Next Article in Journal
Epidemiological Trends and Resistance Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study in a Tertiary-Care Hospital in Hungary
Previous Article in Journal
Fibroblasts Collagen Production and Histological Alterations in Hereditary Gingival Fibromatosis
Article Menu
Issue 2 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Electrochemical Methodology for Evaluating Skin Oxidative Stress Status (SOSS)

1
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery/CREDEC, Antioxidant Nutrition and Health Platform, University of Liège and CHU, Sart Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium
2
Institut Européen des Antioxydants, Oxystress Technologies, 1 rue Victor de Lespinats, 54230 Neuves-Maisons, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diseases 2019, 7(2), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases7020040
Received: 29 March 2019 / Revised: 10 May 2019 / Accepted: 22 May 2019 / Published: 27 May 2019
  |  
PDF [1874 KB, uploaded 24 June 2019]
  |  

Abstract

For the purpose of human disease prevention, several methods have been developed, and are still developing, to assess the oxidative stress status (OSS) of individuals. In the present paper, we describe an approach based on electrochemical detection able to evaluate skin oxidative stress status (SOSS) as a PAOT (Pouvoir AntiOxydant Total)-Skin Score®. Normal reference values for the PAOT-Skin Score® were: 0–62.94 (n = 263). Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were, respectively, 12.47 ± 4.29% and 7.0 ± 2.5%. Our technology showed increased skin antioxidant activity following topical application of reduced coeznyme Q10 cream or vitamin C intake as orange juice or supplements. Moreover, we found significant correlations between some blood oxidative stress biomarkers and the PAOT-Skin Score® (γ-tocopherol/α-tocopherol ratio (r = 0.43, p = 0.020); copper (r = −0.42, p = 0.022); copper/zinc ratio (r = −0.49, p = 0.006), and lipid peroxides (r = −0.43, p = 0.002)). In addition to being non–invasive, the present electrochemical methodology is also not expensive, fast, and easy to use. View Full-Text
Keywords: oxidative stress; skin; electrochemical detection; PAOT-Skin Score® oxidative stress; skin; electrochemical detection; PAOT-Skin Score®
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Joël, P.; Mouna-Messaouda, K.; Jean-Paul, C.-B.; Jean-Olivier, D.; Smail, M. Electrochemical Methodology for Evaluating Skin Oxidative Stress Status (SOSS). Diseases 2019, 7, 40.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Diseases EISSN 2079-9721 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top