Wireless Power and Data Transmission System of Submarine Cable-Inspecting Robot Fish and Its Time-Sharing Multiplexing Method

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

What is the state of the art performance in underwater power and data transmission? Comparison to other works is missing.

The presentation can be improved. Please proofread the paper. For example line 247 has an extra dot point after Figure. Line 219 used "Fig." for the figure number seven. Equations can be centered. Line 254 Table I vs Table 1 on Line 256. And so on.

Author Response

Dear Editors and reviewing experts

Thank you very much for doing a lot of work on this paper. According to the opinions and suggestions put forward by the reviewing experts, this paper has given a revised explanation and made a supplement to the original. All the changes in the revised version are marked by annotations. Please review them.

Response to reviewer 1

What is the state of the art performance in underwater power and data transmission? Comparison to other works is missing.

Thanks for your advice. We have added relevant research literature and added a comparison with other literature work in the preface. Now the author has revised them and highlighted them in the article.

The presentation can be improved. Please proofread the paper. For example line 247 has an extra dot point after Figure. Line 219 used "Fig." for the figure number seven. Equations can be centered. Line 254 Table I vs Table 1 on Line 256. And so on.

I'm sorry that the author didn't notice that, but it has been revised and highlighted in the original text. Thanks for your advice.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

abstract should be re-formulate to a research question

Work looks more a report than a scientific work. 

Improve also presentation sequence, work is hard to follow in a logical sequence

improve figure labels

Figure 1. cable inspection machine fish working  (start with capital letter)

Figure 2. (???) and data time-sharing transmission system structure diagram

Figure 9 too small impossible to read

improve equation numbers labels 

Author Response

Dear Editors and reviewing experts

Thank you very much for doing a lot of work on this paper. According to the opinions and suggestions put forward by the reviewing experts, this paper has given a revised explanation and made a supplement to the original. All the changes in the revised version are marked by annotations. Please review them.

abstract should be re-formulate to a research question

Work looks more a report than a scientific work. 

Improve also presentation sequence, work is hard to follow in a logical sequence

Thanks for your advice. We optimize the abstract and text structure of the paper in order to better demonstrate the research work of the paper. Now the author has revised them and highlighted them in the article.

improve figure labels

Figure 1. cable inspection machine fish working  (start with capital letter)

Figure 2. (???) and data time-sharing transmission system structure diagram

Figure 9 too small impossible to read

improve equation numbers labels 

I'm sorry that the author didn't notice that, but it has been revised and highlighted in the original text. Thanks for your advice.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This paper proposes a wireless energy and data transmission composite topology based on magnetic coupling resonance technology for the problem of wireless charging and data  transmission of the submarine cable patrol robot fish. Although the parameter design method is given in references, the papameters' value of the ICPT are given in table 1.  In my point of view the paper is a well written theoretical paper and could be published in its presence form.

Some minor comments:

1. Please describe the buck converter to the figure 2

2. Please correct line  70 for ICPT (Inductively Coupled Power Transfer) system instead of Magnetic Field Coupled Radio Energy Transmission

Author Response

Thank you very much for doing a lot of work on this paper. According to the opinions and suggestions put forward by the reviewing experts, this paper has given a revised explanation and made a supplement to the original. All the changes in the revised version are marked by annotations. Please review them.

1.Please describe the buck converter to the figure 2

Thanks for your advice. Related descriptions have been added. Now the author has revised them and highlighted them in the article.

2. Please correct line  70 for ICPT (Inductively Coupled Power Transfer) system instead of Magnetic Field Coupled Radio Energy Transmission

I'm sorry that the author didn't notice that, but it has been revised and highlighted in the original text. Thanks for your advice.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors need to improve equation formating and Fig 7

Fig 11 and 12 does not make sense have labels in chinese. This is an international publication

Author Response

Thank you very much for doing a lot of work on this paper. According to the opinions and suggestions put forward by the reviewing experts, this paper has given a revised explanation and made a supplement to the original. All the changes in the revised version are marked by annotations. Please review them.

We have improved the equation formating and Fig 7，Fig 11 and 12 .

Thanks for your advice.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf