Next Article in Journal
Auditory Perception Based Anti-Spoofing System for Human Age Verification
Previous Article in Journal
Hall-Effect Current Sensors Susceptibility to EMI: Experimental Study
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

A Novel 3D Visible Light Positioning Method Using Received Signal Strength for Industrial Applications

1
Department of Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UK
2
Department of Information Technology, Ghent University/imec, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
3
School of Computing, Electronics and Mathematics, University of Coventry, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2019, 8(11), 1311; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8111311
Received: 21 October 2019 / Revised: 1 November 2019 / Accepted: 5 November 2019 / Published: 8 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Microwave and Wireless Communications)
In this paper, a novel three-dimensional (3D) indoor visible light positioning (VLP) algorithm using the Cayley–Menger determinant (CMD) with a cost function is proposed and experimentally tested to track a drone for industrial applications. The proposed algorithm uses optical received signal strength (RSS) for estimating the drone’s 3D position without prior knowledge of its height. This reduces the need for additional height sensors used in some 3D VLP systems. The performance of the proposed algorithm in terms of positioning error is also compared with a linear least squares (LLS) trilateration algorithm, with and without tilting of the receiver and with multipath reflections. The simulation results show that the proposed algorithm is more accurate and outperforms the LLS algorithm by a median improvement of 21% and is also more robust to the effect of tilting, as well as in the presence of multipath reflections. Furthermore, the proposed algorithm has been experimentally tested and compared with the LLS algorithm in a VLP test bed measuring 4 × 4 × 4.1 m 3 . The experimental results show that the median errors for LLS are 11.4 cm, while the median errors for CMD are 10.5 cm, which results in an error decrease of 8% when CMD with a cost function is used. View Full-Text
Keywords: visible light positioning; VLP; indoor positioning; indoor localization; Cayley–Menger determinant; visible light communication visible light positioning; VLP; indoor positioning; indoor localization; Cayley–Menger determinant; visible light communication
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Almadani, Y.; Ijaz, M.; Joseph, W.; Bastiaens, S.; Rajbhandari, S.; Adebisi, B.; Plets, D. A Novel 3D Visible Light Positioning Method Using Received Signal Strength for Industrial Applications. Electronics 2019, 8, 1311.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop