Next Article in Journal
Multimatrix Detection and Quantification of the Advanced Glycation End Products Precursor Fructoselysine via UHPLC-HRMS/MS
Previous Article in Journal
A Major Update and Improved Validation Functionality in the mwtab Python Library and the Metabolomics Workbench File Status Website
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Genome-Scale Model Reconstruction Strategies for Lentilactobacillus kefiri DH5 and Deciphering Its Metabolic Network
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genomic-Driven Identification of Conserved Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Cladosporium limoniforme: The Case of the DHN-Melanin Pathway

by
Angela Rojas-Coll
1,†,
José-Ignacio Valencia
1,†,
Javier Tognarelli
2 and
Guillermo Fernández-Bunster
1,*
1
Laboratorio de Biotecnología (BioTecLab), Escuela de Tecnología Médica, Facultad de Medicina, Campus San Felipe, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2100000, Chile
2
Genómica UV, Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340000, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Metabolites 2026, 16(1), 77; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo16010077
Submission received: 30 December 2025 / Revised: 13 January 2026 / Accepted: 15 January 2026 / Published: 16 January 2026

Abstract

Background: Endolichenic fungi represent an emerging source of bioactive secondary metabolites; however, the genomic basis of their chemical diversity remains largely poorly characterized. Specifically, the metabolic capabilities of Cladosporium limoniforme have not been explored at the genomic level. Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the biosynthetic potential of C. limoniforme by presenting its first whole-genome sequence and conducting a comparative analysis of its biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), with a specific focus on the evolutionary conservation of the DHN-melanin pathway. Methods: Genome mining was performed using antiSMASH and fungiSMASH tools. Comparative genomics involved heatmap-based distribution analysis across the Cladosporium genus, synteny profiling using Clinker to assess gene order conservation, and Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic analysis of the polyketide synthase (T1PKS) domain. Results: We identified 26 putative BGCs, revealing a largely untapped metabolic repertoire. Comparative analysis demonstrated a high degree of conservation for the metachelin C (siderophore) and 1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxynaphthalene (T4HN) clusters across the genus. Notably, synteny and phylogenetic analyses showed that while C. limoniforme retains a conserved, ancestral T1PKS core essential for stress survival, it exhibits a significant reduction in accessory genes compared to plant-pathogenic congeners. Conclusions: These findings support a “metabolic streamlining” hypothesis driven by the endolichenic lifestyle, where the fungus retains essential protective machinery while shedding costly accessory genes unnecessary in the buffered lichen niche. This study establishes C. limoniforme as a valuable genomic resource for future biotechnological research.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Lichens are symbiotic organisms formed by the association of fungi (mycobionts) with photosynthetic partners, such as green algae and/or cyanobacteria (photobionts) [1]. In this relationship, algal cells synthesize organic nutrients, whereas the fungus provides water, minerals, and physical protection. This mutualistic interaction allows lichens to prosper under extreme ecological conditions [2,3], driving the production of specialized secondary metabolites that are essential for survival and adaptation [4]. These metabolites mediate interactions between microorganisms and their environment [5], and many have demonstrated remarkable medicinal, agricultural, and environmental potentials [6,7,8]. However, the slow growth of lichens in nature and the difficulty in culturing them in vitro have hindered the isolation of these compounds.
Consequently, researchers have focused on faster-growing microorganisms such as endolichenic fungi (ELF) [3,8]. These microfungi are taxonomically and functionally distinct from the dominant mycobionts and reside within the lichen thallus without causing apparent symptoms or producing sporulating structures [9,10]. Since the first report of bioactive compounds derived from ELF in 2007 [11], there has been scientific interest in this area. Studies have identified a wide array of chemical classes, including alkaloids, steroids, terpenoids, quinones, xanthones, peptides, and chromenones [9,12]. These compounds exhibit diverse biological activities, including antimicrobial, antitumor, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory properties [13].
Genes encoding secondary metabolite biosynthesis are typically organized into biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) [14]. However, under standard laboratory conditions, many of these clusters remain silent because of the absence of specific ecological triggers [15,16]. Genome mining has emerged as a powerful computational strategy to overcome this limitation. By analyzing gene arrangement, this approach predicts BGCs capable of producing secondary metabolites that are otherwise undetectable using traditional culture-based techniques [17,18]. Complementarily, phylogenetic analysis of BGCs facilitates species classification and reveals patterns of genetic divergence, offering insights into microbial diversity [19,20].
The genus Cladosporium (Cladosporiaceae; Capnodiales; Ascomycota) [21] comprises cosmopolitan fungi [22] isolated from diverse substrates, including leaves [21,23], fruits [24,25], soils [26], and lichens [27]. A recent review covering the period from 2000 to 2022 [28] reported over 300 secondary metabolites from this genus, with polyketides constituting approximately 48% of the identified compounds. These metabolites exhibit antibacterial, cytotoxic, antiviral, antifungal, and herbicidal activities, making Cladosporium a promising candidate for drug discovery and agricultural applications.
Cladosporium limoniforme was first described in 2015 [29], but limited information exists regarding its biology, and its biosynthetic potential remains unexplored. Although the genus is known for bioactive compound synthesis, the specific metabolic landscape of C. limoniforme remains unknown. This knowledge gap hinders our understanding of BGC composition, homology to known pathways, and conservation relative to other species. Hence, whole-genome sequencing of C. limoniforme would provide a unique opportunity to analyze its BGC repertoire.
As an endolichenic fungus inhabiting a protected yet stressful niche, we hypothesize that C. limoniforme harbors evolutionarily conserved BGCs for essential stress-protection metabolites, while exhibiting species-specific structural variations in accessory genes driven by ecological adaptation to the host environment. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate and compare the biosynthetic potential of C. limoniforme with other species of the genus using a genome mining approach to identify conserved secondary metabolite clusters.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Strain and Culture Conditions

The C. limoniforme strain was cultivated on Petri dishes containing Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium (2% potato dextrose, 2% agar) at 25 °C for approximately 7 days. Once fungal growth was established, a sterile scalpel was used to cut a small block of mycelium with agar, which was then transferred into a flask containing 50 mL of PDB (2% potato dextrose powder in distilled water). The culture was maintained on an orbital shaker (100 rpm) at room temperature.

2.2. DNA Extraction

Genomic DNA extraction was performed at the Laboratory of Biotechnology, University of Valparaíso, San Felipe (UV-SF), using residual mycelium adhering to the flask walls as the starting material. The biomass was recovered, resuspended in 600 µL of nuclease-free water in a 2 mL Eppendorf tube, and vortexed. The suspension underwent enzymatic digestion with Zymolyase (50 mg/mL, 10 µL) at 37 °C for 1 h, with intermittent vortexing every 20 min. Subsequently, cell lysis was supplemented by adding SDS (10%, 70 µL) and proteinase K (20 mg/mL, 5 µL) and incubated at 65 °C for 15 min.
DNA purification was performed using the CTAB method. Briefly, 100 µL of 5 M NaCl and 100 µL of preheated 2% CTAB/0.7% NaCl solution were added to the lysate and incubated at 65 °C for 10 min to precipitate the DNA. Phase separation was performed by adding 750 µL of chloroform–isopropanol (24:1) and centrifuging at 12,000 rpm for 5 min. The aqueous supernatant was recovered, and DNA was precipitated with 450 µL of isopropanol and centrifuged at maximum speed for 15 min to pellet the DNA. The resulting DNA pellet was washed with cold 70% ethanol, air-dried at room temperature for 24 h, and resuspended in 100 µL nuclease-free water. DNA quality was assessed by electrophoresis, and the samples were stored at 4 °C. The extracted DNA was sent to the Genomics UV Facility (Universidad de Valparaíso) for whole-genome sequencing.

2.3. Full Genome Sequencing and Genome Assembly

Whole-genome sequencing was performed at the Genomics UV Facility (Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile). The library was prepared using Native Barcoding Kit 24 (ONT, Oxford, United Kingdom) and sequenced using ONT MinION Mk1b platform with a R10 flowcell. Basecalling was performed using the super-accuracy (SUP) model, and reads were demultiplexed using barcodes. Subsequently, raw reads were merged and quality-filtered using Filtlong (v0.2.1), retaining only reads ≥ 1000 bp and the top 90% based on quality scores.

2.4. De Novo Assembly and Quality Assessment

De novo genome assembly was performed using Flye (v2.9.6) with the parameters for ONT high-quality reads (--nano-hq) and an estimated genome size of 34 Mb. The draft assembly underwent polishing through two iterative rounds of Racon (v1.5), followed by a final consensus polishing step using Medaka (v2.0.1) with model r1041_e82_400bps_sup_variant_v5.0.0. Read alignment required for consensus generation was performed using minimap2 (v2.30).
Assembly statistics, including total length, number of contigs, N50, and GC content, were calculated using QUAST (v5.3.0). Genome completeness was assessed using BUSCO (v6.0.0) against the fungi_odb12 dataset on the nuclear assembly and the predicted proteome. Mitochondrial contigs were identified based on elevated sequencing depth and excluded prior to downstream analysis.

2.5. Structural and Functional Annotation

Repetitive elements were identified using RepeatModeler (v2.0.7) and soft-masked with RepeatMasker (v4.2.1). Structural gene prediction was performed on the soft-masked nuclear assembly using funannotate predict (v1.8.17), integrating ab initio gene prediction with GeneMark-ES and BUSCO-guided species-specific training with Augustus, assuming diploid ploidy. Functional annotation was performed using funannotate, combining homology-based annotation with DIAMOND (v2.1.10), conserved domain detection using HMMER (v3.4), and orthology assignment using eggNOG-mapper (v2.1.13) with a locally downloaded database.

2.6. Analysis of BGCs of Secondary Metabolites from C. limoniforme

The nuclear genome assembly of C. limoniforme was mined for BGCs using the Antibiotics and Secondary Metabolite Analysis Shell (antiSMASH v8.0) [30]. The analysis was conducted with the detection strictness set to “relaxed” and all additional features enabled to allow for the preliminary identification of genomic regions potentially associated with secondary metabolism. To refine the predictions specifically for fungal genomes, the sequences were subsequently analyzed using the fungal-dedicated platform fungiSMASH (v8.0) [31] under identical parameter settings.

2.7. Selection of Comparative Species

For comparative genomic analyses, eight representative species of Cladosporium were selected from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database [32] (Table 1). The selection criteria prioritized genomes designated as “reference assemblies” and aimed to maximize ecological diversity by including isolates from distinct hosts and environments to minimize sampling redundancy.

2.8. Prediction of BGCs in Comparative Genomes

BGCs were predicted in all comparative genomes using antiSMASH. Additionally, fungiSMASH was employed for genomes, where structural annotation files (*. gff) were available along with the FASTA sequences. All analyses were performed using the same parameter settings applied to the C. limoniforme reference run to ensure methodological consistency across the dataset.

2.9. Comparative Profiling and Visualization of BGCs

To evaluate the conservation patterns of the identified BGCs across the Cladosporium genus, a comparative profiling analysis was performed between C. limoniforme and those identified in the eight selected species. Table S1 lists the genomic coordinates, cluster type, predicted product, similarity to the closest match in the MIBiG database, and source of the predicted cluster for each species in the study. A binary presence/absence matrix was constructed based on the structural annotation and orthology results, where BGCs were scored as present (1) or absent (0) depending on the presence of core biosynthetic enzymes. The resulting dataset was visualized as a heatmap to elucidate lineage-specific distribution patterns and metabolic variations among the analyzed species.

2.10. Structural Comparison of BGCs

Gene cluster synteny and structural conservation were analyzed using Clinker (v1.0) [33] and its visualization module clustermap.js. Comparisons included C. limoniforme, the selected Cladosporium species, and a reference BGC identified using the KnownClusterBlast function of fungiSMASH to provide external context. Selected BGCs were exported in GenBank format (. gbf) and aligned in Clinker to generate similarity matrices based on the sequence identity and gene order. Visualizations were generated using clustermap.js, scaling clusters to size and highlighting homologous genes through identity-coded linkages.

2.11. Phylogenetic Analysis of the Core Synthase

To evaluate the evolutionary relationships of the selected central biosynthetic gene, amino acid sequences of the putative T1PKS were extracted from the antiSMASH predictions for C. limoniforme and other Cladosporium species harboring the T4HN cluster. Sequence alignment was performed using the ClustalW algorithm implemented in MEGA 12 [34], with default parameters. Phylogenetic inference was conducted using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method based on the best-fit amino acid substitution model determined by the model-selection feature in MEGA. The analysis assumed uniform evolutionary rates among the sites and included all alignment positions. Node support was evaluated using 1000 bootstrap replicates. The phylogenetic tree was rooted using the T1PKS sequence from the Pestalotiopsis fici reference cluster, as an outgroup.

3. Results

3.1. General Features of the Cladosporium limoniforme Genome

The de novo assembly of the C. limoniforme nuclear genome yielded a total size of 28.3 Mb, distributed across 20 contigs, with an N50 of 1.66 Mb and GC content of 53.5%. BUSCO analysis (fungi_odb10 dataset) indicated a completeness of 98.6% (Table 2), confirming a high-quality assembly suitable for functional annotation purposes. Gene prediction identified 10,123 protein-coding genes. The mitochondrial genome was assembled into a single circular contig of 27,819 bp with a GC content of 28.5%.

3.2. Prediction of Biosynthetic Gene Regions in C. limoniforme

Genome mining using antiSMASH identified 26 genomic regions associated with secondary metabolite biosynthesis in C. limoniforme, of which only three showed potential matches with previously reported clusters in the MIBiG database. In comparison, fungiSMASH predicted 21 regions, four of which corresponded to known clusters (Table 3).
Among the clusters showing similarity to previously characterized metabolites, compounds belonging to the NRPS (Non-Ribosomal Peptide Synthetase), T1PKS (Type I Polyketide Synthase), and terpene classes were identified (Table 4). Only two metabolites, 1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxynaphthalene (T4HN) and metachelin C, were consistently predicted by both tools, although fungiSMASH annotated the former as 1,3,8-trihydroxynaphthalene (T3HN). Furthermore, antiSMASH predicted one metabolite that was not detected by fungiSMASH, whereas fungiSMASH identified two metabolites that were absent in the antiSMASH results. Through this combined analysis, five BGCs associated with known metabolites were identified.

3.3. Overview of BGCs in Cladosporium Species

All examined species exhibited a limited number of BGCs with homology to known clusters (Table 5). The total repertoire of predicted genomic regions ranged from 22 to 40 across datasets. Among the species analyzed, C. oxysporum exhibited the largest biosynthetic potential, whereas C. cladosporioides displayed the lowest number of detected clusters.

3.4. Comparison of BGC Patterns in the Genus Cladosporium

Comparative profiling of the known BGCs in C. limoniforme and related species (Figure 1) revealed lineage-specific conservation patterns. The BGC associated with metachelin C was identified in all analyzed genomes, indicating its ubiquitous distribution within the genus. Similarly, the 1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxynaphthalene (T4HN)/scytalone-T3HN cluster was detected in nearly all species, suggesting that it represents a core metabolic feature of Cladosporium. The Cyclo-(D-Phe-L-Phe-D-Val-L-Val) cluster exhibited an intermediate distribution, being present in over half of the species. In contrast, clavaric acid was restricted to only two species, whereas the choline cluster was absent in all comparative genomes. Given the pivotal role of melanin in conferring protection against abiotic stress in lichenized environments, subsequent evolutionary analyses will focus on this specific pathway.

3.5. Structural Conservation of the Analyzed BGC

Comparative synteny analysis using Clinker (Figure 2) demonstrated a high degree of structural conservation between the reference BGC from Pestalotiopsis fici, C. limoniforme, and other members of the genus. The core region of the BGC, which encodes the biosynthetic T1PKS, was present in all evaluated species. In contrast, greater variability was observed in accessory genes, such as O-methyltransferases and hypothetical proteins. These findings suggest that while the core biosynthetic machinery is evolutionarily conserved, potentially representing the minimal requirement for T4HN expression, structural differences in the flanking regions indicate that species-specific auxiliary components may differentially modulate the biosynthetic pathway.

3.6. Evolutionary Relationship of the T1PKS Among Species of the Genus Cladosporium

Phylogenetic reconstruction (Figure 3) revealed a high degree of sequence conservation among the clustered sequences, indicating that the core T1PKS gene has been evolutionarily preserved within the genus. Notably, the C. limoniforme sequence was positioned closer to the basal node (rooted with P. fici) than several other analyzed species. This topological placement suggests that this fungus retains the ancestral structural and functional characteristics of T1PKS, driving the T4HN pathway.

4. Discussion

This study represents the first comparative assessment of the biosynthetic potential of C. limoniforme using two complementary genome mining tools: antiSMASH and fungiSMASH. The analysis predicted 26 and 21 BGCs. Notably, in both datasets, fewer than 20% of the predicted clusters exhibited significant similarity to previously characterized pathways, emphasizing that C. limoniforme possesses a vast and largely unexplored metabolic repertoire. Based on homology, five putative BGCs were associated with known metabolic pathways. Specifically, regions 16.2 and 17.2 were consistently detected by both platforms, whereas region 9.3 was unique to antiSMASH and regions 9.1 and 9.2 were exclusively identified by fungiSMASH.
Regarding the specific annotation of the melanin-associated cluster, a divergence in prediction was observed: antiSMASH annotated the product as 1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxynaphthalene (T4HN), whereas fungiSMASH identified it as 1,3,8-trihydroxynaphthalene (T3HN). However, these differences are not considered biologically critical, as both compounds are consecutive intermediates in the same DHN-melanin biosynthetic pathway [35,36]. Such discrepancies in automated predictions have been previously documented [37,38] and are likely attributable to the distinct algorithms, reference databases, and scoring parameters employed by each platform. For instance, a comparative study [39] evaluating specialized metabolite prediction across antiSMASH, fungiSMASH, SMURF, and PRISM demonstrated that while tools may differ in metabolite categorization or similarity scoring, the total count and overall composition of the predicted clusters remain largely consistent. Similar patterns have been reported in eukaryotic algal genomes [40], where tools generally agree on cluster detection but vary in specific metabolite assignment or gene count, reinforcing the necessity of manual curation and multi-tool approaches.
Comparative genomic profiling revealed that two BGCs are highly conserved across the Cladosporium genus: the metachelin C cluster, which was present in all analyzed genomes, and the T4HN cluster, which was detected in seven of the eight species. The ubiquitous presence of the metachelin C cluster underscores its importance. Metachelin C is a siderophore responsible for iron acquisition, a critical process for fungal survival, given that the bioavailability of this essential element is often limited by its oxidation into insoluble ferric hydroxides [41]. Beyond its physiological role, this compound has significant biotechnological potential. In agriculture, it functions as a biocontrol agent to enhance plant growth and suppress pathogens; in bioremediation, it facilitates the mobilization of heavy metals and radionuclides; and in the food industry, it is under investigation for its potential as a natural antioxidant [42].
In contrast, the broad conservation of the T4HN cluster highlights the evolutionary value of the DHN-melanin pathway [35]. Melanin is a dark pigment known to confer resistance to a wide range of abiotic stressors, including UV and ionizing radiation, extreme temperatures, and heavy metal toxicity [43]. Consequently, this pathway is of significant interest in biotechnology. In the biomedical field, fungal melanins have demonstrated radioprotective and antioxidant properties, offering protection against oxidative stress and ionizing radiation. Furthermore, in environmental biotechnology, melanin has been proposed as an effective agent for bioremediation because of its physicochemical capacity to adsorb and sequester environmental contaminants, such as heavy metals [43,44]. Melanin plays a pivotal role in survival and stress adaptation. Its dark pigmentation confers resistance to abiotic stressors, such as UV radiation, desiccation, extreme temperatures, and oxidative stress, which are critical for survival within the lichen thallus [45,46,47]. Beyond individual protection, this metabolite likely contributes to the stability of the symbiotic partnership by enhancing the overall health and homeostasis of the lichen ecosystem [3]. Given the high conservation and ecological relevance of the predicted DHN-melanin BGC, a comparative synteny analysis was conducted across the species in which the cluster was detected.
Synteny analysis using Clinker confirmed that the core T1PKS gene is strictly conserved across all analyzed Cladosporium species, highlighting its importance. Interestingly, comparison with the Pestalotiopsis fici reference cluster revealed significant gene loss; only one accessory gene from the reference was retained in C. limoniforme, whereas the others were absent throughout the genus. Furthermore, substantial variability was observed in the accessory gene content of Cladosporium species. This genomic heterogeneity implies that while T1PKS constitutes the minimal functional unit for melanin backbone synthesis, the flanking accessory genes likely play non-essential but adaptive modulatory roles tailored to specific physiological needs [48].
The conservation of the core DHN-melanin biosynthetic machinery across the genus highlights its fundamental role in basic stress survival, particularly against UV radiation and oxidative stress. However, the observed variability in accessory genes, specifically the absence of certain transporters and modifying enzymes in C. limoniforme compared to plant pathogens such as C. fulvum, suggests niche-specific adaptive pressures. We hypothesize that the endolichenic lifestyle of C. limoniforme significantly influences its genomic architecture. Unlike environmental fungi, which are directly exposed to fluctuating environmental extremes and host immune responses, C. limoniforme inhabits a protected microenvironment within the lichen thallus. This symbiotic niche likely provides physical shielding and chemical homeostasis, potentially reducing the selective pressure to maintain the complex secretion systems or auxiliary enzymes typically required for pathogenicity or host invasion. Consequently, the melanin pathway in C. limoniforme appears to reflect an evolutionary ‘optimization’ strategy, maintaining the essential core for cellular protection while shedding metabolically costly accessory functions unnecessary for an endolichenic existence.
Our genome-driven approach used synteny analysis to elucidate the conservation of gene order and content, providing insights into the functional and evolutionary dynamics of the T4HN cluster. The identification of conserved biosynthetic cores among variable accessory regions emphasizes the utility of synteny in revealing taxon-specific gene arrangements that contribute to key adaptive traits [49]. Moreover, this context-based analysis facilitated the functional exploration of annotated “hypothetical proteins” within the cluster, suggesting shared regulatory or synergistic associations with the core synthase [50]. Beyond functional inference, integrating synteny data refines the structural annotation of these loci [51] and enhances the robustness of ortholog identification for phylogenomic reconstruction [52]. Consequently, this comparative framework reinforces the phylogenetic placement of C. limoniforme by considering gene order conservation and cluster architecture as complementary evolutionary signals to the sequence data [53].
Phylogenetic reconstruction of the T1PKS domain revealed that while C. limoniforme clusters within the melanin-producing lineage of Cladosporium, its sequence is topologically closer to the reference gene (P. fici) than to those of other congeneric species. This evolutionary proximity suggests that C. limoniforme retains a more ancestral variant of T1PKS, consistent with its conserved core structure and lack of extensive accessory insertions. This pattern—a highly conserved core coupled with variable accessory genes—has been documented in other fungal BGCs, such as those for aflatoxin and sterigmatocystin in Aspergillus, where peripheral genes modulate catalytic efficiency or intermediates without altering the central biosynthetic module [48].
This structural economy contrasts with the evolutionary patterns observed in obligate parasitic fungi, such as powdery mildew and rust. In these groups, strict host dependence often drives reductive evolution, leading to massive loss of genes involved in independent metabolism and environmental sensing [54,55,56]. Conversely, endolichenic fungi, such as C. limoniforme, which live asymptomatically and facultatively within the thallus, generally do not exhibit such drastic genomic erosion, retaining diverse BGCs for environmental interaction [3,13]. However, the specific absence of accessory genes in the T4HN cluster of C. limoniforme suggests a nuanced evolutionary scenario: rather than undergoing the generalized reductive evolution typical of parasites, C. limoniforme appears to have undergone a targeted “metabolic streamlining.” The lichen host may provide specific precursors or physical protection that renders the full accessory machinery redundant, allowing the fungus to maintain only the essential ancestral core required for melanin synthesis.
To definitively characterize the biosynthetic capability of this BGC, heterologous expression is the necessary next step. Since bioinformatic prediction does not guarantee metabolite production under native conditions, expressing the full cluster or minimal combinations (e.g., T1PKS alone vs. T1PKS plus accessory genes) in model hosts such as Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, or Aspergillus oryzae would confirm T4HN synthesis [57,58]. Furthermore, to elucidate the specific functions of the annotated “hypothetical proteins” and accessory genes, gene knockout experiments in the native host (if transformable) or comparative heterologous expression could be employed. Following this, chemical profiling via LC-MS and structural elucidation by NMR would reveal whether these accessory genes introduce specific modifications or confer adaptive properties, providing a precise understanding of the functional evolution of BGCs in C. limoniforme.
This study has inherent limitations associated with the predictive nature of genome mining. First, tools such as fungiSMASH are continuously evolving; thus, the results are constrained by the software version and algorithms available at the time of analysis. Second, the quality of the genome assembly is critical, as fragmented contigs may artificially split BGCs, leading to incomplete cluster prediction. Discrepancies between tools (e.g., antiSMASH vs. fungiSMASH) regarding ORF identification and hypothetical protein annotation can also introduce uncertainty, whereas the accuracy of metabolic inference relies heavily on the completeness of reference databases such as MIBiG. Therefore, these bioinformatic predictions should be interpreted as guiding hypotheses rather than definitive proofs of metabolism.
Finally, while this study provides robust genomic insights, inherent limitations must be acknowledged beyond computational boundaries. The comparative analysis was constrained by the limited number of high-quality Cladosporium genomes currently available from diverse ecological niches, particularly extreme environments. This taxonomic sampling bias may obscure the broader evolutionary patterns specific to extremophilic lineages. Furthermore, our ecological hypotheses regarding the loss of accessory genes in C. limoniforme rely on genomic presence/absence data from the genome assembly. Future integrative studies combining transcriptomics (RNA-seq) and proteomics under controlled stress conditions (e.g., UV-B exposure or desiccation) are essential to experimentally validate the expression levels of the identified DHN-melanin clusters and confirm their functional roles in the endolichenic adaptation proposed herein.

5. Conclusions

Genomic analysis of C. limoniforme provides the first comprehensive characterization of its biosynthetic potential through a comparative approach using antiSMASH and fungiSMASH. This strategy enabled the identification of five putative BGCs associated with the known metabolic pathways. Notably, comparative profiling across the genus revealed that the clusters for metachelin C (a siderophore) and T4HN (a precursor of DHN-melanin) are highly conserved, suggesting that they fulfill essential biological functions related to stress survival and environmental adaptation within Cladosporium.
Overall, this study establishes C. limoniforme as a valuable genomic resource harboring a largely underexplored yet biologically significant metabolic repertoire. The integration of structural synteny analysis with phylogenetics proved to be a robust strategy for prioritizing clusters of functional interest, offering critical insights into the retention of ancestral biosynthetic features in this species compared to other isolates. These findings lay a solid foundation for future experimental work aimed at functionally validating the T4HN BGC, opening new perspectives for understanding the evolutionary dynamics of secondary metabolism in endolichenic fungi and exploring their potential for biotechnological applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/metabo16010077/s1, Table S1. Detailed list of putative biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) showing similarity to known pathways identified in the Cladosporium reference species using antiSMASH.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.F.-B.; methodology, A.R.-C., J.-I.V., J.T. and G.F.-B.; validation, A.R.-C., J.-I.V. and G.F.-B.; formal analysis, A.R.-C. and J.-I.V.; investigation, A.R.-C. and J.-I.V.; resources, G.F.-B.; data curation, A.R.-C., J.-I.V., J.T. and G.F.-B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R.-C. and J.-I.V.; writing—review and editing, A.R.-C., J.-I.V., J.T. and G.F.-B.; visualization, A.R.-C., J.-I.V. and G.F.-B.; supervision, G.F.-B.; project administration, G.F.-B.; funding acquisition, G.F.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the FONDECYT (Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico) Iniciación, grant number 11230988.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The genome assembly of Cladosporium limoniforme is available at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under accession JBTNQL000000000 (version JBTNQL010000000), associated with BioProject PRJNA1398797 and BioSample SAMN54460825.

Acknowledgments

During the preparation of this work, the authors used ScholarGPT-5.1 and Gemini 3 for English language editing and proofreading. The authors reviewed and edited the content and took full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Paguirigan, J.A.G.; Jeong, E.; Kang, K.B.; Hur, J.; Kim, W. Investigation of Antimicrobial Compounds Produced by Endolichenic Fungi in Various Culture Media. Plant Pathol. J. 2024, 40, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gao, H.; Zou, J.; Li, J.; Zhao, H. Endolichenic Fungi: A Potential Treasure Trove for Discovery of Special Structures and Bioactive Compounds. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 2016, 48, 347–397. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wethalawe, A.N.; Alwis, Y.V.; Udukala, D.N.; Paranagama, P.A. Antimicrobial Compounds Isolated from Endolichenic Fungi: A Review. Molecules 2021, 26, 3901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jacobs, J.; Malinowska, A. Microbium: The Neglected Lives of Micro-Matter; Punctum Books: Goleta, CA, USA, 2023; pp. 81–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ishikawa, Y.; Kimura, M.T.; Toda, M.J. Biology and ecology of the Oriental flower-breeding Drosophila elegans and related species. Fly 2022, 16, 201–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shah, A.A.; Badshah, L.; Muhammad, M.; Basit, A.; Ullah, I.; Mohamed, H.I.; Khan, A. Secondary metabolites of lichens and their application. In Fungal Secondary Metabolites: Synthesis and Applications in Agroecosystems; Abd-elsalam, K.A., Mohamed, H.I., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 91–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Deoli, S.; Prakash, O.; Kumar, R.; Mishra, G.K.; Kumar, V. A Comprehensive Review on Lichen-Derived Bioactive Compounds: Integrating Synthesis, Applications, and Nanotechnology. ChemistrySelect 2025, 10, e04515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bhagarathi, N.L.K.; DaSilva, N.P.N.B.; Subramanian, N.G.; Maharaj, N.G.; Kalika-Singh, N.S.; Pestano, N.F.; Phillips-Henry, N.Z.; Cossiah, N.C. An Integrative Review of the Biology and Chemistry of Lichens and Their Ecological, Ethnopharmacological, Pharmaceutical and Therapeutic Potential. GSC Biol. Pharm. Sci. 2023, 23, 92–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rondilla, R.R.; Edrada-Ebel, R. Recent biotechnological advances in bioprospecting secondary metabolites from endolichenic fungi for drug discovery applications. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2025, 51, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kellogg, J.J.; Raja, H.A. Endolichenic Fungi: A New Source of Rich Bioactive Secondary Metabolites on the Horizon. Phytochem. Rev. 2016, 16, 271–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Paranagama, P.A.; Wijeratne, E.M.K.; Burns, A.M.; Marron, M.T.; Gunatilaka, M.K.; Arnold, A.E.; Gunatilaka, A.A.L. Heptaketides from Corynespora sp. inhabiting the cavern beard lichen, Usnea cavernosa: First report of metabolites of an endolichenic fungus. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 1700–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, W.; Ran, Q.; Li, H.; Lou, H. Endolichenic fungi: A promising medicinal microbial resource to discover bioactive natural molecules—An update. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Agrawal, S.; Deshmukh, S.K.; Reddy, M.S.; Prasad, R.; Goel, M. Endolichenic fungi: A hidden source of bioactive metabolites. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 134, 163–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, Y.; Xu, M.; Tang, Y.; Shao, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, H. Genome Features and AntiSMASH Analysis of an Endophytic Strain Fusarium sp. R1. Metabolites 2022, 12, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shuikan, A.M.; Hozzein, W.N.; Alshuwaykan, R.M.; Arif, I.A. Metabolomics and Genetic Engineering for Secondary Metabolites Discovery. In Secondary Metabolites—Trends and Reviews; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Scherlach, K.; Hertweck, C. Mining and unearthing hidden biosynthetic potential. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, L.; Chen, S.; Miao, M.; Liang, Y.; Liu, X. Integrative Multi-Omics Identify Key Secondary Metabolites Linked to Acid Tolerance in Leptospirillum ferriphilum. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nickles, G.R.; Oestereicher, B.; Keller, N.P.; Drott, M.T. Mining for a new class of fungal natural products: The evolution, diversity, and distribution of isocyanide synthase biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, 7220–7235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Moran, M.; Turner, H.; Yanchar, J.; Preece, J.; Ahlborn, G.; Robison, R. Various Bacillus and Paenibacillus spp. Isolated from Soil Produce Compounds with Potent Antimicrobial Activity Against Clinically Relevant Pathogens. MicrobiologyOpen 2025, 14, e70179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Fadipe, E.O.; Hölzle, L.E. Phylogenetic Analysis and Public Health Implications of Salmonella Strains in Southwestern States of Nigeria Using InvA Gene Sequences. Animals 2025, 15, 3399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cho, S.E.; Oh, J.Y.; Lee, D.H. The complete mitochondrial genome of Cladosporium anthropophilum (Cladosporiaceae, Dothideomycetes). Mitochondrial DNA Part B Resour. 2023, 8, 164–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bensch, K.; Braun, U.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. The genus Cladosporium. Stud. Mycol. 2012, 72, 1–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pereira, C.M.; Sarmiento, S.S.; Colmán, A.A.; Belachew-Bekele, K.; Evans, H.C.; Barreto, R.W. Mycodiversity in a micro-habitat: Twelve Cladosporium species, including four new taxa, isolated from uredinia of coffee leaf rust, Hemileia vastatrix. Fungal Syst. Evol. 2024, 14, 9–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nabor-Romero, O.; Silva-Valenzuela, M.; Rojas-Martínez, R.I.; Garza-García, R. Primer reporte de Cladosporium cladosporioides causando pudriciones en frutos de zapote mante en México. Rev. Mex. Fitopatol. 2018, 36, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Temperini, C.V.; Alonso, J.N.; Colodner, A.D.; Pose, G.N. Cladosporium species causing “Cladosporium rot” on “Bosc” pear fruit in Argentina. Rev. Argent. De Microbiol. 2021, 53, 75–77. [Google Scholar]
  26. Iturrieta-González, I.; García, D.; Gené, J. Novel species of Cladosporium from environmental sources in Spain. MycoKeys 2021, 77, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Favero-Longo, S.E.; Sandrone, S.; Matteucci, E.; Appolonia, L.; Piervittori, R. Spores of lichen-forming fungi in the mycoaerosol and their relationships with climate factors. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 466–467, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Shi, T.; Wang, B. The genus Cladosporium: A prospective producer of natural products. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bensch, K.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Braun, U.; Dijksterhuis, J.; De Jesús Yáñez-Morales, M.; Crous, P.W. Common but Different: The Expanding Realm of Cladosporium. Stud. Mycol. 2015, 82, 23–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. antiSMASH. Available online: https://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org/ (accessed on 20 September 2025).
  31. fungiSMASH. Available online: https://fungismash.secondarymetabolites.org/ (accessed on 15 October 2025).
  32. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 5 November 2025).
  33. Cagecat. Available online: https://cagecat.bioinformatics.nl/tools/clinker (accessed on 12 November 2025).
  34. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA). Available online: https://www.megasoftware.net (accessed on 30 November 2025).
  35. Eliahu, N.; Igbaria, A.; Rose, M.S.; Horwitz, B.A.; Lev, S. Melanin biosynthesis in the maize pathogen Cochliobolus heterostrophus depends on two mitogen-activated protein kinases, Chk1 and Mps1, and the transcription factor Cmr1. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sone, Y.; Nakamura, S.; Sasaki, M.; Hasebe, F.; Kim, S.Y.; Funa, N. Bacterial Enzymes Catalyzing the Synthesis of 1,8-Dihydroxynaphthalene, a Key Precursor of Dihydroxynaphthalene Melanin, from Sorangium cellulosum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e00258-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kai Blin, K.; Kim, H.U.; Medema, M.H.; Weber, T. Recent development of antiSMASH and other computational approaches to mine secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters. Brief. Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1103–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. antiSMASH Documentation. Submitting Jobs on the Website. Available online: https://docs.antismash.secondarymetabolites.org/website_submission/ (accessed on 10 November 2025).
  39. Nègre, D.; Larhlimi, A.; Bertrand, S. Reconciliation and evolution of Penicillium rubens genome-scale metabolic networks–What about specialised metabolism? PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0289757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. O’Neill, E.C. Mining Natural Product Biosynthesis in Eukaryotic Algae. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, J.; Zhang, P.; Zeng, G.; Wu, G.; Qi, L.; Chen, G.; Fang, W.; Yin, W.B. Transcriptional Differences Guided Discovery and Genetic Identification of Coprogen and Dimerumic Acid Siderophores in Metarhizium robertsii. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 783609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. De Serrano, L. Biotechnology of siderophores in high-impact scientific fields. Biomol. Concepts 2017, 8, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hennessa, T.M.; Irie, L.M.; Dong, H.; VanArsdale, E.S.; Glaser, E.R.; Carr, E.C.; Harris, S.D.; Gianneschi, N.C.; Wang, Z. Genetic, structural, and functional characterization of allomelanin from black yeast Exophiala viscosa, a chassis for fungal melanin production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2025, 109, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mattoon, E.R.; Cordero, R.J.B.; Casadevall, A. Fungal melanins and applications in healthcare, bioremediation and industry. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chhoker, K.; Hausner, G.; Harris, S.D. Regulation of melanin production in fungi. Front. Fungal Biol. 2025, 6, 1621764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Eisenman, H.C.; Mcgrail, C.W.; Greer, E.M. The role of melanins in melanotic fungi for pathogenesis and environmental survival. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 4247–4257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Liu, R.; Meng, X.; Mo, C.; Ma, A.; Wei, X. Melanin of fungi: From classification to application. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 38, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rokas, A.; Mead, M.E.; Steenwyk, J.L.; Raja, H.A.; Oberlies, N.H. Biosynthetic gene clusters and the evolution of fungal chemodiversity. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2020, 37, 868–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Almeida-Silva, F.; Zhao, T.; Ullrich, K.K.; Schranz, M.E.; Van De Peer, Y. syntenet: An R/Bioconductor package for the inference and analysis of synteny networks. Bioinformatics 2022, 39, btac806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Botas, J.; Rodríguez Del Río, Á.; Giner-Lamia, J.; Huerta-Cepas, J. GeCoViz: Genomic context visualisation of prokaryotic genes from a functional and evolutionary perspective. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, W352–W357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wu, F.; Mai, Y.; Chen, C.; Xia, R. SynGAP: A synteny-based toolkit for gene structure annotation polishing. Genome Biol. 2024, 25, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Walden, N.; Schranz, M.E. Synteny Identifies Reliable Orthologs for Phylogenomics and Comparative Genomics of the Brassicaceae. Genome Biol. Evol. 2023, 15, evad034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Drillon, G.; Champeimont, R.; Oteri, F.; Fischer, G.; Carbone, A. Phylogenetic Reconstruction Based on Synteny Block and Gene Adjacencies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020, 37, 2747–2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Duplessis, S.; Aime, M.C.; Figueroa, M.; Petre, B.; Dodds, P.N.; Lorrain, C. Host Adaptation and Virulence in Heteroecious Rust Fungi. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2021, 59, 403–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Padilla-Roji, I.; Fernández-Ortuño, D.; Bakhat, N.; Vielba-Fernández, A.; Pérez-García, A.; Ruiz-Jiménez, L. RNAi Technology: A New Path for the Research and Management of Obligate Biotrophic Phytopathogenic Fungi. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, F.; Wang, S.-H.; Cheewangkoon, R.; Zhao, R.-L. Uneven distribution of prokaryote-derived horizontal gene transfer in fungi: A lifestyle-dependent phenomenon. mBio 2025, 16, e0285524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pahirulzaman, K.A.; Williams, K.; Lazarus, C.M. A toolkit for heterologous expression of metabolic pathways in Aspergillus oryzae. Methods Enzymol. 2012, 517, 241–260. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Alberti, F.; Khairudin, K.; Davies, J.A.; Sangmalee, S.; Willis, C.L.; Foster, G.D.; Bailey, A.M. Biosynthesis of pleuromutilin congeners using an Aspergillus oryzae expression platform. Chem. Sci. 2023, 14, 3826–3833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Heatmap of BGCs conservation across the Cladosporium genus. Presence (colored squares) and absence (white squares) of the five main BGCs identified in the C. limoniforme genome compared to eight related Cladosporium species. The core melanin pathway (T4HN/Scytalone) and Metachelin C are broadly conserved, whereas secondary clusters such as Choline and Clavaric acid show a discontinuous distribution, supporting the hypothesis of lineage-specific gene loss or acquisition.
Figure 1. Heatmap of BGCs conservation across the Cladosporium genus. Presence (colored squares) and absence (white squares) of the five main BGCs identified in the C. limoniforme genome compared to eight related Cladosporium species. The core melanin pathway (T4HN/Scytalone) and Metachelin C are broadly conserved, whereas secondary clusters such as Choline and Clavaric acid show a discontinuous distribution, supporting the hypothesis of lineage-specific gene loss or acquisition.
Metabolites 16 00077 g001
Figure 2. Comparative gene conservation of the repeated BGC T4HN in Cladosporium using Clinker. The first cluster corresponded to the reference BGC (Pestalotiopsis fici), followed by the fungiSMASH and antiSMASH predictions for C. limoniforme. The remaining seven clusters represented other species within the genus Cladosporium. A conserved biosynthetic core (pink) was observed, along with variations in accessory genes, reflecting differences in cluster architecture among species. CogE: Component Of Oligomeric Golgi Complex 3, 2-Hacid_dh: 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase, MFS1: major facilitator superfamily transporter, gpi: glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, adh: alcohol dehydrogenase.
Figure 2. Comparative gene conservation of the repeated BGC T4HN in Cladosporium using Clinker. The first cluster corresponded to the reference BGC (Pestalotiopsis fici), followed by the fungiSMASH and antiSMASH predictions for C. limoniforme. The remaining seven clusters represented other species within the genus Cladosporium. A conserved biosynthetic core (pink) was observed, along with variations in accessory genes, reflecting differences in cluster architecture among species. CogE: Component Of Oligomeric Golgi Complex 3, 2-Hacid_dh: 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase, MFS1: major facilitator superfamily transporter, gpi: glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, adh: alcohol dehydrogenase.
Metabolites 16 00077 g002
Figure 3. Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of T1PKS amino acid sequences. Bootstrap values are indicated at the nodes. Pestalotiopsis fici was used as an outgroup.
Figure 3. Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of T1PKS amino acid sequences. Bootstrap values are indicated at the nodes. Pestalotiopsis fici was used as an outgroup.
Metabolites 16 00077 g003
Table 1. Species of Cladosporium considered in this study for the analysis of BGCs.
Table 1. Species of Cladosporium considered in this study for the analysis of BGCs.
SpeciesGenBankGenome SizeNumber of ContigsContig N50GC PercentGenome DepthHost/Isolation Source
C. cladosporioidesGCA_002901145.133.2 Mb672 Mb52.2374.29×Taxus cuspidata (seeds)
C. cucumerinumGCA_023634325.133.8 Mb292.1 Mb51.5247.27×Cucumis sativus
C. sphaerospermumGCA_023621355.128.1 Mb436691.5 kb55.5100×Homo sapiens (feces)
C. tenuissimumGCA_046128905.132.7 Mb332.1 Mb53170×Luffa aegyptiaca (leaf)
C. oxysporumGCA_035771495.134.5 Mb521.9 Mb53300×Solanum lycopersicum
C. veloxGCA_024604135.132 Mb211.7 Mb53154×Gossypium sp. (cotton field)
C. anthropophilumGCA_052324185.130.8 Mb831.2 Mb53270×Citrus x limon
C. rectoidesGCA_046128805.131.4 Mb192.1 Mb52.5180×Soil at roots of Citrus reticulata
Table 2. Genome assembly statistics and completeness of C. limoniforme.
Table 2. Genome assembly statistics and completeness of C. limoniforme.
MetricValue
Genome size (Mb)28.3
Number of contigs20
Genome depth28.9×
N50 (Mb)1.66
GC content (%)53.5
BUSCO completeness (%)98.6
BUSCO single-copy (%)98.5
BUSCO duplicated (%)0.1
BUSCO fragmented (%)0.1
BUSCO missing (%)1.2
Table 3. Results from antiSMASH and fungiSMASH for C. limoniforme.
Table 3. Results from antiSMASH and fungiSMASH for C. limoniforme.
ToolTotal BGCsKnown BGCsUnknown BGCs
antiSMASH26323
fungiSMASH21417
Table 4. Known BGCs identified in C. limoniforme using antiSMASH and fungiSMASH.
Table 4. Known BGCs identified in C. limoniforme using antiSMASH and fungiSMASH.
ToolRegionCluster TypeSimilar Product (MiBiG)
antiSMASH9.3NRPSCyclo-(D-Phe-L-Phe-D-Val-L-Val)
antiSMASH16.2T1PKS1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxynaphthalene
antiSMASH17.2NRPSmetachelin C
fungiSMASH9.1NRPS-likecholine
fungiSMASH9.2Terpeneclavaric acid
fungiSMASH16.2T1PKSscytalone/T3HN
fungiSMASH17.2NRPSmetachelin C
Table 5. Known and unknown BGCs identified in the Cladosporium genomes.
Table 5. Known and unknown BGCs identified in the Cladosporium genomes.
SpeciesTotal BGCsKnown BGCsUnknown BGCs
C. cladosporioides22319
C. cucumerinum27423
C. sphaerospermum29722
C. tenuissimum36630
C. oxysporum40931
C. velox31526
C. anthropophilum34628
C. rectoides34628
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rojas-Coll, A.; Valencia, J.-I.; Tognarelli, J.; Fernández-Bunster, G. Genomic-Driven Identification of Conserved Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Cladosporium limoniforme: The Case of the DHN-Melanin Pathway. Metabolites 2026, 16, 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo16010077

AMA Style

Rojas-Coll A, Valencia J-I, Tognarelli J, Fernández-Bunster G. Genomic-Driven Identification of Conserved Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Cladosporium limoniforme: The Case of the DHN-Melanin Pathway. Metabolites. 2026; 16(1):77. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo16010077

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rojas-Coll, Angela, José-Ignacio Valencia, Javier Tognarelli, and Guillermo Fernández-Bunster. 2026. "Genomic-Driven Identification of Conserved Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Cladosporium limoniforme: The Case of the DHN-Melanin Pathway" Metabolites 16, no. 1: 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo16010077

APA Style

Rojas-Coll, A., Valencia, J.-I., Tognarelli, J., & Fernández-Bunster, G. (2026). Genomic-Driven Identification of Conserved Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Cladosporium limoniforme: The Case of the DHN-Melanin Pathway. Metabolites, 16(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo16010077

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop