Next Article in Journal
Observability of HOFNARs at SRG/eROSITA
Previous Article in Journal
Cold Quark–Gluon Plasma EOS Applied to a Magnetically Deformed Quark Star with an Anomalous Magnetic Moment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Statistical Similarity of Repeating and Non-Repeating Fast Radio Bursts

1
Department of Physics, College of Physics, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
2
School of Mathematics and Physics, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056005, China
3
College of Physics and Electronic Science, Qiannan Normal University, Duyun 55800, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Universe 2022, 8(7), 355; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8070355
Submission received: 4 May 2022 / Revised: 13 June 2022 / Accepted: 14 June 2022 / Published: 27 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Compact Objects)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we present a sample of 21 repeating fast radio bursts (FRBs) detected by different radio instruments before September 2021. Using the Anderson–Darling test, we compared the distributions of extra-Galactic dispersion measure ( D M E ) of non-repeating FRBs, repeating FRBs and all FRBs. It was found that the D M E values of three sub-samples are log-normally distributed. The D M E of repeaters and non-repeaters were drawn from a different distribution on basis of the Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test. In addition, assuming that the non-repeating FRBs identified currently may be potentially repeators, i.e., the repeating FRBs to be universal and representative, one can utilize the averaged fluence of repeating FRBs as an indication from which to derive an apparent intensity distribution function (IDF) with a power-law index of a 1 = 1.10 ± 0.14 ( a 2 = 1.01 ± 0.16 , the observed fluence as a statistical variant), which is in good agreement with the previous IDF of 16 non-repeating FRBs found by Li et al. Based on the above statistics of repeating and non-repeating FRBs, we propose that both types of FRBs may have different cosmological origins, spatial distributions and circum-burst environments. Interestingly, the differential luminosity distributions of repeating and non-repeating FRBs can also be well described by a broken power-law function with the same power-law index of −1.4.

1. Introduction

Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are mysterious millisecond-duration radio pulses which occur randomly on the sky (e.g., [1,2,3]). FRBs were first found in archived pulsar survey data more than a decade ago [1], and more than 600 FRBs were reported as of April 2022 (e.g., [4,5,6]). However, the detection rate of FRBs is considered to be 10 3 10 4 sky 1 day 1 [2,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17], which means that FRBs are not uncommon in the Universe; e.g., 1652 repeating events from FRB 20121102A [18] and 1863 bursts from FRB 20201124A [19] were recently detected by the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST, Li et al. [20]). The observed dispersion measures ( D M ) are larger than the D M contributions from the Milk Way ( D M M W ) (except FRB 200428, which was confirmed to be from the Galactic magnetar SGR 1935+2154 [21,22,23,24,25,26,27]), which suggests an extragalactic, even cosmological origin in most cases.
It should be mentioned that there is no unambiguous physical origin for FRBs now. In general, FRBs’ millisecond duration and high D M indicate the high brightness temperature ( 10 32 K – 3.5 × 10 35 K) [28] and the corresponding isotropic energy (E) released ( 10 35 erg 10 44 erg) [5,22,29,30]. Many progenitor models have been proposed to figure out what FRBs are (for a review, see, e.g., [31]), such as mergers of compact objects [32], flaring magnetars [33], young magnetars in supernova remnants [34], collisions between neutron star/magnetar and asteroids [35,36,37,38,39], collisions between episodic magnetic blobs [40], and massive black hole model [41]. However, none of the current models can explain all the observational properties of FRBs. Fortunately, great progress in observations can help to constrain the progenitor model of FRBs; there has been a great leap forward in the research of FRBs. For example, the periodic activity of repeating FRB 20180916B suggests that the source is modulated by the orbital motion of a binary system [42]. Additionally, the discovery of Galactic FRB 200428 indicates the origin of a magnetar (e.g., [43]). In addition, some other models, e.g., the precession like a gyroscope model [43,44,45,46,47] and the spin period of isolated neutron star/magnetars model [48,49], can also work.
With the increase in FRBs monitoring by many radio telescopes, such as Very Large Array (VLA, Thompson et al. [50]), Australian Square Kilometer Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) [51], Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME, CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al. [52]) and FAST, it was found that some events are apparently “non-repeating,” i.e., they did not repeat within a monitoring period. On the other hand, some sources have been repeating (e.g., [53,54,55,56,57]), which led to the successful identification of host galaxies and the precise mensuration of redshifts. Li et al. [5] analyzed 133 FRBs, including 110 non-repeating and 23 repeating ones, and proposed to classify FRBs into short and long groups according to pulse duration less than 100 ms or not. Interestingly, they found long FRBs are on average more energetic than short ones about two orders of magnitude. Moreover, they pointed out that FRBs could be used as a standard candle because peak luminosity becomes weakly dependent of the cosmological distance at higher redshift. Some observational properties of FRBs are similar to those of short and long gamma-ray bursts [58,59,60]. However, it is still uncertain whether this classification of FRBs is derived from the intrinsic physical characteristics, and whether repeating or “non-repeating” is due to observational selection bias—e.g., the monitor is not in the most active window for the “non-repeating” FRBs. Although the astrophysical origins of repeating and non-repeating FRBs are considered to be different (e.g., [61,62,63,64]), another viewpoint that most FRBs may be repeating sources has also been proposed [5,65,66,67]. It is now accepted that there are usually two types of FRBs, i.e., repeating FRBs and non-repeating FRBs. It is worth noting that the luminostiy function can place important constraints on the physical origins of FRBs and possible progenitors (e.g., [31,61,67,68,69,70,71,72]). Niino [69] has hypothesized three luminosity distribution function models (i.e., standard candle, power-law, and power-law + exponential cutoff) to investigate how differences in luminosity functions (LF) affect the observation properties of FRBs, and used the LF model and the cosmic FRB rate density to examine the distribution of D M E , the log N log S distribution, and the D M E S peak correlation. Luo et al. [61] constructed a Schechter luminosity function of 33 FRBs samples with a power-law index ranging from −1.8 to −1.2. Unfortunately, the LF of repeating FRBs has not been constructed yet due to the limit of numbers in the past. Hence, it is important and necessary to investigate their statistical characteristics and build the apparent intensity distribution function (IDF) and the LF of these repeating FRBs in order to disclose more natural differences from those non-repeating ones.
Our article is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce the FRB sample and present the statistical analyses of their parameters. The intensity distribution function of our repeating FRB sample is derived in Section 3. In Section 4, we construct the differential broken power-law LF of repeating FRBs and non-repeating FRBs based on the k-corrected isotropic luminosity (L). In Section 5, our conclusion and discussion are presented. The flat Λ CDM cosmological parameters H 0 = 67.74 km s 1 Mpc 1 , Ω b = 0.0486, Ω m = 0.3089, Ω Λ = 0.6911 have been adopted throughout the paper [73].

2. The Statistical Properties of Repeating FRBs

2.1. Distributions of Extra-Galactic Dispersion Measure and Total Energy

Currently, about 600 FRBs have been reported (including repeating bursts and apparent non-repeating bursts). Here, we collect the observation data of 21 repeating FRBs and 571 non-repeating FRBs. The sample of repeating FRBs was extracted from FRBCAT and several reported observational datasets (e.g., [53,54,55,56,74]). We list the key physical parameters of 21 repeating FRBs in Table 1. It is worth mentioning that for the observed peak flux density ( S peak ) listed in Table 1, which is used as a representative of the brightness of an FRB, we chose the brightest one in every monitoring period for one repeating event. Additionally, the last column of Table 1 is the average fluence F ¯ , which is calculated based on all archived observed fluence ( F obs ) for one repeating FRB. The reason is that multiple observations at different duty-circles inevitably suffer from the observational biases. Another reason is that number of sub-bursts within a repeater varies among distinct FRBs even for a comparable observation time, and thus is very difficult to count accurately. For instance, 1652 sub-bursts from FRB 20121102A [18] and 1863 sub-bursts from FRB 20201124A [19] were recently detected by FAST. In addition, the fluence fluctuations between different sub-bursts for one repeating FRB could be very large. For example, the fluences of FRB 20171019A were found to range from 0.37 to 388 Jy ms [56]. Although it is uncertain whether repeating or “non-repeating” is due to the observational select bias (e.g., [13,56,62] for a discussion of repeating FRBs), here we ignore the probability that the present non-repeating events may be found to be repeating in future, and treat them as real non-repeating events, whose corresponding parameters are not presented in the text because of their large number. Note that in Table 1, we consider the observed pulse width instead of the intrinsic one. The reason is that the intrinsic pulses of the narrow FRBs would be broadened due to scattering, and the scattering time scale is affected by the local environment of the FRB and is model-dependent, which results in a larger uncertainty. An appendix of non-repeating FRBs samples has been added separately at the end of the paper (for more details, see Table A1). Moreover, we did not consider FRB 200428 in our non-repeating burst sample, which is the only event detected in the Milky Way [21,22,23,25,75].
The D M is a key quantity in the study of FRBs. CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al. [55] argued that FRBs can be divided into two subclasses (repeating and non-repeating FRBs) according to the current observations. If repeating FRBs indeed differ from the apparent non-repeating FRBs—for example, the two subclasses have different host or local environments, or one population is intrinsically more bright—the D M distributions of the sub-samples could be obviously different. Meanwhile, their extra-Galactic dispersion measures ( D M E = D M D M M W ) could be distinctly distributed. We applied the Anderson–Darling (A–D) test to different kinds of FRBs, see Figure 1a,b, and list the statistical results in Table 2, where it is shown that the D M E distributions of the non-repeating, repeating and all FRBs can be well described by a log-normal function. Furthermore, we found the mean values of D M E are 496.9 ± 16.9 pc cm 3 (0.70 dex) for non-repeating FRBs and 349.1 ± 8.4 pc cm 3 (0.39 dex) for repeating FRBs via a Gauss fit. Simultaneously, we found that the mean values of D M E of all FRBs are 485.1 ± 15.2 pc cm 3 (0.67 dex). It is notable that the mean D M E value of non-repeating FRBs is evidently larger than that of repeating FRBs. To check whether the D M E distributions of non-repeaters and repeaters are same or not, we used a Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon (M–W–W) test [76,77] and obtained the statistic W = 4328.5 with a p-value of 0.031, less than the significance threshold of 0.05, which demonstrates that the D M E distributions of the two kinds of FRBs may have different progenitors or different physical mechanisms [31,64,78]. Notably, the D M E is mainly contributed by the intergalactic medium, the host galaxies or the local environments. Unfortunately, what we have learned about the host galaxies is so little that the D M E distributions are still uncertain and need to be verified by more observations in future.
In addition, we found that the radio energy of repeating FRBs ranges from 2.00 × 10 37 to 6.01 × 10 40 erg. We also used the Gauss function to fit the energy statistical distribution of repeating FRBs. As shown in panel Figure 1c, the total energy of repeating FRBs roughly follows a log-normal distribution with a mean value of 2 . 51 0.59 + 0.81 × 10 38 erg and a scatter of 1.03 dex. Interesting, our result is roughly consistent with the early estimates of Li et al. [5] ( 10 39 10 42 erg) for the repeating FRBs. Meanwhile, it is worth mentioning that this result is different from the bimodal energy distribution (a log-normal function and a generalized Cauchy function, with the peak of the energy distribution of 4.8 × 10 37 erg) of a sub-sample of all the bursts from FRB 20121102A found by Li et al. [18] with FAST. Alternatively, it is possible that the bimodal energy distribution could be existent for a single burst but disappear when many bimodal distributions of diverse repeating FRBs are randomly mixed. However, Li et al. [5] noticed that the total energy of non-repeaters is on average larger than that of repeaters about one order of magnitude, which may demonstrate that at least some of repeating and non-repeating FRBs have different physical origins.

2.2. Correlations between Some Characteristic Parameters

In Figure 2, the relationships of the D M E S peak , D M E F obs , D M E E , W obs S peak , W obs D M E , W obs E of repeating FRBs are illustrated. Figure 2a shows that S peak is not correlated with D M E . Note that the intrinsic width of the narrow FRBs is difficult to discern due to dispersion smearing and scattering broadening. Scattering is model dependent, and the assumptions of the model introduce high uncertainty. Therefore, we used the observed pulse width instead of the intrinsic pulse width in our work. Figure 2b shows that F obs does not correlate with D M E . As shown in Figure 2c, the radio energy and the D M E are positively correlated with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.81 and can be well-fitted. The power-law relation is E D M E 2.60 ± 0.04 , which is roughly consistent with the tight correlation of non-repeating FRBs found by Li et al. [80], who argued that the positive correlation may be attributed to an observation selection effect—i.e., a fainter event is easier to be observed at a nearer distance. We found from Panels (d) and (e) that W obs is not correlated with S peak but obviously correlated with the D M E . Note that our W obs S peak relation is inconsistent with that of non-repeaters in [80]. The S peak of the repeated FRBs spans three magnitudes and is more dispersive than the S peak of the non-repeating FRBs sample of Li et al. [80], so that W obs and S peak are not correlated. Meanwhile, we found that there is a positive correlation between W obs and the radio energy, as shown in Figure 2f. Li et al. [80] analyzed the correlations of key parameters of 16 non-repeating FRBs and found no clear correlation between energy and pulse width. For our repeating FRBs, the radio energy E and the pulse width W obs , respectively, span four and three orders of magnitude. The best-fitted power-law relation is E W obs 0.43 ± 0.06 , with a correlation coefficient of 0.71 and a chance probability of 1.49 × 10 6 . This means that the repeating FRB pulse with a longer duration has a greater energy release generally, which is similar to those non-repeaters reported by Li et al. [80], and both of which are consistent with the findings in [5], where the averaged isotropic energies of long FRBs were found to be larger than those of short FRBs by at least two orders of magnitude, not only for non-repeating FRBs but also for repeating FRBs.
Figure 2e,f seems to show that D M E , W obs and E may be related. This motivated us to perform multiple linear regression fitting for these three parameters in Figure 3. The three-parameter relation can be well described by a binary linear regression function as
log E = ( 1.31 ± 0.97 ) + ( 1.85 ± 0.41 ) log D M E + ( 1.04 ± 0.36 ) log W obs
with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.88, which implies that wider FRBs usually hold larger energy outputs and higher D M E values, and vice versa.

3. Apparent Intensity Distribution Function of Repeating FRBs

Li et al. [80] applied the F obs of 16 non-repeating FRBs to derive an intensity distribution function (IDF). We considered the IDF of repeating FRBs to be determined by the average fluence ( F ¯ ) and observed fluence ( F obs ) of the brightest burst for each repeater. We then utilized the average fluence F ¯ presented in Table 1 to investigate the IDF of 21 repeating FRBs. This was done for several reasons: (1) For one repeating burst, multiple monitor observations in different time periods may lead to the observational bias. (2) The repeaters contain multiple bursts, and the number of monitored subbursts between different repeaters varies—e.g., FAST has recently detected 1652 repeating events from FRB 20121102A [18] and 1863 bursts from FRB 20201124A [19]. (3) There is a certain degree of fluctuation between the fluences of repetitions for one repeating FRB; for example, the fluence of the repetitions from faint FRB 20171019A have a large range of 0.37 to ∼ 388 Jy ms [56]. Therefore, we took the mean fluence as a statistical variable for each repeater in order to build an apparent IDF of the repeating FRBs. In addition, we got rid of the faint FRB 20171019A from our repeating FRB sample because of its large fluctuations of fluence in the following calculations.
We assumed that FRBs can be considered as standard candles, and defined that the apparent IDF of repeating FRBs is in the same form as the function given by Li et al. [80]: d N / d F obs = A F obs a (or N ( > F obs ) F obs a + 1 ), where α is the power-law index, a = 2.5 is expected for a uniform distribution and A is a constant which depends on the observations and the event rates of FRBs. We group the repeating FRB sample into several fluence intervals with a bin width of Δ F ¯ , and created the exemplary distributions of F ¯ , as presented in Figure 4. Then we acquired a best-fit power-law curve for d N / d F obs . In Figure 4a, best fit results are shown for a bin width of Δ F ¯ = 3.6 Jy ms ; the corresponding power-law index and the coefficient of determination (R-Square) are a 1 = 1.07 ± 0.05 and 0.99, respectively. Note that the error bars along the x-axis and y-axis are, respectively, Δ F ¯ / 2 and the square root of FRB count in each interval. Meanwhile, we also investigated the influence of bin width selection on the fitted results. In our work, the range of the bin width Δ F ¯ was selected to be from 0.2 to 6.0 Jy ms , and the best-fit power-law indices corresponding to each Δ F ¯ are shown in Figure 4b, where one can see that when Δ F ¯ is in a range of 3.2 4.2 Jy ms, the fitted a 1 has smaller fluctuations and the corresponding error bar is also small. Hence, the a 1 values of Δ F ¯ = 3.2 4.2 Jy ms were selected to calculate the final average value, which is a 1 = 1.10 ± 0.14 . To constrain the unknown constant A, we adopted similar calculation processes to those described in detail in Li et al. [80] and compare them with the published event rates of FRBs in the literature in Table 3. The A value in our IDF was obtained to be ( 2.37 ± 0.76 ) × 10 3 sky 1 day 1 . As a result, the final IDF of 20 repeating FRBs can be written as
d N d F = ( 2.37 ± 0.76 ) × 10 3 F obs 1.10 ± 0.14 sky 1 day 1 .
Similarly, we derived, while adopting F obs , the power-law a 2 = 1.01 ± 0.16 of IDF for repeating FRBs (see Figure 4d). Furthermore, we got A = ( 1.96 ± 0.41 ) × 10 3 sky 1 day 1 for our IDF. The IDF of repeating FRBs is given by
d N d F = ( 1.96 ± 0.41 ) × 10 3 F obs 1.01 ± 0.16 sky 1 day 1 .
In particular, we found that power-law indices a 1 and a 2 have small differences, which indicates that our results are stable and reliable. If assuming the minimum fluence of 0.36 Jy ms as the threshold, one can estimate that the detection rate of repeating FRBs is at least ( 9.64 ± 3.09 ) × 10 3 sky 1 day 1 for a 1 and ( 1.38 ± 0.19 ) × 10 4 sky 1 day 1 for a 2 . Combined with all parameters of FAST [81,82,83], we utilized the method of Li et al. [80], and estimate the detection rate for the 1000 h observation time is about 3 ± 1 ; that is slightly smaller than that for non-repeating FRBs predicted by Li et al. [80]. It is reasonable, since the current detection rate of non-repeating FRBs is obviously larger than that of repeating FRBs observationally.

4. Differential Bolometric Luminosity Distributions

The luminosity functions of FRBs can be applied to reveal the origins of FRBs, design the optimal searching plan, guide future observations [61,67,80,87], etc. The detection rate of the telescope can be calculated by the luminosity function, and the event rate density at different luminosity ranges sheds light on the origins of FRBs [31,78]. Building the LF requires not only the flux and distance, but also a k-correction of luminosity because of the different observational central frequencies ( ν c ) in the mixed sample of FRBs. According to Zhang [29], the isotropic peak luminosity of a FRB can be calculated with L p 4 π D L 2 ( z ) S peak ν c , where D L ( z ) is the lumonisity distance calculated with the redshift given by FRBCAT (https://www.frbcat.org/). (accessed on 3 May 2022). We utilized ν c to substitute the observational bandwidth of radio telescopes, which was proposed by Petroff et al. [4] and Aggarwal [88]. Additionally, Zhang [29] also suggested to use the central frequency instead of the receiver bandwidth since the FRB spectrum must be unknown and emissions may extend beyond the receiver bandwidth. In addition, when the observed flux densities of cosmological objects at different ν c are considered, k-correction is also an important effect. After the k-correction, the bolometric luminosity can be given by L L p 4 π D L 2 ( z ) S peak ν c k , in which the k-correction factor is taken as k = ( 1 + z ) α t β with a temporal index of α t 0 and a spectral index β 1 / 3 [5,89], which are similar to those parameters of normal pulsar spectra [28,90,91].
The differential distributions of the k-corrected luminosity for 21 repeaters and 571 non-repeaters are shown in Figure 5, where one can notice that the repeaters are normally less luminous than the non-repeaters by about two orders of magnitude. Subsequently, we adopted a broken power-law from [92,93,94] to build the LF as
ϕ ( L ) = A L L b α 1 , L L b A L L b α 2 , L > L b ,
where A is the normalized factor; L b is the break luminosity; α 1 and α 2 are two power-law indices corresponding to lower and higher luminosity portions. In Figure 5, we can see that the luminosity distributions of both repeating and non-repeating FRBs can be well described by the broken power-law function, and the best-fit parameters are provided in Table 4. We excitingly found that the power-law indices of repeating and non-repeating bursts in the luminous end are the same as 1.4 within the range from −1.8 to −1.2, constrained by the Schechter luminosity function by Luo et al. [61]. However, we noticed that non-repeaters decline slower that repeaters in the less luminous end instead. In addition, after k-correction for observational frequency, the distributions of luminosity for repeating and non-repeating FRBs are similar at their brightest ends. The characteristic luminosity values L b are not significantly different.

5. Conclusions and Discussion

In this study, we analyzed the observed data of 21 repeating and 571 non-repeating FRBs published and drew the following conclusions:
  • The extra-Galactic dispersion measures D M E of non-repeating and repeating FRBs were found to be log-normally distributed with mean values of 496.9 pc cm 3 and 349.1 pc cm 3 , respectively. The M–W–W test showed that the D M E is drawn from a different distribution.
  • It was found that the total radio energies of repeating FRBs are log-normally distributed with a mean value of 2.51 × 10 38 ergs (1.03 dex), which is smaller than to that of non-repeating FRBs, which is consistent with the conclusion in [5]. Surprisingly, the bimodal energy distribution discovered in FRB 20121102A by Li et al. [18] with FAST was not recovered in our repeating FRB sample any more.
  • We statistically analyzed the relationships among D M E , S peak , F obs , E and W obs , and found that most correlations between them are similar to those of non-repeaters given by Li et al. [80], except that the E W obs relation of repeaters is tighter. The statistical results hint that the spatial distribution and the local environments of two samples of FRBs may be different, although more samples are needed to verify our argument, as noted by CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al. [55] and Fonseca et al. [74].
  • We constructed a three-parameter relation to be log E 1.31 + 1.85 log D M E + 1.04 log W obs , indicating that longer FRBs usually have larger extra-galactic dispersion measures and more energy releases, which supports the early findings by Li et al. [5], no matter whether a FRB is repeating or not.
  • We assume that FRBs can be considered as standard candles homogeneously in a flat Euclidean space, with an IDF of d N / d F obs = A F obs a (or N ( > F obs ) F obs a + 1 ), where a should be theoretically 2.5. Using the averaged fluence as a characteristic quantity, we built the IDF of repeating FRBs as d N / d F = ( 2.37 ± 0.76 ) × 10 3 F obs 1.10 ± 0.14 sky 1 day 1 . Likewise, using the observed fluence as a statistical indicator, we obtained the IDF as d N / d F = ( 1.96 ± 0.41 ) × 10 3 F obs 1.01 ± 0.16 sky 1 day 1 . The power-law index ( a 1 , a 2 ) of IDF deviates from the theoretical value of 2.5 in a flat Euclidean space, and shows that the repeating FRBs may be not uniformly distributed. Assuming the averaged minimum fluence as the threshold, we predicted the detection rate of repeaters to be about ( 9.64 ± 3.09 ) × 10 3 sky 1 day 1 or ( 1.38 ± 0.19 ) × 10 4 sky 1 day 1 ; that is slightly lower in contrast with those non-repeating ones.
  • Finally, we constructed and compared the luminosity functions of repeating and non-repeating FRBs. Interestingly, we found that the luminosity functions for both kinds of FRBs can be well characterized by a broken power-law relation; their power-law indices at their luminous ends are equal to 1.4 , despite the discrepancy at their less-luminous ends.
Observationally, the power-law relation of N F α , especially its power-law index a, indeed changes largely for different telescopes, owing to many factors, such as the selection effects/biases, the instrumental sensitivity, the sample incompleteness, the poor localizations, the small sample size or the cosmological effect (e.g., [12,90,96]), which may cause the relation to deviate from the theoretical form of N F 3 / 2 in a Euclidean space. Caleb et al. [68] pointed out by simulations that the slope of the logarithmic relation is mainly determined by cosmological effect and got a = 0.9 ± 0.3 , which matches a uniform distribution of FRBs roughly. Even for the same telescope, the deduced power-law indices could be inconsistent. For instance, Macquart and Ekers [90] found a = 2 . 6 1.3 + 0.7 and James et al. [96] obtained a = 1.18 ± 0.24 for Parkes FEBs. However, these power-law indices cannot show that the FRBs are not distributed in a Euclidean space. It is also why we took the average fluence as a characteristic quantity. Considering all above complex situations, we have assumed a universal slope in order to reduce the influences of uncertain factors on the l o g N l o g F relation.
In addition, we have constructed the luminosity functions for our samples of repeating and non-repeating FRBs on the basis of the k-corrected isotropic luminosities. It was found that the k-corrected luminosity of repeaters and non-repeaters span three and six orders of magnitude, respectively. On average, the repeaters are less energetic than the non-repeaters, which is coincident with [5]. The luminosity distributions of the two samples of FRBs can be well described by a broken power-law function with a break luminosity of L b = 1.74 × 10 42 erg s 1 for non-repeaters and L b = 1.78 × 10 42 erg s 1 for repeaters. This may imply that either repeaters or non-repeaters can be redivided into low- and high-luminosity types originating from different progenitors.
As addressed above, the D M E distributions of the two samples have different distributions, which suggests that the majority of FRBs might have different astrophysical origins. Recent observations indicate that both kinds of FRBs may have distinct environments, such as dense, offset and star formation distribution (e.g., [97,98]). Additionally, there exist some special observed properties (such as polarization, rotation measures and the complex frequency–time structure) and a difference between FRB host galaxies [99,100,101]. Thus, these observational differences imply the emergence of subpopulations of FRBs. However, there are several recent works claiming no significant differences in the host galaxy properties (e.g., [102,103]). One possible reason is that the number of FRBs with known host galaxies is still limited currently. There is a debate about repeating and non-repeating (or more subclasses) or having a single population [62,104,105]. This means that the current classification results from the observations may be due to observational selection bias, e.g., if the observational period is not in the most active window for the individual FRBs [63,105], and one non-repeating burst identified currently may be a potential repeating FRB, as was the case for FRB 20171019A and FRB 20180301A. It may be just a few lucky cases, but we have probably missed many faint bursts of other FRBs. Nonetheless, the large sample of known FRBs is starting to show trends that suggest subclasses based on burst morphology and frequency–time structure (the downward frequency drift of sub-bursts [55,74,106], 100 % linear polarization and negligible circular polarization [107]; and some sources show periodicity [108,109,110]). The observations in future should be focused on the FRB events which have relatively high probabilities of becoming repeating FRBs (see also [5]). When more FRBs are accurately localized, more useful information (such as D M , redshift, hosts and local environments of repeaters and apparently one-off FRBs) can be obtained from the direct observations, and the true LF will be accurately built as a cosmological probe to reveal the nature of FRBs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Z.; methodology, Z.Z. and L.L.; software, K.Z.; validation, K.Z., L.L. and Z.Z.; formal analysis, Z.Z.; investigation, K.Z.; resources, Z.Z.; data curation, Q.L., J.L. and M.J.; writing—original draft preparation, K.Z.; writing—review and editing, Z.Z. and L.L.; visualization, K.Z. and Q.L.; supervision, Z.Z.; project administration, Z.Z.; funding acquisition, Z.Z. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Z.Z. ([email protected]). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers U2031118 and U1431126) and the science research grants from the China Manned Space Project, CMS-CSST-2021-B11. L. B. Li acknowledges support from the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China (grant number A2020402010). J. J. Luo acknowledges the Youth Science & Technology Talents Development Project of Guizhou Education Department (No.KY[2022]098).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in the following websites: https://www.frbcat.org/ and https://www.chime-frb.ca/catalog (accessed on 3 May 2022).

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the referees for their constructive and helpful comments and suggestions that have improved the paper greatly. This study was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers U2031118 and U1431126) and the science research grants from the China Manned Space Project, CMS-CSST-2021-B11. L. B. Li acknowledges support from the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China (grant number A2020402010). J. J. Luo acknowledges the Youth Science & Technology Talents Development Project of Guizhou Education Department (No.KY[2022]098).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

The appendix Table A1 contains supplementary non-repeating FRBs details and data. Note: The FRBCAT sample were taken from FRB Catalogue [4] (https://www.frbcat.org/ (accessed on 3 May 2022)). CHIME samples of non-repeating FRBs were extracted from CHIME/FRB Catalog 1 [6] (https://www.chime-frb.ca/catalog (accessed on 3 May 2022)). The redshifts were calculated using the method of Petroff et al. [4] and Caleb et al. [68].
Table A1. Extended data.
Table A1. Extended data.
TNS Name ν c
(MHz)
DM
(pc cm−3)
DM MW
(pc cm−3)
DM E
(pc cm−3)
S peak
(Jy ms)
z D L
(Gpc)
L p
(erg s−1)
FRBCAT sample
FRB 20010125A1372.5790.30110.00680.300.540.573.428.91 × 10 42
FRB 20010305A1374350.0036.00314.004.200.301.601.62 × 10 43
FRB 20010312A13741187.0051.001136.000.251.4010.293.25 × 10 43
FRB 20010621A1374745.00523.00225.000.530.190.967.50 × 10 41
FRB 20010724A1374375.0044.58330.4230.000.281.489.94 × 10 43
FRB 20090625A1352899.5531.69867.861.150.724.543.20 × 10 43
FRB 20110214A1352168.9031.10137.8027.000.140.681.95 × 10 43
FRB 20110220A1352944.3834.77909.611.300.764.854.09 × 10 43
FRB 20110523A800623.3043.52579.780.600.482.783.89 × 10 42
FRB 20110626A1352723.0047.46675.540.630.563.349.83 × 10 42
FRB 20110703A13521103.6032.331071.270.500.895.882.27 × 10 43
FRB 20120127A1352553.3031.82521.480.620.432.445.29 × 10 42
FRB 20121002A13521629.1874.271554.910.761.309.398.21 × 10 43
FRB 20121029A111732.0071.00661.000.340.553.274.18 × 10 41
FRB 20130626A1352952.4066.87885.530.740.744.692.19 × 10 43
FRB 20130628A1352469.8852.58417.301.910.351.911.02 × 10 43
FRB 20130729A1352861.0031.00830.000.220.694.315.54 × 10 42
FRB 20131030A111203.0064.40138.600.240.120.581.03 × 10 40
FRB 20131104A1352779.0071.10707.901.160.593.562.04 × 10 43
FRB 20140212A111910.0049.80860.200.260.724.545.93 × 10 41
FRB 20140514A1352562.7034.90527.800.470.442.514.24 × 10 42
FRB 20141113A1375400.30188.00212.300.040.150.743.32 × 10 40
FRB 20141216A111545.0069.50475.500.230.402.241.37 × 10 41
FRB 20150215A13521105.60427.20678.400.700.573.421.14 × 10 43
FRB 20150418A1352776.20188.50587.702.200.492.852.53 × 10 43
FRB 20150610A13521593.90122.001471.900.701.208.516.30 × 10 43
FRB 20150807A1352266.5036.90229.60128.000.190.961.78 × 10 44
FRB 20151018A111570.00275.00295.001.400.241.242.67 × 10 41
FRB 20151125A2.5273.0050.20222.800.540.190.961.39 × 10 39
FRB 20151206A13521909.80160.001749.800.301.5011.204.48 × 10 43
FRB 20151230A1352960.4038.00922.400.420.805.161.49 × 10 43
FRB 20160102A13522596.1013.002583.100.502.1016.911.59 × 10 44
FRB 20160206A1111262.0069.101192.900.260.996.711.24 × 10 42
FRB 20160317A8431165.00319.60845.403.000.704.384.87 × 10 43
FRB 20160410A843278.0057.70220.307.000.180.905.41 × 10 42
FRB 20160608A843682.00238.30443.704.300.372.041.63 × 10 43
FRB 20160920A1111767.00250.001517.000.221.208.511.63 × 10 42
FRB 20161202A111291.0069.80221.200.290.180.902.95 × 10 40
FRB 20170107A1320609.5035.00574.5024.100.482.782.58 × 10 44
FRB 20170416A1320523.2040.00483.2019.400.402.241.37 × 10 44
FRB 20170428A1320991.7040.00951.707.700.795.082.59 × 10 44
FRB 20170606A111247.00250.00(3.00)0.540.060.264.87 × 10 39
FRB 20170707A1297235.2036.00199.2014.800.170.841.56 × 10 43
FRB 20170712A1297312.7938.00274.7937.800.231.187.66 × 10 43
FRB 20170827A835176.8037.00139.8060.000.120.581.93 × 10 43
FRB 20170906A1297390.3039.00351.3029.600.291.541.00 × 10 44
FRB 20170922A8351111.0045.001066.005.191.208.512.88 × 10 44
FRB 20171003A1297463.2040.00423.2040.500.351.912.08 × 10 44
FRB 20171004A1297304.0038.00266.0022.000.221.134.05 × 10 43
FRB 20171019A1297114.1038.0076.10117.600.060.281.38 × 10 43
FRB 20171020A1297618.5036.00582.5019.600.492.852.16 × 10 44
FRB 20171116A13521457.4013.001444.401.481.5711.852.45 × 10 44
FRB 20171209A1297158.6036.00122.6088.600.100.483.01 × 10 43
FRB 20171213A1297203.1037.00166.1021.000.140.681.45 × 10 43
FRB 20171216A1297715.7038.00677.70128.100.563.341.92 × 10 45
FRB 20180110A1297402.7036.00366.7040.700.311.661.60 × 10 44
FRB 20180119A1297441.4032.00409.4017.500.341.858.44 × 10 43
FRB 20180128B1297495.9040.00455.9028.700.382.111.78 × 10 44
FRB 20180130A1297343.5039.00304.5023.100.251.305.62 × 10 43
FRB 20180131A1297657.7040.00617.7022.200.512.992.68 × 10 44
FRB 20180212A1297167.5033.00134.5053.000.110.532.20 × 10 43
FRB 20180309A1352263.4244.69218.7327.600.190.963.84 × 10 43
FRB 20180311A13521570.9045.201530.400.202.0015.945.70 × 10 43
FRB 20180315A1297479.0036.00443.0023.300.372.041.36 × 10 44
FRB 20180321A111594.0070.00524.000.540.442.513.99 × 10 41
FRB 20180324A1297431.0070.00361.0016.500.301.606.02 × 10 43
FRB 20180417A1272.5474.8026.15448.6521.800.372.041.25 × 10 44
FRB 20180430A1297264.10165.4498.66147.500.080.383.14 × 10 43
FRB 20180515A1320355.2033.00322.2024.200.201.013.68 × 10 43
FRB 20180525A1297388.1031.00357.1078.900.301.602.88 × 10 44
FRB 20180528A835899.3069.00830.3015.750.905.974.52 × 10 44
FRB 20180714A13521467.92257.001212.875.001.6012.128.65 × 10 44
FRB 20180725A400715.9871.00644.9838.710.543.201.64 × 10 44
FRB 20180727A600642.0721.00621.0717.950.523.061.05 × 10 44
FRB 20180729B600317.3795.00222.37112.500.190.966.96 × 10 43
FRB 20180729A600109.6131.0078.61283.330.070.332.11 × 10 43
FRB 20180730A600849.0557.00792.05119.050.664.081.20 × 10 45
FRB 20180801A600656.2090.00566.2054.900.472.712.55 × 10 44
FRB 20180806A600739.9841.00698.9834.780.583.492.61 × 10 44
FRB 20180810A600414.95104.00310.9540.740.261.365.00 × 10 43
FRB 20180810B600169.1347.00122.1360.710.100.489.54 × 10 42
FRB 20180812A600802.5783.00719.5714.400.603.631.17 × 10 44
FRB 20180814B600238.3241.00197.32138.890.160.795.92 × 10 43
FRB 20180817A6001006.8428.00978.8475.680.825.321.26 × 10 45
FRB 20180924B1320361.4240.50320.9212.300.341.856.04 × 10 43
FRB 20181016A8351982.8090.001892.8010.192.2017.902.21 × 10 45
FRB 20181017C835239.9738.00201.97161.000.201.011.55 × 10 44
FRB 20181112A1272.5589.27102.00487.2712.380.412.318.93 × 10 43
FRB 20181123B12501812.00149.501662.500.071.3910.207.56 × 10 42
FRB 20181228D835354.2058.00296.2019.230.301.604.51 × 10 43
FRB 20190102C1320363.6057.30306.308.240.261.362.23 × 10 43
FRB 20190523A1411760.8037.00723.80666.670.603.631.27 × 10 46
FRB 20190608B1320338.7037.20301.504.330.251.301.07 × 10 43
FRB 20190611B1320321.4057.83263.575.000.221.139.36 × 10 42
FRB 20191108A1370588.1052.00536.1027.000.523.063.60 × 10 44
FRB 20190614D1400959.2083.50875.700.120.734.613.68 × 10 42
FRB 20200125A350179.4725.00154.470.370.170.841.04 × 10 41
CHIME sample
FRB20180725A600715.8171.61644.201.700.543.181.07 × 10 43
FRB20180727A600642.1321.23620.900.580.523.043.35 × 10 42
FRB20180729A600109.5930.7978.8011.700.070.307.65 × 10 41
FRB20180729B600317.2294.02223.200.920.190.935.43 × 10 41
FRB20180730A600848.9059.20789.705.200.664.075.22 × 10 43
FRB20180801A600655.7390.13565.601.110.472.725.18 × 10 42
FRB20180806A600739.9540.65699.301.900.583.511.44 × 10 43
FRB20180810A600414.88104.68310.201.100.261.351.33 × 10 42
FRB20180810B600169.1445.84123.305.200.100.498.65 × 10 41
FRB20180812A600802.4580.35722.100.930.603.657.59 × 10 42
FRB20180814B600238.3541.15197.203.400.160.811.54 × 10 42
FRB20180817A6001006.7727.67979.102.400.825.293.95 × 10 43
FRB20180904A600361.1455.44305.703.800.251.334.46 × 10 42
FRB20180906A600383.4643.46340.001.600.281.502.38 × 10 42
FRB20180906B6003038.0631.363006.700.362.5120.967.48 × 10 43
FRB20180907A600877.2492.04785.200.870.654.048.61 × 10 42
FRB20180907B600658.1938.09620.101.080.523.046.22 × 10 42
FRB20180907C600638.2091.40546.801.110.462.614.80 × 10 42
FRB20180907D6001447.1056.001391.100.891.168.153.28 × 10 43
FRB20180907E600383.3630.46352.900.730.291.571.18 × 10 42
FRB20180909A600408.6549.85358.800.330.301.605.53 × 10 41
FRB20180910A600684.4158.11626.306.500.523.073.83 × 10 43
FRB20180911A600221.2556.55164.701.600.140.674.92 × 10 41
FRB20180915A600371.03171.93199.102.300.170.821.06 × 10 42
FRB20180915B600177.1322.43154.700.990.130.622.66 × 10 41
FRB20180916A600296.0378.43217.602.400.180.911.34 × 10 42
FRB20180916C6002252.8773.872179.000.391.8214.163.98 × 10 43
FRB20180917B600857.0443.14813.901.030.684.221.11 × 10 43
FRB20180918A6001453.9979.991374.001.451.158.035.20 × 10 43
FRB20180919B600560.2232.82527.402.560.442.501.02 × 10 43
FRB20180920A600555.66160.76394.900.860.331.781.78 × 10 42
FRB20180920B600463.4033.20430.200.350.361.978.80 × 10 41
FRB20180921A600394.3735.17359.200.920.301.601.54 × 10 42
FRB20180922A600555.69141.29414.402.600.351.886.01 × 10 42
FRB20180923A600219.44100.04119.400.760.100.471.18 × 10 41
FRB20180923C600173.9829.08144.900.890.120.582.08 × 10 41
FRB20180923D600329.4030.70298.702.400.251.292.68 × 10 42
FRB20180924A6001116.5569.251047.301.300.875.742.50 × 10 43
FRB20180925A600237.7470.64167.100.990.140.683.14 × 10 41
FRB20180925B600667.8739.67628.200.760.523.084.51 × 10 42
FRB20180928A600252.77158.0794.701.340.080.371.28 × 10 41
FRB20181012B600715.1933.49681.700.490.573.403.51 × 10 42
FRB20181013A600309.3148.11261.202.810.221.112.34 × 10 42
FRB20181013B600277.5185.81191.700.560.160.792.38 × 10 41
FRB20181013C6001005.7738.57967.200.440.815.217.04 × 10 42
FRB20181013E600345.3080.80264.500.620.221.135.30 × 10 41
FRB20181014A6001314.89186.691128.200.990.946.302.26 × 10 43
FRB20181014B600887.97102.57785.400.650.654.046.44 × 10 42
FRB20181014C600752.1759.87692.300.570.583.474.22 × 10 42
FRB20181014D600377.1330.03347.108.400.291.541.31 × 10 43
FRB20181015A600568.8246.52522.301.510.442.475.88 × 10 42
FRB20181017B600307.3743.67263.701.060.221.129.00 × 10 41
FRB20181018A6001129.45120.951008.500.490.845.488.63 × 10 42
FRB20181018B600293.87113.17180.705.100.150.741.91 × 10 42
FRB20181018C600411.19146.19265.002.400.221.132.06 × 10 42
FRB20181019B600725.18159.78565.400.720.472.723.36 × 10 42
FRB20181019C600501.6439.24462.401.160.392.143.43 × 10 42
FRB20181020A6001112.4772.171040.300.800.875.701.51 × 10 43
FRB20181022C600528.4749.87478.600.910.402.232.91 × 10 42
FRB20181022D600514.3320.13494.202.900.412.329.97 × 10 42
FRB20181022E600285.9921.79264.200.690.221.135.88 × 10 41
FRB20181025A600592.5661.66530.901.520.442.526.14 × 10 42
FRB20181027A600727.7464.04663.704.900.553.293.30 × 10 43
FRB20181030C600668.7673.06595.701.600.502.898.41 × 10 42
FRB20181030D600289.44123.54165.902.740.140.678.55 × 10 41
FRB20181030E600159.6949.89109.802.000.090.432.61 × 10 41
FRB20181101A6001472.68144.881327.800.501.117.701.66 × 10 43
FRB20181102A600414.46155.66258.801.480.221.101.21 × 10 42
FRB20181104C600580.82105.32475.509.700.402.213.05 × 10 43
FRB20181115A600981.6140.01941.600.440.785.046.62 × 10 42
FRB20181116A600355.4337.13318.304.000.271.395.13 × 10 42
FRB20181116B600409.8836.38373.500.740.311.671.36 × 10 42
FRB20181117A600959.2838.08921.200.610.774.918.72 × 10 42
FRB20181117B600538.2065.00473.203.600.392.201.12 × 10 43
FRB20181117C6001773.7466.141707.601.571.4210.509.24 × 10 43
FRB20181118A600557.4131.51525.904.300.442.491.70 × 10 43
FRB20181118B600422.2853.08369.200.780.311.651.39 × 10 42
FRB20181119B600609.10442.30166.804.500.140.681.42 × 10 42
FRB20181119C600284.9644.66240.302.800.201.011.94 × 10 42
FRB20181119E6001169.77220.27949.500.700.795.091.07 × 10 43
FRB20181122A600662.82196.12466.700.530.392.171.60 × 10 42
FRB20181122B600225.7654.36171.4014.700.140.704.92 × 10 42
FRB20181123A600798.72103.82694.900.990.583.487.40 × 10 42
FRB20181124A6001108.5334.431074.100.660.905.931.34 × 10 43
FRB20181124B600801.64104.94696.702.610.583.491.96 × 10 43
FRB20181125A600272.1937.99234.200.390.200.982.56 × 10 41
FRB20181126A600494.2249.62444.603.500.372.059.47 × 10 42
FRB20181127A600930.3232.22898.100.780.754.761.05 × 10 43
FRB20181128B600456.5533.55423.000.340.351.938.23 × 10 41
FRB20181128C600618.3549.15569.200.390.472.741.85 × 10 42
FRB20181128D600146.5032.70113.802.600.090.453.65 × 10 41
FRB20181129A600385.9786.77299.201.520.251.301.70 × 10 42
FRB20181129B600405.9162.11343.804.000.291.526.09 × 10 42
FRB20181129C600502.2226.52475.700.770.402.222.43 × 10 42
FRB20181130A600220.0995.09125.000.970.100.501.66 × 10 41
FRB20181201A600694.3623.96670.400.400.563.332.75 × 10 42
FRB20181201B600876.5851.28825.300.660.694.297.33 × 10 42
FRB20181202A600667.9538.75629.202.630.523.091.57 × 10 43
FRB20181202B600825.8833.68792.200.990.664.081.00 × 10 43
FRB20181202C600557.16126.46430.700.510.361.971.29 × 10 42
FRB20181203A600635.9346.73589.201.740.492.868.92 × 10 42
FRB20181203B600375.3956.69318.701.450.271.391.87 × 10 42
FRB20181203C6002444.5737.472407.101.052.0115.991.34 × 10 44
FRB20181208A600562.7845.18517.600.950.432.453.63 × 10 42
FRB20181209A600328.6665.66263.002.500.221.122.11 × 10 42
FRB20181213A600678.6748.57630.100.880.533.095.26 × 10 42
FRB20181213B600626.5930.59596.000.750.502.903.95 × 10 42
FRB20181213C600380.7430.54350.200.620.291.559.84 × 10 41
FRB20181214A600468.15184.25283.900.160.241.221.56 × 10 41
FRB20181214B6001120.7542.051078.700.410.905.968.43 × 10 42
FRB20181214C600632.7833.28599.501.200.502.926.40 × 10 42
FRB20181214D6001177.3226.021151.300.550.966.451.31 × 10 43
FRB20181214F6002105.7640.262065.500.311.7213.262.80 × 10 43
FRB20181215A600412.63128.53284.100.340.241.223.40 × 10 41
FRB20181215B600494.0140.61453.401.900.382.095.37 × 10 42
FRB20181216A600542.74146.74396.000.940.331.791.96 × 10 42
FRB20181217A6001177.1769.771107.400.640.926.151.40 × 10 43
FRB20181218A6001874.41147.211727.200.831.4410.645.01 × 10 43
FRB20181218B600753.41169.61583.800.560.492.822.81 × 10 42
FRB20181218C600384.1564.35319.800.250.271.403.24 × 10 41
FRB20181219B6001952.1737.271914.904.601.6012.083.51 × 10 44
FRB20181219C600647.8936.19611.700.210.512.991.16 × 10 42
FRB20181220A600209.40125.8083.601.330.070.329.83 × 10 40
FRB20181220B600257.8053.60204.202.900.170.851.41 × 10 42
FRB20181221A600316.2424.44291.801.250.241.261.32 × 10 42
FRB20181221B6001395.0261.921333.100.971.117.733.25 × 10 43
FRB20181222B600619.25148.25471.000.460.392.191.42 × 10 42
FRB20181222C6001104.8946.391058.500.840.885.821.65 × 10 43
FRB20181222D6001417.1131.211385.900.221.158.118.05 × 10 42
FRB20181222E600327.9859.88268.101.120.221.159.86 × 10 41
FRB20181223B600565.6625.45540.200.680.452.572.86 × 10 42
FRB20181223C600112.5119.9192.601.360.080.361.24 × 10 41
FRB20181224A600310.2185.01225.204.300.190.942.59 × 10 42
FRB20181224B600781.01121.31659.700.770.553.275.11 × 10 42
FRB20181224C600596.3355.33541.000.500.452.582.11 × 10 42
FRB20181224D600690.2031.40658.800.540.553.273.57 × 10 42
FRB20181224E600581.8536.55545.303.600.452.601.55 × 10 43
FRB20181225B600299.2958.29241.001.900.201.021.33 × 10 42
FRB20181226B600287.0427.74259.308.900.221.107.28 × 10 42
FRB20181226C600409.0294.02315.000.880.261.371.10 × 10 42
FRB20181226D600385.3864.98320.401.890.271.402.46 × 10 42
FRB20181226E600308.7668.86239.900.480.201.013.31 × 10 41
FRB20181227A600791.2189.01702.200.930.593.537.12 × 10 42
FRB20181228A600748.6834.18714.501.160.603.609.24 × 10 42
FRB20181228B600568.6539.95528.700.400.442.511.60 × 10 42
FRB20181228C600510.7045.60465.100.450.392.161.35 × 10 42
FRB20181229A600955.5742.97912.601.180.764.851.65 × 10 43
FRB20181229B600389.0529.35359.700.420.301.607.07 × 10 41
FRB20181230A600769.6168.41701.200.940.583.527.17 × 10 42
FRB20181230B6001137.3684.961052.400.880.885.781.71 × 10 43
FRB20181230C6001037.1936.891000.300.890.835.431.54 × 10 43
FRB20181230D600223.9740.57183.401.390.150.755.37 × 10 41
FRB20181230E6001041.7154.51987.201.320.825.342.21 × 10 43
FRB20181231A6001376.7343.031333.701.091.117.743.65 × 10 43
FRB20181231B600197.1746.87150.300.890.130.612.25 × 10 41
FRB20181231C600556.0935.49520.600.680.432.462.63 × 10 42
FRB20190101A600854.6124.31830.300.600.694.326.75 × 10 42
FRB20190101B6001323.91234.011089.901.020.916.032.15 × 10 43
FRB20190102A600699.1743.57655.601.120.553.257.33 × 10 42
FRB20190102B600367.1641.06326.101.710.271.432.32 × 10 42
FRB20190103B600541.13187.13354.000.680.301.571.10 × 10 42
FRB20190103C6001349.13155.531193.602.300.996.755.97 × 10 43
FRB20190103D6001913.5533.251880.300.451.5711.823.29 × 10 43
FRB20190103E600736.2545.65690.600.460.583.463.39 × 10 42
FRB20190104A600549.43151.53397.901.450.331.803.06 × 10 42
FRB20190104B600530.1449.84480.302.700.402.248.70 × 10 42
FRB20190105A600383.5546.35337.200.600.281.498.75 × 10 41
FRB20190106A600340.0688.86251.200.270.211.062.06 × 10 41
FRB20190106B600316.59141.69174.901.700.150.715.94 × 10 41
FRB20190107A600849.1939.89809.300.490.674.195.20 × 10 42
FRB20190107B600166.0969.9996.102.800.080.382.76 × 10 41
FRB20190109A600324.60147.70176.901.190.150.724.26 × 10 41
FRB20190109B600175.1768.27106.901.200.090.421.48 × 10 41
FRB20190110A600472.75188.55284.201.540.241.221.54 × 10 42
FRB20190110B600486.1245.52440.600.470.372.021.25 × 10 42
FRB20190110C600221.9635.66186.300.640.160.762.56 × 10 41
FRB20190111A600171.9721.47150.503.600.130.619.13 × 10 41
FRB20190111B6001336.9365.131271.800.321.067.309.61 × 10 42
FRB20190112A600425.8542.05383.801.400.321.722.72 × 10 42
FRB20190113A600428.92178.92250.001.300.211.069.82 × 10 41
FRB20190114A600887.3938.09849.300.550.714.446.52 × 10 42
FRB20190115A6001021.68186.38835.300.460.704.355.25 × 10 42
FRB20190115B600748.2963.79684.501.450.573.421.05 × 10 43
FRB20190116C600629.2841.88587.4028.000.492.851.42 × 10 44
FRB20190116D6001164.0378.531085.500.510.906.001.06 × 10 43
FRB20190116E6001491.00128.401362.600.461.147.951.62 × 10 43
FRB20190116F600316.9246.82270.100.490.231.154.38 × 10 41
FRB20190117C600865.9053.30812.600.420.684.214.50 × 10 42
FRB20190117D6001178.0622.561155.500.780.966.481.88 × 10 43
FRB20190118A600225.1153.41171.709.300.140.703.12 × 10 42
FRB20190118B600670.8950.19620.700.310.523.041.79 × 10 42
FRB20190121A600425.3587.35338.001.700.281.492.49 × 10 42
FRB20190122A6001231.2164.611166.600.330.976.568.06 × 10 42
FRB20190122B600469.5754.47415.100.410.351.899.51 × 10 41
FRB20190122C600689.9024.40665.504.200.553.312.84 × 10 43
FRB20190124A6001275.85176.551099.300.610.926.101.31 × 10 43
FRB20190124B600441.3821.58419.800.970.351.912.31 × 10 42
FRB20190124C600303.6421.44282.202.500.241.212.46 × 10 42
FRB20190124D600340.1245.62294.500.500.251.275.41 × 10 41
FRB20190124E600617.79391.99225.800.640.190.953.87 × 10 41
FRB20190124F600254.7937.59217.203.900.180.912.17 × 10 42
FRB20190125A600564.7060.40504.300.370.422.371.33 × 10 42
FRB20190125B600178.2433.24145.000.830.120.581.94 × 10 41
FRB20190127B600663.0348.43614.600.630.513.003.56 × 10 42
FRB20190128A600696.1243.62652.500.580.543.233.75 × 10 42
FRB20190128B600248.2357.23191.000.810.160.793.42 × 10 41
FRB20190128C600310.6271.32239.300.710.201.014.88 × 10 41
FRB20190128D600430.23232.83197.401.200.160.815.43 × 10 41
FRB20190129A600484.7652.06432.700.490.361.981.25 × 10 42
FRB20190130A6001367.4637.361330.100.471.117.711.56 × 10 43
FRB20190130B600989.0329.73959.300.770.805.161.21 × 10 43
FRB20190131B6001805.7335.631770.100.991.4810.976.32 × 10 43
FRB20190131C600507.7632.96474.800.840.402.212.64 × 10 42
FRB20190131D600642.1267.52574.602.900.482.771.40 × 10 43
FRB20190131E600279.8043.30236.503.000.201.002.01 × 10 42
FRB20190201A600242.0062.40179.602.600.150.739.61 × 10 41
FRB20190201B600749.1854.18695.000.810.583.486.06 × 10 42
FRB20190202A600307.3640.76266.6041.000.221.143.56 × 10 43
FRB20190202B600464.9170.11394.801.570.331.783.25 × 10 42
FRB20190203A600420.5745.87374.701.210.311.682.23 × 10 42
FRB20190203B600582.2245.82536.400.490.452.552.03 × 10 42
FRB20190203C600370.4629.66340.801.400.281.502.09 × 10 42
FRB20190204A600449.6436.14413.500.240.341.885.52 × 10 41
FRB20190204B6001464.9445.541419.401.351.188.365.22 × 10 43
FRB20190205A600695.3967.69627.700.740.523.084.38 × 10 42
FRB20190206A600188.3441.44146.901.400.120.593.37 × 10 41
FRB20190206B600352.5278.52274.000.950.231.178.77 × 10 41
FRB20190206C6001043.0038.301004.700.560.845.469.78 × 10 42
FRB20190208B600714.2260.62653.6010.300.543.236.69 × 10 43
FRB20190208C600238.3949.69188.701.270.160.785.22 × 10 41
FRB20190210B600624.19116.49507.702.600.422.399.50 × 10 42
FRB20190210C600643.3755.27588.102.370.492.851.21 × 10 43
FRB20190210D600359.15141.25217.901.370.180.917.68 × 10 41
FRB20190210E600580.5857.88522.700.690.442.482.69 × 10 42
FRB20190211A6001188.26103.861084.401.470.906.003.06 × 10 43
FRB20190211B600260.7084.50176.200.300.150.721.06 × 10 41
FRB20190212B600600.1941.19559.001.550.472.687.05 × 10 42
FRB20190212C6001016.4522.35994.100.700.835.391.19 × 10 43
FRB20190212D6001139.7735.371104.400.420.926.139.12 × 10 42
FRB20190213C600357.06175.96181.100.620.150.742.33 × 10 41
FRB20190213D6001346.85234.551112.301.000.936.192.21 × 10 43
FRB20190214A600497.6869.78427.900.460.361.961.14 × 10 42
FRB20190214C600533.1122.11511.001.020.432.413.78 × 10 42
FRB20190215B600274.63136.23138.402.200.120.554.67 × 10 41
FRB20190217A600798.11110.71687.400.290.573.442.11 × 10 42
FRB20190217B600846.2145.81800.400.540.674.135.59 × 10 42
FRB20190218A6001285.1331.431253.700.541.047.171.57 × 10 43
FRB20190218B600547.8781.57466.300.570.392.161.72 × 10 42
FRB20190218C600319.3243.72275.6019.000.231.181.78 × 10 43
FRB20190219A600657.1978.79578.400.310.482.791.50 × 10 42
FRB20190219B6001681.1137.711643.401.101.3710.015.94 × 10 43
FRB20190219C600806.69124.09682.600.400.573.412.87 × 10 42
FRB20190220A600216.1240.92175.200.340.150.711.19 × 10 41
FRB20190221A600223.8152.91170.901.230.140.704.09 × 10 41
FRB20190221B600393.12165.52227.600.690.190.954.25 × 10 41
FRB20190221C6002042.30220.601821.700.591.5211.374.02 × 10 43
FRB20190221D600473.79189.59284.200.650.241.226.50 × 10 41
FRB20190222B600497.6233.22464.400.400.392.151.19 × 10 42
FRB20190222C600524.0129.51494.500.440.412.321.51 × 10 42
FRB20190222D600895.30115.60779.700.790.654.007.69 × 10 42
FRB20190223A600389.2458.14331.100.470.281.456.58 × 10 41
FRB20190223B600536.51124.71411.800.550.341.871.25 × 10 42
FRB20190224A600818.4065.50752.900.630.633.845.66 × 10 42
FRB20190224B600839.3751.37788.002.000.664.062.00 × 10 43
FRB20190224C600497.4059.90437.501.370.362.013.58 × 10 42
FRB20190224D600752.9556.25696.702.750.583.492.07 × 10 43
FRB20190224E600435.8633.06402.802.030.341.824.40 × 10 42
FRB20190226A600601.5791.27510.301.450.432.415.36 × 10 42
FRB20190226B600631.6050.70580.900.380.482.811.89 × 10 42
FRB20190226C600827.7744.47783.300.390.654.033.84 × 10 42
FRB20190227A600394.0463.44330.603.580.281.455.00 × 10 42
FRB20190227B600331.2323.93307.300.480.261.345.70 × 10 41
FRB20190228A600419.0820.18398.901.790.331.803.80 × 10 42
FRB20190228B6001115.2571.351043.904.800.875.729.16 × 10 43
FRB20190301B600621.3382.83538.500.400.452.571.67 × 10 42
FRB20190301C600802.9120.51782.400.340.654.023.34 × 10 42
FRB20190301D6001160.6953.091107.600.390.926.158.53 × 10 42
FRB20190302A6001034.24220.74813.500.560.684.226.01 × 10 42
FRB20190303B600193.5147.11146.409.400.120.592.25 × 10 42
FRB20190303C6001089.6623.061066.600.800.895.871.60 × 10 43
FRB20190303D600711.1537.05674.100.590.563.364.11 × 10 42
FRB20190304A600483.7349.83433.900.710.361.991.82 × 10 42
FRB20190304B600470.0122.61447.400.670.372.061.84 × 10 42
FRB20190304C600564.9922.09542.900.530.452.592.25 × 10 42
FRB20190307A600355.3458.04297.30...0.251.29...
FRB20190307B600294.0054.90239.10...0.201.01...
FRB20190308B600180.1868.68111.501.110.090.441.49 × 10 41
FRB20190308C600500.5223.12477.400.470.402.221.49 × 10 42
FRB20190309A600356.9058.60298.300.390.251.294.34 × 10 41
FRB20190313B6001191.2559.851131.400.670.946.321.54 × 10 43
FRB20190316A600515.9338.93477.001.310.402.224.16 × 10 42
FRB20190317A6001157.26137.961019.300.540.855.569.75 × 10 42
FRB20190317B600424.3180.61343.700.650.291.529.89 × 10 41
FRB20190317C600598.2653.56544.700.430.452.601.84 × 10 42
FRB20190317E600800.88134.28666.602.170.563.311.47 × 10 43
FRB20190317F6001118.1133.311084.801.650.906.003.44 × 10 43
FRB20190318A600419.2785.37333.901.550.281.472.21 × 10 42
FRB20190319A6002039.94107.641932.302.781.6112.222.16 × 10 44
FRB20190320A600614.15143.95470.200.940.392.192.89 × 10 42
FRB20190320B600489.4937.69451.800.730.382.092.05 × 10 42
FRB20190320C600368.7947.09321.701.240.271.411.63 × 10 42
FRB20190320D6001141.3543.851097.500.490.916.081.05 × 10 43
FRB20190320E600299.1455.84243.304.400.201.033.13 × 10 42
FRB20190322A6001060.1263.62996.500.640.835.401.10 × 10 43
FRB20190322B600576.9846.98530.000.610.442.522.46 × 10 42
FRB20190322C6001192.0865.781126.304.100.946.289.32 × 10 43
FRB20190323A600857.5072.80784.700.670.654.046.62 × 10 42
FRB20190323B600789.5640.26749.306.940.623.816.17 × 10 43
FRB20190323C600381.1223.62357.500.560.301.599.30 × 10 41
FRB20190323D600763.65162.35601.300.370.502.931.99 × 10 42
FRB20190325A600359.2950.99308.301.310.261.341.57 × 10 42
FRB20190325B6001733.9219.821714.100.701.4310.544.16 × 10 43
FRB20190325C600797.83188.43609.400.630.512.973.49 × 10 42
FRB20190326A600283.3140.71242.601.020.201.027.22 × 10 41
FRB20190327A600346.5788.77257.802.430.211.101.96 × 10 42
FRB20190328A6001303.5851.781251.800.431.047.161.25 × 10 43
FRB20190328B600565.0050.10514.900.720.432.432.72 × 10 42
FRB20190328C600472.8664.66408.204.700.341.851.05 × 10 43
FRB20190329A600188.6187.81100.800.520.080.405.67 × 10 40
FRB20190329B600406.0565.95340.10...0.281.50...
FRB20190329C6001256.3660.361196.00...1.006.76...
FRB20190330A600508.9724.87484.100.370.402.261.21 × 10 42
FRB20190330B600668.0948.89619.202.790.523.031.60 × 10 43
FRB20190401A600783.2242.42740.801.050.623.769.09 × 10 42
FRB20190402A6001291.6926.391265.300.301.057.258.91 × 10 42
FRB20190403A600518.8354.23464.601.120.392.153.35 × 10 42
FRB20190403B600292.4754.07238.402.700.201.001.84 × 10 42
FRB20190403C600935.0138.91896.100.370.754.744.96 × 10 42
FRB20190403D600613.4662.96550.500.650.462.632.85 × 10 42
FRB20190403E600226.2049.90176.303.900.150.721.39 × 10 42
FRB20190403F600664.1867.38596.800.580.502.903.06 × 10 42
FRB20190403G600865.31165.31700.000.750.583.515.70 × 10 42
FRB20190404A6001353.9040.301313.601.171.097.593.79 × 10 43
FRB20190404B600489.4245.02444.408.600.372.052.33 × 10 43
FRB20190405A600424.8847.28377.600.650.311.691.22 × 10 42
FRB20190405B6001113.2253.921059.303.400.885.836.71 × 10 43
FRB20190408A600863.3845.98817.400.640.684.246.95 × 10 42
FRB20190409A6001791.8984.391707.503.001.4210.491.77 × 10 44
FRB20190409B600285.6347.83237.800.390.201.002.64 × 10 41
FRB20190409C600674.6343.03631.601.040.533.106.25 × 10 42
FRB20190409D6001300.1254.721245.400.591.047.111.69 × 10 43
FRB20190410A600284.02128.52155.501.590.130.634.32 × 10 41
FRB20190410B600642.1778.37563.800.220.472.711.02 × 10 42
FRB20190411A600460.5660.76399.801.240.331.812.64 × 10 42
FRB20190411B6001229.5835.281194.300.891.006.752.31 × 10 43
FRB20190411C600233.6638.86194.803.190.160.801.40 × 10 42
FRB20190412A600364.7337.53327.201.770.271.442.42 × 10 42
FRB20190412B600375.75264.85110.900.680.090.449.06 × 10 40
FRB20190414A600811.9820.18791.800.440.664.084.44 × 10 42
FRB20190414B600506.4937.79468.700.490.392.181.49 × 10 42
FRB20190415A600633.6836.98596.700.570.502.903.01 × 10 42
FRB20190415B600722.99155.39567.600.850.472.734.00 × 10 42
FRB20190415C600650.18168.48481.700.460.402.251.49 × 10 42
FRB20190416A6002287.2739.172248.100.601.8714.716.56 × 10 43
FRB20190416B600575.3620.56554.800.690.462.663.08 × 10 42
FRB20190417B6001161.2035.001126.200.460.946.281.04 × 10 43
FRB20190417C600320.23122.03198.207.900.170.823.61 × 10 42
FRB20190418A600184.5170.11114.400.990.100.451.41 × 10 41
FRB20190419A600439.9762.27377.700.410.311.697.70 × 10 41
FRB20190419B600165.0852.28112.804.600.090.456.35 × 10 41
FRB20190420A600609.1065.70543.400.880.452.593.75 × 10 42
FRB20190420B600846.8467.44779.402.200.654.002.14 × 10 43
FRB20190420C600629.9535.75594.200.440.502.882.30 × 10 42
FRB20190421B600392.2596.45295.805.100.251.285.57 × 10 42
FRB20190422A600452.3079.50372.800.600.311.671.09 × 10 42
FRB20190422B600977.3934.09943.300.220.795.053.32 × 10 42
FRB20190423A600242.6531.65211.0010.800.180.885.65 × 10 42
FRB20190423B600584.95482.65102.300.870.090.409.78 × 10 40
FRB20190423C600855.5360.43795.101.230.664.101.25 × 10 43
FRB20190423D600496.4666.16430.301.710.361.974.30 × 10 42
FRB20190424A600758.6735.47723.201.130.603.659.26 × 10 42
FRB20190425A600128.1648.7679.4018.600.070.311.23 × 10 42
FRB20190425B6001031.7252.72979.001.250.825.292.06 × 10 43
FRB20190426A600340.6655.86284.801.590.241.231.60 × 10 42
FRB20190427A600455.7884.98370.803.900.311.667.03 × 10 42
FRB20190428A600969.4027.00942.402.220.795.053.35 × 10 43
FRB20190429A600470.8857.58413.300.800.341.881.84 × 10 42
FRB20190429B600295.6542.15253.500.740.211.085.76 × 10 41
FRB20190430A600339.2557.85281.400.750.231.217.34 × 10 41
FRB20190430B6002619.4036.402583.000.382.1517.435.65 × 10 43
FRB20190430C600400.5699.06301.502.170.251.312.47 × 10 42
FRB20190501B600784.0743.57740.500.880.623.767.61 × 10 42
FRB20190502A600625.7734.97590.803.180.492.871.64 × 10 43
FRB20190502B600918.6133.81884.802.580.744.673.36 × 10 43
FRB20190502C600396.8447.44349.403.600.291.555.68 × 10 42
FRB20190515A600450.50157.40293.100.550.241.275.89 × 10 41
FRB20190515B600822.1932.49789.702.800.664.072.81 × 10 43
FRB20190515D600426.0647.76378.303.000.321.705.65 × 10 42
FRB20190516B6001235.4233.321202.101.131.006.812.98 × 10 43
FRB20190517C600335.57187.97147.603.100.120.597.54 × 10 41
FRB20190517D6001180.1593.351086.800.450.916.019.42 × 10 42
FRB20190518B600913.7726.07887.701.530.744.692.01 × 10 43
FRB20190518C600444.0841.68402.406.700.341.821.45 × 10 43
FRB20190518D600202.4653.96148.501.360.120.603.35 × 10 41
FRB20190518G600524.9563.05461.900.990.382.142.92 × 10 42
FRB20190519D600539.7730.47509.300.360.422.401.32 × 10 42
FRB20190519E600693.8327.53666.301.000.563.316.79 × 10 42
FRB20190519F600797.7742.07755.700.750.633.856.80 × 10 42
FRB20190519G600430.0973.49356.601.110.301.581.83 × 10 42
FRB20190519H6001170.8759.371111.503.200.936.187.05 × 10 43
FRB20190519J600642.7656.06586.700.630.492.843.20 × 10 42
FRB20190520A600432.5179.71352.801.080.291.561.74 × 10 42
FRB20190527A600584.5833.68550.900.470.462.642.07 × 10 42
FRB20190527C600535.4473.84461.603.000.382.148.84 × 10 42
FRB20190529A600704.45165.45539.000.470.452.571.97 × 10 42
FRB20190530A600555.45139.25416.200.580.351.891.35 × 10 42
FRB20190531A600324.7044.00280.70...0.231.21...
FRB20190531B600167.9643.06124.90...0.100.50...
FRB20190531C600478.20132.40345.800.370.291.535.71 × 10 41
FRB20190531E600328.2032.00296.202.700.251.282.96 × 10 42
FRB20190601A6002227.8932.992194.900.731.8314.297.56 × 10 43
FRB20190601B600787.8041.90745.901.000.623.798.80 × 10 42
FRB20190601C600424.07186.37237.701.320.201.008.93 × 10 41
FRB20190601D600668.4763.87604.600.630.502.953.42 × 10 42
FRB20190603B600504.32100.32404.001.700.341.833.71 × 10 42
FRB20190604C600515.64163.94351.701.560.291.562.50 × 10 42
FRB20190604D6001021.1724.77996.400.820.835.401.40 × 10 43
FRB20190604E6001218.6026.001192.601.160.996.743.01 × 10 43
FRB20190604G600233.0551.45181.601.150.150.744.35 × 10 41
FRB20190605C600187.6437.84149.804.600.120.601.15 × 10 42
FRB20190605D6001656.5348.831607.700.821.349.744.21 × 10 43
FRB20190606B600277.4955.09222.402.620.190.931.53 × 10 42
FRB20190607A600562.4543.95518.504.350.432.451.67 × 10 43
FRB20190607B600289.38138.28151.101.060.130.612.71 × 10 41
FRB20190608A600722.1838.38683.801.290.573.429.29 × 10 42
FRB20190609A600316.6458.44258.203.600.221.102.92 × 10 42
FRB20190609B600292.1952.29239.9011.500.201.017.94 × 10 42
FRB20190609C600480.28112.68367.600.640.311.641.13 × 10 42
FRB20190609D600511.7157.51454.200.660.382.101.87 × 10 42
FRB20190612A600432.2941.69390.600.790.331.761.60 × 10 42
FRB20190612B600187.6027.70159.902.410.130.656.95 × 10 41
FRB20190612C6001641.57107.771533.803.801.289.191.75 × 10 44
FRB20190613A600714.9853.48661.501.070.553.287.14 × 10 42
FRB20190613B600285.14168.84116.301.080.100.461.59 × 10 41
FRB20190614A6001064.0452.341011.700.830.845.511.47 × 10 43
FRB20190614B600581.9154.91527.004.500.442.501.79 × 10 43
FRB20190614C600589.1657.46531.700.500.442.532.03 × 10 42
FRB20190616A600212.5925.49187.100.730.160.772.95 × 10 41
FRB20190617A600195.7746.67149.105.800.120.601.44 × 10 42
FRB20190617B600273.5143.81229.700.990.190.966.22 × 10 41
FRB20190617C600640.1645.36594.800.540.502.892.83 × 10 42
FRB20190618A600228.9577.25151.702.400.130.616.19 × 10 41
FRB20190619A600899.9137.61862.301.570.724.531.93 × 10 43
FRB20190619B600270.5945.89224.701.960.190.941.17 × 10 42
FRB20190619C600488.2769.27419.000.720.351.911.71 × 10 42
FRB20190619D600378.4763.97314.500.480.261.376.00 × 10 41
FRB20190621B6001061.2330.731030.500.300.865.635.55 × 10 42
FRB20190621C600570.2725.67544.601.980.452.608.48 × 10 42
FRB20190621D600647.5150.71596.800.890.502.904.70 × 10 42
FRB20190622A6001122.8256.821066.000.610.895.871.22 × 10 43
FRB20190623A6001082.2074.201008.000.410.845.487.21 × 10 42
FRB20190623B6001556.77143.771413.001.581.188.316.04 × 10 43
FRB20190623C6001049.8348.831001.001.920.835.433.32 × 10 43
FRB20190624A600973.8537.85936.000.580.785.008.60 × 10 42
FRB20190624B600213.9269.72144.2016.500.120.583.82 × 10 42
FRB20190625A600302.1423.14279.000.350.231.203.36 × 10 41
FRB20190625C600442.2476.14366.102.220.311.633.89 × 10 42
FRB20190625D600717.88101.38616.505.300.513.013.01 × 10 43
FRB20190627A600404.2230.32373.901.980.311.673.63 × 10 42
FRB20190627B600430.3242.02388.304.060.321.758.11 × 10 42
FRB20190627C600968.6148.01920.604.000.774.905.71 × 10 43
FRB20190627D6002002.24132.041870.200.241.5611.741.71 × 10 43
FRB20190628A600745.8429.84716.000.810.603.616.49 × 10 42
FRB20190628B600408.0146.51361.500.750.301.611.28 × 10 42
FRB20190628C6001748.4498.841649.600.381.3710.062.07 × 10 43
FRB20190629A600503.7835.08468.700.820.392.182.50 × 10 42
FRB20190630B600652.15150.55501.600.920.422.363.27 × 10 42
FRB20190630C6001660.3568.051592.300.661.339.633.32 × 10 43
FRB20190630D600323.5243.72279.801.730.231.201.67 × 10 42
FRB20190701A600637.0954.29582.801.260.492.826.30 × 10 42
FRB20190701B600749.1161.51687.601.100.573.448.03 × 10 42
FRB20190701C600974.2058.40915.800.880.764.871.24 × 10 43
FRB20190701D600933.3655.96877.401.330.734.621.70 × 10 43
FRB20190701E600890.4842.38848.100.680.714.448.04 × 10 42

References

  1. Lorimer, D.R.; Bailes, M.; McLaughlin, M.A.; Narkevic, D.J.; Crawford, F. A Bright Millisecond Radio Burst of Extragalactic Origin. Science 2007, 318, 777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Thornton, D.; Stappers, B.; Bailes, M.; Barsdell, B.; Bates, S.; Bhat, N.D.R.; Burgay, M.; Burke-Spolaor, S.; Champion, D.J.; Coster, P.; et al. A Population of Fast Radio Bursts at Cosmological Distances. Science 2013, 341, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cordes, J.M.; Chatterjee, S. Fast Radio Bursts: An Extragalactic Enigma. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 57, 417–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Petroff, E.; Barr, E.D.; Jameson, A.; Keane, E.F.; Bailes, M.; Kramer, M.; Morello, V.; Tabbara, D.; van Straten, W. FRBCAT: The Fast Radio Burst Catalogue. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 2016, 33, e045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Li, X.J.; Dong, X.F.; Zhang, Z.B.; Li, D. Long and Short Fast Radio Bursts Are Different from Repeating and Nonrepeating Transients. Astrophys. J. 2021, 923, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. CHIME/FRB Collaboration; Amiri, M.; Andersen, B.C.; Bandura, K.; Berger, S.; Bhardwaj, M.; Boyce, M.M.; Boyle, P.J.; Brar, C.; Breitman, D.; et al. The First CHIME/FRB Fast Radio Burst Catalog. Astrophys. J. 2021, 257, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Keane, E.F.; Petroff, E. Fast radio bursts: Search sensitivities and completeness. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, 447, 2852–2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Law, C.J.; Bower, G.C.; Burke-Spolaor, S.; Butler, B.; Lawrence, E.; Lazio, T.J.W.; Mattmann, C.A.; Rupen, M.; Siemion, A.; VanderWiel, S. A Millisecond Interferometric Search for Fast Radio Bursts with the Very Large Array. Astrophys. J. 2015, 807, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Champion, D.J.; Petroff, E.; Kramer, M.; Keith, M.J.; Bailes, M.; Barr, E.D.; Bates, S.D.; Bhat, N.D.R.; Burgay, M.; Burke-Spolaor, S.; et al. Five new fast radio bursts from the HTRU high-latitude survey at Parkes: First evidence for two-component bursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett. 2016, 460, L30–L34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Oppermann, N.; Connor, L.D.; Pen, U.L. The Euclidean distribution of fast radio bursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016, 461, 984–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rane, A.; Lorimer, D.R.; Bates, S.D.; McMann, N.; McLaughlin, M.A.; Rajwade, K. A search for rotating radio transients and fast radio bursts in the Parkes high-latitude pulsar survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016, 455, 2207–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bhandari, S.; Keane, E.F.; Barr, E.D.; Jameson, A.; Petroff, E.; Johnston, S.; Bailes, M.; Bhat, N.D.R.; Burgay, M.; Burke-Spolaor, S.; et al. The SUrvey for Pulsars and Extragalactic Radio Bursts - II. New FRB discoveries and their follow-up. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 475, 1427–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Connor, L.; Petroff, E. On Detecting Repetition from Fast Radio Bursts. Astrophys. J. 2018, 861, L1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Patel, C.; Agarwal, D.; Bhardwaj, M.; Boyce, M.M.; Brazier, A.; Chatterjee, S.; Chawla, P.; Kaspi, V.M.; Lorimer, D.R.; McLaughlin, M.A.; et al. PALFA Single-pulse Pipeline: New Pulsars, Rotating Radio Transients, and a Candidate Fast Radio Burst. Astrophys. J. 2018, 869, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shannon, R.M.; Macquart, J.P.; Bannister, K.W.; Ekers, R.D.; James, C.W.; Osłowski, S.; Qiu, H.; Sammons, M.; Hotan, A.W.; Voronkov, M.A.; et al. The dispersion-brightness relation for fast radio bursts from a wide-field survey. Nature 2018, 562, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Farah, W.; Flynn, C.; Bailes, M.; Jameson, A.; Bateman, T.; Campbell-Wilson, D.; Day, C.K.; Deller, A.T.; Green, A.J.; Gupta, V.; et al. Five new real-time detections of fast radio bursts with UTMOST. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 488, 2989–3002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Parent, E.; Chawla, P.; Kaspi, V.M.; Agazie, G.Y.; Blumer, H.; DeCesar, M.; Fiore, W.; Fonseca, E.; Hessels, J.W.T.; Kaplan, D.L.; et al. First Discovery of a Fast Radio Burst at 350 MHz by the GBNCC Survey. Astrophys. J. 2020, 904, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, D.; Wang, P.; Zhu, W.W.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, X.X.; Duan, R.; Zhang, Y.K.; Feng, Y.; Tang, N.Y.; Chatterjee, S.; et al. A bimodal burst energy distribution of a repeating fast radio burst source. Nature 2021, 598, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, H.; Niu, J.R.; Chen, P.; Lee, K.J.; Zhu, W.W.; Dong, S.; Zhang, B.; Jiang, J.C.; Wang, B.J.; Xu, J.W.; et al. A fast radio burst source at a complex magnetised site in a barred galaxy. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2111.11764. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, D.; Wang, P.; Qian, L.; Krco, M.; Jiang, P.; Yue, Y.; Jin, C.; Zhu, Y.; Pan, Z.; Nan, R.; et al. FAST in Space: Considerations for a Multibeam, Multipurpose Survey Using China’s 500-m Aperture Spherical Radio Telescope (FAST). IEEE Microw. Mag. 2018, 19, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. CHIME/FRB Collaboration; Andersen, B.C.; Bandura, K.M.; Bhardwaj, M.; Bij, A.; Boyce, M.M.; Boyle, P.J.; Brar, C.; Cassanelli, T.; Chawla, P.; et al. A bright millisecond-duration radio burst from a Galactic magnetar. Nature 2020, 587, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bochenek, C. A Fast Radio Burst Associated with a Galactic Magnetar. In Proceedings of the American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, New York, NY, USA, 11–15 January 2021; Volume 53, p. 236.05D. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lin, L.; Zhang, C.F.; Wang, P.; Gao, H.; Guan, X.; Han, J.L.; Jiang, J.C.; Jiang, P.; Lee, K.J.; Li, D.; et al. No pulsed radio emission during a bursting phase of a Galactic magnetar. Nature 2020, 587, 63–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mereghetti, S.; Savchenko, V.; Ferrigno, C.; Götz, D.; Rigoselli, M.; Tiengo, A.; Bazzano, A.; Bozzo, E.; Coleiro, A.; Courvoisier, T.J.L.; et al. INTEGRAL Discovery of a Burst with Associated Radio Emission from the Magnetar SGR 1935+2154. Astrophys. J. 2020, 898, L29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, C.K.; Lin, L.; Xiong, S.L.; Ge, M.Y.; Li, X.B.; Li, T.P.; Lu, F.J.; Zhang, S.N.; Tuo, Y.L.; Nang, Y.; et al. HXMT identification of a non-thermal X-ray burst from SGR J1935+2154 and with FRB 200428. Nat. Astron. 2021, 5, 378–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ridnaia, A.; Svinkin, D.; Frederiks, D.; Bykov, A.; Popov, S.; Aptekar, R.; Golenetskii, S.; Lysenko, A.; Tsvetkova, A.; Ulanov, M.; et al. A peculiar hard X-ray counterpart of a Galactic fast radio burst. Nat. Astron. 2021, 5, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tavani, M.; Casentini, C.; Ursi, A.; Verrecchia, F.; Addis, A.; Antonelli, L.A.; Argan, A.; Barbiellini, G.; Baroncelli, L.; Bernardi, G.; et al. An X-ray burst from a magnetar enlightening the mechanism of fast radio bursts. Nat. Astron. 2021, 5, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Petroff, E.; Hessels, J.W.T.; Lorimer, D.R. Fast radio bursts. Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 27, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhang, B. Fast Radio Burst Energetics and Detectability from High Redshifts. Astrophys. J. 2018, 867, L21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ravi, V.; Catha, M.; D’Addario, L.; Djorgovski, S.G.; Hallinan, G.; Hobbs, R.; Kocz, J.; Kulkarni, S.R.; Shi, J.; Vedantham, H.K.; et al. A fast radio burst localized to a massive galaxy. Nature 2019, 572, 352–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Platts, E.; Weltman, A.; Walters, A.; Tendulkar, S.P.; Gordin, J.E.B.; Kandhai, S. A living theory catalogue for fast radio bursts. Phys. Rep. 2019, 821, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Yamasaki, S.; Totani, T.; Kiuchi, K. Repeating and non-repeating fast radio bursts from binary neutron star mergers. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 2018, 70, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Popov, S.B.; Postnov, K.A. Millisecond extragalactic radio bursts as magnetar flares. arXiv 2013, arXiv:1307.4924. [Google Scholar]
  34. Metzger, B.D.; Margalit, B.; Sironi, L. Fast radio bursts as synchrotron maser emission from decelerating relativistic blast waves. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 485, 4091–4106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Geng, J.J.; Huang, Y.F. Fast Radio Bursts: Collisions between Neutron Stars and Asteroids/Comets. Astrophys. J. 2015, 809, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Dai, Z.G.; Wang, J.S.; Wu, X.F.; Huang, Y.F. Repeating Fast Radio Bursts from Highly Magnetized Pulsars Traveling through Asteroid Belts. Astrophys. J. 2016, 829, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Xiao, D.; Dai, Z.G. Double-peaked Pulse Profile of FRB 200428: Synchrotron Maser Emission from Magnetized Shocks Encountering a Density Jump. Astrophys. J. 2020, 904, L5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Geng, J.J.; Li, B.; Li, L.B.; Xiong, S.L.; Kuiper, R.; Huang, Y.F. FRB 200428: An Impact between an Asteroid and a Magnetar. Astrophys. J. 2020, 898, L55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Geng, J.; Li, B.; Huang, Y. Repeating fast radio bursts from collapses of the crust of a strange star. Innovation 2021, 2, 100152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, L.B.; Huang, Y.F.; Geng, J.J.; Li, B. A model of fast radio bursts: Collisions between episodic magnetic blobs. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2018, 18, 061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zhang, B. FRB 121102: A Repeatedly Combed Neutron Star by a Nearby Low-luminosity Accreting Supermassive Black Hole. Astrophys. J. 2018, 854, L21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Li, Q.C.; Yang, Y.P.; Wang, F.Y.; Xu, K.; Shao, Y.; Liu, Z.N.; Dai, Z.G. Periodic Activities of Repeating Fast Radio Bursts from Be/X-Ray Binary Systems. Astrophys. J. 2021, 918, L5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yang, H.; Zou, Y.C. Orbit-induced Spin Precession as a Possible Origin for Periodicity in Periodically Repeating Fast Radio Bursts. Astrophys. J. 2020, 893, L31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Levin, Y.; Beloborodov, A.M.; Bransgrove, A. Precessing Flaring Magnetar as a Source of Repeating FRB 180916.J0158+65. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2020, 895, L30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tong, H.; Wang, W.; Wang, H.G. Periodicity in fast radio bursts due to forced precession by a fallback disk. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 20, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, D.; Zanazzi, J.J. Emission Properties of Periodic Fast Radio Bursts from the Motion of Magnetars: Testing Dynamical Models. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021, 909, L25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sridhar, N.; Metzger, B.D.; Beniamini, P.; Margalit, B.; Renzo, M.; Sironi, L.; Kovlakas, K. Periodic Fast Radio Bursts from Luminous X-ray Binaries. Astrophys. J. 2021, 917, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, B. Unexpected emission pattern adds to the enigma of fast radio bursts. Nature 2020, 582, 344–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, K.; Li, Q.C.; Yang, Y.P.; Li, X.D.; Dai, Z.G.; Liu, J. Do the Periodic Activities of Repeating Fast Radio Bursts Represent the Spins of Neutron Stars? Astrophys. J. 2021, 917, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Thompson, A.R.; Clark, B.G.; Wade, C.M.; Napier, P.J. The Very Large Array. Astrophys. J. 1980, 44, 151–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bannister, K.W.; Shannon, R.M.; Macquart, J.P.; Flynn, C.; Edwards, P.G.; O’Neill, M.; Osłowski, S.; Bailes, M.; Zackay, B.; Clarke, N.; et al. The Detection of an Extremely Bright Fast Radio Burst in a Phased Array Feed Survey. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2017, 841, L12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. CHIME/FRB Collaboration; Amiri, M.; Bandura, K.; Berger, P.; Bhardwaj, M.; Boyce, M.M.; Boyle, P.J.; Brar, C.; Burhanpurkar, M.; Chawla, P.; et al. The CHIME Fast Radio Burst Project: System Overview. Astrophys. J. 2018, 863, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Spitler, L.G.; Scholz, P.; Hessels, J.W.T.; Bogdanov, S.; Brazier, A.; Camilo, F.; Chatterjee, S.; Cordes, J.M.; Crawford, F.; Deneva, J.; et al. A repeating fast radio burst. Nature 2016, 531, 202–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. CHIME/FRB Collaboration; Amiri, M.; Bandura, K.; Bhardwaj, M.; Boubel, P.; Boyce, M.M.; Boyle, P.J.; . Brar, C.; Burhanpurkar, M.; Cassanelli, T.; et al. A second source of repeating fast radio bursts. Nature 2019, 566, 235–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. CHIME/FRB Collaboration; Andersen, B.C.; Bandura, K.; Bhardwaj, M.; Boubel, P.; Boyce, M.M.; Boyle, P.J.; Brar, C.; Cassanelli, T.; Chawla, P.; et al. CHIME/FRB Discovery of Eight New Repeating Fast Radio Burst Sources. Astrophys. J. 2019, 885, L24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kumar, P.; Shannon, R.M.; Osłowski, S.; Qiu, H.; Bhandari, S.; Farah, W.; Flynn, C.; Kerr, M.; Lorimer, D.R.; Macquart, J.P.; et al. Faint Repetitions from a Bright Fast Radio Burst Source. Astrophys. J. 2019, 887, L30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Luo, R.; Wang, B.J.; Men, Y.P.; Zhang, C.F.; Jiang, J.C.; Xu, H.; Wang, W.Y.; Lee, K.J.; Han, J.L.; Zhang, B.; et al. Diverse polarization angle swings from a repeating fast radio burst source. Nature 2020, 586, 693–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, Z.B.; Choi, C.S. An analysis of the durations of Swift gamma-ray bursts. Astron. Astrophys. 2008, 484, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Zhang, Z.B.; Zhang, C.T.; Zhao, Y.X.; Luo, J.J.; Jiang, L.Y.; Wang, X.L.; Han, X.L.; Terheide, R.K. Spectrum-energy Correlations in GRBs: Update, Reliability, and the Long/Short Dichotomy. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 2018, 130, 054202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, Z.B.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Li, X.J.; Zhang, Q. On the Spectral Peak Energy of Swift Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophys. J. 2020, 902, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Luo, R.; Lee, K.; Lorimer, D.R.; Zhang, B. On the normalized FRB luminosity function. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 481, 2320–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Caleb, M.; Stappers, B.W.; Rajwade, K.; Flynn, C. Are all fast radio bursts repeating sources? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 484, 5500–5508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Li, Y.; Zhang, B.; Nagamine, K.; Shi, J. The FRB 121102 Host Is Atypical among Nearby Fast Radio Bursts. Astrophys. J. 2019, 884, L26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Zhang, B. The physical mechanisms of fast radio bursts. Nature 2020, 587, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ravi, V. The prevalence of repeating fast radio bursts. Nat. Astron. 2019, 3, 928–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Lu, W.; Piro, A.L.; Waxman, E. Implications of Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment repeating fast radio bursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 498, 1973–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Luo, R.; Men, Y.; Lee, K.; Wang, W.; Lorimer, D.R.; Zhang, B. On the FRB luminosity function—II. Event rate density. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 494, 665–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Caleb, M.; Flynn, C.; Bailes, M.; Barr, E.D.; Hunstead, R.W.; Keane, E.F.; Ravi, V.; van Straten, W. Are the distributions of fast radio burst properties consistent with a cosmological population? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016, 458, 708–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Niino, Y. Fast Radio Bursts’ Recipes for the Distributions of Dispersion Measures, Flux Densities, and Fluences. Astrophys. J. 2018, 858, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Lu, W.; Piro, A.L. Implications from ASKAP Fast Radio Burst Statistics. Astrophys. J. 2019, 883, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, G.Q.; Wang, F.Y. Energy function, formation rate, and low-metallicity environment of fast radio bursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 487, 3672–3678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bhattacharya, M.; Kumar, P. Population Modeling of Fast Radio Bursts from Source Properties. Astrophys. J. 2020, 899, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Planck Collaboration; Ade, P.A.R.; Aghanim, N.; Arnaud, M.; Ashdown, M.; Aumont, J.; Baccigalupi, C.; Banday, A.J.; Barreiro, R.B.; Bartlett, J.G.; et al. Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 2016, 594, A13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Fonseca, E.; Andersen, B.C.; Bhardwaj, M.; Chawla, P.; Good, D.C.; Josephy, A.; Kaspi, V.M.; Masui, K.W.; Mckinven, R.; Michilli, D.; et al. Nine New Repeating Fast Radio Burst Sources from CHIME/FRB. Astrophys. J. 2020, 891, L6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Kirsten, F.; Snelders, M.P.; Jenkins, M.; Nimmo, K.; van den Eijnden, J.; Hessels, J.W.T.; Gawroński, M.P.; Yang, J. Detection of two bright radio bursts from magnetar SGR 1935 + 2154. Nat. Astron. 2021, 5, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bauer, D.F. Constructing confidence sets using rank statistics. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1972, 67, 687–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hollander, M.; Wolfe, D.A.; Chicken, E. Nonparametric Statistical Methods; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; Volume 751. [Google Scholar]
  78. Xiao, D.; Wang, F.; Dai, Z. The physics of fast radio bursts. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 2021, 64, 249501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Thode, H.C. Testing for Normality, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, CA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  80. Li, L.B.; Huang, Y.F.; Zhang, Z.B.; Li, D.; Li, B. Intensity distribution function and statistical properties of fast radio bursts. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2017, 17, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Nan, R.; Li, D. The five-hundred-meter aperture spherical radio telescope (FAST) project. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2013, 44, 012022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Li, D.; Nan, R.; Pan, Z. The Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope project and its early science opportunities. In Proceedings of the Neutron Stars and Pulsars: Challenges and Opportunities after 80 Years, Beijing, China, 20–24 August 2012; van Leeuwen, J., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013; Volume 291, pp. 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Zhang, Z.B.; Kong, S.W.; Huang, Y.F.; Li, D.; Li, L.B. Detecting radio afterglows of gamma-ray bursts with FAST. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 2015, 15, 237–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Spitler, L.G.; Cordes, J.M.; Hessels, J.W.T.; Lorimer, D.R.; McLaughlin, M.A.; Chatterjee, S.; Crawford, F.; Deneva, J.S.; Kaspi, V.M.; Wharton, R.S.; et al. Fast Radio Burst Discovered in the Arecibo Pulsar ALFA Survey. Astrophys. J. 2014, 790, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Crawford, F.; Rane, A.; Tran, L.; Rolph, K.; Lorimer, D.R.; Ridley, J.P. A search for highly dispersed fast radio bursts in three Parkes multibeam surveys. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016, 460, 3370–3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Lawrence, E.; Vander Wiel, S.; Law, C.; Burke Spolaor, S.; Bower, G.C. The Nonhomogeneous Poisson Process for Fast Radio Burst Rates. Astron. J. 2017, 154, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bera, A.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Bharadwaj, S.; Bhat, N.D.R.; Chengalur, J.N. On modelling the Fast Radio Burst population and event rate predictions. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016, 457, 2530–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Aggarwal, K. Observational Effects of Banded Repeating FRBs. Astrophys. J. 2021, 920, L18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhang, Z.B.; Chandra, P.; Huang, Y.F.; Li, D. The Redshift Dependence of the Radio Flux of Gamma-Ray Bursts and Their Host Galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2018, 865, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Macquart, J.P.; Ekers, R. FRB event rate counts - II. Fluence, redshift, and dispersion measure distributions. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 480, 4211–4230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Macquart, J.P.; Shannon, R.M.; Bannister, K.W.; James, C.W.; Ekers, R.D.; Bunton, J.D. The Spectral Properties of the Bright Fast Radio Burst Population. Astrophys. J. 2019, 872, L19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Salvaterra, R.; Campana, S.; Vergani, S.D.; Covino, S.; D’Avanzo, P.; Fugazza, D.; Ghirlanda, G.; Ghisellini, G.; Melandri, A.; Nava, L.; et al. A Complete Sample of Bright Swift Long Gamma-Ray Bursts. I. Sample Presentation, Luminosity Function and Evolution. Astrophys. J. 2012, 749, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Pescalli, A.; Ghirlanda, G.; Salvaterra, R.; Ghisellini, G.; Vergani, S.; Nappo, F.; Salafia, O.; Melandri, A.; Götz, D. The rate and luminosity function of long Gamma Ray Bursts. Astron. Astrophys. 2015, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Deng, C.M.; Wang, X.G.; Guo, B.B.; Lu, R.J.; Wang, Y.Z.; Wei, J.J.; Wu, X.F.; Liang, E.W. Cosmic Evolution of Long Gamma-Ray Burst Luminosity. Astrophys. J. 2016, 820, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Gehrels, N. Confidence Limits for Small Numbers of Events in Astrophysical Data. Astrophys. J. 1986, 303, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. James, C.W.; Ekers, R.D.; Macquart, J.P.; Bannister, K.W.; Shannon, R.M. The slope of the source-count distribution for fast radio bursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 483, 1342–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Heintz, K.E.; Prochaska, J.X.; Simha, S.; Platts, E.; Fong, W.f.; Tejos, N.; Ryder, S.D.; Aggerwal, K.; Bhandari, S.; Day, C.K.; et al. Host Galaxy Properties and Offset Distributions of Fast Radio Bursts: Implications for Their Progenitors. Astrophys. J. 2020, 903, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Pleunis, Z.; Good, D.C.; Kaspi, V.M.; Mckinven, R.; Ransom, S.M.; Scholz, P.; Bandura, K.; Bhardwaj, M.; Boyle, P.J.; Brar, C.; et al. Fast Radio Burst Morphology in the First CHIME/FRB Catalog. Astrophys. J. 2021, 923, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Marcote, B.; Nimmo, K.; Hessels, J.W.T.; Tendulkar, S.P.; Bassa, C.G.; Paragi, Z.; Keimpema, A.; Bhardwaj, M.; Karuppusamy, R.; Kaspi, V.M.; et al. A repeating fast radio burst source localized to a nearby spiral galaxy. Nature 2020, 577, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Piro, L.; Bruni, G.; Troja, E.; O’Connor, B.; Panessa, F.; Ricci, R.; Zhang, B.; Burgay, M.; Dichiara, S.; Lee, K.J.; et al. The fast radio burst FRB 20201124A in a star-forming region: Constraints to the progenitor and multiwavelength counterparts. Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 656, L15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Bhardwaj, M.; Gaensler, B.M.; Kaspi, V.M.; Landecker, T.L.; Mckinven, R.; Michilli, D.; Pleunis, Z.; Tendulkar, S.P.; Andersen, B.C.; Boyle, P.J.; et al. A Nearby Repeating Fast Radio Burst in the Direction of M81. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021, 910, L18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ravi, V.; Law, C.J.; Li, D.; Aggarwal, K.; Burke-Spolaor, S.; Connor, L.; Lazio, T.J.W.; Simard, D.; Somalwar, J.; Tendulkar, S.P. The host galaxy and persistent radio counterpart of FRB 20201124A. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2106.09710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Bhandari, S.; Heintz, K.E.; Aggarwal, K.; Marnoch, L.; Day, C.K.; Sydnor, J.; Burke-Spolaor, S.; Law, C.J.; Xavier Prochaska, J.; Tejos, N.; et al. Characterizing the Fast Radio Burst Host Galaxy Population and its Connection to Transients in the Local and Extragalactic Universe. Astron. J. 2022, 163, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Caleb, M.; Spitler, L.G.; Stappers, B.W. One or several populations of fast radio burst sources? Nat. Astron. 2018, 2, 839–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Palaniswamy, D.; Li, Y.; Zhang, B. Are There Multiple Populations of Fast Radio Bursts? Astrophys. J. 2018, 854, L12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Hessels, J.W.T.; Spitler, L.G.; Seymour, A.D.; Cordes, J.M.; Michilli, D.; Lynch, R.S.; Gourdji, K.; Archibald, A.M.; Bassa, C.G.; Bower, G.C.; et al. FRB 121102 Bursts Show Complex Time-Frequency Structure. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2019, 876, L23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Nimmo, K.; Hessels, J.W.T.; Keimpema, A.; Archibald, A.M.; Cordes, J.M.; Karuppusamy, R.; Kirsten, F.; Li, D.Z.; Marcote, B.; Paragi, Z. Highly polarized microstructure from the repeating FRB 20180916B. Nat. Astron. 2021, 5, 594–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. CHIME/FRB Collaboration; Amiri, M.; Andersen, B.C.; Bandura, K.M.; Bhardwaj, M.; Boyle, P.J.; Brar, C.; Chawla, P.; Chen, T.; Cliche, J.F.; et al. Periodic activity from a fast radio burst source. Nature 2020, 582, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Rajwade, K.M.; Mickaliger, M.B.; Stappers, B.W.; Morello, V.; Agarwal, D.; Bassa, C.G.; Breton, R.P.; Caleb, M.; Karastergiou, A.; Keane, E.F.; et al. Possible periodic activity in the repeating FRB 121102. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 495, 3551–3558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Cruces, M.; Spitler, L.G.; Scholz, P.; Lynch, R.; Seymour, A.; Hessels, J.W.T.; Gouiffés, C.; Hilmarsson, G.H.; Kramer, M.; Munjal, S. Repeating behaviour of FRB 121102: Periodicity, waiting times, and energy distribution. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 500, 448–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The logarithmic distributions of D M E and radio energy of FRBs. Panel (a) presents the D M E distributions of non-repeating and repeating FRBs and panel (b) displays the D M E distributions of all FRBs. Panel (c) shows the radio energy distribution of repeating events. The dash lines are the best fits to data with a Gauss function.
Figure 1. The logarithmic distributions of D M E and radio energy of FRBs. Panel (a) presents the D M E distributions of non-repeating and repeating FRBs and panel (b) displays the D M E distributions of all FRBs. Panel (c) shows the radio energy distribution of repeating events. The dash lines are the best fits to data with a Gauss function.
Universe 08 00355 g001
Figure 2. The correlations of D M E with S peak , F obs and E are shown in Panels (ac) respectively. The W obs is plotted against S peak in Panel (d), D M E in Panel (e) and E in Panel (f). The observed data are symbolized with the filled squares. The solid lines in Panels (c,f) stand for the best fits to data with a power-law function.
Figure 2. The correlations of D M E with S peak , F obs and E are shown in Panels (ac) respectively. The W obs is plotted against S peak in Panel (d), D M E in Panel (e) and E in Panel (f). The observed data are symbolized with the filled squares. The solid lines in Panels (c,f) stand for the best fits to data with a power-law function.
Universe 08 00355 g002
Figure 3. Left panel: Correlation among E, D M E and W obs of repeating FRBsis illustrated by the 3D scatter plot. Right panel: The isotropic energy E is plotted against the energy estimated by Equation (1). The solid line is the best fit to the data. The light and the heavy shaded regions are the 95 % confidence and the 95 % prediction ranges, respectively.
Figure 3. Left panel: Correlation among E, D M E and W obs of repeating FRBsis illustrated by the 3D scatter plot. Right panel: The isotropic energy E is plotted against the energy estimated by Equation (1). The solid line is the best fit to the data. The light and the heavy shaded regions are the 95 % confidence and the 95 % prediction ranges, respectively.
Universe 08 00355 g003
Figure 4. Panel (a) shows an exemplary distribution of F ¯ for a bin width of Δ F ¯ = 3.6 Jy ms. The solid line is the best-fit curve. Panel (b) illustrates the best-fit power-law values a 1 for each bin width; the solid short horizontal line shows the relatively stable range of Δ F ¯ = 3.2 –4.2 Jy ms for a 1 . Panel (c) shows an example distribution of F obs for a bin width of F obs = 3.8 Jy ms. The solid line is the fitted curve. Panel (d) presents the best-fit power-law values a 2 for each bin width; the solid short horizontal line shows the relatively stable range of Δ F obs = 3.3 –4.4 Jy ms for a 2 .
Figure 4. Panel (a) shows an exemplary distribution of F ¯ for a bin width of Δ F ¯ = 3.6 Jy ms. The solid line is the best-fit curve. Panel (b) illustrates the best-fit power-law values a 1 for each bin width; the solid short horizontal line shows the relatively stable range of Δ F ¯ = 3.2 –4.2 Jy ms for a 1 . Panel (c) shows an example distribution of F obs for a bin width of F obs = 3.8 Jy ms. The solid line is the fitted curve. Panel (d) presents the best-fit power-law values a 2 for each bin width; the solid short horizontal line shows the relatively stable range of Δ F obs = 3.3 –4.4 Jy ms for a 2 .
Universe 08 00355 g004
Figure 5. The luminosity functions of the repeating (Panel a) and non-repeating (Panel b) FRBs. The solid lines stand for the best fits with the power-law function of Equation (3). In each panel, the error bars along the x-axis are simply the standard errors in the corresponding luminosity bins, and the y-axis error bars are the 1- σ Poisson errors [95].
Figure 5. The luminosity functions of the repeating (Panel a) and non-repeating (Panel b) FRBs. The solid lines stand for the best fits with the power-law function of Equation (3). In each panel, the error bars along the x-axis are simply the standard errors in the corresponding luminosity bins, and the y-axis error bars are the 1- σ Poisson errors [95].
Universe 08 00355 g005
Table 1. Key physical parameters of 21 repeating FRBs before September 2021.
Table 1. Key physical parameters of 21 repeating FRBs before September 2021.
TNS Name ν c a
MHz
DM
(pc cm−3)
DM MW
(pc cm−3)
DM E b
(pc cm−3)
W obs
(ms)
S peak
(Jy)
F obs
(Jy ms)
zE
(1039 erg)
F ¯ d
(Jy ms)
FRB 20121102A1375 557.00 ± 2.00 188.00369.00 3.00 ± 0.50 0 . 40 0.10 + 0.40 1 . 20 0.55 + 1.60 0.310.130.36
FRB 20171019A1297 460.80 ± 1.10 37.00423.80 5.40 ± 0.30 40.50219.000.3534.01101.62
FRB 20180814A600 189.38 ± 0.09 87.00102.38 2.60 ± 0.20 8.08 c 21.000.090.1322.57
FRB 20180908B600 195.70 ± 0.90 38.00157.70 1.91 ± 0.10 0.60 ± 0.40 2.700.130.042.03
FRB 20180916B600 349.70 ± 0.70 200.00149.70 1.06 ± 0.05 7.64 c 8.100.120.1210.26
FRB 20181017A600 1281.00 ± 0.60 43.001238.00 20.20 ± 1.70 0.79 c 16.001.0360.078.50
FRB 20181030A600 103.50 ± 0.70 40.0063.50 0.59 ± 0.08 12.37 c 7.300.050.024.75
FRB 20181119A600 364.00 ± 0.30 34.00330.00 2.66 ± 0.10 0.94 c 2.500.280.241.77
FRB 20181128A600 450.20 ± 0.30 112.00338.20 2.43 ± 0.16 1.81 c 4.400.280.463.45
FRB 20190116B600 443.60 ± 0.80 20.00423.60 1.50 ± 0.30 1.87 c 2.800.350.521.80
FRB20190117A600 393.30 ± 0.10 48.00345.30 1.44 ± 0.03 1.70 ± 0.60 5.900.290.646.36
FRB 20190208A600 580.20 ± 0.20 72.00508.20 1.31 ± 0.14 0.60 ± 0.30 2.000.420.601.70
FRB 20190209A600 424.60 ± 0.60 46.00378.60 3.70 ± 0.50 0.54 c 2.000.320.281.25
FRB 20190213A600 651.50 ± 0.40 43.00608.504.00 0.50 ± 0.30 3.000.511.461.80
FRB 20190212A600 301.40 ± 0.20 49.00252.40 2.10 ± 0.30 1.10 ± 0.60 2.500.210.132.67
FRB 20190222A600 460.60 ± 0.10 87.00373.60 2.97 ± 0.90 2.53 c 7.500.311.005.45
FRB 20190303A600 221.80 ± 0.50 29.00192.80 2.00 ± 0.30 0.50 ± 0.30 2.300.160.062.47
FRB 20190417A600 1378.50 ± 0.30 78.001300.50 1.19 ± 0.02 0.70 ± 0.20 1.701.087.403.10
FRB 20190604A600 552.60 ± 0.20 32.00520.60 3.00 ± 0.40 0.90 ± 0.40 8.300.432.645.00
FRB 20190711A23.8 593.10 ± 0.40 56.40536.70 6.50 ± 0.50 5.23 c 34.000.459.8817.70
FRB 20190907A600 309.50 ± 0.30 53.00256.50 0.54 ± 0.14 0.40 ± 0.20 0.900.210.051.10
Note: The all data were taken from http://www.frbcat.org [4] (accessed on 3 May 2022), and we report the properties of the brightest bursts for each repeater. a νc is the central frequency within the observational bandwith for an FRB. b DME is the extra-Galactic dispersion measure, which is defined as DME = DMDMMW. c For Speak which is not given in FRBCAT, the corresponding value is estimated by Speak = Fobs/Wobs. d F ¯ is the average fluence, which is calculated based on all archived Fobs of one repeating FRB.
Table 2. The statistical results of D M E for non-repeating FRBs and repeating FRBs.
Table 2. The statistical results of D M E for non-repeating FRBs and repeating FRBs.
DM FRB SampleStatistic ValueThe Critical Valuep-ValueMethods
D M E Non-repeating0.8141.0840.035 b A–D test a
D M E Repeating0.4270.9630.285 b A–D test a
D M E All0.7271.0850.058 b A–D test a
D M E Repeating and Non-repeating FRBs4328.5...0.031 d M–W–W test c
a The A–D test was executed in logarithmic scale with a significance level of α = 0.01. b A p-value larger than α indicates a log-normal distribution is favored [79]. c The M–W–W test was used to check different distributions with a significance Level of α = 0.05. d A p-value greater than α means that the two distributions are the same [76].
Table 3. Comparison of the deduced event rates of different FRB samples.
Table 3. Comparison of the deduced event rates of different FRB samples.
F Limit
(Jy ms)
R > F Limit
(sky −1 day −1)
ReferenceCoefficient A
(103 sky −1 day −1)
FEB Class
3 1 . 0 0.5 + 0.6 × 10 4 Thornton et al. [2] 5.02 ± 1.62 non-repeaters
0.35 3 . 1 3.1 + 12 × 10 4 Spitler et al. [84] 7.49 ± 1.15 non-repeaters
2 2.5 × 10 3 Keane and Petroff [7] 1.06 ± 0.32 non-repeaters
1.8 1.2 × 10 4 Law et al. [8] 4.88 ± 1.38 non-repeaters
4 4 . 4 3.1 + 5.2 × 10 3 Rane et al. [11] 2.53 ± 0.87 non-repeaters
0.13–1.5 7 3 + 5 × 10 3 Champion et al. [9] 2.87 ± 0.82 non-repeaters
3.8 3 . 3 2.2 + 3.7 × 10 3 Crawford et al. [85] 1.85 ± 0.63 non-repeaters
0.03 ( 3.03 ± 1.56 ) × 10 4 Li et al. [80] 4.19 ± 0.22 non-repeaters
6587Lawrence et al. [86] 0.42 ± 0.16 non-repeaters
2 1 . 7 0.9 + 1.5 × 10 3 Bhandari et al. [12] 0.72 ± 0.21 non-repeaters
26 37 ± 8 Shannon et al. [15] 0.15 ± 0.01 non-repeaters
8 98 39 + 59 Farah et al. [16] 0.01 ± 0.003 non-repeaters
2 3 . 4 3.3 + 15.4 × 10 3 Parent et al. [17] 1.44 ± 0.42 non-repeaters
5 818 ± 64 CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al. [6] 0.53 ± 0.19 non-repeaters
0.36 ( 9.64 ± 3.09 ) × 10 3 this work 2.37 ± 0.76 repeaters
Table 4. The best-fit parameters of a broken power-law LF for repeating and non-repeating FRBs.
Table 4. The best-fit parameters of a broken power-law LF for repeating and non-repeating FRBs.
SampleA α 1 α 2 L b ( erg s 1 ) χ ν 2
Repeating FRBs ( 4.80 ± 1.41 ) × 10 42 0.45 ± 0.20 1.41 ± 0.08 ( 1.78 ± 0.44 ) × 10 42 0.17
Non-repeating FRBs ( 8.59 ± 2.01 ) × 10 41 0.09 ± 0.10 1.49 ± 0.05 ( 1.74 ± 0.29 ) × 10 42 3.17
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, K.; Li, L.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Q.; Luo, J.; Jiang, M. The Statistical Similarity of Repeating and Non-Repeating Fast Radio Bursts. Universe 2022, 8, 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8070355

AMA Style

Zhang K, Li L, Zhang Z, Li Q, Luo J, Jiang M. The Statistical Similarity of Repeating and Non-Repeating Fast Radio Bursts. Universe. 2022; 8(7):355. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8070355

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Kongjun, Longbiao Li, Zhibin Zhang, Qinmei Li, Juanjuan Luo, and Min Jiang. 2022. "The Statistical Similarity of Repeating and Non-Repeating Fast Radio Bursts" Universe 8, no. 7: 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8070355

APA Style

Zhang, K., Li, L., Zhang, Z., Li, Q., Luo, J., & Jiang, M. (2022). The Statistical Similarity of Repeating and Non-Repeating Fast Radio Bursts. Universe, 8(7), 355. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8070355

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop