Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Nice paper. I am interested to know what was changed to make the wire live. Was it just the lights being turned from off to on? This detail should be added to the paper so other researchers can replicate the experiment. Also, what is the SFCW radar system used? Is it commercially available or a custom unit developed by the authors?

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This paper proposed a radar penetrating technique via adversial network and the model and experiment convinced the theory. However, some of the notion are confusing.

1, The title has 'Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Network', but in the abstract, it is 'Cycle Generative Adversarial Networks'. In fourth paragraph of page 2, there is 'Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks (Cycle GAN)', in where the full name and the initials are even not consistent. Furthur more, 'works' and 'work' are used interchangedly. Can the authors make these more clearly?

2, Figure 1 shows some fallings. What are they? human body? or what is the man's guesture? The same doubt appears in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 6.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I have no other concerns.