Editorial to the Special Issue “Origins and Natures of Inflation, Dark Matter and Dark Energy, 2nd Edition”
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Perlmutter, S. et al. [SNCP Collaboration]. Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 1999, 517, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riess, A.G. et al. [Supernova Search Team Collaboration]. Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant. Astron. J. 1998, 116, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spergel, D.N. et al. [WMAP Collaboration]. First Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2003, 148, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spergel, D.N. et al. [WMAP Collaboration]. Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) three year results: Implications for cosmology. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2007, 170, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komatsu, E. et al. [WMAP Collaboration]. Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2009, 180, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komatsu, E. et al. [WMAP Collaboration]. Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2011, 192, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aghanim, N. et al. [Planck]. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 641, A6, Erratum in Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 652, C4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akrami, Y. et al. [Planck]. Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 641, A10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tegmark, M. et al. [SDSS Collaboration]. Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP. Phys. Rev. D 2004, 69, 103501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seljak, U. et al. [SDSS Collaboration]. Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Ly-alpha forest and galaxy bias: Constraints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neutrino mass, and dark energy. Phys. Rev. D 2005, 71, 103515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsagas, C.G.; Challinor, A.; Maartens, R. Relativistic cosmology and large-scale structure. Phys. Rep. 2008, 465, 61–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eisenstein, D.J. et al. [SDSS Collaboration]. Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large-Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2005, 633, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alam, S. et al. [eBOSS]. Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 103, 083533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adame, A.G. et al. [DESI]. DESI 2024 III: Baryon acoustic oscillations from galaxies and quasars. JCAP 2025, 4, 012. [Google Scholar]
- Adame, A.G. et al. [DESI]. DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations. JCAP 2025, 2, 021. [Google Scholar]
- Karim, M.A. et al. [DESI]. DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints. Phys. Rev. D 2025, 112, 083515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karim, M.A. et al. [DESI]. DESI DR2 results. I. Baryon acoustic oscillations from the Lyman alpha forest. Phys. Rev. D 2025, 112, 083514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, B.; Taylor, A. Cross-correlation Tomography: Measuring Dark Energy Evolution with Weak Lensing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 141302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munshi, D.; Valageas, P.; Waerbeke, L.V.; Heavens, A. Cosmology with weak lensing surveys. Phys. Rep. 2008, 462, 67–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Troxel, M.A.; Ishak, M. The Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and its Impact on Weak Gravitational Lensing in an Era of Precision Cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2014, 558, 1–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbott, T.M.C. et al. [DES]. Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 98, 043526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbott, T.M.C. et al. [DES]. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 023520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guth, A.H. The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems. Phys. Rev. D 1981, 23, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sato, K. First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 1981, 195, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Starobinsky, A.A. A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity. Phys. Lett. 1980, 91, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linde, A.D. A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems. Phys. Lett. 1982, 108, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Louis, T. et al. [Atacama Cosmology Telescope]. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and ΛCDM parameters. JCAP 2025, 11, 062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calabrese, E. et al. [Atacama Cosmology Telescope]. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 constraints on extended cosmological models. JCAP 2025, 11, 063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, F. et al. [SPT-3G]. Cosmology from CMB lensing and delensed EE power spectra using 2019–2020 SPT-3G polarization data. Phys. Rev. D 2025, 111, 083534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Camphuis, E. et al. [SPT-3G]. SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2506.20707. [Google Scholar]
- Available online: https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Euclid (accessed on 22 March 2026).
- Laureijs, R. et al. [EUCLID]. Euclid Definition Study Report. arXiv 2011, arXiv:1110.3193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amendola, L. et al. [Euclid TheoryWorking Group]. Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite. Living Rev. Relativ. 2013, 16, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amendola, L.; Appleby, S.; Avgoustidis, A.; Bacon, D.; Baker, T.; Baldi, M.; Bartolo, N.; Blanchard, A.; Bonvin, C.; Borgani, S.; et al. Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite. Living Rev. Relativ. 2018, 21, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanchard, A. et al. [Euclid]. Euclid preparation. VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological probes. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 642, A191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nesseris, S. et al. [Euclid]. Euclid: Forecast constraints on consistency tests of the ΛCDM model. Astron. Astrophys. 2022, 660, A67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ballardini, M. et al. [Euclid]. Euclid: The search for primordial features. Astron. Astrophys. 2024, 683, A220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mellier, Y. et al. [Euclid]. I. Overview of the Euclid mission. Astron. Astrophys. 2025, 697, A1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eifler, T.; Miyatake, H.; Krause, E.; Heinrich, C.; Miranda, V.; Hirata, C.; Xu, J.; Hemmati, S.; Simet, M.; Capak, P.; et al. Cosmology with the Roman Space Telescope – multiprobe strategies. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2021, 507, 1746–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://simonsobservatory.org/ (accessed on 22 March 2026).
- Ade, P. et al. [Simons Observatory]. The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts. JCAP 2019, 2, 056. [Google Scholar]
- Available online: https://webbtelescope.org/home (accessed on 22 March 2026).
- Gardner, J.P.; Mather, J.C.; Clampin, M.; Doyon, R.; Greenhouse, M.A.; Hammel, H.B.; Hutchings, J.B.; Jakobsen, P.; Lilly, S.J.; Long, K.S.; et al. The James Webb Space Telescope. Space Sci. Rev. 2006, 123, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbott, B.P. et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo]. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 061102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbott, B.P. et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo]. GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 161101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbott, B.P. et al. [LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi GBM, INTEGRAL, IceCube, AstroSat Cadmium Zinc Telluride Imager Team, IPN, Insight-Hxmt, ANTARES, Swift, AGILE Team, 1M2H Team, Dark Energy Camera GW-EM, DES, DLT40, GRAWITA, Fermi-LAT, ATCA, ASKAP, Las Cumbres Observatory Group, OzGrav, DWF (Deeper Wider Faster Program), AST3, CAASTRO, VINROUGE, MASTER, J-GEM, GROWTH, JAGWAR, CaltechNRAO, TTU-NRAO, NuSTAR, Pan-STARRS, MAXI Team, TZAC Consortium, KU, Nordic Optical Telescope, ePESSTO, GROND, Texas Tech University, SALT Group, TOROS, BOOTES, MWA, CALET, IKIGW Follow-up, H.E.S.S., LOFAR, LWA, HAWC, Pierre Auger, ALMA, Euro VLBI Team, Pi of Sky, Chandra Team at McGill University, DFN, ATLAS Telescopes, High Time Resolution Universe Survey, RIMAS, RATIR and SKA South Africa/MeerKAT]. Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2017, 848, L12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barack, L.; Cardoso, V.; Nissanke, S.; Sotiriou, T.P.; Askar, A.; Belczynski, C.; Bertone, G.; Bon, E.; Blas, D.; Brito, R.; et al. Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: A roadmap. Class. Quant. Grav. 2019, 36, 143001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakar, E. The electromagnetic counterparts of compact binary mergers. Phys. Rep. 2020, 886, 1–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yokoyama, J. Implication of pulsar timing array experiments on cosmological gravitational wave detection. AAPPS Bull. 2021, 31, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domènech, G. Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review. Universe 2021, 7, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandel, I.; Farmer, A. Merging stellar-mass binary black holes. Phys. Rep. 2022, 955, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agazie, G. et al. [NANOGrav]. The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2023, 951, L8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D. Introduction to modified gravity and gravitational alternative for dark energy. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 2007, 4, 115–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lue, A. The phenomenology of dvali-gabadadze-porrati cosmologies. Phys. Rep. 2006, 423, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Copeland, E.J.; Sami, M.; Tsujikawa, S. Dynamics of dark energy. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2006, 15, 1753–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fujii, Y.; Maeda, K. The Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravitation; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Padmanabhan, T. Dark energy and gravity. Gen. Rel. Grav. 2008, 40, 529–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durrer, R.; Maartens, R. Dark Energy and Dark Gravity. Gen. Rel. Grav. 2008, 40, 301–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexander, S.; Yunes, N. Chern-Simons Modified General Relativity. Phys. Rep. 2009, 480, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sotiriou, T.P.; Faraoni, V. f(R) Theories Of Gravity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010, 82, 451–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.F.; Saridakis, E.N.; Setare, M.R.; Xia, J.Q. Quintom Cosmology: Theoretical implications and observations. Phys. Rep. 2010, 493, 1–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Felice, A.D.; Tsujikawa, S. f(R) theories. Living Rev. Relativ. 2010, 13, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amendola, L.; Tsujikawa, S. Dark Energy; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Faraoni, V.; Capozziello, S. Beyond Einstein Gravity; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D. Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: From F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models. Phys. Rep. 2011, 505, 59–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Capozziello, S.; Laurentis, M.D. Extended Theories of Gravity. Phys. Rep. 2011, 509, 167–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clifton, T.; Ferreira, P.G.; Padilla, A.; Skordis, C. Modified Gravity and Cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2012, 513, 1–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weinberg, D.H.; Mortonson, M.J.; Eisenstein, D.J.; Hirata, C.; Riess, A.G.; Rozo, E. Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration. Phys. Rep. 2013, 530, 87–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bamba, K.; Capozziello, S.; Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D. Dark energy cosmology: The equivalent description via different theoretical models and cosmography tests. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2012, 342, 155–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padmanabhan, T.; Kothawala, D. Lanczos-Lovelock models of gravity. Phys. Rep. 2013, 531, 115–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Will, C.M. The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment. Living Rev. Relativ. 2014, 17, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joyce, A.; Jain, B.; Khoury, J.; Trodden, M. Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model. Phys. Rep. 2015, 568, 1–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.F.; Capozziello, S.; Laurentis, M.D.; Saridakis, E.N. f(T) teleparallel gravity and cosmology. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2016, 79, 106901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, M. Holographic Dark Energy. Phys. Rep. 2017, 696, 1–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D.; Oikonomou, V.K. Modified Gravity Theories on a Nutshell: Inflation, Bounce and Late-time Evolution. Phys. Rep. 2017, 692, 1–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jimenez, J.B.; Heisenberg, L.; Olmo, G.J.; Rubiera-Garcia, D. Born–Infeld inspired modifications of gravity. Phys. Rep. 2018, 727, 1–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahamonde, S.; Böhmer, C.G.; Carloni, S.; Copeland, E.J.; Fang, W.; Tamanini, N. Dynamical systems applied to cosmology: Dark energy and modified gravity. Phys. Rep. 2018, 775–777, 1–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adami, H.; Setare, M.R.; Sisman, T.C.; Tekin, B. Conserved Charges in Extended Theories of Gravity. Phys. Rep. 2019, 834, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heisenberg, L. A systematic approach to generalisations of General Relativity and their cosmological implications. Phys. Rep. 2019, 796, 1–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Langlois, D. Dark energy and modified gravity in degenerate higher-order scalar–tensor (DHOST) theories: A review. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2019, 28, 1942006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobayashi, T. Horndeski theory and beyond: A review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2019, 82, 086901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frusciante, N.; Perenon, L. Effective field theory of dark energy: A review. Phys. Rep. 2020, 857, 1–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olmo, G.J.; Rubiera-Garcia, D.; Wojnar, A. Stellar structure models in modified theories of gravity: Lessons and challenges. Phys. Rep. 2020, 876, 1–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saridakis, E.N.; Lazkoz, R.; Salzano, V.; Moniz, P.V.; Capozziello, S.; Jimenez, J.B.; Laurentis, M.D.; Olmo, G.J. Modified Gravity and Cosmology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Faraoni, V.; Giusti, A.; Fahim, B.H. Spherical inhomogeneous solutions of Einstein and scalar–tensor gravity: A map of the land. Phys. Rep. 2021, 925, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bamba, K. Review on Dark Energy Problem and Modified Gravity Theories. LHEP 2022, 2022, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahamonde, S.; Dialektopoulos, K.F.; Escamilla-Rivera, C.; Farrugia, G.; Gakis, V.; Hendry, M.; Hohmann, M.; Said, J.L.; Mifsud, J.; Valentino, E.D. Teleparallel gravity: From theory to cosmology. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2023, 86, 026901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arai, S.; Aoki, K.; Chinone, Y.; Kimura, R.; Kobayashi, T.; Miyatake, H.; Yamauchi, D.; Yokoyama, S.; Akitsu, K.; Hiramatsu, T.; et al. Cosmological gravity probes: Connecting recent theoretical developments to forthcoming observations. PTEP 2023, 2023, 072E01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Haro, J.; Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D.; Oikonomou, V.K.; Pan, S. Finite-time cosmological singularities and the possible fate of the Universe. Phys. Rep. 2023, 1034, 1–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heisenberg, L. Review on f(Q) gravity. Phys. Rep. 2024, 1066, 1–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avsajanishvili, O.; Chitov, G.Y.; Kahniashvili, T.; Mandal, S.; Samushia, L. Observational Constraints on Dynamical Dark Energy Models. Universe 2024, 10, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousaf, Z.; Bamba, K.; Bhatti, M.Z.; Farwa, U. Quasi-static evolution of axially and reflection symmetric large-scale configuration. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 2024, 21, 2430005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gasperini, M.; Veneziano, G. The Pre-big bang scenario in string cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2003, 373, 1–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiritsis, E. D-branes in standard model building, gravity and cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2005, 421, 105–190, Erratum in Phys. Rep. 2006, 429, 121–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davidson, S.; Nardi, E.; Nir, Y. Leptogenesis. Phys. Rep. 2008, 466, 105–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Novello, M.; Bergliaffa, S.E.P. Bouncing Cosmologies. Phys. Rep. 2008, 463, 127–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehners, J.L. Ekpyrotic and Cyclic Cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2008, 465, 223–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazumdar, A.; Rocher, J. Particle physics models of inflation and curvaton scenarios. Phys. Rep. 2011, 497, 85–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maleknejad, A.; Sheikh-Jabbari, M.M.; Soda, J. Gauge Fields and Inflation. Phys. Rep. 2013, 528, 161–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Battefeld, D.; Peter, P. A Critical Review of Classical Bouncing Cosmologies. Phys. Rep. 2015, 571, 1–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sato, K.; Yokoyama, J. Inflationary cosmology: First 30+ years. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2015, 24, 1530025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bamba, K.; Odintsov, S.D. Inflationary cosmology in modified gravity theories. Symmetry 2015, 7, 220–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asadi, P.; Bansal, S.; Berlin, A.; Co, R.T.; Croon, D.; Cui, Y.; Curtin, D.; Cyr-Racine, F.Y.; Davoudiasl, H.; Rose, L.D.; et al. Early-Universe Model Building. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2203.06680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Odintsov, S.D.; Oikonomou, V.K.; Giannakoudi, I.; Fronimos, F.P.; Lymperiadou, E.C. Recent Advances in Inflation. Symmetry 2023, 15, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cicoli, M.; Conlon, J.P.; Maharana, A.; Parameswaran, S.; Quevedo, F.; Zavala, I. String cosmology: From the early universe to today. Phys. Rep. 2024, 1059, 1–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donnay, L. Celestial holography: An asymptotic symmetry perspective. Phys. Rep. 2024, 1073, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kallosh, R.; Linde, A. On the present status of inflationary cosmology. Gen. Rel. Grav. 2025, 57, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linde, A. Alexei Starobinsky and Modern Cosmology. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2509.01675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kodama, H.; Sasaki, M. Cosmological Perturbation Theory. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 1984, 78, 1–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukhanov, V.F.; Feldman, H.A.; Brandenberger, R.H. Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions. Phys. Rep. 1992, 215, 203–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernardeau, F.; Colombi, S.; Gaztanaga, E.; Scoccimarro, R. Large scale structure of the universe and cosmological perturbation theory. Phys. Rep. 2002, 367, 1–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, K.A.; Wands, D. Cosmological perturbations. Phys. Rep. 2009, 475, 1–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palti, E. The Swampland: Introduction and Review. Fortsch. Phys. 2019, 67, 1900037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Beest, M.; Calderón-Infante, J.; Mirfendereski, D.; Valenzuela, I. Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications. Phys. Rep. 2022, 989, 1–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riet, T.V.; Zoccarato, G. Beginners lectures on flux compactifications and related Swampland topics. Phys. Rep. 2024, 1049, 1–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weinberg, S. The Cosmological Constant Problem. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1989, 61, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padmanabhan, T. Cosmological constant: The Weight of the vacuum. Phys. Rep. 2003, 380, 235–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dolgov, A.D. Neutrinos in cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2002, 370, 333–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lesgourgues, J.; Pastor, S. Massive neutrinos and cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2006, 429, 307–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kusenko, A. Sterile neutrinos: The Dark side of the light fermions. Phys. Rep. 2009, 481, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abazajian, K.N. Sterile neutrinos in cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2017, 711–712, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dasgupta, B.; Kopp, J. Sterile Neutrinos. Phys. Rep. 2021, 928, 1–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marsh, D.J.E. Axion Cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2016, 643, 1–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yokoyama, J. Formation of primordial black holes in the inflationary universe. Phys. Rep. 1998, 307, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carr, B.; Kohri, K.; Sendouda, Y.; Yokoyama, J. Constraints on primordial black holes. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2021, 84, 116902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Özsoy, O.; Tasinato, G. Inflation and Primordial Black Holes. Universe 2023, 9, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carr, B.; Clesse, S.; Garcia-Bellido, J.; Hawkins, M.; Kuhnel, F. Observational evidence for primordial black holes: A positivist perspective. Phys. Rep. 2024, 1054, 1–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Domènech, G. Lectures on Gravitational Wave Signatures of Primordial Black Holes. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2307.06964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertone, G.; Hooper, D.; Silk, J. Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints. Phys. Rep. 2005, 405, 279–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hooper, D.; Profumo, S. Dark Matter and Collider Phenomenology of Universal Extra Dimensions. Phys. Rep. 2007, 453, 29–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zurek, K.M. Asymmetric Dark Matter: Theories, signatures, and constraints. Phys. Rep. 2014, 537, 91–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baer, H.; Choi, K.Y.; Kim, J.E.; Roszkowski, L. Dark matter production in the early Universe: Beyond the thermal WIMP paradigm. Phys. Rep. 2015, 555, 1–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aramaki, T.; Boggs, S.; Bufalino, S.; Dal, L.; von Doetinchem, P.; Donato, F.; Fornengo, N.; Fuke, H.; Grefe, M.; Hailey, C.; et al. Review of the theoretical and experimental status of dark matter identification with cosmic-ray antideuterons. Phys. Rep. 2016, 618, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayet, F.; Green, A.M.; Battat, J.B.R.; Billard, J.; Bozorgnia, N.; Gelmini, G.B.; Gondolo, P.; Kavanagh, B.J.; Lee, S.K.; Loomba, D.; et al. A review of the discovery reach of directional Dark Matter detection. Phys. Rep. 2016, 627, 1–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tulin, S.; Yu, H.B. Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure. Phys. Rep. 2018, 730, 1–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buckley, M.R.; Peter, A.H.G. Gravitational probes of dark matter physics. Phys. Rep. 2018, 761, 1–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arcadi, G.; Djouadi, A.; Raidal, M. Dark Matter through the Higgs portal. Phys. Rep. 2020, 842, 1–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buen-Abad, M.A.; Essig, R.; McKeen, D.; Zhong, Y.M. Cosmological constraints on dark matter interactions with ordinary matter. Phys. Rep. 2022, 961, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahluwalia, D.V.; da Silva, J.M.H.; Lee, C.Y.; Liu, Y.X.; Pereira, S.H.; Sorkhi, M.M. Mass dimension one fermions: Constructing darkness. Phys. Rep. 2022, 967, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bramante, J.; Raj, N. Dark matter in compact stars. Phys. Rep. 2024, 1052, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grasso, D.; Rubinstein, H.R. Magnetic fields in the early universe. Phys. Rep. 2001, 348, 163–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrow, J.D.; Maartens, R.; Tsagas, C.G. Cosmology with inhomogeneous magnetic fields. Phys. Rep. 2007, 449, 131–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subramanian, K. Magnetic fields in the early universe. Astron. Nachr. 2010, 331, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kandus, A.; Kunze, K.E.; Tsagas, C.G. Primordial magnetogenesis. Phys. Rep. 2011, 505, 1–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamazaki, D.G.; Kajino, T.; Mathew, G.J.; Ichiki, K. The Search for a Primordial Magnetic Field. Phys. Rep. 2012, 517, 141–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iocco, F.; Mangano, G.; Miele, G.; Pisanti, O.; Serpico, P.D. Primordial Nucleosynthesis: From precision cosmology to fundamental physics. Phys. Rep. 2009, 472, 1–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pitrou, C.; Coc, A.; Uzan, J.P.; Vangioni, E. Precision big bang nucleosynthesis with improved Helium-4 predictions. Phys. Rep. 2018, 754, 1–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knox, L.; Millea, M. Hubble constant hunter’s guide. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 043533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asgari, M. et al. [KiDS]. KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Cosmic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics. Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 645, A104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valentino, E.D.; Mena, O.; Pan, S.; Visinelli, L.; Yang, W.; Melchiorri, A.; Mota, D.F.; Riess, A.G.; Silk, J. In the realm of the Hubble tension—A review of solutions. Class. Quant. Grav. 2021, 38, 153001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perivolaropoulos, L.; Skara, F. Challenges for ΛCDM: An update. New Astron. Rev. 2022, 95, 101659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schöneberg, N.; Abellán, G.F.; Sánchez, A.P.; Witte, S.J.; Poulin, V.; Lesgourgues, J. The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models. Phys. Rep. 2022, 984, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdalla, E.; Abellán, G.F.; Aboubrahim, A.; Agnello, A.; Akarsu, O.; Akrami, Y.; Alestas, G.; Aloni, D.; Amendola, L.; Anchordoqui, L.A.; et al. Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies. JHEAp 2022, 34, 49–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamionkowski, M.; Riess, A.G. The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2023, 73, 153–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.-P.; Wang, F.-Y. Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics. Universe 2023, 9, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poulin, V.; Smith, T.L.; Karwal, T. The Ups and Downs of Early Dark Energy solutions to the Hubble tension: A review of models, hints and constraints circa 2023. Phys. Dark Univ. 2023, 42, 101348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vagnozzi, S. Seven Hints That Early-Time New Physics Alone Is Not Sufficient to Solve the Hubble Tension. Universe 2023, 9, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cervantes-Cota, J.L.; Galindo-Uribarri, S.; Smoot, G.F. The Unsettled Number: Hubble’s Tension. Universe 2023, 9, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furlanetto, S.; Oh, S.P.; Briggs, F. Cosmology at Low Frequencies: The 21 cm Transition and the High-Redshift Universe. Phys. Rep. 2006, 433, 181–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barkana, R. The Rise of the First Stars: Supersonic Streaming, Radiative Feedback, and 21-cm Cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2016, 645, 1–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartelmann, M.; Schneider, P. Weak gravitational lensing. Phys. Rep. 2001, 340, 291–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewis, A.; Challinor, A. Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB. Phys. Rep. 2006, 429, 1–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barnacka, A. Gravitational Lenses as High-Resolution Telescopes. Phys. Rep. 2018, 778–779, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durrer, R.; Kunz, M.; Melchiorri, A. Cosmic structure formation with topological defects. Phys. Rep. 2002, 364, 1–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padmanabhan, T. Gravity and the thermodynamics of horizons. Phys. Rep. 2005, 406, 49–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hollands, S.; Wald, R.M. Quantum fields in curved spacetime. Phys. Rep. 2015, 574, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porto, R.A. The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics. Phys. Rep. 2016, 633, 1–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dayal, P.; Ferrara, A. Early galaxy formation and its large-scale effects. Phys. Rep. 2018, 780–782, 1–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adams, F.C. The degree of fine-tuning in our universe — and others. Phys. Rep. 2019, 807, 1–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perlick, V.; Tsupko, O.Y. Calculating black hole shadows: Review of analytical studies. Phys. Rep. 2022, 947, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brout, D.; Scolnic, D.; Popovic, B.; Riess, A.G.; Zuntz, J.; Kessler, R.; Carr, A.; Davis, T.M.; Hinton, S.; Jones, D.; et al. The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints. Astrophys. J. 2022, 938, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/universe/special_issues/origins (accessed on 22 March 2026).
- Brandenberger, R.; Favero, A. Cosmic Strings from Thermal Inflation. Universe 2024, 10, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertolami, O.; Potting, R.; Sá, P.M. The de Sitter Swampland Conjectures in the Context of Chaplygin-Inspired Inflation. Universe 2024, 10, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Ye, X. Regularized Stress Tensor of Vector Fields in de Sitter Space. Universe 2025, 11, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagy, J.; Nagy, S.; Sailer, K. Time Scales of Slow-Roll Inflation in Asymptotically Safe Cosmology. Universe 2025, 11, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aldabergenov, Y.; Berkimbayev, D. Gauss–Bonnet-Induced Symmetry Breaking/Restoration During Inflation. Universe 2025, 11, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilić, N.; Dimitrijević, D.D.; Djordjevic, G.S.; Milošević, M.; Stojanović, M. Scaling Invariance of Perturbations in k-Inflation Models. Universe 2025, 11, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duarte, M.; Dahia, F.; Romero, C. The Geometric Proca–Weyl Field as a Candidate for Dark Matter. Universe 2025, 11, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakamura, T.; Homma, K. Earth-Lens Telescope for Distant Axion-like Particle Sources with Stimulated Backward Reflection. Universe 2025, 11, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popa, L.A. Gravitational Wave Signatures of Warm Dark Matter in the Gauge Extensions of the Standard Model. Universe 2025, 11, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasada, T. et al. [SAPPHIRES]. Single-Point Search for eV-Scale Axion-like Particles with Variable-Angle Three-Beam-Stimulated Resonant Photon Collider. Universe 2026, 12, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, C. The Equation of State of Novel Double-Field Pure K-Essence for Inflation, Dark Matter and Dark Energy. Universe 2024, 10, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Souza, J.S.T.; Vicente, G.S.; Graef, L.L. Constraints on Metastable Dark Energy Decaying into Dark Matter. Universe 2024, 10, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nashed, G.G.L.; Eid, A. New Black Hole Solution in f(R) Theory and Its Related Physics. Universe 2025, 11, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nashed, G.G.L.; Eid, A. Black Hole Solution Free of Ghosts in f(R) Gravity Coupled with Two Scalar Fields. Universe 2025, 11, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Bamba, K. Editorial to the Special Issue “Origins and Natures of Inflation, Dark Matter and Dark Energy, 2nd Edition”. Universe 2026, 12, 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12040098
Bamba K. Editorial to the Special Issue “Origins and Natures of Inflation, Dark Matter and Dark Energy, 2nd Edition”. Universe. 2026; 12(4):98. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12040098
Chicago/Turabian StyleBamba, Kazuharu. 2026. "Editorial to the Special Issue “Origins and Natures of Inflation, Dark Matter and Dark Energy, 2nd Edition”" Universe 12, no. 4: 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12040098
APA StyleBamba, K. (2026). Editorial to the Special Issue “Origins and Natures of Inflation, Dark Matter and Dark Energy, 2nd Edition”. Universe, 12(4), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12040098
