Next Article in Journal
Black Hole Solution Free of Ghosts in f(R) Gravity Coupled with Two Scalar Fields
Next Article in Special Issue
Selected Results on Variable Stars Observed by TESS
Previous Article in Journal
On the True Significance of the Hubble Tension: A Bayesian Error Decomposition Accounting for Information Loss
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Catalog of 73 B-Type Stars and Their Brightness Variation from K2 Campaign 13–18
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Variable Sky Through the OGLE Eye

Astronomical Observatory, University of Warsaw, Al. Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland
Universe 2025, 11(9), 304; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe11090304
Submission received: 12 July 2025 / Revised: 31 August 2025 / Accepted: 2 September 2025 / Published: 8 September 2025

Abstract

The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE) is one of the most productive and influential photometric sky surveys in the history of observational astronomy. Originally designed to detect dark matter through gravitational microlensing events, OGLE has evolved into a cornerstone of time-domain astrophysics, delivering three decades of two-band, high-cadence observations of approximately two billion stars across the Galactic bulge, disk, and Magellanic System. This review summarizes OGLE’s key contributions to variable star research, including the discovery, classification and characterization of pulsating stars, eclipsing, ellipsoidal, and rotating variables, or irregular and eruptive stars. Particular emphasis is placed on the OGLE Collection of Variable Stars (OCVS), a publicly available and systematically expanded dataset that has become a fundamental resource for studies of stellar variability and evolution, Milky Way and other galaxies structure, microlensing, compact objects, exoplanets and more. The synergy between OGLE and other major sky surveys, including ASAS, ASAS-SN, ATLAS, Gaia, KMTNet, MACHO, MOA, TESS, PLATO, or ZTF further amplifies its scientific reach.

1. Introduction

Variable stars are not just curiosities—they are a fundamental tool in astronomy. Their light curves convey a lot of knowledge about stellar interiors, binarity, mass loss, rotation, magnetic activity, outbursts, evolution, or even unseen companions. They serve as distance indicators, tracers of galactic structures, and tools for identifying exoplanets or compact objects through gravitational microlensing. Beyond these roles, variable stars also inform about galactic chemical evolution, e.g., classical Cepheids map the disk’s metallicity gradient, while RR Lyrae stars trace the old, metal-poor halo and accreted substructures—an approach often termed galactic archaeology. This wide applicability has made variable stars indispensable across many fields, from asteroseismology to cosmology. Looking ahead, asteroseismology will be a key method for determining exoplanet host-star properties with the PLAnetary Transits and Oscillations of stars (PLATO) mission, which will deliver high-cadence space-based photometry [1]. However, modern studies usually require long-term, high-cadence and precise photometric monitoring, which only became widely feasible with the rise of large-scale time-domain surveys.
Although the formal beginning of variable star astronomy is associated with the discovery of Mira (o Ceti) in 1596, the variable sky has been observed for centuries. Historical records from East Asia and Europe described transient stellar phenomena, including so-called “guest stars”, i.e., novae and supernovae, which have been confirmed as real astrophysical events. There are also suggestions that the periodic variability of Algol may have been recognized in antiquity—for example by the ancient Egyptians—with its period recorded in the Cairo Calendar for religious reasons [2]. As argued by Jetsu et al. [2], the Cairo Calendar may be the oldest preserved historical document attesting to the discovery of a variable star.
What distinguishes Mira from transient events is its periodic behavior. In 1596 David Fabricius noticed a new bright, reddish star in the constellation Cetus. He described it as slightly brighter than α Arietis and resembling Mars in color. Fabricius observed the star for several weeks before it faded from view, and he re-identified it in 1609, albeit without initially recognizing it as the same object. The periodic nature of Mira’s variability was identified in 1638 by Johannes Holwarda. He estimated its period to be about 11 months. After that, in 1662, Johannes Hevelius named the star Mira (“the wonderful one”) and published a dedicated treatise (Historiola Mirae Stellae), affirming its significance [3]. Recent analyses combining historical records with modern photometry confirm that Mira’s pulsation period remained remarkably stable over more than four centuries, at approximately 330 days [4].
A major turning point came in 1784, when British amateur astronomer Edward Pigott discovered the first classical Cepheid—η Antinoi (now η Aquilae) and measured its period to be approximately 7.18 days—remarkably close to the modern value of 7.176641 days. In the same year, John Goodricke (also British amateur astronomer) independently discovered the variability of δ Cephei. He determined the variability period on 5.37 days (modern measurement is 5.366249 days). Pigott, the more experienced observer, acted as a mentor to Goodricke, and the two friends collaborated closely while living in York. Despite Pigott’s priority in identifying the first classical Cepheid, it was Goodricke’s work on δ Cephei that ultimately led to this class of stars being named after the latter object—hence Cepheids and not Aquilaes [5,6].
Over a century later, the study of Classical Cepheids led to one of the most important breakthroughs in cosmology. While working at the Harvard College Observatory, Henrietta Swan Leavitt investigated variable stars in the Magellanic Clouds. In 1907, she noted a striking correlation between variability periods and apparent brightness of a subset of variables of the Small Magellanic Cloud [7]. In 1912, Henrietta Swan Leavitt published a refined version of this relation based on 25 variables (classical Cepheids), laying the foundation for the so-called period–luminosity relation (PLR), also known as the Leavitt Law [8]. Despite using only a handful of photographic plates and a provisional magnitude scale, Leavitt achieved remarkable accuracy in estimating both periods and brightness. However, her original relation lacked an absolute zero-point because the distance to the Small Magellanic Clouds was not known at the time. The first calibration attempts were made by Ejnar Hertzsprung [9], and a more robust zero-point was later provided by Harlow Shapley using distances to globular clusters [10]. These efforts, along with the subsequent separation of different populations of Cepheids in the following decades (see the historical summary in Fernie [11]), eventually enabled Edwin Hubble to use the PLR for extragalactic distance measurements, leading to the discovery of the expanding Universe [12]. A recent reanalysis of Leavitt’s original sample using modern data confirms the overall validity of the relation and shows that most of the measured periods agree with current values to better than 0.01 days [13]. The PLR remains at the core of the cosmic distance ladder and plays a key role in the debate over the value of the Hubble constant [14,15].
During the twentieth century, advances in spectroscopy and photometric observations and theoretical modeling enabled the discovery and characterization of numerous other classes of variable stars. Among pulsators, there were known RR Lyrae stars (e.g., [16,17]), δ Scuti stars (e.g., [18,19]), and β Cephei variables (e.g., [20,21,22,23]). Pulsating white dwarfs, such as ZZ Ceti were identified in the late 1960s and confirmed as a distinct class by the 1970s [24,25]. In parallel, other types of variable stars have been discovered, classified, and analyzed. Eclipsing binaries, such as Algol-type and β Lyrae systems, allowed the determination of stellar masses and radii when light curve modeling was combined with spectroscopic data (see references in [26]). Rotational variables were identified through quasi-periodic modulations, and their variability was first linked to magnetic phenomena (e.g., spots) in chemically peculiar stars like those of α2 Canum Venaticorum type (e.g., [27,28,29,30]). Eruptive and cataclysmic variables, such as novae or dwarf novae, attracted attention due to their dramatic outburst (e.g., [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]). These variables offer a unique opportunity to study accretion discs in detail and thus shed light on accretion processes in X-ray binaries, black holes, and active galactic nuclei [39]. Moreover, irregular variability was increasingly recognized in young stars of T-Tauri type [40]. All these discoveries broadened the landscape of variable stars taxonomy and revealed the ubiquity of stellar variability across all stages of stellar evolution.
The characterization and discovery of the variable stars were accelerated by the development of large-scale CCD sky surveys, most notably and pioneering the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE), launched in the early 1990s [41]. Originally designed to search for dark matter using microlensing events, OGLE quickly became one of the most prolific and influential photometric sky surveys in astronomy. The OGLE project provides high-quality, long-term, two-band photometry for approximately two billion stars in the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds, the Magellanic Bridge, the Galactic bulge, and the Galactic disk. Similar surveys, such as Expérience pour la Recherche d’Objets Sombres (EROS) [42], and MAssive Compact Halo Objects (MACHO) [43], shared this initial focus on microlensing, but all of them revolutionized time-domain astrophysics through a by-product of their observational strategy: the continuous monitoring of the sky.
The operational design of the OGLE, EROS, and MACHO sky surveys led to the discovery of a large number of variable stars, increasing the number of known variable stars by orders of magnitude [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. These by-products not only filled previously unexplored regions of the sky but also provided the first large samples of many types of variables in the Milky Way, and in the extragalactic environments. This legacy transformed the role of the microlensing surveys into a “manufacture” of variable star discoveries.
Due to the sheer breadth of discoveries enabled by the OGLE survey over the past three decades, this review focuses specifically on results from the last few years of the project. This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, I provide an overview of the OGLE project, its objectives, instrumentation, sky coverage, and survey strategy. Section 3 introduces the structure and scope of the OGLE Collection of Variable Stars (OCVS). In Section 4, I highlight key discoveries across different classes of variable stars. Finally, in Section 5, I conclude the paper.

2. Overview of the OGLE Project

The OGLE project is one of the longest-lasting and most impactful photometric sky surveys in the history of astronomy. Initiated in 1992, it was originally designed to search for gravitational microlensing events, following Bohdan Paczyński’s idea to detect dark matter in the form of massive compact halo objects [53]. Since then, OGLE has grown into a versatile, large-scale time-domain survey dedicated to monitoring stellar variability on multiple timescales. Over the decades, the project has undergone several major instrumental and operational upgrades, each marking a new phase with increased sensitivity, sky coverage, and scientific reach.
The OGLE project began in the early 1990s with a pilot phase (OGLE-I) using a 1.0-m Swope telescope at Las Campanas Observatory, Chile, primarily targeting the Galactic bulge [41]. The initial effort demonstrated the feasibility of long-term CCD monitoring of dense stellar fields by detecting the first gravitational microlensing events [54]. In the second phase (OGLE-II), a dedicated 1.3-m Warsaw telescope was constructed, significantly enhancing the survey’s capabilities and extending coverage to the Magellanic Clouds [55]. Later phases, OGLE-III and OGLE-IV, introduced significant instrumental improvements, particularly in the CCD mosaic cameras, enabling growth in both sky coverage and the number of observed stars [56,57,58]. Today, OGLE-IV used a 32-chip CCD camera and has monitored approximately two billion stars across more than 3600 deg2 of the sky, including the Galactic bulge, Galactic disk, Large and Small Magellanic Clouds, and Magellanic Bridge. The observations are conducted in two photometric bands: Johnson V and Kron-Cousins I. The basic characteristics of each phase of the OGLE project are summarized in Figure 1. Figure 2 presents the current OGLE-IV sky footprint.
The most recent phase, OGLE-V, officially launched in 2025, introduces a major conceptual shift in the project scope. Alongside ongoing photometric monitoring, OGLE-V integrates high-precision astrometry as a fundamental component of the survey. One of its primary goals is the identification of microlensing events caused by dark, compact objects such as isolated stellar-mass black holes, which are promising targets for astrometric follow-up studies. Additionally, OGLE-V aims to investigate short-timescale variability (on the order of minutes to hours), opening a new variability window to future discoveries, as this regime has remained largely unexplored by previous long-term surveys. The new phase also plans to extend existing filters with a B-band and prioritize monitoring of the Magellanic System. As a result, this will enable three-band BVI coverage of Large and Small Magellanic Clouds, and the Magellanic Bridge. OGLE observations will also be carried out in a new wide R-band (which combines RC- and IC-bands). The development of OGLE-V has been supported by a grant awarded in 2025 by the Polish National Science Center to the PI of the project—Andrzej Udalski. Implementation of this new phase is currently underway.

3. The OGLE Collection of Variable Stars

The OGLE Collection of Variable Stars (OCVS) is one of the most extensive and diverse databases of stellar variability in modern astrophysics. Compiled over decades of photometric monitoring, OCVS includes more than a million variable stars of different types. It represents a fundamental by-product of the OGLE observational strategy, originally designed to detect microlensing events, but which also enabled systematic and long-term monitoring of approximately two billion stars.
The OCVS covers a wide range of astrophysical environments, including the densest stellar fields of the Galactic bulge, the spiral arms and disk of the Milky Way, as well as the extragalactic systems of the Magellanic Clouds (as shown in Figure 2). Each of the major regions—the Galactic bulge (BLG), the Galactic disk (GD), the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), and the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) has its own dedicated set of variable star catalogs, which are systematically expanded over time. For cluster environments, OGLE produced dedicated samples of variables in star clusters of the Magellanic Clouds enabling cluster-by-cluster occurrence and properties studies (see e.g., [59,60,61]).
The collection includes a broad set of variability classes, ranging from pulsating stars to eclipsing and ellipsoidal binaries, rotating and eruptive variables, and other rare and exotic objects. Table 1 summarizes the number of variable stars discovered and published in the OCVS. The collection continues to grow over time, reflecting both the increase in sky coverage and the improved classification techniques. In Figure 3, I show how the cumulative number of variable stars in the OCVS has evolved over the years, with distinctions corresponding to successive OGLE phases.
Over decades of sky surveys, the number of known e.g., classical pulsators in the Magellanic Clouds has increased dramatically—from only a few thousand at the beginning of the twentieth century to nearly complete samples today. Figure 3 in Soszyński [62] clearly illustrates this transformation, showing the steep rise in the cumulative number of classical Cepheids, RR Lyrae stars, type II Cepheids, and anomalous Cepheids following the OGLE era.
A star in the OCVS is classified as variable when its light curve exhibits statistically significant periodic or non-periodic brightness changes that exceed the typical photometric noise level, with the detection thresholds depending primarily on mean magnitude, amplitude, and time-series sampling. For periodic variables, the detection efficiency naturally decreases toward low amplitudes and very long periods, while crowding and sky position affect the achievable photometric precision, and thus the sensitivity to low-amplitude variability.
The entire collection is publicly available and can be accessed via the OGLE website or directly through the catalog repository:
  • The catalog data include observational parameters of the variable stars, such as coordinates, periods, mean magnitudes, brightness amplitudes, color indices, cross-matches with external catalogs, etc. Additionally, time-series OGLE photometry in the I- and V-bands is made available to the astronomical community. It is worth emphasizing that the OGLE classification pipeline is still semi-automatic, based on a combination of time-series analysis tools, and visual inspection of each light curve by team members. This led to exceptionally high completeness and a low contamination rate.
Due to its scale, homogeneity, rich variability content, and long-term precise light curves, the OCVS has also become a perfect dataset for training machine learning models for variability classification and time series analysis. Its structure, completeness, and diversity of variability types make it an ideal benchmark for testing and validating modern algorithms (e.g., [63,64,65,66,67,68,69]).

4. The OGLE Contributions to Variable Star Research

4.1. Classical Cepheids

Classical Cepheids is one of the most important classes of variable stars in modern astrophysics. Their high luminosities and well-defined PLR make them indispensable standard candles for measuring distances within the Milky Way and to nearby galaxies.
The OGLE project has provided the most complete and homogeneous collection of classical Cepheids in the Milky Way and in the Magellanic Clouds. Most of the classical Cepheids known today in the Magellanic Clouds [70], and approximately half of the currently known Galactic Cepheids [71] have been identified in the OGLE photometric databases. As a result, OGLE has essentially completed the task of cataloging classical Cepheids in the Magellanic System—a work that was originally initiated by Henrietta Leavitt at the beginning of the twentieth century.
The two satellite galaxies—Large and Small Magellanic Cloud—are ideal laboratories for studying classical Cepheids. They are close enough that individual stars are easily resolved with ground-based telescopes, yet distant enough that their stellar populations can be treated as lying at nearly the same distance. The distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud is measured with remarkable precision—about 1% uncertainty [72]. This makes the Large Magellanic Cloud, and by extension the Small Magellanic Cloud, critical anchor points for calibrating the cosmic distance ladder.
The OGLE Cepheid samples have enabled detailed mapping of the three-dimensional structures of both Clouds. OGLE data show that the Large Magellanic Cloud disk is inclined at 24. 2° ± 0. 7°, with a position angle of 151. 4° ± 1. 7°, and exhibits a prominent northern warp [73]. The Small Magellanic Cloud, in contrast, shows a more complex bimodial structure [73]. Moreover, classical Cepheids have been used to trace the Magellanic Bridge—a structure that links the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds [74].
The use of OGLE-based Cepheids has revolutionized our view of the three-dimensional structure of the Milky Way. In a groundbreaking study, the OGLE team utilized a sample of 2400 classical Cepheids complemented with Cepheids from other surveys to construct the most detailed map of the Galactic young stellar disk to date [75]. This study revealed that the Milky Way disk is strongly warped and flared, especially in its outer parts, with a vertical displacement that reaches up to ∼1 kpc from the Galactic plane. The warping of the Milky Way disk is shown in Figure 4. The spatial distribution of these young variables also demonstrated clear spiral-arm structures and asymmetries between the nothern and southern parts of the disk. This study provided a direct stellar-based view of the Galaxy’s morphology, offering constraints on the mechanisms responsible for disk warping. In a recent paper Skowron et al. [76] re-estimated distances to the Milky Way Cepheids using mid-infrared photometry and three-dimensional extinction maps. Their results show high consistency with the Gaia parallaxes, with typical distance uncertainties around 6%.
In addition to classical Cepheids’ role as distance indicators and tracers of the Galactic structure, they have been used to probe the kinematics of the Milky Way. Mróz et al. [77] combined the OGLE photometry with radial velocities and proper motions from Gaia for 773 Cepheids, to measure the rotation of the Galactic disk. The authors measured the rotation velocity as 233.6 ± 2.8 km/s. The rotation curve of the Milky Way is presented in Figure 5.
Among the most notable individual discoveries is OGLE-GD-CEP-1884, the classical Cepheid with the longest known pulsation period in the Milky Way—78.14 days—found in the Galactic disk [80]. This ultra-long-period Cepheid lies ∼4.5 kpc from the Sun and demonstrates that the known population of such rare and massive variables is still incomplete.

4.2. Type II and Anomalous Cepheids

Type II and anomalous Cepheids represent less massive and poorly understood counterparts of classical Cepheid pulsators. Although they also follow PLRs (see Figure 6 with Period-Wesenheit index1 relations, their evolutionary origins, pulsation periods, and population characteristics are different. Thanks to the extensive OGLE database, these stars have been discovered and analyzed with unprecedented completeness and detail.
The OGLE project has provided almost complete collections of type II and anomalous Cepheids to date. In the Magellanic Clouds, OGLE has discovered 344 type II Cepheids, divided into: 121 BL Herculis, 123 W Virginis, 34 peculiar W Virginis, 66 RV Tauri stars [82], along with 271 anomalous Cepheids identified as a separate class [83]. The peculiar W Virginis stars—distinguished by their brighter and bluer appearance, as well as light curve shapes—emerged as a newly recognized subclass with distinct spatial and evolutionary properties [84]. In the Milky Way, the OGLE survey contributed to the census of pulsating stars by discovering 1641 type II Cepheids and 119 anomalous Cepheids—the first anomalous Cepheids found in this region [85].
Figure 6. Period-Wesenheit index relations for different groups of classical pulsators in the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds, including relations for type II and anomalous Cepheids. For more information see Iwanek et al. [86].
Figure 6. Period-Wesenheit index relations for different groups of classical pulsators in the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds, including relations for type II and anomalous Cepheids. For more information see Iwanek et al. [86].
Universe 11 00304 g006
Particularly noteworthy is the first-ever detection of type II Cepheids pulsating exclusively in the first overtone mode [87], as well as a triple-mode anomalous Cepheid [88].
Beyond individual discoveries, OGLE data have enabled population-scale analyses. Using three-dimensional spatial distributions of classical, type II, and anomalous Cepheids, as well as the RR Lyrae star in the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds, Iwanek et al. [86] demonstrated that BL Her stars share the old stellar halo with the RR Lyrae variables, while W Virginis stars show characteristics of both old and intermediate age populations, potentially indicating a mixed evolutionary origin. The anomalous Cepheids were found to differ significantly from classical Cepheids in spatial distribution, yet show partial overlap with RR Lyrae stars—supporting the binary coalescence scenario as a viable evolutionary channel. The comparison of spatial distributions of RR Lyrae stars and anomalous Cepheids is shown in Figure 7.

4.3. Miras

Mira variables are long-period, large-amplitude pulsating Asymptotic Giant Branch stars, representing an evolved phase of low- and intermediate-mass stellar evolution. Due to their high luminosities and well-defined PLRs, Miras serve as excellent tracers of old- and intermediate-age stellar populations and can act as valuable distance indicators across a wide range of wavelengths.
The OGLE project has provided the most complete sample of Mira variables in Milky Way and Magellanic System. This enabled a series of detailed studies exploring their physical, photometric, and spatial properties. Iwanek et al. [89] based on Miras from Large Magellanic Cloud, derived precise mid-infrared PLRs. The authors based their findings on the Spitzer and Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) observations. Seperate calibrations for oxygen-rich (O-rich) and carbon-rich (C-rich) Miras yielded distances with an accuracy of 5–12%, confirming that Miras are reliable standard candles in the mid-infrared domain.
In a subsequent paper, the authors examined multiwavelength variability from the optical to the mid-infrared, highlighting how pulsation amplitudes systematically decrease with increasing wavelength, while phase lags increase [90]. These effects are especially prominent for C-rich Miras, many of which exhibit dust ejections. The study also introduced synthetic PLRs for 42 photometric bands, enabling applications for distance estimation in a wide range of surveys, such as OGLE, the VISTA Near-Infrared YJKs Survey of the Magellanic Clouds System, Legacy Survey of Space and Time, Gaia, Spitzer, WISE, the James Webb Space Telescope, the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope (formerly WFIRST), and the Hubble Space Telescope.
In 2022, Iwanek et al. [91] published the most complete catalog of Mira-type stars in the Milky Way. This work significantly expanded the OCVS by discovering over 60,000 Miras toward the Galactic bulge and in the Galactic disk. This study provided pulsation periods, mean magnitudes, and amplitudes, based on more than two decades of OGLE photometric monitoring. The authors estimate that the completeness of the catalog is at the level of 96%. A set of Mira-type variables from the OCVS is presented in Figure 8.
Based on Miras discovered in the Milky Way, Iwanek et al. [92] constructed a detailed three-dimensional map of our Galaxy. The authors analyze the spatial distribution of Mira variables using a model containing three barred components that include the X-shaped boxy component in the Galactic center, and an axisymmetric disk [93]. In the analysis, they took into account distance uncertainties by implementing the Bayesian hierarchical inference method. As a result, the distance to the Galactic center was measured (R0 = 7.66 ± 0.01(stat.) ± 0.39(sys.) kpc), as well as the inclination of the major axis of the bulge to the Sun-Galactic center line of sight (θ = 20. 2° ± 0. 6°(stat.) ± 0. 7°(sys.)), what is consistent with other studies, e.g., based on the RR Lyrae stars sample [94]. Finally, the authors showed independent evidence for the X-shaped bulge component. In Figure 9, the Milky Way map in three Cartesian projections composed of young (classical Cepheids) and intermediate-age (Mira-type stars) stellar populations is shown.

4.4. Blue Large-Amplitude Pulsators

Thanks to its vast sky coverage and continuous, long-term monitoring of approximately two billion stars, the OGLE project serves not only as a powerful database for studying a well-known type of stellar variability, but also as a rich source of new and previously unrecognized variable star classes. OGLE has become a true discovery mine, particularly effective in revealing rare and exotic phenomena. One striking example of this is the identification of Blue Large-Amplitude Pulsators (BLAPs).
BLAPs constitute a recently discovered class of variable stars characterized by short pulsation periods—typically from several to several dozen minutes—and large optical amplitudes (≳0.2 mag in the I-band, [95]). Their phased light curves exhibit a distinctive sawtooth shape, which is shown in Figure 10. BLAPs are significantly bluer than main-sequence stars observed in the same fields, indicating that they are hot objects, with a spectroscopic follow-up confirming effective temperatures around 30,000 K.
The first BLAPs identified by the OGLE have periods in the 20–40 min range, but subsequent targeted searches in the OGLE-IV data expaded the known range from 7.5 to over 75 min [96]. In the Galactic disk, 25 BLAPs were found—20 of them newly discovered [97]. A separate search in the outer Galactic bulge fields revealed 33 additional BLAPs [98]. These discoveries significantly increased the number of known stars of this type to more than 100.
The long-term photometric stability of BLAPs, together with observed temperatures and color variations over their pulsation cycles, confirms their pulsation nature. According to pulsation theory, such large-amplitude oscillations over short timescales are expected in evolved, low-mass stars with helium-rich envelopes. However, the evolutionary path leading to such configurations remains unclear, making BLAPs a key challenge for future stellar evolution models.

4.5. Long Secondary Periods Variables

One of the most puzzling forms of stellar variability observed in evolved stars is the phenomenon of Long Secondary Periods (LSPs). These brightness variations, occurring in roughly one-third of pulsating red giants of the upper Red Giant Branch and Asymptotic Giant Branch, remain the only major type of large-amplitude stellar variability without a fully established explanation.
The OGLE projects has provided an unparalleled dataset for exploring the LSPs mystery. Over 16,000 well-defined LSP stars have been identified in the OGLE dataset, revealing common light curve characteristics and enabling in-depth statistical and phenomenological studies [99]. A gallery of examples of LSP light curves is presented in Figure 11.
Multiple evidences now strongly support a binary scenario as the physical origin of LSPs. In this model, the red giant is orbited by a low-mass companion—possibly a former planet that has accreted mass and evolved into a brown dwarf. The companion is accompanied by a dusty cloud, which obscures the giant one per orbital cycle, causing the observed long-period photometric variations. In many cases, additional light curve features, such as double-humped modulations resembling ellipsoidal or eclipsing variability, have been detected and share the same periodicity as the LSPs, further supporting the binary interpretation.
A particular argument comes from the mid-infrared data from the WISE, where roughly half of a carefully selected sample of OGLE LSPs show secondary eclipses—visible only in the infrared—consistent with the obscuring cloud being eclipsed by the red giant [100].
The puzzle of LSPs has attracted the attention of the broader stellar astrophysics community, culminating in a dedicated European Research Council (ERC) grant: LSP-MIST (101040160), led by Dorota Skowron. This project focuses on disentangling the mechanisms behind LSP variability, using OGLE data together with multiwavelength and spectroscopic observations to shed light on the physical processes potentially driving this phenomenon and their role in late-stage stellar evolution. The project also aims to combine the observational evidence with theoretical modeling to directly confront the data with stellar evolution theory.

4.6. Millinovae

A recent breakthrough from OGLE’s monitoring of the Magellanic Clouds is the discovery of a new class of eruptive variables: millinovae [101]. These objects bridge the observational gap between classical novae and other accreting binary systems involving white dwarfs, and challenge the current understanding of X-ray emission from white dwarf binaries.
These objects show long-duration, symmetric optical outbursts about 1000 times fainter than classical novae, and exhibit transient supersoft X-ray emission. Unlike classical novae, no signs of mass ejection are detected during their eruptions. This challenges traditional models, where supersoft X-rays are linked to either novae explosions or steady nuclear burning in high-accretion binaries. The first such case, ASASSN-16oh [102], raised questions about its nature—OGLE has now identified 29 similar systems, suggesting a new class of accreting white-dwarf binaries.

4.7. Supernovae

Although OGLE was designed primarily for microlensing, it has also become an efficient finder of extragalactic transients. The OGLE-IV Transient Detection System has operated in near real time in the wide area around the Magellanic Clouds, detecting supernovae and other transients by difference imaging analysis (DIA, [103,104]) on the standard OGLE frames [105]. A two-year analysis of the Magellanic Bridge (∼65 deg2) yielded 130 transients, including 126 supernovae, with a quantified detection efficiency (≈100% at peak I < 18.8 mag and ≈50% at peak I ≈ 19.7 mag) [106]. OGLE discoveries also include individual well-studied supernovae, e.g., OGLE-2013-SN-079 at z = 0.07, interpreted as consistent with a helium-shell detonation [107]. Furthermore, a dedicated study of 11 type II supernovae discovered by OGLE-IV showed that magnitude-limited surveys can preferentially find brighter, often more rapidly evolving type II supernovae [108].

4.8. Rotating Variables

Stellar rotation plays a crucial role in shaping stellar structure and evolution, particularly through its influence on magnetic activity. One of the most prominent manifestations of this activity is rotational modulation caused by starspots—cool or chemically peculiar regions on the stellar surface—and occasional flares.
In the direction of the Galactic bulge, OGLE has identified and characterized over 18,000 rotating variable stars, including both dwarfs and giants [109]. These objects exhibit periodic or quasi-periodic light variations due to the rotation of spotted surfaces, with amplitudes and periodicities strongly dependent on stellar type and magnetic activity level. Three examples of such variable stars are presented in Figure 12.
A particular detailed analysis of a subset of 12,660 spotted variables revealed well-defined correlations between brightness, amplitude, and rotation period, especially among giant stars. Giants show the highest variability amplitudes—up to 0.8 mag in the I-band, while rapidly rotating dwarfs (P ≤ 2 days) tend to have much lower amplitudes (<0.2 mag). A novel dereddening method, tailored for the complex and non-uniform extinction toward the bulge, allowed accurate placement of these stars in the color-magnitude diagram and enabled their classification: 11,812 stars were classified as giants, and 848 as dwarfs [110].
The collection of rotational variables identified by OGLE, with time-series photometry spanning more than two decades in the I- and V-band, represents one of the most complete samples investigating stellar magnetic activity and its long-term evolution. This opens the door to studying activity cycles, dynamo processes, and the relation between stellar structure and rotation in a wide range of stellar populations.

4.9. Exoplanets

The OGLE project has played a pioneering role in the detection of exoplanets, contributing fundamentally to the development and first successful application of both gravitational microlensing and transit methods.
The idea that binary stars and planetary systems could be detected through the microlensing phenomena, proposed by Mao and Paczyński et al. [111] and Gould and Loeb et al. [112], became reality thanks to OGLE’s monitoring—starting with the first-ever observed binary microlensing event in 1994 [113]. This breakthrough came with the detection of the first microlensing event with a definitive planet detection, in collaboration with the MOA project [114]. Since then, OGLE has participated in the discovery of hundreds of microlensing planets [115,116].
OGLE also made key contributions to the discovery of free-floating planet—planetary-mass objects not bound to any star [117]. These are identified through extremely short microlensing events, lasting less than a few days. An example is OGLE-2019-BLG-0551, a microlensing event characterized by an exceptionally short Einstein timescale of 0.381 ± 0.017 days, which strongly suggests a planetary-mass lens and makes it a compelling candidate for free-floating planets [118].
In addition to microlensing, OGLE also pioneered the transit method of exoplanet detection. In 2002, OGLE published the first list of planetary transit candidates [119], at a time when only one transiting planet was known, which was detected first spectroscopically, while transit observations were made afterwards. This campaign led to the discovery of OGLE-TR-56b, the first exoplanet found by transient observation and confirmed spectroscopically [120].

5. Summary

During three decades of operations, the OGLE survey has changed our understanding of stellar variability and time-domain astrophysics. With its exceptional cadence, coverage, and longevity, OGLE has enabled the discovery and precise characterization of more than a million variable stars in Milky Way and Magellanic Clouds. It has revealed a new classes of variables, deepened our insight into stellar structure and evolution, and opened new frontiers in exoplanet detection—including the discovery of free-floating planets. OGLE’s legacy demonstrates the power of systematic, long-term sky monitoring and continues to provide an irreplaceable foundation for present and future research in astronomy.

Funding

This research was supported by the European Union (ERC, LSP-MIST, 101040160). Views and opinions expressed are, however, those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Council. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

Data Availability Statement

The entire OGLE Collection of Variable Stars (OCVS) can be accessed via the OGLE website https://ogle.astrouw.edu.pl (accessed on 11 July 2025) or through the catalog repository: https://www.astrouw.edu.pl/ogle/ogle4/OCVS (accessed on 11 July 2025).

Acknowledgments

I thank the anonymous referees for constructive and valuable feedback that improved this manuscript. I also thank Andrzej Udalski, Igor Soszyński, Paweł Pietrukowicz, and Przemek Mróz for their comments on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Note

1
The Wesenheit index is an extinction-free quantity, defined as WI = I − 1.55(VI), where I and V are apparent mean magnitudes of the stars (see e.g., Soszyński et al. [81]).

References

  1. Rauer, H.; Aerts, C.; Cabrera, J.; Deleuil, M.; Erikson, A.; Gizon, L.; Goupil, M.; Heras, A.; Walloschek, T.; Lorenzo-Alvarez, J.; et al. The PLATO mission. Exp. Astron. 2025, 59, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jetsu, L.; Porceddu, S.; Lyytinen, J.; Kajatkari, P.; Lehtinen, J.; Markkanen, T.; Toivari-Viitala, J. Did the Ancient Egyptians Record the Period of the Eclipsing Binary Algol—The Raging One? Astrophys. J. 2013, 773, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hevelius, J. Historiola Mirae Stellae. In Mercurius in Sole visus Gedani; Simon Reiniger: Gdańsk, Poland, 1662; pp. 146–171. [Google Scholar]
  4. Neuhäuser, R.; Neuhäuser, D.L.; Mugrauer, M.; Luge, D.; Chapman, J. The Mira discovery problem—Observations by David Fabricius in 1596 and 1609 (and by others before?): Positional accuracy, brightness, color index, and period. Astron. Nachr. 2024, 345, e20230131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hoskin, M. Goodricke, Pigott and the Quest for Variable Stars. J. Hist. Astron. 1979, 10, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bono, G.; Braga, V.F.; Pietrinferni, A. Cepheids as distance indicators and stellar tracers. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 2024, 32, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Leavitt, H.S. 1777 variables in the Magellanic Clouds. Ann. Harvard Coll. Obs. 1907, 60, 87–108.3. [Google Scholar]
  8. Leavitt, H.S.; Pickering, E.C. Periods of 25 Variable Stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud. Harv. Coll. Obs. Circ. 1912, 173, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hertzsprung, E. Zur Stralung Der Strerne. WisZP 1907, 5, 86–107. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shapley, H. Studies based on the colors and magnitudes in stellar clusters. VI. On the determination of the distances of globular clusters. Astrophys. J. 1918, 48, 89–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fernie, J.D. The Period-Luminosity Relation: A Historical Review. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 1969, 81, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hubble, E. A Relation between Distance and Radial Velocity among Extra-Galactic Nebulae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1929, 15, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Breuval, L.; Huang, C.D.; Riess, A.G. The Legacy of Henrietta Leavitt: A Re-analysis of the First Cepheid Period–Luminosity Relation. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 2025, 137, 044001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Freedman, W.L.; Madore, B.F.; Gibson, B.K.; Ferrarese, L.; Kelson, D.D.; Sakai, S.; Mould, J.R.; Kennicutt, R.C.J.; Ford, H.C.; Graham, J.A.; et al. Final Results from the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project to Measure the Hubble Constant. Astrophys. J. 2001, 553, 47–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Riess, A.G.; Yuan, W.; Macri, L.M.; Scolnic, D.; Brout, D.; Casertano, S.; Jones, D.O.; Murakami, Y.; Anand, G.S.; Breuval, L.; et al. A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s-1 Mpc-1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2022, 934, L7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. van Gent, H. Provisional ephemerides of 63 new and 3 known variable stars in or near the constellation Corona Australis (Errata: 6 V). Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 1932, 6, 163. [Google Scholar]
  17. van Gent, H. Discussion of 122, mostly new, variable stars in or near the constellation Corona Australis. Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 1933, 7, 21. [Google Scholar]
  18. Campbell, W.W.; Wright, W.H. A list of nine stars whose velocities in the line of sight are variable. Astrophys. J. 1900, 12, 254–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Eggen, O.J. ρ Puppis: A New Short-Period Variable Star. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 1956, 68, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. FROST, E.B. The period of beta Cephei. Astrophys. J. 1906, 24, 259–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lesh, J.R.; Aizenman, M.L. The observational status of the beta Cephei stars. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1978, 16, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Moskalik, P.; Dziembowski, W.A. New opacities and the origin of the β Cephei pulsation. Astron. Astrophys. 1992, 256, L5–L8. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sterken, C.; Jerzykiewicz, M. Beta Cephei stars from a photometric point of view. Space Sci. Rev. 1993, 62, 95–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Landolt, A.U. A New Short-Period Blue Variable. Astrophys. J. 1968, 153, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. McGraw, J.T. The physical properties of the ZZ Ceti stars and their pulsations. Astrophys. J. 1979, 229, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kopal, Z. Close Binary Systems; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1959. [Google Scholar]
  27. Abt, H.A.; Golson, J.C. Colors and Variability of Magnetic Stars. Astrophys. J. 1962, 136, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Peterson, D.M. The Photometric Variability of AP Stars. Astrophys. J. 1970, 161, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Preston, G.W. The chemically peculiar stars of the upper main sequence. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 1974, 12, 257–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hensberge, H.; Maitzen, H.M.; Deridder, G.; Gerbaldi, M.; Delmas, F.; Renson, P.; Doom, C.; Weiss, W.W.; Morguleff, N. A photoelectric investigation of light variability in AP stars. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 1981, 46, 151–170. [Google Scholar]
  31. Vogt, N. Photometric study of the dwarf nova VW Hydri. Astron. Astrophys. 1974, 36, 369–378. [Google Scholar]
  32. Warner, B. Observations of rapid blue variables-XV. VW Hydri. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1975, 170, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  33. Udalski, A. Photometry of cataclysmic variables. II. TT Arietis. Acta Astron. 1988, 38, 315–327. [Google Scholar][Green Version]
  34. Udalski, A.; Szymański, M. Photometry of cataclysmic variables. I. The 1987 September superoutburst of the dwarf nova AY Lyrae. Acta Astron. 1988, 38, 215–223. [Google Scholar][Green Version]
  35. Udalski, A.; Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A. Photometry of cataclysmic variables. IV. Nova V603 Aquilae: Discovery of a magnetic rotator. Acta Astron. 1989, 39, 125–138. [Google Scholar][Green Version]
  36. Udalski, A. SU Ursae Majoris: The Perfect Prototype of SU UMa Subclass of Dwarf Novae. Astron. J. 1990, 100, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Udalski, A.; Kałużny, J. CCD Photometry of the X-ray Nova V404 Cygni after the 1989 Outburst. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 1991, 103, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Warner, B. Systematics of Surperoutbursts in Dwarf Novae. Astrophys. Space Sci. 1995, 226, 187–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Warner, B. Cataclysmic Variable Stars; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995; Volume 28. [Google Scholar]
  40. Appenzeller, I.; Mundt, R. T Tauri stars. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 1989, 1, 291–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.; Kałużny, J.; Kubiak, M.; Mateo, M. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Acta Astron. 1992, 42, 253–284. [Google Scholar]
  42. Aubourg, E.; Bareyre, P.; Bréhin, S.; Gros, M.; Lachièze-Rey, M.; Laurent, B.; Lesquoy, E.; Magneville, C.; Milsztajn, A.; Moscoso, L.; et al. Evidence for gravitational microlensing by dark objects in the Galactic halo. Nature 1993, 365, 623–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alcock, C.; Akerlof, C.W.; Allsman, R.A.; Axelrod, T.S.; Bennett, D.P.; Chan, S.; Cook, K.H.; Freeman, K.C.; Griest, K.; Marshall, S.L.; et al. Possible gravitational microlensing of a star in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Nature 1993, 365, 621–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Udalski, A.; Kubiak, M.; Szymański, M.; Kałużny, J.; Mateo, M.; Krzemiński, W. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. The Catalog of Periodic Variable Stars in the Galactic Bulge. I. Periodic Variables in the Center of the Baade’s Window. Acta Astron. 1994, 44, 317–386. [Google Scholar]
  45. Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.; Kałużny, J.; Kubiak, M.; Mateo, M.; Krzemiński, W. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. The Catalog of Periodic Variable Stars in the Galactic Bulge. II. Periodic Variables in Four Baade’s Window Fields: BW1, BW2, BW3 and BW4. Acta Astron. 1995, 45, 1–235. [Google Scholar]
  46. Udalski, A.; Olech, A.; Szymański, M.; Kałużny, J.; Kubiak, M.; Mateo, M.; Krzemiński, W. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. The Catalog of Periodic Variable Stars in the Galactic Bulge. III. Periodic Variables in Four Baades Window Fields: BW5, BW6, BW7 and BW8. Acta Astron. 1995, 45, 433–622. [Google Scholar]
  47. Udalski, A.; Olech, A.; Szymański, M.; Kałużny, J.; Kubiak, M.; Krzemiński, W.; Mateo, M.; Stanek, K.Z. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. The Catalog of Periodic Variable Stars in the Galactic Bulge. IV. Periodic Variables in Three Baade’s Window Fields: BW9, BW10, BW11. Acta Astron. 1996, 46, 51–231. [Google Scholar]
  48. Udalski, A.; Olech, A.; Szymański, M.; Kałużny, J.; Kubiak, M.; Mateo, M.; Krzemiński, W.; Stanek, K.Z. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. The Catalog of Periodic Variable Stars in the Galactic Bulge. V. Periodic Variables in Fields: MM5-A, MM5-B, MM7-A and MM7-B. Acta Astron. 1997, 47, 1–167. [Google Scholar]
  49. Alcock, C.; Allsman, R.A.; Alves, D.; Axelrod, T.S.; Becker, A.C.; Bennett, D.P.; Cook, K.H.; Freeman, K.C.; Griest, K.; Lacy, C.H.S.; et al. The MACHO Project LMC Variable Star Inventory.V.Classification and Orbits of 611 Eclipsing Binary Stars. Astron. J. 1997, 114, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Alcock, C.; Allsman, R.A.; Alves, D.; Axelrod, T.S.; Becker, A.C.; Bennett, D.P.; Cook, K.H.; Freeman, K.C.; Griest, K.; Guern, J.; et al. The MACHO Project Large Magellanic Cloud Variable Star Inventory. III. Multimode RR Lyrae Stars, Distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud, and Age of the Oldest Stars. Astrophys. J. 1997, 482, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Beaulieu, J.P.; Grison, P.; Tobin, W.; Pritchard, J.D.; Ferlet, R.; Lepeintre, F.; Vidal-Madjar, A.; Maurice, E.; Prevot, L.; Gry, C. et al. EROS variable stars: Fundamental-mode and first-overtone Cepheids in the bar of the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 1995, 303, 137. [Google Scholar]
  52. de Laverny, P.; Beaulieu, J.P.; Asplund, M.; Kilkenny, D.; Renault, C.; Ferlet, R.; Marquette, J.B.; Vidal-Madjar, A.; Maurice, E.; Prevot, L.; et al. EROS variable stars: Discovery of a slow nova in the SMC. Astron. Astrophys. 1998, 335, L93–L96. [Google Scholar]
  53. Paczyński, B. Gravitational Microlensing by the Galactic Halo. Astrophys. J. 1986, 304, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.; Kałużny, J.; Kubiak, M.; Krzemiński, W.; Mateo, M.; Preston, G.W.; Paczyński, B. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Discovery of the First Candidate Microlensing Event in the Direction of the Galactic Bulge. Acta Astron. 1993, 43, 289–294. [Google Scholar]
  55. Udalski, A.; Kubiak, M.; Szymański, M. Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. OGLE-2—The Second Phase of the OGLE Project. Acta Astron. 1997, 47, 319–344. [Google Scholar]
  56. Udalski, A. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Real Time Data Analysis Systems in the OGLE-III Survey. Acta Astron. 2003, 53, 291–305. [Google Scholar]
  57. Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Soszyński, I.; Poleski, R. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Final Reductions of the OGLE-III Data. Acta Astron. 2008, 58, 69–87. [Google Scholar]
  58. Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Szymański, G. OGLE-IV: Fourth Phase of the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Acta Astron. 2015, 65, 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pietrzyński, G.; Kubiak, M.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. A CCD Search for Variable Stars in Open Clusters - NGC5999. Acta Astron. 1998, 48, 489–508. [Google Scholar]
  60. Pietrzyński, G.; Udalski, A. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Variable Stars in Star Clusters of the Magellanic Clouds. I.Eclipsing Systems in the Clusters of the SMC. Acta Astron. 1999, 49, 149–155. [Google Scholar]
  61. Pietrzyński, G.; Udalski, A. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Cepheids in Star Clusters from the Magellanic Clouds. Acta Astron. 1999, 49, 543–550. [Google Scholar]
  62. Soszyński, I. Classical Pulsators in Large-Scale Optical Photometric Surveys. In Proceedings of the The RR Lyrae 2017 Conference. Revival of the Classical Pulsators: From Galactic Structure to Stellar Interior Diagnostics, Niepołomice, Poland, 17–21 September 2017; Volume 6, pp. 29–36. [Google Scholar]
  63. Richards, J.W.; Starr, D.L.; Brink, H.; Miller, A.A.; Bloom, J.S.; Butler, N.R.; James, J.B.; Long, J.P.; Rice, J. Active Learning to Overcome Sample Selection Bias: Application to Photometric Variable Star Classification. Astrophys. J. 2022, 744, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Aguirre, C.; Pichara, K.; Becker, I. Deep multi-survey classification of variable stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2019, 482, 5078–5092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Godines, D.; Bachelet, E.; Narayan, G.; Street, R.A. A machine learning classifier for microlensing in wide-field surveys. Astron. Comput. 2019, 28, 100298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Becker, I.; Pichara, K.; Catelan, M.; Protopapas, P.; Aguirre, C.; Nikzat, F. Scalable end-to-end recurrent neural network for variable star classification. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 493, 2981–2995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mróz, P. Identifying Microlensing Events Using Neural Networks. Acta Astron. 2020, 70, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Monsalves, N.; Jaque Arancibia, M.; Bayo, A.; Sánchez-Sáez, P.; Angeloni, R.; Damke, G.; Segura Van de Perre, J. Application of Convolutional Neural Networks to time domain astrophysics. 2D image analysis of OGLE light curves. Astron. Astrophys. 2024, 691, A106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Li, M.Y.; Qian, S.B.; Zhu, L.Y.; Liao, W.P.; Chang, L.F.; Zhao, E.G.; Shi, X.D.; Li, F.X.; Sun, Q.B.; Li, P. Heartbeat Stars Recognition Based on Recurrent Neural Networks: Method and Validation. Astron. J. 2025, 170, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Soszyński, I.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Wyrzykowski, Ł.; Ulaczyk, K.; Poleski, R.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Kozłowski, S.; Skowron, D.M.; Skowron, J.; et al. Concluding Henrietta Leavitt’s Work on Classical Cepheids in the Magellanic System and Other Updates of the OGLE Collection of Variable Stars. Acta Astron. 2017, 67, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pietrukowicz, P.; Soszyński, I.; Udalski, A. Classical Cepheids in the Milky Way. Acta Astron. 2021, 71, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pietrzyński, G.; Graczyk, D.; Gallenne, A.; Gieren, W.; Thompson, I.B.; Pilecki, B.; Karczmarek, P.; Górski, M.; Suchomska, K.; Taormina, M.; et al. A distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud that is precise to one per cent. Nature 2019, 567, 200–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jacyszyn-Dobrzeniecka, A.M.; Skowron, D.M.; Mróz, P.; Skowron, J.; Soszyński, I.; Udalski, A.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Kozłowski, S.; Wyrzykowski, Ł.; Poleski, R.; et al. OGLE-ing the Magellanic System: Three-Dimensional Structure of the Clouds and the Bridge Using Classical Cepheids. Acta Astron. 2016, 66, 149–196. [Google Scholar]
  74. Jacyszyn-Dobrzeniecka, A.M.; Soszyński, I.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Skowron, D.M.; Skowron, J.; Mróz, P.; Kruszyńska, K.; Iwanek, P.; Pietrukowicz, P.; et al. OGLE-ing the Magellanic System: Cepheids in the Bridge. Astrophys. J. 2020, 889, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Skowron, D.M.; Skowron, J.; Mróz, P.; Udalski, A.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Soszyński, I.; Szymański, M.K.; Poleski, R.; Kozłowski, S.; Ulaczyk, K.; et al. A three-dimensional map of the Milky Way using classical Cepheid variable stars. Science 2019, 365, 478–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Skowron, D.M.; Drimmel, R.; Khanna, S.; Spagna, A.; Poggio, E.; Ramos, P. The Milky Way as Seen by Classical Cepheids. I. Distances Based on Mid-infrared Photometry. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2025, 278, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Mróz, P.; Udalski, A.; Skowron, D.M.; Skowron, J.; Soszyński, I.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Szymański, M.K.; Poleski, R.; Kozłowski, S.; Ulaczyk, K. Rotation Curve of the Milky Way from Classical Cepheids. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2019, 870, L10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sofue, Y.; Honma, M.; Omodaka, T. Unified Rotation Curve of the Galaxy–Decomposition into de Vaucouleurs Bulge, Disk, Dark Halo, and the 9-kpc Rotation Dip–. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 2009, 61, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Reid, M.J.; Menten, K.M.; Brunthaler, A.; Zheng, X.W.; Dame, T.M.; Xu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, B.; Sanna, A.; Sato, M. Trigonometric Parallaxes of High Mass Star Forming Regions: The Structure and Kinematics of the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. 2014, 783, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Soszyński, I.; Skowron, D.M.; Udalski, A.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Gromadzki, M.; Szymański, M.K.; Skowron, J.; Mróz, P.; Poleski, R.; Kozłowski, S.; et al. Discovery of the Longest-period Classical Cepheid in the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2024, 965, L17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Soszyński, I.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Kubiak, M.; Pietrzyński, G.; Wyrzykowski, Ł.; Ulaczyk, K.; Poleski, R.; Kozłowski, S.; Pietrukowicz, P. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. The OGLE-III Catalog of Variable Stars. XIII. Long-Period Variables in the Small Magellanic Cloud. Acta Astron. 2011, 61, 217–230. [Google Scholar]
  82. Soszyński, I.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Wyrzykowski, Ł.; Ulaczyk, K.; Poleski, R.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Kozłowski, S.; Skowron, D.; Skowron, J.; et al. The OGLE Collection of Variable Stars. Type II Cepheids in the Magellanic System. Acta Astron. 2018, 68, 89–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Soszyński, I.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Pietrzyński, G.; Wyrzykowski, Ł.; Ulaczyk, K.; Poleski, R.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Kozłowski, S.; Skowron, J.; et al. The OGLE Collection of Variable Stars. Anomalous Cepheids in the Magellanic Clouds. Acta Astron. 2015, 65, 233–250. [Google Scholar]
  84. Soszyński, I.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Kubiak, M.; Pietrzyński, G.; Wyrzykowski, Ł.; Szewczyk, O.; Ulaczyk, K.; Poleski, R. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. The OGLE-III Catalog of Variable Stars. II.Type II Cepheids and Anomalous Cepheids in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Acta Astron. 2008, 58, 293. [Google Scholar]
  85. Soszyński, I.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Wyrzykowski, Ł.; Ulaczyk, K.; Poleski, R.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Kozłowski, S.; Skowron, D.M.; Skowron, J.; et al. The OGLE Collection of Variable Stars. Classical, Type II, and Anomalous Cepheids toward the Galactic Center. Acta Astron. 2017, 67, 297–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Iwanek, P.; Soszyński, I.; Skowron, D.; Skowron, J.; Mróz, P.; Kozłowski, S.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Poleski, R.; et al. Three-Dimensional Distributions of Type II Cepheids and Anomalous Cepheids in the Magellanic Clouds. Do these Stars Belong to the Old, Young or Intermediate-Age Population? Acta Astron. 2018, 68, 213–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Soszyński, I.; Smolec, R.; Udalski, A.; Pietrukowicz, P. Type II Cepheids Pulsating in the First Overtone from the OGLE Survey. Astrophys. J. 2019, 873, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Soszyński, I.; Smolec, R.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Skowron, D.M.; Skowron, J.; Mróz, P.; Poleski, R.; Kozłowski, S.; et al. OGLE-GAL-ACEP-091: The First Known Multi-mode Anomalous Cepheid. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2020, 901, L25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Iwanek, P.; Soszyński, I.; Kozłowski, S. Mid-infrared Period-Luminosity Relations for Miras in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astrophys. J. 2021, 919, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Iwanek, P.; Kozłowski, S.; Gromadzki, M.; Soszyński, I.; Wrona, M.; Skowron, J.; Ratajczak, M.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Pietrukowicz, P.; et al. Multiwavelength Properties of Miras. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2021, 257, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Iwanek, P.; Soszyński, I.; Kozłowski, S.; Poleski, R.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Skowron, J.; Wrona, M.; Mróz, P.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; et al. The OGLE Collection of Variable Stars: Nearly 66,000 Mira Stars in the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2022, 260, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Iwanek, P.; Poleski, R.; Kozłowski, S.; Soszyński, I.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Ban, M.; Skowron, J.; Mróz, P.; Wrona, M.; Udalski, A.; et al. A Three-dimensional Map of the Milky Way Using 66,000 Mira Variable Stars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2023, 264, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sormani, M.C.; Gerhard, O.; Portail, M.; Vasiliev, E.; Clarke, J. The stellar mass distribution of the Milky Way’s bar: An analytical model. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 514, L1–L5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Pietrukowicz, P.; Kozłowski, S.; Skowron, J.; Soszyński, I.; Udalski, A.; Poleski, R.; Wyrzykowski, Ł.; Szymański, M.K.; Pietrzyński, G.; Ulaczyk, K.; et al. Deciphering the 3D Structure of the Old Galactic Bulge from the OGLE RR Lyrae Stars. Astrophys. J. 2015, 811, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Pietrukowicz, P.; Dziembowski, W.A.; Latour, M.; Angeloni, R.; Poleski, R.; di Mille, F.; Soszyński, I.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Wyrzykowski, Ł.; et al. Blue large-amplitude pulsators as a new class of variable stars. Nat. Astron. 2017, 1, 0166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Pietrukowicz, P.; Latour, M.; Soszyński, I.; Di Mille, F.; King, P.S.; Angeloni, R.; Poleski, R.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Ulaczyk, K.; et al. Observational Parameters of Blue Large-amplitude Pulsators. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 2025, 279, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Borowicz, J.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Mróz, P.; Soszyński, I.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Ulaczyk, K.; Poleski, R.; Kozłowski, S.; Skowron, J.; et al. Blue Large-Amplitude Pulsators and Other Short-Period Variable Stars in the OGLE-IV Galactic Disk Fields. Acta Astron. 2023, 73, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Borowicz, J.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Skowron, J.; Soszyński, I.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Ulaczyk, K.; Poleski, R.; Kozłowski, S.; Mróz, P.; et al. Blue Large-Amplitude Pulsators and Other Short-Period Variable Stars in OGLE-IV Fields of the Outer Galactic Bulge. Acta Astron. 2023, 73, 265–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Soszyński, I.; Udalski, A. The Light Curve Shapes as a Key to Resolving the Origin of Long Secondary Periods in Red Giant Stars. Astrophys. J. 2014, 788, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Soszyński, I.; Olechowska, A.; Ratajczak, M.; Iwanek, P.; Skowron, D.M.; Mróz, P.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Skowron, J.; et al. Binarity as the Origin of Long Secondary Periods in Red Giant Stars. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021, 911, L22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mróz, P.; Król, K.; Szegedi, H.; Charles, P.; Page, K.L.; Udalski, A.; Buckley, D.A.H.; Dewangan, G.; Meintjes, P.; Szymański, M.K.; et al. Millinovae: A New Class of Transient Supersoft X-Ray Sources without a Classical Nova Eruption. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2024, 977, L37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Maccarone, T.J.; Nelson, T.J.; Brown, P.J.; Mukai, K.; Charles, P.A.; Rajoelimanana, A.; Buckley, D.A.H.; Strader, J.; Chomiuk, L.; Britt, C.T.; et al. Unconventional origin of supersoft X-ray emission from a white dwarf binary. Nat. Astron. 2019, 3, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Alard, C.; Lupton, R.H. A Method for Optimal Image Subtraction. Astrophys. J. 1998, 503, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Woźniak, P.R. Difference Image Analysis of the OGLE-II Bulge Data. I. The Method. Acta Astron. 2000, 50, 421–450. [Google Scholar]
  105. Wyrzykowski, Ł.; Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.; Kozłowski, S.; Udalski, A.; Poleski, R.; Skowron, J.; Blagorodnova, N.; Kubiak, M.; Szymański, M.K.; Pietrzyński, G.; et al. OGLE-IV Real-Time Transient Search. Acta Astron. 2014, 64, 197–232. [Google Scholar]
  106. Kozłowski, S.; Udalski, A.; Wyrzykowski, Ł.; Poleski, R.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Skowron, J.; Szymański, M.K.; Kubiak, M.; Pietrzyński, G.; Soszyński, I.; et al. Supernovae and Other Transients in the OGLE-IV Magellanic Bridge Data. Acta Astron. 2013, 63, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  107. Inserra, C.; Sim, S.A.; Wyrzykowski, L.; Smartt, S.J.; Fraser, M.; Nicholl, M.; Shen, K.J.; Jerkstrand, A.; Gal-Yam, A.; Howell, D.A.; et al. OGLE-2013-SN-079: A Lonely Supernova Consistent with a Helium Shell Detonation. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2015, 799, L2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Poznanski, D.; Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z.; Wyrzykowski, L.; Blagorodnova, N. Bright but slow—Type II supernovae from OGLE-IV—implications for magnitude-limited surveys. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, 449, 1753–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Iwanek, P.; Soszyński, I.; Stępień, K.; Kozłowski, S.; Skowron, J.; Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Wrona, M.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Poleski, R.; et al. The OGLE Collection of Variable Stars: Over 18 000 Rotating Variables toward the Galactic Bulge. Acta Astron. 2024, 74, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Iwanek, P.; Soszyński, I.; Skowron, J.; Udalski, A.; Stępień, K.; Kozłowski, S.; Mróz, P.; Poleski, R.; Skowron, D.; Szymański, M.K.; et al. 12,660 Spotted Stars toward the OGLE Galactic Bulge Fields. Astrophys. J. 2019, 879, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mao, S.; Paczyński, B. Gravitational Microlensing by Double Stars and Planetary Systems. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1991, 374, L37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Gould, A.; Loeb, A. Discovering Planetary Systems through Gravitational Microlenses. Astrophys. J. 1992, 396, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Udalski, A.; Szymański, M.; Mao, S.; Di Stefano, R.; Kałużny, J.; Kubiak, M.; Mateo, M.; Krzemiński, W. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment: OGLE No. 7: Binary Microlens or a New Unusual Variable? Astrophys. J. Lett. 1994, 436, L103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Bond, I.A.; Udalski, A.; Jaroszyński, M.; Rattenbury, N.J.; Paczyński, B.; Soszyński, I.; Wyrzykowski, L.; Szymański, M.K.; Kubiak, M.; Szewczyk, O.; et al. OGLE 2003-BLG-235/MOA 2003-BLG-53: A Planetary Microlensing Event. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2004, 606, L155–L158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Cassan, A.; Kubas, D.; Beaulieu, J.P.; Dominik, M.; Horne, K.; Greenhill, J.; Wambsganss, J.; Menzies, J.; Williams, A.; Jørgensen, U.G.; et al. One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observations. Nature 2012, 481, 167–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zang, W.; Jung, Y.K.; Yee, J.C.; Hwang, K.H.; Yang, H.; Udalski, A.; Sumi, T.; Gould, A.; Mao, S.; Albrow, M.D.; et al. Microlensing events indicate that super-Earth exoplanets are common in Jupiter-like orbits. Science 2025, 388, 400–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Mróz, P.; Udalski, A.; Skowron, J.; Poleski, R.; Kozłowski, S.; Szymański, M.K.; Soszyński, I.; Wyrzykowski, Ł.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Ulaczyk, K.; et al. No large population of unbound or wide-orbit Jupiter-mass planets. Nature 2017, 548, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Mróz, P.; Poleski, R.; Han, C.; Udalski, A.; Gould, A.; Szymański, M.K.; Soszyński, I.; Pietrukowicz, P.; Kozłowski, S.; Skowron, J.; et al. A Free-floating or Wide-orbit Planet in the Microlensing Event OGLE-2019-BLG-0551. Astron. J. 2020, 159, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Udalski, A.; Paczyński, B.; Żebruń, K.; Szymański, M.; Kubiak, M.; Soszyński, I.; Szewczyk, O.; Wyrzykowski, L.; Pietrzyński, G. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Search for Planetary and Low-Luminosity Object Transits in the Galactic Disk. Results of 2001 Campaign. Acta Astron. 2002, 52, 1–37. [Google Scholar]
  120. Konacki, M.; Torres, G.; Jha, S.; Sasselov, D.D. An extrasolar planet that transits the disk of its parent star. Nature 2003, 421, 507–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Timeline of the OGLE project phases with basic characteristics for each phase.
Figure 1. Timeline of the OGLE project phases with basic characteristics for each phase.
Universe 11 00304 g001
Figure 2. OGLE-IV sky coverage of the Galactic bulge, the Galactic disk, and the Magellanic System, presented in the Galactic coordinates.
Figure 2. OGLE-IV sky coverage of the Galactic bulge, the Galactic disk, and the Magellanic System, presented in the Galactic coordinates.
Universe 11 00304 g002
Figure 3. Number of variable stars published by the OGLE project in the years 1992–2025. Left and right panels show the number of variable stars in the linear and logarithmic scales, respectively.
Figure 3. Number of variable stars published by the OGLE project in the years 1992–2025. Left and right panels show the number of variable stars in the linear and logarithmic scales, respectively.
Universe 11 00304 g003
Figure 4. Warping of the Milky Way disk. For more information see Skowron et al. [75]. Reproduced with The American Association for the Advancement of Science permission.
Figure 4. Warping of the Milky Way disk. For more information see Skowron et al. [75]. Reproduced with The American Association for the Advancement of Science permission.
Universe 11 00304 g004
Figure 5. Rotation curve of the Milky Way obtained from classical Cepheids. The label “This work” is part of the original figure and refers to Mróz et al. [77], not to the present manuscript. For more information see [77,78,79]. © AAS. Reproduced with permission.
Figure 5. Rotation curve of the Milky Way obtained from classical Cepheids. The label “This work” is part of the original figure and refers to Mróz et al. [77], not to the present manuscript. For more information see [77,78,79]. © AAS. Reproduced with permission.
Universe 11 00304 g005
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of anomalous Cepheids in comparison to the distribution of RR Lyrae stars. Top panel presents equal-area Hammer projection of the MS, while middle and bottom panels present Cartesian projections for the Large and Small Magellanic Cloud, respectively. In the middle and bottom panels, RR Lyrae stars are shown as a color map with density contours, while anomalous Cepheids are shown as magenta points. For more information see Iwanek et al. [86].
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of anomalous Cepheids in comparison to the distribution of RR Lyrae stars. Top panel presents equal-area Hammer projection of the MS, while middle and bottom panels present Cartesian projections for the Large and Small Magellanic Cloud, respectively. In the middle and bottom panels, RR Lyrae stars are shown as a color map with density contours, while anomalous Cepheids are shown as magenta points. For more information see Iwanek et al. [86].
Universe 11 00304 g007
Figure 8. Fourteen examples of Mira stars from the OCVS which were observed since 1997, i.e., the beginning of the OGLE-II phase, until March 2020. Left-hand-side panels show unfolded light curves, while right-hand-side panels show phase-folded light curves with pulsation periods P (provided above the plots). For more information see Iwanek et al. [91].
Figure 8. Fourteen examples of Mira stars from the OCVS which were observed since 1997, i.e., the beginning of the OGLE-II phase, until March 2020. Left-hand-side panels show unfolded light curves, while right-hand-side panels show phase-folded light curves with pulsation periods P (provided above the plots). For more information see Iwanek et al. [91].
Universe 11 00304 g008
Figure 9. Two-dimensional projection of three-dimensional map of the Milky Way. Blue, red, and gray points marked O-rich Miras, C-rich Miras, and classical Cepheids, respectively. Galactic center is marked as black cross, while the black line along the bar shows slope of the bar. For more information see Iwanek et al. [92].
Figure 9. Two-dimensional projection of three-dimensional map of the Milky Way. Blue, red, and gray points marked O-rich Miras, C-rich Miras, and classical Cepheids, respectively. Galactic center is marked as black cross, while the black line along the bar shows slope of the bar. For more information see Iwanek et al. [92].
Universe 11 00304 g009
Figure 10. Phase-folded I-band light curves of selected BLAPs discovered in the OGLE data. Each light curve is phased with period P indicated in the plot. For more information see Pietrukowicz et al. [95]. Reproduced with Springer Nature permission.
Figure 10. Phase-folded I-band light curves of selected BLAPs discovered in the OGLE data. Each light curve is phased with period P indicated in the plot. For more information see Pietrukowicz et al. [95]. Reproduced with Springer Nature permission.
Universe 11 00304 g010
Figure 11. Phased I-band light curves of LSPs with different brightness amplitudes of secondary periods discovered in the OGLE data. For more information see Soszyński et al. [100]. © AAS. Reproduced with permission.
Figure 11. Phased I-band light curves of LSPs with different brightness amplitudes of secondary periods discovered in the OGLE data. For more information see Soszyński et al. [100]. © AAS. Reproduced with permission.
Universe 11 00304 g011
Figure 12. Three examples of rotating variables. For more information see Iwanek et al. [109].
Figure 12. Three examples of rotating variables. For more information see Iwanek et al. [109].
Universe 11 00304 g012
Table 1. Types and number of variable stars published in the OCVS.
Table 1. Types and number of variable stars published in the OCVS.
Type of Variable StarsNumber of Stars
Classical Cepheids11,689
Type II Cepheids2046
Anomalous Cepheids393
RR Lyrae stars129,740
δ Scuti stars42,672
Blue Large-Amplitude Pulsators94
Long-Period Variables403,636
Eclipsing binaries525,998
Heartbeat stars991
Rotating variables18,443
Short-period eclipsing variables242
R Coronae Borealis stars23
Dwarf novae1091
Double Periodic Variables32
Total:1,137,090
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iwanek, P. The Variable Sky Through the OGLE Eye. Universe 2025, 11, 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe11090304

AMA Style

Iwanek P. The Variable Sky Through the OGLE Eye. Universe. 2025; 11(9):304. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe11090304

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iwanek, Patryk. 2025. "The Variable Sky Through the OGLE Eye" Universe 11, no. 9: 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe11090304

APA Style

Iwanek, P. (2025). The Variable Sky Through the OGLE Eye. Universe, 11(9), 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe11090304

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop