Next Article in Journal
A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Systemic Enzyme Supplementation on Symptoms and Quality of Life in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Previous Article in Journal
STRILL: Phase I Trial Evaluating Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Dose Escalation for Re-Irradiation of Inoperable Peripheral Lung Lesions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Prevalence and Species Distribution of Neonatal Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

1
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Family and Community Medicine and Medical Education, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diseases 2024, 12(7), 154; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12070154
Submission received: 1 June 2024 / Revised: 2 July 2024 / Accepted: 10 July 2024 / Published: 12 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Disease)

Abstract

:
Background and aim: Candida infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) globally. We aimed to conduct a systematic review to investigate the prevalence of candida among causative organisms of neonatal sepsis and identify the distribution of candida species infecting Saudi neonates. Methods: We comprehensively searched Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Library from their inception till November 2023. After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, we ultimately included 21 eligible studies. The designs of the included studies were randomized clinical trials, cohorts, case–control, and case reports; the methodological quality was appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, NIH tool for observational studies, and Murad tool for assessing case reports. Results: Our systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data reported in 21 studies in the Saudi populations, which provided data on different types of candidal infections in 2346 neonates. The pooled data of ten retrospective studies enrolling 1823 neonates revealed that candida species resembled 4.2% of the causative organisms of neonatal sepsis among Saudi neonates (95%CI [2.5%; 5.9%], p = 0.000). Additionally, out of a total of 402 candida species that were identified among the included studies, C. albicans prevailed mostly among Saudi neonates, followed by C. parapsilosis, NS candida, and C. tropicalis (50.25%, 21.40%, 12.44%, and 9.45%, respectively). Conclusions: We found that candida species prevailed in 4.2% of 1823 cases of neonatal sepsis; the most common candida species was C. albicans. We could not pool data regarding risk factors or susceptibility of candida species to different treatment modalities due to insufficient data, requiring future large-scale, high-quality studies to be conducted.

1. Introduction

Candida infection is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) globally [1,2]. Vulnerable premature and low birth weight infants are at exceptionally high risk, with reported candidiasis incidence rates ranging from 7 to 20% in developing regions [3,4,5]. Candida commonly colonizes the skin, mucosal surfaces like the oral cavities, gastrointestinal tracts, and vagina [1,6]. However, certain situations like reduced immune response, microflora disruption, and exposure to medical devices allow Candida overgrowth and potential dissemination [7,8]. Invasive candidiasis is defined as candida infections involving normally sterile blood, tissues, bones, and organs [1], while non-invasive, superficial Candida infections may present as oral thrush or diaper dermatitis [9,10]. Beyond mortality threats, both invasive and superficial neonatal candidiasis correlate to worsened neurodevelopment among survivors [11].
Globally, candida remains the third most prevalent cause of neonatal late-onset sepsis, behind Staphylococcus and Klebsiella bacteria [11,12]. In developing regions, reported incidence rates of combined invasive and superficial candidiasis infections in neonatal intensive care units range widely from around 3% to over 25% [2,4,13]. Premature rupture of membranes, very low birth weight, use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and steroids, fungal colonization, surgery, endotracheal intubation, underlying gastrointestinal disorders, and central vascular access heighten vulnerability [14]. Despite antifungal treatment, attributable mortality remains high between 10 and 40% [15]. Beyond death, neurodevelopment impairment among survivors presents an equally alarming longer-term burden [16].
Saudi Arabia is a critical focal area for tackling neonatal candidiasis, given the estimated higher national incidence rates than in Western Europe and North America [17]. Local single-center reports suggest between 5 and 20% of neonatal sepsis cases show confirmed Candida infections depending on geographical area [18,19]. However, substantial gaps exist regarding the large-scale epidemiological synthesis of neonatal candidiasis prevalence across Saudi Arabia using consolidated national data.
Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aim to thoroughly investigate the existing literature on neonatal candidiasis in Saudi Arabia. We aim to assess the overall prevalence of candida among other causative organisms of neonatal sepsis, identify the common candida species infecting neonates, and identify primary risk factors, standard treatment regimens, and attributable mortality rate on a national level.

2. Method

Our systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) was crafted following the most recent Cochrane Handbook guidelines [20] and reported as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist [21].

3. Literature Search

We conducted a comprehensive search of databases including Scopus, Web Of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library from their inception until November 2023 using the following keywords: ((((Neonates OR Neonate OR neonatal OR infant OR fetal OR newborn OR Premature OR Preterm OR Fetal OR postmature OR dysmature OR dysmaturity OR (small for gestational age) OR (low birth weight) OR LBW OR (intrauterine growth restriction) OR IUGR)) AND (candida OR candidiasis OR candida OR candidemia OR monilia OR monilial OR moniliasis OR thrush)) AND (Saudi OR “Saudi Arabia” OR “Kingdom of Saudi Arabia” OR KSA OR SA OR Riyadh OR Medina OR Mekka)). The search results were compiled using EndNote software (Version 20.2.1), duplicates were removed, and the remaining studies were transferred to an Excel sheet for further screening.

4. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

We included any English-language study in our SRMA that met the following criteria: population—neonates from Saudi Arabia aged less than one month; exposure—any superficial or deep candidal infection; control—not specified; outcome—any safety and efficacy outcomes; study designs—randomized clinical trials (RCTs), cohorts, case–control, case series, or case reports. Studies were excluded if they defined their neonatal population with an age range that exceeded one month, combined neonates and infants into one group, studied a mixed population of Saudi and non-Saudi subjects, were not written in English, or were animal studies.

5. Data Extraction

We collected data about study ID (last name of first author–publication year), title, study design, initiation date, termination date, study duration, hospital name, Saudi city, primary neonatal pathology/outcome and its definition by the authors, events of candidal infection, total study population, sex, candida species, birth weight, mode of delivery, and conclusion.

6. Assessment of Risk of Bias

Our SRMA incorporated RCTs, cohorts, cross-sectional studies, and case reports. The RCTs were evaluated methodologically using the first version of the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) tool [22]. This tool comprises seven domains: selection, performance, detection, attrition, and reporting biases. Each domain was assessed as having a high, low, or unclear risk of bias. The methodological quality of the cohorts and cross-sectional studies was assessed using the NIH tool [23], which consists of 14 questions, each scored as zero, 0.5, or one. The overall study quality was classified as poor, fair, or good based on the total score (0–7 points, 7.5–10.5 points, or 11–14 points, respectively). Case reports were evaluated using the Murad et al. quality appraisal tool [24], which includes four main domains of selection, ascertainment, causality, and reporting, investigated through eight questions. Each study was assigned a score of eight, denoting it as poor, fair, or good quality.

7. Data Synthesis

We analyzed the available categorical outcomes as pooled proportions with 95% CIs; the random effect model was applied. We investigated the statistical heterogeneity between studies using the I2 statistics Chi-squared test, with p < 0.1 considered heterogeneous and I2 ≥ 50% suggestive of high heterogeneity. We conducted statistical analyses using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software (Version 3) (CMA, Englewood, NJ, USA).

8. Result

8.1. Literature Review

A thorough search was conducted across various databases, including WOS, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. This search yielded 3302 records in total. After removing duplicates, 2468 studies remained. These were screened based on their title and abstracts. Of these, 47 studies were further scrutinized by examining their full texts for relevance. Ultimately, 21 studies were selected for our Systematic Review. Out of them, only ten studies were included in the analysis. Further details can be found in Figure 1 (PRISMA).

8.2. Characteristics of the Studies

This SRMA incorporated data from 21 studies [18,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44] conducted in Saudi Arabia. These studies, which spanned various cities, including Aseer, Jeddah, Medina, Qatif, Tabuk, and Taif, provided data on different types of candidal infections in 2346 neonates. The majority of these studies, 14 in total, were carried out in the city of Riyadh. The studies had an average duration of 3.8 years, ranging from 1 year to 7.25 years. Approximately 50% of the population studied were male neonates (Figure 2). Additional details regarding the characteristics of the eligible studies and populations are presented in Table 1.

8.3. Assessment of Studies Quality

This SRMA included two Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) [26,29], 15 cohort studies [18,25,27,28,30,31,32,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42], one case–control study [43], and three case reports [33,34,44]. The Murad tool assessed the case reports, which indicated either poor [34,44] or fair methodological quality [33]. The RCTs were evaluated to have an unclear risk of bias. The 15 cohort studies and one case-control study were judged to be fair or good quality. Supplementary Tables S1–S3 provide more details.

8.4. Prevalence of Candida among Causative Organisms of Neonatal Sepsis

We synthesized data from ten retrospective studies that included 1823 neonatal infection cases to determine the prevalence of candida as a cause of neonatal sepsis. Our analysis revealed that candida species prevalence accounted for 4.2% of all neonatal sepsis causative agents (95% CI [2.5%; 5.9%], p = 0.000). We detected significant heterogeneity that could not be resolved (p = 0.0001, I2 = 72.1%) (Figure 3).

8.5. Distribution of Candida Species among Saudi Neonates in Different Cities

We pooled data from 21 studies and identified 402 yeasts isolated from neonates. Our SRMA showed that C. albicans was the most prevalent Candida species, representing 50.25% of all isolates. C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis followed, representing 21.40% and 9.45%, respectively. Non-specified candida species (NS candida) represented 12.44% of the identified isolates. Moreover, we found a low prevalence of some species, such as C. glabrata, C. lusitaniae, C. krusei, C. famata, and C. pseudotropicalis (2.73%, 1.5%, 0.99%, 0.99%, 0.25%, respectively) (Figure 4).
Nevertheless, neonatal Candida infections were observed in various cities. Notable findings include Qatif, where approximately 7.58% of neonates were affected, and Riyadh, with an incidence of approximately 4.66% of neonates. Tabuk reported a lower incidence of approximately 2.17, while Taif had a slightly higher incidence of approximately 4.55%. These findings emphasize the importance of monitoring and managing Candida infections in neonates across different regions (Figure 5).

8.6. Invasive Candidiasis

Four studies reported data on 245 Saudi neonates from Aseer, Medina, and Riyadh with invasive candidiasis. Al-Jasser and colleagues investigated the distribution of candida species across different age groups and found 17 cases of invasive candidiasis in NICU over six years. C. albicans (13 cases) was the predominant candida species in the study population [41]. Another study conducted in Aseer Central Hospital compared the safety and efficacy of amphotericin B and caspofungin for treating 32 cases of neonatal invasive candidiasis, of which C. albicans was isolated from 24 cases. The results indicated that caspofungin was superior, achieving a favorable response in 86.7% of patients, compared to only 41.7% in the amphotericin B group (p = 0.04). Moreover, the caspofungin group had a significantly lower incidence of adverse events than the amphotericin B group [26]. Almoosa et al. identified 66 cases of invasive candidiasis among King Fahad Medical City neonates over five years. The most common candida species were C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsiolosis, C. lusitaniae, and C. famata (29 cases, 11 cases, 11 cases, four cases, three cases, respectively) [35]. Eisi et al. conducted a retrospective study and found 130 cases of neonatal candidiasis in the Madinah Maternity and Children Hospital NICU over seven years. The study classified neonates based on deep tissue involvement. Deep tissue invasion was found in 16 cases. It was significantly associated with a higher risk of cerebral palsy, heart failure, and more extended hospital stay than the non-deep tissue invasion group [32].

8.7. Other Forms of Candidal Infection/Involvement in the Saudi Neonates

The prevalence and impact of candidal infection in Saudi neonates is a topic of interest for several studies. Mersal et al. compared nystatin and fluconazole as prophylactic agents for candidal colonization in preterm or low birth weight infants. They randomly assigned 57 neonates to either group and found no difference in safety outcomes or invasive candidal infection rates. Nystatin was also more cost-effective than fluconazole [29].
Al-Hussaini et al. examined the candida species and their antifungal susceptibility in 100 neonates. They reported a colonization rate of 51%, with higher rates in preterm neonates. The most common sites of colonization were the perianal area and oral cavity; the most common species was C. albicans (58.8%). The isolated candida species showed moderate sensitivity to fluconazole, itraconazole, and ketoconazole (68.6%, 80%, and 64.7%, respectively) while showing low sensitivity to amphotericin B (33%) [36].
Other studies explored the role of candida in neonatal conjunctivitis and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Faraz found that candida accounted for 3.37% of neonatal conjunctivitis cases [25], while Afify et al. found that candida accounted for 9% of neonatal VAP cases. They suggested that candida infection was a significant risk factor for VAP in neonates [42].
Some case reports illustrated the challenges of diagnosing and treating different candidal infections in Saudi neonates. Abuhajj and his team highlighted a case of congenital cutaneous candidiasis, which can often be mistaken for benign or bacterial eruptions. They described a neonate with a congenital maculopapular eruption that spanned the torso, diaper area, extremities, palms, and soles. The neonate exhibited leukocytosis (>30 k) and bilateral lung opacifications. Initial treatment with empirical antibiotics exacerbated the condition. However, a significant improvement was observed just three days after initiating intravenous amphotericin B and topical miconazole, pending the results of a skin-scraping culture. After two weeks of treatment, the neonate’s skin returned to normal, and the child was discharged in stable condition [43]. Azhar et al. reported a case involving a female neonate who was admitted to the hospital with symptoms including fever (38.1 °C), leukocytosis, tachycardia (168 bpm), and hypotension. Initially treated as a septic shock with IV fluids, empirical ampicillin, and cefotaxime, subsequent chest X-rays revealed a sizeable cardiac shadow. This was attributed to vegetation in both the left and right ventricles and a thickened pericardium, as detected by echocardiography. Following the administration of intravenous fluconazole and amphotericin B, the size of the vegetation decreased until it completely disappeared, as confirmed by an echocardiography after 40 days. The patient was discharged following clinical improvements [33].
Al-Arishi documented a case of a male neonate with a severely dysplastic right kidney and a moderately hydronephrotic left kidney. A left cutaneous pyelostomy was performed on the fourth day of life due to declining renal function. Urine analysis from the pyelostomy catheter revealed numerous yeast cells, and a complete blood count and blood samples confirmed the presence of candidemia. Treatment with Ambisome rendered the blood completely sterile after just five days of initiation [34].

9. Discussion

Our study included 21 studies, encompassing a total of 2346 neonates. The consolidated data from ten retrospective studies, which enrolled 1823 neonates, indicated that candida species accounted for 4.2% of the causative organisms of neonatal sepsis among Saudi neonates. Out of the 402 candida species identified in the included studies, C. albicans was the most prevalent among Saudi neonates, followed by C. parapsilosis, NS candida, and C. tropicalis. Furthermore, a literature review revealed that four studies reported 245 neonates diagnosed with invasive candidiasis, with candida accounting for 3.37% and 9% of organisms causing neonatal conjunctivitis and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP), respectively.
A previous multicenter study conducted in eight Arab countries over 19 years (1990–2009) enrolled data on sepsis from 2308 neonates [44]. However, they found inadequate data regarding the prevalence of candida among other microbiological causes of sepsis. They concluded that Candida species had been emerging in multiple Arab countries, including Egypt, Bahrain, UAE, and Kuwait; a study conducted in Kuwait stated that candida represented 14% of the causes of neonatal sepsis [45]. Additionally, a study by Pillay and colleagues, conducted over three years and enrolling 681 cases of neonatal sepsis, reported results consistent with ours, with fungal isolates accounting for 4.5% of cases of neonatal sepsis and the majority of cases being bacterial (over 95%) [46].
We found that C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis were the most common yeast isolated from 402 neonates (50.25%, 21.40%, and 9.45%, respectively). Moreover, we found a low prevalence of some species such as C. glabrata, C. lusitaniae, C. krusei, C. famata, and C. pseudotropicalis (2.73%, 1.5%, 0.99%, 0.99%, 0.25%, respectively). Non-specified candida species (NS candida) represented 12.44% of the identified isolates. This was consistent with what was reported by an 11-year, multinational, retrospective study with participants from 23 different European countries. They found that among 422 neonates with candidal infections, C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis were the most common species, prevailing in 60.1%, 27.7%, and 2.8%, respectively [47]. Another study by Cook enrolled 127 neonates from eight countries and found that the most common isolated candida species were C. albicans, C.parapsilosis, and C. auris (35%, 30%, and 14%, respectively) [48].
However, a three-year study conducted in South Africa found that C. parapsilosis was the most prevalent, followed by C. albicans and NS candida (45.2%, 29%, and 25.8%, respectively) [46]. These discrepancies could be attributed to the different demographics, narrower time scale of the study, and a small sample of 31 candida species. Our study pooled data over twenty years and enrolled over 400 candida species among neonates.
We could not pool and analyze data regarding possible risk factors for neonatal candidiasis or susceptibility of candida species to different treatment modalities. However, some included studies provided data regarding significant risk factors for different candidal infections. Eisi and colleagues found that gestational age of less than 32 weeks and candidal infection of central venous catheters were significantly associated with deep candidal infections [32]. Additionally, Afify et al. found that the nosocomial infection by candida was a risk factor for developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), in addition to other factors, including prolonged NICU admission, invasive maneuvers, hypothermia, high CRP, and hypoalbuminemia [42]. The literature review provided additional insights about other possible risk factors for candidal infection in neonates. A multicenter study by Xia and colleagues found that over 90% of neonates diagnosed with invasive candidiasis were administered an extensive course of broad-spectrum antibiotics.
Moreover, about 70% and 60% of the neonates were either low birth weight or had central venous catheters, respectively [49]. Manzoni et al. confirmed that a central venous catheter posed a significant risk of developing candidal infection [50]. The influence of low birth weight, central venous catheter, and prior extensive antibiotic course and their significant relation to candidal infection in neonates was confirmed by Benjamin Jr. [51].
Regarding treatment modalities for neonatal candidiasis, Mersal et al. compared nystatin and fluconazole as prophylactic agents for candidal colonization in preterm or low birth weight infants. They randomly allocated 57 neonates to either group and found no difference in safety outcomes or rates of invasive candidal infection. Nystatin also proved to be more cost-effective than fluconazole [29].
A study by HSU analyzed 342 episodes of candidiasis in neonates and children and reported that 97.1% received antifungal treatment, but 2.9% were untreated due to patient demise before proceeding to treatment. Antifungal therapy commenced, on average, 1.81 days after obtaining diagnostic cultures, notably delayed in neonates compared to children (2.1 vs. 1.7 days). The mean duration of antifungal therapy was 18.5 days. Among the 332 treated episodes, 45.5% experienced regimen modifications, primarily due to poor initial response (66.9%), suspected resistance (23.8%), or undocumented reasons (9.3%). Initial prescriptions favored fluconazole (62.3%), followed by amphotericin B (24.7%) and caspofungin (4.5%), while final regimens were fluconazole/voriconazole (39.5%), amphotericin B (29.2%) and echinocandin (28.9%). Catheter removal within three days occurred in only 32.2% of cases. Neonates faced prolonged fungemia, higher treatment failure rates (31.0% vs. 19.7%), and increased sepsis-related mortality (28.3% vs. 17.5%) and in-hospital mortality (42.7% vs. 25.4%) post-invasive candidiasis compared to children. Susceptibility studies on 295 isolates revealed a 14.6% fluconazole-resistant or susceptible-dose-dependent candida rate, with no significant differences between neonates and non-neonatal pediatric cases [52].
We conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) to evaluate the incidence of candidal infections in neonates from Saudi Arabia. We amalgamated data from 2346 neonates across 21 studies. These studies were carried out in diverse Saudi cities such as Riyadh, Jeddah, Medina, Qatif, Tabuk, and Taif, bolsters our findings’ applicability to the entire Saudi population. We confined our data inclusion to neonates, which were either explicitly defined as less than one month old or as neonates without an age specification. We excluded any study that defined neonates as older than one month or included a mixed-age group. Nonetheless, our study had certain limitations. The data we pooled spanned a considerable period from 1989 to 2020, which could lead to inconsistencies concerning the diagnostic laboratory methods and identification of various candida species. Most of the included studies were conducted in Riyadh City, which might limit the applicability of our findings to the entire Saudi population. Our data included three case reports and several studies over two decades. Despite these limitations, we endeavored to compile all accessible evidence to provide a comprehensive overview of the prevalence of candidal infections among Saudi neonates. However, we could not pool and analyze data about potential risk factors for neonatal candidiasis or the susceptibility of different candida species to various treatment modalities. We recommend conducting comprehensive future studies to enhance our understanding of Candida species prevalence among neonates in Saudi Arabia. Additionally, exploring antifungal resistance in greater detail for the identified Candida species would be valuable.

10. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study evaluated the epidemiology of Candida species among neonates in Saudi Arabia. We found that candida species were present in 4.2% of 1823 neonatal sepsis cases, based on data from ten retrospective studies conducted between 1980 and 2020 in Aseer, Jeddah, Medina, Riyadh, Qatif, Tabuk, and Taif. Among the 402 candida isolates identified, C. albicans was the most common, followed by C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis. Unfortunately, due to insufficient data, we could not pool information regarding risk factors or the susceptibility of different candida species to various treatment modalities. We advocate for future large-scale, high-quality studies to provide detailed insights for pediatricians and primary care physicians regarding neonatal candidal infections in Saudi neonates.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/diseases12070154/s1, Table S1: The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias. Table S2: NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Table S3: Assessment Tool for Case Report Studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, resources, software, validation, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review, and editing were performed by A.M.; A.M. and M.A. were involved in investigation and methodology, contributing equally to these areas. M.A. was specifically responsible for general project administration, resources, and supervision, ensuring the project’s overall direction and management. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Pappas, P.G.; Lionakis, M.S.; Arendrup, M.C.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Kullberg, B.J. Invasive candidiasis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primer 2018, 4, 18026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Caggiano, G.; Lovero, G.; Giglio, O.; Barbuti, G.; Montagna, O.; Laforgia, N. Candidemia in the neonatal intensive care unit: A retrospective, observational survey and analysis of literature data. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 7901763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Greenberg, R.G.; Benjamin, D.K. Neonatal candidiasis: Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. J. Infect. 2014, 69, S19–S22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Benjamin, D.K.; Stoll, B.J.; Fanaroff, A.A.; McDonald, S.A.; Oh, W.; Higgins, R.D. Neonatal candidiasis among extremely low birth weight infants: Risk factors, mortality rates, and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics 2006, 117, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kaur, H.; Chakrabarti, A. Strategies to reduce mortality in adult and neonatal candidemia in developing countries. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. R, A.N.; Rafiq, N.B. Candidiasis. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560624/ (accessed on 17 December 2023).
  7. Ciurea, C.N.; Kosovski, I.B.; Mare, A.D.; Toma, F.; Pintea-Simon, I.A.; Man, A. Candida and Candidiasis—Opportunism versus pathogenicity: A review of the virulence traits. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kojic, E.M.; Darouiche, R.O. Candida infections of medical devices. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 17, 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Taylor, M.; Brizuela, M.; Raja, A. Oral Candidiasis. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545282/ (accessed on 17 December 2023).
  10. Benitez Ojeda, A.B.; Mendez, M.D. Diaper Dermatitis. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559067/ (accessed on 17 December 2023).
  11. Stoll, B.J.; Hansen, N.; Fanaroff, A.A.; Wright, L.L.; Carlo, W.A.; Ehrenkranz, R.A. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: The experience of the NICHD neonatal research network. Pediatrics 2002, 110, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wisplinghoff, H.; Bischoff, T.; Tallent, S.M.; Seifert, H.; Wenzel, R.P.; Edmond, M.B. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: Analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004, 39, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Juyal, D.; Sharma, M.; Pal, S.; Rathaur, V.; Sharma, N. Emergence of non-albicans candida species in neonatal candidemia. N. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2013, 5, 541–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kelly, M.S.; Benjamin, D.K.; Smith, P.B. The epidemiology and diagnosis of invasive candidiasis among premature infants. Clin. Perinatol. 2015, 42, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gudlaugsson, O.; Gillespie, S.; Lee, K.; Berg, J.V.; Hu, J.; Messer, S.; Herwaldt, L.; Pfaller, M.; Diekema, D. Attributable mortality of nosocomial candidemia. Revisit. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 37, 1172–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Adams-Chapman, I.; Bann, C.M.; Das, A.; Goldberg, R.N.; Stoll, B.J.; Walsh, M.C. Neurodevelopmental outcome of extremely low birth weight infants with candida infection. J. Pediatr. 2013, 967, 961–967.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Osman, M.; Al Bikai, A.; Rafei, R.; Mallat, H.; Dabboussi, F.; Hamze, M. Update on invasive fungal infections in the Middle Eastern and North African region. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2020, 51, 1771–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Alharbi, A.S. Common Bacterial Isolates Associated with Neonatal Sepsis and Their Antimicrobial Profile: A Retrospective Study at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Cureus 2022, 14, e21107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Al-Matary, A.; Heena, H.; AlSarheed, A.S.; Ouda, W.; AlShahrani, D.A.; Wani, T.A. Characteristics of neonatal Sepsis at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. J. Infect. Public Health 2019, 12, 666–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Higgins, J.P.T.; Thomas, J.; Chandler, J.; Cumpston, M.; Li, T.; Page, M.J.; Welch, V.A. (Eds.) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Internet]. Available online: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook (accessed on 17 December 2023).
  21. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 2021, 10, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Higgins, J.P.T.; Altman, D.G.; Gotzsche, P.C.; Juni, P.; Moher, D.; Oxman, A.D.; Savovic, J.; Schulz, K.F.; Weeks, L.; Sterne, J.A.C.; et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011, 343, d5928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. National Institutes of Health. Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. 2014. Available online: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools (accessed on 17 December 2023).
  24. Murad, M.H.; Sultan, S.; Haffar, S.; Bazerbachi, F. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. BMJ Evid.-Based Med. 2018, 23, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Faraz, A.; Farhan, M.; Ali, M. Microbial etiology of neonatal conjunctivitis in a general hospital in Saudi Arabia. Al-Shifa J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 15, 30. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wahab Mohamed, W.A.; Ismail, M. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Prospective Study of Caspofungin vs. Amphotericin B for the Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis in Newborn Infants. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2012, 58, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ohlsson, A.; Bailey, T.; Takieddine, F. Changing Etiology and Outcome of Neonatal Septicemia in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Acta Paediatr. 1986, 75, 540–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ndlovu, B. Nosocomial Infections in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a Public Healthcare Facility in Saudi Arabia. 2021. Available online: https://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/27907 (accessed on 16 December 2023).
  29. Mersal, A.; Alzahrani, I.; Azzouz, M.; Alsubhi, A.; Alsawaigh, H.; Albshri, N.; Bajammal, M.; Avand, G.; Almahbosh, A. Oral nystatin versus intravenous fluconazole as neonatal antifungal prophylaxis: Non-inferiority trial. J. Clin. Neonatol. 2013, 2, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Elbashier, A.M.; Abusrair, H.; Owa, J.A. Aetiology of neonatal septicaemia in Qatif, Saudi Arabia. Early Child Dev. Care 1994, 98, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Elbashier, A.M.; Malik, A.G.; Khot, A.P. Blood Stream Infections: Micro-Organisms, Risk Factors and Mortality Rate in Qatif Central Hospital. Ann. Saudi Med. 1998, 18, 176–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Eisi, H.; Ibraheem, S.; Hisham, T.; Al-Harbi, A.; Saidy, K.; Ali, I.; Nour, I.; Nasef, N. Risk factors and outcomes of deep tissue Candida invasion in neonates with invasive candidiasis. Mycoses 2022, 65, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Azhar, A. Successful management of fungal pericarditis and endocarditis in a neonate: A case report. J. Saudi Heart Assoc. 2012, 24, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Arishi, H.A.; Alaiyan, S.A.; Dj, M. Liposomalamphotericin B in neonates with invasive Candidiasis. Am. J. Perinatol. 1997, 14, 573–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Almoosa, Z.; Ahmed, G.Y.; Omran, A.; AlSarheed, A.; Alturki, A.; Alaqeel, A.; Alshehri, M.; Alfawaz, T.; Alshahrani, D. Invasive Candidiasis in pediatric patients at King Fahad Medical City in Central Saudi Arabia: A 5-year retrospective study. Saudi Med. J. 2017, 38, 1118–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Alhussaini, M.S. Incidence of Candida species colonization in neonatal intensive care unit at Riyadh Hospital, Saudi Arabia. Med. J. Indones. 2016, 25, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. AlFaleh, K.M. Incidence of Late Onset Neonatal Sepsis in Very Low Birth Weight Infants in a Tertiary Hospital An ongoing challenge. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Med. J. 2010, 10, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Al-Zahrani, A.K.; Eed, E.M.; Alsulaimani, A.A.; Abbadi, S.H. Healthcare Associated Infection in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of King Abdl Aziz Specialist Hospital, Taif, KSA. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2013, 3, 300–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Al-Mouqdad, M.M.; Egunsola, O.; Ali, S.; Asfour, S.S. A Neonatal Unit Experience with Empiric Antibiotics for Late-onset Neonatal Sepsis: A Retrospective Study. Pediatr. Qual. Saf. 2019, 4, e239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Al-Matary, A.; Al Sulaiman, M.; Al-Otaiby, S.; Qaraqei, M.; Al-Matary, M. Association between the timing of antibiotics administration and outcome of neonatal sepsis. J. Infect. Public Health 2022, 15, 643–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Al-Jasser, A.M. Distribution of Candida species among bloodstream isolates. Saudi Med. J. 2004, 25, 566–569. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Afify, M.; AI-Zahrani, S.; Nouh, M.A. Risk factors for the development of ventilator—Associated pneumonia in critically-Ill neonates. Life Sci. J. 2012, 9, 302–307. [Google Scholar]
  43. Abuhajj, R.; Abdoun, M.; Syeda, B.; Abdulla, R.; Al Zahrani, A. Congenital Candidiasis in a Preterm Neonate: Raising Awareness of a Rare and Unpredictable Disease. Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Med. J. 2021, 3, 144–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tosson, A.M.S.; Speer, C.P. Microbial pathogens causative of neonatal sepsis in Arabic countries. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011, 24, 990–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gomaa, H.H.; Udo, E.E.; Rajaram, U. Neonatal septicemia in al-jahra hospital, kuwait: Etiologic agents and antibiotic sensitivity patterns. Med. Princ. Pract. 2001, 10, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pillay, D.; Naidoo, L.; Swe Swe-Han, K.; Mahabeer, Y. Neonatal sepsis in a tertiary unit in South Africa. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Warris, A.; Pana, Z.-D.; Oletto, A.; Lundin, R.; Castagnola, E.; Lehrnbecher, T.; Groll, A.H.; Roilides, E. Etiology and Outcome of Candidemia in Neonates and Children in Europe: An 11-year Multinational Retrospective Study. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2020, 39, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cook, A.; Ferreras-Antolin, L.; Adhisivam, B.; Ballot, D.; Berkley, J.A.; Bernaschi, P.; Carvalheiro, C.G.; Chaikittisuk, N.; Chen, Y.; Chibabhai, V.; et al. Neonatal invasive candidiasis in low- and middle-income countries: Data from the NeoOBS study. Med. Mycol. 2023, 61, myad010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xia, H.; Wu, H.; Xia, S.; Zhu, X.; Chen, C.; Qiu, G.; Zhou, W.; Shi, Y.; Ma, L.; Sun, J.; et al. Invasive Candidiasis in preterm neonates in China: A retrospective study from 11 NICUS during 2009–2011. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2014, 33, 106–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Manzoni, P.; Farina, D.; Leonessa, M.; d’Oulx, E.A.; Galletto, P.; Mostert, M.; Miniero, R.; Gomirato, G. Risk factors for progression to invasive fungal infection in preterm neonates with fungal colonization. Pediatrics 2006, 118, 2359–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Benjamin, D.K.; Stoll, B.J.; Gantz, M.G.; Walsh, M.C.; Sánchez, P.J.; Das, A.; Shankaran, S.; Higgins, R.D.; Auten, K.J.; Miller, N.A.; et al. Neonatal Candidiasis: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Clinical Judgment. Pediatrics 2010, 126, e865–e873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hsu, J.-F.; Lai, M.-Y.; Lee, C.-W.; Chu, S.-M.; Wu, I.-H.; Huang, H.-R.; Lee, I.-T.; Chiang, M.-C.; Fu, R.-H.; Tsai, M.-H. Comparison of the incidence, clinical features and outcomes of invasive candidiasis in children and neonates. BMC Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart.
Diseases 12 00154 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of males and females in the included patients.
Figure 2. Distribution of males and females in the included patients.
Diseases 12 00154 g002
Figure 3. Prevalence of candida among causative organisms of neonatal sepsis in Saudi Arabia. Included studies (Alfaleh 2010 [37], Almatary 2019 [19], Elbashier 1994 [30], Elbashier 1998 [31], Ndlovu 2021 [28], Ohlsson 1986 [29], Alharbi 2022 [18], Al matary 2022 [40], Al-Mouqdad 2019 [39], Al-Zahrani 2013 [37]).
Figure 3. Prevalence of candida among causative organisms of neonatal sepsis in Saudi Arabia. Included studies (Alfaleh 2010 [37], Almatary 2019 [19], Elbashier 1994 [30], Elbashier 1998 [31], Ndlovu 2021 [28], Ohlsson 1986 [29], Alharbi 2022 [18], Al matary 2022 [40], Al-Mouqdad 2019 [39], Al-Zahrani 2013 [37]).
Diseases 12 00154 g003
Figure 4. Distribution of Candida species among Saudi neonates in Saudi Arabia.
Figure 4. Distribution of Candida species among Saudi neonates in Saudi Arabia.
Diseases 12 00154 g004
Figure 5. Different regions in Saudi Arabia with higher incidences of Candida infections.
Figure 5. Different regions in Saudi Arabia with higher incidences of Candida infections.
Diseases 12 00154 g005
Table 1. Summary and baseline characteristics of the included studies.
Table 1. Summary and baseline characteristics of the included studies.
Study IDStudy DesignCity of Saudi ArabiaHospital NameTotal PopulationMales, %Birth Weight (g) Mean +/− SDMode of DeliveryInitiation Date/
Termination Date
Study DurationThe Main Neonatal Pathology/Outcome of the StudyDiagnostic MethodsNumber of Candida IsolatesCandida SpeciesConclusions
Mohamed 2012 [26]RCTAseerAseer Central
Hospital
3256.25%877.646 ± 80.81-October 2008/
September 2010
Two yearsTreatment of invasive candidiasisNeonates are confirmed with invasive candidiasis if they have at least one positive blood culture and/or positive cerebrospinal fluid culture or positive urine culture obtained by suprapubic aspiration.321. C. albicans = 24
2. C. parapsiolosis = 5
3. C. tropicalis = 3
“Caspofungin is more effective, safer, and alternative to amphotericin B for treating invasive candidiasis in newborn infants”.
Azhar 2012 [33]Case reportJeddahKing Abdulaziz University Hospital Pediatric Emergency Facility101400Emergency cesarean section--Fungal pericarditis and endocarditis-1C. albicans“Fungal endocarditis in neonates is a rare, serious disease that has a poor prognosis if not treated properly. Interestingly, this disease is increasingly frequent in today’s highly advanced medical practices globally. Recognizing FE early is challenging due to its nonspecific symptoms, but an accurate diagnosis can be made with a high index of suspicion and understanding of the predisposing factors. Management with antifungal medications can be an adequate choice, even in critically ill patients”.
Eisi 2022 [32]Retrospective studyMedinaMadinah Maternity
and Children’s Hospital
13052.30%1350 ± 113Vaginal delivery: 61.5%January 2012/
December 2019
Seven yearsInvasive candidiasisDeep tissue Candida invasion was diagnosed based on radiological or histopathological evidence of Candida seeding in the central nervous system, eyes, heart, lungs, liver, spleen, kidneys, joints, or long bones. Two cases of deep tissue Candida invasion were identified based on reviewing the notes and the diagnosis made by the treating physicians for each infant.1301. C. albicans = 59
2. C. parapsilosis = 55
3. C. krusei = 3
4. C. tropicalis = 12
5. C. glabrata = 1
“Persistent Candida growth in blood cultures, prematurity, and long-term antibiotic use are significant risk factors for deep tissue Candida invasion. Deep tissue Candida invasion is associated with prolonged hospital stay and higher neonatal morbidity”.
Elbashier 1994 [30]Retrospective studyQatifQatif Central Hospital14464.60%--January 1989/
January 1992
Three yearsNeonates with septicemiaThe diagnosis was made based on clinical and laboratory parameters. Blood culture isolates were classified either as clinically significant isolates or as contaminants. A positive culture was considered clinically significant only when at least one positive blood culture (and/or CSF) was obtained with supporting clinical findings or laboratory data. On the other hand, a contaminant was an isolate obtained in their absence, i.e., where the clinical and laboratory findings suggested that the organism was not involved in any infection. Early-onset infection was defined as infection occurring within the first 48 h of life, and late-onset infection was defined as infection occurring after that period.71. C. albicans = 7“We conclude that the incidence of neonatal septicemia, the prevalence of particular organisms, case mortality rate, and antimicrobial susceptibility vary greatly between hospitals in the same area, between different regions in the same country, and between countries. Extrapolation of data from one hospital to another is likely misleading: treatment should, if possible, always be based on local data”.
Elbashier 1998 [31]Retrospective studyQatifQatif Central Hospital (QCH) is the same hospital with intersecting duration with the above study199---May 1990/
May 1995
Five yearsBloodstream infection in neonatesAn episode of bacteremia was defined by the isolation of one (antimicrobial) or more (polymicrobial) microorganisms from blood culture(s), together with clinical evidence of systemic infection. Bacteremia, which developed before or within three days of admission and was not related to medical procedures undertaken after admission, was designated as community-acquired, and that with late-onset or indirect relation to medical procedures undertaken in the hospital was considered to be hospital-acquired.19NS candida“Bloodstream infections continue to be life-threatening. Their incidence, the prevalence of causative organisms, and the case mortality rate vary greatly between hospitals in the same area, regions in the same country, and different countries. Extrapolation of data from one hospital to another may sometimes be misleading. Treatment should, as far as possible, be based on local data, and since that may also vary from time to time, even in the same hospital, regular surveillance of BSI is desirable”.
Alfaleh 2010 [37]Retrospective studyRiyadhKing Khalid University Hospital.9848%980Vaginal 63%January 2006/
December 2008
Three yearsLate-onset neonatal sepsis (LOS)Late-onset sepsis was defined as a positive result on one or more blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures obtained after 48 h of life. We took no measures to differentiate definite from possible infections with coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CONS) (i.e., repeated cultures from different sites or at a later date)41. C. albicans = 2
2. C. parapsilosis = 2
“The rate of LONS was high and exceeded internationally reported rates in our tertiary care NICU. Gram-positive organisms continue to be major causative isolates. High priority should be placed on preventative steps to control nosocomial sepsis”.
Al-Matary 2019 [40]Retrospective studyRiyadhKing Fahad Medical City29856.40%1. Thirty-three neonates = 2187.3 ± 964.1 g for a neonate with EOS 2. A total of 265 neonates = 1501.1 ± 876 g for a neonate with LOS.-January 2011/
December 2015
Five yearsEarly- and late-onset neonatal sepsisEarly-onset sepsis (EOS) occurs in the first 72 h of life, or late-onset sepsis (LOS) occurs after 72 h of life. EOS is mainly due to organisms acquired before and during delivery, while LOS is due to organisms acquired after delivery and is mainly referred to as a healthcare-associated infection (HAI)221. C. albicans = 14
2. C. parapsilosis = 4
3. C. tropicalis = 2
4. C. glabrata = 2
“Concerted efforts are needed to determine the spectrum of risk factors and the clinical characteristics of EOS and LOS to implement appropriate treatment strategies as sepsis remains a danger to neonatal wellbeing. Moreover, our study emphasizes that using aminoglycosides is much more agreeable than the broad-spectrum antibiotics which are more widely used nowadays”.
Ohlsson 1986 [27]Retrospective studyRiyadhKing Faisal Specialist Hospital53---November 1980/
October 1984
Four yearsNeonatal septicemiaIn all cases of suspected sepsis, cerebrospinal fluid, stools, and urine cultures were obtained by suprapubic aspiration.11. C. pseudotropicalis = 1“The incidence of neonatal sepsis among patients born in the hospital was 2.5/1000 live births. Mortality from sepsis was 33% and was associated with neutropenia in 63%. The most commonly isolated bacteria were E. coli, Klebsiella, and Staphylococcus aureus. Salmonella enteritidis serotypes were isolated in 4% of the cases. Group B streptococci (GBS) were isolated, for the first time, from the blood of 3 neonates. Salmonella species were less frequent, and GBS was more often isolated than previously. GBS have now appeared as an etiologic organism in neonatal sepsis, as well as in Saudi Arabia. Salmonella septicemia remains more common in Saudi Arabia than in the West”.
Alharbi 2022 [18]Retrospective studyRiyadhKing Abdulaziz University Hospital4047.60%--May 2011/
October 2018
7.25 yearsNeonatal sepsisall neonates (0–28 days of age) born in or admitted to the hospital with clinically diagnosed sepsis and who had a blood culture test were included in this study. Sepsis was clinically diagnosed if the infant presented with signs and symptoms of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) attributed to microbial etiology, whether confirmed microbiologically or not.2NS candida“This study points to a likely emergence of coagulase-negative Staphylococci as the main cause of sepsis among neonates. Ampicillin and gentamicin are highly effective against the commonly isolated bacterial pathogens that cause neonatal sepsis”.
Al-Matary 2022 [41]Retrospective studyRiyadhKing Fahad Medical City23752.70%58.6% had birth weights of <1.5 kg61.6% had CSJanuary 2016/
May 2020
4.33 yearsNeonatal sepsis-10NS candida“Early antibiotic administration in patients with neonatal sepsis can improve the survival rate and reduce the incidence of complications”.
Al-Mouqdad 2019 [39]Retrospective studyRiyadhtertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia? King Saud Medical City,13244.50%917.95 ± 355.95-January 2014/
December 2017
Three yearsNeonatal sepsisClinical (suspected) sepsis: The exact definition of suspected neonatal sepsis remains vague. As pro-inflammatory solid cytokines may influence the clinical features of sepsis, clinicians rely on clinical features in their decision to suspect sepsis and start antimicrobial agents. Confirmed (proven) sepsis: Detection of a pathogen (positive culture) in otherwise sterile body fluid and clinical and laboratory signs of sepsis. Early-onset sepsis: Sepsis is caused by pathogens transmitted vertically from mother to infant in the first three days of life. Late-onset sepsis: sepsis caused by horizontally acquired pathogens that occur after three days of an infant’s life.1NS candida“In our center, amikacin–cloxacillin combination therapy was associated with lower mortality in deficient birth weight neonates with late-onset sepsis compared with cefotaxime–ampicillin therapy”.
Faraz 2019 [25]Prospective studyRiyadhKing Khaled Hospital Majma’ah8451%--January 2016/
January 2018
Two yearsConjunctivitis-3NS candida“Ophthalmia neonatorum is a common infection in newborns; gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae and gram-positive cocci are common etiological agents”.
Alhussaini 2016 [36]Retrospective studyRiyadhSaudi Arabian hospital10052%1. <1.5 kg: 24%
2. >1.5 kg: 76%
Vaginal 16%September 2014/
October 2015
One yearEarly and late-onset candidal colonizationA positive surveillance culture defined fungal colonization at any time during their stay in NICU or at baseline. Thirteen early colonizations of Enterobacteriaceaeion were considered when Candida species were isolated from the initial cultures. In contrast, late colonization was considered when the initial cultures were negative and at least one subsequent culture was positive.511. C. albicans (n = 30)
2. C. tropicalis (n = 9)
3. C. glabrata (n = 8)
4. C. krusei (n = 1)
5. C. lusitaniae (n = 2)
6. C. parapsilosis (n = 1)
“Candida has emerged as a common cause of infections in infants admitted to NICU, and C. albicans is the most commonly isolated candidal species. Neonatal infections caused by non-albicans species occur at a later age during their stay in NICU”.
Abuhajj 2021 [44]Case reportRiyadhNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Arryan Hospital11 (100%)2540Vaginal--Congenital cutaneous candidiasis-1NS“This report highlights that newborns could have CC without obvious risk factors such as premature rupture of membrane or positive maternal vaginal swab, and it could be misdiagnosed as benign skin eruption. Worsening of respiratory symptoms on top of the skin rashes is a potential presentation. Therefore, it is crucial to include CC screening as a part of unexplained skin rashes in neonates. Early diagnosis and treatment could reduce morbidity and prevent further complications”.
Al Arishi 1997 [34]Case reportRiyadh 21 (100%)2600---Candidemia afer pyelostomy-2C. parapsilosis“L-amp B may be a therapeutic option for therapy of invasive fungal infections in neonates who are at high risk for nephrotoxicity and other amp B-related adverse events. Studies are needed to determine the pharmacokinetics, safety, efficacy, and optimal therapeutic dosage of L-amp B in this patient population”.
Almoosa 2017 [35]Retrospective studyRiyadhKing Fahad
Medical City
66---January 2010/
January 2015
5 yearsInvasive candidiasisInvasive
Candidiasis was defined as the isolation of Candida from
blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or other sterile body
fluids such as synovial fluid, peritoneal fluid, and pleural
fluid.
661. C. albicans = 29
2. C. tropicalis = 11
3. C. parapsilosis = 11
4. C. famata = 3
5. C. lusitaniae = 4
6. Other = 8
Candida albicans is the most common isolate among all Candida species. Gender, low birth weight, prolonged ICU stay, presence of vegetation, positive blood culture, and mechanical ventilation are strong predictive risk factors for death in children with invasive candidiasis. This finding could be applied as a prophylactic indicator in critically ill children, especially neonates”.
Al-Jasser 2004 [42]Retrospective studyRiyadhArmed
Forces Hospital
17---1996/
2002
Six yearsCandidemia in NICUReported the laboratory method of identification only.171. C. albicans = 13
2. C. tropicalis = 1
3. C. parapsilosis = 3
“These findings reinforce the need for continued and active surveillance programs to address the changes in the species distribution among candidal bloodstream isolates, which will help to develop effective, preventive, and therapeutic strategies”.
Mersal 2013 [29]RCTRiyadh and JeddahKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Cente; Maternity and Children Hospital.5745.60%1. Twenty-four neonates = (1.16 ± 0.14)
2. Thirty-three neonates = (1.02 ± 0.2)
-February 2011/
February 2012
One yearNeonatal antifungal prophylaxis-6NS candida“Intravenous fluconazole and oral nystatin at the prophylactic doses are equally effective and safe in preventing (ICI) in preterm neonates. However, oral nystatin is readily available, easily administered with a lower cost per neonate”.
Ndlovu 2021 [28]Cross-sectional studyTabuk-138----Two yearsNosocomial infections in NICU-31. C. famata = 1
2. C. parapsilosis = 2
“Most infections, 59.3%, occurred at less than 14 days of life. The most common site of infection was blood at 79.7%, and the most prevalent organisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at 22.5%, respectively. Some of the recommendations from the study are that healthcare workers should take extra precautions in collecting blood samples, ensure proper hand hygiene, and have external practitioners observe hand hygiene practices in NICU”.
Al-Zahrani 2013 [38]Retrospective studyTaifKing Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital48453.30%1. G I (<1000) 29.54%
2. G II (1000–1500) 27.9%
3. G III (1501–2500) 28.5%
4. G IV (>2500) 14%
-April 2006/
December 2012
Six yearsInfection in NICUHealthcare-associated sepsis is defined as a positive blood culture taken after 48 h of admission to the NICU with the presence of clinical signs that are suggestive of neonatal septicemia. Each neonate showing sepsis was subjected to sampling for blood culture, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture, or other samples according to the clinical presentation.22C. albicans“The rate of healthcare-associated infections in the neonatal intensive care unit at KAASH was relatively high. In addition, the mortality rate was observed to be high (27.1%) due to the causative organisms’ high virulence”.
Afify 2012 [43]Case–Control study--3318-Vaginal: 19, C/S: 142010/
2011
Two yearsVentilator-associated pneumonia-oneC. albicans“In conclusion, risk factors for the development of VAP include (1) decreased body weight and gestational age, (2) increased duration of NICU admission, MV, and use of invasive maneuvers, (3) hypothermia, mucopurulent ETT secretions and the use of inotrops/corticosteroids, (4) raised serum CRP, hypoalbuminemia and positive blood cultures and (5) nosocomial infection by Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, Staph aureus, E. coli, and Candida”.
Abbreviations: CS = cesarean section, NS = not specified, NICU = Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Molla, A.; Albadrani, M. Prevalence and Species Distribution of Neonatal Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diseases 2024, 12, 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12070154

AMA Style

Molla A, Albadrani M. Prevalence and Species Distribution of Neonatal Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diseases. 2024; 12(7):154. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12070154

Chicago/Turabian Style

Molla, Amr, and Muayad Albadrani. 2024. "Prevalence and Species Distribution of Neonatal Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" Diseases 12, no. 7: 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12070154

APA Style

Molla, A., & Albadrani, M. (2024). Prevalence and Species Distribution of Neonatal Candidiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diseases, 12(7), 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12070154

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop