Next Article in Journal
GeV Proton Detection in the 8 November 2000 Solar Event
Next Article in Special Issue
Stueckelberg and Higgs Mechanisms: Frames and Scales
Previous Article in Journal
Binary X-ray Sources in Massive Brans–Dicke Gravity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Methodologies to Measure the CP Structure of the Higgs Yukawa Coupling to Tau Leptons
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Short Overview on Low Mass Scalars at Future Lepton Colliders

1
Division of Theoretical Physics, Ruder Boskovic Institute, 10002 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
Universe 2022, 8(5), 286; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8050286
Submission received: 15 April 2022 / Revised: 14 May 2022 / Accepted: 16 May 2022 / Published: 20 May 2022

Abstract

:
In this manuscript, I give a short summary on scenarios with new physics scalars that could be investigated at future e + e colliders. I concentrate on cases where at least one of the additional scalars has a mass below 125 GeV, and discuss both models where this could be realized, as well as studies which focus on such scenarios. This work is based on several overview talks I recently gave at the CEPC workshop, FCC week and ECFA future collider workshop, as well as a Snowmass White Paper.

1. Introduction

The discovery of a scalar which so far largely agrees with predictions for the Higgs boson of the Standard Model (SM) has by now been established by the LHC experiments (see e.g., [1,2]), with analyses of Run II LHC data further confirming this. In the European Strategy Report [3,4], a large focus was put on future e + e colliders, especially so-called Higgs factories with center-of-mass (com) energies around 240–250 GeV. While these will on the one hand further help to determine properties of the scalar discovered at the LHC, and especially will help to determine in detail the parameters and shape of the scalar potential, it is also interesting to investigate their potential to search for additional scalar states. In general, such states can be realized by extending the scalar sector of the SM by additional gauge singlets, doublets, triplets, or other multiplets. Depending on the specific extension, these models then contain several additional neutral or (multiply) charged scalar states. Here, I concentrate on scenarios where at least one of these has a mass 125 GeV .
In this work, I give a short overview on some models that allow for such light states, and point to phenomenological studies investigating such models. This should be viewed as an encouragement for further detailed studies in this direction. A preliminary version of this overview has been submitted as a Snowmass White Paper [5].

2. Models

2.1. Singlet Extensions

In singlet extensions (see e.g., [6,7,8,9,10]), the SM scalar potential is enhanced by additional scalar states that are singlets under the SM gauge group. In such scenarios, the coupling of the novel scalar(s) to SM particles is typically inherited via mixing, i.e., mass-eigenstates are related to gauge eigenstates via a unitary mixing matrix. The corresponding couplings and interactions are mediated via a simple mixing angle. In general, in such models, scalars have decay modes that connect them to both the SM as well as the novel scalar sector. If the additional states are singlets, all interactions to SM final states are rescaled by a mixing angle, such that:
g h i , SM SM = sin α i × g h i , SM SM SM ,
for general SM SM final states, where h i and α i denote the respective scalar and mixing angle. Depending on the specific kinematics, also novel triple and quartic interactions are possible, where the couplings depend on the specific values of the potential parameters. This allows in general for decays h i h j h k . Naturally, one of the CP even neutral scalars of the model has to have properties that concur with current measurements by the LHC experiments.
In [11], the authors present the status of current searches for the process,
p p h 125 h i h i X X Y Y ,
which for such models can be read as a bound in
sin 2 α × BR h 125 h i h i X X Y Y .
We display these results in Figure 1. Current bounds on the mixing angle for the 125 GeV-like state are around | sin α | 0.3 [12], which in turn means that branching ratios BR h 125 h i h i X X Y Y down to O 10 5 can be tested. In particular, the μ μ μ μ final states in the low mass region give interesting constraints on the h 125 h i h i branching ratio down to 0.03 .
We also refer the reader to a related discussion in [13].
After this short overview on current constraints, we now show an example of the allowed parameter space in a model with two additional singlets, the two real scalar extension studied in [10]. In this model, three CP-even neutral scalars exist that relate the gauge and mass eigenstates h 1 , 2 , 3 via mixing. One of these states has to have couplings and mass complying with current measurements of the SM-like scalar, the other two can have higher or lower masses. A detailed discussion of the model including theoretical and experimental constraints, can be found in [10]. In Figure 2, we display two cases where either one (high-low) or two (low-low) scalar masses are smaller than 125 GeV . On the y-axis, the respective mixing angle is shown. Complete decoupling would be designated by sin α = 0 in the notation used in this figure.
The points were generated using ScannerS [14,15], interfaced to HiggsBounds-5.10.2 [16,17,18,19] and HiggsSignals-2.6.2 [20,21], with constraints as implemented in these versions. Dominant decays are inherited from SM-like scalars with the respective masses, rendering the b b ¯ b b ¯ final state dominant for large regions of this parameter space. Note that in the case where both additional scalars have masses 125 GeV , h 1 h 1 h 1 final states would also be allowed in certain regions of parameter space. Note that the points additionally fulfill the novel upper bound on the total width of the 125 GeV scalar of 5.6 MeV [22].

2.2. Two Higgs Doublet Models

Two Higgs doublet models (2HDMs) constitute another example of new physics models allowing for low mass scalar states. A general discussion of such models is, e.g., given in [23] and will not be repeated here. In general, such models contain, besides the SM candidate, two additional neutral scalars which differ in CP properties as well as a charged scalar, so the particle content is given by h , H , A , H ± , where one of the two CP-even neutral scalars h , H needs to be identified with the 125 GeV resonance discovered at the LHC. Couplings to the fermions in the Yukawa sector distinguish different types of 2HDMs.
In [24], the authors perform a scan including bounds from theory, experimental searches and constraints, as e.g., electroweak observables, as well as B-physics. Examples for these scan results are shown in Figure 3, taken from that reference.
We see that for all regions solutions for either one or several low mass scenarios exist and are viable for the constraints discussed in that reference. The authors here primarily consider an aligned 2HDM [25,26], including an angle α ˜ that parametrizes the rescaling with respect to the Standard Model couplings to gauge bosons, with cos α ˜ = 0 designating the SM decoupling.
The limits on the absolute value of the cosine of rescaling angle vary between 0.05 and 0.25 [27]. In Figure 4, we display this angle vs the different scalar masses, reproduced from [24]1. We see that all regions for masses 125 GeV can be populated, with absolute value of mixing angle ranges | cos α ˜ | 0.1 .
Other examples for 2HDMs including possibilities for low-mass scalars, in particular for the CP-odd candidate A, can be found in [28].

2.3. Other Extensions

The scalar sector of the SM can be extended by an arbitrary number of additional scalar fields, such as singlets, doublets, etc. One option which is also often considered is the extension of this sector by both singlets and doublets. We will discuss a couple of examples of such extensions which are able to provide regions where some of the additional scalars are in the low-mass range of interest here. For more details on the specific models, we refer the readers to the respective publications.

2.3.1. N2HDM

In [29], the authors consider a model where the SM scalar sector is extended by an additional doublet as well as a real singlet. This model has three CP even neutral scalar particles, out of which one needs to have the properties in compliance with LHC measurements of the 125 GeV scalar. The authors perform an extensive scan and find regions in parameter space where either one or both of the additional scalars have masses below 125 GeV. We show an example of the allowed parameter space in Figure 5. We see that in the CP-even sector there are regions within this model that still allow for low mass scalars.

2.3.2. Lepton-Specific Inert Doublet Model

In [30], the authors consider a model where the SM scalar sector is augmented by an additional doublet, where they impose an exact Z 2 symmetry. This symmetry is then broken by a specific coupling to the fermionic sector. The authors identify regions in the models parameter space that agree with current searches as well as anomalous magnetic momenta of electron and muon, and find regions where the second CP-even scalar can have a mass 30 GeV . We display these regions in Figure 6.

2.3.3. Scalar Triplet Model

Finally, we want to discuss a model containing scalar triplets, leading to a rich particle content as well as the possibility of CP violating terms. The model has been presented in [31]. This model contains 5 neutral, 3 charged, and 2 doubly charged mass eigenstates. The authors present regions in parameter space where masses for some of these can be ≲ 125 GeV . We display these results in Figure 7. We see that both neutral and charged scalars with low mass realizations exist, with a rescaling of the h Z Z coupling below LEP sensitivity. These scenarios could be investigated at future machines with higher sensitivity in this region.

3. Studies at 90 GeV

For this center-of-mass energy, several searches exist which have already been performed at LEP and are summarized in [32,33], concentrating on Z h , h 1 h 2 , and h 1 h 1 h 1 final states, where h i signifies novel scalars. Possible new studies could build upon these searches. We want to note that the luminosity at FCC-ee and CEPC at this center of mass energy is exceeding LEP luminosity by several orders of magnitude [34,35].
We also want to draw attention to one specific study, which investigates several composite models at a com energy of 91 GeV [36]. The authors consider the process e + e + τ + τ , where the tau-pair stems from an additional pseudoscalar a radiated off one of the fermion lines in the pair-production. They apply a cut-based study as well as an improved analysis using machine learning techniques; for the latter, the authors are able to achieve a 3 σ exclusion for benchmarks with masses M a 20 GeV . We display event rates for the various benchmark scenarios in Figure 8.

4. Studies at 240–250 GeV

Throughout this work, we show for reference leading order predictions for Z h production at e + e colliders for low mass scalars which are SM-like. These results were obtained using Madgraph5 [37] and are given for approximate reference only. We also display the VBF-type production of e + e h ν ν ¯ . Note that the latter signature also contains contributions from Z h production, where Z ν ν ¯ .
Figure 9 shows the production cross sections for these processes for a center-of-mass energy of 240–250 GeV. Using these predictions, and taking into account standard rescaling ∼0.1, around 10 5 10 6 events could be produced with ILC, FCC-ee, and CEPC design luminosities [34,35,38].

4.1. Dedicated Studies

4.1.1. Light Scalars in Z h Production

Not many dedicated studies exist that investigate low-mass scalars at Higgs factories. We here point to [39] that investigates the sensitivity of the ILC for low-mass scalars in Z h production, either using pure Z recoil (“recoil method”) or taking the light scalar decay into b b ¯ into account. The y-axis shows the 95 % CL limit for agreement with a background only hypothesis, which can directly be translated into an upper bound on rescaling. The authors validate their method by reproducing LEP results [33,40] for these channels prior to applying their method to the ILC. Their predictions are shown in Figure 10.
A more detailed study along similar lines using the recoil method only and comparing different detector options has been presented recently in [41]. We display their results in Figure 11. The authors perform their analysis in a model where the coupling of the new resonance is rescaled by a mixing angle sin θ ; therefore, their results can directly be compared with the ones presented in [39] and Figure 10.

4.1.2. Higgsstrahlung and Decay into Two Light Scalars

In [42], the authors consider Higgs–Strahlung at a 240 GeV e + e collider, where the Higgs subsequently decays into two light scalar states. They give 95 % confidence level bounds for the branching ratios into the decay products of the two light scalars as a function of the light scalar masses for an integrated luminosity of L = 5 ab 1 following a detailed study. Their results are subsequently used by many authors as standard reference. We show their results for various channels in Figure 12.
Depending on the mass, model, and decay mode, branching ratios down to ∼ 10 4 can be tested.
A more recent study [43] investigates the same process, but for 4 τ final states, for the same center-of-mass energy and integrated luminosity. The results, for varying values of tracking efficiency, are shown in Figure 13. Note that current constraints on the invisible branching ratio of the Higgs, the signal strength, as well as SM-like decays of the light scalars currently render a bound 10 2 .
Several works make use of the bounds derived in [42]. In [44], the authors investigate the allowed parameter space in the scNMSSM, an NMSSM extension that relaxes unification requirements at the GUT scale [45,46,47,48], also known as NUHM, which contains in total five scalar particles; if CP is conserved, three are CP-even and two CP-odd. The authors include various bounds on the models parameter space, and show the allowed scan points and predictions for the above channels for various scalar combinations. We display their results in Figure 14. We see that various scenarios exist where light scalars can be realized, with masses in the whole mass range between 10 and 60 GeV. The authors also display the projected sensitivity limits.
Finally, in simple singlet extensions it is possible to test regions in the models parameter space which can lead to a strong first-order electroweak phase transition. Several authors have worked on this; we here show results from [49], where in addition several collider sensitivity projections are shown, including the bounds derived in [42]. From Figure 15, it becomes obvious that e + e Higgs factories would be an ideal environment to confirm or rule out such scenarios. While [49] rely on previous analyses of this channel, in [50] the authors perform a dedicated study of this channel testing the same model and parameter space in the CEPC setup. Their results, also displayed in Figure 15, seem to confirm previous findings.
Related work, with a spontaneous breaking of the imposed Z 2 symmetry, has been presented in [57].

4.1.3. Other Channels

We now turn to other channels that do not focus on Z h production and successive decays involving light scalars. We briefly present two different studies for such searches. In [58], the authors investigate a slightly different channel, i.e., tau pair-production where a light pseudoscalar is radiated off one on the outgoing fermion lines and decays again into τ + τ , leading to a 4 τ final state. They are considering a type X 2HDM, which in addition allows them to explain the current discrepancy between theoretical prediction and experiment for the anomalous magnetic momentum of the muon [59]. They perform a detailed study including background and determine 2 and 5 σ contours in the m A , tan β plane, where tan β denotes the ratio of the vevs of the two doublets. Their results are shown in Figure 16. We see that even for 500 fb 1 , the proposed analysis can already test the region of interest to explain the g μ 2 anomaly, including a possible discovery in that region of parameter space for 2 ab 1 .
It is also interesting to investigate models with give the possibility of light charged scalars. A corresponding study has been performed in [60], where the authors consider charged scalar pair-production within a 3HDM, with successive decays into c c ¯ b b ¯ final states. The authors perform a detailed study and present their results in the 1 and 2 b-jet tagged category, as a function of light scalar mass and charm tagging efficiency. We show the corresponding significances in Figure 17, for a com energy of 240 GeVand an integrated luminosity of 1 ab 1 . Depending on the charm tagging efficiency, the authors predict that relatively large significances can be reached throughout the models parameter space.

4.2. Cross Section Predictions

Inspired by possible low-mass excesses in LEP [33] and CMS [61], in [62] several models are fitted to these excesses that contain singlet and doublet extensions of the SM scalar sector; in particular, they consider models with an additional doublet as well as a (complex) singlet, labelled N2HDM and 2HDMs, respectively. For both models, as well as varying tan β ranges (where tan β denotes the ratio of the vevs in the 2HDM part of the models), the authors investigate the possibility to explain the observed accesses and give rate predictions for a 250 GeV collider with a total luminosity of L = 2 ab 1 . We display their results in Figure 18. We see that also other final states for the h decay, as e.g., τ + τ , g g , or W + W can render sizeable rates. Related work concentrating on the N2HDM can be found in [63].

5. Other Center of Mass Energies

The FCC-ee and CEPC colliders are supposed to also run with a center-of-mass energy of ∼160 GeV, already tested at LEP. In analogy to Figure 9, in Figure 19 we show again cross section predictions for the process Z h in dependence of the mass of h, assuming a SM-like scalar. Note we here assume onshell production of Z h , which leads to a hard cutoff for M h 70 GeV . Detailed studies should in turn assume contributions from offshell Zs and hs as well.
We see that for this lower com energy, there is basically no contribution to the ν ν ¯ h final state that does not originate from Z h . Using FCC-ee target luminosity for this energy, and again assuming a general suppression factor 0.1 stemming from signal strength, we expect up to 10 6 events depending on the mass of the additional scalar.
For this center-of-mass energy, several searches exist which have already been performed at LEP and are summarized in [32,33], concentrating on Z h , h 1 h 2 , and h 1 h 1 h 1 final states, which could be further pursued in future collider studies. We want to note that the luminosity at FCC-ee at this center of mass energy is exceeding LEP luminosity by several orders of magnitude.
Finally, we present a study that investigates various types of 2HDMs containing several neutral scalars [64], for a collider energy of 350 GeV. The authors perform a scan of the allowed parameter space and render predictions for the Higgs–Strahlung process as well as ν ν ¯ h final states with the scalar decaying into b b ¯ pairs. We show their results in Figure 20.

6. Conclusions

In this overview, I have presented several models and searches that investigate the sensitivity of future e + e machines for scalars with masses 125 GeV . This is based on several talks I have recently given and is thereby not meant to be inclusive. I have pointed to models that allow for such light scalars, as well as several references that either provide rates or pursue dedicated studies. I have also pointed to the connection of low-scalar searches at such colliders and the electroweak phase transition within certain models. My impression is that further detailed studies are called for, with a possible focus on so-called Higgs factories with center-of-mass energies around 240–250 GeV.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated explicitely by the author for this review can be made available upon request.

Acknowledgments

I thank Sven Heinemeyer and the conveners of the CEPC workshop for inspiring me to set up an overview on these models. Several authors of the references cited here were also helpful in answering specific questions regarding their work.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Note

1
I thank V. Miralles for providing these plots.

References

  1. Available online: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/HiggsPublicResults (accessed on 14 April 2022).
  2. Available online: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsHIG (accessed on 14 April 2022).
  3. Ellis, R.K.; European Strategy for Particle Physics Preparatory Group. Physics Briefing Book: Input for the European Strategy for Particle Physics Update 2020. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1910.11775. [Google Scholar]
  4. European Strategy Group, 2020 Update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics. Technical Report, Geneva. 2020. Available online: http://cds.cern.ch/record/2720129 (accessed on 14 April 2022).
  5. Robens, T. A short overview on low mass scalars at future lepton colliders-Snowmass White Paper. 2022 Snowmass Summer Study. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2203.08210. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pruna, G.M.; Robens, T. Higgs singlet extension parameter space in the light of the LHC discovery. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 88, 115012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Robens, T.; Stefaniak, T. Status of the Higgs Singlet Extension of the Standard Model after LHC Run 1. Eur. Phys. J. C 2015, 75, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Robens, T.; Stefaniak, T. LHC Benchmark Scenarios for the Real Higgs Singlet Extension of the Standard Model. Eur. Phys. J. C 2016, 76, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ilnicka, A.; Robens, T.; Stefaniak, T. Constraining Extended Scalar Sectors at the LHC and beyond. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2018, 33, 1830007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Robens, T.; Stefaniak, T.; Wittbrodt, J. Two-real-scalar-singlet extension of the SM: LHC phenomenology and benchmark scenarios. Eur. Phys. J. C 2020, 80, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cepeda, M.; Gori, S.; Outschoorn, V.M.; Shelton, J. Exotic Higgs Decays. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2111.12751. [Google Scholar]
  12. Robens, T. Constraining extended scalar sectors at current and future colliders. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2203.17016. [Google Scholar]
  13. Carena, M.; Kozaczuk, J.; Liu, Z.; Ou, T.; Ramsey-Musolf, M.J.; Shelton, J.; Wang, Y.; Xie, K.P. Probing the Electroweak Phase Transition with Exotic Higgs Decays. 2022 Snowmass Summer Study. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2203.08206. [Google Scholar]
  14. Coimbra, R.; Sampaio, M.O.P.; Santos, R. ScannerS: Constraining the phase diagram of a complex scalar singlet at the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C 2013, 73, 2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Mühlleitner, M.; Sampaio, M.O.P.; Santos, R.; Wittbrodt, J. ScannerS: Parameter scans in extended scalar sectors. Eur. Phys. J. C 2022, 82, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bechtle, P.; Brein, O.; Heinemeyer, S.; Weiglein, G.; Williams, K.E. HiggsBounds: Confronting Arbitrary Higgs Sectors with Exclusion Bounds from LEP and the Tevatron. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2010, 181, 138–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bechtle, P.; Brein, O.; Heinemeyer, S.; Weiglein, G.; Williams, K.E. HiggsBounds 2.0.0: Confronting Neutral and Charged Higgs Sector Predictions with Exclusion Bounds from LEP and the Tevatron. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2011, 182, 2605–2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bechtle, P.; Brein, O.; Heinemeyer, S.; Stål, O.; Stefaniak, T.; Weiglein, G.; Williams, K.E. HiggsBounds-4: Improved Tests of Extended Higgs Sectors against Exclusion Bounds from LEP, the Tevatron and the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C 2014, 74, 2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Bechtle, P.; Dercks, D.; Heinemeyer, S.; Klingl, T.; Stefaniak, T.; Weiglein, G.; Wittbrodt, J. HiggsBounds-5: Testing Higgs Sectors in the LHC 13 TeV Era. Eur. Phys. J. C 2020, 80, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bechtle, P.; Heinemeyer, S.; Stål, O.; Stefaniak, T.; Weiglein, G. HiggsSignals: Confronting arbitrary Higgs sectors with measurements at the Tevatron and the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C 2014, 74, 2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bechtle, P.; Heinemeyer, S.; Klingl, T.; Stefaniak, T.; Weiglein, G.; Wittbrodt, J. HiggsSignals-2: Probing new physics with precision Higgs measurements in the LHC 13 TeV era. Eur. Phys. J. C 2021, 81, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. CMS Collaboration. First evidence for off-shell production of the Higgs boson and measurement of its width. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2202.06923. [Google Scholar]
  23. Branco, G.C.; Ferreira, P.M.; Lavoura, L.; Rebelo, M.N.; Sher, M.; Silva, J.P. Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models. Phys. Rept. 2012, 516, 1–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Eberhardt, O.; Martínez, A.P.n.; Pich, A. Global fits in the Aligned Two-Higgs-Doublet model. J. High Energy Phys. 2021, 5, 005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pich, A.; Tuzon, P. Yukawa Alignment in the Two-Higgs-Doublet Model. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 80, 091702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Pich, A. Flavour constraints on multi-Higgs-doublet models: Yukawa alignment. Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 2010, 209, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Combined Measurements of Higgs Boson Production and Decay Using Up to 139 fb−1 of Proton-Proton Collision Data at s = 13 TeV Collected with the ATLAS Experiment. Technical Report, CERN, Geneva. 2021. Available online: https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/CONFNOTES/ATLAS-CONF-2021-053 (accessed on 14 April 2022).
  28. Wang, L.; Yang, J.M.; Zhang, Y. Two-Higgs-doublet models in light of current experiments: A brief review. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2203.07244. [Google Scholar]
  29. Abouabid, H.; Arhrib, A.; Azevedo, D.; Falaki, J.E.; Ferreira, P.M.; Mühlleitner, M.; Santos, R. Benchmarking Di-Higgs Production in Various Extended Higgs Sector Models. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2112.12515. [Google Scholar]
  30. Han, X.F.; Li, T.; Wang, H.X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y. Lepton-specific inert two-Higgs-doublet model confronted with the new results for muon and electron g-2 anomalies and multilepton searches at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 104, 115001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ferreira, P.M.; Gonçalves, B.L.; Joaquim, F.R. The hidden side of scalar-triplet models with spontaneous CP violation. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2109.13179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. OPAL Collaboration; Abbiendi, G. Decay mode independent searches for new scalar bosons with the OPAL detector at LEP. Eur. Phys. J. C 2003, 27, 311–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Schael, S.; Barate, R.; Brunelière, R.; De Bonis, I.; Decamp, D.; Goy, C.; Jézéquel, S.; Lees, J.P.; Martin, F.; Merle, E.; et al. Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons at LEP. Eur. Phys. J. C 2006, 47, 547–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Abada, A.; Abbrescia, M.; AbdusSalam, S.S.; Abdyukhanov, I.; Abelleira Fernandez, J.; Abramov, A.; Aburaia, M.; Acar, A.O.; Adzic, P.R.; Agrawal, P.; et al. FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2019, 228, 261–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. CEPC Study Group. CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2-Physics & Detector. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1811.10545. [Google Scholar]
  36. Cornell, A.S.; Deandrea, A.; Fuks, B.; Mason, L. Future lepton collider prospects for a ubiquitous composite pseudoscalar. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 035030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Alwall, J.; Herquet, M.; Maltoni, F.; Mattelaer, O.; Stelzer, T. MadGraph 5: Going Beyond. J. High Energy Phys. 2011, 06, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bambade, P.; Barklow, T.; Behnke, T.; Berggren, M.; Brau, J.; Burrows, P.; Denisov, D.; Faus-Golfe, A.; Foster, B.; Fujii, K.; et al. The International Linear Collider: A Global Project. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1903.01629. [Google Scholar]
  39. Drechsel, P.; Moortgat-Pick, G.; Weiglein, G. Prospects for direct searches for light Higgs bosons at the ILC with 250 GeV. Eur. Phys. J. C 2020, 80, 922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Barate, R. Search for the standard model Higgs boson at LEP. Phys. Lett. B 2003, 565, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, Y.; Berggren, M.; List, J. ILD Benchmark: Search for Extra Scalars Produced in Association with a Z boson at s =500 GeV. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2005.06265. [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu, Z.; Wang, L.T.; Zhang, H. Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson at future e+e lepton colliders. Chin. Phys. C 2017, 41, 063102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shelton, J.; Xu, D. Exotic Higgs Decays to Four Taus at Future Electron-Positron Colliders. 2022 Snowmass Summer Study. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2110.13225. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ma, S.; Wang, K.; Zhu, J. Higgs decay to light (pseudo)scalars in the semi-constrained NMSSM. Chin. Phys. C 2021, 45, 023113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Das, D.; Ellwanger, U.; Teixeira, A.M. LHC constraints on M1/2 and m0 in the semi-constrained NMSSM. J. High Energy Phys. 2013, 4, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ellwanger, U.; Hugonie, C. The semi-constrained NMSSM satisfying bounds from the LHC, LUX and Planck. J. High Energy Phys. 2014, 8, 046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Nakamura, K.; Nomura, D. Charged Lepton Flavor Violation in the Semi-Constrained NMSSM with Right-Handed Neutrinos. Phys. Lett. B 2015, 746, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Wang, K.; Wang, F.; Zhu, J.; Jie, Q. The semi-constrained NMSSM in light of muon g-2, LHC, and dark matter constraints. Chin. Phys. C 2018, 42, 103109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kozaczuk, J.; Ramsey-Musolf, M.J.; Shelton, J. Exotic Higgs boson decays and the electroweak phase transition. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 115035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, Z.; Zhu, X.; Khoda, E.E.; Hsu, S.C.; Konstantinidis, N.; Li, K.; Li, S.; Ramsey-Musolf, M.J.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, Y.E. Study of Electroweak Phase Transition in Exotic Higgs Decays at the CEPC. 2022 Snowmass Summer Study. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2203.10184. [Google Scholar]
  51. Aaboud, M.; Aad, G.; Abbott, B.; Abeloos, B.; Abhayasinghe, D.K.; Abidi, S.H.; AbouZeid, O.S.; Abraham, N.L.; Abramowicz, H.; Abreu, H.; et al. Search for Higgs boson decays into a pair of light bosons in the bbμμ final state in pp collision at s =13 TeV with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Lett. B 2019, 790, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sirunyan, A.M.; Tumasyan, A.; Adam, W.; Ambrogi, F.; Asilar, E.; Bergauer, T.; Brandstetter, J.; Brondolin, E.; Dragicevic, M.; Erö, J.; et al. Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state with two muons and two b quarks in pp collisions at 13 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 2019, 795, 398–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sirunyan, A.M.; Tumasyan, A.; Adam, W.; Ambrogi, F.; Asilar, E.; Bergauer, T.; Brandstetter, J.; Brondolin, E.; Dragicevic, M.; Erö, J.; et al. Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state with two b quarks and two τ leptons in proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 2018, 785, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Aaboud, M.; Aad, G.; Abbott, B.; Abeloos, B.; Abhayasinghe, D.K.; Abidi, S.H.; AbouZeid, O.S.; Abraham, N.L.; Abramowicz, H.; Abreu, H.; et al. Search for the Higgs boson produced in association with a vector boson and decaying into two spin-zero particles in the Haa→4b channel in pp collisions at s =13 TeV with the ATLAS detector. J. High Energy Phys. 2018, 10, 031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Sirunyan, A.M.; Tumasyan, A.; Adam, W.; Ambrogi, F.; Asilar, E.; Bergauer, T.; Brandstetter, J.; Dragicevic, M.; Erö, J.; Del Valle, A.E.; et al. Search for light pseudoscalar boson pairs produced from decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson in final states with two muons and two nearby tracks in pp collisions at s = 13 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 2020, 800, 135087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Aad, G.; Abbott, B.; Abdallah, J.; Aben, R.; Abolins, M.; AbouZeid, O.S.; Abramowicz, H.; Abreu, H.; Abreu, R.; Abulaiti, Y.; et al. Search for Higgs bosons decaying to aa in the μμττ final state in pp collisions at s = 8 TeV with the ATLAS experiment. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 92, 052002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Carena, M.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Y. Electroweak phase transition with spontaneous Z2-breaking. J. High Energy Phys. 2020, 8, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chun, E.J.; Mondal, T. Searching for a Light Higgs Boson via the Yukawa Process at Lepton Colliders. Phys. Lett. B 2020, 802, 135190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Abi, B.; Albahri, T.; Al-Kilani, S.; Allspach, D.; Alonzi, L.P.; Anastasi, A.; Anisenkov, A.; Azfar, F.; Badgley, K.; Baeßler, S.; et al. Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 126, 141801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Akeroyd, A.G.; Moretti, S.; Song, M. Light charged Higgs boson with dominant decay to a charm quark and a bottom quark and its search at LEP2 and future e+e colliders. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 035021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Sirunyan, A.M.; Tumasyan, A.; Adam, W.; Ambrogi, F.; Asilar, E.; Bergauer, T.; Brandstetter, J.; Brondolin, E.; Dragicevic, M.; Erö, J.; et al. Search for a standard model-like Higgs boson in the mass range between 70 and 110 GeV in the diphoton final state in proton-proton collisions at s = 8 and 13 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 2019, 793, 320–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Heinemeyer, S.; Li, C.; Lika, F.; Moortgat-Pick, G.; Paasch, S. A 96 GeV Higgs Boson in the 2HDM plus Singlet. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2112.11958. [Google Scholar]
  63. Biekötter, T.; Heinemeyer, S.; Weiglein, G. Mounting evidence for a 95 GeV Higgs boson. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2203.13180. [Google Scholar]
  64. Azevedo, D.; Ferreira, P.; Mühlleitner, M.M.; Santos, R.; Wittbrodt, J. Models with extended Higgs sectors at future e+e colliders. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 99, 055013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Limits on the process in Equation (1), taken from [11]. This displays current constraints which can especially be easily reinterpreted in extended scalar sector models, in particular models where couplings are inherited via a simple mixing angle. In this figure, the lighter scalar is denoted by s, which corresponds to h i in the notation used in this manuscript.
Figure 1. Limits on the process in Equation (1), taken from [11]. This displays current constraints which can especially be easily reinterpreted in extended scalar sector models, in particular models where couplings are inherited via a simple mixing angle. In this figure, the lighter scalar is denoted by s, which corresponds to h i in the notation used in this manuscript.
Universe 08 00286 g001
Figure 2. Available parameter space in the TRSM, with one (high-low) or two (low-low) masses lighter than 125 GeV. Left: light scalar mass and mixing angle, with sin α = 0 corresponding to complete decoupling. Right: available parameter space in the m h 1 , m h 2 plane, with color coding denoting the rescaling parameter sin α for the lighter scalar h 1 . Within the green triangle, h 125 h 2 h 1 h 1 h 1 h 1 decays are kinematically allowed.
Figure 2. Available parameter space in the TRSM, with one (high-low) or two (low-low) masses lighter than 125 GeV. Left: light scalar mass and mixing angle, with sin α = 0 corresponding to complete decoupling. Right: available parameter space in the m h 1 , m h 2 plane, with color coding denoting the rescaling parameter sin α for the lighter scalar h 1 . Within the green triangle, h 125 h 2 h 1 h 1 h 1 h 1 decays are kinematically allowed.
Universe 08 00286 g002
Figure 3. Allowed regions in the 2HDM, from a scan presented in [24].
Figure 3. Allowed regions in the 2HDM, from a scan presented in [24].
Universe 08 00286 g003
Figure 4. Mixing angle and masses of different additional scalars in the aligned 2HDM, from the scan presented in [24]. For all additional scalars, regions exist where masses are 125 GeV , with absolute values of mixing angles such that | cos α ˜ | 0.1 .
Figure 4. Mixing angle and masses of different additional scalars in the aligned 2HDM, from the scan presented in [24]. For all additional scalars, regions exist where masses are 125 GeV , with absolute values of mixing angles such that | cos α ˜ | 0.1 .
Universe 08 00286 g004
Figure 5. Scan results in the N2HDM, taken from [29]. There are regions in the models parameter space where either one or two of the additional scalars have masses 125 GeV .
Figure 5. Scan results in the N2HDM, taken from [29]. There are regions in the models parameter space where either one or two of the additional scalars have masses 125 GeV .
Universe 08 00286 g005
Figure 6. Allowed regions in the parameter space of the model discussed in [30], taken from that reference, where squares denote allowed and bullets excluded regions in the models parameter space. CP-even neutral scalars with low masses are viable within this model.
Figure 6. Allowed regions in the parameter space of the model discussed in [30], taken from that reference, where squares denote allowed and bullets excluded regions in the models parameter space. CP-even neutral scalars with low masses are viable within this model.
Universe 08 00286 g006
Figure 7. Allowed regions in the parameter space of the model discussed in [31], taken from that reference. For neutral and charged new scalars, masses 125 GeV are achievable.
Figure 7. Allowed regions in the parameter space of the model discussed in [31], taken from that reference. For neutral and charged new scalars, masses 125 GeV are achievable.
Universe 08 00286 g007
Figure 8. Rates at a 91 GeV FCC-ee for various models discussed in [36], for + τ + τ final states. M7 and M10 reach a 3 σ significance using ML techniques. Figure taken from [36].
Figure 8. Rates at a 91 GeV FCC-ee for various models discussed in [36], for + τ + τ final states. M7 and M10 reach a 3 σ significance using ML techniques. Figure taken from [36].
Universe 08 00286 g008
Figure 9. Leading order production cross sections for Z h and h ν ν ¯ production at an e + e collider with a com energy of 240 GeV(left) and 250 GeV (right) using Madgraph5 for an SM-like scalar h. Shown is also the contribution of Z h to ν ν ¯ h using a factorized approach for the Z decay.
Figure 9. Leading order production cross sections for Z h and h ν ν ¯ production at an e + e collider with a com energy of 240 GeV(left) and 250 GeV (right) using Madgraph5 for an SM-like scalar h. Shown is also the contribution of Z h to ν ν ¯ h using a factorized approach for the Z decay.
Universe 08 00286 g009
Figure 10. Sensitivity predictions for an ILC with a com energy of 250 GeV from [39]. See text for details.
Figure 10. Sensitivity predictions for an ILC with a com energy of 250 GeV from [39]. See text for details.
Universe 08 00286 g010
Figure 11. Upper bounds on the mixing angle for the model discussed in [41], in a comparison of different detector concepts and using the recoil method.
Figure 11. Upper bounds on the mixing angle for the model discussed in [41], in a comparison of different detector concepts and using the recoil method.
Universe 08 00286 g011
Figure 12. Ninety-five percent confidence bounds on branching ratios for Higgs decay into a pair of lighter particles, for a com energy of 240 GeVand L = 5 ab 1 . Taken from [42].
Figure 12. Ninety-five percent confidence bounds on branching ratios for Higgs decay into a pair of lighter particles, for a com energy of 240 GeVand L = 5 ab 1 . Taken from [42].
Universe 08 00286 g012
Figure 13. Bounds on decay of the SM Higgs boson into two light scalars, with a 4 τ final state, at an e + e collider with a com energy of 240 GeV, with different assumptions on tracking efficiencies. Taken from [43].
Figure 13. Bounds on decay of the SM Higgs boson into two light scalars, with a 4 τ final state, at an e + e collider with a com energy of 240 GeV, with different assumptions on tracking efficiencies. Taken from [43].
Universe 08 00286 g013
Figure 14. Allowed rates for various Higgs–Strahlung processes with successive decays into two light scalars. Top: 2 b 2 τ final state. Bottom: 4 τ final state. Expected upper bounds for various collider machines are also shown, with projections from [42]. Figure taken from [44].
Figure 14. Allowed rates for various Higgs–Strahlung processes with successive decays into two light scalars. Top: 2 b 2 τ final state. Bottom: 4 τ final state. Expected upper bounds for various collider machines are also shown, with projections from [42]. Figure taken from [44].
Universe 08 00286 g014
Figure 15. Expected bounds on Higgs production via Higgs–Strahlung and subsequent decay into two light scalars, in the singlet extension scenario discussed in [49,50]. Left: Taken from [49]. Right: Results presented in [50], for CEPC at 250 GeV. The blue band denotes the region where a strong first-order electroweak phase transition is possible. We see that e + e Higgs factories are required on order to confirm or exclude such scenarios. LHC searches as well as projections stem from [51,52] ( b b μ μ ) , [53] ( b b τ τ ) , [54] ( 4 b ) , and [55,56] ( μ μ τ τ ) .
Figure 15. Expected bounds on Higgs production via Higgs–Strahlung and subsequent decay into two light scalars, in the singlet extension scenario discussed in [49,50]. Left: Taken from [49]. Right: Results presented in [50], for CEPC at 250 GeV. The blue band denotes the region where a strong first-order electroweak phase transition is possible. We see that e + e Higgs factories are required on order to confirm or exclude such scenarios. LHC searches as well as projections stem from [51,52] ( b b μ μ ) , [53] ( b b τ τ ) , [54] ( 4 b ) , and [55,56] ( μ μ τ τ ) .
Universe 08 00286 g015
Figure 16. Exclusion and discovery regions in the 2HDM type X model, in the m A , tan β plane. The color region additionally explains the current g μ 2 discrepancy. Regions above the respective lines are excluded. Taken from [58].
Figure 16. Exclusion and discovery regions in the 2HDM type X model, in the m A , tan β plane. The color region additionally explains the current g μ 2 discrepancy. Regions above the respective lines are excluded. Taken from [58].
Universe 08 00286 g016
Figure 17. Significances as a function of charged scalar mass and charm tagging efficiency at an 240 GeV CEPC, at an integrated luminosity of 1 ab 1 , within a 3HDM as presented in [60], considering a c c ¯ b b ¯ final state. Figures taken from that reference.
Figure 17. Significances as a function of charged scalar mass and charm tagging efficiency at an 240 GeV CEPC, at an integrated luminosity of 1 ab 1 , within a 3HDM as presented in [60], considering a c c ¯ b b ¯ final state. Figures taken from that reference.
Universe 08 00286 g017
Figure 18. Left: Points in the 2HDMs that agree with both CMS and LEP excess and which can be probed at the ILC. Right: predicted rates in the 2HDMS and N2HDM at 250 GeVusing full target luminosity.
Figure 18. Left: Points in the 2HDMs that agree with both CMS and LEP excess and which can be probed at the ILC. Right: predicted rates in the 2HDMS and N2HDM at 250 GeVusing full target luminosity.
Universe 08 00286 g018
Figure 19. As Figure 9, for a com of 160 GeV. We assume onshell final states.
Figure 19. As Figure 9, for a com of 160 GeV. We assume onshell final states.
Universe 08 00286 g019
Figure 20. Achievable rates for various light scalar production modes at an e + e collider with a com energy of 350 GeV, in various 2HDM variant models. Figure taken from [64].
Figure 20. Achievable rates for various light scalar production modes at an e + e collider with a com energy of 350 GeV, in various 2HDM variant models. Figure taken from [64].
Universe 08 00286 g020
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Robens, T. A Short Overview on Low Mass Scalars at Future Lepton Colliders. Universe 2022, 8, 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8050286

AMA Style

Robens T. A Short Overview on Low Mass Scalars at Future Lepton Colliders. Universe. 2022; 8(5):286. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8050286

Chicago/Turabian Style

Robens, Tania. 2022. "A Short Overview on Low Mass Scalars at Future Lepton Colliders" Universe 8, no. 5: 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8050286

APA Style

Robens, T. (2022). A Short Overview on Low Mass Scalars at Future Lepton Colliders. Universe, 8(5), 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8050286

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop