Next Article in Journal
Time to Death and Associated Factors among Tuberculosis Patients in South West Ethiopia: Application of Shared Frailty Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Facial Hemiplegia Treated with Botulinum Toxin: A Case Report
Previous Article in Journal
T-Cell Assay after COVID-19 Vaccination Could Be a Useful Tool? A Pilot Study on Interferon-Gamma Release Assay in Healthcare Workers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diseases
Volume 10
Issue 3
10.3390/diseases10030050
diseases-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Work Conditions of Italian Nurses and Their Related Risk Factors: A Cohort Investigatory Study

by
Elsa Vitale
Local Health Company Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
Diseases 2022, 10(3), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases10030050
Submission received: 15 July 2022 / Revised: 29 July 2022 / Accepted: 1 August 2022 / Published: 3 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inflammation in Neuro-Psychiatric Disorders 2.0)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
(1) Background: Nursing is a satisfying employment pathway, as nurses preserve lives, but it is also considered one of the most stressful care professions. Nursing is a lifesaving and highly satisfying profession, yet it is considered one of the most stressful occupations. This study aimed to assess differences in anxiety, depression and stress states among nurses according to gender, work history, shift and body mass index (BMI) characteristics. (2) Methods: An online questionnaire was addressed to all Italian nurses during May 2022, investigating anxiety, depression and stress conditions according to the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 Items (DASS-21) and sampling characteristics, such as sex, work experience, shift and BMI values. (3) Results: A total of 408 Italian nurses answered the questionnaire. Significant differences between the following were reported: anxiety levels and work experience, since nurses employed over 6 years reported higher anxiety levels than their younger colleagues (p = 0.035); depression levels and sex (p = 0.017), as females reported higher depression levels than males; and also between depression levels and BMI levels (p = 0.003), as 5.90% of overweight and 2.50% of obese participants reported extremely severe depression. By considering stress levels according to sampling characteristics, significant differences were registered according to BMI levels (p < 0.001), as overweight subjects reported higher stress levels (7.40%) than the other subgroups. Finally, significant associations were recorded between anxiety, depression and stress conditions with sex, work experience, shift and BMI. (4) Conclusions: The data were in agreement with the current literature, indicating that nurses might take care not only of their patients but also of themselves, in both the physical and mental aspects.

1. Introduction

Nursing is a satisfying employment pathway, as it preserving lives. On the other hand, it is also one of the most stressful care professions. Every day, nurses deal with physical and emotional situations, which are often combined with several factors, such as understaffing due to the low availability of funds in the healthcare system, heavy workloads, and the increasing utilization of sophisticated healthcare technologies [1]. Therefore, nursing is considered as the most stress-related profession in the entire healthcare system [2]. Research has highlighted that nurses are stressed and overemployed, with a poor perception of their own safety in their many working environments [3]. Stressed workers are susceptible to harm and poor health, leading to absenteeism and reduced productivity [4]. In stress conditions, corticosteroids regulate learning and memory processes due to a rapid alternating hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis activation and inhibition, which depend on the phase of the pulse [5,6] and are also affected by circadian rhythms [7,8].
The literature demonstrates a very strong relationship between nursing, working conditions and psychological conditions, such as stress, anxiety and depression [9,10,11,12,13], which negatively influence biological rhythms [9,10] and increase the risk of a hostile work–life balance [14,15], for example by increasing the BMI [16] and the possibility of work-related injury [17,18,19]. Several studies have investigated the association between employment and psychological conditions, particularly stress, anxiety and depression [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. In all healthcare organizations, shift work, particularly in nursing employment, was considered indispensable for ensuring continuity in patient care, also including night shifts [27]. Both shift and night shift work were considered as the most common factors in the dysregulation of physiological circadian rhythms, influencing both physical and psychological well-being and reducing work performance [28,29,30]. Some studies recognized a maladaptation syndrome associated with shift work, involving an impaired sleeping/waking pattern, gastrointestinal disorders and an increased risk of cardiovascular diabetic diseases [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39], which also seemed to be associated with increasing variations in BMI values [40,41,42,43].
Depression is a very common mental health disorder in several working environments [44,45], and women seem to be at a major risk of becoming depressed [46,47]. A Chinese cross-sectional study explored the prevalence of depression among 1592 nurses, reporting 25.1% rate of moderate and severe depressive symptoms [48]. This trend is very common all around the world, highlighting the prevalence of depressive symptoms in the female population [49,50,51]. Due to heavy workloads, nigh shifts, and little autonomy in their professions, nurses seem to be more stressed in their working environments, and this is also due to poor working organization, design, management, unsatisfactory working conditions and a lack of support from colleagues and supervisors [52].
The literature has highlighted strong associations between work-related stress and mental health problems and similar symptoms [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. However, very few studies have focused on all these variables simultaneously in order to assess how the nursing profession is related to psychological conditions.
Therefore, the present study aimed to assess any differences in anxiety, depression and stress conditions among nurses according to sex, work experience, shift and BMI characteristics. Additionally, this research also evaluated any associations between sampling characteristics and psychological conditions in order to establish the ultimate existence of a potential risk factor in the nursing profession, which could also contribute to worse mental health conditions. Specifically, the purpose of the present research was to investigate whether the nursing profession could itself pose a risk of developing negative psychological conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study

An online cohort observational study was conducted during May 2022. The questionnaire was created ad hoc through the Google function of Google Modules and publicized though some nursing socials and pages found on Facebook and Instagram, such as #noisiamopronti, Nurse health professional, Professional nurse, Nurses by passion, NurseTimes, Nurse24.it, Nurse Specialist, Nurseallface, Nursing research, NursesInProgress, Nurses, Active Nurses, Nurses Italy, Nurses supporting health, Nursing Mobility, Nursing Competitions and Informed Nurses.

2.2. Participants

The questionnaire was addressed to all Italian nurses who were employed as nurses in both private and public healthcare services.

2.3. The Questionnaire

An ad hoc questionnaire was created, which included the first part concerning some sampling characteristics of the participants associated with their nursing activity, specifically including:
  • Sex, if the respondent was female or male;
  • Years of work experience, divided into two main subgroups, including less than 5 years and over 6 years;
  • Shift work per day, whether the nursing work occurred in a single or double shift, whether during the morning and/or the afternoon (day), or during the night (night);
  • Weight, expressed in kilograms (Kg), and height, expressed in meters (m), with the BMI value assessed as meters divided by the height squared. Each BMI value was classified according to the range groups explained in the current literature [53] as follows: for BMI values below 18.49, an underweight condition was classified; for values between 18.50 and 24.99, a normal weight condition was assessed; for BMI scores between 25 and 29.99, an overweight condition was identified; and for values over 30, an obesity condition was identified.
Then, the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 Items (DASS-21) [54,55] were administered, including a total of 21 items which assessed the negative emotional conditions of depression, anxiety and stress, respectively. Each of the three DASS-21 subscales included 7 items, divided into subscales with similar content. The depression scale measured dysphoria, hopelessness, devaluation of life, self-deprecation, lack of interest/involvement, anhedonia and inertia. The anxiety scale assessed autonomic arousal, skeletal muscle effects, situational anxiety and the subjective experience of anxious affect. The stress scale measured levels of chronic non-specific arousal by assessing difficulty in relaxing, nervous arousal, and the states of being easily upset/agitated, irritable/over-reactive and impatient. Each item was associated with a 7-point Linkert scale, which ranged from “0”, indicating that the situation mentioned never happened, to ‘’3’’, indicating that the situation mentioned happened almost all the time. Finally, by summing items numbered 1, 6, 8, 11, 12, 14 and 18 and multiplying the total score by 2, the stress condition was assessed. By summing items numbered 2, 4, 7, 9, 15, 19 and 20 and multiplying the total score by 2, the anxiety condition was defined, and, finally, by adding items numbered 3, 5, 10, 13, 16, 17 and 21 and multiplying the total score by 2, the depression condition was defined. All three conditions, once defined, were classified into five levels, including normal, mild, moderate, severe and extremely severe.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All data were developed through the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 20. All variables included in the present study were categorical variables and presented in frequencies and percentages. The chi-square test was performed for each psychological condition according to sex, work experience, shift and BMI levels. Finally, linear regressions were performed in order to explain any associations between anxiety, depression and stress conditions and sex, work experience, shift and BMI characteristics. All p-values of < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

2.5. Ethical Considerations

In the first part of the questionnaire, there was a clear explanatory note about the research study, detailing its relative purpose, as well as the possibility of joining and consenting to the processing of the data provided or not. All participants who did not give their consent were not enrolled in the study.
The present study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Polyclinic in Bari, Italy, with the protocol no. 0040/56/02/05/2022.

3. Results

In Italy, over 360,000 healthcare professionals were employed as nurses in all Italian healthcare facilities. The representative sample was assessed using 384 participants by considering a confidence level of 95% and a confidence interval of 5%. The sample was randomly collected until its completion. Therefore, the answer rate exceeded the representative sample, since it a total of 408 Italian nurses were recruited. Of these, 76% were females and 24% were males. 33.6% had been employed for less than 5 years and 66.4% had been working for over 6 years. 26.7% of the participants worked only day shifts and 73.30% of the interviewees worked also during night shifts.
Among the participants, with respect to their BMI scores, 4.4% were reported as being in an underweight condition, 57.6% had a normal weight condition, 26% had an overweight and 12% had an obese condition.
According to the anxiety levels registered, Table 1 shows all the sampling characteristics of the participants, highlighting significant differences in anxiety levels according to work experience, since nurses employed over 6 years reported higher anxiety levels than their younger colleagues (p = 0.035). No further significant differences between anxiety levels and the sampling characteristics were identified.
Considering the depression levels identified according to the sampling characteristics (Table 2), significant differences were registered according to sex (p = 0.017), as females reported having higher depression condition than males, ranging from moderate (14.50%) to severe (10.30%) and extremely severe (12.50%). Depression condition also significantly differed according to BMI levels (p = 0.003), as 5.90% of overweight and 2.50% of obese participants reported extremely severe depression conditions.
As regards the stress levels according to the sampling characteristics (Table 3), significant differences were registered according to BMI levels (p < 0.001), as overweight subjects reported having higher stress levels (7.40%) than the other subgroups.
Finally, considering the associations between anxiety, depression and stress conditions and sex, work experience, shift and BMI (Table 4), a significant relationship was identified between anxiety levels and shift work, as nurses who worked also during the night shift developed anxiety conditions more than their day shift-working colleagues (p = 0.023). No further associations were found.

4. Discussion

The present study aimed to assess any differences in anxiety, depression and stress conditions among nurses according to sex, years of work experience, shift and BMI sampling characteristics. Additionally, this research also evaluated any associations between the sampling traits and psychological conditions in order to establish the ultimate existence of a potential risk factor in the nursing profession, which could also contribute to worse mental health conditions. Specifically, the purpose of the present research was to investigate whether the nursing profession could itself be a potential risk factor for developing negative psychological conditions among nurses [56], exposing them to a great degree of psychosocial job-stress correlated with numerous health risks later in life [57,58]. In this way, chronic oxidative stress-induced cellular damage is involved in many debilitating diseases, such as heart disease and cancer [59,60].
In the present study, significant differences were registered between stress conditions according to BMI levels (p < 0.001), as overweight subjects reported higher stress levels (7.40%) than the other subgroups. The data were in agreement with the current literature, showing significant associations between high BMI values and psychosocial job-stress conditions. In a Canadian national population health survey, it was reported that men employed for more than 35 h/week appeared to be more overweight. In an American nurses’ health study [61,62], higher job pressure was also correlated with higher BMI levels. The age variable was also positively associated with stress in another similar study [63,64], with the data suggesting the increased prevalence of stress conditions among older nurses, influenced by age-related burn-out and a lower physical ability to perform at the highest level [65]. Evidence has also suggested a link between nursing job-stress and its related oxidative biomarkers (MDA, antioxidant capacity), as reported among 204 registered nurses from two Egyptian hospitals [15]. Another Chinese study suggested a significant association between occupational stress, oxidative stress and reduced antioxidant capacity in older nurses [66]. As well as stress, from the present data it emerged that there were higher levels of anxiety conditions among nurses who had been employed for more than 6 years compared to their younger colleagues. This data seemed to be in disagreement with the current literature, according to which younger nurses often experienced acute anxiety, stress or psychological disorders during the transition from being a student to an employed nurse, due to feelings of being unqualified, with scarce self-esteem in complex clinical situations, and the fact that they become more vulnerable to experiencing work-related stress, workplace violence, bullying or kinds of emotional abuse in interactions at work. Therefore, younger nurses became more isolated or stressed than their colleagues and peers [67].
In the present study, significant associations were identified between anxiety levels and shift conditions, since nurses who were employed also during the night shift reported higher stress levels than their colleagues who were employed only during the day shift. In this regard, too, the literature has suggested that shift work, working weekends and long working hours influence nurses’ health risks. In fact, by working during the night shift for many years of their lives, nurses might suffer from burn-out syndrome, accompanied by elevated oxidative stress biomarkers, as reported by several studies, from Spain [15] to Poland and Turkey [16,68]. Shift work was associated with reduced sleep duration and poor sleep quality, influencing physiological rhythms and desynchronizing the sleep cycle, hormonal rhythms and metabolic functions, such as daily cortisol rhythms, which were adjusted with alterations in the circadian sleep cycle [69], as reported also in salivary cortisol rhythm profiles, which differed among subjects working night shifts and those working day shifts [70,71]. Additionally, sleep restriction was associated with glucose intolerance, augmented cortisol and an increase in the sympathetic drive [72]. Therefore, highly important interactions were discovered between sleep deprivation, disturbed cortisol rhythm and metabolic complications, as reported in a meta-analysis of 34 observational studies involving over 2 million shift workers, which demonstrated a higher degree of myocardial infarctions and ischemic strokes [73], and particularly an increased risk of coronary events.
Recent studies demonstrated how an overweight condition and obesity were more prevalent in shift workers than in day workers, including in Mediterranean regions [41]. In addition, the literature reported that shift workers gained weight more frequently than daily workers [37,38,41,74,75], demonstrating a large variability in the prevalence of overweight conditions and obesity. In another study, this variability was influenced not only by shift work, but also by increasing age [76]. A study enrolling 787 day shift workers and 787 day–night shift workers highlighted that a longer exposure to shift work conditions associated with long working hours might predict a higher BMI value [77].
Therefore, the literature is in agreement in considering nursing shift work as a fundamental determinant of a nurse’s circadian dysregulation by identifying a greater number of physical and psychological symptoms with a higher risk of several chronic physiological and metabolic diseases [32,78], as a structure of the timing of rhythms was superimposed onto the human body with trends in development and ageing [28]. The temporal organization of organic activities estimated for each action was carried out during a particular hour of the day, by developing a series of controlled and rigorous procedures and determining the circadian rhythm expression proposed by Halberg [78].
According to the present data, depression conditions also significantly differed according to BMI levels, as 5.90% of overweight and 2.50% of obese participants reported extremely severe depression conditions.
In this regard, evidence has suggested that depressed people also exhibited an alteration in the HPA axis [79,80]. Specifically, mean cortisol levels during the whole day were elevated and similar in people with both unipolar and bipolar depression [81], deregulating the glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors in the brain, which may explain how the HPA axis is controlled and contribute to the clinical efficacy of antidepressant treatments [82].
The data highlighted differences in depression conditions according to sex (p = 0.017), as females reported higher depression conditions than males, ranging from moderate (14.50%) to severe (10.30%) and extremely severe (12.50%). Women seem to be at risk of becoming depressed [47], as reported in a recent Chinese cross-sectional study, which reported depression among female participants ranging from mild (61.7%) to moderate (25.1%) and severe (38.00%) [48]. Similar results were recorded in South Korea [83], in which approximately 38% of the enrolled nurses experienced depressive symptoms. The same trend was reported in the present study: females reported mild (7.80%) to moderate (4.50%) and severe (10.30%) or extremely severe (12.50%) depressive conditions, which were significantly higher than the levels reported by their male colleagues (mild: 10.05; moderate: 7.80%; severe: 2.70%; extremely severe: 4.90%).
Nevertheless, Wang et al. [84] argued that depressive symptoms were associated with work stress conditions as well.

Limitations

The present study had some limitations. First of all, the sample was small. Moreover, its observational design did not allow for the complete assessment of the causal relationships between anxiety, depression and stress conditions and the selected sampling variables. Prospective research using more numerous samples collected in a greater number of healthcare environments will be helpful for investigating this topic in greater depth.

5. Conclusions

The data were in agreement with the current literature, indicating that nurses might take care not only of their patients but also of themselves, in both the physical and mental aspects [85]. Surely, such data will allow healthcare organizations to introduce preventive interventions for improving well-being among nurses by ameliorating their organizational working environments, and to consider individual nursing pathways that will also improve nurses’ psychological and physical well-being.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ethical Committee of Polyclinic in Bari, Italy, with the protocol no. 0040/56/02/05/2022.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wagner, B.D.; Accurso, F.J.; Laguna, T.A. The applicability of urinary creatinine as a method of specimen normalization in the cystic fibrosis population. J. Cyst. Fibros 2010, 9, 212–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Eskola, S.; Roos, M.; McCormack, B.; Slater, P.; Hahtela, N.; Suominen, T. Workplace culture among operating room nurses. J. Nurs. Manag. 2016, 24, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cheung, T.; Yip, P.S. Lifestyle and depression among Hong Kong nurses. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Suridjan, I.; Herrmann, N.; Adibfar, A.; Saleem, M.; Andreazza, A.; Oh, P.I.; Lanctot, K.L. Lipid peroxidation markers in coronary artery disease patients with possible vascular mild cognitive impairment. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017, 58, 885–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Sarabdjitsingh, R.A.; Conway-Campbell, B.L.; Leggett, J.D.; Waite, E.J.; Meijer, O.C.; de Kloet, E.R.; Lightman, S.L. Stress responsiveness varies over the ultradian glucocorticoid cycle in a brain-region-specific manner. Endocrinology 2010, 151, 5369–5379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Phelps, E.A.; LeDoux, J.E. Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: From animal models to human behavior. Neuron 2005, 2, 175–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Tapp, W.; Holloway, F. Phase shifting circadian rhythms produces retrograde amnesia. Science 1981, 211, 1056–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Smarr, B.; Jennings, K.; Driscoll, J.; Kriegsfeld, L.J. A time to remember: The role of circadian clocks in learning and memory. Behav. Neurosci. 2014, 128, 283–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Han, K.; Kim, Y.-H.; Lee, H.Y.; Cho, H.; Jung, Y.S. Changes in health behaviours and health status of novice nurses during the first 2 years of work. J. Adv. Nurs. 2019, 75, 1648–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hatch, D.J.; Freude, G.; Martus, P.; Rose, U.; Muller, G.; Potter, G.G. Age, burnout and physical and psychological work ability among nurses. Occup. Med. 2018, 68, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Dai, Q.; Zhu, X. F2-isoprostanes and metabolite, and breast cancer risk. Am. Chin. J. Med. Sci. 2009, 2, 106–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gaweł, S.; Wardas, M.; Niedworok, E.; Wardas, P. Malondialdehyde (MDA) as a lipid peroxidation marker. Wiad. Lek. 2004, 57, 453–455. [Google Scholar]
  13. Il’Yasova, D.; Scarbrough, P.; Spasojevic, I. Urinary biomarkers of oxidative status. Clin. Chim. Acta 2012, 413, 1446–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Spirlandeli, A.L.; Deminice, R.; Jordao, A.A. Plasma malondialdehyde as biomarker of lipid peroxidation: Effects of acute exercise. Int. J. Sports Med. 2014, 35, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Salem, E.A.; Ebrahem, S.M. Psychosocial work environment and oxidative stress among nurses’. J. Occup. Health 2018, 60, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Buyukhatipoglu, H.; Kirhan, I.; Vural, M.; Taskin, A.; Sezen, Y.; Dag, O.F.; Turan, M.N.; Aksoy, N. Oxidative stress increased in healthcare workers working 24-h on-call shifts. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2010, 340, 462–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bennett, P.; Williams, Y.; Page, N.; Hood, K.; Woollard, M. Levels of mental health problems among UK emergency ambulance workers. Emerg. Med. J. 2004, 21, 235–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Newbury-Birch, D.; Kamali, F. Psychological stress, anxiety, depression, job satisfaction, and personality characteristics in preregistration house officers. Postgrad. Med. J. 2001, 77, 109–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Caplan, R.P. Stress, anxiety, and depression in hospital consultants, general practitioners, and senior health service managers. BMJ 1994, 309, 1261–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Plaisier, I.; de Bruijn, J.G.; de Graaf, R.; Have, M.T.; Beekman, A.T.; Penninx, B.W. The contribution of working conditions and social support to the onset of depressive and anxiety disorders among male and female employees. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007, 64, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Karasek, R. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Adm. Sci. Q. 1979, 24, 285–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sanne, B.; Mykletun, A.; Dahl, A.A.; Moen, B.E.; Tell, G.S. Testing the job demand-control-support model with anxiety and depression as outcomes: The Hordaland health study. Occup. Med. 2005, 55, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Pikhart, H.; Bobak, M.; Pajak, A.; Malyutina, S.; Kubinova, R.; Topor, R.; Sebakova, H.; Nikitin, Y.; Marmot, M. Psychosocial factors at work and depression in three countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Soc. Sci. Med. 2004, 58, 1475–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Niedhammer, I.; Chastang, J.F.; David, S.; Barouhiel, L.; Barrandon, G. Psychosocial work environment and mental health: Job-strain and effort-reward imbalance models in a context of major organizational changes. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health 2006, 12, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, J.; Patten, S.B. Perceived work stress and major depression in the Canadian employed population, 20–49 years old. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2001, 6, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chen, H.C.; Chou, F.H.; Chen, M.C.; Su, S.F.; Wang, S.Y.; Feng, W.W.; Chen, P.C.; Lai, J.Y.; Chao, S.S.; Yang, S.L.; et al. A survey of quality of life and depression for police officers in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. In Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; Volume 15, pp. 925–932. [Google Scholar]
  27. Korompeli, A.; Muurlink, O.; Tzavara, C.; Velonakis, E.; Lemonidou, C.; Sourtzi, P. Influence of shiftwork on Greek nursing personnel. Saf. Health Work 2014, 5, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Burch, J.B.; Yost, M.G.; Johnson, W.; Allen, E. Melatonin, sleep, and shift work adaptation. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2005, 47, 893–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Costa, G. Shift work and health: Current problems and preventive actions. Saf. Health Work 2010, 1, 112–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Costa, G.; Accattoli, M.P.; Garbarino, S.; Magnavita, N.; Roscelli, F. Sleep disorders and work: Guidelines for health surveillance, risk management and prevention. Med. Lav. 2013, 104, 251–266. [Google Scholar]
  31. Matheson, A.; O’Brien, L.; Reid, J.A. The impact of shiftwork on health: A literature review. J. Clin. Nurs. 2014, 23, 3309–3320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Gu, F.; Han, J.; Laden, F.; Pan, A.; Caporaso, N.E.; Stampfer, M.J.; Kawachi, I.; Rexrode, K.M.; Willett, W.C.; Hankinson, S.E.; et al. Total and cause-specific mortality of U.S. nurses working rotating night shifts. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2015, 48, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. West, S.; Mapedzahama, V.; Ahern, M.; Rudge, T. Rethinking shiftwork: Mid-life nurses making it work! Nurs Inq. 2012, 19, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sveinsdóttir, H. Self-assessed quality of sleep, occupational health, working environment, illness experience and job satisfaction of female nurses working different combination of shifts. Scand J. Caring Sci. 2006, 20, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Burch, J.B.; Tom, J.; Zhai, Y.; Criswell, L.; Leo, E.; Ogoussan, K. Shiftwork impacts and adaptation among health care workers. Occup. Med. 2009, 59, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Knutsson, A.; Bøggild, H. Gastrointestinal disorders among shift workers. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2010, 36, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Vitale, E.; Galatola, V.; Mea, R.; Di Dio, F.; Canonico, A. The linkage “body mass index-insomnia levels-eating disorder flexibility” in Italian nurses during the COVID-19 outbreak: A psychoendocrinological employment disease. Endocr. Metab. Immune Dis. Drug Targets 2022, 22, 490–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vitale, E.; Mea, R.; Di Dio, F.; Canonico, A.; Galatola, V. Anxiety, insomnia and body mass index scores in Italian nurses engaged in the care of COVID-19 patients. Endocr. Metab. Immune Dis. Drug Targets 2021, 21, 1604–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wong, H.; Wong, M.C.; Wong, S.Y.; Lee, A. The association between shift duty and abnormal eating behavior among nurses working in a major hospital: A cross-sectional study. Int J. Nurs. Stud. 2010, 47, 1021–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Buchvold, H.V.; Pallesen, S.; Øyane, N.M.; Bjorvatn, B. Associations between night work and BMI, alcohol, smoking, caffeine and exercise—A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Di Lorenzo, L.; De Pergola, G.; Zocchetti, C.; L’Abbate, N.; Basso, A.; Pannacciulli, N.; Cignarelli, M.; Giorgino, R.; Soleo, L. Effect of shift work on body mass index: Results of a study performed in 319 glucose-tolerant men working in a Southern Italian industry. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 2003, 27, 1353–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Ostry, A.S.; Radi, S.; Louie, A.M.; LaMontagne, A.D. Psychosocial and other working conditions in relation to body mass index in a representative sample of Australian workers. BMC Public Health 2006, 6, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Hansen, A.B.; Stayner, L.; Hansen, J.; Andersen, Z.J. Night shift work and incidence of diabetes in the Danish Nurse Cohort. Occup. Environ. Med. 2016, 73, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Whooley, M.A.; Kiefe, C.I.; Chesney, M.A.; Markovitz, J.H.; Matthews, K.; Hulley, S.B. Depressive symptoms, unemployment and loss of income. The Cardia study. Arch. Intern. Med. 2002, 162, 2614–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chung, C.; Lin, M.; Ching, Y.; Kao, C.; Chou, Y.; Ho, P.; Chang, H. Mediating and moderating effects of learned resourcefulness on depressive symptoms and positive ideation in hospital nurses in Taiwan. Res. Nurs. Health 2012, 35, 576–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. World Health Organization. Women’s Health; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  47. Welsh, D. Predictors of depressive symptoms in female medical-surgical hospital nurses. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 2009, 30, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gao, Y.; Pan, B.; Sun, W.; Wu, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, L. Depressive symptoms among Chinese nurses: Prevalence and the associated factors. J. Adv. Nurs. 2012, 68, 1166–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Din, M.O.; Noor, N.M. Prevalence and factors associated with depressive symptoms in Malay women. Women Health 2009, 49, 573–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Eid, R.S.; Gobinath, A.R.; Galea, L.A.M. Sex differences in depression: Insights from clinical and preclinical studies. Prog. Neurobiol. 2019, 176, 86–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sagud, M.; Hotujac, L.j.; Mihaljević-Peles, A.; Jakovljević, M. Gender differences in depression. Coll. Antropol. 2002, 26, 149–157. [Google Scholar]
  52. World Health Organization. Occupational Health: Stress at the Workplace. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/ccupational-health-stress-at-the-workplace (accessed on 20 June 2022).
  53. Stubbs, R.J.; Brogelli, D.J.; Barber, J.; Pallister, C.; Whybrow, S.; Avery, A.; Lavin, J. Service evaluation of weight outcomes as a function of initial BMI in 34,271 adults referred to a primary care/commercial weight management partnership scheme. BMC Res. Notes 2013, 6, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Ng, F.; Trauer, T.; Dodd, S.; Callaly, T.; Campbell, S.; Berk, M. The validity of the 21-item version of the depression anxiety stress scales as a routine clinical outcome measure. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2007, 19, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Szabó, M. The short version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): Factor structure in a young adolescent sample. J. Adolesc. 2010, 33, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. World Health Organization. State of the World Nursing 2020. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris (accessed on 20 June 2022).
  57. Chen, C.; Wang, J.; Yang, C.; Fan, J. Nurse practitioner job content and stress effects on anxiety and depressive symptoms, and self-perceived health status. J. Nurs. Manag. 2016, 24, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cheung, T.; Yip, P.S. Depression, Anxiety and Symptoms of Stress among Hong Kong Nurses: A Cross-sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 11072–11100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Li, J.; Zhang, M.; Loerbroks, A.; Angerer, P.; Siegrist, J. Work stress and the risk of recurrent coronary heart disease events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2015, 28, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lu, J.; Chen, B.; Chen, T.; Guo, S.; Xue, X.; Chen, Q.; Zhao, M.; Xia, L.; Zhu, Z.; Zheng, L.; et al. Comprehensive metabolomics identified lipid peroxidation as a prominent feature in human plasma of patients with coronary heart diseases. Redox Biol. 2017, 12, 899–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fujishiro, K.; Lawson, C.C.; Hibert, E.L.; Chavarro, J.E.; Rich-Edwards, J.W. Job strain and changes in the body mass index among working women: A prospective study. Int. J. Obes. 2015, 39, 1395–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Nyberg, S.T.; Heikkila, K.; Fransson, E.I.; Alfredsson, L.; De Bacquer, D.; Bjorner, J.B.; Bonenfant, S.; Borritz, M.; Burr, H.; Casini, A.; et al. Job strain in relation to body mass index: Pooled analysis of 160,000 adults from 13 cohort studies. J. Intern. Med. 2012, 272, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Gotz, S.; Hoven, H.; Muller, A.; Dragano, N.; Wahrendorf, M. Age differences in the association between stressful work and sickness absence among full-time employed workers: Evidence from the German socio-economic panel. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2018, 91, 479–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Balakrishnamurthy, C.; Shankar, S. Impact of age and level of experience on occupational stress experienced by non-gazetted officers of the central reserve police force. Ind. Psychiatry J. 2009, 18, 81–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ezenwaji, I.O.; Eseadi, C.; Okide, C.C.; Nwosu, N.C.; Ugwoke, S.C.; Ololo, K.O.; Oforka, T.O.; Oboegbulem, A.I. Work-related stress, burnout, and related sociodemographic factors among nurses: Implications for administrators, research, and policy. Medicine 2019, 98, e13889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bardhan, R.; Heaton, K.; Davis, M.; Chen, P.; Dickinson, D.A.; Lungu, C.T. A cross sectional study evaluating psychosocial job stress and health risk in emergency department nurses. Int J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Thyer, S.E.; Bazeley, P. Stressors to student nurses beginning tertiary education: An Australian study. Nurse Educ. Today 1993, 13, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ulas, T.; Buyukhatipoglu, H.; Kirhan, I.; Dal, M.S.; Eren, M.A.; Hazar, A.; Demir, M.E.; Aydogan, T.; Karababa, F.; Uyanikoglu, A.; et al. The effect of day and night shifts on oxidative stress and anxiety symptoms of the nurses. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2012, 16, 594–599. [Google Scholar]
  69. Gromadzinska, J.; Peplonska, B.; Sobala, W.; Reszka, E.; Wasowicz, W.; Bukowska, A.; Lie, J.A. Relationship between intensity of night shift work and antioxidant status in blood of nurses. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2013, 86, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Caufriez, A.; Moreno-Reyes, R.; Leproult, R.; Vertongen, F.; Van Cauter, E.; Copinschi, G. Immediate effects of an 8-h advance shift of the rest-activity cycle on 24-h profiles of cortisol. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 282, E1147–E1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Niu, S.F.; Chung, M.H.; Chu, H.; Tsai, J.C.; Lin, C.C.; Liao, Y.M.; Ou, K.L.; O’Brien, A.P.; Chou, K.R. Differences in cortisol profiles and circadian adjustment time between nurses working night shifts and regular day shifts: A prospective longitudinal study. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2015, 52, 1193–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Merkus, S.L.; Holte, K.A.; Huysmans, M.A.; Hansen, Å.M.; van de Ven, P.M.; van Mechelen, W.; van der Beek, A.J. Neuroendocrine recovery after 2-week 12-h day and night shifts: An 11-day follow-up. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2015, 88, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Spiegel, K.; Leproult, R.; Van Cauter, E. Impact of sleep debt on metabolic and endocrine function. Lancet 1999, 354, 1435–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Vyas, M.V.; Garg, A.X.; Iansavichus, A.V.; Costella, J.; Donner, A.; Laugsand, L.E.; Janszky, I.; Mrkobrada, M.; Parraga, G.; Hackam, D.G. Shift work and vascular events: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2012, 345, e4800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Morikawa, Y.; Nakagawa, H.; Miura, K.; Soyama, Y.; Ishizaki, M.; Kido, T.; Naruse, Y.; Suwazono, Y.; Nogawa, K. Effect of shift work on body mass index and metabolic parameters. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2007, 33, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Parkes, K.R. Shift work and age as interactive predictors of body mass index among offshore workers. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2002, 28, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Haus, E.; Smolensky, M. Biological clocks and shift work: Circadian dysregulation and potential long-term effects. Cancer Causes Control 2006, 17, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Halberg, F. Chronobiology in 1975. Chronobiologia 1976, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  79. Holsboer, F.; Barden, N. Antidepressants and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical regulation. Endocr. Rev. 1996, 17, 187–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Nemeroff, C.B.; Vale, W.W. The neurobiology of depression: Inroads to treatment and new drug discovery. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2005, 66, 5–13. [Google Scholar]
  81. Linkowski, P.; Mendlewicz, J.; Leclercq, R.; Brasseur, M.; Hubain, P.; Golstein, J.; Copinschi, G.; Van Cauter, E. The 24-hour profile of adrenocorticotropin and cortisol in major depressive illness. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 1985, 61, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. De Kloet, E.R.; Derijk, R.H.; Meijer, O.C. Therapy insight: Is there an imbalanced response of mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors in depression? Nat. Clin. Pract. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 3, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yoon, S.L.; Kim, J. Job-related stress, emotional labor, and depressive symptoms among Korean nurses. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2013, 45, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, S.M.; Lai, C.Y.; Chang, Y.; Huang, C.; Zauszniewski, J.A.; Yu, C. The relationships among work stress, resourcefulness, and depression level in psychiatric nurses. Arch. Psychiatr. Nurs. 2015, 29, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Schluter, P.J.; Turner, C.; Huntington, A.D.; Bain, C.J.; Mcclure, R.J. Work/life balance and health: The nurses and midwives e-cohort study. Int. Nurs. Rev. 2011, 58, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Sampling characteristics according to anxiety levels.
Table 1. Sampling characteristics according to anxiety levels.
Anxiety Levels
Sampling CharacteristicsNormal
n (%)		Mild
n (%)		Moderate
n (%)		Severe
n (%)		Extremely Severe
n (%)		p-Value
Sex
Female93 (22.80)27 (6.60)59 (6.60)42 (10.30)89 (21.80)0.571
Male28 (6.90)6 (1.50)23 (5.60)9 (2.20)32 (7.80)
Work experience
>5 years44 (10.80)14 (3.40)25 (6.10)8 (2.00)46 (11.30)0.035 *
<6 years77 (18.90)19 (4.70)57 (14.00)43 (10.50)75 (18.40)
Shift
Day23 (5.60)6 (1.50)26 (6.40)18 (4.40)36 (8.80)0.077
Night98 (24.00)27 (6.60)56 (13.70)33 (8.10)85 (20.80)
BMI levels
Underweight2 (0.50)0 (0)5 (1.20)2 (0.50)9 (2.20)0.409
Normal weight66 (16.20)23 (5.60)43 (10.50)32 (7.80)71 (17.40)
Overweight37 (9.10)8 (2.00)22 (5.40)10 (2.50)29 (7.10)
Obese16 (3.90)2 (0.50)12 (2.90)7 (1.70)12 (2.90)
* p < 0.05 is statistically significant.
Table
Table 2. Sampling characteristics according to depression levels.
Table 2. Sampling characteristics according to depression levels.
Depression Levels
Sampling CharacteristicsNormal
n (%)		Mild
n (%)		Moderate
n (%)		Severe
n (%)		Extremely Severe
n (%)		p-Value
Sex
Female126 (30.90)32 (7.80)59 (6.60)42 (10.30)51 (12.50)
Male31 (7.60)4 (1.00)32 (7.80)11 (2.70)20 (4.90)0.017 *
Work experience
>5 years44 (10.80)14 (3.40)25 (6.10)8 (2.00)21 (5.10)0.032 *
<6 years77 (18.90)19 (4.70)57 (14.00)43 (10.50)50 (12.30)
Shift
Day23 (5.60)6 (1.50)26 (6.40)18 (4.40)22 (5.40)0.873
Night98 (24.00)27 (6.60)56 (13.70)33 (8.10)49 (12.00)
BMI levels
Underweight5 (1.20)0 (0)5 (1.20)6 (1.50)2 (0.50)0.003 *
Normal weight96 (23.50)19 (4.70)51 (12.50)34 (8.30)35 (8.60)
Overweight36 (8.8)17 (4.20)24 (5.90)5 (1.20)24 (5.90)
Obese20 (4.90)0 (0)11 (2.70)8 (2.00)10 (2.50)
* p < 0.05 is statistically significant.
Table
Table 3. Sampling characteristics according to stress levels.
Table 3. Sampling characteristics according to stress levels.
Stress Levels
Sampling CharacteristicsNormal
n (%)		Mild
n (%)		Moderate
n (%)		Severe
n (%)		Extremely Severe
n (%)		p-Value
Sex
Female76 (18.60)54 (13.20)79 (19.40)66 (16.20)35 (8.60)0.141
Male31 (7.60)14 (3.40)18 (4.40)17 (4.70)18 (4.40)
Work
experience
>5 years44 (10.80)14 (3.40)25 (6.10)8 (2.00)14 (3.40)0.812
<6 years77 (18.90)19 (4.70)57 (14.00)43 (10.50)39 (9.60)
Shift
Day27 (6.60)24 (5.90)19 (4.70)23 (5.60)13 (3.90)0.234
Night80 (19.60)44 (10.80)78 (19.100)60 (14.70)37 (9.10)
BMI levels
Underweight0 (0.50)0 (0)9 (2.20)7 (1.70)0 (0)>0.001 *
Normal weight57 (14.00)46 (11.30)64 (15.70)49 (12.00)19 (4.70)
Overweight34 (8.30)17 (4.20)6 (1.50)19 (4.70)30 (7.40)
Obese14 (3.40)5 (1.20)18 (4.40)8 (2.00)4 (1.00)
* p < 0.05 is statistically significant.
Table
Table 4. Linear regression between the sampling characteristics and anxiety, depression and stress conditions.
Table 4. Linear regression between the sampling characteristics and anxiety, depression and stress conditions.
Psychological ConditionsSexWork ExperienceShiftBMI
Anxiety
β0.0250.024−0.113−0.087
t0.5030.484−2.280−1.772
p-value0.6160.6280.023 *0.077
Depression
β0.089−0.082−0.0190.028
t1.790−1.643−0.3820.560
p-value0.0740.1010.7030.576
Stress
β−0.0040.033−0.066−0.003
t−0.0840.665−0.118−0.057
p-value0.9330.5660.9060.955
* p < 0.05 is statistically significant.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vitale, E. Work Conditions of Italian Nurses and Their Related Risk Factors: A Cohort Investigatory Study. Diseases 2022, 10, 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases10030050

AMA Style

Vitale E. Work Conditions of Italian Nurses and Their Related Risk Factors: A Cohort Investigatory Study. Diseases. 2022; 10(3):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases10030050

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vitale, Elsa. 2022. "Work Conditions of Italian Nurses and Their Related Risk Factors: A Cohort Investigatory Study" Diseases 10, no. 3: 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases10030050

APA Style

Vitale, E. (2022). Work Conditions of Italian Nurses and Their Related Risk Factors: A Cohort Investigatory Study. Diseases, 10(3), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases10030050

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop