Next Article in Journal
Targeted Metabolomics Analysis of Bile Acids in Patients with Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury
Next Article in Special Issue
Untargeted Metabolomics Reveals a Complex Impact on Different Metabolic Pathways in Scallop Mimachlamys varia (Linnaeus, 1758) after Short-Term Exposure to Copper at Environmental Dose
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Assessment of Leptomeningeal Metastasis Diagnosis in Medulloblastoma Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Metabolomic Profiles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Metabolomic Studies for the Evaluation of Toxicity Induced by Environmental Toxicants on Model Organisms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Targeted Metabolomics to Assess Exposure to Environmental Chemicals of Concern in Japanese Quail at Two Life Stages

1
Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, QC H9X 3V9, Canada
2
Toxicology Centre and School of the Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B3, Canada
3
Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Wildlife Research Centre, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
4
SGS-AXYS Analytical Services Ltd., 2045 Mills Road West, Sidney, BC V8L 5X2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2021, 11(12), 850; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11120850
Submission received: 24 November 2021 / Accepted: 6 December 2021 / Published: 8 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Metabolomic in Ecotoxicology)

Abstract

:
This proof-of-concept study characterizes the Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) hepatic metabolome following exposure to benzo[a]pyrene, chlorpyrifos, ethinylestradiol, fluoxetine hydrochloride, hexabromocyclododecane, lead(II)nitrate, seleno-L-methionine, and trenbolone in embryos and adults. The analysis revealed effects on lipid metabolism following exposure to several chemicals at both life stages. The most pronounced effects were observed in embryos exposed to 41.1 μg/g chlorpyrifos. This work highlighted challenges and the need for further avian metabolomics studies.

1. Introduction

Metabolomics in ecotoxicology generates high throughput data, providing information on alterations of specific metabolic pathways in response to environmental stress, including anthropogenic contaminants [1]. Metabolite changes have traditionally been primarily measured using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), but liquid chromatography, coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based metabolomics, is now increasingly used, due to its higher sensitivity [2].
Although the number of metabolomics studies in ecotoxicology has drastically increased over the past 20 years, targeted and untargeted LC-MS-based metabolomics (in support of ecotoxicological studies) have primarily focused on assessing metabolite alterations in aquatic organisms exposed to a variety of chemicals [1,2]. For example, a targeted analysis reported that arginine, proline, alanine, aspartic acid, and glutamate metabolism were altered after PCB exposure in both zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos and larvae [3]. An untargeted analysis revealed that the UV filter oxybenzone affected lipid metabolism, and phenylalanine and tyrosine metabolism in the liver and plasma of the gilt-head bream (Sparus aurata) [4].
In contrast, metabolomics studies have rarely been applied to the field of avian ecotoxicology, and have only focused on one of two species: chicken or double-crested cormorant [5,6,7,8,9,10]. These studies revealed that lipid metabolism was affected by exposure to perfluorooctanesulfonic acid, chromium, and alpha-cypermethrin in chickens [6,7,10]. In addition, amino acid, energy, fatty acid, and nucleoside metabolisms were disrupted in double-crested cormorant and chicken after exposure to Deep Water Horizon oil and T2-toxin, respectively [8,9]. Recently, a metabolomics study in Japanese quail embryos revealed effects on lipid and fatty-acid metabolism following chlorpyrifos exposure [11].
Here, we describe a proof-of-concept metabolomic study in the Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) after exposure to anthropogenic contaminants at two life stages. Targeted LC-MS-based metabolomics data were collected as part of a large-scale Genome Canada project (www.ecotoxchip.ca, accessed on 6 December 2021) aimed at validating early-life stage (ELS) models for toxicity testing, and integrating omics approaches into screening and prioritization of environmental chemicals [12]. The EcoToxChip project assessed hepatic transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, as well as apical outcomes, histology, and chemical analysis data for eight chemicals of environmental concern, and controls in ELS and adult Japanese quail [13,14]. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of these eight chemicals on the Japanese quail liver metabolome.

2. Results and Discussion

The data presented in this study illustrate a characterization of the Japanese quail metabolome at two life stages following exposure to eight environmental chemicals (Figure 1). Overall, few effects of chemical exposure on the metabolome were observed at the doses that we tested. This was notable, given that significant changes were reported at the transcriptional and organismal level in response to several of the chemicals [11,13]. Here, we discuss these results and factors that may have contributed to this outcome.
Among the chemicals tested, the high dose of CPF induced the most changes in the ELS liver metabolome. The PCA scores plot showed a clear effect of CPF high dose on the liver metabolome (81.9% of total explained variance by PC1 and PC2, Figure 2A). The high dose of CPF significantly impacted the highest number of metabolites in ELS livers with 59 metabolites displaying a statistically different concentration from the control group (one-way ANOVA, FDR < 0.05, Table S1). Phospholipids and acylcarnitines were principally dysregulated, representing 47 of the 59 metabolites. Among them, 16 lipids showed a log2FC > |1.5| (Table 1). We previously explored this result in a related study comparing transcriptomic and metabolomic responses to CPF in two avian species: Japanese quail and double-crested cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus) [11]. We found that CPF had a high impact in Japanese quail ELS liver, disrupting hepatic metabolism, causing oxidative stress, and endocrine disruption (steroid and non-steroid hormones). In addition to the alteration of the phospholipids and acylcarnitine, key genes involved in lipid and fatty-acid metabolism were dysregulated, showing a consistent response across metabolomic, transcriptomic, and organismal scales. These results are outside of CPF’s neurological effects, which is to be expected when investigating the avian liver.
The early-life stage of the Japanese quail liver metabolome was relatively unaffected by most of the remaining seven chemicals at the test concentrations. Individuals exposed to the TB medium dose, FLX low dose, BaP medium dose, and EE2 high dose separated from the control individuals on the PCA scores plot (Figure 2B–E), while HBCD, Pb, and SeMe showed no effect on the ELS liver metabolome, based on the PCA analysis (Figure 2F–H). The univariate statistical analysis identified changes in metabolite concentrations, following EE2 and FLX exposure. Phospholipids and acylcarnitines were the only metabolites that were significantly affected for both chemicals (Table S1). Similar to CPF, the primary target tissue for FLX is the brain. However, effects of FLX on fatty-acid and lipid metabolism have been previously reported. In particular, an increase in carnitine concentration has been measured in rat plasma treated with fluoxetine [15]. As many aspects of lipid synthesis and transport are regulated by the endocrine system, a disruption of lipid metabolism is also expected following EE2 exposure [16]. While the traditional biomarker vitellogenin was not measured in the present study, we did observe variation in concentrations of several phosphatidylcholines in the embryonic livers. Similar results were observed in fathead minnow exposed to EE2 [16].
As with the ELS quail, few chemical-associated effects were observed in the adult Japanese quail liver metabolome. The PCA scores plot did not show a clear effect of any chemicals at any of the doses tested (Figure S1). Very few changes in metabolite concentrations were identified by one-way ANOVA (Table S1). TB induced the most variation in the adult Japanese quail liver metabolome, with five metabolite concentrations being statistically different between treated and control individuals (FDR < 0.05, Table S1). Two amino acids and biogenic amines (asymmetric dimethylarginine and phenylalanine) were upregulated, while three metabolites associated with energy pathways (reduced and oxidized glutathione and pentose-phosphate) were downregulated, following exposure to all three TB doses (Table S1). Asymmetric dimethylarginine and pentose-phosphate demonstrated the biggest changes following TB in the adult liver (Table 1). The elevated concentration of asymmetric dimethylarginine could have resulted from an increase of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol due to TB exposure [17,18]. In addition, the observed glutathione depletion in adult Japanese quail liver samples could have been a function of TB metabolism [13]. Depletion of glutathione is a biomarker of oxidative stress, which has been observed in rat hepatic cells after exposure to anabolic–androgenic steroids [19]. While oxidative stress is not the primary mode of action of TB, it has been reported that TB can be detoxified by conjugation to glutathione [20].
The lack of a metabolite response to many of the chemicals should be interpreted with caution. One hypothesis could be that the concentrations tested did not alter the Japanese quail liver metabolome. As reported in Farhat et al. [13] and Boulanger et al. [14] for ELS and adult Japanese quail, respectively, the administered concentrations of Pb and SeMe were low. No apical outcomes and low-to-no transcriptomic responses were observed for these two chemicals and concentrations and, therefore, limited effects in the metabolome were expected. However, we previously showed that the concentrations of BaP, EE2, FLX, HBCD, and TB induced apical outcomes [13] and/or moderate-to-elevated transcriptomic response in Japanese quail embryos (unpublished in-house data; intended for publication elsewhere). This suggests that effects may have occurred in the metabolome that we were not able to detect with the present study design.
Our study used a targeted metabolomics approach, where 234 metabolites were investigated (Tables S2 and S3). While this technique permits the measurement of specific metabolite classes (i.e., well-known metabolites or potential-known biomarkers of environmental stress), it does not permit the discovery of novel metabolites. Since little is known about the Japanese quail liver metabolome, some chemicals and doses could potentially have impacted metabolites outside of the targeted 234. Additionally, the sample size was low for this study, which limited the statistical power and, therefore, the detection of effects.
Despite an overall low effect on the metabolome, some common effects between chemicals were observed. Phospholipids and acylcarnitines were commonly affected by three chemicals (CPF, EE2, and FLX, Table 1 and Table S1) in ELS liver samples, and by two chemicals in adult liver samples (FLX and SeMe, Table S1). In Japanese quail, a change in acylcarnitine concentrations could illustrate a disruption of hepatic lipid β-oxidation, which could negatively affect chick growth [21,22]. Moreover, five phospholipids (PC aa 36:1, PC aa 34:1, PC aa 34:2, PC ae 36:2, and PC aa 36:2) were impacted by both CPF and EE2 in ELS Japanese quail liver, and PC ae C38:6 was commonly affected by FLX and SeMe in adult Japanese quail (Table 2). A change in phospholipids could affect the cellular membranes and overall molecular activity [23]. The avian liver plays a primary role in lipid synthesis [24], and lipid metabolism is often affected by chemical exposure in avian species. For example, perfluorooctanesulfonic acid exposure affected lipid concentrations in the chicken embryo [10]. Moreover, transcriptomics and metabolomics analyses revealed an effect on lipid metabolism in double-crested cormorant and chicken after exposure to oil, triclosan, perfluorooctane sulfonate, and tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate [9,25,26,27].
While ELS tests are increasingly being used in ecotoxicology, their application in avian metabolomics remains challenging. In the present study, the metabolomics analysis was performed on 50 mg and 100 mg (wet weight), respectively, for ELS and adult Japanese quail. To meet this weight requirement, 3 to 4 livers were pooled per sample in ELS Japanese quail, increasing the number of organisms required for the experiment. When designing metabolomics studies in ecotoxicology, biological replicates are primordial to perform powerful statistical analysis and to identify metabolite changes [28]. Due to the given constraints of the project, three pooled replicates for ELS and five individual replicates for adults were used. The low sample size of the present study limited the statistical power of the analysis and, therefore, the detection of effects. Saccenti and Timmerman [29] demonstrated that with a larger sample size, the variability of PCA loadings decreased (for a sample size greater than 50), and the stability or estimated PCA loadings increased (for a sample size greater than 25). However, this sample size seems unrealistic and unattainable for the majority of environmental metabolomics studies.
Tools have been developed to help determine the appropriate sample size for metabolomics studies. Based on a pilot study, the Power Analysis module of MetaboAnalyst can compute a sample size for the desired FDR [30]. Such analysis can help researchers to determine the appropriate number of biological replicates, balancing statistical power and experiment constraints. Based on the present CPF dataset in ELS Japanese quail, increasing the number of biological replicates to 9 to 15 would give a predicted power of 0.7 to 0.8, for a 0.05 FDR. We hope that this result will be helpful for future avian metabolomics studies.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals and Working Solutions

Stock solutions of eight chemicals—benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), chlorpyrifos (CPF), ethinylestradiol (EE2), fluoxetine hydrochloride (FLX), hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD), lead(II)nitrate (Pb), seleno-L-methionine (SeMe), and trenbolone (TB)—were prepared in DMSO for the ELS tests and in corn oil for the adult tests, as previously described [13,14].
For both life stages, birds were exposed to three concentrations of test chemicals and a solvent control (Figure 1). The high dose was selected to cause ≤20% mortality based on a review of the literature. The medium dose and low dose were 10- and 100-fold dilutions of the high dose, respectively (Table 3).

3.2. Egg Injection and Tissue Collection

A detailed description of the methodology for the ELS experiments is provided elsewhere [13]. Briefly, the eggs (n = 35) were injected on embryonic day 0 (ED0), prior to incubation (Figure 1). On ED9, a subset of embryos (n = 20) was euthanized, and livers were collected for omics analysis. To obtain sufficient wet weight required for metabolomics analysis, livers from three to four individuals were pooled, constituting one replicate, and three replicates were collected per dose. Additional liver samples were collected for other analyses, such as analytical determination of the concentrations of test chemicals in tissue, transcriptomics, proteomics, and histology [11,13]. Tissue samples were flash frozen on dry ice and stored at −80 °C until further analysis.

3.3. Adult Exposure and Tissue Collection

The adult exposures were carried out at EAG Agroscience, LLC facility. Hatched Japanese quail (1- or 2-day old; Loudounberry Farm & Garden, Leesburg, VA 20176, USA) were raised for 7 to 12 weeks prior to exposure, as previously described [14]. A single dose of each test chemical in corn oil was orally administered to individual Japanese quail by gavage at the start of the experiment (Figure 1). The dose volume corresponded to 4 mL/kg body weight. Four days after the exposure, subsets of 6 birds (3 per sex) per chemical and dosage group were euthanized using CO2 gas, and individual livers were collected and weighed. Five livers (from 3 males and 2 females) were subsectioned to yield sufficient tissue for metabolomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, and the remaining liver was used for analytical determination of the concentrations of test chemicals in the tissue. Tissue samples were flash frozen on dry ice and stored at −80 °C until further analysis.

3.4. Targeted Metabolomics

3.4.1. Sample Processing

The metabolomics samples were extracted at SGS AXYS Analytical Services Ltd. (Sidney, BC, Canada). Metabolite extraction was performed on approximately 50 mg of tissue per sample for ELS and 100 mg for adults, using 3 sequential methanol extractions in a bead blender. Portions of extracts (20 µL for amino acids and biogenic amines, 50 µL for fatty acids, hexose, bile acids, phospholipids, and acylcarnitines, and 250 µL for metabolites associated with energy pathways) were plated on 96-well plates preloaded with internal standards specific to the analysis. The plates were dried under liquid nitrogen. Extracts used for the analysis of amino acids and biogenic amines were derivatized using Edman’s Reagent to form phenylthiocarbamyl derivatives and then re-dried. Dried samples were resuspended in 250 µL of 5 mM ammonium acetate in MeOH for the analysis of amino acids, biogenic amines, fatty acids, hexose, bile acids, phospholipids, and acylcarnitines, and in 200 µL of MeOH for the analysis of metabolites associated with energy pathways. The plates were shaken for 20 min at 22 rpm and samples were eluted by centrifugation (100× g for 2 min). Samples were diluted with an equal volume of water for the analysis of amino acids, biogenic amines, phospholipids, and acylcarnitines. Samples were diluted with an equal volume of 5 mM ammonium acetate in MeOH for the analysis of fatty acids, hexose, and bile acids, and samples were diluted using 300 µL of acetonitrile for the analysis of metabolites associated with energy pathways.
The 211 samples were processed in 3 batches of 81, 80, and 50 samples. Samples were segregated based on their developmental stage (ELS versus adult), and chemical doses and associated solvent controls. The plating order within each batch was randomized across the samples. Each batch of samples was processed along with 3 procedural blank samples and 3 internal reference materials (IRMs). This allowed the extraction efficiency and reproducibility to be assessed. Metabolite concentration values in the procedural blanks represented background levels.

3.4.2. Mass Spectrometry

The metabolomics samples were processed at SGS AXYS Analytical Services Ltd. (Sidney, BC, Canada). A total of 234 metabolites (Tables S2 and S3) grouped into the following classes were investigated: amino acids and biogenic amines (43 metabolites), fatty acids (17 metabolites), hexose (1 metabolite), bile acids (13 metabolites), phospholipids, and acylcarnitines (144 metabolites), and metabolites associated with energy pathways (16 metabolites). Amino acids, biogenic amines, fatty acids, hexose, bile acids, and metabolites associated with energy pathways were analyzed by LC-MS/MS, using an Agilent 1100 HPLC coupled to an API4000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Concord, ON, Canada). Phospholipid and acylcarnitine analytes were analyzed using flow-injection tandem mass spectrometry (FI-MS/MS). Mass spectrometry performance across the run was monitored by replicate injections of a mid-point calibration sample approximately once every 20 samples.

3.4.3. Quantification

All data were initially processed using AB/Sciex’s Analyst Software version 1.6.2. For the quantification of phospholipids and acylcarnitines, area counts from the Analyst Software were transferred to the SGS AXYS laboratory information system (LIMS), where they were processed using an isotopic correction algorithm [31] that accounted for carbon isotope contributions between the high abundance phosphatidylcholines and the lower abundance sphingomyelins. All other methods used a 5–8 point quadratic calibration curve, generated using standards for both the target metabolites and isotopically labelled surrogate standards at known concentrations.

3.4.4. Quality Control

Each batch was filtered according to its respective control checks. For each batch, metabolite concentrations outside of the expected range (50–150% of the targeted range) were flagged using the IRM measurements. Metabolites detected in two or three blank samples at a concentration above 33% of the median IRM value, and in more than half of the experimental samples, were excluded. When metabolites were detected in one blank sample at a concentration above 33% of the median IRM value, the blank average concentration was subtracted from the experimental concentration. Metabolites presenting variability between the IRMs (RSD > 30%) were excluded from the analysis.

3.5. Data Visualization and Statistical Analysis

Each dataset was normalized with its respective IRM (per LC-MS run) and Pareto scaled using MetaboAnalyst (v5) [30]. Metabolomics data were visualized by principal component analysis (PCA) (ELS: n = 3; adult n = 5 per dose per chemical). Metabolites that were significantly different between a given dose of each chemical and its respective control group were identified using analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA, FDR < 0.05 and post hoc Tukey HSD). Fold change analysis was performed between treated and control groups.

4. Conclusions

This work represents a proof-of-concept avian metabolomics study and a first step towards characterizing the Japanese quail liver metabolome after exposure to environmental chemicals of concern. While only the high dose of CPF had an important impact on the ELS Japanese quail liver metabolome, we highlighted a pattern of the lipid metabolism pathway being commonly impacted by several chemicals and at both life stages. Considering the important role of lipid metabolism in avian species, more research is needed to understand the consequences of its disruption by chemicals. Moreover, this work highlighted some challenges, which we hope will be helpful for future environmental metabolomics studies in birds.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/metabo11120850/s1, Figure S1: Principal component analysis (PCA) scores plot of the adult Japanese quail (JQ) liver metabolome following exposure to trenbolone (TB, A), benzo[a]pyrene (BaP, B), fluoxetine (FLX, C), seleno-L-methionine (SeMe, D), lead(II)nitrate (Pb, E), hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD, F), ethinylestradiol (EE2; G), and chlorpyrifos (CPF; H). JQ were exposed to three doses of each chemical defined as: low (LD, dark blue), medium (MD, green), and high (HD, red). Table S1: Metabolites impacted by chemical treatment in early life stage and adult Japanese quail liver. Statistically significant metabolites were identified by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc (FDR < 0.05). Fold change (log2FC) analysis was performed between treated and control groups. For better visibility, some metabolites were abbreviated: phosphatidylcholine diacyl (PC aa) and phosphatidylcholine acyl-alkyl (PC ae). Table S2: Metabolite concentrations (ng/g) in early life stage Japanese quail-liver metabolome. The data were provided by SGS-AXYS (Sidney, BC, Canada). Chemicals are defined as follows: ethinylestradiol (EE2), chlorpyrifos (CPF), benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), lead(II)nitrate (Pb), seleno-L-methionine (SeMe), fluoxetine hydrochloride (FLX), trenbolone (TB), and hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD). Shared solvent controls for each chemical are noted as Exp1-S, Exp2-S, Exp3-S, and Exp4-S. Internal reference materials are indicated as IRM. Table S3: Metabolite concentrations (ng/g) in adult Japanese quail-liver metabolome. The data were provided by SGS-AXYS (Sidney, BC, Canada). Chemicals are defined as follows: ethinylestradiol (EE2), chlorpyrifos (CPF), benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), lead(II)nitrate (Pb), seleno-L-methionine (SeMe), fluoxetine hydrochloride (FLX), trenbolone (TB), and hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD). Internal reference materials are indicated as IRM.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.B., M.H., J.A.H. and D.C.; methodology, B.C. and H.B.; formal analysis, E.L.; investigation, D.C., J.A.H., B.C. and H.B.; data curation, E.L.; writing—original draft preparation, E.L.; writing—review and editing, E.L., J.A.H., D.C., N.B., M.H., J.X., B.C. and H.B.; visualization, E.L.; supervision, J.A.H. and D.C.; project administration, N.B., M.H., J.A.H. and D.C.; funding acquisition, N.B., M.H., J.A.H. and D.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was conducted as a part of the project, “EcoToxChip: A toxicogenomics tool for chemical prioritization and environmental management,” which was funded by Genome Canada, Génome Québec, Genome Prairie, the Government of Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ministère de l’Économie, de la Science et de l’Innovation du Québec, the University of Saskatchewan, and McGill University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were not applicable for this study. Experiments using avian early-life stages are not regulated by the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) and therefore do not require an animal care protocol. Nevertheless, the experiments followed standard procedures approved by both the McGill University and Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) animal care committees for hatched birds as stated in Farhat et al. 2020. The experiments using adult Japanese quail were contracted out to the EAG Laboratories in Maryland, USA. The protocol was based upon procedures specified in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Series 850-Ecological Effects Test Guidelines OCSPP Number 850.2100.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the results can be found in the supporting information (Tables S1 and S2).

Acknowledgments

We thank Jenny Eng, Pascal Poulin, Emily Boulanger, and Anita Masse for technical and managerial support. M.H., N.B. and J.X. were supported through the Canada Research Chairs program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, L.-J.; Qian, L.; Ding, L.-Y.; Wang, L.; Wong, M.H.; Tao, H.-C. Ecological and toxicological assessments of anthropogenic contaminants based on environmental metabolomics. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 2021, 5, 100081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Viant, M.R.; Sommer, U. Mass spectrometry based environmental metabolomics: A primer and review. Metabolomics 2013, 9, S144–S158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chai, T.; Cui, F.; Yin, Z.; Yang, Y.; Qiu, J.; Wang, C. Chiral PCB 91 and 149 toxicity testing in embryo and larvae (Danio rerio): Application of targeted metabolomics via UPLC-MS/MS. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ziarrusta, H.; Mijangos, L.; Picart-Armada, S.; Irazola, M.; Perera-Lluna, A.; Usobiaga, A.; Prieto, A.; Etxebarria, N.; Olivares, M.; Zuloaga, O. Non-targeted metabolomics reveals alterations in liver and plasma of gilt-head bream exposed to oxybenzone. Chemosphere 2018, 211, 624–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mattsson, A.; Kärrman, A.; Pinto, R.; Brunström, B. Metabolic profiling of chicken embryos exposed to perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and agonists to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, X.; Liu, C.; Wang, P.; Liang, Y.; Zhan, J.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, D. Distribution, metabolism and metabolic disturbances of α-cypermethrin in embryo development, chick growth and adult hens. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 249, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wu, X.; Zhang, T.; Shen, K.; Li, L.; Peng, Y.; Mehmood, K.; Zhou, D. Metabonomic analysis of the hepatic injury suffer from hexavalent chromium poisoning in broilers. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 18181–18190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wan, Q.; He, Q.; Deng, X.; Hao, F.; Tang, H.; Wang, Y. Systemic metabolic sesponses of broiler chickens and piglets to acute T-2 toxin intravenous exposure. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 714–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dorr, B.S.; Hanson-Dorr, K.C.; Assadi-Porter, F.M.; Selen, E.S.; Healy, K.A.; Horak, K.E. Effects of repeated sublethal external exposure to Deep Water Horizon oil on the avian metabolome. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Geng, D.; Musse, A.A.; Wigh, V.; Carlsson, C.; Engwall, M.; Orešič, M.; Scherbak, N.; Hyötyläinen, T. Effect of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) on the liver lipid metabolism of the developing chicken embryo. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 170, 691–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Desforges, J.-P.; Legrand, E.; Boulager, E.; Liu, P.; Xia, J.; Butler, H.; Chandramouli, B.; Ewald, J.; Basu, N.; Hecker, M.; et al. Using transcriptomics and metabolomics to understand species differences in sensitivity to chlorpyrifos in Japanese quail and double-crested cormorant embryos. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2021, 40, 3019–3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Basu, N.; Crump, D.; Head, J.; Hickey, G.; Hogan, N.; Maguire, S.; Xia, J.; Hecker, M. EcoToxChip: A next-generation toxicogenomics tool for chemical prioritization and environmental management. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2019, 38, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Farhat, A.; Crump, D.; Bidinosti, L.; Boulanger, E.; Basu, N.; Hecker, M.; Head, J.A. An early-life stage alternative testing strategy for assessing the impacts of environmental chemicals in birds. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2020, 39, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Boulanger, E.; Farhat, A.; Jeon, Y.S.; Basu, N.; Hecker, M.; Crump, D.; Head, J.A. Evaluation of the Toxic Effects of Eight Environmental Chemicals in Adult Japanese Quail (Coturnix japonica); figshare. Poster 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, L.; Xiong, Z.; Lu, X.; Zheng, S.; Wang, F.; Ge, L.; Su, G.; Yang, J.; Wu, C. Metabonomic evaluation of chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced changes in rats by intervention of fluoxetine by HILIC-UHPLC/MS. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0129146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ekman, D.R.; Teng, Q.; Villeneuve, D.L.; Kahl, M.D.; Jensen, K.M.; Durhan, E.J.; Ankley, G.T.; Collette, T.W. Profiling lipid metabolites yields unique information on sex- and time-dependent responses of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) exposed to 17α-ethynylestradiol. Metabolomics 2009, 5, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. McCullough, D.; Webb, R.; Enright, K.J.; Lane, K.E.; McVeigh, J.; Stewart, C.E.; Davies, I.G. How the love of muscle can break a heart: Impact of anabolic androgenic steroids on skeletal muscle hypertrophy, metabolic and cardiovascular health. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2021, 22, 389–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Böger, R.H.; Sydow, K.; Borlak, J.; Thum, T.; Lenzen, H.; Schubert, B.; Tsikas, D.; Bode-Böger, S.M. LDL cholesterol upregulates synthesis of asymmetrical dimethylarginine in human endothelial cells: Involvement of S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferases. Circ. Res. 2000, 87, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Welder, A.A.; Robertson, J.W.; Melchert, R.B. Toxic effects of anabolic-androgenic steroids in primary rat hepatic cell cultures. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 1995, 33, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Evrard, P.; Maghuin-Rogister, G. In vitro metabolism of trenbolone: Study of the formation of covalently bound residues. Food Addit. Contam. 1988, 5, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Surugihalli, C.; Porter, T.E.; Chan, A.; Farley, L.S.; Maguire, M.; Zhang, C.; Kattapuram, N.; Muyyarikkandy, M.S.; Liu, H.C.; Sunny, N.E. Hepatic mitochondrial oxidative metabolism and lipogenesis synergistically adapt to mediate healthy embryonic-to-neonatal transition in chicken. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 20167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Musa, B.B.; Khawar, H.; Yang, X.; Cao, Y.; Yang, X. Developmental changes in hepatic lipid metabolism of chicks during the embryonic periods and the first week of posthatch. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 1655–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hulbert, A.J.; Else, P.L. Membranes as possible pacemakers of metabolism. J. Theor. Biol. 1999, 199, 257–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zaefarian, F.; Abdollahi, M.R.; Cowieson, A.; Ravindran, V. Avian liver: The forgotten organ. Animals 2019, 9, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Guo, J.; Ito, S.; Nguyen, H.T.; Yamamoto, K.; Iwata, H. Effects on the hepatic transcriptome of chicken embryos in ovo exposed to phenobarbital. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 160, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jacobsen, A.V.; Nordén, M.; Engwall, M.; Scherbak, N. Effects of perfluorooctane sulfonate on genes controlling hepatic fatty acid metabolism in livers of chicken embryos. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 23074–23081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Farhat, A.; Buick, J.K.; Williams, A.; Yauk, C.L.; O’Brien, J.M.; Crump, D.; Williams, K.L.; Chiu, S.; Kennedy, S.W. Tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate perturbs the expression of genes involved in immune response and lipid and steroid metabolism in chicken embryos. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2014, 275, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rodrigues, A.M.; Ribeiro-Barros, A.I.; Antónion, C. Experimental design and sample preparation in forest tree metabolomics. Metabolites 2019, 9, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Saccenti, E.; Timmerman, M.E. Approaches to sample size determination for multivariate data: Applications to PCA and PLS-DA of omics data. J. Proteome Res. 2016, 15, 2379–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pang, Z.; Chong, J.; Zhou, G.; De Lima Morais, D.A.; Chang, L.; Barrette, M.; Gauthier, C.; Jacques, P.É.; Li, S.; Xia, J. MetaboAnalyst 5.0: Narrowing the gap between raw spectra and functional insights. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W388–W396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liebisch, G.; Lieser, B.; Rathenberg, J.; Drobnik, W.; Schmitz, G. High-throughput quantification of phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry coupled with isotope correction algorithm. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2004, 1686, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Experimental design of the early-life stage (ELS) and adult Japanese quail exposures, adapted from Farhat et al. [13] and Boulanger et al. [14]. ELS and adult Japanese quail were exposed to 8 environmental chemicals (benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), chlorpyrifos (CPF), ethinylestradiol (EE2), fluoxetine hydrochloride (FLX), hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD), lead(II)nitrate (Pb), seleno-L-methionine (SeMe), and trenbolone (TB)) following this experimental design. (A) Embryos were exposed via egg injection on day 0 of incubation. A subset was euthanized on embryonic day 9 and liver samples were taken for omics and chemical residue analysis. To provide sufficient tissue for metabolomics, 3–4 ELS livers were pooled for each replicate (n = 3 replicates). Remaining embryos were incubated until embryonic day 16 in order to monitor apical outcomes. (B) Adults were exposed to a single dose via gavage. A subset was euthanized 4 days later for omics (n = 5) and chemical residue analysis. Remaining individuals were maintained until day 14 in order to monitor apical outcomes.
Figure 1. Experimental design of the early-life stage (ELS) and adult Japanese quail exposures, adapted from Farhat et al. [13] and Boulanger et al. [14]. ELS and adult Japanese quail were exposed to 8 environmental chemicals (benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), chlorpyrifos (CPF), ethinylestradiol (EE2), fluoxetine hydrochloride (FLX), hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD), lead(II)nitrate (Pb), seleno-L-methionine (SeMe), and trenbolone (TB)) following this experimental design. (A) Embryos were exposed via egg injection on day 0 of incubation. A subset was euthanized on embryonic day 9 and liver samples were taken for omics and chemical residue analysis. To provide sufficient tissue for metabolomics, 3–4 ELS livers were pooled for each replicate (n = 3 replicates). Remaining embryos were incubated until embryonic day 16 in order to monitor apical outcomes. (B) Adults were exposed to a single dose via gavage. A subset was euthanized 4 days later for omics (n = 5) and chemical residue analysis. Remaining individuals were maintained until day 14 in order to monitor apical outcomes.
Metabolites 11 00850 g001
Figure 2. Principal component analysis (PCA) scores plot of the early-life stage (ELS) Japanese quail (JQ) liver metabolome after exposure to chlorpyrifos (CPF, A), trenbolone (TB, B), fluoxetine (FLX, C), benzo(a)pyrene (BaP, D), ethinylestradiol (EE2, E), hexabromocyclodecane (HBCD, F), lead(II)nitrate (Pb, G), and seleno-L-methionine (SeMe, H). JQ were exposed to three doses defined as low dose (LD, dark blue), medium dose (MD, green), and high dose (HD, red).
Figure 2. Principal component analysis (PCA) scores plot of the early-life stage (ELS) Japanese quail (JQ) liver metabolome after exposure to chlorpyrifos (CPF, A), trenbolone (TB, B), fluoxetine (FLX, C), benzo(a)pyrene (BaP, D), ethinylestradiol (EE2, E), hexabromocyclodecane (HBCD, F), lead(II)nitrate (Pb, G), and seleno-L-methionine (SeMe, H). JQ were exposed to three doses defined as low dose (LD, dark blue), medium dose (MD, green), and high dose (HD, red).
Metabolites 11 00850 g002
Table 1. Most-impacted (log2Fold Change > |1.5|) metabolites by chemical treatment in early-life stage and adult Japanese quail liver. Statistically significant metabolites were identified by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc (false discovery rate FDR < 0.05). The full list of metabolites statistically different between treated and control groups is reported in Table S1. For better visibility, some metabolites were abbreviated: phosphatidylcholine diacyl (PC aa) and phosphatidylcholine acyl-alkyl (PC ae).
Table 1. Most-impacted (log2Fold Change > |1.5|) metabolites by chemical treatment in early-life stage and adult Japanese quail liver. Statistically significant metabolites were identified by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc (false discovery rate FDR < 0.05). The full list of metabolites statistically different between treated and control groups is reported in Table S1. For better visibility, some metabolites were abbreviated: phosphatidylcholine diacyl (PC aa) and phosphatidylcholine acyl-alkyl (PC ae).
Life StageChemicalDosesMetabolite ClassMetabolitep-ValueFDRLog2(FC)
HDMDLD
ELSCPFHDABAOrnithine1.00 × 10−22.87 × 10−2−1.62
HDFHBArachidonic acid7.54 × 10−32.22 × 10−2−1.82
HD Docosahexaenoic acid 2.07 × 10−24.65 × 10−2−3.45
HD FA C22:5n6c1.11 × 10−22.96 × 10−2−4.64
MDLIPAC C141.04 × 10−22.87 × 10−2 3.25
MD AC C164.99 × 10−31.70 × 10−2 1.90
MD AC C18:13.97 × 10−44.32 × 10−3 2.01
MD AC C18:23.44 × 10−51.14 × 10−3 2.95
HD lysoPC a C18:12.04 × 10−31.06 × 10−21.63
HD lysoPC a C18:25.92 × 10−31.87 × 10−21.60
HD PC aa C32:23.36 × 10−44.29 × 10−31.76
HD PC aa C34:12.07 × 10−43.01 × 10−31.56
HD PC aa C34:28.09 × 10−46.71 × 10−31.71
HD PC aa C34:32.76 × 10−31.17 × 10−21.82
HD PC aa C36:11.16 × 10−54.83 × 10−41.85
HD PC aa C36:27.35 × 10−52.03 × 10−31.90
HD PC aa C36:35.05 × 10−44.65 × 10−31.62
HD PC ae C42:21.59 × 10−39.25 × 10−32.04
HD PC ae C42:44.16 × 10−44.32 × 10−3−2.04
HD;MD;LD SM C26:11.89 × 10−31.01 × 10−2−3.07−2.27−2.73
EE2HD;MD;LDLIPPC aa C40:22.23 × 10−73.71 × 10−5−2.60−2.34−2.74
AdultTBHD; MD; LDABAAsymmetric
dimethylarginine
6.99 × 10−55.15 × 10−31.661.951.90
Pentose-
phosphate
6.10 × 10−42.69 × 10−2−2.43−2.83−2.62
Chemicals are defined as follows: chlorpyrifos (CPF), ethinylestradiol (EE2), and trenbolone (TB), and the doses as high dose (HD), medium dose (MD), and low dose (LD).
Table 2. Metabolites impacted by multiple chemicals in early-life stage (ELS) and adult quail. None of the metabolites were impacted at both life stages. Chemicals are abbreviated as chlorpyrifos (CPF), ethinylestradiol (EE2), trenbolone (TB), and seleno-L-methionine (SeMe).
Table 2. Metabolites impacted by multiple chemicals in early-life stage (ELS) and adult quail. None of the metabolites were impacted at both life stages. Chemicals are abbreviated as chlorpyrifos (CPF), ethinylestradiol (EE2), trenbolone (TB), and seleno-L-methionine (SeMe).
MetaboliteChemicalsLife Stage
PC ae C36:2CPF, EE2ELS
PC aa C34:1CPF, EE2ELS
PC aa C34:2CPF, EE2ELS
PC aa C36:1CPF, EE2ELS
PC aa C36:2CPF, EE2ELS
PC ae C38:6FLX, SeMeAdult
Table 3. Administered concentrations of test chemicals in early-life stage (ELS) and adult Japanese quail. As described in Figure 1, ELS Japanese quail were injected with a single chemical dose, while adult Japanese quail were exposed via gavage. Vehicle solvents were DMSO and corn oil for ELS and adult, respectively. Values in the table were calculated based on the analytically determined (ELS) or nominal (adult) concentrations of the dosing solutions. Chemicals are abbreviated as follows: ethinylestradiol (EE2), chlorpyrifos (CPF), benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), lead(II)nitrate (Pb), seleno-L-methionine (SeMe), fluoxetine hydrochloride (FLX), trenbolone (TB), and hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD). JQ were exposed to three doses of each chemical (low dose: LD, medium dose: MD, and high dose: HD). Table was adapted from Farhat et al. [13] and Boulanger et al. [14].
Table 3. Administered concentrations of test chemicals in early-life stage (ELS) and adult Japanese quail. As described in Figure 1, ELS Japanese quail were injected with a single chemical dose, while adult Japanese quail were exposed via gavage. Vehicle solvents were DMSO and corn oil for ELS and adult, respectively. Values in the table were calculated based on the analytically determined (ELS) or nominal (adult) concentrations of the dosing solutions. Chemicals are abbreviated as follows: ethinylestradiol (EE2), chlorpyrifos (CPF), benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), lead(II)nitrate (Pb), seleno-L-methionine (SeMe), fluoxetine hydrochloride (FLX), trenbolone (TB), and hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD). JQ were exposed to three doses of each chemical (low dose: LD, medium dose: MD, and high dose: HD). Table was adapted from Farhat et al. [13] and Boulanger et al. [14].
ChemicalELSAdult
Administered Concentration
(ppm a egg)
Administered Concentration
(ppm a)
LDMDHDLDMDHD
EE20.546.354.20.050.55
CPF0.564.941.10.1110
BaP0.010.05 b0.830.5550
Pb0.07 c (0.11)0.7 c (1.1)6.7 (10.7)353503500
SeMe0.0003 d (0.0007)0.002 d (0.005)0.03 d (0.07)0.1110
FLX0.394.632.7110100
TB0.040.434.40.1110
HBCD0.02γ0.73γ10.5γ101001000
a: Parts per million relative to egg and body weight for ELS and adult Japanese quail, respectively. b: Nominal value (due to an error, this stock solution was not analyzed). c,d: Reported values represent the analytically determined concentrations of elemental lead or selenium, followed by the calculated concentrations of lead(II)nitrate or seleno-L-methionine in parentheses, where applicable. γ: γ-HBCD is the predominant isomer in the technical mixture used in this study.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Legrand, E.; Basu, N.; Hecker, M.; Crump, D.; Xia, J.; Chandramouli, B.; Butler, H.; Head, J.A. Targeted Metabolomics to Assess Exposure to Environmental Chemicals of Concern in Japanese Quail at Two Life Stages. Metabolites 2021, 11, 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11120850

AMA Style

Legrand E, Basu N, Hecker M, Crump D, Xia J, Chandramouli B, Butler H, Head JA. Targeted Metabolomics to Assess Exposure to Environmental Chemicals of Concern in Japanese Quail at Two Life Stages. Metabolites. 2021; 11(12):850. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11120850

Chicago/Turabian Style

Legrand, Elena, Niladri Basu, Markus Hecker, Doug Crump, Jianguo Xia, Bharat Chandramouli, Heather Butler, and Jessica A. Head. 2021. "Targeted Metabolomics to Assess Exposure to Environmental Chemicals of Concern in Japanese Quail at Two Life Stages" Metabolites 11, no. 12: 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11120850

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop