Next Article in Journal
Galactic Core–Tail Structure in BEC Dark Matter with Kapitza Potential
Previous Article in Journal
Constraining the Quantum Gravity Energy Scale via Gamma-Ray Burst Spectral Lag Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Single-Point Search for eV-Scale Axion-like Particles with Variable-Angle Three-Beam-Stimulated Resonant Photon Collider
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial to the Special Issue “Origins and Natures of Inflation, Dark Matter and Dark Energy, 2nd Edition”

Faculty of Symbiotic Systems Science, Fukushima University, Fukushima 960-1296, Japan
Universe 2026, 12(4), 98; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12040098
Submission received: 23 March 2026 / Accepted: 27 March 2026 / Published: 31 March 2026
It has been confirmed from recent precise cosmological observations, such as Supernovae Ia (SNe Ia) [1,2], the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation [3,4,5,6,7,8], the large-scale structure (LSS) of the universe [9,10,11], the baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) [12,13,14,15,16,17], and the weak lensing effect [18,19,20,21,22], that in addition to inflation in the early universe [23,24,25,26], even the current expansion of the universe is accelerating. Furthermore, it has been suggested from the Planck observations [7,8] that for the spatially flat universe, around 70% of the total energy density of the current universe is dark energy, around 25% of it is dark matter, and the rest is only around 5% baryons, which is well known. Not only have the identity of the inflaton field driving inflation, namely, the origin of inflation, been studied, but also that of dark matter and dark energy. Indeed, the true natures, i.e., the origins of inflation, dark matter, and dark energy, have not been determined yet.
Moreover, the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) [27,28], the South Pole Telescope (SPT) [29,30], and the DESI data [14,15,16,17] provide a new direction of observational constraints on inflation.
It is strongly expected that more fundamental and precise understandings of modern cosmology from the early universe to the present time can be found by future, observations including the Euclid satellite [31] of the European Space Agency (ESA) [32,33,34,35,36,37,38], the Roman Space Telescope [39], the Simons Observatory [40,41], and the James Webb Space Telescope [42,43].
In addition, by the direct detection of gravitational waves [44,45], the era of gravitational waves cosmology has been kicked off. It is expected that not only did the gravitational waves originate from astrophysical objects but also the primordial gravitational waves from the early universe, including the inflationary stage and cosmological first order phase transitions such as the Electro-Weak phase transition (EWPT) and the QCD phase transition (QCDPT) [46,47,48,49,50,51,52].
There are two representative approaches to account for the late-time cosmic acceleration. The first is to introduce unknown dark energy with negative pressure in general relativity. The second is to consider the deviation of gravitation from general relativity at cosmological scales, namely, the so-called geometrical dark energy. A number of candidates for dark energy and alternative theories of gravity have been proposed (for reviews, see, e.g., Refs. [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92]).
There are also significant research themes in modern cosmology. For instance, physics in the early universe, including inflation [93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108], the cosmological perturbation theories [109,110,111,112], the picture of the Swampland related to a consistent quantum theory of gravity [113,114,115], the cosmological constant problem [116,117], cosmology through neutrino [118,119,120,121,122], cosmology through axion [123], primordial black holes [124,125,126,127,128], physics of dark matter [129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140], the origin of primordial magnetic fields [141,142,143,144,145], various aspects of big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) [146,147], the Hubble tension [148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158], cosmology with a 21 cm hydrogen line [159,160], the effects of gravitational lensing [161,162,163], and the topics related to astrophysics [164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171].
In the present Special Issue “Origins and Natures of Inflation, Dark Matter and Dark Energy, 2nd Edition” of Universe, which is the second series of “Origins and Natures of Inflation, Dark Matter and Dark Energy” [172], fourteen original research papers, in terms of inflation, dark matter, and dark energy, are collected. The construction of this Special Issue is as follows. In the first part, a number of subjects in inflationary cosmology [173,174,175,176,177,178] are studied. In the second part, the various properties of dark matter [179,180,181,182] are explored. In the final part, the applied research on the issue of dark energy and alternative theories of gravity [183,184,185,186] is investigated. In the following, fourteen research papers are briefly overviewed.
In Ref. [173], the generation of cosmic strings in thermal inflation is driven by the so-called flaton, which is a complex scalar field with a very flat potential, and whose vacuum expectation value is a large one. The breaking scale of the symmetry in the present scenario is compared with that in the conventional Abelian Higgs strings.
In Ref. [174], the de Sitter swampland conjecture is studied in an inflation model motivated by the generalized Chaplygin gas model for dark energy, in which the Friedmann equation during inflation is modified from that in general relativity.
In Ref. [175], the Stueckelberg field is explored in de Sitter space. In particular, the regularization of the stress tensor is argued in detail for the case where the Stueckelberg field is a massive vector field with a specific gauge-fixing term.
In Ref. [176], the slow-roll inflation is explored in a gravity theory whose action is described by a kind of Einstein–Hilbert form with two parameters. In this model, the time scale of the slow-roll inflation with enough numbers of e-folds is altered by the quantum effect from that in the classical case.
In Ref. [177], inflation is investigated in a gravity theory with the Gauss–Bonnet invariant coupled to a charged scalar field. In particular, the mechanisms of the spontaneous symmetry breaking and that of the symmetry restoration are discussed.
In Ref. [178], k-inflation driven by a kinetic term of a scalar field is analyzed. In addition to the background dynamics of inflation, the properties of the perturbations generated during inflation are studied.
In Ref. [179], a geometrical origin of dark matter corresponding to a Proca field is argued in a gravity theory with the Weyl invariance. In particular, it is argued whether Weyl–Proca particles could behave as a gas in the Bose–Einstein condensate.
In Ref. [180], a new concept of a telescope through the gravitational lensing effect by Earth is proposed to detect distant sources of dark matter, such as axion-like particles. Especially, the structure of the focal region is analyzed numerically, and the sensitivity to the coupling of axion-like particles to photons is estimated.
In Ref. [181], the signatures of gravitational waves for warm dark matter are analyzed in the extended version of the standard model with the left–right symmetry, in which the type-II seesaw mechanism can be achieved for active neutrino masses, and the energy density of the keV sterile neutrino dark matter can be consistent with observations.
In Ref. [182], a laboratory search is explored for axion-like particles in the eV mass range through a photon collider with a variable-angle three-beam-stimulated resonance.
In Ref. [183], a K-essence model with two scalar fields is proposed to explain the late-time cosmic acceleration. In particular, the Lagrangian consists of the ratio of the two kinetic energies of the two scalar fields.
In Ref. [184], the transformation of energy from a dark energy component in its metastable state to the energy of a dark matter component is argued during a first-order phase transition.
In Ref. [185], a novel black hole solution is analyzed in f ( R ) gravity, which is one of the promising candidates as an alternative theory of gravity to achieve cosmic acceleration, without supposing any non-linear electromagnetism nor a specific constraint on the scalar curvature.
In Ref. [186], a new black hole solution is studied in f ( R ) gravity coupled to two scalar fields. The thermodynamics of a black hole and the stability of a black hole solution are also discussed.
It is strongly expected that these fourteen papers introduced above in this Special Issue are useful for the related future research on inflation, dark matter, dark energy, and other various aspects of modern cosmology.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 24KF0100, 25KF0176, and Competitive Research Funds for Fukushima University Faculty (25RK011).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Contributions from all authors are highly appreciated by the Guest Editor (Kazuharu Bamba) of the present Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Perlmutter, S. et al. [SNCP Collaboration]. Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 1999, 517, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Riess, A.G. et al. [Supernova Search Team Collaboration]. Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant. Astron. J. 1998, 116, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Spergel, D.N. et al. [WMAP Collaboration]. First Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2003, 148, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Spergel, D.N. et al. [WMAP Collaboration]. Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) three year results: Implications for cosmology. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2007, 170, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Komatsu, E. et al. [WMAP Collaboration]. Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2009, 180, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Komatsu, E. et al. [WMAP Collaboration]. Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2011, 192, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aghanim, N. et al. [Planck]. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 641, A6, Erratum in Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 652, C4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Akrami, Y. et al. [Planck]. Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 641, A10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tegmark, M. et al. [SDSS Collaboration]. Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP. Phys. Rev. D 2004, 69, 103501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Seljak, U. et al. [SDSS Collaboration]. Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Ly-alpha forest and galaxy bias: Constraints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neutrino mass, and dark energy. Phys. Rev. D 2005, 71, 103515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tsagas, C.G.; Challinor, A.; Maartens, R. Relativistic cosmology and large-scale structure. Phys. Rep. 2008, 465, 61–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Eisenstein, D.J. et al. [SDSS Collaboration]. Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large-Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2005, 633, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alam, S. et al. [eBOSS]. Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 103, 083533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Adame, A.G. et al. [DESI]. DESI 2024 III: Baryon acoustic oscillations from galaxies and quasars. JCAP 2025, 4, 012. [Google Scholar]
  15. Adame, A.G. et al. [DESI]. DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations. JCAP 2025, 2, 021. [Google Scholar]
  16. Karim, M.A. et al. [DESI]. DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints. Phys. Rev. D 2025, 112, 083515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Karim, M.A. et al. [DESI]. DESI DR2 results. I. Baryon acoustic oscillations from the Lyman alpha forest. Phys. Rev. D 2025, 112, 083514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jain, B.; Taylor, A. Cross-correlation Tomography: Measuring Dark Energy Evolution with Weak Lensing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 141302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Munshi, D.; Valageas, P.; Waerbeke, L.V.; Heavens, A. Cosmology with weak lensing surveys. Phys. Rep. 2008, 462, 67–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Troxel, M.A.; Ishak, M. The Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and its Impact on Weak Gravitational Lensing in an Era of Precision Cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2014, 558, 1–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abbott, T.M.C. et al. [DES]. Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 98, 043526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abbott, T.M.C. et al. [DES]. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 023520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guth, A.H. The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems. Phys. Rev. D 1981, 23, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sato, K. First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 1981, 195, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Starobinsky, A.A. A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity. Phys. Lett. 1980, 91, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Linde, A.D. A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems. Phys. Lett. 1982, 108, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Louis, T. et al. [Atacama Cosmology Telescope]. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and ΛCDM parameters. JCAP 2025, 11, 062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Calabrese, E. et al. [Atacama Cosmology Telescope]. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 constraints on extended cosmological models. JCAP 2025, 11, 063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ge, F. et al. [SPT-3G]. Cosmology from CMB lensing and delensed EE power spectra using 2019–2020 SPT-3G polarization data. Phys. Rev. D 2025, 111, 083534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Camphuis, E. et al. [SPT-3G]. SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2506.20707. [Google Scholar]
  31. Available online: https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Euclid (accessed on 22 March 2026).
  32. Laureijs, R. et al. [EUCLID]. Euclid Definition Study Report. arXiv 2011, arXiv:1110.3193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Amendola, L. et al. [Euclid TheoryWorking Group]. Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite. Living Rev. Relativ. 2013, 16, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Amendola, L.; Appleby, S.; Avgoustidis, A.; Bacon, D.; Baker, T.; Baldi, M.; Bartolo, N.; Blanchard, A.; Bonvin, C.; Borgani, S.; et al. Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite. Living Rev. Relativ. 2018, 21, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Blanchard, A. et al. [Euclid]. Euclid preparation. VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological probes. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 642, A191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nesseris, S. et al. [Euclid]. Euclid: Forecast constraints on consistency tests of the ΛCDM model. Astron. Astrophys. 2022, 660, A67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ballardini, M. et al. [Euclid]. Euclid: The search for primordial features. Astron. Astrophys. 2024, 683, A220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mellier, Y. et al. [Euclid]. I. Overview of the Euclid mission. Astron. Astrophys. 2025, 697, A1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Eifler, T.; Miyatake, H.; Krause, E.; Heinrich, C.; Miranda, V.; Hirata, C.; Xu, J.; Hemmati, S.; Simet, M.; Capak, P.; et al. Cosmology with the Roman Space Telescope – multiprobe strategies. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2021, 507, 1746–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Available online: https://simonsobservatory.org/ (accessed on 22 March 2026).
  41. Ade, P. et al. [Simons Observatory]. The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts. JCAP 2019, 2, 056. [Google Scholar]
  42. Available online: https://webbtelescope.org/home (accessed on 22 March 2026).
  43. Gardner, J.P.; Mather, J.C.; Clampin, M.; Doyon, R.; Greenhouse, M.A.; Hammel, H.B.; Hutchings, J.B.; Jakobsen, P.; Lilly, S.J.; Long, K.S.; et al. The James Webb Space Telescope. Space Sci. Rev. 2006, 123, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Abbott, B.P. et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo]. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 061102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Abbott, B.P. et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo]. GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 161101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Abbott, B.P. et al. [LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi GBM, INTEGRAL, IceCube, AstroSat Cadmium Zinc Telluride Imager Team, IPN, Insight-Hxmt, ANTARES, Swift, AGILE Team, 1M2H Team, Dark Energy Camera GW-EM, DES, DLT40, GRAWITA, Fermi-LAT, ATCA, ASKAP, Las Cumbres Observatory Group, OzGrav, DWF (Deeper Wider Faster Program), AST3, CAASTRO, VINROUGE, MASTER, J-GEM, GROWTH, JAGWAR, CaltechNRAO, TTU-NRAO, NuSTAR, Pan-STARRS, MAXI Team, TZAC Consortium, KU, Nordic Optical Telescope, ePESSTO, GROND, Texas Tech University, SALT Group, TOROS, BOOTES, MWA, CALET, IKIGW Follow-up, H.E.S.S., LOFAR, LWA, HAWC, Pierre Auger, ALMA, Euro VLBI Team, Pi of Sky, Chandra Team at McGill University, DFN, ATLAS Telescopes, High Time Resolution Universe Survey, RIMAS, RATIR and SKA South Africa/MeerKAT]. Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2017, 848, L12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Barack, L.; Cardoso, V.; Nissanke, S.; Sotiriou, T.P.; Askar, A.; Belczynski, C.; Bertone, G.; Bon, E.; Blas, D.; Brito, R.; et al. Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: A roadmap. Class. Quant. Grav. 2019, 36, 143001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nakar, E. The electromagnetic counterparts of compact binary mergers. Phys. Rep. 2020, 886, 1–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yokoyama, J. Implication of pulsar timing array experiments on cosmological gravitational wave detection. AAPPS Bull. 2021, 31, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Domènech, G. Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review. Universe 2021, 7, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mandel, I.; Farmer, A. Merging stellar-mass binary black holes. Phys. Rep. 2022, 955, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Agazie, G. et al. [NANOGrav]. The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2023, 951, L8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D. Introduction to modified gravity and gravitational alternative for dark energy. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 2007, 4, 115–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lue, A. The phenomenology of dvali-gabadadze-porrati cosmologies. Phys. Rep. 2006, 423, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Copeland, E.J.; Sami, M.; Tsujikawa, S. Dynamics of dark energy. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2006, 15, 1753–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fujii, Y.; Maeda, K. The Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravitation; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  57. Padmanabhan, T. Dark energy and gravity. Gen. Rel. Grav. 2008, 40, 529–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Durrer, R.; Maartens, R. Dark Energy and Dark Gravity. Gen. Rel. Grav. 2008, 40, 301–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Alexander, S.; Yunes, N. Chern-Simons Modified General Relativity. Phys. Rep. 2009, 480, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sotiriou, T.P.; Faraoni, V. f(R) Theories Of Gravity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010, 82, 451–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cai, Y.F.; Saridakis, E.N.; Setare, M.R.; Xia, J.Q. Quintom Cosmology: Theoretical implications and observations. Phys. Rep. 2010, 493, 1–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Felice, A.D.; Tsujikawa, S. f(R) theories. Living Rev. Relativ. 2010, 13, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Amendola, L.; Tsujikawa, S. Dark Energy; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  64. Faraoni, V.; Capozziello, S. Beyond Einstein Gravity; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  65. Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D. Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: From F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models. Phys. Rep. 2011, 505, 59–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Capozziello, S.; Laurentis, M.D. Extended Theories of Gravity. Phys. Rep. 2011, 509, 167–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Clifton, T.; Ferreira, P.G.; Padilla, A.; Skordis, C. Modified Gravity and Cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2012, 513, 1–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Weinberg, D.H.; Mortonson, M.J.; Eisenstein, D.J.; Hirata, C.; Riess, A.G.; Rozo, E. Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration. Phys. Rep. 2013, 530, 87–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bamba, K.; Capozziello, S.; Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D. Dark energy cosmology: The equivalent description via different theoretical models and cosmography tests. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2012, 342, 155–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Padmanabhan, T.; Kothawala, D. Lanczos-Lovelock models of gravity. Phys. Rep. 2013, 531, 115–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Will, C.M. The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment. Living Rev. Relativ. 2014, 17, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Joyce, A.; Jain, B.; Khoury, J.; Trodden, M. Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model. Phys. Rep. 2015, 568, 1–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Cai, Y.F.; Capozziello, S.; Laurentis, M.D.; Saridakis, E.N. f(T) teleparallel gravity and cosmology. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2016, 79, 106901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, M. Holographic Dark Energy. Phys. Rep. 2017, 696, 1–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D.; Oikonomou, V.K. Modified Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late-time Evolution. Phys. Rep. 2017, 692, 1–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jimenez, J.B.; Heisenberg, L.; Olmo, G.J.; Rubiera-Garcia, D. Born–Infeld inspired modifications of gravity. Phys. Rep. 2018, 727, 1–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bahamonde, S.; Böhmer, C.G.; Carloni, S.; Copeland, E.J.; Fang, W.; Tamanini, N. Dynamical systems applied to cosmology: Dark energy and modified gravity. Phys. Rep. 2018, 775–777, 1–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Adami, H.; Setare, M.R.; Sisman, T.C.; Tekin, B. Conserved Charges in Extended Theories of Gravity. Phys. Rep. 2019, 834, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Heisenberg, L. A systematic approach to generalisations of General Relativity and their cosmological implications. Phys. Rep. 2019, 796, 1–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Langlois, D. Dark energy and modified gravity in degenerate higher-order scalar–tensor (DHOST) theories: A review. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2019, 28, 1942006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kobayashi, T. Horndeski theory and beyond: A review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2019, 82, 086901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Frusciante, N.; Perenon, L. Effective field theory of dark energy: A review. Phys. Rep. 2020, 857, 1–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Olmo, G.J.; Rubiera-Garcia, D.; Wojnar, A. Stellar structure models in modified theories of gravity: Lessons and challenges. Phys. Rep. 2020, 876, 1–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Saridakis, E.N.; Lazkoz, R.; Salzano, V.; Moniz, P.V.; Capozziello, S.; Jimenez, J.B.; Laurentis, M.D.; Olmo, G.J. Modified Gravity and Cosmology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  85. Faraoni, V.; Giusti, A.; Fahim, B.H. Spherical inhomogeneous solutions of Einstein and scalar–tensor gravity: A map of the land. Phys. Rep. 2021, 925, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bamba, K. Review on Dark Energy Problem and Modified Gravity Theories. LHEP 2022, 2022, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bahamonde, S.; Dialektopoulos, K.F.; Escamilla-Rivera, C.; Farrugia, G.; Gakis, V.; Hendry, M.; Hohmann, M.; Said, J.L.; Mifsud, J.; Valentino, E.D. Teleparallel gravity: From theory to cosmology. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2023, 86, 026901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Arai, S.; Aoki, K.; Chinone, Y.; Kimura, R.; Kobayashi, T.; Miyatake, H.; Yamauchi, D.; Yokoyama, S.; Akitsu, K.; Hiramatsu, T.; et al. Cosmological gravity probes: Connecting recent theoretical developments to forthcoming observations. PTEP 2023, 2023, 072E01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. de Haro, J.; Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D.; Oikonomou, V.K.; Pan, S. Finite-time cosmological singularities and the possible fate of the Universe. Phys. Rep. 2023, 1034, 1–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Heisenberg, L. Review on f(Q) gravity. Phys. Rep. 2024, 1066, 1–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Avsajanishvili, O.; Chitov, G.Y.; Kahniashvili, T.; Mandal, S.; Samushia, L. Observational Constraints on Dynamical Dark Energy Models. Universe 2024, 10, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yousaf, Z.; Bamba, K.; Bhatti, M.Z.; Farwa, U. Quasi-static evolution of axially and reflection symmetric large-scale configuration. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 2024, 21, 2430005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gasperini, M.; Veneziano, G. The Pre-big bang scenario in string cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2003, 373, 1–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kiritsis, E. D-branes in standard model building, gravity and cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2005, 421, 105–190, Erratum in Phys. Rep. 2006, 429, 121–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Davidson, S.; Nardi, E.; Nir, Y. Leptogenesis. Phys. Rep. 2008, 466, 105–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Novello, M.; Bergliaffa, S.E.P. Bouncing Cosmologies. Phys. Rep. 2008, 463, 127–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lehners, J.L. Ekpyrotic and Cyclic Cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2008, 465, 223–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mazumdar, A.; Rocher, J. Particle physics models of inflation and curvaton scenarios. Phys. Rep. 2011, 497, 85–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Maleknejad, A.; Sheikh-Jabbari, M.M.; Soda, J. Gauge Fields and Inflation. Phys. Rep. 2013, 528, 161–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Battefeld, D.; Peter, P. A Critical Review of Classical Bouncing Cosmologies. Phys. Rep. 2015, 571, 1–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sato, K.; Yokoyama, J. Inflationary cosmology: First 30+ years. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2015, 24, 1530025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Bamba, K.; Odintsov, S.D. Inflationary cosmology in modified gravity theories. Symmetry 2015, 7, 220–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Asadi, P.; Bansal, S.; Berlin, A.; Co, R.T.; Croon, D.; Cui, Y.; Curtin, D.; Cyr-Racine, F.Y.; Davoudiasl, H.; Rose, L.D.; et al. Early-Universe Model Building. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2203.06680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Odintsov, S.D.; Oikonomou, V.K.; Giannakoudi, I.; Fronimos, F.P.; Lymperiadou, E.C. Recent Advances in Inflation. Symmetry 2023, 15, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Cicoli, M.; Conlon, J.P.; Maharana, A.; Parameswaran, S.; Quevedo, F.; Zavala, I. String cosmology: From the early universe to today. Phys. Rep. 2024, 1059, 1–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Donnay, L. Celestial holography: An asymptotic symmetry perspective. Phys. Rep. 2024, 1073, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kallosh, R.; Linde, A. On the present status of inflationary cosmology. Gen. Rel. Grav. 2025, 57, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Linde, A. Alexei Starobinsky and Modern Cosmology. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2509.01675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kodama, H.; Sasaki, M. Cosmological Perturbation Theory. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 1984, 78, 1–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mukhanov, V.F.; Feldman, H.A.; Brandenberger, R.H. Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions. Phys. Rep. 1992, 215, 203–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Bernardeau, F.; Colombi, S.; Gaztanaga, E.; Scoccimarro, R. Large scale structure of the universe and cosmological perturbation theory. Phys. Rep. 2002, 367, 1–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Malik, K.A.; Wands, D. Cosmological perturbations. Phys. Rep. 2009, 475, 1–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Palti, E. The Swampland: Introduction and Review. Fortsch. Phys. 2019, 67, 1900037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. van Beest, M.; Calderón-Infante, J.; Mirfendereski, D.; Valenzuela, I. Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications. Phys. Rep. 2022, 989, 1–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Riet, T.V.; Zoccarato, G. Beginners lectures on flux compactifications and related Swampland topics. Phys. Rep. 2024, 1049, 1–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Weinberg, S. The Cosmological Constant Problem. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1989, 61, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Padmanabhan, T. Cosmological constant: The Weight of the vacuum. Phys. Rep. 2003, 380, 235–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Dolgov, A.D. Neutrinos in cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2002, 370, 333–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Lesgourgues, J.; Pastor, S. Massive neutrinos and cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2006, 429, 307–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kusenko, A. Sterile neutrinos: The Dark side of the light fermions. Phys. Rep. 2009, 481, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Abazajian, K.N. Sterile neutrinos in cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2017, 711–712, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Dasgupta, B.; Kopp, J. Sterile Neutrinos. Phys. Rep. 2021, 928, 1–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Marsh, D.J.E. Axion Cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2016, 643, 1–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Yokoyama, J. Formation of primordial black holes in the inflationary universe. Phys. Rep. 1998, 307, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Carr, B.; Kohri, K.; Sendouda, Y.; Yokoyama, J. Constraints on primordial black holes. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2021, 84, 116902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Özsoy, O.; Tasinato, G. Inflation and Primordial Black Holes. Universe 2023, 9, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Carr, B.; Clesse, S.; Garcia-Bellido, J.; Hawkins, M.; Kuhnel, F. Observational evidence for primordial black holes: A positivist perspective. Phys. Rep. 2024, 1054, 1–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Domènech, G. Lectures on Gravitational Wave Signatures of Primordial Black Holes. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2307.06964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Bertone, G.; Hooper, D.; Silk, J. Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints. Phys. Rep. 2005, 405, 279–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Hooper, D.; Profumo, S. Dark Matter and Collider Phenomenology of Universal Extra Dimensions. Phys. Rep. 2007, 453, 29–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zurek, K.M. Asymmetric Dark Matter: Theories, signatures, and constraints. Phys. Rep. 2014, 537, 91–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Baer, H.; Choi, K.Y.; Kim, J.E.; Roszkowski, L. Dark matter production in the early Universe: Beyond the thermal WIMP paradigm. Phys. Rep. 2015, 555, 1–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Aramaki, T.; Boggs, S.; Bufalino, S.; Dal, L.; von Doetinchem, P.; Donato, F.; Fornengo, N.; Fuke, H.; Grefe, M.; Hailey, C.; et al. Review of the theoretical and experimental status of dark matter identification with cosmic-ray antideuterons. Phys. Rep. 2016, 618, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Mayet, F.; Green, A.M.; Battat, J.B.R.; Billard, J.; Bozorgnia, N.; Gelmini, G.B.; Gondolo, P.; Kavanagh, B.J.; Lee, S.K.; Loomba, D.; et al. A review of the discovery reach of directional Dark Matter detection. Phys. Rep. 2016, 627, 1–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Tulin, S.; Yu, H.B. Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure. Phys. Rep. 2018, 730, 1–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Buckley, M.R.; Peter, A.H.G. Gravitational probes of dark matter physics. Phys. Rep. 2018, 761, 1–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Arcadi, G.; Djouadi, A.; Raidal, M. Dark Matter through the Higgs portal. Phys. Rep. 2020, 842, 1–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Buen-Abad, M.A.; Essig, R.; McKeen, D.; Zhong, Y.M. Cosmological constraints on dark matter interactions with ordinary matter. Phys. Rep. 2022, 961, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ahluwalia, D.V.; da Silva, J.M.H.; Lee, C.Y.; Liu, Y.X.; Pereira, S.H.; Sorkhi, M.M. Mass dimension one fermions: Constructing darkness. Phys. Rep. 2022, 967, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Bramante, J.; Raj, N. Dark matter in compact stars. Phys. Rep. 2024, 1052, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Grasso, D.; Rubinstein, H.R. Magnetic fields in the early universe. Phys. Rep. 2001, 348, 163–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Barrow, J.D.; Maartens, R.; Tsagas, C.G. Cosmology with inhomogeneous magnetic fields. Phys. Rep. 2007, 449, 131–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Subramanian, K. Magnetic fields in the early universe. Astron. Nachr. 2010, 331, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Kandus, A.; Kunze, K.E.; Tsagas, C.G. Primordial magnetogenesis. Phys. Rep. 2011, 505, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Yamazaki, D.G.; Kajino, T.; Mathew, G.J.; Ichiki, K. The Search for a Primordial Magnetic Field. Phys. Rep. 2012, 517, 141–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Iocco, F.; Mangano, G.; Miele, G.; Pisanti, O.; Serpico, P.D. Primordial Nucleosynthesis: From precision cosmology to fundamental physics. Phys. Rep. 2009, 472, 1–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Pitrou, C.; Coc, A.; Uzan, J.P.; Vangioni, E. Precision big bang nucleosynthesis with improved Helium-4 predictions. Phys. Rep. 2018, 754, 1–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Knox, L.; Millea, M. Hubble constant hunter’s guide. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 043533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Asgari, M. et al. [KiDS]. KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Cosmic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics. Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 645, A104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Valentino, E.D.; Mena, O.; Pan, S.; Visinelli, L.; Yang, W.; Melchiorri, A.; Mota, D.F.; Riess, A.G.; Silk, J. In the realm of the Hubble tension—A review of solutions. Class. Quant. Grav. 2021, 38, 153001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Perivolaropoulos, L.; Skara, F. Challenges for ΛCDM: An update. New Astron. Rev. 2022, 95, 101659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Schöneberg, N.; Abellán, G.F.; Sánchez, A.P.; Witte, S.J.; Poulin, V.; Lesgourgues, J. The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models. Phys. Rep. 2022, 984, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Abdalla, E.; Abellán, G.F.; Aboubrahim, A.; Agnello, A.; Akarsu, O.; Akrami, Y.; Alestas, G.; Aloni, D.; Amendola, L.; Anchordoqui, L.A.; et al. Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies. JHEAp 2022, 34, 49–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Kamionkowski, M.; Riess, A.G. The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2023, 73, 153–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Hu, J.-P.; Wang, F.-Y. Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics. Universe 2023, 9, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Poulin, V.; Smith, T.L.; Karwal, T. The Ups and Downs of Early Dark Energy solutions to the Hubble tension: A review of models, hints and constraints circa 2023. Phys. Dark Univ. 2023, 42, 101348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Vagnozzi, S. Seven Hints That Early-Time New Physics Alone Is Not Sufficient to Solve the Hubble Tension. Universe 2023, 9, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Cervantes-Cota, J.L.; Galindo-Uribarri, S.; Smoot, G.F. The Unsettled Number: Hubble’s Tension. Universe 2023, 9, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Furlanetto, S.; Oh, S.P.; Briggs, F. Cosmology at Low Frequencies: The 21 cm Transition and the High-Redshift Universe. Phys. Rep. 2006, 433, 181–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Barkana, R. The Rise of the First Stars: Supersonic Streaming, Radiative Feedback, and 21-cm Cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2016, 645, 1–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Bartelmann, M.; Schneider, P. Weak gravitational lensing. Phys. Rep. 2001, 340, 291–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Lewis, A.; Challinor, A. Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB. Phys. Rep. 2006, 429, 1–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Barnacka, A. Gravitational Lenses as High-Resolution Telescopes. Phys. Rep. 2018, 778–779, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Durrer, R.; Kunz, M.; Melchiorri, A. Cosmic structure formation with topological defects. Phys. Rep. 2002, 364, 1–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Padmanabhan, T. Gravity and the thermodynamics of horizons. Phys. Rep. 2005, 406, 49–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Hollands, S.; Wald, R.M. Quantum fields in curved spacetime. Phys. Rep. 2015, 574, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Porto, R.A. The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics. Phys. Rep. 2016, 633, 1–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Dayal, P.; Ferrara, A. Early galaxy formation and its large-scale effects. Phys. Rep. 2018, 780–782, 1–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Adams, F.C. The degree of fine-tuning in our universe — and others. Phys. Rep. 2019, 807, 1–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Perlick, V.; Tsupko, O.Y. Calculating black hole shadows: Review of analytical studies. Phys. Rep. 2022, 947, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Brout, D.; Scolnic, D.; Popovic, B.; Riess, A.G.; Zuntz, J.; Kessler, R.; Carr, A.; Davis, T.M.; Hinton, S.; Jones, D.; et al. The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints. Astrophys. J. 2022, 938, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/universe/special_issues/origins (accessed on 22 March 2026).
  173. Brandenberger, R.; Favero, A. Cosmic Strings from Thermal Inflation. Universe 2024, 10, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Bertolami, O.; Potting, R.; Sá, P.M. The de Sitter Swampland Conjectures in the Context of Chaplygin-Inspired Inflation. Universe 2024, 10, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Zhang, Y.; Ye, X. Regularized Stress Tensor of Vector Fields in de Sitter Space. Universe 2025, 11, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Nagy, J.; Nagy, S.; Sailer, K. Time Scales of Slow-Roll Inflation in Asymptotically Safe Cosmology. Universe 2025, 11, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Aldabergenov, Y.; Berkimbayev, D. Gauss–Bonnet-Induced Symmetry Breaking/Restoration During Inflation. Universe 2025, 11, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Bilić, N.; Dimitrijević, D.D.; Djordjevic, G.S.; Milošević, M.; Stojanović, M. Scaling Invariance of Perturbations in k-Inflation Models. Universe 2025, 11, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Duarte, M.; Dahia, F.; Romero, C. The Geometric Proca–Weyl Field as a Candidate for Dark Matter. Universe 2025, 11, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Nakamura, T.; Homma, K. Earth-Lens Telescope for Distant Axion-like Particle Sources with Stimulated Backward Reflection. Universe 2025, 11, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Popa, L.A. Gravitational Wave Signatures of Warm Dark Matter in the Gauge Extensions of the Standard Model. Universe 2025, 11, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Hasada, T. et al. [SAPPHIRES]. Single-Point Search for eV-Scale Axion-like Particles with Variable-Angle Three-Beam-Stimulated Resonant Photon Collider. Universe 2026, 12, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Gao, C. The Equation of State of Novel Double-Field Pure K-Essence for Inflation, Dark Matter and Dark Energy. Universe 2024, 10, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. de Souza, J.S.T.; Vicente, G.S.; Graef, L.L. Constraints on Metastable Dark Energy Decaying into Dark Matter. Universe 2024, 10, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Nashed, G.G.L.; Eid, A. New Black Hole Solution in f(R) Theory and Its Related Physics. Universe 2025, 11, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Nashed, G.G.L.; Eid, A. Black Hole Solution Free of Ghosts in f(R) Gravity Coupled with Two Scalar Fields. Universe 2025, 11, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bamba, K. Editorial to the Special Issue “Origins and Natures of Inflation, Dark Matter and Dark Energy, 2nd Edition”. Universe 2026, 12, 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12040098

AMA Style

Bamba K. Editorial to the Special Issue “Origins and Natures of Inflation, Dark Matter and Dark Energy, 2nd Edition”. Universe. 2026; 12(4):98. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12040098

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bamba, Kazuharu. 2026. "Editorial to the Special Issue “Origins and Natures of Inflation, Dark Matter and Dark Energy, 2nd Edition”" Universe 12, no. 4: 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12040098

APA Style

Bamba, K. (2026). Editorial to the Special Issue “Origins and Natures of Inflation, Dark Matter and Dark Energy, 2nd Edition”. Universe, 12(4), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12040098

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop