Figure 1.
Total ion current diagram in positive ion mode.
Figure 2.
Total ion current diagram in negative ion mode.
Figure 3.
PCA score in positive ion mode. Green dots represent quality control samples, and blue dots represent study samples.
Figure 4.
PCA score in negative ion mode. Green dots represent quality control samples, and blue dots represent study samples.
Figure 5.
PCA score of positive ions. Red dots represent the control group, and blue dots represent the study group.
Figure 6.
OPLS−DA score of positive ions. Red dots represent the control group. Blue dots represent the study group.
Figure 7.
PCA score of anions. Red dots represent the control group. Blue dots represent the study group.
Figure 8.
OPLS−DA score of anions. Red represent the control group. Blue represent the study group.
Figure 9.
Displacement test chart of positive ions.
Figure 10.
Replacement test of anions.
Figure 11.
Volcanic diagram of positive ions in the plasma between study group and the control group. Abscissa was the change multiple of each substance in two groups. The ordinate is the P value of the t test, which is expressed by –logP. The dots in the picture represent metabolites, which represent the size of the VIP value. The red dots represent an increase in metabolites. The blue dots represent metabolites that are falling. Gray dots represent no difference in metabolic products.
Figure 12.
Volcano map of anions in the plasma of the study group and the control group. Abscissa is the change in the multiple of comparison between two groups of each substance, and ordinate is the P value of the t test, expressed by –logP. The point in the graph represents the metabolite, and the size of the point represents the size of the VIP value. Red dots represent ascending metabolites, blue dots represent descending metabolites, and gray dots represent undifferentiated metabolites.
Figure 13.
Topological analysis of positive ions. The ordinate of metabolic topological analysis was -ln(P), and the value of P represents significance. The lower the value of P and the higher the value of -lnP, the more significant the enrichment of metabolites in this pathway. The abscissa impact was the path influence value. The greater the influence value of the pathway, the more likely the metabolites of the query were consistent with the metabolites of the pathway.
Figure 14.
Topological analysis diagram of anion. The ordinate of metabolic topological analysis was -ln(P), and the value of P represents significance. The lower the value of P and the higher the value of -lnP, the more significant the enrichment of metabolites in this pathway. The abscissa impact was the path influence value. The greater the influence value of the pathway, the more likely the metabolites of the query were consistent with the metabolites of the pathway.
Figure 15.
Structural formula of differential metabolites.
Figure 16.
Histogram of OTU quantity of fecal intestinal flora of each sample after clustering.
Figure 17.
Common and unique OTUs of fecal intestinal flora among groups. Each circle represents the number of fecal microbial OTUs in the feces of each group. The intersection part of the circle represents the number of OTUs shared between groups. The non-intersecting parts represent the number of exclusive OTUs in each group.
Figure 18.
The histogram of species distribution of each sample at the levels of phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species in Figures (A–F).
Figure 19.
Rarefaction curve of each sample fosr each group. Abscissa was the number of sequences, and ordinates represented the number of OTU in sequence clustering. The curves of different colors represented various samples.
Figure 20.
Rank abundance curve of each sample for each group. The abscissa represented the OTU level, and the ordinate represented the relative abundance. Each sample was marked with different color curves.
Figure 21.
PCoA analysis of microbial communities in each group. A showed the control population group. B showed the study group. Points in the figure represent each sample separately, and groups are distinguished by different colors. The transverse and ordinate coordinates are the two eigenvalues (%) that cause the greatest difference between the samples and represent the main degree of influence.
Figure 22.
Histogram of LDA value of intestinal flora. A represents the control group; B represents the study group.
Figure 23.
Evolutionary branch map of intestinal flora LefSe. A represents the control group; B represents the study group.
Figure 24.
Correlation thermodynamic diagram in negative ion mode.
Figure 25.
Correlation network diagram in negative ion mode.
Figure 26.
Correlation thermodynamic diagram in positive ion mode. In the figure, red (corr = 1), blue (corr = −1), white (corr = 0). The data with correlation P value less than 0.05 were marked with “*” in the figure. The ordinate was metabonomics differential metabolites, and the abscissa was 16S differential flora.
Figure 27.
Correlation network diagram in positive ion mode. In the figure, the green circle represents the differential metabolites. The yellow square represents the differential flora. The line represents the correlation coefficient between the differential metabolites and the differential flora. The red line represents the positive correlation, and the blue line represents the negative correlation.
Table 1.
PCR amplification program.
Location | Time | Cycle Number |
---|
98 °C | 2 min | 30 cycles |
98 °C | 30 s | |
50 °C | 30 s | |
72 °C | 60 s | |
72 °C | 5 min | |
4 °C | | |
Table 2.
Differential metabolites in positive ion mode.
Number | Ion Mode | Metabolites | Maximum Change Multiple | VIP | p | Metabolic Pathway |
---|
1 | Positive ion mode | Diethanolamine | 3.86 | 1.96 | 8.41534 × 10−10 | Glycerol phospholipid metabolism |
2 | Positive ion mode | Dipeptide | 6.69 | 2.56 | 1.21497 × 10−5 | D- glutamine and D- glutamate metabolism |
3 | Positive ion mode | Glutamic acid | 11.93 | 3.29 | 2.08556 × 10−7 | Cyanamide metabolism |
4 | Positive ion mode | Tryptophan | 7.39 | 4.32 | 9.41414 × 10−9 | Aminoacyl tRNA biosynthesis |
5 | Positive ion mode | Phe-Try | 2.41 | 4.91 | 2.3 × 10−4 | Nitrogen metabolism |
Table 3.
Differential metabolites in anion mode.
Number | Ion Mode | Material Name | Maximum Change Multiple | VIP | p Value | Metabolic Pathway |
---|
1 | Negative ion mode | Formic acid | 2.300 | 1.32 | 4.4 × 10−3 | Tryptophan metabolism |
2 | Negative ion mode | Eicosapentaenoic acid | 2.566 | 1.09 | 1.6 × 10−2 | |
3 | Negative ion mode | Acanoic acid | 3.986 | 1.51 | 2.05937 × 10−7 | |
4 | Negative ion mode | Inosine | 2.949 | 3.28 | 5.3 × 10−4 | Purine metabolism |
5 | Negative ion mode | Phenylacetylurea | 2.906 | 2.28 | 1.6 × 10−3 | |
Table 4.
Differential metabolite characterization.
Metabolites | Molecular Formula | Change | Existence and Source | Function |
---|
Glutamic acid | C5H9NO4 | Rise | Cereal protein and animal brain | Participates in many important chemical reactions in animal, plant and microorganism. |
Diethanolamine | C4H11NO2 | Rise | - | Gas purifier; Synthetic drugs and raw materials for organic synthesis; synthesis of glycerol phosphatide |
Tryptophan | C11H12N2O2 | Rise | - | Important precursors of auxin biosynthesis in plants. Important neurotransmitter in the human body is the precursor of 5- erotonin. Participates in the renewal of plasma protein in animals; promotes riboflavin to play a role; contributes to the synthesis of nicotinic acid and heme |
Eicosapentaenoic Acid | C20H30O2 | Rise | Food (sardine, etc.) | Used for health care |
Inosine | C10H12N4O5 | Rise | Composed of hypoxanthine and ribose | Used as coenzyme drugs; improves the level of ATP; an auxiliary liver-protecting drug |
Acamprosate | C5H11NO4S | Rise | Derivatives of taurine | Treatment of alcohol addiction |
Phenylacetylurea | C9H10N2O2 | Rise | - | Synthesis of antituberculosis drugs thiourea and sulfonamide; rodenticide; analytical reagent for quantitative determination of chromium and identification of aldehydes and ketones |
Table 5.
Quality statistics of intestinal microbiological sequencing data of two groups.
Group | Samples | PE Reads | Clean Tags | Effective Tags | AvgLen (bp) | GC (%) | Effective (%) |
---|
Control group | A1 | 79,736 | 76,692 | 56,155 | 416 | 53.98 | 70.43 |
A2 | 79,941 | 77,337 | 59,944 | 409 | 53.63 | 74.99 |
A3 | 79,998 | 77,102 | 52,758 | 410 | 52.83 | 65.97 |
A4 | 79,977 | 77,050 | 61,366 | 409 | 52.59 | 76.74 |
A5 | 79,962 | 75,610 | 63,058 | 408 | 54.06 | 79.02 |
A6 | 79,800 | 76,476 | 59,411 | 412 | 53.59 | 74.08 |
A7 | 80,200 | 75,698 | 61,292 | 412 | 53.67 | 76.8 |
A8 | 79,812 | 76,211 | 62,648 | 427 | 54.28 | 78.37 |
A9 | 79,939 | 76,432 | 60,284 | 417 | 54.51 | 75.49 |
A10 | 79,856 | 76,639 | 58,172 | 417 | 55.46 | 72.82 |
A11 | 79,890 | 74,239 | 64,256 | 412 | 54.15 | 80.51 |
A12 | 79,815 | 75,760 | 59,902 | 421 | 54.74 | 74.96 |
A13 | 79,911 | 75,448 | 58,943 | 408 | 54.32 | 73.78 |
A14 | 79,888 | 76,845 | 67,853 | 411 | 57.8 | 84.72 |
A15 | 80,088 | 77,226 | 62,664 | 411 | 57.55 | 78.57 |
Study group | B1 | 79,755 | 76,680 | 62,322 | 421 | 51.5 | 77.95 |
B2 | 79,953 | 77,018 | 58,276 | 410 | 52.18 | 72.81 |
B3 | 80,035 | 77,086 | 55,139 | 410 | 53.66 | 69.14 |
B4 | 80,369 | 77,660 | 61,955 | 410 | 52.56 | 77.09 |
B5 | 79,798 | 77,466 | 63,235 | 416 | 54.13 | 79.24 |
B6 | 79,962 | 75,041 | 60,358 | 413 | 53.98 | 75.48 |
B7 | 80,091 | 75,911 | 64,254 | 413 | 53.85 | 80.23 |
B8 | 79,918 | 77,444 | 59,203 | 410 | 53.33 | 74.08 |
B9 | 80,096 | 76,968 | 68,829 | 417 | 53.96 | 85.93 |
B10 | 79,944 | 76,595 | 68,422 | 417 | 53.88 | 85.59 |
B11 | 79,867 | 76,712 | 70,834 | 418 | 54.11 | 88.69 |
B12 | 80,313 | 76,260 | 63,738 | 418 | 54.83 | 79.36 |
B13 | 79,371 | 75,726 | 55,646 | 411 | 54.57 | 70.11 |
B14 | 79,899 | 75,761 | 62,840 | 416 | 52.43 | 78.65 |
B15 | 80,084 | 76,874 | 67,742 | 407 | 54.44 | 84.59 |
Table 6.
The statistical table of species in different grades of samples.
Classification Level | Control Group | Study Group |
---|
Phylum | 8.00 ± 0.66 | 8.47 ± 0.52 |
Class | 13.60 ± 0.83 | 14.40 ± 0.51 |
Order | 26.80 ± 1.21 | 27.60 ± 0.99 |
Family | 47.20 ± 2.65 | 47.87 ± 1.99 |
Genus | 112.27 ± 5.85 | 117.93 ± 3.43 |
Species | 126.27 ± 6.85 | 132.33 ± 5.354 |
Table 7.
Alpha diversity index statistics.
Index | Control Group | Study Group |
---|
ACE | 233.80 ± 20.45 | 238.87 ± 11.25 * |
Chao1 | 133.78 ± 18.89 | 239.49 ± 13.33 * |
Shannon | 0.27 ± 0.15 | 0.18 ± 0.08 * |
Simpson | 2.27 ± 0.65 | 2.53 ± 0.56 * |
Table 8.
Morphological characterization of differential flora.
Flora | Form | Size | Spore Flagella | Gram Stain | Main Habitat |
---|
Veillonellaceae | Globular | 0.3–2.6 μm | No spores, no flagellum. | Negative | Anaerobic |
Actinobacteria | Radial | The mycelial diameter is 1 μm | Most of them produce conidia, and some form spores and flagella. | Positive | Anaerobic or facultative anaerobic |
Bifidobacterium | Rod shape | 0.5–1.3 μm × 1.5–8 μm | No spores, no flagellum. | Positive | Strict anaerobic |
Prevotellaceae | Rod shape | - | No spores, no flagellum. | Negative | Strict anaerobic |
Table 9.
Other characterization of differential bacteria.
Flora | Fermentation Metabolism | Major Metabolites of Fermentation Metabolism | Pathogenicity | Distribution |
---|
Veillonellaceae | Pyruvic acid, lactic acid, malic acid, pyruvic acid and oxalic acid | Acid and gas production | When mixed infection, endotoxin can be produced | The gut of warm-blooded animals (such as ruminants, rodents, and pigs) |
Actinobacteria | Sugar, starch, organic acid, cellulose, hemicellulose, etc | A wide variety of antibiotics | Can cause actinomycosis | Widely distributed in soil |
Bifidobacterium | Sugar | Lactic acid, acetic acid | - | Human and animal habitats, such as the digestive tract, vagina, and oral cavity |
Prevotellaceae | Sugar | Acetic acid and succinic acid and a small amount of isobutyric acid, isovalerate, and lactic acid | Conditional treatment | Oral cavity, upper respiratory tract, urogenital tract |