Next Article in Journal
Non-Analog Compounds to Sialic Acid as Inhibitors of Influenza Virus Neuraminidase: An Underexplored Approach for Novel Antivirals―Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Medicinal Use of Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evidence of Hyperglycemic Levels Improving the Binding Capacity between Human Serum Albumin and the Antihypertensive Drug Hydrochlorothiazide

by
Marilia Amável Gomes Soares
1,
Franklin Souza-Silva
2,3,
Carlos Roberto Alves
4,
Leonardo Vazquez
5,
Talita Stelling de Araujo
6,
Carlos Serpa
7 and
Otávio Augusto Chaves
7,8,*
1
Comissão Brasileira de Energia Nuclear, Instituto de Engenharia Nuclear, Laboratório de Nanoradiofármacos e Síntese de Novos Radiofármacos, Rio de Janeiro 21941-906, Brazil
2
Centro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico em Saúde, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Avenida Brasil 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil
3
Faculdade de Biologia e Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Iguaçu, Avenida Abílio Augusto Távora 2134, Dom Rodrigo, Nova Iguaçu 26260-045, Brazil
4
Laboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Avenida Brasil 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro 21040-900, Brazil
5
Programa de Biologia Estrutural, Laboratório Estrutural e Regulação de Proteínas e ATPases, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica Leopoldo de Meis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil
6
Centro Nacional de Biologia Estrutural e Bioimagem (CENABIO), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil
7
Departamento de Química, Centro de Química de Coimbra-Institute of Molecular Sciences (CQC-IMS), Universidade de Coimbra, Rua Larga, 3004-535 Coimbra, Portugal
8
Laboratório de Imunofarmacologia, Centro de Pesquisa, Inovação e Vigilância em COVID-19 e Emergências Sanitárias (CPIV), Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro 21040-361, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sci. Pharm. 2024, 92(2), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm92020032
Submission received: 8 April 2024 / Revised: 26 May 2024 / Accepted: 28 May 2024 / Published: 7 June 2024

Abstract

:
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), especially arterial hypertension, stand as prominent contributors to global mortality. Regrettably, individuals with diabetes encounter a two-fold increase in the risk of mortality associated with CVDs. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) represents a primary intervention for hypertension, particularly in diabetic patients. Nevertheless, there has not yet been a comprehensive assessment of the biophysical characteristics regarding the impact of glucose levels on its binding affinity with human serum albumin (HSA). Thus, the present work reports the interactive profile of HSA/HCTZ in nonglycemic, normoglycemic (80 mg/dL), and hyperglycemic (320 mg/dL) conditions by time-resolved fluorescence, saturation transfer difference–nuclear magnetic resonance (STD-NMR), and surface plasmon resonance (SPR). There was a moderate ground state association of HSA/HCTZ with subdomain IIA that was affected in the presence of different glucose levels. The hyperglycemic condition decreased the binding affinity of HCTZ to subdomain IIA and increased the possibility of subdomain IB also being considered as a secondary binding site due to cooperativity and/or alterations in the protein’s structure. Overall, the glucose level under hyperglycemic conditions led to the cavities being more likely to receive more ligands, offering insights into the necessity of glucose control in the human bloodstream to not impact the residence time (pharmacokinetic profile) and pharmacotherapeutic potential of HCTZ.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the main causes of death, and among them, the most representative is arterial hypertension [1,2,3], e.g., according to studies by the Global Burden of Disease, in 2017, among the 17 million deaths from CVDs, arterial hypertension was responsible for at least 51% of them. Overall, arterial hypertension already affects at least 600 million people worldwide, with an estimated increase of 60% in cases until 2025 [4,5,6]. The risk of death from CVDs increases in diabetic patients, especially if there is another comorbidity [7,8,9]. As the main cause of morbidity in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is due to macro- and microvascular complications, the risk of arterial hypertension is high, and blood pressure control is a major challenge for these patients [10,11].
In this sense, several classes of drugs have been used in the treatment of hypertension in patients with DM, e.g., beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and thiazide diuretics [12,13]. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ; Figure 1) belongs to the group of thiazide diuretics and is the drug of first choice for the initial treatment of hypertensive patients, reducing blood pressure. HCTZ is mainly used daily in low doses (<25 mg/day). According to the recent 2023 European Society of Hypertension (ESH) guidelines, as well as the previous 2018 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and ESH guidelines on hypertension, both thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics are indicated as drugs to be used in combination therapies for the first-line therapy of hypertension [14,15].
The interaction of a drug with blood components influences its bioavailability and can affect the functions of various endogenous and exogenous compounds [16,17,18,19]. Human serum albumin (HSA) is the main transport protein in the human bloodstream, constituting 60% of the total globular proteins, playing an effective role in the balance of the plasma concentration of drugs and their metabolites, influencing their absorption, distribution, elimination, and clinical effects [20,21,22,23,24,25]. From a structural point of view, HSA contains 585 amino acid residues (with a molecular weight of 66.5 kDa) distributed in three main domains (I, II, and III). These domains are subdivided into A and B, having a helical shape, and are extensively cross-linked through disulfide bonds. The tryptophan residue (Trp) at position 214 in subdomain IIA is primarily responsible for the intrinsic fluorescence of HSA [26,27]. Recently, a report on the interactive profile between HSA and the monosaccharides fructose, glucose, and arabinose [20] indicated a spontaneous and weak binding with subdomain IIA. Additionally, the spectroscopic and in silico results showed that the monosaccharides might cause functional perturbation in the binding capacity of albumin to endogenous and exogenous compounds, highlighting the importance of characterizing the binding affinity of commercial drugs in normoglycemic and hyperglycemic conditions [20,28]. Glucose levels in a normoglycemic condition are in the range of 70–100 mg/dL, while an increased risk for diabetes is considered when glucose levels are in the 100–125 mg/dL range, and glucose levels higher than 200 mg/dL indicate a hyperglycemic condition. For this reason, there are some reports on the biophysical characterization of albumin-binding drugs at 80 and 320 mg/dL glucose levels under in vitro normoglycemic and hyperglycemic conditions [20,29].
Previously, Soares and coworkers [30] reported a preliminary interactive profile between HSA and HCTZ in nonglycemic, normoglycemic (80 mg/dL), and hyperglycemic (320 mg/dL) conditions via absorption and steady-state fluorescence techniques. The spectroscopic data indicated high glucose concentrations might perturb the available binding sites due to the albumin’s conformational change, making the binding of HCTZ in the vicinity of the Trp-214 residue difficult. These results indicated that glycemic control is required to obtain an appropriate treatment with HCTZ. However, we did not identify the main fluorescence quenching mechanism, which is extremely important to verify the best mathematical approach to determine the binding affinity. It is also important to mention that there are more sensitive techniques than absorption and steady-state fluorescence to determine the binding affinity [31], e.g., saturation transfer difference (STD) is the most encountered ligand-detecting nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) method for small-molecule target studies, while surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is a very sensitive technique to explore specific binding sites [32]. Thus, to continue the binding characterization of albumin/HCTZ and better clarify the effect of glucose levels on the binding affinity, the present work reports the interactive profile of HSA/HCTZ in nonglycemic, normoglycemic (80 mg/dL), and hyperglycemic (320 mg/dL; extreme case) conditions using time-resolved fluorescence combined with the STD-NMR and SPR techniques. Overall, understanding the influence of glucose on the HSA/HCTZ association will provide valuable insights into the structural dynamics and binding specificity, emphasizing the importance of comprehensively exploring molecular interactions in complex physiological environments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Commercially available HSA (purity ≥ 99%), D-(+)-glucose, phosphate buffer solution (PBS; pH 7.4), digitoxin, warfarin, Ludox®, and HCTZ were purchased from the Merck KGaA company (Darmstadt, Germany) and used without further purification. Ethanolamide and the amine-coupling agents 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) were purchased from Cytiva/GE Healthcare (Piscataway, NJ, USA), while the sensor chip with a matrix of carboxymethylated dextran covalently attached to a gold surface (COOH5) was acquired from FortéBio—Sartorius BioAnalytical Instruments (New York, NY, USA). Milli-Q water was obtained with a Direct System QUV3-Millipore (Darmstadt, Germany) at 24.1 °C and 18.2 mΩ. The concentration of the stock solutions of albumin was confirmed by the UV absorption, using a molar absorptivity (ε) of 35,700 M−1 cm−1 at 280 nm in the PBS [26].

2.2. Time-Resolved Fluorescence Measurements

The spectrofluorometer model FL920 CD (Edinburgh Instruments Ltd., Livingston, UK) was used to obtain the time-resolved fluorescence decays (λexc = 280 ± 10 nm) at room temperature (298 K). The corresponding decays in nonglycemic conditions were obtained for 10 μM of HSA solution (3 mL in PBS) without and with HCTZ at a concentration of 13.4 μM. In normoglycemic and hyperglycemic conditions, the fluorescence decays for HSA (10 μM) in the presence of 80 and 320 mg/dL of glucose were recorded, respectively, before and upon the addition of 13.4 μM of HCTZ. The instrument response function (IRF) was obtained for a mixture of titanium dioxide (TiO2), water, and glycerol (Ludox® dispersion). The fluorescence decay lifetimes were analyzed using deconvolution software provided by Edinburgh Instruments. The average fluorescence lifetime (τaverage) was determined following Equation (1):
τ average = A i   τ i 2 A i   τ i
where τi is the fluorescence lifetime, and Ai is the pre-exponential factor.

2.3. STD-NMR Measurements

The STD-NMR experiments were performed at 298 K with a Bruker Avance III spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Rheinstetten, Germany) operating at a 1H frequency of 600 MHz equipped with a triple-resonance Z-axis gradient 5 mm probe. The D2O signal was used as the lock signal for the instrument, while tetramethylsilane (TMS) was used as an internal reference. The HSA sample used for these experiments was prepared in PBS. The samples were prepared with a 100-fold excess of HCTZ (2 mM) vs. protein, at 20 μM. The experiments performed in the presence of glucose (at 2 mM, 10 mM, and 20 mM) were acquired in the same experimental conditions. The on-resonance spectrum was obtained with the saturation of protein signals at 0.78 ppm and the off-resonance spectrum at −10 ppm, using the Bruker standard parameters (STDDIFFGP.3). A spin-lock filter of 40 ms was used to suppress protein signals. A saturation time build-up curve was obtained to evaluate if an accumulation of saturated ligand molecules was occurring. The saturation times used were 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 s with a recycling delay of 4.0 s. The STD amplification factor (ASTD) values were determined using the mathematical approximation reported in the literature [33]. The relative STD percentages were obtained using 2.5 s for saturation. The highest intensity of ASTD was set to 100%, and all other STD signals were calculated relative to this.

2.4. Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Measurements

The SPR experiments were performed with an optical biosensor transduction SensíQ® Pioneer FortéBio—Sartorius BioAnalytical Instruments (New York, NY, USA) at room temperature (298 K). The samples of protein were incubated (for 30 min at 298 K) with a 10 mM acetate buffer (pH 4.5), and then the protein immobilization was performed as previously described in [34,35] with modifications. Briefly, a COOH5 sensor chip was functionalized with HSA (100 μg) using the EDC/NHS coupling method. The COOH5 covering with HSA was performed with running PBS (pH 7.4) in sequential steps at a continuous flow rate: (i) injection of 50 μL of the mixture (1:1; 0.4 M EDC and 0.1 M NHS) for 2 min at 50 μL/min; (ii) injection of HSA (100 µg) for 5 min at 50 μL/min; and (iii) injection of 150 μL of 100 mM ethanolamine at 20 μL/min.
Binding assays were performed with 50 μL injections of different concentrations (0.21–26.8 μM) of HCTZ and site markers (warfarin and digitoxin) at a continuous flow rate (50 μL/min) to access the bioavailability of HSA binding sites after immobilization on the sensor chip. Calibration curves were plotted for each ligand and then competition assays were performed with combinations of the concentration of these ligands based on the affinity constant (KD) obtained for each. Subsequently, the influence of a glucose-enriched environment (80 mg/dL and 320 mg/dL) on HSA binding to HCTZ was evaluated by the new KD value obtained, maintaining an equimolecular rate concentration. Subsequently, the binding of HCTZ (13.4–209 μM) to HSA was evaluated in a glucose-enriched environment, maintaining a stoichiometric ratio with glucose, based on the amount of HSA immobilized per sensor chip surface area (1.24 ng in 0.155 mm2). After binding pulses with each ligand concentration, the sensor chip was subjected to a regeneration pulse (30 s with 10 mM glycine-HCl at pH 1.5) followed by a stabilization period (30 s) and, finally, a buffer injection (60 s) to verify the mass transfer effect.
Binding assays were assessed in real-time by a sensorgram of association and dissociation for the complex formation, and changes in the SPR angle were expressed as resonance units (RU) using the Qdat software (version 4.3.1, FortéBio, New York, NY, USA). To avoid artifacts, RU values from the reference channel were subtracted from the RU values of the test samples. The rate constants that measure interactions between proteins–drugs can be expressed as an association rate constant (ka or kon) and/or a dissociation rate constant (kd or koff), which are used to determine the equilibrium or affinity constant (KD; Equation (2)) [36]. Thus, KD was the nomenclature adopted in this work to define affinity.
K D = k a k d  

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Identification of the Main Fluorescence Quenching Mechanism

According to Soares and coworkers [30], the bimolecular quenching rate constant (kq) values for the interaction of HSA/HCTZ in nonglycemic, normoglycemic, or hyperglycemic conditions are in the order of 1012 M−1 s−1, larger than the diffusion rate constant in water (kdiff~7.40 × 109 M−1 s−1 at 298 K, following the Smoluchowski–Stokes–Einstein theory) [37], indicating a ground state association. However, in the Stern–Volmer plot, we noticed the appearance of a negative curvature at the highest glucose level (320 mg/dL), which was not expected in a pure static quenching mechanism [31]. Thus, to clarify the fluorescence quenching mechanism operating in the HSA/HCTZ complex, time-resolved fluorescence measurements were conducted in the absence and presence of the maximum HCTZ concentration used in the reported steady-state fluorescence analysis [30] (Figure 2 and Table 1).
The fluorescence decays were better fitted in a bi-exponential function (residuals in Figure 2), with the measured corresponding shorter (τ1) and longer lifetimes (τ2) for non-bound HSA in a nonglycemic condition of 1.76 ± 0.09 and 5.75 ± 0.09 ns, in full agreement with the literature data [38,39]. Since the fluorescence lifetimes for HSA did not significantly change in the presence of HCTZ, it can be stated that the quenching process occurred through a purely static mechanism [31], indicating that the Stern–Volmer technique, and not the double-logarithmic approach, is the best mathematical approximation to estimate the binding affinity of HSA/HCTZ [40,41]. Thus, the reported Stern–Volmer quenching constant (Ksv), and not the apparent binding constant (Kb), must be considered to estimate the binding affinity of albumin/HCTZ, correcting the approach carried out by Soares and coworkers [30]. In this sense, the reported Ksv value of (1.38 ± 0.01) × 104 M−1 at 310 K [30] indicated a moderate binding affinity.
Glucose in both normoglycemic and hyperglycemic concentrations in the HSA solution did not significantly decrease the lifetimes of albumin (Table 1), agreeing with previous trends reported for different monosaccharides [20]. The interaction of HSA/HCTZ in normoglycemic and hyperglycemic conditions decreased albumin’s average fluorescence lifetime by less than 1% (Table 1), indicating that under the two different glucose levels used in this work, the fluorescence quenching mechanism induced by HCTZ continues to be purely static. Energy transfer (from the dynamic quenching mechanism) does not operate in the system under study. Thus, even in the presence of glucose, HCTZ still might interact via a ground state association, and the reported KSV values of 1.57 ± 0.03 and 2.82 ± 0.09 × 104 M−1 for normoglycemic and hyperglycemic conditions, respectively, [30] indicate that these glucose levels might increase HCTZ’s affinity to albumin, increasing by about two-fold at extreme glucose concentrations.
It is important to highlight that high glucose levels cause oxidative changes in proteins (glycoxidation), inducing the formation of Maillard reaction products and further advanced glycation end-products [42]. Thus, glycoxidation in patients with diabetes under long exposure to high glucose concentrations in the blood is feasible, leading to the formation of glycated albumin [43]. Under the experimental in vitro conditions used in this work, we did not induce the glycoxidation of albumin. We did not identify any significant change in the τ values for HSA and HSA/glucose that could indicate glycoxidation [44,45].

3.2. STD-NMR Analysis

To deeply evaluate the binding mode of HCTZ with HSA, we performed STD-NMR experiments. The STD-NMR technique enables the identification of the binding epitope on the ligand by assessing the efficiency of saturation transfer from the specifically saturated protein. The saturation transfer efficiency is quantitatively expressed by the amplification factor (ASTD), representing the average number of transient contacts of the ligand per molecule of the receptor within a given saturation time [33]. The ASTD plot obtained for HCTZ (Figure 3) depicts that for the three observable hydrogens in HCTZ’s structure (H3, H7, and H10), H10 exhibited a stronger ASTD than H7 (100% vs. 67.1%, respectively) while no signal corresponding to H3 was observed in the on-resonance spectrum. Thus, the STD percentage data indicate that H10 is closer than H7 to the amino acid residues of albumin, and H3 is the most distant from the binding site, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the interaction of albumin/HCTZ.
To contribute to the evaluation of glucose’s effect on the interaction of HSA/HCTZ, we conducted STD-NMR experiments on HCTZ in the presence of increasing concentrations of glucose. In this case, we did not observe any evidence of glucose binding in HSA, even with the highest concentration of glucose (20 mM), which gave a 1000-fold ligand excess compared with the protein (Figure 4A–C). From the literature, it is known that glucose might interact with albumin very weakly with a binding constant of 102 M−1 [20,46], and, probably for this reason, the STD-NMR results did not detect the complex of HSA/glucose. Moreover, the presence of glucose in an equimolar proportion of HCTZ did not affect the binding of the drug to albumin. There was not any significant alteration in the amplification factor of HCTZ signals in the mixture (Figure 4D). In the concentrations of glucose five- and ten-fold higher than the drug, the interaction of HSA/HCTZ (Figure 4B,C) was still observed with an improvement in the ASTD (Figure 4D), indicating that glucose in concentrations higher than those of HCTZ might increase the binding capacity of this drug to albumin, agreeing with the time-resolved fluorescence results.
Overall, the new interpretation of the reported KSV values [30] based on the obtained time-resolved fluorescence and STD-NMR data indicates that high glucose levels significantly increase the binding capacity of HCTZ to albumin, indicating the importance of glycemic control in the human bloodstream to obtain the appropriate residence time and pharmacotherapeutic treatment for the commercial drug HCTZ.

3.3. SPR Analysis

Balaei and Ghobadi [47] detected the interaction of albumin/HCTZ in subdomain IIA (the warfarin-binding site, site I) and not in subdomain IIIA (the ibuprofen-binding site, site II); however, they did not explore the possibility of interaction with subdomain IB (the digitoxin-binding site), a newly discovered binding region that, due to its importance in albumin–drugs interactions, is considered site III [48]. Since both time-resolved fluorescence and STD-NMR experiments indicated an improvement in the binding capacity of HCTZ with glucose, positive cooperativity was expected to increase the drug interaction with subdomain IIA or with other subdomains, e.g., IB. Site III can be considered a feasible binding site for HCTZ due to its high positive electrostatic potential region like site I [21,49]. Thus, SPR experiments were performed without and in the presence of the site markers warfarin or digitoxin to provide the binding property of HCTZ to subdomains IIA and IB.
The binding of HSA to the sensor chip exhibited a significant binding rate of 8000 resonance units per second (RU/s). Therefore, the HSA binding site was accessible to interactions with specific ligands in the solution. The variation in RU/s time over 200 s was used to evaluate the interactions between HSA and HCTZ, warfarin, and digitoxin (Figure 5A). The site markers (warfarin and digitoxin) and the antihypertensive drug were further analyzed using a series of concentrations, which demonstrated an increase in SPR signals (RU/s), indicating a direct binding to immobilized HSA in a concentration-dependent manner (R2 = 0.99 for all tests; Figure 5B).
The binding affinities between HSA and the three specific ligands were evaluated by the affinity constant (KD; Table 2). The obtained results showed the bioavailability of multiple HSA binding sites after immobilization on the sensor chip, which was confirmed due to the different KD values for warfarin, digitoxin, and HCTZ. The obtained KD values for the site markers were in the same order of magnitude as those previously reported in the literature [50,51]. The KD value for HCTZ under the nonglycemic condition was comparable to the reported KSV value in [30], indicating the reliability of the new approach obtained by time-resolved fluorescence measurements (Section 3.1). Competitive binding studies were performed in the presence of the site markers warfarin and digitoxin. There was a higher inhibition of HCTZ binding in the presence of warfarin than digitoxin on the HSA after immobilization on the sensor chip. Furthermore, it was possible to verify that digitoxin can affect drug binding at a concentration of 0.67 μM (Figure 5C,D). These results indicate that subdomain IIA is the main binding site of HCTZ to albumin; however, subdomain IB can also accommodate HCTZ but to a lesser extent, corroborating the previous discussion (Section 3.2) about more than one feasible binding site. This trend was not previously detected by Balaei and Ghobadi [47] due to the lack of drug-displacement assays for subdomain IB.
The binding profile of HCTZ with HSA under glucose-enriched conditions was also evaluated (Figure 5E,F). The results suggest that glucose in the SPR running buffer can affect the affinity of HCTZ for albumin mainly in the hyperglycemic condition, i.e., the KD value in the hyperglycemic condition decreased by about 1.6-fold compared with the normoglycemic condition (Table 2). This result agrees with recent research that indicates the presence of glucose influences the drug–albumin interaction via cooperativity and/or perturbation in the albumin structure, which induces the protein’s pockets to receive drugs [29].

4. Conclusions

The time-resolved fluorescence analysis for HSA/HCTZ indicated that the fluorescence lifetime average did not significantly change in both nonglycemic, normoglycemic, and hyperglycemic conditions. Thus, a purely static quenching mechanism is operating, which results in a ground-state association close to the fluorophore Trp-214 residue (subdomain II). Thus, the reported KSV value is the best constant via fluorescence to estimate the binding affinity—moderate. The SPR results agreed with the time-resolved fluorescence data, indicating subdomain IIA as the main binding site; however, there is the possibility of subdomain IB also being considered as a secondary binding site, mainly in the hyperglycemic condition, due to the cooperativity and/or perturbations in the protein’s structure. Finally, both the time-resolved fluorescence and STD-NMR results showed that even in the presence of different levels of glucose, HCTZ continuously interacted with albumin, indicating that glucose under hyperglycemic conditions led the cavities to be more likely to receive more ligands. Thus, there is a necessity for glucose control in the human bloodstream to not impact the residence time (pharmacokinetic profile) and pharmacotherapeutic potential of HCTZ.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.A.C.; methodology, C.R.A., L.V. and O.A.C.; validation, C.S. and O.A.C.; formal analysis, M.A.G.S., F.S.-S., L.V., T.S.d.A. and O.A.C.; investigation, M.A.G.S., F.S.-S., C.R.A., T.S.d.A., C.S. and O.A.C.; resources, C.S. and O.A.C.; data curation, O.A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.G.S., F.S.-S., C.R.A., T.S.d.A. and O.A.C.; writing—review and editing, L.V., C.S. and O.A.C.; visualization, O.A.C.; supervision, O.A.C.; project administration, O.A.C.; funding acquisition, C.R.A. and C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the following Brazilian agencies: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq: 301744/2019-0), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES: 001), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ: E-26/200.799/2021). Carlos R. Alves is a research fellow at CNPq. Franklin Souza-Silva is a research fellow at CAPES. Additionally, the authors acknowledge the Coimbra Chemistry Centre that is supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT—the Portuguese Agency for Scientific Research) through the projects UIDB/00313/2020 and UIDP/00313/2020. Otávio Augusto Chaves thanks the FCT for his Ph.D. fellowship 2020.07504.BD (https://doi.org/10.54499/2020.07504.BD, accessed on 1 February 2024).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the technical support from the Nanotechnology Platform (subunit RPT03E-IOC) of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation and the Oswaldo Cruz Institute, especially Luzia Monteiro de Castro-Côrtes.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mansur, A.P.; Favarato, D. Mortality due to cardiovascular diseases in Brazil and in the metropolitan region of São Paulo: A 2011 update. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2012, 99, 755–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chang, K.Y.; Duval, S.; Badesch, D.B.; Bull, T.M.; Chakinala, M.M.; de Marco, T.; Frantz, R.P.; Hemnes, A.; Mathai, S.C.; Rosenzweig, E.B.; et al. Mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension in the modern era: Early insights from the pulmonary hypertension association registry. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e024969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nascimento, B.R.; Brant, L.C.C.; Oliveira, G.M.M.; Malachias, M.V.B.; Reis, G.M.A.; Teixeira, R.A.; Malta, D.C.; França, E.; Souza, M.F.M.; Roth, G.A.; et al. Cardiovascular disease epidemiology in Portuguese-speaking countries: Data from the global burden of disease, 1990 to 2016. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2018, 110, 500–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Boateng, E.B.; Ampofo, A.G. A glimpse into the future: Modelling global prevalence of hypertension. BMC Public Health 2023, 23, 1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Amini, M.; Zayeri, F.; Salehi, M. Trend analysis of cardiovascular disease mortality, incidence, and mortality-to-incidence ratio: Results from global burden of disease study 2017. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: A pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet 2021, 398, 957–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lira, A.; Cláudia, M.; de Souza, M.; Mayara, N.; Burgos, P.A.; Goretti, M. Prevalência de fatores de risco para doenças cardiovasculares em diabéticas. Nutr. Clín. Diet. Hosp. 2017, 37, 75–81. [Google Scholar]
  8. Siqueira, A.F.A.; Almeida-Pititto, B.; Ferreira, S.R.G. Cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus: Classical and non-classical risk factors. Arq. Bras. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 51, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Leon, B.M.; Maddox, T.M. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatment recommendations and future research. World J. Diabetes 2015, 6, 1246–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chanda, R.; Fenves, A.Z. Hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2009, 11, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yeates, K.; Lohfeld, L.; Sleeth, J.; Morales, F.; Rajkotia, Y.; Ogedegbe, O. A global perspective on cardiovascular disease in vulnerable populations. Can. J. Cardiol. 2015, 31, 1081–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Krum, H.; Skiba, M.; Gilbert, R.E. Comparative metabolic effects of hydrochlorothiazide and indapamide in hypertensive diabetic patients. Diabet. Med. 2003, 20, 708–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bertoluci, M.C.; Pimazoni-Netto, A.; Pires, A.C.; Pesaro, A.E.; Schaan, B.D.; Caramelli, B.; Polanczyk, C.A.; Júnior, C.V.S.; Gualandro, D.M.; Malerbi, D.A.; et al. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: From evidence to clinical practice–position statement 2014 of Brazilian Diabetes Society. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2014, 20, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mancia, G.; Kreutz, R.; Brunstrom, M.; Burnier, M.; Grassi, G.; Januszewicz, A.; Muiesan, M.L.; Tsioufis, K.; Agabiti-Rosei, E.; Algharably, E.A.E.; et al. 2023 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension: Endorsed by the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) and the European Renal Association (ERA). J. Hypertens. 2023, 41, 1874–2071. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Williams, B.; Mancia, G.; Spiering, W.; Rosei, E.A.; Azizi, M.; Burnier, M.; Clement, D.L.; Coca, A.; de Simone, G.; Dominiczak, A.; et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH). Europ. Heart J. 2018, 39, 3021–3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Moreira, M.L.S.; Chaves, O.A.; de Lucas, N.C.; Goulart, J.S.; Garden, S.J.; Serpa, C.; Netto-Ferreira, J.C. Spectroscopic and in silico characterization of the interaction between synthetic 2-substituted-naphtho-1,4-quinones and human serum albumin. J. Mol. Liq. 2024, 403, 124829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mukai, R.; Okuyama, H.; Uchimura, M.; Sakao, K.; Matsuhiro, M.; Ikeda-Imafuku, M.; Ishima, Y.; Nishikawa, M.; Ikushiro, S.; Tai, A. The binding selectivity of quercetin and its structure-related polyphenols to human serum albumin using a fluorescent dye cocktail for multiplex drug-site mapping. Bioorg. Chem. 2024, 145, 107184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sargolzaei, J.; Jalali, E.; Rajabi, P. Insights into the binding of buspirone to human serum albumin using multi-spectroscopic and molecular docking techniques. Heliyon 2024, 8, e29430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yang, Y.; Hu, J.; Wang, H.; Qiao, L.; Wang, Y.; Tong, W.; Zhao, L. Deciphering the binding mechanisms of eugenol and 2-methylpyrazine with human serum albumin using technical approach. J. Mol. Liq. 2024, 405, 124981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chaves, O.A.; Soares, M.A.G.; Oliveira, M.C.C. Monosaccharides interact weakly with human serum albumin. Insights for the functional perturbations on the binding capacity of albumin. Carbohydr. Res. 2021, 501, 1082742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Costa-Tuna, A.; Chaves, O.A.; Loureiro, R.J.S.; Pinto, S.; Pina, J.; Serpa, C. Interaction between a water-soluble anionic porphyrin and human serum albumin unexpectedly stimulates the aggregation of the photosensitizer at the surface of the albumin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 225, 128210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jalali, E.; Sargolzaei, J.; Rajabi, P. Investigating the interaction between sertraline hydrochloride and human serum albumin using equilibrium dialysis and spectroscopic methods. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2024, 166, 112586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sliwinska-Hill, U.; Krzyzak, E.; Czyznikowska, Z. The effect of simultaneous binding of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on the human serum albumin structure. J. Mol. Liq. 2024, 404, 125003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Akbari, V.; Ghobadi, S. Evaluation of the effect of phenylpropanoids on the binding of heparin to human serum albumin and glycosylated human serum albumin concerning anticoagulant activity: A comparison study. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 257, 128732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rodrigues, B.M.; Victória, H.F.V.; Leite, G.; Krambrock, K.; Chaves, O.A.; de Oliveira, R.Q.; de Boni, L.; Costa, L.A.S.; Iglesias, B.A. Photophysical, photobiological, and biomolecule-binding properties of new tri-cationic meso-tri(2-thienyl)corroles with Pt(II) and Pd(II) polypyridyl derivatives. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2023, 242, 112149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chaves, O.A.; Loureiro, R.J.S.; Costa-Tuna, A.; Almeida, Z.L.; Pina, J.; Brito, R.M.M.; Serpa, C. Interaction of two comercial azobenzene food dyes, amaranth and new coccine, with human serum albumin: Biophysical characterization. ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 3, 955–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, X.; Wang, J.-Z.; Liu, Q.-H.; Ding, X.; Yin, M.-M.; Hu, Y.-J. Bisphenol a modification and how its structure influences human serum albumin binding force. J. Mol. Liq. 2024, 401, 124655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Raghav, A.; Ahmad, J.; Alam, K. Nonenzymatic glycosylation of human serum albumin and its effect on antibodies profile in patients with diabetes mellitus. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Soares, M.A.G.; de Aquino, P.A.; Costa, T.; Serpa, C.; Chaves, O.A. Insights into the effect of glucose on the binding between human serum albumin and the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug nimesulide. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 265, 131148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Soares, M.A.G.; Chaves, O.A.; Cesarin-Sobrinho, D.; Silva, D.; Cortez, C.M. Effect of blood glucose levels on the HSA-hydrochlorothiazide interaction—A spectrofluorimetric study. Int. J. Health Sc. 2021, 1, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lakowicz, J.R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 3rd ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  32. Walpole, S.; Monaco, S.; Nepravishta, R.; Ângulo, J. STD NMR as a technique for ligand screening and structural studies. Methods Enzymol. 2019, 615, 423–451. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Viegas, A.; Manso, J.; Nobrega, F.L.; Cabrita, E.J. Saturation-transfer difference (STD) NMR: A simple and fast method for ligand screening and characterization of protein binding. J. Chem. Ed. 2011, 88, 990–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Santos-de-Souza, R.; Souza-Silva, F.; de Albuquerque-Melo, B.C.; Ribeiro-Guimarães, M.L.; Côrtes, L.M.C.; Pereira, B.A.S.; Silva-Almeida, M.; Cysne-Finkelstein, L.; Junior, F.O.R.O.; Pereira, M.C.S.; et al. Insights into the tracking of the cysteine proteinase B COOH-terminal polypeptide of Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis by surface plasmon resonance. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 1249–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Vachali, P.; Li, B.; Nelson, K.; Bernstein, P.S. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) studies on the interactions of carotenoids and their binding proteins. Ach. Biochem. Biophys. 2012, 519, 32–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jarmoskaite, I.; AlSadhan, I.; Vaidyanathan, P.P.; Herschlag, D. How to measure and evaluate binding affinities. eLife 2020, 9, e57264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Montalti, M.; Credi, A.; Prodi, L.; Gandolfi, M.T. Handbook of Photochemistry, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bai, G.; Cui, Y.; Yang, Y.; Ye, C.; Liu, M. A competitive low-affinity binding model for determining the mutual and specific sites of two ligands on protein. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2005, 38, 588–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Liu, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Zhao, P.; Li, C.; Qin, L.; Zhao, T.; Zhu, X.; Feng, S. Studies on the binding of wedelolactone to human serum albumin with multi-spectroscopic analysis, molecular docking and molecular dynamic simulation. Biophys. Chem. 2024, 307, 107198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Moreno, M.J.; Loura, L.M.S.; Martins, J.; Salvador, A.; Velazquez-Campoy, A. Analysis of the equilibrium distribution of ligands in heterogeneous media–Approaches and pitfalls. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Costa-Tuna, A.; Chaves, O.A.; Almeida, Z.L.; Cunha, R.S.; Pina, J.; Serpa, C. Profiling the interaction between human serum albumin and clinically relevant HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Viruses 2024, 16, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rondeau, P.; Bourdon, E. The glycation of albumin: Structural and functional impacts. Biochimie 2011, 93, 645–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Arasteh, A.; Farahi, S.; Habibi-Rezaei, M.; Moosavi-Movahedi, A.A. Glycated albumin: An overview of the In Vitro models of an In Vivo potential disease marker. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2014, 13, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sadowska-Bartosz, I.; Galiniak, S.; Bartosz, G. Kinetics of glycoxidation of bovine serum albumin by glucose, fructose and ribose and its prevention by food components. Molecules 2014, 19, 18828–18849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wybranowski, T.; Ziomkowska, B.; Cyrankiewicz, M.; Bosek, M.; Pyskir, J.; Napiórkoska, M.; Kruszewski, S. A study of the oxidative processes in human plasma by time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 9012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, Y.; Yu, H.; Shi, X.; Luo, Z.; Lin, D.; Huang, M. Structural mechanism of ring-opening reaction of glucose by human serum albumin. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 15980–15987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Balaei, F.; Ghobadi, S. Hydrochlorothiazide binding to human serum albumin induces some compactness in the molecular structure of the protein: A multi-spectroscopic and computational study. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2019, 162, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hage, D.S.; Sengupta, A. Characterisation of the binding of digitoxin and acetyldigitoxin to human serum albumin by high-performance affinity chromatography. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Appl. 1999, 724, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chaves, O.A.; Iglesias, B.A.; Serpa, C. Biophysical characterization of the interaction between a transport human plasma protein and the 5,10,15,20-tetra(pyridine-4-yl)porphyrin. Molecules 2022, 27, 5341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Eskew, M.W.; Benight, A.S. Ligand binding constants for human serum albumin evaluated by ratiometric analysis of DSC thermograms. Anal. Biochem. 2021, 628, 114293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rich, R.L.; Day, Y.S.; Morton, T.A.; Myszka, D.G. High-resolution and high-throughput protocols for measuring drug/human serum albumin interactions using BIACORE. Anal. Biochem. 2001, 296, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ).
Figure 1. Chemical structure of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ).
Scipharm 92 00032 g001
Figure 2. Time-resolved fluorescence decays for HSA (10 μM) in nonglycemic, normoglycemic (80 mg/dL), and hyperglycemic (320 mg/dL) conditions without and in the presence of HCTZ (13.4 μM) at room temperature.
Figure 2. Time-resolved fluorescence decays for HSA (10 μM) in nonglycemic, normoglycemic (80 mg/dL), and hyperglycemic (320 mg/dL) conditions without and in the presence of HCTZ (13.4 μM) at room temperature.
Scipharm 92 00032 g002
Figure 3. Analysis of STD-NMR reveals the binding epitope of HCTZ in HSA protein in nonglycemic conditions. The reference spectrum acquired in the off-resonance condition is depicted in black, while the corresponding STD-NMR spectrum is presented in blue. The chemical structure of HCTZ featuring assigned protons is illustrated as an inset in the reference spectrum. The STD amplification factor is plotted as a function of the saturation time, accompanied by the estimated relative STD percentages for each HCTZ signal. Elements’ color: Chlorine, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, and carbon in green, red, blue, yellow, and black, respectively.
Figure 3. Analysis of STD-NMR reveals the binding epitope of HCTZ in HSA protein in nonglycemic conditions. The reference spectrum acquired in the off-resonance condition is depicted in black, while the corresponding STD-NMR spectrum is presented in blue. The chemical structure of HCTZ featuring assigned protons is illustrated as an inset in the reference spectrum. The STD amplification factor is plotted as a function of the saturation time, accompanied by the estimated relative STD percentages for each HCTZ signal. Elements’ color: Chlorine, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, and carbon in green, red, blue, yellow, and black, respectively.
Scipharm 92 00032 g003
Figure 4. STD-NMR experiments on HCTZ with increasing concentrations of glucose: (A) 2 mM, (B) 10 mM, and (C) 20 mM. The reference spectrum acquired for each glucose concentration is given in black (off-resonance), and the corresponding STD-NMR spectrum is colored in blue. (D) ASTD plot of HCTZ in the presence and absence of glucose.
Figure 4. STD-NMR experiments on HCTZ with increasing concentrations of glucose: (A) 2 mM, (B) 10 mM, and (C) 20 mM. The reference spectrum acquired for each glucose concentration is given in black (off-resonance), and the corresponding STD-NMR spectrum is colored in blue. (D) ASTD plot of HCTZ in the presence and absence of glucose.
Scipharm 92 00032 g004
Figure 5. SPR assays assessing the interactions between the HSA and some specific ligands. These experiments were performed with HSA on a COOH5 chip. (A,B) Accessing the bioavailability of multiple HSA binding sites after immobilization onto the sensor chip by using warfarin, HCTZ, and digitoxin. (C,D) Inhibition assays of (i) HSA binding to HCTZ without inhibitor (wi) and in the presence of warfarin or digitoxin. (E,F) Competition assays of HCTZ binding to HSA in nonglycemic, normoglycemic (80 mg/dL), and hyperglycemic (320 mg/dL) conditions. (A,C,E) Data are presented as average sensorgrams (resonance signal versus time, representative of three independent experiments) and (B,D,F) nonlinear regression curve fit (the error bars represent a standard deviation of approximately 1.0% of the average value, rendering them barely visible in the graphs); 1.34 × 10−5 M (), 6.70 × 10−6 M (), 3.35 × 10−6 M (), 1.68 × 10−6 M (), 8.38 × 10−7 M (), 4.19 × 10−7 M (), and 2.09 × 10−7 M ().
Figure 5. SPR assays assessing the interactions between the HSA and some specific ligands. These experiments were performed with HSA on a COOH5 chip. (A,B) Accessing the bioavailability of multiple HSA binding sites after immobilization onto the sensor chip by using warfarin, HCTZ, and digitoxin. (C,D) Inhibition assays of (i) HSA binding to HCTZ without inhibitor (wi) and in the presence of warfarin or digitoxin. (E,F) Competition assays of HCTZ binding to HSA in nonglycemic, normoglycemic (80 mg/dL), and hyperglycemic (320 mg/dL) conditions. (A,C,E) Data are presented as average sensorgrams (resonance signal versus time, representative of three independent experiments) and (B,D,F) nonlinear regression curve fit (the error bars represent a standard deviation of approximately 1.0% of the average value, rendering them barely visible in the graphs); 1.34 × 10−5 M (), 6.70 × 10−6 M (), 3.35 × 10−6 M (), 1.68 × 10−6 M (), 8.38 × 10−7 M (), 4.19 × 10−7 M (), and 2.09 × 10−7 M ().
Scipharm 92 00032 g005
Table 1. Time-resolved fluorescence parameters for HSA, HSA/HCTZ, HSA/glucose, and HSA/glucose/HCTZ in a PBS solution (pH 7.4) at room temperature.
Table 1. Time-resolved fluorescence parameters for HSA, HSA/HCTZ, HSA/glucose, and HSA/glucose/HCTZ in a PBS solution (pH 7.4) at room temperature.
Systemτ1 (ns)%Relativeτ2 (ns)% Relativeτaverage (ns)χ2
HSA1.76 ± 0.0924.85.75 ± 0.0975.24.761.158
HSA/HCTZ1.69 ± 0.0925.15.66 ± 0.0974.94.661.125
HSA/glucose (80 mg/dL)1.73 ± 0.1023.25.65 ± 0.0976.84.741.115
HSA/glucose (320 mg/dL)1.71 ± 0.0923.95.73 ± 0.0976.14.771.191
HSA/glucose/HCTZ (80 mg/dL)1.75 ± 0.0925.55.74 ± 0.0974.54.721.154
HSA/glucose/HCTZ (320 mg/dL)1.71 ± 0.1022.15.59 ± 0.0977.94.731.193
Table 2. Binding affinity values (KD × 10−6 M) of the interactions between HSA and drugs.
Table 2. Binding affinity values (KD × 10−6 M) of the interactions between HSA and drugs.
Binding Sites
Biodisponibility
Inhibition of HCTZ Binding in Presence of:Competition with HCTZ
Binding
HCTZDigitoxinWarfarinDigitoxinWarfarinNormoglycemicHyperglycemic
180.0 ± 4078.0 ± 4.037.0 ± 1.022.9 ± 0.662.0 ± 4.0218.0 ± 6.0114.0 ± 2.0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Soares, M.A.G.; Souza-Silva, F.; Alves, C.R.; Vazquez, L.; de Araujo, T.S.; Serpa, C.; Chaves, O.A. Evidence of Hyperglycemic Levels Improving the Binding Capacity between Human Serum Albumin and the Antihypertensive Drug Hydrochlorothiazide. Sci. Pharm. 2024, 92, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm92020032

AMA Style

Soares MAG, Souza-Silva F, Alves CR, Vazquez L, de Araujo TS, Serpa C, Chaves OA. Evidence of Hyperglycemic Levels Improving the Binding Capacity between Human Serum Albumin and the Antihypertensive Drug Hydrochlorothiazide. Scientia Pharmaceutica. 2024; 92(2):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm92020032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Soares, Marilia Amável Gomes, Franklin Souza-Silva, Carlos Roberto Alves, Leonardo Vazquez, Talita Stelling de Araujo, Carlos Serpa, and Otávio Augusto Chaves. 2024. "Evidence of Hyperglycemic Levels Improving the Binding Capacity between Human Serum Albumin and the Antihypertensive Drug Hydrochlorothiazide" Scientia Pharmaceutica 92, no. 2: 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm92020032

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop