Next Article in Journal
A Lightweight Authentication Scheme for a Network of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) by Using Physical Unclonable Functions
Next Article in Special Issue
Application-Aware Flow Forwarding Service for SDN-Based Data Centers
Previous Article in Journal
Power and Energy Applications Based on Quantum Computing: The Possible Potentials of Grover’s Algorithm
Previous Article in Special Issue
Model Checking-Based Performance Prediction for P4
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Programmable SRv6 Processor for SFC

Electronics 2022, 11(18), 2920; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11182920
by Zhongpei Liu *, Gaofeng Lv, Jichang Wang and Xiangrui Yang
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Electronics 2022, 11(18), 2920; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11182920
Submission received: 28 July 2022 / Revised: 11 September 2022 / Accepted: 13 September 2022 / Published: 15 September 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The purpose of this article is to highlight a Deparser module of the RMT architecture. Thus the authors propose a Deparser plus module with complex instruction sets to process packets of increased complexity. Deparser plus presents a programmable architecture proposed SRV6 processor that performs a set of SRV6 packet processing. Deparser plus has been tested to add only moderate overhead to existing RMT pipelines. As a result, it allows packet processing at line rate.

In this work, seven instructions in Deparser plus were realized. These seven complex instructions, together with the reduced instructions of the RMT architecture, contain most of the operations required for complex packet processing.

In this paper the authors have demonstrated that the programmable SRv6 processor supports a wide range of possible application scenarios, such as VXLAN, SRoU, INT and SFC.

The comparison and analysis of these four application scenarios have been presented.

While the paper presents an important and consequent work some shortcomings remain important and need to be improved:

1) The state of the art needs to be enriched and recent references used several are very old (17, 1315, 1923)

2) The results section needs to be enriched and improved as it does not highlight the quality of the proposed approach compared to the literature and current works.

3) The discussion part is missing in this paper and makes it incomplete. A study of the qualities but also the defects of this incomplete system needs to be proposed

4) It is important to respect the template of the electronics journal in which you have submitted this paper.

Thus a major revision must be proposed to improve this paper.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The state of the art section needs to be enriched. 

It is necessary to take into account the template of the journal.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop