Pseudo-Signal Interference Regularity of Single-Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation to Stepped-Frequency Radar

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

reviewer the authors discut about "Pseudo-Signal Interference Regularity of Single Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation to Stepped Frequency Radar" this paper it's well-structured as well written the authors gives the experimental results show that there are at least 7 pseudo-signal interference sensitive bands in the tested radar, and the first pseudo-signal strength is only related to the interference signal strength

Conclusion: accepted

Author Response

Thank you very much for taking the time to review the manuscript. We have carefully studied these comments and used the “Track Changes” function to make revisions to the manuscript, hoping for approval. Thank you again for your affirmation of the article.

Reviewer 2 Report

It is an important article related to the interference effect of a single frequency signal on the stepped radar transceiver.

 

Comments:

Line 11: “The effect mechanism of two kinds”, I think there is some typo in this sentence. Please revise this sentence.

Line 101-104: The sentence is too long and may be broken into two or more shorter sentences for convenient reading and understanding.

Line 132: Why in “The frequency” the “T” is in capital as it is not the start of a new sentence. Is it some specific word and need to be capitalized?

Line 134-137: Can the authors write these steps in a proper step by step method such as in the form of an algorithm so that it may be convenient for the readers.  

Line 212: The text resolution quality inside Figure 2 may be improved.

Line 259: the frequency source The ( I think there should be comma before “The” and “The” should be written as “the”.

Line 273: clutter signal. Level value. (on full stop need to be removed).

Line 276: “At” A should be small.

Line 304: curve. Increase. (is the word increase added by mistake?)

Line 454: But the increase gradually increases Decrease”. It is kind of confusing for me. Please try to rephrase it.

Figure 3: Please explain more about the generation of the interference signal source and how it was injected into the system. Also explain how the different parameters were varied for the tests.

 

Author Response

Thank you very much for taking the time to review the manuscript. We have carefully studied these comments and made corrections in the hope of approval. To facilitate discussion, the revised content will be uploaded as an attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx