Through-the-Wall Micro-Doppler De-Wiring Technique via Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Network
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Nice paper. I am interested to know what was changed to make the wire live. Was it just the lights being turned from off to on? This detail should be added to the paper so other researchers can replicate the experiment. Also, what is the SFCW radar system used? Is it commercially available or a custom unit developed by the authors?
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Please see the attached file.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
This paper proposed a radar penetrating technique via adversial network and the model and experiment convinced the theory. However, some of the notion are confusing.
1, The title has 'Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Network', but in the abstract, it is 'Cycle Generative Adversarial Networks'. In fourth paragraph of page 2, there is 'Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks (Cycle GAN)', in where the full name and the initials are even not consistent. Furthur more, 'works' and 'work' are used interchangedly. Can the authors make these more clearly?
2, Figure 1 shows some fallings. What are they? human body? or what is the man's guesture? The same doubt appears in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 6.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
I have no other concerns.
