Next Article in Journal
Current Developments in µMAS NMR Analysis for Metabolomics
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolomic Profiling of Cerebral Palsy Brain Tissue Reveals Novel Central Biomarkers and Biochemical Pathways Associated with the Disease: A Pilot Study
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Metabolites 2019, 9(2), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9020028

Consistency, Inconsistency, and Ambiguity of Metabolite Names in Biochemical Databases Used for Genome-Scale Metabolic Modelling

Laboratory of Systems and Synthetic Biology, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: EDP Patent Attorneys, 6708 WH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Received: 28 December 2018 / Revised: 24 January 2019 / Accepted: 31 January 2019 / Published: 6 February 2019
Full-Text   |   PDF [4723 KB, uploaded 20 February 2019]   |  

Abstract

Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) are manually curated repositories describing the metabolic capabilities of an organism. GEMs have been successfully used in different research areas, ranging from systems medicine to biotechnology. However, the different naming conventions (namespaces) of databases used to build GEMs limit model reusability and prevent the integration of existing models. This problem is known in the GEM community, but its extent has not been analyzed in depth. In this study, we investigate the name ambiguity and the multiplicity of non-systematic identifiers and we highlight the (in)consistency in their use in 11 biochemical databases of biochemical reactions and the problems that arise when mapping between different namespaces and databases. We found that such inconsistencies can be as high as 83.1%, thus emphasizing the need for strategies to deal with these issues. Currently, manual verification of the mappings appears to be the only solution to remove inconsistencies when combining models. Finally, we discuss several possible approaches to facilitate (future) unambiguous mapping. View Full-Text
Keywords: identifier multiplicity; name ambiguity; databases; naming conventions; standardization; chemical nomenclature; GEM; GEM interoperability identifier multiplicity; name ambiguity; databases; naming conventions; standardization; chemical nomenclature; GEM; GEM interoperability
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Pham, N.; van Heck, R.G.A.; van Dam, J.C.J.; Schaap, P.J.; Saccenti, E.; Suarez-Diez, M. Consistency, Inconsistency, and Ambiguity of Metabolite Names in Biochemical Databases Used for Genome-Scale Metabolic Modelling. Metabolites 2019, 9, 28.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Metabolites EISSN 2218-1989 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top