Next Article in Journal
Extracellular Vesicles Contribute to the Difference in Lipid Composition between Ovarian Follicles of Different Size Revealed by Mass Spectrometry Imaging
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Symbiotic Fermentation Broth on Regulating Metabolism with Gut Microbiota and Metabolite Profiles Is Estimated Using a Third-Generation Sequencing Platform
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metabolites
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/metabo13091000
metabolites-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

The Metabolic Footprint of Systemic Effects in the Blood Caused by Radiotherapy and Inflammatory Conditions: A Systematic Review

by
Karol Jelonek
1,*,
Katarzyna Mrowiec
1,
Dorota Gabryś
2 and
Piotr Widłak
3
1
Center for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
2
Department of Radiotherapy, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
3
2nd Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2023, 13(9), 1000; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13091000
Submission received: 11 August 2023 / Revised: 27 August 2023 / Accepted: 7 September 2023 / Published: 9 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Radiation Research)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Response to radiotherapy (RT) includes tissue toxicity, which may involve inflammatory reactions. We aimed to compare changes in metabolic patterns induced at the systemic level by radiation and inflammation itself. Patients treated with RT due to head and neck cancer and patients with inflammation-related diseases located in the corresponding anatomical regions were selected. PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched from 1 January 2000 to 10 August 2023. Twenty-five relevant studies where serum/plasma metabolic profiles were analyzed using different metabolomics approaches were identified. The studies showed different metabolic patterns of acute and chronic inflammatory diseases, yet changes in metabolites linked to the urea cycle and metabolism of arginine and proline were common features of both conditions. Although the reviewed reports showed only a few specific metabolites common for early RT response and inflammatory diseases, partly due to differences in metabolomics approaches, several common metabolic pathways linked to metabolites affected by radiation and inflammation were revealed. They included pathways involved in energy metabolism (e.g., metabolism of ketone bodies, mitochondrial electron transport chain, Warburg effect, citric acid cycle, urea cycle) and metabolism of certain amino acids (Arg, Pro, Gly, Ser, Met, Ala, Glu) and lipids (glycerolipids, branched-chain fatty acids). However, metabolites common for RT and inflammation-related diseases could show opposite patterns of changes. This could be exemplified by the lysophosphatidylcholine to phosphatidylcholine ratio (LPC/PC) that increased during chronic inflammation and decreased during the early phase of response to RT. One should be aware of dynamic metabolic changes during different phases of response to radiation, which involve increased levels of LPC in later phases. Hence, metabolomics studies that would address molecular features of both types of biological responses using comparable analytical and clinical approaches are needed to unravel the complexities of these phenomena, ultimately contributing to a deeper understanding of their impact on biological systems.

1. Introduction

Radiotherapy (RT) uses ionizing radiation (IR) to damage DNA and other components of cells, which ultimately leads to the destruction of their ability to reproduce [1]. IR is mainly directed at tumor volume, but it also damages neighboring healthy tissue, which may result in radiation toxicity. Radiation exposure activates several biological mechanisms. Radiation-induced damage causes the death of target cells and changes in intercellular signaling [2], inflammation [3], immune responses [4], tissue repair processes [5], and the growth [6] of residual cells to compensate for cell loss [7]. The patient’s response to RT is assessed based on observable clinical responses. Clinical symptoms associated with radiation-induced damage to normal tissues are usually reflected as early and late radiotoxic reactions [8]. Early radiation reactions are syndromes of functional and morphologic disturbances in the cells and intercellular spaces of tissues during and within 3 months after radiotherapy [9]. Early radiation toxicity is mostly pronounced in tissues with rapid cellular regeneration, which is associated with a reduction of functional cells that are removed as part of the normal tissue cycle and not replaced by damaged stem cells. Such unrepaired damage causes cell death during the first few cell divisions after the damage. Besides cell death, IR induces various cell signaling pathways. These include activation of inflammatory cytokines and inflammatory cytokine cascades [10], vascular damage [11], and coagulation cascade signaling [12]. The patient’s systemic response to radiation treatment was already measured at different ‘omics’ levels in body fluids [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Among these, metabolomics has great clinical potential as it directly reflects phenotypic and functional changes and correlates with the changes observed at the level of transcripts and proteins [20]. Blood metabolome changes during RT with different time-related patterns. In early response, the number of metabolites with significantly changed levels is high. Over time some of these changes are diminished, while others become chronic.
RT is an effective treatment for patients suffering from head and neck cancer (HNC). Moreover, this cancer is among a few malignancies where the independent RT alone remains a modality of radical treatment. Therefore, this malignancy represents a valid clinical model for molecular radiobiology [21]. Aggressive treatment of HNC (e.g., dose-escalated hypofractionation or accelerated fractionation) is usually required in advanced cancer cases, which might be associated with an increased risk of treatment toxicity. The RT dose escalation trials in HNC treatment [22,23,24,25,26] relied on functional imaging modalities that assisted with target delineation and allowed researchers to push this boundary further. On the other hand, more recently, there is also an observable trend of dose [27,28,29,30,31] and volume [32,33] de-escalation to reduce the subsequent toxicity. Another reported reason for increased toxicities in RT patients is due to the unexpected RT errors where patients receive a higher dose or/and volume of radiation [34]. The major symptom of early radiation toxicity in HNC patients is mucositis, which is usually associated with inflammation and early-phase response [35], but also dermatitis [36]. The body’s metabolism could be affected not only by radiation toxicity within the irradiation field but also by weight loss during and after treatment, which is related to difficulties with swallowing, pain, and appetite loss [37,38,39,40]. More than 50% of HNC patients lose more than 5% of their body weight at the time of initial treatment [41]. Importantly, weight loss alone can induce changes in lipid and amino acid metabolism, energy metabolism, and dietary composition, which was documented for healthy persons [42].
Inflammation is a normal response to injury or infection. Acute inflammatory response involves the release of interleukins [43] and lipid mediators [44] that can cause organ dysfunction. One of the well-known lipid mediators is arachidonic acid, which, during inflammation, is converted to prostaglandins [45]. Acute inflammation usually heals quickly, but chronic inflammation persists and harms healthy tissue. It occurs when the immune system is constantly activated and attracts more leukocytes to the inflamed tissues. Chronic inflammation can affect different body systems and cause various diseases [46]. Inflammatory diseases, both acute and chronic, also influence blood metabolic patterns, which raises the question of the similarity of metabolic changes induced by RT and those associated with inflammatory conditions. One could hypothesize that because inflammation is an important component of radiation toxicity developed during RT, metabolic features observed at the systemic level in the blood of patients undergoing RT and patients suffering from inflammation-related diseases may show similar patterns.
RT-related changes in blood metabolome profiles are best studied in the case of HNC compared to other types of cancers and non-cancer diseases. Therefore, in this systematic review, we aimed to compare the blood metabolome changes observed after irradiation in HNC patients to inflammation-related changes caused by diseases located in the corresponding anatomical regions (i.e., head and neck area or skin). Diseases associated with acute and chronic inflammation were selected to enable the comparison of metabolic features of radiation response with both types of inflammatory conditions. We wanted to know whether early radiation-induced metabolic changes follow patterns characteristic of acute or chronic inflammatory diseases.

2. Materials and Methods

This systematic review was elaborated following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statements [47].

2.1. Search Strategy

We systematically retrieved PubMed and Web of Science databases for articles published between 1 January 2000 and 10 August 2023. The search terms are presented in Table 1. Records were filtered to exclude case reports, meta-analyses, letters, editorials, meeting abstracts, authors’ replies, books, reviews, and articles nonrelevant according to inclusion criteria. Non-English articles were also removed. Two investigators [KJ and KM] conducted an independent preliminary screening based on the titles and abstracts. Full texts were retrieved and prepared to assess eligibility in the next step. Disagreements were resolved by involving the third researcher [PW] in the event of inconsistencies.

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

The inclusion criteria for selecting eligible studies were as follows: (a) studies provided a measure of association between control samples and samples from patients with inflammatory diseases; (b) studies provided a measure of association between patients before and after radiotherapy; and (c) studies were peer-reviewed publication. On the contrary, studies were excluded if they: (a) reported inflammation diseases in combination with other diseases; (b) involved drug supplementation or other treatments; (c) additionally prefiltered serum or plasma and used only fraction; (d) involved children (age < 18); (e) did not include statistical analysis to compare the groups. Two researchers (KJ and KM) independently identified the eligible studies, and their discrepancies were resolved by involving the third researcher (PW).

2.3. Data Extraction and Preparation

A standardized data extraction form was developed to record data from each eligible study in connection with the aims of this systematic review. The following study characteristics were recorded from each eligible study: name of the first author, publication year, inflammatory or RT model, number of patients and controls, sample type, method of analysis, and analyzed metabolites. For each analyzed metabolite, the status of change (significant increase, significant decrease, or no significant change) was recorded. The level of significance was chosen by the authors of the particular study based on their data.

2.4. Pathway Analysis

Metabolic pathways were associated with metabolites with a net significant vector of changes different than zero in all screened studies. Over-represented metabolic pathways were associated with metabolites differentiating between chronic or acute inflammatory disease and healthy control as well as between pre-RT and post-RT statuses using the enrichment analysis on the MetaboAnalyst platform (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/MetaboAnalyst/ModuleView.xhtml (accessed on 14 July 2023)). Obtained enriched pathways and their connections were further analyzed in Cytoscape. The DyNet addon was used to compare two networks and find interacting nodes [48].

3. Results

3.1. Study Selection

Figure 1 presents the study selection flow chart. The applied search strategy retrieved 1151 articles in the Pubmed and Web of Science databases. Duplicate screening excluded 530 articles, while abstract screening excluded another 497 articles. The full texts of the remaining 124 articles were reviewed concerning the study selection criteria, which resulted in 25 studies included in this systematic review.

3.2. Study Characteristics

The characteristics of the 25 eligible studies are summarized in Table 2. Specifically, 4 studies were related to acute inflammatory diseases (AID), 14 studies were related to chronic inflammatory diseases (CID), and 7 studies were related to radiotherapy (RT).
About 1000 compounds present in at least one study were identified; however, only 7 metabolites were commonly analyzed in each of three groups of studies. The numbers of metabolites measured in the studied groups are presented in Figure 2.
Most of the metabolites in the selected studies showed no statistically significant changes (according to the methodology applied by the authors), or changes reported in one study were “counterbalanced” by data from another report. Therefore, to extract a metabolite affected by the analyzed condition, we calculated a net significant change for each metabolite. A net significant change was equal to zero if none of the studies showed a statistically significant change or the number of reports with statistically significant increases and decreases was equal. Then, metabolites for which a net significant change was different from zero were used in further analyses. Information about specific compounds analyzed in each of the 25 eligible studies is presented in Supplementary Table S1.

3.3. Systemic Effects Caused by Acute Inflammatory Diseases

We found four studies with acute inflammatory diseases (summarized in Table 2). In all cases, the analyzed disease was periodontitis. One of the studies utilized GC-MS [50], while the rest used LC-MS/MS approach to analyze serum metabolome. There was no single metabolite that was measured in all four publications. Two studies analyzed arginine and its methylated derivatives: one showed no significantly affected metabolites [52], while the other showed two significantly affected compounds (out of six measured) [51]. Another study performed by LC-MS/MS revealed 28 metabolites (out of 51 measured) that were significantly increased in periodontitis [49]. These metabolites were related to omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and PUFA-metabolites of linoleic acid, arachidonic acid (AA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Another study performed by GC-MS revealed six significantly affected metabolites [50]. In general, out of 62 metabolites measured in studies related to acute inflammatory diseases, 36 compounds had a net significant change different than zero. Among metabolites with reduced levels in the sera of patients were SDMA, 2,5-dihydroxybenzaldehyde, 2-deoxyguanosine, adipic acid, and glutathione. On the other hand, among metabolites with increased levels in sera of patients were allo-inositol, ADMA, two eicosanoids, five HDHA, five HEPE, hepoxilin A3, five HETE, two HODE, lipoxin A4, oxylipin 13, prostaglandin D2, protectin D1, PUFAs (arachidonic acid and its 20-COOH derivative, docosahexaenoic acid, and eicosapentaenoic acid), and urea.

3.4. Systemic Effects Caused by Chronic Inflammatory Diseases

Search for chronic inflammation-related diseases in the region of the head and neck showed disorders related only to the skin. Since the structure of the skin is similar in all regions of the human body, we included in our study skin diseases located in different areas, which revealed 14 studies summarized in Table 2. Most of the studies were focused on psoriasis (10 investigations), two involved atopic dermatitis, and two single studies targeted hidradenitis suppurativa and dermatomyositis. Most of the examinations applied LC-MS/MS (11); two of them used GC-MS, and one study used NMR. The majority of studies analyzed broad metabolic profiles (10 studies), some of them specific lipid profiles (3 studies), and one of them analyzed bioactive lipid mediators [58]. Out of 882 compounds measured in studies related to chronic inflammatory diseases, 153 metabolites showed a net significant change different than zero. For the majority of these compounds, the net significant change was equal to −1 or 1 (e.g., one paper showed a significant change in a specific compound, either increase or decrease, while other(s) papers showed no significant change of the same compound). Six metabolites showed a net significant change equal to −2 (i.e., two more studies with particular metabolites showing significantly lower levels in disease in comparison to the number of studies presenting no change or upregulation): arachidonic acid, 12-HETE, lysoPE (20:4), lactosylceramide (d18:1–12:0), and two PCs (36:4 and 38:5), while six metabolites showed the net significant change equal to +2: four LPCs (16:0, 18:1, 18:0 and 22:6), palmitic amide, and oleamide.

3.5. Comparison of Systemic Effects Caused by Acute and Chronic Inflammatory Diseases

The number of studies available in the literature regarding metabolomic patterns in either type of inflammatory disease (compared to healthy controls) and the number of addressed metabolites is substantially different (Figure 3A), and only six compounds (out of 183 affected in either group) were affected in both acute and chronic inflammatory diseases (Figure 3B). Among 31 metabolites measured in both types of studies, there were 24 compounds affected in either condition (a net change different than 0): 23 metabolites in acute conditions and 7 metabolites in chronic conditions (Figure 3C). Six metabolites (arachidonic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, and four hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids) were affected in both inflammatory conditions. However, these compounds showed increased levels in the serum/plasma of patients with acute inflammation while decreased levels in the serum/plasma of patients with chronic inflammation. This indicated rather limited similarity of metabolic pattern characteristics for acute and chronic inflammatory conditions.
The comparison of specific compounds may not reflect the essence of the difference between acute and chronic inflammation due to markedly different sets of metabolites addressed in both types of studies. Therefore, to enable a more systemic look at metabolic changes, metabolites were annotated with their corresponding pathways that were compared between conditions. The pathway analysis included metabolites with net significance different than zero (as shown in Figure 3B). Over-represented metabolic pathways associated with metabolites differentiating between chronic inflammatory disease or acute inflammatory disease and relevant healthy controls are presented in Figure 4. Among over-represented pathways associated with metabolites affected in both types of inflammatory conditions were arachidonic acid metabolism (the most affected in both groups), linolenic acid metabolism, and urea cycle (Figure 4 A,B). The Cytoscape joint pathway analysis showed the network of 39 pathways associated with metabolites affected by inflammatory conditions (Figure 4C). Among them, only two pathways (Arginine and proline Metabolism and Urea Cycle) were linked to both types of inflammatory conditions, which indicated different patterns of metabolic changes associated with both types of inflammatory conditions.

3.6. Systemic Effects Caused by Radiotherapy

Seven studies related to systemic metabolomic effects caused by RT were retrieved, all of them concerned patients irradiated due to HNC (summarized in Table 2). One study analyzed a global profile of serum metabolites using the NMR approach [71], two studies addressed the global metabolite profile of serum using GC-MS [68,69], and one study addressed plasma amino acids by GC-MS [70]. Choline-containing phospholipids were addressed in two studies based on MS, either LC-MS/MS [19] or MALDI-MS [67]. Another study analyzed a panel of 180 lipids and small metabolites using a targeted MS-based approach [18]. In general, all these studies addressed 358 compounds in total, of which 76 compounds were significantly affected (a net change different than zero) when pre-RT and post/within-RT samples were compared. Additionally, in four studies, samples from irradiated patients were collected more than one time post/within RT, which allowed us to study the kinetics of serum metabolome response to ionizing radiation [18,19,67,71]. This is especially important since the metabolomic changes are dynamic in time (most of the early changes might be compensated later and some even beyond the original pre-RT levels), and not all studies analyzed samples collected at the same time points after the start of RT. In the study that analyzed choline phospholipids, there was a massive decrease in LPC and PC levels two weeks after the start of RT and their subsequent increase one month after the end of RT [67]. The other three studies analyzed samples collected during RT and right after RT. They also revealed differences in metabolic patterns between both time points yet did not show a direct compensation effect, which suggested the requirement of longer post-RT times for the compensation [18,19,71].

3.7. Comparison of Systemic Effects Caused by Radiotherapy and Inflammation-Related Diseases

The number of studies available in the literature regarding metabolomic patterns in irradiated humans and patients with either type of inflammatory disease, as well as the number of addressed metabolites, is substantially different (Figure 5A). Among them, there were 21 metabolites affected both after RT and any inflammatory conditions (Figure 5B).
A set of 214 compounds was measured in both types of studies (Figure 5A). Among them, 53 metabolites were affected by RT, and 44 metabolites were affected by the inflammation-related disease (Figure 5C). A subset of 21 metabolites affected in both conditions included glutamine, dimethylglycine, sebacic acid, 9 phosphatidylcholines, 5 lysophosphatidylcholines, 2 sphingomyelins, oleamide, and urea. Importantly, the only metabolite common for radiation response and acute inflammation was urea, whose level increased in AID and decreased in RT. Other metabolites common for RT and inflammation were characteristic of chronic inflammation. It is noteworthy that except for oleamide (increased in both conditions), levels of common metabolites showed an opposite direction of changes in response to radiation and upon chronic inflammation. Importantly, after RT, levels of LPCs decreased, and levels of PCs decreased, while during inflammation, levels of LPCs increased, and levels of five (out of nine) PCs increased. However, although serum concentrations of LPCs decreased in the first stage of RT, their levels increased in the second stage of RT (healing stage or late effects of RT) [67], which represented a pattern similar to that observed during chronic inflammation. Moreover, glutamine and sebacic acid increased in RT and decreased inflammation, while dimethylglycine decreased in RT and increased in inflammation.
In order to enable a more systemic look at metabolic changes linked to radiation and inflammation, metabolites were annotated with their corresponding metabolic pathways (metabolites with net significant changes different than zero were included). Over-represented metabolic pathways associated with metabolites differentiating between pre-RT and post-RT samples as well as between inflammatory disease and healthy controls, are presented in Figure 6. Among the top 25 overrepresented pathways associated with metabolites affected by inflammation (Figure 6A) and radiation response (Figure 6B), there were eight pathways common for both types of conditions (with the urea cycle as the top ranking). Moreover, when the network of pathways associated with radiation or inflammation-affected metabolites was revealed, there were 16 common pathways, which included the metabolism of ketone bodies and butyrate, metabolism of glycerolipids, metabolism of certain amino acids (Arg, Pro, Gly, Ser, Met, Ala, Glu), metabolism of betaine, urea cycle, citric acid cycle, Warburg effect, glucose-alanine cycle, mitochondrial electron transport chain, oxidation of phytanic acid and branched chain fatty acids (Figure 6C). Two of these sixteen are common for RT and ID pathways (arginine and proline metabolism and urea cycle) and were linked to both types of inflammatory conditions; the rest were specific only to chronic conditions. Although a limited number of common metabolites was identified, several metabolic pathways associated with response to radiation and inflammatory conditions were identified using a pathway analysis approach. However, one should be aware that specific metabolites associated with these common pathways could show the opposite direction of changes in either type of condition, which was described in the previous paragraph. Nonetheless, patterns of RT-related changes strongly correlate with the time of sample collection, which could correspond either to the early phase of response or the late/healing phase of response [18,19,67,71], which further complicates the comparison to inflammatory conditions.

4. Discussion

Inflammation is a critical constituent of normal responses to injury or infection [72]. During acute inflammatory response, large amounts of interleukin and lipid mediators are released and play an important role in the pathogenesis of organ dysfunction. Arachidonic acid is released from phospholipids located in the cell membrane during the activation of an inflammatory response, and it is converted to prostaglandins [45]. Activation of this process was also observed in one of the reviewed studies within the acute inflammatory disease group, where both arachidonic acid and prostaglandin D2 were shown to have significantly changed levels in the disease [49]. Most of the acute inflammations repair relatively quickly, and metabolic homeostasis is rapidly restored. However, a wide range of inflammatory diseases exist due to chronic activation of the immune system, resulting in chronic persistent inflammation [73]. In chronic conditions, inflammation becomes more of a problem than a solution for infection, injury, or illness. Chronic inflammatory tissues continue to signal to attract leukocytes from the bloodstream. As leukocytes move from the blood to the tissues, they amplify the inflammatory response. This chronic inflammatory response damages healthy tissue in a misdirected attempt to repair and heal. Chronic inflammation can take various forms and have the potential to affect diverse body systems [74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82]. Here, we reviewed 14 studies related to chronic inflammation of the skin. Among serum components commonly linked to chronic inflammation were lysophospatidylcholines (LPCs) which increased in disease conditions (in contrast to phosphatidylcholines, PCs). Hence, increased LPC/PC ratio was a characteristic mark of chronic inflammation.
Systemic effects caused by acute and chronic inflammatory diseases differ at every “OME” level, including metabolome [83]. This is also visible from the current review, where only six common metabolites were affected in both types of inflammatory conditions, and all of them changed their levels in different directions in the blood of patients with acute and chronic inflammation. Therefore, there is no general metabolomic pattern of inflammation that could be compared with metabolomic patterns related to radiation response. However, the comparison of metabolomic changes induced by RT and either chronic or acute inflammation revealed several common features. The only significantly changed metabolite common for radiation response and acute inflammation was urea, whose level increased in one study related to aggressive periodontitis [50] and decreased in one study related to RT [69]. However, in this particular report, post-RT samples were collected one month after the end of RT and putatively represented the healing stage of the process, where the levels of radiation-influenced metabolites are compensated even beyond the original pre-RT levels. The affected LPC/PC ratio was the most characteristic difference when common features of chronic inflammation and radiation response were addressed. In chronic inflammation, an increased LPC/PC ratio was observed, while a decreased LPC/PC ratio was linked with response to RT of HNC patients. This observation is contrary to previous observations in whole-body irradiated mice, where an increased ratio of LPCs to PCs was proposed as a radiation biomarker that generally indicates a pro-inflammatory response and phospholipase A activity [84]. Furthermore, the analysis of patients irradiated due to prostate cancer revealed that changes in the LPC/PC ratio depend on the irradiation scheme and dose: the LPC/PC ratio increased after conventional intensity-modulated RT and decreased after hypofractionated accelerated RT [85]. It is also important to note that serum concentrations of LPCs that increased in the initial phase of response to RT were elevated in the later post-RT samples (late RT effects or the healing stage) [67], which resembled the pattern of inflammation more closely.
Large differences in analytical approaches applied to asses serum/plasma metabolic profiles in all retrieved studies are the major limitation of the current analysis. Therefore, only two studies that used the same quantitative targeted MS-based approach to analyze serum metabolite profiles in patients with atopic dermatitis [63] and HNC patients treated with RT [18] were retrieved. Another important limitation of the study is the fact that the radiation response was reported in cancer patients since no metabolomic study exists for patients exposed to RT due to noncancer conditions. Hence, the characteristics of control for radiation response (i.e., pre-RT samples of cancer patients) and inflammatory conditions (i.e., samples of healthy humans) are markedly different. For example, patterns of metabolites linked to energy metabolism (e.g., glycolysis, glycogenesis, Warburg effect, TCA cycle, pyruvate metabolism, and mitochondrial electron transfer chain) were significantly different in pre-RT samples of HNC patients and samples of healthy individuals [69]. Therefore, only differences between addressed conditions (i.e., radiation exposure or inflammation-related disease) and “specific controls” were taken into account. One should also be aware that RT, in addition to toxic reactions induced in the irradiated tissues, may affect the patient’s metabolomic balance in many other ways (e.g., weight loss frequently observed during and after RT). Nonetheless, new metabolomics studies using a comparable clinical and analytical model to compare directly the effects of irradiation and inflammation would be of great importance to elucidate the impact of both conditions on biological systems.

5. Conclusions

This review underscores the delicate balance of inflammation, the intricate repercussions of ionizing radiation exposure, and the potential overlaps and disparities in their metabolic signatures. Inflammation presents its dual nature as a vital acute response promoting tissue repair and metabolic equilibrium and as a detrimental chronic process that damages healthy tissues due to sustained immune activation. A critical observation emerges from the comparison of metabolomic responses to ionizing radiation and acute/chronic inflammation. The network of pathways revealed common pathways associated with radiation and inflammation-affected metabolites, which included the urea cycle, the metabolism of certain amino acids (Arg, Pro, Gly, Ser, Met, Ala, Glu), metabolism of ketone bodies and butyrate, metabolism of glycerolipids, Warburg effect, citric acid cycle, and mitochondrial electron transport chain. While some common features exist, the most distinguishing difference lies in the LPC/PC ratio, which fluctuates inversely in response to radiation and chronic inflammation. However, this pattern is not uniform across different radiation schemes and doses, underscoring the complexity of the response. In light of these findings, there is an urgent need for a deeper exploration of metabolomic patterns and their underlying mechanisms in both inflammation and radiation responses, especially the need for comprehensive studies directly comparing these effects, utilizing comparable analytical approaches and controls. This would shed further light on the intricate interplay between inflammation, radiation, and their metabolic implications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/metabo13091000/s1, Supplementary Table S1: Raw data extracted from the reviewed studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.J., D.G. and P.W.; methodology, K.J.; investigation, K.J. and K.M.; data curation, K.J.; writing—original draft preparation, K.J. and P.W.; writing—review and editing, all authors.; visualization, K.J.; supervision, P.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, J.S.; Wang, H.J.; Qian, H.L. Biological effects of radiation on cancer cells. Mil. Med. Res. 2018, 5, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. McMahon, S.J.; Butterworth, K.T.; Trainor, C.; McGarry, C.K.; O’Sullivan, J.M.; Schettino, G.; Hounsell, A.R.; Prise, K.M. A kinetic-based model of radiation-induced intercellular signalling. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gandhi, S.; Chandna, S. Radiation-induced inflammatory cascade and its reverberating crosstalks as potential cause of post-radiotherapy second malignancies. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2017, 36, 375–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Carvalho, H.A.; Villar, R.C. Radiotherapy and immune response: The systemic effects of a local treatment. Clinics 2018, 73, e557s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McBride, W.H.; Schaue, D. Radiation-induced tissue damage and response. J. Pathol. 2020, 250, 647–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lonati, L.; Barbieri, S.; Guardamagna, I.; Ottolenghi, A.; Baiocco, G. Radiation-induced cell cycle perturbations: A computational tool validated with flow-cytometry data. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bock, F.J.; Riley, J.S. When cell death goes wrong: Inflammatory outcomes of failed apoptosis and mitotic cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2023, 30, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Barnett, G.C.; West, C.M.; Dunning, A.M.; Elliott, R.M.; Coles, C.E.; Pharoah, P.D.; Burnet, N.G. Normal tissue reactions to radiotherapy: Towards tailoring treatment dose by genotype. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wygoda, A.; Maciejewski, B.; Skladowski, K.; Hutnik, M.; Pilecki, B.; Golen, M.; Rutkowski, T. Pattern analysis of acute mucosal reactions in patients with head and neck cancer treated with conventional and accelerated irradiation. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2009, 73, 384–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Di Maggio, F.M.; Minafra, L.; Forte, G.I.; Cammarata, F.P.; Lio, D.; Messa, C.; Gilardi, M.C.; Bravata, V. Portrait of inflammatory response to ionizing radiation treatment. J. Inflamm. 2015, 12, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, E.H.; Marmagkiolis, K.; Balanescu, D.V.; Hakeem, A.; Donisan, T.; Finch, W.; Virmani, R.; Herrman, J.; Cilingiroglu, M.; Grines, C.L.; et al. Radiation-Induced Vascular Disease–A State-of-the-Art Review. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 652761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kennedy, A.R.; Maity, A.; Sanzari, J.K. A Review of Radiation-Induced Coagulopathy and New Findings to Support Potential Prevention Strategies and Treatments. Radiat. Res. 2016, 186, 121–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Story, M.D.; Durante, M. Radiogenomics. Med. Phys. 2018, 45, e1111–e1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, H.; Yu, J.; Kong, D.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Shui, J.; Li, Z.; Luo, H.; Wang, K. Population and single-cell transcriptome analyses reveal diverse transcriptional changes associated with radioresistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Oncol. 2019, 55, 1237–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jelonek, K.; Pietrowska, M.; Widlak, P. Systemic effects of ionizing radiation at the proteome and metabolome levels in the blood of cancer patients treated with radiotherapy: The influence of inflammation and radiation toxicity. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2017, 93, 683–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Widłak, P.; Pietrowska, M.; Polańska, J.; Rutkowski, T.; Jelonek, K.; Kalinowska-Herok, M.; Gdowicz-Kłosok, A.; Wygoda, A.; Tarnawski, R.; Składowski, K. Radiotherapy-related changes in serum proteome patterns of head and neck cancer patients; The effect of low and medium doses of radiation delivered to large volumes of normal tissue. J. Transl. Med. 2013, 11, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Widlak, P.; Jelonek, K.; Wojakowska, A.; Pietrowska, M.; Polanska, J.; Marczak, Ł.; Miszczyk, L.; Składowski, K. Serum proteome signature of radiation response: Upregulation of inflammation-related factors, and downregulation of apolipoproteins and coagulation factors in cancer patients subjected to radiotherapy—A pilot study. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2015, 92, 1108–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jelonek, K.; Krzywon, A.; Jablonska, P.; Slominska, E.M.; Smolenski, R.T.; Polanska, J.; Rutkowski, T.; Mrochem-Kwarciak, J.; Skladowski, K.; Widlak, P. Systemic Effects of Radiotherapy and Concurrent Chemo-Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer Patients-Comparison of Serum Metabolome Profiles. Metabolites 2020, 10, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jelonek, K.; Krzywon, A.; Papaj, K.; Polanowski, P.; Szczepanik, K.; Skladowski, K.; Widlak, P. Dose-dependence of radiotherapy-induced changes in serum levels of choline-containing phospholipids; The importance of lower doses delivered to large volumes of normal tissues. Strahlenther. Und Onkol. 2021, 197, 926–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Spratlin, J.L.; Serkova, N.J.; Eckhardt, S.G. Clinical applications of metabolomics in oncology: A review. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alsahafi, E.; Begg, K.; Amelio, I.; Raulf, N.; Lucarelli, P.; Sauter, T.; Tavassoli, M. Clinical update on head and neck cancer: Molecular biology and ongoing challenges. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liu, F.; Xi, X.P.; Wang, H.; Han, Y.Q.; Xiao, F.; Hu, Y.; He, Q.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, Q.; Liu, L.; et al. PET/CT-guided dose-painting versus CT-based intensity modulated radiation therapy in locoregional advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiat. Oncol. 2017, 12, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chakraborty, S.; Ghoshal, S.; Patil, V.M.; Oinam, A.S.; Sharma, S.C. Preliminary results of SIB-IMRT in head and neck cancers: Report from a regional cancer center in northern India. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2009, 5, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gujral, D.M.; Miah, A.B.; Bodla, S.; Richards, T.M.; Welsh, L.; Schick, U.; Powell, C.J.; Clark, C.H.; Bidmead, M.A.; Grove, L.; et al. Final long-term results of a phase I/II study of dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancers. Oral Oncol. 2014, 50, 1089–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Studer, G.; Peponi, E.; Kloeck, S.; Dossenbach, T.; Huber, G.; Glanzmann, C. Surviving hypopharynx-larynx carcinoma in the era of IMRT. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2010, 77, 1391–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Berwouts, D.; Madani, I.; Duprez, F.; Olteanu, A.L.; Vercauteren, T.; Boterberg, T.; Deron, P.; Bonte, K.; Huvenne, W.; De Neve, W.; et al. Long-term outcome of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-guided dose painting for head and neck cancer: Matched case-control study. Head Neck 2017, 39, 2264–2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Deschuymer, S.; Nevens, D.; Duprez, F.; Daisne, J.-F.; Dok, R.; Laenen, A.; Voordeckers, M.; De Neve, W.; Nuyts, S. Randomized clinical trial on reduction of radiotherapy dose to the elective neck in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; update of the long-term tumor outcome. Radiother. Oncol. 2020, 143, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nevens, D.; Duprez, F.; Daisne, J.-F.; Schatteman, J.; Van der Vorst, A.; De Neve, W.; Nuyts, S. Recurrence patterns after a decreased dose of 40 Gy to the elective treated neck in head and neck cancer. Radiother. Oncol. 2017, 123, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maguire, P.D.; Neal, C.R.; Hardy, S.M.; Schreiber, A.M. Single-Arm Phase 2 Trial of Elective Nodal Dose Reduction for Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2018, 100, 1210–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cho, W.K.; Oh, D.; Lee, E.; Kim, T.G.; Lee, H.; Nam, H.; Noh, J.M.; Ahn, Y.C. Feasibility of Selective Neck Irradiation with Lower Elective Radiation Dose in Treating Nasopharynx Cancer Patients. Cancer Res. Treat. 2019, 51, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sher, D.J.; Pham, N.-L.; Shah, J.L.; Sen, N.; Williams, K.A.; Subramaniam, R.M.; Moore, W.; Chorley, R.; Ahn, C.; Khan, S.M. Prospective Phase 2 Study of Radiation Therapy Dose and Volume De-escalation for Elective Neck Treatment of Oropharyngeal and Laryngeal Cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2021, 109, 932–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zukauskaite, R.; Hansen, C.R.; Grau, C.; Samsøe, E.; Johansen, J.; Petersen, J.B.B.; Andersen, E.; Brink, C.; Overgaard, J.; Eriksen, J.G. Local recurrences after curative IMRT for HNSCC: Effect of different GTV to high-dose CTV margins. Radiother. Oncol. 2018, 126, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Burr, A.R.; Harari, P.M.; Ko, H.C.; Bruce, J.Y.; Kimple, R.J.; Witek, M.E. Reducing radiotherapy target volume expansion for patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 2019, 92, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. van Herk, M. Errors and margins in radiotherapy. Semin. Radiat. Oncol. 2004, 14, 52–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wygoda, A.; Rutkowski, T.; Hutnik, M.; Skladowski, K.; Golen, M.; Pilecki, B. Acute mucosal reactions in patients with head and neck cancer. Three patterns of mucositis observed during radiotherapy. Strahlenther. Und Onkol. 2013, 189, 547–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Maciejewski, B.; Withers, H.R.; Taylor, J.M.G.; Hliniak, A. Dose fractionation and regeneration in radiotherapy for cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Part 2. Normal tissue responses: Acute and late effects. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1990, 18, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ottosson, S.; Zackrisson, B.; Kjellén, E.; Nilsson, P.; Laurell, G. Weight loss in patients with head and neck cancer during and after conventional and accelerated radiotherapy. Acta Oncol. 2013, 52, 711–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bozzetti, F.; Cotogni, P. Nutritional Issues in Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Healthcare 2020, 8, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abu Zaid, Z.; Kay Neoh, M.; Mat Daud, Z.A.; Md Yusop, N.B.; Ibrahim, Z.; Abdul Rahman, Z.; Jamhuri, N.; Abdul Azim, A.Z. Weight Loss in Post-Chemoradiotherapy Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Nutrients 2022, 14, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cacicedo, J.; Casquero, F.; Martinez-Indart, L.; del Hoyo, O.; Gomez de Iturriaga, A.; Navarro, A.; Bilbao, P. A prospective analysis of factors that influence weight loss in patients undergoing radiotherapy. Chin. J. Cancer 2014, 33, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ghadjar, P.; Hayoz, S.; Zimmermann, F.; Bodis, S.; Kaul, D.; Badakhshi, H.; Bernier, J.; Studer, G.; Plasswilm, L.; Budach, V.; et al. Impact of weight loss on survival after chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer: Secondary results of a randomized phase III trial (SAKK 10/94). Radiat. Oncol. 2015, 10, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vijay, A.; Valdes, A.M. The Metabolomic Signatures of Weight Change. Metabolites 2019, 9, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tanaka, T.; Narazaki, M.; Kishimoto, T. IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014, 6, a016295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Serhan, C.N.; Chiang, N.; Dalli, J.; Levy, B.D. Lipid mediators in the resolution of inflammation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014, 7, a016311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ricciotti, E.; FitzGerald, G.A. Prostaglandins and inflammation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011, 31, 986–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Furman, D.; Campisi, J.; Verdin, E.; Carrera-Bastos, P.; Targ, S.; Franceschi, C.; Ferrucci, L.; Gilroy, D.W.; Fasano, A.; Miller, G.W.; et al. Chronic inflammation in the etiology of disease across the life span. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1822–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Page, M.J.; Moher, D.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj 2021, 372, n160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Goenawan, I.H.; Bryan, K.; Lynn, D.J. DyNet: Visualization and analysis of dynamic molecular interaction networks. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 2713–2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Elabdeen, H.R.; Mustafa, M.; Szklenar, M.; Rühl, R.; Ali, R.; Bolstad, A.I. Ratio of pro-resolving and pro-inflammatory lipid mediator precursors as potential markers for aggressive periodontitis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, H.W.; Zhou, W.; Liao, Y.; Hu, S.C.; Chen, T.L.; Song, Z.C. Analysis of metabolic profiles of generalized aggressive periodontitis. J. Periodontal. Res. 2018, 53, 894–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Şengül, V.; Güney, Z.; Kurgan, Ş.; Önder, C.; Serdar, M.A.; Günhan, M. Evaluation of salivary and serum methylated arginine metabolites and nitric oxide synthase in advanced periodontitis patients. Clin. Oral Investig. 2022, 26, 5061–5070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yilmaz, M.; Yay, E.; Atalay, N.; Balci, N.; Kurgan, Ş.; Toygar, H.; Serdar, M.A. Do arginine metabolites have a role in periodontitis due to smoking? A new perspective. Oral Dis. 2022, 00, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Armstrong, A.W.; Wu, J.; Johnson, M.A.; Grapov, D.; Azizi, B.; Dhillon, J.; Fiehn, O. Metabolomics in psoriatic disease: Pilot study reveals metabolite differences in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. F1000Res 2014, 3, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Li, L.; Chuan-Jian, L.; Ling, H.; Jing-Wen, D.; Ze-Hui, H.; Yu-Hong, Y.; Zhong-Zhao, Z. Untargeted serum metabonomics study of psoriasis vulgaris based on ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 95931–95944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Myśliwiec, H.; Baran, A.; Harasim-Symbor, E.; Myśliwiec, P.; Milewska, A.J.; Chabowski, A.; Flisiak, I. Serum fatty acid profile in psoriasis and its comorbidity. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2017, 309, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zeng, C.; Wen, B.; Hou, G.; Lei, L.; Mei, Z.; Jia, X.; Chen, X.; Zhu, W.; Li, J.; Kuang, Y.; et al. Lipidomics profiling reveals the role of glycerophospholipid metabolism in psoriasis. Gigascience 2017, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sorokin, A.V.; Norris, P.C.; English, J.T.; Dey, A.K.; Chaturvedi, A.; Baumer, Y.; Silverman, J.; Playford, M.P.; Serhan, C.N.; Mehta, N.N. Identification of proresolving and inflammatory lipid mediators in human psoriasis. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2018, 12, 1047–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sorokin, A.V.; Domenichiello, A.F.; Dey, A.K.; Yuan, Z.X.; Goyal, A.; Rose, S.M.; Playford, M.P.; Ramsden, C.E.; Mehta, N.N. Bioactive Lipid Mediator Profiles in Human Psoriasis Skin and Blood. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2018, 138, 1518–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, S.S.; Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, L.P.; Xue, L.F.; Yin, G.S.; Wu, X.S. Identification of psoriasis vulgaris biomarkers in human plasma by non-targeted metabolomics based on UPLC-Q-TOF/MS. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 3940–3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, L.; Yao, D.N.; Lu, Y.; Deng, J.W.; Wei, J.A.; Yan, Y.H.; Deng, H.; Han, L.; Lu, C.J. Metabonomics Study on Serum Characteristic Metabolites of Psoriasis Vulgaris Patients With Blood-Stasis Syndrome. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 558731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cao, H.; Su, S.; Yang, Q.; Le, Y.; Chen, L.; Hu, M.; Guo, X.; Zheng, J.; Li, X.; Yu, Y. Metabolic profiling reveals interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody treatment ameliorate lipids metabolism with the potentiality to reduce cardiovascular risk in psoriasis patients. Lipids Health Dis. 2021, 20, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Tarentini, E.; Odorici, G.; Righi, V.; Paganelli, A.; Giacomelli, L.; Mirisola, V.; Mucci, A.; Benassi, L.; D’Aversa, E.; Lasagni, C.; et al. Integrated metabolomic analysis and cytokine profiling define clusters of immuno-metabolic correlation in new-onset psoriasis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ottas, A.; Fishman, D.; Okas, T.L.; Püssa, T.; Toomik, P.; Märtson, A.; Kingo, K.; Soomets, U. Blood serum metabolome of atopic dermatitis: Altered energy cycle and the markers of systemic inflammation. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0188580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Raouf, J.; Idborg, H.; Englund, P.; Alexanderson, H.; Dastmalchi, M.; Jakobsson, P.J.; Lundberg, I.E.; Korotkova, M. Targeted lipidomics analysis identified altered serum lipid profiles in patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2018, 20, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Choi, E.; Mir, S.A.; Ji, S.; Ooi, X.T.; Chua, E.W.L.; Yi Wei, Y.; Wenk, M.R.; Bendt, A.K.; Chandran, N.S. Understanding the systemic burden of disease in hidradenitis suppurativa from plasma lipidomic analysis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2022, 107, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sakai, T.; Herrmann, N.; Maintz, L.; Nümm, T.J.; Welchowski, T.; Claus, R.A.; Gräler, M.H.; Bieber, T. Altered Serum Phospholipids in Atopic Dermatitis and Association with Clinical Status. JID Innov. 2022, 2, 100092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jelonek, K.; Pietrowska, M.; Ros, M.; Zagdanski, A.; Suchwalko, A.; Polanska, J.; Marczyk, M.; Rutkowski, T.; Skladowski, K.; Clench, M.R.; et al. Radiation-induced changes in serum lipidome of head and neck cancer patients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 6609–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ros-Mazurczyk, M.; Wojakowska, A.; Marczak, L.; Polanski, K.; Pietrowska, M.; Jelonek, K.; Dominczyk, I.; Hajduk, A.; Rutkowski, T.; Skladowski, K.; et al. Ionizing radiation affects profile of serum metabolites: Increased level of 3-hydroxybutyric acid in serum of cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2017, 64, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wojakowska, A.; Zebrowska, A.; Skowronek, A.; Rutkowski, T.; Polanski, K.; Widlak, P.; Marczak, L.; Pietrowska, M. Metabolic Profiles of Whole Serum and Serum-Derived Exosomes Are Different in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated by Radiotherapy. J. Pers. Med. 2020, 10, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rodríguez-Tomàs, E.; Arguís, M.; Arenas, M.; Fernández-Arroyo, S.; Murcia, M.; Sabater, S.; Torres, L.; Baiges-Gayà, G.; Hernández-Aguilera, A.; Camps, J.; et al. Alterations in plasma concentrations of energy-balance-related metabolites in patients with lung, or head & neck, cancers: Effects of radiotherapy. J. Proteom. 2020, 213, 103605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Boguszewicz, Ł.; Bieleń, A.; Ciszek, M.; Wendykier, J.; Szczepanik, K.; Skorupa, A.; Mrochem-Kwarciak, J.; Składowski, K.; Sokół, M. NMR-Based Metabolomics in Investigation of the Radiation Induced Changes in Blood Serum of Head and Neck Cancer Patients and Its Correlation with the Tissue Volumes Exposed to the Particulate Doses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Chen, L.; Deng, H.; Cui, H.; Fang, J.; Zuo, Z.; Deng, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, L. Inflammatory responses and inflammation-associated diseases in organs. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 7204–7218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Murakami, M.; Hirano, T. The molecular mechanisms of chronic inflammation development. Front. Immunol. 2012, 3, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Deepak, P.; Axelrad, J.E.; Ananthakrishnan, A.N. The Role of the Radiologist in Determining Disease Severity in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Gastrointest. Endosc. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 29, 447–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Yousuf, A.; Ibrahim, W.; Greening, N.J.; Brightling, C.E. T2 Biologics for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2019, 7, 1405–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Milenkovic, V.M.; Stanton, E.H.; Nothdurfter, C.; Rupprecht, R.; Wetzel, C.H. The Role of Chemokines in the Pathophysiology of Major Depressive Disorder. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cutolo, M.; Soldano, S.; Smith, V. Pathophysiology of systemic sclerosis: Current understanding and new insights. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2019, 15, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ding, Q.; Hu, W.; Wang, R.; Yang, Q.; Zhu, M.; Li, M.; Cai, J.; Rose, P.; Mao, J.; Zhu, Y.Z. Signaling pathways in rheumatoid arthritis: Implications for targeted therapy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Dasgupta, S.; Ghosh, N.; Bhattacharyya, P.; Roy Chowdhury, S.; Chaudhury, K. Metabolomics of asthma, COPD, and asthma-COPD overlap: An overview. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2023, 60, 153–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pedersen, C.C.; Ushakova, A.; Skogseth, R.E.; Alves, G.; Tysnes, O.B.; Aarsland, D.; Lange, J.; Maple-Grødem, J. Inflammatory Biomarkers in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Parkinson Disease and Related Neurodegenerative Disorders. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflammation 2023, 10, e200132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, C.L.; Gao, M.Q.; Jiang, X.C.; Pan, X.; Zhang, X.Y.; Li, Y.; Shen, Q.; Chen, Y.; Pang, B. Research progress and value of albumin-related inflammatory markers in the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer: A review of clinical evidence. Ann. Med. 2023, 55, 1294–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Frego, N.; Contieri, R.; Diana, P.; Mancon, S.; Colombo, P.; Lazzeri, M.; Buffi, N.M.; Casale, P.; Hurle, R. Inflammatory markers and Type 2 diabetes mellitus as prognostic risk factors in low-risk bladder cancer. BJU Int. 2023, 132, 154–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Abudukelimu, A.; Barberis, M.; Redegeld, F.A.; Sahin, N.; Westerhoff, H.V. Predictable Irreversible Switching Between Acute and Chronic Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Laiakis, E.C.; Canadell, M.P.; Grilj, V.; Harken, A.D.; Garty, G.Y.; Astarita, G.; Brenner, D.J.; Smilenov, L.; Fornace, A.J., Jr. Serum lipidomic analysis from mixed neutron/X-ray radiation fields reveals a hyperlipidemic and pro-inflammatory phenotype. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Frey, B.; Mika, J.; Jelonek, K.; Cruz-Garcia, L.; Roelants, C.; Testard, I.; Cherradi, N.; Lumniczky, K.; Polozov, S.; Napieralska, A.; et al. Systemic modulation of stress and immune parameters in patients treated for prostate adenocarcinoma by intensity-modulated radiation therapy or stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy. Strahlenther. Und Onkol. 2020, 196, 1018–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Metabolites 13 01000 g001
Figure 1. Flowchart of study selection. It presents the process by which relevant studies were retrieved from the databases, assessed, selected, or excluded. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) diagram was used for the study search.
Figure 1. Flowchart of study selection. It presents the process by which relevant studies were retrieved from the databases, assessed, selected, or excluded. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) diagram was used for the study search.
Metabolites 13 01000 g001
Metabolites 13 01000 g002
Figure 2. The number of metabolites identified in analyzed studies. AA—arachidonic acid; ADMA—asymmetric dimethylarginine; AID—acute inflammatory diseases; CID—chronic inflammatory diseases; DHA—docosahexaenoic acid; LA—linoleic acid; RT—Radiotherapy; SDMA—symmetric dimethylarginine.
Figure 2. The number of metabolites identified in analyzed studies. AA—arachidonic acid; ADMA—asymmetric dimethylarginine; AID—acute inflammatory diseases; CID—chronic inflammatory diseases; DHA—docosahexaenoic acid; LA—linoleic acid; RT—Radiotherapy; SDMA—symmetric dimethylarginine.
Metabolites 13 01000 g002
Metabolites 13 01000 g003
Figure 3. Numbers of metabolites analyzed in studies related to acute and chronic inflammatory disease. (A) Numbers of all measured compounds. (B) Numbers of all metabolites which significantly changed levels were noted between disease conditions and relevant controls. (C) Numbers of metabolites discriminating inflammatory conditions and controls in the subset of compounds measured in both types of inflammation. AA—arachidonic acid; AID—acute inflammatory diseases; CID—chronic inflammatory diseases; DHA—docosahexaenoic acid; HDHA—hydroxy docosahexaenoic acid; HETE—hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid.
Figure 3. Numbers of metabolites analyzed in studies related to acute and chronic inflammatory disease. (A) Numbers of all measured compounds. (B) Numbers of all metabolites which significantly changed levels were noted between disease conditions and relevant controls. (C) Numbers of metabolites discriminating inflammatory conditions and controls in the subset of compounds measured in both types of inflammation. AA—arachidonic acid; AID—acute inflammatory diseases; CID—chronic inflammatory diseases; DHA—docosahexaenoic acid; HDHA—hydroxy docosahexaenoic acid; HETE—hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid.
Metabolites 13 01000 g003
Metabolites 13 01000 g004
Figure 4. Pathways associated with metabolites affected by inflammatory diseases. Overview of top metabolite sets enriched in acute inflammation (A) and chronic inflammation (B) according to the MataboAnalyst analysis. The higher the dot in Enrichment Ratio, the more metabolites were present in a given pathway. (C) Network of pathways associated with inflammation-related metabolites (according to the Cytoscape analysis). AID—acute inflammatory diseases; CID—chronic inflammatory diseases.
Figure 4. Pathways associated with metabolites affected by inflammatory diseases. Overview of top metabolite sets enriched in acute inflammation (A) and chronic inflammation (B) according to the MataboAnalyst analysis. The higher the dot in Enrichment Ratio, the more metabolites were present in a given pathway. (C) Network of pathways associated with inflammation-related metabolites (according to the Cytoscape analysis). AID—acute inflammatory diseases; CID—chronic inflammatory diseases.
Metabolites 13 01000 g004
Metabolites 13 01000 g005
Figure 5. Numbers of metabolites analyzed in studies related to RT and inflammatory diseases. (A) Numbers of all measured compounds in either type of study (both types of inflammation-related diseases treated collectively). (B) Numbers of all metabolites that significantly changed levels were noted after irradiation (RT) or in inflammation-related disease (ID). (C) Numbers of metabolites affected by RT and discriminating inflammatory conditions from healthy controls in the subset of compounds measured in both types of studies. Urea marked with blue was affected by acute inflammation, and other compounds were affected by chronic inflammation. DMG—dimethylglycine; Gln—glutamine; ID—inflammatory diseases; LPC—lysophosphatidylcholine; PC—phosphatidylcholine; RT- radiotherapy; SA—sebacic acid; SM—sphingomyelin.
Figure 5. Numbers of metabolites analyzed in studies related to RT and inflammatory diseases. (A) Numbers of all measured compounds in either type of study (both types of inflammation-related diseases treated collectively). (B) Numbers of all metabolites that significantly changed levels were noted after irradiation (RT) or in inflammation-related disease (ID). (C) Numbers of metabolites affected by RT and discriminating inflammatory conditions from healthy controls in the subset of compounds measured in both types of studies. Urea marked with blue was affected by acute inflammation, and other compounds were affected by chronic inflammation. DMG—dimethylglycine; Gln—glutamine; ID—inflammatory diseases; LPC—lysophosphatidylcholine; PC—phosphatidylcholine; RT- radiotherapy; SA—sebacic acid; SM—sphingomyelin.
Metabolites 13 01000 g005
Metabolites 13 01000 g006
Figure 6. Pathways associated with metabolites affected by radiation and inflammatory diseases. Overview of top metabolite sets enriched in inflammatory conditions (A) and after irradiation (B) according to the MataboAnalyst analysis. The higher the dot in Enrichment Ratio, the more metabolites were present in a given pathway. (C) Network of pathways associated with irradiation and inflammation-related metabolites (according to the Cytoscape analysis). ID—inflammatory diseases; AID—acute inflammatory diseases; CID—chronic inflammatory diseases; RT—radiotherapy.
Figure 6. Pathways associated with metabolites affected by radiation and inflammatory diseases. Overview of top metabolite sets enriched in inflammatory conditions (A) and after irradiation (B) according to the MataboAnalyst analysis. The higher the dot in Enrichment Ratio, the more metabolites were present in a given pathway. (C) Network of pathways associated with irradiation and inflammation-related metabolites (according to the Cytoscape analysis). ID—inflammatory diseases; AID—acute inflammatory diseases; CID—chronic inflammatory diseases; RT—radiotherapy.
Metabolites 13 01000 g006
Table 1. The search terms were used to retrieve the studies from the databases. The successful record had to consist of at least one term from each column.
Table 1. The search terms were used to retrieve the studies from the databases. The successful record had to consist of at least one term from each column.
AND
OR- metabolite- radiotherapy- serum- human- mass spectrometry
- metabolites- radiation- sera- humans- MS
- metabolome- dermatitis- plasma- patient- gas chromatography
- metabonome- mucositis- plasmas- patients- GC
- metabolic- laryngitis- blood - liquid chromatography
- metabolomic- odynophagia - LC
- metabolomics- esophagitis - capillary electrophoresis
- lipid- pharyngitis - CE
- lipids
- lipidome
- lipidomics		- tonsillitis
- aphtha
- otitis		 - matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight
- lipidomic- epiglottitis
- sinusitis
- pulpitis		 - matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight
- periodontitis - MALDI-TOF
- gingivitis - triple quadrupole
- xerostomia - QQQ
- shingles - ion trap
- erysipelas - IT
- sialadenitis - quadrupole ion trap
- angina - QIT
- orbitrap
- Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance
- FTICR
- nuclear magnetic resonance
- NMR
- magnetic resonance spectroscopy
- MRS
Table 2. Studies presenting the influence of inflammatory diseases or radiotherapy on human blood metabolome.
Table 2. Studies presenting the influence of inflammatory diseases or radiotherapy on human blood metabolome.
Clinical ModelControls 1 (n)Cases 2 (n)Type of
Material		Method of AnalysisAnalyzed MetabolitesReference
Acute Inflammatory Disease
AgP1919serumLC-MS/MSn3 and n6 PUFAs[49]
AgP2020serumGC-MSglobal profile[50]
periodontitis2421serumLC-MS/MSarginine and derivatives[51]
periodontitis2020serumLC-MS/MSarginine and derivatives[52]
Chronic Inflammatory Disease
psoriasis1010serumGC-MSglobal profile[53]
psoriasis7575serumLC-MSglobal profile[54]
psoriasis3285serumGC-MSfatty acid profile[55]
psoriasis4545plasmaLC-MS/MSglobal profile[56]
psoriasis77serum and plasmaLC-MS/MSBLMs[57]
psoriasis3060serum and
plasma		LC-MS/MS;
GC-MS		BLMs[58]
psoriasis1212plasmaLC-MSglobal profile[59]
psoriasis4550serumLC-MSglobal profile[60]
psoriasis2828serumLC-MSlipid profile[61]
psoriasis77serumNMRglobal profile[62]
AD2425serumLC-MS/MSglobal profile 3[63]
PM or DM1213serumLC-MS/MS;
GC-FID		global profile[64]
HS7360plasmaLC-MS/MSglobal profile[65]
AD4730serumLC-MS/MSCer, Sph, LPC, PC, SM, and LPE[66]
Radiotherapy 4
CAIR (1.8; 72)6666serumMALDI-MSglobal profile[67]
CAIR (1.8; 72)2020serumGC-MSglobal profile[68]
CAIR; CFRT; (1.8–2.5; 62.5–72)1818serumLC-MS/MSglobal profile 3[18]
CAIR (1.8; 72)1010serumGC-MSglobal profile[69]
CFRT (2; 70)2828plasmaGC-MSamino acids[70]
CAIR; CFRT; MAN (1.8–3; 51–72)106106serumNMRglobal profile[71]
CAIR; CFRT; MAN (1.8–3; 51–72)4545serumLC-MS/MSglobal profile[19]
1 healthy controls in case of inflammatory disease or pre-RT samples in case of RT; 2 inflammatory disease or within/post-RT samples in case of RT; 3 Biocrates p180 targeted assay; 4 In the “Clinical model” column specified are Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) schemes with dose per fraction (Gy) and total doses (Gy) in the parenthesis. AD—atopic dermatitis; AgP—aggressive periodontitis; BLMs—Bioactive lipid mediators; CAIR—continuous accelerated irradiation; CFRT—conventional fractionated radiotherapy; DM—dermatomyositis; HNC—head and neck cancer; HS—hidradenitis suppurativa; MAN—Manchester scheme (accelerated hypofractionated irradiation); PM—polymyositis; PUFAs—polyunsaturated fatty acids.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jelonek, K.; Mrowiec, K.; Gabryś, D.; Widłak, P. The Metabolic Footprint of Systemic Effects in the Blood Caused by Radiotherapy and Inflammatory Conditions: A Systematic Review. Metabolites 2023, 13, 1000. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13091000

AMA Style

Jelonek K, Mrowiec K, Gabryś D, Widłak P. The Metabolic Footprint of Systemic Effects in the Blood Caused by Radiotherapy and Inflammatory Conditions: A Systematic Review. Metabolites. 2023; 13(9):1000. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13091000

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jelonek, Karol, Katarzyna Mrowiec, Dorota Gabryś, and Piotr Widłak. 2023. "The Metabolic Footprint of Systemic Effects in the Blood Caused by Radiotherapy and Inflammatory Conditions: A Systematic Review" Metabolites 13, no. 9: 1000. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13091000

APA Style

Jelonek, K., Mrowiec, K., Gabryś, D., & Widłak, P. (2023). The Metabolic Footprint of Systemic Effects in the Blood Caused by Radiotherapy and Inflammatory Conditions: A Systematic Review. Metabolites, 13(9), 1000. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13091000

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop