Next Article in Journal
Adaptive Step Size Linear Multistep Method for Small Signal Stability Analysis in Power Systems with Time Delays
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Real-Time Control of an Electric Furnace with Three-Dimensional Heating
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design and Analysis of Dual-Band Metasurface Filter for Pulse Waves Based on Capacitive Nonlinear Circuits

by
Wenliang Tian
1,†,
Lingling Yang
2,†,
Bin Cai
1,
Yongzhi Cheng
1,*,
Fu Chen
1,
Hui Luo
1 and
Xiangcheng Li
1,3
1
School of Electronic Information, Engineering Research Center for Metallurgical Automation and Detecting Technology Ministry of Education and Key Laboratory of High Temperature Electromagnetic Materials and Structure of MOE, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
2
School of Electronic Engineering, Hubei Engineering Research Center for Intelligent Detection and Identification of Complex Parts, Wuhan Vocational College of Software and Engineering (Wuhan Open University), Wuhan 430205, China
3
The State Key Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These are the co-first authors.
Electronics 2025, 14(3), 603; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14030603
Submission received: 6 January 2025 / Revised: 27 January 2025 / Accepted: 1 February 2025 / Published: 4 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Microwave and Wireless Communications)

Abstract

:
In this paper, a novel dual-band metasurface filter (MSF) designed for accurately differentiating pulse waves (PWs) and continuous waves (CWs) is proposed, which is based on a complementary cross resonator (CSR) structure adhered on a dielectric substrate integrated with a capacitive nonlinear circuit. The unit cell of the designed dual-band MSF comprises two identical CSR structures: one of the capacitive nonlinear circuits is configured in parallel with a capacitor (C1) within one CSR structure. These structures loaded with nonlinear circuits are fabricated on a dielectric substrate. The simulation outcomes reveal that, for normally incident CWs with an input power of 10 dBm, the transmittance of the designed dual-band MSF reaches as high as 97.1% at 2.0 GHz and 93.9% at 3.45 GHz. In contrast, when it comes to 50 ns short PWs, the transmittance remains consistently below 6% throughout the entire frequency range from 1 GHz to 5 GHz. In addition, the transmittance of the dual-band MSF for normally incident PWs increases significantly as the pulse width widens at the aforementioned two discrete frequencies. The ensuing simulation data corroborates that within the input power range of −15 to 15 dBm, the transmittance difference between CWs and PWs of the dual-band MSF first rises and then falls as the input power increases. Specifically, when the input power is specified as 10 dBm and the angle of oblique incidence ranges from 0° to 60°, in the context of TE and TM modes, the transmittance of CWs exceeds 80% around both 2.0 GHz and 3.45 GHz, while that of PWs remains below 15%. Finally, the effects of resistance and capacitance on the transmittance of the dual-band MSF for the incident PWs and CWs are also studied. The dual-band MSF proposed herein showcases its potential applications in wireless communication as well as in the realm of anti-electromagnetic interference. The electromagnetic (EM) waveform modulation in the frequency band of 1–5 GHz has great development prospects in low-frequency working fields such as radar antennas and EM protection.

1. Introduction

Spatial spectral filters, also known as frequency-selective surfaces (FSSs), are essential in numerous applications, including wireless communications, biomedical detectors, image sensors, atmospheric sciences, and various other fields [1,2,3]. Filters take full advantage of the frequency response characteristics of circuit components to carry out the filtering of signals at specific frequencies. However, traditional filters often have disadvantages such as relatively bulky physical sizes, limited bandwidth flexibility, and significant insertion losses. Metasurfaces (MSs) can be deemed as the two-dimensional (2D) planar manifestation of metamaterials (MMs), and they have attracted considerable attention owing to their ultra-thin profile, low-profile attributes, and remarkable ability to manipulate EM waves [4,5]. MSs have been widely employed in the creation of a range of functional devices [6], including absorbers [7,8,9,10], reflectors [11,12], retroreflectors [13], metalenses [14], wavefront manipulators [15], filters [16,17,18,19,20,21,22], and various other devices [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. In particular, spatial MS filters (MSFs) have garnered increasing attention across an extensive spectrum of frequencies, covering microwaves, THz, and even higher optical frequencies within, owing to their exceptional spectral-filtering capabilities [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. For example, Zhu et al. proposed a multiband spatial angular MSF with multiple hierarchical structures, capable of achieving a multiband operational mode while exhibiting spatial angular filtering performance [18]. Yoshikawa et al. presented a novel methodology for bandpass MSFs that leverages circuit theory, allowing for functioning at the targeted refraction angle [31]. Li et al. proposed a straightforward design for a bandpass MSF with a cross-shaped periodic array placed between two identical layers of four-square patches and dielectric substrates, enabling broadband and high transmission performance within the Ku band [34]. However, these MSFs only respond and operate effectively for normal incident planar continuous waves (CWs); they are unable to respond to other waveforms, such as short pulse waves (PWs). In modern practical applications, it may be necessary to absorb or reflect certain signals (such as high-power short PWs), to avoid interference, while simultaneously transmitting or reflecting other signals (such as CWs) at the same frequency for antenna communication [35,36]. For the current most MSFs, the complexity increases when multiple signals share the same frequency, as frequency dependence can no longer be leveraged for their discrimination.
To address this issue, Wakatsuchi et al. introduced a novel approach that employs nonlinear circuit–based structures known as waveform-selective MSs, which exhibit the controlled absorption and transmission characteristics for surface PWs or CWs [37,38]. These waveform-selective MSs consisted of a metal resonator structure integrated with a nonlinear circuit that incorporated Schottky diodes, along with supplementary circuit components such as resistors configured in parallel with capacitors or in series with inductors [39]. By leveraging the rectification properties of the four Schottky diodes on the incoming signal, these MSs demonstrated the capability to selectively absorb either short PWs or CWs, and selectively absorb or transmit specific waveforms [40,41]. Since its inception, the waveform-selective concept has provided an additional layer of control over the modulation of reflection or transmission behavior for incident EM signals with different waveforms that share the same frequency [41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. Waveform-selective MSs based on a nonlinear circuit have become a novel platform to construct various functional devices, such as filters [42], cloaks [43], antennas [36,44], and absorbers [37,38,39,40,41,46,47]. However, the majority of current research on nonlinear circuit–based MS devices [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45], particularly focusing on MSFs, primarily concerns the selection of specific waveforms at a single frequency. Consequently, there is a growing requirement for the design and implementation of MSFs capable of independently distinguishing waveforms at two or more disparate operational frequencies.
In this work, we introduce a novel design of a dual-band MSF for transmitting CWs while inhibiting short PWs, which leverages a complementary cross resonator (CSR) structure mounted on a dielectric substrate and integrated with capacitive type nonlinear circuits. By connecting additional capacitors in parallel, the designed MSF can realize a waveform-selective filtering effect at two different and independent frequencies. Specifically, the designed MSF can transmit most of the CWs at both operating frequencies and simultaneously suppress the transmission of short PWs at the same frequencies. The designed MSF has excellent filtering performance in both dual frequency bands, and the difference in transmittance between CWs and PWs at the two frequencies of 2.0 GHz and 3.45 GHz is higher than 90%. In addition, we perform an in-depth discussion on the influence of incident PWs and CWs with different powers on the filtering performance of the MSF, as well as the influence of the oblique incidence angles under TE and TM modes on the filtering performance of the MSF. Subsequently, a systematic investigation is conducted into how RC circuit parameters affect the transmittance of CWs and PWs of the designed dual-band MSF. Our study lays a theoretical foundation for further research on MSFs and provides a prospective solution to the challenges associated with multifrequency waveform identification and filtering, which is expected to realize advanced waveform modulation and signal processing functions in low-frequency application fields such as antenna and wireless communication [35,36].

2. Design and Simulation

Figure 1 presents the schematic diagram of the designed MSF and its corresponding circuit simulation configuration. Figure 1a depicts the 2D periodic array of the MSF, with its unit cell comprising two CSR structures adhered to a dielectric layer. The dielectric layer is a lossless polyimide substrate made of Rogers RO3003, with a relative permittivity of 3.0. As shown in Figure 1b, the capacitive nonlinear circuit contains four Schottky diodes (forming one diode bridge) loaded with resistors (Rn) and capacitors (Cn) in parallel, respectively, positioned in the inner gaps of the two CSR structures (see the white rectangular region). To achieve two distinct resonance responses within the unit cell of the designed MSF, one of the capacitive nonlinear circuits is configured in parallel with a capacitor (C1) within one CSR structure. This MSF structure was usually accurately modeled using a transmission line representation connected to an equivalent capacitive component C0 and an equivalent inductive component L0. The values of C0 and L0 were determined by the gap between the conducting patches and the substrate thickness, respectively [44,48]. Thus, the resonant frequency f0 of the structure can be estimated by f 0 = 1 / ( 2 π L 0 C 0 ) . However, as illustrated in Figure 1b, the resonance frequency f0 can be readily adjusted by incorporating an additional lumped C1, e.g., f 0 = 1 / ( 2 π L 0 ( C 0 + C 1 ) ) . It is expected that the introduction of another paralleled capacitor (C1) can realize dual-band operation of the designed MSF. Here, px and py denote the period of a unit cell structure; g and l denote the width and length of the CSR gap, respectively; ts represents the thickness of the dielectric substrate; and tm indicates the thickness of the metal resonator.
In this design, the electric field of the incoming EM waves with a certain power, which is normal to these nonlinear-circuit CSR structures, charges the inner edge of each CSR either positively or negatively, resulting in a high induced voltage across the gaps within the CSR array. Consequently, the set of four diodes effectively rectifies the incoming EM wave signal into a stationary field across these gaps through Fourier transformation [38]. Specifically, full-wave rectification using a diode set bridge is more efficient at converting the incoming wave signal into a DC component compared to half-wave rectification with a solitary diode [39,40]. The capacitive nonlinear circuit is more effective at suppressing short PWs while absorbing CWs at the same frequency less effectively. This is due to the ability of the parallel capacitors to temporarily store the rectified EM energy, which gradually charges up as a result of the zero-frequency component. The rectified EM energy can be regulated by the time constants of the other components, RnCn. Consequently, the filtering performance of the designed capacitive nonlinear-circuit MSF highly depends on the pulse width of the incoming EM wave signals.
To demonstrate the waveform-selective filtering properties at the two distinct frequencies, the transmission properties of the designed capacitive-type nonlinear-circuit MSF were calculated using a co-simulation within ANSYS Electronic Desktop (version 2022). This integrated platform combined an EM simulator (HFSS) with a circuit simulator (Circuit) to facilitate the analysis. In the EM simulation, the master–slave boundary conditions are employed, and the size of mesh dissection is set to 0.0001 mm, two Floquet ports were utilized to launch an incident wave and observe the reflected and transmitted waves. Lumped ports replaced all circuit components (represented as the white rectangular areas of the 2D array in Figure 1a), which were positioned at the gaps of the metallic CSR structure. The lumped ports were interfaced with the circuit components within the simulator. In the EM simulation, the optimized structural parameters of the unit cell are as follows: px = 32 mm, py = 64 mm, l = 30 mm, g = 8 mm, ts = 3.5 mm, and tm = 0.017 mm. In the circuit simulation, the Schottky diodes from the HSMS-286x series by Avago were modeled using the SPICE model, and the pertinent parameters are provided in Ref [43]. The resistance and capacitance of these parallel-connected chip resistors (Rn) and capacitors (Cn) were Rn = 300 KΩ and Cn = 1 nF. Thus, the time constant of this capacitive type nonlinear circuit is τ = RnCn = 300 μs. All the results can be obtained by connecting the circuit components with the MSF circuit models. During the circuit simulation, a scan is carried out at a step length of 0.05 GHz within the frequency range from 1 GHz to 5 GHz. It is worth noting that the short PWs discussed here are sine wave-modulated pulses. When the pulse width is excessively short, the modulated waveforms will contain frequency components in addition to the excitation frequency. To mitigate this issue, a pulse width of 50 ns is utilized for the short PWs in this study [45]. The CWs employ sine planar waves, and both waveforms share the same frequency and power. Consequently, the transmittance of nonlinear circuit–based MSFs in the time domain was calculated in the following manner:
T PW ( CW ) = t 1 t 2 P t d t t 1 t 2 P i d t
where Pt and Pi represent the transmitted power and the incident power, respectively. For the PWs, t1 was set to 0 seconds and t2 was established as the end of the pulse duration plus an additional 50 ns. Regarding CWs, t1 was selected during the steady state, whereas t2 was designated as four cycles after t1. The transmittance was calculated using the circuit simulator.

3. Results and Discussion

Firstly, as shown in Figure 2a, we consider the single-band waveform-selective filtering performance of the designed MSF with two additional identical paralleled capacitors (C1). Figure 2b,c presents the simulated transmittance of the designed MSF with different values of C1 for the normal incident 50 ns short PWs and CWs both with 10 dBm power. As shown in Figure 2b, for the normal incident PWs, the transmittance of the designed MSF is nearly unchanged and below 10% across the entire interested frequency range (1–5 GHz) when changing the value of C1. However, for the normal incident CWs, the designed MSF exhibits strong transmissivity in the single-band when the value of C1 changes, as shown in Figure 2c. Furthermore, the transmittance is nearly unchanged and greater than 95% while the operation frequency will gradually shift toward the lower frequency region as the paralleled C1 increases due to the increase in the equivalent capacitance of the MSF.
Specifically, when C1 increases from 0 pF to 0.6 pF, the frequency point of the transmission peak of the CWs shifts from 3.05 GHz to 1.75 GHz, and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the transmittance is decreased from 1.05 GHz to 0.3 GHz. This verifies that the designed MSF with two additional identical parallel capacitors C1 can achieve a strong CWs transmissive property while inhibiting PWs within a single band. The above results prove that the single-band MSF has an excellent waveform-selective filtering effect and the operation frequency can be regulated by altering the value of parallel capacitor C1. It is inspired that the dual/multiband waveform-selective filtering effect of the MSF can be realized by integrating two/more additional different parallel capacitors into the nonlinear-circuit structure.
Without loss of generality, we construct a dual-band MSF by integrating a capacitive nonlinear circuit with the paralleled C1 into one CSR structure, as shown in Figure 3a. In this designed dual-band MSF, the C1 is set to 0.5 pF, and the corresponding transmittance for the normal incident CWs and PWs is depicted in Figure 3b. The MSF has a transmittance of up to 97% and 94% at 2.0 GHz and 3.45 GHz for CWs, respectively, while the one for the 50 ns short PWs is only 4.8% and 2.3%. Based on transmission line theory, it is conjectured that the response of this dual-band MSF at the lower frequency (2.0 GHz) is governed by a capacitive nonlinear circuit that includes the paralleled component C1, whereas the response at the higher frequency (3.45 GHz) is determined by a different capacitive-type nonlinear circuit that does not include C1. In addition, the transmittance of the 50 ns short PWs is below 6% across the entire interested frequency range of 1–5 GHz. Evidently, the proposed MSF has a remarkable ultra-broadband shielding performance for the short PWs.
Figure 3c presents the transmittance (TPW) of the designed dual-band MSF for the normal incident PWs with different pulse widths at 2.0 GHz and 3.45 GHz, respectively. When the pulse width of the PWs increases from 50 ns to 400 μs, the transmittance of the designed dual-band MSF increases from 4.8% and 2.3% to 97.1% and 93.9% at 2.0 GHz and 3.45 GHz, respectively. It means that there is a distinct transition between the shorter and longer PWs with an input power of 10 dBm. This is mainly related to the time constant of the RC circuit. In this model, the time constant of the RC circuit is τ = RnCn = 300 μs. When the pulse width of the PWs gradually increases and reaches the time constant of the RC circuit, the long PWs then exhibit the characteristics of CWs. The long-time charging causes the energy storage performance of capacitor Cn to decline and tend to saturation. Before the arrival of subsequent PWs, it cannot store and dissipate the current energy, thus leading to a gradual increase in transmittance with the increase in the pulse width of the incident pulse waves. This result further validates the dual-band selective transmittance characteristics of the designed MSF based on nonlinear circuits for specific pulse waveforms.
Next, we consider the influence of the different C1 on the transmittance of the dual-band MSF for the normal incident PWs (50 ns) and CWs. As depicted in Figure 4b, when changing the value of C1, the transmittance of the 50 ns short PWs is below 9% across the entire interested frequency range of 1–5 GHz. Obviously, the designed MSF with different C1 also has an excellent ultra-broadband shielding performance for the short PWs. As depicted in Figure 4c, for normally incident CWs, the transmission peak at the lower frequency undergoes a red shift, whereas the higher frequency peak remains nearly unchanged as the value of C1 increases. This is because the lower frequency response of this dual-band MSF is determined by a capacitive nonlinear circuit with the paralleled C1, while the higher one without C1. Thus, as the paralleled C1 increases, the first frequency point will gradually shift toward the lower frequency region, while the second one is nearly unchanged. This means that the dual-band filtering function of the proposed MSF is achieved, and the operation frequency can be adjusted easily.
Taking a step further, we study the influence of the different input power, oblique incident angle of both TE and TM, and the parameters of paralleled capacitors (Cn) and resistors (Rn) on the waveform-selective filtering performance of the designed dual-band MSF (see Figure 1b). Figure 5 illustrates the influence of short PWs (50 ns) and CWs with different input powers on the waveform-selective filtering performance of the designed dual-band MSF. As depicted in Figure 5a,b, when the input power increases from −15 dBm to 15 dBm, the transmittance peaks of the dual-band MSF for the normal incident CWs around 1.95 GHz and 3.45 GHz firstly increase and then decrease gradually, while the one for the short PWs decreases gradually.
As depicted in Figure 5b,c, the corresponding transmittance difference (△T = TCWTPW) between CWs and PWs firstly increases gradually and then decrease slightly with the increase in the input power. At a low power of −15 dBm, the transmittance of both CWs and PWs is over 60%, and the transmittance difference between CWs and PWs is very small and only 5.1% and 2.3% around 1.95 GHz and 3.15 GHz. Under such conditions, the input power is extremely low, and the voltage induced by the incident CWs and PWs on the surface of the metal CSR structures falls below the threshold voltage of the rectified diodes, rendering the activation of the diodes for rectification impractical. Consequently, the transmittances for both CWs and PWs around these two frequencies are nearly the same. When the input power is increased to 10 dBm, the difference in transmittance between CWs and PWs around 1.95 GHz and 3.45 GHz attain their peak values of 92.3% and 91.6%, respectively. Under such circumstances, the induced voltage in CSR structures is sufficient for activating the rectification of the bridge diodes. The capacitive nonlinear circuits in the CSR structures significantly contribute to the robust suppression of transmission performance for short PWs and the enhancement of CWs at frequencies above this range. When the input power reaches 15 dBm, the transmittance for CWs is 69.6% and 58.4% around the above two resonance frequencies, while that for PWs reaches about 3.6% and 2.4%. In this scenario, the induced voltages generated by the PWs and CWs within the CSR structure surpass the voltage threshold for diode bridge breakdown, thus breaking down the diodes, resulting in a substantial suppression of the nonlinear transmission mechanism. Consequently, the transmission ability of MSF for CWs is weakened. Nevertheless, since the duration of the induced current formed by the high power PWs is too short, the energy can be easily dissipated or reflected by the wires and resistors in the RC circuit, and the MSF still maintains a low transmittance for the PWs. However, the transmittance difference between CWs and PWs is still over 50% when the input power is increased to 15 dBm. This means that the designed dual-band MSF has a significant selective filtering performance for the high power PWs.
Figure 6 presents the simulated transmittance (TCW, TPW) spectra of the dual-band MSF on different waveforms when the incident angle is varied under different polarization modes. As depicted in Figure 6a,b, for the CWs with an incident angle changed from 0° to 60°, the transmittance of the dual-band MSF for both TE and TM modes is always higher than 90% around 2.0 GHz. However, around the higher frequency of 3.45 GHz, with the increase in incident angle, the transmittance of CWs for TE mode shows a decreasing trend and the resonant frequency points gradually diverge when the incident angle is over 35°. This is because when the TE mode is obliquely incident, the larger the incident angle is, the more the wave behavior resembles that of the TE surface wave. In this case, the EM wave has a strong electric field component, which enhances the rectification process of the diode. As a result, more incident waves are absorbed or reflected, leading to a decrease in the transmittance of CWs in the higher frequency. For the lower frequency, due to the presence of parallel diodes, part of the electric field component is shunted. Therefore, the obliquely incident CWs in the TE mode have little impact on the transmittance of the lower frequency. However, as shown in Figure 6b for the higher frequency, multiple absorption peaks are observed for the CWs when the incident angle exceeds 35°, attributed to a reduction in the excitation of resonance modes associated with the electric field component. In addition, as depicted in Figure 6b, when the incident angle of CWs for the TM mode is increased, the electric field component does not change significantly. Therefore, for the CWs obliquely incident in the TM mode, the transmittance at the two resonant frequency points remains at a relatively high level. It is worth noting that due to the higher-order resonances response, the resonance bandwidth of the transmittance near these two frequencies will be slightly broadened. As depicted in Figure 6c,d, when the incident angle is changed from 0° to 60°, the transmittance of the dual-band MSF for both TE and TM mode PWs is always below 10%. This implies that the designed dual-band MSF has an excellent shielding performance in a wide-angle range for the short PWs, and also wide-angle transmission property for the CWs. From this, it can be concluded that the designed dual-band MSF possesses the characteristics of polarization insensitivity and certain wide-angle stability.
Finally, as depicted in Figure 7, we studied the effect of the circuit component parameters (Rn and Cn) on the filtering characteristics of the dual-band MSF for both short PWs (50 ns) and CWs, both with an input power of 10 dBm. Figure 7a,b present the transmittance spectra of the proposed dual-band MSF for the normal incident CWs and PWs with different Rn while fixed Cn = 1 nF in the nonlinear circuits. It can be observed that when the Rn is less than 5 KΩ, the transmittance of the designed dual-band MSF for CWs is lower than 30%. This is because when Rn is small, the equivalent impedance of the designed dual-band MSF is seriously mismatched with the free space, which finally leads to a considerably diminished transmission property for CWs. When Rn reaches 300 KΩ, the transmittance of the proposed dual-band MSF for CWs can reach up to maximum values of 97.1% and 93.9% at 2.0 GHz and 3.45 GHz, respectively, indicating that the dual-band MSF must have a sufficiently large resistance to achieve its high transmittance for CWs. When changing Rn, as depicted in Figure 7b, the transmittance of the proposed dual-band MSF for PWs remains nearly unchanged and at an extremely low level. This is due to the fact that the energy of the electrostatic field generated by the incident PWs within the MSF is mainly dissipated through the internal resistance of the rectified diodes rather than the paralleled Rn in the capacitive nonlinear circuit.
Figure 7c,d present the transmittance of the designed dual-band MSF for CWs and PWs with varied Cn and fixed Rn = 300 KΩ in the nonlinear circuits. As illustrated in Figure 7c, it is evident that variations in Cn do not affect the transmission of CWs, with the transmittance of CWs remaining consistent at 97.1% at 2.0 GHz and 93.9% at 3.45 GHz, respectively. This is due to the zero-frequency component generated by the diode bridge rectification completely charging the capacitor, which subsequently inhibits the absorption of CWs and ultimately enhances the transmission of CWs at above two frequencies. From Figure 7d, with the continuous increase in the Cn, the transmittance of the designed dual-band MSF for short PWs exhibits a significant decline, and it remains consistently below 6% once Cn exceeds 1 nF. When Cn < 1 nF, as Cn increases, the time constant τc = CnRn progressively surpasses 50 ns, which is the pulse width of PWs, thereby impeding the transmission performance of PWs. When Cn >1 nF, the transmittance of short PWs diminishes to 4.8% at 2.0 GHz and 2.3% at 3.45 GHz, respectively. This indicates that a larger Cn can accumulate shorter PWs (50 ns) energy, rendering the transmission performance of the dual-band MSF for PWs greatly reliant on Cn.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have proposed a dual-band MSF based on a capacitive nonlinear circuit and numerically demonstrated its outstanding waveform-selective filtering effect in the microwave region. The unit cell of the designed dual-band MSF comprises two identical CSR structures: one of the capacitive nonlinear circuits is configured in parallel with a capacitor into one CSR structure. The dual-band MSF that we have designed surpasses the limitation of selective filtering for specific waveforms at a single frequency. It achieves efficient transmission performance for CWs in two distinct frequency bands while effectively inhibiting short PWs across an ultra-broadband range of 1–5 GHz. The numerical simulations indicate that for normally incident CWs with an input power of 10 dBm, the designed dual-band MSF achieves a transmittance of 97.1% at 2.0 GHz and 93.9% at 3.45 GHz. Conversely, for 50 ns short PWs, the transmittance remains consistently below 6% across the entire interested frequency range of 1–5 GHz. As the pulse width of the PWs increases, the dual-band MSF exhibits a noticeable transition in transmission behavior between CWs and PWs at the two distinct frequency points. As the input power varies from −15 dBm to 15 dBm, the transmittance of CWs of the dual-band MSF initially increases and subsequently decreases, while the transmittance of PWs significantly decreases. Additional results indicate that by examining the impact of varying the incident angle on the filtering performance for both CWs and PWs, the dual-band MSF demonstrated a reduced sensitivity to wide-angle oblique incidence for both TE and TM modes. Moreover, the precise selection of these circuit component parameters is vital for achieving high-performance dual-band waveform-selective filtering. Due to the excellent dual-band waveform filtering performance, the designed MSF operated in the frequency band of 1–5 GHz holds broad application prospects in fields such as radar antennas, wireless communication, and EM protection.

Author Contributions

W.T., B.C., L.Y. and Y.C. conceptualization, methodology, and software; W.T. and L.Y. performed the calculations and composed the first draft of the manuscript; W.T., B.C. and L.Y. refined the model and provided helpful discussions; H.L., F.C. and X.L. coordinated the work. All authors have contributed to writing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 52304410 and 51972242), the Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (grant no. 2020CFA038), the Key Research and Development Project of Hubei Province (grant no. 2020BAA028), the Major Project of Hubei Province (grant no. 2023BAA003).

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, Z.; Li, J.; Shi, H.; Chen, X.; Zhang, A. A low-profile angle insensitive bandpass frequency-selective surface based on vias. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2018, 28, 200–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nikolaidou, K.; Oliveira, H.M.; Cardoso, S.; Freitas, P.P.; Chu, V.; Conde, J.P. Monolithic Integration of multi-spectral optical interference filter array on thin film amorphous silicon photodiodes. IEEE Sens. J. 2022, 22, 5636–5643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kisku, S.; Sarwagya, K.; Ranjan, S. Performance investigation of triple unsymmetrical micro ring resonator as optical filter as well as biosensor. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2023, 55, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Raimond, G. Electromagnetic metamaterials. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2013, 178, 1285–1295. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, H.T.; Taylor, A.J.; Yu, N. A review of metasurfaces: Physics and applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2016, 79, 076401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, A.; Singh, S.; Sievenpiper, D. Metasurfaces and their applications. Nanophotonics 2018, 7, 989–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, X.; Fan, K.; Shadrivov, I.V. Experimental realization of a terahertz all-dielectric metasurface absorber. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, D.; Xu, K.D.; Luo, S. A high Q-factor dual-band terahertz metamaterial absorber and its sensing characteristics. Nanoscale 2023, 15, 3398–3407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Li, W.; Cheng, S.; Zhang, H.; Yi, Z.; Tang, B.; Ma, C.; Wu, P.; Zeng, Q.; Raza, R. Multi-Functional Metasurface: Ultra-Wideband/Multi-Band Absorption Switching by adjusting Guided Mode Resonance and Local Surface Plasmon Resonance Effects. Commun. Theor. Phys. 2024, 76, 065701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Feng, S.; Yang, L.; Cai, B. Tri-band terahertz metamaterial absorber based on structural Ti3C2Tx MXene for enhanced sensing application. IEEE Sens. J. 2024, 24, 28889–28896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Feng, M.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J. Wide-angle flat metasurface corner reflector. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 113, 143504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, W.; Qiu, T.; Wang, J. Programmable coding metasurface reflector for reconfigurable multibeam antenna application. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2020, 69, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Arbabi, A.; Arbabi, E.; Horie, Y. Planar metasurface retroreflector. Nature Photonics. 2017, 11, 415–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Li, J.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Z.-K.; Chen, L. High-resolution metalens imaging polarimetry. Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 10991–10997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yin, X.; Zhu, H.; Guo, H. Hyperbolic metamaterial devices for wavefront manipulation. Laser Photonics Rev. 2019, 13, 1800081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fu, W.; Han, Y.; Li, J. Polarization insensitive wide-angle triple-band metamaterial bandpass filter. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2016, 49, 285110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shen, F.; Kang, Q.; Wang, J. Dielectric metasurface-based high-efficiency mid-infrared optical filter. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, J.; Liu, Y.; Tang, H. Multiband spatial angular filtering transmissions through cascade asymmetrical metasurface. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2021, 63, 2969–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hong, Y.P.; Hwang, I.J.; Yun, D.J. Design of single-layer metasurface filter by conformational space annealing algorithm for 5G mm-wave communications. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 29764–29774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Y. Deep-learning-assisted inverse design of polarization-multiplexed structural color filters with ultrahigh saturation based on all-dielectric metasurface. Results Phys. 2024, 61, 107805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lv, Q.; Qin, X.; Hu, M. Metatronics-inspired high-selectivity metasurface filter. Nanophotonics 2024, 13, 2995–3003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, D.; Yang, L.; Cai, B. Temperature tunable broadband filter based on hybridized vanadium dioxide (VO2) metasurface. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2024, 58, 035106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, A.; Chen, W.; Wei, H. Riemann-encircling exceptional points for efficient asymmetric polarization-locked device. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 129, 127401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Deng, M.; Cotrufo, M.; Wang, J. Broadband angular spectrum differentiation using dielectric metasurfaces. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shakya, D.; Ying, M.; Rappaport, T.S.; Ma, P.; Al-Wazani, I.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Calin, D.; Poddar, H.; Bazzi, A.; et al. Urban Outdoor Propagation Measurements and Channel Models at 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 Upper Mid-Band Spectrum for 5G and 6G. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Montreal, QC, Canada, 8–12 June 2025; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  26. Deng, M.; Kanwal, S.; Wang, Z.; Cai, C.; Cheng, Y.; Guan, J.; Hu, G.; Wang, J.; Wen, J.; Chen, L. Dielectric Metasurfaces for Broadband Phase-Contrast Relief-Like Imaging. Nano Lett. 2024, 24, 14641–14647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. You, X.; Fumeaux, C.; Withayachumnankul, W. Tutorial on broadband transmissive metasurfaces for wavefront and polarization control of terahertz waves. J. Appl. Phys. 2022, 131, 061101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. You, X.; Ako, R.; Sriram, S.; Withayachumnankul, W. 3D terahertz confocal imaging with chromatic metasurface. Laser Photonics Rev. 2025, 2401011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, W.; Cheng, S.; Yi, Z.; Zhang, H.; Song, Q.; Hao, Z.; Sun, T.; Wu, P.; Zeng, Q.; Raza, R. Advanced optical reinforcement materials based on three-dimensional four-way weaving structure and metasurface technology. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2025, 126, 033503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, Z.; Cheng, S.; Zhang, H.; Yang, W.; Yi, Z.; Yi, Y.; Wang, J.; Ahmad, S.; Raza, R. Ultrathin broadband terahertz metamaterial based on single-layer nested patterned graphene. Phys. Lett. A 2025, 534, 130262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yoshikawa, H.; Hiramatsu, N.; Yonehara, M. A Design Method of Transmission-Type Metasurfaces Using Circuit Synthesis Theory of Microwave Bandpass Filters. IEICE Trans. Electron. 2023, 106, 651–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tong, J.; Zhong, W.; Shi, J. 22/43 GHz low-insertion-loss dual-polarized multi-layer bandpass frequency selective surfaces for millimeter astronomy. Phys. Scr. 2024, 99, 025021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bhowmik, B.K.; Bhowmik, T.; Pandey, P.K. All-dielectric metasurface based ultranarrow bandpass filter in optical C-band. JOSA B. 2023, 40, 1311–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, N.; Zhao, J.; Xie, Y.; Wang, D.; Cheng, Y. Broadband metasurface bandpass filter with wide angular stability for the Ku-band. Optik 2024, 311, 171918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ushikoshi, D.; Tanikawa, M.; Asano, K. Experimental demonstration of waveform-selective metasurface varying wireless communication characteristics at the same frequency band of 2.4 GHz. Electron. Lett. 2020, 56, 160–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ushikoshi, D.; Higashiura, R.; Tachi, K. Pulse-driven self-reconfigurable meta-antennas. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wakatsuchi, H.; Kim, S.; Rushton, J. Waveform-dependent absorbing metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111, 245501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wakatsuchi, H.; Rushton, J.; Lee, J. Experimental demonstration of nonlinear waveform-dependent metasurface absorber with pulsed signal. Electron. Lett. 2013, 49, 1530–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wakatsuchi, H.; Long, J.; Sievenpiper, D.F. Waveform selective surfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1806386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wakatsuchi, H. Waveform-selective metasurfaces with free-space wave pulses at the same frequency. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 164904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cheng, Y.; Qian, Y.; Li, Z. The design of metasurface absorber based on the ring-shaped resonator lumped with nonlinear circuit for a pulse wave. J. Electron. Inf. Technol. 2023, 45, 3812–3820. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wakatsuchi, H. Time-domain filtering of metasurfaces. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Vellucci, S.; Monti, A.; Barbuto, M. Waveform-selective mantle cloaks for intelligent antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2019, 68, 1717–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Barbuto, M.; Lione, D.; Monti, A. Waveguide components and aperture antennas with frequency-and time-domain selectivity properties. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2020, 68, 7196–7201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fathnan, A.A.; Takimoto, K.; Tanikawa, M. Unsynchronized reconfigurable intelligent surfaces with pulse-width-based design. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2023, 72, 15103–15108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cheng, Y.; Qian, Y.; Homma, H. Waveform-selective metasurface absorber with a single-patch structure and lumped nonlinear circuit for a higher-order mode. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2023, 71, 8677–8691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Takeshita, H.; Nita, D.; Cheng, Y. Dual-band waveform-selective metasurfaces for reflection suppression. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2023, 123, 191703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Qian, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Luo, H. Design of a Dual-Band Waveform-Selective Metasurface Absorber Based on the Combination of Two Resonator Structures Loaded with Nonlinear Circuits. Adv. Theory Simul. 2024, 7, 2300590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Nonlinear-circuit MSF: (a) schematic diagram of the 2D periodic array, (b) the unit cell structure, (c) the corresponding configuration for circuit simulation.
Figure 1. Nonlinear-circuit MSF: (a) schematic diagram of the 2D periodic array, (b) the unit cell structure, (c) the corresponding configuration for circuit simulation.
Electronics 14 00603 g001
Figure 2. (a) The unit cell structure of the single-band MSF, (b,c) the simulated transmittance (TPW, TCW) spectra of the single-band MSF with the change of the paralleled capacitor (C1) for the normal incident PWs (50 ns) and CWs. The input power was set to 10 dBm.
Figure 2. (a) The unit cell structure of the single-band MSF, (b,c) the simulated transmittance (TPW, TCW) spectra of the single-band MSF with the change of the paralleled capacitor (C1) for the normal incident PWs (50 ns) and CWs. The input power was set to 10 dBm.
Electronics 14 00603 g002
Figure 3. (a) The unit cell structure of the designed dual-band MSF, (b) transmittance (TPW, TCW) spectra of the designed dual-band MSF for the normal incident CWs and PWs (50 ns), (c) the transmittance (TPW) of PWs with different pulse widths at 2.0 GHz and 3.45 GHz. The input power was set to 10 dBm.
Figure 3. (a) The unit cell structure of the designed dual-band MSF, (b) transmittance (TPW, TCW) spectra of the designed dual-band MSF for the normal incident CWs and PWs (50 ns), (c) the transmittance (TPW) of PWs with different pulse widths at 2.0 GHz and 3.45 GHz. The input power was set to 10 dBm.
Electronics 14 00603 g003
Figure 4. (a) The unit cell structure of the designed dual-band MSF, (b,c) the transmittance (TPW, TCW) spectra of the designed dual-band MSF with different values of the additional parallel capacitor (C1) for (b) the normal incident PWs (50 ns) and (c) CWs. The input power was set to 10 dBm.
Figure 4. (a) The unit cell structure of the designed dual-band MSF, (b,c) the transmittance (TPW, TCW) spectra of the designed dual-band MSF with different values of the additional parallel capacitor (C1) for (b) the normal incident PWs (50 ns) and (c) CWs. The input power was set to 10 dBm.
Electronics 14 00603 g004
Figure 5. The transmittance (TPW, TCW) of the designed dual-band MSF for the normal incident (a) CWs and (b) PWs (50 ns) with different input power (Pin); (c) the corresponding transmittance difference (△T = TCWTPW) between the normal incident CWs and PWs (50 ns).
Figure 5. The transmittance (TPW, TCW) of the designed dual-band MSF for the normal incident (a) CWs and (b) PWs (50 ns) with different input power (Pin); (c) the corresponding transmittance difference (△T = TCWTPW) between the normal incident CWs and PWs (50 ns).
Electronics 14 00603 g005
Figure 6. The transmittance (TCW, TPW) spectra of the designed dual-band MSF under different oblique incident angles: (a,b) CWs and (c,d) PWs (50 ns); (a,c) TE mode and (b,d) TM mode. The input power is 10 dBm.
Figure 6. The transmittance (TCW, TPW) spectra of the designed dual-band MSF under different oblique incident angles: (a,b) CWs and (c,d) PWs (50 ns); (a,c) TE mode and (b,d) TM mode. The input power is 10 dBm.
Electronics 14 00603 g006
Figure 7. The transmittance (TCW, TPW) of the designed dual-band MSF (a,b) with different parallel resistances (Rn) and (c,d) capacitances (Cn) for normal incidence. The PW’s duration is 50 ns and the input power is 10 dBm.
Figure 7. The transmittance (TCW, TPW) of the designed dual-band MSF (a,b) with different parallel resistances (Rn) and (c,d) capacitances (Cn) for normal incidence. The PW’s duration is 50 ns and the input power is 10 dBm.
Electronics 14 00603 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tian, W.; Yang, L.; Cai, B.; Cheng, Y.; Chen, F.; Luo, H.; Li, X. Design and Analysis of Dual-Band Metasurface Filter for Pulse Waves Based on Capacitive Nonlinear Circuits. Electronics 2025, 14, 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14030603

AMA Style

Tian W, Yang L, Cai B, Cheng Y, Chen F, Luo H, Li X. Design and Analysis of Dual-Band Metasurface Filter for Pulse Waves Based on Capacitive Nonlinear Circuits. Electronics. 2025; 14(3):603. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14030603

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tian, Wenliang, Lingling Yang, Bin Cai, Yongzhi Cheng, Fu Chen, Hui Luo, and Xiangcheng Li. 2025. "Design and Analysis of Dual-Band Metasurface Filter for Pulse Waves Based on Capacitive Nonlinear Circuits" Electronics 14, no. 3: 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14030603

APA Style

Tian, W., Yang, L., Cai, B., Cheng, Y., Chen, F., Luo, H., & Li, X. (2025). Design and Analysis of Dual-Band Metasurface Filter for Pulse Waves Based on Capacitive Nonlinear Circuits. Electronics, 14(3), 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14030603

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop