Next Article in Journal
A Systematic Literature Review of Enabling IoT in Healthcare: Motivations, Challenges, and Recommendations
Next Article in Special Issue
Traction System for Electric Vehicles Based on Synchronous Reluctance Permanent Magnet Machine
Previous Article in Journal
Forensic Analysis of IoT File Systems for Linux-Compatible Platforms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electric Mobility: An Overview of the Main Aspects Related to the Smart Grid
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Electronics
Volume 11
Issue 19
10.3390/electronics11193221
Review Report
electronics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Comparison of Grid Reactive Voltage Regulation with Reconfiguration Network for Electric Vehicle Penetration

Electronics 2022, 11(19), 3221; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11193221
by Farrukh Nagi 1,*, Aidil Azwin 2, Navaamsini Boopalan 2,*, Agileswari K. Ramasamy 2, Marayati Marsadek 1 and Syed Khaleel Ahmed 3
Reviewer 1:
Dorin Petreus
Reviewer 2:
Bo Yang
Electronics 2022, 11(19), 3221; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11193221
Submission received: 19 August 2022 / Revised: 22 September 2022 / Accepted: 23 September 2022 / Published: 8 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electric Vehicles Integration and Control in Smart Grids)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper is interested and the area worth to be investigated. The authors used a combination of methods to improve the EV charging presented in the literature. A part of this methods are presented in the introduction. The simulation is based on the IEEE 33 network. 

The authors must explain more clear what is their contribution. Finally, as a conclusion, "reactive voltage injection after DFR analysis meets the charging requirement of 16K  EVs in comparison to without DFR analysis"

The formulas used are not very clear and is difficult  to see the link between them.

In my opinion the paper must be reorganized and make more clear the main objectives.

 

Author Response

Thank you for your kind comments. A resubmission of our manuscript, with an opportunity to address the reviewers’ comments, is much appreciated.

We are uploading (a) our point-by-point response to the comments (below) (response to reviewers), (b) an updated manuscript with yellow highlighting indicating the changes.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Appendix is a screenshot which is not allowable; In case studies, comparison is lacking to the previous typical methods; The contribution and novelty of this work is quite limited while motivation of this work is unclear; Hence, it is suggested to be rejected.

 

Author Response

Thank you for your kind comments. A resubmission of our manuscript, with an opportunity to address the reviewers’ comments, is much appreciated.

We are uploading (a) our point-by-point response to the comments (below) (response to reviewers), (b) an updated manuscript with yellow highlighting indicating the changes.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper was improved. No other remarks.

Author Response

Thank you for your accepting our corrections. We appreciate it. 

Reviewer 2 Report

acceptable

Author Response

Thank you for your accepting our corrections. We appreciate it. 

Back to TopTop