Next Article in Journal
An Extensive Analysis of Tsallis Statistics: π±, K± Mesons, and pp¯ Baryon in Inelastic pp Collisions
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of Atomic Spectroscopy of Trapped Radioactive Ions in Nuclear Physics
Previous Article in Journal
Fisher Information-Based Optimization of Mapped Fourier Grid Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Radio-Frequency Ion Trap System for the Multi-Reflection Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer at SHANS and Its Offline Commissioning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

High-Precision Experiments with Trapped Radioactive Ions Produced at Relativistic Energies

by
Timo Dickel
1,2,*,
Wolfgang R. Plaß
1,2,
Emma Haettner
1,
Christine Hornung
1,
Sivaji Purushothaman
1,
Christoph Scheidenberger
1,2,3 and
Helmut Weick
1
1
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
2
II. Physikalisches Institut, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, 35392 Gießen, Germany
3
Helmholtz Research Academy Hesse for FAIR (HFHF), GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research, Campus Gießen, 35392 Gießen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atoms 2024, 12(10), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms12100051
Submission received: 5 September 2024 / Revised: 30 September 2024 / Accepted: 6 October 2024 / Published: 8 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Ion Trapping of Radioactive Ions)

Abstract

:
Research on radioactive ion beams produced with in-flight separation of relativistic beams has advanced significantly over the past decades, with contributions to nuclear physics, nuclear astrophysics, atomic physics, and other fields. Central to these advancements are improved production, separation, and identification methods.The FRS Ion Catcher at GSI/FAIRexemplifies these technological advancements. The system facilitates high-precision experiments by efficiently stopping and extracting exotic nuclei as ions and making these available at thermal energies. High-energy synchrotron beams enhance the system’s capabilities, enabling unique experimental techniques such as multi-step reactions, mean range bunching, and optimized stopping, as well as novel measurement methods for observables such as beta-delayed neutron emission probabilities. The FRS Ion Catcher has already contributed to various scientific fields, and the future with the Super-FRS at FAIR promises to extend research to even more exotic nuclei and new applications.

1. Introduction

In-flight fragmentation and fission have generated the majority of new nuclides this century [1]. Research with radioactive ion beams is finding widespread use in nuclear physics, nuclear astrophysics, atomic physics, chemistry, fundamental research, and various applications. This is largely due to significant advancements in production, separation, and identification methods, particularly isotope separation online and in-flight separation. In-flight separation of relativistic beams is particularly effective, providing high-purity beams for all elements up to uranium; even Np and Pu isotopes can be produced through charge–exchange reactions.
To identify and produce high-Z isotopes with high intensity, primary beam energies of approximately 1 GeV/nucleon are required. The GSI facility, with its combination of the heavy-ion synchrotron SIS18 [2] and the projectile fragment separator FRS [3], specializes in this area. It has been used to discover new isotopes [4], measure stopping powers [5,6] and charge state distributions [7] at various energies, advance hadron therapy [8,9], conduct fission research [10], discover new decay modes [11], and was used to make the first measurement of 100Sn [12]. High beam energy benefits the identification of nuclei and allows for flexible operations of the separator because, at the focal planes, more matter—including detectors and degraders—can be inserted. However, the high primary beam energy also leads to challenges for certain types of experiments. For example, in experiments with slowed-down or stopped beams, the high primary beam energy results in large range distributions due to range straggling. Consequently, devices designed to thermalize the produced nuclei need to be large and have high areal densities to efficiently stop the beams.
Once the ions are slowed down, a variety of high-precision experiments can be conducted, including half-life [13] and mass measurements [14,15,16], investigations of decay modes [17], nuclear reaction studies [18], and laser spectroscopy [19]. The FRS Ion Catcher at GSI/FAIR is the first system designed for these relativistic ions and is utilized for numerous applications [20,21]. The research and technical developments as well as matching to the special challenges and possibilities of ion trapping experiments with exotic ions produced at relativistic energies with this system are detailed below.

2. Setup of the FRS Ion Catcher

The FRS Ion Catcher [20] is placed at the final focus of the symmetric branch of the FRS. It is designed to cope with the special needs of ion beams produced at relativistic energies. It consists of a degrader system, a cryogenic gas-filled stopping cell (CSC), and an RFQ beamline, including a laser ablation ion source and a multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer (MR-TOF-MS), see Figure 1.
The uniquely high beam energies at GSI/FAIR allow for a specialized solution and very flexible operations. To fully exploit this, special devices are needed and are described in the following.

2.1. Multipurpose Degrader System

A degrader is used to slow down the ion beam, separate different species by their energy loss, reduce the energy spread of the ions, and modify the ion-optics of the separator. The high beam energy at the FRS allows the use of thick degrader systems and, thus, high flexibility. The multipurpose degrader system of the FRS Ion Catcher allows for various operational modes and consists of the following components: (i) a double wedge degrader that creates a variable homogeneous degrader; (ii) a double disk degrader that forms a variable wedge; and (iii) two ladders equipped with fixed wedges, thick aluminum plates, and tantalum plates. The homogeneity of the wedge is shown in Figure 2. It is evident that very high homogeneity is achieved for aluminum. This is due to two factors: first, the surface roughness is small (about 5 times less than that of tantalum); second, aluminum has a density more than six times lower than that of tantalum. As a result, the homogeneity of the areal density is 30 times better for aluminum compared to tantalum. A double wedge degrader has a minimal areal density of a few hundred mg/cm2, as the two wedges must overlap with the beam. This may be too much for high-Z, low-energy beams. In this case, a gas degrader with variable density [22] can be used. It has a minimal areal density of only a few tens of mg/cm2.

2.2. Cryogenic Gas-Filled Stopping Cell

The cryogenic gas-filled stopping cell of the FRS-IC is the first cryogenic gas cell for exotic nuclei in operation and is used for experiments [23,24,25]. It features a beam window measuring 200 × 100 mm2 and has an active length of 1 m. The cell operates at temperatures between 80 and 90 K and pressures between 30 and 150 mbar of helium, resulting in an areal density of up to 10 mg/cm2 [26], which is significantly higher than any other system. These unique performance parameters are essential to cope with the challenges induced by the high beam energies. The range straggling in a typical experiment is 10 mg/cm2, allowing stopping efficiencies of up to 50%. Once the ions are stopped in the gas, they are transported by DC fields, usually around 30 V/cm, to the system’s extraction side, resulting in a mean transport time of 20 ms to the RF carpet. Here, the RF carpet with a 250 µm pitch generates a repelling field by applying a sinusoidal RF signal at 100 Vpp and 6 MHz. More than 50% of the stopped ions can be extracted from the CSC, with most of them being singly or doubly charged atomic ions [21,27]. Additionally, the RF carpet can suppress molecular background through ion mobility selection by finely adjusting the RF amplitude [28].

2.3. RFQ Beamline

The RFQ beamline offers differential pumping; ion transport and cooling, separation; background suppression; diagnostics; as well as ions for calibration, testing, and optimization of the downstream system, all within a compact 1.5-m-long setup [29,30,31] (see Figure 1). The first mass selection occurs right after the nozzle in the extraction RFQ, which can also function as an RF mass filter. This setup can achieve mass-resolving powers of up to 150, albeit with significantly reduced transmission efficiency (around 1%). Typically, a mass-resolving power of 5 to 10 is achieved at efficiencies above 90%, sufficient for selecting the desired mass range [32].
In the subsequent section of the beamline, various detectors for both stable and radioactive ions, as well as ion sources, are introduced. Further downstream, an RFQ switchyard is used to connect ion sources and detectors to the beamline [33]. This is followed by a dedicated RF mass filter with a mass-resolving power greater than 50 at 90% transmission. The molecular background can be reduced by using the isolation–dissociation–isolation method. In this technique, a voltage step (typically 60 V) is applied to dissociate weakly bound adducts or molecules. Mass selection is performed both before and after this dissociation step [34] with the two mass filters described earlier.
Recently, the system was upgraded with a laser ablation carbon cluster ion source (LACCI), which provides the downstream MR-TOF-MS with various calibration ions and additional capabilities [31]. After the mass filter, another RFQ captures and cools the selected ions at the end of the RFQ beamline before delivering them to the trap system of the MR-TOF-MS.

2.4. MR-TOF-MS

The final component of the FRS Ion Catcher is the MR-TOF-MS, where the quasi DC beam extracted from the CSC (typical time structure from the SIS18 is a few-second beam followed by a 2-s pause) is converted into a bunched beam using a trap system [35,36,37]. Bunches of ions with a time spread of 5–10 ns at the time focus and with an energy spread of ±10 eV are generated and travel with an average kinetic energy of 1300 eV in the time-of-flight analyzer for the selected number of turns. Subsequently, they are ejected via the time-focus shift (TFS) reflector spatially and temporally, focused on the detector or the fast-switching ion gate [38]. The system has achieved a mass resolving power of one million and mass accuracy of low 10 8 [39]. A few ions are sufficient to determine a mass with this level of mass accuracy. Due to the unique design of the MR-TOF-MS of the FRS Ion Catcher, which includes the TFS reflector, the system has an unprecedented mass range [40], which has been utilized in offline and online measurements [41,42]. The MR-TOF-MS can also function as an isobar and isomer separator [43] by replacing the time-of-flight detector with a fast-switching ion gate, i.e., a Bradbury–Nielsen Gate [44].

3. Examples of Advantages for Experiments with Thermalized and Trapped Exotic Ions Produced at Synchrotron Facilities

A synchrotron offers inherent advantages: (i) rapidly variable beam energy, (ii) high beam energy for heavy ions, and (iii) pulsed beams. The following examples illustrate how these advantages are utilized for ion trapping experiments.

3.1. Multi-Step Reactions in a Very Thick Target

Due to the high beam energies from the SIS18, very thick targets can be used without stopping the fragments of interest within the target. This increases the rates for all isotopes (neutron-rich and -deficient) produced in fragmentation and fission. Depending on the primary beam, target, and fragment combination, beryllium targets as thick as ≤16 g/cm2, approximately 86 mm, can be used, and the interaction probability of the beam can reach up to 90%. As a result, the produced fragments also have a high probability of undergoing additional nuclear reactions within the thick target. Generally, such thick targets lead to an increased longitudinal energy spread that exceeds the acceptance of the separator due to the varying energy loss of the projectile and the fragments. However, for many neutron-deficient nuclei, this is not the case, resulting in an additional substantial increase in production yields. The key criterion is that the beam and fragments should have similar energy losses, leading to a narrow momentum spread after passing through the target. This condition is met when A p / Z p 2 A f / Z f 2 , where A p and Z p are the mass and proton number of the primary beam, and A f and Z f are the mass and proton number of the fragment.
Figure 3 shows the nuclear chart, the isotopes for which the optimal choice of the primary beam meets this condition. Evidence of this effect and the energy dependence of the apparent production cross-sections has been observed in the production of 100Sn at RIKEN (using a 124Xe primary beam at 345 MeV/u) and GSI (using a 124Xe primary beam at 1000 MeV/u), with the higher energy yielding an increase in the apparent cross-section by a factor of about 8 [12,45]. From simulations, it is expected that the rate of nuclides of interest could increase by up to an order of magnitude for the proposed mass measurements, as illustrated in Figure 4. This approach may extend the reach towards more exotic nuclides at the FRS and the Super-FRS Ion Catcher.
When multi-step reactions are used for medium and heavy primary beams, the secondary beams have low energy and increased background. Therefore, only detection systems that can handle high rates and do not rely on the FRS particle identification, such as the FRS Ion Catcher, can fully exploit multi-step reactions.

3.2. Beta-Delayed Neutron Emission

The high and variable energy enables the production of a very clean stopped beam. By using the CSC as an ion trap and extracting from the SIS18 in short pulses of about 10 ms, it becomes possible to measure beta-delayed neutron emission without needing to detect the neutron directly. This method is particularly effective for multi-neutron detection [46]. For this approach, the FRS is used to provide a clean beam of the ions of interest, which are stopped and thermalized in CSC. At variance to the normal operation, the electric fields in the CSC are switch off; thereby, the CSC acts as a ion trap. The ions are stored for up to 1 s in the dense and cold He gas. Now, the ions of interest decay and their recoils are thermalized in the CSC. After a selected time, the electric field is switched on, and ions are extracted, detected, identified, and counted with the MR-TOF-MS.

3.3. Mean Range Bunching

When the FRS is used in achromatic mode, the disk degrader positioned in front of the CSC is used to achieve mean range bunching. This technique minimizes the range differences between various nuclides, allowing them to be stopped simultaneously. This is possible as there is an almost linear dependence of the mean range of nuclides with their position in the dispersive plane. Now, a wedge-shaped degrader is inserted to compensate the difference in ranges. When combined with the MR-TOF-MS capabilities, this approach becomes a highly effective measurement method to investigate the mass surface over a broader region on the nuclear chart [42] or for decay experiments with stopped beams [47].

3.4. Optimize Stopping

A synchrotron provides the benefit of easily adjusting primary beam energy, which helps in optimizing the stopped beam. Fine-tuning these adjustments allows us to produce a particularly clean stopped beam [17,48,49] or to stop specific isotopes of interest simultaneously, see Figure 5. Another method to improve the rate of stopped beams is to use a degrader made from a high-A material. This choice minimizes nuclear reactions and reduces losses during the deceleration process. From a practical perspective, tantalum is ideal for this purpose, although producing highly uniform plates from it is technically challenging, see discussion in Section 2.1.

3.5. Using the Same Exotic Ions for Multiple, Simultaneous Experiments

Due to the high beam energy, the ions can interact with significant amounts of matter at the mid-focal plane and remain available for experiments at the final focal plane. Consequently, combined experiments were conducted where the EXPERT setup [50] was positioned at the mid-focal plane and the FRS Ion Catcher was placed at the final focal plane. The experiment requires the mid focal plane to be achromatic and the mid focal plane to the final focal plane to be dispersive. Thus, the target to final focal becomes dispersive. To achieve good stopping of the fragments transmitted to the final focal plane, a disk degrader is used to achieve a monochromatic setting. With such a setup, multiple experiments can be conducted simultaneously with the same beam.

3.6. The FRS Ion Catcher as a Tool for the Fragment Separator

By measuring the mass of the stopped ions, the MR-TOF-MS can provide an independent particle identification based solely on mass, complementing the FRS method. This technique is known as mass tagging. This fast and robust method can be implemented in different ways; for details, see [51]. The FRS and the MR-TOF-MS data streams can also be merged to obtain additional information in the FRS or provide background suppression for the MR-TOF-MS [41]. To set up the experiment, the capability to calculate the range for each ion based on the information measured with the particle identification of the FRS has been implemented.

4. Scientific Program and Outlook

The FRS Ion Catcher has already been used to address various scientific questions, from nuclear structure effects for heavy N = Z isotopes [15,16,39] to mid-shell nuclides above Sn and around 208Pb [13,14]. It also searches for exotic decay modes, such as fission isomers [52] and double alpha decay [53]. Current research includes multi-nucleon transfer reaction studies with slowed-down relativistic primary and secondary beams, beta-delayed neutron emission, and the evolution of the mass surface toward the third peak of the r-process [21]. These topics will remain relevant for years to come. With the Super-FRS becoming operational, there will be many new opportunities to study even more exotic nuclei; the Super-FRS Ion Catcher will play a crucial role in this research. The new stopping cell [54] is expected to achieve near-unity stopping efficiency, operate faster, and handle a higher rate, thereby further extending the reach. The system is currently under construction at Justus-Liebig University Giessen.

5. Conclusions

The development and implementation of the FRS Ion Catcher at GSI/FAIR have enabled precise and versatile experiments with thermalized relativistic ions for the first time. Important upgrades include the multipurpose degrader system at the final focal plane, the cryogenic stopping cell’s exceptional areal density and ion extraction efficiency, and the RFQ-based beamline’s capabilities for mass selection and background suppression.
The unique concepts enabled by high-energy beams from the SIS18 synchrotron, such as multi-step reactions in thick targets, mean range bunching, and optimized stopping, have significantly broadened the scope of the research with the FRS Ion Catcher.
The coupling of the FRS Ion Catcher with the fragment separator data acquisition provides independent particle identification and enhanced background suppression, it has proven to be a powerful tool for both current and future experiments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.D., W.R.P., E.H., C.H., S.P., C.S. and H.W.; writing—original draft preparation, T.D., W.R.P., E.H., C.H., S.P., C.S. and H.W.; writing—review and editing, T.D., W.R.P., E.H., C.H., S.P., C.S. and H.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) under contract nos. 05P19RGFN1 and 05P21RGFN1, by Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen and GSI under the JLU-GSI strategic Helmholtz partnership agreement and by HGS-HIRe.

Data Availability Statement

No new data used.

Acknowledgments

The authors dedicate this article to our long-standing friend and colleague, Hans Geissel, who passed away in April 2024, much too early. He was a pioneer of in-flight separation of relativistic heavy-ion beams and made essential contributions to the realization of the experiments with the FRS Ion Catcher. We also thank Bettina Lommel and Birgit Kindler from the GSI target, the technicians of the FRS group, the Super-FRS Experiment Collaboration, and all who collaborated over the years.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Thoennessen, M. 2017 update of the discoveries of nuclides. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 2018, 27, 1830002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Blasche, K. SIS Beam Development 1989–1991. GSI-Rep. GSI-SIS-INT, 86-2.
  3. Geissel, H.; Armbruster, P.; Behr, K.; Brünle, A.; Burkard, K.; Chen, M.; Folger, H.; Franczak, B.; Keller, H.; Klepper, O.; et al. The GSI projectile fragment separator (FRS): A versatile magnetic system for relativistic heavy ions. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 1992, 70, 286–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kurcewicz, J.; Farinon, F.; Geissel, H.; Pietri, S.; Nociforo, C.; Prochazka, A.; Weick, H.; Winfield, J.S.; Estrade, A.; Allegro, P.R.P.; et al. Discovery and cross-section measurement of neutron-rich isotopes in the element range from neodymium to platinum with the FRS. Phys. Lett. B 2012, 717, 371–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Scheidenberger, C.; Geissel, H.; Mikkelsen, H.H.; Nickel, F.; Brohm, T.; Folger, H.; Irnich, H.; Magel, A.; Mohar, M.F.; Münzenberg, G.; et al. Direct observation of systematic deviations from the Bethe stopping theory for relativistic heavy ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994, 73, 50–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ishikawa, S.; Geissel, H.; Purushothaman, S.; Weick, H.; Haettner, E.; Iwasa, N.; Scheidenberger, C.; Sørensen, A.; Tanaka, Y.; Abel, T.; et al. Accurate simultaneous lead stopping power and charge-state measurements in gases and solids: Benchmark data for basic atomic theory and nuclear applications. Phys. Lett. B 2023, 846, 138220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Weick, H.; Geissel, H.; Scheidenberger, C.; Attallah, F.; Cortina, D.; Hausmann, M.; Münzenberg, G.; Radon, T.; Schatz, H.; Schmidt, K.; et al. Drastic Enhancement of Energy-Loss Straggling of Relativistic Heavy Ions due to Charge-State Fluctuations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 2725–2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Schardt, D.; Schall, I.; Geissel, H.; Irnich, H.; Kraft, G.; Magel, A.; Mohar, M.; Münzenberg, G.; Nickel, F.; Scheidenberger, C.; et al. Nuclear fragmentation of high-energy heavy-ion beams in water. Adv. Space Res. 1996, 17, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Haettner, E.; Geissel, H.; Franczak, B.; Kostyleva, D.; Purushothaman, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Amjad, F.; Boscolo, D.; Dickel, T.; Graeff, C.; et al. Production and separation of positron emitters for hadron therapy at FRS-Cave M. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 2023, 541, 114–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bernas, M.; Engelmann, C.; Armbruster, P.; Czajkowski, S.; Ameil, F.; Böckstiegel, C.; Dessagne, P.; Donzaud, C.; Geissel, H.; Heinz, A.; et al. Discovery and cross-section measurement of 58 new fission products in projectile-fission of 750 · A MeV 238U. Phys. Lett. B 1997, 415, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pfützner, M.; Badura, E.; Bingham, C.; Blank, B.; Chartier, M.; Geissel, H.; Giovinazzo, J.; Grigorenko, L.V.; Grzywacz, R.; Hellström, M.; et al. First evidence for the two-proton decay of 45Fe. Eur. Phys. J. A 2003, 14, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hinke, C.B.; Böhmer, M.; Boutachkov, P.; Faestermann, T.; Geissel, H.; Gerl, J.; Gernhäuser, R.; Gorska, M.; Gottardo, A.; Grawe, H.; et al. Superallowed Gamow–Teller decay of the doubly magic nucleus 100Sn. Nature 2012, 486, 341–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ayet San Andrés, S.; Mollaebrahimi, A.; Dickel, T.; Bergmann, J.; Ebert, J.; Geissel, H.; Greiner, F.; Haettner, E.; Hornung, C.; Kalantar-Nayestanaki, N.; et al. Mass and half-life measurements of neutron-deficient iodine isotopes. Eur. Phys. J. A 2020, 56, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ayet San Andrés, S.; Hornung, C.; Ebert, J.; Plaß, W.R.; Dickel, T.; Geissel, H.; Scheidenberger, C.; Bergmann, J.; Greiner, F.; Haettner, E.; et al. High-resolution, accurate multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometry for short-lived, exotic nuclei of a few events in their ground and low-lying isomeric states. Phys. Rev. C 2019, 99, 064313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hornung, C.; Amanbayev, D.; Dedes, I.; Kripko-Koncz, G.; Miskun, I.; Shimizu, N.; Ayet San Andrés, S.; Bergmann, J.; Dickel, T.; Dudek, J.; et al. Isomer studies in the vicinity of the doubly-magic nucleus 100Sn: Observation of a new low-lying isomeric state in 97Ag. Phys. Lett. B 2020, 802, 135200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mollaebrahimi, A.; Hornung, C.; Dickel, T.; Amanbayev, D.; Kripko-Koncz, G.; Plaß, W.R.; Ayet San Andrés, S.; Beck, S.; Blazhev, A.; Bergmann, J.; et al. Studying Gamow-Teller transitions and the assignment of isomeric and ground states at N = 50. Phys. Lett. B 2023, 839, 137833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Miskun, I.; Dickel, T.; Mardor, I.; Hornung, C.; Amanbayev, D.; Ayet San Andrés, S.; Bergmann, J.; Ebert, J.; Geissel, H.; Górska, M.; et al. A novel method for the measurement of half-lives and decay branching ratios of exotic nuclei. Eur. Phys. J. A 2019, 55, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Constantin, P.; Dickel, T.; Karpov, A.V.; Amanbayev, D.; Balabanski, D.; Geissel, H.; Mahajan, K.; Mardor, I.; Mollaebrahimi, A.; Plaß, W.R.; et al. In-cell multi-nucleon transfer reactions at the FRS Ion Catcher. Phys. Scr. 2024, 99, 075313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rodríguez, D.; Blaum, K.; Nörtershäuser, W.; Ahammed, M.; Algora, A.; Audi, G.; Äystö, J.; Beck, D.; Bender, M.; Billowes, J.; et al. MATS and LaSpec: High-precision experiments using ion traps and lasers at FAIR. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2010, 183, 1–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Plaß, W.R.; Dickel, T.; Purushothaman, S.; Dendooven, P.; Geissel, H.; Ebert, J.; Haettner, E.; Jesch, C.; Ranjan, M.; Reiter, M.P.; et al. The FRS Ion Catcher—A facility for high-precision experiments with stopped projectile and fission fragments. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 2013, 317, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Plaß, W.R.; Dickel, T.; Mardor, I.; Pietri, S.; Geissel, H.; Scheidenberger, C.; Amanbayev, D.; Ayet San Andrés, S.; Äystö, J.; Balabanski, D.L.; et al. The science case of the FRS Ion Catcher for FAIR Phase-0. Hyperfine Interact 2019, 240, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Purushothaman, S.; Dickel, T.; Ayet San Andrés, S.; Bagchi, S.; Behr, K.H.; Bergmann, J.; Blatz, T.; Constantin, P.; Ebert, J.; Finley, A.; et al. A gas degrader for the low-energy branch of the Super-FRS at FAIR. GSI Sci. Rep. 2016, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ranjan, M.; Purushothaman, S.; Dickel, T.; Geissel, H.; Plaß, W.R.; Schäfer, D.; Scheidenberger, C.; de Walle, J.V.; Weick, H.; Dendooven, P. New stopping cell capabilities: RF carpet performance at high gas density and cryogenic operation. Europhys. Lett. 2011, 96, 52001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Purushothaman, S.; Reiter, M.P.; Haettner, E.; Dendooven, P.; Dickel, T.; Geissel, H.; Ebert, J.; Jesch, C.; Plaß, W.R.; Ranjan, M.; et al. First experimental results of a cryogenic stopping cell with short-lived, heavy uranium fragments produced at 1000 MeV/u. Europhys. Lett. 2013, 104, 42001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ranjan, M.; Dendooven, P.; Purushothaman, S.; Dickel, T.; Reiter, M.; Ayet San Andrés, S.; Haettner, E.; Moore, I.; Kalantar-Nayestanaki, N.; Geissel, H.; et al. Design, construction and cooling system performance of a prototype cryogenic stopping cell for the Super-FRS at FAIR. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 2015, 770, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Miskun, I. A Novel Method for the Measurement of Half-Lives and Decay Branching Ratios of Exotic Nuclei with the FRS Ion Catcher. Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Gießen, Giessen, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  27. Plaß, W.R.; Dickel, T.; Ayet San Andrés, S.; Bagchi, S.; Balabanski, D.; Beck, S.; Constantin, P.; Eronen, T.; Geissel, H.; Greiner, F.; et al. Detector tests with the prototype CSC for the Super-FRS and direct mass measurements of neutron-deficient nuclides below 100-Sn. GSI Sci. Rep. 2018, 2018-1, 115. [Google Scholar]
  28. Miskun, I.; Dickel, T.; San Andrés, S.A.; Bergmann, J.; Constantin, P.; Ebert, J.; Geissel, H.; Greiner, F.; Haettner, E.; Hornung, C.; et al. Separation of atomic and molecular ions by ion mobility with an RF carpet. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2021, 459, 116450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Haettner, E.; Plaß, W.R.; Czok, U.; Dickel, T.; Geissel, H.; Kinsel, W.; Petrick, M.; Schäfer, T.; Scheidenberger, C. A versatile triple radiofrequency quadrupole system for cooling, mass separation and bunching of exotic nuclei. Nucl. Inst. Methods A 2018, 880, 138–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reiter, M.P. Pilot Experiments with Relativistic Uranium Projectile and Fission Fragments Thermalized in a Cryogenic Gas-Filled Stopping Cell. Ph.D. Thesis, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Hesse, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yu, J.; Hornung, C.; Dickel, T.; Plaß, W.R.; Amanbayev, D.; Bergmann, J.; Ge, Z.; Greiner, F.; Geissel, H.; Gröf, L.; et al. A laser ablation carbon cluster ion source for the FRS Ion Catcher. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 2024, 1064, 169371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Miskun, I.; Reiter, M.P.; Rink, A.; Dickel, T.; Ayet San Andrés, S.; Ebert, J.; Geissel, H.; Greiner, F.; Haettner, E.; Hornung, C.; et al. An RFQ based beam line and mass filter to improve identification capabilities at the diagnostics unit of the prototype CSC for the LEB. GSI Sci. Rep. 2014 2015, 2015-1, 146p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Plaß, W.R.; Dickel, T.; Ayet San Andrés, S.; Ebert, J.; Greiner, F.; Hornung, C.; Jesch, C.; Lang, J.; Lippert, W.; Majoros, T.; et al. High-performance multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometers for research with exotic nuclei and for analytical mass spectrometry. Phys. Scr. 2015, T166, 014069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Greiner, F.; Dickel, T.; Ayet San Andrés, S.; Bergmann, J.; Constantin, P.; Ebert, J.; Geissel, H.; Haettner, E.; Hornung, C.; Miskun, I.; et al. Removal of molecular contamination in low-energy RIBs by the isolation–dissociation–isolation method. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 2020, 463, 324–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Plaß, W.R.; Dickel, T.; Czok, U.; Geissel, H.; Petrick, M.; Reinheimer, K.; Scheidenberger, C.; Yavor, M. Isobar separation by time-of-flight mass spectrometry for low-energy radioactive ion beam facilities. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 2008, 266, 4560–4564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dickel, T.; Plaß, W.R.; Becker, A.; Czok, U.; Geissel, H.; Haettner, E.; Jesch, C.; Kinsel, W.; Petrick, M.; Scheidenberger, C.; et al. A high-performance multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer and isobar separator for the research with exotic nuclei. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 2015, 777, 172–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yavor, M.I.; Plaß, W.R.; Dickel, T.; Geissel, H.; Haettner, E.; Jesch, C.; Kinsel, W.; Petrick, M.; Scheidenberger, C.; Simon, A. Ion-optical design of a high-performance multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer and isobar separator. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2015, 381–382, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dickel, T.; Yavor, M.I.; Lang, J.; Plaß, W.R.; Lippert, W.; Geissel, H.; Scheidenberger, C. Dynamical time focus shift in multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometers. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2017, 412, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mardor, I.; Ayet San Andrés, S.; Dickel, T.; Amanbayev, D.; Beck, S.; Bergmann, J.; Geissel, H.; Gröf, L.; Haettner, E.; Hornung, C.; et al. Mass measurements of As, Se, and Br nuclei, and their implication on the proton-neutron interaction strength toward the N=Z line. Phys. Rev. C 2021, 103, 034319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Plaß, W.R.; Dickel, T.; Scheidenberger, C. Multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 349–350, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Spătaru, A.; Hornung, C.; Dickel, T.; Haettner, E.; Pietri, S.; San Andrés, S.A.; Bagchi, S.; Balabanski, D.L.; Bergmann, J.; Ebert, J.; et al. First coupling of the FRS particle identification and the FRS-Ion Catcher data acquisition systems: The case of 109In. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2022, 522, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dickel, T.; Hornung, C.; Amanbayev, D.; Ayet San Andrés, S.; Beck, S.; Bergmann, J.; Geissel, H.; Gerl, J.; Górska, M.; Gröf, L.; et al. Mean range bunching of exotic nuclei produced by in-flight fragmentation and fission—Stopped-beam experiments with increased efficiency. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2023, 541, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dickel, T.; Plaß, W.R.; Ayet San Andrés, S.; Ebert, J.; Geissel, H.; Haettner, E.; Hornung, C.; Miskun, I.; Pietri, S.; Purushothaman, S.; et al. First spatial separation of a heavy ion isomeric beam with a multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Phys. Lett. B 2015, 744, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bradbury, N.E.; Nielsen, R.A. Absolute Values of the Electron Mobility in Hydrogen. Phys. Rev. 1936, 49, 388–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Suzuki, H.; Kubo, T.; Fukuda, N.; Inabe, N.; Kameda, D.; Takeda, H.; Yoshida, K.; Kusaka, K.; Yanagisawa, Y.; Ohtake, M.; et al. Production cross section measurements of radioactive isotopes by BigRIPS separator at RIKEN RI Beam Factory. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 2013, 317, 756–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Miskun, I. In Preparation. Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Gießen, Giessen, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hall, O.; Davinson, T.; Griffin, C.; Woods, P.; Appleton, C.; Bruno, C.; Estrade, A.; Kahl, D.; Sexton, L.; Burrows, I.; et al. The Advanced Implantation Detector Array (AIDA). Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 2023, 1050, 168166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Schmidt, K.H.; Hanelt, E.; Geissel, H.; Münzenberg, G.; Dufour, J. The momentum-loss achromat—A new method for the isotopical separation of relativistic heavy ions. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 1987, 260, 287–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kubo, T. In-flight RI beam separator BigRIPS at RIKEN and elsewhere in Japan. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 2003, 204, 97–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kostyleva, D.; Kiselev, O.; Bezbakh, A.; Chudoba, V.; Eremin, V.; Fomichev, A.; Gorshkov, A.; Krupko, S.; Mukha, I.; Muzalevskii, I.; et al. Study of the Silicon Detectors for Time-of-Flight Measurements at the Super-FRS Facility and Expert Experiments at FAIR. Acta Phys. Pol. B 2018, 49, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hornung, C.; Dickel, T.; Amanbayev, D.; Ayet San Andrés, S.; Balabanski, D.L.; Beck, S.; Bergmann, J.; Constantin, P.; Ebert, J.; Geissel, H.; et al. Mass tagging: Verification and calibration of particle identification by high-resolution mass measurements. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 2023, 541, 257–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhao, J.; Dickel, T.; Reiter, M.P.; Thirolf, P.G.; Wada, M.; Tortorelli, N.; Brencic, Z. Fission isomer studies with the FRS. PoS 2023, FAIRness2022, 063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Varga, L.; Wilsenach, H.; Hall, O.; Dickel, T.; Reiter, M.; Amanbayev, D.; Davinson, T.; Morrissey, D.; Pohjalainen, I.; Tortorelli, N.; et al. Novel device to study double-alpha decay at the FRS Ion Catcher. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 2024, 1063, 169252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dickel, T.; Plaß, W.; Geissel, H.; Heiße, F.; Miskun, I.; Purushothman, S.; Reiter, M.; Rink, A.K.; Scheidenberger, C. Conceptional design of a novel next-generation cryogenic stopping cell for the Low-Energy Branch of the Super-FRS. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2016, 376, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic Layout of the FRS Ion Catcher.
Figure 1. Schematic Layout of the FRS Ion Catcher.
Atoms 12 00051 g001
Figure 2. Deviations from the perfect wedge shape, based on optical scanner measurement from both sides.
Figure 2. Deviations from the perfect wedge shape, based on optical scanner measurement from both sides.
Atoms 12 00051 g002
Figure 3. Schematic nuclear chart indicating the optimal primary beam to exploit multi-step reactions. Stable isotopes are black, beams available at GSI/FAIR are green, and the secondary isotopes produced with the same energy loss as the primary beams are marked in red.
Figure 3. Schematic nuclear chart indicating the optimal primary beam to exploit multi-step reactions. Stable isotopes are black, beams available at GSI/FAIR are green, and the secondary isotopes produced with the same energy loss as the primary beams are marked in red.
Atoms 12 00051 g003
Figure 4. Calculated range distributions of the projectile (LISE++, Monte Carlo mode) fragments for a 94Ag setting for a 3 g/cm2 target (left panel) and an 18.5 g/cm2 target (right panel). The vertical axis show the yields of the respective fragments at the final focus of the FRS per shift (8 h).
Figure 4. Calculated range distributions of the projectile (LISE++, Monte Carlo mode) fragments for a 94Ag setting for a 3 g/cm2 target (left panel) and an 18.5 g/cm2 target (right panel). The vertical axis show the yields of the respective fragments at the final focus of the FRS per shift (8 h).
Atoms 12 00051 g004
Figure 5. Simulated range distribution of isotones for 750 (left panel) and 900 (right panel) MeV/u 124Xe primary beams on an 8 g/cm2 production target. The FRS is operated in monochromatic mode with a 737 mg/cm2 degrader at the mid-focal plane.
Figure 5. Simulated range distribution of isotones for 750 (left panel) and 900 (right panel) MeV/u 124Xe primary beams on an 8 g/cm2 production target. The FRS is operated in monochromatic mode with a 737 mg/cm2 degrader at the mid-focal plane.
Atoms 12 00051 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dickel, T.; Plaß, W.R.; Haettner, E.; Hornung, C.; Purushothaman, S.; Scheidenberger, C.; Weick, H. High-Precision Experiments with Trapped Radioactive Ions Produced at Relativistic Energies. Atoms 2024, 12, 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms12100051

AMA Style

Dickel T, Plaß WR, Haettner E, Hornung C, Purushothaman S, Scheidenberger C, Weick H. High-Precision Experiments with Trapped Radioactive Ions Produced at Relativistic Energies. Atoms. 2024; 12(10):51. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms12100051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dickel, Timo, Wolfgang R. Plaß, Emma Haettner, Christine Hornung, Sivaji Purushothaman, Christoph Scheidenberger, and Helmut Weick. 2024. "High-Precision Experiments with Trapped Radioactive Ions Produced at Relativistic Energies" Atoms 12, no. 10: 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms12100051

APA Style

Dickel, T., Plaß, W. R., Haettner, E., Hornung, C., Purushothaman, S., Scheidenberger, C., & Weick, H. (2024). High-Precision Experiments with Trapped Radioactive Ions Produced at Relativistic Energies. Atoms, 12(10), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms12100051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop