Next Article in Journal
Metabolic and Transcriptomic Changes in the Mouse Brain in Response to Short-Term High-Fat Metabolic Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
Normal-Fat vs. High-Fat Diets and Olive Oil vs. CLA-Rich Dairy Fat: A Comparative Study of Their Effects on Atherosclerosis in Male Golden Syrian Hamsters
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Omics Analysis of Lung Tissue Demonstrates Changes to Lipid Metabolism during Allergic Sensitization in Mice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tea Polyphenols Protect the Mammary Gland of Dairy Cows by Enhancing Antioxidant Capacity and Regulating the TGF-β1/p38/JNK Pathway
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biological Health Markers Associated with Oxidative Stress in Dairy Cows during Lactation Period

by
Vincenzo Tufarelli
1,*,
Maria Antonietta Colonna
2,
Caterina Losacco
1 and
Nikola Puvača
3
1
Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Jonian Area (DiMePRe-J), Section of Veterinary Science and Animal Production, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70010 Valenzano, Italy
2
Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70125 Bari, Italy
3
Department of Engineering Management in Biotechnology, Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management in Novi Sad, University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Cvećarska 2, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2023, 13(3), 405; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13030405
Submission received: 14 February 2023 / Revised: 6 March 2023 / Accepted: 8 March 2023 / Published: 9 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metabolic Studies in Dairy Science)

Abstract

:
This review aims to summarize and present different biological health markers in dairy cows during the lactation period. Biochemical health markers provide an indicator of how foreign chemical substances, whether external or internal, affect the animal’s health. To understand the relationship between dairy cow health issues and oxidative stress, various biomarkers of oxidative stress must be investigated. Biochemical and hematological factors play a significant role in determining the biological health markers of animals. A variety of biochemical parameters are dependent on various factors, including the animal’s breed, its age, its development, its pregnancy status, and its production status. When assessing the health of cattle, a blood test is conducted to determine the blood chemistry. To diagnose diseases in dairy animals, the blood biochemistry is necessary to determine the cause of many physiological, metabolic, and pathological problems. Observing blood alterations during pregnancy and at peak lactation may determine what factors lift oxidative stress in cows due to disturbances in feed intake and metabolic processes.

1. Introduction

The term “biomarker” was used for the first time in 1980 to describe the features that are intentionally measured and used to determine the effects of therapeutic interventions or to indicate the course of everyday biological processes [1]. It is possible to detect exposure to unknown chemicals in our surroundings using biomarkers [2,3]. It can be a peripheral material itself or a dissimilarity of the original exterior material following the body that has practiced it which can often be enumerated. Biochemical and hematological factors play a significant role in determining the biological health markers of animals [4]. A wide range of biochemical parameters is affected by factors such as the breed of the animal, its age, its development, and its gestation status [5].
The biochemistry of blood is estimated significantly to evaluate cattle health status [6,7]. In dairy animals, biochemical measurements are necessary to find a wide range of pathological, physiological, and metabolic problems [8,9]. It has been shown that blood glucose, cholesterol, and protein affect the fertility and reproductive cycle of dairy cattle. Among lipids, cholesterol is one of the most important [10]. Located in the bloodstream, it is considered vital for an organism’s survival [11]. Different hormones, such as estrogen, progesterone, and aldosterone, are produced by cholesterol to develop cell membranes and maintain proper body functions. By assessing variations in the parameters such as total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), and triglycerides (TG), variations in lipid metabolism happening in the body of cows during pregnancy and lactation can be better understood [12,13,14].
Aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), and γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) are serum enzymes commonly found in the tissues of the liver and considered biological health markers in case of hepatic disorders and other health issues [15,16,17]. To diagnose and understand dairy cow health issues, serum enzyme performance and other parameters must be determined [18,19]. To understand the growth of health issues in dairy cows, researchers seek biomarkers of oxidative stress [20].
Oxidative stress, by definition, is the result of an increase in oxidant production in animal body cells as a result of free radical production [21,22,23]. By releasing free radicals in the body, the body is subjected to chemical stress because it cannot neutralize or eliminate them [24]. A growing number of veterinarians are interested in finding out how different antioxidants can improve the health of animals [25]. A few biochemical markers monitor the stress caused by oxidation, but only a few diagnostic procedures evaluate total antioxidant status (TAS) [26].
When different tissues do not function as they should, malondialdehyde (MDA) is the best indicator of reactive oxygen species and the most effective detector for free radicals of oxygen [27]. The main function of the superoxide dismutase enzyme (SOD) is to change the superoxide radical into an oxygen molecule and water [28]. In the following reaction, oxygen and water are transformed from hydrogen peroxide to water and oxygen by catalase and peroxidase. Cells use catalase (CAT) to catalyze the breakdown of water into molecules of water and less reactive oxygen gas [29]. Oxidative stress can result from disturbances in antioxidant balance [30]. This type of imbalance can lead to a variety of disorders [31,32,33].
Both HDL and LDL oxidized lipids are eliminated by paraoxonase (PON1), which acts as an antioxidant molecule, and antioxidant mechanisms are thus affected by it [34]. In high milk production situations, measuring serum PON1 activity could be a helpful diagnostic tool for evaluating dairy cattle’s health [14]. Living beings possess the lipophilic antioxidants PON1 and arylesterase (ARE), which are serum esterase enzymes. A chemical reaction is catalyzed by both esterase enzymes acting together as one enzyme [35].
As an acute phase protein, ceruloplasmin (Cp) performs as an antioxidant in living beings. Acute phase proteins are imprecise biological health markers and are arbitrated by cytokines [36]. These proteins’ levels in serum modify noticeably in an acute phase. Vitamins and trace elements as antioxidants can defend the body from free radicals directly by hunting these radicals or indirectly by slowing down the enzymes’ activity of oxidation [37].
In their one-year life cycle after adulthood, dairy cattle have to pass various physiological changes. During such physiological stages including breeding, pregnancy, fetus growth and development, parturition, and lactation, dairy animals are highly influenced by changes in hormones [38]. Among these hormones, thyroid hormones (T3 and T4) directly influence the cattle’s metabolic activities, mainly enhancing the speed of metabolism of approximately all tissues [39]. Energy metabolism having main components such as lipids and carbohydrates is modulated by thyroid hormones. Cortisol is considered the best biomarker to determine stress status [40,41].
As an investigative practice, serum biochemical analyses are a reliable way to obtain information about dairy animals’ metabolic and health status. By doing so, we can compare the standard values of healthy animals with those of animals with detrimental health statuses [42]. To gain a better understanding of the role of oxidative stress on animal welfare and production, Celi and Gabai [43] encouraged other scientists to recognize the biomarkers of protein oxidation in veterinary medicine.
Based on the previously presented, the objective of this review was to summarize and present the biological health markers of cows during lactation.

2. Production of Free Radicals

Oxidative stress is an energetic ground of research in the veterinary field and is related to numerous diseases. Nowadays, studies have been paying thoughts to oxidant and antioxidant status that have an effect on dairy cattle during the gestation and lactation period [44,45]. Oxidation involves the loss of electrons and reduction is the addition of electrons. The number of electrons increase or decrease when involved in an electron transfer which raises due to oxidation and reduction. Reactive oxygen species is a common term which includes both oxygen radicals and some non-radicals, which take steps as oxidizing agents and are simply converted into radicals [46,47]. Free radicals are very reactive atoms or molecules having one or more than one unpaired electron. Biologically related free radicals are groups of atoms generally having oxygen or nitrogen with an unpaired number of electrons. When a bond is broken during a chemical reaction, free radicals are formed. The free radicals can attach to tissues and damage the tissues [48]. Mostly, biological compounds such as carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids are damaged. When oxygen species and nitrogen species are immediately produced, they collectively also act as free radicals [49].
During normal physiology and metabolism in tissues, free radicals such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) are constantly produced. For the generation of ATP, oxygen is utilized in mitochondria and water is formed by the reduction of oxygen, but some quantities are not reduced completely and form an oxygen intermediate compound. In living cells, the main free radical is the superoxide radical, produced in the mitochondria by the electron transport chain [50]. Free radicals produced during oxidative metabolism form fatty acid hydroperoxides. When these peroxides react with fatty acids, they generate a chain reaction which again produces free radicals. In a stress condition, macrophages are also produced as a source of free radicals. ROS is also produced by immune cells [51]. Next to free radicals and ROS, other molecules with oxidative properties are produced during metabolism, such as reactive nitrogen species (RNS) or reactive chlorine species [52].

3. Antioxidants and Oxidative Stress in Cows

In oxidative damage prevention or removal, antioxidants play an important role [53,54]. By protecting the body from free radicals, antioxidants play an important role. There are two types of defense systems: enzymatic and non-enzymatic. Among the enzymes are SOD, glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and CAT, while the non-enzymatic vitamins are C, E, and selenium [55,56]. A weak antioxidant defense occurs when reactive oxygen species and free radical production increase greatly. By reducing antioxidant defenses, biological molecules and normal physiological and metabolic functions are damaged. The formation of reactive oxygen species occurs naturally in living organisms due to the release of free radicals. Normally, prooxidants and oxidants balance each other, but when the equilibrium is disturbed, harmful effects result. In cattle, oxidative stress occurs due to a decrease in antioxidant levels near the time of parturition [57,58]. Figure 1 shows the oxidative stress and antioxidant status in advanced pregnant and early lactating cows [59].
A disturbance and disorderly metabolic process may occur due to ROS damage during oxidative stress, such as damage to lipids, proteins, or DNA. Furthermore, ROS may alter cellular membranes or other components in addition to causing damage to lipids and other macromolecules [60]. This means oxidative stress does not present a precise clinical picture and does not act as a disease. As a result of oxidative stress, animals with high metabolisms are likely to develop other metabolic diseases [61]. Therefore, the role of antioxidants and oxidative stress in animals is well understood thanks to enzymatic and non-enzymatic substances.

4. Oxidative Stress during Lactation in Cows

Oxidative stress can weaken dairy cattle to several diseases and metabolic disorders during lactation. As a result, the physical condition and reproductive capability of dairy cows are affected [62]. During lactation, energy demands are increased, so this is the stressful stage with increased metabolic activities. The normal metabolism of the animals changes and stress is produced, thus metabolic disorder takes place. In addition, during the late period of pregnancy and the first stage of lactation, oxidative stress progresses in a negative energy balance (NEB) [47]. Dairy cows experience a drastic change in metabolism around parturition. Daily dry matter (DM) intake declines up to 30%, and at the same time before lactation, energy demand raises leading to NEB. This enhances metabolism harshly, resulting in a raised production of ROS and RNS. It is also well-known that dairy cows suffer from increased oxidative stress in late gestation and early lactation can be measured by a rise in thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) including MDA [63]. The start of lactation is an important factor for free radicals production [64], mostly a negative energy balance developed in lactating animals that have starved conditions. A negative energy balance also develops in some diseases in which oxytocin is produced [65], while environmental conditions can also affect the antioxidant status [66] of high milk-producing dairy cattle (Figure 2).

5. Biological Health Markers of Cows in the Lactation Period

For monitoring the animal’s health and reproductive condition, metabolic profiles are important to review the oxidants and antioxidant substances [67].

5.1. Serum Biochemistry and Liver Enzymes in Dairy Cows

A high intensity of energy is consumed by the gravid uterus for the growth and development of the fetus. During late pregnancy, the glucose requirement for the gravid uterus increases and there is also a greater requirement for lactation, demanding major adjustments in the production of glucose and use in the maternal liver, adipose tissues, and skeletal muscles. The negative energy balance during lactation can raise lipolysis and diminish lipogenesis, causing the raised level of non-esterified fatty acids and β-hydroxybutyric concentration, which mobilized the fats and indicator of fatty acids mobilization [68,69,70]. An imbalance in hepatic carbohydrates occurs due to the mobilization of excessive fats and fat metabolism resulting in metabolic problems, such as ketosis and fatty liver syndrome. Economic losses can be caused by metabolic disorders in dairy farmers such as decreased milk production, treatment costs, decreased reproductive efficiency, and greater involuntary culling. Lactation stimulates stress because it is a physiological condition that adapts to metabolism in cows [14]. After calving, the body condition score loss is linked with an NEB [71]. In cows, NEB is produced by the mobilization of body reserves, because more nutrition is needed for milk synthesis. It is well known that to meet the nutritional demands of milk synthesis, dairy cows need to mobilize body reserves; awaiting nutrient intake covers the demand [71,72]. The study of Basoglu et al. [73] indicated that there was an increase in glucose VLDL, triglyceride levels before parturition, HDL levels, and cholesterol during late lactation in dairy cows. The dairy cows were tending to the fatty liver because of lower VLDL and glucose levels in early and late lactation and were inclined to hyperketonemia in early lactation because of lower insulin levels than in late lactation. Hagawane et al. [74] reported that in early and late lactating cows, blood glucose concentration was lower and significantly increased in dry cows. The downward trend of serum cholesterol was observed in dry pregnant cows as compared to lactating cows. The study of Piccione et al. [75] experimented on five healthy pregnant and lactating Holstein Friesian dairy cows. Samples of blood were collected at late gestation and early lactation during the 15, 35, and 105 days after parturition and at the end of lactation. Urea, total proteins, creatinine, albumin, total cholesterol, triglycerides, nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA), β-hydroxybutyrate, total and indirect bilirubin, calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium were determined on each sample. It was observed that the physiological phases have a significant effect on urea, creatinine, total proteins, total cholesterol, triglycerides, NEFA, β-hydroxybutyrate, calcium, and phosphorus. The study confirmed that a metabolic lactation period is more rational for the high-producing dairy cow. During the three situations such as late pregnancy, lactation, and disease, animals had undergone a negative energy status. High-yielding dairy cows during lactation undergo an NEB because energy is used for milk production and less feed intake; during the first four weeks of lactation, lipids uptake is increased by the liver thus the capacity of lipid oxidation results in a fatty liver or hepatic lipidosis. During the first stage of lactation in high yielding cows, lipid mobilization was observed, causing the liver lesion by fatty infiltration. This hepatic lesion increases the possibility of distress to the animal from other disorders such as mastitis, ketosis, hypocalcemia, and retention of the placenta more reactively or less reactively. AST and GGT appear to be the most useful for identifying hepatic disease in animals. The sensitive indicator of liver damage is the increased activity of AST; still, the level of damage is subclinical.
Stojević et al. [76] reported the behavior of aspartate, AST, ALT, and GGT in the plasma of dairy Holstein breed cows. The lactation period was divided into three groups and the fourth one was the dry period. The first group covered the 10th to 45th day of lactation, the second from the 46th to 90th day, and the third from the 91st to the end of lactation. The dry period is considered the 4th period. In the first lactation period, AST activity was highest and in the 2nd and 3rd it was higher than in the dry period. ALT showed a significant increase from the 46th day of lactation until the dry period. ALT activity in the 2nd and 3rd periods was higher than in the dry period. In the first production period and dry period, GGT activity was statistically higher as compared to the second and third periods. On the enzymes, there was a significant influence of lactation and the dry period, and it was concluded that constant monitoring is a need for good production.

5.2. Lipid Peroxidation and Antioxidant Enzymes in Dairy Cows

During metabolism, reactive oxygen species are produced, and their production and balance are controlled by enzymatic and non-enzymatic defense mechanisms [77]. Enzymatic antioxidants are SOD and CAT, while ascorbate, vitamin E, and β-carotene are non-enzymatic antioxidants. Due to elevated energy demand and increased oxygen necessity during lactation, oxidative stress is produced [78]. Lactation is a physiological action; any change in biochemical positions results in complications. Bhullar et al. [79] studied lipid peroxidation, glutathione peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase behavior, finding that they were firm with the plasma level of vitamin E and β-carotene during early, mid, and late pregnancy, early lactation, and the dry period.
On Holstein dairy cows, Sharma et al. [59] studied the stress due to oxidants and in turn antioxidant conditions during advanced gestation and early lactation. MDA was measured as a marker of lipid peroxidation and SOD, CAT, GSH, and GPx as antioxidants. During early lactation, the values of lipid peroxidation were significantly higher as compared to advanced gestation stages. In early lactation between MDA and CAT, a significant positive correlation was found. Blood glutathione (GSH) was significantly lower in early lactating cows than in the late pregnant stage. There was no significant negative correlation between lipid oxidation and all antioxidant enzymes. It is concluded that dairy cows have more oxidative stress and less antioxidant defense during early lactation than late pregnant cows.
Konvičná et al. [57] studied the indicators of oxidative stress MDA and SOD, GPx, selenium, and vitamin E in dairy cows in late gestation and early lactation. The significantly higher MDA concentration was in one week after calving as compared to three, six, and nine weeks. During the full monitoring period, SOD activities were increased and GPx activities were decreased during one week after calving as compared to six and nine. Vitamin E was found in the lowest concentration in the first week after calving. Between MDA and SOD, GPx, and vitamin E, significant changes proved that oxidative pressure occurs during the parturition and may be a reason for the increase in the rate of metabolic disease.

5.3. Serum Biochemical Profile in Dairy Cows

The TAS scale has been used to determine the active balance between prooxidants and antioxidants. Oxidative stress is determined by the ratio of total peroxides to total antioxidant capacity. The serum TAS level was higher in the first week of lactation than in the cattle in pregnancy and late lactation. According to Castillo et al. [80], antioxidant activity diminishes with the passage of lactation. Castillo et al. [81] studied the values of lipid hydroperoxides and TAS in healthy cows and also studied their relationship with milk yield. The results indicated that there was a higher level of lipid hydroperoxides present in the group with a high milk yield than the other. This high oxidant compound is not accompanied by an increased level of defensive antioxidant substances. A TAS measurement gives balancing information about the metabolic status of parameters than parameters (Figure 3). Mousa and Galal [82] found that the concentration of TAS was significantly poorer before calving and the TAS concentration elevated eight weeks after calving. The decreased TAS rate before calving was synchronized with the deficiency of vitamins and minerals.
The PON1 is a calcium-dependent glycoprotein in nature that is linked with HDL [83]. PON1 acts as an enzyme that hydrolyzes organophosphorus. It has been recommended that increased oxidative stress might be associated with decreased serum PON1 activity, anti-inflammatory and antioxidative properties, and activities of PON1 give relief from physiological oxidative stress as well as contaminated environmental chemicals [84]. The liver is the site where the PON1 gene is expressed. After production, some of the PON1 residue is inside the hepatocytes and some of it is free in the blood where it is attached to HDL by association with apolipoprotein [85]. Hussein and Staufenbiel [86] studied the Cp action and copper (Cu) concentration in plasma and serum in dairy cows. In addition to this, a ceruloplasmin to Cu ratio was also observed. Serum Cu, plasma Cu, and plasma ceruloplasmin activities were increased in the fresh lactating stage. Serum ceruloplasmin showed no significant difference between fresh and early lactation. It was found that plasma Cu and plasma ceruloplasmin concentrations were increased, rather than serum Cu and Cp. Vitamin E is an antioxidant and hinders peroxidation, removes free oxygen radicals, and mixes up the break of peroxidation chain reactions by a holdback of reactive oxygen species. Near the parturition, vitamin E supplementation decreases the level of ALT, AST, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP); thus, it prevents oxidative stress by neutralizing reactive oxygen species during late pregnancy and early lactation, and the liver condition becomes better. The cows during lactation and mastitis have lowered vitamin C in milk and plasma [86]. Vitamin C scavenges the reactive oxygen species by a fast electron transfer and inhibiting lipid peroxidation, showing an important antioxidant defense next to oxidative damage. Cellular and non-cellular immunity can be increased by the antioxidant vitamins. Vitamin C has an inspiring effect on the phagocytic activity of leukocytes and the formation of antibodies. Vitamin C with the phagocytic cells uses free radicals and reactive oxygen species to destroy the pathogen. Thus, vitamin C defends the cells from oxidative damage [87].

5.4. Alterations in the Antioxidant Status of Health Markers in Dairy Cows

Ruminant medicine is relatively new in terms of assessing oxidative status. There have actually been a number of studies in cattle, sheep, and goats, but they have mostly focused on the effects of diseases, such as mastitis, pneumonia, sepsis, acidosis, ketosis, enteritis, joint disease, and retained placentas [88,89,90]. Nowadays, peripartum metabolic diseases are becoming increasingly studied in dairy ruminants, while dairy cattle blood biochemical parameters are well-established as a means of analyzing metabolic profiles [67]. Nevertheless, metabolic profile tests can serve as an effective method of discovering which areas of dairy management and nutrition require more attention [91].
Free radical damage detection has emerged as an important complementary tool for evaluating metabolic status in recent years [92]. To combat free radical accumulation, the body has sufficient antioxidant capacity under normal physiological conditions, while ROS are produced in the body as a result of aerobic metabolic pathways. Maintaining homeostasis requires an equilibrium between ROS production and neutralization [93]. It is important to know that when domestic animals are in the productive phase, oxygen free radicals are produced [94]. There are a number of biomarkers that can be used to monitor oxidative stress, which result from increased exposure to or production of oxidants. Through TAC estimation, antioxidative systems are monitored for their efficacy against ROS. Antioxidants other than enzymatic antioxidants are found in serum, such as GSH, α-tocopherol, and β-carotene [95]. Taking into account the cumulative effects of all the antioxidants present in plasma, TAC is a useful, reliable, and sensitive indicator. Additionally, TAC can be used to assess the nutritional status of calves during transportation and for measuring stress. The measurement of TACs and the levels of MDA, as major components of total body antioxidants in dairy cows, are useful in identifying their relationship to lactational stages and the dry period [91].
The major portion of the total antioxidants in the body are plasma total thiols, which serve as a marker of oxidative protein damage. Thiol compounds have a high antioxidant capacity since the sulfur atom can easily accommodate electron loss [96]. There have been reports indicating that total thiol levels are low in various physiological and pathological conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disorders, kidney disorders, and neurological disorders that are caused by excessive free radical production [97,98,99,100]. A primiparous cow, or a cow in the early stages of lactation, is more susceptible to infections and metabolic diseases than a multiparous cow [101,102]. For this reason, it is vital to assess the metabolic and oxidative markers in cows to detect at-risk cows, especially primiparous or early lactating cows.

6. Conclusions

Free radical production, oxidative stress, and damage are great concerns when dealing with high-producing dairy cows. Oxidative stress biomarkers are considered to be useful tools to comprehend animal welfare since stress can reduce the body’s antioxidant resources and, as a consequence, lead the animal to metabolic disorders or diseases. In dairy cows, oxidative stress biomarkers undergo wide changes in production and concentration during the different stages from pregnancy to parturition and lactation. Hence, blood analyses carried out during these periods is helpful to detect the oxidative status of the animal and to identify possible strategies in order to limit the negative effects of free radicals and oxidant molecules upon health, production, and reproduction. Enzymes from the liver, blood, and microbial marker mined from the different states of dairy cattle gut by high-throughput sequencing (metagenome) should not be forgotten as important health markers as well. A growing number of researchers are interested in gaining further insight on the mechanisms by which different antioxidants can improve the health of animals and, consequently, milk yield and quality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.T. and N.P.; methodology, V.T. and N.P.; software, N.P.; writing—original draft preparation, V.T. and N.P.; writing—review and editing, N.P., M.A.C. and C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. O’Connor, J.P.B.; Aboagye, E.O.; Adams, J.E.; Aerts, H.J.W.L.; Barrington, S.F.; Beer, A.J.; Boellaard, R.; Bohndiek, S.E.; Brady, M.; Brown, G.; et al. Imaging Biomarker Roadmap for Cancer Studies. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 14, 169–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gil, F.; Pla, A. Biomarkers as Biological Indicators of Xenobiotic Exposure. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2001, 21, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tashla, T.; Žuža, M.; Kenjveš, T.; Prodanović, R.; Soleša, D.; Bursić, V.; Petrović, A.; Ljubojević Pelić, D.; Bošković, J.; Puvača, N. Fish as an Important Bio-Indicator of Environmental Pollution with Persistent Organic Pollutants and Heavy Metals. J. Agron. Technol. Eng. Manag. 2018, 1, 52–56. [Google Scholar]
  4. Khan, M.S.; Buzdar, S.A.; Hussain, R.; Afzal, G.; Jabeen, G.; Javid, M.A.; Iqbal, R.; Iqbal, Z.; Mudassir, K.B.; Saeed, S.; et al. Hematobiochemical, Oxidative Stress, and Histopathological Mediated Toxicity Induced by Nickel Ferrite (NiFe2O4) Nanoparticles in Rabbits. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 2022, e5066167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Onasanya, G.O.; Oke, F.O.; Sanni, T.M.; Muhammad, A.I. Parameters Influencing Haematological, Serum and Bio-Chemical References in Livestock Animals under Different Management Systems. Open J. Vet. Med. 2015, 5, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Herdt, T.H.; Hoff, B. The Use of Blood Analysis to Evaluate Trace Mineral Status in Ruminant Livestock. Vet. Clin. Food Anim. Pract. 2011, 27, 255–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shoukat, F.; Khan, R.U.; De Marzo, D.; Mazzei, D.; Laudadio, V.; Tufarelli, V. Interaction of Blood Calcium with Luteal Activity, Energy Metabolites and Somatic Cells Count in Post-Partum Dairy Cows. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2022, 57, 849–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Drackley, J.K.; Dann, H.M.; Douglas, N.; Guretzky, N.A.J.; Litherland, N.B.; Underwood, J.P.; Loor, J.J. Physiological and Pathological Adaptations in Dairy Cows That May Increase Susceptibility to Periparturient Diseases and Disorders. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 4, 323–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Celi, P. Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Ruminant Medicine. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2011, 33, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Maxfield, F.R.; Tabas, I. Role of Cholesterol and Lipid Organization in Disease. Nature 2005, 438, 612–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. LaRosa, J.C. Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Reduction: The End Is More Important Than the Means. Am. J. Cardiol. 2007, 100, 240–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kurpińska, A.K.; Jarosz, A.; Ożgo, M.; Skrzypczak, W.F. Changes in Lipid Metabolism during Last Month of Pregnancy and First Two Months of Lactation in Primiparous Cows—Analysis of Apolipoprotein Expression Pattern and Changes in Concentration of Total Cholesterol, HDL, LDL, Triglycerides. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2015, 18, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Alvarez, J.J.; Montelongo, A.; Iglesias, A.; Lasunción, M.A.; Herrera, E. Longitudinal Study on Lipoprotein Profile, High Density Lipoprotein Subclass, and Postheparin Lipases during Gestation in Women. J. Lipid Res. 1996, 37, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Obućinski, D.; Soleša, D.; Kučević, D.; Prodanović, R.; Simin, M.T.; Pelić, D.L.; Ðuragić, O.; Puvača, N. Management of Blood Lipid Profile and Oxidative Status in Holstein and Simmental Dairy Cows during Lactation. Mljekarstvo 2019, 69, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gowda, S.; Desai, P.B.; Hull, V.V.; Math, A.A.K.; Vernekar, S.N.; Kulkarni, S.S. A Review on Laboratory Liver Function Tests. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2009, 3, 17. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kathak, R.R.; Sumon, A.H.; Molla, N.H.; Hasan, M.; Miah, R.; Tuba, H.R.; Habib, A.; Ali, N. The Association between Elevated Lipid Profile and Liver Enzymes: A Study on Bangladeshi Adults. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Niemelä, O.; Alatalo, P. Biomarkers of Alcohol Consumption and Related Liver Disease. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. 2010, 70, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Klein, R.; Nagy, O.; Tóthová, C.; Chovanová, F. Clinical and Diagnostic Significance of Lactate Dehydrogenase and Its Isoenzymes in Animals. Vet. Med. Int. 2020, 2020, e5346483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bertoni, G.; Trevisi, E. Use of the Liver Activity Index and Other Metabolic Variables in the Assessment of Metabolic Health in Dairy Herds. Vet. Clin. Food Anim. Pract. 2013, 29, 413–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Könyves, T.; Zlatković, N.; Memiši, N.; Lukač, D.; Puvača, N.; Stojšin, M.; Halász, A.; Miščević, B. Relationship of Temperature-Humidity Index with Milk Production and Feed Intake of Holstein-Frisian Cows in Different Year Seasons. Thai J. Vet. Med. 2017, 47, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kostadinović, L. Influence of Wormwood Seeds on Enzymatic and Non–Enzymatic Activity in Blood of Broilers with Coccidiosis. J. Agron. Technol. Eng. Manag. 2023, 6, 857–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Saqib, M.N.; Qureshi, M.S.; Suhail, S.M.; Khan, R.U.; Bozzo, G.; Ceci, E.; Laudadio, V.; Tufarelli, V. Association among Metabolic Status, Oxidative Stress, Milk Yield, Body Condition Score and Reproductive Cyclicity in Dairy Buffaloes. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2022, 57, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Becskei, Z.; Savić, M.; Ćirković, D.; Rašeta, M.; Puvača, N.; Pajić, M.; Đorđević, S.; Paskaš, S. Assessment of Water Buffalo Milk and Traditional Milk Products in a Sustainable Production System. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lobo, V.; Patil, A.; Phatak, A.; Chandra, N. Free Radicals, Antioxidants and Functional Foods: Impact on Human Health. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2010, 4, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Puvača, N.; Britt, C. Welfare and Legal Aspects of Making Decisions on Medical Treatments of Pet Animals. Pravo Teor. Praksa 2020, 37, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Karacay, Ö.; Sepici-Dincel, A.; Karcaaltincaba, D.; Sahin, D.; Yalvaç, S.; Akyol, M.; Kandemir, Ö.; Altan, N. A Quantitative Evaluation of Total Antioxidant Status and Oxidative Stress Markers in Preeclampsia and Gestational Diabetic Patients in 24–36 Weeks of Gestation. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2010, 89, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Subramanian, V.; Ravichandran, A.; Thiagarajan, N.; Govindarajan, M.; Dhandayuthapani, S.; Suresh, S. Seminal Reactive Oxygen Species and Total Antioxidant Capacity: Correlations with Sperm Parameters and Impact on Male Infertility. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med. 2018, 45, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Scandalios, J.G. Oxygen Stress and Superoxide Dismutases. Plant Physiol. 1993, 101, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hou, X.; Shi, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Li, R.; Jiang, W.; Huang, T.; Guo, J.; Shang, W. Treatment of Acute Kidney Injury Using a Dual Enzyme Embedded Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks Cascade That Catalyzes In Vivo Reactive Oxygen Species Scavenging. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 9, 800428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kostadinović, L.; Lević, J.; Popović, S.T.; Čabarkapa, I.; Puvača, N.; Djuragic, O.; Kormanjoš, S. Dietary Inclusion of Artemisia Absinthium for Management of Growth Performance, Antioxidative Status and Quality of Chicken Meat. Europ. Poult. Sci. 2015, 79, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Balmus, I.M.; Ciobica, A.; Antioch, I.; Dobrin, R.; Timofte, D. Oxidative Stress Implications in the Affective Disorders: Main Biomarkers, Animal Models Relevance, Genetic Perspectives, and Antioxidant Approaches. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, e3975101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Balmus, I.M.; Ciobica, A.; Trifan, A.; Stanciu, C. The Implications of Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Clinical Aspects and Animal Models. Saudi J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wajner, M.; Latini, A.; Wyse, A.T.S.; Dutra-Filho, C.S. The Role of Oxidative Damage in the Neuropathology of Organic Acidurias: Insights from Animal Studies. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2004, 27, 427–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Navab, M.; Hama-Levy, S.; Lenten, B.J.V.; Fonarow, G.C.; Cardinez, C.J.; Castellani, L.W.; Brennan, M.L.; Lusis, A.J.; Fogelman, A.M.; Du, B.N.L. Mildly Oxidized LDL Induces an Increased Apolipoprotein J/Paraoxonase Ratio. J. Clin. Investig. 1997, 99, 2005–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Aviram, M.; Rosenblat, M.; Bisgaier, C.L.; Newton, R.S.; Primo-Parmo, S.L.; Du, B.N.L. Paraoxonase Inhibits High-Density Lipoprotein Oxidation and Preserves Its Functions. A Possible Peroxidative Role for Paraoxonase. J. Clin. Investig. 1998, 101, 1581–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Akalın, P.P.; Ataseven, V.S.; Fırat, D.; Ergün, Y.; Başpınar, N.; Özcan, O. Selected Biochemical and Oxidative Stress Parameters and Ceruloplasmin as Acute Phase Protein Associated with Bovine Leukaemia Virus Infection in Dairy Cows. J. Vet. Res. 2015, 59, 327–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Anisimov, V.N.; Mylnikov, S.V.; Oparina, T.I.; Khavinson, V.K. Effect of Melatonin and Pineal Peptide Preparation Epithalamin on Life Span and Free Radical Oxidation in Drosophila Melanogaster. Mech. Ageing Dev. 1997, 97, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Blanc, F.; Bocquier, F.; Agabriel, J.; D’hour, P.; Chilliard, Y. Adaptive Abilities of the Females and Sustainability of Ruminant Livestock Systems. A Review. Anim. Res. 2006, 55, 489–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bernabucci, U.; Lacetera, N.; Baumgard, L.H.; Rhoads, R.P.; Ronchi, B.; Nardone, A. Metabolic and Hormonal Acclimation to Heat Stress in Domesticated Ruminants. Animal 2010, 4, 1167–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Schwinn, A.-C.; Knight, C.H.; Bruckmaier, R.M.; Gross, J.J. Suitability of Saliva Cortisol as a Biomarker for Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal Axis Activation Assessment, Effects of Feeding Actions, and Immunostimulatory Challenges in Dairy Cows1. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 94, 2357–2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nelis, J.L.D.; Bose, U.; Broadbent, J.A.; Hughes, J.; Sikes, A.; Anderson, A.; Caron, K.; Schmoelzl, S.; Colgrave, M.L. Biomarkers and Biosensors for the Diagnosis of Noncompliant PH, Dark Cutting Beef Predisposition, and Welfare in Cattle. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2022, 21, 2391–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Madreseh-Ghahfarokhi, S.; Dehghani-Samani, A.; Dehghani-Samani, A. Blood Metabolic Profile Tests at Dairy Cattle Farms as Useful Tools for Animal Health Management. BJVM 2020, 23, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Celi, P.; Gabai, G. Oxidant/Antioxidant Balance in Animal Nutrition and Health: The Role of Protein Oxidation. Front. Vet. Sci. 2015, 2, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Surai, P.F.; Kochish, I.I.; Fisinin, V.I.; Juniper, D.T. Revisiting Oxidative Stress and the Use of Organic Selenium in Dairy Cow Nutrition. Animals 2019, 9, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Abuelo, A.; Hernández, J.; Benedito, J.L.; Castillo, C. Redox Biology in Transition Periods of Dairy Cattle: Role in the Health of Periparturient and Neonatal Animals. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Gomes, A.; Fernandes, E.; Lima, J.L.F.C. Fluorescence Probes Used for Detection of Reactive Oxygen Species. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2005, 65, 45–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tashla, T.; Ćosić, M.; Kurćubić, V.; Prodanović, R.; Puvača, N. Occurrence of Oxidative Stress in Sheep during Different Pregnancy Periods. Acta Agric. Serbica 2021, 26, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kehrer, J.P. Free Radicals as Mediators of Tissue Injury and Disease. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 1993, 23, 21–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ahmadinejad, F.; Geir Møller, S.; Hashemzadeh-Chaleshtori, M.; Bidkhori, G.; Jami, M.-S. Molecular Mechanisms behind Free Radical Scavengers Function against Oxidative Stress. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Indo, H.P.; Davidson, M.; Yen, H.-C.; Suenaga, S.; Tomita, K.; Nishii, T.; Higuchi, M.; Koga, Y.; Ozawa, T.; Majima, H.J. Evidence of ROS Generation by Mitochondria in Cells with Impaired Electron Transport Chain and Mitochondrial DNA Damage. Mitochondrion 2007, 7, 106–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Victor, V.M.; Rocha, M.; De la Fuente, M. Immune Cells: Free Radicals and Antioxidants in Sepsis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2004, 4, 327–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Phaniendra, A.; Jestadi, D.B.; Periyasamy, L. Free Radicals: Properties, Sources, Targets, and Their Implication in Various Diseases. Ind. J. Clin. Biochem. 2015, 30, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Turk, R.; Koledić, M.; Maćešić, N.; Benić, M.; Dobranić, V.; Ðuričić, D.; Cvetnić, L.C.; Samardžija, M. The Role of Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Response in the Pathogenesis of Mastitis in Dairy Cows. Mljekarstvo 2017, 67, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Puvača, N.; Čabarkapa, I.; Bursić, V.; Petrović, A.; Aćimović, M. Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Acaricidal Properties of Tea Tree (Melaleuca Alternifolia). J. Agron. Technol. Eng. Manag. 2018, 1, 29–38. [Google Scholar]
  55. Kharrazi, H.; Vaisi-Raygani, A.; Rahimi, Z.; Tavilani, H.; Aminian, M.; Pourmotabbed, T. Association between Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Antioxidant Defense Mechanism with Apolipoprotein E Genotypes in Alzheimer Disease. Clin. Biochem. 2008, 41, 932–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Hasan, M.N.; Chand, N.; Naz, S.; Khan, R.U.; Ayaşan, T.; Laudadio, V.; Tufarelli, V. Mitigating Heat Stress in Broilers by Dietary Dried Tamarind (Tamarindus Indica L.) Pulp: Effect on Growth and Blood Traits, Oxidative Status and Immune Response. Livest. Sci. 2022, 264, 105075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Konvičná, J.; Vargová, M.; Paulíková, I.; Kováč, G.; Kostecká, Z. Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Status in Dairy Cows during Prepartal and Postpartal Periods. Acta Vet. Brno 2015, 84, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Mutinati, M.; Piccinno, M.; Roncetti, M.; Campanile, D.; Rizzo, A.; Sciorsci, R. Oxidative Stress During Pregnancy In The Sheep. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2013, 48, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sharma, N.; Singh, N.K.; Singh, O.P.; Pandey, V.; Verma, P.K. Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Status during Transition Period in Dairy Cows. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 24, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Juan, C.A.; Pérez de la Lastra, J.M.; Plou, F.J.; Pérez-Lebeña, E. The Chemistry of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Revisited: Outlining Their Role in Biological Macromolecules (DNA, Lipids and Proteins) and Induced Pathologies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rani, V.; Deep, G.; Singh, R.K.; Palle, K.; Yadav, U.C.S. Oxidative Stress and Metabolic Disorders: Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Strategies. Life Sci. 2016, 148, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Xiao, J.; Khan, M.Z.; Ma, Y.; Alugongo, G.M.; Ma, J.; Chen, T.; Khan, A.; Cao, Z. The Antioxidant Properties of Selenium and Vitamin E; Their Role in Periparturient Dairy Cattle Health Regulation. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ingvartsen, K.L.; Moyes, K. Nutrition, Immune Function and Health of Dairy Cattle. Animal 2013, 7, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Castillo, C.; Hernandez, J.; Bravo, A.; Lopez-Alonso, M.; Pereira, V.; Benedito, J.L. Oxidative Status during Late Pregnancy and Early Lactation in Dairy Cows. Vet. J. 2005, 169, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Butler, W.R. Energy Balance Relationships with Follicular Development, Ovulation and Fertility in Postpartum Dairy Cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2003, 83, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, R.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Xu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Qi, Z. Effect of Seasonal Thermal Stress on Oxidative Status, Immune Response and Stress Hormones of Lactating Dairy Cows. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 7, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Giannuzzi, D.; Mota, L.F.M.; Pegolo, S.; Gallo, L.; Schiavon, S.; Tagliapietra, F.; Katz, G.; Fainboym, D.; Minuti, A.; Trevisi, E.; et al. In-Line near-Infrared Analysis of Milk Coupled with Machine Learning Methods for the Daily Prediction of Blood Metabolic Profile in Dairy Cattle. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 8058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Herdt, T.H. Ruminant Adaptation to Negative Energy Balance: Influences on the Etiology of Ketosis and Fatty Liver. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2000, 16, 215–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. van Knegsel, A.T.M.; van den Brand, H.; Dijkstra, J.; Kemp, B. Effects of Dietary Energy Source on Energy Balance, Metabolites and Reproduction Variables in Dairy Cows in Early Lactation. Theriogenology 2007, 68, S274–S280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, X.; Li, X.; Chen, H.; Lei, L.; Liu, J.; Guan, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Yang, W.; Zhao, C.; et al. Non-Esterified Fatty Acids Activate the AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathway to Regulate Lipid Metabolism in Bovine Hepatocytes. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2013, 67, 1157–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhao, W.; Chen, X.; Xiao, J.; Chen, X.H.; Zhang, X.F.; Wang, T.; Zhen, Y.G.; Qin, G.X. Prepartum Body Condition Score Affects Milk Yield, Lipid Metabolism, and Oxidation Status of Holstein Cows. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 32, 1889–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Halil Bayrak, I.; Ipekesen, S.; Tuba Bicer, B. Determination of the Effect of Different Sowing Dates on Growth and Yield Parameters of Some Dry Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Varieties. J. Agron. Technol. Eng. Manag. 2022, 5, 732–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Başoğlu, A.; Sevinç, M.; Ok, M.; Gökçen, M. Peri and Postparturient Concentrations of Lipid Lipoprotein Insulin and Glucose in Normal Dairy Cows. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 1998, 22, 141–144. [Google Scholar]
  74. Hagawane, S.D.; Shinde, S.B.; Rajguru, D.N. Haematological and Blood Biochemical Profile in Lactating Buffaloes in and around Parbhani City. Vet. World 2009, 2, 467–469. [Google Scholar]
  75. Piccione, G.; Messina, V.; Marafioti, S.; Casella, S. Changes of Some Haematochemical Parameters in Dairy Cows during Late Gestation, Post Partum, Lactation and Dry Periods. Vet. Zootech. 2012, 58, 59–64. [Google Scholar]
  76. Stojević, Z.; Piršljin, J.; Milinković-Tur, S.; Zdelar-Tuk, M.; Beer Ljubić, B. Activities of AST, ALT and GGT in Clinically Healthy Dairy Cows during Lactation and in the Dry Period. Vet. Arh. 2005, 75, 67–73. [Google Scholar]
  77. Vásquez-Garzón, V.R.; Arellanes-Robledo, J.; García-Román, R.; Aparicio-Rautista, D.I.; Villa-Treviño, S. Inhibition of Reactive Oxygen Species and Pre-Neoplastic Lesions by Quercetin through an Antioxidant Defense Mechanism. Free Radic. Res. 2009, 43, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ozgur, R.; Uzilday, B.; Sekmen, A.H.; Turkan, I. Reactive Oxygen Species Regulation and Antioxidant Defence in Halophytes. Funct. Plant Biol. 2013, 40, 832–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bhullar, P.; Nayyar, S.; Sangha, S.P.S. Antioxidant Status and Metabolic Profile of Buffalo during Different Growth Stages. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 79, 251–254. [Google Scholar]
  80. Castillo, C.; Hernández, J.; Valverde, I.; Pereira, V.; Sotillo, J.; Alonso, M.L.; Benedito, J.L. Plasma Malonaldehyde (MDA) and Total Antioxidant Status (TAS) during Lactation in Dairy Cows. Res. Vet. Sci. 2006, 80, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Castillo, C.; Hernández, J.; López-Alonso, M.; Miranda, M.; Luís, J. Values of Plasma Lipid Hydroperoxides and Total Antioxidant Status in Healthy Dairy Cows: Preliminary Observations. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2003, 46, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mousa, S.A.; Galal, M.K.H. Alteration in Clinical, Hemobiochemical and Oxidative Stress Parameters in Egyptian Cattle Infected with Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). J. Anim. Sci. Adv. 2013, 3, 485–491. [Google Scholar]
  83. Tomás, M.; Sentí, M.; García-Faria, F.; Vila, J.; Torrents, A.; Covas, M.; Marrugat, J. Effect of Simvastatin Therapy on Paraoxonase Activity and Related Lipoproteins in Familial Hypercholesterolemic Patients. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2000, 20, 2113–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Li, W.-F.; Costa, L.G.; Richter, R.J.; Hagen, T.; Shih, D.M.; Tward, A.; Lusis, A.J.; Furlong, C.E. Catalytic Efficiency Determines the In-Vivo Efficacy of PON1 for Detoxifying Organophosphorus Compounds. Pharm. Genom. 2000, 10, 767–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Eltramss, N.A.; El-Shafey, R.S.; Sharaf Eldin, A.; Adole, P.; Fakher, H. Role of Paraoxonase-1 Enzyme in Prediction of Severity and Outcome of Acute Organophosphorus Poisoning: A Prospective Study. Zagazig J. Forensic Med. 2023, 21, 49–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hussein, H.A.; Staufenbiel, R.; Müller, A.E.; El-Sebaie, A.; Abd-El-Salam, M. Ceruloplasmin Activity in Holstein Dairy Cows: Effects of Lactation Stages and Anticoagulants. Comp. Clin. Pathol. 2012, 21, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Guo, Z.; Gao, S.; Ouyang, J.; Ma, L.; Bu, D. Impacts of Heat Stress-Induced Oxidative Stress on the Milk Protein Biosynthesis of Dairy Cows. Animals 2021, 11, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Abutarbush, S.M.; Tuppurainen, E.S.M. Serological and Clinical Evaluation of the Yugoslavian RM65 Sheep Pox Strain Vaccine Use in Cattle against Lumpy Skin Disease. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018, 65, 1657–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bishop, S.C.; Morris, C.A. Genetics of Disease Resistance in Sheep and Goats. Small Rumin. Res. 2007, 70, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ibeagha-Awemu, E.M.; Kgwatalala, P.; Ibeagha, A.E.; Zhao, X. A Critical Analysis of Disease-Associated DNA Polymorphisms in the Genes of Cattle, Goat, Sheep, and Pig. Mamm. Genome 2008, 19, 226–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Omidi, A.; Fathi, M.H.; Parker, M.O. Alterations of Antioxidant Status Markers in Dairy Cows during Lactation and in the Dry Period. J. Dairy Res. 2017, 84, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Gutierrez, J.; Ballinger, S.W.; Darley-Usmar, V.M.; Landar, A. Free Radicals, Mitochondria, and Oxidized Lipids. Circ. Res. 2006, 99, 924–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Stefanatos, R.; Sanz, A. The Role of Mitochondrial ROS in the Aging Brain. FEBS Lett. 2018, 592, 743–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Ji, Y.; Hu, W.; Liao, J.; Jiang, A.; Xiu, Z.; Gaowa, S.; Guan, Y.; Yang, X.; Feng, K.; Liu, C. Effect of Atmospheric Cold Plasma Treatment on Antioxidant Activities and Reactive Oxygen Species Production in Postharvest Blueberries during Storage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 5586–5595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Gwozdzinski, K.; Pieniazek, A.; Gwozdzinski, L. Reactive Oxygen Species and Their Involvement in Red Blood Cell Damage in Chronic Kidney Disease. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, e6639199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bernabucci, U.; Ronchi, B.; Lacetera, N.; Nardone, A. Influence of Body Condition Score on Relationships Between Metabolic Status and Oxidative Stress in Periparturient Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 2017–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Yang, Y.; Guan, X. Rapid and Thiol-Specific High-Throughput Assay for Simultaneous Relative Quantification of Total Thiols, Protein Thiols, and Nonprotein Thiols in Cells. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 649–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Ying, J.; Clavreul, N.; Sethuraman, M.; Adachi, T.; Cohen, R.A. Thiol Oxidation in Signaling and Response to Stress: Detection and Quantification of Physiological and Pathophysiological Thiol Modifications. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2007, 43, 1099–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Eryilmaz, M.A.; Kozanhan, B.; Solak, I.; Çetinkaya, Ç.D.; Neselioglu, S.; Erel, Ö. Thiol-Disulfide Homeostasis in Breast Cancer Patients. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2019, 15, 1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Shamsi, A.; Bano, B. Journey of Cystatins from Being Mere Thiol Protease Inhibitors to at Heart of Many Pathological Conditions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 102, 674–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wittrock, J.M.; Proudfoot, K.L.; Weary, D.M.; von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. Short Communication: Metritis Affects Milk Production and Cull Rate of Holstein Multiparous and Primiparous Dairy Cows Differently. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 2408–2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Adnane, M.; Kaidi, R.; Hanzen, C.; England, G. Risk Factors of Clinical and Subclinical Endometritis in Cattle: A Review. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2017, 41, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Oxidative stress and antioxidant status in advanced pregnant and early lactating dairy cows.
Figure 1. Oxidative stress and antioxidant status in advanced pregnant and early lactating dairy cows.
Metabolites 13 00405 g001
Figure 2. Effect of temperature–humidity index (THI) on antioxidant status of lactating cows.
Figure 2. Effect of temperature–humidity index (THI) on antioxidant status of lactating cows.
Metabolites 13 00405 g002
Figure 3. TAS (mmol/L) and MDA (µM/L) values in serum of cows in different periods.
Figure 3. TAS (mmol/L) and MDA (µM/L) values in serum of cows in different periods.
Metabolites 13 00405 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tufarelli, V.; Colonna, M.A.; Losacco, C.; Puvača, N. Biological Health Markers Associated with Oxidative Stress in Dairy Cows during Lactation Period. Metabolites 2023, 13, 405. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13030405

AMA Style

Tufarelli V, Colonna MA, Losacco C, Puvača N. Biological Health Markers Associated with Oxidative Stress in Dairy Cows during Lactation Period. Metabolites. 2023; 13(3):405. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13030405

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tufarelli, Vincenzo, Maria Antonietta Colonna, Caterina Losacco, and Nikola Puvača. 2023. "Biological Health Markers Associated with Oxidative Stress in Dairy Cows during Lactation Period" Metabolites 13, no. 3: 405. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13030405

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop