concept. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 120, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Moore, N.; Lyle, S. Quiescent, slow-cycling stem cell populations in cancer: A review of the evidence and discussion of significance. J. Oncol. 2011, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lee, S.H.; Nam, H.J.; Kang, H.J.; Kwon, H.W.; Lim, Y.C. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate attenuates head and neck cancer stem cell traits through suppression of Notch pathway. Eur. J. Cancer 2013, 49, 3210–3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Yang, C.Y.; Hsieh, C.C.; Lin, C.K.; Lin, C.S.; Peng, B.; Lin, G.J.; Sytwu, H.K.; Chang, W.L.; Chen, Y.W. Danshen extract circumvents drug resistance and represses cell growth in human oral cancer cells. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 17, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Lin, F.Z.; Wang, S.C.; Hsi, Y.T.; Lo, Y.S.; Lin, C.C.; Chuang, Y.C.; Lin, S.H.; Hsieh, M.J.; Chen, M.K. Celastrol induces vincristine multidrug resistance oral cancer cell apoptosis by targeting JNK1/2 signaling pathway. Phytomedicine 2019, 54, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Pinna, R.; Campus, G.; Cumbo, E.; Mura, I.; Milia, E. Xerostomia induced by radiotherapy: An overview of the physiopathology, clinical evidence, and management of the oral damage. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2015, 11, 171–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Vera-Llonch, M.; Oster, G.; Hagiwara, M.; Sonis, S. Oral mucositis in patients undergoing radiation treatment for head and neck carcinoma. Cancer 2006, 106, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Rogers, S.N.; Ahad, S.A.; Murphy, A.P. A structured review and theme analysis of papers published on ‘quality of life’ in head and neck cancer: 2000-2005. Oral. Oncol. 2007, 43, 843–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Jensen, S.B.; Pedersen, A.M.; Vissink, A.; Andersen, E.; Brown, C.G.; Davies, A.N.; Dutilh, J.; Fulton, J.S.; Jankovic, L.; Lopes, N.N.; et al. A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: Management strategies and economic impact. Support. Care Cancer 2010, 18, 1061–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Vissink, A.; Mitchell, J.B.; Baum, B.J.; Limesand, K.H.; Jensen, S.B.; Fox, P.C.; Elting, L.S.; Langendijk, J.A.; Coppes, R.P.; Reyland, M.E. Clinical management of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer patients: Successes and barriers. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2010, 78, 983–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Plemons, J.M.; Al-Hashimi, I.; Marek, C.L. Americal Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Managing xerostomia and salivary gland hypofunction: Executive summary of a report from the American Dental Association Council on Scirntific Affairs. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2014, 145, 867–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Yarom, N.; Hovan, A.; Bossi, P.; Ariyawardana, A.; Jensen, S.B.; Gobbo, M.; Saca-Hazboun, H.; Kandwal, A.; Majorana, A.; Ottaviani, G.; et al. Systematic review of natural and miscellaneous agents, for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients and clinical practice guideline—Part 2: Honey, herbal compounds, saliva stumulants, probiotics, and miscellaneous agents. Support. Care Cancer 2020, 28, 2457–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ameri, A.; Heydarirad, G.; Rezaeizadeh, H.; Choopani, R.; Ghobadi, A.; Gachkar, L. Evaluation of Efficacy of an Herbal Compound on Dry Mouth in Patients With Head and Neck Cancers: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Evid. Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2016, 21, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Nik Nabil, W.N.; Lim, R.J.; Chan, S.Y.; Lai, N.M.; Liew, A.C. A systematic review on Chinese herbal treatment for radiotherapy-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2018, 30, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Wang, G.; Jia, L. Herb medicine for relieving radiation induced oral mucositis: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019, 98, e18337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Bensinger, W.; Schubert, M.; Ang, K.K.; Brizel, D.; Brown, E.; Eilers, J.G.; Elting, L.; Mittal, B.B.; Schattner, M.A.; Spielberger, R.; et al. NCCN Task Force Report. prevention and management of mucositis in cancer care. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2008, 6 (Suppl. S1), 1–21; quiz S22–S24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Soltani, G.M.; Hemati, S.; Sarvizadeh, M.; Kamalinejad, M.; Tafazoli, V.; Latifi, S.A. Efficacy of the plantago major L. syrup on radiation induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients: A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Complement. Ther. Med. 2020, 51, 102397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Baharvand, M.; Jafari, S.; Mortazavi, H. Herbs in Oral Mucositis. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2017, 11, ZE05–ZE11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Nagi, R.; Patil, D.J.; Rakesh, N.; Jain, S.; Sahu, S. Natural agents in the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients-systematic review. J. Oral. Biol. Craniofac. Res. 2018, 8, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Regulatory Effects of Traditional Herbal Medicine (THM) compounds for Head and Neck Squamous Cell carcinoma (HNSCC) Cell Growth/Survival.
Table 1. Regulatory Effects of Traditional Herbal Medicine (THM) compounds for Head and Neck Squamous Cell carcinoma (HNSCC) Cell Growth/Survival.
Herbal CompoundsCell TypesCellular/Molecular Changes
CurcuminNT8e
(HNSCC cells)
Combination of 5-FU or doxorubicin (DOX)		↓cyclins (D1, E2, B1, and A2) and CDK2
↑p21 levels → cell cycle growth arrest at the G1/S phase
↓EGFR-ERK1/2 signaling molecules → cell proliferation↓
↓Bcl-2
↑Bax, caspase-3, and PARP
→apoptosis↑ [12]
Copper supplementation of curcumin in several oral cancer cells↑anti-tumor growth [35]
OE33/OE19
(Human esophageal adenocarcinoma)		↑T cell-induced cytotoxicity [36]
Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG)KB
(p53 wild-type human oral cancer)
FaDu
(Human hypopharynx squamous cell carcinoma)		↓mRNA and transcriptional activity of β-catenin KB cells
↑ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of β-catenin
↑apoptosis [37]
SCC-4
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↑BAD, BAK, FAS, IGF1R, WNT11, and ZEB1 genes
↓CASP8, MYC, and TP53
↑cell death via apoptosis and autophagy [32]
BerberineKYSE70
(Human esophageal squamous carcinoma)
SKGT43
(Human esophageal adenocarcinoma cell)		↓phosphorylation of Akt
↑AMP-activated protein kinase phosphorylation
↑apoptosis [22]
Artemisinin
(Dihydroartemisinin)		5-8F/CNE-1/CNE-2/CNE-2Z
(Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells)		↑ferroptosis and apoptosis [38]
CAL-27
(Human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma)		↑LC3B-II level→autophagy↑ [33]
Combined DHA and PDT treatment in human esophageal cancer cell line Eca109 cells ## tumor↓HIF-1α and VEGF
↓cell/tumor growth in vitro and in vivo ## [39]
Ursolic acid (UA)Ca922
(Human oral squamous cell carcinoma)		↓Akt/mTOR/NF-κB signaling
↓ERK/p38 [23]
TriptolideCNE
(Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma)		↓NF-κB p65 phosphorylation
→anti-tumor [40]
KYSE180 (well differentiated)
Eca109 (well differentiated)
KYSE150 (poor differentiated)
(Human esophageal squamous carcinoma)		↑ caspases activity
→cycle arrest at the G1/S phase and apoptosis↑
↓ p53 and MAPK/ERK signaling pathway regulation
→regulates cell apoptosis [17]
CucurbitacinsSAS
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↑caspases activity → apoptosis [18]
TanshinonesSCC-9
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↑Beclin-1/Atg7/Atg12-Atg5 pathway
↓PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway
→autophagy↑ [24]
OridoninKYSE-30/KYSE-150/EC9706
(Human esophageal squamous carcinoma)		↓cyclin B1, CDK2 and Bcl-2
↑p53, p21, Bax, cleaved caspase-3, -8, and -9
↓PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Ras/Raf signaling pathway in vivo ##
↑cell cycle arrest [13]
UM1 and SCC-25
(Human oral squamous cell carcinoma)		↑the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2
↑the cleavage of caspase-3, caspase-9 and PARP-1
↓proliferation and clonal formation
↑apoptosis
↓cyclin B1
↑cyclin D1, cyclin D3, P21, p-CDK1 and cyclin A2
→G2/M phase arrest [29]
ChrysophanolFaDu
(Human hypopharynx squamous cell carcinoma)
SAS
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↑cleaved caspase-3
↑ROS
↑apoptosis
↓G1 phase arrest [31]
Shikonin5-8F
(Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma)		↓plasma membrane integrity
→electron-lucent cytoplasm and intact nuclear membrane
→ necroptosis↑
↑RIPK1, RIPK3, and MLKL
↓tumor growth in the 5-8F xenograft mouse model ## [41]
ArtesunateEca109/Ec9706
(Human esophageal squamous carcinoma)		↓BCL-2 and CDC25A
↑Bax and caspase-3 → apoptosis and cell cycle arrest↑
## In vivo: dose-dependent tumor regression [19]
WogoninNPC-TW076/NPC-TW039
(Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma)		↓mTOR/P70S6K pathway
→autophagy↑
↓Raf/ERK and PI3K/Akt pathway
↑apoptosis [25]
β-ElemeneYD-38
(Human gingival squamous cell carcinoma)
in vitro and in vivo ##		↓p-STAT3, p-JAK2, and Bcl-2
↑Bax and caspase-3
↑proliferative inhibition and apoptosis [30]
DemethoxycurcuminSCC-9, HSC3
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↓cIAP1/XIAP
↑HO-1
↑cleaved caspase-3, -8, -9
↓p38
→G2/M phase arrest
↑apoptosis [26]
MoscatilinFaDu
(Human hypopharynx squamous cell carcinoma)		↑cleaved caspase-3, -7, -8, -9
↑cleaved PARP
↓JNK activity
↑apoptosis [27]
Cepharanthine (CEP)CNE-1/CNE-2
(Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma)		↓NF-κB
↑apoptosis [14]
HSC2, HSC3 and HSC4
(Human oral squamous cell carcinoma)
in vitro and in vivo ##		↓DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair after radiation
↑caspase-3 → apoptosis↑ [42]
##: In vivo study. Abbreviations: DHA: Dihydroartemisinin; PDT: Photodynamic therapy; ERK: extracellular signal-regulated kinase; MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; PARP: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; Nrf2: Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2; cIAP1/XIAP: cellular IAP 1/X-chromosome-linked IAP; HO-1: heme oxygenase-1; JNK = c-Jun N-terminal kinase; ROS: Reactive oxygen species.
Table
Table 2. Regulatory Impacts of THM compounds for HNSCC Cell Mobility/Metastasis and Angiogenesis.
Table 2. Regulatory Impacts of THM compounds for HNSCC Cell Mobility/Metastasis and Angiogenesis.
Herbal CompoundsCell TypesCellular/Molecular Changes
Andrographis paniculataEC-109

(Human esophageal squamous carcinoma)		↓WNT/BMP pathway
↓ErbB and MAPK pathway [45]
↓TM4SF3, HER2, CXCR4, NFκB, MMP-2 and MMP-9 [46]
## Intraperitoneal EC-109 xenograft mouse↓liver and lung metastases [46]
↓tumor weight and tumor nodule number [47]
Andrographispaniculate extract/isoandrographolideEC-109/KYSE-520
(Human esophageal squamous carcinoma)
HMEC-1
(Human microvascular endothelial cell)		↓anoikis resistance, TM4SF3 [47]
EcliptaprostrataHSC-3/SCC-9
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)
TW2.6
(Human buccal carcinoma)		↓MMP-2
(probably via ERK1/2 signaling pathways) [48]
RubusIdaeusSCC-9/SAS
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↓MMP-2
(probably via ERK1/2 signaling pathways) [49,50]
HONE-1, NPC-39 and NPC-BM
(Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma)
SelaginellatamariscinaHSC-3
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↓MMP-2 and MMP-9
↑TIMP-1 and TIMP-2
(probably via Akt pathway) [51]
DuchesneaindicaSCC-9/SCC-14
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)
TW2.6
(Human buccal carcinoma)		↓MMP-2
(probably via MEK/ERK1/2 signaling pathways) [52]
LeucaenaleucocephalaSCC-9/SAS
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↓MMP-2
(probably via ERK1/2 and p38 signaling pathways) [53]
PhysalisangulataHSC-3
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↓VEGF, MMP-2, MMP-9 and u-PA
↑TIMP-1, TIMP-2, PAI-1 and PAI-2
HUVECsIn vitro↓MMP-2
## In vivo
(CAM assay)		↓Induced neovascularization [54]
GaliumverumHep-2/HLaC79
(Taxol sensitive/resistant
human laryngeal carcinoma)		↓MMP-2 [55]
Rheum palmatum L.SCC-9/SAS
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↓MMP-2
(probably via ERK1/2 signaling pathways) [56]
Rheum palmatum L./Emodin, aloe-emodin and rheinSCC-4
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↓MMP-2 and u-PA [57]
Rheum palmatum L./ChrysophanolFaDu
(Human hypopharynx squamous cell carcinoma)
SAS
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↓EMT (↑E-cadherin, ↓vimentin) [31]
Rhizomacoptidis/BerberineSCC-4
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↓MMP-2, MMP-9, and u-PA [58]
Gynostemmapentaphyllum Makino/GypenosidesSAS
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↓MMP-2, MMP-7, and MMP-9 [59]
Myrtaceae pollen and Eucalyptus honey/TricetinSCC-9/HSC-3
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)
OECM-1
(Human oral epidermal carcinoma)		↓MMP-9
(probably via p38/JNK1/2 pathway) [60]
Pinussylvestris/pinosylvinSAS/SCC-9/HSC-3
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↓MMP-2
↑TIMP-2
(probably via ERK1/2 signaling pathways) [61]
Salvia miltiorrhiza (Danshen)/salvianolic acid ASCC-9/SCC-25
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↓MMP-2
(probably via c-Raf/MEK/ERK pathway) [62]
Quercetin (found in onion)SAS
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↓MMP-2 and MMP-9 [63]
Phenethyl isothiocyanateSAS
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↓p-EGFR, MMP-2 and MMP-9
↑TIMP-1 and TIMP-2
(probably via PI3K/AKT, NF-κB, and MAPK pathway) [64]
Gallic AcidNPC-BM1
(Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma)		↓MMP-1
↑TIMP-1
(mediated by ↓AP-1, ETS-1, p-p38, c-fos and c-jun) [65]
EvodiamineHONE1 (poorly differentiated) and CNE1 (well differentiated)
(Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma)		↓MMP-2
(probably via ↓NF-κB p65, p-ERK1/2) [66]
Ursolic acid (UA)Ca922
(Human oral squamous cell carcinoma)		↓angiogenesis
↓migration/invasion by
blocking MMP-2 secretion [23]
NobiletinHONE-1
(Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma)
NPC-BM
(Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma derived from bone marrow metastatic lesion)		↓MMP-2
↑TIMP-2
(probably via ERK1/2, NF-kB, and AP-1 pathway) [67]
## HONE-1 injected s.c. into the right flank of BALB/c nude mouse↓lung metastasis (↓NF–κB) [67]
ResveratrolSCC-9
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↓MMP-9
(probably via JNK1/2 and ERK1/2 pathways) [68]
TriptolideCNE
(Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma)		anti-angiogenesis [40]
KYSE180 (well differentiated)
Eca109 (well differentiated)
KYSE150 (poor differentiated)
(Human esophageal squamous carcinoma)		differentially regulates metastasis [17,69]
Pinostilbene hydrate (methylated derivative of resveratrol)SAS/SCC-9/HSC-3
(Human tongue squamous carcinoma)		↓MMP-2
(probably via p38/ERK1/2 pathway) [70]
Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG)TW01
(Human keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma)
TW06
(Human undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma		↓stem cell genes (Oct4 and Klf4)
↓EMT related protein (↓Snail, Vimentin/↑E-Cadherin) [71]
TW01 (EBV-negative)/NA (EBV-positive), (Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma)
NP460hTert
(Human immortalized human nasopharyngeal cell)		↓MMP-2 and MMP-9 (mediated by ↓ERK, AP-1 and Sp1 [72]
CNE2 and C666-1
(Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma)		↓EMT (via NF-κB p65 inactivation) [73]
## CNE2-SC xenograft nude mouse (combined with cisplatin treatment)↓N-cadherin, vimentin, Bmi-1, Twist1, and NF-κB p65
↑E-cadherin [73]
CAL-27
(HNSCC cell)
(treated alone or combined with Gefitinib)		↓MMP-2, p-EGFR
↑TIMP-2
(probably via MAPK pathway) [74]
Qigesan (fufang)TE1, TE13 and Eca109
(Human esophageal cancer)		↑Cx26 and Cx43 [75]
Fuzheng Yiliu granules&& Randomized clinical treatment
(treatment group = 30, control group = 33) (combined with radiotherapy)		↑RBC-C3bRR
↓RBC-ICRR and CD44v6 [76]
Aidi injectionEC9706/KYSE70
(Human esophageal squamous carcinoma)		↓VEGF-A, cadherin-2 and vimentin
↑cadherin-1 [77]
## EC9706 cells inoculated into the peritoneal cavity of BALB/c NU mouse↓vimentin and VEGF-A
↑cadherin-1 [77]
##: In vivo study. &&: Clinical study. Abbreviations: MMP = metalloproteinase; u-PA = urokinase-type plasminogen activator; Cx = connexin; VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor; TIMP = tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase; ERK = extracellular signal-regulated kinase; MAPK = mitogen-activated protein kinase; JNK = c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK); BMP = bone morphogenetic protein; TKI = tyrosine kinase inhibitor; EGFR = epidermal growth factor receptor; HIF-1α = Hypoxia inducible factor 1, alpha subunit; THBS2 = Thrombospondin 2; TGF = Transforming Growth Factor; AP-1 = activator protein-1; NF-κB = nuclear factor-κB; PAI = plasminogen activator inhibitors; HUVECs = human umbilical vein endothelial cells; CAM = chick chorioallantoic membrane; EBV = Epstein-Barr virus; ETS-1 = proto-oncogene 1.
Table
Table 3. Regulatory Impacts of THM compounds for HNSCC Cell Drug Resistance.
Table 3. Regulatory Impacts of THM compounds for HNSCC Cell Drug Resistance.
Herbal CompoundsCell TypesCellular/Molecular Changes
BerberineOC2
(Human oral cancer cells)		↑Paclitaxel induced cytotoxicity
↓multidrug resistant gene pgp-170 [103]
ArtesunateEca109/Ec9706
(Human esophageal squamous carcinoma)		↓mitochondrial membrane potential [19]
WogoninAMC-HN4R/AMC-HN9R
(CDDP resistant HNSCC cells)		↓cell number
↓Nrf2 and glutathione S-transferase P → ROS accumulation↑
→cell death pathways involving PUMA and PARP↑ [105]
EGCGK3, K4 and K5
(Cancer stem cells isolated from HNSCC patients)		↓sphere forming capacity
↓Oct4, Sox2, Nanog and CD44
↓ABCC2 and ABCG2 → ↑CDDP mediated chemosensitivity
↓xenografic tumor formation and induced apoptosis## [111]
(-)-GossypolUM-SCC-5/UM-SCC-10B
(CDDP sensitive/resistant HNSCC cells)		→induced more cell apoptosis in CDDP resistant cells via regulation of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL as well as p53 status [106,107]
Galiumverum aqueous extractHep-2/HLaC79
(Paclitaxel sensitive/resistant
human laryngeal carcinoma)		↑MDR and p-gp protein expression in resistant cells
→more profoundly inhibited 3D spheroid mediated invasion [55]
Danshen extract KB-7D (etoposide resistant)
KB-tax (taxol resistant)
(Human oral cancer)		→significantly inhibited the proliferation of drug-resistant cells [112]
CelastrolSAS/SASV16
(vincristine-resistant
human tongue squamous carcinoma)		→G2/M cell cycle arrest
↑caspases-3, -8, -9 and PARP activity → apoptosis
→modulating BCL-2 and JNK1/2 signaling activity [113]
Cepharanthine (CEP)Eca109
(CDDP sensitive/resistant
human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma)
In vitro and in vivo ##		↓P-gp
→sensitivity of cell lines resistant to cisplatin↑ [14]
##: In vivo study. Abbreviations: P-gp: P-glycoprotein; MDR: Multidrug resistance; ABCG2: ATP-binding cassette super –family G member 2; JNK = c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lan, X.-Y.; Chung, T.-T.; Huang, C.-L.; Lee, Y.-J.; Li, W.-C. Traditional Herbal Medicine Mediated Regulations during Head and Neck Carcinogenesis. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1321. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10091321

AMA Style

Lan X-Y, Chung T-T, Huang C-L, Lee Y-J, Li W-C. Traditional Herbal Medicine Mediated Regulations during Head and Neck Carcinogenesis. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(9):1321. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10091321

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lan, Xiang-Yun, Tzu-Ting Chung, Chien-Ling Huang, Yi-Jang Lee, and Wan-Chun Li. 2020. "Traditional Herbal Medicine Mediated Regulations during Head and Neck Carcinogenesis" Biomolecules 10, no. 9: 1321. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10091321

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop