Next Article in Journal
Urinary 1H NMR Metabolomic Analysis of Prenatal Maternal Stress Due to a Natural Disaster Reveals Metabolic Risk Factors for Non-Communicable Diseases: The QF2011 Queensland Flood Study
Previous Article in Journal
Multinuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at Ultra-High-Field: Assessing Human Cerebral Metabolism in Healthy and Diseased States
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Influence of Cholesterol on the Regulation of Osteoblast Function

by
Alena Akhmetshina
1,2,
Dagmar Kratky
1,3 and
Elizabeth Rendina-Ruedy
2,4,*
1
Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Medical University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
2
Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
3
BioTechMed-Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
4
Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2023, 13(4), 578; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13040578
Submission received: 14 March 2023 / Revised: 11 April 2023 / Accepted: 19 April 2023 / Published: 21 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Cell Metabolism)

Abstract

:
Bone is a dynamic tissue composed of cells, an extracellular matrix, and mineralized portion. Osteoblasts are responsible for proper bone formation and remodeling, and function. These processes are endergonic and require cellular energy in the form of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which is derived from various sources such as glucose, fatty acids, and amino acids. However, other lipids such as cholesterol have also been found to play a critical role in bone homeostasis and can also contribute to the overall bioenergetic capacity of osteoblasts. In addition, several epidemiological studies have found a link between elevated cholesterol, cardiovascular disease, an enhanced risk of osteoporosis, and increased bone metastasis in cancer patients. This review focuses on how cholesterol, its derivatives, and cholesterol-lowering medications (statins) regulate osteoblast function and bone formation. It also highlights the molecular mechanisms underlying the cholesterol–osteoblast crosstalk.

1. Introduction

The bones that constitute the skeleton (approximately 15% of the body weight) are one of the largest organs in humans and animals. Bone tissue is a type of connective tissue characterized by strength and structural support. As external forces are constantly changing, bone maintains its supportive properties by continuous turnover, although this rate is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. In this regard, bone is inherently dynamic in nature, as it is being degraded and regenerated [1,2]. This process occurs through primary bone cells represented by bone-forming osteoblasts, bone-resorbing osteoclasts, and terminally differentiated mechano-sensing osteocytes [3], which are deeply embedded in the extracellular matrix (ECM) and the mineralized portion of the bone [4]. Thus, osteoblasts form bone by orchestrating the secretion of matrix and mineralization vesicles that give rise to ‘bone’. This unique composition of bone is dominated by the inorganic components that constitute the mineralized portion, including hydroxyapatite [Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2], owing to the hard and brittle characteristics of bone, while the organic portion contributes to its plasticity [5,6]. Actual bone composition is more complex, and further studies are required to find specific nanocomposites that may play a role as scaffolds in bone regeneration [7].
As the main players responsible for bone formation, osteoblasts differentiate from multipotent mesenchymal stem cells of the bone marrow [8] with the support of the transcription factors RUNX2 and Osterix (encoded by Sp7) [9]. The differentiation of pre-osteoblasts into osteoblasts is accompanied by the formation of new capillaries [10]. At high partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) values, osteogenic cells differentiate into osteoblasts, whereas at a low pO2 they differentiate into chondroblasts [11]. During active bone formation, three types of osteoblasts are distinguished, whose ultrastructure reflects the peculiarities of their functional activity [3,12]. Osteoblasts are further divided into mature and immature [13], active and quiescent cells [14]. Mature osteoblasts are characterized by high osteogenic activity, rapidly producing organic ECM, including collagen type 1, proteoglycans, and osteocalcin (OCN) [3,15]. Immature osteoblasts adhere directly to the bone surface within the periosteum and endocortical surface, and their cytoplasm contains low concentrations of glycogen granules [3]. The primary function of active osteoblasts is the synthesis of organic bone matrix components, cytokines, and growth factors, as well as the production of matrix vesicles, which participate in bone tissue mineralization. To this end, the primary markers of osteoblasts are proteins involved in matrix production and mineralization, including the ectopic enzyme alkaline phosphatase (ALP), as well as osteonectin, and OCN [3,15].
Bone formation requires many endergonic, or energy-depleting, reactions. Examples of these energy-dependent processes include chromatin remodeling [16,17], actin organization [18,19], ECM and mineralization vesicle secretion [20,21], active transport [22,23,24], lysosomal acidification [25], and ALP activity [26]. Therefore, adequate energy metabolism is essential for overall osteoblast function and bone quality [27]. Cellular energy is derived from the hydrolysis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) generated either by glycolysis in the cytoplasm or by oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria [22,28]. Several studies have described a preference for oxidative phosphorylation to counteract the deleterious effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in mesenchymal stem cells that have differentiated into an osteoblast lineage [29,30]. However, in mature osteoblast cells, such as the MC3T3-E1 cell line and primary bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), glycolysis was preferred over oxidative phosphorylation for energy production [23,31,32,33,34]. It remains unclear why these cells switch from oxidative phosphorylation, an ATP-proficient pathway, to aerobic glycolysis, which is inefficient in ATP generation. Due to the presumed hypoxic environment within the skeletal niche, the production of the pentose phosphate pathway intermediates and reduced ROS production have also been suggested as possibilities [29,35]. Finally, it is important to emphasize that the ATP required for bone formation is finite and limited. Altering metabolic processes outside of oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis can have a profound impact on cellular function by shifting ATP requirements and/or intermediates, thereby altering overall bioenergetics. Therefore, we propose cholesterol homeostasis as an additional regulator of osteoblast bioenergetic capacity.
As mentioned previously, ATP generation requires the catabolism of substrates, of which osteoblasts have been shown to utilize glucose, glutamine, and fatty acids for energy production. While the crucial role of these substrates has been demonstrated for decades and confirmed by recent sophisticated studies [28,30,31,34,36,37], other metabolic pathways remain less understood. Of particular interest are the effects of lipids and lipid metabolism on osteoblast function. For example, cholesterol, along with endogenous metabolites (e.g., prostaglandins, oxysterols) and several specific lipids derived from membrane phospholipids (i.e., sphingosine-1-phosphate, lysophosphatidic acid, and various fatty acid amides), are gaining increasing scientific interest concerning bone and its regulation of cellular energy status. For the purposes of the current review, cholesterol, a single-atom cyclic hydrophobic alcohol, is critical for many cellular processes [38], both directly and indirectly. For example, in terms of osteoblast function, cholesterol has been reported to be essential for survival and function, bone mineralization, and critical signaling pathways [39]. Additionally, the manipulation of cholesterol status could alter osteoblast bioenergetics and shift various metabolic substrates.
Cholesterol is a non-polar hydrophobic molecule that is transported in circulation as part of lipoprotein particles. Maintaining systemic cholesterol homeostasis is determined by endogenous biosynthesis, uptake, efflux, transport, storage, utilization, and/or excretion [40]. Low-density lipoproteins (LDL) transport the majority of cholesterol in the plasma from the liver to peripheral tissues and cells, including osteoblasts. Reverse cholesterol transport describes cholesterol transport in high-density lipoproteins (HDL) from peripheral tissues back to the liver for secretion into the bile [41] (Figure 1).
Like many other cell types, osteoblasts derive free cholesterol by exogenous uptake via LDL-LDL receptor (LDLR) endocytosis and/or by de novo biosynthesis. In this regard, circulating LDL particles interact with the osteoblast surface and are internalized by LDLR-mediated endocytosis. These endosomes fuse with the lysosome inside the cell, where lysosomal acid lipase (LAL) hydrolyzes CE and TG to form free cholesterol (FC) and free fatty acids (FFA) (Figure 2A). Apart from the LDL-LDLR uptake of cholesterol, osteoblasts can also use the endogenous cholesterol biosynthetic pathway (Figure 2B). To do so, these cells must utilize acetyl-CoA precursors to initiate the mevalonate pathway. The formation of acetoacetyl-CoA from two molecules of acetyl-CoA generated by the β-oxidation pathway is the first step in de novo cholesterol biosynthesis, followed by the formation of β-hydroxy-β-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) from acetoacetyl-CoA and a third acetyl-CoA molecule by HMG-CoA synthase. The enzyme HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) then reduces this molecule to mevalonate. Mevalonate production is the rate-limiting and irreversible step in cholesterol biosynthesis that can be inhibited by statins (a class of cholesterol-lowering drugs).
Osteoblasts contain machinery to regulate cholesterol via both LDL-LDLR endocytosis as well as via the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway. While cholesterol is needed for many cellular processes, cellular energy or bioenergetics can be altered based on which pathway is activated. Therefore, the current review aims to highlight recent findings on the relationship between cholesterol metabolism and the formation, differentiation, and function of osteoblasts as the most represented cell population in bone, both under normal physiological conditions and in pathologies.

2. Role of Cholesterol in Osteoblast Formation, Function, and Metabolism

Publications demonstrating the importance of cholesterol in the bone formation process and metabolism date back to the late 1990s and early 2000s. At that time, authors successfully showed that the osteoblastic differentiation of mouse bone-marrow-derived pluripotent M2–10B4 stromal cells is regulated by the inhibition of cellular cholesterol biosynthesis through the rate-limiting enzyme HMGCR. They also confirmed that cholesterol and its metabolic intermediates are required for the maturation of bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) [42]. In line with these studies, the induction of osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization was confirmed in M2–10B4 treated with cholesterol-derived oxysterols [43]. Further studies revealed a beneficial effect of cholesterol treatment on mouse mesenchymal stem cells resulting in increased cell number and the formation of mineralized nodules, identified by an increase in ALP together with other important osteoblast differentiation genes such as bone morphogenetic protein-1 (Bmp-1), Runx2, and Bglap2 (gene encoded OCN). Additionally, this study indicated an essential role of CE in osteogenesis by inhibiting acyl-CoA: cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) [44].
While cholesterol clearly affects osteoblast function, the effect of cholesterol on bones in general and on osteoblasts themselves appears to be dose- and/or time-dependent. For instance, MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts showed reduced proliferation and differentiation rates as well as increased oxidative damage when treated with high concentrations of cholesterol [45]. In addition, the treatment of osteogenic cells in bone marrow stroma with minimally oxidized low-density lipoprotein (MM-LDL) as a source of cholesterol resulted in reduced differentiation. By impairing ALP activity, collagen processing, and mineralization, MM-LDL might interfere with key stages of differentiation, most probably by triggering peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α and mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent signaling pathways [46].
One of the major HDL protein constituents, apolipoprotein A-I (apo A-I), is a crucial modulator of plasma cholesterol trafficking and cellular cholesterol balance [47]. Interestingly, mesenchymal stem cells from apo A-1-deficient mice differentiate less into osteoblasts and more into adipocytes, indicating a switch of their subtypes toward adipocyte progenitors [48]. Osteoprogenitor cells, calvarial cells, embryonic fibroblasts, and primary BMSCs treated with an osteogenic oxysterol combination blocked and reversed the inhibition of osteogenic differentiation caused by xanthine/xanthine oxidase (XXO) and MM-LDL. The ability of oxysterols to positively regulate osteogenic differentiation and overall osteogenic properties was associated with cyclooxygenase 1 and MAPK-dependent mechanisms against oxidative stress [49]. Oxidized LDL (oxLDL), which has been shown to play a critical role in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis, leads to elevated levels of the receptor activator of NFkappaB ligand (RANKL) in UMR106 rat osteoblasts and human osteoblast-like cells (MG63 human osteosarcoma cell line), which has been linked to osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption [50,51]. Moreover, oxLDL inhibits the differentiation and mineralization of osteoblasts via phosphate signaling and phosphate-induced mineralization [51], demonstrating the deleterious impact of these particles on bone development. Recent data additionally hint that osteoblast demineralization driven by oxidized HDL (oxHDL) occurs because of inflammation [52].
These in vitro data were confirmed by experiments in rodents fed a high-cholesterol diet. Both C57BL/6 and C.B-17/Icr-SCID/Sed-Prkdcscid (severe combined immunodeficiency) mice fed a high-fat high-cholesterol diet (40 kcal% fat, 1.25% cholesterol) exhibited an osteoporotic bone phenotype, along with elevated osteoclast number, trabeculae loss, and thinning of trabeculae and cortex [53]. Female mice fed a Western diet (1.1 mg cholesterol/g diet) exhibit a drastic phenotype with low bone mass [54]. In C57BL/6 mice fed an atherogenic diet (high-fat/high-cholesterol plus sodium cholate), a reduction in bone mineral content and mineral density (BMD) of the femur, estimated by peripheral quantitative computed tomographic scanning and confirmed by lower OCN expression, was observed compared with mice fed a meat-supplemented diet [55]. As expected, a high-cholesterol diet caused hypercholesterolemia and, interestingly, was associated with increased bone resorption and decreased bone formation, leading to reduced BMD in rats [45].
The role of lipoproteins was identified in several physiological and pathological conditions of bones. Ldlr−/− mice showing severe hypercholesterolemia [56] became an important model for the study of bone metabolism. Reduced ALP activity and a delayed Ca2+ incorporation suggest defective osteoblastogenesis in cells isolated and differentiated from Ldlr−/− mice compared to wild-type littermates. Moreover, the expression of Runx2 and Osterix, key factors in osteoblastic differentiation, was decreased [57]. Scavenger receptor class B, type I (SR-BI), a receptor involved in the uptake of CE from HDL, encoded by Scarb1 gene, was found to play a role in bone formation. Unexpectedly, Scarb1−/− mice, which tend to develop atherosclerosis, exhibit higher bone mass. The authors proposed that SR-BI may influence proliferation and differentiation processes in MSCs and thus contribute to bone turnover by modulating adrenocorticotropin (ACTH)/glucocorticoids levels through cholesterol uptake in the adrenal glands [58]. However, the high bone mass in these mice might be caused by a rise in serum ACTH, which has anabolic effects on osteoblasts [59,60,61].
Recently, our group has shown that LAL, as the only known essential CE hydrolysis enzyme, is essential for proper osteoblast metabolism [62]. Loss of LAL is associated with increased CE and TG accumulation in multiple cells and tissues [63,64]. Global Lal−/− mice exhibited lower cortical bone thickness and strength as well as fewer osteoblasts, whereas osteoclast numbers were unchanged. Impaired osteoblastogenesis in these mice was connected to Wnt, Notch, and BMP signaling pathways and resulted in drastically altered lipid metabolism [62].
Further data hint at a delay in skeletal development in utero in pregnant C57BL/6J and Swiss Albino mice exposed to a high-cholesterol diet. The animals suffered from a decrease in total length and mineralized bone due to the inhibition of bone formation and increased resorption during bone remodeling [65]. Additionally, these mice suffered from permanent bone growth deficiencies not only during pregnancy but also during lactation, with no recovery later in life. In offspring of both C57BL/6J and Swiss Albino mice, dramatic changes in bone microarchitecture and osteogenic gene expression profile were observed, even when the mice were switched to a regular diet [65]. Furthermore, the cholesterol metabolite 27-hydroxycholesterol (27-HC) at high concentrations in mouse serum caused a significant BMD decrease [66]. Studies disclosed that 27-HC reduces bone deposition while increasing bone turnover by competing with the 17β-estradiol receptor and activating liver X receptors [67]. Research studies carried out in cells and animal models to evaluate the influence of cholesterol and its different sources and derivates on osteoblast cell proliferation, differentiation, and functions are summarized in Table 1.
Human studies sparked interest in the role of cholesterol in bone metabolism, as it has been repeatedly observed that a high-cholesterol diet affects bone health, particularly with regard to high cholesterol levels and osteoporosis. Specific attention was paid to postmenopausal bone turnover and its correlation with increased serum LDL-cholesterol levels, which were linked to bone loss and increased bone fracture risk [68,69,70,71,72,73].
Like mice, patients with hypercholesterolemia showed increased bone turnover associated with elevated serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, which in turn correlated positively with total and LDL cholesterol [74,75]. Subjects with the familial apolipoprotein B-10 R3500Q variation were found to have low BMD in the femoral neck and lumbar spine [76]. Unexpectedly, patients affected by heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) caused by LDLR gene mutations had comparable BMD at the femoral neck and markers of bone resorption. However, the authors noted that serum OCN, urinary calcium, and glomerular filtration rate were negatively correlated with a higher degree of aortic calcification [77]. Even more controversial data were found in the Spanish male population, exhibiting increased BMD in femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine [78]. Clinical studies have shown that high LDL, HDL, and total cholesterol levels were associated with low total lumbar, femur neck, and total hip BMD in men and women with type 2 diabetes. Likewise, cholesterol concentrations were negatively related with OCN, procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide, and β-crosslaps [79]. While some of the clinical data remain controversial, elevated cholesterol generally appears to exert a negative impact on skeletal health.
Taken together, these data suggest that cholesterol is an important player in osteoblastogenesis and adequate bone formation, as well as bone metabolism. However, high cholesterol concentrations are negatively associated with skeletal health, as evidenced by increased resorption and decreased bone formation. However, whether hyperlipidemia is a consistent cause of low BMD and high fracture risk in humans has not been established.

3. Effect of Statins on Osteoblasts

Although the liver and intestine produce more than 80% of the body’s total daily cholesterol, bone cells also participate in cholesterol synthesis via the mevalonate pathway [80]. As mentioned above, HMGCR catalyzes the key step in the synthesis of mevalonic acid, which is a precursor of sterols, isoprenoids, and other lipids [81]. Statins are a commonly prescribed medication to lower cholesterol that act via the inhibition of HMGCR. Interestingly, these drugs also possess bone-protective properties. As such, simvastatin and lovastatin have been demonstrated to promote bone growth associated with the upregulation of bone morphogenetic protein -2 (BMP-2) in mice and rats [82]. Further studies revealed that osteoblast cells and MSCs treated with simvastatin and lovastatin increased ALP activity, the expression of collagen and osteopontin, and upregulated BMP-2 expression and nodule formation [44,45,83,84,85,86]. In fact, lovastatin activates AKT in osteoblasts by promoting tyrosine phosphorylation at the p85 regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase [84]. A study on the mechanism of action of statins revealed that statins enhance osteoblast-activating osteoprotegerin and inhibit the mRNA expression of CD9, M-CSF, and RANKL by activating p38MAPK and blocking the Ras/ERK pathway, thereby having a major influence on osteoclast activity [87]. Additionally, Rho and MKP-1 are rendered inactive by the reduction in farnesyl pyrophosphate synthesis via reducing GR production, which may reverse their detrimental effects on osteogenesis. Statin-activated TGF/SMAD3 suppresses osteoblast apoptosis, while the estrogen receptor inhibits osteoclastogenesis by activating the osteoprotegerin/RANKL/RANK system [88]. Thus, the stimulation of osteoblast differentiation, suppression of osteoblast death, and inhibition of osteoclastogenesis are some of the effects of statins on bone anabolism.

4. Mechanism of Osteoblast Regulation by Cholesterol via Signaling Pathways

4.1. Wnt-Lrp5-β-Catenin

One of the main components of the lipid oxidation system in osteoblasts is Wnt-Lrp5 signaling [27]. Lrp5, encoding low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5, causes the autosomal recessive disorder osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome (OPPG), which is characterized by low bone mass, increased fractures, and deformation in patients [89]. It is appreciated that the name of Lrp5 inherently implies its involvement in ‘lipoproteins’. This includes its primary ligand, Wnt, which is heavily lipidated. LRP5 itself is involved in fuel metabolism, which was confirmed in several studies linking polymorphisms of this gene to hypercholesterolemia [90,91,92,93] and the reduced clearance of CR from the circulation [94]. In addition, the high-bone-mass trait (HBM) mutation, which confers unique osteogenic activity in bone remodeling, is also associated with the chromosomal region corresponding to LRP5 [95]. Mice lacking Lrp5 specifically in terms of osteoblasts and osteocytes exhibit a decrease in postnatal [36] and adult bone mass and also show an increase in body fat with a corresponding reduction in whole-body energy expenditure [27,36].
The regulation of osteoblast metabolism by cholesterol was also connected to Wnt/β-catenin, as recent findings suggested that cholesterol is crucial in the modulation of Wnt/β-catenin for adult skeleton development and the regulation of adult synovium, articular cartilage, and osteoblasts [96]. Furthermore, the knockdown of forkhead box protein f1 gene (Foxf1), an activator of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, induced osteogenesis and significantly boosted the expression of genes associated with osteoblasts, ALP activity, and mineralization in vitro [97]. This effect was partially restored by the Wnt signaling inhibitor Dickkopf-related protein 1. Moreover, FOXF1 upregulation in bone tissue of postmenopausal osteoporosis patients was shown to be associated with decreased bone mass and bone growth [97].

4.2. TGF-β/BMP2

The gene expression profile of rats fed a high-cholesterol diet revealed some downregulated genes, including Wnt5, β-catenin, Tgfbr, Smad4, Smad6, Smad7, Bmpr2, and Bmp6, which are known to be involved in the TGF-β/BMP2 and Wnt signaling pathways (Figure 3). The downregulation of these genes promoted the suppression of the differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts, the maturation of osteoblasts themselves and, thus, decreased bone formation [45].

4.3. Notch

Historically, the Notch signaling system is essential for cellular homeostasis, cell-to-cell interaction, and cell differentiation in many tissues [98,99,100]. Therefore, Notch serves as a key biomarker for osteoblasts by participating in many signaling pathways that are important for osteoblast differentiation and function [101,102]. Interestingly, cholesterol synthesis and regulation have been suggested to play a critical role in subchondral bone formation. Osteoblast-induced culture reduced intracellular cholesterol content and cholesterol synthesis in chondrocytes [100]. These alterations were accompanied by a profound downregulation of key genes involved in chondrocytes Notch signaling [100]. Therefore, while the mechanistic link between Notch signaling and cholesterol regulation during subchondral bone formation remains unknown, osteoblasts appear to alter cholesterol synthesis and Notch signaling in chondrocytes (Figure 3).

4.4. Hedgehog (Hh)

Cholesterol has recently been found to be an endogenous stimulator of Hh signaling, which has been linked to the pathophysiology of osteoporosis. Using ST2 cells, a BMSC cell line, it was found that cholesterol treatment markedly decreased the expression of osteoblast marker genes (Alpl, Sp7, and Ibsp) along with ALP activity, stimulating the expression of Gli1, one of the Hh targets. However, further osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs required physiological levels of endogenous cholesterol because of Hh signaling, suggesting that both Hh-dependent and -independent processes play a role in osteoblast differentiation [103].

5. Mechanism of Mineralization Regulation by Matrix Vesicles

Another important mechanism of osteoblast-cholesterol crosstalk is based on matrix vesicles (MVs) (Figure 3). They are released by chondrocytes and osteoblasts for biomineralization, which involves the systematic deposition of calcium and PO43−-containing minerals to produce a calcium phosphate salt that mimics hydroxyapatite [104,105]. Interestingly, MVs have high cholesterol, sphingomyelin, and phosphatidylserine contents, which is similar to the content of rafts in the plasma membrane [105,106]. MVs additionally contain a variety of hydrolytic enzymes, including tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP) with phosphomonohydrolytic activity [107]. Recent findings implied that TNAP catalyzed ATP hydrolysis more effectively in reconstituted liposomes when they consisted of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), dioleoylphosphatidylcholine (DOPC), DPPC:cholesterol, and DOPC:cholesterol. As a function of time, these lipid microenvironments produce more inorganic phosphate, which subsequently encourages further biomineralization. Moreover, the presence of cholesterol causes a higher exclusion pressure, showing that glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor (GPI)-TNAP penetrates deeper into the saturated lipid monolayer, which in turn influences the action of the membrane and impacts the activity of the enzyme [106].

6. Conclusions

The interaction between lipids and bone metabolism has become a hot topic, especially due to the important role both play in bone health and diseases. However, an overview of the balance between lipids and bone, especially between cholesterol and osteoblasts, has yet to be clarified. On the one hand, cholesterol and its derivates regulate osteoblast differentiation and support their cellular functions. On the other hand, high levels of cholesterol, either in the form of dietary supplements or produced endogenously, inhibit osteoblastogenesis and thus increase osteoporosis risk. The consumption of a currently quite popular high-cholesterol diet leads to an increased lack of bone growth that persists into old age and impacts overall health. The schema below summarizes the current literature on the effects of hypercholesterolemia on osteoblasts and skeletal homeostasis in rodents and humans (Figure 4). Although these data are compelling, further research should be directed toward fully unraveling the molecular mechanisms by which cholesterol alters osteoblast function.
Thus, the results of the studies covered in this review demonstrate the importance of individuals lowering their circulating cholesterol concentrations to maintain their bone health. Furthermore, the regulatory pathways highlighted in this review may become potential targets for regulating born turnover in patients at risk of or with existing hypercholesterolemia.
It is also worth mentioning that cholesterol biosynthesis is a complex process that requires 18 moles of acetyl-CoA, 36 moles of ATP (or, according to some sources, 99 molecules of ATP [108]), 16 moles of NADPH, and high oxygen consumption. This is usually higher than the cost of gluconeogenesis (4 ATP, 2 GTP, and 2 NADH) or fatty acid synthesis (8 acetyl CoA, 7 ATP + 14 NADPH) [109]. In addition, acetyl-CoA carboxylase and HMGCR activities reflect not only the cellular demand for cholesterol and fatty acids but also the availability of common substrates (particularly citrate and acetyl-CoA) [38]. The supply of and demand for these common precursors is a function of the cells’ overall metabolic activity, which may affect the energy status of the cell. This in turn may become an important topic for further consideration and research on the complex interaction between cholesterol metabolism and different cell types, especially osteoblasts.

7. Outlook

The general inverse relationship between cholesterol and BMD has been appreciated for some time. While some of these data remain controversial, likely due to the comorbidities associated with hypercholesterolemia, dyslipidemia often results in an increase in fracture incidence. To date, there are few molecular data delineating the mechanism(s) that regulate these processes. This review aimed to highlight how cholesterol status may impact bone formation via the modulation of osteoblast processes. Although cholesterol is not considered a classical regulator of cellular bioenergetics, cholesterol homeostasis alters ATP status. The differences in ATP demand required for cholesterol derived from LDL-LDLR endocytosis versus the biosynthetic pathway could directly influence the ability of osteoblasts to form bone. Therefore, future studies are needed to determine how ATP availability shifts from one pathway to another beyond direct substrate utilization for ATP generation. Expanding the field of osteoblast bioenergetics may open an area of research that could lead to therapeutic options to improve overall skeletal health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A. and E.R.-R.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.; writing—review and editing, A.A., D.K. and E.R.-R.; project administration, D.K. and E.R.-R.; funding acquisition, D.K. and E.R.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Health (NIH) National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) Grant AR072123 and AR080387; and National Institute on Aging (NIA) Grant AG069795 (to E.R.-R.), the Austrian Science Fund FWF (W1226 Metabolic and Cardiovascular Disease (DK-MCD), F73 SFB Lipid Hydrolysis), the Province of Styria, the City of Graz, the PhD program “Molecular Medicine” of the Medical University of Graz (all to D.K.), and the Austrian Marshall Plan Foundation Fellowship (to A.A.). We thank the international PhD program DK-MCD for the opportunity to conduct a research stay abroad at Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledged the Open Access Funding by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Su, N.; Yang, J.; Xie, Y.; Du, X.; Chen, H.; Zhou, H.; Chen, L. Bone function, dysfunction and its role in diseases including critical illness. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 15, 776–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Robling, A.G.; Castillo, A.B.; Turner, C.H. Biomechanical and molecular regulation of bone remodeling. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2006, 8, 455–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Florencio-Silva, R.; Sasso, G.R.; Sasso-Cerri, E.; Simoes, M.J.; Cerri, P.S. Biology of Bone Tissue: Structure, Function, and Factors That Influence Bone Cells. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 421746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Clarke, B. Normal Bone Anatomy and Physiology. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008, 3, S131–S139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Boskey, A.L. Bone composition: Relationship to bone fragility and antiosteoporotic drug effects. Bonekey Rep. 2013, 2, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Buckwalter, J.A.; Glimcher, M.J.; Cooper, R.R.; Recker, R. Bone biology. I: Structure, blood supply, cells, matrix, and mineralization. Instr. Course Lect. 1996, 45, 371–386. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mohan, A.; Girdhar, M.; Kumar, R.; Chaturvedi, H.S.; Vadhel, A.; Solanki, P.R.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, D.; Mamidi, N. Polyhydroxybutyrate-Based Nanocomposites for Bone Tissue Engineering. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chan, C.K.F.; Gulati, G.S.; Sinha, R.; Tompkins, J.V.; Lopez, M.; Carter, A.C.; Ransom, R.C.; Reinisch, A.; Wearda, T.; Murphy, M.; et al. Identification of the Human Skeletal Stem Cell. Cell 2018, 175, 43–56.e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Marie, P.J. Transcription factors controlling osteoblastogenesis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2008, 473, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kenkre, J.S.; Bassett, J. The bone remodelling cycle. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 2018, 55, 308–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, T.; Zhang, X.; Bikle, D.D. Osteogenic Differentiation of Periosteal Cells During Fracture Healing. J. Cell. Physiol. 2017, 232, 913–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Franz-Odendaal, T.A.; Hall, B.K.; Witten, P.E. Buried alive: How osteoblasts become osteocytes. Dev. Dyn. 2006, 235, 176–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Brauer, A.; Pohlemann, T.; Metzger, W. Osteogenic differentiation of immature osteoblasts: Interplay of cell culture media and supplements. Biotech. Histochem. 2016, 91, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dai, R.; Liu, M.; Xiang, X.; Xi, Z.; Xu, H. Osteoblasts and osteoclasts: An important switch of tumour cell dormancy during bone metastasis. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 41, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Blair, H.C.; Larrouture, Q.C.; Li, Y.; Lin, H.; Beer-Stoltz, D.; Liu, L.; Tuan, R.S.; Robinson, L.J.; Schlesinger, P.H.; Nelson, D.J. Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Matrix Formation In Vivo and In Vitro. Tissue Eng. Part. B. Rev. 2017, 23, 268–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gordon, J.A.R.; Stein, J.L.; Westendorf, J.J.; van Wijnen, A.J. Chromatin modifiers and histone modifications in bone formation, regeneration, and therapeutic intervention for bone-related disease. Bone 2015, 81, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yi, S.J.; Lee, H.; Lee, J.; Lee, K.; Kim, J.; Kim, Y.; Park, J.I.; Kim, K. Bone Remodeling: Histone Modifications as Fate Determinants of Bone Cell Differentiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sen, B.; Xie, Z.; Uzer, G.; Thompson, W.R.; Styner, M.; Wu, X.; Rubin, J. Intranuclear Actin Regulates Osteogenesis. Stem Cells 2015, 33, 3065–3076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Suzuki, H.; Tatei, K.; Ohshima, N.; Sato, S.; Izumi, T. Regulation of MC3T3-E1 differentiation by actin cytoskeleton through lipid mediators reflecting the cell differentiation stage. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 514, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ansari, S.; de Wildt, B.W.M.; Vis, M.A.M.; de Korte, C.E.; Ito, K.; Hofmann, S.; Yuana, Y. Matrix Vesicles: Role in Bone Mineralization and Potential Use as Therapeutics. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cui, L.; Houston, D.A.; Farquharson, C.; MacRae, V.E. Characterisation of matrix vesicles in skeletal and soft tissue mineralisation. Bone 2016, 87, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Riddle, R.C.; Clemens, T.L. Bone Cell Bioenergetics and Skeletal Energy Homeostasis. Physiol. Rev. 2017, 97, 667–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ye, J.; Xiao, J.; Wang, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Yin, H. The Interaction Between Intracellular Energy Metabolism and Signaling Pathways During Osteogenesis. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 807487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sautchuk, R., Jr.; Eliseev, R.A. Cell energy metabolism and bone formation. Bone Rep. 2022, 16, 101594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Guntur, A.R.; Le, P.T.; Farber, C.R.; Rosen, C.J. Bioenergetics during calvarial osteoblast differentiation reflect strain differences in bone mass. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 1589–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ansari, S.; Ito, K.; Hofmann, S. Alkaline Phosphatase Activity of Serum Affects Osteogenic Differentiation Cultures. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 12724–12733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Q.; Riddle, R.C.; Clemens, T.L. Bone and the regulation of global energy balance. J. Intern. Med. 2015, 277, 681–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dirckx, N.; Moorer, M.C.; Clemens, T.L.; Riddle, R.C. The role of osteoblasts in energy homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019, 15, 651–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shum, L.C.; White, N.S.; Mills, B.N.; Bentley, K.L.; Eliseev, R.A. Energy Metabolism in Mesenchymal Stem Cells During Osteogenic Differentiation. Stem Cells Dev. 2016, 25, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Motyl, K.J.; Guntur, A.R.; Carvalho, A.L.; Rosen, C.J. Energy Metabolism of Bone. Toxicol. Pathol. 2017, 45, 887–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jayapalan, S.; Nandy, A.; Rendina-Ruedy, E. Using Real-Time Cell Metabolic Flux Analyzer to Monitor Osteoblast Bioenergetics. J. Vis. Exp. 2022, e63142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Misra, B.B.; Jayapalan, S.; Richards, A.K.; Helderman, R.C.M.; Rendina-Ruedy, E. Untargeted metabolomics in primary murine bone marrow stromal cells reveals distinct profile throughout osteoblast differentiation. Metabolomics 2021, 17, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tencerova, M.; Rendina-Ruedy, E.; Neess, D.; Faergeman, N.; Figeac, F.; Ali, D.; Danielsen, M.; Haakonsson, A.; Rosen, C.J.; Kassem, M. Metabolic programming determines the lineage-differentiation fate of murine bone marrow stromal progenitor cells. Bone Res. 2019, 7, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guntur, A.R.; Gerencser, A.A.; Le, P.T.; DeMambro, V.E.; Bornstein, S.A.; Mookerjee, S.A.; Maridas, D.E.; Clemmons, D.E.; Brand, M.D.; Rosen, C.J. Osteoblast-like MC3T3-E1 Cells Prefer Glycolysis for ATP Production but Adipocyte-like 3T3-L1 Cells Prefer Oxidative Phosphorylation. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2018, 33, 1052–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, C.T.; Shih, Y.R.; Kuo, T.K.; Lee, O.K.; Wei, Y.H. Coordinated changes of mitochondrial biogenesis and antioxidant enzymes during osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2008, 26, 960–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Frey, J.L.; Li, Z.; Ellis, J.M.; Zhang, Q.; Farber, C.R.; Aja, S.; Wolfgang, M.J.; Clemens, T.L.; Riddle, R.C. Wnt-Lrp5 signaling regulates fatty acid metabolism in the osteoblast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2015, 35, 1979–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shen, L.; Hu, G.; Karner, C.M. Bioenergetic Metabolism In Osteoblast Differentiation. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2022, 20, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zampelas, A.; Magriplis, E. New Insights into Cholesterol Functions: A Friend or an Enemy? Nutrients 2019, 11, 1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. During, A.; Penel, G.; Hardouin, P. Understanding the local actions of lipids in bone physiology. Prog. Lipid Res. 2015, 59, 126–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Duan, Y.; Gong, K.; Xu, S.; Zhang, F.; Meng, X.; Han, J. Regulation of cholesterol homeostasis in health and diseases: From mechanisms to targeted therapeutics. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Osborne, J.C.; Brewer, H.B. The Plasma Lipoproteins. In Advances in Protein Chemistry; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1977; pp. 253–337. [Google Scholar]
  42. Parhami, F.; Mody, N.; Gharavi, N.; Ballard, A.J.; Tintut, Y.; Demer, L.L. Role of the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway in osteoblastic differentiation of marrow stromal cells. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2002, 17, 1997–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Aghaloo, T.L.; Amantea, C.M.; Cowan, C.M.; Richardson, J.A.; Wu, B.M.; Parhami, F.; Tetradis, S. Oxysterols enhance osteoblast differentiation in vitro and bone healing in vivo. J. Orthop. Res. 2007, 25, 1488–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, H.; Guo, H.; Li, H. Cholesterol loading affects osteoblastic differentiation in mouse mesenchymal stem cells. Steroids 2013, 78, 426–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. You, L.; Sheng, Z.Y.; Tang, C.L.; Chen, L.; Pan, L.; Chen, J.Y. High cholesterol diet increases osteoporosis risk via inhibiting bone formation in rats. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2011, 32, 1498–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Parhami, F.; Jackson, S.M.; Tintut, Y.; Le, V.; Balucan, J.P.; Territo, M.; Demer, L.L. Atherogenic diet and minimally oxidized low density lipoprotein inhibit osteogenic and promote adipogenic differentiation of marrow stromal cells. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1999, 14, 2067–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mangaraj, M.; Nanda, R.; Panda, S. Apolipoprotein A-I: A Molecule of Diverse Function. Indian. J. Clin. Biochem. 2016, 31, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Blair, H.C.; Kalyvioti, E.; Papachristou, N.I.; Tourkova, I.L.; Syggelos, S.A.; Deligianni, D.; Orkoula, M.G.; Kontoyannis, C.G.; Karavia, E.A.; Kypreos, K.E.; et al. Apolipoprotein A-1 regulates osteoblast and lipoblast precursor cells in mice. Lab. Investig. 2016, 96, 763–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shouhed, D.; Kha, H.T.; Richardson, J.A.; Amantea, C.M.; Hahn, T.J.; Parhami, F. Osteogenic oxysterols inhibit the adverse effects of oxidative stress on osteogenic differentiation of marrow stromal cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2005, 95, 1276–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Maziere, C.; Salle, V.; Gomila, C.; Maziere, J.C. Oxidized low density lipoprotein enhanced RANKL expression in human osteoblast-like cells. Involvement of ERK, NFkappaB and NFAT. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1832, 1756–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Maziere, C.; Savitsky, V.; Galmiche, A.; Gomila, C.; Massy, Z.; Maziere, J.C. Oxidized low density lipoprotein inhibits phosphate signaling and phosphate-induced mineralization in osteoblasts. Involvement of oxidative stress. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1802, 1013–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Harun, N.H.; Froemming, G.R.A.; Mohd Ismail, A.; Nawawi, H.; Mokhtar, S.S.; Abd Muid, S. Osteoblast Demineralization Induced by Oxidized High-Density Lipoprotein via the Inflammatory Pathway Is Suppressed by Adiponectin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pelton, K.; Krieder, J.; Joiner, D.; Freeman, M.R.; Goldstein, S.A.; Solomon, K.R. Hypercholesterolemia promotes an osteoporotic phenotype. Am. J. Pathol. 2012, 181, 928–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Demigne, C.; Bloch-Faure, M.; Picard, N.; Sabboh, H.; Besson, C.; Remesy, C.; Geoffroy, V.; Gaston, A.T.; Nicoletti, A.; Hagege, A.; et al. Mice chronically fed a westernized experimental diet as a model of obesity, metabolic syndrome and osteoporosis. Eur. J. Nutr. 2006, 45, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Parhami, F.; Tintut, Y.; Beamer, W.G.; Gharavi, N.; Goodman, W.; Demer, L.L. Atherogenic high-fat diet reduces bone mineralization in mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2001, 16, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, X.; Wang, C.; Zhang, K.; Xie, Y.; Ji, X.; Huang, H.; Yu, X. Reduced femoral bone mass in both diet-induced and genetic hyperlipidemia mice. Bone 2016, 93, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, N.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, J.; Qiu, X.; Chen, L.; Pan, X.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, D.; et al. Low-density lipoprotein receptor deficiency impaired mice osteoblastogenesis in vitro. Biosci. Trends 2018, 11, 658–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Martineau, C.; Martin-Falstrault, L.; Brissette, L.; Moreau, R. The atherogenic Scarb1 null mouse model shows a high bone mass phenotype. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 306, E48–E57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Isales, C.M.; Zaidi, M.; Blair, H.C. ACTH is a novel regulator of bone mass. Ann. N. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1192, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tourkova, I.L.; Dobrowolski, S.F.; Secunda, C.; Zaidi, M.; Papadimitriou-Olivgeri, I.; Papachristou, D.J.; Blair, H.C. The high-density lipoprotein receptor Scarb1 is required for normal bone differentiation in vivo and in vitro. Lab. Investig. 2019, 99, 1850–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Alekos, N.S.; Moorer, M.C.; Riddle, R.C. Dual Effects of Lipid Metabolism on Osteoblast Function. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 578194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Helderman, R.C.; Whitney, D.G.; Duta-Mare, M.; Akhmetshina, A.; Vujic, N.; Jayapalan, S.; Nyman, J.S.; Misra, B.B.; Rosen, C.J.; Czech, M.P.; et al. Loss of function of lysosomal acid lipase (LAL) profoundly impacts osteoblastogenesis and increases fracture risk in humans. Bone 2021, 148, 115946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Li, F.; Zhang, H. Lysosomal Acid Lipase in Lipid Metabolism and Beyond. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019, 39, 850–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Du, H.; Heur, M.; Duanmu, M.; Grabowski, G.A.; Hui, D.Y.; Witte, D.P.; Mishra, J. Lysosomal acid lipase-deficient mice: Depletion of white and brown fat, severe hepatosplenomegaly, and shortened life span. J. Lipid Res. 2001, 42, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Mangu, S.R.; Patel, K.; Sukhdeo, S.V.; Savitha, M.R.; Sharan, K. Maternal high-cholesterol diet negatively programs offspring bone development and downregulates hedgehog signaling in osteoblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 298, 102324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. DuSell, C.D.; Nelson, E.R.; Wang, X.; Abdo, J.; Modder, U.I.; Umetani, M.; Gesty-Palmer, D.; Javitt, N.B.; Khosla, S.; McDonnell, D.P. The endogenous selective estrogen receptor modulator 27-hydroxycholesterol is a negative regulator of bone homeostasis. Endocrinology 2010, 151, 3675–3685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nelson, E.R.; DuSell, C.D.; Wang, X.; Howe, M.K.; Evans, G.; Michalek, R.D.; Umetani, M.; Rathmell, J.C.; Khosla, S.; Gesty-Palmer, D.; et al. The oxysterol, 27-hydroxycholesterol, links cholesterol metabolism to bone homeostasis through its actions on the estrogen and liver X receptors. Endocrinology 2011, 152, 4691–4705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tarakida, A.; Iino, K.; Abe, K.; Taniguchi, R.; Higuchi, T.; Mizunuma, H.; Nakaji, S. Hypercholesterolemia accelerates bone loss in postmenopausal women. Climacteric 2011, 14, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Go, J.H.; Song, Y.M.; Park, J.H.; Park, J.Y.; Choi, Y.H. Association between Serum Cholesterol Level and Bone Mineral Density at Lumbar Spine and Femur Neck in Postmenopausal Korean Women. Korean J. Fam. Med. 2012, 33, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tanko, L.B.; Bagger, Y.Z.; Nielsen, S.B.; Christiansen, C. Does serum cholesterol contribute to vertebral bone loss in postmenopausal women? Bone 2003, 32, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yamauchi, M.; Yamaguchi, T.; Nawata, K.; Tanaka, K.; Takaoka, S.; Sugimoto, T. Increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level is associated with non-vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women. Endocrine 2015, 48, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Uyama, O.; Yoshimoto, Y.; Yamamoto, Y.; Kawai, A. Bone changes and carotid atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women. Stroke 1997, 28, 1730–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bagger, Y.Z.; Rasmussen, H.B.; Alexandersen, P.; Werge, T.; Christiansen, C.; Tanko, L.B.; PERF Study Group. Links between cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: Serum lipids or atherosclerosis per se? Osteoporos. Int. 2007, 18, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Majima, T.; Komatsu, Y.; Fukao, A.; Ninomiya, K.; Matsumura, T.; Nakao, K. Short-term effects of atorvastatin on bone turnover in male patients with hypercholesterolemia. Endocr. J. 2007, 54, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Majima, T.; Shimatsu, A.; Komatsu, Y.; Satoh, N.; Fukao, A.; Ninomiya, K.; Matsumura, T.; Nakao, K. Short-term effects of pitavastatin on biochemical markers of bone turnover in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Intern. Med. 2007, 46, 1967–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yerges-Armstrong, L.M.; Shen, H.; Ryan, K.A.; Streeten, E.A.; Shuldiner, A.R.; Mitchell, B.D. Decreased bone mineral density in subjects carrying familial defective apolipoprotein B-100. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, E1999–E2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Awan, Z.; Alwaili, K.; Alshahrani, A.; Langsetmo, L.; Goltzman, D.; Genest, J. Calcium homeostasis and skeletal integrity in individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia and aortic calcification. Clin. Chem. 2010, 56, 1599–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hernandez, J.L.; Olmos, J.M.; Ramos, C.; Martinez, J.; de Juan, J.; Valero, C.; Nan, D.; Gonzalez-Macias, J. Serum lipids and bone metabolism in Spanish men: The Camargo cohort study. Endocr. J. 2010, 57, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yang, Y.; Liu, G.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, G.; Yi, X.; Liang, J.; Zhao, C.; Liang, J.; Ma, C.; Ye, Y.; et al. Association Between Bone Mineral Density, Bone Turnover Markers, and Serum Cholesterol Levels in Type 2 Diabetes. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mullen, P.J.; Yu, R.; Longo, J.; Archer, M.C.; Penn, L.Z. The interplay between cell signalling and the mevalonate pathway in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2016, 16, 718–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bloch, K. The Biological Synthesis of Cholesterol. Science 1965, 150, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mundy, G.; Garrett, R.; Harris, S.; Chan, J.; Chen, D.; Rossini, G.; Boyce, B.; Zhao, M.; Gutierrez, G. Stimulation of bone formation in vitro and in rodents by statins. Science 1999, 286, 1946–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Mandal, C.C. High Cholesterol Deteriorates Bone Health: New Insights into Molecular Mechanisms. Front. Endocrinol. 2015, 6, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ghosh-Choudhury, N.; Mandal, C.C.; Choudhury, G.G. Statin-induced Ras activation integrates the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signal to Akt and MAPK for bone morphogenetic protein-2 expression in osteoblast differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 4983–4993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Liu, S.; Bertl, K.; Sun, H.; Liu, Z.H.; Andrukhov, O.; Rausch-Fan, X. Effect of simvastatin on the osteogenetic behavior of alveolar osteoblasts and periodontal ligament cells. Hum. Cell. 2012, 25, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Maeda, T.; Matsunuma, A.; Kurahashi, I.; Yanagawa, T.; Yoshida, H.; Horiuchi, N. Induction of osteoblast differentiation indices by statins in MC3T3-E1 cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2004, 92, 458–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Tsubaki, M.; Satou, T.; Itoh, T.; Imano, M.; Yanae, M.; Kato, C.; Takagoshi, R.; Komai, M.; Nishida, S. Bisphosphonate- and statin-induced enhancement of OPG expression and inhibition of CD9, M-CSF, and RANKL expressions via inhibition of the Ras/MEK/ERK pathway and activation of p38MAPK in mouse bone marrow stromal cell line ST2. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2012, 361, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ruan, F.; Zheng, Q.; Wang, J. Mechanisms of bone anabolism regulated by statins. Biosci. Rep. 2012, 32, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gong, Y.; Slee, R.B.; Fukai, N.; Rawadi, G.; Roman-Roman, S.; Reginato, A.M.; Wang, H.; Cundy, T.; Glorieux, F.H.; Lev, D.; et al. LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) affects bone accrual and eye development. Cell 2001, 107, 513–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lappalainen, S.; Saarinen, A.; Utriainen, P.; Voutilainen, R.; Jaaskelainen, J.; Makitie, O. LRP5 in premature adrenarche and in metabolic characteristics of prepubertal children. Clin. Endocrinol. 2009, 70, 725–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Suwazono, Y.; Kobayashi, E.; Uetani, M.; Miura, K.; Morikawa, Y.; Ishizaki, M.; Kido, T.; Nakagawa, H.; Nogawa, K. G-protein beta 3 subunit polymorphism C1429T and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 polymorphism A1330V are risk factors for hypercholesterolemia in Japanese males--a prospective study over 5 years. Metabolism 2006, 55, 751–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Suwazono, Y.; Kobayashi, E.; Uetani, M.; Miura, K.; Morikawa, Y.; Ishizaki, M.; Kido, T.; Nakagawa, H.; Nogawa, K. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 variant Q89R is associated with hypertension in Japanese females. Blood Press. 2006, 15, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Guo, Y.F.; Xiong, D.H.; Shen, H.; Zhao, L.J.; Xiao, P.; Guo, Y.; Wang, W.; Yang, T.L.; Recker, R.R.; Deng, H.W. Polymorphisms of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) gene are associated with obesity phenotypes in a large family-based association study. J. Med. Genet. 2006, 43, 798–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Fujino, T.; Asaba, H.; Kang, M.J.; Ikeda, Y.; Sone, H.; Takada, S.; Kim, D.H.; Ioka, R.X.; Ono, M.; Tomoyori, H.; et al. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) is essential for normal cholesterol metabolism and glucose-induced insulin secretion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Little, R.D.; Carulli, J.P.; Del Mastro, R.G.; Dupuis, J.; Osborne, M.; Folz, C.; Manning, S.P.; Swain, P.M.; Zhao, S.C.; Eustace, B.; et al. A mutation in the LDL receptor-related protein 5 gene results in the autosomal dominant high-bone-mass trait. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2002, 70, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wang, B.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Song, L. Lipid metabolism within the bone micro-environment is closely associated with bone metabolism in physiological and pathophysiological stages. Lipids Health Dis. 2022, 21, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Shen, G.; Ren, H.; Shang, Q.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, X.; Tang, K.; Tang, J.; Yang, Z.; Liang, D.; et al. Foxf1 knockdown promotes BMSC osteogenesis in part by activating the Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway and prevents ovariectomy-induced bone loss. EBioMedicine 2020, 52, 102626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Foldi, J.; Chung, A.Y.; Xu, H.; Zhu, J.; Outtz, H.H.; Kitajewski, J.; Li, Y.; Hu, X.; Ivashkiv, L.B. Autoamplification of Notch signaling in macrophages by TLR-induced and RBP-J-dependent induction of Jagged1. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 5023–5031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bjornson, C.R.; Cheung, T.H.; Liu, L.; Tripathi, P.V.; Steeper, K.M.; Rando, T.A. Notch signaling is necessary to maintain quiescence in adult muscle stem cells. Stem Cells 2012, 30, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Guo, D.; Li, J.; Xu, S.; Wei, J.; Xie, J.; Zhou, X. Osteoblasts impair cholesterol synthesis in chondrocytes via Notch1 signalling. Cell. Prolif. 2021, 54, e13156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Colombo, M.; Platonova, N.; Giannandrea, D.; Palano, M.T.; Basile, A.; Chiaramonte, R. Re-establishing Apoptosis Competence in Bone Associated Cancers via Communicative Reprogramming Induced Through Notch Signaling Inhibition. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Tikhonova, A.N.; Dolgalev, I.; Hu, H.; Sivaraj, K.K.; Hoxha, E.; Cuesta-Dominguez, A.; Pinho, S.; Akhmetzyanova, I.; Gao, J.; Witkowski, M.; et al. The bone marrow microenvironment at single-cell resolution. Nature 2019, 569, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Li, K.; Xiu, C.; Zhou, Q.; Ni, L.; Du, J.; Gong, T.; Li, M.; Saijilafu; Yang, H.; Chen, J. A dual role of cholesterol in osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 2058–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Golub, E.E. Role of matrix vesicles in biomineralization. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1790, 1592–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Millan, J.L. The role of phosphatases in the initiation of skeletal mineralization. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2013, 93, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Favarin, B.Z.; Andrade, M.A.R.; Bolean, M.; Simao, A.M.S.; Ramos, A.P.; Hoylaerts, M.F.; Millan, J.L.; Ciancaglini, P. Effect of the presence of cholesterol in the interfacial microenvironment on the modulation of the alkaline phosphatase activity during in vitro mineralization. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2017, 155, 466–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Vimalraj, S. Alkaline phosphatase: Structure, expression and its function in bone mineralization. Gene 2020, 754, 144855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Luu, W.; Sharpe, L.J.; Gelissen, I.C.; Brown, A.J. The role of signalling in cellular cholesterol homeostasis. IUBMB Life 2013, 65, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Nelson, D.L.; Hoskins, A.A.; Cox, M.M.; Lehninger, A.L. Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, 8th ed.; Macmillan Learning: Austin, TX, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Systemic cholesterol flux. Chylomicrons (CM) are formed in the lymphatic system of the intestinal villi. They package and transport up to half of all triglycerides (TG) and lymph cholesterol. As peripheral lipid uptake progresses, CM lose most of their TG to various cells, whereas the relative content of cholesterol and its esters (CE) increases and their size decreases. CM remnants are taken up by the liver, where CE and TG are eventually hydrolyzed. Very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) carry TG, phospholipids, cholesterol, and CE from the liver to other tissues. As TG are broken down, the diameter of VLDL decreases and they become low-density lipoproteins (LDL). High-density lipoproteins (HDL) ensure the reverse transport of cholesterol from extrahepatic tissues, such as bone, back to the liver. Important structural components of lipoproteins are the apolipoproteins (Apo), the types of which vary but remain specific to certain types of lipoproteins. This figure was created using Biorender.com (accessed on 24 March 2023).
Figure 1. Systemic cholesterol flux. Chylomicrons (CM) are formed in the lymphatic system of the intestinal villi. They package and transport up to half of all triglycerides (TG) and lymph cholesterol. As peripheral lipid uptake progresses, CM lose most of their TG to various cells, whereas the relative content of cholesterol and its esters (CE) increases and their size decreases. CM remnants are taken up by the liver, where CE and TG are eventually hydrolyzed. Very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) carry TG, phospholipids, cholesterol, and CE from the liver to other tissues. As TG are broken down, the diameter of VLDL decreases and they become low-density lipoproteins (LDL). High-density lipoproteins (HDL) ensure the reverse transport of cholesterol from extrahepatic tissues, such as bone, back to the liver. Important structural components of lipoproteins are the apolipoproteins (Apo), the types of which vary but remain specific to certain types of lipoproteins. This figure was created using Biorender.com (accessed on 24 March 2023).
Metabolites 13 00578 g001
Figure 2. Osteoblast cellular cholesterol homeostasis. (A) Exogenous LDL uptake in osteoblast via LDL-LDLR endocytosis is an important source of CE and TG for lysosomal hydrolysis. Lysosomal acid lipase (LAL)-mediated lipid catabolism leads to the release of free cholesterol and free fatty acids (FFA) for further cellular needs. (B) Cholesterol formation begins with acetyl-coenzyme A (CoA), two molecules of which are converted into acetoacetyl-CoA by acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase (ACAT). The first step in the mevalonate pathway from 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA to mevalonate is catalyzed by HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR), which is the main target of statins. This figure was created using Biorender.com (accessed on 13 March 2023).
Figure 2. Osteoblast cellular cholesterol homeostasis. (A) Exogenous LDL uptake in osteoblast via LDL-LDLR endocytosis is an important source of CE and TG for lysosomal hydrolysis. Lysosomal acid lipase (LAL)-mediated lipid catabolism leads to the release of free cholesterol and free fatty acids (FFA) for further cellular needs. (B) Cholesterol formation begins with acetyl-coenzyme A (CoA), two molecules of which are converted into acetoacetyl-CoA by acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase (ACAT). The first step in the mevalonate pathway from 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA to mevalonate is catalyzed by HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR), which is the main target of statins. This figure was created using Biorender.com (accessed on 13 March 2023).
Metabolites 13 00578 g002
Figure 3. Possible mechanisms of regulation of osteoblastogenesis by cholesterol. In response to Wnt ligand, BMPs, and TGFβ, bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) differentiate into mature osteoblasts. All these pathways were found to be regulated by cholesterol. On the other hand, sufficient release of matrix vesicles (MVs) by chondrocytes and osteoblasts ensures appropriate mineralization. Chondrocytes and cholesterol are connected via the Notch signaling pathway, and it is still unclear whether this directly affects pre-osteoblasts or osteoblasts. Nevertheless, this pathway is essential for proper bone formation. This figure was created using Biorender.com (accessed on 13 March 2023).
Figure 3. Possible mechanisms of regulation of osteoblastogenesis by cholesterol. In response to Wnt ligand, BMPs, and TGFβ, bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) differentiate into mature osteoblasts. All these pathways were found to be regulated by cholesterol. On the other hand, sufficient release of matrix vesicles (MVs) by chondrocytes and osteoblasts ensures appropriate mineralization. Chondrocytes and cholesterol are connected via the Notch signaling pathway, and it is still unclear whether this directly affects pre-osteoblasts or osteoblasts. Nevertheless, this pathway is essential for proper bone formation. This figure was created using Biorender.com (accessed on 13 March 2023).
Metabolites 13 00578 g003
Figure 4. Summary of the effects of cholesterol on osteoblasts. A high cholesterol diet (HCD) and hypercholesterolemia have negative effects on bone health. They manifest as reduced proliferation and differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells, which in turn results in decreased osteoblastogenesis. Such a hyperlipidemic condition affects several aspects of osteoblast function and homeostasis, increases the number and activity of osteoclasts, and decreases bone mass and bone mineral density (BMD). This figure was created using Biorender.com (accessed on 13 March 2023).
Figure 4. Summary of the effects of cholesterol on osteoblasts. A high cholesterol diet (HCD) and hypercholesterolemia have negative effects on bone health. They manifest as reduced proliferation and differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells, which in turn results in decreased osteoblastogenesis. Such a hyperlipidemic condition affects several aspects of osteoblast function and homeostasis, increases the number and activity of osteoclasts, and decreases bone mass and bone mineral density (BMD). This figure was created using Biorender.com (accessed on 13 March 2023).
Metabolites 13 00578 g004
Table 1. Effect of cholesterol on osteoblast proliferation and functions.
Table 1. Effect of cholesterol on osteoblast proliferation and functions.
Research ObjectTreatment/DietCholesterol/Cholesterol Derivatives ConcentrationEffectReference
M2-10B4 (mouse stromal cell line)22(S)-hydroxycholesterol
20(S)-hydroxycholesterol (SS)
5 mM↑ALP activity ↑mineralization ↑OCN mRNA [43]
MSCs
(bone marrow- derived mesenchymal stem cells)
Chol:MbCD (‘‘water-soluble cholesterol’’ containing 30 mg
of cholesterol/g solid)
5, 10 and 15 μg/mL↑differentiation ↑ALP activity ↑mineralized nodules[44]
MC3T3-E1 (mouse cell line of immature osteoblasts)Cholesterol0, 12.5, 25, and 50 μg/mL ↓proliferation ↓differentiation
↑oxidative injury
[45]
M2–10B4 Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (MM-LDL)150 µg/mL↓osteogenic differentiation
↑adipogenic differentiation
[46]
M2-10B4,
Primary mouse bone marrow stromal cells
Xanthine/xanthine oxidase (XXO)
minimally oxidized LDL
(MM-LDL)
Osteogenic oxysterol combination 22(S)- and
20(S)-hydroxycholesterol
50 mM/40 mU/mL
200 mg/mL
0.1–5 µM
↓markers of osteogenic differentiation


blocked and reversed the inhibition of osteogenic differentiation
[49]
UMR106
(rat osteoblast-like cell line)
Oxidized LDL (oxLDL)10–50 μg protein/mL↓mineralization[51]
MG63
(human osteosarcoma cell line)
Oxidized LDL (oxLDL)10–50 μg/mL↑cell-associated and extracellular RANKL levels[50]
HOBs
(primary human osteoblast cells)
Oxidized HDL (oxHDL)
oxHDL with adiponectin
100 μg/mL protein
100 μg/mL; 5, 10, and 15 μg/mL
↓mineralization, ↓calcium incorporation.
↑expression of mineralization markers ↓inflammatory markers
[52]
RatPoly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) scaffolds alone or oxysterol cocktail140 ng (low dose)
1400 ng (high dose)
slight bone healing
↑bone formation
[43]
RatHigh-cholesterol diet 77% normal diet food, 3% cholesterol and 20% lard↓femur BMD ↓osteocalcin
↑carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks
[45]
C57BL/6 and C.B-17/Icr-SCID/Sed-Prkdcscid male miceHigh-fat/high-cholesterol (HFHC) diet1.25% cholesterol↓cortical and trabecular bone in the femurs and vertebrae
↓bone mineral density (BMD)
[53]
OF1
female mice
Westerntype diet1.1 mg cholesterol/g diet ↓BMD[54]
C57BL/6 and C3H/HeJ male miceHigh-fat (atherogenic) diet1.25% cholesterol↓femoral and vertebral mineral content
↓BMD
[55]
C57BL6/J and Swiss Albino miceHigh-cholesterol (HC) diet0.5% cholesterol↓osteoblast cell activity
↑osteoclast cell population
delayed skeletal ossification
[65]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Akhmetshina, A.; Kratky, D.; Rendina-Ruedy, E. Influence of Cholesterol on the Regulation of Osteoblast Function. Metabolites 2023, 13, 578. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13040578

AMA Style

Akhmetshina A, Kratky D, Rendina-Ruedy E. Influence of Cholesterol on the Regulation of Osteoblast Function. Metabolites. 2023; 13(4):578. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13040578

Chicago/Turabian Style

Akhmetshina, Alena, Dagmar Kratky, and Elizabeth Rendina-Ruedy. 2023. "Influence of Cholesterol on the Regulation of Osteoblast Function" Metabolites 13, no. 4: 578. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13040578

APA Style

Akhmetshina, A., Kratky, D., & Rendina-Ruedy, E. (2023). Influence of Cholesterol on the Regulation of Osteoblast Function. Metabolites, 13(4), 578. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13040578

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop